<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>gizmo</author><text>A city doesn&amp;#x27;t need to be big to have skyscrapers. It&amp;#x27;s just a policy choice, like how wide roads are or public transportation. Many Americans are surprised that small European towns are big enough to justify a train station.</text><parent_chain><item><author>ido</author><text>This is off-topic, but I just wanted to say as a European how crazy it is to keep finding out the US is so large that even some third-tier city I ± never heard of is big enough to have a downtown full of outright skyscrapers[0]! It reminds me of reading about some minor Indian city and then looking it up in Wikipedia and seeing it has a population in the millions.&lt;p&gt;[0] &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;upload.wikimedia.org&amp;#x2F;wikipedia&amp;#x2F;commons&amp;#x2F;thumb&amp;#x2F;7&amp;#x2F;79&amp;#x2F;Kansas_City_-_Downtown_-_panoramio_%2815%29.jpg&amp;#x2F;1280px-Kansas_City_-_Downtown_-_panoramio_%2815%29.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;upload.wikimedia.org&amp;#x2F;wikipedia&amp;#x2F;commons&amp;#x2F;thumb&amp;#x2F;7&amp;#x2F;79&amp;#x2F;Ka...&lt;/a&gt;</text></item><item><author>tylerFowler</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s kind of odd to me (as someone who used to live there at its latest boom time) that nobody talks about Kansas City when it comes to this topic.&lt;p&gt;From the ~70&amp;#x27;s until the early 2010&amp;#x27;s Kansas City&amp;#x27;s downtown was in a similar &amp;quot;doom loop&amp;quot; of crime, undevelopment, decaying historic buildings, etc... In that city 75% of the metro lives in suburbs, drives in to downtown for work and promptly leaves. Until about 2012 or so. Urban redevelopment kicked in, adding (free!) transit, boosting retail, arts district events, a new stadium, and crucially - *massive office to housing conversion projects*.&lt;p&gt;There are tons of success stories like the historic Fidelity Tower at 909 Walnut (&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;909_Walnut&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;909_Walnut&lt;/a&gt;), a huge 35-story tower that sat vacant (creepy) for the better part of a decade and is now home to 159 units. Ditto with the Power &amp;amp; Light Building (&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Kansas_City_Power_and_Light_Building&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Kansas_City_Power_and_Light_Bu...&lt;/a&gt;) (36 stories) - largely vacant for the better part of 20 years and now home to nearly 300 units. I could go on, every block has similar projects of 100+ year old buildings of nontrivial sizes that are now super unique apartments. I myself lived in the 30-story Commerce Tower (&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Commerce_Tower&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Commerce_Tower&lt;/a&gt;) for a while and it was incredibly cheap to do so (~$1100&amp;#x2F;month for 750sqft 1 bed on the 14th floor), I had a 10 minute commute by foot to my office, it was awesome. Even the more squat, broad midsize banking buildings have had major success with residential conversions.&lt;p&gt;These kinds of conversions have been proven out when there is willpower to do so at the city level - people will move in and prices typically get competitive fast if done at scale. I&amp;#x27;ve lived in SF for 4 years now and I&amp;#x27;m convinced its a policy problem not an economic problem.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Can turning office towers into apartments save downtowns?</title><url>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/05/06/can-turning-office-towers-into-apartments-save-downtowns</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>arethuza</author><text>Well Europe and the EU both have larger populations than the US and quite a bit higher population densities (even though the continent of Europe is slightly larger) so wouldn&amp;#x27;t you expect Europe to have &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; skyscrapers than the US?</text><parent_chain><item><author>ido</author><text>This is off-topic, but I just wanted to say as a European how crazy it is to keep finding out the US is so large that even some third-tier city I ± never heard of is big enough to have a downtown full of outright skyscrapers[0]! It reminds me of reading about some minor Indian city and then looking it up in Wikipedia and seeing it has a population in the millions.&lt;p&gt;[0] &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;upload.wikimedia.org&amp;#x2F;wikipedia&amp;#x2F;commons&amp;#x2F;thumb&amp;#x2F;7&amp;#x2F;79&amp;#x2F;Kansas_City_-_Downtown_-_panoramio_%2815%29.jpg&amp;#x2F;1280px-Kansas_City_-_Downtown_-_panoramio_%2815%29.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;upload.wikimedia.org&amp;#x2F;wikipedia&amp;#x2F;commons&amp;#x2F;thumb&amp;#x2F;7&amp;#x2F;79&amp;#x2F;Ka...&lt;/a&gt;</text></item><item><author>tylerFowler</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s kind of odd to me (as someone who used to live there at its latest boom time) that nobody talks about Kansas City when it comes to this topic.&lt;p&gt;From the ~70&amp;#x27;s until the early 2010&amp;#x27;s Kansas City&amp;#x27;s downtown was in a similar &amp;quot;doom loop&amp;quot; of crime, undevelopment, decaying historic buildings, etc... In that city 75% of the metro lives in suburbs, drives in to downtown for work and promptly leaves. Until about 2012 or so. Urban redevelopment kicked in, adding (free!) transit, boosting retail, arts district events, a new stadium, and crucially - *massive office to housing conversion projects*.&lt;p&gt;There are tons of success stories like the historic Fidelity Tower at 909 Walnut (&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;909_Walnut&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;909_Walnut&lt;/a&gt;), a huge 35-story tower that sat vacant (creepy) for the better part of a decade and is now home to 159 units. Ditto with the Power &amp;amp; Light Building (&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Kansas_City_Power_and_Light_Building&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Kansas_City_Power_and_Light_Bu...&lt;/a&gt;) (36 stories) - largely vacant for the better part of 20 years and now home to nearly 300 units. I could go on, every block has similar projects of 100+ year old buildings of nontrivial sizes that are now super unique apartments. I myself lived in the 30-story Commerce Tower (&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Commerce_Tower&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#x2F;wiki&amp;#x2F;Commerce_Tower&lt;/a&gt;) for a while and it was incredibly cheap to do so (~$1100&amp;#x2F;month for 750sqft 1 bed on the 14th floor), I had a 10 minute commute by foot to my office, it was awesome. Even the more squat, broad midsize banking buildings have had major success with residential conversions.&lt;p&gt;These kinds of conversions have been proven out when there is willpower to do so at the city level - people will move in and prices typically get competitive fast if done at scale. I&amp;#x27;ve lived in SF for 4 years now and I&amp;#x27;m convinced its a policy problem not an economic problem.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Can turning office towers into apartments save downtowns?</title><url>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/05/06/can-turning-office-towers-into-apartments-save-downtowns</url></story>