\section{Introduction}
A systematic study of natural refinements of the standard notions of rational and Du Bois singularities of complex algebraic varieties has been taking shape recently, guided especially by developments of a Hodge theoretic and $\mathscr{D}$-module theoretic flavor.
On one hand, the papers \cite{MOPW} and \cite{Saito_et_al} introduced and studied the notion of \emph{$k$-Du Bois singularities} for hypersurfaces (the terminology appeared in the latter one) as a natural extension of the concept of Du Bois singularities. The definition, which makes sense for an arbitrary variety $Z$, is that the natural morphisms
$$\Omega_Z^i \longrightarrow \underline\Omega_Z^i$$
are isomorphisms for $0 \le i \le k$, where $\underline\Omega_Z^i$ is the $i$-th graded piece of the Du Bois  complex of $Z$ with respect to the Hodge filtration. The results in \emph{loc. cit.} were extended to local complete intersections in \cite{MP2}.

On the other hand, as defined in \cite{FL1} (cf. also \cite{FL3}) for normal isolated singularities, and communicated to us by
R. Laza in general, rational singularities also admit a natural refinement: a variety $Z$ has \emph{$k$-rational singularities} if for any
resolution of singularities $\mu \colon \widetilde{Z} \to Z$ that is an isomorphism over the smooth locus of $Z$ and such that the reduced inverse image $D$ of the singular locus is a simple normal crossing divisor,
the canonical morphisms
$$\Omega_Z^i\to \mathbf{R}\mu_*\Omega^i_{\widetilde{Z}}(\log\,D)$$
are isomorphisms for all $0\leq i\leq k$.

The study we undertake here is motivated by two points. First, for $k = 0$ these are the standard notions of
Du Bois and rational singularities, and as it is well known by work of Kov\'acs \cite{Kovacs1}, and later Saito \cite{Saito-HC} as well, rational singularities are Du Bois; it is natural to ask whether this persists for the higher versions.  Second, in the case of hypersurfaces both notions have other possible (numerical) refinements in terms of minimal exponents; the natural question, already approached for isolated singularities in \cite{FL1},  is whether they coincide with the notions defined above.

In this paper we answer some of these questions positively for local complete intersections, and others, when the $V$-filtration and minimal exponents are involved, only in the case of hypersurfaces. While writing it, we learned that some of the results we obtain have also been arrived at independently in \cite{FL2} and \cite{Saito-AppendixFL}, following work in the case of isolated singularities in \cite{FL1}, \cite{FL3}; see below. At the moment  it seems quite hard to say much beyond the case of local complete intersections.

In what follows we always work over $\mathbb{C}$, and $X$ is an irreducible $n$-dimensional smooth algebraic variety.

\medskip

\noindent
{\bf Results for local complete intersections.}
The main result we obtain in this context is an injectivity theorem for the cohomologies of the Grothendieck duals of the various graded quotients of the Du Bois complex, whose proof relies on the study of the Hodge filtration on local cohomology in \cite{MP2}.

\begin{intro-theorem}\label{injectivity}
Let $Z$ be an algebraic variety which is locally a complete intersection, and let
$k$ be a nonnegative integer such that $Z$ is has $(k-1)$-Du Bois singularities.  Then the morphism
$$\mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} (\underline{\Omega}_Z^k, \omega_Z) \to \mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} (\Omega_Z^k, \omega_Z)$$
in the derived category of coherent sheaves on $Z$, obtained by dualizing the canonical morphism
$\Omega_Z^k \to \underline{\Omega}_Z^k$, is injective at the level of cohomology.
\end{intro-theorem}

When $k = 0$ the hypothesis is vacuous, and the statement is known to hold for an arbitrary variety $Z$ (meaning not necessarily a local complete intersection). This result was shown by Kov\'acs and Schwede \cite[Theorem 3.3]{KoS}, with a somewhat stronger version obtained by different means in \cite[Theorem A]{MP2}, and has proven to be useful for a whole range of applications.

 A quick consequence of Theorem \ref{injectivity} that we derive here is the natural higher analogue for local complete intersections of the
 well-known fact that rational singularities are Du Bois, shown by Kov\'acs and Saito independently in response to a conjecture of Steenbrink.

\begin{intro-theorem}\label{main2}
Let $Z$ be an algebraic variety which is locally a complete intersection. If $Z$ has $k$-rational singularities, then $Z$ has $k$-Du Bois singularities.
\end{intro-theorem}

This result was also obtained in a different fashion by Friedman and Laza in \cite{FL2}, and previously in the case of
 isolated singularities in \cite{FL1} (cf. also \cite{FL3}).

An interesting consequence of Theorem \ref{main2} regards duality for the graded pieces of the Du Bois complex. It is not hard to show, see Proposition \ref{duality-DB} below,  that for every $d$-dimensional irreducible variety $Z$ and every $k \ge 0$ there is a natural morphism
$$\psi_k \colon \underline{\Omega}_Z^k \longrightarrow \mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} \big( \underline{\Omega}_Z^{d-k}, \omega_Z^\bullet [-d]\big),$$
where $\omega_Z^\bullet$ is the dualizing complex of $Z$. This is however usually not an isomorphism, and in fact we show that this property is precisely what makes
the difference between $k$-Du Bois and $k$-rational singularities:

\begin{intro-corollary}\label{krat-duality}
If $Z$ is an irreducible $d$-dimensional local complete intersection variety, then
$Z$ has $k$-rational singularities if and only if it has $k$-Du Bois singularities and
the canonical morphism
$$\psi_k \colon \underline{\Omega}_Z^k \longrightarrow \mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} ( \underline{\Omega}_Z^{d-k}, \omega_Z)$$
is an isomorphism.
\end{intro-corollary}

By duality, in the situation of Corollary \ref{krat-duality} one can also compute $\underline{\Omega}_Z^{d-k}$ as the derived
dual of $\Omega_Z^k$; see Corollary \ref{dual-dual}.

On a different note, since the work of Steenbrink, see e.g. \cite{Steenbrink}, it has been known that the graded pieces of the Du Bois complex are closely related to direct images of sheaves of forms with log poles on log resolutions. In this direction, we record the following local vanishing theorem, which is mainly a consequence of our results in \cite{MP2}, with some additions from \cite{GKKP}; this gives a positive answer to a question of R. Laza.
A related result, Theorem \ref{thm_vanishing} below, will be a crucial technical step towards a finer understanding of $k$-rational singularities of hypersurfaces.

\begin{intro-theorem}\label{DB-vanishing}
If $Z$ is a $d$-dimensional local complete intersection variety which has $k$-Du Bois singularities and is normal,\footnote{Note that $Z$ is automatically normal if $k\geq 1$.} then
$$R^q\mu_*\Omega^p_{\widetilde{Z}}(\log\,D)(-D)=0$$
in each of the following cases:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[i)] $p+q\geq d +1$;
\item[ii)] $p\leq k$, $q \ge 1$, and $ p + q \ge d - 2k +1$;
\item[iii)] $p=k+1$ and $q=d-k-1$;
\item[iv)] $q \ge \max \{ d- k - 1, 1\}$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{intro-theorem}

When the singularities of $Z$ are isolated, a different approach to such vanishing is provided in
\cite[Theorem 3.6]{FL1}.

\noindent
{\bf Results for hypersurfaces.}
In the case of hypersurfaces, one can obtain stronger results; the key technical tool allowing for this is the minimal exponent, and
especially its connection with the $V$-filtration of Kashiwara and Malgrange.

Let $Z$ be a hypersurface in $X$. Its minimal exponent $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)$ is the negative of the greatest root of the reduced Bernstein-Sato polynomial $b_Z(s) / (s+1)$; see e.g. \cite[\S6]{MP3} for a general discussion of this singularity invariant. The minimal exponent is related to the log canonical threshold by the formula ${\rm lct}(X, Z) = \min\{\widetilde{\alpha}(Z), 1\}$.
M. Saito showed in \cite{Saito-B} that $Z$ has rational singularities if and only if $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)> 1$.
This can be extended to the following:

\begin{intro-theorem}\label{thm_main}
If $Z$ is a hypersurface in $X$,  and $k$ is a nonnegative integer, then $Z$ has $k$-rational singularities
if and only if $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>k+1$.
\end{intro-theorem}

Another proof of this result was obtained independently by Saito \cite{Saito-AppendixFL}. For isolated singularities, it had been established in \cite[Theorem 3.8]{FL1}, cf. also \cite{FL3}.

\noindent
\emph{Note.}
The notion of $k$-rationality for hypersurfaces first appeared in \cite{KL} precisely as the condition
$\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>k+1$. Here we are of course using the more natural definition in terms of log resolutions suggested in \cite{FL1}. The point of the theorem is that these two possible generalizations
indeed coincide. For isolated singularities, this was established in \cite[Theorem 3.8]{FL1}.

Combining the main results of  \cite{MOPW} and \cite{Saito_et_al},  we also know that
$Z$ is $k$-Du Bois if and only if $\widetilde{\alpha} (Z)  \ge k +1$. Together with Theorem \ref{thm_main}, this provides a numerical strengthening of Theorem \ref{main2}, and has the following immediate consequence (cf. also \cite[Conjecture 1.8]{FL2}):

\begin{intro-corollary}\label{drop}
If $Z$ is a hypersurface in $X$ which has $(k+1)$-Du Bois singularities, for some $k\ge 0$, then $Z$ has $k$-rational singularities.
\end{intro-corollary}

At the moment we do not know how to show this last implication in the case of local complete intersections of higher codimension.

We consider an approach that obtains the ``if" part of Theorem \ref{thm_main} is a quick consequence of the following local vanishing theorem, which is the counterpart to Theorem \ref{DB-vanishing}. The question whether a vanishing result roughly of this type holds was
posed to us by R. Laza. Part ii) is in fact one of the main results of \cite{MP1} (the proof we give here is technically similar, but slightly simpler); the main new result is part i). Again, for isolated singularities see also \cite[Theorem 3.8 and Remark 3.9]{FL1}.

\begin{intro-theorem}\label{thm_vanishing}
If $Z$ is a hypersurface in $X$, $k$ is a nonnegative integer, and $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>k+1$, then
$$R^q\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^p(\log\,D)=0$$
in each of the following cases:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[i)] $p\leq k$ and $q\geq 1$;
\item[ii)] $p=k+1$ and $q=n-k-2$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{intro-theorem}

This theorem is in turn a consequence of an analogous result we establish for log resolutions of the pair $(X, Z)$, as opposed to $Z$ itself; see Theorem \ref{thm_vanishing_log}
below. The proofs of Theorems \ref{thm_main} and \ref{thm_vanishing} make use of Saito's theory of mixed Hodge modules \cite{Saito-MHM}, especially duality and the description of the Hodge filtration
on the local cohomology ${\mathcal H}_Z^1(\shf{O}_X)$ in terms of the $V$-filtration.

\noindent
{\bf Acknowledgements.}
We especially thank R. Laza for outlining the program we address here, and for asking us many relevant questions.
We also thank him and R. Friedman for sharing an early version of the paper \cite{FL1}, which discusses
many of these topics in the case of isolated singularities.

\section{Definitions and background}
In what follows we work over the field $\mathbb{C}$ of complex numbers. By a \emph{variety} we mean a reduced, separated scheme of finite type over $\mathbb{C}$ (not necessarily irreducible).  For a variety $Z$, we denote by $Z_{\rm sing}$ its singular locus and by $Z_{\rm sm}$ the complement $Z \smallsetminus Z_{\rm sing}$.

\subsection{Log resolutions}
We will deal with two types of resolutions of singularities that we now describe. If $Z$ is an \emph{irreducible} variety, then by a \emph{strong log resolution}
of $Z$ we mean a proper morphism $\mu\colon\widetilde{Z}\to Z$ that is an isomorphism over $Z_{\rm sm}$, with $\widetilde{Z}$ smooth, and such that
$D = \mu^{-1}(Z_{\rm sing})_{\rm red}$ is a divisor with simple normal crossings.

Suppose now that $Z$ is a subvariety of the smooth irreducible variety $X$. A \emph{log resolution} of $(X,Z)$ is a proper
morphism $\pi\colon Y\to X$, with $Y$ smooth, which is an isomorphism over $X\smallsetminus Z$, and such that $\pi^{-1}(Z)_{\rm red}$ is a divisor with simple normal crossings. If $Z$ is a hypersurface in $X$,
then $\pi$ is a \emph{strong log resolution} of $(X,Z)$ if, in addition, it is an isomorphism over $X\smallsetminus Z_{\rm sing}$.  In this case, if $Z$ is irreducible and $\widetilde{Z}$ is its strict transform on $Y$, then the induced morphism $\widetilde{Z}\to Z$ is a strong log resolution of $Z$.
We note that in both contexts strong log resolutions exist by Hironaka's fundamental theorem. Moreover, a (strong) log resolution of $(X,Z)$ can be obtained
as a composition of blow-ups of smooth centers.

