<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>theamk</author><text>What exactly has changed? It’s not like sqlite suddenly stopped calling fsync all the time, and the memory consumption is still relevant.&lt;p&gt;It might be just the opposite, in fact - faster SSDs may mean that directories with many files are faster, and packing many objects into one big sqlite archive does not have as many benefits as before.</text><parent_chain><item><author>Yoric</author><text>Wow, that is old. The last meaningful edit to this document is 2014.&lt;p&gt;Everything has changed several times since then. Please  ignore this link :)</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Performance/Avoid SQLite in Your Next Firefox Feature (2014)</title><url>https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance/Avoid_SQLite_In_Your_Next_Firefox_Feature</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>ampersandy</author><text>What&amp;#x27;s the latest, then? Preferably this document could be updated to point to more up-to-date advice on using SQLite, while retaining the old information for historical reference.</text><parent_chain><item><author>Yoric</author><text>Wow, that is old. The last meaningful edit to this document is 2014.&lt;p&gt;Everything has changed several times since then. Please  ignore this link :)</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Performance/Avoid SQLite in Your Next Firefox Feature (2014)</title><url>https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance/Avoid_SQLite_In_Your_Next_Firefox_Feature</url></story>