Would it be completely unreasonable to allow `fundrawtransaction` to use unsafe outputs?

I understand this means the resulting transaction may be invalidated whenever the unsafe output I'm relying one disappears (e.g. because the transaction that produced it was RBF-ed) but in my case that's ok, I'll react to that and re-publish the tree of child transactions accordingly.

But let me know if you think that's too much of a footgun for users, in that case I'll architect my solution differently.
{
    LOCK(cs_);
    CAmount balance = 0;
    std::vector<COutput> vCoins;
    AvailableCoins(vCoins, true, coinControl);
    for (const COutput& out : vCoins) {
        if (out.fSpendable) {
            balance += out.tx->tx->vout[out.i].nValue;
        }
    }
    return balance;
}
void CWallet::AvailableCoins(std::vector<COutput>& vCoins, bool fOnlySafe, const CCoinControl* coinControl, const CAmount& nMinimumAmount, const CAmount& nMaximumAmount, const CAmount& nMinimumSumAmount, const uint64_t nMaximumCount) const