Se trata de un Luminal B. Según la SEGO, esta paciente sí es candidata a tratamiento con quimioterapia por ser de alto grado histológico y elevada proliferación tumoral.

Mujer de 64 años, sin comorbilidades relevantes, intervenida de un cáncer de mama derecha mediante una tumorectomia ampliada y biopsia selectiva del ganglio centinela, con el siguiente resultado anatomopatologico: carcinoma ductal Infiltrante pobremente dlferenciado (grado 3), tamaño de 2,2 cm (pT2), receptores de estrógenos y progesterona positivo., Ki67 25%, HER2 negativo. Presenta afectación macroscópica del ganglio centinela, aunque no hay afectación del resto de ganglios axilares aislados (pN1). ¿Qué tratamiento sistémico adyuvante considera mas adecuado para esta paciente?

Hormonoterapia adyuvante que incluya inhibidores de aromatasa.

Quimioterapia adyuvante, preferentemente con antraciclinas y taxanos, seguida de hormonoterapia.

Quimioterapia adyuvante en asociación con el anticuerpo monoclonal trastuzumab, seguida de hormonoterapia.

Quimioterapia adyuvante, preferiblemente con antraciclinas y taxanos.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Does Not Improve Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients With Stage 2 or Stage 3 Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision.

Current guidelines for locally advanced stage 2/3 rectal cancer recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy. The oncologic benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has not been consistently demonstrated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate disease recurrence and survival in patients with rectal cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy after chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. This was a retrospective review of patients with stage 2/3 rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy and surgery, based on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. The study was conducted at the Kaiser Permanente Southern California system of 14 hospitals and associated clinics. A total of 862 patients with stage 2/3 rectal cancer diagnosed and treated between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016, were included in this study. The study involved neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival. A total of 348 stage 2 and 514 stage 3 patients were included; 660 patients (76.6%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Mean patient follow-up after surgery was 63.0 months (range, 3-160). Multivariable analysis showed that yp stage (HR for yp stage 2 = 4.74; yp stage 3 = 8.83) and en bloc resection (HR = 1.76) were the only variables that significantly predicted disease recurrence. Neither pretreatment tumor stage nor receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with recurrence-free survival. Log-rank testing failed to demonstrate significant recurrence-free survival improvement after receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy in any patient subgroup. The study was limited by selection bias attributed to the nature of a retrospective study without patient randomization or predefined treatment protocol. In stage 2/3 rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy and surgery, the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with decreased recurrence-free survival in the entire cohort or in any subgroup, whereas tumor response to chemoradiotherapy is closely associated with disease recurrence. These findings have important consequences for treatment and surveillance decisions for patients with rectal cancer. Presurgical efforts that maximize tumor downstaging, such as total neoadjuvant therapy, may produce better oncologic outcomes than traditional adjuvant chemotherapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B134. LA QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE NO MEJORA LA SOBREVIDA LIBRE DE RECURRENCIA EN PACIENTES CON CÁNCER DE RECTO ESTADÍOS II O III DESPUÉS DE RADIO-QUIMIOTERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE Y ESCISIÓN TOTAL DEL MESORRECTO: Las guías actuales para el tratamiento de cáncer rectal en estadio II-III localmente avanzado, recomiendan la radio-quimioterapia neoadyuvante con escisión total del mesorrecto seguidas de quimioterapia adyuvante. El beneficio oncológico de la quimioterapia adyuvante no ha sido demostrado de manera fehaciente.Evaluar la recurrencia y sobrevida a la enfermedad en pacientes con cáncer rectal que recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante después de radio-quimioterapia y escisión total del mesorrecto.Revisión retrospectiva de pacientes con cáncer rectal en estadios II-III después de radio-quimioterapia y cirugía, basada en la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante.Sistema Permanente de Kaiser Sur-Californiano de 14 hospitales y clínicas asociadas.862 pacientes con cáncer rectal en estadio II-III diagnosticados y tratados entre el 1 de Enero 2005 y el 31 de Diciembre 2016.Radio-quimioterapia neoadyuvante seguida de escisión total del mesorrecto +/- quimioterapia adyuvante.El objetivo primario fue la sobrevida libre de recurrencia.Fueron incluidos 348 pacientes en estadio II y 514 en estadio III. 660 pacientes (76,6%) se sometieron a quimioterapia adyuvante. El seguimiento medio de cada paciente después de la cirugía fué de 63.0 meses (rango, 3-160). El análisis multivariable mostró que la etapa yp (Cociente de riesgo para estadío yp II = 4.74 y estadío yp III = 8.83) y la resección en bloque (Cociente de riesgo = 1.76) fueron las únicas variables que predijeron significativamente la recurrencia de la enfermedad. Ni el estadío tumoral previo al tratamiento ni la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante se asociaron significativamente con la sobrevida libre de recurrencia. Las pruebas de rango logarítmico no pudieron demostrar una mejoría significativa de la sobrevida libre de recurrencia después de recibir quimioterapia adyuvante en cualquier subgrupo de pacientes.Sesgo de selección, debido al estudio retrospectivo sin aleatorización de los pacientes o protocolo de tratamiento predefinido.En casos de cáncer de recto estadíos II-III tratados con radio-quimioterapia y cirugía, la adición de quimioterapia adyuvante no se asoció con una disminución de la sobrevida libre de recurrencia en toda la cohorte o en ningún subgrupo, mientras que la respuesta tumoral a la radio-quimioterapia está estrechamente asociada con la recurrencia de la enfermedad. Estos hallazgos tienen consecuencias importantes en la decisión del tratamiento y la vigilancia en pacientes con cáncer de recto. Los esfuerzos pre-quirúrgicos que maximizan la reducción del tamaño del tumor, como la terapia neoadyuvante total, pueden producir mejores resultados oncológicos que la quimioterapia adyuvante tradicional. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B134.

[Supervivencia en cáncer de mama por subtipo mediante inmunohistoquímica: Un estudio retrospectivo].

Breast cancer subtype classification according to hormone receptors (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) using immunohistochemistry is the standard practice for therapeutic decision making. To design future studies information on characteristics and survival of each subtype is essential. We conducted a retrospective study to analyze clinical and pathologic features as well as survival data according to breast cancer immunohistochemistry subtype. There were 211 women with a RH(+)/HER2(-) breast cancer subtype, 53 HR(+)/HER2(+), 16 HER2(+) and 23 HR(-)/HER2(-), with a median overall survival in months of 39 (20.5-62.7), 42 (25.5-65), 42 (13.7-67.7) and 26 (11-78), respectively, for a 3.7 hazard ratio of death (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.3-10.3) for the triple negative group as compared to the HR(+)/HER2(-) group (p = 0.01). HR positive subtypes by immunohistochemistry where most frequent and showed a greater overall survival compared to the triple negative subtype.

Clinical Decision Support for High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer: A Real-World Study of Treatment Concordance and Survival.

Prognostic and pathologic risk factors typically guide clinicians and patients in their choice of surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy when managing high-risk stage II colon cancer. However, variations in treatment and outcomes in patients with stage II colon cancer remain. This study aimed to assess the survival benefits of treatments concordant with suggested therapeutic options from Watson for Oncology, a clinical decision support system. This is a retrospective observational study of concordance between actual treatment and Watson for Oncology therapeutic options. This study was conducted at a top-tier cancer center in China. Postoperative treatment data were retrieved from the electronic health records of 306 patients with high-risk stage II colon adenocarcinoma. The primary outcomes measured were the treatment patterns plus 3- and 5-year overall and disease-free survival for concordant and nonconcordant cases. Overall concordance was 90%. Most nonconcordant care resulted from adjuvant chemotherapy use (rather than surveillance) in patients with high-level microsatellite instability and ≥70 years old. No difference in overall survival (p = 0.56) or disease-free survival (p = 0.19) was observed between concordance groups. Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly higher 5-year overall survival than those undergoing surveillance (94% vs 84%, p = 0.01). This study was limited by the use of retrospective cases drawn from patients presenting for surgery, the lack of complete follow-up data for 58% of patients who could not be included in the analysis, and a survival analysis that assumes no unmeasured correlation between survival and censoring. Watson for Oncology produced therapeutic options highly concordant with human decisions at a top-tier cancer center in China. Treatment patterns suggest that Watson for Oncology may be able to guide clinicians to minimize overtreatment of patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer with chemotherapy. Survival analyses suggest the need for further investigation to specifically assess the association between surveillance, single-agent and multiagent chemotherapy, and survival outcomes in this population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B291. APOYO A LA DECISIÓN CLÍNICA DEL CÁNCER DE COLON EN ESTADIO II DE ALTO RIESGO: UN ESTUDIO DEL MUNDO REAL SOBRE LA CONCORDANCIA DEL TRATAMIENTO Y LA SUPERVIVENCIA: Los factores de riesgo pronósticos y patológicos generalmente guían a los médicos y pacientes en su elección de vigilancia o quimioterapia adyuvante cuando se trata el cáncer de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo. Sin embargo, las variaciones en el tratamiento y los resultados en pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio II permanecen.Evaluar los beneficios de supervivencia de los tratamientos concordantes con las opciones terapéuticas sugeridas por "Watson for Oncology" (Watson para la oncología), un sistema de apoyo a la decisión clínica.Estudio observacional retrospectivo de concordancia entre el tratamiento real y las opciones terapéuticas de Watson para oncología.Un centro oncológico de primer nivel en China.Datos de tratamiento postoperatorio de registros de salud electrónicos de 306 pacientes con adenocarcinoma de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo.Patrones de tratamiento más supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad a 3 y 5 años para casos concordantes y no concordantes.La concordancia general fue del 90%. La mayoría de la atención no concordante resultó del uso de quimioterapia adyuvante (en lugar de vigilancia) en pacientes de alto nivel con inestabilidad de microsatélites y pacientes ≥70 años. No se observaron diferencias en la supervivencia global (p = 0,56) o la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (p = 0,19) entre los grupos de concordancia. Los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante tuvieron una supervivencia global a los 5 años significativamente más alta que los que fueron sometidos a vigilancia (94% frente a 84%, p = 0,01).Uso de casos retrospectivos extraídos de pacientes que se presentan para cirugía, falta de datos de seguimiento completos para el 58% de los pacientes que no pudieron ser incluidos en el análisis, y análisis de supervivencia que asume que no exite una correlación no medida entre supervivencia y censura.Watson para Oncología produjo opciones terapéuticas altamente concordantes con las decisiones humanas en un centro oncológico de primer nivel en China. Los patrones de tratamiento sugieren que Watson para Oncología puede guiar a los médicos para minimizar el sobretratamiento de pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo con quimioterapia. Los análisis de supervivencia sugieren la necesidad de realizar mas investigaciónes para evaluar específicamente la asociación entre la vigilancia, la quimioterapia con uno solo o múltiples agentes y los resultados de supervivencia en esta población. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B291. (Traducción-Dr. Gonzalo Hagerman).

