<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>gnuvince</author><text>As a language, OCaml gets most things right: being functional by default appeals to me very much, as does the easy path into imperative programming when you need it.  Its type system is awesome not only at catching bugs at compile-time, but also at guiding you in your design.  There are a couple of nice-to-have that would be cool though: Haskell-like type classes come to mind, and some minor syntax warts could be improved.  Its implementation is also extremely solid: I always expect the code generated by OCaml to perform well.  With tools like OPAM, getting the latest compiler and libraries is very easy.  Definitely one of my favorite language toolset.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Python to OCaml: Retrospective</title><url>http://roscidus.com/blog/blog/2014/06/06/python-to-ocaml-retrospective/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>pnathan</author><text>This is possibly the best language writeup I have seen in years, if ever. Congratulations, sir!</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Python to OCaml: Retrospective</title><url>http://roscidus.com/blog/blog/2014/06/06/python-to-ocaml-retrospective/</url></story>