<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>thrance</author><text>Would it have been better if nuclear weapons had been developed by a private company whose board consisted entirely of lunatics?</text><parent_chain><item><author>ein0p</author><text>Nation state governments are responsible for the vast majority of deaths attributable to violence historically. Willingly entrusting them with a potentially world ending technology that they’re 100% certain to abuse is a moronic idea.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>AI firms mustn’t govern themselves, say ex-members of OpenAI’s board</title><url>https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2024/05/26/ai-firms-mustnt-govern-themselves-say-ex-members-of-openais-board</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>ZhadruOmjar</author><text>This whole thing seems like a way to build a regulatory framework so only the existing, largest AI players can continue and there is too much regulation for anyone else to enter the industry.</text><parent_chain><item><author>ein0p</author><text>Nation state governments are responsible for the vast majority of deaths attributable to violence historically. Willingly entrusting them with a potentially world ending technology that they’re 100% certain to abuse is a moronic idea.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>AI firms mustn’t govern themselves, say ex-members of OpenAI’s board</title><url>https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2024/05/26/ai-firms-mustnt-govern-themselves-say-ex-members-of-openais-board</url></story>