[Effectiveness of adjuvant radiotherapy in the conservative treatment of early breast cancer].

Randomized study was made of 254 women with breast invasive duct cancer (pT1N0M0). In 61 patients, organ sparing operation was followed by radiation therapy of either breast alone or zones of regional metastasizing (57 patients) as well, with or without adjuvant chemotherapy or hormone therapy (tamoxifen). It was found that radiation of mammary gland, with or without additional radiation exposure of zones of regional metastasizing, results in both decrease recurrence development (p < 0.05) and significant (p < 0.05) increase in recurrence-free survival in women who had tumor size within the range from 1 to 2 cm in diameter in contrast to patients with tumor size not exceeding 1 cm, whose survival was not positively influenced by radiation.

Perineural Invasion Is a Prognostic but not a Predictive Factor in Nonmetastatic Colon Cancer.

Perineural invasion is associated with adverse oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer. However, data regarding the prognostic and predictive impact in colon cancer are scarce. This study aims to clarify the role of perineural invasion in patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer. This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. This study took place at a tertiary medical center. Patients with stage I to III colon cancer who underwent elective surgery at our tertiary center between 2004 and 2015 (n = 1145) were included. The primary long-term outcomes include disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival. Differences were determined by multivariate Cox regression models adjusted for stage and potential confounders. Perineural invasion was identified in 215 patients (18.8%) and associated with emergency procedures, male sex, and advanced disease. Histopathological features including lymphatic and extramural vascular invasion, poor differentiation, and infiltrating tumor borders were correlated with perineural invasion. Compared with patients with perineural invasion-negative tumors, patients who had perineural invasion-positive tumors had worse disease-free, overall, and disease-specific survival (all p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with perineural invasion-positive node-negative disease had worse overall survival than patients with perineural invasion-negative node-positive disease (p < 0.001). After adjustment, perineural invasion remained significantly associated with worse disease-free survival (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.03-2.03; p = 0.033), worse overall survival (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.33-2.31; p < 0.001), and worse disease-specific survival (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.00-2.30; p = 0.048). However, we did not find a significant predictive response with adjuvant chemotherapy in perineural invasion-positive node-negative tumors (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 0.80-5.51; p = 0.122). The predictive value was only demonstrated in stage III disease with a significant impaired overall survival in patients with perineural invasion-positive tumors who did not receive adjuvant therapy (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13-0.40; p < 0.001). This study was limited by its retrospective design. Our study confirms the prognostic value of perineural invasion in stage I to II and III colon cancer. However, patients with node-negative disease and perineural invasion did not significantly benefit from adjuvant therapy. More information regarding postoperative treatment in node-negative perineural invasion-positive colon cancer is required. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A988. LA INVASIÓN PERINEURAL COMO FACTOR PRONÓSTICO NO PREDICTIVO EN EL CÁNCER DE COLON NO METASTÁSICO: La invasión perineural se encuentra asociada a resultados oncológicos adversos en casos de cáncer colorrectal. Sin embargo, los datos sobre el impacto pronóstico y predictivo en caso de cáncer de colon son pocos. Definir el papel de la invasión perineural en pacientes con cáncer de colon no metastásico. DISEÑO:: Revisión retrospectiva de una base de datos alimentada prospectivamente. Centro hospitalario de atención terciaria. Todos aquellos portadores de un cáncer de colon estadío I-III que se sometieron a cirugía electiva en nuestro centro entre 2004-2015 (n = 1145). Los resultados a largo plazo incluyeron la supervivencia sin enfermedad, la supervivencia específica de la enfermedad y la supervivencia general. Las diferencias se determinaron mediante modelos de regresión multivariantes de Cox, ajustados para el control de factores de confusión durante el análisis por estratificación. La invasión perineural fué identificada en 215 pacientes (18.8%) y se la asoció con procedimientos de emergencia, al género masculino y a la enfermedad avanzada. Las características histopatológicas que incluyeron la invasión vascular linfática y extramural, la diferenciación deficiente y los bordes tumorales infiltrantes se correlacionaron con la invasión perineural. Comparativamente con los tumores sin invasión perineural, los pacientes positivos a la invasión perineural tuvieron una peor supervivencia general, libre y específica de la enfermedad (todos p < 0.001). Asimismo, aquellos pacientes con invasion-perineural con ganglios negativos tuvieron una supervivencia global mucho peor que aquellos pacientes con ganglios positivos e invasión perineural negativa (p < 0.001). Después del ajuste, la invasión perineural se asoció significativamente con una peor supervivencia sin la enfermedad (HR, 1.45; IC 95%, 1.03-2.03; p = 0.033), supervivencia general (HR, 1.75; IC 95%, 1.33-2.31; p <0.001), así como con una peor supervivencia específica de la enfermedad (HR, 1.52; IC 95%, 1.00-2.30; p = 0.048). Sin embargo, no encontramos una respuesta predictiva significativa con quimioterapia adyuvante en los tumores acompañados de invasion-perineural con ganglios negativos (HR, 2.10; IC del 95%, 0.80-5.51; p = 0.122). El valor predictivo solo fué demostrado en aquellos casos de estadio III con un deterioro significativo de la supervivencia global en pacientes con tumores perineurales positivos a la invasión y que no recibieron tratamiento adyuvante (HR, 0.23; IC 95%, 0.13-0.40; p < 0.001). Diseño retrospectivo. CONCLUSIÓN:: Nuestros resultados confirman el valor pronóstico de la invasión perineural en el cáncer de colon estadios I-II y III. Sin embargo, los pacientes con enfermedad ganglionar negativa e invasión perineural no se beneficiaron significativamente de la terapia adyuvante. Se requiere más información sobre el tratamiento postoperatorio en el cáncer de colon positivo para la invasión perineural con ganglios negativos. Vea el Resumen del video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/A988.

[Adjuvant treatments of early breast cancer without lymph node involvement].

Lymph node status remains the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer. However, only 70% of the node negative breast cancer patients are alive at 10 years. Several randomized trials have shown that systemic adjuvant therapy, either chemo or hormonotherapy, increases survival in these patients. A recent meta-analysis confirms these findings. In 1992, a consensus conference recommended no therapy in low risk patients (tumor size less than 1 cm), tamoxifen in good risk patients (tumor less than 2 cm, oestrogen or progesterone receptors positive, well differentiated) and chemotherapy in premenopausal or hormonotherapy in postmenopausal high risk patients (receptor-negative less than 1 cm tumor or high pathological grade).

A Population-Based Cohort Study of Venous Thromboembolism Rates Following Surgery and During Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Colon Cancer.

There is an elevated risk of venous thromboembolism in patients treated for colon cancer. Postoperative venous thromboembolism has been studied previously, but no large study has compared the risks during different stages of treatment. This study aimed to quantify and compare the risks of venous thromboembolism before surgery, after surgery, during adjuvant chemotherapy, and up to 365 days after surgery among patients with resected colon cancer. This is a population-based retrospective cohort study. This study was conducted in a single-payer, universal health care setting (Ontario) between 2002 and 2008. A total of 6806 patients with stage I to III colon cancer treated with surgical resection were included. Phases of treatment were evaluated, including preoperative, in-hospital, postoperative, during adjuvant chemotherapy, and 365 days postoperatively. Venous thromboembolism, as defined using diagnostic codes from administrative data sources, was the primary outcome measured. Of the 6806 patients included, 327 (5%) developed venous thromboembolism. Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had a higher risk versus surgery-alone patients (6% vs 4%, p < 0.001). Of the 327 who developed venous thromboembolism, 32% (1.6% overall) were diagnosed during hospital admission and 13.5% (0.6% overall) were diagnosed between discharge and 30 days after surgery. The majority of venous thromboembolisms diagnosed in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (53%, 3.1% of all patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy) were diagnosed within 180 days of starting adjuvant chemotherapy. Venous thromboembolism was an independent risk factor for worse 5-year overall survival (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.43-1.91; p < 0.001). This study was limited by the potential for misclassification of venous thromboembolism and unknown compliance with prophylaxis recommendations. Patients who undergo treatment for stage I to III colon cancer are at considerable risk of developing venous thromboembolism. The risk is elevated in those who require adjuvant chemotherapy, and venous thromboembolism is associated with worse long-term outcomes. There may be a role of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during all phases of treatment, including both after surgery and during adjuvant chemotherapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B123. UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE POBLACIONAL DE LAS TASAS DE TROMBOEMBOLISMO VENOSO DESPUÉS DE CIRUGÍA Y DURANTE QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE EN PACIENTES CON CÁNCER DE COLON: Existe un riesgo elevado de tromboembolismo venoso en pacientes tratados por cáncer de colon. El tromboembolismo venoso postoperatorio se ha estudiado previamente, pero ningún estudio grande ha comparado los riesgos durante las diferentes etapas del tratamiento.Cuantificar y comparar los riesgos de tromboembolismo venoso antes de la cirugía, después de la cirugía, durante quimioterapia adyuvante y hasta 365 días después de cirugía en pacientes con cáncer de colon resecado.Estudio retrospectivo de cohorte poblacional.Escenario de atención médica universal con pagador único (Ontario) entre 2002-2008.6,806 pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio I-III tratados con resección quirúrgica.Fase de tratamiento, incluyendo preoperatorio, hospitalización, postoperatorio, durante quimioterapia adyuvante y 365 días después de la operación.Tromboembolismo venoso, tal como se define utilizando códigos de diagnóstico de fuentes de datos administrativos.Se incluyeron 6,806 pacientes, con 327 (5%) que desarrollaron tromboembolismo venoso. Los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante tuvieron un mayor riesgo en comparación con los pacientes con cirugía solamente (6% vs 4%, p <0.001). De los 327 que desarrollaron tromboembolismo venoso, 32% (1.6% en general) fueron diagnosticados durante el ingreso hospitalario y 13.5% (0.6% en general) fueron diagnosticados entre el alta y 30 días después de la cirugía. La mayoría de los tromboembolismos venosos diagnosticados en pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante (53%, 3.1% de todos los pacientes con quimioterapia adyuvante) fueron diagnosticados dentro de los 180 días de comenzar la quimioterapia adyuvante. El tromboembolismo venoso fue un factor de riesgo independiente para una peor supervivencia general a 5 años (Hazard Ratio (cociente de riesgo) 1.65, IC 95% 1.43-1.91, p <0.001).Potencial de clasificación errónea del tromboembolismo venoso, cumplimiento desconocido de las recomendaciones de profilaxis.Los pacientes que se someten a tratamiento para el cáncer de colon en estadio I-III tienen un riesgo considerable de desarrollar tromboembolismo venoso. El riesgo es elevado en aquellos que requieren quimioterapia adyuvante y el tromboembolismo venoso se asocia con peores resultados a largo plazo. La profilaxis del tromboembolismo venoso puede desempeñar un papel durante todas las fases del tratamiento, incluyendo tanto el periodo posquirúrgico como durante la quimioterapia adyuvante. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B123.

