<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>explorigin</author><text>Besides, Emma Watson (of all possible examples) is an outspoken advocate of women&amp;#x27;s rights (&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Emma_Watson#Women.27s_rights_work&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Emma_Watson#Women.27s_rights_w...&lt;/a&gt;). I feel reasonably confident that she would have no problem with this application (IP issues aside).&lt;p&gt;EDIT: I&amp;#x27;m not making any point about the appropriateness of this for your workplace.  That depends entirely on your workplace.</text><parent_chain><item><author>tjallingt</author><text>Why?&lt;p&gt;Its just an example gallery that happens to be of a photo shoot of Emma Watson. The photo&amp;#x27;s aren&amp;#x27;t even remotely suggestive... Are your female co-workers that sensitive and&amp;#x2F;or unable to rationalize?
Would you have kept looking at the demo if it was filled with similar pictures of Brat Pitt?&lt;p&gt;Not trying to be mean or anything I genuinely don&amp;#x27;t understand and would like to know.&lt;p&gt;EDIT:&lt;p&gt;I do see and agree that a more varied subject matter would probably do better to showcase the usage of the plugin but I still think that your reaction is slightly extreme as it seems like you look down on your female co-workers by removing their agency in the matter :S (although that might be taking it to the extreme from my side...)</text></item><item><author>xbryanx</author><text>Might be cool, but I closed my tab immediately. I work on an open team with quite a few women and other folks who would immediately react negatively to the sexy Emma Watson example photos. Bring on the downvotes, but even if this is an irrational negative reaction, it&amp;#x27;s a real one. If you want this to be a useful and universal library consider your example images. If you want it to be used only by people who aren&amp;#x27;t bothered by this, then plow straight ahead.&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s 2016, let&amp;#x27;s not propagate the mess that was Lenna:
&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Lenna&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Lenna&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Viewer.js – JavaScript image viewer</title><url>https://github.com/fengyuanchen/viewerjs</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>Jean-Philipe</author><text>Yes, I for one would have kept looking at the demo if it was Brad Pitt.&lt;p&gt;But that&amp;#x27;s not the point. Sexism, in reality, favours men and hurts women. That&amp;#x27;s why an image of Brad Pitt is okay, whereas an image of Emma Watson is not okay! (and by the way, they &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; suggestive)&lt;p&gt;Any argument that goes &amp;quot;But if we switched genders, then it would be fine!&amp;quot; is completely missing the point that we are still living in a de-facto patriarchy, where objectification of men is not even an issue.&lt;p&gt;In any case, I found the choice of images immature and closed the website right away.</text><parent_chain><item><author>tjallingt</author><text>Why?&lt;p&gt;Its just an example gallery that happens to be of a photo shoot of Emma Watson. The photo&amp;#x27;s aren&amp;#x27;t even remotely suggestive... Are your female co-workers that sensitive and&amp;#x2F;or unable to rationalize?
Would you have kept looking at the demo if it was filled with similar pictures of Brat Pitt?&lt;p&gt;Not trying to be mean or anything I genuinely don&amp;#x27;t understand and would like to know.&lt;p&gt;EDIT:&lt;p&gt;I do see and agree that a more varied subject matter would probably do better to showcase the usage of the plugin but I still think that your reaction is slightly extreme as it seems like you look down on your female co-workers by removing their agency in the matter :S (although that might be taking it to the extreme from my side...)</text></item><item><author>xbryanx</author><text>Might be cool, but I closed my tab immediately. I work on an open team with quite a few women and other folks who would immediately react negatively to the sexy Emma Watson example photos. Bring on the downvotes, but even if this is an irrational negative reaction, it&amp;#x27;s a real one. If you want this to be a useful and universal library consider your example images. If you want it to be used only by people who aren&amp;#x27;t bothered by this, then plow straight ahead.&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s 2016, let&amp;#x27;s not propagate the mess that was Lenna:
&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Lenna&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Lenna&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Viewer.js – JavaScript image viewer</title><url>https://github.com/fengyuanchen/viewerjs</url></story>