Let's assume now that  $Z$ is an irreducible hypersurface in $X$, and establish a connection between
higher direct images of forms with log poles in the two contexts. Suppose that $\pi\colon Y\to X$ is a strong log resolution of $(X,Z)$
that is a composition of smooth blow-ups. More precisely, the morphism
$\pi$ factors as
$$Y=X_N\overset{\pi_N}\longrightarrow X_{N-1}\longrightarrow\cdots\longrightarrow X_1\overset{\pi_1}\longrightarrow X_0=X,$$
where each $\pi_j$ with $1\leq j\leq N$ is the blow-up of a smooth irreducible subvariety $W_{j-1}\subseteq X_{j-1}$ that lies over $Z_{\rm sing}$.
We denote by $F_j$ the exceptional divisor of $X_j\to X$ and by $Z_j$ the strict transform of $Z$ on $X_j$.
Moreover, for each $1\leq j\leq N$, we assume that $W_{j-1}$ has simple normal crossings with $Z_{j-1}+F_{j-1}$. We note that such a resolution exists by Hironaka's theorem. We denote
$$\widetilde{Z}=Z_N,\,\,\,\, E=\pi^*(Z)_{\rm red}=\widetilde{Z}+F_N, \,\,\,\, {\rm and} \,\,\,\, D=F_N\vert_{\widetilde{Z}}.$$
If $\mu\colon \widetilde{Z}\to Z$ is the restriction of $\pi$, then $\mu$ is a strong log resolution of $Z$ and $D=\mu^{-1}(Z_{\rm sing})_{\rm red}$.

\begin{proposition}\label{prop_log_res}
With the above notation, if  $r={\rm codim}_X(Z_{\rm sing})$, then
for every $i$ with $0\leq i\leq r-2$ and every $q\geq 1$, we have an isomorphism
\begin{equation}\label{eq11_prop_log_res}
R^q\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^i(\log D)\simeq R^q\pi_*\Omega_Y^{i+1}(\log\,E).
\end{equation}
Moreover, we have an isomorphism
\begin{equation}\label{eq12_prop_log_res}
\mu_*\Omega^i_{\widetilde{Z}}(\log\,D)\simeq {\rm Coker}\big(\Omega_X^{i+1}\to\pi_*\Omega_Y^{i+1}(\log\,E)\big).
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The argument is similar to the one in the proof of \cite[Theorem~D]{MP1}, but we include the details for the benefit of the reader.
We first show that for every $i\leq r-1$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1_prop_log_res}
\pi_*\Omega_Y^i(\log\,F_N)=\Omega_X^i\quad\text{and}\quad R^q\pi_*\Omega_Y^i(\log\,F_N)=0\quad\text{for all}\quad q\geq 1.
\end{equation}
Using the Leray spectral sequence, we see that in order to prove (\ref{eq1_prop_log_res}) it is enough to show that for every $1\leq j\leq N$,
we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq2_prop_log_res}
{\pi_j}_*\Omega_{X_j}^i(\log\,F_j)=\Omega_{X_{j-1}}^i(\log\,F_{j-1})\quad\text{and}\quad R^q{\pi_j}_*\Omega_{X_j}^i(\log\,F_j)=0\quad\text{for all}\quad q\geq 1.
\end{equation}
Let us fix $j$. If $W_{j-1}\subseteq F_{j-1}$, then this follows from \cite[Theorem~31.1(i)]{MP0}. On the other hand, if $W_{j-1}\not\subseteq F_{j-1}$, then $W_{j-1}$
is the strict transform of its image in $X$. In particular, we have ${\rm codim}_{X_{j-1}}(W_{j-1})\geq r$ and the assertions in (\ref{eq2_prop_log_res}) for $j$
follow from \cite[Lemma~7.2]{MP1}.

We now consider on $Y$ the residue short exact sequence
$$0\longrightarrow \Omega_Y^{i+1}(\log\,F_N)\longrightarrow \Omega_Y^{i+1}(\log\,E)\longrightarrow\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^i(\log\,D)\longrightarrow 0.$$
The long exact sequence for higher direct images together with the formulas in (\ref{eq1_prop_log_res}) imply that for $i\leq r-2$ we have an isomorphism
$$R^q\pi_*\Omega_Y^{i+1}(\log E)\simeq R^q\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^i(\log\,D)\quad\text{for all}\quad q\geq 1$$
and a short exact sequence
$$0\longrightarrow \Omega_X^{i+1}\longrightarrow \pi_*\Omega_Y^{i+1}(\log\,E)\longrightarrow \mu_*\Omega^i_{\widetilde{Z}}(\log\,D)\longrightarrow 0.$$
This completes the proof of the proposition.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}\label{indep_res2}
For every $p$ and $q$, the sheaves
$$R^q\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^p(\log\,D) \,\,\,\,{\rm and} \,\,\,\,R^q\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^p(\log\,D) (-D)$$
are independent of the choice of strong log resolution $\mu \colon \widetilde{Z} \to Z$, where
$D = \mu^{-1}(Z_{\rm sing})_{\rm red}$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Since any two strong log resolutions are dominated
by a common one, in order to prove the assertion it is enough to show that if $E$ is a reduced simple normal crossing divisor on the smooth $n$-dimensional variety $Y$ and $g\colon \widetilde{Y}\to Y$
is a proper morphism that is an isomorphism over $Y\smallsetminus {\rm Supp}(E)$, with $\widetilde{Y}$ smooth and $F=g^*(E)_{\rm red}$ having simple normal crossings, then for every $p\geq 0$,
we have isomorphisms
\begin{equation}\label{eq_rmk_indep_res3}
\mathbf{R} g_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Y}}^p(\log\,F)\simeq\Omega_Y^p(\log\,E).
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq_rmk_indep_res2}
\mathbf{R} g_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Y}}^p(\log\,F)(-F)\simeq\Omega_Y^p(\log\,E)(-E).
\end{equation}
In fact ($\ref{eq_rmk_indep_res3}$) is already known; see for example \cite[Theorem~31.1(i)]{MP0}.
On the other hand, since we have
$$\big(\Omega_Y^p(\log\,E)(-E)\big)^{\vee}\simeq\Omega_Y^{n-p}(\log\,E)\otimes\omega_Y^{-1} \,\,\,\,{\rm and}\,\,\,\,
\big(\Omega_{\widetilde{Y}}^p(\log\,F)(-F)\big)^{\vee}\simeq\Omega^{n-p}_{\widetilde{Y}}(\log\,F)\otimes\omega_{\widetilde{Y}}^{-1},$$
using Grothendieck duality we obtain
$$\mathbf{R} {\mathcal Hom}_{\shf{O}_Y}\big(\mathbf{R} g_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Y}}^p(\log\,F)(-F),\omega_Y\big)\simeq
\mathbf{R} g_*\mathbf{R} {\mathcal Hom}_{\shf{O}_{\widetilde{Y}}}\big(\Omega_{\widetilde{Y}}^p(\log\,F)(-F),\omega_{\widetilde{Y}}\big)$$
$$\simeq \mathbf{R} g_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Y}}^{n-p}(\log\,F)\simeq \Omega_Y^{n-p}(\log\,E)\simeq \mathbf{R} {\mathcal Hom}_{\shf{O}_Y}\big(\Omega_Y^p(\log\,E)(-E),\omega_Y\big).$$
The isomorphism in (\ref{eq_rmk_indep_res2}) follows from the fact that $\mathbf{R} {\mathcal Hom}_{\shf{O}_Y}(-,\omega_Y)$ is a duality.
\end{proof}

\subsection{$k$-rational singularities}
The following definition is due to Friedman and Laza \cite{FL1} in the case of normal isolated singularities, and communicated to us by Laza in general.

\begin{definition}\label{def_k_rat}
Let $Z$ be an irreducible variety and $\mu\colon\widetilde{Z}\to Z$ a strong log resolution, with $\mu^{-1}(Z_{\rm sing})_{\rm red}=D$.
For a nonnegative integer $k\geq 0$, we say that $Z$ has \emph{$k$-rational singularities} if the canonical morphisms
$$\Omega_Z^i\to \mathbf{R}\mu_*\Omega^i_{\widetilde{Z}}(\log\,D)$$
are isomorphisms for all $0\leq i\leq k$. We say that an arbitrary variety $Z$ has $k$-rational singularities if all its connected components are irreducible, with $k$-rational singularities.
\end{definition}

\begin{remark}\label{rmk_indep_res}
By Lemma \ref{indep_res2}, the definition is independent of the choice of strong log resolution.
\end{remark}

\begin{remark}
For $k=0$, we recover the familiar notion of \emph{rational singularities}.
\end{remark}

\begin{remark}\label{rmk_level_zero}
With the notation in Definition~\ref{def_k_rat}, the condition that $Z$ has $k$-rational singularities is equivalent to the vanishings
$$R^q\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^i(\log\,D)=0\quad\text{for}\quad i\leq k, \,\,q\geq 1$$
and the fact that the canonical morphism
\begin{equation}\label{eq_rmk_level_zero}
\Omega_Z^i\to\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^i(\log\,D)
\end{equation}
is an isomorphism for all $i\leq k$. Note that for $i=0$, the morphism (\ref{eq_rmk_level_zero}) is an isomorphism
if and only if $Z$ is normal. On the other hand, for $i\geq 1$, we have
\end{remark}

\begin{lemma}\label{lem:reflexive}
If $Z$ has rational singularities, then  the morphism (\ref{eq_rmk_level_zero}) is an isomorphism if and only if $\Omega_Z^i$ is a reflexive sheaf.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The hypothesis implies that
then $\mu_*\omega_{\widetilde{Z}}(D)$ is a reflexive sheaf.
Indeed, the fact that $Z$ has rational singularities implies that $Z$ is normal and Cohen-Macaulay and $\mu_*\omega_{\widetilde{Z}}\simeq\omega_Z$, which is reflexive; see \cite[Theorem~5.10]{KM}. Since the inclusion $j\colon \mu_*\omega_{\widetilde{Z}}\hookrightarrow \mu_*\omega_{\widetilde{Z}}(D)$
is an isomorphism over the smooth locus of $Z$ and $\mu_*\omega_{\widetilde{Z}}(D)$ is torsion-free, it is straightforward to deduce that
$\mu_*\omega_{\widetilde{Z}}(D)$ is reflexive, and in fact isomorphic to $\mu_*\omega_{\widetilde{Z}}$.
We can thus apply
\cite[Theorem~1.5]{KS} to deduce that $\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^i(\log\,D)$ is reflexive for every $i$.
Therefore the morphism (\ref{eq_rmk_level_zero}) is an isomorphism if and only if $\Omega_Z^i$ is reflexive.
\end{proof}

\subsection{Brief review of  filtered $\mathscr{D}$-modules}
We will make use of the theory of mixed Hodge modules, for which we refer to \cite{Saito-MHM}. Let $X$ be a smooth, irreducible, $n$-dimensional complex algebraic variety.
Recall that every (mixed) Hodge module on $X$ has an underlying
filtered $\mathscr{D}_X$-module $(\mathcal{M},F)$ (the corresponding filtration is the \emph{Hodge filtration}). The \emph{Tate twist} $\mathcal{M}(q)$ of a filtered module $\mathcal{M}$ has the same underlying
$\mathscr{D}_X$-module, but the filtration is given by $F_p\mathcal{M}(q)=F_{p-q}\mathcal{M}$ for all $p\in\mathbb{Z}$.

We will use both left and right Hodge modules. Recall that there is an equivalence of categories between left and right Hodge modules such that
if $(\mathcal{M}^r,F)$ is the right one that corresponds to $(\mathcal{M},F)$, then there is an isomorphism of $\shf{O}_X$-modules $\mathcal{M}^r\simeq\omega_X\otimes_{\shf{O}_X}\mathcal{M}$
that induces for every $p$ an isomorphism $F_{p-n}\mathcal{M}^r\simeq\omega_X\otimes_{\shf{O}_X}\mathcal{M}$. For example, the left version of the (pure) Hodge module
${\mathbf Q}_X^H[n]$ is $(\shf{O}_X,F)$, where ${\rm gr}^F_i \shf{O}_X =0$ for $i\neq 0$, and the corresponding right filtered $\mathscr{D}_X$-module  is
$(\omega_X,F)$, where ${\rm gr}^F_i \omega_X =0$ for $i\neq -n$.

