<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>masswerk</author><text>Hm – I&amp;#x27;m not too happy to see most of the original HTML-elements marked &amp;quot;not conforming&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;must not be used&amp;quot;, thus preparing for browsers to eventually drop the support. There are still lots of web-sites and valuable information stored and archived in this format. Back in the day, it was thought that basic HTML was a format to last. Who is going to update these documents in order to make them conforming to future browsers? Or are we just dropping a decade of documentation? Is it worth it?&lt;p&gt;(Consider: Apparently, MS-Word docs or PDF prove longer lived than basic HTML documents! Who would have thought of this?)</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>HTML 5.2 Recommendation</title><url>https://www.w3.org/TR/html52/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>taspeotis</author><text>&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.w3.org&amp;#x2F;TR&amp;#x2F;html52&amp;#x2F;changes.html#changes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.w3.org&amp;#x2F;TR&amp;#x2F;html52&amp;#x2F;changes.html#changes&lt;/a&gt;</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>HTML 5.2 Recommendation</title><url>https://www.w3.org/TR/html52/</url></story>