<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>mcpackieh</author><text>&amp;gt;hoarding&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;ve got 30 tabs open today, and the oldest of them is only a few hours old.&lt;p&gt;I look down a page, see interesting links, and middle click them all.  They open tabs but don&amp;#x27;t actually load until I click that tab.   I close each tab after I&amp;#x27;m done reading it, or after a few hours if I never got around to reading it and lost interest.&lt;p&gt;Is that hoarding?  I don&amp;#x27;t think so.  But it&amp;#x27;s the sort of workflow that TST makes pleasant but is extremely frustrating with a horizontal tab bar.</text><parent_chain><item><author>dahfizz</author><text>&amp;gt; I couldn&amp;#x27;t imagine opening more than a dozen of tabs without it.&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;#x27;t imagine having more than a dozen tabs open, period. You tab hoarders will never make sense to me...</text></item><item><author>beltsazar</author><text>I switched to Firefox from Chrome years ago because Chrome was slower. Specially, when there were many tabs opened, switching tabs in Chrome were usually prefaced with a blank white screen for about 2 seconds.&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;ve been staying with Firefox not for the performance (today Chrome loads Google sites like YouTube faster), but mainly for Tree Style Tab extension. I couldn&amp;#x27;t imagine opening more than a dozen of tabs without it.</text></item><item><author>seba_dos1</author><text>There was a time when Firefox felt a lot slower than Chromium, but for a few years now it&amp;#x27;s been close enough (even if still somewhat slower) to not bother me, while Firefox clearly offers superior functionality and &lt;i&gt;much&lt;/i&gt; better performance under high load. The last time Chromium has felt attractive compared to Firefox was a really long time ago. Glad to see it moving in the right direction still.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer</title><url>https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/graphs?timerange=31536000&amp;series=mozilla-central,3735773,1,13&amp;series=mozilla-central,3412459,1,13</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>ddoolin</author><text>Agreed, but once I switched to vertical tabs (via Sidebery with Firefox), it is WAY more manageable. Multiple tab spaces, named groupings, and a scrollable view that doesn&amp;#x27;t crowd and shorten names make it great for having many items in there with little downside.</text><parent_chain><item><author>dahfizz</author><text>&amp;gt; I couldn&amp;#x27;t imagine opening more than a dozen of tabs without it.&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;#x27;t imagine having more than a dozen tabs open, period. You tab hoarders will never make sense to me...</text></item><item><author>beltsazar</author><text>I switched to Firefox from Chrome years ago because Chrome was slower. Specially, when there were many tabs opened, switching tabs in Chrome were usually prefaced with a blank white screen for about 2 seconds.&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;ve been staying with Firefox not for the performance (today Chrome loads Google sites like YouTube faster), but mainly for Tree Style Tab extension. I couldn&amp;#x27;t imagine opening more than a dozen of tabs without it.</text></item><item><author>seba_dos1</author><text>There was a time when Firefox felt a lot slower than Chromium, but for a few years now it&amp;#x27;s been close enough (even if still somewhat slower) to not bother me, while Firefox clearly offers superior functionality and &lt;i&gt;much&lt;/i&gt; better performance under high load. The last time Chromium has felt attractive compared to Firefox was a really long time ago. Glad to see it moving in the right direction still.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer</title><url>https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/graphs?timerange=31536000&amp;series=mozilla-central,3735773,1,13&amp;series=mozilla-central,3412459,1,13</url></story>