[Results of 10 years of a randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers larger than 3 cm].

The aim of this randomised trial was to determine advantages and drawbacks of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancers > 3 cm. Two hundred and seventy-two women (age 70) with operable breast cancers larger than 3 cm (T2-3/N0-1/M0) were included in a randomised trial from January 1, 1985 to April 30, 1989. Patients in group A (n = 138) were treated by mastectomy and axillary node dissection. Adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated for 104 patients with axillary node involvement (n = 82) or negative oestrogen and progesterone receptors (EPR-) (n = 22). Patients in group B (n = 134) were treated by initial chemotherapy (identical as in group A) followed by locoregional treatment according to the response. Before treatment, the average of clinical tumoural diameter was 43 mm. The median follow-up was 124 months. In group B, 49 patients (36.5%) were resistant to chemotherapy; a conservative breast surgical treatment was performed in the other 84 patients sensitive to chemotherapy (62.6%). In this last subgroup, 19 (22.6%) needed a secondary mastectomy because of locoregional recurrence. Survival rates were not different in groups A and B, but loco-regional recurrences were frequent in group B. At 10 years, the overall survival rate was 60% and half of living patients in group B were free of cancer and with their breast. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy permitted in two-thirds of cases breast conservation treatment, initially considered to be impossible. Locoregional recurrences are more frequent than after mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Differential Survival Benefits of 5-Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Microsatellite-Stable Stage III Colorectal Cancer According to the Tumor Budding Status: A Retrospective Analysis.

Recent research has established tumor budding as a prognostic factor and a possible histomorphologic reflection of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer, highlighting the ability of cancer cells exhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition to resist chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the tumor budding status in microsatellite-stable stage III colorectal cancer. This was a retrospective study of 2 cohorts. The study was conducted at the National Defense Medical College in Japan. We reviewed 2 data sets of patients with microsatellite-stable stage III colorectal cancer with curatively intended surgery (R0) from 1999 to 2005 (first cohort; n = 203) and 2006 to 2012 (second cohort; n = 346). In both cohorts, 128 and 203 patients received 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and 75 and 143 patients did not. We assessed the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the grades of tumor budding based on the cancer-specific survival. In low-budding tumors, the chemotherapy group exhibited better cancer-specific survival than the surgery-alone group (first cohort, 93.1% vs 65.5%, p = 0.001; second cohort, 94.0% vs 76.0%, p < 0.0001). Conversely, the prognostic difference between the chemotherapy and surgery-alone groups was statistically insignificant in high-budding tumors (first cohort, 59.7% vs 52.4%, p = 0.57; second cohort, 83.1% vs 75.6%, p = 0.19). The multivariate analysis corroborated the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in low-budding tumors (first cohort, p = 0.002, HR = 0.28; second cohort, p < 0.0001, HR = 0.23) but not in high-budding tumors. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and treatments for recurrence were not homogeneous, and the patient backgrounds differed between the chemotherapy and surgery alone groups. The high-budding group demonstrated resistance to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, whereas the low-budding group exhibited significant survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colorectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B14. BENEFICIOS DE SUPERVIVENCIA DIFERENCIAL DE LA QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE BASADA EN 5-FLUOROURACILO PARA PACIENTES CON CÁNCER COLORRECTAL EN ESTADIO III ESTABLE CON MICROSATÉLITE SEGÚN EL ESTADO DE BROTACIÓN DEL TUMOR: UN ANÁLISIS RETROSPECTIVO:: Investigaciones recientes han establecido la aparición de tumores como un factor pronóstico y una posible reflexión histomorfológica de la transición epitelial-mesenquimatosa en el cáncer colorrectal, destacando la capacidad de las células cancerosas que presentan una transición epitelio-mesenquimática para resistir la quimioterapia.El objetivo de este estudio es investigar los beneficios clínicos de la quimioterapia adyuvante según el estado de brotación del tumor en el cáncer colorrectal en estadio III estable con microsatélite.Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de dos cohortes.El estudio se realizó en la Escuela de Medicina de la Defensa Nacional de Japón.Revisamos dos conjuntos de datos de pacientes con cáncer colorrectal en estadio III estable con microsatélite con cirugía de intención curativa (R0) de 1999 a 2005 (primera cohorte; n = 203) y 2006 a 2012 (segunda cohorte; n = 346). En ambas cohortes, 128 y 203 pacientes recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante basada en 5-fluorouracilo y 75 y 143 pacientes no, respectivamente.Evaluamos los beneficios de la quimioterapia adyuvante de acuerdo con los grados de brotación del tumor en función de la supervivencia específica del cáncer.n los tumores con brotes bajos, el grupo de quimioterapia mostró una mejor supervivencia específica al cáncer que el grupo con cirugía sola (primera cohorte, 93.1% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.001; segunda cohorte, 94.0% vs. 76.0%, p < 0.0001). A la inversa, la diferencia pronóstica entre los grupos de quimioterapia y cirugía sola fue estadísticamente insignificante en los tumores de brotes elevados (primera cohorte, 59.7% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.57; segunda cohorte, 83.1% vs. 75.6%, p = 0.19). El análisis multivariado corroboró los beneficios de la quimioterapia adyuvante en los tumores de brotes bajos (primera cohorte, p = 0,002, índice de riesgo: 0,28; segundo cohorte, p <0,0001, índice de riesgo: 0,23) pero no en los tumores de alto brote.a quimioterapia adyuvante postoperatoria y los tratamientos para la recurrencia no fueron homogéneos, y los antecedentes de los pacientes difirieron entre los grupos de quimioterapia y cirugía sola.El grupo de alto brote demostró resistencia a la quimioterapia basada en 5-fluorouracilo, mientras que el grupo de bajo brote mostró beneficios significativos de supervivencia de la quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer colorrectal en estadio III. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B14.

[Small HER2-positive breast cancer: which prognosis and which adjuvant treatment?].

Incidence of centimetric or infracentimetric node negative (pT1a-b, N0) breast cancer is increasing due to screening procedures. Although considered as having an overall favorable prognosis, several retrospective studies have suggested a higher risk of relapse when HER2 is overexpressed. Since randomized studies evaluating trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting did not include T1a-bN0, there is no level I evidence supporting the administration of a trastuzumab-based post-operative chemotherapy in these cases. However, some recent retrospective data suggest a benefit for such a strategy and current guidelines recommend to consider adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab in pT1bN0. The final decision, as well as the nature of cytotoxics to be administered in combination with trastuzumab, require a careful evaluation of the benefit/risk ratio in order to minimize the risk of toxic events, notably at the cardiac level.

Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol Is Associated With On-Time Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer.

Delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy negatively impacts long-term survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Colorectal enhanced recovery protocols result in decreased complications and length of stay; however, the impact of enhanced recovery on the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unknown. This study aimed to identify factors associated with on-time delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy after colorectal cancer surgery, hypothesizing that implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol would result in more patients receiving on-time chemotherapy. This was a retrospective cohort study comparing the rate of on-time adjuvant chemotherapy delivery after colorectal cancer resection before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. The study was conducted at a large academic medical center. All of the patients who underwent nonemergent colorectal cancer resections for curative intent from January 2010 to June 2017, excluding patients who had no indication for adjuvant chemotherapy, had received preoperative systemic chemotherapy, or did not have medical oncology records available were included. Patients before and enhanced recovery were compared, with the rate of on-time adjuvant chemotherapy delivery as the primary outcome. Adjuvant chemotherapy delivery was considered on time if initiated ≤8 weeks postoperatively, and treatment was considered delayed or omitted if initiated >8 weeks postoperatively (delayed) or never received (omitted). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of on-time chemotherapy delivery. A total of 363 patients met inclusion criteria, with 189 patients (52.1%) undergoing surgery after enhanced recovery implementation. Groups differed in laparoscopic approach and median procedure duration, both of which were higher after enhanced recovery. Significantly more patients received on-time chemotherapy after enhanced recovery implementation (p = 0.007). Enhanced recovery was an independent predictor of on-time adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.014). The study was limited by its retrospective and nonrandomized before-and-after design. Enhanced recovery was associated with receiving on-time adjuvant chemotherapy. As prompt initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in colorectal cancer, future investigation of long-term oncologic outcomes is necessary to evaluate the potential impact of enhanced recovery on survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B21. LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE UN PROTOCOLO DE RECUPERACIÓN ACELERADA SE ASOCIA CON EL INICIO A TIEMPO DE QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE EN CÁNCER COLORRECTAL:: El inicio tardío de la quimioterapia adyuvante afecta negativamente la supervivencia a largo plazo en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal. Los protocolos de recuperación acelerada colorrectales dan lugar a una disminución de las complicaciones y la duración de estancia hospitalaria; sin embargo, el impacto de la recuperación acelerada en el momento de inicio de quimioterapia adyuvante sigue siendo desconocido.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar los factores asociados con la administración a tiempo de la quimioterapia adyuvante después de la cirugía de cáncer colorrectal, con la hipótesis de que la implementación de un protocolo de recuperación acelerada daría lugar a que más pacientes reciban quimioterapia a tiempo.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que compara la tasa de administración de quimioterapia adyuvante a tiempo después de la resección del cáncer colorrectal antes y después de la implementación de un protocolo de recuperación acelerada.Centro médico académico grande.Todos los pacientes que se sometieron a resecciones de cáncer colorrectal no emergentes con intención curativa desde enero de 2010 hasta junio de 2017, excluyendo a los pacientes que no tenían indicación de quimioterapia adyuvante, que recibieron quimioterapia sistémica preoperatoria o no tenían registros médicos de oncología disponibles.Los pacientes se compararon antes y después de la implementación de la recuperación acelerada, con la tasa de administración de quimioterapia adyuvante a tiempo como el resultado primario. La administración de quimioterapia adyuvante se consideró a tiempo si se inició ≤8 semanas después de la operación, y el tratamiento se consideró retrasado / omitido si se inició> 8 semanas después de la operación (retrasado) o nunca fue recibido (omitido). La regresión logística multivariable identificó predictores de administración de quimioterapia a tiempo.363 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión, con 189 (52.1%) pacientes sometidos a cirugía después de la implementación de recuperación acelerada. Los grupos difirieron en el abordaje laparoscópico y la duración media del procedimiento; ambos factores fueron mayores después de la recuperación acelerada. Significativamente más pacientes recibieron quimioterapia a tiempo después de la implementación de recuperación acelerada (p = 0.007). La recuperación acelerada fue un factor predictivo independiente de quimioterapia adyuvante a tiempo (p = 0.014).Diseño retrospectivo, tipo ¨antes y después¨ no aleatorizado.La recuperación acelerada se asoció con la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante a tiempo. Debido a que el inicio rápido de la quimioterapia adyuvante mejora la supervivencia en el cáncer colorrectal, en el futuro será necesario investigar los resultados oncológicos a largo plazo para evaluar el impacto potencial de la recuperación acelerada en la supervivencia. Vea el Resumen en Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B21.

