In specter https://github.com/cryptoadvance/specter-desktop/issues/1491#issuecomment-1126145011  a user can abandon an **receiving** tx that was evicted from the mempool (for example because it was double spent). The tx is marked via [abandontransaction](https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/developer.bitcoin.org/blob/master/reference/rpc/abandontransaction.rst) as abandoned in bitcoin core.

However [gettransaction](https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/developer.bitcoin.org/blob/master/reference/rpc/gettransaction.rst) and [listtransactions](https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/developer.bitcoin.org/blob/master/reference/rpc/listtransactions.rst) do not return the field `abandoned`, even though this is visible in the GUI:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/60378539/168316171-45c1aa29-de52-4d9a-ae2b-3293aeadd663.png)

**Consequence**: Specter cannot get the `abandoned` information from bitcoin rpc, and will fetch the abandoned tx back again via [listtransactions](https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/developer.bitcoin.org/blob/master/reference/rpc/listtransactions.rst) after it was deleted in specter.   

**Describe the solution you'd like**
Always return the `abandoned` field in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/225e5b57b2ee2bc1acd7f09c89ccccc15ef8c85f/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp#L345  and not only in this special case https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/225e5b57b2ee2bc1acd7f09c89ccccc15ef8c85f/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp#L375
That should then automatically solve  [gettransaction](https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/developer.bitcoin.org/blob/master/reference/rpc/gettransaction.rst)  via https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/225e5b57b2ee2bc1acd7f09c89ccccc15ef8c85f/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp#L795

**Describe alternatives you've considered**
If specter can't get the information about abandoned tx from bitcoin, it would have to keep an internal list. That is possible, but redundant and can lead to many edge cases.

**Steps to reproduce**

- Wallet A:  Send 1 BTC to Wallet B  (rbf)
- Wallet A:  Replace tx with rbf to send all funds to wallet A
- Wallet B: Abandon tx (because no longer in mempool)
- Wallet B:  [gettransaction](https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/developer.bitcoin.org/blob/master/reference/rpc/gettransaction.rst) will not show the  `abandoned` field
{
    return RPCHelpMan{"listreceivedbyaddress",
                "\nList balances by receiving address.\n",
                {
                    {"minconf", RPCArg::Type::NUM, RPCArg::Default{1}, "The minimum number of confirmations before payments are included."},
                    {"include_empty", RPCArg::Type::BOOL, RPCArg::Default{false}, "Whether to include addresses that haven't received any payments."},
                    {"include_watchonly", RPCArg::Type::BOOL, RPCArg::DefaultHint{"true for watch-only wallets, otherwise false"}, "Whether to include watch-only addresses (see 'importaddress')"},
                    {"address_filter", RPCArg::Type::STR, RPCArg::Optional::OMITTED, "If present and non-empty, only return information on this address."},
                    {"include_immature_coinbase", RPCArg::Type::BOOL, RPCArg::Default{false}, "Include immature coinbase transactions."},
                },
                RPCResult{
                    RPCResult::Type::ARR, "", "",
                    {
                        {RPCResult::Type::OBJ, "", "",
                        {
                            {RPCResult::Type::BOOL, "involvesWatchonly", true, "Only returns true if imported addresses were involved in transaction"},
                            {RPCResult::Type::STR, "address", "The receiving address"},
                            {RPCResult::Type::STR_AMOUNT, "amount", "The total amount in " + CURRENCY_UNIT + " received by the address"},