<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jstanley</author><text>Unfortunately, laws are unlikely to change without a bit of violation.&lt;p&gt;Alcohol prohibition in the US didn&amp;#x27;t end because everyone stayed good and sober.</text><parent_chain><item><author>mabbo</author><text>It feels to me as though the mantra of &amp;quot;move fast and break things&amp;quot; wasn&amp;#x27;t meant to apply to &lt;i&gt;laws&lt;/i&gt;. Purposely ignoring laws, regulations, or seeing vague ones that didn&amp;#x27;t expect your crazy idea, and then hoping you can work it all out later after you&amp;#x27;ve made lots of money- this is becoming more and more common in tech startups. And I personally don&amp;#x27;t like it.&lt;p&gt;Uber and AirBnB are the classic examples (and it&amp;#x27;s worked out wonderfully for them). In Toronto, Car2Go told customers to just park anywhere- don&amp;#x27;t worry about getting parking tickets, we&amp;#x27;ll handle it. (They didn&amp;#x27;t). Swarm was told that their satellites could not be launched, so they just did it anyways hoping no one would notice. (Someone did). RobinHood announced checking accounts without checking if there were laws around such things. (There are).&lt;p&gt;Governments would be better to be ready for disruptive ideas and have flexibility in regulations to try them out. And we should all be voting and supporting candidates who want to see such changes happen. But until they do, it seems wrong to purposely break laws in order to make money.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>FCC fines Swarm $900K for unauthorized satellite launch</title><url>https://reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1OJ2WT</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>bluGill</author><text>The problem is not all laws are moral. Regulatory capture is a thing. Many different people (often paid by a corporation) have come up with scheme that greatly harm their competition for no gain, yet made them sound good.</text><parent_chain><item><author>mabbo</author><text>It feels to me as though the mantra of &amp;quot;move fast and break things&amp;quot; wasn&amp;#x27;t meant to apply to &lt;i&gt;laws&lt;/i&gt;. Purposely ignoring laws, regulations, or seeing vague ones that didn&amp;#x27;t expect your crazy idea, and then hoping you can work it all out later after you&amp;#x27;ve made lots of money- this is becoming more and more common in tech startups. And I personally don&amp;#x27;t like it.&lt;p&gt;Uber and AirBnB are the classic examples (and it&amp;#x27;s worked out wonderfully for them). In Toronto, Car2Go told customers to just park anywhere- don&amp;#x27;t worry about getting parking tickets, we&amp;#x27;ll handle it. (They didn&amp;#x27;t). Swarm was told that their satellites could not be launched, so they just did it anyways hoping no one would notice. (Someone did). RobinHood announced checking accounts without checking if there were laws around such things. (There are).&lt;p&gt;Governments would be better to be ready for disruptive ideas and have flexibility in regulations to try them out. And we should all be voting and supporting candidates who want to see such changes happen. But until they do, it seems wrong to purposely break laws in order to make money.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>FCC fines Swarm $900K for unauthorized satellite launch</title><url>https://reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1OJ2WT</url></story>