**Describe what's wrong**
INTERPOLATE doesn't work for tables with ENGINE = MergeTree

**Does it reproduce on recent release?**
yes

**How to reproduce**
```
CREATE TABLE t1 (n Int32) ENGINE = MergeTree ORDER BY n;
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1),(3),(3),(6),(6),(6);

SELECT
    n,
    count() AS m
FROM t1
GROUP BY n
ORDER BY n ASC WITH FILL
INTERPOLATE ( m AS m + 1 );

Received exception from server (version 22.5.1):
Code: 47. DB::Exception: Received from localhost:9000. DB::Exception: Missing columns: 'm' while processing query: 'SELECT n, count() FROM t1 GROUP BY n ORDER BY n ASC WITH FILL INTERPOLATE ( m AS m + 1 )', required columns: 'n' 'm', maybe you meant: ['n','n']. (UNKNOWN_IDENTIFIER)
```

**Expected behavior**
same as
```
CREATE TABLE t1 (n Int32) ENGINE = Memory;
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1),(3),(3),(6),(6),(6);

SELECT
    n,
    count() AS m
FROM t1
GROUP BY n
ORDER BY n ASC WITH FILL
INTERPOLATE ( m AS m + 1 );

┌─n─┬─m─┐
│ 1 │ 1 │
│ 2 │ 2 │
│ 3 │ 2 │
│ 4 │ 3 │
│ 5 │ 4 │
│ 6 │ 3 │
└───┴───┘
```

**Error message and/or stacktrace**
```
Received exception from server (version 22.5.1):
Code: 47. DB::Exception: Received from localhost:9000. DB::Exception: Missing columns: 'm' while processing query: 'SELECT n, count() FROM t1 GROUP BY n ORDER BY n ASC WITH FILL INTERPOLATE ( m AS m + 1 )', required columns: 'n' 'm', maybe you meant: ['n','n']. (UNKNOWN_IDENTIFIER)
```

**Additional context**
INTERPOLATE is a new feature added in #35349
if (DataPartPtr existing_part_in_partition = getAnyPartInPartition(part->info.partition_id, lock))
    {
        if (part->partition.value != existing_part_in_partition->partition.value)
            throw Exception(
                "Partition value mismatch between two parts with the same partition ID. Existing part: "
                + existing_part_in_partition->name + ", newly added part: " + part->name,
                ErrorCodes::CORRUPTED_DATA);
    }
    /** It is important that obtaining new block number and adding that block to parts set is done atomically.
      * Otherwise there is race condition - merge of blocks could happen in interval that doesn't yet contain new part.
      */
    if (increment)
    {
        part_info.min_block = part_info.max_block = increment->get();
        part_info.mutation = 0; 
        part_name = part->getNewName(part_info);
    }
    else 
        part_name = part->name;
    LOG_TRACE(log, "Renaming temporary part {} to {}.", part->relative_path, part_name);
    if (auto it_duplicate = data_parts_by_info.find(part_info); it_duplicate != data_parts_by_info.end())
    {
        String message = "Part " + (*it_duplicate)->getNameWithState() + " already exists";
        if ((*it_duplicate)->checkState({DataPartState::Outdated, DataPartState::Deleting}))
            throw Exception(message + ", but it will be deleted soon", ErrorCodes::PART_IS_TEMPORARILY_LOCKED);
        throw Exception(message, ErrorCodes::DUPLICATE_DATA_PART);
    }
    DataPartPtr covering_part;
    DataPartsVector covered_parts = getActivePartsToReplace(part_info, part_name, covering_part, lock);
    if (covering_part)