<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>Mirioron</author><text>&amp;gt;&lt;i&gt;However it&amp;#x27;s quite hard to find workloads that keep all 256 threads busy at once.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;Run Crysis only on the CPU.[0]&lt;p&gt;[0] &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.youtube.com&amp;#x2F;watch?v=1LaKH5etJoE&amp;amp;t=10m37s&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.youtube.com&amp;#x2F;watch?v=1LaKH5etJoE&amp;amp;t=10m37s&lt;/a&gt;</text><parent_chain><item><author>rwmj</author><text>I&amp;#x27;ve played with the AMD Daytona Rome Server (two EPYC sockets, 2*64 = 128 cores, 256 threads), with RHEL, and it rocks.  However it&amp;#x27;s quite hard to find workloads that keep all 256 threads busy at once.  Most builds aren&amp;#x27;t nearly parallel enough, most programs can&amp;#x27;t find work for 256 threads.  So as a personal machine 128 or 256 threads aren&amp;#x27;t really worth it unless money is no object.  Likely the best current use for these is as servers for running large numbers of virtual machines or containers.</text></item><item><author>tbenst</author><text>Wish they’d review on Linux. Windows does not seem like the target audience given all the limitations.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>64 Core Threadripper 3990X CPU Review</title><url>https://www.anandtech.com/show/15483/amd-threadripper-3990x-review/3</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>glangdale</author><text>I am craving one of these for my superoptimizer. The level of task parallelism I have is north of 100M independent jobs; my last run took a single-core machine 20 days. It&amp;#x27;s pretty rare to have a workload like this but as more machines ship with &amp;gt;16 cores, I think more developers will look at the order-of-magnitude improvements of parallelizing their tasks where possible.</text><parent_chain><item><author>rwmj</author><text>I&amp;#x27;ve played with the AMD Daytona Rome Server (two EPYC sockets, 2*64 = 128 cores, 256 threads), with RHEL, and it rocks.  However it&amp;#x27;s quite hard to find workloads that keep all 256 threads busy at once.  Most builds aren&amp;#x27;t nearly parallel enough, most programs can&amp;#x27;t find work for 256 threads.  So as a personal machine 128 or 256 threads aren&amp;#x27;t really worth it unless money is no object.  Likely the best current use for these is as servers for running large numbers of virtual machines or containers.</text></item><item><author>tbenst</author><text>Wish they’d review on Linux. Windows does not seem like the target audience given all the limitations.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>64 Core Threadripper 3990X CPU Review</title><url>https://www.anandtech.com/show/15483/amd-threadripper-3990x-review/3</url></story>