When using `listsinceblock` to fetch transactions since the last record observed, there is a relevant detail missed that I would like to record in the ledger: `blockheight`.

It is unreasonable for my wallet interface to do an RPC lookup for every new blockhash just to get the height number. There could be hundreds of transactions or even thousands and they could all be processed with a simple call to `listsinceblock` if it wasn't for the lack of `blockheight`.

Currently it looks like:

> "blockhash": "0000000000000000000549800794b27ab10d5e16ac6ad16a7c4a13dae756f80d",
> "blockindex": 1120,
> "blocktime": 1572073467,

I would like it to look like:

> "blockhash": "0000000000000000000549800794b27ab10d5e16ac6ad16a7c4a13dae756f80d",
> "blockindex": 1120,
> "blocktime": 1572073467,
> "blockheight": 601091,

I have the same request regarding the output of `gettransaction` also.

Thanks in advance.


},
                    {"replaceable", RPCArg::Type::BOOL,  "wallet default", "Allow this transaction to be replaced by a transaction with higher fees via BIP 125"},
                    {"conf_target", RPCArg::Type::NUM,  "wallet default", "Confirmation target (in blocks)"},
                    {"estimate_mode", RPCArg::Type::STR,  "UNSET", "The fee estimate mode, must be one of:\n"
            "       \"UNSET\"\n"
            "       \"ECONOMICAL\"\n"
            "       \"CONSERVATIVE\""},
                },
                 RPCResult{
            "\"txid\"                   (string) The transaction id for the send. Only 1 transaction is created regardless of \n"
            "                                    the number of addresses.\n"
                 },
                RPCExamples{
            "\nSend two amounts to two different addresses:\n"
            + HelpExampleCli("sendmany", "\"\" \"{\\\"1D1ZrZNe3JUo7ZycKEYQQiQAWd9y54F4XX\\\":0.01,\\\"1353tsE8YMTA4EuV7dgUXGjNFf9KpVvKHz\\\":0.02}\"") +
            "\nSend two amounts to two different addresses setting the confirmation and comment:\n"
            + HelpExampleCli("sendmany", "\"\" \"{\\\"1D1ZrZNe3JUo7ZycKEYQQiQAWd9y54F4XX\\\":0.01,\\\"1353tsE8YMTA4EuV7dgUXGjNFf9KpVvKHz\\\":0.02}\" 6 \"testing\"") +
            "\nSend two amounts to two different addresses, subtract fee from amount:\n"
            + HelpExampleCli("sendmany", "\"\" \"{\\\"1D1ZrZNe3JUo7ZycKEYQQiQAWd9y54F4XX\\\":0.01,\\\"1353tsE8YMTA4EuV7dgUXGjNFf9KpVvKHz\\\":0.02}\" 1 \"\" \"[\\\"1D1ZrZNe3JUo7ZycKEYQQiQAWd9y54F4XX\\\",\\\"1353tsE8YMTA4EuV7dgUXGjNFf9KpVvKHz\\\"]\"") +
            "\nAs a JSON-RPC call\n"
            + HelpExampleRpc("sendmany", "\"\", {\"1D1ZrZNe3JUo7ZycKEYQQiQAWd9y54F4XX\":0.01,\"1353tsE8YMTA4EuV7dgUXGjNFf9KpVvKHz\":0.02}, 6, \"testing\"")
                },
    }.Check(request);
    
    
    pwallet->BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain();
    auto locked_chain = pwallet->chain().lock();
    LOCK(pwallet->cs_wallet);
    if (!request.params[0].isNull() && !request.params[0].get_str().empty()) {
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, "Dummy value must be set to \"\"");