<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>diegoandrade</author><text>This is not Physics-based at all, you need to introduce other variables like wind speed around the drone, the direction of the wind, angle of attack, viscosity, etc. 
This example is parametric modeling at best or a configurator, not saying that is bad, just has a misleading title. I do not see any real geometry manipulation or groundbreaking CAD being attempted. Here is a viewer that Autodesk released this year using javascript.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;developer.autodesk.com&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;developer.autodesk.com&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Show HN: Physics-based CAD</title><url>http://www.prandtl.design/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>kylestlb</author><text>Nice project.  What are you hoping to add in the future?&lt;p&gt;Our team works on goal directed design as well, but at the moment it&amp;#x27;s less of an interactive optimization tool and more of an involved job running process a la Optistruct.  One of our fun projects was a drone body as well :)&lt;p&gt;link for the interested: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;autodeskresearch.com&amp;#x2F;projects&amp;#x2F;dreamcatcher&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;autodeskresearch.com&amp;#x2F;projects&amp;#x2F;dreamcatcher&lt;/a&gt;</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Show HN: Physics-based CAD</title><url>http://www.prandtl.design/</url></story>