Below is an abstract from a computer science research paper. Given this abstract, your task is to extract all unique relationships between entities of the following types:

- "USED-FOR": For instance, "Our method models user proficiency" -> ["method", "user proficiency", "USED-FOR"].
- "EVALUATE-FOR": For instance, "We evaluate our method using F1-measure" -> ["F1-measure", "method", "EVALUATE-FOR"].
- "FEATURE-OF": For instance, "prior knowledge of the model" -> ["prior knowledge", "model", "FEATURE-OF"].
- "HYPONYM-OF": For instance, "TUIT is a software library" -> ["TUIT", "software library", "HYPONYM-OF"].
- "PART-OF": For instance, "We incorporate NLU module into the system." -> ["NLU module", "system", "PART-OF"].
- "COMPARE": For instance, "Unlike the quantitative prior, the qualitative prior is often ignored" -> ["quantitative prior", "qualitative prior", "COMPARE"].
- "CONJUNCTION": For instance: "obtained from human expert or knowledge base" -> ["human expert", "knowledge base", "CONJUNCTION"].

Format your output as a json array. Each entry in the array should express a single relation, formatted as ["<Entity_A>", "<Entity_B>", "<RELATION_A_B>"]. An example output might look like:

[["neural networks", "classification", "USED-FOR"], ["neuron", "neural network", "PART-OF"]].

If no relations are found, please return an empty array [].

Abstract:

We revisit the classical decision-theoretic problem of weighted expert voting from a statistical learning perspective. In particular, we examine the consistency (both asymptotic and finitary) of the optimal Nitzan-Paroush weighted majority and related rules. In the case of known expert competence levels, we give sharp error estimates for the optimal rule. When the competence levels are unknown, they must be empirically estimated. We provide frequentist and Bayesian analyses for this situation. Some of our proof techniques are non-standard and may be of independent interest. The bounds we derive are nearly optimal, and several challenging open problems are posed. Experimental results are provided to illustrate the theory.
[["sharp error estimates", "optimal rule", "USED-FOR"], ["statistical learning perspective", "classical decision-theoretic problem of weighted expert voting", "USED-FOR"]]