<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>bgrohman</author><text>It looks nice, but I guess I still[1] don’t understand the proliferation of simple static site generators. It’s pretty easy (and fun!) to build your own that works exactly as you want it to. And I don’t think a static site generator is suitable for non-technical users. Is there an in-between type of user technical enough to use a static site generator but not able to write their own? Or maybe the proliferation is only because they are both easy and fun to create?&lt;p&gt;[1]&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;#x2F;item?id=14877298&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;#x2F;item?id=14877298&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;Edit: I didn’t intend for this to sound negative for the creator. Even if it’s just for fun and the chance someone else might find it useful, that’s enough of a reason to build it for me.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Ivy – A static website generator built in Python</title><url>http://mulholland.xyz/docs/ivy/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jaredandrews</author><text>Not sure if OP is the developer behind this but...&lt;p&gt;As a happy user of Pelican[0], a different Python based static site generator. Why would I want to switch over to Ivy?&lt;p&gt;[0] &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;blog.getpelican.com&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;blog.getpelican.com&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Ivy – A static website generator built in Python</title><url>http://mulholland.xyz/docs/ivy/</url></story>