Would it be completely unreasonable to allow `fundrawtransaction` to use unsafe outputs?

I understand this means the resulting transaction may be invalidated whenever the unsafe output I'm relying one disappears (e.g. because the transaction that produced it was RBF-ed) but in my case that's ok, I'll react to that and re-publish the tree of child transactions accordingly.

But let me know if you think that's too much of a footgun for users, in that case I'll architect my solution differently.
{"estimate_mode", RPCArg::Type::STR, RPCArg::Default{"unset"}, std::string() + "The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):\n"
            "       \"" + FeeModes("\"\n\"") + "\""},
                    {"fee_rate", RPCArg::Type::AMOUNT, RPCArg::DefaultHint{"not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation"}, "Specify a fee rate in " + CURRENCY_ATOM + "/vB."},
                    {"verbose", RPCArg::Type::BOOL, RPCArg::Default{false}, "If true, return extra infomration about the transaction."},
                },
                {
                    RPCResult{"if verbose is not set or set to false",
                        RPCResult::Type::STR_HEX, "txid", "The transaction id for the send. Only 1 transaction is created regardless of\n"
                "the number of addresses."
                    },
                    RPCResult{"if verbose is set to true",
                        RPCResult::Type::OBJ, "", "",
                        {
                            {RPCResult::Type::STR_HEX, "txid", "The transaction id for the send. Only 1 transaction is created regardless of\n"
                "the number of addresses."},
                            {RPCResult::Type::STR, "fee reason", "The transaction fee reason."}
                        },
                    },
                },
                RPCExamples{
            "\nSend two amounts to two different addresses:\n"
            + HelpExampleCli("sendmany", "\"\" \"{\\\"" + EXAMPLE_ADDRESS[0] + "\\\":0.01,\\\"" + EXAMPLE_ADDRESS[1] + "\\\":0.02}\"") +
            "\nSend two amounts to two different addresses setting the confirmation and comment:\n"
            + HelpExampleCli("sendmany", "\"\" \"{\\\"" + EXAMPLE_ADDRESS[0] + "\\\":0.01,\\\"" + EXAMPLE_ADDRESS[1] + "\\\":0.02}\" 6 \"testing\"") +
            "\nSend two amounts to two different addresses, subtract fee from amount:\n"
            + HelpExampleCli("sendmany", "\"\" \"{\\\"" + EXAMPLE_ADDRESS[0] + "\\\":0.01,\\\"" + EXAMPLE_ADDRESS[1] + "\\\":0.02}\" 1 \"\" \"[\\\"" + EXAMPLE_ADDRESS[0] + "\\\",\\\"" + EXAMPLE_ADDRESS[1] + "\\\"]\"") +
            "\nAs a JSON-RPC call\n"
            + HelpExampleRpc("sendmany", "\"\", {\"" + EXAMPLE_ADDRESS[0] + "\":0.01,\"" + EXAMPLE_ADDRESS[1] + "\":0.02}, 6, \"testing\"")
                },
        [&](const RPCHelpMan& self, const JSONRPCRequest& request) -> UniValue