<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>nlavezzo</author><text>I think it&apos;s worth noting that most of those stories are random blog sites, which are kind of allowed (expected?) to post stupid, sensationalist stuff fairly regularly. The WIRED article was a cover story on a major technology publication, and went beyond opinion and used a totally misleading graph ( &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2010/08/17/is-the-web-really-de.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.boingboing.net/2010/08/17/is-the-web-really-de.ht...&lt;/a&gt; ). The WIRED article is a few levels above those links in terms of stupidity.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>The Tragic Death of Practically Everything</title><url>http://technologizer.com/2010/08/18/the-tragic-death-of-practically-everything/</url><text></text></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>dingle_thunk</author><text>Breaking News: Unnecessarily hyperbolic and speculative tech news sites are dead!</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>The Tragic Death of Practically Everything</title><url>http://technologizer.com/2010/08/18/the-tragic-death-of-practically-everything/</url><text></text></story>