**Description**


It would be great if the metrics we publish in Airflow change to include TAGs for "variable" parts of those (such as dag_id, task_id, pool name) rather than being part of the metrics.

See here: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/1.10.12/metrics.html, https://airflow.readthedocs.io/en/latest/logging-monitoring/metrics.html  - those variable parts should be tags.

We might consider to change those metrics by default in 2.0 and possibly introduce a backport in 1.10.13 to allow people to migrate.


**Use case / motivation**

Having the variable parts of the metrics makes it really difficult to aggregate the metrics. Seems that statsd python library does not support tags, but there are possible solutions by installing extensions:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49852654/sending-statsd-metrics-with-tags-from-python-client

**Related Issues**

<!-- Is there currently another issue associated with this? -->

"""
        This function is where the main scheduling decisions take places.
        It:
        - Creates any necessary DAG runs by examining the next_dagrun_create_after column of DagModel
          Since creating Dag Runs is a relatively time consuming process, we select only 10 dags by default
          (configurable via ``scheduler.max_dagruns_to_create_per_loop`` setting) - putting this higher will
          mean one scheduler could spend a chunk of time creating dag runs, and not ever get around to
          scheduling tasks.
        - Finds the "next n oldest" running DAG Runs to examine for scheduling (n=20 by default, configurable
          via ``scheduler.max_dagruns_per_loop_to_schedule`` config setting) and tries to progress state (TIs
          to SCHEDULED, or DagRuns to SUCCESS/FAILURE etc)
          By "next oldest", we mean hasn't been examined/scheduled in the most time.
          We don't select all dagruns at once, because the rows are selected with row locks, meaning
          that only one scheduler can "process them", even it is waiting behind other dags. Increasing this
          limit will allow more throughput for smaller DAGs but will likely slow down throughput for larger
          (>500 tasks.) DAGs
        - Then, via a Critical Section (locking the rows of the Pool model) we queue tasks, and then send them
          to the executor.
          See docs of _critical_section_enqueue_task_instances for more.
        :return: Number of TIs enqueued in this iteration
        """
        
        with prohibit_commit(session) as guard:
            if settings.USE_JOB_SCHEDULE:
                self._create_dagruns_for_dags(guard, session)
            self._start_queued_dagruns(session)
            guard.commit()
            dag_runs = self._get_next_dagruns_to_examine(DagRunState.RUNNING, session)