<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>pessimizer</author><text>Reading this thread, I thought this press release was going to be interesting. Instead it seems totally anodyne and reasonable. Imagine being so angry that twitter is going to put its recommendation code on github.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>A new era of transparency for Twitter</title><url>https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2023/a-new-era-of-transparency-for-twitter</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>JulianWasTaken</author><text>Isn&amp;#x27;t it slightly ironic for a post on transparency to be signed &amp;quot;Twitter&amp;quot; as its author instead of some human? Who&amp;#x27;s speaking at this point?&lt;p&gt;Of course in context of the rest of their missteps it&amp;#x27;s a tiny thing, but it stands out to me immediately when seeing the post at least.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>A new era of transparency for Twitter</title><url>https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2023/a-new-era-of-transparency-for-twitter</url></story>