While fuzzing the RPC interface I stumbled upon a signed integer overflow in `CTxMemPool::PrioritiseTransaction(…)` which is reachable via the following two `prioritisetransaction` RPC calls:

```
$ ./autogen.sh
$ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./configure --with-sanitizers=address,undefined
$ make
$ UBSAN_OPTIONS="print_stacktrace=1" src/bitcoind &
$ src/bitcoin-cli prioritisetransaction cafebabecafebabecafebabecafebabecafebabecafebabecafebabecafebabe 0 -9123456789123456789
$ src/bitcoin-cli prioritisetransaction cafebabecafebabecafebabecafebabecafebabecafebabecafebabecafebabe 0 -9123456789123456789
txmempool.cpp:832:15: runtime error: signed integer overflow: -9123456789123456789 + -9123456789123456789 cannot be represented in type 'long'
    #0 0x5581f3e69c3c in CTxMemPool::PrioritiseTransaction(uint256 const&, long const&) src/txmempool.cpp:832:15
    #1 0x5581f3c93852 in prioritisetransaction()::$_6::operator()(RPCHelpMan const&, JSONRPCRequest const&) const src/rpc/mining.cpp:470:36
…

SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior txmempool.cpp:832:15
```

Nothing high priority of course, but still worth fixing :)
{
        LOCK(cs);
        
        
        if (exists(GenTxid::Txid(txid))) m_unbroadcast_txids.insert(txid);
    };
    
    void RemoveUnbroadcastTx(const uint256& txid, const bool unchecked = false);
    
    std::set<uint256> GetUnbroadcastTxs() const
    {
        LOCK(cs);
        return m_unbroadcast_txids;
    }
    
    bool IsUnbroadcastTx(const uint256& txid) const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs)
    {
        AssertLockHeld(cs);
        return m_unbroadcast_txids.count(txid) != 0;
    }
    
    uint64_t GetAndIncrementSequence() const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs) {
        return m_sequence_number++;
    }
    uint64_t GetSequence() const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs) {