I think that if a reorg fails due to an error while disconnecting blocks, the node should shut down.

My thought is that if we are trying to switch to a more work chain and something goes wrong before we can even try to validate that more-work chain, then we have a problem that is not related to the chain we're trying to switch to but instead related to our own hardware or software; shutting down and having the user deal with the issue is better than continuing on, when we know there's a more work chain that we're unable to try validating.

This has recently come up on testnet, where unpatched nodes are unable to reorg from the invalid chain containing the duplicate-input-in-a-transaction block, but rather than crash or shutdown they are continuing on the invalid chain, with messages like this in the debug log:

```
ERROR: DisconnectTip(): DisconnectBlock 00000000210004840364b52bc5e455d888f164e4264a4fec06a514b67e9d5722 failed
```
if (pindexBestForkTip && chainActive.Height() - pindexBestForkTip->nHeight >= 72)
        pindexBestForkTip = nullptr;
    if (pindexBestForkTip || (pindexBestInvalid && pindexBestInvalid->nChainWork > chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork + (GetBlockProof(*chainActive.Tip()) * 6)))
    {
        if (!GetfLargeWorkForkFound() && pindexBestForkBase)
        {
            std::string warning = std::string("'Warning: Large-work fork detected, forking after block ") +
                pindexBestForkBase->phashBlock->ToString() + std::string("'");
            AlertNotify(warning);
        }
        if (pindexBestForkTip && pindexBestForkBase)
        {
            LogPrintf("%s: Warning: Large valid fork found\n  forking the chain at height %d (%s)\n  lasting to height %d (%s).\nChain state database corruption likely.\n", __func__,
                   pindexBestForkBase->nHeight, pindexBestForkBase->phashBlock->ToString(),
                   pindexBestForkTip->nHeight, pindexBestForkTip->phashBlock->ToString());
            SetfLargeWorkForkFound(true);
        }
        else
        {
            LogPrintf("%s: Warning: Found invalid chain at least ~6 blocks longer than our best chain.\nChain state database corruption likely.\n", __func__);
            SetfLargeWorkInvalidChainFound(true);
        }
    }
    else
    {
        SetfLargeWorkForkFound(false);
        SetfLargeWorkInvalidChainFound(false);
    }
}
static void CheckForkWarningConditionsOnNewFork(CBlockIndex* pindexNewForkTip) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)