<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>blinkingled</author><text>They just added &quot;on this issue&quot; to it. Doesn&apos;t seem to be a big deal - they are just making bit more explicit what was already implied. It would be different if they had removed the line completely or changed their stance 180 degree.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>New York Times silently edits its &quot;lost all credibility&quot; line</title><url>http://www.newsdiffs.org/diff/245566/245668/www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/opinion/president-obamas-dragnet.html</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>vosper</author><text>I&apos;m so happy that newsdiffs exists! I had come up with the same idea (and name) independently after noticing substantial edits to articles on a major NZ news website, but never got around to creating the tool. I&apos;m excited to check out their github repo and see if I can setup tracking for the sites I&apos;m interested in.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>New York Times silently edits its &quot;lost all credibility&quot; line</title><url>http://www.newsdiffs.org/diff/245566/245668/www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/opinion/president-obamas-dragnet.html</url></story>