<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>hnlmorg</author><text>Personally Windows 2000 was the only Microsoft operating system I’ve ever liked. And I’m including Microsoft Basic in that scope as well.&lt;p&gt;XP did mature into something that was decent, but the initial release of XP was just an uglier and more system hungry version of 2000. And thus XP drive me to run Linux as my primary OS.&lt;p&gt;But back when 2000 was around, most other OSs were terrible. Linux was getting close but still had a lot of rough edges. BeOS was awesome but you could tell it was a dying company. Apple were struggling too: MacOS 9 was less stable than Windows 9x (and that’s saying something!) and OS X took a couple of releases to really take off. Atari were dead. Amiga was basically only ram by enthusiasts. Yet Windows 2000 arrived and it felt genuinely like a next generation OS for its time.&lt;p&gt;Windows 2000 took NT4 and focused on bettering the stuff that didn’t work rather than breaking the stuff that did. Often little changes like adding short cut keys to Notepad.exe. Whereas every version of Windows since has done far too much GUI overhaul (and always to the detriment of UX in my personal opinion) while doing very little to improve my core complaints with the OS.&lt;p&gt;I get this is going to be my subjective opinion, just like Windows 7 is yours. But I did wasn’t to share a counterpoint to the praise of Windows 7.</text><parent_chain><item><author>Animats</author><text>I could see staying with Windows 7. That was the best version Microsoft ever made. Microsoft finally figured out how to make it stable, and it didn&amp;#x27;t have all the ad and cloud crap nailed in. You can run current Firefox, current Thunderbird, and current LibreOffice, which covers the basics. Most Windows software still works.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Legacy Update: Fix Windows Update on Windows XP, Vista, Server 2008, 2003, 2000</title><url>https://legacyupdate.net</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>kitsunesoba</author><text>Windows 7 also had the best customization&amp;#x2F;theming, followed by XP. Both 7 and XP had some amazing looking community-made .msstyle themes but 7&amp;#x27;s theme engine allowed for things like full transparency while XP was limited to 1-bit transparency. This was nice in that it offered UI looks that were more modern than the classic theme yet more understated than the gaudy Luna&amp;#x2F;Aero.&lt;p&gt;Then Windows 8 came along and decided flat squares were the only option anybody could use, removing theme transparency support altogether.</text><parent_chain><item><author>Animats</author><text>I could see staying with Windows 7. That was the best version Microsoft ever made. Microsoft finally figured out how to make it stable, and it didn&amp;#x27;t have all the ad and cloud crap nailed in. You can run current Firefox, current Thunderbird, and current LibreOffice, which covers the basics. Most Windows software still works.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Legacy Update: Fix Windows Update on Windows XP, Vista, Server 2008, 2003, 2000</title><url>https://legacyupdate.net</url></story>