<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>eganist</author><text>Lots of comments are misunderstanding the point of the map and think it&amp;#x27;s supposed to be perfectly accurate.&lt;p&gt;No, that&amp;#x27;s not at all the point. The point is to allow individuals and businesses to challenge telecom self-attestations of coverage that are likely suspect. So if e.g SpaceX says you&amp;#x27;re currently served by Starlink but it turns out Starlink is refusing you on their site until the middle of next year, you can challenge the accuracy of Starlink&amp;#x27;s coverage map.&lt;p&gt;Starlink used as an example. You can challenge anything, but so far I&amp;#x27;ve had to challenge Starlink at every address I&amp;#x27;m responsible for.&lt;p&gt;Over time the map should be reliable, but for now, look for the Location Challenge and Availability Challenge links to see your options if you think a provider is misrepresenting coverage.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>FCC Broadband Map</title><url>https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/home</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jeffdubin</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s hard for me to take this data seriously when I enter an address that I know to be problematic for cellular coverage and receive &amp;quot;100% coverage&amp;quot; on the mobile broadband tab, and listed with carriers I know to have zero outdoor coverage at the location.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>FCC Broadband Map</title><url>https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/home</url></story>