<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>yminsky</author><text>That&amp;#x27;s not the intended implication, and Jane Street has in no way taken over the show. Our PRs are discussed vigorously, just like everyone else&amp;#x27;s, and they&amp;#x27;re definitely not always accepted!&lt;p&gt;Indeed, one of the great things about the OCaml compiler development process is that the core team is highly skeptical, and does a good job of rejecting marginal changes.</text><parent_chain><item><author>weavie</author><text>When did Jane Street take over development of OCaml? I knew they were heavy users, but I thought it was INRIA that were the main developers. This post implies that JS are running the show now...</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Plans for OCaml 4.08</title><url>https://blog.janestreet.com/plans-for-ocaml-408/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>tormeh</author><text>&amp;gt;we in Jane Street’s Tools &amp;amp; Compilers group have been planning what we want to work on for inclusion in OCaml 4.08&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#x27;ll find similar phrasing among major contributors to Postgres.</text><parent_chain><item><author>weavie</author><text>When did Jane Street take over development of OCaml? I knew they were heavy users, but I thought it was INRIA that were the main developers. This post implies that JS are running the show now...</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Plans for OCaml 4.08</title><url>https://blog.janestreet.com/plans-for-ocaml-408/</url></story>