### Is there an existing issue for this?

- [X] I have searched the existing issues

### Current behaviour

The WalletCreateTxUsePresetInputsAndCoinSelection benchmark crashes on master due to the commit 758501b71391136c33b525b1a0109b990d4f463e introduced in #25273 (I used git bisect to verify).

```
valgrind ./src/bench/bench_bitcoin -filter=WalletCreateTxUsePresetInputsAndCoinSelection -min-time=10000
==34277== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==34277== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==34277== Using Valgrind-3.18.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==34277== Command: ./src/bench/bench_bitcoin -filter=WalletCreateTxUsePresetInputsAndCoinSelection -min-time=10000
==34277==
bench_bitcoin: bench/wallet_create_tx.cpp:135: WalletCreateTx(ankerl::nanobench::Bench&, OutputType, bool, std::optional<PreSelectInputs>)::<lambda()>: Assertion `tx_res' failed.
==34277==
==34277== Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
==34277==    at 0x4DD79FC: __pthread_kill_implementation (pthread_kill.c:44)
==34277==    by 0x4DD79FC: __pthread_kill_internal (pthread_kill.c:78)
==34277==    by 0x4DD79FC: pthread_kill@@GLIBC_2.34 (pthread_kill.c:89)
==34277==    by 0x4D83475: raise (raise.c:26)
==34277==    by 0x4D697F2: abort (abort.c:79)
==34277==    by 0x4D6971A: __assert_fail_base.cold (assert.c:92)
==34277==    by 0x4D7AE95: __assert_fail (assert.c:101)
==34277==    by 0x29607B: operator() (wallet_create_tx.cpp:135)
==34277==    by 0x29607B: ankerl::nanobench::Bench& ankerl::nanobench::Bench::run<WalletCreateTx(ankerl::nanobench::Bench&, OutputType, bool, std::optional<PreSelectInputs>)::{lambda()#3}>(WalletCreateTx(ankerl::nanobench::Bench&, OutputType, bool, std::optional<PreSelectInputs>)::{lambda()#3}&&) [clone .isra.0] (nanobench.h:1221)
==34277==    by 0x297F81: WalletCreateTx(ankerl::nanobench::Bench&, OutputType, bool, std::optional<PreSelectInputs>) [clone .constprop.0] [clone .isra.0] (wallet_create_tx.cpp:132)
==34277==    by 0x21B74A: operator() (std_function.h:590)
==34277==    by 0x21B74A: benchmark::BenchRunner::RunAll(benchmark::Args const&) (bench.cpp:119)
==34277==    by 0x1F8B96: main (bench_bitcoin.cpp:132)
==34277==
==34277== HEAP SUMMARY:
==34277==     in use at exit: 48,159,834 bytes in 72,552 blocks
==34277==   total heap usage: 1,668,158 allocs, 1,595,606 frees, 552,252,252 bytes allocated
==34277==
==34277== LEAK SUMMARY:
==34277==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34277==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34277==      possibly lost: 912 bytes in 3 blocks
==34277==    still reachable: 48,158,922 bytes in 72,549 blocks
==34277==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34277== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==34277==
==34277== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==34277== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Aborted
```

### Expected behaviour

No crash

### Steps to reproduce

`git checkout master && make -j$(nproc)`
`valgrind ./src/bench/bench_bitcoin -filter=WalletCreateTxUsePresetInputsAndCoinSelection -min-time=10000`

### Relevant log output

_No response_

### How did you obtain Bitcoin Core

Compiled from source

### What version of Bitcoin Core are you using?

master@758501b71391136c33b525b1a0109b990d4f463e

### Operating system and version

Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS

### Machine specifications

_No response_
{
    const bool want_psbt = method_name == "psbtbumpfee";
    const std::string incremental_fee{CFeeRate(DEFAULT_INCREMENTAL_RELAY_FEE).ToString(FeeEstimateMode::SAT_VB)};
    return RPCHelpMan{method_name,
        "\nBumps the fee of an opt-in-RBF transaction T, replacing it with a new transaction B.\n"
        + std::string(want_psbt ? "Returns a PSBT instead of creating and signing a new transaction.\n" : "") +
        "An opt-in RBF transaction with the given txid must be in the wallet.\n"
        "The command will pay the additional fee by reducing change outputs or adding inputs when necessary.\n"
        "It may add a new change output if one does not already exist.\n"
        "All inputs in the original transaction will be included in the replacement transaction.\n"
        "The command will fail if the wallet or mempool contains a transaction that spends one of T's outputs.\n"
        "By default, the new fee will be calculated automatically using the estimatesmartfee RPC.\n"
        "The user can specify a confirmation target for estimatesmartfee.\n"
        "Alternatively, the user can specify a fee rate in " + CURRENCY_ATOM + "/vB for the new transaction.\n"
        "At a minimum, the new fee rate must be high enough to pay an additional new relay fee (incrementalfee\n"