<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>HillOBeans</author><text>Does anyone else here ever wonder if some of these &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; dinosaurs are really just re-discoveries of known dinosaurs? The article even mentions that the skeletal remains are incomplete. What if a number of these sauropods are really all the same species, albeit at different stages of their life? Is size alone enough to create a new classification? Perhaps growth continued throughout the life of a sauropod, and the largest ones were just the oldest?</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>&apos;Biggest dinosaur ever&apos; discovered</title><url>http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-27441156</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>spindritf</author><text>So what&amp;#x27;s their secret? How did they manage to feed themselves? Were they living sparsely? Was bioshpere denser then? Were they capable of eating just about anything?&lt;p&gt;And how was such massive size selected for? Is it just a matter of warmer climate and a feedback loop with larger and larger predators?</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>&apos;Biggest dinosaur ever&apos; discovered</title><url>http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-27441156</url></story>