<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>DontBreakAlex</author><text>The leadership of the monument changed in 2018 and they hired the guy to finish the restoration: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.radiofrance.fr&amp;#x2F;franceculture&amp;#x2F;12-ans-apres-sa-restauration-clandestine-l-horloge-du-pantheon-fonctionne-enfin-2199259&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.radiofrance.fr&amp;#x2F;franceculture&amp;#x2F;12-ans-apres-sa-res...&lt;/a&gt; (In French)</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Untergunther – Restoration of the Pantheon clock (2007)</title><url>https://urban-resources.net/untergunther.html</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>seabass-labrax</author><text>I think it&amp;#x27;s wonderful that people are restoring public objects of historical value, but nowhere does the article explain why this has to be clandestine.&lt;p&gt;The article says that Monum&amp;#x27;s leadership didn&amp;#x27;t want to publicise the repair, but why would they? It would be a tacit admission that illegal entry into protected historical sites is justifiable for the purpose of &amp;#x27;guerilla restoration&amp;#x27; - wherever such a position is valid or not, endorsing it would indeed compromise Monum and similar organisations. Monsieur Jeannot was surely right in this regard.&lt;p&gt;That leaves me wondering why simply asking wasn&amp;#x27;t an option. Are Monum really so resistant to offers of restoration that a few phone calls and a press release couldn&amp;#x27;t have done the job, saving both sides a lawsuit?</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Untergunther – Restoration of the Pantheon clock (2007)</title><url>https://urban-resources.net/untergunther.html</url></story>