<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>indentit</author><text>I was interested to see a more formal definition of calendar versioning than I&amp;#x27;ve come across before, until I saw that  it refers to `DD` for short day while `0D` is zero padded - which goes against all date formatting specifications ever... `DD` should be zero-padded and a single `D` unpadded...</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Calendar Versioning</title><url>https://calver.org/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>amelius</author><text>Are they trying to make this as obscure as possible? After reading the top of the scrollable page, I still couldn&amp;#x27;t understand what a CalVer version string looks like.&lt;p&gt;Also, I think version strings should contain information about compatibility, not just about time.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Calendar Versioning</title><url>https://calver.org/</url></story>