You will be presented with a citation segment from the section of an NLP research paper, as well as the context surrounding that citation. Classify the intent behind this citation by choosing from one of the following categories:
- Background: provides context or foundational information related to the topic.
- Extends: builds upon the cited work.
- Uses: applies the methods or findings of the cited work.
- Motivation: cites the work as inspiration or rationale for the research.
- CompareOrContrast: compares or contrasts the cited work with others.
- FutureWork: cites the work as a direction for future research.

Your answer should be a single word from the following list of options: ["Background", "Extends", "Uses", "Motivation", "CompareOrContrast", "FutureWork"]. Do not include any other text in your response.

Section Title:
None

Context before the citation:
Tetreault's contribution features comparative evaluation involving the author's own centering-based pronoun resolution algorithm called the Left-Right Centering algorithm (LRC) as well as three other pronoun resolution methods: Hobbs's naive algorithm (Hobbs 1978), BFP (Brennan, Friedman, and Pollard 1987), and Strube's 5list approach (Strube 1998). In particular, both developer-oriented (e.g., related to the selection of optimal resolution factors) and application-oriented (e.g., related to the requirement of the application, as in the case of information extraction, where a proper name antecedent is needed) evaluation metrics should be considered. He also argues that evaluation of anaphora resolution systems should take into account several factors beyond simple accuracy of resolution.

Citation Sentence:
Tetreault 's contribution features comparative evaluation involving the author 's own centering-based pronoun resolution algorithm called the Left-Right Centering algorithm ( LRC ) as well as three other pronoun resolution methods : Hobbs 's naive algorithm ( Hobbs 1978 ) , BFP ( Brennan , Friedman , and Pollard 1987 ) , and Strube 's 5list approach ( Strube 1998 ) .

Context after the citation:
The LRC is an alternative to the original BFP algorithm in that it processes utterances incrementally. It works by first searching for an antecedent in the current sentence; if none can be found, it continues the search on the Cf-list of the previous and the other preceding utterances in a left-to-right fashion. In her squib, Byron maintains that additional kinds of information should be included in an evaluation in order to make the performance of algorithms on pronoun resolution more transparent. In particular, she suggests that the pronoun coverage be explicitly reported and proposes that the evaluation details be presented in a concise and compact tabular format called standard disclosure.
Background