Not sure if this failed because it was aborted or if it's a genuine linearizability failure. Hopefully the former!

**Build scan:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/gx6tcdvqgpy6y/tests/:server:internalClusterTest/org.elasticsearch.versioning.ConcurrentSeqNoVersioningIT/testSeqNoCASLinearizability
**Reproduction line:**
```
./gradlew ':server:internalClusterTest' --tests "org.elasticsearch.versioning.ConcurrentSeqNoVersioningIT.testSeqNoCASLinearizability" -Dtests.seed=67F2A8CBA2C4EF6D -Dtests.locale=hu -Dtests.timezone=Etc/GMT-8 -Druntime.java=21
```

**Applicable branches:**
main

**Reproduces locally?:**
Didn't try

**Failure history:**
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.versioning.ConcurrentSeqNoVersioningIT&tests.test=testSeqNoCASLinearizability


**Failure excerpt:**
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Must be linearizable

  at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([67F2A8CBA2C4EF6D:BC3C86A1B8D6CDD9]:0)
  at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
  at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
  at org.elasticsearch.versioning.ConcurrentSeqNoVersioningIT$Partition.assertLinearizable(ConcurrentSeqNoVersioningIT.java:450)
  at java.lang.Iterable.forEach(Iterable.java:75)
  at org.elasticsearch.versioning.ConcurrentSeqNoVersioningIT.testSeqNoCASLinearizability(ConcurrentSeqNoVersioningIT.java:179)
  at jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:48)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:390)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:843)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:490)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:390)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:850)
  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)

```
server/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/elasticsearch/versioning/ConcurrentSeqNoVersioningIT.java
import java.util.regex.Matcher;
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
import java.util.stream.IntStream;
import static org.elasticsearch.core.Strings.format;
import static org.elasticsearch.test.hamcrest.ElasticsearchAssertions.assertAcked;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.equalTo;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.greaterThan;
/**
 * This test stress tests CAS updates using sequence number based versioning (ifPrimaryTerm/ifSeqNo).
 *
 * <p>The following is a summary of the expected CAS write behaviour of the system:</p>
 *
 * <ul>
 *     <li>acknowledged CAS writes are guaranteed to have taken place between invocation and response and cannot be lost. It is
 *     guaranteed that the previous value had the specified primaryTerm and seqNo</li>
 *     <li>CAS writes resulting in a VersionConflictEngineException might or might not have taken place or may take place in the future
 *     provided the primaryTerm and seqNo still matches. The reason we cannot assume it will not take place after receiving the failure
 *     is that a request can fork into two because of retries on disconnect, and now race against itself. The retry might complete (and do a
 *     dirty or stale read) before the forked off request gets to execute, and that one might still subsequently succeed.
 *
 *     Such writes are not necessarily fully replicated and can be lost. There is no
 *     guarantee that the previous value did not have the specified primaryTerm and seqNo</li>
 *     <li>CAS writes with other exceptions might or might not have taken place. If they have taken place, then after invocation but not
 *     necessarily before response. Such writes are not necessarily fully replicated and can be lost.
 *     </li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * A deeper technical explanation of the behaviour is given here:
 *
 * <ul>