<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>arp242</author><text>To view Facebook as &amp;quot;complicit&amp;quot; is probably not the right way to view things.  The fact of the matter is that at scale, it&amp;#x27;s almost impossible to prevent these kind of thing. Facebook is &amp;quot;complicit&amp;quot; in the same way that, say, the W3C is &amp;quot;complicit&amp;quot;: by providing the tools.&lt;p&gt;Could Facebook be doing better or more? Probably. But they are surrounded by malicious actors from all sides, ranging from people who issue coordinated takedown requests like in this story to people who use Facebook to maliciously push &amp;quot;fake news&amp;quot; stories to just banal and boring spammers to outright scams. Balancing this all out and keeping a grip on things at scale is very hard, perhaps even impossible.&lt;p&gt;Even HN would be vulnerable to these kind of attacks; HN&amp;#x27;s scale is much smaller than Facebook&amp;#x27;s but still much too large for anyone to really get a &amp;quot;grip&amp;quot; on. A few years ago one of my stories got flagged[1], and while I&amp;#x27;m probably biased I don&amp;#x27;t think it should be (I probably should have email dang about it, but I didn&amp;#x27;t post it myself and didn&amp;#x27;t really want to bother him with it). Was it &amp;quot;coordinated&amp;quot;? Probably not. The end result is the same though: people abuse the &amp;quot;flag&amp;quot; feature to hide stories they would prefer to not be seen. I also know for a fact that some companies will coordinate employees to upvote comments and stories because I worked for a company that did this.&lt;p&gt;Is HN currently under attack from coordinated flagging? Maybe, maybe not. I would be surprised if it hasn&amp;#x27;t happened on at least &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; occasions, and the only reason it doesn&amp;#x27;t happen more often is that it&amp;#x27;s small enough to fly under the radar for most of these kind of government agencies.&lt;p&gt;I think it&amp;#x27;s important to have a good understanding of the situation as only with a good understanding can you come up with a good solution. &amp;quot;Facebook bad&amp;quot; may or may not be true, but it is not a good understanding of things.&lt;p&gt;[1]: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;#x2F;item?id=26579225&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;#x2F;item?id=26579225&lt;/a&gt;</text><parent_chain><item><author>system16</author><text>So Facebook is complicit in allowing its platform to be weaponized by the state against all speakers of Vietnamese (in and outside of the country). When questioned, they simply shrug their shoulders and say &amp;quot;if we did anything to stop this, our platform would be banned in Vietnam.&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m beyond the point of expecting anything more from Facebook, but I would think the US government should have some leverage here. Vietnam is not the powerhouse that China is (yet), so if a major US company were banned because it applied the same rules it applies to every other country, I&amp;#x27;d expect that to be a violation of their WTO commitments.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>The Vietnamese military has an actual troll army and Facebook is its weapon</title><url>https://restofworld.org/2023/force-47-vietnam-military-group-facebook/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>kornhole</author><text>Does Facebook have rules that are consistently applied to every country? AFAIK, Facebook complies with the local governments&amp;#x27; requirements everywhere it operates even though they will occasionally publicize some resistance.</text><parent_chain><item><author>system16</author><text>So Facebook is complicit in allowing its platform to be weaponized by the state against all speakers of Vietnamese (in and outside of the country). When questioned, they simply shrug their shoulders and say &amp;quot;if we did anything to stop this, our platform would be banned in Vietnam.&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m beyond the point of expecting anything more from Facebook, but I would think the US government should have some leverage here. Vietnam is not the powerhouse that China is (yet), so if a major US company were banned because it applied the same rules it applies to every other country, I&amp;#x27;d expect that to be a violation of their WTO commitments.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>The Vietnamese military has an actual troll army and Facebook is its weapon</title><url>https://restofworld.org/2023/force-47-vietnam-military-group-facebook/</url></story>