### Is there an existing issue for this?

- [X] I have searched the existing issues

### Enhancement description

Hi, can we add the new lambda docker repos to  [the list](https://github.com/localstack/localstack/blob/800c54e29231caf5fcd78d5be52a55cb1fe4f453/localstack/utils/diagnose.py#L16)?

It seems like we are missing the new nodejs16/18, python 3.9/3.10, java 17, dotnet6 and the new repository. `public.ecr.aws/`.

Current list:
```
 "docker-dependent-image-hashes": {
        "localstack/lambda:provided": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:ruby2.7": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:nodejs14.x": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:nodejs12.x": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:java8": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:java11": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:go1.x": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:dotnetcore3.1": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:python2.7": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:python3.6": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:python3.7": "not_present",
        "localstack/lambda:python3.8": "not_present",
        "localstack/bigdata": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:provided": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:ruby2.7": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:nodejs14.x": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:nodejs12.x": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:java8": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:java11": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:go1.x": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:dotnetcore3.1": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:dotnetcore2.1": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:dotnetcore2.0": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:python2.7": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:python3.6": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:python3.7": "not_present",
        "lambci/lambda:python3.8": "not_present",
        "mongo": "not_present"
    },
```

### 🧑‍💻 Implementation

_No response_

### Anything else?

_No response_
return {
                "AccessKeyId": env["AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID"],
                "SecretAccessKey": env["AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY"],
                "SessionToken": env["AWS_SESSION_TOKEN"],
            }
        def _assert_invocations():
            with ThreadPoolExecutor(2) as executor:
                results = list(executor.map(_invoke_lambda, range(2)))
            assert len(results) == 2
            assert (
                results[0]["AWS_LAMBDA_LOG_STREAM_NAME"] != results[1]["AWS_LAMBDA_LOG_STREAM_NAME"]
            ), "Environments identical for both invocations"
            
            assert (
                results[0]["AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID"] != results[1]["AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID"]
            ), "Access Key IDs have to differ"
            assert (
                results[0]["AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY"] != results[1]["AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY"]
            ), "Secret Access keys have to differ"
            assert (
                results[0]["AWS_SESSION_TOKEN"] != results[1]["AWS_SESSION_TOKEN"]
            ), "Session tokens have to differ"
            
            
            keys_1 = _transform_to_key_dict(results[0])
            keys_2 = _transform_to_key_dict(results[1])