Follow up from https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/11616.

Here's one I found. These two invariants:

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/7e7127387ba64f57299eaff8656542cea6fb3a2d/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberClassComponent.js#L330-L343

are in a function that's behind a DEV block:

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/7e7127387ba64f57299eaff8656542cea6fb3a2d/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberClassComponent.js#L447-L449

I don't think this is intentional, but need to verify.

There may be more. I'll use this issue to track while https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/11616 preserves existing behavior.
expect(e.getAttribute('htmlFor')).toBe('test');
      });
      itRenders('for attribute on custom elements', async render => {
        const e = await render(<div is="custom-element" for="test" />);
        expect(e.getAttribute('for')).toBe('test');
      });
    });
    describe('numeric properties', function() {
      itRenders(
        'positive numeric property with positive value',
        async render => {
          const e = await render(<input size={2} />);
          expect(e.getAttribute('size')).toBe('2');
        },
      );
      itRenders(
        'no positive numeric property with zero value',
        async render => {
          const e = await render(<input size={0} />);
          expect(e.hasAttribute('size')).toBe(false);
        },
      );
      itRenders('numeric property with zero value', async render => {
        const e = await render(<ol start={0} />);
        expect(e.getAttribute('start')).toBe('0');
      });
    });
    describe('props with special meaning in React', function() {
      itRenders('no ref attribute', async render => {
        class RefComponent extends React.Component {