<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>afaz</author><text>Picat is a pragmatic mix of several programming paradigms, and it supports both directional and non-directional computing.&lt;p&gt;Pattern-matching is directional. Consider the following predicate definitions:&lt;p&gt;p([a,b|_]) =&amp;gt; true.&lt;p&gt;q([X,X]) =&amp;gt; true.&lt;p&gt;A call p(L) succeeds only when L has at least two elements and the first two elements are a and b, respectively. A call q(L) succeeds only when L has exactly two identical elements.&lt;p&gt;Functions are directional. In Prolog, the length(L,N) predicate can be used to compute the length of L and can also be used to create a list of a given length N. In Picat, you need to use function new_list(N) to create a list, and use function len(L) to compute the length of L.&lt;p&gt;Loops are directional. Unlike in ECLiPSe-CLP where it is possible to iterate over a list that is to be created, in Picat the collection of every iterator must be fixed.&lt;p&gt;Unification is non-directional. A call X = Y is like an equality constraint over terms. Built-ins predicates, such as member(X,L) and append(L1,L2,L3), are defined by using unification, and can be used in the same way as in Prolog.&lt;p&gt;Constraints are non-directional. While a unification X = Y has a unique solution when it succeeds, a system of constraints may have multiple solutions. Picat provides a built-in, called solve, that calls the imported solver to search for a satisfactory or an optimal solution.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Picat: A Logic-Based, Multi-Paradigm, Programming Language</title><url>http://picat-lang.org/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>EtDybNuvCu</author><text>Interesting syntax. Can Picat programs be run backwards or in other-than-expected directions, as in Prologs and Kanrens? This relational aspect is the killer feature of logical languages, and it would be unfortunate if Picat doesn&amp;#x27;t have it.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Picat: A Logic-Based, Multi-Paradigm, Programming Language</title><url>http://picat-lang.org/</url></story>