[Impact of taxanes in the adjuvant setting of node-negative breast cancers].

The use of regimens with adjuvant taxanes reduces the risk of recurrence and improves survival in patients with node-positive breast cancer, but the use of taxanes in node-negative breast cancer is still to be defined. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of taxanes in high-risk node-negative breast cancer. Two categories of studies were reviewed: studies that evaluated both node-positive and node-negative breast cancers, and studies that included only high-risk node-negative breast cancers. Three phase-III studies that evaluated both negative and positive nodes did not show any benefit of the use of taxanes according to the node-negative subgroup analyses, versus two studies (European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer [ECTO] et Grupo Español de Investigación del Cáncer de Mama [GEICAM]) that showed a significant difference in disease-free survival. In view of these studies, the role of taxanes in node-negative breast cancer is still controversial and the results of the ongoing trials may respond to this subject.

Patient Survival With ypT0N+ Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer.

After neoadjuvant therapy, pathologic analysis of rectal cancer resected specimens may show a complete response in the primary tissue cancer with residual tumor in the lymph nodes (ypT0N+). The aim of this study was to describe the 5-year overall survival and factors associated with survival of ypT0N+ patients with rectal cancer who had neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and to compare these patients' survival with patients in other pathologic categories. We conducted a retrospective analysis. We used the National Cancer Database. We identified patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery between 2006 and 2016. Besides ypT0N+, 5 pathologic categories were identified: ypT0N0, ypT1-2N0, ypT3-4N0, ypT1-2N+, and ypT3-4N+. The primary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival. We included 30,751 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. A total of 342 patients developed ypT0N+, of whom 181 (52.9%) received total neoadjuvant therapy. Among patients who received total neoadjuvant therapy, developing ypT0N+ was associated with a lower 5-year overall survival than ypT0N0 and ypT1-2N0. However, ypT0N+ disease was associated with a higher 5-year overall survival than ypT3-4N+. There were no differences in 5-year overall survival between ypT0N+ and ypT3-4N0 or ypT1-2N+. Similar findings were noticed among patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with ypT0N+, older age, male gender, and higher number of positive lymph nodes were all associated with a decrease in the overall survival. Limitations include the retrospective nature of this study, lack of variables describing the chemotherapy and radiation regimens used, and paucity of data on disease-specific survival or recurrence. Developing ypT0N+ was associated with a lower 5-year overall survival than ypT0N0 and ypT1-2N0. However, it was associated with a higher 5-year overall survival than ypT3-4N+. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B863 . ANTECEDENTES:Después del tratamiento neoadyuvante en el cáncer de recto bajo, el análisis patológico de la pieza operatoria resecada, puede mostrar una respuesta patológica completa del tumor primario pero con tumor residual en los ganglios linfáticos (ypT0N+).OBJETIVOS:Describir la sobrevida general a 5 años y los factores asociados con la sobrevida de los pacientes ypT0N+ con cáncer de recto, que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante seguida de cirugía y comparar la sobrevida de estos pacientes con la de pacientes con otros estadios patológicos.DISEÑO:Realizamos un análisis retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Utilizamos la base de datos nacional del cáncer.PACIENTES:Identificamos pacientes con adenocarcinoma de recto que se sometieron a terapia neoadyuvante total, seguida de cirugía entre 2006 y 2016. Además de ypT0N +, se identificaron 5 categorías patológicas: ypT0N0, ypT1-2N0, ypT3-4N0, ypT1-2N+, e ypT3-4N+.PRINCIPAL MEDIDA DE RESULTADO:La medida de resultado principal fue la supervivencia general a 5 años.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 30.751 pacientes con adenocarcinoma de recto. Un total de 342 pacientes desarrollaron ypT0N+, de los cuales 181 (52,9%) recibieron terapia neoadyuvante total. Entre los pacientes que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante total, el desarrollo de ypT0N+ se asoció con una supervivencia general a 5 años más baja que ypT0N0 e ypT1-2N0. Sin embargo, la enfermedad ypT0N+ se asoció con una supervivencia general a 5 años más alta que ypT3-4N+. No hubo diferencias en la supervivencia global a 5 años entre ypT0N+ y ypT3-4N0 o ypT1-2N+. Se observaron hallazgos similares entre los pacientes que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante y quimioterapia adyuvante. Para los pacientes con ypT0N+, la edad avanzada, el sexo masculino y un mayor número de ganglios linfáticos positivos se asociaron con una disminución en la supervivencia general.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones incluyen la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio, la falta de variables que describan los regímenes de quimioterapia y radiación utilizados y la escasez de datos sobre la supervivencia o la recurrencia específicas de la enfermedad.CONCLUSIONES:El desarrollo de ypT0N+ se asoció con una supervivencia general a 5 años más baja que ypT0N0 e ypT1-2N0. Sin embargo, se asoció con una supervivencia global a 5 años más alta que ypT3-4N+. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B863 . (Traducción-Dr. Rodrigo Azolas ).

[Modulation of indications of adjuvant hormone therapy with tamoxifen in T1T2/N0N1 breast cancers. Preliminary results of a multicenter study with 695 cases].

From 1982 to 1990, patients less than 75 years, without any previous or synchonous carcinoma, suffering from an invasive breast cancer classified as T1T2/N0N1/MO according to clinical TNM staging, were enrolled in this study; 82.4% underwent a breast conservative procedure and 17.2% a modified radical mastectomy followed by a postoperative irradiation. Histological axillary lymph node status, Scarff-Bloom grade and/or cytological grade, estradiol receptor content, were used to define three groups of patients. The breakdown of patients is not well balanced: 416 women were included in group I (N-, grade I II, ER+) when there was no adjuvant medical treatment, 110 in group II (N-, grade III, ER+), 169 in group III (N+ < or = 3, grade I II, ER+). Patients from the latter two groups were receiving tamoxifene, 20 mg per day for 2 years; Those women not menopaused received first a pelvic irradiation. With a median follow-up of 35 months (1-138) the overall survival is respectively for the three groups 95%, 96%, 96% (P = 0.5) and the disease free survival 86%, 93%, 90% (P = 0.1). The actuarial local regional remission rate is 94%, 97%, 99% (P = 0.07). Such results need to be updated with a longer follow-up, but they show the ability of adjuvant hormonotherapy to tailor the short term survival thanks to prognostic factors.

José Antonio Gurriarán

La Bomba." Primer libro de Gurriarán sobre la cuestión armenia publicado por Editorial Planeta en 1982, año y medio después del atentado por bomba que sufrió en la Plaza España de Madrid. Es un relato biográfico y directo del autor, en el que vierte pensamientos y sensaciones, miedos y esperanzas desde aquella noche del 29 de diciembre de 1980 en la que una potente carga explosiva, colocada por nacionalistas armenios del ESALA (Ejército Secreto para la Liberación de Armenia), contra unas líneas aéreas, le dejó malherido. Es la búsqueda incesante de los porqués de este atentado, la investigación y reconstrucción de los hechos por parte de quien siempre militó en las filas del pacisfismo y era devoto de Gandhi, Lhuter King y Lanza del Vasto. El autor logró reunirse en Líbano con los autores del atentado, y con dirigentes del ESALA. En 2011 Sirar Ediciones publica el libro en armenio. En 2015 se edita en francés (Editorial Thadée). Este mismo año y con motivo del 100 aniversario del

Anal Adenocarcinoma: A Rare Entity in Need of Multidisciplinary Management.

Anal adenocarcinoma is a rare clinical entity for which the optimal management is not defined. This study aimed to describe the multidisciplinary management and outcomes of patients with anal adenocarcinoma. This is a retrospective cohort study. This study was conducted at a quaternary cancer center. Men and women with anal adenocarcinoma treated between 1995 and 2016 were selected. Fifty-two patients were treated with either chemoradiotherapy or trimodality therapy including radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgical resection. Local failure, regional failure, and distant metastasis rates were estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival and overall survival. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the clinical predictors of outcome. There was a higher 5-year rate of local failure in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy compared with trimodality therapy (53% vs 10%; p < 0.01). The 5-year incidence of distant metastases was 29% (trimodality therapy) versus 30% (chemoradiotherapy; p = 0.9); adjuvant chemotherapy did not reduce the incidence of distant metastases (p = 0.8). Five-year overall survival was 73% (trimodality therapy) versus 49.4% (chemoradiotherapy; p = 0.1). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with worse overall survival were treatment with chemoradiotherapy, cT3-4 category disease, and node-positive disease. This study is limited by its small sample size and retrospective nature. Although treatment may continue to be tailored to individual patients, better outcomes with a trimodality therapy approach were observed. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B708.ADENOCARCINOMA ANAL: UNA ENTIDAD POCO FRECUENTE EN NECESIDAD DE UN MANEJO MULTIDISCIPLINARIO. El adenocarcinoma anal es una entidad clínica poco frecuente por lo que aún no se define el manejo óptimo. Describir el manejo multidisciplinario y los resultados de los pacientes con adenocarcinoma anal. Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. Centro de cáncer cuaternario. Hombres y mujeres con adenocarcinoma anal tratados entre 1995 y 2016. Cincuenta y dos pacientes fueron tratados con quimiorradioterapia o terapia trimodal que incluyó: radioterapia, quimioterapia y resección quirúrgica. Se estimaron las tasas de falla local, falla regional y metástasis a distancia mediante el método de incidencia acumulada. Se utilizó el método de Kaplan-Meier para estimar la supervivencia libre de progresión y la supervivencia global. Los riesgos proporcionales de multivariable Cox se utilizaron para evaluar los predictores clínicos de los resultados. Hubo una mayor tasa de falla local a cinco años en pacientes tratados con quimiorradioterapia en comparación con terapia trimodal (53% vs 10%; p < 0,01). La incidencia a cinco años de metástasis a distancia fue del 29% (terapia trimodal) versus 30% (quimiorradioterapia) (p = 0,9); la quimioterapia adyuvante no redujo la incidencia de metástasis a distancia (p = 0,8). La supervivencia global a cinco años fue del 73% (terapia trimodal) versus 49,4% (quimiorradioterapia); p = 0,1. En el análisis multivariable, los factores asociados con una peor supervivencia general fueron el tratamiento con quimiorradioterapia, enfermedad de categoría cT3-4 y enfermedad con ganglios positivos. Este estudio está limitado por su pequeño tamaño de muestra y su naturaleza retrospectiva. Aunque el tratamiento puede seguir adaptándose a pacientes individuales, se observaron mejores resultados con un enfoque TTM. Conslute Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B708. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

[Epirubicina neoadyuvante con o sin docetaxel secuencial en el tratamiento del cáncer de mama avanzado: evaluación de la respuesta patológica completa y tolerabilidad de la quimioterapia].

