### Elasticsearch Version

8.6.0

### Installed Plugins

_No response_

### Java Version

_bundled_

### OS Version

Docker

### Problem Description

When testing datemath with complex date strings, I found that some worked and some didn't. I narrowed it down to the existence of the `|` pipe character in the string.

@dakrone seems to think this may be due to how the `IndexNameExpressionResolver` works differently for security-enabled vs. non-security-enabled clusters.

### Steps to Reproduce

## Security Disabled Cluster
```
curl -XGET 'http://localhost:9200/%3Cdatemath-%7B2001-01-01-13%7C%7C%2B1h%2Fh%7Byyyy-MM-dd-HH%7C-07%3A00%7D%7D%3E'
{"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"Cross-cluster calls are not supported in this context but remote indices were requested: [<datemath-{2001-01-01-13||+1h/h{yyyy-MM-dd-HH|-07:00}}>]"}],"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"Cross-cluster calls are not supported in this context but remote indices were requested: [<datemath-{2001-01-01-13||+1h/h{yyyy-MM-dd-HH|-07:00}}>]"},"status":400}%
```

## Security Enabled Cluster

```
curl -XGET -u sample -p 'https://secure.cluster.io/%3Cdatemath-%7B2001-01-01-13%7C%7C%2B1h%2Fh%7Byyyy-MM-dd-HH%7C-07%3A00%7D%7D%3E'
Enter host password for user 'sample':
{"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"index_not_found_exception","reason":"no such index [datemath-2001-01-01-14]","index_uuid":"_na_","index":"datemath-2001-01-01-14"}],"type":"index_not_found_exception","reason":"no such index [datemath-2001-01-01-14]","index_uuid":"_na_","index":"datemath-2001-01-01-14"},"status":404}%
```

### Logs (if relevant)

_No response_
server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/IndexNameExpressionResolverTests.java
results = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(context, "foo*");
        assertEquals(2, results.length);
        assertThat(results, arrayContainingInAnyOrder("foobar", "foo"));
        results = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(context, "bar");
        assertEquals(1, results.length);
        assertEquals("bar", results[0]);
        results = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(context, "*", "-foo*");
        assertEquals(1, results.length);
        assertEquals("bar", results[0]);
        results = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(context, "*", "-foo", "-foobar");
        assertEquals(1, results.length);
        assertEquals("bar", results[0]);
        results = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(context, "*", "-foo", "*");
        assertEquals(3, results.length);
        assertThat(results, arrayContainingInAnyOrder("bar", "foobar", "foo"));
        results = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(context, "-*");
        assertEquals(0, results.length);
        
        results = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(context, ".*");
        assertEquals(2, results.length);
        assertThat(results, arrayContainingInAnyOrder(".hidden", ".hidden-closed"));
        results = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(context, ".hidd*");
        assertEquals(2, results.length);
        assertThat(results, arrayContainingInAnyOrder(".hidden", ".hidden-closed"));
        
        options = IndicesOptions.fromOptions(false, true, true, true, true);
        context = new IndexNameExpressionResolver.Context(state, options, SystemIndexAccessLevel.NONE);
        results = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(context, Strings.EMPTY_ARRAY);
        assertEquals(7, results.length);
        assertThat(results, arrayContainingInAnyOrder("bar", "foobar", "foo", "hidden", "hidden-closed", ".hidden", ".hidden-closed"));