The `getaddressesbylabel` API spends a lot more time than the `getaddressesbyaccount` API.

I generated addresses by the `getnewaddress` API, then, I measured time that the `getaddressesby*` API spends. It seems the algorithm of the `getaddressesbylabel` API takes **O(N ^ 2)** time! The results of my survey are as follows.

### getaddressesbylabel

bitcoind v0.17.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 (AWS EC2 t3.large)

#### 11,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbylabel ""
# (omitted)
real    0m1.230s # 1.2s
user    0m0.044s
sys 0m0.048s
```

#### 111,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbylabel ""
# (omitted)
real    1m37.027s # 97.0s
user    0m0.408s
sys 0m0.544s
```

#### 211,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbylabel ""
# (omitted)
real    6m3.727s # 363.7s
user    0m0.800s
sys 0m0.900s
```

### getaddressesbyaccount

bitcoind v0.16.3 on Ubuntu 16.04 (AWS EC2 t3.large)

#### 11,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbyaccount ""
# (omitted)
real    0m0.500s # 0.5s
user    0m0.092s
sys 0m0.160s
```

#### 111,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbyaccount ""
# (omitted)
real    0m1.361s # 1.4s
user    0m0.168s
sys 0m0.348s
```

#### 211,001 addresses

```sh
time sudo /usr/local/bin/bitcoin-cli -conf=/etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf getaddressesbyaccount ""
# (omitted)
real    0m2.220s # 2.2s
user    0m0.384s
sys 0m0.532s
```

{"minimumSumAmount", RPCArg::Type::AMOUNT,  "unlimited", "Minimum sum value of all UTXOs in " + CURRENCY_UNIT + ""},
                        },
                        "query_options"},
                },
                RPCResult{
            "[                   (array of json object)\n"
            "  {\n"
            "    \"txid\" : \"txid\",          (string) the transaction id \n"
            "    \"vout\" : n,               (numeric) the vout value\n"
            "    \"address\" : \"address\",    (string) the bitcoin address\n"
            "    \"label\" : \"label\",        (string) The associated label, or \"\" for the default label\n"
            "    \"scriptPubKey\" : \"key\",   (string) the script key\n"
            "    \"amount\" : x.xxx,         (numeric) the transaction output amount in " + CURRENCY_UNIT + "\n"
            "    \"confirmations\" : n,      (numeric) The number of confirmations\n"
            "    \"redeemScript\" : \"script\" (string) The redeemScript if scriptPubKey is P2SH\n"
            "    \"witnessScript\" : \"script\" (string) witnessScript if the scriptPubKey is P2WSH or P2SH-P2WSH\n"
            "    \"spendable\" : xxx,        (bool) Whether we have the private keys to spend this output\n"
            "    \"solvable\" : xxx,         (bool) Whether we know how to spend this output, ignoring the lack of keys\n"
            "    \"desc\" : xxx,             (string, only when solvable) A descriptor for spending this output\n"
            "    \"safe\" : xxx              (bool) Whether this output is considered safe to spend. Unconfirmed transactions\n"
            "                              from outside keys and unconfirmed replacement transactions are considered unsafe\n"
            "                              and are not eligible for spending by fundrawtransaction and sendtoaddress.\n"
            "  }\n"
            "  ,...\n"
            "]\n"
                },
                RPCExamples{
                    HelpExampleCli("listunspent", "")
            + HelpExampleCli("listunspent", "6 9999999 \"[\\\"1PGFqEzfmQch1gKD3ra4k18PNj3tTUUSqg\\\",\\\"1LtvqCaApEdUGFkpKMM4MstjcaL4dKg8SP\\\"]\"")
            + HelpExampleRpc("listunspent", "6, 9999999 \"[\\\"1PGFqEzfmQch1gKD3ra4k18PNj3tTUUSqg\\\",\\\"1LtvqCaApEdUGFkpKMM4MstjcaL4dKg8SP\\\"]\"")