I think that if a reorg fails due to an error while disconnecting blocks, the node should shut down.

My thought is that if we are trying to switch to a more work chain and something goes wrong before we can even try to validate that more-work chain, then we have a problem that is not related to the chain we're trying to switch to but instead related to our own hardware or software; shutting down and having the user deal with the issue is better than continuing on, when we know there's a more work chain that we're unable to try validating.

This has recently come up on testnet, where unpatched nodes are unable to reorg from the invalid chain containing the duplicate-input-in-a-transaction block, but rather than crash or shutdown they are continuing on the invalid chain, with messages like this in the debug log:

```
ERROR: DisconnectTip(): DisconnectBlock 00000000210004840364b52bc5e455d888f164e4264a4fec06a514b67e9d5722 failed
```
{
    uiInterface.ShowProgress(_("Verifying blocks..."), 0, false);
}
CVerifyDB::~CVerifyDB()
{
    uiInterface.ShowProgress("", 100, false);
}
bool CVerifyDB::VerifyDB(const CChainParams& chainparams, CCoinsView *coinsview, int nCheckLevel, int nCheckDepth)
{
    LOCK(cs_main);
    if (chainActive.Tip() == nullptr || chainActive.Tip()->pprev == nullptr)
        return true;
    
    if (nCheckDepth <= 0 || nCheckDepth > chainActive.Height())
        nCheckDepth = chainActive.Height();
    nCheckLevel = std::max(0, std::min(4, nCheckLevel));
    LogPrintf("Verifying last %i blocks at level %i\n", nCheckDepth, nCheckLevel);
    CCoinsViewCache coins(coinsview);
    CBlockIndex* pindex;
    CBlockIndex* pindexFailure = nullptr;
    int nGoodTransactions = 0;
    CValidationState state;
    int reportDone = 0;
    LogPrintf("[0%%]..."); 
    for (pindex = chainActive.Tip(); pindex && pindex->pprev; pindex = pindex->pprev) {
        boost::this_thread::interruption_point();
        const int percentageDone = std::max(1, std::min(99, (int)(((double)(chainActive.Height() - pindex->nHeight)) / (double)nCheckDepth * (nCheckLevel >= 4 ? 50 : 100))));
        if (reportDone < percentageDone/10) {
            
            LogPrintf("[%d%%]...", percentageDone);