Would it be completely unreasonable to allow `fundrawtransaction` to use unsafe outputs?

I understand this means the resulting transaction may be invalidated whenever the unsafe output I'm relying one disappears (e.g. because the transaction that produced it was RBF-ed) but in my case that's ok, I'll react to that and re-publish the tree of child transactions accordingly.

But let me know if you think that's too much of a footgun for users, in that case I'll architect my solution differently.
{
        UniValue obj(UniValue::VOBJ);
        CPubKey pubkey;
        if (provider && provider->GetPubKey(ToKeyID(id), pubkey)) {
            obj.pushKV("pubkey", HexStr(pubkey));
        }
        return obj;
    }
    UniValue operator()(const WitnessV0ScriptHash& id) const
    {
        UniValue obj(UniValue::VOBJ);
        CScript subscript;
        CRIPEMD160 hasher;
        uint160 hash;
        hasher.Write(id.begin(), 32).Finalize(hash.begin());
        if (provider && provider->GetCScript(CScriptID(hash), subscript)) {
            ProcessSubScript(subscript, obj);
        }
        return obj;
    }
    UniValue operator()(const WitnessUnknown& id) const { return UniValue(UniValue::VOBJ); }