<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>chrisandchris</author><text>Maybe it&amp;#x27;s just me, but I would never like to pay such an amount for a subscription of a service (they charge &amp;gt;300 if you use C#, as I do). I maybe want to analyze my architecture on this level a couple times a year. Why do I have to pay each month? I&amp;#x27;m missing usage-based pricing today, everyone sticks everything into a subscription.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Show HN: Archsense – Accurately generated architecture from the source code</title><url>https://www.archsense.dev</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>d_watt</author><text>I definitely want some innovation in this space.&lt;p&gt;Does this actually track dependancies at the code level, or just at the module import level. EG if have a redis connection file that&amp;#x27;s imported to a service library file, and only 1 of 8 exposed methods from that service file use the imported Redis, will every file that imports that service library show a dependency to Redis, or just the ones that import the Redis based service.&lt;p&gt;Also, quick feedback on your site, your hero image shows the view that turns me off these types of things. An overwhelming graph that sprawls 3 screens horizontally, and thus can&amp;#x27;t be reasoned about in one look. The ones further down the page are more compelling, but perhaps the 1st one is the only one that actually represents the project?</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Show HN: Archsense – Accurately generated architecture from the source code</title><url>https://www.archsense.dev</url></story>