<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>napoleoncomplex</author><text>Reproducibility in science is something that badly needs this push. It&amp;#x27;s an incredibly difficult &amp;quot;sell&amp;quot; to anyone with funds for research, and I&amp;#x27;m extremely happy that they&amp;#x27;ve found capital for it.&lt;p&gt;The foundations of our scientific knowledge need to be solidified, and from all the science news and developments, this one is the one that makes me by far the most excited for the future of science.&lt;p&gt;Next on the list, open source repositories for protocols of experiments! Maybe someone surprises me with a link to an existing solution :).</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Reproducibility Initiative gets $1.3M grant to validate 50 cancer studies</title><url>http://blog.scienceexchange.com/2013/10/reproducibility-initiative-receives-1-3m-grant-to-validate-50-landmark-cancer-studies/</url><text></text></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>irollboozers</author><text>Science Exchange is leading and pushing ahead with this very important work. They are addressing what the public funders and private industry can&amp;#x27;t and won&amp;#x27;t do, but at scale this becomes really powerful. Great stuff.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Reproducibility Initiative gets $1.3M grant to validate 50 cancer studies</title><url>http://blog.scienceexchange.com/2013/10/reproducibility-initiative-receives-1-3m-grant-to-validate-50-landmark-cancer-studies/</url><text></text></story>