<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>teraflop</author><text>I like the idea, and decided to try doing some validation. The first thing I noticed is that it asks me to make a yes-or-no judgment of whether the sentence was spoken &amp;quot;accurately&amp;quot;, but nowhere on the site is it explained what &amp;quot;accurate&amp;quot; means, or how strict I should be.&lt;p&gt;(The first clip I got was spoken more or less correctly, but a couple of words are slurred together and the prosody is awkward. Without having a good idea of the standards and goals of the project, I have no idea whether including this clip would make the overall dataset better or worse. My gut feeling is that it&amp;#x27;s good for training recognition, and bad for training synthesis.)&lt;p&gt;This seems to me like a major issue, since it should take a relatively small amount of effort to write up a list of guidelines, and it would be hugely beneficial to establish those guidelines &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; asking a lot of volunteers to donate their time. I don&amp;#x27;t find it encouraging that this has been an open issue for four years, with apparently no action except a bunch of bikeshedding: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;#x2F;common-voice&amp;#x2F;common-voice&amp;#x2F;issues&amp;#x2F;273&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;#x2F;common-voice&amp;#x2F;common-voice&amp;#x2F;issues&amp;#x2F;273&lt;/a&gt;</text><parent_chain><item><author>sodality2</author><text>Mozilla CommonVoice is definitely trying. I always do a few validations and a few clips if I have a few minutes to spare, and I recommend everyone does. They need volunteers to validate and upload speech clips to create a dataset.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;commonvoice.mozilla.org&amp;#x2F;en&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;commonvoice.mozilla.org&amp;#x2F;en&lt;/a&gt;</text></item><item><author>marcodiego</author><text>Good FLOSS speech recognition and TTS is badly needed. Such interaction should not be left to an oligoply with bad history of not respecting users freedoms and privacy.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Voice2json: Offline speech and intent recognition on Linux</title><url>https://voice2json.org/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>wcarss</author><text>I&amp;#x27;ve used the deepspeech project a fair amount and it is good. It&amp;#x27;s not &lt;i&gt;perfect&lt;/i&gt;, certainly, and it honestly isn&amp;#x27;t good enough yet for an accurate transcription in my mind, but it&amp;#x27;s good. Easy to work with, pretty good results, and all the right kinds of free.&lt;p&gt;Thanks for taking time to contribute!</text><parent_chain><item><author>sodality2</author><text>Mozilla CommonVoice is definitely trying. I always do a few validations and a few clips if I have a few minutes to spare, and I recommend everyone does. They need volunteers to validate and upload speech clips to create a dataset.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;commonvoice.mozilla.org&amp;#x2F;en&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;commonvoice.mozilla.org&amp;#x2F;en&lt;/a&gt;</text></item><item><author>marcodiego</author><text>Good FLOSS speech recognition and TTS is badly needed. Such interaction should not be left to an oligoply with bad history of not respecting users freedoms and privacy.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Voice2json: Offline speech and intent recognition on Linux</title><url>https://voice2json.org/</url></story>