<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>dagss</author><text>Former Cython developer here.&lt;p&gt;To get some perspective to this, consider the alternatives for a scientific programmer: MATLAB, R, FORTRAN, Mathematica, or if you&amp;#x27;re hip, Julia -- all specifically made for scientific programming with 0% general purpose&amp;#x2F;web&amp;#x2F;etc. development going on.&lt;p&gt;So I would say that the scientific Python community has been doing extremely well in terms of even using a language that isn&amp;#x27;t designed ground up for scientific computing.&lt;p&gt;I could write a lot about why that is (and how some of the CS and IT crowd doesn&amp;#x27;t &amp;quot;get&amp;quot; scientific computing..) -- I&amp;#x27;ll refrain, I just wanted to say that were you see something and get frustrated, I see the same picture and think it&amp;#x27;s actually an incredible success, to bring so many scientists onto at least the same ball park as other programmers, even if they are still playing their own game.</text><parent_chain><item><author>fijal</author><text>I must say I&amp;#x27;m always a little annoyed by the split in Python community around the scientific stack vs the rest. There are two ecosystems, two packaging tools etc (which is fine), but the insistence that there are no other python users that are worth considering (both sides are guilty) is really frustrating.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Python JITs are coming</title><url>https://lwn.net/Articles/691070/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>twa927</author><text>Hi, I recognize you as a PyPy developer. Do you think it&amp;#x27;s fair to write that &amp;quot;no one uses PyPy&amp;quot;?. I feel there are quite many companies using PyPy, mostly for web backend. You don&amp;#x27;t see many usages in other usages like Linux distros or ad-hoc scripts, even when the C extensions are not used, because 1) In 95% of cases, the performance is good enough, 2) the warmup slowdown dwarfs the overall gains.&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I think PyPy doesn&amp;#x27;t get the attention it deserves - the performance gains are fantastic and the vision of the Python ecosystem as Python-only packages with occasional lightweight C libraries integrated with cffi looks very nice to me.</text><parent_chain><item><author>fijal</author><text>I must say I&amp;#x27;m always a little annoyed by the split in Python community around the scientific stack vs the rest. There are two ecosystems, two packaging tools etc (which is fine), but the insistence that there are no other python users that are worth considering (both sides are guilty) is really frustrating.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Python JITs are coming</title><url>https://lwn.net/Articles/691070/</url></story>