Follow up from https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/11616.

Here's one I found. These two invariants:

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/7e7127387ba64f57299eaff8656542cea6fb3a2d/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberClassComponent.js#L330-L343

are in a function that's behind a DEV block:

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/7e7127387ba64f57299eaff8656542cea6fb3a2d/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberClassComponent.js#L447-L449

I don't think this is intentional, but need to verify.

There may be more. I'll use this issue to track while https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/11616 preserves existing behavior.
expectTextNode(e.childNodes[0], 'foo');
        } else {
          expect(e.childNodes.length).toBe(2);
          expectTextNode(e.childNodes[0], 'foo');
          expectTextNode(e.childNodes[1], '');
        }
      });
      itRenders('an element with two text children', async render => {
        const e = await render(
          <div>
            {'foo'}
            {'bar'}
          </div>,
        );
        if (
          render === serverRender ||
          render === clientRenderOnServerString ||
          render === streamRender
        ) {
          
          expect(e.childNodes.length).toBe(3);
          expectTextNode(e.childNodes[0], 'foo');
          expectTextNode(e.childNodes[2], 'bar');
        } else {
          expect(e.childNodes.length).toBe(2);
          expectTextNode(e.childNodes[0], 'foo');
          expectTextNode(e.childNodes[1], 'bar');
        }
      });
      itRenders(