<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>WoodenChair</author><text>The lightweight Linux desktop environments have been battling for years now over who&amp;#x27;s Windows 95 clone is better.  It&amp;#x27;s a nice paradigm because it&amp;#x27;s familiar to many users and serves its purpose. However, does low resource usage necessarily imply lack of innovation regarding user experience?  Or does familiarity in this space just trump other concerns and experimentation should be left to the fat environments like Gnome, Unity, and KDE?</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>LXQt – The next generation of the Lightweight Desktop Environment</title><url>http://lxqt.org/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>uncletaco</author><text>So would that acronym be pronounced &amp;quot;looks cute&amp;quot;?</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>LXQt – The next generation of the Lightweight Desktop Environment</title><url>http://lxqt.org/</url></story>