Follow up from https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/11616.

Here's one I found. These two invariants:

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/7e7127387ba64f57299eaff8656542cea6fb3a2d/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberClassComponent.js#L330-L343

are in a function that's behind a DEV block:

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/7e7127387ba64f57299eaff8656542cea6fb3a2d/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberClassComponent.js#L447-L449

I don't think this is intentional, but need to verify.

There may be more. I'll use this issue to track while https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/11616 preserves existing behavior.
return <div>{context.text}</div>;
      }
      Grandchild.contextTypes = {text: PropTypes.string};
      const Child = props => <Grandchild />;
      const e = await render(
        <PurpleContext>
          <Child />
        </PurpleContext>,
      );
      expect(e.textContent).toBe('purple');
    });
    itRenders('a child context overriding a parent context', async render => {
      const Grandchild = (props, context) => {
        return <div>{context.text}</div>;
      };
      Grandchild.contextTypes = {text: PropTypes.string};
      const e = await render(
        <PurpleContext>
          <RedContext>
            <Grandchild />
          </RedContext>
        </PurpleContext>,
      );
      expect(e.textContent).toBe('red');
    });
    itRenders('a child context merged with a parent context', async render => {
      class Parent extends React.Component {