<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>sherjilozair</author><text>Why are close-world assumptions bad for all cases? There might be cases limited to a domain where the computer does not need to know about the world too much. Consider, the language of geometry problems given in high school math books. Surely, to understand that, one doesn&amp;#x27;t need to have world knowledge, but only ideas about what intersect means, and so on. This way, SHRDLU can be modified to understand geometry problem statements. The same way, it could also work for other domain-limited applications. A general solution might have to go to probabilistic systems, as current research suggests.</text><parent_chain><item><author>zeratul</author><text>Maybe it&amp;#x27;s also good idea to revisit the reason why these systems are not widely in use. They all operate under so called &amp;quot;closed-world&amp;quot; assumptions. It means that the knowledge about the world is very limited.&lt;p&gt;Once the limitation is lifted the system has to deal with non-monotonic reasoning (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-monotonic_logic&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Non-monotonic_logic&lt;/a&gt;) and that leads to multiple inheritance problem (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_inheritance&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Multiple_inheritance&lt;/a&gt;). Unfortunately, the multiple inheritance problem has, so far, only NP-hard solutions (&lt;a href=&quot;http://ijcai.org/Past%20Proceedings/IJCAI-89-VOL-2/PDF/047.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;ijcai.org&amp;#x2F;Past%20Proceedings&amp;#x2F;IJCAI-89-VOL-2&amp;#x2F;PDF&amp;#x2F;047.p...&lt;/a&gt;). [EDIT: think of a command &amp;quot;eggs are in a fridge&amp;quot;; to find eggs in a fridge you need to know that they are inside a container; you need to know its shape and how to open it; if your software knows that and inherits this knowledge each time when asked for eggs, then it will brake when the eggs are not in the box.]&lt;p&gt;We are in need of software that deals with large networks of human knowledge. Then we can take SHRDLU to the next level. Otherwise we are stuck with Will Smith movie (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0343818/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.imdb.com&amp;#x2F;title&amp;#x2F;tt0343818&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;p&gt;[EDIT2: there are many theoretical &amp;quot;suggestions&amp;quot; but very little software or practical internet applications]</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>SHRDLU</title><url>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHRDLU</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jbarrow</author><text>Although it&amp;#x27;s not a discussion of the specific limitations of a closed-world system, Jeff Hawkin&amp;#x27;s 2004 book &amp;quot;On Intelligence&amp;quot; touches on many of the shortcomings of such systems, especially with respect to general problem solving and understanding. Even if you don&amp;#x27;t agree with all of his ideas, I would still recommend reading it if you have an interest in computer understanding.</text><parent_chain><item><author>zeratul</author><text>Maybe it&amp;#x27;s also good idea to revisit the reason why these systems are not widely in use. They all operate under so called &amp;quot;closed-world&amp;quot; assumptions. It means that the knowledge about the world is very limited.&lt;p&gt;Once the limitation is lifted the system has to deal with non-monotonic reasoning (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-monotonic_logic&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Non-monotonic_logic&lt;/a&gt;) and that leads to multiple inheritance problem (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_inheritance&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Multiple_inheritance&lt;/a&gt;). Unfortunately, the multiple inheritance problem has, so far, only NP-hard solutions (&lt;a href=&quot;http://ijcai.org/Past%20Proceedings/IJCAI-89-VOL-2/PDF/047.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;ijcai.org&amp;#x2F;Past%20Proceedings&amp;#x2F;IJCAI-89-VOL-2&amp;#x2F;PDF&amp;#x2F;047.p...&lt;/a&gt;). [EDIT: think of a command &amp;quot;eggs are in a fridge&amp;quot;; to find eggs in a fridge you need to know that they are inside a container; you need to know its shape and how to open it; if your software knows that and inherits this knowledge each time when asked for eggs, then it will brake when the eggs are not in the box.]&lt;p&gt;We are in need of software that deals with large networks of human knowledge. Then we can take SHRDLU to the next level. Otherwise we are stuck with Will Smith movie (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0343818/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.imdb.com&amp;#x2F;title&amp;#x2F;tt0343818&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;p&gt;[EDIT2: there are many theoretical &amp;quot;suggestions&amp;quot; but very little software or practical internet applications]</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>SHRDLU</title><url>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHRDLU</url></story>