<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>sien</author><text>Inoreader.&lt;p&gt;I loved Google Reader. But now Inoreader is better than Google Reader ever was.&lt;p&gt;Link to the last time I posted this comment:&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;#x2F;item?id=16285449&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;#x2F;item?id=16285449&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Seriously - if you liked RSS try Inoreader)&lt;p&gt;Also, I have no connection with Inoreader whatsoever. I wish I did. Great product.</text><parent_chain><item><author>PeterStuer</author><text>I used to love reading his pieces. Then Google killed Reader, I never found a replacement I liked, and blogs just died for me. Not &amp;#x27;rational&amp;#x27;, I know, but I&amp;#x27;m sure I&amp;#x27;m not alone.</text></item><item><author>dwightgunning</author><text>If, like me, you find these quirks and oddities fascinating, you must keep an eye on Raymond Chen&amp;#x27;s blog, The Old New Thing[1].&lt;p&gt;[1] &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;blogs.msdn.microsoft.com&amp;#x2F;oldnewthing&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;blogs.msdn.microsoft.com&amp;#x2F;oldnewthing&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>“We Are Morons” – A quick look at the Win2k source (2004)</title><url>http://atdt.freeshell.org/k5/story_2004_2_15_71552_7795.html</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>vog</author><text>QuiteRSS. This is a simple Qt application with good usability that does the job.&lt;p&gt;Advantages: It&amp;#x27;s neither a web service that will disappaer tomorrow, nor a browser extension that ties you to a specific browser.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;quiterss.org&amp;#x2F;en&amp;#x2F;about&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;quiterss.org&amp;#x2F;en&amp;#x2F;about&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;Off-Topic: As with most websites, I had to visit an &amp;quot;About&amp;quot; sub page to get to the description what it does. Why?! Shouldn&amp;#x27;t this information be the first you read when you open the main site? It&amp;#x27;s almost the same nonsense as with so-called &amp;quot;landing pages&amp;quot;. If a company&amp;#x27;s main site doesn&amp;#x27;t qualify as landing page, why do they create a separate sub page instead of just improving their main site? And some websites don&amp;#x27;t have any newcomer-friendly sub page at all - then there&amp;#x27;s Wikipedia to the rescue.</text><parent_chain><item><author>PeterStuer</author><text>I used to love reading his pieces. Then Google killed Reader, I never found a replacement I liked, and blogs just died for me. Not &amp;#x27;rational&amp;#x27;, I know, but I&amp;#x27;m sure I&amp;#x27;m not alone.</text></item><item><author>dwightgunning</author><text>If, like me, you find these quirks and oddities fascinating, you must keep an eye on Raymond Chen&amp;#x27;s blog, The Old New Thing[1].&lt;p&gt;[1] &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;blogs.msdn.microsoft.com&amp;#x2F;oldnewthing&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;blogs.msdn.microsoft.com&amp;#x2F;oldnewthing&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>“We Are Morons” – A quick look at the Win2k source (2004)</title><url>http://atdt.freeshell.org/k5/story_2004_2_15_71552_7795.html</url></story>