<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>shever73</author><text>&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;#x2F;AlexAlexandrius&amp;#x2F;status&amp;#x2F;1617885287048425478?s=20&amp;amp;t=fVNqR7S_mhvIDHtRe50Wrw&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;#x2F;AlexAlexandrius&amp;#x2F;status&amp;#x2F;16178852870484254...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, all I&amp;#x27;ve learned is that ChatGPT knows the obfuscated and de-obfuscated versions of code that it itself has generated.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>TIL you can de-obfuscate code with ChatGPT</title><url>https://twitter.com/AlexAlexandrius/status/1617876020593557506</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>crizzlenizzle</author><text>Is it correct though?&lt;p&gt;I’ve been toying around with ChatGPT for a few weeks now and I encountered a few situations in which ChatGPT was like 90% accurate at best. Things like suggesting snippets of configuration files or plugin research. It’s good to get an idea and get started somewhere, but I certainly cannot trust it blindly.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>TIL you can de-obfuscate code with ChatGPT</title><url>https://twitter.com/AlexAlexandrius/status/1617876020593557506</url></story>