<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>TheGRS</author><text>Energy comes to my mind: mass battery storage, solar, wind and various other renewable fuel sources. I have a buddy who was working for the Dept of Energy until just recently and was saying that the funding for renewable energy is being wound down very quickly right now, many in that sector (working for DoE that is) will be without a job soon, probably to be scooped up by the private sector. He said it was also a huge shame because those guys were working on some amazing tech that would be hugely beneficial.</text><parent_chain><item><author>Houshalter</author><text>Yes if a government started buying trillions of vacuum tubes, companies would quickly get much more efficient at producing then and there would be a huge investment into researching alternatives.&lt;p&gt;But that brings up the question, what tech could we be subsidizing today so we can get it faster?</text></item><item><author>duhast</author><text>Comparisons like that always assume the that price is constant with increased demand even when world GDP is spent on something. What would likely happen is first the price would go up and later down as the world manufacturing would shift to vacuum tubes production.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Cost of iPhone X in 1957</title><url>http://www.bradford-delong.com/2017/09/do-they-really-say-technological-progress-is-slowing-down.html</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>nindalf</author><text>We already subsidize renewables, and that is encouraging research into them. The current projection of price per watt for solar is set to plummet in the next decade and a half. It&amp;#x27;s possible that further subsidies would encourage higher levels of production and economies of scale would reduce the price quicker.</text><parent_chain><item><author>Houshalter</author><text>Yes if a government started buying trillions of vacuum tubes, companies would quickly get much more efficient at producing then and there would be a huge investment into researching alternatives.&lt;p&gt;But that brings up the question, what tech could we be subsidizing today so we can get it faster?</text></item><item><author>duhast</author><text>Comparisons like that always assume the that price is constant with increased demand even when world GDP is spent on something. What would likely happen is first the price would go up and later down as the world manufacturing would shift to vacuum tubes production.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Cost of iPhone X in 1957</title><url>http://www.bradford-delong.com/2017/09/do-they-really-say-technological-progress-is-slowing-down.html</url></story>