<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>ErrantX</author><text>This is the sort of thing that we get told will make my job easier.&lt;p&gt;Take from the horse mouth; complete crap.&lt;p&gt;Which is why you probably won&apos;t find anyone in the security or forensics business that thinks this is a good solution.&lt;p&gt;One of my trainers told me something to me when I first started working on LE cases. He pointed out that catching criminals can only be made so easy before it becomes detrimental. And that point is either when the tools can be used by anyone (i.e. not specialist investigators) or when the tools begin to facilitate crime.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Wiretapping the Internet</title><url>http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/09/wiretapping_the.html</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>scrrr</author><text>If product x has a backdoor, this backdoor will also be used by bad people. It can also be cracked and there will always be product y without a backdoor. Don&apos;t the legislators see this? Or are criminals statistically really that lazy that they will still use mobile phones even though they are compromised.&lt;p&gt;According to &quot;The Wire&quot; they often even put extra layers of encryption security, anyway. Such behavior would make that legislation even more useless, as it would indeed only target the innocent that don&apos;t take extra precautions.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Wiretapping the Internet</title><url>http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/09/wiretapping_the.html</url></story>