### Summary

When creating a new plugin, if an argument uses a list of pre-defined `choices`, even if an empty string ('') is not defined in the selection, it is accepted as a valid value in the playbook.

The problem is that `diff_list` is evaluated to "", and thus, the test that should raise an error evaluates to false (`lib/ansible/module_utils/common/parametres.py`):
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/36121aeee7812e7f37dd49a64c0dbf9cf741878f/lib/ansible/module_utils/common/parameters.py#L653..L660

### Issue Type

Bug Report

### Component Name

Any plugin that uses `choices` in one of its parameters.

### Ansible Version

```console
$ ansible --version
ansible [core 2.12.2]
  config file = /etc/ansible/ansible.cfg
  configured module search path = ['/home/rjeffman/.ansible/plugins/modules', '/usr/share/ansible/plugins/modules']
  ansible python module location = /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/ansible
  ansible collection location = /home/rjeffman/.ansible/collections:/usr/share/ansible/collections
  executable location = /usr/bin/ansible
  python version = 3.10.2 (main, Jan 17 2022, 00:00:00) [GCC 11.2.1 20211203 (Red Hat 11.2.1-7)]
  jinja version = 3.0.1
  libyaml = True
```


### Configuration

```console
$ ansible-config dump --only-changed
$
```


### OS / Environment

Any.

### Steps to Reproduce

If you have a plugin (e.g: `myplugin`) where `argument_spec` list a parameter defined like:
```
ch_param=dict(type="list", choices=["A", "B", "C"]),
``` 

Then the following task would not raise an error:
```yaml (paste below)
- myplugin:
    ch_param: ""
```


### Expected Results

If a value provide by a parameter with a list of valid choices, it is expected that any value outside of this list would raise an error.

### Actual Results

```console
No error is reported by Ansible.
```


### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow the Ansible Code of Conduct
set(),
        "Elements value for option 'numbers' is of type <class 'dict'> and we were unable to convert to int: <class 'dict'> cannot be converted to an int"
    ),
    (
        'required',
        {'req': {'required': True}},
        {},
        {'req': None},
        set(),
        "missing required arguments: req"
    )
]
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    ('arg_spec', 'parameters', 'expected', 'unsupported', 'error'),
    (i[1:] for i in INVALID_SPECS),
    ids=[i[0] for i in INVALID_SPECS]
)
def test_invalid_spec(arg_spec, parameters, expected, unsupported, error):
    v = ArgumentSpecValidator(arg_spec)
    result = v.validate(parameters)
    with pytest.raises(AnsibleValidationErrorMultiple) as exc_info:
        raise result.errors
    if PY2:
        error = error.replace('class', 'type')
    assert isinstance(result, ValidationResult)
    assert error in exc_info.value.msg
    assert error in result.error_messages[0]
    assert result.unsupported_parameters == unsupported
    assert result.validated_parameters == expected