The `getaddressesbylabel` API spends a lot more time than the `getaddressesbyaccount` API.

I generated addresses by the `getnewaddress` API, then, I measured time that the `getaddressesby*` API spends. It seems the algorithm of the `getaddressesbylabel` API takes **O(N ^ 2)** time! The results of my survey are as follows.

### getaddressesbylabel

bitcoind v0.17.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 (AWS EC2 t3.large)

#### 11,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbylabel ""
# (omitted)
real    0m1.230s # 1.2s
user    0m0.044s
sys 0m0.048s
```

#### 111,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbylabel ""
# (omitted)
real    1m37.027s # 97.0s
user    0m0.408s
sys 0m0.544s
```

#### 211,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbylabel ""
# (omitted)
real    6m3.727s # 363.7s
user    0m0.800s
sys 0m0.900s
```

### getaddressesbyaccount

bitcoind v0.16.3 on Ubuntu 16.04 (AWS EC2 t3.large)

#### 11,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbyaccount ""
# (omitted)
real    0m0.500s # 0.5s
user    0m0.092s
sys 0m0.160s
```

#### 111,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbyaccount ""
# (omitted)
real    0m1.361s # 1.4s
user    0m0.168s
sys 0m0.348s
```

#### 211,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbyaccount ""
# (omitted)
real    0m2.220s # 2.2s
user    0m0.384s
sys 0m0.532s
```

{
                            {"address", RPCArg::Type::AMOUNT, RPCArg::Optional::NO, "The bitcoin address is the key, the numeric amount (can be string) in " + CURRENCY_UNIT + " is the value"},
                        },
                    },
                    {"minconf", RPCArg::Type::NUM,  "1", "Only use the balance confirmed at least this many times."},
                    {"comment", RPCArg::Type::STR, RPCArg::Optional::OMITTED_NAMED_ARG, "A comment"},
                    {"subtractfeefrom", RPCArg::Type::ARR, RPCArg::Optional::OMITTED_NAMED_ARG, "A json array with addresses.\n"
            "                           The fee will be equally deducted from the amount of each selected address.\n"
            "                           Those recipients will receive less bitcoins than you enter in their corresponding amount field.\n"
            "                           If no addresses are specified here, the sender pays the fee.",
                        {
                            {"address", RPCArg::Type::STR, RPCArg::Optional::OMITTED, "Subtract fee from this address"},
                        },
                    },
                    {"replaceable", RPCArg::Type::BOOL,  "fallback to wallet's default", "Allow this transaction to be replaced by a transaction with higher fees via BIP 125"},
                    {"conf_target", RPCArg::Type::NUM,  "fallback to wallet's default", "Confirmation target (in blocks)"},
                    {"estimate_mode", RPCArg::Type::STR,  "UNSET", "The fee estimate mode, must be one of:\n"
            "       \"UNSET\"\n"
            "       \"ECONOMICAL\"\n"
            "       \"CONSERVATIVE\""},
                },
                 RPCResult{
            "\"txid\"                   (string) The transaction id for the send. Only 1 transaction is created regardless of \n"
            "                                    the number of addresses.\n"
                 },
                RPCExamples{
            "\nSend two amounts to two different addresses:\n"
            + HelpExampleCli("sendmany", "\"\" \"{\\\"1D1ZrZNe3JUo7ZycKEYQQiQAWd9y54F4XX\\\":0.01,\\\"1353tsE8YMTA4EuV7dgUXGjNFf9KpVvKHz\\\":0.02}\"") +
            "\nSend two amounts to two different addresses setting the confirmation and comment:\n"
            + HelpExampleCli("sendmany", "\"\" \"{\\\"1D1ZrZNe3JUo7ZycKEYQQiQAWd9y54F4XX\\\":0.01,\\\"1353tsE8YMTA4EuV7dgUXGjNFf9KpVvKHz\\\":0.02}\" 6 \"testing\"") +