**Describe what's wrong**

Wrong table name in logs after table `RENAME`


**Does it reproduce on recent release?**

Yes.
**How to reproduce**
22.6

```
CREATE TABLE table_test_a
(
    `key` UInt32
)
ENGINE = MergeTree
ORDER BY key;

INSERT INTO table_test_a SELECT *
FROM numbers(1000);

RENAME TABLE table_test_a TO table_test_b;

SELECT *
FROM table_test_b
FORMAT `Null`;


[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370192 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> executeQuery: (from 127.0.0.1:58484) SELECT * FROM table_test_b FORMAT Null; (stage: Complete)
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370599 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> ContextAccess (default): Access granted: SELECT(key) ON test.table_test_b
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370665 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> ContextAccess (default): Access granted: SELECT(key) ON test.table_test_b
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370714 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> InterpreterSelectQuery: FetchColumns -> Complete
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370783 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> test.table_test_a (SelectExecutor): Key condition: unknown
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370817 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> test.table_test_a (SelectExecutor): Selected 1/1 parts by partition key, 1 parts by primary key, 1/1 marks by primary key, 1 marks to read from 1 ranges
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370847 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> MergeTreeInOrderSelectProcessor: Reading 1 ranges in order from part all_1_1_0, approx. 1000 rows starting from 0
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.371812 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Information> executeQuery: Read 1000 rows, 3.91 KiB in 0.0015354 sec., 651296 rows/sec., 2.48 MiB/sec.
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.371956 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> MemoryTracker: Peak memory usage (for query): 45.10 KiB.
```
**Expected behavior**

Correct table name in logs


**Additional context**

Interesting, does it affect grants and etc (looks like no, in ContextAccess log it's using correct table name )

have_parts_with_version_metadata = true;
        }
        else
        {
            ++iter;
            continue;
        }
        
        bool version_updated = false;
        chassert(!version.creation_tid.isEmpty());
        if (!part->version.creation_csn)
        {
            auto min = TransactionLog::getCSN(version.creation_tid);
            if (!min)
            {
                
                TransactionLog::assertTIDIsNotOutdated(version.creation_tid);
                min = Tx::RolledBackCSN;
            }
            LOG_TRACE(log, "Will fix version metadata of {} after unclean restart: part has creation_tid={}, setting creation_csn={}",
                      part->name, version.creation_tid, min);
            version.creation_csn = min;
            version_updated = true;
        }
        if (!version.removal_tid.isEmpty() && !part->version.removal_csn)
        {
            auto max = TransactionLog::getCSN(version.removal_tid);
            if (max)
            {
                LOG_TRACE(log, "Will fix version metadata of {} after unclean restart: part has removal_tid={}, setting removal_csn={}",