Would it be completely unreasonable to allow `fundrawtransaction` to use unsafe outputs?

I understand this means the resulting transaction may be invalidated whenever the unsafe output I'm relying one disappears (e.g. because the transaction that produced it was RBF-ed) but in my case that's ok, I'll react to that and re-publish the tree of child transactions accordingly.

But let me know if you think that's too much of a footgun for users, in that case I'll architect my solution differently.
{
    return RPCHelpMan{"sendmany",
                "\nSend multiple times. Amounts are double-precision floating point numbers." +
        HELP_REQUIRING_PASSPHRASE,
                {
                    {"dummy", RPCArg::Type::STR, RPCArg::Optional::NO, "Must be set to \"\" for backwards compatibility.", "\"\""},
                    {"amounts", RPCArg::Type::OBJ, RPCArg::Optional::NO, "The addresses and amounts",
                        {
                            {"address", RPCArg::Type::AMOUNT, RPCArg::Optional::NO, "The bitcoin address is the key, the numeric amount (can be string) in " + CURRENCY_UNIT + " is the value"},
                        },
                    },
                    {"minconf", RPCArg::Type::NUM, RPCArg::Optional::OMITTED_NAMED_ARG, "Ignored dummy value"},
                    {"comment", RPCArg::Type::STR, RPCArg::Optional::OMITTED_NAMED_ARG, "A comment"},
                    {"subtractfeefrom", RPCArg::Type::ARR, RPCArg::Optional::OMITTED_NAMED_ARG, "The addresses.\n"
                                       "The fee will be equally deducted from the amount of each selected address.\n"
                                       "Those recipients will receive less bitcoins than you enter in their corresponding amount field.\n"
                                       "If no addresses are specified here, the sender pays the fee.",
                        {
                            {"address", RPCArg::Type::STR, RPCArg::Optional::OMITTED, "Subtract fee from this address"},
                        },
                    },
                    {"replaceable", RPCArg::Type::BOOL, RPCArg::DefaultHint{"wallet default"}, "Allow this transaction to be replaced by a transaction with higher fees via BIP 125"},
                    {"conf_target", RPCArg::Type::NUM, RPCArg::DefaultHint{"wallet -txconfirmtarget"}, "Confirmation target in blocks"},