I get a lot of spurious messages like this in the log:
```
2019-08-31T18:07:53Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592633 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:09:40Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592634 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:09:40Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592634 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:09:40Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592634 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:09:40Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592634 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:09:40Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592634 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:10:28Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592635 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:10:28Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592635 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:10:28Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592635 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:10:28Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592635 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:10:28Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592635 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:11:01Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:11:01Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:11:01Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:11:01Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:11:01Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
```
also
```
2019-08-31T18:19:47Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70015, blocks=592636, peer=0
2019-08-31T18:19:47Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:19:47Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70015, blocks=592636, peer=1
2019-08-31T18:19:48Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:19:48Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70015, blocks=592636, peer=2
2019-08-31T18:19:49Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
```
This log message was introduced in #15615 by @jonasschnelli..
From what I understand, it's supposed to only be shown once per 2000 blocks, not multiple times for the same block.


CFeeRate oldFeeRate(mi->GetModifiedFee(), mi->GetTxSize());
                if (newFeeRate <= oldFeeRate)
                {
                    return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee",
                            strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s",
                                  hash.ToString(),
                                  newFeeRate.ToString(),
                                  oldFeeRate.ToString()));
                }
                for (const CTxIn &txin : mi->GetTx().vin)
                {
                    setConflictsParents.insert(txin.prevout.hash);
                }
                nConflictingCount += mi->GetCountWithDescendants();
            }
            
            
            
            if (nConflictingCount <= maxDescendantsToVisit) {
                
                
                for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : setIterConflicting) {
                    pool.CalculateDescendants(it, allConflicting);
                }
                for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : allConflicting) {
                    nConflictingFees += it->GetModifiedFee();
                    nConflictingSize += it->GetTxSize();
                }
            } else {