Recall that for every left  Hodge module $\mathcal{M}$ on $X$ and every $i\in\mathbb{Z}$, the complex ${\rm Gr}^F_{i}{\rm DR}_X(\mathcal{M})$ is given by
$$0\to {\rm Gr}^F_i \mathcal{M} \to \Omega_X^{1}\otimes_{\shf{O}_X}{\rm Gr}^F_{i+1} \mathcal{M} \to \cdots \to \omega_X
\otimes_{\shf{O}_X}{\rm Gr}^F_{i+n} \mathcal{M} \to 0,$$
placed in cohomological degrees $-n,\ldots,0$. The same complex can be written in terms of the corresponding right Hodge module $(\mathcal{M}^r,F)$ as

$$0\to \wedge^n T_X\otimes_{\shf{O}_X}{\rm Gr}^F_{i-n} \mathcal{M}^r \to
\wedge^{n-1} T_X\otimes_{\shf{O}_X}{\rm Gr}^F_{i-n+1} \mathcal{M}^r \to\cdots\to {\rm Gr}^F_i \mathcal{M}^r \to 0.$$

\subsection{The Du Bois complex and $k$-Du Bois singularities}
Recall that for any complex variety $W$ (assumed to be reduced, but not necessarily irreducible), the \emph{Du Bois complex} of $W$ is an element
$(\underline{\Omega}_W^{\bullet},F)$ in a suitable filtered derived category. We will only be interested in its shifted graded pieces
$$\underline{\Omega}_W^p:={\rm Gr}^p_F\underline{\Omega}_W^{\bullet}[p].$$
For an introduction to the Du Bois complex and for further references, we refer to \cite[Chapter~7.3]{PS}.
We note that $\mathcal{H}^i(\underline{\Omega}_W^p)=0$ for all $i<0$ and $\mathcal{H}^0(\underline{\Omega}_W^p)$ is torsion-free
(this follows, for example, from the description in \cite[Theorem~7.12]{Huber}).

For every $W$ as above and every $p$, there is a canonical morphism $\sigma_p\colon \Omega_W^p\to \underline{\Omega}_W^p$ that is an isomorphism over the smooth
locus of $W$. Recall that by definition, $W$ has Du Bois singularities if $\sigma_0$ is an isomorphism. More generally, following \cite{Saito_et_al}, we will say that $W$
has $k$-Du Bois singularities if $\sigma_p$ is an isomorphism for all $p$, with $0\leq p\leq k$.

\begin{remark}\label{rmk_factorization}
Suppose that $Z$ is an irreducible variety and $\mu\colon\widetilde{Z}\to Z$ is any resolution of singularities.
By functoriality of the Du Bois complex, for every $p$, we get a canonical map
$$\underline{\Omega}_Z^p\to \mathbf{R} \mu_*\underline{\Omega}_{\widetilde{Z}}^p=\mathbf{R} \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^p$$
whose composition with $\sigma_p$ is the canonical morphism $\Omega_Z^p\to\mathbf{R} \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^p$.
Indeed, this follows using the next remark,  since $\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^p$ is torsion-free and
the assertion certainly holds on the locus of $X$
over which $\mu$ is an isomorphism.
\end{remark}

The following general remark is used repeatedly throughout the paper.

\begin{remark}\label{identify_morphisms}
Let $Z$ be a variety and let $u\colon{\mathcal F}\to {\mathcal P}$ be a morphism in $D^b_{\rm coh}(Z)$,
where ${\mathcal F}$ is a coherent sheaf and $\mathcal{H}^i({\mathcal P})=0$ for all $i<0$. If $\mathcal{H}^0({\mathcal P})$ is torsion-free
and $u\vert_V=0$ for some open dense subset $V$ of $Z$, then $v=0$. Indeed, giving such a morphism $u$ is equivalent to giving the corresponding
morphism of coherent sheaves ${\mathcal F}\to \mathcal{H}^0({\mathcal P})$, and the assertion is clear.
\end{remark}

\section{Results for local complete intersections}
We recall that $X$ denotes a smooth irreducible $n$-dimensional variety. All throughout this chapter,
$Z$ will be a  local complete intersection closed subvariety of $X$, of pure codimension $r$.

\subsection{Injectivity and hierarchy of singularities}
In this section we prove the main statement for local complete intersections, the injectivity Theorem \ref{injectivity}, and
deduce Theorem \ref{main2}, stating that $k$-rational local complete intersection singularities are $k$-Du Bois.

In preparation for the proof of Theorem \ref{injectivity}, we start with a review of the connection established in \cite{MP2} between the Du Bois complex of a local complete intersection and the Hodge filtration on the local cohomology sheaf $\mathcal{H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)$. The $\mathscr{D}_X$-module $\mathcal{H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)$ underlies a (left) mixed Hodge module. In particular, it carries
a Hodge filtration $F$. It also carries a more elementary filtration, the \emph{Ext filtration}, given for $p\geq 0$ by
$$E_p\mathcal{H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)=\big\{u\in \mathcal{H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)\mid \mathcal{I}_Z^{p+1}0=0\big\}=
{\rm Im} ~\big[ \shf{E} xt^q_{\shf{O}_X} \big(\shf{O}_X/ \mathcal{I}_Z^{p+1}, \shf{O}_X\big) \to
{\mathcal H}_Z^q(\shf{O}_X) \big],$$
where $\mathcal{I}_Z$ is the ideal defining $Z$ in $X$.
This filtration, too, is compatible with the order filtration on $\mathscr{D}_X$. The  \emph{singularity level} of the Hodge filtration on $\mathcal{H}^r_Z \shf{O}_X$, defined as
$$p (Z) := {\rm sup}\{k ~| ~ F_k \mathcal{H}^r_Z \shf{O}_X = E_k \mathcal{H}^r_Z \shf{O}_X \},$$
with the convention that $p (Z) = -1$ if there are no such $k$. For a general study of this invariant, see
\cite[\S9]{MP2}. We only mention that $p(Z)=\infty$ if and only if $Z$ is smooth.
Moreover, when $Z$ is singular, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:ineq}
{\rm codim}_Z (Z_{\rm sing}) \ge 2 p(Z) + 1.
\end{equation}
In general, singularity level $p(Z)$ only depends on $Z$ (not on the ambient smooth variety $X$).
If $Z$ is a hypersurface in $X$, then
 $p(Z)=\lfloor \widetilde{\alpha}(Z)\rfloor-1$, where $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)$ is the minimal exponent of $Z$, defined in terms
 of the Bernstein-Sato polynomial of $Z$ (see Introduction).

The main result proved in \emph{loc. cit.} relates $p(Z)$ to the complexity of the Du Bois complex of $Z$, extending the
hypersurface case treated in  \cite{MOPW} and \cite{Saito_et_al}.

\begin{theorem}[{\cite[Theorem F]{MP2}}]\label{thm-DB-main}
For every nonnegative integer $p$, we have $p(Z)\geq k$ if and only if $Z$ has $k$-Du Bois singularities.
\end{theorem}

We consider also for each $0 \le k \le \dim Z$ the complex $C_k^\bullet$ defined by
$$0\to {\rm Sym}^k N_{Z/X}^{\vee}\to \Omega_X^{1}\otimes_{\shf{O}_X}{\rm Sym}^{k-1} N_{Z/X}^{\vee}\to\cdots\to
\Omega_X^{k-1}\otimes_{\shf{O}_X} N_{Z/X}^{\vee}\to \Omega_X^k\otimes_{\shf{O}_X}\shf{O}_Z\to 0$$
and placed in cohomological degrees $-k,\ldots,0$. This complex
is obtained by truncating the generalized Eagon-Northcott complex $D_{n-r-k}$ (see \cite[Chapter~2.C]{Bruns}) associated to the canonical morphism
$$g\colon T_X\vert_Z\to N_{Z/X},$$
keeping the first $k+1$ terms, and then suitably translating. We have a canonical isomorphism ${\mathcal H}^0(C_k^{\bullet})\simeq \Omega_Z^k$
induced by the exact sequence
$$N_{Z/X}^{\vee}\to \Omega^1_X\vert_Z\to \Omega^1_Z\to 0.$$
It is shown in \cite[\S13]{MP2} (right before the proof of Theorem F), that if ${\rm codim}_Z (Z_{\rm sing}) \ge k$, then $C_k^\bullet$ is a resolution of
$ \Omega_Z^k$.

\medskip

We are now ready to prove the injectivity theorem for the duals of the graded pieces of the Du Bois complex of a local complete intersection.

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{injectivity}]
Since $p (Z) \ge k -1$, using ($\ref{eqn:ineq}$) we deduce that
$${\rm codim}_Z (Z_{\rm sing}) \ge 2k -1.$$
We conclude that the complex $C_k^\bullet$ is a locally free resolution of $\Omega_Z^k$ over $\shf{O}_Z$; for $k = 0$
this is obvious, while for $k \ge 1$ the inequality above implies in particular that ${\rm codim}_Z (Z_{\rm sing}) \ge k$,
hence we can apply the  discussion before the start of the proof.
We can therefore compute $\mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} (\Omega_Z^k, \omega_Z)$ by applying the functor
$\mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} (- , \omega_Z)$ to $C_k^\bullet$; this leads to the complex
$$
0\to \Omega_X^{n-k}\otimes\omega_Z\otimes\omega_X^{-1}\to \Omega_X^{n-k+1}\otimes N_{Z/X}\otimes\omega_Z\otimes\omega_X^{-1}\to
\cdots\to \Omega_X^n\otimes {\rm Sym}^k N_{Z/X}\otimes\omega_Z\otimes\omega_X^{-1}\to 0
$$
placed in cohomological degrees $-k,\ldots,0$. It turns out that this is precisely the complex
${\rm Gr}^E_{k-n}{\rm DR}_X\mathcal{H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)$,
i.e. the associated graded of the De Rham complex of the $\mathscr{D}_X$-module $\mathcal{H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)$ with respect
to the Ext filtration; see \cite[\S13]{MP2}, especially the discussion before formula (13.2). In other words, under our assumption on the minimal exponent, we have a natural isomorphism
$$\mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} (\Omega_Z^k, \omega_Z) \simeq {\rm Gr}^E_{k-n}{\rm DR}_X\mathcal{H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)[-k].$$

On the other hand, by dualizing the second isomorphism in \cite[Proposition 13.1]{MP2}, we also have
$$\mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_X} (\underline{\Omega}_Z^k, \omega_X) \simeq {\rm Gr}^F_{k-n}{\rm DR}_X\mathcal{H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)[-k-r],$$
where this time the associated graded is taken with respect to the Hodge filtration. Using Grothendieck duality for
the inclusion $Z\hookrightarrow X$, we deduce an isomorphism
$$\mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} (\underline{\Omega}_Z^k, \omega_Z) \simeq
{\rm Gr}^F_{k-n}{\rm DR}_X\mathcal{H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)[-k]$$
of objects on $Z$.
We claim that via these identifications, the canonical morphism
$$\varphi_k\colon {\rm Gr}^F_{k-n}{\rm DR}_X\mathcal{H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)\to {\rm Gr}^E_{k-n}{\rm DR}_X\mathcal{H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)$$
induced by the inclusion of the Hodge filtration into the Ext filtration is the dual of the canonical morphism $\Omega_Z^k\to \underline{\Omega}_Z^k$.
Indeed, since $\mathcal{H}^0(\underline{\Omega}_Z^k)$ is torsion-free, it follows from Remark~\ref{identify_morphisms} that it is enough to check this on the
complement of the singular locus of $Z$, and this is straightforward (though rather tedious) to check.

Note that $\varphi_k$ is a morphism of complexes placed in nonpositive degrees.
Moreover, by definition of the
singularity level, since $p (Z) \ge k-1$, it follows $\varphi_k$ is an injective morphism of complexes and its cokernel is concentrated in degree $0$. It is then immediate to check that ${\mathcal H}^i(\varphi_k)$ is an isomorphism for all $i\neq 0$ and ${\mathcal H}^0(\varphi_k)$ is injective.
\end{proof}

The fact that $k$-rational implies $k$-Du Bois in our setting is now an easy application.

