### Apache Airflow Provider(s)

amazon

### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers



apache-airflow-providers-amazon | 2.4.0

### Apache Airflow version

2.2.3 (latest released)

### Operating System

Amazon Linux 2

### Deployment

MWAA

### Deployment details

_No response_

### What happened

Sagemaker Processing Operator no longer honors the `action_if_job_exists` param and always fails creation of a new processing job is a job with the name already exists. 

This happens because in a recent change, the function responsible for executing the job no longer honors the increment setting:

Change that breaks the increment: https://github.com/apache/airflow/commit/96dd70348ad7e31cfeae6d21af70671b41551fe9

New code: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/6734eb1d09a99dc519e89a59e2086cef09a87098/airflow/providers/amazon/aws/operators/sagemaker.py#L167

  

### What you expected to happen

When Sagemaker Processing operator is called with a job-name that already exists, the job creation should succeed with a name that is incremented by 1.   

### How to reproduce

invoke SageMakerProcessingOperator twice with the same job name while keeping action_if_job_exists as 'increment'.   

### Anything else

_No response_

### Are you willing to submit PR?

- [X] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)

sagemaker = SageMakerProcessingOperator(
            **self.processing_config_kwargs, config=CREATE_PROCESSING_PARAMS_WITH_STOPPING_CONDITION
        )
        sagemaker.execute(None)
        mock_processing.assert_called_once_with(
            CREATE_PROCESSING_PARAMS_WITH_STOPPING_CONDITION,
            wait_for_completion=False,
            check_interval=5,
            max_ingestion_time=None,
        )
    @mock.patch.object(SageMakerHook, "get_conn")
    @mock.patch.object(
        SageMakerHook,
        "create_processing_job",
        return_value={"ProcessingJobArn": "test_arn", "ResponseMetadata": {"HTTPStatusCode": 404}},
    )
    def test_execute_with_failure(self, mock_processing, mock_client):
        sagemaker = SageMakerProcessingOperator(
            **self.processing_config_kwargs, config=CREATE_PROCESSING_PARAMS
        )
        with pytest.raises(AirflowException):
            sagemaker.execute(None)
    @unittest.skip("Currently, the auto-increment jobname functionality is not missing.")
    @mock.patch.object(SageMakerHook, "get_conn")
    @mock.patch.object(SageMakerHook, "find_processing_job_by_name", return_value=True)
    @mock.patch.object(
        SageMakerHook, "create_processing_job", return_value={"ResponseMetadata": {"HTTPStatusCode": 200}}
    )
    def test_execute_with_existing_job_increment(