### Apache Airflow version

2.7.1

### What happened

After upgrading to 2.7.1 from 2.5.3 we encountered those logs in the scheduler logs:

```[2023-09-11T05:52:34.865+0000] {logging_mixin.py:151} INFO - [2023-09-11T05:52:34.865+0000] {security.py:708} INFO - Not syncing DAG-level permissions for DAG 'DAG:<dag_name>' as access control is unset.```

Since we have multiple DAGs for the same DAG file (>40), and the DAG processor is running on a high period, we have a lot of redundant logs, which creates more unnecessary data to store.

Adding the setting `access_control={}` did not change the logs.

We don't want to manage the access control for each DAG, as we have a high-level approach, but we also don't want these logs.


### What you think should happen instead

Add some settings to allow avoid printing this info logs about sync permissions

### How to reproduce

Airflow Version - 2.7.1
Python - 3.11.5

Create a DAg without setting access_control and watch logs. e.g. `XXX/_data/scheduler/2023-09-11/dag_name.py.log`

### Operating System

Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)

### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

_No response_

### Deployment

Docker-Compose

### Deployment details

_No response_

### Anything else

_No response_

### Are you willing to submit PR?

- [ ] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)

self,
        dag_id: str,
        access_control: dict[str, Collection[str]] | None = None,
    ) -> None:
        """
        Sync permissions for given dag id.
        The dag id surely exists in our dag bag as only / refresh button or DagBag will call this function.
        :param dag_id: the ID of the DAG whose permissions should be updated
        :param access_control: a dict where each key is a rolename and
            each value is a set() of action names (e.g.,
            {'can_read'}
        :return:
        """
        dag_resource_name = permissions.resource_name_for_dag(dag_id)
        for dag_action_name in self.DAG_ACTIONS:
            self.create_permission(dag_action_name, dag_resource_name)
        if access_control is not None:
            self.log.info("Syncing DAG-level permissions for DAG '%s'", dag_resource_name)
            self._sync_dag_view_permissions(dag_resource_name, access_control)
        else:
            self.log.info(
                "Not syncing DAG-level permissions for DAG '%s' as access control is unset.",
                dag_resource_name,
            )
    def _sync_dag_view_permissions(self, dag_id: str, access_control: dict[str, Collection[str]]) -> None: