Follow up from https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/11616.

Here's one I found. These two invariants:

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/7e7127387ba64f57299eaff8656542cea6fb3a2d/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberClassComponent.js#L330-L343

are in a function that's behind a DEV block:

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/7e7127387ba64f57299eaff8656542cea6fb3a2d/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberClassComponent.js#L447-L449

I don't think this is intentional, but need to verify.

There may be more. I'll use this issue to track while https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/11616 preserves existing behavior.
render() {
            return <div ref="foo" />;
          }
        }
        const e = await render(<RefComponent />);
        expect(e.getAttribute('ref')).toBe(null);
      });
      itRenders('no children attribute', async render => {
        const e = await render(React.createElement('div', {}, 'foo'));
        expect(e.getAttribute('children')).toBe(null);
      });
      itRenders('no key attribute', async render => {
        const e = await render(<div key="foo" />);
        expect(e.getAttribute('key')).toBe(null);
      });
      itRenders('no dangerouslySetInnerHTML attribute', async render => {
        const e = await render(
          <div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: '<foo />'}} />,
        );
        expect(e.getAttribute('dangerouslySetInnerHTML')).toBe(null);
      });
      itRenders('no suppressContentEditableWarning attribute', async render => {