**Describe what's wrong**

Wrong table name in logs after table `RENAME`


**Does it reproduce on recent release?**

Yes.
**How to reproduce**
22.6

```
CREATE TABLE table_test_a
(
    `key` UInt32
)
ENGINE = MergeTree
ORDER BY key;

INSERT INTO table_test_a SELECT *
FROM numbers(1000);

RENAME TABLE table_test_a TO table_test_b;

SELECT *
FROM table_test_b
FORMAT `Null`;


[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370192 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> executeQuery: (from 127.0.0.1:58484) SELECT * FROM table_test_b FORMAT Null; (stage: Complete)
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370599 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> ContextAccess (default): Access granted: SELECT(key) ON test.table_test_b
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370665 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> ContextAccess (default): Access granted: SELECT(key) ON test.table_test_b
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370714 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> InterpreterSelectQuery: FetchColumns -> Complete
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370783 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> test.table_test_a (SelectExecutor): Key condition: unknown
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370817 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> test.table_test_a (SelectExecutor): Selected 1/1 parts by partition key, 1 parts by primary key, 1/1 marks by primary key, 1 marks to read from 1 ranges
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370847 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> MergeTreeInOrderSelectProcessor: Reading 1 ranges in order from part all_1_1_0, approx. 1000 rows starting from 0
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.371812 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Information> executeQuery: Read 1000 rows, 3.91 KiB in 0.0015354 sec., 651296 rows/sec., 2.48 MiB/sec.
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.371956 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> MemoryTracker: Peak memory usage (for query): 45.10 KiB.
```
**Expected behavior**

Correct table name in logs


**Additional context**

Interesting, does it affect grants and etc (looks like no, in ContextAccess log it's using correct table name )

{
    if (metadata.sampling_key.column_names.empty())
        throw Exception("There are no columns in sampling expression", ErrorCodes::INCORRECT_QUERY);
    const auto & pk_sample_block = metadata.getPrimaryKey().sample_block;
    if (!pk_sample_block.has(metadata.sampling_key.column_names[0]) && !allow_sampling_expression_not_in_primary_key)
        throw Exception("Sampling expression must be present in the primary key", ErrorCodes::BAD_ARGUMENTS);
    if (!check_sample_column_is_correct)
        return;
    const auto & sampling_key = metadata.getSamplingKey();
    DataTypePtr sampling_column_type = sampling_key.data_types[0];
    bool is_correct_sample_condition = false;
    if (sampling_key.data_types.size() == 1)
    {
        if (typeid_cast<const DataTypeUInt64 *>(sampling_column_type.get()))
            is_correct_sample_condition = true;
        else if (typeid_cast<const DataTypeUInt32 *>(sampling_column_type.get()))
            is_correct_sample_condition = true;
        else if (typeid_cast<const DataTypeUInt16 *>(sampling_column_type.get()))
            is_correct_sample_condition = true;
        else if (typeid_cast<const DataTypeUInt8 *>(sampling_column_type.get()))
            is_correct_sample_condition = true;
    }
    if (!is_correct_sample_condition)
        throw Exception(
            "Invalid sampling column type in storage parameters: " + sampling_column_type->getName()
            + ". Must be one unsigned integer type",
            ErrorCodes::ILLEGAL_TYPE_OF_COLUMN_FOR_FILTER);
}
inline UInt64 time_in_microseconds(std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock> timepoint)