### Is there an existing issue for this?

- [X] I have searched the existing issues

### Enhancement description

Hi, can we add the new lambda docker repos to  [the list](https://github.com/localstack/localstack/blob/800c54e29231caf5fcd78d5be52a55cb1fe4f453/localstack/utils/diagnose.py#L16)?

It seems like we are missing the new nodejs16/18, python 3.9/3.10, java 17, dotnet6 and the new repository. `public.ecr.aws/`.

Current list:
```
 "docker-dependent-image-hashes": {
        "localstack/lambda:provided": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:ruby2.7": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:nodejs14.x": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:nodejs12.x": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:java8": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:java11": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:go1.x": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:dotnetcore3.1": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:python2.7": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:python3.6": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:python3.7": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:python3.8": "not_present",
        "localstack/bigdata": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:provided": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:ruby2.7": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:nodejs14.x": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:nodejs12.x": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:java8": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:java11": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:go1.x": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:dotnetcore3.1": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:dotnetcore2.1": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:dotnetcore2.0": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:python2.7": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:python3.6": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:python3.7": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:python3.8": "not_present",
        "mongo": "not_present"
    },
```

### 🧑‍💻 Implementation

_No response_

### Anything else?

_No response_
snapshot.match("put_reserved", put_reserved)
        with pytest.raises(aws_client.awslambda.exceptions.TooManyRequestsException) as e:
            aws_client.awslambda.invoke(FunctionName=fn_arn, InvocationType="RequestResponse")
        snapshot.match("exc_no_cap_requestresponse", e.value.response)
        queue_name = f"test-queue-{short_uid()}"
        queue_url = sqs_create_queue(QueueName=queue_name)
        queue_arn = aws_client.sqs.get_queue_attributes(
            QueueUrl=queue_url, AttributeNames=["QueueArn"]
        )["Attributes"]["QueueArn"]
        put_event_invoke_conf = aws_client.awslambda.put_function_event_invoke_config(
            FunctionName=func_name,
            MaximumRetryAttempts=0,
            DestinationConfig={"OnFailure": {"Destination": queue_arn}},
        )
        snapshot.match("put_event_invoke_conf", put_event_invoke_conf)
        time.sleep(3)  # just to be sure
        invoke_result = aws_client.awslambda.invoke(FunctionName=fn_arn, InvocationType="Event")
        snapshot.match("invoke_result", invoke_result)
        def get_msg_from_queue():
            msgs = aws_client.sqs.receive_message(
                QueueUrl=queue_url, AttributeNames=["All"], WaitTimeSeconds=5
            )
            return msgs["Messages"][0]
        msg = retry(get_msg_from_queue, retries=10, sleep=2)
        snapshot.match("msg", msg)
    @markers.parity.aws_validated
    def test_reserved_provisioned_overlap(self, create_lambda_function, snapshot, aws_client):
        func_name = f"test_lambda_{short_uid()}"
        create_lambda_function(
            func_name=func_name,