<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>me_bx</author><text>He probably means in terms of general usability. This is the reason why I don&amp;#x27;t use bitbucket at all, and I&amp;#x27;m happy to give some money to github in exchange for their service.&lt;p&gt;Bitbucket&amp;#x27;s issue tracker is such a pain to work with. I remember being redirected to a new page whenever I had to create a new tag. Then I&amp;#x27;d loose the content of the issue I had started to write, something like that.</text><parent_chain><item><author>TAForObvReasons</author><text>Can you clarify?  Why is Bitbucket &amp;quot;terrible&amp;quot;?</text></item><item><author>teen</author><text>Bitbucket is terrible though, so what does it matter?</text></item><item><author>pron</author><text>Except that now GitHub is 9x more expensive than BitBucket (and for a team under 5 developers, GitHub is $25 vs. BitBucket&amp;#x27;s $0).</text></item><item><author>mrweasel</author><text>We have a tons of repositories, most are currently on BItbucket, because GitHub was to expensive. Only our largest projects are on GitHub. Our team is maybe 8 developers, depending on consultants, interns and other temporary employments, but we have 20 - 30 repos.&lt;p&gt;I think for small companies that do all development in-house, having large number of repos, and few developer is a pretty normal.&lt;p&gt;The way I look at it, GitHub is moving to a model where they assume that the number of employees is more indicative to the amount you can afford to pay, compared to previously where having a large number of repos meant you could pay more.&lt;p&gt;It will certainly help attract smaller businesses to GitHub.</text></item><item><author>arnvald</author><text>A small comparison:&lt;p&gt;Team   |             Cost Before |  Cost Now&lt;p&gt;1 repo, 5 users   |   $25   |   $25&lt;p&gt;1 repo, 10 users  |   $25  |    $70&lt;p&gt;11 repos, 5 users  |   $50   |   $25&lt;p&gt;11 repos, 10 users  | $50  |    $70&lt;p&gt;5 repos,  50 users  | $25   |   $430&lt;p&gt;50 repos, 5 users  |  $100  |   $25&lt;p&gt;50 repos, 50 users |  $100   |  $430&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m not sure how common are organizations with few users and large number of repose - I guess software houses that keep old projects (for maintenance and future requests from clients) fall into this category, but who else?&lt;p&gt;The other case where it becomes cheaper is personal accounts.&lt;p&gt;In all the other cases - it just looks like a raise of prices.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Introducing unlimited private repositories</title><url>https://github.com/blog/2164-introducing-unlimited-private-repositories</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>shadowmint</author><text>Dunno, we&amp;#x27;ve had downtime every month for months.&lt;p&gt;Its slow as heck.&lt;p&gt;The UI is clunky.&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#x27;projects&amp;#x27; made it hard to find anything and broke bookmarks.&lt;p&gt;... but the downtime is the killer. Last week was the last one.</text><parent_chain><item><author>TAForObvReasons</author><text>Can you clarify?  Why is Bitbucket &amp;quot;terrible&amp;quot;?</text></item><item><author>teen</author><text>Bitbucket is terrible though, so what does it matter?</text></item><item><author>pron</author><text>Except that now GitHub is 9x more expensive than BitBucket (and for a team under 5 developers, GitHub is $25 vs. BitBucket&amp;#x27;s $0).</text></item><item><author>mrweasel</author><text>We have a tons of repositories, most are currently on BItbucket, because GitHub was to expensive. Only our largest projects are on GitHub. Our team is maybe 8 developers, depending on consultants, interns and other temporary employments, but we have 20 - 30 repos.&lt;p&gt;I think for small companies that do all development in-house, having large number of repos, and few developer is a pretty normal.&lt;p&gt;The way I look at it, GitHub is moving to a model where they assume that the number of employees is more indicative to the amount you can afford to pay, compared to previously where having a large number of repos meant you could pay more.&lt;p&gt;It will certainly help attract smaller businesses to GitHub.</text></item><item><author>arnvald</author><text>A small comparison:&lt;p&gt;Team   |             Cost Before |  Cost Now&lt;p&gt;1 repo, 5 users   |   $25   |   $25&lt;p&gt;1 repo, 10 users  |   $25  |    $70&lt;p&gt;11 repos, 5 users  |   $50   |   $25&lt;p&gt;11 repos, 10 users  | $50  |    $70&lt;p&gt;5 repos,  50 users  | $25   |   $430&lt;p&gt;50 repos, 5 users  |  $100  |   $25&lt;p&gt;50 repos, 50 users |  $100   |  $430&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m not sure how common are organizations with few users and large number of repose - I guess software houses that keep old projects (for maintenance and future requests from clients) fall into this category, but who else?&lt;p&gt;The other case where it becomes cheaper is personal accounts.&lt;p&gt;In all the other cases - it just looks like a raise of prices.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Introducing unlimited private repositories</title><url>https://github.com/blog/2164-introducing-unlimited-private-repositories</url></story>