I was messing around with min relay policies and found that under certain circumstances the mempool will accept things, then not relay to any peers.

Example made using wallet:
Transaction of size 6195, fee of 619 satoshis, minrelay of 100 satoshis per kvB. Mempool logic allows it:

```
        // No transactions are allowed below minRelayTxFee except from disconnected blocks
        if (!bypass_limits && nModifiedFees < ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize)) {
            return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "min relay fee not met", false, strprintf("%d < %d", nModifiedFees, ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize)));
        }
```
and lets it into mempool

but in net_processing.cpp:

```
                    if (filterrate && txinfo.feeRate.GetFeePerK() < filterrate) {
                        continue;
                    }
```
this gets hit because the computed feerate is insufficient(printing I added):
```
0.00000099 BTC/kB
```

I'm not super at arithmetic so I'm opening this up in case someone has an easy fix. 

let me also get a reproducible test failure with this...
"       \"UNSET\"\n"
            "       \"ECONOMICAL\"\n"
            "       \"CONSERVATIVE\""},
                },
                 RPCResult{
            "\"txid\"                   (string) The transaction id for the send. Only 1 transaction is created regardless of \n"
            "                                    the number of addresses.\n"
                 },
                RPCExamples{
            "\nSend two amounts to two different addresses:\n"
            + HelpExampleCli("sendmany", "\"\" \"{\\\"1D1ZrZNe3JUo7ZycKEYQQiQAWd9y54F4XX\\\":0.01,\\\"1353tsE8YMTA4EuV7dgUXGjNFf9KpVvKHz\\\":0.02}\"") +
            "\nSend two amounts to two different addresses setting the confirmation and comment:\n"
            + HelpExampleCli("sendmany", "\"\" \"{\\\"1D1ZrZNe3JUo7ZycKEYQQiQAWd9y54F4XX\\\":0.01,\\\"1353tsE8YMTA4EuV7dgUXGjNFf9KpVvKHz\\\":0.02}\" 6 \"testing\"") +
            "\nSend two amounts to two different addresses, subtract fee from amount:\n"
            + HelpExampleCli("sendmany", "\"\" \"{\\\"1D1ZrZNe3JUo7ZycKEYQQiQAWd9y54F4XX\\\":0.01,\\\"1353tsE8YMTA4EuV7dgUXGjNFf9KpVvKHz\\\":0.02}\" 1 \"\" \"[\\\"1D1ZrZNe3JUo7ZycKEYQQiQAWd9y54F4XX\\\",\\\"1353tsE8YMTA4EuV7dgUXGjNFf9KpVvKHz\\\"]\"") +
            "\nAs a JSON-RPC call\n"
            + HelpExampleRpc("sendmany", "\"\", {\"1D1ZrZNe3JUo7ZycKEYQQiQAWd9y54F4XX\":0.01,\"1353tsE8YMTA4EuV7dgUXGjNFf9KpVvKHz\":0.02}, 6, \"testing\"")
                },
    }.Check(request);
    
    
    pwallet->BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain();
    auto locked_chain = pwallet->chain().lock();
    LOCK(pwallet->cs_wallet);
    if (!request.params[0].isNull() && !request.params[0].get_str().empty()) {
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, "Dummy value must be set to \"\"");
    }
    UniValue sendTo = request.params[1].get_obj();
    mapValue_t mapValue;
    if (!request.params[3].isNull() && !request.params[3].get_str().empty())