### Apache Airflow version

2.7.1

### What happened

After upgrading to 2.7.1 from 2.5.3 we encountered those logs in the scheduler logs:

```[2023-09-11T05:52:34.865+0000] {logging_mixin.py:151} INFO - [2023-09-11T05:52:34.865+0000] {security.py:708} INFO - Not syncing DAG-level permissions for DAG 'DAG:<dag_name>' as access control is unset.```

Since we have multiple DAGs for the same DAG file (>40), and the DAG processor is running on a high period, we have a lot of redundant logs, which creates more unnecessary data to store.

Adding the setting `access_control={}` did not change the logs.

We don't want to manage the access control for each DAG, as we have a high-level approach, but we also don't want these logs.


### What you think should happen instead

Add some settings to allow avoid printing this info logs about sync permissions

### How to reproduce

Airflow Version - 2.7.1
Python - 3.11.5

Create a DAg without setting access_control and watch logs. e.g. `XXX/_data/scheduler/2023-09-11/dag_name.py.log`

### Operating System

Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)

### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

_No response_

### Deployment

Docker-Compose

### Deployment details

_No response_

### Anything else

_No response_

### Are you willing to submit PR?

- [ ] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)

"""Determines if a resource belongs to a DAG or all DAGs."""
        if resource_name == permissions.RESOURCE_DAG:
            return True
        return resource_name.startswith(permissions.RESOURCE_DAG_PREFIX)
    def has_access(self, action_name: str, resource_name: str, user=None) -> bool:
        """
        Verify whether a given user could perform a certain action on the given resource.
        Example actions might include can_read, can_write, can_delete, etc.
        :param action_name: action_name on resource (e.g can_read, can_edit).
        :param resource_name: name of view-menu or resource.
        :param user: user name
        :return: Whether user could perform certain action on the resource.
        :rtype bool
        """
        if not user:
            user = g.user
        if (action_name, resource_name) in user.perms:
            return True
        if self.is_dag_resource(resource_name):
            if (action_name, permissions.RESOURCE_DAG) in user.perms:
                return True
            return (action_name, resource_name) in user.perms
        return False
    def _has_role(self, role_name_or_list: Container, user) -> bool: