<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>ohazi</author><text>Oscilloscope Specifications:&lt;p&gt;Maximum Sampling rate: 4MSPS&lt;p&gt;Analog Bandwidth: ---&amp;gt; 200kHz &amp;lt;---&lt;p&gt;Arbitrary Waveform Generator Specifications&lt;p&gt;Maximum conversion rate: 1MSPS&lt;p&gt;Analog Bandwidth: ---&amp;gt; 50kHz &amp;lt;---&lt;p&gt;This is certainly not the first project in the &amp;quot;super miniaturized hardware tools&amp;quot; category, and as much as I like the idea of having a single tricorder-like device that can replace a lab full of hardware, all of the similar projects that I&amp;#x27;ve seen have fallen short in exactly the same way: analog bandwidth - the one spec that actually matters.&lt;p&gt;I would pay a &lt;i&gt;lot&lt;/i&gt; of money for a miniaturized tool that took RF performance seriously.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Oscilloscope watch</title><url>http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/920064946/oscilloscope-watch?ref=card</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>beloch</author><text>I had a calculator watch as a kid. Great idea, but not terribly useful due to poor ergonomics. Still, it undeniably had appeal. This is like a calculator watch for a new decade, but also for a greatly reduced audience (Fewer people use oscilloscopes than calculators). This doesn&amp;#x27;t seem likely to find much of an audience unfortunately, but a part of me still wants one!</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Oscilloscope watch</title><url>http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/920064946/oscilloscope-watch?ref=card</url></story>