<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>Quinzel</author><text>I work in operating rooms, and while I think you make a good point, I don’t entirely agree with your comment. I do think that healthcare professionals have a responsibility to be held accountable for their behaviour - and the social medical MedTok thing is disgusting, and ultimately bad for healthcare as an industry that is in the business of caring - because this is exploitation of people who are generally vulnerable in one way or another.&lt;p&gt;I think using surgery&amp;#x2F;medical procedures for entertainment is unethical and irresponsible even if consent is given. Firstly in addition to privacy concerns, there is also concerns around being distracted while doing surgery, and infection control risks. For that reason, I don’t think any responsible healthcare practitioners that had their patients well-being at the forefront of their mind would be indulging in that kind of behaviour. 
However, I think there is a place for surgery to be shown to the general public, but from an educational perspective for both healthcare professionals that are learning, but also for people to know what happens to their bodies when they have surgery. It should not be some unknown exclusive mystery. (I think the mystery of it is what makes it appealing as a form of entertainment.)
However, I think the sharing of medical procedures should be done responsibly, and accurately, and not for entertainment - which has a tendency to overdramatise things, or misrepresent things. 
My biggest daily drama in an operating room is actually often dealing with the anxiety patients have around coming in for their procedures because what they expect to happen is so warped by biased representation’s of what happens in operating rooms. 
I think the article does bring to light some issues in healthcare being used as a form of entertainment</text><parent_chain><item><author>acyou</author><text>This is a hit piece with a divisive agenda. Patients vs. the health establishment.  Us vs. them. I had to stop reading. I am not convinced this is widespread behavior. Yes, if I saw myself on social media without consent, I would go straight to the college or professional association with a privacy violation complaint.  But this article is just trying to fuel hatred.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Doctors on TikTok</title><url>https://thewalrus.ca/medical-tiktok/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jbigelow76</author><text>&lt;i&gt;I am not convinced this is widespread behavior.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;How many does it take to be widespread (or more crucially, addressable) behavior, is it N+you?&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Yes, if I saw myself on social media without consent, I would go straight to the college or professional association with a privacy violation complaint. But this article is just trying to fuel hatred.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;Are there any release documents for doctors that you can cite that include a patient appearing, either knowingly or unknowingly, in social media? I know this sounds sarcastic because it&amp;#x27;s so ludicrous but if they exist I would like to know.</text><parent_chain><item><author>acyou</author><text>This is a hit piece with a divisive agenda. Patients vs. the health establishment.  Us vs. them. I had to stop reading. I am not convinced this is widespread behavior. Yes, if I saw myself on social media without consent, I would go straight to the college or professional association with a privacy violation complaint.  But this article is just trying to fuel hatred.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Doctors on TikTok</title><url>https://thewalrus.ca/medical-tiktok/</url></story>