<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>c7b</author><text>It sounds like a cool idea if I get it right (organize links to wikipedia articles in a way that could correspond to a curriculum), but the quality of the curation at least for mathematics looks abysmal. Here are some of the top-level categories:&lt;p&gt;* Charles Sanders Peirce (the only (!) mathematician with a top-level category to himself, who&amp;#x27;s arguably more of a philosopher actually) - 46 pages.&lt;p&gt;* Set theory - 3 pages&lt;p&gt;* Theory of summation of natural numbers - empty&lt;p&gt;This fails to be useful for students at so many levels. The entries are at completely inconsistent levels of granularity or concepts, it fails to make any meaningful selection or ranking by importance (another example, it has a top-level category for Chaos Theory but none for Dynamical Systems). And, most importantly, it doesn&amp;#x27;t correspond to how university curriculums are structured and doesn&amp;#x27;t work as a useful guide for self-study.&lt;p&gt;But yeah, it&amp;#x27;s a wiki, so I guess I shouldn&amp;#x27;t complain but instead just contribute to improving it.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Wikiversity</title><url>https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Main_Page</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>texaslonghorn5</author><text>If there was a &amp;quot;sitemap&amp;quot; in the form of a course catalog or sample degree plan, linking to each course, that would make this incredibly easy to follow.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Wikiversity</title><url>https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Main_Page</url></story>