<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>winter_blue</author><text>&amp;gt; So who&amp;#x27;s lobbying against this exactly?&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;#x27;ve ever come across any posts on HN regarding immigrant workers in technology (who are on the same visa, the H1B†, that the author of the Vox article was on), you will see a shockingly offensive amount &lt;i&gt;contempt and hatred for highly-skilled immigrants&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;p&gt;To answer your question more directly, despite high support for skilled immigration reform, there are currently 2 senators who are hell-bent on making life hard for highly-skilled immigrants. One of them is Chuck Grassley, chair of the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, and the other is Jeff Sessions, chair of the Subcommittee on Immigration. Both senators (esp. Sessions) thoroughly hate immigrants of all kinds, and have avowed to do everything in their power to block immigration reform from passing, and the committee and subcommittee they chair are key to immigration reform passing in the Senate.&lt;p&gt;Jeff Sessions has even go so far as to write a document full of half-truths and lies, with the goal of convincing other Republicans that even the tiny trickle of high-skilled immigration now permitted is detestable, and must be put to an end. The Cato Institute has an excellent fact-based rebuttal of it: &lt;a href=&quot;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.cato.org&amp;#x2F;blog&amp;#x2F;rebuttal-sen-sessions-anti-legal-immigration-oped&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.cato.org&amp;#x2F;blog&amp;#x2F;rebuttal-sen-sessions-anti-legal-im...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;Opposition to immigration itself is pretty hard to believe in country like the U.S., but the opposition to economically beneficial high-skilled worker immigration, is even more shocking.&lt;p&gt;† Note: there are really no other alternatives than getting a work visa, if someone wants to immigrate as high-skilled worker. I&amp;#x27;ve read ill-informed people on HN say ridiculous things like, they do not have a problem with people &amp;quot;coming to the US normally&amp;quot;, but they hate to their guts anyone on a work visa. Ridiculous.</text><parent_chain><item><author>murbard2</author><text>I personally consider that opening borders is a moral imperative, but I understand why it is controversial. I understand that the arguments against &amp;quot;letting everyone in&amp;quot; have some merit, though I ultimately disagree with them.&lt;p&gt;What is a real head scratcher to me is the US policy on highly-skilled immigrants. There are certainly some political constituencies in favor of those, but I can&amp;#x27;t think of anyone against, at least not one with a modicum  of political pull.&lt;p&gt;One could imagine a regulatory capture scenario where large companies benefit from the regime, because they have an easier time obtaining visas than their smaller competitors, but in practice even those lobby for more, not less immigration.&lt;p&gt;So who&amp;#x27;s lobbying against this exactly?</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>I spent the last 15 years trying to become an American and failed</title><url>http://www.vox.com/2015/6/23/8823349/immigration-system-broken</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>tlb</author><text>There&amp;#x27;s no strong lobby against more high-skilled immigration. But as sometimes happens in US politics, the uncontroversial reform is held hostage to the controversial one.&lt;p&gt;In particular, lobbying groups for and against having an official status for the millions of currently undocumented Mexicans in the US have opposed any immigration bill that doesn&amp;#x27;t include what they want.&lt;p&gt;Lawmaking does not allow cherry-picking bugfixes.</text><parent_chain><item><author>murbard2</author><text>I personally consider that opening borders is a moral imperative, but I understand why it is controversial. I understand that the arguments against &amp;quot;letting everyone in&amp;quot; have some merit, though I ultimately disagree with them.&lt;p&gt;What is a real head scratcher to me is the US policy on highly-skilled immigrants. There are certainly some political constituencies in favor of those, but I can&amp;#x27;t think of anyone against, at least not one with a modicum  of political pull.&lt;p&gt;One could imagine a regulatory capture scenario where large companies benefit from the regime, because they have an easier time obtaining visas than their smaller competitors, but in practice even those lobby for more, not less immigration.&lt;p&gt;So who&amp;#x27;s lobbying against this exactly?</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>I spent the last 15 years trying to become an American and failed</title><url>http://www.vox.com/2015/6/23/8823349/immigration-system-broken</url></story>