<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>HermanMartinus</author><text>Creator here. So it may be a bit pedantic, but yes, there are styles (pure HTML isn&amp;#x27;t the most pleasant to read) but no external stylesheets.&lt;p&gt;I ran a bunch of tests when setting it up to see what loads faster and it turns out the &amp;lt;style&amp;gt; tag in the head, with such minimal styles outperformed external stylesheets (even though the browser can cache them). With styles so small once the html page is loaded (at 2-5kb gzipped) the styles are immediate, whereas even if retrieving from browser cache the html needs to load first before it can take effect.&lt;p&gt;The second bit with Fathom analytics is that users can optionally connect Fathom to their accounts (this is the only analytics tool you can connect since they have a track record of being trustworthy). But yes, it is technically included JS.</text><parent_chain><item><author>tyingq</author><text>&amp;gt;no stylesheets&lt;p&gt;Well, there is a fair amount of css wrapped in &amp;lt;style&amp;gt; tags. Not sure I understand the upside of not putting it in a separate file.&lt;p&gt;Though the look is reasonably pleasant.&lt;p&gt;Edit: The example blog also loads js, despite the &amp;quot;no javascript&amp;quot; claim. Like: &lt;i&gt;&amp;lt;script src=&amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;cdn.usefathom.com&amp;#x2F;script.js&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;cdn.usefathom.com&amp;#x2F;script.js&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; data-site=&amp;quot;WKWMFTPV&amp;quot; defer&amp;gt;&amp;lt;&amp;#x2F;script&amp;gt;&lt;/i&gt;.  Perhaps that&amp;#x27;s not a default thing, but it seems odd to link to an example blog that doesn&amp;#x27;t match the sales pitch.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Bear Blog – A privacy-first, fast blogging platform</title><url>https://bearblog.dev</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>Kaze404</author><text>Inline CSS has the benefit of not making a second HTTP request, as well as (if I recall correctly) rendering the page styled from the get go, as opposed to once unstyled and once again when the CSS has finished downloading.</text><parent_chain><item><author>tyingq</author><text>&amp;gt;no stylesheets&lt;p&gt;Well, there is a fair amount of css wrapped in &amp;lt;style&amp;gt; tags. Not sure I understand the upside of not putting it in a separate file.&lt;p&gt;Though the look is reasonably pleasant.&lt;p&gt;Edit: The example blog also loads js, despite the &amp;quot;no javascript&amp;quot; claim. Like: &lt;i&gt;&amp;lt;script src=&amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;cdn.usefathom.com&amp;#x2F;script.js&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;cdn.usefathom.com&amp;#x2F;script.js&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; data-site=&amp;quot;WKWMFTPV&amp;quot; defer&amp;gt;&amp;lt;&amp;#x2F;script&amp;gt;&lt;/i&gt;.  Perhaps that&amp;#x27;s not a default thing, but it seems odd to link to an example blog that doesn&amp;#x27;t match the sales pitch.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Bear Blog – A privacy-first, fast blogging platform</title><url>https://bearblog.dev</url></story>