<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>knome</author><text>&amp;gt;ChatGPT doesn&amp;#x27;t do that&lt;p&gt;It can if you give it the option. My own openai chatbot prompts to either respond or to ponder by stating a question or considering a related idea. It infrequently will decide to ponder for one to about a dozen times as it restates an idea to itself in various forms, which gets recorded into the growing conversational prompt.&lt;p&gt;Elsewhere in the thread, someone mentions it always uses the same amount of time. In my estimation, it will spend longer on introspective or recursive prompts. Easier to get it ranting absurdities using those as well.&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s always the craziest chatter when the request takes a couple minutes to get back to me.</text><parent_chain><item><author>Jensson</author><text>&amp;gt; nobody is stopping and thinking&lt;p&gt;To trivial questions no, but to more complex questions humans actually does go &amp;quot;hmm, let me think&amp;quot;. ChatGPT doesn&amp;#x27;t do that, it just blurts out the first thing that gets into its head regardless if the question is trivial or extremely complex.</text></item><item><author>FrustratedMonky</author><text>Where are the jokes that most people aren&amp;#x27;t much more than copy&amp;#x2F;paste, or LLM.  In most daily lives, a huge amount of what we do is habit, and just plain following a pattern.  When someone says &amp;quot;Good Morning&amp;quot;, nobody is stopping and thinking &amp;quot;HMMM, let me think about what word to say in response,  what do I want to convey here, hmmmm,   let me think&amp;quot;.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Evidence of a predictive coding hierarchy in the human brain listening to speech</title><url>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01516-2</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jmoss20</author><text>Which makes you wonder what would happen if you gave ChatGPT two streams of output: one for &amp;quot;speech&amp;quot; and one for inner-monologue-style &amp;quot;thinking&amp;quot;.&lt;p&gt;For most of our &amp;quot;hmm, let me think&amp;quot;&amp;#x27;s I&amp;#x27;m not sure what we do is significantly more complicated than that. We just get to hide the inner monologue.</text><parent_chain><item><author>Jensson</author><text>&amp;gt; nobody is stopping and thinking&lt;p&gt;To trivial questions no, but to more complex questions humans actually does go &amp;quot;hmm, let me think&amp;quot;. ChatGPT doesn&amp;#x27;t do that, it just blurts out the first thing that gets into its head regardless if the question is trivial or extremely complex.</text></item><item><author>FrustratedMonky</author><text>Where are the jokes that most people aren&amp;#x27;t much more than copy&amp;#x2F;paste, or LLM.  In most daily lives, a huge amount of what we do is habit, and just plain following a pattern.  When someone says &amp;quot;Good Morning&amp;quot;, nobody is stopping and thinking &amp;quot;HMMM, let me think about what word to say in response,  what do I want to convey here, hmmmm,   let me think&amp;quot;.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Evidence of a predictive coding hierarchy in the human brain listening to speech</title><url>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01516-2</url></story>