Feeling Optimistic? Ambiguity Attitudes for Online Decision Making
As autonomous agents enter complex environments, it becomes more difficult to adequately model the interactions between the two. Agents must therefore cope with greater ambiguity (e.g., unknown environments, underdefined models, and vague problem definitions). Despite the consequences of ignoring ambiguity, tools for decision making under ambiguity are understudied. The general approach has been to avoid ambiguity (exploit known information) using robust methods. This work contributes ambiguity attitude graph search (AAGS), generalizing robust methods with ambiguity attitudes--the ability to trade-off between seeking and avoiding ambiguity in the problem. AAGS solves online decision making problems with limited budget to learn about their environment. To evaluate this approach AAGS is tasked with path planning in static and dynamic environments. Results demonstrate that appropriate ambiguity attitudes are dependent on the quality of information from the environment. In relatively certain environments, AAGS can readily exploit information with robust policies. Conversely, model complexity reduces the information conveyed by individual samples; this allows the risks taken by optimistic policies to achieve better performance.