Follow up from https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/11616.

Here's one I found. These two invariants:

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/7e7127387ba64f57299eaff8656542cea6fb3a2d/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberClassComponent.js#L330-L343

are in a function that's behind a DEV block:

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/7e7127387ba64f57299eaff8656542cea6fb3a2d/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberClassComponent.js#L447-L449

I don't think this is intentional, but need to verify.

There may be more. I'll use this issue to track while https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/11616 preserves existing behavior.
expect(changeCount).toBe(0);
        });
        it('should not blow away user-entered text on successful reconnect to an uncontrolled checkbox', () =>
          testUserInteractionBeforeClientRender(
            <input type="checkbox" defaultChecked={true} />,
            true,
            false,
            'checked',
          ));
        it('should not blow away user-entered text on successful reconnect to a controlled checkbox', async () => {
          let changeCount = 0;
          await testUserInteractionBeforeClientRender(
            <ControlledCheckbox onChange={() => changeCount++} />,
            true,
            false,
            'checked',
          );
          expect(changeCount).toBe(0);
        });
        
        
        xit('should not blow away user-entered text on successful reconnect to an uncontrolled textarea', () =>
          testUserInteractionBeforeClientRender(
            <textarea defaultValue="Hello" />,
          ));
        
        
        xit('should not blow away user-entered text on successful reconnect to a controlled textarea', async () => {
          let changeCount = 0;