<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>maxerickson</author><text>The article proposes a heuristic for people to use when offering support to those close to them. You are analyzing it as if it is a treatment plan for the person receiving support.&lt;p&gt;It doesn&amp;#x27;t say that it&amp;#x27;s good for someone in the hospital to spend all of their time complaining about their situation, it says that their co-worker who is visiting to be supportive probably shouldn&amp;#x27;t bring up how it was hard for them to do it.</text><parent_chain><item><author>ants_everywhere</author><text>A lot of these ideas if taken literally would harm the person in the center.&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s a long history of clinical psychology and evidence based psychology diverging, with the clinical psychologists adopting methods that actively harm their patients. The history starts of course with Freud, but another prominent example was the theory of recovered memories in the late 1900s.&lt;p&gt;In this case, the ring theory was developed out of hurt because the first author felt hurt by something a colleague said. That&amp;#x27;s not generally a good basis for a theory of how to deal with something as complicated as trauma.&lt;p&gt;Even the basic idea of a &amp;quot;center&amp;quot; is suspect. In many cases, a traumatic event is an event that affects multiple people who must interact. The classic example of trauma is warfare. Families go through trauma. Even when there isn&amp;#x27;t a common trauma, many conversations happen between individuals who have separate but comparable traumas. You don&amp;#x27;t want to get into a frame of mind where you have to judge and compare people&amp;#x27;s trauma to determine what they can and can&amp;#x27;t say.&lt;p&gt;On top of that there is a lot of research on kvetching and whether it&amp;#x27;s good for patients. In most cases I&amp;#x27;m aware of, it&amp;#x27;s harmful to them. Most evidence-based approaches, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), advocate the opposite of what this article is advocating. CBT says that the patient does best when they talk back to their own distorted thoughts. That means not thinking of yourself as the center of some universe, and not thinking of yourself as a &amp;quot;why me&amp;quot; victim that is targeted by some cosmic force. This article is saying diametrically the opposite; it says you should reinforce people&amp;#x27;s distorted thoughts.&lt;p&gt;Of course, you have to be kind and gentle to someone when they&amp;#x27;re having a hard time. But that kindness can take a lot of forms, and this article is advocating a very particular and almost ideological approach.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>How not to say the wrong thing (2013)</title><url>https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-oe-0407-silk-ring-theory-20130407-story.html</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>nine_k</author><text>This is fair. But I think that instead of debunking this approach, it just limits its applicability.&lt;p&gt;(1) Keep the &amp;quot;kvetching order&amp;quot; for the (relatively) short time when the impact of the trauma is still very strong and hasn&amp;#x27;t been processed by the person in the center.&lt;p&gt;(2) Do not allow two systems of kvetching rings clash. Yes, this includes both warfare, hopefully far from most people here, and, say, divorces.&lt;p&gt;This is not a universal solution. Taken too literally, or too long-term, it will harm the person(s) in the center it&amp;#x27;s intended to protect. Yes, sometimes the only way out of pain is through, &amp;quot;no pain, no gain&amp;quot;. But this is a good rule-of-thumb kind of solution that helps limit the pain inflicted to the people  &lt;i&gt;definitely more hurt than you&lt;/i&gt;, without any significant gain. Maybe a traumatized person, for their long-term benefit. needs to have a difficult conversation that would be extra painful due to the trauma. But there&amp;#x27;s no reason to inflict pain by small talk and trivial daily iissues.</text><parent_chain><item><author>ants_everywhere</author><text>A lot of these ideas if taken literally would harm the person in the center.&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s a long history of clinical psychology and evidence based psychology diverging, with the clinical psychologists adopting methods that actively harm their patients. The history starts of course with Freud, but another prominent example was the theory of recovered memories in the late 1900s.&lt;p&gt;In this case, the ring theory was developed out of hurt because the first author felt hurt by something a colleague said. That&amp;#x27;s not generally a good basis for a theory of how to deal with something as complicated as trauma.&lt;p&gt;Even the basic idea of a &amp;quot;center&amp;quot; is suspect. In many cases, a traumatic event is an event that affects multiple people who must interact. The classic example of trauma is warfare. Families go through trauma. Even when there isn&amp;#x27;t a common trauma, many conversations happen between individuals who have separate but comparable traumas. You don&amp;#x27;t want to get into a frame of mind where you have to judge and compare people&amp;#x27;s trauma to determine what they can and can&amp;#x27;t say.&lt;p&gt;On top of that there is a lot of research on kvetching and whether it&amp;#x27;s good for patients. In most cases I&amp;#x27;m aware of, it&amp;#x27;s harmful to them. Most evidence-based approaches, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), advocate the opposite of what this article is advocating. CBT says that the patient does best when they talk back to their own distorted thoughts. That means not thinking of yourself as the center of some universe, and not thinking of yourself as a &amp;quot;why me&amp;quot; victim that is targeted by some cosmic force. This article is saying diametrically the opposite; it says you should reinforce people&amp;#x27;s distorted thoughts.&lt;p&gt;Of course, you have to be kind and gentle to someone when they&amp;#x27;re having a hard time. But that kindness can take a lot of forms, and this article is advocating a very particular and almost ideological approach.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>How not to say the wrong thing (2013)</title><url>https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-oe-0407-silk-ring-theory-20130407-story.html</url></story>