The `getaddressesbylabel` API spends a lot more time than the `getaddressesbyaccount` API.

I generated addresses by the `getnewaddress` API, then, I measured time that the `getaddressesby*` API spends. It seems the algorithm of the `getaddressesbylabel` API takes **O(N ^ 2)** time! The results of my survey are as follows.

### getaddressesbylabel

bitcoind v0.17.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 (AWS EC2 t3.large)

#### 11,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbylabel ""
# (omitted)
real    0m1.230s # 1.2s
user    0m0.044s
sys 0m0.048s
```

#### 111,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbylabel ""
# (omitted)
real    1m37.027s # 97.0s
user    0m0.408s
sys 0m0.544s
```

#### 211,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbylabel ""
# (omitted)
real    6m3.727s # 363.7s
user    0m0.800s
sys 0m0.900s
```

### getaddressesbyaccount

bitcoind v0.16.3 on Ubuntu 16.04 (AWS EC2 t3.large)

#### 11,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbyaccount ""
# (omitted)
real    0m0.500s # 0.5s
user    0m0.092s
sys 0m0.160s
```

#### 111,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbyaccount ""
# (omitted)
real    0m1.361s # 1.4s
user    0m0.168s
sys 0m0.348s
```

#### 211,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbyaccount ""
# (omitted)
real    0m2.220s # 2.2s
user    0m0.384s
sys 0m0.532s
```

{
    std::shared_ptr<CWallet> const wallet = GetWalletForJSONRPCRequest(request);
    CWallet* const pwallet = wallet.get();
    if (!EnsureWalletIsAvailable(pwallet, request.fHelp)) {
        return NullUniValue;
    }
    if (request.fHelp || request.params.size() > 2) {
        throw std::runtime_error(
            RPCHelpMan{"rescanblockchain",
                "\nRescan the local blockchain for wallet related transactions.\n",
                {
                    {"start_height", RPCArg::Type::NUM,  "0", "block height where the rescan should start"},
                    {"stop_height", RPCArg::Type::NUM, RPCArg::Optional::OMITTED_NAMED_ARG, "the last block height that should be scanned. If none is provided it will rescan up to the tip at return time of this call."},
                },
                RPCResult{
            "{\n"
            "  \"start_height\"     (numeric) The block height where the rescan started (the requested height or 0)\n"
            "  \"stop_height\"      (numeric) The height of the last rescanned block. May be null in rare cases if there was a reorg and the call didn't scan any blocks because they were already scanned in the background.\n"
            "}\n"
                },
                RPCExamples{
                    HelpExampleCli("rescanblockchain", "100000 120000")
            + HelpExampleRpc("rescanblockchain", "100000, 120000")
                },