<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>sgc</author><text>&amp;gt;   The company says it&amp;#x27;ll have a system commercially available for light aircraft in 2024. It&amp;#x27;s looking into a version for eVTOL air taxis by 2026, and hoping to have a system relevant to commercial airliners by 2030. Godspeed, team, the world&amp;#x27;s airline passengers – not to mention cleaning crews – need you to succeed.&lt;p&gt;They are not targeting airliners for the current generation.</text><parent_chain><item><author>londons_explore</author><text>&amp;gt; on long pole masts that placed them some 2.65 m (8.69 ft) forward of the leading edges. At cruise speed, that&amp;#x27;s enough to give the system a tenth of a second&amp;#x27;s worth of advance warning before turbulence hits&lt;p&gt;2.65m *&amp;#x2F; 0.1 seconds = 60 mph.&lt;p&gt;Airliners fly about 500 mph, so something about this math is far off...</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Active turbulence cancellation makes bumpy flights smoother</title><url>https://newatlas.com/aircraft/active-turbulence-cancellation/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>wongarsu</author><text>Maybe they meant the cruise speed of the test aircraft. Some quick googling reveals it as a Colomban MC-30 Luciole [1], which according to Wikipedia [2] has a cruise speed of 110 mph and a maximum speed of 120 mph. Mounting the long instrument arm to the tiny aircraft probably doesn&amp;#x27;t do it any favors (seriously, the aircraft looks tiny next to a Cessna), so cruising at 60mph sounds reasonable.&lt;p&gt;[1] &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.wildbergair.com&amp;#x2F;registrations&amp;#x2F;C&amp;#x2F;OE-CRG_1_01.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.wildbergair.com&amp;#x2F;registrations&amp;#x2F;C&amp;#x2F;OE-CRG_1_01.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;[2] &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Colomban_MC-30_Luciole&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Colomban_MC-30_Luciole&lt;/a&gt;</text><parent_chain><item><author>londons_explore</author><text>&amp;gt; on long pole masts that placed them some 2.65 m (8.69 ft) forward of the leading edges. At cruise speed, that&amp;#x27;s enough to give the system a tenth of a second&amp;#x27;s worth of advance warning before turbulence hits&lt;p&gt;2.65m *&amp;#x2F; 0.1 seconds = 60 mph.&lt;p&gt;Airliners fly about 500 mph, so something about this math is far off...</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Active turbulence cancellation makes bumpy flights smoother</title><url>https://newatlas.com/aircraft/active-turbulence-cancellation/</url></story>