<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>rockostrich</author><text>I think Pebble benefitted a ton from being the first company in the space.  There were definitely a ton of hiccups with the original Pebble watch.  There was barely a store and when the store did come into being it was buggy as hell.  The hardware design decisions have always been pretty great though.  Even today, I&amp;#x27;d probably take the original Pebble over an Apple watch or anything from Android wear for practicality.</text><parent_chain><item><author>modeless</author><text>I liked Pebble as a company because they knew how to make just the right engineering compromises to make their product work. The smartwatch everyone wants has a battery that lasts for weeks, a high contrast always-on color screen visible in daylight and total darkness, no bezel, and a round case only a few mm thick. That perfect watch is impossible to build, but Pebble found compromises that worked. They chose different compromises than those of Apple and Google, and IMHO better ones. The Pebble Time Round is a tiny little triumph of smart engineering compared with any other product on the market, including the Apple Watch.&lt;p&gt;In particular it&amp;#x27;s incredible what the Pebble firmware team was able to accomplish. They built a bespoke OS that&amp;#x27;s extremely reliable (certainly more reliable than Android Wear), with an app SDK and store, &lt;i&gt;plus&lt;/i&gt; a well thought out user interface with a striking visual design and even fun little animated flourishes, despite running in a fraction of the power budget of Apple or Android smartwatches. How many companies could have done that? Fitbit is getting a bargain, if that team is still intact.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Fitbit is reportedly buying Pebble for around $40M</title><url>https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/30/fitbit-pebble/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>kobeya</author><text>&amp;gt; How many companies could have done that? Fitbit is getting a bargain, if that team is still intact.&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s been an exodus from Pebble for months now. Our team already picked up a few competent people. :( Sad because I really like Pebble&amp;#x27;s products.</text><parent_chain><item><author>modeless</author><text>I liked Pebble as a company because they knew how to make just the right engineering compromises to make their product work. The smartwatch everyone wants has a battery that lasts for weeks, a high contrast always-on color screen visible in daylight and total darkness, no bezel, and a round case only a few mm thick. That perfect watch is impossible to build, but Pebble found compromises that worked. They chose different compromises than those of Apple and Google, and IMHO better ones. The Pebble Time Round is a tiny little triumph of smart engineering compared with any other product on the market, including the Apple Watch.&lt;p&gt;In particular it&amp;#x27;s incredible what the Pebble firmware team was able to accomplish. They built a bespoke OS that&amp;#x27;s extremely reliable (certainly more reliable than Android Wear), with an app SDK and store, &lt;i&gt;plus&lt;/i&gt; a well thought out user interface with a striking visual design and even fun little animated flourishes, despite running in a fraction of the power budget of Apple or Android smartwatches. How many companies could have done that? Fitbit is getting a bargain, if that team is still intact.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Fitbit is reportedly buying Pebble for around $40M</title><url>https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/30/fitbit-pebble/</url></story>