Reported here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12629#issuecomment-381095603 by @Empact.  I've seen it now in a few different travis jobs, including:

https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/366157920
https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/366139851

From my initial investigation it seems like there may be an actual bug in block announcement, so I'm  opening this issue to track.
LogPrintf("VerifyDB(): block verification stopping at height %d (pruning, no data)\n", pindex->nHeight);
            break;
        }
        CBlock block;
        
        if (!ReadBlockFromDisk(block, pindex, chainparams.GetConsensus()))
            return error("VerifyDB(): *** ReadBlockFromDisk failed at %d, hash=%s", pindex->nHeight, pindex->GetBlockHash().ToString());
        
        if (nCheckLevel >= 1 && !CheckBlock(block, state, chainparams.GetConsensus()))
            return error("%s: *** found bad block at %d, hash=%s (%s)\n", __func__,
                         pindex->nHeight, pindex->GetBlockHash().ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
        
        if (nCheckLevel >= 2 && pindex) {
            CBlockUndo undo;
            if (!pindex->GetUndoPos().IsNull()) {
                if (!UndoReadFromDisk(undo, pindex)) {
                    return error("VerifyDB(): *** found bad undo data at %d, hash=%s\n", pindex->nHeight, pindex->GetBlockHash().ToString());
                }
            }
        }
        
        if (nCheckLevel >= 3 && pindex == pindexState && (coins.DynamicMemoryUsage() + pcoinsTip->DynamicMemoryUsage()) <= nCoinCacheUsage) {
            assert(coins.GetBestBlock() == pindex->GetBlockHash());
            DisconnectResult res = g_chainstate.DisconnectBlock(block, pindex, coins);
            if (res == DISCONNECT_FAILED) {
                return error("VerifyDB(): *** irrecoverable inconsistency in block data at %d, hash=%s", pindex->nHeight, pindex->GetBlockHash().ToString());
            }
            pindexState = pindex->pprev;
            if (res == DISCONNECT_UNCLEAN) {