<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>betterunix2</author><text>To be fair, the FCC ignored the automatically generated comments and focused on comments that were unique, detailed, and relevant.  The actual scandal should be what they did with those comments:  those that supported rolling back the NN rules were accepted as fact, those opposed (i.e. those in favor of NN regulation) were dismissed as &amp;quot;not compelling.&amp;quot;  I know this because my comment was among those dismissed as &amp;quot;not compelling,&amp;quot; including specific sections that dealt strictly with the factual errors in Ajit Pai&amp;#x27;s proposal.  The only reason they bothered citing my comment (and numerous others by actual technical experts who took the time to comment) was to avoid being sued for ignoring the public comments (they are legally required to consider public comments when making a decision).&lt;p&gt;It is also worth mentioning that Ajit Pai differed from his predecessor Tom Wheeler.  Wheeler had intended to introduce rules that allowed various NN violations but changed course in response to public comments and went with the stronger regulations.  Pai never cared what the public had to say and made that very clear in his public statements, where he basically said that the only thing that would change his mind would be comments concerning the FCC&amp;#x27;s legal authority (not that there was any serious dispute about that legal authority).</text><parent_chain><item><author>rectang</author><text>It was obvious at the time. I recall many people reporting that fake comments antithetical to their own beliefs had been submitted using their identities.&lt;p&gt;Why was FCC head Ajit Pai able to get away with citing fraudulent evidence? How can we stop such blatant corruption of the FCC&amp;#x27;s policy-making process in the future?</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Opposition to net neutrality was faked, New York says</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/06/technology/internet-providers-fake-comments-net-neutrality-new-york.html</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jliptzin</author><text>We can stop this blatant corruption by handing a very long federal prison sentence to Mr. Pai. It’s not really that complicated.</text><parent_chain><item><author>rectang</author><text>It was obvious at the time. I recall many people reporting that fake comments antithetical to their own beliefs had been submitted using their identities.&lt;p&gt;Why was FCC head Ajit Pai able to get away with citing fraudulent evidence? How can we stop such blatant corruption of the FCC&amp;#x27;s policy-making process in the future?</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Opposition to net neutrality was faked, New York says</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/06/technology/internet-providers-fake-comments-net-neutrality-new-york.html</url></story>