Why there is an inverse syndromeArgyle-Robertson, for which the complete absence of pupillary reaction to accommodation and convergence is characteristic, as well as the preservation of reaction to light?
Why there is an inverse syndromeArgyle-Robertson, for which the complete absence of pupillary reaction to accommodation and convergence is characteristic, as well as the preservation of reaction to light?
user
Чому виникає зворотний синдромАргайла-Робертсона, для якого характерно повна відсутність реакції зіниць на акомодацію і конвергенцію, а також збереження реакції на світло?
assistant