<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jasonwatkinspdx</author><text>I find it tiresome empty snark.&lt;p&gt;Better batteries are a really big deal. Is every promising technology gonna work out? Of course not. But there&amp;#x27;s valid reasons to be interested and excited. I &lt;i&gt;like&lt;/i&gt; that these stories appear on HN so I can keep a rough understanding of how research is progressing. And usually there&amp;#x27;s some comments here from people who know the field a lot better. But to find those gems I have to scroll past a whole crowd of people posting this self congratulatory snark.</text><parent_chain><item><author>ncann</author><text>Sorry, I can&amp;#x27;t resist the urge to repost this classic comment on a thread about new battery technology:&lt;p&gt;Dear battery technology claimant,&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your submission of proposed new revolutionary battery technology. Your new technology claims to be superior to existing lithium-ion technology and is just around the corner from taking over the world. Unfortunately your technology will likely fail, because:&lt;p&gt;[ ] it is impractical to manufacture at scale.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it will be too expensive for users.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it suffers from too few recharge cycles.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it is incapable of delivering current at sufficient levels.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it lacks thermal stability at low or high temperatures.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it lacks the energy density to make it sufficiently portable.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it has too short of a lifetime.&lt;p&gt;[ ] its charge rate is too slow.&lt;p&gt;[ ] its materials are too toxic.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it is too likely to catch fire or explode.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it is too minimal of a step forward for anybody to care.&lt;p&gt;[ ] this was already done 20 years ago and didn&amp;#x27;t work then.&lt;p&gt;[ ] by this time it ships li-ion advances will match it.&lt;p&gt;[ ] your claims are lies.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Na-S Battery: Low-cost with four times the capacity of lithium</title><url>https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2022/12/07/low-cost-battery-built-with-four-times-the-capacity-of-lithium.html</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>ksec</author><text>Nothing wrong with reposting it. As a matter of fact I think this should be posted every time there is a new battery announcement so we can all do the tick boxes.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it lacks thermal stability at low or high temperatures.
[ ] it is too likely to catch fire or explode.
[ ] it is impractical to manufacture at scale.&lt;p&gt;These are the only three I see as problematic or unknown. Which is not that bad.</text><parent_chain><item><author>ncann</author><text>Sorry, I can&amp;#x27;t resist the urge to repost this classic comment on a thread about new battery technology:&lt;p&gt;Dear battery technology claimant,&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your submission of proposed new revolutionary battery technology. Your new technology claims to be superior to existing lithium-ion technology and is just around the corner from taking over the world. Unfortunately your technology will likely fail, because:&lt;p&gt;[ ] it is impractical to manufacture at scale.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it will be too expensive for users.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it suffers from too few recharge cycles.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it is incapable of delivering current at sufficient levels.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it lacks thermal stability at low or high temperatures.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it lacks the energy density to make it sufficiently portable.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it has too short of a lifetime.&lt;p&gt;[ ] its charge rate is too slow.&lt;p&gt;[ ] its materials are too toxic.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it is too likely to catch fire or explode.&lt;p&gt;[ ] it is too minimal of a step forward for anybody to care.&lt;p&gt;[ ] this was already done 20 years ago and didn&amp;#x27;t work then.&lt;p&gt;[ ] by this time it ships li-ion advances will match it.&lt;p&gt;[ ] your claims are lies.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Na-S Battery: Low-cost with four times the capacity of lithium</title><url>https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2022/12/07/low-cost-battery-built-with-four-times-the-capacity-of-lithium.html</url></story>