### FEATURE REQUEST

Currently, when a bitcoin node is set up with a connection to both TOR and normal IPv4/6 internet, the 8 outbound-only connection slots, almost always get filled with nodes connecting over IP.
Adding a config option, which would try to ballance these connections based on what kind of network they go through, would be benefficial in many ways:

1. It would add edges between bitcoin network on TOR and normal internet, reducing delays, and the risks associated with an attacker isolating a part of TOR-bitcoin-network from the rest of the world
(Or an ISP/government man-in-the-middling all the normal IP connections)

2. It would help hide/annonymise normal user's transactions from his/her ISP, by mixing them with TOR-outbound ones

3. It would reduce the stress on normal general purpose TOR exit nodes, as users would more likely/reliably connect to TOR-IPv4/6 bitcoin nodes instead of exiting into normal internet first, and then connecting to default IPv4/6-only bitcoin nodes

I understand it is possible to create such bridges already, by forcing connections to TOR-only nodes, or by just running a node with lots of inbound slots, but I think the proposed option, would greatly increase the number of such relays, and remove the need for user to maintain a TOR-node whitelist, by handing this work off to normal bitcoind connection finding algorithm.

This could be implemented as a minimum number of connections for each network, or just a simple evening boolean switch. (Which could be enabled by default for bitcoind installs with TOR connectivity)

In the future, if bitcoin was to support a new network type (for example cjdns/I2P/GNUnet), this option would help establish a presence on the new network faster

bitcoind: 0.15
{
    std::vector<CAddress> addresses = addrman.GetAddr(max_addresses, max_pct);
    if (m_banman) {
        addresses.erase(std::remove_if(addresses.begin(), addresses.end(),
                        [this](const CAddress& addr){return m_banman->IsDiscouraged(addr) || m_banman->IsBanned(addr);}),
                        addresses.end());
    }
    return addresses;
}
std::vector<CAddress> CConnman::GetAddresses(CNode& requestor, size_t max_addresses, size_t max_pct)
{
    auto local_socket_bytes = requestor.addrBind.GetAddrBytes();
    uint64_t cache_id = GetDeterministicRandomizer(RANDOMIZER_ID_ADDRCACHE)
        .Write(requestor.addr.GetNetwork())
        .Write(local_socket_bytes.data(), local_socket_bytes.size())
        .Finalize();
    const auto current_time = GetTime<std::chrono::microseconds>();
    auto r = m_addr_response_caches.emplace(cache_id, CachedAddrResponse{});
    CachedAddrResponse& cache_entry = r.first->second;
    if (cache_entry.m_cache_entry_expiration < current_time) { 
        cache_entry.m_addrs_response_cache = GetAddresses(max_addresses, max_pct);