Follow up from https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/11616.

Here's one I found. These two invariants:

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/7e7127387ba64f57299eaff8656542cea6fb3a2d/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberClassComponent.js#L330-L343

are in a function that's behind a DEV block:

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/7e7127387ba64f57299eaff8656542cea6fb3a2d/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberClassComponent.js#L447-L449

I don't think this is intentional, but need to verify.

There may be more. I'll use this issue to track while https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/11616 preserves existing behavior.
{options}
            </select>,
          );
          expectSelectValue(e, ['bar', 'baz']);
        },
      );
      itRenders(
        'a select with a multiple values and readOnly',
        async render => {
          const e = await render(
            <select value={['bar', 'baz']} multiple={true} readOnly={true}>
              {options}
            </select>,
          );
          expectSelectValue(e, ['bar', 'baz']);
        },
      );
      itRenders(
        'a select with a value and no onChange/readOnly',
        async render => {
          
          
          const e = await render(<select value="bar">{options}</select>, 1);
          expectSelectValue(e, 'bar');
        },
      );
      itRenders('a select with a defaultValue', async render => {
        const e = await render(<select defaultValue="bar">{options}</select>);
        expectSelectValue(e, 'bar');
      });