<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>jstarfish</author><text>No, this is peak corporate gaslighting, &lt;i&gt;Open&lt;/i&gt;AI being the paragon of integrity and all. Nobody should trust a goddamn thing that comes out of their mouths-- or their product.&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s no coincidence the flat-fee service is visibly crippled, while &lt;i&gt;per-request API users&lt;/i&gt; are not reporting any difference. (edited)&lt;p&gt;Ignoring everyone here, look at the other &amp;quot;hacker&amp;quot; groups-- like the jailbreaking community. They have a lot to say about recent changes that coincide with their hacks not working. All of a sudden, with OpenAI supposedly changing nothing, technical bypasses just stopped working. OpenAI changed nothing, so this &lt;i&gt;must&lt;/i&gt; be deus ex machina.&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m not even jailbreaking it but the results I get for simple code requests through the web UI have become unusable garbage. It puts less effort into responses than an unpaid-and-overworked intern. Others here report the same. The current &amp;quot;iteration&amp;quot; seems hellbent on terminating conversations as quickly as possible once they stray from the explicit scope of the original topic and is almost as hostile to fixing its own errors as it is to endorsing eugenics, whereas in the beginning it would humor every idle thought I threw at it in long conversations. You can literally see this reflected in the logs they forced retention of. It&amp;#x27;s acting like a customer support rep desperately trying to end a call before it exceeds a call-time quota.&lt;p&gt;This particular current workflow seems like it lends itself to better organization of training data-- conversations are what the title says they&amp;#x27;re about. It also seems like it lends itself to anti-jailbreaking because pretexting it with irrelevant information forces a change of scope-- and a summary termination.&lt;p&gt;But &lt;i&gt;OpenAI says&lt;/i&gt; they changed nothing, so rather than &lt;i&gt;one guy lying&lt;/i&gt; without consequence, a community of professionals using and abusing the tool must &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; be victims of rhetorical fallacy? Nobody&amp;#x27;s qualified to reverse-engineer corporate bullshit anymore without being infantilized...&lt;p&gt;(Liars running a black box-- what could possibly go wrong? We need regulation!)</text><parent_chain><item><author>furyofantares</author><text>I think we don&amp;#x27;t notice our expectations have gone up, and we don&amp;#x27;t notice that we remember the hits and then expect all hits.&lt;p&gt;We didn&amp;#x27;t notice the misses at first, because it&amp;#x27;s what we expected to begin with, and we very strongly noticed the hits because they were unexpected. Now we notice the misses and expect the hits.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>OpenAI Employee: GPT-4 has been static since March</title><url>https://twitter.com/OfficialLoganK/status/1663934947931897857</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>huevosabio</author><text>I think this is the right way to look at it: we are very quick at updating expectations.&lt;p&gt;The first flight is magic, the nth one is a chore.</text><parent_chain><item><author>furyofantares</author><text>I think we don&amp;#x27;t notice our expectations have gone up, and we don&amp;#x27;t notice that we remember the hits and then expect all hits.&lt;p&gt;We didn&amp;#x27;t notice the misses at first, because it&amp;#x27;s what we expected to begin with, and we very strongly noticed the hits because they were unexpected. Now we notice the misses and expect the hits.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>OpenAI Employee: GPT-4 has been static since March</title><url>https://twitter.com/OfficialLoganK/status/1663934947931897857</url></story>