hoy en día, antraciclinas (no sufre del corazón) y taxanos antes de la RT.

Pregunta típica, cirugía conservadora implica radiar, seguro. Alto grado, y no tiene receptores hormonales ni her2 (la temida triple negativa). Yo estuve cuando no había ni taxanos ni herceptin y estuve en los ensayos que demostraron que se curan cada vez más, por desgracia aún no todas. Por eso hoy en día, antraciclinas (no sufre del corazón) y taxanos antes de la RT. Mi especialidad es bonita, y lo será más en los próximos años.

Mujer de 65 años sin comorbilidades, operada de cirugía conservadora de mama izquierda con biopsia selectiva del ganglio centinela. La anatomía patológica de la pieza muestra un carcinoma ductal infiltrante grado III de 11 mm, dos ganglios centinelas negativos, receptores de estrógenos: 0%, receptores de progesterona: 0%, Ki 67: 70%, HER2: negativo. El estudio de extensión es negativo. El tratamiento adyuvante sería:

Quimioterapia basada en antraciclinas y taxanos, radioterapia y trastuzumab.

Quimioterapia basada en antraciclinas y taxanos, radioterapia y tamoxifeno.

Quimioterapia basada en antraciclinas y taxanos, y radioterapia.

Quimioterapia basada en antraciclinas y taxanos, radioterapia e inhibidores de la aromatasa, dado que es postmenopáusica.

Supervised physical therapy in women treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer.

to evaluate the effect of physical therapy on the range of motion of the shoulders and perimetry of the upper limbs in women treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer. a total of 35 participants were randomized into two groups, with 18 in the control group (CG) and 17 in the study group (SG). Both of the groups underwent three evaluations to assess the range of motion of the shoulders and perimetry of the upper limbs, and the study group underwent supervised physical therapy for the upper limbs. the CG had deficits in external rotation in evaluations 1, 2, and 3, whereas the SG had deficits in flexion, abduction, and external rotation in evaluation 1. The deficit in abduction was recovered in evaluation 2, whereas the deficits in all movements were recovered in evaluation 3. No significant differences in perimetry were observed between the groups. the applied supervised physical therapy was effective in recovering the deficit in abduction after radiotherapy, and the deficits in flexion and external rotation were recovered within two months after the end of radiotherapy. Registration number of the clinical trial: NCT02198118. avaliar o efeito da fisioterapia na amplitude de movimento do ombro e na perimetria do membro superior, aplicada durante o período da radioterapia nas mulheres em tratamento para o câncer de mama. 35 voluntárias foram randomizadas em dois grupos, 18 para o grupo controle e 17 para o grupo de estudo. Os dois grupos foram submetidos a três avaliações da amplitude de movimento do ombro e perimetria do membro superior, sendo o grupo de estudo também submetido à fisioterapia supervisionada para os membros superiores. o grupo controle apresentou déficit entre os membros para o movimento de rotação externa nas avaliações 1, 2 e 3. O grupo de estudo apresentou déficit entre os membros para os movimentos de flexão, abdução e rotação externa na avaliação 1. Houve recuperação do déficit de movimento de abdução na avaliação 2 e, na avaliação 3, os déficits de todos os movimentos estavam recuperados. Na análise da perimetria não foi observada diferença significativa. o protocolo fisioterapêutico supervisionado aplicado foi efetivo na recuperação do déficit de abdução pós-radioterapia e de flexão e rotação externa quando avaliados até 2 meses após o término da radioterapia. Número do registro do ensaio clínico: NCT02198118. evaluar el efecto de la terapia física en el rango de movimiento de los hombros y la perimetría de las extremidades superiores en mujeres tratadas con radioterapia debido a cáncer de mama. un total de 35 participantes fueron aleatorizadas en dos grupos, 18 en el grupo control y 17 en el grupo de estudio. Ambos grupos fueron sometidos a tres evaluaciones para evaluar el rango de movimiento de los hombros y la perimetría de las extremidades superiores, y el grupo de estudio fue sometido a terapia física supervisada de las extremidades superiores. el grupo de control tuvo déficits en la rotación externa en la evaluación 1, 2, y 3, mientras que el grupo de estudio tuvo déficits en la flexión, abducción y rotación externa en la evaluación 1. El déficit en la abducción fue recuperado en la evaluación 2, mientras que los déficits en todos los movimientos fueron recuperados en la evaluación 3. No se observaron diferencias significativas en la perimetría. la terapia física supervisada aplicada fue efectiva en la recuperación del déficit en la abducción después de la radioterapia y los déficits en flexión y rotación externa fueron recuperados dos meses después de terminada la radioterapia. Número de registro del ensayo clínico: NCT02198118.

Downstaging in Advanced Rectal Cancers: A Propensity-Matched Comparison Between Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Chemotherapy and Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy.

Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy has not been widely evaluated as an alternative to traditional long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. This study compared the oncological and short-term outcomes between short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. This is a retrospective propensity-matched study. The study was conducted in a colorectal department at a tertiary care oncology center in India. There were 173 patients. Group A had 47 patients and group B had 126 patients. A 1:2.7 matching was done for age, sex, distance of tumor from the anal verge, sphincter preservation surgeries, MRI-based pretreatment T stage, and circumferential resection margin. The interventions performed were short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy (group A) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (group B) in locally advanced rectal cancer. The primary measures were pathological circumferential resection margin positivity, downstaging, tumor regression grade, and postoperative complications. Of the patients, 52% had a positive circumferential resection margin on MRI, 57% had low rectal tumors, and 20% had T4 tumors. Distribution of rectal surgeries was similar between the 2 groups. pT downstaging and tumor regression scores were significantly better in group B ( p = 0.028 and 0.026). Pathological circumferential resection margin, distal resection margin, and nodal yield were similar. On multivariate analysis, pretreatment N status was the only independent predictive factor for pathological circumferential resection margin status. Grade 3 to 4 Clavien-Dindo complications, anastomotic leak rates, and hospital stay were similar between the 2 groups. This was a retrospective study. Although propensity matching was performed, selection bias cannot be eliminated completely, as seen in the difference in the surgical approaches between the 2 groups. In a cohort containing a significant portion of MRI circumferential resection margin-positive low rectal cancers, short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery resulted in lower T downstaging and lower tumor regression scores compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy, but pathological circumferential margin status, distal resection margin, nodal yield, and perioperative morbidity were similar between the 2 groups. This suggests that short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy could be a viable alternative to long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancers. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B855 . ANTECEDENTES:La radioterapia de ciclo corto seguida de quimioterapia no ha sido evaluada ampliamente como una alternativa a la tradicional quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.OBJETIVO:Estudio que compara los resultados oncológicos y a corto plazo entre la radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia y la quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.DISEÑO:Estudio comparado de propensión de manera retrospectiva.AJUSTE:Departamento colorrectal en un centro de atención oncológica de tipo terciario en la India.PACIENTES:Hubo 173 pacientes. El grupo A tenía 47 y el grupo B tenía 126 pacientes. Se realizó una comparación de 1: 2,7 para edad, sexo, distancia del tumor desde el margen anal, cirugías de preservación del esfínter, estadio T previo al tratamiento basada en resonancia magnética y margen de resección circunferencial (CRM).INTERVENCIONES:Radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia (grupo A) y quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo (grupo B) en cáncer de recto localmente avanzado (LARC).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Positividad histopatológica de CRM, reducción del estadio tumoral, grado de regresión tumoral, complicaciones posoperatorias.RESULTADOS:El 52% de los pacientes han tenido un margen de resección circunferencial positivo en la resonancia magnética, 57% de tumores rectales bajos, 20% de tumores T4. La distribución de cirugías rectales fue similar entre los 2 grupos. Las puntuaciones de regresión tumoral y de reducción del estadio de pT fueron significativamente mejores en el grupo B ( p = 0.028 y 0.026 respectivamente). El margen de resección circunferencial patológico, el margen de resección distal y los ganglios arrojados fueron similares. En el análisis multivariado, el estadio N previo al tratamiento fue el único factor predictivo independiente para el estadio de pCRM. Las complicaciones Clavien-Dindo de grado 3-4, las tasas de fuga anastomótica y la estancia hospitalaria fueron similares entre los dos grupos.LIMITACIONES:Retrospectiva; aunque la propensión coincide, existe potencial sesgo de selección.CONCLUSIONES:En una cohorte que contenía una porción significativa de cánceres rectales bajos con margen de resección circunferencial positivo por resonancia magnética, la radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia seguida de cirugía tardía dio como resultado una mayor reducción del estadio T y de regresión tumoral en comparación con la quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo. Pero el estatus histopatológico del margen circunferencial, el margen de resección distal, el rendimiento ganglionar y la morbilidad perioperatoria fueron similares entre los dos grupos. Esto sugiere que la radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia podría ser una alternativa viable a la quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo en cánceres rectales localmente avanzados. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B855 . (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto ).

[Supervivencia en cáncer de mama por subtipo mediante inmunohistoquímica: Un estudio retrospectivo].

Breast cancer subtype classification according to hormone receptors (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) using immunohistochemistry is the standard practice for therapeutic decision making. To design future studies information on characteristics and survival of each subtype is essential. We conducted a retrospective study to analyze clinical and pathologic features as well as survival data according to breast cancer immunohistochemistry subtype. There were 211 women with a RH(+)/HER2(-) breast cancer subtype, 53 HR(+)/HER2(+), 16 HER2(+) and 23 HR(-)/HER2(-), with a median overall survival in months of 39 (20.5-62.7), 42 (25.5-65), 42 (13.7-67.7) and 26 (11-78), respectively, for a 3.7 hazard ratio of death (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.3-10.3) for the triple negative group as compared to the HR(+)/HER2(-) group (p = 0.01). HR positive subtypes by immunohistochemistry where most frequent and showed a greater overall survival compared to the triple negative subtype.

Differential Survival Benefits of 5-Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Microsatellite-Stable Stage III Colorectal Cancer According to the Tumor Budding Status: A Retrospective Analysis.

