<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>mhitza</author><text>I literally chuckled when I saw the screenshot at the end with the bots reply and read the authors comment &amp;quot;(totally made up URL, not even our domain)&amp;quot;.&lt;p&gt;If it&amp;#x27;s something that augments the support experience, as in something you can interact with while a real person is assigned to your support request, I&amp;#x27;m totally fine with that. But if anyone places this as the first line of support, with no way of reaching a real person, I can&amp;#x27;t wish them the best.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Prompt engineering DaVinci-003 on our own docs for automated support (Part I)</title><url>https://www.patterns.app/blog/2022/12/21/finetune-llm-tech-support/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>PetrBrzyBrzek</author><text>“Fine-tune our model (OpenAIs GPT-3 davinci-003 engine)”&lt;p&gt;I think there is a mistake in the article. It is not possible to do fine-tuning for the latest davinci-text-003, but only for the original davinci model, which generates much worse results.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Prompt engineering DaVinci-003 on our own docs for automated support (Part I)</title><url>https://www.patterns.app/blog/2022/12/21/finetune-llm-tech-support/</url></story>