<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>onion2k</author><text>&lt;i&gt;It&amp;#x27;s like an executive team discussing whether to adopt a mobile-first strategy and then someone blurts &amp;#x27;but Galaxy 7 phones caught fire!&amp;#x27;.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s more like an executive team discussing whether or not to equip the entire company with Galaxy Note 7 phones, and the CEO not mentioning the fires.</text><parent_chain><item><author>dingaling</author><text>But the test and its result was orthogonal to the issue before Parliament.&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s like an executive team discussing whether to adopt a mobile-first strategy and then someone blurts &amp;#x27;but Galaxy 7 phones caught fire!&amp;#x27;.</text></item><item><author>fidget</author><text>It was before the vote to renew, and was not disclosed to people making that vote.</text></item><item><author>misnome</author><text>I&amp;#x27;ve read a couple of articles, and as I understand it a missile veered off course. During a test. Which is kind of the point of a test.&lt;p&gt;Oh, except apparently it &amp;#x27;veered&amp;#x27; towards the US. And this was before the vote to renew, so naturally people are trying to call it a cover up.</text></item><item><author>cylinder</author><text>The reason this is posted here again is that there was recently a Trident &amp;quot;accident&amp;quot; which May did not disclose to Parliament.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Trident whistleblower: nuclear &apos;disaster waiting to happen&apos; (2015)</title><url>https://wikileaks.org/trident-safety/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>lostlogin</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s more like discussing the Galaxy 7 strategy whist hiding that they are malfunctioning.</text><parent_chain><item><author>dingaling</author><text>But the test and its result was orthogonal to the issue before Parliament.&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s like an executive team discussing whether to adopt a mobile-first strategy and then someone blurts &amp;#x27;but Galaxy 7 phones caught fire!&amp;#x27;.</text></item><item><author>fidget</author><text>It was before the vote to renew, and was not disclosed to people making that vote.</text></item><item><author>misnome</author><text>I&amp;#x27;ve read a couple of articles, and as I understand it a missile veered off course. During a test. Which is kind of the point of a test.&lt;p&gt;Oh, except apparently it &amp;#x27;veered&amp;#x27; towards the US. And this was before the vote to renew, so naturally people are trying to call it a cover up.</text></item><item><author>cylinder</author><text>The reason this is posted here again is that there was recently a Trident &amp;quot;accident&amp;quot; which May did not disclose to Parliament.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Trident whistleblower: nuclear &apos;disaster waiting to happen&apos; (2015)</title><url>https://wikileaks.org/trident-safety/</url></story>