<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>mkdirp</author><text>Terminal is the only thing that maps ctrl+shift+c&amp;#x2F;v to copy&amp;#x2F;paste because ctrl+c&amp;#x2F;v conflicts with signals. I&amp;#x27;ve never come across any other program that maps something that isn&amp;#x27;t ctrl+c&amp;#x2F;v to copy&amp;#x2F;paste.&lt;p&gt;MacOS is able to keep this consistent because ctrl+c&amp;#x2F;v isn&amp;#x27;t mapped to copy&amp;#x2F;paste, and instead command+c&amp;#x2F;v is. If you really want, Linux is perfectly capable of mapping Super+c&amp;#x2F;v to copy&amp;#x2F;paste. You would probably only need to do this in your terminal emulator and your DE.</text><parent_chain><item><author>somenewaccount1</author><text>Lol. I came here to say the only thing that matters is that copy and paste in Linux is &amp;#x27;cntrl+shift+c&amp;#x27;.  You can try changing it, but your still fucked in most terminals, and then you end up with two key combos depending on context.  It&amp;#x27;s a nightmare, and I&amp;#x27;m really glad you have the top comment. Clearly I&amp;#x27;m not alone.</text></item><item><author>im_down_w_otp</author><text>All I want in life is a Linux distro with a package repo full of meticulously reworked &amp;amp; reconfigured packages that make all the keyboard shortcuts across the entire system and every application be like and be as consistent as my old Macs.&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;ve been full-time Linux (Kubuntu) for a few years now, and I&amp;#x27;ve hobbled together something that only irritates me to death about 30% of the time rather than the 100% of the time it used to before spending days and days fiddling with a bunch of different flavors of remapping at nearly every layer of the system.&lt;p&gt;If I&amp;#x27;m ever fabulously wealthy, I already know I&amp;#x27;m just going to finance an open source fastidious spiritual successor to MacOS 10.6&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m going to give Pop_Os a try, but I suspect I&amp;#x27;m going to run into the same problems I always do. The trouble with Linux as a desktop for me isn&amp;#x27;t weather it&amp;#x27;s beautiful or not. The problem is how disintegrated everything is and the thousand papercuts ways in which it works.&lt;p&gt;That said, I absolutely consider it basically an incredible miracle that the experience is as good as it is, frankly. So, I keep at it.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Switching from macOS to Pop_OS</title><url>https://support.system76.com/articles/switch-from-macos-to-popos/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>nerdponx</author><text>I think MacOS got something right by using its Command key for &amp;quot;desktop-wide&amp;quot; shortcuts that aren&amp;#x27;t specific to one application, (kind of) leaving Ctrl and Alt for applications.&lt;p&gt;I generally try to follow this pattern when possible.&lt;p&gt;But I really do wish that it was easier to get a consistent look and feel on Linux, including key bindings.</text><parent_chain><item><author>somenewaccount1</author><text>Lol. I came here to say the only thing that matters is that copy and paste in Linux is &amp;#x27;cntrl+shift+c&amp;#x27;.  You can try changing it, but your still fucked in most terminals, and then you end up with two key combos depending on context.  It&amp;#x27;s a nightmare, and I&amp;#x27;m really glad you have the top comment. Clearly I&amp;#x27;m not alone.</text></item><item><author>im_down_w_otp</author><text>All I want in life is a Linux distro with a package repo full of meticulously reworked &amp;amp; reconfigured packages that make all the keyboard shortcuts across the entire system and every application be like and be as consistent as my old Macs.&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;ve been full-time Linux (Kubuntu) for a few years now, and I&amp;#x27;ve hobbled together something that only irritates me to death about 30% of the time rather than the 100% of the time it used to before spending days and days fiddling with a bunch of different flavors of remapping at nearly every layer of the system.&lt;p&gt;If I&amp;#x27;m ever fabulously wealthy, I already know I&amp;#x27;m just going to finance an open source fastidious spiritual successor to MacOS 10.6&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m going to give Pop_Os a try, but I suspect I&amp;#x27;m going to run into the same problems I always do. The trouble with Linux as a desktop for me isn&amp;#x27;t weather it&amp;#x27;s beautiful or not. The problem is how disintegrated everything is and the thousand papercuts ways in which it works.&lt;p&gt;That said, I absolutely consider it basically an incredible miracle that the experience is as good as it is, frankly. So, I keep at it.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Switching from macOS to Pop_OS</title><url>https://support.system76.com/articles/switch-from-macos-to-popos/</url></story>