<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>ashleyw</author><text>It&apos;s using Canvas, so yes it&apos;s HTML5. And even though it&apos;s using Javascript, I&apos;ve always considered that to be the tool you use to communicate with the HTML API. The same goes for CSS to some extent, too.&lt;p&gt;Anyway, the average joe needs a buzzword to sum up all the new browser advancements. &quot;HTML5&quot; isn&apos;t that bad, at least it makes sense.&lt;p&gt;Unless you prefer &apos;Web 3.0&apos;? :)</text><parent_chain><item><author>thehodge</author><text>Am I missing something or is this just Liquid particles in HTML + JS. The HTML5 tag seems to be getting knocked about quite a bit really... someone said HTML5 is the new AJAX and I am starting to agree</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Liquid particles in HTML5</title><url>http://spielzeugz.de/html5/liquid-particles.html</url><text></text></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>al_james</author><text>I think we need to accept that the &apos;HTML5&apos; name will be mis-used to mean &apos;HTML5 + CSS3 + JS&apos;. It certainly is easier that naming all 3 component technologies and IMO its acceptable as those browsers that support HTML5 typically support some degree of CSS3 as well (and of course JS).</text><parent_chain><item><author>thehodge</author><text>Am I missing something or is this just Liquid particles in HTML + JS. The HTML5 tag seems to be getting knocked about quite a bit really... someone said HTML5 is the new AJAX and I am starting to agree</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Liquid particles in HTML5</title><url>http://spielzeugz.de/html5/liquid-particles.html</url><text></text></story>