<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>glhaynes</author><text>Add one more to the &amp;quot;Reasons Apple would want to take control of their own destiny by putting their own chips in Macs&amp;quot; tally.</text><parent_chain><item><author>Slartie</author><text>So I guess this means that we&amp;#x27;ll have to wait an additional year for the MacBook Pro that finally smashes through this archaic limit of 16 gigabytes of memory :(&lt;p&gt;Except if Intel wakes up and relieves us from our pains by inserting a Kaby Lake revision of sorts with an updated memory controller capable of driving more low-power RAM. I personally couldn&amp;#x27;t care less about 10-20% more processing power per watt from Cannonlake and 10nm, it&amp;#x27;s the memory limit that&amp;#x27;s really limiting me.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Intel delays Cannonlake 10nm processor for the third time</title><url>https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/business/intel-delays-cannonlake-10nm-processor-third-time-2017-09/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>bogomipz</author><text>&amp;gt;&amp;quot;So I guess this means that we&amp;#x27;ll have to wait an additional year for the MacBook Pro that finally smashes through this archaic limit of 16 gigabytes of memory.&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;Can you elaborate? What are the details of the current chips that limits Macbooks to 16 Gigs? Is it power consumption?</text><parent_chain><item><author>Slartie</author><text>So I guess this means that we&amp;#x27;ll have to wait an additional year for the MacBook Pro that finally smashes through this archaic limit of 16 gigabytes of memory :(&lt;p&gt;Except if Intel wakes up and relieves us from our pains by inserting a Kaby Lake revision of sorts with an updated memory controller capable of driving more low-power RAM. I personally couldn&amp;#x27;t care less about 10-20% more processing power per watt from Cannonlake and 10nm, it&amp;#x27;s the memory limit that&amp;#x27;s really limiting me.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Intel delays Cannonlake 10nm processor for the third time</title><url>https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/business/intel-delays-cannonlake-10nm-processor-third-time-2017-09/</url></story>