Would it be completely unreasonable to allow `fundrawtransaction` to use unsafe outputs?

I understand this means the resulting transaction may be invalidated whenever the unsafe output I'm relying one disappears (e.g. because the transaction that produced it was RBF-ed) but in my case that's ok, I'll react to that and re-publish the tree of child transactions accordingly.

But let me know if you think that's too much of a footgun for users, in that case I'll architect my solution differently.
{
    return RPCHelpMan{"keypoolrefill",
                "\nFills the keypool."+
        HELP_REQUIRING_PASSPHRASE,
                {
                    {"newsize", RPCArg::Type::NUM, RPCArg::Default{100}, "The new keypool size"},
                },