I get a lot of spurious messages like this in the log:
```
2019-08-31T18:07:53Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592633 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:09:40Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592634 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:09:40Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592634 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:09:40Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592634 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:09:40Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592634 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:09:40Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592634 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:10:28Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592635 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:10:28Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592635 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:10:28Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592635 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:10:28Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592635 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:10:28Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592635 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:11:01Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:11:01Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:11:01Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:11:01Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:11:01Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
```
also
```
2019-08-31T18:19:47Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70015, blocks=592636, peer=0
2019-08-31T18:19:47Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:19:47Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70015, blocks=592636, peer=1
2019-08-31T18:19:48Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
2019-08-31T18:19:48Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70015, blocks=592636, peer=2
2019-08-31T18:19:49Z Synchronizing blockheaders, height: 592636 (~100.00%)
```
This log message was introduced in #15615 by @jonasschnelli..
From what I understand, it's supposed to only be shown once per 2000 blocks, not multiple times for the same block.


return ::ChainstateActive().ReplayBlocks(params, view);
}
void CChainState::EraseBlockData(CBlockIndex* index)
{
    AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
    assert(!m_chain.Contains(index)); 
    
    index->nStatus = std::min<unsigned int>(index->nStatus & BLOCK_VALID_MASK, BLOCK_VALID_TREE) | (index->nStatus & ~BLOCK_VALID_MASK);
    
    index->nStatus &= ~(BLOCK_HAVE_DATA | BLOCK_HAVE_UNDO);
    
    index->nFile = 0;
    index->nDataPos = 0;
    index->nUndoPos = 0;
    
    index->nTx = 0;
    index->nChainTx = 0;
    index->nSequenceId = 0;
    
    setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(index);
    
    setBlockIndexCandidates.erase(index);
    auto ret = m_blockman.m_blocks_unlinked.equal_range(index->pprev);
    while (ret.first != ret.second) {
        if (ret.first->second == index) {
            m_blockman.m_blocks_unlinked.erase(ret.first++);
        } else {