I think that if a reorg fails due to an error while disconnecting blocks, the node should shut down.

My thought is that if we are trying to switch to a more work chain and something goes wrong before we can even try to validate that more-work chain, then we have a problem that is not related to the chain we're trying to switch to but instead related to our own hardware or software; shutting down and having the user deal with the issue is better than continuing on, when we know there's a more work chain that we're unable to try validating.

This has recently come up on testnet, where unpatched nodes are unable to reorg from the invalid chain containing the duplicate-input-in-a-transaction block, but rather than crash or shutdown they are continuing on the invalid chain, with messages like this in the debug log:

```
ERROR: DisconnectTip(): DisconnectBlock 00000000210004840364b52bc5e455d888f164e4264a4fec06a514b67e9d5722 failed
```
{
    pos.nFile = nFile;
    LOCK(cs_LastBlockFile);
    unsigned int nNewSize;
    pos.nPos = vinfoBlockFile[nFile].nUndoSize;
    nNewSize = vinfoBlockFile[nFile].nUndoSize += nAddSize;
    setDirtyFileInfo.insert(nFile);
    unsigned int nOldChunks = (pos.nPos + UNDOFILE_CHUNK_SIZE - 1) / UNDOFILE_CHUNK_SIZE;
    unsigned int nNewChunks = (nNewSize + UNDOFILE_CHUNK_SIZE - 1) / UNDOFILE_CHUNK_SIZE;
    if (nNewChunks > nOldChunks) {
        if (fPruneMode)
            fCheckForPruning = true;
        if (CheckDiskSpace(nNewChunks * UNDOFILE_CHUNK_SIZE - pos.nPos, true)) {
            FILE *file = OpenUndoFile(pos);
            if (file) {
                LogPrintf("Pre-allocating up to position 0x%x in rev%05u.dat\n", nNewChunks * UNDOFILE_CHUNK_SIZE, pos.nFile);
                AllocateFileRange(file, pos.nPos, nNewChunks * UNDOFILE_CHUNK_SIZE - pos.nPos);
                fclose(file);
            }
        }
        else
            return state.Error("out of disk space");
    }
    return true;
}
static bool CheckBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState& state, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams, bool fCheckPOW = true)