Would it be completely unreasonable to allow `fundrawtransaction` to use unsafe outputs?

I understand this means the resulting transaction may be invalidated whenever the unsafe output I'm relying one disappears (e.g. because the transaction that produced it was RBF-ed) but in my case that's ok, I'll react to that and re-publish the tree of child transactions accordingly.

But let me know if you think that's too much of a footgun for users, in that case I'll architect my solution differently.
{
                        {RPCResult::Type::ARR, "transactions", "",
                        {
                            {RPCResult::Type::OBJ, "", "", Cat(Cat<std::vector<RPCResult>>(
                            {
                                {RPCResult::Type::BOOL, "involvesWatchonly", "Only returns true if imported addresses were involved in transaction."},
                                {RPCResult::Type::STR, "address", "The bitcoin address of the transaction."},
                                {RPCResult::Type::STR, "category", "The transaction category.\n"
                                    "\"send\"                  Transactions sent.\n"
                                    "\"receive\"               Non-coinbase transactions received.\n"
                                    "\"generate\"              Coinbase transactions received with more than 100 confirmations.\n"
                                    "\"immature\"              Coinbase transactions received with 100 or fewer confirmations.\n"
                                    "\"orphan\"                Orphaned coinbase transactions received."},
                                {RPCResult::Type::STR_AMOUNT, "amount", "The amount in " + CURRENCY_UNIT + ". This is negative for the 'send' category, and is positive\n"
                                    "for all other categories"},
                                {RPCResult::Type::NUM, "vout", "the vout value"},
                                {RPCResult::Type::STR_AMOUNT, "fee", "The amount of the fee in " + CURRENCY_UNIT + ". This is negative and only available for the\n"
                                     "'send' category of transactions."},
                            },
                            TransactionDescriptionString()),
                            {
                                {RPCResult::Type::BOOL, "abandoned", "'true' if the transaction has been abandoned (inputs are respendable). Only available for the \n"
                                     "'send' category of transactions."},
                                {RPCResult::Type::STR, "label", "A comment for the address/transaction, if any"},
                                {RPCResult::Type::STR, "to", "If a comment to is associated with the transaction."},
                            })},
                        }},
                        {RPCResult::Type::ARR, "removed", "<structure is the same as \"transactions\" above, only present if include_removed=true>\n"
                            "Note: transactions that were re-added in the active chain will appear as-is in this array, and may thus have a positive confirmation count."
                        , {{RPCResult::Type::ELISION, "", ""},}},