<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>codetrotter</author><text>&amp;gt; Without being logged in, things are as fast as they usually are -- but post log-in, SLOWWWER THAN MOLASSESS...&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I tried this several times; why this is, I can only wonder...&lt;p&gt;That is to be expected. Non-logged-in pages can be cached aggressively server side. When you are logged in much more has to be done dynamically.&lt;p&gt;The fact that non-logged-in pages are still loading fast is testament to the fact that the HN devs have done their job properly with implementing caching.&lt;p&gt;In the bad old days it would be slow for everyone whether logged in or not. In general I mean. I have only been on HN since 2009 and have been logged in (other accounts in the past, changed name) pretty much always so I don&amp;#x27;t know when HN got good at caching. I would kind of sort of expect that HN was actually like that from the beginning, given that pg came from having used Lisp in production at Viaweb and they got a lot of experience there early at how to do things fast (in terms of time to implement) and presumably proper (since they were able to compete with others).</text><parent_chain><item><author>peter_d_sherman</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s not just you...&lt;p&gt;I posted the following in the &amp;quot;Slack Down Completely&amp;quot; article (before this article was posted):&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;For some reason, today, HN seems exceedingly exceedingly slow (to me) after logging in...&lt;p&gt;Without being logged in, things are as fast as they usually are -- but post log-in, SLOWWWER THAN MOLASSESS...&lt;p&gt;I tried this several times; why this is, I can only wonder...&lt;p&gt;To quote Bill and Ted... &amp;quot;Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Ask HN: Is HN slow today?</title><text>What&amp;#x27;s normally the snappiest site on the web has been consistently taking ~5 seconds for each page load today. Extra traffic due to Slack being down, perhaps?</text></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>1f60c</author><text>HN caches pages for logged out users (since they&amp;#x27;ll obviously be the same for everyone).</text><parent_chain><item><author>peter_d_sherman</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s not just you...&lt;p&gt;I posted the following in the &amp;quot;Slack Down Completely&amp;quot; article (before this article was posted):&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;For some reason, today, HN seems exceedingly exceedingly slow (to me) after logging in...&lt;p&gt;Without being logged in, things are as fast as they usually are -- but post log-in, SLOWWWER THAN MOLASSESS...&lt;p&gt;I tried this several times; why this is, I can only wonder...&lt;p&gt;To quote Bill and Ted... &amp;quot;Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Ask HN: Is HN slow today?</title><text>What&amp;#x27;s normally the snappiest site on the web has been consistently taking ~5 seconds for each page load today. Extra traffic due to Slack being down, perhaps?</text></story>