<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>greggman</author><text>First off let me say I&amp;#x27;m 100% for this tech because IMO there&amp;#x27;s no way to stop progress. You can&amp;#x27;t control 7+ billion people.&lt;p&gt;That said, the first thing that came to my mind when they mentioned putting the CRISPR engine in new cells so they make more of the same and spread kind of like a virus... They mentioned they tried it and it worked first time. So, unless I&amp;#x27;m missing something, it&amp;#x27;s only a short matter of time before some disgruntled person could try to destroy the world&amp;#x27;s food supply or cause many other large scale issues.&lt;p&gt;Maybe that&amp;#x27;s harder than it sounds but it just seemed like a crazy amount of power for any one person with access to the tech to have. And, unlike nukes there&amp;#x27;s really no way to prevent this power from getting stronger, easier, and more accessible. Nukes you need the fuel. This you mostly just need the knowledge.&lt;p&gt;Sorry I&amp;#x27;m not suggesting any course of action. It&amp;#x27;s just I believe we won&amp;#x27;t make it past The Great Filter because as tech progresses it gets easier and easier for a single person to destroy the world. Embedding the CRISPR engine so it spreads seemed like a step in that direction.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Update: CRISPR</title><url>http://www.radiolab.org/story/update-crispr/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jwcrux</author><text>This podcast mentions that only testing against non-viable embryos has been done. It&amp;#x27;s worth noting that just the other day, the results of the first testing against viable human embryos was released [0].&lt;p&gt;Also, I thought it was interesting when they talked about &amp;quot;who would turn down the ability to remove diseases for $x?&amp;quot; My answer would be people who simply don&amp;#x27;t have that kind of money.&lt;p&gt;This makes things complicated.&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m not even close to an expert in this area, but I don&amp;#x27;t think it&amp;#x27;s too far a stretch to consider that having technology like this where you can theoretically pick and choose &amp;quot;add ons&amp;quot; for set prices would lead to class divides that are clearly visible when these add ons stop being just internal changes and start including exterior traits.&lt;p&gt;[0] &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.newscientist.com&amp;#x2F;article&amp;#x2F;2123973-first-results-of-crispr-gene-editing-of-normal-embryos-released&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.newscientist.com&amp;#x2F;article&amp;#x2F;2123973-first-results-o...&lt;/a&gt;</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Update: CRISPR</title><url>http://www.radiolab.org/story/update-crispr/</url></story>