<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>SQueeeeeL</author><text>Wait, a mysterious man showed up to an impactless meeting to basically embarrass the hell out of an aspiring undergrad research and your immediate reaction wasn&amp;#x27;t &amp;quot;Oh shit, these people are probably trying to cover something up.&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;Cause that&amp;#x27;s my immediate reaction, sounds similar to the cigarette industry in the 60s</text><parent_chain><item><author>ryanferg</author><text>When I was in undergrad, a Cog Psych professor told me a story about an undergrad who made a poster for a regional research conference of no real consequence about the correlation between diet soda drinking and some recall task. The study and the conference were more about teaching students about research more than actually finding anything. When he and his student showed up to the conference, a representative from a low-cal sweetener producer was there, and proceeded to spend the entire conference standing next to the poster refuting the obviously amateurish research. He said for years afterwards, he&amp;#x27;d still get mail and faxes about new research that disproved any link between fake sugar and memory problems.&lt;p&gt;All of that being said, I don&amp;#x27;t know if there is a substance that we consume that has had more research done on it than artificial sweeteners. For every study like this, there are other studies disproving them, etc. If there is an effect, the effect size is small, and I&amp;#x27;m not convinced there is anything there. Also, I&amp;#x27;m drinking a Diet Coke right now and in another life I was an Alz researcher so maybe I really want it to not be there.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Early-life low-calorie sweetener consumption disrupts memory function in rats</title><url>https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/157714</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jrootabega</author><text>I guess it&amp;#x27;s good that the sugar industry has enough money to fund studies of artificial sweetener and vice versa.</text><parent_chain><item><author>ryanferg</author><text>When I was in undergrad, a Cog Psych professor told me a story about an undergrad who made a poster for a regional research conference of no real consequence about the correlation between diet soda drinking and some recall task. The study and the conference were more about teaching students about research more than actually finding anything. When he and his student showed up to the conference, a representative from a low-cal sweetener producer was there, and proceeded to spend the entire conference standing next to the poster refuting the obviously amateurish research. He said for years afterwards, he&amp;#x27;d still get mail and faxes about new research that disproved any link between fake sugar and memory problems.&lt;p&gt;All of that being said, I don&amp;#x27;t know if there is a substance that we consume that has had more research done on it than artificial sweeteners. For every study like this, there are other studies disproving them, etc. If there is an effect, the effect size is small, and I&amp;#x27;m not convinced there is anything there. Also, I&amp;#x27;m drinking a Diet Coke right now and in another life I was an Alz researcher so maybe I really want it to not be there.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Early-life low-calorie sweetener consumption disrupts memory function in rats</title><url>https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/157714</url></story>