### Apache Airflow version

2.7.1

### What happened

After upgrading to 2.7.1 from 2.5.3 we encountered those logs in the scheduler logs:

```[2023-09-11T05:52:34.865+0000] {logging_mixin.py:151} INFO - [2023-09-11T05:52:34.865+0000] {security.py:708} INFO - Not syncing DAG-level permissions for DAG 'DAG:<dag_name>' as access control is unset.```

Since we have multiple DAGs for the same DAG file (>40), and the DAG processor is running on a high period, we have a lot of redundant logs, which creates more unnecessary data to store.

Adding the setting `access_control={}` did not change the logs.

We don't want to manage the access control for each DAG, as we have a high-level approach, but we also don't want these logs.


### What you think should happen instead

Add some settings to allow avoid printing this info logs about sync permissions

### How to reproduce

Airflow Version - 2.7.1
Python - 3.11.5

Create a DAg without setting access_control and watch logs. e.g. `XXX/_data/scheduler/2023-09-11/dag_name.py.log`

### Operating System

Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)

### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

_No response_

### Deployment

Docker-Compose

### Deployment details

_No response_

### Anything else

_No response_

### Are you willing to submit PR?

- [ ] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)

"""Create perm-vm if not exist and insert into FAB security model for all-dags."""
        
        for resource_name in self.DAG_RESOURCES:
            for action_name in self.DAG_ACTIONS:
                self._merge_perm(action_name, resource_name)
    def check_authorization(
        self,
        perms: Sequence[tuple[str, str]] | None = None,
        dag_id: str | None = None,
    ) -> bool:
        """Checks that the logged in user has the specified permissions."""
        if not perms:
            return True
        for perm in perms:
            if perm in (
                (permissions.ACTION_CAN_READ, permissions.RESOURCE_DAG),
                (permissions.ACTION_CAN_EDIT, permissions.RESOURCE_DAG),
                (permissions.ACTION_CAN_DELETE, permissions.RESOURCE_DAG),
            ):
                can_access_all_dags = self.has_access(*perm)
                if not can_access_all_dags:
                    action = perm[0]
                    if not self.can_access_some_dags(action, dag_id):
                        return False
            elif not self.has_access(*perm):
                return False
        return True
class FakeAppBuilder: