<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>civilized</author><text>If they&amp;#x27;re monitoring AWS downtime they might want to rethink this.</text><parent_chain><item><author>QuiiBz</author><text>I tried to monitor services status using &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stop.lying.cloud&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stop.lying.cloud&lt;/a&gt;, but they are also hosted to AWS, and down too.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Tell HN: AWS appears to be down again</title><text>Anyone else seeing this?</text></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>synergy20</author><text>AWS should monitor itself from Azure or GCP, even DO or Linode makes more sense.&lt;p&gt;Eat your own dog food shows confidence, but monitoring it is a different dimension, you need use anything but your own dog food there.</text><parent_chain><item><author>QuiiBz</author><text>I tried to monitor services status using &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stop.lying.cloud&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stop.lying.cloud&lt;/a&gt;, but they are also hosted to AWS, and down too.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Tell HN: AWS appears to be down again</title><text>Anyone else seeing this?</text></story>