<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>kamikaz1k</author><text>Love love love planetscale.&lt;p&gt;When I found it (you can thank Theo), shocked this isn&amp;#x27;t what AWS&amp;#x27; serverless DB offering already was.&lt;p&gt;I agree with what the author mentioned in another comment, not dropping performance for non-serverless use cases is a decided win. I deeply appreciate the work being done to enable serverless applications, so thank you for the work and thank you for sharing your findings OP.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Faster MySQL with HTTP/3</title><url>https://planetscale.com/blog/faster-mysql-with-http3</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>erulabs</author><text>Awesome work! I&amp;#x27;m loving planetscale for lighting a new fire under the butt of MySQL again. Have been demoing Vitess (Planetscale&amp;#x27;s underlying software) and have only positive things to say so far - the Kubernetes operator is wonderful.&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m also curious about the comparison to the MySQL Classic protocol - would be interesting have an &amp;quot;as-close-as-possible&amp;quot; benchmark between Aurora MySQL &amp;quot;Serverless V2&amp;quot; and Planetscale. Even if it was as naive as &amp;quot;Given 100$ of credits, how many reads can you do at what average latency&amp;quot;.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Faster MySQL with HTTP/3</title><url>https://planetscale.com/blog/faster-mysql-with-http3</url></story>