<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jxcole</author><text>Read the linked paper, it&apos;s actually very good. It looks like they used good science in testing this:&lt;p&gt;&quot;From our study, we conclude that both our method and the light probe method are highly realistic, but that users can tell a real image apart from a synthetic image with probability higher than chance. However, even though users had no time restrictions, they still could not differentiate real images from both our method and the light probe method reliably.&quot;</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Inserting Artificial Objects into Photographs</title><url>http://www.cgchannel.com/2011/10/cool-tech-demo-match-3d-models-into-archive-photos/</url><text></text></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>sp332</author><text>This is a great example of using humans for what humans are good at (interpreting photographs) and computers for what computers are good at (lots of light modelling).</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Inserting Artificial Objects into Photographs</title><url>http://www.cgchannel.com/2011/10/cool-tech-demo-match-3d-models-into-archive-photos/</url><text></text></story>