<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>SEJeff</author><text>I&amp;#x27;m genuinely not sure why they are trying to compete with the likes of Mesos or Kubernetes, or what they are really trying to achieve here. There is simply no way they&amp;#x27;ll build a community around nomad 1&amp;#x2F;2 as big as either of the aforementioned even if the software is really good.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Nomad, a cluster manager and scheduler</title><url>https://www.hashicorp.com/blog/nomad.html</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>cpitman</author><text>This one is interesting to me. I&amp;#x27;ve been a big proponent of Hashicorp&amp;#x27;s other tooling, but this seems like an area that other projects are already addressing (and doing well in). Choice is great, but I think I would have preferred if they joined up with Kubernetes&amp;#x2F;Mesos&amp;#x2F;etc.&lt;p&gt;Also, their messaging seems a little ingenious. Otto talks about how important it is to support microservice development and deployment, but Nomad lists as a con that Kubernetes has too many separately deployed and composed services.&lt;p&gt;PS, I do work for Red Hat, so maybe I&amp;#x27;m a little biased.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Nomad, a cluster manager and scheduler</title><url>https://www.hashicorp.com/blog/nomad.html</url></story>