To assess the pathological complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) with anthracyclines with or without taxanes in management of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Patients with LABC were included. A cohort received four cycles of 5-fluorouracil [FEC] (FEC 500 mg/m<sup2</sup, epirubicin 75 mg/m<sup2</sup, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m<sup2</sup) every 3 weeks followed by four cycles of docetaxel (D) 75 mg/m<sup2</sup as 1 h infusion intravenous every 3 weeks. Another cohort received six cycles of FE100C (500, 100 and 600 mg/m<sup2</sup). The chemotherapy was followed by surgery and radiotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference in overall response rate (ORR) (ORR: 78.5 vs. 85%; p = 0.299) and clinical complete response (cCR) (c CR: 20.6 vs. 33.3%; p = 0.103) for 4FEC→4D compared to 6FE100C, respectively. Instead, there was a statistically significant improved rate of pCR (30.2 vs. 16.7%; p = 0.049) and negative axillary lymph nodes (51.6 vs. 35%; p = 0.03) for 4FEC→4D compared to 6FE100C, respectively. Serious toxicity was low and non-significant in both cohorts. The logistic regression multivariate models showed that main significant predictors to obtain a pCR were 4FEC→4D NC (odds ratio [OR]: 2.7; p = 0.019) and stage IIIA (OR: 3.8; p = 0.002). This study showed that 4FEC→4D regimen with conventional dose is highly active and well tolerated in patients with LABC in our hospital.

Age Determines Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use in Resected Stage II Colon Cancer.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage II colon cancer remains controversial. Treatment recommendations rely largely on the presence of certain high-risk features for recurrence. We sought to define patient and clinicopathologic differences between early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer and determine whether these differences impact treatment. We hypothesized that high-risk features in stage II colorectal cancer differed between age groups and would most strongly influence administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. This was a retrospective cohort study. The study was conducted at a Commission on Cancer designated hospital as well as the National Cancer Institute Intramural Research Program. Patients with resected stage II colon cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database, and clinicopathologic characteristics were recorded. Patients were stratified into young (≤45), middle-aged (50-75), and older (>75) age groups. Incidence of high-risk clinicopathologic features and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were measured. A total of 14,966 patients met inclusion criteria. Young patients were found to have had at least one high-risk feature ( n = 489, 44%) slightly more often than both middle-aged ( n = 3734, 40%) and older patients ( n = 1890, 42%). A total of 332 (7%) older patients received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to 627 (56%) young patients and 2854 (30%) middle-aged patients. Age group was independently associated with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy when controlling for relevant clinicopathologic factors. This was a retrospective study without granular detail on treatment decisions. Young patients are frequently prescribed adjuvant chemotherapy for both high- and low-risk tumors despite questionable benefit in the latter. Older patients rarely receive adjuvant therapy. Both medical and surgical oncologists should be aware of disparities in cancer treatment and remain conscientious about making treatment decisions solely based on age. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B846 . ANTECEDENTES:El papel de la quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de colon resecado en estadio II sigue siendo controversial . Las recobmendaciones para el tratamiento dependen en gran medida de la presencia de ciertas características de alto riesgo de recurrencia.OBJETIVO:Buscamos definir las diferencias clínico-patológicas del paciente entre el CCR de inicio temprano y tardío; y determinar si estas diferencias afectan el tratamiento. Hipotetizamos que las características de alto riesgo del cáncer colorrectal en estadio II difieren entre los grupos de edad y que influyen fuertemente en la administración de quimioterapia adyuvante.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un hospital designado por la Comisión sobre el Cáncer, así como el Programa de Investigación Intramural del Instituto Nacional del Cáncer.PACIENTES:Se identificaron los pacientes con cáncer de colon resecado en estadio II en la Base de datos nacional del cáncer y se registraron las características clínico-patológicas. Los pacientes se estratificaron en grupos de edad jóvenes (≤45), de mediana edad (50-75) y mayores (> 75).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se estudiaron la incidencia de las características clínico-patológicas de alto riesgo y la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante.RESULTADOS:Un total de 14.966 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Se encontró que los pacientes jóvenes tenían al menos una característica de alto riesgo (n = 489, 44%) un poco más frecuente que los pacientes de mediana edad (n = 3734, 40%) y los pacientes mayores (n = 1890, 42%). Un total de 332 (7%) de los pacientes mayores recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante en comparación con 627 (56%) de los pacientes jóvenes y 2854 (30%) de los pacientes de mediana edad. El grupo de edad se asoció de forma independiente con la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante al controlar los factores clínico-patológicos relevantes.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo sin detalles granulares sobre las decisiones de tratamiento.CONCLUSIONES:A los pacientes jóvenes se les prescribe con frecuencia quimioterapia adyuvante para tumores de alto y bajo riesgo, a pesar de los cuestionables beneficios en estos últimos. Los pacientes de edad avanzada rara vez reciben terapia adyuvante. Tanto los oncólogos clínicos como los quirúrgicos deben ser conscientes de las disparidades en el tratamiento del cáncer y ser conscientes de tomar decisiones de tratamiento basadas únicamente en la edad. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B846 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

[The importance of the extracapsular extension of the sentinel node metastasis in the surgical treatment of breast cancer].

Introduction: The introduction of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has led to a significant decrease of axillary lymph node dissections (ALND). The importance of the extracapsular extension (ECE) in the sentinel lymph node (SN) remains unclear. Method: The data of 635 patients with T1-T2N0M0 invasive breast cancer who underwent SNB between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. 25% of the SNB patients (158) had metastasis in the SNs. These patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of ECE. The main objective of our study was to analyse the occurrence of massive (>3) node metastasis in the case of ECE negative and ECE positive patients, where ALND was performed. Results: There were 91/158 patients (58%) in the ECE negative group and 67/158 patients (42%) in the ECE positive group. ALND was performed in 42% of the ECE negative and in 69% of the ECE positive patients. There were no significant differences in the mean age of the patients; size, histological type and grade of the tumours, presence of lymphovascular invasion and proportion of hormone and HER2 receptor positivities. In the ECE negative ALND group, pN1 involvement was 82%, pN2+pN3 involvement represented 18% of cases. In the ECE positive ALND group, pN1 involvement was 60%, pN2+pN3 involvement was found in 40% of cases. The presence of ECE was associated with greater axillary disease burden. These results show a significant difference (<ip</i = 0.038). Conclusions: ECE of the SN is an important predictor for non-sentinel lymph node involvement. These data suggest, when ECE is confirmed, it is a further factor to be considered in deciding about ALND.

Is Microsatellite Status Associated With Prognosis in Stage II Colon Cancer With High-Risk Features?

The influence of microsatellite instability on prognosis in high-risk stage II colon cancer is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between microsatellite instability and overall survival in high-risk stage II colon cancer. This is a retrospective review of the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2016. This study included national cancer epidemiology data from the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Included were 16,788 patients with stage II colon adenocarcinoma and known microsatellite status (1709 microsatellite unstable). The primary outcome measured was overall survival. Microsatellite unstable cancers with high-risk features had significantly better overall survival than microsatellite stable cancers with high-risk features (5-year survival 80% vs 72%, p = 0.01), and had survival equivalent to microsatellite stable cancers with low-risk features (5-year survival, 80%). When stratified by specific high-risk features, patients with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, or high-grade histology had overall survival similar to patients without these features, only in microsatellite unstable cancers. However, patients with high-risk features of T4 stage, positive margins, and <12 lymph nodes saw no survival benefit based on microsatellite status. This was confirmed on multivariable Cox regression modeling. A subgroup analysis of patients who did not receive chemotherapy similarly demonstrated that microsatellite unstable cancers with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, or high-grade histology had overall survival similar to microsatellite unstable cancers without those features. The study is limited by the lack of specific clinical data and potential treatment bias. In microsatellite unstable cancers, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and high-grade histology are not associated with worse overall survival, even when deferring adjuvant chemotherapy. These data support National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations to forego chemotherapy in stage II cancers with microsatellite instability and these features. In contrast, some high-risk features were associated with worse survival despite microsatellite unstable biology, and therapies to improve survival need to be explored. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B500. ¿EL ESTADO MICROSATÉLITE ESTÁ ASOCIADO CON EL PRONÓSTICO EN EL CÁNCER DE COLON EN ESTADIO II CON CARACTERÍSTICAS DE ALTO RIESGO: Se desconoce la influencia de la inestabilidad microsatélite en el pronóstico del cáncer de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo.Investigar la relación entre la inestabilidad microsatélite y la supervivencia general en el cáncer de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo.Revisión retrospectiva de la base de datos nacional del cáncer de 2010 a 2016.Este estudio incluyó datos nacionales de epidemiología del cáncer de la Comisión de Cáncer del Colegio Americano de Cirujanos.16,788 pacientes con adenocarcinoma de colon en estadio II y estado microsatélite conocido (1,709 microsatélite inestables).Supervivencia global.Los cánceres microsatélite inestables con características de alto riesgo tuvieron una supervivencia general significativamente mejor que los cánceres microsatélite estables con características de alto riesgo (supervivencia a 5 años 80% vs 72%, p = 0.01), y tuvieron una supervivencia equivalente a los cánceres microsatélite estables con características de bajo riesgo (supervivencia a 5 años 80%). Al estratificar por características específicas de alto riesgo, los pacientes con invasión linfovascular, invasión perineural o histología de alto grado tuvieron una supervivencia general similar a la de los pacientes sin estas características, solo en cánceres microsatélite inestables. Sin embargo, los pacientes con características de alto riesgo en estadio T4, márgenes positivos y <12 ganglios linfáticos no tuvieron ningún beneficio de supervivencia basado en el estado de microsatélites. Esto se confirmó en un modelo de regresión de Cox multivariable. Un análisis de subgrupos de pacientes que no recibieron quimioterapia demostró de manera similar que los cánceres microsatélite inestables con invasión linfovascular, invasión perineural o histología de alto grado tenían una supervivencia general similar a los cánceres microsatélite inestables sin esas características.El estudio está limitado por la falta de datos clínicos específicos y el posible sesgo de tratamiento.En los cánceres microsatélite inestables, la invasión linfovascular, la invasión perineural y la histología de alto grado no se asocian con una peor sobrevida general, incluso cuando se aplaza la quimioterapia adyuvante. Estos datos respaldan las recomendaciones de la National Comprehensive Cancer Network de omitir la quimioterapia en los cánceres en estadio II con inestabilidad microsatélite y estas características. Por el contrario, algunas características de alto riesgo se asociaron con una peor supervivencia a pesar de la biología microsatélite inestable, y es necesario considerar las terapias para mejorar la supervivencia.Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B500. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco).

