<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>SnorkelTan</author><text>One reason I could think of is that real humans only read a certain number of tweets per day. Showing ads to users that &amp;quot;read&amp;quot; large numbers is showing ads to robots which, sadly, do not convert very well.</text><parent_chain><item><author>jljljl</author><text>This seems like death for an ad supported model on Twitter. Why would you buy ads on a social network that deliberately restricts the number of posts (and thus ads) that a user can view?</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day</title><url>https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1675187969420828672</url></story>
<instructions>Your goal is to analyze the following comment and estimate how highly it will be upvoted by the Hacker News community.</instructions><comment><author>CreepGin</author><text>Can&amp;#x27;t speak for the big advertisers, but as a small business owner, I&amp;#x27;m more likely to spend ad money on platforms that take an active stance against bots. In general, advertisers (should) care about impressions by unique users, not total number of views.&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m not sure about requiring an account to view contents though. That to me will just kill total usage across the board.</text><parent_chain><item><author>jljljl</author><text>This seems like death for an ad supported model on Twitter. Why would you buy ads on a social network that deliberately restricts the number of posts (and thus ads) that a user can view?</text></item></parent_chain></comment><story><title>Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day</title><url>https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1675187969420828672</url></story>