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{main2}]
Since the connected components of $Z$ are irreducible, we may and will assume that $Z$ is irreducible.
We prove the result by induction on $k\geq 0$. The canonical morphism
$\Omega_Z^p\to \mathbf{R}\mu_*\Omega_X^k(\log D)$ factors as
$$\Omega_Z^k \overset{\sigma_k}{\longrightarrow} \underline{\Omega}_Z^k \overset{\tau_k}{\longrightarrow} \mathbf{R} \mu_* \Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^k
(\log D)$$
(see Remark~\ref{rmk_factorization}). Dualizing this,
we obtain the composition
$$ \mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} (\mathbf{R} \mu_* \Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^k
(\log D), \omega_Z) \overset{\tau'_k}{\longrightarrow}  \mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} ( \underline{\Omega}_Z^k, \omega_Z)
\overset{\sigma'_k}{\longrightarrow}  \mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} (\Omega_Z^k , \omega_Z).$$

Our hypothesis gives that $\tau_k \circ \sigma_k$ is a quasi-isomorphism, and therefore so  is $\sigma_k' \circ \tau'_k$. On the other hand, since $Z$ is also $(k-1)$-rational,
it is $(k-1)$-Du Bois by induction (of course, this is vacuous if $k=0$). Therefore Theorem \ref{injectivity} applies, to the effect that $\sigma'_k$ induces injective
maps in cohomology. These maps are also surjective, hence $\sigma'_k$ is an isomorphism, and so is $\sigma_k$. Therefore $Z$ has
 $k$-Du Bois singularities.
\end{proof}

\subsection{Duality}\label{scn:duality}
The $k$-rationality condition has interesting consequences regarding duality for the graded pieces of the Du Bois complex.
We start with a general construction:

\begin{proposition}\label{duality-DB}
For every irreducible variety $Z$ of dimension $d$ and every $k \ge 0$, there is a canonical morphism
$$\psi_k \colon \underline{\Omega}_Z^k \longrightarrow \mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} \big(\underline{\Omega}_Z^{d-k}, \omega_Z^\bullet [-d]\big)$$
in the bounded derived category of coherent sheaves on $Z$.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Let $f \colon Y \to Z$ be any resolution of singularities. The functoriality of the Du Bois complex gives a morphism
$$\alpha_k \colon \underline{\Omega}_Z^k \longrightarrow \mathbf{R} f_* \Omega_Y^k$$
for each $k$. On the other hand, on $Y$ we have an isomorphism
$$\tau^Y_k\colon \Omega_Y^k\overset{\simeq}\longrightarrow
\mathbf{R}\mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Y}\big(\Omega_Y^{d-k},\omega_Y^{\bullet}[-d]\big)$$ and we get an isomorphism $\beta_k$ on $Z$ as the composition
$$\mathbf{R} f_* \Omega_Y^k \overset{\simeq }\longrightarrow \mathbf{R} f_*\mathbf{R}\mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Y}\big(\Omega_Y^{d-k},\omega_Y^{\bullet}[-d]\big)
\overset{\simeq}\longrightarrow
\mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z}
\big(\mathbf{R} f_* \Omega_Y^{d-k}, \omega_Z^\bullet [-d]\big),$$
where the first isomorphism is $\mathbf{R} f_*(\tau^Y_k)$ and the second isomorphism is provided by relative duality for $f$.
Finally, taking the Grothendieck dual of $\alpha_{d-k}$ provides a morphism
$$\gamma_k \colon \mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om
\big(\mathbf{R} f_* \Omega_Y^{d-k}, \omega_Z^\bullet [-d]\big) \longrightarrow
\mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om
\big(\underline{\Omega}_Z^{d-k}, \omega_Z^\bullet [-d]\big).$$
We define
$$\psi_k := \gamma_k \circ \beta_k\circ \alpha_k.$$

We need to show that this is independent of the choice of resolution. Since any two resolutions are dominated by a third one, it is enough to show that  if $f$ is as above and $g\colon W\to Y$ is
a proper birational morphism, with $W$ smooth, then the morphisms $\psi_k$ corresponding to $f$ and $h=f\circ g$ coincide.
This follows easily from the definitions once we know that the following diagram is commutative:
$$
\begin{tikzcd}
\mathbf{R} f_* \Omega_Y^k\dar\rar & \mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om \big(\mathbf{R} f_* \Omega_Y^{d-k}, \omega_Z^\bullet [-d]\big)\\
\mathbf{R} h_*\Omega_W^k\rar & \mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om\big(\mathbf{R} h_* \Omega_W^{d-k}, \omega_Z^\bullet [-d]\big)\uar,
\end{tikzcd}
$$
in which the top horizontal map is the $\beta_k$ with respect to $f$ and the bottom map is $\beta_k$ with respect to $h$.
This commutativity follows from the functoriality of relative duality and its compatibility with composition of proper morphisms, together with the commutativity
of the diagram
$$
\begin{tikzcd}
\Omega_Y^k\rar{\tau^Y_k}\dar & \mathbf{R}\mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Y}\big(\Omega_Y^{d-k},\omega_Y^{\bullet}[-d]\big) \\
\mathbf{R} g_*\Omega_W^k\rar{\mathbf{R} g_*(\tau^W_k)}& \,\,\,\,\mathbf{R} g_*\mathbf{R}\mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_W}\big(\Omega_W^{d-k},\omega_W^{\bullet}[-d]\big)\uar,
\end{tikzcd}
$$
which in turn follows from the fact that it trivially holds over any open subset over which $g$ is an isomorphism (note that we are comparing two morphisms between
vector bundles). This completes the proof of the proposition.
\end{proof}

It is interesting to understand under what assumptions $\psi_k$ is an isomorphism, as in the case of smooth varieties.
Note that this requires assumptions on the singularities. For instance, when $k = 0$, even when $Z$ is Cohen-Macaulay and Du Bois, $\psi_0$ being an isomorphism is equivalent to the condition $\mu_* \omega_{\widetilde Z} \simeq \omega_Z$, where $\mu \colon \widetilde{Z} \to Z$ is a resolution of singularities; in other words, it is equivalent to $Z$ having rational singularities. More generally, we now show that the condition that $\psi_k$ is an isomorphism is the difference between having $k$-rational and
$k$-Du Bois singularities.

\begin{proof}[Proof of Corollary~\ref{krat-duality}]
By Theorem~\ref{main2}, we may assume that $Z$ has $k$-Du Bois singularities, hence $p(Z)\geq k$ by
Theorem~\ref{thm-DB-main}.
We consider a strong log-resolution $\mu\colon \widetilde{Z} \to Z$ as in Definition \ref{def_k_rat}. We put
$W = Z_{\rm sing}$, and $D = \mu^{-1}(W)_{\rm red}$. By  \cite[Proposition~3.3]{Steenbrink}, we have an exact triangle
\begin{equation}\label{eq_exact_trg_Steenbrink}
\mathbf{R} \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^{d-k}({\rm log}\,D)(-D)\longrightarrow \underline{\Omega}_Z^{d-k}\longrightarrow \underline{\Omega}_W^{d-k}\overset{+1}\longrightarrow.
\end{equation}
Since $p (Z) \ge k$, using ($\ref{eqn:ineq}$) we deduce that
$$\dim W \le d - 2k - 1 < d - k.$$
It follows that $\underline{\Omega}_W^{d-k} = 0$, hence the above triangle implies that the canonical morphism
$$\mathbf{R} \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^{d-k}({\rm log}\,D)(-D)\longrightarrow \underline{\Omega}_Z^{d-k}$$
is an isomorphism. Equivalently, using Grothendieck duality, the induced morphism
$$\mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} ( \underline{\Omega}_Z^{d-k}, \omega_Z) \overset{\nu_k}\longrightarrow \mathbf{R} \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^k ({\rm log}\,D)$$
is an isomorphism.  On the other hand, since
$\Omega_Z^k \to \underline{\Omega}_Z^k$ is an isomorphism, it follows that the canonical morphism
$\Omega_Z^k \to \mathbf{R} \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^k ({\rm log}\,D)$ can be identified with the composition
$\nu_k \circ \psi_k$. Thus by definition $Z$ has rational singularities if and only if
$\psi_k$ is an isomorphism.
\end{proof}

Note that in the situation of Corollary \ref{krat-duality}, it follows by duality that one can also compute $\underline{\Omega}_Z^{d-k}$ in terms of the sheaf of K\"ahler differentials $\Omega_Z^k$.

\begin{corollary}\label{dual-dual}
If $Z$ is has $k$-rational singularities, then we have an isomorphism
$$\psi_{d-k} \colon \underline{\Omega}_Z^{d-k} \longrightarrow \mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} (\Omega_Z^k, \omega_Z).$$
\end{corollary}

\begin{remark}
The proof of Corollary~\ref{krat-duality} shows that if ${\rm codim}_Z(Z_{\rm sing})>k$, then
we have a natural isomorphism
$$\mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} ( \underline{\Omega}_Z^{d-k}, \omega_Z) \simeq
\mathbf{R} \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^k ({\rm log}\,D).$$
In particular, this is the case if $2 p (Z) + 1 > k$.
\end{remark}

\begin{remark}[Depth of $\Omega_Z^k$]
It is well known (see e.g. \cite[Theorem 7.29]{PS}) that for any variety $W$ and any $p$, we have  $\mathcal{H}^i(\underline{\Omega}_W^p)$ for $i >  \dim W - p$. Thus a numerical consequence of Corollary \ref{dual-dual} is that if $Z$ has $k$-rational singularities, then
${\rm depth}(\Omega_Z^k) \ge  d- k$.
However, this holds  even if we only assume that $Z$ has $k$-Du Bois singularities:
this follows from the Auslander-Buchsbaum formula and the fact that in this case
$C_k^\bullet$ gives a locally free resolution of $\Omega_Z^k$ (see the discussion before the proof of Theorem~\ref{injectivity}).
\end{remark}

\begin{remark}[Small singular locus]
We also note that the duality morphism $\psi_k$ has a more familiar interpretation
for an arbitrary $d$-dimensional irreducible variety $Z$ whose singular locus $W$ has small dimension.
Indeed, it follows from the exact triangle (\ref{eq_exact_trg_Steenbrink}) that the
canonical morphism
$$
\mathbf{R} \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^k ({\rm log}\,D)(-D)\longrightarrow \underline{\Omega}_Z^k
$$
is an isomorphism when $\dim X < k$, while just as in the proof of Corollary \ref{krat-duality}, the canonical
morphism
$$\mathbf{R} \mathcal{H}om_{\shf{O}_Z} ( \underline{\Omega}_Z^{d-k}, \omega_Z) \longrightarrow \mathbf{R} \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^k ({\rm log}\,D)$$
is an isomorphism when $\dim W < d- k$.

We conclude that, in general, under the assumption $\dim W < {\rm min}\{k, d- k\}$, the duality morphism
$\psi_k$ is naturally identified with the morphism
$$\mathbf{R} \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^k ({\rm log}\,D)(-D)\longrightarrow  \mathbf{R} \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^k ({\rm log}\,D)$$
obtained by pushing forward the canonical inclusion on $\widetilde{Z}$. This holds for instance when
$Z$ has isolated singularities and $1\leq k\leq d-1$; in this case, at the level of cohomology the map can be studied as in \cite[\S3]{FL1}, using classical Hodge theory arguments involving the mixed Hodge structure on the cohomology of the link of the singularity.
\end{remark}

\subsection{Local vanishing for $k$-Du Bois singularities}
We assume again that $Z \subseteq X$ is a local complete intersection closed subvariety of pure dimension $d$. For completeness, we start by recording a consequence of results we established in \cite[\S13]{MP2}.
Let $f \colon Y \to X$ be a log resolution of the pair $(X, Z)$ and $E = f^{-1} (Z)_{\rm red}$.

\begin{corollary}
If $k$ is a nonnegative integer such that $p (Z) \ge k$, then
$$R^q f_* \Omega_Y^p (\log E ) (-E) = 0 \,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm for~all} \,\,\,\,q \ge 1 \,\,\,\,{\rm and} \,\,\,\,p \le k.$$
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}
The hypothesis implies that $\mathcal{H}^q (\underline\Omega_Z^p) = 0$ in the range of the conclusion, by
Theorem \ref{thm-DB-main}. The proof is then identical to that of  \cite[Corollary 1.2]{MOPW}.
\end{proof}

We next establish the generalization of \cite[Theorem 1.4]{MOPW} to local complete intersections.

\begin{theorem}\label{marginal-LCI}
For every $q \le p (Z) + 1$ we have
$$\mathcal{H}^{d - q} (\underline\Omega_Z^q) = 0,$$
unless $q =d$ (in which case $Z$ is either smooth or a curve with nodal singularities). In particular,
we always have
\begin{equation}\label{eq1_marginal_LCI}
R^{d-q+1} f_* \Omega_Y^q (\log E ) (-E) = 0,
\end{equation}
unless $q=d$ or $q=d+1$ (in the latter case $Z$ being smooth).
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Note first that by \cite[Proposition~3.3]{Steenbrink}, we have an exact triangle
\begin{equation}\label{eq0_marginal-LCI}
\mathbf{R} f_*\Omega_{Y}^q({\rm log}\,E)(-E)\longrightarrow \Omega_X^q\longrightarrow \underline{\Omega}_Z^q\overset{+1}\longrightarrow.
\end{equation}
This immediately implies that (\ref{eq1_marginal_LCI}) holds if $Z$ is smooth and $q\neq d+1$. The first assertion in the theorem
is clear, too, if $Z$ is smooth, hence from now on we assume that $Z$ is singular.