[Impact of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer according to molecular subtype].

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of pathological complete response (pCR) on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to molecular subtypes in women treated for an invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). All women (n=225) managed with a neoadjuvant chemotherapy for an invasive breast cancer in our institution between January 2007 and December 2013 were included. The characteristics of patients with pCR (pCR-1), breast pCR and axillary pCR were compared to those without pCR (pCR-0) according to the molecular subtypes: luminal A (n=62), luminal B (n=77), Her-2 (n=31) and triple negative (n=55). NAC concerned 225 patients of whom 36 (16%) had pCR. Achievement of pCR led to significantly better overall survival in women with Her-2 tumors (35% versus 100%, P=0.035) and also to significantly better locoregional survival in women treated for triple negative tumors (P=0.026). Predictive factors of pCR were a high pathologic grade: OR=2.39, IC 95% (1.19-4.83), P=0.008; Her-2 molecular subtype (P=0.008); positive estrogenic hormonal receptors (P=0.006), a positive Her-2 receptor: OR=2.58, IC 95% (1.20-5.54), P=0.01. Achievement of pCR is an intermediate marker of survival in women managed with NAC for breast cancer.

Prognostic Value of Venous Invasion Detected by Elastin Stain May Surpass Lymph Node Status in Colon Cancer.

Venous invasion is a poor prognostic factor in colon cancer but is often underreported with significant variability. We aimed to determine the impact of an elastin stain on venous invasion detection in colon cancer and evaluate the value of venous invasion in predicting disease recurrence in combination with lymph node status and other prognostic factors. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. This study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center. A total of 418 patients who underwent curative resection for stage I to III colon cancer and routinely adopted an elastin stain were evaluated. Venous invasion detection rate after adopting elastin stain, prognostic factors influencing disease recurrences by multivariate Cox regression models, and survival were measured. The zones of lymph node metastasis were defined as LNZ1, LNZ2, and LNZ3, corresponding to metastases in the pericolic, intermediate, and apical nodes. Venous invasion detection rate increased from 11.3% to 35.4% compared with the previous period in which only hematoxylin and eosin stain was performed. Cox regression analysis showed venous invasion (HR, 3.856; 95% CI, 1.249-11.910; p = 0.019) and lymph node metastases (HR, 3.156; 95% CI, 1.094-9.108; p = 0.034) in all stages and LNZ 2, 3 (HR, 2.649; 95% CI, 1.244-5.640; p = 0.012) in stage III to be significantly associated with poor disease-free survival. When stratifying all patients by these 3 factors, patients with stage III [LNZ1/venous invasion (-)] had disease-free survival comparable with stage I, but significantly better disease-free survival than those with stage II [venous invasion (+)] (p = 0.018). Patients with stage II [venous invasion (+)] had better disease-free survival by using adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001). This study was limited by its retrospective design. Elastin stain contributed to a considerable increase in venous invasion detection. Venous invasion can be a powerful predictor of poor disease-free survival beyond lymph node metastases when limited to the pericolic area and is useful for deciding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B573. ANTECEDENTES:Invasión venosa (IV) es un factor de mal pronóstico en el cáncer de colon, que frecuentemente no se informa con una variabilidad significativa.OBJETIVOS:Nuestro objetivo fue determinar el impacto de tinción de elastina en la detección de IV en el cáncer de colon y evaluar el valor de IV en la predicción de la recurrencia de la enfermedad en combinación con el estado de los ganglios linfáticos y otros factores pronósticos.DISEÑO:Este es un análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos recopilada prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en un centro oncológico de referencia de tercer nivel.PACIENTES:Se valoraron un total de 418 pacientes sometidos a resección curativa por cáncer de colon en estadio I-III utilizando de manera rutinaria una tinción de elastina.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Se midieron la tasa de detección de IV después de adoptar la tinción de elastina, los factores de pronóstico que influyen en las recurrencias de la enfermedad mediante modelos de regresión de Cox multivariados y la supervivencia. La zona de metástasis ganglionares se definió como, LNZ1, LNZ2 y LNZ3, correspondientes a las metástasis en los ganglios pericólicos, intermedios y apicales, respectivamente.RESULTADOS:La tasa de detección de IV aumentó de 11,3% a 35,4% en comparación con el período anterior en el que solo se realizó tinción con hematoxilina y eosina. El análisis de regresión de Cox mostró VI (razón de riesgo, 3.856; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 1.249-11.910, p = 0.019) y metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos (razón de riesgo, 3.156; IC del 95%, 1.094-9.108, p = 0.034) en todos los estadios y LNZ 2, 3 (cociente de riesgo, 2.649; IC del 95%, 1.244-5.640, p = 0.012) en el estadio III se asociaron significativamente con una pobre supervivencia libre de enfermedad. Al estratificar a todos los pacientes según estos tres factores, los pacientes con estadio III [LNZ1 / VI (-)] tuvieron una sobrevivencia sin enfermedad (SSE) comparable con el estadio I, pero una supervivencia libre de enfermedad significativamente mejor que aquellos con estadio II [VI (+)] (p = 0,018). Pacientes en estadío II [VI (+)] tuvieron una mejor supervivencia sin enfermedad mediante el uso de quimioterapia adyuvante (p <0,001).LIMITACIONES:Estudio limitado por su diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIÓN:La tinción de elastina contribuyó a un aumento considerable en la detección de IV. IV puede ser un poderoso predictor de supervivencia sin enfermedad deficiente más allá de las metástasis de los ganglios linfáticos cuando se limita al área pericólica y es útil para decidir el uso de quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de colon en estadío II. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B573. (Traducción-Dr. Adrian Ortega).

[Analysis of positive margins risk factors and long term recurrence in the conservative treatment of breast cancer].

breast conserving therapy remains the first choice in breast cancer care for the early stages. Adequate surgical margins are essential to reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence. This study aims to identify risk factors of positive margins and locoregional recurrence. 437 patients who underwent a lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ have been included. Age, surgical margins, size, type, grade and number of tumor foci, the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ, lymph node status, expression of hormone receptors and HER-2 gene were assessed as risk factors for positive margins and locoregional recurrence. The disease-free survival is 94 % at 10 years. Patients with positive margins have lower survival (92 %) than those with negative margins (96 %) (p £ 0.05). Lobular and multifocal tumors are at risk of positive margins. Tumors with positive margins, T2, grade III, triple negative and HER-2 positive neoplasms are at risk of locoregional recurrence while the expression of hormone receptors is a protective factor for local recurrence. It appears in our study that invasive lobular and multifocal tumors may present positive surgical margins. Studies on pre- operative work-up are needed. Biological factors of the tumor seem to play a fundamental role in the locoregional recurrence or persistence of the tumor.

Patterns of Care and Comparison of Outcomes Between Primary Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Anal Adenocarcinoma.

The management of adenocarcinoma of the anus can be challenging because there are few data on outcomes and trends in its treatment to date. This study aimed to compare and analyze the patterns of care and survival outcomes of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma and anal adenocarcinoma. This was a retrospective study. This study was performed by utilizing the National Cancer Database. We selected a total of 19,539 patients between 2004 and 2014 with stage II to III squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the anus. The treatment groups analyzed were surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation, or definitive chemoradiation. Patient- and clinical-related factors were compared between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess overall survival. Of the patients studied, 18,346 (93.9%) had primary squamous cell carcinoma and 1193 (6.1%) had primary adenocarcinoma of the anus. The 5-year overall survival for stage II squamous cell carcinoma was 69.2%, and, for stage II adenocarcinoma, 5-year overall survival was 54.2% (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival for stage III squamous cell carcinoma was 55.2%, and, for stage III adenocarcinoma, 5-year overall survival was 32.9% (p < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression, treatment with chemoradiation alone (HR, 0.67; p = 0.008) was associated with improved survival in squamous cell carcinoma. For the adenocarcinoma group, stage III disease (HR, 2.26; p < 0.001) and high tumor grade (HR, 1.59; p < 0.011) had a negative impact on survival, but there were no differences in survival based on the type of treatment received. The National Cancer Database does not include information on specific chemotherapeutic or immunotherapy agents given to patients, nor does it provide the exact cause of death. Anal adenocarcinoma in comparison to anal squamous cell carcinoma had a lower 5-year overall survival stage for stage. Anal adenocarcinoma appears to be treated similarly to the rectal cancer paradigm, with frequent use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B50. PATRONES DE EL CUIDADO Y COMPARACIÓN DE RESULTADOS ENTRE EL CARCINOMA DE CÉLULAS ESCAMOSAS ANAL PRIMARIO Y EL ADENOCARCINOMA ANAL: El tratamiento del adenocarcinoma del ano puede ser un desafío ya que hasta la fecha, hay pocos datos sobre los resultados y las tendencias en su tratamiento.Comparar y analizar los patrones de el cuidado y resultados de supervivencia de pacientes con carcinoma anal de células escamosas y adenocarcinoma anal.Este fue un estudio retrospectivo.Este estudio se realizó utilizando la Base de Datos Nacional de Cancer (National Cancer Database, NCB).Seleccionamos un total de 19,539 pacientes entre el 2004-2014 con carcinoma de células escamosas en estadio II-III o adenocarcinoma del ano.Los grupos de tratamiento analizados fueron solo cirugía, quimiorradiación neoadyuvante seguida por cirugía, cirugía seguida por quimiorradiación adyuvante o quimiorradiación definitiva.Se compararon los factores clínicos y de pacientes entre los dos grupos. Se utilizaron modelos de regresión de riesgos proporcionales de Kaplan-Meier y Cox para evaluar la supervivencia general.18,346 (93.9%) tenían carcinoma primario de células escamosas y 1,193 (6.1%) tenían adenocarcinoma primario del ano. La supervivencia global a 5 años para el carcinoma de células escamosas en estadio II fue del 69.2% y para el adenocarcinoma en estadio II fue del 54.2% (p < 0.001). La supervivencia global a cinco años para el carcinoma de células escamosas en estadio III fue del 55.2% y para el adenocarcinoma en estadio III fue del 32.9% (p < 0.001). En la regresión de Cox multivariable, el tratamiento con quimiorradiación sola (proporción de riesgo 0.67, p = 0.008) se asoció con una mejor supervivencia en el carcinoma de células escamosas. Para el grupo de adenocarcinoma, la enfermedad en estadio III (proporción de riesgo 2.26, p < 0.001) y el alto grado tumoral (proporción de riesgo 1.59, p < 0.011) tuvieron un impacto negativo en la supervivencia, pero no hubo diferencias en la supervivencia según el tipo de tratamiento recibido.La Base de Datos Nacional de Cancer no incluye información sobre agentes quimioterapéuticos o de inmunoterapia específicos que se administran a los pacientes, ni proporciona la causa exacta de la muerte.El adenocarcinoma anal en comparación con el carcinoma anal de células escamosas tuvo una supervivencia general inferior a 5 años, etapa por etapa. El adenocarcinoma anal parece tratarse de manera similar al paradigma del cáncer rectal, con el uso frecuente de quimiorradiación neoadyuvante. Vea el video del resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B50.

