<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>SeanDav</author><text>To this list you can add the deal breaker - Firefox is not mining your data and then passing it on to the NSA.</text><parent_chain><item><author>nathanb</author><text>This article is, in my opinion, not very good. It documents areas where Firefox differs from Chrome, yes, but it fails to make the case why I should care.&lt;p&gt;* I don&amp;#x27;t want a multi-process architecture, I want it so one tab can&amp;#x27;t kill my entire browser. If Firefox can get there in a different way than Chrome, so much the better.&lt;p&gt;* I don&amp;#x27;t care whether or not my browser utilizes certain Windows features, since I run Linux. Have we seen an attack against Firefox which would have been stopped if it utilized this Windows feature? The article provides no evidence of this.&lt;p&gt;* I don&amp;#x27;t want a desktop app store. addons.mozilla.org is, for all intents and purposes, Firefox&amp;#x27;s app store. mozilla.org is Mozilla&amp;#x27;s &amp;quot;app store&amp;quot;. This is kind of a silly request.&lt;p&gt;I use Firefox for the following reasons:&lt;p&gt;* There are extensions I like which have no equivalent (that I know of) in Chrome&lt;p&gt;* Inertia&lt;p&gt;* I like the Mozilla Foundation better than I like Google&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t expect these reasons to convince you. They are sufficient for convincing me. I&amp;#x27;m not going to pretend like they present a compelling argument.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Here’s Why Firefox is Still Years Behind Google Chrome</title><url>http://www.howtogeek.com/165264/heres-why-firefox-is-still-years-behind-google-chrome/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>mtgx</author><text>Why wouldn&amp;#x27;t you want a multi-process architecture? It&amp;#x27;s bad enough that so many apps can utilize the quad core CPU&amp;#x27;s we have in our PC&amp;#x27;s. At least the browser is one app that can fully take advantage of multiple cores, unlike most apps out there.</text><parent_chain><item><author>nathanb</author><text>This article is, in my opinion, not very good. It documents areas where Firefox differs from Chrome, yes, but it fails to make the case why I should care.&lt;p&gt;* I don&amp;#x27;t want a multi-process architecture, I want it so one tab can&amp;#x27;t kill my entire browser. If Firefox can get there in a different way than Chrome, so much the better.&lt;p&gt;* I don&amp;#x27;t care whether or not my browser utilizes certain Windows features, since I run Linux. Have we seen an attack against Firefox which would have been stopped if it utilized this Windows feature? The article provides no evidence of this.&lt;p&gt;* I don&amp;#x27;t want a desktop app store. addons.mozilla.org is, for all intents and purposes, Firefox&amp;#x27;s app store. mozilla.org is Mozilla&amp;#x27;s &amp;quot;app store&amp;quot;. This is kind of a silly request.&lt;p&gt;I use Firefox for the following reasons:&lt;p&gt;* There are extensions I like which have no equivalent (that I know of) in Chrome&lt;p&gt;* Inertia&lt;p&gt;* I like the Mozilla Foundation better than I like Google&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t expect these reasons to convince you. They are sufficient for convincing me. I&amp;#x27;m not going to pretend like they present a compelling argument.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Here’s Why Firefox is Still Years Behind Google Chrome</title><url>http://www.howtogeek.com/165264/heres-why-firefox-is-still-years-behind-google-chrome/</url></story>