**Describe what's wrong**

Wrong table name in logs after table `RENAME`


**Does it reproduce on recent release?**

Yes.
**How to reproduce**
22.6

```
CREATE TABLE table_test_a
(
    `key` UInt32
)
ENGINE = MergeTree
ORDER BY key;

INSERT INTO table_test_a SELECT *
FROM numbers(1000);

RENAME TABLE table_test_a TO table_test_b;

SELECT *
FROM table_test_b
FORMAT `Null`;


[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370192 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> executeQuery: (from 127.0.0.1:58484) SELECT * FROM table_test_b FORMAT Null; (stage: Complete)
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370599 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> ContextAccess (default): Access granted: SELECT(key) ON test.table_test_b
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370665 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> ContextAccess (default): Access granted: SELECT(key) ON test.table_test_b
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370714 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> InterpreterSelectQuery: FetchColumns -> Complete
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370783 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> test.table_test_a (SelectExecutor): Key condition: unknown
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370817 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> test.table_test_a (SelectExecutor): Selected 1/1 parts by partition key, 1 parts by primary key, 1/1 marks by primary key, 1 marks to read from 1 ranges
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.370847 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Trace> MergeTreeInOrderSelectProcessor: Reading 1 ranges in order from part all_1_1_0, approx. 1000 rows starting from 0
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.371812 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Information> executeQuery: Read 1000 rows, 3.91 KiB in 0.0015354 sec., 651296 rows/sec., 2.48 MiB/sec.
[LAPTOP-] 2022.06.13 10:58:18.371956 [ 27745 ] {43b0dc5d-69e6-4e42-b96c-a13871b6a791} <Debug> MemoryTracker: Peak memory usage (for query): 45.10 KiB.
```
**Expected behavior**

Correct table name in logs


**Additional context**

Interesting, does it affect grants and etc (looks like no, in ContextAccess log it's using correct table name )

{
        auto it = data_parts_by_info.find(part->info);
        if (it == data_parts_by_info.end() || (*it).get() != part.get())
            throw Exception("Part " + part->name + " doesn't exist", ErrorCodes::LOGICAL_ERROR);
        if (!data_parts_by_state_and_info.modify(data_parts_indexes.project<TagByStateAndInfo>(it), getStateModifier(state)))
            throw Exception("Can't modify " + (*it)->getNameWithState(), ErrorCodes::LOGICAL_ERROR);
    }
    
    std::mutex grab_old_parts_mutex;
    
    std::mutex clear_old_temporary_directories_mutex;
    void checkProperties(const StorageInMemoryMetadata & new_metadata, const StorageInMemoryMetadata & old_metadata, bool attach = false) const;
    void setProperties(const StorageInMemoryMetadata & new_metadata, const StorageInMemoryMetadata & old_metadata, bool attach = false);
    void checkPartitionKeyAndInitMinMax(const KeyDescription & new_partition_key);
    void checkTTLExpressions(const StorageInMemoryMetadata & new_metadata, const StorageInMemoryMetadata & old_metadata) const;
    void checkStoragePolicy(const StoragePolicyPtr & new_storage_policy) const;
    
    void calculateColumnAndSecondaryIndexSizesImpl();
    
    void addPartContributionToColumnAndSecondaryIndexSizes(const DataPartPtr & part);
    void removePartContributionToColumnAndSecondaryIndexSizes(const DataPartPtr & part);
    
    DataPartPtr getAnyPartInPartition(const String & partition_id, DataPartsLock & data_parts_lock) const;
    
    
    DataPartsVector getActivePartsToReplace(
        const MergeTreePartInfo & new_part_info,
        const String & new_part_name,