<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jamesgreenleaf</author><text>Snow Crash:&lt;p&gt;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;    Y.T.’s mom pulls up the new memo, checks the time, and starts reading it. The estimated reading time is 15.62 minutes. Later, when Marietta [her boss] does her end-of-day statistical roundup, sitting in her private office at 9:00 P.M., she will see the name of each employee and next to it, the amount of time spent reading this memo, and her reaction, based on the time spent, will go something like this:

    • Less than 10 min.: Time for an employee conference and possible attitude counseling.
    • 10-14 min.: Keep an eye on this employee; may be developing slipshod attitude.
    • 14-15.61 min.: Employee is an efficient worker, may sometimes miss important details.
    • Exactly 15.62 min.: Smartass. Needs attitude counseling.
    • 15.63-16 min.: Asswipe. Not to be trusted.
    • 16-18 min.: Employee is a methodical worker, may sometimes get hung up on minor details.
    • More than 18 min.: Check the security videotape, see just what this employee was up to (e.g., possible unauthorized restroom break).

    Y.T.’s mom decides to spend between fourteen and fifteen minutes reading the memo. It’s better for younger workers to spend too long, to show that they’re careful, not cocky. It’s better for older workers to go a little fast, to show good management potential. She’s pushing forty. She scans through the memo, hitting the Page Down button at reasonably regular intervals, occasionally paging back up to pretend to reread some earlier section. The computer is going to notice all this. It approves of rereading. It’s a small thing, but over a decade or so this stuff really shows up on your work-habits summary.&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</text><parent_chain><item><author>bell-cot</author><text>Fond Fantasy:  If $Company can&amp;#x27;t demonstrate that their average user has actually read (and passably understood) their ToS, then a basic requirement of Contract Law is clearly not being fulfilled...so their ToS is not legally binding on their users.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Voice Actor Turns Instagram&apos;s Terms of Service into 51-Minute Sleep Aid</title><url>https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kxkgx/voice-actor-turns-instagrams-terms-of-service-into-51-minute-sleep-aid</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>damiante</author><text>I have a similar desire for laws; they say &amp;quot;ignoratia juris non excusat&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;ignorance of the law is no excuse&amp;quot;, but that is only a fair rule if the law can reasonably be known. No-one could possibly know all of the law, so expecting everyone to know it is an unreasonable standard (unless we can make the law very brief).</text><parent_chain><item><author>bell-cot</author><text>Fond Fantasy:  If $Company can&amp;#x27;t demonstrate that their average user has actually read (and passably understood) their ToS, then a basic requirement of Contract Law is clearly not being fulfilled...so their ToS is not legally binding on their users.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Voice Actor Turns Instagram&apos;s Terms of Service into 51-Minute Sleep Aid</title><url>https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kxkgx/voice-actor-turns-instagrams-terms-of-service-into-51-minute-sleep-aid</url></story>