<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>superb-owl</author><text>I&amp;#x27;ve been working on translating and summarizing some of Grothendieck&amp;#x27;s esoteric writing from his later years. It&amp;#x27;s...pretty bananas. But some fascinating stuff--clearly brilliant and a little crazy.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;#x2F;superb-owl&amp;#x2F;grothendieck&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;#x2F;superb-owl&amp;#x2F;grothendieck&lt;/a&gt;</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Alexandre Grothendieck, The New Universal Church (1971) [pdf]</title><url>https://publish.uwo.ca/~jbell/univ.pdf</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>wffurr</author><text>This would have been a lot better with a “steelman” version of the “scientism credo” rather than the exaggerated form presented.  I found it pretty alienating to try to read this, even though I probably agree with the thesis on the whole.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Alexandre Grothendieck, The New Universal Church (1971) [pdf]</title><url>https://publish.uwo.ca/~jbell/univ.pdf</url></story>