### Apache Airflow version

2.7.1

### What happened

I start a simple pod (one container and that's it) with the KubernetesPodOperator from the cncf.kubernetes provider.

The task in my container fails (exit code non-zero).
The istio sidecar is indeed terminated but the pod itself remain in an `Error` status even if the `on_finish_action` parameter is set at `"delete_pod"` and the pod is never terminated.

It is expected that the pod is fully deleted, istio or not.

I found that there is a difference in treatment [upon deleting the pod](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/5b85442fdc19947e125dcb0591bd59a53626a27b/airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/operators/pod.py#L824) so it might be some specific case I'm not aware of.

I'll be happy to help either on documentation or fixing this small issue but I would need confirmation on what is the expected behavior.

### What you think should happen instead

I think the `on_finish_action="delete_pod"` should terminate the pod, not let it hanging the `Error` state with both containers stopped.

### How to reproduce

here is the simplest dag on how to reproduce on my end, note that istio is not visible here since managed cluster-wide.

```python3
from airflow import DAG
from airflow.utils.dates import days_ago
from airflow.providers.cncf.kubernetes.operators.kubernetes_pod import (
    KubernetesPodOperator,
)


with DAG(
    dag_id="issue_reproduction",
    schedule_interval=None,
    start_date=days_ago(0),
    is_paused_upon_creation=False,
    max_active_runs=1,
) as dag:
    pod = KubernetesPodOperator(
        task_id="issue_reproduction",
        image="ubuntu",
        cmds=["bash", "-cx"],
        arguments=["exit 1"],
        dag=dag,
        security_context={
            "runAsNonRoot": True,
            "runAsUser": 65534,
            "seccompProfile": {"type": "RuntimeDefault"},
        },
    )
```

### Operating System

local=macos, deployments=k8s

### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes==7.5.0
(Didn't see any fix that should change anything between 7.5.0 and 7.6.0 and the code I pointed to has not changed)

### Deployment

Official Apache Airflow Helm Chart

### Deployment details

k8s version: v1.26.3

### Anything else

The issue should be 100% reproductible provided I didn't miss any specifics.

### Are you willing to submit PR?

- [X] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)

if self.do_xcom_push:
            self.log.debug("Adding xcom sidecar to task %s", self.task_id)
            pod = xcom_sidecar.add_xcom_sidecar(
                pod,
                sidecar_container_image=self.hook.get_xcom_sidecar_container_image(),
                sidecar_container_resources=self.hook.get_xcom_sidecar_container_resources(),
            )
        labels = self._get_ti_pod_labels(context)
        self.log.info("Building pod %s with labels: %s", pod.metadata.name, labels)
        
        pod.metadata.labels.update(labels)
        
        
        pod.metadata.labels.update(
            {
                "airflow_version": airflow_version.replace("+", "-"),
                "airflow_kpo_in_cluster": str(self.hook.is_in_cluster),
            }
        )
        pod_mutation_hook(pod)
        return pod
    def dry_run(self) -> None:
        """
        Prints out the pod definition that would be created by this operator.
        Does not include labels specific to the task instance (since there isn't
        one in a dry_run) and excludes all empty elements.
        """
        pod = self.build_pod_request_obj()
        print(yaml.dump(prune_dict(pod.to_dict(), mode="strict")))
class _optionally_suppress(AbstractContextManager):