### Describe the issue

Testing in bitcoin 0.13.0, calling `bitcoin-cli listsinceblock x` is outputting all double-spent transactions that are in the wallet, even those that were double-spent well and truly before x.
### Is the issue reproducible?

Yes
#### List steps to reproduce below:
1.   Create a double-spend send to your wallet (easiest using bip125)
2.   Wait until one confirms, and then wait a few more blocks
3.   Run `bitcoin-cli listsinceblock $(bitcoin-cli getbestblockhash)` and it will output the double spent transaction
### Expected behavior

The double-spent transaction that was conflicted before the block hash should be filtered

throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, strprintf("Unknown address type '%s'", request.params[3].get_str()));
        }
    }
    
    CScript inner;
    CTxDestination dest = AddAndGetMultisigDestination(required, pubkeys, output_type, *pwallet, inner);
    pwallet->SetAddressBook(dest, label, "send");
    UniValue result(UniValue::VOBJ);
    result.pushKV("address", EncodeDestination(dest));
    result.pushKV("redeemScript", HexStr(inner.begin(), inner.end()));
    return result;
}
struct tallyitem
{
    CAmount nAmount{0};
    int nConf{std::numeric_limits<int>::max()};
    std::vector<uint256> txids;
    bool fIsWatchonly{false};
    tallyitem()
    {
    }
};
static UniValue ListReceived(interfaces::Chain::Lock& locked_chain, CWallet * const pwallet, const UniValue& params, bool by_label) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(pwallet->cs_wallet)
{
    
    int nMinDepth = 1;
    if (!params[0].isNull())
        nMinDepth = params[0].get_int();
    
    bool fIncludeEmpty = false;