<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jbotz</author><text>So, IIUC, this is an alternative to the paper that was discussed a couple of days ago saying the Universe might be twice as old as previously thought.  The &amp;quot;problem observations&amp;quot; both of them try to address are what appear to be huge galaxies at an early time (according to redshift) when there shouldn&amp;#x27;t have been such large galaxies yet.  The aforementioned paper says maybe the Universe is actually much older.  This paper says maybe those huge early galaxies aren&amp;#x27;t actually galaxies but &amp;quot;Dark Stars&amp;quot; instead.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Supermassive Dark Star candidates seen by JWST</title><url>https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2305762120</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>Pxtl</author><text>I&amp;#x27;m surprised to read an article with so much assumed knowledge about dark matter - about how it heats, etc.  Is there a good place to read about the current best-guesses of the properties of dark matter?</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Supermassive Dark Star candidates seen by JWST</title><url>https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2305762120</url></story>