[Trastuzumab in early breast cancer].

The HER2 gene or c-erb B2 or neu is amplified in 15-25% of breast cancers. This amplification is associated with an aggressive course of disease. The trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the extracellular domain of HER2. This is the first targeted molecule designed to treat breast cancer. In the firstline metastatic disease, trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy significantly improved survival of patients with HER2-positive disease. In the adjuvant setting, trastuzumab has been evaluated in several randomized trials. The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. A search of articles published in English literature, between 1987 (date of establishment of prognostic value of HER2) and November 2012, was conducted on Medline and in the database of the main international congress using the following terms: "breast cancer", "HER2-positive", "adjuvant therapy" and "Trastuzumab". We identified seven randomized phase 3 trial evaluating trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive. The trastuzumab was administered weekly or every 3weeks. Its administration with concomitant taxane chemotherapy and with concurrent radiotherapy was preferred. Four randomized trials have clearly confirmed the benefit of trastuzumab, two positive in overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), and two positive in PFS. The duration of trastuzumab for 1year was the most effective. The trastuzumab was well tolerated. The most significant toxicity, associated with trastuzumab, was cardiac toxicity. However, it is found in only 5% or less of cases, and it is severe in only 2% or less of cases, and most patients recovered their cardiac function by medical treatment alone. In the contemporary medical literature, several strong arguments confirm the benefit in survival of trastuzumab administered concomitantly with a taxane-based chemotherapy and with concurrent radiotherapy, and for a period of 1year. Trastuzumab was well tolerated. Only 2% or less of patients experienced a serious cardiac toxicity, but it was reversible in most of the time.

Downstaging in Advanced Rectal Cancers: A Propensity-Matched Comparison Between Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Chemotherapy and Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy.

Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy has not been widely evaluated as an alternative to traditional long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. This study compared the oncological and short-term outcomes between short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. This is a retrospective propensity-matched study. The study was conducted in a colorectal department at a tertiary care oncology center in India. There were 173 patients. Group A had 47 patients and group B had 126 patients. A 1:2.7 matching was done for age, sex, distance of tumor from the anal verge, sphincter preservation surgeries, MRI-based pretreatment T stage, and circumferential resection margin. The interventions performed were short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy (group A) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (group B) in locally advanced rectal cancer. The primary measures were pathological circumferential resection margin positivity, downstaging, tumor regression grade, and postoperative complications. Of the patients, 52% had a positive circumferential resection margin on MRI, 57% had low rectal tumors, and 20% had T4 tumors. Distribution of rectal surgeries was similar between the 2 groups. pT downstaging and tumor regression scores were significantly better in group B ( p = 0.028 and 0.026). Pathological circumferential resection margin, distal resection margin, and nodal yield were similar. On multivariate analysis, pretreatment N status was the only independent predictive factor for pathological circumferential resection margin status. Grade 3 to 4 Clavien-Dindo complications, anastomotic leak rates, and hospital stay were similar between the 2 groups. This was a retrospective study. Although propensity matching was performed, selection bias cannot be eliminated completely, as seen in the difference in the surgical approaches between the 2 groups. In a cohort containing a significant portion of MRI circumferential resection margin-positive low rectal cancers, short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery resulted in lower T downstaging and lower tumor regression scores compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy, but pathological circumferential margin status, distal resection margin, nodal yield, and perioperative morbidity were similar between the 2 groups. This suggests that short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy could be a viable alternative to long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancers. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B855 . ANTECEDENTES:La radioterapia de ciclo corto seguida de quimioterapia no ha sido evaluada ampliamente como una alternativa a la tradicional quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.OBJETIVO:Estudio que compara los resultados oncológicos y a corto plazo entre la radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia y la quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.DISEÑO:Estudio comparado de propensión de manera retrospectiva.AJUSTE:Departamento colorrectal en un centro de atención oncológica de tipo terciario en la India.PACIENTES:Hubo 173 pacientes. El grupo A tenía 47 y el grupo B tenía 126 pacientes. Se realizó una comparación de 1: 2,7 para edad, sexo, distancia del tumor desde el margen anal, cirugías de preservación del esfínter, estadio T previo al tratamiento basada en resonancia magnética y margen de resección circunferencial (CRM).INTERVENCIONES:Radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia (grupo A) y quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo (grupo B) en cáncer de recto localmente avanzado (LARC).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Positividad histopatológica de CRM, reducción del estadio tumoral, grado de regresión tumoral, complicaciones posoperatorias.RESULTADOS:El 52% de los pacientes han tenido un margen de resección circunferencial positivo en la resonancia magnética, 57% de tumores rectales bajos, 20% de tumores T4. La distribución de cirugías rectales fue similar entre los 2 grupos. Las puntuaciones de regresión tumoral y de reducción del estadio de pT fueron significativamente mejores en el grupo B ( p = 0.028 y 0.026 respectivamente). El margen de resección circunferencial patológico, el margen de resección distal y los ganglios arrojados fueron similares. En el análisis multivariado, el estadio N previo al tratamiento fue el único factor predictivo independiente para el estadio de pCRM. Las complicaciones Clavien-Dindo de grado 3-4, las tasas de fuga anastomótica y la estancia hospitalaria fueron similares entre los dos grupos.LIMITACIONES:Retrospectiva; aunque la propensión coincide, existe potencial sesgo de selección.CONCLUSIONES:En una cohorte que contenía una porción significativa de cánceres rectales bajos con margen de resección circunferencial positivo por resonancia magnética, la radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia seguida de cirugía tardía dio como resultado una mayor reducción del estadio T y de regresión tumoral en comparación con la quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo. Pero el estatus histopatológico del margen circunferencial, el margen de resección distal, el rendimiento ganglionar y la morbilidad perioperatoria fueron similares entre los dos grupos. Esto sugiere que la radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia podría ser una alternativa viable a la quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo en cánceres rectales localmente avanzados. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B855 . (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto ).

[Surgical treatment of the primary tumor in stage IV breast cancer].

The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of loco-regional surgery on survival of patients with stage IV breast cancer. Retrospective study that included patients with breast cancer and synchronous metastases. Patients with ECOG above 2 and high-risk patients were excluded. The following variables were evaluated: age, tumor size, nodal involvement, histological type, histological grade, hormone receptor status, HER2 overexpression, number of affected organs, location of metastases and surgical treatment. The impact of surgery and several clinical and pathologic variables on survival was analyzed by Cox regression model. A total of 69 patients, of whom 36 (52.2%) underwent surgery (study group) were included. After a mean follow-up of 34 months, the median survival of the series was 55 months and no significant differences between the study group and the group of patients without surgery (P=0.187) were found. Two factors associated with worse survival were identified: the number of organs with metastases (HR=1.69, IC 95%: 1.05-2.71) and triple negative breast cancer (HR=3.49, IC 95%: 1.39-8.74). Loco-regional surgery, however, was not associated with survival. Loco-regional surgical treatment was not associated with improved survival inpacientes with stage IV breast cancer. The number of organs with metastases and tumors were triple negative prognostic factors for survival.

The Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.

Patients with chronic kidney disease are commonly excluded from clinical trials. The impact of chronic kidney disease on outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer has not been previously studied. This study aimed to investigate the impact of chronic kidney disease on outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. This is a multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study. This study was conducted at academic and community cancer centers participating in the Canadian Health Outcomes Research Database Consortium Rectal Cancer Database. Consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation before curative-intent surgery from 2005 to 2013 were selected. Disease-free survival, overall survival, pathologic complete response, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy completion rate were the primary outcomes measured. A total of 1254 patients were included. Median age was 62, and 29%/69% had clinical stage II and III disease. Median estimated creatinine clearance was 93 mL/min, with 11% <60 mL/min (n = 136). There was no significant difference in the completion rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (82% vs 85%, p = 0.36) or radiotherapy (93% vs 95%, p = 0.45) between patients with and without chronic kidney disease. Patients with chronic kidney disease were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (63% vs 77%, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, patients with chronic kidney disease had decreased disease-free survival (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.82; p = 0.03) but not overall survival (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.88-1.75; p = 0.23) or pathologic complete response (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.50-1.39; p = 0.71). This study was limited by its retrospective design and by limited events for overall survival analysis. In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation, baseline chronic kidney disease was associated with less use of adjuvant chemotherapy and decreased disease-free survival. Chronic kidney disease was not independently associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy completion rate, pathologic complete response, or overall survival. These data suggest that patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with chronic kidney disease may have distinct outcomes and, accordingly, the results of landmark clinical trials may not be generalizable to this population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B694. ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica generalmente se excluyen de los ensayos clínicos. La repercusión de la enfermedad renal crónica en el desenlace en pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado no se ha estudiado previamente.OBJETIVO:Investigar la repercusión de la enfermedad renal crónica en los desenlaces en pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo multiinstitucional.ESCENARIO:Centros oncológicos académicos y comunitarios que participan en la base de datos de cáncer rectal del consorcio CHORD.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado, tratados con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante, previa a la cirugía con intención curativa del 2005 al 2013.PRINCIPALES VARIABLES EVALUADAS:Sobrevida libre de enfermedad, sobrevida global, respuesta patológica completa, tasa de conclusión de quimioterapia / radioterapia neoadyuvante.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 1254 pacientes. El promedio de edad fue de 62, y el 29% / 69% tenían enfermedad en estadio clínico II y III, respectivamente. El promedio de la depuración de creatinina estimada fue de 93 mililitros / minuto, con un 11% <60 mililitros / minuto (n = 136). No hubo diferencias significativas en la tasa de conclusión de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante (82% vs 85%, p = 0,36) o radioterapia (93% vs 95%, p = 0,45) entre pacientes con y sin enfermedad renal crónica. Los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica tenían menos probabilidades de recibir quimioterapia adyuvante (63% contra el 77%, p <0,01). En el análisis multivariado, los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica tenían una sobrevida libre de enfermedad menor (HR 1,37, IC 95% 1,03-1,82, p = 0,03) pero no en la sobrevida global (HR 1,23, IC 95% 0,88-1,75, p = 0,23) o respuesta patológica completa (OR 0,83, IC 95% 0,50-1,39, p = 0,71).LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo y acontecimientos limitados para el análisis de sobrevida global.CONCLUSIONES:En pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado tratados con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante, la enfermedad renal crónica de base se asoció con un menor uso de quimioterapia adyuvante y una menor sobrevida libre de enfermedad. La enfermedad renal crónica no se asoció de forma independiente con la tasa de conclusión de la quimioterapia / radioterapia neoadyuvante, la respuesta patológica completa o la sobrevida global. Estos datos sugieren que los pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado con enfermedad renal crónica pueden tener resultados distintos y, en consecuencia, los resultados de los ensayos clínicos de referencia pueden no ser generalizables a esta población. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B694.

[Adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer].

Breast cancer(BC) is the most frequent neoplasm in women of the west countries. The treatment of BC is very complex, and include the combination of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy and immunotherapy. Surgery is the gold standard in the radical treatment of BC. Anthracyclines and taxanes are very important in the adjuvant treatment of BC. These drugs have shown an increased disease-free-survival and overall survival in several studies. Tamoxifen has been the gold standard adjuvant hormone therapy for the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early BC for many years, but the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane) are now recommended as the preferred therapy. Trastuzumab in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy has changed the natural history of early Her-2 positive BC. New drugs are under investigation in the treatment of BC.

The Addition of Preoperative Radiation Is Insufficient for Lateral Pelvic Control in a Subgroup of Patients With Low Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Post Hoc Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

The local recurrence of rectal cancer has been improved by total mesorectal excision following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, in patients with low locally advanced rectal cancer, lateral pelvic recurrence remains to be addressed. This study aimed to determine the efficiency of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in addressing lateral pelvic recurrence and which subgroup of patients might be optimal to receive lateral lymph node dissection. The MRI/CT images were reassessed for lateral lymph node status. The lateral lymph nodes with short axis ≥5 mm and ≥4 mm were considered positive in pretreatment and restaging MRI/CT. This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial (FOWARC, NCT01211210). A total of 495 patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma were included in the original trial. According to the excluding criteria, the finally included population consists of 253 patients; of these, 195 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 94 received chemotherapy alone. The primary outcome was the 5-year lateral pelvic recurrence rate. Compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone, patients receiving additional radiotherapy had a marginal significance of lower lateral pelvic recurrence rate (6.6% vs 13.0%; p = 0.051). In the subset with pretreatment positive lateral lymph nodes, patients had a lateral pelvic recurrence rate of 22.6% and 45.1% after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone. Of note, 34.9% of the pretreatment positive lateral lymph nodes were persistent after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, culminating in a lateral pelvic recurrence rate of 63.3%. This is a post hoc analysis, and only the patients from the leading center were included, which limited the sample size. In addition, the lateral lymph node dissection was not performed in this cohort. The addition of radiotherapy in neoadjuvant regimens could not address lateral pelvic recurrence adequately. Some subgroups of patients might need additional dissection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B613. ANTECEDENTES:La recurrencia local del cancer de recto ha disminuido al efectuar una excision mesorrectal total seguida de quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante. No obstante, en pacientes con cancer de tercio inferior de recto avanzado localmente, aún está por controlarse la recurrencia pélvicaOBJETIVOS:Determinar la eficacia de la radioterapia neoadyuvante en el control de la recurrencia pélvica lateral y en que subgrupo de pacientes sería conveniente efecutar una excisión lateral de las cadenas ganglionares.DISEÑO:Se reevaluaron las imágenes tomográficas y de resonancia magnética del status de las cadenas ganglionares linfáticas laterales. Los ganglios linfáticos laterales con un eje-corto > 5 mm y ≥ 4 mm se consideraron como positivos previo al tratamiento y reestadificados con RM y TAC respectivamente.ESCENARIO:Es un análisis post hoc de un studio prospectivo randomizado controlado (FOWARC, NCT01211210).PACIENTESSe incluyeron un total de 495 pacientes en estdio II o III con adenomcarcinoma rectal en el estudio original. De acuerdo a los criterios de exclusión, la población final incluida consistió en 253 pacientes; de estos, 195 recibieron quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante y 94 quimioterapia sola.EVALUACION DE LOS RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES:El parámetro mas importante fue la tasa de recurrencia pélvica lateral a cinco años.RESULTADOS:En comparación con los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia sola, aquellos que además fueron sometidos a radioterapia adicional presentaron un margen significativo de menor tasa de recurrencia pélvica lateral (6.6% vs. 13.0%; p=0.051). En el grupo de pacientes con ganglios linfáticos laterales positivos, los enfermos presentaron una tasa de recurrencia pélvica lateral de 22.6% y 45.1% después de quimioradiaterapia neoadyuvante en comparación con quimioterapia sola respectivamente. Cabe mencionar que el 34.9% de los pacientes con ganglios linfáticos laterales positivos antes del tratamiento persistieron después de la quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante, reportándose finalmente una recurrencia pélvica lateral de un 63.3%.LIMITACIONES:Se trata de un análisis posthoc y solo los pacientes del hospital fueron incluidos, lo que limita el tamaño de la muestra. Además, no se efectuó la disección de los ganglios linfáticos laterales en este grupo.CONCLUSIONES:La radioterapia en los esquemas de neoadyuvancia no logran controlar la recurrencia pélvica lateral en forma adecuada. Algunos subgrupos de pacientes podría requerir de disección adicional. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B613.

[Are endocrine receptors determining factors for the prognosis of carcinoma of the breast?].

The capacity of hormone receptors to predict sensitivity to hormone therapy in breast cancer has been demonstrated since many years; on the other hand, its importance in the prognosis of these patients, expressed as disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS), is still discussed. The authors have reviewed the literature data on this problem, paying particular attention to studies homogeneous for disease extent and therapeutic approaches (surgical or post-surgical). At the moment of mastectomy, the presence of estrogen or progesterone receptors in primary tumors was not clearly related to the patients' DFS. The higher probability of DFS was observed in the group of patients who received adjuvant hormone therapy after mastectomy, with increasing amounts of each receptor in primary tumors and when both hormone receptors were contemporaneously present. In patients with breast carcinoma, the data on the relationship between hormone receptors and overall survival were more homogeneous: the presence of the cellular hormone receptor improves the probability to have a longer OS in patients treated by radical mastectomy. The opportunity to analyze these relationships in some reports which processed a statistical multivariate analysis permits us to confirm the hormone receptor values also as a prognostic parameter which is not dependent from other (axillary lymph nodes involvement, tumor size and therapy) till now considered parameters.

Oncological Outcomes and Hospital Costs of the Treatment in Patients With Rectal Cancer: Watch-and-Wait Policy and Standard Surgical Treatment.

Little is known about the costs of the current treatment strategy in locally advanced rectal cancer, in which patients with a clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy are treated in a watch-and-wait policy. The aim of this study is to present the oncological outcome and hospital costs of patients with a complete response after chemoradiotherapy (watch-and-wait policy) and patients with an incomplete response after chemoradiotherapy (total mesorectal excision). This was a cohort study. This study was conducted at an academic and a nonacademic hospital. Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received either a watch-and-wait policy or total mesorectal excision depending on their clinical response to chemoradiotherapy. Watch-and-wait policy and total mesorectal excision were the treatments applied. The primary outcomes measured were overall, local recurrence-free, and distant metastasis-free survival and hospital costs over a 2-year follow-up period. A total of 292 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were included. Mean age was 65.1 years, and 64.7% were men. One hundred five patients were included in the watch-and-wait subgroup, and 187 patients were in the total mesorectal excision subgroup. Both subgroups showed good oncological outcomes. Hospital costs consisted of 5 categories: costs of primary surgery, costs of adjuvant chemotherapy, costs of examinations, costs of additional surgery, and costs of treatment of regrowth/metastasis. The mean costs per patient were &OV0556;6713 (watch-and-wait subgroup) and &OV0556;17,108 (total mesorectal excision subgroup) over the first 2 years. This study was limited by the following: costs were only from a hospital perspective, follow-up was 2 years, the study was retrospective in part, and there was no comparative study. Overall survival was good in both subgroups and comparable to literature. The mean costs per patient differ between the watch-and-wait subgroup (&OV0556;6713) and the total mesorectal excision subgroup (&OV0556;17,108). No comparison between the groups could be made. Based on the results of this study, the current strategy, where patients with a clinical complete response are treated in a watch-and-wait policy, and patients with an incomplete response are treated with total mesorectal excision, is likely to be (cost)saving. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B177. RESULTADOS ONCOLÓGICOS Y COSTOS HOSPITALARIOS EN EL TRATAMIENTO DE PACIENTES CON CANCER DE RECTO: ACTITUD DE ESPERA-VIGILANCIA Y TRATAMIENTO QUIRÚRGICO ESTANDARD: Se sabe poco sobre el costo del tratamiento actual en casos de cancer de recto localmente avanzado, cuando se aplica una política de vigilancia y espera en aquellos pacientes que presentan una respuesta clínica completa después de radio-quimioterapia.El propósito final del presente estudio es dar a conocer el resultado oncológico y los costos hospitalarios de los pacientes que presentan una respuesta clínica completa después de radio-quimioterapia (actitud de vigilancia-espera) y los pacientes con una respuesta incompleta después luego de radio-quimioterapia (excisión total del mesorrecto-ETM).Estudio de cohortes.Hospitales académicos y no académicos.Todos aquellos pacientes tratados por un cáncer de recto localmente avanzado y que fueron seguidos con una política de vigilancia y espera o la ETM, en función de la respuesta clínica a la radio-quimioterapia.Políticas de vigilancia-espera, excisión total del mesorrecto.Sobrevida global libre de recurrencia local, metástasis a distancia, sobrevida libre de enfermedad y costos hospitalarios durante un período de seguimiento de dos años.Se incluyeron 292 pacientes diagnosticados de cancer de recto localmente avanzado. La edad media fue de 65,1 años, 64,7% eran de sexo masculino. Se incluyeron 105 pacientes en el subgrupo de vigilancia-espera, y 187 en el subgrupo de excisión total del mesorrecto. Ambos subgrupos mostraron optimos resultados oncológicos. Los costos hospitalarios se dividieron en cinco categorías: costos de cirugía primaria; costos de quimioterapia adyuvante; costos de exámenes; costos de cirugía adicional; y costos del tratamiento de rebrote / metástasis. Los costos medios por paciente fueron de &OV0556; 6.713 (subgrupo de espera-vigilancia) y &OV0556; 17.108 (subgrupo de excisión total del mesorrecto) durante los primeros dos años.Analisis de costos desde una perspectiva hospitalaria durante un seguimiento de dos años, estudio parcialmente retrospectivo, no comparativo.La sobrevida general fue optima en ambos subgrupos y comparable con la literatura. El costo promedio por paciente difiere entre el subgrupo de vigilancia y espera (&OV0556; 6.713) con el subgrupo de la ETM(&OV0556; 17.108). No se pudieron comparar definitivamente ambos grupos. Basados en los resultados del presente estudio, es probable que la estrategia actual, en la que los pacientes con respuesta clínica completa sean tratados con una política de vigilancia y espera, presenten muy probablemente un cierto ahorro en el costo con relación a los pacientes con una respuesta incompleta tratados con excisión total del mesorrecto. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B177. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).