**Describe what's wrong**

Wrong table name in logs after table `RENAME`


**Does it reproduce on recent release?**

Yes.
**How to reproduce**
22.6

```
CREATE TABLE table_test_a
(
    `key` UInt32
)
ENGINE = MergeTree
ORDER BY key;

INSERT INTO table_test_a SELECT *
FROM numbers(1000);

RENAME TABLE table_test_a TO table_test_b;

SELECT *
FROM table_test_b
FORMAT `Null`;


[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370192 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> executeQuery: (from 127.0.0.1:58484) SELECT * FROM table_test_b FORMAT Null; (stage: Complete)
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370599 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> ContextAccess (default): Access granted: SELECT(key) ON test.table_test_b
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370665 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> ContextAccess (default): Access granted: SELECT(key) ON test.table_test_b
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370714 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> InterpreterSelectQuery: FetchColumns -> Complete
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370783 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> test.table_test_a (SelectExecutor): Key condition: unknown
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370817 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> test.table_test_a (SelectExecutor): Selected 1/1 parts by partition key, 1 parts by primary key, 1/1 marks by primary key, 1 marks to read from 1 ranges
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370847 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> MergeTreeInOrderSelectProcessor: Reading 1 ranges in order from part all_1_1_0, approx. 1000 rows starting from 0
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.371812 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Information> executeQuery: Read 1000 rows, 3.91 KiB in 0.0015354 sec., 651296 rows/sec., 2.48 MiB/sec.
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.371956 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> MemoryTracker: Peak memory usage (for query): 45.10 KiB.
```
**Expected behavior**

Correct table name in logs


**Additional context**

Interesting, does it affect grants and etc (looks like no, in ContextAccess log it's using correct table name )

if (!part->minmax_idx->initialized)
            throw Exception("Found a non-empty part with uninitialized minmax_idx. It's a bug", ErrorCodes::LOGICAL_ERROR);
        filter_column_data.emplace_back();
        if (max_block_numbers_to_read)
        {
            auto blocks_iterator = max_block_numbers_to_read->find(part->info.partition_id);
            if (blocks_iterator == max_block_numbers_to_read->end() || part->info.max_block > blocks_iterator->second)
                continue;
        }
        if (minmax_idx_condition
            && !minmax_idx_condition->checkInHyperrectangle(part->minmax_idx->hyperrectangle, minmax_columns_types).can_be_true)
            continue;
        if (partition_pruner)
        {
            if (partition_pruner->canBePruned(*part))
                continue;
        }
        if (need_primary_key_max_column && !part->index_granularity.hasFinalMark())
        {
            normal_parts.push_back(part);
            continue;
        }
        real_parts.push_back(part);
        filter_column_data.back() = 1;
    }
    if (real_parts.empty())
        return {};
    FilterDescription filter(*filter_column);
    for (size_t i = 0; i < virtual_columns_block.columns(); ++i)
    {