<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>kmod</author><text>This reminds me about the Semantic Web, which was a movement explicitly about making the web more understandable to machines. I don&amp;#x27;t agree with the ideas and I think a lot of other people were also skeptical, but I bring it up to say that some people take the other side of your argument rather seriously and that there&amp;#x27;s a lot of existing debate on the topic. Here&amp;#x27;s Tim Berners-Lee talking about this way back in 1999:&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I have a dream for the Web [in which computers] become capable of analyzing all the data on the Web – the content, links, and transactions between people and computers. A &amp;quot;Semantic Web&amp;quot;, which makes this possible, has yet to emerge, but when it does, the day-to-day mechanisms of trade, bureaucracy and our daily lives will be handled by machines talking to machines. The &amp;quot;intelligent agents&amp;quot; people have touted for ages will finally materialize.&lt;p&gt;I quoted this from &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Semantic_Web&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Semantic_Web&lt;/a&gt; since the original reference was a book that is not openly accessible. Also I think it&amp;#x27;s funny that he&amp;#x27;s talking about agents in exactly the same way that people do now.</text><parent_chain><item><author>blenderob</author><text>Anyone else worried how backward this sounds? I mean this is like totally giving up on the dismal state of website UXes these days and gladly accepting that website navigation and experience should remain utterly confusing for humans but machines (yes, machines) should get preferential treatment! Good UX is now for machines, not for humans!&lt;p&gt;Shouldn&amp;#x27;t something like this be first and foremost for humans ... which also benefits machines as an obvious side-effect?</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Llms.txt</title><url>https://llmstxt.org/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>spencerchubb</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s recognizing that the needs of a human are different from the needs of an LLM.</text><parent_chain><item><author>blenderob</author><text>Anyone else worried how backward this sounds? I mean this is like totally giving up on the dismal state of website UXes these days and gladly accepting that website navigation and experience should remain utterly confusing for humans but machines (yes, machines) should get preferential treatment! Good UX is now for machines, not for humans!&lt;p&gt;Shouldn&amp;#x27;t something like this be first and foremost for humans ... which also benefits machines as an obvious side-effect?</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Llms.txt</title><url>https://llmstxt.org/</url></story>