### Apache Airflow version

2.7.1

### What happened

After upgrading to 2.7.1 from 2.5.3 we encountered those logs in the scheduler logs:

```[2023-09-11T05:52:34.865+0000] {logging_mixin.py:151} INFO - [2023-09-11T05:52:34.865+0000] {security.py:708} INFO - Not syncing DAG-level permissions for DAG 'DAG:<dag_name>' as access control is unset.```

Since we have multiple DAGs for the same DAG file (>40), and the DAG processor is running on a high period, we have a lot of redundant logs, which creates more unnecessary data to store.

Adding the setting `access_control={}` did not change the logs.

We don't want to manage the access control for each DAG, as we have a high-level approach, but we also don't want these logs.


### What you think should happen instead

Add some settings to allow avoid printing this info logs about sync permissions

### How to reproduce

Airflow Version - 2.7.1
Python - 3.11.5

Create a DAg without setting access_control and watch logs. e.g. `XXX/_data/scheduler/2023-09-11/dag_name.py.log`

### Operating System

Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)

### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

_No response_

### Deployment

Docker-Compose

### Deployment details

_No response_

### Anything else

_No response_

### Are you willing to submit PR?

- [ ] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)

)
                .where(User.id == user.id)
            )
            roles = user_query.roles
        resources = set()
        for role in roles:
            for permission in role.permissions:
                action = permission.action.name
                if action in user_actions:
                    resource = permission.resource.name
                    if resource == permissions.RESOURCE_DAG:
                        return {dag.dag_id for dag in session.execute(select(DagModel.dag_id))}
                    if resource.startswith(permissions.RESOURCE_DAG_PREFIX):
                        resources.add(resource[len(permissions.RESOURCE_DAG_PREFIX) :])
                    else:
                        resources.add(resource)
        return {
            dag.dag_id
            for dag in session.execute(select(DagModel.dag_id).where(DagModel.dag_id.in_(resources)))
        }
    def can_access_some_dags(self, action: str, dag_id: str | None = None) -> bool:
        """Checks if user has read or write access to some dags."""
        if dag_id and dag_id != "~":
            root_dag_id = self._get_root_dag_id(dag_id)
            return self.has_access(action, permissions.resource_name_for_dag(root_dag_id))
        user = g.user
        if action == permissions.ACTION_CAN_READ:
            return any(self.get_readable_dag_ids(user))
        return any(self.get_editable_dag_ids(user))
    def can_read_dag(self, dag_id: str, user=None) -> bool: