<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>A_D_E_P_T</author><text>The scientific paper underlying the article is here: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.nature.com&amp;#x2F;articles&amp;#x2F;s41559-024-02448-y&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.nature.com&amp;#x2F;articles&amp;#x2F;s41559-024-02448-y&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s a different article, and to my mind a more readable one, here:  &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.sciencedaily.com&amp;#x2F;releases&amp;#x2F;2024&amp;#x2F;07&amp;#x2F;240715135713.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.sciencedaily.com&amp;#x2F;releases&amp;#x2F;2024&amp;#x2F;07&amp;#x2F;240715135713.h...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;Lakes and reservoirs have experienced oxygen losses of 5.5% and 18.6% respectively since 1980. The oceans have experienced oxygen losses of around 2% since 1960 and, although that number is smaller, it represents a more geographically and volumetrically extensive mass. Marine ecosystems have also experienced substantial variability in oxygen depletion. For example, the midwaters off of Central California have lost 40% of their oxygen in the last few decades.&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;If that holds true worldwide, and not just at a selection of measuring sites, it&amp;#x27;s a rapid and very concerning shift.  It&amp;#x27;ll be interesting to see if their measurements are corroborated.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Loss of oxygen in lakes and oceans</title><url>https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/07/240715135713.htm</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>throwaway5752</author><text>&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;Relevant, critical oxygen thresholds are being approached at rates comparable to other planetary boundary processes.&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.researchgate.net&amp;#x2F;publication&amp;#x2F;372847863_Anoxia_Begets_Anoxia_a_positive_feedback_to_the_deoxygenation_of_temperate_lakes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.researchgate.net&amp;#x2F;publication&amp;#x2F;372847863_Anoxia_Be...&lt;/a&gt; is a previous paper, I can&amp;#x27;t find this. The author is qualified and has produced a good deal of original and field research on the topic.&lt;p&gt;This is a good example of where just reacting to a bad or clickbait headline would be to your detriment. This actually is new information and bad news.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Loss of oxygen in lakes and oceans</title><url>https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/07/240715135713.htm</url></story>