In this case it follows from (\ref{eqn:ineq}) that
$p (Z) \le \frac{d-1}{2}$, hence
\begin{equation}\label{eq2_marginal-LCI}
q \le \frac{d+1}{2}<d+1.
\end{equation}
In particular, we have $q \neq d +1$.
We thus have $\mathcal{H}^{d +1- q} (\Omega_X^q) = 0$, and the vanishing in (\ref{eq1_marginal_LCI})
follows if we know that $\mathcal{H}^{d - q} (\underline\Omega_Z^q) = 0$.

Therefore it is enough to prove the first assertion in the theorem. We know that $q\leq d$ and it follows from (\ref{eq2_marginal-LCI})
that if $q=d$, then $d=1$. Therefore $Z$ is a locally complete intersection curve with Du Bois singularities and it is known that
this implies that $Z$ has nodal singularities. (Note that in this case we
clearly have ${\mathcal H}^{0}(\underline{\Omega}_Z^1)\neq 0$.)

From now on we assume that $q\leq d-1$. We use the notation in the proof of Theorem~\ref{injectivity}.
By \cite[Proposition 13.1]{MP2}, we have
$${\mathcal H}^{d-q}(\underline{\Omega}_Z^q)
\simeq {\mathcal Ext}^n_{\shf{O}_X}\big({\rm Gr}_{q-n}^F{\rm DR}_X({\mathcal H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)),\omega_X\big),$$
where we recall that $n=\dim(X)$.
The hypothesis $p (Z) + 1\geq q$ implies that $F_i\mathcal{H}^r(\shf{O}_Z)=E_i\mathcal{H}^r(\shf{O}_Z)$ for all $i\leq q-1$,
hence the morphism of complexes
$$\varphi_q\colon {\rm Gr}_{q-n}^F{\rm DR}_X({\mathcal H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X))\to B_q^{\bullet}: = {\rm Gr}_{q-n}^E{\rm DR}_X({\mathcal H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X))$$
is injective and its cokernel is a sheaf $\shf{F}$ (supported in cohomological degree $0$).
We thus have an exact sequence
$${\mathcal Ext}^n_{\shf{O}_X}(B_q^{\bullet},\omega_X)\to {\mathcal Ext}^n_{\shf{O}_X}\big({\rm Gr}_{q-n}^F{\rm DR}_X({\mathcal H}^r_Z(\shf{O}_X)),\omega_X\big)
\to {\mathcal Ext}^{n+1}_{\shf{O}_X}(\shf{F},\omega_X)=0,$$
and we see that it is enough to show that ${\mathcal Ext}^n_{\shf{O}_X}(B_q^{\bullet},\omega_X)=0$.

Recall from the proof of Theorem~\ref{injectivity} that $B_q^\bullet$ can be described as the complex
$$
0\to \Omega_X^{n-q}\otimes\omega_Z\otimes\omega_X^{-1}\to \Omega_X^{n-q+1}\otimes N_{Z/X}\otimes\omega_Z\otimes\omega_X^{-1}\to
\cdots\to \Omega_X^n\otimes {\rm Sym}^q N_{Z/X}\otimes\omega_Z\otimes\omega_X^{-1}\to 0
$$
placed in cohomological degrees $-q,\ldots,0$. The spectral sequence
$$E_1^{i,j} : = {\mathcal Ext}^j_{\shf{O}_X}(B_q^{-i},\omega_X)\Rightarrow {\mathcal Ext}_{\shf{O}_X}^{i+j}(B_q^{\bullet},\omega_X)$$
shows that it is enough to prove that
$${\mathcal Ext}^{n-m}_{\shf{O}_X} \big(\Omega_X^{n- m} \otimes  {\rm Sym}^{q-m} N_{Z/X} \otimes {\rm det} N_{Z/X},\omega_X\big) = 0\quad\text{for}\quad 0\leq m\leq q.$$
This is a consequence of the fact that $q \le d -1$, combined with the fact that if $r=n-d$, then for every locally free sheaf $\shf{E}$ on $Z$ we have
$$
{\mathcal Ext}_{\shf{O}_X}^j(\shf{E},\omega_X)=0 \,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm for} \,\,\,\,j \neq r.
$$
\end{proof}

 We are now able to prove the local vanishing theorem for $k$-Du Bois singularities.

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{DB-vanishing}]
By a general vanishing result due to Steenbrink (see \cite[Theorem~2]{Steenbrink}), we always have
$R^q\mu_*\Omega^p_{\widetilde{Z}}(\log\,D) (-D)=0$ if $p+q> d$, i.e. the statement in i) (for an arbitrary variety $Z$). From now on we assume that $p+q\leq d$.

By \cite[Proposition~3.3]{Steenbrink},  if $W=Z_{\rm sing}$, then we have an exact triangle
$$
\mathbf{R} \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^p({\rm log}\,D)(-D)\longrightarrow\underline{\Omega}_Z^p\longrightarrow \underline{\Omega}_W^p\overset{+1}\longrightarrow.
$$
By taking the long exact sequence in cohomology, we obtain the exact sequence
\begin{equation}\label{eq10_DB}
{\mathcal H}^{q-1}(\underline{\Omega}^p_W)\longrightarrow R^q\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^p(\log\,D)(-D)\longrightarrow{\mathcal H}^q(\underline{\Omega}_Z^p).
\end{equation}

By Theorem \ref{thm-DB-main}, $Z$ having  $k$-Du Bois singularities is equivalent to the fact that $p(Z)\geq k$.
This in turn implies by ($\ref{eqn:ineq}$) that $\dim(W)\leq d-2k-1$. By general bounds on the cohomology of the graded pieces of the Du Bois complex (see \cite[Theorem~7.29]{PS}), we then have
$$
{\mathcal H}^{q-1}(\underline{\Omega}_W^p)=0\quad\text{if}\quad p+q \ge d-2k + 1.
$$
On the other hand, if $p\leq k$ and $q\geq 1$, we have
${\mathcal H}^q(\underline{\Omega}_Z^p)=0$ by definition of $k$-Du Bois singularities.
The assertion in ii) thus follows from the exact sequence (\ref{eq10_DB}).

 The assertion in iii) follows directly from Theorem \ref{marginal-LCI} (note that we avoid the exceptional cases in that theorem
 since $q\leq d-1$). Let's prove now the assertion in iv).

 We assume that $q\geq\max\{d-k-1,1\}$. Suppose first that $p+q\geq d-2k+1$. If $p\leq k$, then we are done by ii). Hence we may and will assume that
 $p\geq k+1$. By i), we may also assume that $p+q\leq d$, hence $q\leq d-p\leq d-k-1$. Since we are assuming $q\geq d-k-1$, it follows that
 $q=d-k-1$ and $p=k+1$, hence we are done by iii).

 Suppose now that $p+q\leq d-2k$. Since $q\geq d-k-1$, it follows that $p+k\leq 1$,
 hence we are left with 3 possible case, when
$(k,p)=(1,0)$, $(0,0)$, or $(0,1)$.

If $p=0$, then we need to show that
$$R^q\mu_*\shf{O}_{\widetilde{Z}}(-D)=0 \,\,\,\,\,\, {\rm for} \,\,\,\, q\geq \max \{d-k-1, 1\}.$$
If $k=1$, then the condition $p+q\leq d-2k$ gives $d\geq 3$, while the inequality (\ref{eqn:ineq}) gives $d\geq 3$.
If $k=0$, then we only get $\dim(W)\leq d - 2$, using the fact that $Z$ is normal. Since the case when $Z$ is a smooth curve is obvious, we may and will assume
$d \ge 2$. Using the fact that $Z$ is normal, with Du Bois singularities, we can then apply
\cite[Theorem~13.3]{GKKP} which says that $R^i\mu_*\shf{O}_{\widetilde{Z}}(-D)=0$ for $i>\max\{\dim(W), 0\}$. Therefore we are done in this case.

If $p=1$ and $k=0$, then we have $d \ge 2$ and we need to show that
$$R^q\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^1(\log\,D)(-D)=0 \,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm  for}\,\,\,\, q\geq d-1.$$
This follows by applying \cite[Theorem~14.1]{GKKP}.\footnote{Note that the result we refer to is stated for log canonical pairs $(Z,E)$. However, when $E=0$,  the same proof works
when $Z$ is only assumed to have Du Bois singularities; this is the only condition that is used in the proof, via \cite[Theorem~13.3]{GKKP}.}
This completes the proof of the theorem.
\end{proof}

\section{Results for hypersurfaces}
In this chapter we show that $k$-rational singularities are characterized numerically in terms of their
minimal exponent; see the discussion around Theorem \ref{thm_main} and Corollary \ref{drop} in the introduction.

All throughout this chapter, $Z$ will be a (nonempty) hypersurface, meaning a closed subscheme of pure codimension $1$, in the smooth irreducible $n$-dimensional variety $X$.

\subsection{Minimal exponent $>k+1$ implies $k$-rational singularities}
 Our goal in this section is to prove one implication in Theorem~\ref{thm_main}, namely to show the following:

\begin{theorem}\label{main_thm1}
If $k$ is a nonnegative integer such that
$\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>k+1$, then $Z$ has $k$-rational singularities.
\end{theorem}

\begin{remark}\label{rmk1_main_thm1}
Under the hypotheses in Theorem~\ref{main_thm1}, we have $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>1$, hence $Z$ is normal; in particular, it is reduced
and all its connected components are irreducible.\footnote{It follows from \cite[Theorem~0.4]{Saito-B} that $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>1$ implies that $Z$ has rational singularities, hence in particular it is normal.
However, we prefer to give a direct argument for this elementary fact.}
Indeed, we have ${\rm lct}(X,Z)=1$, hence $Z$ is reduced and in codimension $1$ its singularities are at worst nodal singularities. Since the Bernstein-Sato polynomial
of a union of two smooth divisors meeting transversally is
$(s+1)^2$, we conclude that if $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>1$, we have $Z$ smooth in codimension $1$. Therefore $Z$ is normal by Serre's criterion since it is Cohen-Macaulay,
being a hypersurface.
\end{remark}

In order to prove the theorem, we may clearly treat each connected component of $Z$ separately. In light of Remark~\ref{rmk1_main_thm1}, we thus may and will
assume from now on that $Z$ is a normal variety. We choose a log resolution $\pi\colon Y\to X$ of $(X,Z)$
and write $\pi^{-1}(Z)_{\rm red}=E$. The morphism $\pi$ may be taken to be projective, and we will do so in what follows. The key input for the proof of Theorem~\ref{main_thm1} is the following vanishing result, interesting in its own right.

\begin{theorem}\label{thm_vanishing_log}
If $k$ is a nonnegative integer and $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>k+1$, then
$$R^q\pi_*\Omega_Y^p(\log\,E)=0$$
in each of the following cases:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[i)] $p+q\geq n+1$;
\item[ii)] $p\leq k+1$ and $q\geq 1$;
\item[iii)] $p=k+2$ and $q=n-k-2$.
\end{enumerate}
In particular, it holds for all $p$ and all $q \ge \max \{ n- k - 2, 1\}$.
\end{theorem}

Part i) is known to hold for an arbitrary hypersurface $Z$ in $X$; cf. ($\ref{eq_vanishing_sum_n}$) below.
The case when $p=k+2$ and $q=n-k-2$ is the content of \cite[Corollary~C]{MP1}.
In what follows we will show that (a simplified version of) the argument in \emph{loc}. \emph{cit}. is enough to give also the vanishing in ii).

\begin{remark}\label{rmk_thm_vanishing}
We note that if $Z$ is smooth, then all the vanishings in Theorem~\ref{thm_vanishing_log} are well known; see for example \cite[Theorem~31.1(i)]{MP0}.
On the other hand, if $Z$ is singular, we have $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)\leq\tfrac{n}{2}$ by \cite[Theorem~0.4]{Saito_microlocal}. If $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>k+1$,
then $k\leq \tfrac{n-3}{2}$,
hence if $q\geq n-k-2$, we automatically have $q\geq 1$.
\end{remark}

We begin by relating the higher direct images of the sheaves of log differentials on $Y$ to certain mixed Hodge modules on $X$.
Recall that $\omega_X(*Z)$ is the right Hodge module whose underlying $\mathscr{D}_X$-module is the module of top rational differentials on $X$
with poles along $Z$. It is a basic fact that for every $p$ we have an isomorphism
\begin{equation}\label{eq_push_forward1}
\mathbf{R} \pi_*\Omega_Y^p(\log\,E)[n-p]\simeq {\rm Gr}^F_{-p}{\rm DR}_X\big(\omega_X(*Z)\big).
\end{equation}
One way to see this is by using the explicit filtered resolution of $\omega_Y(*E)$ in \cite[Proposition~3.1]{MP0} to get an
isomorphism
$$\Omega_Y^p(\log\,E)[n-p]\simeq {\rm Gr}^F_{-p}{\rm DR}_Y\big(\omega_Y(*E)\big).$$
The isomorphism in (\ref{eq_push_forward1}) then follows from the fact that $\omega_X(*Z)$ is the push-forward of $\omega_Y(*E)$ (in the category of
Hodge modules), using Saito's Strictness Theorem \cite[Section~2.3.7]{Saito-MHP}; cf.\ \cite[Section C.4]{MP1}.

