I think that if a reorg fails due to an error while disconnecting blocks, the node should shut down.

My thought is that if we are trying to switch to a more work chain and something goes wrong before we can even try to validate that more-work chain, then we have a problem that is not related to the chain we're trying to switch to but instead related to our own hardware or software; shutting down and having the user deal with the issue is better than continuing on, when we know there's a more work chain that we're unable to try validating.

This has recently come up on testnet, where unpatched nodes are unable to reorg from the invalid chain containing the duplicate-input-in-a-transaction block, but rather than crash or shutdown they are continuing on the invalid chain, with messages like this in the debug log:

```
ERROR: DisconnectTip(): DisconnectBlock 00000000210004840364b52bc5e455d888f164e4264a4fec06a514b67e9d5722 failed
```
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
    int nHeight = pindex->nHeight;
    
    BlockMap::iterator it = mapBlockIndex.begin();
    while (it != mapBlockIndex.end()) {
        if (!it->second->IsValid() && it->second->GetAncestor(nHeight) == pindex) {
            it->second->nStatus &= ~BLOCK_FAILED_MASK;
            setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(it->second);
            if (it->second->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS) && it->second->HaveTxsDownloaded() && setBlockIndexCandidates.value_comp()(chainActive.Tip(), it->second)) {
                setBlockIndexCandidates.insert(it->second);
            }
            if (it->second == pindexBestInvalid) {
                
                pindexBestInvalid = nullptr;
            }
            m_failed_blocks.erase(it->second);
        }
        it++;
    }
    
    while (pindex != nullptr) {
        if (pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK) {
            pindex->nStatus &= ~BLOCK_FAILED_MASK;
            setDirtyBlockIndex.insert(pindex);
            m_failed_blocks.erase(pindex);
        }
        pindex = pindex->pprev;
    }
}
void ResetBlockFailureFlags(CBlockIndex *pindex) {