<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>johnhattan</author><text>Update: &amp;quot;We apologize that the update was rejected due to an snag in the review system. The updated item will be available in the Chrome Web Store within 30 minutes.&amp;quot;</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>An update to UBlock Origin was rejected by the Chrome Web Store</title><url>https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/880</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>eli</author><text>Headline is wrong. An update to the plugin was rejected (with the option to resubmit), but the previous version is clearly still in the store: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;chrome.google.com&amp;#x2F;webstore&amp;#x2F;detail&amp;#x2F;ublock-origin&amp;#x2F;cjpalhdlnbpafiamejdnhcphjbkeiagm?hl=en&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;chrome.google.com&amp;#x2F;webstore&amp;#x2F;detail&amp;#x2F;ublock-origin&amp;#x2F;cjpa...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;I empathize with the developer, but Occam&amp;#x27;s Razor suggests this isn&amp;#x27;t anything more than a typically crummy vague Walled Garden app store rejection. I&amp;#x27;d take their advice and re-submit.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>An update to UBlock Origin was rejected by the Chrome Web Store</title><url>https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/880</url></story>