Recent research has established tumor budding as a prognostic factor and a possible histomorphologic reflection of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer, highlighting the ability of cancer cells exhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition to resist chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the tumor budding status in microsatellite-stable stage III colorectal cancer. This was a retrospective study of 2 cohorts. The study was conducted at the National Defense Medical College in Japan. We reviewed 2 data sets of patients with microsatellite-stable stage III colorectal cancer with curatively intended surgery (R0) from 1999 to 2005 (first cohort; n = 203) and 2006 to 2012 (second cohort; n = 346). In both cohorts, 128 and 203 patients received 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and 75 and 143 patients did not. We assessed the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the grades of tumor budding based on the cancer-specific survival. In low-budding tumors, the chemotherapy group exhibited better cancer-specific survival than the surgery-alone group (first cohort, 93.1% vs 65.5%, p = 0.001; second cohort, 94.0% vs 76.0%, p < 0.0001). Conversely, the prognostic difference between the chemotherapy and surgery-alone groups was statistically insignificant in high-budding tumors (first cohort, 59.7% vs 52.4%, p = 0.57; second cohort, 83.1% vs 75.6%, p = 0.19). The multivariate analysis corroborated the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in low-budding tumors (first cohort, p = 0.002, HR = 0.28; second cohort, p < 0.0001, HR = 0.23) but not in high-budding tumors. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and treatments for recurrence were not homogeneous, and the patient backgrounds differed between the chemotherapy and surgery alone groups. The high-budding group demonstrated resistance to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, whereas the low-budding group exhibited significant survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colorectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B14. BENEFICIOS DE SUPERVIVENCIA DIFERENCIAL DE LA QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE BASADA EN 5-FLUOROURACILO PARA PACIENTES CON CÁNCER COLORRECTAL EN ESTADIO III ESTABLE CON MICROSATÉLITE SEGÚN EL ESTADO DE BROTACIÓN DEL TUMOR: UN ANÁLISIS RETROSPECTIVO:: Investigaciones recientes han establecido la aparición de tumores como un factor pronóstico y una posible reflexión histomorfológica de la transición epitelial-mesenquimatosa en el cáncer colorrectal, destacando la capacidad de las células cancerosas que presentan una transición epitelio-mesenquimática para resistir la quimioterapia.El objetivo de este estudio es investigar los beneficios clínicos de la quimioterapia adyuvante según el estado de brotación del tumor en el cáncer colorrectal en estadio III estable con microsatélite.Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de dos cohortes.El estudio se realizó en la Escuela de Medicina de la Defensa Nacional de Japón.Revisamos dos conjuntos de datos de pacientes con cáncer colorrectal en estadio III estable con microsatélite con cirugía de intención curativa (R0) de 1999 a 2005 (primera cohorte; n = 203) y 2006 a 2012 (segunda cohorte; n = 346). En ambas cohortes, 128 y 203 pacientes recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante basada en 5-fluorouracilo y 75 y 143 pacientes no, respectivamente.Evaluamos los beneficios de la quimioterapia adyuvante de acuerdo con los grados de brotación del tumor en función de la supervivencia específica del cáncer.n los tumores con brotes bajos, el grupo de quimioterapia mostró una mejor supervivencia específica al cáncer que el grupo con cirugía sola (primera cohorte, 93.1% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.001; segunda cohorte, 94.0% vs. 76.0%, p < 0.0001). A la inversa, la diferencia pronóstica entre los grupos de quimioterapia y cirugía sola fue estadísticamente insignificante en los tumores de brotes elevados (primera cohorte, 59.7% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.57; segunda cohorte, 83.1% vs. 75.6%, p = 0.19). El análisis multivariado corroboró los beneficios de la quimioterapia adyuvante en los tumores de brotes bajos (primera cohorte, p = 0,002, índice de riesgo: 0,28; segundo cohorte, p <0,0001, índice de riesgo: 0,23) pero no en los tumores de alto brote.a quimioterapia adyuvante postoperatoria y los tratamientos para la recurrencia no fueron homogéneos, y los antecedentes de los pacientes difirieron entre los grupos de quimioterapia y cirugía sola.El grupo de alto brote demostró resistencia a la quimioterapia basada en 5-fluorouracilo, mientras que el grupo de bajo brote mostró beneficios significativos de supervivencia de la quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer colorrectal en estadio III. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B14.

[Adjuvant treatments of early breast cancer without lymph node involvement].

Lymph node status remains the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer. However, only 70% of the node negative breast cancer patients are alive at 10 years. Several randomized trials have shown that systemic adjuvant therapy, either chemo or hormonotherapy, increases survival in these patients. A recent meta-analysis confirms these findings. In 1992, a consensus conference recommended no therapy in low risk patients (tumor size less than 1 cm), tamoxifen in good risk patients (tumor less than 2 cm, oestrogen or progesterone receptors positive, well differentiated) and chemotherapy in premenopausal or hormonotherapy in postmenopausal high risk patients (receptor-negative less than 1 cm tumor or high pathological grade).

The Addition of Preoperative Radiation Is Insufficient for Lateral Pelvic Control in a Subgroup of Patients With Low Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Post Hoc Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

The local recurrence of rectal cancer has been improved by total mesorectal excision following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, in patients with low locally advanced rectal cancer, lateral pelvic recurrence remains to be addressed. This study aimed to determine the efficiency of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in addressing lateral pelvic recurrence and which subgroup of patients might be optimal to receive lateral lymph node dissection. The MRI/CT images were reassessed for lateral lymph node status. The lateral lymph nodes with short axis ≥5 mm and ≥4 mm were considered positive in pretreatment and restaging MRI/CT. This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial (FOWARC, NCT01211210). A total of 495 patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma were included in the original trial. According to the excluding criteria, the finally included population consists of 253 patients; of these, 195 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 94 received chemotherapy alone. The primary outcome was the 5-year lateral pelvic recurrence rate. Compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone, patients receiving additional radiotherapy had a marginal significance of lower lateral pelvic recurrence rate (6.6% vs 13.0%; p = 0.051). In the subset with pretreatment positive lateral lymph nodes, patients had a lateral pelvic recurrence rate of 22.6% and 45.1% after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone. Of note, 34.9% of the pretreatment positive lateral lymph nodes were persistent after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, culminating in a lateral pelvic recurrence rate of 63.3%. This is a post hoc analysis, and only the patients from the leading center were included, which limited the sample size. In addition, the lateral lymph node dissection was not performed in this cohort. The addition of radiotherapy in neoadjuvant regimens could not address lateral pelvic recurrence adequately. Some subgroups of patients might need additional dissection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B613. ANTECEDENTES:La recurrencia local del cancer de recto ha disminuido al efectuar una excision mesorrectal total seguida de quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante. No obstante, en pacientes con cancer de tercio inferior de recto avanzado localmente, aún está por controlarse la recurrencia pélvicaOBJETIVOS:Determinar la eficacia de la radioterapia neoadyuvante en el control de la recurrencia pélvica lateral y en que subgrupo de pacientes sería conveniente efecutar una excisión lateral de las cadenas ganglionares.DISEÑO:Se reevaluaron las imágenes tomográficas y de resonancia magnética del status de las cadenas ganglionares linfáticas laterales. Los ganglios linfáticos laterales con un eje-corto > 5 mm y ≥ 4 mm se consideraron como positivos previo al tratamiento y reestadificados con RM y TAC respectivamente.ESCENARIO:Es un análisis post hoc de un studio prospectivo randomizado controlado (FOWARC, NCT01211210).PACIENTESSe incluyeron un total de 495 pacientes en estdio II o III con adenomcarcinoma rectal en el estudio original. De acuerdo a los criterios de exclusión, la población final incluida consistió en 253 pacientes; de estos, 195 recibieron quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante y 94 quimioterapia sola.EVALUACION DE LOS RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES:El parámetro mas importante fue la tasa de recurrencia pélvica lateral a cinco años.RESULTADOS:En comparación con los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia sola, aquellos que además fueron sometidos a radioterapia adicional presentaron un margen significativo de menor tasa de recurrencia pélvica lateral (6.6% vs. 13.0%; p=0.051). En el grupo de pacientes con ganglios linfáticos laterales positivos, los enfermos presentaron una tasa de recurrencia pélvica lateral de 22.6% y 45.1% después de quimioradiaterapia neoadyuvante en comparación con quimioterapia sola respectivamente. Cabe mencionar que el 34.9% de los pacientes con ganglios linfáticos laterales positivos antes del tratamiento persistieron después de la quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante, reportándose finalmente una recurrencia pélvica lateral de un 63.3%.LIMITACIONES:Se trata de un análisis posthoc y solo los pacientes del hospital fueron incluidos, lo que limita el tamaño de la muestra. Además, no se efectuó la disección de los ganglios linfáticos laterales en este grupo.CONCLUSIONES:La radioterapia en los esquemas de neoadyuvancia no logran controlar la recurrencia pélvica lateral en forma adecuada. Algunos subgrupos de pacientes podría requerir de disección adicional. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B613.

[Effectiveness of adjuvant radiotherapy in the conservative treatment of early breast cancer].

Randomized study was made of 254 women with breast invasive duct cancer (pT1N0M0). In 61 patients, organ sparing operation was followed by radiation therapy of either breast alone or zones of regional metastasizing (57 patients) as well, with or without adjuvant chemotherapy or hormone therapy (tamoxifen). It was found that radiation of mammary gland, with or without additional radiation exposure of zones of regional metastasizing, results in both decrease recurrence development (p < 0.05) and significant (p < 0.05) increase in recurrence-free survival in women who had tumor size within the range from 1 to 2 cm in diameter in contrast to patients with tumor size not exceeding 1 cm, whose survival was not positively influenced by radiation.

Prediction of Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients With Rectal Cancer Using a DNA Repair Deregulation Score: Picking the Losers Instead of the Winners.

Patients with rectal cancer may undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiation even in early stages in an attempt to achieve complete clinical response and undergo organ preservation. However, prediction of tumor response is unavailable. In this setting, accurate identification of poor responders could spare patients with early stage disease from potentially unnecessary chemoradiation. This study focused on development/test of a score based on DNA repair gene expression to predict response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer. Pretreatment biopsy samples from patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation were collected and underwent gene expression analysis using RNA-Seq (test cohort). A score was constructed using 8 differentially expressed DNA repair genes between good (complete clinical) and poor responders (incomplete clinical) to treatment. The score was validated in 2 independent cohorts of patients undergoing similar treatment strategies and using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and microarray gene expression data. This was a retrospective analysis of gene expression data from 3 independent institutions. Patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation (50.4-54.0 Gy and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy) were eligible. Patients with complete clinical response, complete pathological response, or ≤10% residual cancer cells were considered good responders. Patients with >10% residual cancer cells were considered poor responders. The test cohort included 25 patients (16 poor responders). Validation cohort 1 included 28 patients (18 poor responders), and validation cohort 2 included 46 patients (22 poor responders). Response was correlated with the DNA repair score calculated using the expression levels of 8 DNA repair genes. DNA repair score sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined in test and validation cohorts. Poor responders had significantly lower DNA repair scores when compared with good responders across all 3 cohorts, regardless of the gene expression platform used. A low score correctly predicted poor response in 93%, 90%, and 71% in test, validation 1, and validation 2 cohorts. This study was limited by its small sample size, different gene expression platforms, and treatment regimens across different cohorts used. A DNA repair gene score may predict patients likely to have poor response to chemoradiation. This score may be a relevant tool to be investigated in future studies focused on chemoradiation used in the context of organ preservation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B104. PREDICCIÓN DE RESPUESTA DEFICIENTE A LA RADIO-QUIMIOTERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE EN PACIENTES CON CÁNCER RECTAL UTILIZANDO UNA PUNTUACIÓN DE DESREGULACIÓN DE REPARACIÓN DE ADN: ESCOGER LOS PERDEDORES EN LUGAR DE LOS GANADORES: Los pacientes con cáncer rectal pueden someterse a radio-quimioterapia neoadyuvante incluso en estadios tempranos en el intento por lograr una respuesta clínica completa y permitir una preservación de órgano. Sin embargo, aun no existen herramientas disponible para la prediccion de la respuesta tumoral al tratamiento. En este contexto, la identificación precisa de los tumores con mala respuesta al tratamiento podría evitar que los pacientes con enfermedad en estadio temprano sean sometidos a radio-quimioterapia potencialmente innecesaria.Desarrollo / testeo de una puntuación basada en la expresión genes reparadores del ADN para predecir la respuesta a la nCRT en pacientes con cáncer rectal.Se recogieron muestras de biopsia de pre-tratamiento de pacientes con cáncer rectal sometidos a radio-quimioterapia neoadyuvante y se les realizó un análisis de expresión génica utilizando RNAseq (cohorte de prueba). Se construyó una puntuación utilizando 8 genes de reparación de ADN expresados diferencialmente entre buenos (respuesta clinica completa) y pobres respondedores (respuesta clinica incompleta) al tratamiento. La puntuación se validó en 2 cohortes independientes de pacientes sometidos a estrategias de tratamiento similares y utilizando qPCR y datos de expresión de genes en chips ADN (biotecnología -microarrays).Análisis retrospectivo de los datos de expresión génica de 3 instituciones independientes.Fueron incluidos aquellos pacientes con cáncer rectal sometidos a radio-quimioterapia neoadyuvante (50,4-54 Gy y quimioterapia basada en 5FU). Los pacientes con respuesta clínica completa, respuesta patológica completa o ≤10% de células cancerosas residuales se consideraron buenos respondedores. Los pacientes con> 10% de células cancerosas residuales se consideraron de respuesta deficiente. La cohorte de prueba incluyó a 25 pacientes (16 respondedores pobres). La cohorte de validación n. ° 1 incluyó a 28 pacientes (18 respondedores pobres) y la cohorte de validación n. ° 2 incluyó a 46 pacientes (22 respondedores pobres).La respuesta se correlacionó con la puntuación de reparación de ADN calculada utilizando los niveles de expresión de 8 genes de reparación de ADN. La sensibilidad del puntaje de reparación del ADN, la especificidad, los valores predictivos positivos y negativos se determinaron en las cohortes de prueba y validación.Los malos respondedores tuvieron puntuaciones de reparación de ADN significativamente más bajas en comparación con los buenos respondedores en las 3 cohortes, independientemente de la plataforma de expresión génica utilizada. Una puntuación baja predijo correctamente una respuesta pobre en el 93%, 90% y 71% en las cohortes de prueba, validación n. ° 1 y validación n. ° 2, respectivamente.Pequeño tamaño de la muestra, diferentes plataformas de expresión génica y regímenes de tratamiento en diferentes cohortes utilizadas.La puntuacion basada en genes de reparación del ADN puede predecir los pacientes con respuesta pobre a la radio-quimioterapia. Esta puntuación puede ser una herramienta relevante para investigar en futuros estudios centrados en la radio-quimioterapia utilizada en el contexto de la preservación de órganos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B104. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo and Dr. Laura Melina Fernandez).

[Impact of taxanes in the adjuvant setting of node-negative breast cancers].

The use of regimens with adjuvant taxanes reduces the risk of recurrence and improves survival in patients with node-positive breast cancer, but the use of taxanes in node-negative breast cancer is still to be defined. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of taxanes in high-risk node-negative breast cancer. Two categories of studies were reviewed: studies that evaluated both node-positive and node-negative breast cancers, and studies that included only high-risk node-negative breast cancers. Three phase-III studies that evaluated both negative and positive nodes did not show any benefit of the use of taxanes according to the node-negative subgroup analyses, versus two studies (European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer [ECTO] et Grupo Español de Investigación del Cáncer de Mama [GEICAM]) that showed a significant difference in disease-free survival. In view of these studies, the role of taxanes in node-negative breast cancer is still controversial and the results of the ongoing trials may respond to this subject.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Does Not Improve Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients With Stage 2 or Stage 3 Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision.

Current guidelines for locally advanced stage 2/3 rectal cancer recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy. The oncologic benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has not been consistently demonstrated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate disease recurrence and survival in patients with rectal cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy after chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. This was a retrospective review of patients with stage 2/3 rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy and surgery, based on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. The study was conducted at the Kaiser Permanente Southern California system of 14 hospitals and associated clinics. A total of 862 patients with stage 2/3 rectal cancer diagnosed and treated between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016, were included in this study. The study involved neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival. A total of 348 stage 2 and 514 stage 3 patients were included; 660 patients (76.6%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Mean patient follow-up after surgery was 63.0 months (range, 3-160). Multivariable analysis showed that yp stage (HR for yp stage 2 = 4.74; yp stage 3 = 8.83) and en bloc resection (HR = 1.76) were the only variables that significantly predicted disease recurrence. Neither pretreatment tumor stage nor receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with recurrence-free survival. Log-rank testing failed to demonstrate significant recurrence-free survival improvement after receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy in any patient subgroup. The study was limited by selection bias attributed to the nature of a retrospective study without patient randomization or predefined treatment protocol. In stage 2/3 rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy and surgery, the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with decreased recurrence-free survival in the entire cohort or in any subgroup, whereas tumor response to chemoradiotherapy is closely associated with disease recurrence. These findings have important consequences for treatment and surveillance decisions for patients with rectal cancer. Presurgical efforts that maximize tumor downstaging, such as total neoadjuvant therapy, may produce better oncologic outcomes than traditional adjuvant chemotherapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B134. LA QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE NO MEJORA LA SOBREVIDA LIBRE DE RECURRENCIA EN PACIENTES CON CÁNCER DE RECTO ESTADÍOS II O III DESPUÉS DE RADIO-QUIMIOTERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE Y ESCISIÓN TOTAL DEL MESORRECTO: Las guías actuales para el tratamiento de cáncer rectal en estadio II-III localmente avanzado, recomiendan la radio-quimioterapia neoadyuvante con escisión total del mesorrecto seguidas de quimioterapia adyuvante. El beneficio oncológico de la quimioterapia adyuvante no ha sido demostrado de manera fehaciente.Evaluar la recurrencia y sobrevida a la enfermedad en pacientes con cáncer rectal que recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante después de radio-quimioterapia y escisión total del mesorrecto.Revisión retrospectiva de pacientes con cáncer rectal en estadios II-III después de radio-quimioterapia y cirugía, basada en la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante.Sistema Permanente de Kaiser Sur-Californiano de 14 hospitales y clínicas asociadas.862 pacientes con cáncer rectal en estadio II-III diagnosticados y tratados entre el 1 de Enero 2005 y el 31 de Diciembre 2016.Radio-quimioterapia neoadyuvante seguida de escisión total del mesorrecto +/- quimioterapia adyuvante.El objetivo primario fue la sobrevida libre de recurrencia.Fueron incluidos 348 pacientes en estadio II y 514 en estadio III. 660 pacientes (76,6%) se sometieron a quimioterapia adyuvante. El seguimiento medio de cada paciente después de la cirugía fué de 63.0 meses (rango, 3-160). El análisis multivariable mostró que la etapa yp (Cociente de riesgo para estadío yp II = 4.74 y estadío yp III = 8.83) y la resección en bloque (Cociente de riesgo = 1.76) fueron las únicas variables que predijeron significativamente la recurrencia de la enfermedad. Ni el estadío tumoral previo al tratamiento ni la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante se asociaron significativamente con la sobrevida libre de recurrencia. Las pruebas de rango logarítmico no pudieron demostrar una mejoría significativa de la sobrevida libre de recurrencia después de recibir quimioterapia adyuvante en cualquier subgrupo de pacientes.Sesgo de selección, debido al estudio retrospectivo sin aleatorización de los pacientes o protocolo de tratamiento predefinido.En casos de cáncer de recto estadíos II-III tratados con radio-quimioterapia y cirugía, la adición de quimioterapia adyuvante no se asoció con una disminución de la sobrevida libre de recurrencia en toda la cohorte o en ningún subgrupo, mientras que la respuesta tumoral a la radio-quimioterapia está estrechamente asociada con la recurrencia de la enfermedad. Estos hallazgos tienen consecuencias importantes en la decisión del tratamiento y la vigilancia en pacientes con cáncer de recto. Los esfuerzos pre-quirúrgicos que maximizan la reducción del tamaño del tumor, como la terapia neoadyuvante total, pueden producir mejores resultados oncológicos que la quimioterapia adyuvante tradicional. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B134.

[Results of 10 years of a randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers larger than 3 cm].

The aim of this randomised trial was to determine advantages and drawbacks of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancers > 3 cm. Two hundred and seventy-two women (age 70) with operable breast cancers larger than 3 cm (T2-3/N0-1/M0) were included in a randomised trial from January 1, 1985 to April 30, 1989. Patients in group A (n = 138) were treated by mastectomy and axillary node dissection. Adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated for 104 patients with axillary node involvement (n = 82) or negative oestrogen and progesterone receptors (EPR-) (n = 22). Patients in group B (n = 134) were treated by initial chemotherapy (identical as in group A) followed by locoregional treatment according to the response. Before treatment, the average of clinical tumoural diameter was 43 mm. The median follow-up was 124 months. In group B, 49 patients (36.5%) were resistant to chemotherapy; a conservative breast surgical treatment was performed in the other 84 patients sensitive to chemotherapy (62.6%). In this last subgroup, 19 (22.6%) needed a secondary mastectomy because of locoregional recurrence. Survival rates were not different in groups A and B, but loco-regional recurrences were frequent in group B. At 10 years, the overall survival rate was 60% and half of living patients in group B were free of cancer and with their breast. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy permitted in two-thirds of cases breast conservation treatment, initially considered to be impossible. Locoregional recurrences are more frequent than after mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy.

José Antonio Gurriarán

La Bomba." Primer libro de Gurriarán sobre la cuestión armenia publicado por Editorial Planeta en 1982, año y medio después del atentado por bomba que sufrió en la Plaza España de Madrid. Es un relato biográfico y directo del autor, en el que vierte pensamientos y sensaciones, miedos y esperanzas desde aquella noche del 29 de diciembre de 1980 en la que una potente carga explosiva, colocada por nacionalistas armenios del ESALA (Ejército Secreto para la Liberación de Armenia), contra unas líneas aéreas, le dejó malherido. Es la búsqueda incesante de los porqués de este atentado, la investigación y reconstrucción de los hechos por parte de quien siempre militó en las filas del pacisfismo y era devoto de Gandhi, Lhuter King y Lanza del Vasto. El autor logró reunirse en Líbano con los autores del atentado, y con dirigentes del ESALA. En 2011 Sirar Ediciones publica el libro en armenio. En 2015 se edita en francés (Editorial Thadée). Este mismo año y con motivo del 100 aniversario del

Naples Prognostic Score Is a Useful Prognostic Marker in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Systemic inflammation may influence the response to systemic chemotherapy or the prognosis in patients with various cancers. The Naples prognostic score, based on inflammatory and nutritional statuses, is a useful prognostic marker in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer; however, its significance in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the Naples prognostic factor in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy and to compare its prognostic accuracy with the neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio, platelet:lymphocyte ratio, and the systemic immune-inflammatory index. This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. This study was conducted at a university hospital. A total of 259 patients received first-line systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. The Naples prognostic score was calculated by a composite score of albumin and cholesterol concentrations, lymphocyte:monocyte ratio, and neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on increasing Naples scores (groups 0-2), and the associations of the Naples prognostic score with clinicopathologic features and overall survival were evaluated. Higher Naples prognostic score was positively associated with right-sided primary tumors and synchronous metastases and negatively with primary tumor resection. Patients in group 2 (high Naples prognostic score) had significantly shorter overall survival than those in groups 0 and 1 (p = 0.012 and 0.022). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the Naples prognostic score as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR = 1.574; p = 0.004). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that Naples prognostic score was more sensitive than other prognostic factors for predicting overall survival. The main limitations are the sample size, single institutional feature, and treatment heterogeneity. The Naples prognostic score may be a useful prognostic marker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving systemic chemotherapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B72. LA PUNTUACIÓN PRONÓSTICA DE NÁPOLES ES UN MARCADOR PRONÓSTICO ÚTIL EN PACIENTES CON CÁNCER COLORRECTAL METASTÁSICO: La inflamación sistémica puede influir en la respuesta a la quimioterapia sistémica o el pronóstico en pacientes con varios tipos de cáncer. La puntuación pronóstica de Nápoles, basada en estados inflamatorios y nutricionales, es un marcador pronóstico útil en pacientes sometidos a cirugía por cáncer colorrectal; sin embargo, su importancia en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico sigue siendo incierta.El objetivo fue evaluar la importancia pronóstica del factor pronóstico de Nápoles en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico que reciben quimioterapia de primera línea y comparar su precisión pronóstica con la relación neutrófilos: linfocitos, plaquetas: linfocitos y el índice sistémico inmune-inflamatorio.Este estudio se realizó en un hospital universitario.Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de datos recolectados prospectivamente.Un total de 259 pacientes recibieron quimioterapia sistémica de primera línea para el cáncer colorrectal metastásico.La puntuación pronóstica de Nápoles se calculó mediante una puntuación compuesta de concentraciones de albúmina y colesterol, proporción de linfocitos: monocitos y proporción de neutrófilos: linfocitos. Los pacientes se dividieron en tres grupos basados en el aumento de las puntuaciones de Nápoles (grupos 0-2, respectivamente) y se evaluaron las asociaciones de la puntuación pronóstica de Nápoles con las características clínico-patológicas y la supervivencia general.La puntuación pronóstica de Nápoles es más alta se asoció positivamente con los tumores primarios del lado derecho y metástasis sincrónicas, y negativamente con la resección del tumor primario. Los pacientes del grupo 2 (alto puntaje pronóstico de Nápoles) tuvieron una supervivencia general significativamente menor que los de los grupos 0 y 1 (p = 0.012 y 0.022, respectivamente). El análisis de regresión de Cox multivariado identificó la puntuación pronóstica de Nápoles como un factor pronóstico independiente para la supervivencia global (índice de riesgo = 1.574; p = 0.004). El análisis de la curva característica de funcionamiento del receptor dependiente del tiempo mostró que la puntuación pronóstica de Nápoles era más sensible que otros factores pronósticos para predecir la supervivencia global.Las principales limitaciones son el tamaño de la muestra, la característica institucional única y la heterogeneidad del tratamiento.La puntuación pronóstica de Nápoles puede ser un marcador pronóstico útil en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico que reciben quimioterapia sistémica. Vea el Abstract del video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B72.

[Modulation of indications of adjuvant hormone therapy with tamoxifen in T1T2/N0N1 breast cancers. Preliminary results of a multicenter study with 695 cases].

From 1982 to 1990, patients less than 75 years, without any previous or synchonous carcinoma, suffering from an invasive breast cancer classified as T1T2/N0N1/MO according to clinical TNM staging, were enrolled in this study; 82.4% underwent a breast conservative procedure and 17.2% a modified radical mastectomy followed by a postoperative irradiation. Histological axillary lymph node status, Scarff-Bloom grade and/or cytological grade, estradiol receptor content, were used to define three groups of patients. The breakdown of patients is not well balanced: 416 women were included in group I (N-, grade I II, ER+) when there was no adjuvant medical treatment, 110 in group II (N-, grade III, ER+), 169 in group III (N+ < or = 3, grade I II, ER+). Patients from the latter two groups were receiving tamoxifene, 20 mg per day for 2 years; Those women not menopaused received first a pelvic irradiation. With a median follow-up of 35 months (1-138) the overall survival is respectively for the three groups 95%, 96%, 96% (P = 0.5) and the disease free survival 86%, 93%, 90% (P = 0.1). The actuarial local regional remission rate is 94%, 97%, 99% (P = 0.07). Such results need to be updated with a longer follow-up, but they show the ability of adjuvant hormonotherapy to tailor the short term survival thanks to prognostic factors.

Anal Adenocarcinoma: A Rare Entity in Need of Multidisciplinary Management.

Anal adenocarcinoma is a rare clinical entity for which the optimal management is not defined. This study aimed to describe the multidisciplinary management and outcomes of patients with anal adenocarcinoma. This is a retrospective cohort study. This study was conducted at a quaternary cancer center. Men and women with anal adenocarcinoma treated between 1995 and 2016 were selected. Fifty-two patients were treated with either chemoradiotherapy or trimodality therapy including radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgical resection. Local failure, regional failure, and distant metastasis rates were estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival and overall survival. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the clinical predictors of outcome. There was a higher 5-year rate of local failure in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy compared with trimodality therapy (53% vs 10%; p < 0.01). The 5-year incidence of distant metastases was 29% (trimodality therapy) versus 30% (chemoradiotherapy; p = 0.9); adjuvant chemotherapy did not reduce the incidence of distant metastases (p = 0.8). Five-year overall survival was 73% (trimodality therapy) versus 49.4% (chemoradiotherapy; p = 0.1). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with worse overall survival were treatment with chemoradiotherapy, cT3-4 category disease, and node-positive disease. This study is limited by its small sample size and retrospective nature. Although treatment may continue to be tailored to individual patients, better outcomes with a trimodality therapy approach were observed. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B708.ADENOCARCINOMA ANAL: UNA ENTIDAD POCO FRECUENTE EN NECESIDAD DE UN MANEJO MULTIDISCIPLINARIO. El adenocarcinoma anal es una entidad clínica poco frecuente por lo que aún no se define el manejo óptimo. Describir el manejo multidisciplinario y los resultados de los pacientes con adenocarcinoma anal. Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. Centro de cáncer cuaternario. Hombres y mujeres con adenocarcinoma anal tratados entre 1995 y 2016. Cincuenta y dos pacientes fueron tratados con quimiorradioterapia o terapia trimodal que incluyó: radioterapia, quimioterapia y resección quirúrgica. Se estimaron las tasas de falla local, falla regional y metástasis a distancia mediante el método de incidencia acumulada. Se utilizó el método de Kaplan-Meier para estimar la supervivencia libre de progresión y la supervivencia global. Los riesgos proporcionales de multivariable Cox se utilizaron para evaluar los predictores clínicos de los resultados. Hubo una mayor tasa de falla local a cinco años en pacientes tratados con quimiorradioterapia en comparación con terapia trimodal (53% vs 10%; p < 0,01). La incidencia a cinco años de metástasis a distancia fue del 29% (terapia trimodal) versus 30% (quimiorradioterapia) (p = 0,9); la quimioterapia adyuvante no redujo la incidencia de metástasis a distancia (p = 0,8). La supervivencia global a cinco años fue del 73% (terapia trimodal) versus 49,4% (quimiorradioterapia); p = 0,1. En el análisis multivariable, los factores asociados con una peor supervivencia general fueron el tratamiento con quimiorradioterapia, enfermedad de categoría cT3-4 y enfermedad con ganglios positivos. Este estudio está limitado por su pequeño tamaño de muestra y su naturaleza retrospectiva. Aunque el tratamiento puede seguir adaptándose a pacientes individuales, se observaron mejores resultados con un enfoque TTM. Conslute Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B708. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

[Trastuzumab in early breast cancer].

The HER2 gene or c-erb B2 or neu is amplified in 15-25% of breast cancers. This amplification is associated with an aggressive course of disease. The trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the extracellular domain of HER2. This is the first targeted molecule designed to treat breast cancer. In the firstline metastatic disease, trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy significantly improved survival of patients with HER2-positive disease. In the adjuvant setting, trastuzumab has been evaluated in several randomized trials. The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. A search of articles published in English literature, between 1987 (date of establishment of prognostic value of HER2) and November 2012, was conducted on Medline and in the database of the main international congress using the following terms: "breast cancer", "HER2-positive", "adjuvant therapy" and "Trastuzumab". We identified seven randomized phase 3 trial evaluating trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive. The trastuzumab was administered weekly or every 3weeks. Its administration with concomitant taxane chemotherapy and with concurrent radiotherapy was preferred. Four randomized trials have clearly confirmed the benefit of trastuzumab, two positive in overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), and two positive in PFS. The duration of trastuzumab for 1year was the most effective. The trastuzumab was well tolerated. The most significant toxicity, associated with trastuzumab, was cardiac toxicity. However, it is found in only 5% or less of cases, and it is severe in only 2% or less of cases, and most patients recovered their cardiac function by medical treatment alone. In the contemporary medical literature, several strong arguments confirm the benefit in survival of trastuzumab administered concomitantly with a taxane-based chemotherapy and with concurrent radiotherapy, and for a period of 1year. Trastuzumab was well tolerated. Only 2% or less of patients experienced a serious cardiac toxicity, but it was reversible in most of the time.

Age Determines Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use in Resected Stage II Colon Cancer.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage II colon cancer remains controversial. Treatment recommendations rely largely on the presence of certain high-risk features for recurrence. We sought to define patient and clinicopathologic differences between early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer and determine whether these differences impact treatment. We hypothesized that high-risk features in stage II colorectal cancer differed between age groups and would most strongly influence administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. This was a retrospective cohort study. The study was conducted at a Commission on Cancer designated hospital as well as the National Cancer Institute Intramural Research Program. Patients with resected stage II colon cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database, and clinicopathologic characteristics were recorded. Patients were stratified into young (≤45), middle-aged (50-75), and older (>75) age groups. Incidence of high-risk clinicopathologic features and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were measured. A total of 14,966 patients met inclusion criteria. Young patients were found to have had at least one high-risk feature ( n = 489, 44%) slightly more often than both middle-aged ( n = 3734, 40%) and older patients ( n = 1890, 42%). A total of 332 (7%) older patients received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to 627 (56%) young patients and 2854 (30%) middle-aged patients. Age group was independently associated with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy when controlling for relevant clinicopathologic factors. This was a retrospective study without granular detail on treatment decisions. Young patients are frequently prescribed adjuvant chemotherapy for both high- and low-risk tumors despite questionable benefit in the latter. Older patients rarely receive adjuvant therapy. Both medical and surgical oncologists should be aware of disparities in cancer treatment and remain conscientious about making treatment decisions solely based on age. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B846 . ANTECEDENTES:El papel de la quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de colon resecado en estadio II sigue siendo controversial . Las recobmendaciones para el tratamiento dependen en gran medida de la presencia de ciertas características de alto riesgo de recurrencia.OBJETIVO:Buscamos definir las diferencias clínico-patológicas del paciente entre el CCR de inicio temprano y tardío; y determinar si estas diferencias afectan el tratamiento. Hipotetizamos que las características de alto riesgo del cáncer colorrectal en estadio II difieren entre los grupos de edad y que influyen fuertemente en la administración de quimioterapia adyuvante.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un hospital designado por la Comisión sobre el Cáncer, así como el Programa de Investigación Intramural del Instituto Nacional del Cáncer.PACIENTES:Se identificaron los pacientes con cáncer de colon resecado en estadio II en la Base de datos nacional del cáncer y se registraron las características clínico-patológicas. Los pacientes se estratificaron en grupos de edad jóvenes (≤45), de mediana edad (50-75) y mayores (> 75).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se estudiaron la incidencia de las características clínico-patológicas de alto riesgo y la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante.RESULTADOS:Un total de 14.966 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Se encontró que los pacientes jóvenes tenían al menos una característica de alto riesgo (n = 489, 44%) un poco más frecuente que los pacientes de mediana edad (n = 3734, 40%) y los pacientes mayores (n = 1890, 42%). Un total de 332 (7%) de los pacientes mayores recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante en comparación con 627 (56%) de los pacientes jóvenes y 2854 (30%) de los pacientes de mediana edad. El grupo de edad se asoció de forma independiente con la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante al controlar los factores clínico-patológicos relevantes.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo sin detalles granulares sobre las decisiones de tratamiento.CONCLUSIONES:A los pacientes jóvenes se les prescribe con frecuencia quimioterapia adyuvante para tumores de alto y bajo riesgo, a pesar de los cuestionables beneficios en estos últimos. Los pacientes de edad avanzada rara vez reciben terapia adyuvante. Tanto los oncólogos clínicos como los quirúrgicos deben ser conscientes de las disparidades en el tratamiento del cáncer y ser conscientes de tomar decisiones de tratamiento basadas únicamente en la edad. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B846 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

[Adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer].

Breast cancer(BC) is the most frequent neoplasm in women of the west countries. The treatment of BC is very complex, and include the combination of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy and immunotherapy. Surgery is the gold standard in the radical treatment of BC. Anthracyclines and taxanes are very important in the adjuvant treatment of BC. These drugs have shown an increased disease-free-survival and overall survival in several studies. Tamoxifen has been the gold standard adjuvant hormone therapy for the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early BC for many years, but the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane) are now recommended as the preferred therapy. Trastuzumab in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy has changed the natural history of early Her-2 positive BC. New drugs are under investigation in the treatment of BC.

The Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.

Patients with chronic kidney disease are commonly excluded from clinical trials. The impact of chronic kidney disease on outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer has not been previously studied. This study aimed to investigate the impact of chronic kidney disease on outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. This is a multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study. This study was conducted at academic and community cancer centers participating in the Canadian Health Outcomes Research Database Consortium Rectal Cancer Database. Consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation before curative-intent surgery from 2005 to 2013 were selected. Disease-free survival, overall survival, pathologic complete response, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy completion rate were the primary outcomes measured. A total of 1254 patients were included. Median age was 62, and 29%/69% had clinical stage II and III disease. Median estimated creatinine clearance was 93 mL/min, with 11% <60 mL/min (n = 136). There was no significant difference in the completion rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (82% vs 85%, p = 0.36) or radiotherapy (93% vs 95%, p = 0.45) between patients with and without chronic kidney disease. Patients with chronic kidney disease were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (63% vs 77%, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, patients with chronic kidney disease had decreased disease-free survival (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.82; p = 0.03) but not overall survival (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.88-1.75; p = 0.23) or pathologic complete response (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.50-1.39; p = 0.71). This study was limited by its retrospective design and by limited events for overall survival analysis. In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation, baseline chronic kidney disease was associated with less use of adjuvant chemotherapy and decreased disease-free survival. Chronic kidney disease was not independently associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy completion rate, pathologic complete response, or overall survival. These data suggest that patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with chronic kidney disease may have distinct outcomes and, accordingly, the results of landmark clinical trials may not be generalizable to this population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B694. ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica generalmente se excluyen de los ensayos clínicos. La repercusión de la enfermedad renal crónica en el desenlace en pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado no se ha estudiado previamente.OBJETIVO:Investigar la repercusión de la enfermedad renal crónica en los desenlaces en pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo multiinstitucional.ESCENARIO:Centros oncológicos académicos y comunitarios que participan en la base de datos de cáncer rectal del consorcio CHORD.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado, tratados con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante, previa a la cirugía con intención curativa del 2005 al 2013.PRINCIPALES VARIABLES EVALUADAS:Sobrevida libre de enfermedad, sobrevida global, respuesta patológica completa, tasa de conclusión de quimioterapia / radioterapia neoadyuvante.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 1254 pacientes. El promedio de edad fue de 62, y el 29% / 69% tenían enfermedad en estadio clínico II y III, respectivamente. El promedio de la depuración de creatinina estimada fue de 93 mililitros / minuto, con un 11% <60 mililitros / minuto (n = 136). No hubo diferencias significativas en la tasa de conclusión de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante (82% vs 85%, p = 0,36) o radioterapia (93% vs 95%, p = 0,45) entre pacientes con y sin enfermedad renal crónica. Los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica tenían menos probabilidades de recibir quimioterapia adyuvante (63% contra el 77%, p <0,01). En el análisis multivariado, los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica tenían una sobrevida libre de enfermedad menor (HR 1,37, IC 95% 1,03-1,82, p = 0,03) pero no en la sobrevida global (HR 1,23, IC 95% 0,88-1,75, p = 0,23) o respuesta patológica completa (OR 0,83, IC 95% 0,50-1,39, p = 0,71).LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo y acontecimientos limitados para el análisis de sobrevida global.CONCLUSIONES:En pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado tratados con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante, la enfermedad renal crónica de base se asoció con un menor uso de quimioterapia adyuvante y una menor sobrevida libre de enfermedad. La enfermedad renal crónica no se asoció de forma independiente con la tasa de conclusión de la quimioterapia / radioterapia neoadyuvante, la respuesta patológica completa o la sobrevida global. Estos datos sugieren que los pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado con enfermedad renal crónica pueden tener resultados distintos y, en consecuencia, los resultados de los ensayos clínicos de referencia pueden no ser generalizables a esta población. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B694.

[Factors predicting failure of adjuvant hormonotherapy of breast carcinoma. A study in tamoxifen treated patients].

The latest clinical trials indicate better performance of aromatase inhibitors, compared to tamoxifen, in adjuvant hormonotherapy of breast carcinoma. The identification of molecular markers, predicting resistance to tamoxifen, could help to identify patients, which are most likely to benefit from aromatase inhibitors in up-front adjuvant hormonotherapy. Tissue microarrays were constructed from archival paraffin blocks of primary tumors of 179 patients with estrogen receptor positive operable breast carcinoma in stage I-III, subsequently treated with tamoxifen for five years or until relapse, with at least 7 years follow up available. The amplifications of Her-2 and cyclin D1 genes were evaluated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. The level of progesterone receptor (PR) and Ki67 were estimated by immunohistochemistry. 54 of above patients recurred during follow up. In univariate analysis of disease free survival, the presence of more than three nodal metastases (RR=4,5 p<0,001), grade 3 (RR=2,3 p=0,035), cyclin D1 (RR=3,06 p<0,001) and Her-2 (RR=3,06 p<0,001) amplifications were identified as significant risk factors, together with the negativity of PR (RR=2,1 p=0,013). In multivariate analysis, only clinical stage III (RR=2,6 p=0,003), cyclin D1 (RR=2,7 p=0,001) and Her-2 (RR=2,1 p=0,014) amplifications proved significant. In 77 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy no statistically significant risk factor was identified. In multivariate analysis of 102 patients without adjuvant chemotherapy only stage III (RR=6,9 p=0,001) and Her-2 amplification (RR=4,5 p=0,001) were confirmed. The advanced clinical stage, cyclin D1 and Her-2 gene amplifications represent factors, predicting the failure of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment, but their predictive value is much lower in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. This fact indicates, they can reflect the common biological aggressiveness of tumor and need not to be tamoxifen specific.

A Population-Based Cohort Study of Venous Thromboembolism Rates Following Surgery and During Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Colon Cancer.

There is an elevated risk of venous thromboembolism in patients treated for colon cancer. Postoperative venous thromboembolism has been studied previously, but no large study has compared the risks during different stages of treatment. This study aimed to quantify and compare the risks of venous thromboembolism before surgery, after surgery, during adjuvant chemotherapy, and up to 365 days after surgery among patients with resected colon cancer. This is a population-based retrospective cohort study. This study was conducted in a single-payer, universal health care setting (Ontario) between 2002 and 2008. A total of 6806 patients with stage I to III colon cancer treated with surgical resection were included. Phases of treatment were evaluated, including preoperative, in-hospital, postoperative, during adjuvant chemotherapy, and 365 days postoperatively. Venous thromboembolism, as defined using diagnostic codes from administrative data sources, was the primary outcome measured. Of the 6806 patients included, 327 (5%) developed venous thromboembolism. Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had a higher risk versus surgery-alone patients (6% vs 4%, p < 0.001). Of the 327 who developed venous thromboembolism, 32% (1.6% overall) were diagnosed during hospital admission and 13.5% (0.6% overall) were diagnosed between discharge and 30 days after surgery. The majority of venous thromboembolisms diagnosed in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (53%, 3.1% of all patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy) were diagnosed within 180 days of starting adjuvant chemotherapy. Venous thromboembolism was an independent risk factor for worse 5-year overall survival (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.43-1.91; p < 0.001). This study was limited by the potential for misclassification of venous thromboembolism and unknown compliance with prophylaxis recommendations. Patients who undergo treatment for stage I to III colon cancer are at considerable risk of developing venous thromboembolism. The risk is elevated in those who require adjuvant chemotherapy, and venous thromboembolism is associated with worse long-term outcomes. There may be a role of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during all phases of treatment, including both after surgery and during adjuvant chemotherapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B123. UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE POBLACIONAL DE LAS TASAS DE TROMBOEMBOLISMO VENOSO DESPUÉS DE CIRUGÍA Y DURANTE QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE EN PACIENTES CON CÁNCER DE COLON: Existe un riesgo elevado de tromboembolismo venoso en pacientes tratados por cáncer de colon. El tromboembolismo venoso postoperatorio se ha estudiado previamente, pero ningún estudio grande ha comparado los riesgos durante las diferentes etapas del tratamiento.Cuantificar y comparar los riesgos de tromboembolismo venoso antes de la cirugía, después de la cirugía, durante quimioterapia adyuvante y hasta 365 días después de cirugía en pacientes con cáncer de colon resecado.Estudio retrospectivo de cohorte poblacional.Escenario de atención médica universal con pagador único (Ontario) entre 2002-2008.6,806 pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio I-III tratados con resección quirúrgica.Fase de tratamiento, incluyendo preoperatorio, hospitalización, postoperatorio, durante quimioterapia adyuvante y 365 días después de la operación.Tromboembolismo venoso, tal como se define utilizando códigos de diagnóstico de fuentes de datos administrativos.Se incluyeron 6,806 pacientes, con 327 (5%) que desarrollaron tromboembolismo venoso. Los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante tuvieron un mayor riesgo en comparación con los pacientes con cirugía solamente (6% vs 4%, p <0.001). De los 327 que desarrollaron tromboembolismo venoso, 32% (1.6% en general) fueron diagnosticados durante el ingreso hospitalario y 13.5% (0.6% en general) fueron diagnosticados entre el alta y 30 días después de la cirugía. La mayoría de los tromboembolismos venosos diagnosticados en pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante (53%, 3.1% de todos los pacientes con quimioterapia adyuvante) fueron diagnosticados dentro de los 180 días de comenzar la quimioterapia adyuvante. El tromboembolismo venoso fue un factor de riesgo independiente para una peor supervivencia general a 5 años (Hazard Ratio (cociente de riesgo) 1.65, IC 95% 1.43-1.91, p <0.001).Potencial de clasificación errónea del tromboembolismo venoso, cumplimiento desconocido de las recomendaciones de profilaxis.Los pacientes que se someten a tratamiento para el cáncer de colon en estadio I-III tienen un riesgo considerable de desarrollar tromboembolismo venoso. El riesgo es elevado en aquellos que requieren quimioterapia adyuvante y el tromboembolismo venoso se asocia con peores resultados a largo plazo. La profilaxis del tromboembolismo venoso puede desempeñar un papel durante todas las fases del tratamiento, incluyendo tanto el periodo posquirúrgico como durante la quimioterapia adyuvante. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B123.

[Epirubicina neoadyuvante con o sin docetaxel secuencial en el tratamiento del cáncer de mama avanzado: evaluación de la respuesta patológica completa y tolerabilidad de la quimioterapia].

To assess the pathological complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) with anthracyclines with or without taxanes in management of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Patients with LABC were included. A cohort received four cycles of 5-fluorouracil [FEC] (FEC 500 mg/m<sup2</sup, epirubicin 75 mg/m<sup2</sup, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m<sup2</sup) every 3 weeks followed by four cycles of docetaxel (D) 75 mg/m<sup2</sup as 1 h infusion intravenous every 3 weeks. Another cohort received six cycles of FE100C (500, 100 and 600 mg/m<sup2</sup). The chemotherapy was followed by surgery and radiotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference in overall response rate (ORR) (ORR: 78.5 vs. 85%; p = 0.299) and clinical complete response (cCR) (c CR: 20.6 vs. 33.3%; p = 0.103) for 4FEC→4D compared to 6FE100C, respectively. Instead, there was a statistically significant improved rate of pCR (30.2 vs. 16.7%; p = 0.049) and negative axillary lymph nodes (51.6 vs. 35%; p = 0.03) for 4FEC→4D compared to 6FE100C, respectively. Serious toxicity was low and non-significant in both cohorts. The logistic regression multivariate models showed that main significant predictors to obtain a pCR were 4FEC→4D NC (odds ratio [OR]: 2.7; p = 0.019) and stage IIIA (OR: 3.8; p = 0.002). This study showed that 4FEC→4D regimen with conventional dose is highly active and well tolerated in patients with LABC in our hospital.

Evolution of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: 8-Year Single-Institutional Experience.

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Peritoneal metastases carry the worst prognosis among all sites of colorectal cancer metastases. In recent years, the advent and acceptance of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy have greatly improved survival for selected patients with low-volume peritoneal metastases. Here, we report the evolution of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases at a statewide tertiary referral center over an 8-year period. This is a retrospective study from 2009 to 2017. The study was conducted at a single center over 8 years. Patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were included. Main outcomes included evaluation of grade III/IV morbidity rate, mortality rate, overall and relapse-free survival, and prognostic factors influencing survival on a Cox multivariate analysis model. One hundred one cytoreductive surgeries were undertaken on 96 patients during this time for colorectal peritoneal metastases. The median patient age was 60 years with 55.2% being female. The median Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index was 9, with complete cytoreduction achieved in 76 (75.2%) cases. Grade III or IV complications occurred in 26 cases (25.7%) with 2 (2%) perioperative mortalities. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 32 months, with a 3-year survival of 38%. For patients who achieved a complete cytoreduction, median overall survival was 37 months, with a relapse-free survival of 13 months and a 3-year survival of 54%. Complete cytoreduction and nonmucinous histology were key factors independently associated with improved overall survival. The main limitation this study is its retrospective nature. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for isolated low-volume colorectal peritoneal metastases is safe and effective, with low morbidity. It offers selected patients a highly favorable overall and relapse-free survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B2. EVOLUCIÓN DE LA CIRUGÍA CITORREDUCTIVA Y QUIMIOTERAPIA INTRAPERITONEAL HIPERTÉRMICA (HIPEC) PARA METÁSTASIS PERITONEALES COLORRECTALES: EXPERIENCIA INSTITUCIONAL DE 8 AÑOS: El cáncer colorrectal es la segunda causa de mortalidad relacionada con el cáncer en todo el mundo. Las metástasis peritoneales tienen el peor pronóstico entre todos los sitios de metástasis del cáncer colorrectal. En los últimos años, el advenimiento y la aceptación de la cirugía citorreductiva y la quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica ha mejorado enormemente la supervivencia de pacientes seleccionados con metástasis peritoneales de bajo volumen. Aquí, informamos sobre la evolución de la cirugía citorreductiva y la quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica para las metástasis peritoneales colorrectales en un centro de referencia terciario para todo el estado durante un período de ocho años. DISEÑO:: Estudio retrospectivo del 2009 a 2017. CONFIGURACIÓN:: Centro único a lo largo de ocho años. Pacientes con metástasis peritoneales colorrectales sometidos a cirugía citorreductiva y quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica. Los resultados principales incluyeron la evaluación de la tasa de morbilidad de grado III / IV, la tasa de mortalidad, la supervivencia general y libre de recaída y los factores pronósticos que influyen en la supervivencia en el modelo de análisis multivariado Cox. Se realizaron el ciento uno cirugías citorreductivas en noventa y seis pacientes durante este tiempo por metástasis peritoneales colorrectales. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 60 años, con un 55.2% de mujeres. El Índice de Carcinomatosis Peritoneal mediano fue de 9, con una citorreducción completa lograda en 76 (75.2%) casos. Las complicaciones de grado III o IV ocurrieron en 26 casos (25.7%) con dos (2%) de mortalidad perioperatoria. La supervivencia mediana general para toda la cohorte fue de 32 meses, con una supervivencia de 3 años del 38%. Para los pacientes que lograron una citorreducción completa, la supervivencia global media fue de 37 meses, con una supervivencia sin recaída de 13 meses y una supervivencia de 3 años del 54%. La citorreducción completa y la histología no mucinosa fueron factores clave asociados de forma independiente con una mejor supervivencia general. La principal limitación es la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio. CONCLUSIÓN:: La cirugía citorreductiva y la quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica para las metástasis peritoneales colorrectales aisladas de bajo volumen son seguras y eficaces, con baja morbilidad. Ofrece a los pacientes seleccionados una supervivencia global altamente favorable y libre de recaída. Vea el Resumen del video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B2.

[Small HER2-positive breast cancer: which prognosis and which adjuvant treatment?].

Incidence of centimetric or infracentimetric node negative (pT1a-b, N0) breast cancer is increasing due to screening procedures. Although considered as having an overall favorable prognosis, several retrospective studies have suggested a higher risk of relapse when HER2 is overexpressed. Since randomized studies evaluating trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting did not include T1a-bN0, there is no level I evidence supporting the administration of a trastuzumab-based post-operative chemotherapy in these cases. However, some recent retrospective data suggest a benefit for such a strategy and current guidelines recommend to consider adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab in pT1bN0. The final decision, as well as the nature of cytotoxics to be administered in combination with trastuzumab, require a careful evaluation of the benefit/risk ratio in order to minimize the risk of toxic events, notably at the cardiac level.

Clinical Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Cancer Resection Can Be Predicted by Pelvic Anatomic Features on Preoperative MRI Scans: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

We demonstrated previously that radiation proctitis induced by preoperative radiotherapy is a predisposing factor for clinical anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing rectal cancer resection. Quantitative measurement of radiation proctitis is needed. This study aimed to quantitate the changes of anatomic features caused by preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer and evaluate its ability to predict leakage. It was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT01211210). MRI variables were retrospectively assessed. The study was conducted in the leading center of the trial, which is a tertiary GI hospital. Patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation with sphincter-preserving surgery were included. Anatomic features were measured by preradiotherapy and postradiotherapy MRI. Univariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine the cutoff value of the changes of MRI variables in predicting leakage. Eighteen (14.4%) of the 125 included patients developed clinical anastomotic leakage. Baseline characteristics were comparable between leakage group and nonleakage group. Relative increments of width of presacral space, thickness of rectal wall, and distal end of sigmoid colon discriminate between the 2 groups better than random chance. Relative increments of width of presacral space was the best performing predictor, with area under the curve of 0.722, sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 72.0%, and positive and negative predictive value of 28.6% and 92.8%. The study was limited by its small sample size and retrospective design. Increments of the width of the presacral space, thickness of rectal wall, and distal part of the sigmoid colon helps to identify individuals not at risk for clinical anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection. The first variable is the strongest predictor. Changes of these variables should be taken into consideration when evaluating the application of defunctioning stoma. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B23. NCT1211210. LAS FUGAS ANASTOMÓTICAS CLÍNICAS DESPUÉS DE LA RESECCIÓN DEL CÁNCER DEL RECTO PUEDEN PREDECIRSE POR LAS CARACTERÍSTICAS ANATÓMICAS PÉLVICAS EN LAS IMAGENES DE RESONANCIA MAGNÉTICA PREOPERATORIA: UN ANÁLISIS SECUNDARIO DE UN ESTUDIO CONTROLADO ALEATORIZADO:: Anteriormente demostramos que la proctitis inducida por la radiación de radioterapia preoperatoria es un factor predisponente para la fuga anastomótica clínica en pacientes sometidos a resección de cáncer rectal. Es necesaria la medición cuantitativa de la proctitis por radiación.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo cuantificar los cambios en las características anatómicas causados por la radioterapia preoperatoria para el cáncer de recto y evaluar su capacidad para predecir las fugas anastomoticas.Fue un análisis secundario de un estudio controlado aleatorio (NCT01211210). Los variables de imagines de resonancia magnetica se evaluaron retrospectivamente.Se llevó a cabo en el centro principal del estudio, que es un hospital gastrointestinal terciario.Se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a quimiorradiación preoperatoria con cirugía conservadora del esfínter.Las características anatómicas se midieron mediante imagines de resonancia magnetica previa y posterior a la radioterapia. Se utilizaron análisis univariados para identificar los factores pronósticos. Las curvas de características operativas del receptor se construyeron para determinar el valor de corte de los cambios de los variables de resonancia magnetica en la predicción de fugas.Dieciocho (14.4%) de los 125 pacientes incluidos desarrollaron fugas anastomóticas clínicas. Las características basales fueron comparables entre el grupo de fugas y el grupo de no fugas. Los incrementos relativos del ancho del espacio presacro, el grosor de la pared rectal y distal del colon sigmoide discriminan entre los dos grupos mejor que la posibilidad aleatoria. Los incrementos relativos del ancho del espacio presacro fueron el mejor pronóstico con un AUC de 0.722, sensibilidad del 66.7%, especificidad del 72.0%, valor predictivo positivo y negativo del 28.6% y 92.8%.Estaba limitado por el tamaño de muestra pequeño y el diseño retrospectivo.Los incrementos en el ancho del espacio presacro, el grosor de la pared rectal y la parte distal del colon sigmoide ayudan a identificar a las personas que no tienen riesgo de fuga anastomótica clínica después de la resección del cáncer rectal. La primera variable es el predictor más fuerte. Los cambios de estos variables deben tenerse en cuenta al evaluar la aplicación del estoma para desvio. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B23.

[Initial chemotherapy with conservative treatment in locally advanced cancers of breast (stages IIIa-IIIb). Apropos of 98 cases].

Ninety-eight patients with locally advanced cancer of the breast (stages IIIa-IIIb) observed between March 1981 and March 1986 were included in a study associating initial (neoadjuvant) intensive chemotherapy with or without hormone therapy, in all cases followed by external irradiation and then by maintenance radiotherapy and chemotherapy. A greater than 50% regression in the volume of the tumour was observed in 91% of patients after the initial chemotherapy, a result which was improved by hormone therapy with a complete clinical remission in 100% of cases after external and interstitial irradiation. The incidence of local recurrence was 11%. The 3 and 5 year survival rates without recurrence were 63% and 56% respectively and the global survival rate was 78% and 65% respectively. The degree of tumoral regression after the initial chemotherapy appeared to be the major prognostic factor.

Perineural Invasion Is a Prognostic but not a Predictive Factor in Nonmetastatic Colon Cancer.

Perineural invasion is associated with adverse oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer. However, data regarding the prognostic and predictive impact in colon cancer are scarce. This study aims to clarify the role of perineural invasion in patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer. This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. This study took place at a tertiary medical center. Patients with stage I to III colon cancer who underwent elective surgery at our tertiary center between 2004 and 2015 (n = 1145) were included. The primary long-term outcomes include disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival. Differences were determined by multivariate Cox regression models adjusted for stage and potential confounders. Perineural invasion was identified in 215 patients (18.8%) and associated with emergency procedures, male sex, and advanced disease. Histopathological features including lymphatic and extramural vascular invasion, poor differentiation, and infiltrating tumor borders were correlated with perineural invasion. Compared with patients with perineural invasion-negative tumors, patients who had perineural invasion-positive tumors had worse disease-free, overall, and disease-specific survival (all p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with perineural invasion-positive node-negative disease had worse overall survival than patients with perineural invasion-negative node-positive disease (p < 0.001). After adjustment, perineural invasion remained significantly associated with worse disease-free survival (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.03-2.03; p = 0.033), worse overall survival (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.33-2.31; p < 0.001), and worse disease-specific survival (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.00-2.30; p = 0.048). However, we did not find a significant predictive response with adjuvant chemotherapy in perineural invasion-positive node-negative tumors (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 0.80-5.51; p = 0.122). The predictive value was only demonstrated in stage III disease with a significant impaired overall survival in patients with perineural invasion-positive tumors who did not receive adjuvant therapy (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13-0.40; p < 0.001). This study was limited by its retrospective design. Our study confirms the prognostic value of perineural invasion in stage I to II and III colon cancer. However, patients with node-negative disease and perineural invasion did not significantly benefit from adjuvant therapy. More information regarding postoperative treatment in node-negative perineural invasion-positive colon cancer is required. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A988. LA INVASIÓN PERINEURAL COMO FACTOR PRONÓSTICO NO PREDICTIVO EN EL CÁNCER DE COLON NO METASTÁSICO: La invasión perineural se encuentra asociada a resultados oncológicos adversos en casos de cáncer colorrectal. Sin embargo, los datos sobre el impacto pronóstico y predictivo en caso de cáncer de colon son pocos. Definir el papel de la invasión perineural en pacientes con cáncer de colon no metastásico. DISEÑO:: Revisión retrospectiva de una base de datos alimentada prospectivamente. Centro hospitalario de atención terciaria. Todos aquellos portadores de un cáncer de colon estadío I-III que se sometieron a cirugía electiva en nuestro centro entre 2004-2015 (n = 1145). Los resultados a largo plazo incluyeron la supervivencia sin enfermedad, la supervivencia específica de la enfermedad y la supervivencia general. Las diferencias se determinaron mediante modelos de regresión multivariantes de Cox, ajustados para el control de factores de confusión durante el análisis por estratificación. La invasión perineural fué identificada en 215 pacientes (18.8%) y se la asoció con procedimientos de emergencia, al género masculino y a la enfermedad avanzada. Las características histopatológicas que incluyeron la invasión vascular linfática y extramural, la diferenciación deficiente y los bordes tumorales infiltrantes se correlacionaron con la invasión perineural. Comparativamente con los tumores sin invasión perineural, los pacientes positivos a la invasión perineural tuvieron una peor supervivencia general, libre y específica de la enfermedad (todos p < 0.001). Asimismo, aquellos pacientes con invasion-perineural con ganglios negativos tuvieron una supervivencia global mucho peor que aquellos pacientes con ganglios positivos e invasión perineural negativa (p < 0.001). Después del ajuste, la invasión perineural se asoció significativamente con una peor supervivencia sin la enfermedad (HR, 1.45; IC 95%, 1.03-2.03; p = 0.033), supervivencia general (HR, 1.75; IC 95%, 1.33-2.31; p <0.001), así como con una peor supervivencia específica de la enfermedad (HR, 1.52; IC 95%, 1.00-2.30; p = 0.048). Sin embargo, no encontramos una respuesta predictiva significativa con quimioterapia adyuvante en los tumores acompañados de invasion-perineural con ganglios negativos (HR, 2.10; IC del 95%, 0.80-5.51; p = 0.122). El valor predictivo solo fué demostrado en aquellos casos de estadio III con un deterioro significativo de la supervivencia global en pacientes con tumores perineurales positivos a la invasión y que no recibieron tratamiento adyuvante (HR, 0.23; IC 95%, 0.13-0.40; p < 0.001). Diseño retrospectivo. CONCLUSIÓN:: Nuestros resultados confirman el valor pronóstico de la invasión perineural en el cáncer de colon estadios I-II y III. Sin embargo, los pacientes con enfermedad ganglionar negativa e invasión perineural no se beneficiaron significativamente de la terapia adyuvante. Se requiere más información sobre el tratamiento postoperatorio en el cáncer de colon positivo para la invasión perineural con ganglios negativos. Vea el Resumen del video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/A988.

[Influence of hormonal factors on triple-negative breast cancer prognosis].

Triples negative breast cancer defined by the absence of expression of the hormone receptors and HER2 protein, are considered as aggressive tumours with bad outcome in comparison to the hormone sensitive tumours. The aim of the study was to evaluate the link between hormone factors and prognostic factors of triple-negative tumours. All patients managed for a triple-negative breast cancer between January, 2009 and December, 2013 were included. For every patient, collected data were the clinical, histological, adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatments, as well as survival data. During the study period, 1682 patients were operated for a breast cancer, among which 1444 presented at least an invasive tumour. One hundred and fifty-five women (10.7%) had a negative triple tumour. The average age of diagnosis was 56.4years, is significantly younger than for patients with other types of tumours, P=0.0001. For women with a triple-negative tumour, the parity was the only hormonal factor identified as an independent factor for axillary lymph node involvement (OR=1.53; 95% CI [1.10-2.25] P=0.02) and previous hormone replacement therapy as an independent factor of locoregional recurrence (OR=0.13 [0.005-0.64] P=0.001). We did not find any hormonal factor predictive of distant metastasis. We did not find any difference in overall survival according to the parity (P=0.72), the Body mass index (P=0.62) or the use of HRT (P=0.49). Hormone factors seem to have a prognostic implication for triple-negative despite the absence of hormone receptors expression.

Clinical Decision Support for High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer: A Real-World Study of Treatment Concordance and Survival.

Prognostic and pathologic risk factors typically guide clinicians and patients in their choice of surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy when managing high-risk stage II colon cancer. However, variations in treatment and outcomes in patients with stage II colon cancer remain. This study aimed to assess the survival benefits of treatments concordant with suggested therapeutic options from Watson for Oncology, a clinical decision support system. This is a retrospective observational study of concordance between actual treatment and Watson for Oncology therapeutic options. This study was conducted at a top-tier cancer center in China. Postoperative treatment data were retrieved from the electronic health records of 306 patients with high-risk stage II colon adenocarcinoma. The primary outcomes measured were the treatment patterns plus 3- and 5-year overall and disease-free survival for concordant and nonconcordant cases. Overall concordance was 90%. Most nonconcordant care resulted from adjuvant chemotherapy use (rather than surveillance) in patients with high-level microsatellite instability and ≥70 years old. No difference in overall survival (p = 0.56) or disease-free survival (p = 0.19) was observed between concordance groups. Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly higher 5-year overall survival than those undergoing surveillance (94% vs 84%, p = 0.01). This study was limited by the use of retrospective cases drawn from patients presenting for surgery, the lack of complete follow-up data for 58% of patients who could not be included in the analysis, and a survival analysis that assumes no unmeasured correlation between survival and censoring. Watson for Oncology produced therapeutic options highly concordant with human decisions at a top-tier cancer center in China. Treatment patterns suggest that Watson for Oncology may be able to guide clinicians to minimize overtreatment of patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer with chemotherapy. Survival analyses suggest the need for further investigation to specifically assess the association between surveillance, single-agent and multiagent chemotherapy, and survival outcomes in this population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B291. APOYO A LA DECISIÓN CLÍNICA DEL CÁNCER DE COLON EN ESTADIO II DE ALTO RIESGO: UN ESTUDIO DEL MUNDO REAL SOBRE LA CONCORDANCIA DEL TRATAMIENTO Y LA SUPERVIVENCIA: Los factores de riesgo pronósticos y patológicos generalmente guían a los médicos y pacientes en su elección de vigilancia o quimioterapia adyuvante cuando se trata el cáncer de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo. Sin embargo, las variaciones en el tratamiento y los resultados en pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio II permanecen.Evaluar los beneficios de supervivencia de los tratamientos concordantes con las opciones terapéuticas sugeridas por "Watson for Oncology" (Watson para la oncología), un sistema de apoyo a la decisión clínica.Estudio observacional retrospectivo de concordancia entre el tratamiento real y las opciones terapéuticas de Watson para oncología.Un centro oncológico de primer nivel en China.Datos de tratamiento postoperatorio de registros de salud electrónicos de 306 pacientes con adenocarcinoma de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo.Patrones de tratamiento más supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad a 3 y 5 años para casos concordantes y no concordantes.La concordancia general fue del 90%. La mayoría de la atención no concordante resultó del uso de quimioterapia adyuvante (en lugar de vigilancia) en pacientes de alto nivel con inestabilidad de microsatélites y pacientes ≥70 años. No se observaron diferencias en la supervivencia global (p = 0,56) o la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (p = 0,19) entre los grupos de concordancia. Los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante tuvieron una supervivencia global a los 5 años significativamente más alta que los que fueron sometidos a vigilancia (94% frente a 84%, p = 0,01).Uso de casos retrospectivos extraídos de pacientes que se presentan para cirugía, falta de datos de seguimiento completos para el 58% de los pacientes que no pudieron ser incluidos en el análisis, y análisis de supervivencia que asume que no exite una correlación no medida entre supervivencia y censura.Watson para Oncología produjo opciones terapéuticas altamente concordantes con las decisiones humanas en un centro oncológico de primer nivel en China. Los patrones de tratamiento sugieren que Watson para Oncología puede guiar a los médicos para minimizar el sobretratamiento de pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo con quimioterapia. Los análisis de supervivencia sugieren la necesidad de realizar mas investigaciónes para evaluar específicamente la asociación entre la vigilancia, la quimioterapia con uno solo o múltiples agentes y los resultados de supervivencia en esta población. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B291. (Traducción-Dr. Gonzalo Hagerman).

[Local recurrences after conservative treatment of breast cancer: risk factors and influence on survival].

To determine the risk factors for local and distant failure in node-negative breast cancer treated with breast-conservative surgery and radiotherapy and to determine the relationship between these two events. We retrospectively selected 908 patients who received conservative surgery and radiotherapy but no chemotherapy between 1980 and 1995, for a node-negative breast cancer. Patients were divided in two groups according to the status of the margins of resection. All pathology specimens were reviewed. In case of negative margins, the risk factors for local recurrences picked up by the Cox model were histologic multifocality (P = 0.0076), peritumoral vessel invasion (P = 0.021) and age < or = 40 years (P = 0.024), and in case of involved margins, negative oestrogen receptors (P = 0.0012), histologic multifocality (P = 0.0028), and absence of hormonal therapy (P = 0.017). The 10-year local recurrence rate was 18% in case of negative margins and 29% in case of involved margins, although in the latter case patients received high-dose adjuvant radiotherapy. Accordingly, the 10-year distant failure rates were 16% and 27%, respectively. Many arguments suggest that local and distant failures are closely related. Patients with histologic multifocality or positive margins are at high risk of local failure and then of distant failure, and require a more aggressive initial treatment.

Tailored Strategy for Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma (GRECCAR 4): Long-term Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II Trial.

Systematic preoperative radiochemotherapy and total mesorectal excision are the standard of care for locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Some patients can be over- or undertreated. This study aimed to investigate the long-term oncological, functional, and late morbidity outcomes after tailored radiochemotherapy and induction high-dose chemotherapy. This is a prospective, phase II, multicenter, open-label study at 16 tertiary centers in France. Patients were operated on by surgeons from the French GRECCAR group. Two hundred six patients were randomly assigned to treatment: good responders after chemotherapy (≥75% tumor volume reduction) to immediate surgery (arm A) or standard radiochemotherapy (capecitabine 50) plus surgery (arm B) and poor responders to capecitabine 50 (arm C) or intensive radiochemotherapy (capecitabine 60; 60 Gy irradiation; arm D) before surgery. Treatment was tailored according to MRI response to induction chemotherapy. After induction treatment, 194 patients were classified as good (n = 30, 15%) or poor (n = 164, 85%) responders; they were included in arms A and B (16 and 14 patients) or C and D (113 and 51 patients). The primary objective was obtained: R0 resection rates (90% CI) in the 4 arms were 100% (74-100), 100% (85-100), 83% (72-91), and 88% (77-95). At 5 years, overall survival rates were 90% (47.3-98.5), 93.3% (61.3-99.0), 84.3% (71.0-91.8), and 86.1% (71.6-93.5); disease-free survival rates were 80% (40.9-94.6), 89.5% (64.1-97.3), 72.9% (58.5-82.9), and 72.8% (57.7-83.2); local recurrence rates were 0%, 0%, 2.1% (0.3-13.9), and 9.3% (3.6-23.0); and metastasis rates were 20% (5.4-59.1), 10.5% (2.7-35.9), 18% (31.8-94.6), and 18.8% (10.2-33.0). Late morbidity and quality-of-life evaluations showed no significant difference between arms. Limitations were due to the small number of patients randomly assigned in the good responder arms, especially arm A without radiotherapy. Tailoring preoperative radiochemotherapy based on induction treatment response appears to be promising. Future prospective trials should confirm this strategy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B761 . URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Identifier: NCT01333709. ANTECEDENTES:La radio-quimioterapia pré-operatoria sistemáticas y la excisión total del mesorrecto son el estándar en el tratamiento del carcinoma de recto localmente avanzado. En éste sentido, algunos pacientes podrían recibir un sobre o un infra-tratamiento.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados oncológicos, funcionales y de morbilidad a largo plazo después de radio-quimioterapia personalizada y quimioterapia de inducción a dosis elevadas.DISEÑO:Estudio aleatório multicéntrico y abierto de Fase II° realizado en 16 centros terciarios en Francia.AJUSTE:Aquellos pacientes operados por cirujanos del grupo GRECCAR francés.PACIENTES:206 pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente al tratamiento: los buenos respondedores después de quimioterapia (reducción del volumen tumoral ≥75%) a la cirugía inmediata (brazo A) o a la radio-quimioterapia estándar (Cap 50) asociada a la cirugía (brazo B); los malos respondedores a Cap 50 (brazo C) o a la radio-quimioterapia intensiva (Cap 60 (irradiación de 60 Gy) (brazo D) previas a la cirugía.INTERVENCIONES:Tratamiento adaptado según la respuesta de la RM a la TC de inducción.RESULTADOS:Después del tratamiento de inducción, 194 pacientes fueron clasificados como buenos (n = 30, 15%) o malos (n = 164, 85%) respondedores, y se incluyeron en los brazos A y B (16 y 14 pacientes) o C y D (113 y 51 pacientes). Se alcanzó el objetivo principal: las tasas de resección R0 [intervalo de confianza del 90%] en los cuatro brazos respectivamente, fueron del 100% [74-100], 100% [85-100], 83% [72-91] y 88% [77-95]. A los 5 años, las tasas fueron: de sobrevida global 90% [47,3-98,5], 93,3% [61,3-99,0], 84,3% [71,0-91,8], 86,1% [71,6-93,5]; de sobrevida libre a la enfermedad 80% [40,9-94,6], 89,5% [64,1-97,3], 72,9% [58,5-82,9], 72,8% [57,7-83,2]; de recidiva local 0, 0, 2,1% [0,3-13,9], 9,3% [3,6-23,0]; de metástasis 20% [5,4-59,1], 10,5% [2,7-35,9], 18% [31,8-94,6], 18,8% [10,2-33,0]. La evaluación tardía de la morbilidad y la calidad de vida no mostraron diferencias significativas entre los brazos.LIMITACIONES:Debido al pequeño número de pacientes asignados al azar en los brazos de buenos respondedores, especialmente en el brazo A de aquellos sin radioterapia.CONCLUSIÓN:Parecería muy prometedor el adaptar la radio-quimioterapia pré-operatoria basada en la respuesta al tratamiento de inducción. Estudios prospectivos en el futuro podrán confirmar la presente estrategia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B761 . (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo )IDENTIFICADOR DE CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:NCT01333709. Groupe de REcherche Chirurgicale sur le CAncer du Rectum.

[Co-expression of estrogen receptors and Her2/neu in breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy sentinel lymph node and hormonotherapy].

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an interesting option in the therapy of some breast cancer cases. Cases in which the timing for sentinel lymph node biopsy is controversial. Co-expression of estrogen receptors and Her2/neu (c-erbB-2) in breast cancer may imply hormone resistance, especially to tamoxifen. We present a clinic case with co-expression of estrogen receptors and Her2/neu that was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and previous sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by breasttumorectomy with axillar lymphadenectomy, radiotherapy and hormonotherapy with letrozol, geserelina and trastuzumab. A good treatment response was found.