Since the complex on the right-hand side of
(\ref{eq_push_forward1}) is placed in nonpositive degrees, we immediately deduce
the following vanishing result
\begin{equation}\label{eq_vanishing_sum_n}
R^q\pi_*\Omega_Y^p(\log\,E)=0\quad\text{for}\quad p+q>n
\end{equation}
(cf. \cite[Corollary~3]{Saito-LOG} and \cite[Theorem~32.1]{MP0}). In other words, part i) in Theorem
\ref{thm_vanishing_log} holds for an arbitrary hypersurface $Z$ in $X$.

\begin{lemma}\label{van_for_loc_coh}
With the notation above, for $q \ge 1$ and arbitrary $p$, we have $R^q\pi_*\Omega_Y^p(\log\,E)=0$
provided that
$${\mathcal H}^{p+q-n}\big({\rm Gr}^F_{-p}{\rm DR}_X\big({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)\big)\big)=0.$$
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
We have a short exact sequence of Hodge modules
$$0\to\mathbb{Q}_X^H[n]\to \omega_X(*Z)\to {\mathcal H}_Z^1(\omega_X)\to 0,$$
where the underlying $\mathscr{D}_X$-module of ${\mathcal H}_Z^1(\omega_X)$ is the first local cohomology module of $\omega_X$ along $Z$.
By taking ${\rm Gr}^F_{-p}{\rm DR}_X(-)$,  using (\ref{eq_push_forward1}) we obtain an exact triangle
$$\Omega_X^p[n-p]\longrightarrow \mathbf{R} \pi_*\Omega_Y^p(\log\,E)[n-p]\longrightarrow {\rm Gr}^F_{-p}{\rm DR}_X\big({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)\big)\overset{+1}\longrightarrow.$$
This immediately implies the statement by passing to cohomology.
\end{proof}

The key point for the proof of Theorem \ref{thm_vanishing_log} is the use of duality. Recall that by the compatibility between duality and the graded de Rham complex (see \cite[Sections~2.4.5 and 2.4.11]{Saito-MHP}),
for every $p\in\mathbb{Z}$, we have an isomorphism
$$
{\rm Gr}^F_{-p}{\rm DR}_X\big({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)\big)\simeq \mathbf{R} {\mathcal Hom}_{\shf{O}_X}\big({\rm Gr}^F_{p}{\rm DR}_X{\mathbf D}({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)),\omega_X[n]\big),
$$
and thus
\begin{equation}\label{eq_isom_dual}
{\mathcal H}^{p+q-n}\big({\rm Gr}^F_{-p}{\rm DR}_X\big({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)\big)\big)\simeq {\mathcal Ext}_{\shf{O}_X}^{p+q}\big({\rm Gr}_p^F{\rm DR}_X{\mathbf D}({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)),\omega_X\big).
\end{equation}

We compute ${\mathbf D}({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X))$ using the $V$-filtration. Suppose that $Z$ is a singular hypersurface in $X$ defined by $f\in\shf{O}_X(X)$.
Recall that if $\iota\colon X\to X\times\mathbb{C}$ is the graph embedding $\iota(x)=\big(x,f(x)\big)$, then the $V$-filtration of Malgrange and Kashiwara
is an increasing, exhaustive, discrete, and right-continuous filtration on
$$B_f:=\iota_+\omega_X=\bigoplus_{j\geq 0}\omega_X\partial_t^j$$
indexed by rational numbers and characterized by a few conditions
(see for example \cite[Section~3.1]{Saito-MHP}). For example, if $t$ is the coordinate on $\mathbb{C}$, then $V_{\alpha}B_f\cdot t\subseteq V_{\alpha-1}B_f$
and $V_{\alpha}B_f\cdot\partial_t\subseteq V_{\alpha+1}B_f$.
For every $\alpha$, we put ${\rm Gr}^V_{\alpha}B_f=V_{\alpha}B_f/V_{<\alpha}B_f$.
We note that the Hodge filtration on $B_f$ is given by
$$F_{p-n}B_f=\bigoplus_{j\leq p}\omega_X\partial_t^j.$$

By \cite[Section~2.24]{Saito-MHM},
we have a short exact sequence
$$0\to {\rm Gr}_0^VB_f\overset{\cdot t}\longrightarrow{\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f\to {\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)\to 0,$$
 which gives after taking duals
the exact sequence
\begin{equation}\label{eq_duality1}
0\to {\mathbf D}\big({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)\big)\to {\mathbf D}({\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f)\to {\mathbf D}({\rm Gr}^V_{0}B_f)\to 0.
\end{equation}
On the other hand, Saito showed in \cite[Theorem~1.6]{Saito_duality} that we have isomorphisms
$${\mathbf D}({\rm Gr}_{-1}^VB_f)\simeq {\rm Gr}_{-1}^VB_f(n+1)\quad\text{and}\quad {\mathbf D}({\rm Gr}_0^VB_f)\simeq {\rm Gr}^V_0B_f(n)$$
such that the exact sequence (\ref{eq_duality1}) becomes
\begin{equation}\label{eq_duality2}
0\to {\mathbf D}\big({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)\big)\to {\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f(1+n)\overset{\cdot(-\partial_t)}\longrightarrow {\rm Gr}^V_{0}B_f(n)\to 0.
\end{equation}
By taking the corresponding graded piece of the de Rham complex, we obtain the short exact sequence of complexes
\begin{equation}\label{eq_duality3}
0\to {\rm Gr}^F_p{\rm DR}_X{\mathbf D}\big({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)\big)\to {\rm Gr}^F_{p-n-1}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f\overset{\cdot\partial_t}\longrightarrow
{\rm Gr}^F_{p-n}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_{0}B_f\to 0.
\end{equation}

The connection between the minimal exponent and the $V$-filtration is provided by the following result due to Saito, see \cite[(1.3.8)]{Saito-MLCT}:
if $q$ is a nonnegative integer and $\alpha\in (0,1]$ is a rational number, then
\begin{equation}\label{eq_char_min_exp}
\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)\geq q+\alpha \iff \omega_X\partial_t^q\subseteq V_{-\alpha}B_f \,\,(\iff F_{q-n}B_f \subseteq V_{-\alpha}B_f).
\end{equation}
(Note that the formulation in \emph{loc}. \emph{cit}. is done in terms of the left $\mathscr{D}$-module $B_f^{\ell}$ corresponding to our $B_f$, and with respect to the decreasing version of the
$V$-filtration, related to the one in this paper by $V_{\alpha}B_f=\omega_X\otimes V^{-\alpha}B_f^{\ell}$.)
Therefore the condition that $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>k+1$ is equivalent to $F_{k+1-n}B_f\subseteq V_{<0}B_f$. Note that this implies
\begin{equation}\label{eq5_char_min_exp}
{\rm Gr}^F_{i-n}{\rm Gr}^V_0B_f=0\quad\text{for all}\quad  i\leq k+1.
\end{equation}
Moreover, it was shown in \cite[Proposition~4.5]{MP1} that (after translating from left to right $\mathscr{D}$-modules)
the condition $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>k+1$ implies
\begin{equation}\label{eq2_char_min_exp}
{\rm Gr}^F_{i-n}{\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f\simeq \omega_X \otimes_{\shf{O}_X} \shf{O}_X/(f)\quad\text{for}\quad 0\leq i\leq k\quad\text{and}
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{eq3_char_min_exp}
{\rm Gr}^F_{k+1-n}{\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f\simeq \omega_X \otimes_{\shf{O}_X} J/(f),
\end{equation}
where $J=\{h\in\shf{O}_X\mid \omega_X\cdot h\partial_t^{k+1}\subseteq V_{-1}B_f\}$. We also note that
\begin{equation}\label{eq4_char_min_exp}
{\rm Gr}^F_{i-n}{\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f=0\quad\text{for}\quad i<0
\end{equation}
since $F_{i-n}B_f=0$ for $i<0$.

After these preparations we can give the proof of our vanishing result.

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{thm_vanishing_log}]
The vanishing in i) follows from (\ref{eq_vanishing_sum_n}). Since all assertions are local on $X$, to approach the rest we may assume that $Z$ is defined by $f\in\shf{O}_X(X)$. We may also assume that
$Z$ is singular; see Remark~\ref{rmk_thm_vanishing}.

We begin by recalling that if $A^{\bullet}$ is a complex of $\shf{O}_X$-modules, then we have a spectral sequence
$$E_1^{i,j}={\mathcal Ext}_{\shf{O}_X}^j(A^{-i},\omega_X)\Rightarrow {\mathcal Ext}_{\shf{O}_X}^{i+j}(A^{\bullet},\omega_X).$$
We thus obtain for every $m\in\mathbb{Z}$
\begin{equation}\label{eq1_pf_thm_vanishing}
{\mathcal Ext}^m_{\shf{O}_X}(A^{\bullet},\omega_X)=0\quad\text{if}\,\,\,\,\,\,{\mathcal Ext}_{\shf{O}_X}^{m+i}(A^i,\omega_X)=0\,\,\text{for all}\,\,i\in\mathbb{Z}.
\end{equation}

We also recall that by Lemma~\ref{van_for_loc_coh}, in order to prove that
$R^q\pi_*\Omega_X^p(\log\,E)=0$ for $q \ge 1$, it is enough to verify that
$${\mathcal H}^{p+q-n}\big({\rm Gr}^F_{-p}{\rm DR}_X({\mathcal H}_Z^1(\omega_X))\big)=0.$$
Furthermore, the isomorphism (\ref{eq_isom_dual}) implies that if
$$\mathcal{M}_{p,q}:={\mathcal Ext}_{\shf{O}_X}^{p+q}\big({\rm Gr}^F_p{\rm DR}_X{\mathbf D}({\mathcal H}_Z^1(\omega_Z)),\omega_X\big),$$
then it is enough to show that $\mathcal{M}_{p,q}=0$.

Let's now prove  ii). Suppose that $p\leq k+1$ and $q\geq 1$.
The long exact sequence associated to the exact sequence of complexes (\ref{eq_duality3}) gives an exact sequence
\begin{equation}\label{eq2_pf_thm_vanishing}
{\mathcal Ext}^{p+q}_{\shf{O}_X}\big({\rm Gr}^F_{p-n-1}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f,\omega_X\big)\to\mathcal{M}_{p,q}\to {\mathcal Ext}^{p+q+1}_{\shf{O}_X}\big({\rm Gr}^F_{p-n}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_0B_f,\omega_X\big).
\end{equation}
Since ${\rm Gr}^F_{i-n}{\rm Gr}_0^VB_f=0$ for all $i\leq p\leq k+1$ by (\ref{eq5_char_min_exp}), it follows that
$${\rm Gr}^F_{p-n}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_0B_f=0,$$
hence the third term
in (\ref{eq2_pf_thm_vanishing}) is $0$. On the other hand, if $A^{\bullet}={\rm Gr}^F_{p-n-1}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f$, then $A^i=0$ unless
$1-p\leq i\leq 0$. Since each $A^i$ is a locally free $\shf{O}_Z$-module by (\ref{eq2_char_min_exp}), we have ${\mathcal Ext}^j_{\shf{O}_X}(A^i,\omega_X)=0$ for all $j\geq 2$.
But for $i\geq 1-p$ we have $p+q+i\geq q+1\geq 2$, hence it follows that
$${\mathcal Ext}_{\shf{O}_X}^{p+q+i}(A^i,\omega_X)=0 \,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm  for ~all} \,\,\,\, i\in\mathbb{Z}.$$
We thus conclude, using (\ref{eq1_pf_thm_vanishing}), that the first term in (\ref{eq2_pf_thm_vanishing}) is $0$ as well. Therefore $\mathcal{M}_{p,q}=0$, which completes the proof of ii).

Suppose now that $p=k+2$ and $q=n-k-2\geq 1$ and let's prove that again $\mathcal{M}_{p,q}=0$.
The long exact sequence associated to the exact sequence of complexes (\ref{eq_duality3}) gives an exact sequence
\begin{equation}\label{eq_3_pf_thm_vanishing}
{\mathcal Ext}_{\shf{O}_X}^n\big({\rm Gr}^F_{k-n+1}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f,\omega_X\big)\to\mathcal{M}_{p,q}\to
 {\mathcal Ext}^{n+1}_{\shf{O}_X}\big({\rm Gr}^F_{k-n+2}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_0B_f,\omega_X\big).
\end{equation}
Note first that (\ref{eq5_char_min_exp}) implies that ${\rm Gr}^F_{k-n+2}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_0B_f$ is concentrated in cohomological degree $0$.
Since $\dim(X)=n$, it follows that the third term in (\ref{eq_3_pf_thm_vanishing}) is 0.

