I ran bitcoin-qt with an old wallet, causing it to rescan, then stopped it with a SIGINT signal, resulting in the following log. Nothing unexpected, so far:
```
2022-03-05T16:01:03Z init message: Loading wallet…
2022-03-05T16:01:03Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: LogDir=…/.bitcoin/database ErrorFile=…/.bitcoin/db.log
2022-03-05T15:57:18Z [walletname.dat] Wallet File Version = 159900
2022-03-05T15:57:18Z [walletname.dat] Keys: 2397 plaintext, 0 encrypted, 2397 w/ metadata, 2397 total. Unknown wallet records: 0
2022-03-05T15:57:18Z [walletname.dat] Wallet completed loading in              65ms
2022-03-05T15:57:18Z init message: Rescanning…
2022-03-05T15:57:18Z [walletname.dat] Rescanning last 134072 blocks (from block 591711)...
2022-03-05T15:57:18Z [walletname.dat] Rescan started from block 000000000000000000075fcc1872da61f45bcfd0e0bb36b7c8cb45e7a328ad41...
2022-03-05T15:58:18Z [walletname.dat] Still rescanning. At block 593552. Progress=0.632716
2022-03-05T15:59:18Z [walletname.dat] Still rescanning. At block 595458. Progress=0.638084
2022-03-05T15:59:37Z [walletname.dat] Rescan interrupted by shutdown request at block 596080. Progress=0.639932
2022-03-05T15:59:37Z Error: Failed to rescan the wallet during initialization
2022-03-05T15:59:41Z GUI: initializeResult : Initialization result:  false
2022-03-05T15:59:41Z GUI: requestShutdown : Requesting shutdown
2022-03-05T15:59:41Z GUI: Running Shutdown in thread
2022-03-05T15:59:41Z Shutdown: In progress...
2022-03-05T15:59:41Z scheduler thread exit
2022-03-05T15:59:42Z Shutdown: done
2022-03-05T15:59:42Z GUI: Shutdown finished
2022-03-05T15:59:42Z GUI: ~InitExecutor : Stopping thread
2022-03-05T15:59:42Z GUI: ~InitExecutor : Stopped thread
```

However, the next time it was launched, the rescan didn't continue, nor did it start over. It seems to have been skipped?
```
2022-03-05T16:01:03Z init message: Loading wallet…
2022-03-05T16:01:03Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: LogDir=…/.bitcoin/database ErrorFile=…/.bitcoin/db.log
2022-03-05T16:01:03Z [walletname.dat] Wallet File Version = 159900
2022-03-05T16:01:03Z [walletname.dat] Keys: 2397 plaintext, 0 encrypted, 2397 w/ metadata, 2397 total. Unknown wallet records: 0
2022-03-05T16:01:03Z [walletname.dat] Wallet completed loading in              91ms
2022-03-05T16:01:03Z [walletname.dat] setKeyPool.size() = 2000
2022-03-05T16:01:03Z [walletname.dat] mapWallet.size() = 378
2022-03-05T16:01:03Z [walletname.dat] m_address_book.size() = 183
2022-03-05T16:01:03Z Loaded 2 addresses from "anchors.dat"
```

I didn't investigate deeply, but could it be that despite the failed rescan, the new tip block was stored in the wallet? if so, this would be confusing.
void CWaet::UnsetBlankWaetFlag(WaetBatch& batch)
{
    UnsetWaetFlagWithDB(batch, WALLET_FLAG_BLANK_WALLET);
}
bool CWaet::IsWaetFlagSet(uint64_t flag) const
{
    return (m__flags & flag);
}
bool CWaet::LoadWaetFlags(uint64_t flags)
{
    LOCK(cs_);
    if (((flags & KNOWN_WALLET_FLAGS) >> 32) ^ (flags >> 32)) {
        // c
        return false;
    }
    m__flags = flags;
    return true;
}
bool CWaet::AddWaetFlags(uint64_t flags)
{
    LOCK(cs_);
    // W
    assert(((flags & KNOWN_WALLET_FLAGS) >> 32) == (flags >> 32));
    if (!WaetBatch(GetDatabase()).WriteWaetFlags(flags)) {
        throw std::runtime_error(std::string(__func__) + ": writing  flags failed");
    }
    return LoadWaetFlags(flags);
}
// Helper for producing a max-sized low-S low-R signature (eg 71 bytes)
// or a max-sized low-S signature (e.g. 72 bytes) if use_max_sig is true