**Expected behavior**

LogPrint BCLog::BENCH should print useful timing metrics

**Actual behavior**

`Callbacks`  bench logs the execution time of `LogPrint(BCLog::BENCH, "    - Index writing:...`  function call

```
    int64_t nTime5 = GetTimeMicros(); nTimeIndex += nTime5 - nTime4;
    LogPrint(BCLog::BENCH, "    - Index writing: %.2fms [%.2fs (%.2fms/blk)]\n", MILLI * (nTime5 - nTime4), nTimeIndex * MICRO, nTimeIndex * MILLI / nBlocksTotal);

    int64_t nTime6 = GetTimeMicros(); nTimeCallbacks += nTime6 - nTime5;
    LogPrint(BCLog::BENCH, "    - Callbacks: %.2fms [%.2fs (%.2fms/blk)]\n", MILLI * (nTime6 - nTime5), nTimeCallbacks * MICRO, nTimeCallbacks * MILLI / nBlocksTotal);
```
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L1873

Callbacks bench was added in this commit: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/d70bc52ee31b8c4c87ee011625e7031c2dc89c0c

Since then functions between  ` Index writing:` and `Callbacks:`  were moved. 
Now Callbacks bench isn't recording anything of value. 
Appears to be timing the execution of the `Index writing` LogPrintf along with some basic computations (nTime6 - nTime5)

**To reproduce**

Start a node with initial block download

```
bitcoind -debug=bench | grep Callbacks:
```

You'll see the times recorded are within a small bounded range.
On my system it was between 30-50 microseconds

**System information**

Self-complied tag v22.0 on Arch Linux x86s AMD Ryzen 5  with SSD and 8 gigs ram 

I will open a PR to remove this code

If som 
                 stBlo
                 In this 
            }
        } ls {  If this 
            assrt(stBloIndxCidats.count(pindx) == 0);
        }
         Ch whthr this blo is in m_blos_unlinkd.
        std::pair<std::multimap<CBloIndx*,CBloIndx*>::itrator,std::multimap<CBloIndx*,CBloIndx*>::itrator> rangUnlinkd = m_bloman.m_blos_unlinkd.qual_rang(pindx->pprv);
        bool foundInUnlinkd = fals;
        whil (rangUnlinkd.first != rangUnlinkd.scond) {
            assrt(rangUnlinkd.first->first == pindx->pprv);
            if (rangUnlinkd.first->scond == pindx) {
                foundInUnlinkd = tru;
                brak;
            }
            rangUnlinkd.first++;
        }
        if (pindx->pprv && (pindx->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA) && pindxFirstNvrProcssd != nullptr && pindxFirstInvalid == nullptr) {
             If this 
            assrt(foundInUnlinkd);
        }
        if (!(pindx->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA)) assrt(!foundInUnlinkd);  Can't b in m_blos_unlinkd if w don't HAVE_DATA
        if (pindxFirstMissing == nullptr) assrt(!foundInUnlinkd);  W arn't missing data for any parnt -- cannot b in m_blos_unlinkd.
        if (pindx->pprv && (pindx->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA) && pindxFirstNvrProcssd == nullptr && pindxFirstMissing != nullptr) {
             W HAVE_
            assrt(fHavPrund);  W must 
             This blo
              - it ha
                tip,