<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>dorfsmay</author><text>Visited last weekend. Interesting for sure. Funny to see how many times and for how long we&amp;#x27;ve been trying to do VR!&lt;p&gt;Some of the &amp;quot;failures&amp;quot; were unfair IMO, like minitel and Block Buster: It&amp;#x27;s like saying using wind sails on ships was a failure because it was replaced by steam engines.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Museum of Failure</title><url>https://museumoffailure.com/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>salmo</author><text>I love this idea. So many failures follow the “first is not best”, then many failed business tales.&lt;p&gt;But most of these are the expected and the analysis is shallow.  Snark added is unnecessary.&lt;p&gt;Many are fad products or acknowledged R&amp;amp;D experiments that I wouldn’t necessarily call “failures.”&lt;p&gt;I expected more when having to give my email. A categorized page of bullets with Wikipedia links would be more useful.  The details and references would be higher quality.&lt;p&gt;Cool idea, just needs more development and research to provide real value.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Museum of Failure</title><url>https://museumoffailure.com/</url></story>