<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>mortenjorck</author><text>Original post is from April, but there is an update at the bottom from June:&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;gt; Got a call from Apple after 2 months. They have decided that iDOS is not a retro game console, so the new rule is not applicable. They suggested I make changes and resubmit for review, but when I asked what changes I should make to be compliant, they had no idea, nor when I asked what a retro game console is.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;We need a DMA over here yesterday.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>iDOS 3 Rejected by Apple</title><url>https://litchie.com/2024/04/new-hope</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>giancarlostoro</author><text>Apple seriously needs to make all internal coms about rejecting apps public to the person being rejected. I do mean &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; this way, when people blog about it, there&amp;#x27;s no more ambiguity and it can be assessed. Also, you can see if they&amp;#x27;re rejecting it for something they already approved of prior. It feels like some people doing the reviews dont look at prior history at all. Maybe they dont even get access to it, or maybe they dont want to do it. Let the applicant see their entire history, let them better clarify.&lt;p&gt;This is so embarassing to see every time.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>iDOS 3 Rejected by Apple</title><url>https://litchie.com/2024/04/new-hope</url></story>