**Describe what's wrong**

After Moving to 21.11, [ReplacingMergeTree-style Materialized view](https://github.com/tiniumv/clickhouse_bug/blob/main/migrations/add_view.sql) which is getting data from [two other views](https://github.com/tiniumv/clickhouse_bug/blob/main/migrations/basic.sql) based on kafka topics stopped to receive any data.

Same requst ```select * from causing_problems_mv;```
on 21.10
```
┌─field_a─┬─field_b─┬─field_c─┬──max_field_datetime─┐
│ 1       │ type_a  │       1 │ 2021-12-01 14:00:00 │
│ 2       │ type_a  │       2 │ 2021-12-01 13:00:00 │
└─────────┴─────────┴─────────┴─────────────────────┘
```
and on 21.11
```
0 rows in set. Elapsed: 0.002 sec.
```

Moreover, one of the source view (the one from left part of ```LEFT JOIN``` expression) went broken too. That was isolated - I tried to not create final view under 21.11, and it resulted in basic views working normally.

**Does it reproduce on recent release?**

Yes.

**How to reproduce**

Repository with everything needed to replicate bug: https://github.com/tiniumv/clickhouse_bug . There are two branches, main (with 21.10 CH) and 21.11

**Expected behavior**

I was expecting result of provided queries to be identical independently from ClickHouse version.

**Error message and/or stacktrace**

[I have collected all logs](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tiniumv/clickhouse_bug/21.11/logs/clickhouse-server.err.log)
it says that ```Column `field_a` is not under aggregate function and not in GROUP BY: While processing field_a, field_b, argMax(field_c, field_datetime) AS field_c, max(field_datetime) AS max_field_datetime.```, but it clearly is

**Additional context**

While request ```select * from table_ii;``` returns nothing, ```select * from table_ii_queue;``` spits out all lost messages

const TablesWithColumns & tables, const Aliases & aliases, ContextPtr context)
{
    assert(tables.size() >= 2);
    if (table_join.using_expression_list)
    {
        const auto & keys = table_join.using_expression_list->as<ASTExpressionList &>();
        analyzed_join.addDisjunct();
        for (const auto & key : keys.children)
            analyzed_join.addUsingKey(key);
    }
    else if (table_join.on_expression)
    {
        bool is_asof = (table_join.strictness == ASTTableJoin::Strictness::Asof);
        CollectJoinOnKeysVisitor::Data data{analyzed_join, tables[0], tables[1], aliases, is_asof};
        if (auto * or_func = table_join.on_expression->as<ASTFunction>(); or_func && or_func->name == "or")
        {
            for (auto & disjunct : or_func->arguments->children)
            {
                analyzed_join.addDisjunct();
                CollectJoinOnKeysVisitor(data).visit(disjunct);
            }
            assert(analyzed_join.getClauses().size() == or_func->arguments->children.size());
        }
        else
        {
            analyzed_join.addDisjunct();
            CollectJoinOnKeysVisitor(data).visit(table_join.on_expression);
            assert(analyzed_join.oneDisjunct());
        }