

Using bitcoin-cli in order to generate a transaction with two op_return generate a wrong transaction.

```
bitcoin-cli createrawtransaction "[]" "{\"data\":\"ee\", \"data\":\"ff\"}"
0200000000020000000000000000036a01ee0000000000000000036a01ee00000000
```

Decoding the hex I obtain the following transaction with two op_return with the same value.

```
bitcoin-cli decoderawtransaction "0200000000020000000000000000036a01ee0000000000000000036a01ee00000000"
{
  "txid": "ed4b691958a573c8569177606c77905ecd07c36eb5eec443f17a45427bb9f5fc",
  "hash": "ed4b691958a573c8569177606c77905ecd07c36eb5eec443f17a45427bb9f5fc",
  "version": 2,
  "size": 34,
  "vsize": 34,
  "weight": 136,
  "locktime": 0,
  "vin": [
  ],
  "vout": [
    {
      "value": 0.00000000,
      "n": 0,
      "scriptPubKey": {
        "asm": "OP_RETURN -110",
        "hex": "6a01ee",
        "type": "nulldata"
      }
    },
    {
      "value": 0.00000000,
      "n": 1,
      "scriptPubKey": {
        "asm": "OP_RETURN -110",
        "hex": "6a01ee",
        "type": "nulldata"
      }
    }
  ]
}
```

This incorrect behavior is related to the duplicate key "data" in the JSON passed to the "createrawtransaction" command.

The problem is related to the use of `outputs[name_].getValStr()` in an JSON with duplicated keys https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/rpc/rawtransaction.cpp#L432

Although this kind of transaction wouldn't be relayed, I thought about two possible solutions:
* raise an error as it happens for the use of two identical addresses, maybe calling `JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER ...` if more than one "data" field is recognized - easier to implement, 
* creation of the transaction correctly containing the two different op_returns, maybe need to pass one array in the data field of the passed JSON (like `"data": ["ee", "ff"]`) - maybe require API change.
{
    
    CCoinsView viewDummy;
    CCoinsViewCache view(&viewDummy);
    {
        LOCK2(cs_main, mempool.cs);
        CCoinsViewCache &viewChain = *pcoinsTip;
        CCoinsViewMemPool viewMempool(&viewChain, mempool);
        view.SetBackend(viewMempool); 
        for (const CTxIn& txin : mtx.vin) {
            view.AccessCoin(txin.prevout); 
        }
        view.SetBackend(viewDummy); 
    }
    
    if (!prevTxsUnival.isNull()) {
        UniValue prevTxs = prevTxsUnival.get_array();
        for (unsigned int idx = 0; idx < prevTxs.size(); ++idx) {
            const UniValue& p = prevTxs[idx];
            if (!p.isObject()) {
                throw JSONRPCError(RPC_DESERIALIZATION_ERROR, "expected object with {\"txid'\",\"vout\",\"scriptPubKey\"}");
            }
            UniValue prevOut = p.get_obj();
            RPCTypeCheckObj(prevOut,
                {
                    {"txid", UniValueType(UniValue::VSTR)},
                    {"vout", UniValueType(UniValue::VNUM)},
                    {"scriptPubKey", UniValueType(UniValue::VSTR)},