We now consider the complex $A^{\bullet}={\rm Gr}^F_{k-n+1}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f$. We have $A^i=0$ unless $-k-1\leq i\leq 0$ and
it follows from (\ref{eq2_char_min_exp}) that $A^i$ is a free $\shf{O}_Z$-module for $i\leq -1$, while $A^0\simeq
\omega_X\otimes_{\shf{O}_X} J/(f)$.
For $-k-1\leq i\leq -1$, we thus have $n+i\geq n-k-1\geq 2$, hence ${\mathcal Ext}_{\shf{O}_X}^{n+i}(A^i,\omega_X)=0$.
Moreover, it follows from (\ref{eq2_char_min_exp}) that we have an exact sequence
$$0\to A^0 \otimes_{\shf{O}_X} \omega_X^{-1} \to\shf{O}_Z\to\shf{O}_X/J\to 0,$$
which immediately gives ${\mathcal Ext}^n_{\shf{O}_X}(A^0,\omega_X)=0$. Using
(\ref{eq1_pf_thm_vanishing}) one more time, we conclude that the first term in (\ref{eq_3_pf_thm_vanishing}) is also $0$, and thus $\mathcal{M}_{p,q}=0$. This completes the proof of the theorem.
\end{proof}

We next deduce the local vanishing result for a resolution of $Z$ stated in the introduction.

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{thm_vanishing}]
Let $\pi\colon Y\to X$ be a strong log resolution of $(X,Z)$ as in Proposition~\ref{prop_log_res} and
$\mu\colon\widetilde{Z}\to Z$ the induced log resolution of $Z$. Recall that we write
$$\pi^{-1}(Z)_{\rm red}=E=\widetilde{Z}+F_N \,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm  and} \,\,\,\,\,\, D=F_N\vert_{\widetilde{Z}}=\mu^{-1}(Z_{\rm sing})_{\rm red}.$$

By Theorem~\ref{thm_vanishing_log} ii), we have
$$R^q\pi_*\Omega_Y^{p+1}(\log\,E)=0 \,\,\,\,\,\, {\rm for ~all} \,\,\,\, q\geq 1 \,\,\,\,{\rm  and} \,\,\,\,p\leq k.$$
Note also that since $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>k+1$, it follows from \cite[Proposition~7.4]{MP1} that $r:={\rm codim}_X(Z_{\rm sing})\geq 2k+3$. Thus
(\ref{eq11_prop_log_res})  in Proposition \ref{prop_log_res} gives
$$R^q\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^i(\log D)\simeq R^q\pi_*\Omega_Y^{i+1}(\log\,E)$$
for all $q \ge 1$ and all $0 \le p \le 2k + 1$. This concludes the proof in combination with part ii) and iii)
in Theorem \ref{thm_vanishing_log}.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}[Isolated singularities]
Under the hypothesis of Theorem \ref{thm_vanishing}, if $Z$ has at most isolated singularities, then for $q\geq \max \{n-k-2, 1\}$ we have
$$R^q\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^p(\log\,D)=0 \iff (p,q)\neq (n-1,n-2).$$

Indeed, by Remark~\ref{rmk_indep_res} the assertion is independent of the choice of log resolution. Hence we may assume that we are in the setting of Proposition~\ref{prop_log_res}, which implies
$$R^q\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^p(\log\,D)\simeq R^q\pi_*\Omega_Y^{p+1}(\log\,E)\quad\text{for}\quad p\leq n-2.$$
By Theorem~\ref{thm_vanishing_log}, the right-hand side vanishes for $q\geq \max\{n-k-2,1\}$.

On the other hand, if $p=n-1$, then $\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^p(\log\,D)\simeq \omega_{\widetilde{Z}}(D)$ and the short exact sequence
$$0\to \omega_{\widetilde{Z}}\to\omega_{\widetilde{Z}}(D)\to\omega_D\to 0$$
together with Grauert-Riemenschneider vanishing gives
$$R^q\mu_*\omega_{\widetilde{Z}}(D)\simeq R^q\mu_*\omega_D.$$
The right-hand side is a skyscraper sheaf  of length $h^q(D,\omega_D)=h^{n-2-q}(D,\shf{O}_D)$.
We clearly have $h^0(D,\shf{O}_D)\neq 0$ (in fact, we have $h^0(D,\shf{O}_D)=1$ since $Z$ being normal implies that $D$ is connected), while
$h^i(D,\shf{O}_D)=0$ for $i>0$ since $Z$ has isolated rational singularities; see \cite[Lemma~1.2]{Namikawa}. This proves our assertion.
\end{remark}

The fact that hypersurfaces with minimal exponent $>k+1$ have $k$-rational singularities is an easy consequence.

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{main_thm1}]
By Theorem~\ref{thm_vanishing} i) we have
$$R^q\mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^p(\log\,D)=0 \,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm  for ~all} \,\,\,\, q\geq 1 \,\,\,\,{\rm and} \,\,\,\,
p\leq k.$$

Therefore in order to establish that $Z$ has $k$-rational singularities it is enough to show that
the canonical morphism
\begin{equation}\label{eq_main_thm1}
\Omega_Z^i\to \mu_*\Omega_{\widetilde{Z}}^i(\log\,D)
\end{equation}
is an isomorphism for $i\leq k$. This is clear if $k=0$ by Zariski's Main Theorem, since $Z$ is normal (see Remark~\ref{rmk1_main_thm1}).

Suppose now that $k\geq 1$. Since we already know that $Z$ has rational singularities, the morphism (\ref{eq_main_thm1}) is an isomorphism if and only if
$\Omega_Z^i$ is reflexive; see Remark~\ref{rmk_level_zero} and Lemma \ref{lem:reflexive}. This in turn follows for $i\leq k$ from the fact that $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)\geq k+1$, according to \cite[Remark~3.5]{MOPW}, and completes the proof of the theorem.
\end{proof}

\subsection{$k$-rational hypersurface singularities have minimal exponent $>k+1$}
This section is devoted to the proof of the converse statement in Theorem \ref{thm_main}.

\begin{theorem}\label{converse}
If $k$ is a nonnegative integer and $Z$ has $k$-rational singularities, then $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>k+1$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Since $Z$ has $k$-rational singularities, it follows from
Theorem~\ref{main2} that it has $k$-Du Bois singularities, in which case we get $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)\geq k+1$ by \cite[Theorem~1]{Saito_et_al}.
Using this, we can argue as in the proof of Theorem~\ref{thm_vanishing_log} to show that in fact
$\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>k+1$.
Since the assertion we want to prove is local on $X$, we may and will assume that $Z$ is defined by some $f\in\shf{O}_X(X)$. We also assume that
$Z$ is singular, since otherwise the assertion is trivial. We use the notation from the previous section.

\noindent
\emph{Claim.}
To prove the theorem, it is enough to show that
\begin{equation}\label{eq0_converse}
{\rm Gr}^F_{k-n+1}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_0B_f=0
\end{equation}
in the derived category of coherent sheaves on $X$. To this end, we record two facts that use  (\ref{eq_char_min_exp}): first, the known inequality $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)\geq k+1$ implies that $F_{k-n}B_f\subseteq V_{-1}B_f$; after applying $\partial_t$ this
also implies $F_{k-n+1}B_f\subseteq V_0B_f$. Second, proving that
$\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)>k+1$ is equivalent to showing that $F_{k-n+1}B_f\subseteq V_{<0}B_f$.

Since we already know that $F_{k-n}B_f\subseteq V_{<0}B_f$
and $F_{k-n+1}B_f\subseteq V_0B_f$, it is in turn enough to show that ${\rm Gr}^F_{k-n+1}{\rm Gr}^V_0B_f=0$. Finally, this holds if and only if we have the identity in ($\ref{eq0_converse}$): indeed, since ${\rm Gr}^F_i{\rm Gr}^V_0B_f=0$ for all $i\leq k-n$, the graded piece of de Rham complex we are interested in
is concentrated in cohomological degree $0$, where the entry is ${\rm Gr}^F_{k-n+1}{\rm Gr}^V_0B_f$. This concludes the proof of the Claim.

Recall also that by (\ref{eq_duality3}), we have a short exact sequence of complexes
$$0\longrightarrow {\rm Gr}^F_{k+1}{\rm DR}_X{\mathbf D}\big({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)\big)\longrightarrow {\mathcal Q}_1\longrightarrow {\mathcal Q}_2\longrightarrow 0,$$
where
$${\mathcal Q}_1:={\rm Gr}^F_{k-n}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f\quad\text{and}\quad {\mathcal Q}_2:={\rm Gr}^F_{k-n+1}{\rm DR}_X{\rm Gr}^V_{0}B_f.$$
Since $\mathbf{R} {\mathcal Hom}_{\shf{O}_X}\big(-,\omega_X[n]\big)$ is a duality, it follows that (\ref{eq0_converse}) holds if and only if the induced morphism
$$\tau\colon \mathbf{R} {\mathcal Hom}_{\shf{O}_X}\big({\mathcal Q}_1, \omega_X[n]\big)\longrightarrow
{\mathcal P}:=\mathbf{R} {\mathcal Hom}_{\shf{O}_X}\big({\rm Gr}^F_{k+1}{\rm DR}_X{\mathbf D}({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)),\omega_X[n]\big)$$
is an isomorphism.

We now describe the domain and the target of $\tau$, starting with the target. Note first that by the compatibility between duality and taking the graded pieces of the de Rham complex
(see  \cite[Sections~2.4.5 and 2.4.11]{Saito-MHP}), we have
$${\mathcal P}\simeq {\rm Gr}^F_{-k-1}{\rm DR}_X\big({\mathcal H}^1_Z(\omega_X)\big).$$
We analyze ${\mathcal P}$ more carefully under the $k$-rationality assumption. Let $\pi\colon Y\to X$ be a strong log resolution of $(X,Z)$ as in Proposition~\ref{prop_log_res} and let $\mu\colon\widetilde{Z}\to Z$ be the induced strong log resolution of $Z$. As in the proof of Lemma~\ref{van_for_loc_coh}, we have an exact triangle
$$\Omega_X^{k+1}[n-k-1]\longrightarrow \mathbf{R} \pi_*\Omega_Y^{k+1}(\log\,E)[n-k-1]
\longrightarrow \mathcal{P} \overset{+1}\longrightarrow.$$
Since $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)\geq k+1$, it follows from \cite[Lemma~2.1]{MOPW} that ${\rm codim}_X(Z_{\rm sing})\geq 2k+2$. We can thus apply
Proposition~\ref{prop_log_res} and the fact that $Z$ has $k$-rational singularities to conclude that
$$
R^q\pi_*\Omega_Y^{k+1}(\log\,E)=0\quad\text{for all}\quad q\geq 1\quad\text{and}
$$
$$
\Omega_Z^k\simeq {\rm Coker}\big(\Omega_X^{k+1}\hookrightarrow \pi_*\Omega_Y^{k+1}(\log\,E)\big).
$$
We thus conclude that ${\mathcal H}^i({\mathcal P})=0$ for all $i\neq k+1-n$ and
$${\mathcal H}^{k+1-n}({\mathcal P})\simeq \Omega_Z^k.$$

We next describe the domain of $\tau$. Using the notation in the proof of Theorem \ref{thm_vanishing_log}, we note that the condition $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)\geq k+1$, being equivalent to $\omega_X \cdot \partial_t^k \in V_{-1} B_f$, can also be interpreted as saying that $J = \shf{O}_X$, where
$$J=\{h\in\shf{O}_X\mid \omega_X\cdot h\partial_t^k\subseteq V_{-1}B_f\}.$$
As noted in ($\ref{eq2_char_min_exp}$) and ($\ref{eq3_char_min_exp}$),
we then have isomorphisms
$${\rm Gr}_{i-n}^F{\rm Gr}^V_{-1}B_f\simeq \omega_X\otimes_{\shf{O}_X}\shf{O}_X/(f)\quad\text{for all}\quad
i\leq k.$$
Moreover, it is easy to check that via these isomorphisms the complex
${\mathcal Q}_1$ becomes isomorphic to ${\mathcal A}^{\bullet}\otimes_{\shf{O}_X}\shf{O}_Z$, where
${\mathcal A}^{\bullet}$ is the complex
$$0\longrightarrow \Omega_X^{n-k}\longrightarrow\cdots\longrightarrow \Omega_X^{n-1}\longrightarrow \omega_X\longrightarrow 0$$
placed in cohomological degrees $-k,\ldots,0$, with each map given by wedging with $df$.
Since ${\mathcal A}^{\bullet}$ is a complex of locally free $\shf{O}_X$-modules, it is well known
(and easy to show) that we have an isomorphism
$$\mathbf{R} {\mathcal Hom}_{\shf{O}_X}\big({\mathcal Q}_1,\omega_X[n]\big)\simeq ({\mathcal A}^{\bullet})^{\vee}\otimes_{\shf{O}_X}\omega_Z[n-1].$$

