<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>rexf</author><text>Unintended purchases are a real issue. I&amp;#x27;ve witnessed first hand how young kids tend to press anything on the screen without any thought. I saw them press and nearly purchase youtube&amp;#x27;s &amp;quot;Super Chat, a tool that lets you pay to pin comments on live streams&amp;quot; without knowing what it was.</text><parent_chain><item><author>Rebelgecko</author><text>Some of the features that get disabled for &amp;quot;children&amp;#x27;s content&amp;quot; are a bit surprising:&lt;p&gt;Playback in the Miniplayer&lt;p&gt;Save to playlist and Save to watch later&lt;p&gt;Likes and dislikes on YouTube Music&lt;p&gt;Donate buttons&lt;p&gt;I guess it&amp;#x27;s hard to do these in a way that is compliant with the privacy rules, or they&amp;#x27;re worried that kids will donate $1000 to their favorite Youtuber with Mom and Dad&amp;#x27;s credit card? It will be interesting to see how good their machine learning is at identifying &amp;quot;kid&amp;#x27;s content&amp;quot;. From reading the FTC page, the delineation seems a bit arbitrary. I suppose we&amp;#x27;ll see if there&amp;#x27;s a financial impact on Youtubers that are borderline (is someone playing a video game considered children&amp;#x27;s content? What if the videogame is rated M? Will the tiebreaker be statistics about their actual viewers?)</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Better protecting kids’ privacy on YouTube</title><url>https://youtube.googleblog.com/2020/01/better-protecting-kids-privacy-on-YouTube.html</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>tshaddox</author><text>I think we&amp;#x27;ll find that distinguishing between &amp;quot;children&amp;#x27;s content&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;family-friendly content&amp;quot; is difficult not just for YouTube&amp;#x27;s algorithms but for humans as well. I suspect we&amp;#x27;ll see even more channels get hit by this simply because they&amp;#x27;re not identifiably &amp;quot;adult&amp;quot; in any way.</text><parent_chain><item><author>Rebelgecko</author><text>Some of the features that get disabled for &amp;quot;children&amp;#x27;s content&amp;quot; are a bit surprising:&lt;p&gt;Playback in the Miniplayer&lt;p&gt;Save to playlist and Save to watch later&lt;p&gt;Likes and dislikes on YouTube Music&lt;p&gt;Donate buttons&lt;p&gt;I guess it&amp;#x27;s hard to do these in a way that is compliant with the privacy rules, or they&amp;#x27;re worried that kids will donate $1000 to their favorite Youtuber with Mom and Dad&amp;#x27;s credit card? It will be interesting to see how good their machine learning is at identifying &amp;quot;kid&amp;#x27;s content&amp;quot;. From reading the FTC page, the delineation seems a bit arbitrary. I suppose we&amp;#x27;ll see if there&amp;#x27;s a financial impact on Youtubers that are borderline (is someone playing a video game considered children&amp;#x27;s content? What if the videogame is rated M? Will the tiebreaker be statistics about their actual viewers?)</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Better protecting kids’ privacy on YouTube</title><url>https://youtube.googleblog.com/2020/01/better-protecting-kids-privacy-on-YouTube.html</url></story>