<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>_Microft</author><text>&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;Unfortunately, while their radiative forcing estimate is well within the range of others in the literature, their calculation of the resulting warming relies on an overly simplified model that results in a substantial overstating of current warming impacts.&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.theclimatebrink.com&amp;#x2F;p&amp;#x2F;a-problematic-estimate-of-warming&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.theclimatebrink.com&amp;#x2F;p&amp;#x2F;a-problematic-estimate-of-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;The conclusions of this paper are being disputed. Read more about that at the page linked above.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>2023 planetary heat uptake from termination shock of inadvertent geoengineering?</title><url>https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01442-3</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>AndrewKemendo</author><text>This is wild:&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The amount of radiative forcing could lead to a doubling (or more) of the warming rate in the 2020 s compared with the rate since 1980 with strong spatiotemporal heterogeneity. The warming effect is consistent with the recent observed strong warming in 2023 and expected to make the 2020 s anomalously warm. The forcing is equivalent in magnitude to 80% of the measured increase in planetary heat uptake since 2020.&lt;p&gt;Truly, all bets are off for being able to predict the climate going forward</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>2023 planetary heat uptake from termination shock of inadvertent geoengineering?</title><url>https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01442-3</url></story>