<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jeffwass</author><text>One of my old physics professors said something similar - there are only three numbers in the world - 0, 1, and infinity. No wait, zero is just one divided by infinity, so there are only two numbers, zero and one. So if the answer is not zero, it must be one.  (ie, how to justify dimensional analysis and ignore any dimensionaless constant).&lt;p&gt;Hysterical, especially for the fact that he quotes &amp;#x27;two&amp;#x27; and &amp;#x27;three&amp;#x27; in the sentence itself.</text><parent_chain><item><author>fouronnes3</author><text>As a computer scientist this is not surprising either. After all there are only three numbers: 0 1 and n.</text></item><item><author>BrandoElFollito</author><text>As a physicist, this makes sense. Pi = 3, pi^2 = 10, which is g&lt;p&gt;Not sure why everyone is surprised.&lt;p&gt;Ah, and a year is pi*10e9 seconds (IIRC)</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>A wonderful coincidence or an expected connection: why π² ≈ g</title><url>https://roitman.io/blog/91</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>pansa2</author><text>Remember that `i` is also a number. As in `for i = 0 to n`.&lt;p&gt;Don’t believe those mathematicians when they tell you that `i` is “imaginary”.</text><parent_chain><item><author>fouronnes3</author><text>As a computer scientist this is not surprising either. After all there are only three numbers: 0 1 and n.</text></item><item><author>BrandoElFollito</author><text>As a physicist, this makes sense. Pi = 3, pi^2 = 10, which is g&lt;p&gt;Not sure why everyone is surprised.&lt;p&gt;Ah, and a year is pi*10e9 seconds (IIRC)</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>A wonderful coincidence or an expected connection: why π² ≈ g</title><url>https://roitman.io/blog/91</url></story>