<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jcoder</author><text>&amp;#62;  &quot;Flash proxy&quot; is a name that should make you think &quot;quick&quot; and &quot;short-lived.&quot; Our implementation uses standard web technologies: JavaScript and WebSocket.&lt;p&gt;I get it, but there&apos;s another (widely reviled) in-browser technology that goes by the name Flash, and it&apos;s entirely plausible that this could be written with it. Sometimes you need to be able to let go of a name.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>A Tor proxy that runs in your browser</title><url>https://crypto.stanford.edu/flashproxy/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>arscan</author><text>Time for a stupid question: what prevents the censor from simply blocking the facilitator?  It isn&apos;t ephemeral like the &quot;flash proxy&quot;... so it seems like you&apos;d have the same problem as you have with the relays.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>A Tor proxy that runs in your browser</title><url>https://crypto.stanford.edu/flashproxy/</url></story>