### Is there an existing issue for this?

- [X] I have searched the existing issues

### Current Behavior

I am receiving a ResourceNotFoundException when attempting to run a BatchGetItem operation on a table that exists.  Downgrading to `0.14.2` fixes the issue and I was not receiving this issue on Friday when running the `latest` container.  I am able to run `scan` and `query` requests successfully on these tables.

### Expected Behavior

BatchGetItem should work on tables that exist

### How are you starting LocalStack?

With a `docker run` command

### Steps To Reproduce

#### How are you starting localstack (e.g., `bin/localstack` command, arguments, or `docker-compose.yml`)

    docker run localstack/localstack

#### Client commands (e.g., AWS SDK code snippet, or sequence of "awslocal" commands)

- `awslocal dynamodb create-table --table-name test-table --attribute-definitions AttributeName=PK,AttributeType=S --key-schema AttributeName=PK,KeyType=HASH --provisioned-throughput ReadCapacityUnits=1,WriteCapacityUnits=1`
- `awslocal dynamodb list-tables`
```
{
    "TableNames": [
        "test-table"
    ]
}
```
- `awslocal dynamodb batch-get-item --request-items '{ "test-table": { "Keys": [{ "PK": {"S": "test-key"} }] } }'`
```
An error occurred (ResourceNotFoundException) when calling the BatchGetItem operation: Cannot do operations on a non-existent table
```

### Environment

```markdown
- OS: 
- LocalStack: latest
```


### Anything else?

_No response_
table_name = table_arn.split("/", 1)[-1]
    table_definitions = DynamoDBRegion.get().table_definitions
    if not result and table_definitions.get(table_name):
        if table_definitions[table_name].get("KinesisDataStreamDestinationStatus") == "ACTIVE":
            result = True
    cache[table_arn] = result
    return result
def get_updated_records(table_name: str, existing_items: List) -> List:
    """
    Determine the list of record updates, to be sent to a DDB stream after a PartiQL update operation.
    Note: This is currently a fairly expensive operation, as we need to retrieve the list of all items
          from the table, and compare the items to the previously available. This is a limitation as
          we're currently using the DynamoDB Local backend as a blackbox. In future, we should consider hooking
          into the PartiQL query execution inside DynamoDB Local and directly extract the list of updated items.
    """
    result = []
    stream_spec = dynamodb_get_table_stream_specification(table_name=table_name)
    key_schema = SchemaExtractor.get_key_schema(table_name)
    before = ItemSet(existing_items, key_schema=key_schema)
    after = ItemSet(ItemFinder.get_all_table_items(table_name), key_schema=key_schema)
    def _add_record(item, comparison_set: ItemSet):
        matching_item = comparison_set.find_item(item)
        if matching_item == item:
            return
        
        if comparison_set == after:
            if matching_item: