JunJiaGuo commited on
Commit
564adc2
·
1 Parent(s): 0691f76

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +2 -4
README.md CHANGED
@@ -5,13 +5,11 @@ task_categories:
5
  - multiple-choice
6
  - video-text-to-text
7
  ---
8
- # VidComposition Dataset
9
 
10
  [🖥 Project Page](https://yunlong10.github.io/VidComposition) | [🚀 Evaluation Space](https://huggingface.co/spaces/JunJiaGuo/VidComposition)
11
 
12
- **VidComposition** is a video-language benchmark designed to evaluate the **temporal** and **compositional reasoning** capabilities of models through multiple-choice question answering based on short video segments.
13
-
14
- This dataset release includes annotated video segments, reasoning-type labels, and multiple-choice QA pairs.
15
 
16
  ---
17
 
 
5
  - multiple-choice
6
  - video-text-to-text
7
  ---
8
+ # VidComposition Benchmark
9
 
10
  [🖥 Project Page](https://yunlong10.github.io/VidComposition) | [🚀 Evaluation Space](https://huggingface.co/spaces/JunJiaGuo/VidComposition)
11
 
12
+ The advancement of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has enabled significant progress in multimodal understanding, expanding their capacity to analyze video content. However, existing evaluation benchmarks for MLLMs primarily focus on abstract video comprehension, lacking a detailed assessment of their ability to understand video compositions, the nuanced interpretation of how visual elements combine and interact within highly compiled video contexts. We introduce **VidComposition**, a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the video composition understanding capabilities of MLLMs using carefully curated compiled videos and cinematic-level annotations. VidComposition includes 982 videos with 1706 multiple-choice questions, covering various compositional aspects such as camera movement, angle, shot size, narrative structure, character actions and emotions, etc. Our comprehensive evaluation of 33 open-source and proprietary MLLMs reveals a significant performance gap between human and model capabilities. This highlights the limitations of current MLLMs in understanding complex, compiled video compositions and offers insights into areas for further improvement.
 
 
13
 
14
  ---
15