<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>eganist</author><text>That&amp;#x27;s the whole point of the map. It&amp;#x27;s using data reported by telcos.&lt;p&gt;They opened up the map so that individuals could challenge the coverage they&amp;#x27;re reportedly getting. My data was largely accurate other than SpaceX reporting coverage for addresses that are still waitlisted, so I challenged those.</text><parent_chain><item><author>jeffdubin</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s hard for me to take this data seriously when I enter an address that I know to be problematic for cellular coverage and receive &amp;quot;100% coverage&amp;quot; on the mobile broadband tab, and listed with carriers I know to have zero outdoor coverage at the location.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>FCC Broadband Map</title><url>https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/home</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>gabereiser</author><text>Same. This map isn’t accurate. Areas I know have no cell phone coverage are marked as 100% covered. Areas I know that don’t have cable broadband show 100% covered. It’s complete BS.</text><parent_chain><item><author>jeffdubin</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s hard for me to take this data seriously when I enter an address that I know to be problematic for cellular coverage and receive &amp;quot;100% coverage&amp;quot; on the mobile broadband tab, and listed with carriers I know to have zero outdoor coverage at the location.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>FCC Broadband Map</title><url>https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/home</url></story>