<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>saurik</author><text>The entire premise of protecting people from &amp;quot;their own reactions to test results&amp;quot; is so horribly infuriating :(.&lt;p&gt;The context that is missing here, which I am super curious about: Is this article written to send to a court or some legislative body? Is it maybe the moral equivalent of an amicus brief? Is this &amp;quot;merely&amp;quot; detailed research that might be cited by someone else in such an argument? Is there any real organized opposition at all to the FDA doing this that one can attach themselves to?</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>The FDA&apos;s Restrictive Regulation of Home-Testing Devices (2017)</title><url>https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3914&amp;context=dlj</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>zackify</author><text>Interesting seeing an article about this.&lt;p&gt;Just this week I was looking to get a continuous glucose monitor. I’ve heard it can really prevent diabetes and help you understand what foods spike your levels.&lt;p&gt;The fda won’t allow anyone to get these if they aren’t already diabetic.&lt;p&gt;There’s so many ways we aren’t “free” in this country to do what we want with our bodies.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>The FDA&apos;s Restrictive Regulation of Home-Testing Devices (2017)</title><url>https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3914&amp;context=dlj</url></story>