<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>busyant</author><text>&amp;gt; outperforms humans at most economically valuable work&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;most&amp;quot; but not all economically valuable work.&lt;p&gt;ChatGPT (or what follows) can&amp;#x27;t swing a hammer and it can&amp;#x27;t apply spackle. Maybe I should start looking into the trades.</text><parent_chain><item><author>kasperni</author><text>Worth noting is this clause&lt;p&gt;Fifth, the board determines when we&amp;#x27;ve attained AGI. Again, by AGI we mean a highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable work. Such a system is excluded from IP licenses and other commercial terms with Microsoft, which only apply to pre-AGI technology.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Our structure</title><url>https://openai.com/our-structure</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>FirmwareBurner</author><text>So Microsoft only has access to the &amp;quot;chaff&amp;quot; and not the &amp;quot;beans&amp;quot; of OpenAI?</text><parent_chain><item><author>kasperni</author><text>Worth noting is this clause&lt;p&gt;Fifth, the board determines when we&amp;#x27;ve attained AGI. Again, by AGI we mean a highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable work. Such a system is excluded from IP licenses and other commercial terms with Microsoft, which only apply to pre-AGI technology.</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Our structure</title><url>https://openai.com/our-structure</url></story>