<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>tremon</author><text>&lt;i&gt;this results in the conclusion that Linear B is actually a version of a regional [script, not linguistic] dialect of Linear A that was used to write a different language.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m having trouble understanding this. To me this says that Linear A and Linear B are different scripts that express different [spoken] languages, but might share common heritage. Which sounds obvious to me, not groundbreaking, unless they&amp;#x27;ve now identified the common source.&lt;p&gt;Or are you saying that Linear A and Linear B might be the same script (as in phoneme-&amp;gt;symbol encoding), but used to express a different language?</text><parent_chain><item><author>jcranmer</author><text>I spent basically the entire article trying to figure out &lt;i&gt;what&lt;/i&gt; the &amp;quot;groundbreaking&amp;quot; research actually was... this is a pretty mangled press release rendering of the scientific research, even worse than the kinds you normally see from university research.&lt;p&gt;To its credit, this doesn&amp;#x27;t promise that we can (or will shortly be able to) actually read Linear A texts, and it actually explicates that we won&amp;#x27;t be able to do that. But that&amp;#x27;s pretty much the limit of credit due to this article.&lt;p&gt;Linear A&amp;#x27;s connection to Linear B has been hypothesized since... well, at least as far back as when I was taught it in school, which considering how long it takes textbooks to update themselves to state-of-the-art archaeology may as well be time immemorial.&lt;p&gt;What it looks like the actual &amp;quot;groundbreaking&amp;quot; research here is, based on the sleuthing done in the previous version of the article that leads to an academic review of the work in question (here: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;bmcr.brynmawr.edu&amp;#x2F;2021&amp;#x2F;2021.04.30&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;bmcr.brynmawr.edu&amp;#x2F;2021&amp;#x2F;2021.04.30&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;). The layman&amp;#x27;s version is that it&amp;#x27;s a detailed analysis of the structural elements of the script to propose how the (unknown) language was encoded into Linear A, combined with some analysis of how individual glyphs varied in time and space--and this results in the conclusion that Linear B is actually a version of a regional [script, not linguistic] dialect of Linear A that was used to write a different language.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Minoan language Linear A linked to Linear B in new research</title><url>https://greekreporter.com/2022/04/20/minoan-language-linear-a-linear-b/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>lsrinivas</author><text>I too was scratching my head about as you put it , &amp;quot;what the groundbreaking research was&amp;quot;. The academic review link that you posted was rather useful though it was a little technical.&lt;p&gt;I think the book needs to be read. But thanks a ton.</text><parent_chain><item><author>jcranmer</author><text>I spent basically the entire article trying to figure out &lt;i&gt;what&lt;/i&gt; the &amp;quot;groundbreaking&amp;quot; research actually was... this is a pretty mangled press release rendering of the scientific research, even worse than the kinds you normally see from university research.&lt;p&gt;To its credit, this doesn&amp;#x27;t promise that we can (or will shortly be able to) actually read Linear A texts, and it actually explicates that we won&amp;#x27;t be able to do that. But that&amp;#x27;s pretty much the limit of credit due to this article.&lt;p&gt;Linear A&amp;#x27;s connection to Linear B has been hypothesized since... well, at least as far back as when I was taught it in school, which considering how long it takes textbooks to update themselves to state-of-the-art archaeology may as well be time immemorial.&lt;p&gt;What it looks like the actual &amp;quot;groundbreaking&amp;quot; research here is, based on the sleuthing done in the previous version of the article that leads to an academic review of the work in question (here: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;bmcr.brynmawr.edu&amp;#x2F;2021&amp;#x2F;2021.04.30&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;bmcr.brynmawr.edu&amp;#x2F;2021&amp;#x2F;2021.04.30&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;). The layman&amp;#x27;s version is that it&amp;#x27;s a detailed analysis of the structural elements of the script to propose how the (unknown) language was encoded into Linear A, combined with some analysis of how individual glyphs varied in time and space--and this results in the conclusion that Linear B is actually a version of a regional [script, not linguistic] dialect of Linear A that was used to write a different language.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Minoan language Linear A linked to Linear B in new research</title><url>https://greekreporter.com/2022/04/20/minoan-language-linear-a-linear-b/</url></story>