<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>timtadh</author><text>If you really want to understand this you should read the paper. However, I will try my best to summarize my understanding of what is going on. (Disclaimer: I am not a professional cryptographer, but I know something about crypto-complexity).&lt;p&gt;Many proofs in cryptography start with the following assumption: assume x is a bitstring of length N drawn from a uniformly random distribution of bit strings. This assumption is then used as the basis of the proof of the cryptographic construct.&lt;p&gt;For instance in a provably secure stream cipher you start with that assumption then proceed to show that if weak one-way-functions exist then you can construct a secure pseudo random number generator that is polynomially indistinguishable from a true random source. You then use your assumed random bit string, x, as the key to the psuedo random number generator to generate a one time pad to XOR with your message.&lt;p&gt;Since the secure psuedo random number generator is indistinguishable from a true random number generator (by a polynomial attacker) the message is secure (from a polynomial attacker). However, this is all predicated on the key being drawn from a uniform distribution. If the key is NOT drawn from a uniform distribution than there may be a potential speed-up available to the attacker.&lt;p&gt;What the paper shows is that often it is assumed that words drawn from an IID distribution of letters can be treated as if the distribution of words is uniform (given a sufficiently large word size). However, this distribution while very flat is not quite uniform. They show how this can be exploited using the &amp;quot;Guesswork&amp;quot; framework to come up with a tighter bound on the time it would take to guess a chosen word. This bound is much better than the traditional bound used.&lt;p&gt;What this means is that there needs to be more margin given than previously thought when dealing with keys derived from non-uniform distributions. Such keys include passwords.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Encryption is less secure than we thought</title><url>http://www.mit.edu/newsoffice/2013/encryption-is-less-secure-than-we-thought-0814.html</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>signed0</author><text>TLDR: &lt;i&gt;Bloch doubts that the failure of the uniformity assumption means that cryptographic systems in wide use today are fundamentally insecure. “My guess is that it will show that some of them are slightly less secure than we had hoped, but usually in the process, we’ll also figure out a way of patching them.”&lt;/i&gt;</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Encryption is less secure than we thought</title><url>http://www.mit.edu/newsoffice/2013/encryption-is-less-secure-than-we-thought-0814.html</url></story>