<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>tiffanyh</author><text>My memory is fuzzy on this but didn’t most consider Winamp 2.x the best. Winamp 3.x was considered bloated. So to help rectify the problems of 3.x, Winamp release version 5.x (the best of 2 + 3). Though I recall many still used version 2.x even after the 5.x release.&lt;p&gt;Question: so when you say folks are trying to keep the &amp;quot;last version&amp;quot; alive, which version are you referring too since later versions weren’t loved.</text><parent_chain><item><author>caddywompus</author><text>Interestingly enough, there has been a community project dedicated to keeping the last Winamp version alive (last version from the original creators), and it really great to use.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;getwacup.com&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;getwacup.com&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;It includes a skin that allows it to work on modern display resolutions. It&amp;#x27;s really interesting to see just how low-res screens were when it was in it&amp;#x27;s hey-day, given that they are nearly unusable on a 4k monitor.&lt;p&gt;Edit: I was too young to remember the releases, but replies are indicating that version 5 was in fact, not the most popular :P</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Winamp source code leak</title><url>https://web.archive.org/web/20210515031018/https://github.com/CONIGUERO/winamp</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>cyber_kinetist</author><text>For context, here&amp;#x27;s the new revamped(!) Winamp coming up soon: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.winamp.com&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.winamp.com&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s just... the complete opposite of what Winamp was all about, and it&amp;#x27;s horrible and leaves a bad taste in your mouth (-100 points for the atrocious &amp;quot;modern&amp;quot; website which loads MBs of Javascript, screams BIG TEXT at you, hijacks your scroll wheel, and still tells you nothing about the actual software other than it will probably suck. Oh and another -100 points for that cookie popup.)</text><parent_chain><item><author>caddywompus</author><text>Interestingly enough, there has been a community project dedicated to keeping the last Winamp version alive (last version from the original creators), and it really great to use.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;getwacup.com&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;getwacup.com&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;It includes a skin that allows it to work on modern display resolutions. It&amp;#x27;s really interesting to see just how low-res screens were when it was in it&amp;#x27;s hey-day, given that they are nearly unusable on a 4k monitor.&lt;p&gt;Edit: I was too young to remember the releases, but replies are indicating that version 5 was in fact, not the most popular :P</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Winamp source code leak</title><url>https://web.archive.org/web/20210515031018/https://github.com/CONIGUERO/winamp</url></story>