<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>smackay</author><text>I think this approach has some rather nice features:&lt;p&gt;1. There is no need to try and break a task down into smaller steps before entering it into the list. When you come to work on it you probably have had a chance to think about it some more and it will be obvious if there are any sub-tasks.&lt;p&gt;2. There is no schedule and the granularity is (inifinitely) variable. This helps avoid needless analysis or planning.&lt;p&gt;3. Garbage-colletion. If you perform a task that invalidates some easlier items on your lists the dismissal process should catch that without having to review or re-analyse the complete list looking for dependencies.&lt;p&gt;So for a system that is appears free-form and light on rules it actually has some substance. The only issue I can see is one that asimjalis commented on where one task can take too much time. I think that then it is appropriate to wind up the pomodoro.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Autofocus System - Get Everything Done</title><url>http://www.markforster.net/autofocus-system/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>naradaellis</author><text>I&apos;ve been using this for a year and a bit now. Its stuck for me because it is light on rules I think. No other system has been as successful for me at harnessing structured procrastination.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Autofocus System - Get Everything Done</title><url>http://www.markforster.net/autofocus-system/</url></story>