<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>plinkplonk</author><text>From a comment on the article.&lt;p&gt;&quot;You can&apos;t absorb all those people from Microsoft and not get infected by the same mindset. &quot;.&lt;p&gt;I wouldn&apos;t be surprised at all if this initiative were being driven by an &quot;acquired&quot; (set of) VP s. DoubleClick maybe? Sounds right up their alley.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>A paper trail of betrayal: Google&apos;s net neutrality collapse</title><url>http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2010/08/a-paper-trail-of-betrayal-googles-net-neutrality-collapse.ars</url><text></text></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>icarus_drowning</author><text>What I think is missing from articles like this are clear suggestions on how else to compromise with telcos and the FCC. The latter party has already had significant trouble in their attempts to enforce neutrality, and telcos have fought it vigorously.&lt;p&gt;It seems clear that some sort of compromise was worth inspecting. Whether or not you agree with the Verizon/Google deal, it is worth criticizing it realistically (I thought the EFF&apos;s response is the best so far), rather than using charged language like &quot;A paper trail of betrayal&quot;.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>A paper trail of betrayal: Google&apos;s net neutrality collapse</title><url>http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2010/08/a-paper-trail-of-betrayal-googles-net-neutrality-collapse.ars</url><text></text></story>