

Using bitcoin-cli in order to generate a transaction with two op_return generate a wrong transaction.

```
bitcoin-cli createrawtransaction "[]" "{\"data\":\"ee\", \"data\":\"ff\"}"
0200000000020000000000000000036a01ee0000000000000000036a01ee00000000
```

Decoding the hex I obtain the following transaction with two op_return with the same value.

```
bitcoin-cli decoderawtransaction "0200000000020000000000000000036a01ee0000000000000000036a01ee00000000"
{
  "txid": "ed4b691958a573c8569177606c77905ecd07c36eb5eec443f17a45427bb9f5fc",
  "hash": "ed4b691958a573c8569177606c77905ecd07c36eb5eec443f17a45427bb9f5fc",
  "version": 2,
  "size": 34,
  "vsize": 34,
  "weight": 136,
  "locktime": 0,
  "vin": [
  ],
  "vout": [
    {
      "value": 0.00000000,
      "n": 0,
      "scriptPubKey": {
        "asm": "OP_RETURN -110",
        "hex": "6a01ee",
        "type": "nulldata"
      }
    },
    {
      "value": 0.00000000,
      "n": 1,
      "scriptPubKey": {
        "asm": "OP_RETURN -110",
        "hex": "6a01ee",
        "type": "nulldata"
      }
    }
  ]
}
```

This incorrect behavior is related to the duplicate key "data" in the JSON passed to the "createrawtransaction" command.

The problem is related to the use of `outputs[name_].getValStr()` in an JSON with duplicated keys https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/rpc/rawtransaction.cpp#L432

Although this kind of transaction wouldn't be relayed, I thought about two possible solutions:
* raise an error as it happens for the use of two identical addresses, maybe calling `JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER ...` if more than one "data" field is recognized - easier to implement, 
* creation of the transaction correctly containing the two different op_returns, maybe need to pass one array in the data field of the passed JSON (like `"data": ["ee", "ff"]`) - maybe require API change.
UniValue entry(UniValue::VOBJ);
            if (involvesWatchonly || (::IsMine(*pwallet, s.destination) & ISMINE_WATCH_ONLY)) {
                entry.pushKV("involvesWatchonly", true);
            }
            MaybePushAddress(entry, s.destination);
            entry.pushKV("category", "send");
            entry.pushKV("amount", ValueFromAmount(-s.amount));
            if (pwallet->mapAddressBook.count(s.destination)) {
                entry.pushKV("label", pwallet->mapAddressBook[s.destination].name);
            }
            entry.pushKV("vout", s.vout);
            entry.pushKV("fee", ValueFromAmount(-nFee));
            if (fLong)
                WalletTxToJSON(pwallet->chain(), locked_chain, wtx, entry);
            entry.pushKV("abandoned", wtx.isAbandoned());
            ret.push_back(entry);
        }
    }
    
    if (listReceived.size() > 0 && wtx.GetDepthInMainChain(locked_chain) >= nMinDepth)
    {
        for (const COutputEntry& r : listReceived)
        {
            std::string label;
            if (pwallet->mapAddressBook.count(r.destination)) {
                label = pwallet->mapAddressBook[r.destination].name;
            }
            if (filter_label && label != *filter_label) {
                continue;
            }