<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jennyjenjen</author><text>I wish I could say that I&apos;m surprised that anyone is attacking SendGrid. Even though they have done nothing to deserve such backlash - both before and after firing Adria Richards - it doesn&apos;t surprise me in the least that people are taking the opportunity to unleash hateful comments and demonstrate poor attitudes.&lt;p&gt;I agree with you all the way, other than that. SendGrid made a great case for departing with Ms. Richards and I think it&apos;s pretty clear that her role as a developer evangelist is certainly harmed and she can no longer continue in that role. It has nothing to do with gender, and it has nothing to do with her being offended by those comments, but it has everything to do with the poor way she handled calling out these guys and the fact that she cannot participate in a developer community without developers being fearful of how they conduct themselves within earshot of her (they weren&apos;t even talking to her!).&lt;p&gt;[Edit: Downvoting this eh? If you downvote, you should really participate in the discussion and tell me why I might be wrong.]</text><parent_chain><item><author>cletus</author><text>I&apos;m honestly surprised that anyone is attacking Sendgrid, defending Ms Richards, attacking PyCon or defending Playhaven in this incident.&lt;p&gt;The fact is that what you do reflects on your employer to a degree. If you&apos;re a developer evangelist, that&apos;s quite a high degree, particularly if you drag them into your public  spat.&lt;p&gt;Most people in the media (news readers and so forth) have a &quot;morals clause&quot; in their contract because they publicly represent the company. This situation is much the same.&lt;p&gt;I, for example, am just a software engineer. I pretty much stay away from any thread involving Google directly as I don&apos;t want anything I say to be misconstrued as representing the company&apos;s view. We have a media relations department for that. Those defending Ms Richards might say &quot;on your personal time you can do what you want&quot; (to me). Well, yes and no. It&apos;s certainly at my peril. Also, in Ms Richard&apos;s case, at PyCon she was on official (or at least semi-official) duties so the &quot;personal time&quot; argument doesn&apos;t even apply.&lt;p&gt;This whole incident reads like two guys making jokes to themselves. She overheard and decided to make an issue of it by naming and shaming them in a very public way while waving her employer&apos;s flag. Nevermind that this wasn&apos;t called for (IMHO), I don&apos;t believe for a second that the comments were directed at her or intended for her to hear.&lt;p&gt;The fact that Playhaven fired this engineer over this is disappointing. A public statement about supporting diversity and a warning from HR really should&apos;ve been sufficient (again, IMHO). It makes me wonder if they wanted to fire him anyway.&lt;p&gt;Some other commenters suggest Ms Richards can sue. I tend to disagree but IANAL. I do however think the fired engineer may have a case. He can show damages (losing his job) and argue that Ms Richards (and her employer had they not fired her) had acted with reckless disregard. I&apos;m not sure it&apos;s a strong case but I bet it&apos;s an arguable case.&lt;p&gt;Sendgrid&apos;s statement is (IMHO) excellent. It is measured, factual and has a great tone. This is not a position they wanted to be in (from reading the post). They&apos;ve deliberated. They state a great bottom line that this issue and the subsequent fallout endangers their business. They don&apos;t want to be the story here and Ms Richards made them the story. That&apos;s on her.&lt;p&gt;Let this be a lesson to all reading this: what you do can affect your employment. Act with care and restraint. Once something is said or done it can be very difficult to roll it back.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>A Difficult Situation</title><url>http://blog.sendgrid.com/a-difficult-situation/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>stephengillie</author><text>The joke was between 2 people seated behind her -- were both engineers at Playhaven? Was the other person fired?&lt;p&gt;Edit: Why the downvotes? Is there something I&apos;ve missed? Does this comment really prevent further discussion on the issue?</text><parent_chain><item><author>cletus</author><text>I&apos;m honestly surprised that anyone is attacking Sendgrid, defending Ms Richards, attacking PyCon or defending Playhaven in this incident.&lt;p&gt;The fact is that what you do reflects on your employer to a degree. If you&apos;re a developer evangelist, that&apos;s quite a high degree, particularly if you drag them into your public  spat.&lt;p&gt;Most people in the media (news readers and so forth) have a &quot;morals clause&quot; in their contract because they publicly represent the company. This situation is much the same.&lt;p&gt;I, for example, am just a software engineer. I pretty much stay away from any thread involving Google directly as I don&apos;t want anything I say to be misconstrued as representing the company&apos;s view. We have a media relations department for that. Those defending Ms Richards might say &quot;on your personal time you can do what you want&quot; (to me). Well, yes and no. It&apos;s certainly at my peril. Also, in Ms Richard&apos;s case, at PyCon she was on official (or at least semi-official) duties so the &quot;personal time&quot; argument doesn&apos;t even apply.&lt;p&gt;This whole incident reads like two guys making jokes to themselves. She overheard and decided to make an issue of it by naming and shaming them in a very public way while waving her employer&apos;s flag. Nevermind that this wasn&apos;t called for (IMHO), I don&apos;t believe for a second that the comments were directed at her or intended for her to hear.&lt;p&gt;The fact that Playhaven fired this engineer over this is disappointing. A public statement about supporting diversity and a warning from HR really should&apos;ve been sufficient (again, IMHO). It makes me wonder if they wanted to fire him anyway.&lt;p&gt;Some other commenters suggest Ms Richards can sue. I tend to disagree but IANAL. I do however think the fired engineer may have a case. He can show damages (losing his job) and argue that Ms Richards (and her employer had they not fired her) had acted with reckless disregard. I&apos;m not sure it&apos;s a strong case but I bet it&apos;s an arguable case.&lt;p&gt;Sendgrid&apos;s statement is (IMHO) excellent. It is measured, factual and has a great tone. This is not a position they wanted to be in (from reading the post). They&apos;ve deliberated. They state a great bottom line that this issue and the subsequent fallout endangers their business. They don&apos;t want to be the story here and Ms Richards made them the story. That&apos;s on her.&lt;p&gt;Let this be a lesson to all reading this: what you do can affect your employment. Act with care and restraint. Once something is said or done it can be very difficult to roll it back.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>A Difficult Situation</title><url>http://blog.sendgrid.com/a-difficult-situation/</url></story>