Would it be completely unreasonable to allow `fundrawtransaction` to use unsafe outputs?

I understand this means the resulting transaction may be invalidated whenever the unsafe output I'm relying one disappears (e.g. because the transaction that produced it was RBF-ed) but in my case that's ok, I'll react to that and re-publish the tree of child transactions accordingly.

But let me know if you think that's too much of a footgun for users, in that case I'll architect my solution differently.
{
    LOCK(cs_);
    WalletBatch batch(GetDatabase());
    
    
    
    typedef std::multimap<int64_t, CWalletTx*> TxItems;
    TxItems txByTime;
    for (auto& entry : mapWallet)
    {
        CWalletTx* wtx = &entry.second;
        txByTime.insert(std::make_pair(wtx->nTimeReceived, wtx));
    }
    nOrderPosNext = 0;
    std::vector<int64_t> nOrderPosOffsets;
    for (TxItems::iterator it = txByTime.begin(); it != txByTime.end(); ++it)
    {