<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>robterrell</author><text>I might have worked on some prior art related to this. In 1993 I worked on a project for a &quot;superfax&quot; system for the NCSU library. It was basically a scanner hooked up to a Mac that would send the resulting tiff files over FTP. It was a great learning experience (well... scsi scanners can blow me, tiff is nuts, the ftp protocol is way over-complicated, but I was doing real internet socket programming in 1993, for money!). It was certainly a one-click scan-and-send solution. Maybe we can get this fucker overturned. (If the email angle isn&apos;t essential, which now that I think about it, it probably is.)</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Meet the nice-guy lawyers who want $1,000 per worker for using scanners</title><url>http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/04/meet-the-nice-guy-lawyers-who-want-1000-per-worker-for-using-scanners/</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>cperciva</author><text>I don&apos;t know who first made this observation, but the best way to get a dumb law changed is to enforce it strictly.  I can&apos;t help thinking that this is a good thing...</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Meet the nice-guy lawyers who want $1,000 per worker for using scanners</title><url>http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/04/meet-the-nice-guy-lawyers-who-want-1000-per-worker-for-using-scanners/</url></story>