<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>vvanders</author><text>Looked into Cheerp briefly but the commercial licenses made it pretty much a non-starter. If you&amp;#x27;re going to charge then you should be upfront with your licenses costs rather than hide them until you see who contacts you.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Cheerp 1.2 – C++ to JavaScript: faster than Emscripten with dynamic memory</title><url>http://blog.leaningtech.com/2016/02/cheerp-12-c-to-javascript-with-faster.html</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>emn13</author><text>The &amp;quot;with dynamic memory&amp;quot; part being critical, since that means no asm.js.  With asm.js, emscripten is faster.&lt;p&gt;I get the feeling this is one the one hand pretty cool, but on the other hand poorly timed.  Unless WebAssembly never arrives or arrives really late, there&amp;#x27;s going to be a way to run almost-native code &lt;i&gt;with&lt;/i&gt; dynamic memory allocation fairly soon.  So it&amp;#x27;s likely this will soon be relegated to &amp;quot;old-android support&amp;quot;.</text><parent_chain></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Cheerp 1.2 – C++ to JavaScript: faster than Emscripten with dynamic memory</title><url>http://blog.leaningtech.com/2016/02/cheerp-12-c-to-javascript-with-faster.html</url></story>