<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>peterzakin</author><text>It would probably be too much work if &quot;circling&quot; were done after following a person, but since circling is merely part of the process of following someone, it doesn&apos;t seem like that much of a burden.</text><parent_chain><item><author>nollidge</author><text>I fail to see how Circles is &quot;high work&quot;. You make a simple decision about which circle(s) to put someone in. It&apos;s not multi-variable calculus.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Google Circles is high work and low return</title><url>http://garry.posterous.com/google-circles-is-high-work-and-low-return-wh</url><text></text></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>stevenleeg</author><text>Especially since this decision is required to be made when you first &quot;follow&quot; someone. It&apos;s not like Facebook where there&apos;s a small box for you to choose a list after you&apos;ve already accepted a friend request.</text><parent_chain><item><author>nollidge</author><text>I fail to see how Circles is &quot;high work&quot;. You make a simple decision about which circle(s) to put someone in. It&apos;s not multi-variable calculus.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Google Circles is high work and low return</title><url>http://garry.posterous.com/google-circles-is-high-work-and-low-return-wh</url><text></text></story>