Would it be completely unreasonable to allow `fundrawtransaction` to use unsafe outputs?

I understand this means the resulting transaction may be invalidated whenever the unsafe output I'm relying one disappears (e.g. because the transaction that produced it was RBF-ed) but in my case that's ok, I'll react to that and re-publish the tree of child transactions accordingly.

But let me know if you think that's too much of a footgun for users, in that case I'll architect my solution differently.
CScriptID id;
                    CRIPEMD160().Write(whash.begin(), whash.size()).Finalize(id.begin());
                    CScript witnessScript;
                    if (provider->GetCScript(id, witnessScript)) {
                        entry.pushKV("witnessScript", HexStr(witnessScript));
                    }
                }
            }
        }
        entry.pushKV("scriptPubKey", HexStr(scriptPubKey));
        entry.pushKV("amount", ValueFromAmount(out.tx->tx->vout[out.i].nValue));
        entry.pushKV("confirmations", out.nDepth);
        entry.pushKV("spendable", out.fSpendable);
        entry.pushKV("solvable", out.fSolvable);
        if (out.fSolvable) {
            std::unique_ptr<SigningProvider> provider = pwallet->GetSolvingProvider(scriptPubKey);
            if (provider) {
                auto descriptor = InferDescriptor(scriptPubKey, *provider);
                entry.pushKV("desc", descriptor->ToString());
            }
        }
        if (avoid_reuse) entry.pushKV("reused", reused);
        entry.pushKV("safe", out.fSafe);
        results.push_back(entry);
    }
    return results;
},
    };
}
void FundTransaction(CWallet& wallet, CMutableTransaction& tx, CAmount& fee_out, int& change_position, const UniValue& options, CCoinControl& coinControl, bool override_min_fee)