Finally we record one last consequence of the inequality $\widetilde{\alpha}(Z)\geq k+1$ needed here.
Namely, under this assumption the sheaf $\Omega_Z^k$ is reflexive;
see \cite[Remark~3.5]{MOPW}. (Note also that $Z$ is normal, since it has rational singularities.)
Furthermore, using the isomorphism $\shf{O}_Z (Z)\simeq\shf{O}_Z$ provided by the global equation $f$ defining $Z$, we know that  $\Omega_Z^k$ has a locally free resolution
given by the following complex ${\mathcal C}^{\bullet}$, placed in degrees $-k,\ldots,0$:
$${\mathcal C}^{\bullet}:\,\,\,\,0\longrightarrow \shf{O}_Z\longrightarrow \Omega_X^1\vert_Z\longrightarrow \cdots\longrightarrow\Omega_X^k\vert_Z\longrightarrow 0,$$
where all maps are given by wedging with $df$; this is shown in the proof of \cite[Theorem~1]{MOPW}.
 Therefore we have
$$\mathbf{R} {\mathcal Hom}_{\shf{O}_X}\big({\mathcal Q}_1,\omega_X[n]\big)\simeq {\mathcal C}^{\bullet}[n-1-k]\simeq\Omega_Z^k[n-1-k].$$

Putting everything together, we see that $\tau$ can be identified with a morphism
$$\Omega_Z^k[n-1-k]\longrightarrow \Omega_Z^k[n-1-k].$$
Since $\Omega_Z^k$ is a reflexive sheaf it is thus enough to check
that $\tau$ is an isomorphism on $X\smallsetminus Z_{\rm sing}$. However this is clear, since all our constructions are compatible to restriction to open subsets, and
we clearly have ${\mathcal Q}_2\vert_{X\smallsetminus Z_{\rm sing}}=0$. This completes the proof of the theorem.
\end{proof}

\section*{References}
\begin{biblist}

\bib{Bruns}{book}{
   author={Bruns, W.},
   author={Vetter, U.},
   title={Determinantal rings},
   series={Lecture Notes in Mathematics},
   volume={1327},
   publisher={Springer-Verlag, Berlin},
   date={1988},
   pages={viii+236},
}

\bib{Huber}{article}{
   author={Huber, A.},
   author={J\"{o}rder, C.},
   title={Differential forms in the h-topology},
   journal={Algebr. Geom.},
   volume={1},
   date={2014},
   number={4},
   pages={449--478},
}

\bib{FL1}{article}{
author={Friedman, R.},
author={Laza, R.},
title={Deformations of singular Fano and Calabi-Yau varieties},
journal={preprint arXiv:2203.04823},
date={2022},
}

\bib{FL2}{article}{
author={Friedman, R.},
author={Laza, R.},
title={Higher Du Bois and higher rational singularities},
journal={preprint arXiv:2205.04729},
date={2022},
}

\bib{FL3}{article}{
author={Friedman, R.},
author={Laza, R.},
title={The higher Du Bois and higher rational properties for isolated singularities},
journal={preprint arXiv:2207.07566},
date={2022},
}

\bib{GKKP}{article}{
   author={Greb, D.},
   author={Kebekus, S.},
   author={Kov\'{a}cs, S.},
   author={Peternell, T.},
   title={Differential forms on log canonical spaces},
   journal={Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes \'{E}tudes Sci.},
   number={114},
   date={2011},
   pages={87--169},
}

\bib{Saito_et_al}{article}{
author={Jung, S.-J.},
author={Kim, I.-K.},
author={Saito, M.},
author={Yoon, Y.},
title={Higher Du Bois singularities of hypersurfaces},
journal={preprint arXiv:2107.06619},
date={2021},
}

\bib{KS}{article}{
   author={Kebekus, S.},
   author={Schnell, C.},
   title={Extending holomorphic forms from the regular locus of a complex space to a resolution of singularities},
   journal={J. Amer. Math. Soc.},
   volume={34},
   date={2021},
   pages={315--368}
}

\bib{KL}{article}{
   author={Kerr, M.},
   author={Laza, R.},
   title={Hodge theory of degenerations, (II): vanishing cohomology and geometric applications},
   journal={preprint arXiv:2006.03953},
   date={2020},
}

\bib{KM}{book}{
   author={Koll{\'a}r, J.},
   author={Mori, S.},
   title={Birational geometry of algebraic varieties},
   series={Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics},
   volume={134},
   note={With the collaboration of C. H. Clemens and A. Corti;
   Translated from the 1998 Japanese original},
   publisher={Cambridge University Press, Cambridge},
   date={1998},
}

\bib{Kovacs1}{article}{
   author={Kov\'{a}cs, S.},
   title={Rational, log canonical, Du Bois singularities: on the conjectures
   of Koll\'{a}r and Steenbrink},
   journal={Compositio Math.},
   volume={118},
   date={1999},
   number={2},
   pages={123--133},
   issn={0010-437X},
}

\bib{KoS}{article}{
   author={Kov\'acs, S.},
   author={Schwede, K.},
   title={Du Bois singularities deform},
   journal={Minimal models and extremal rays (Kyoto, 2011), Adv. Stud. in Pure Math., Math. Soc. Japan},
   volume={70},
   date={2016},
   pages={49--65},
}

\bib{MOPW}{article}{
     author={Musta\c t\u a, M.},
     author={Olano, S.},
     author={Popa, M.},
     author={Witaszek, J.},
     title={The Du Bois complex of a hypersurface and the minimal exponent},
     journal={preprint arXiv:2105.01245 },
     date={2021},
}

\bib{MP0}{article}{
      author={Musta\c{t}\u{a}, M.},
      author={Popa, M.},
      title={Hodge ideals},
      journal={Memoirs of the AMS},
      volume={262},
      date={2019},
      number={1268},
}

\bib{MP3}{article}{
   author={Musta\c{t}\u{a}, M.},
   author={Popa, M.},
   title={Hodge ideals for ${\bf Q}$-divisors, $V$-filtration, and minimal
   exponent},
   journal={Forum Math. Sigma},
   volume={8},
   date={2020},
   pages={Paper No. e19, 41},
}

\bib{MP1}{article}{
     author={Musta\c{t}\u{a}, M.},
     author={Popa, M.},
     title={Hodge filtration, minimal exponent, and local vanishing},
     journal={ Invent. Math.},
     volume={220},
     date={2020},
     number={2},
     pages={453--478},
}

\bib{MP2}{article}{
author={Musta\c{t}\u{a}, M.},
author={Popa, M.},
title={Hodge filtration on local cohomology, Du Bois complex, and local cohomological dimension},
journal={preprint arXiv:2108.05192},
date={2021},
}

\bib{Namikawa}{article}{
   author={Namikawa, Y.},
   title={Deformation theory of singular symplectic $n$-folds},
   journal={Math. Ann.},
   volume={319},
   date={2001},
   number={3},
   pages={597--623},
}

\bib{PS}{book}{
   author={Peters, C.},
   author={Steenbrink, J.},
   title={Mixed Hodge structures},
   series={Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A
   Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and
   Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics]},
   volume={52},
   publisher={Springer-Verlag, Berlin},
   date={2008},
   pages={xiv+470},
}

\bib{Saito-MHP}{article}{
   author={Saito, M.},
   title={Modules de Hodge polarisables},
   journal={Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.},
   volume={24},
   date={1988},
   number={6},
   pages={849--995},
}

\bib{Saito_duality}{article}{
   author={Saito, M.},
   title={Duality for vanishing cycle functors},
   journal={Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.},
   volume={25},
   date={1989},
   number={6},
   pages={889--921},
}

\bib{Saito-MHM}{article}{
   author={Saito, M.},
   title={Mixed Hodge modules},
   journal={Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.},
   volume={26},
   date={1990},
   number={2},
   pages={221--333},
}

\bib{Saito-B}{article}{
   author={Saito, M.},
   title={On $b$-function, spectrum and rational singularity},
   journal={Math. Ann.},
   volume={295},
   date={1993},
   number={1},
   pages={51--74},
}

\bib{Saito_microlocal}{article}{
   author={Saito, M.},
   title={On microlocal $b$-function},
   journal={Bull. Soc. Math. France},
   volume={122},
   date={1994},
   number={2},
   pages={163--184},
}

\bib{Saito-HC}{article}{
   author={Saito, M.},
   title={Mixed Hodge complexes on algebraic varieties},
   journal={Math. Ann.},
   volume={316},
   date={2000},
   number={2},
   pages={283--331},
}

\bib{Saito-LOG}{article}{
   author={Saito, M.},
   title={Direct image of logarithmic complexes and infinitesimal invariants of cycles},
   conference={
      title={Algebraic cycles and motives. Vol. 2},
   },
   book={
      series={London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser.},
      volume={344},
      publisher={Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge},
   },
   date={2007},
   pages={304--318},
   }

\bib{Saito-MLCT}{article}{
      author={Saito, M.},
	title={Hodge ideals and microlocal $V$-filtration},
	journal={preprint arXiv:1612.08667},
	date={2016},
}

\bib{Saito-AppendixFL}{article}{
      author={Saito, M.},
	title={Appendix to \cite{FL2}},
	date={2022},
}

\bib{Steenbrink}{article}{
   author={Steenbrink, J.},
   title={Vanishing theorems on singular spaces},
   note={Differential systems and singularities (Luminy, 1983)},
   journal={Ast\'{e}risque},
   number={130},
   date={1985},
   pages={330--341},
}

\end{biblist}

\end{document}

\subsection{\texorpdfstring{}{}}}
\newcommand{\subsection{}}{\subsection{}}
\newcommand{\parref}[1]{\hyperref[#1]{\S\ref*{#1}}}

\makeatletter
\newcommand*\if@single[3]{%
  \setbox0\hbox{${\mathaccent"0362{#1}}^H$}%
  \setbox2\hbox{${\mathaccent"0362{\kern0pt#1}}^H$}%
  \ifdim\ht0=\ht2 #3\else #2\fi
  }
\newcommand*\rel@kern[1]{\kern#1\dimexpr\macc@kerna}
\newcommand*\widebar[1]{\@ifnextchar^{{\wide@bar{#1}{0}}}{\wide@bar{#1}{1}}}
\newcommand*\wide@bar[2]{\if@single{#1}{\wide@bar@{#1}{#2}{1}}{\wide@bar@{#1}{#2}{2}}}
\newcommand*\wide@bar@[3]{%
  \begingroup
  \def\mathaccent##1##2{%
    \if#32 \let\macc@nucleus\first@char \fi
    \setbox\z@\hbox{$\macc@style{\macc@nucleus}_{}$}%
    \setbox\tw@\hbox{$\macc@style{\macc@nucleus}{}_{}$}%
    \dimen@\wd\tw@
    \advance\dimen@-\wd\z@
    \divide\dimen@ 3
    \@tempdima\wd\tw@
    \advance\@tempdima-\scriptspace
    \divide\@tempdima 10
    \advance\dimen@-\@tempdima
    \ifdim\dimen@>\z@ \dimen@0pt\fi
    \rel@kern{0.6}\kern-\dimen@
    \if#31
      \overline{\rel@kern{-0.6}\kern\dimen@\macc@nucleus\rel@kern{0.4}\kern\dimen@}%
      \advance\dimen@0.4\dimexpr\macc@kerna
      \let\final@kern#2%
      \ifdim\dimen@<\z@ \let\final@kern1\fi
      \if\final@kern1 \kern-\dimen@\fi
    \else
      \overline{\rel@kern{-0.6}\kern\dimen@#1}%
    \fi
  }%
  \macc@depth\@ne
  \let\math@bgroup\@empty \let\math@egroup\macc@set@skewchar
  \mathsurround\z@ \frozen@everymath{\mathgroup\macc@group\relax}%
  \macc@set@skewchar\relax
  \let\mathaccentV\macc@nested@a
  \if#31
    \macc@nested@a\relax111{#1}%
  \else
    \def\gobble@till@marker##1\endmarker{}%
    \futurelet\first@char\gobble@till@marker#1\endmarker
    \ifcat\noexpand\first@char A\else
      \def\first@char{}%
    \fi
    \macc@nested@a\relax111{\first@char}%
  \fi
  \endgroup
}
\makeatother