You will be shown an abstract from a computer science research paper. Given this abstract, your task is to extract all unique entities with the following types:

- "Task": Applications, problems to solve, systems to construct. Examples include "information extraction", "machine reading system", "image segmentation".
- "Method": : Methods, models, systems to use, or tools, components of a system, frameworks. Examples include "language model", "CORENLP", "POS parser".
- "Metric": Metrics, measures, or entities that can express quality of a system / method. Examples include "F1", "BLEU", "Precision", "time complexity".
- "Material": Data, datasets, resources, Corpus, Knowledge base. Examples include "image data", "speech data", "stereo images", "CoNLL", "Wikipedia".
- "OtherScientificTerm": Phrases that are a scientific terms but do not fall into any of the above classes. Examples include "physical or geometric constraints", "qualitative prior knowledge", "tree kernel", "noise".
- "Generic": General terms or pronouns that may refer to a entity but are not themselves informative, often used as connection words. Examples include "model", "approach", "them".

Please return the output as a JSON object of the format: {"type1" : ["example_entity", ...], "type2" : ["example_entity", ...]}. The keys should be entity types and values should be lists of extracted entities belonging to the corresponding type. Entity types with no matching entities should be assigned an empty array [].

For instance, the output might look like: {"Task": ["speech recognition", ...], "Method": ["Conditional random field"], "Material": [], ...}.

Only output the JSON object and do not include any additional text.

Abstract:

In this paper, we propose a new approach to generate oriented object proposals (OOPs) to reduce the detection error caused by various orientations of the object. To this end, we propose to efficiently locate object regions according to pixelwise object probability, rather than measuring the objectness from a set of sampled windows. We formulate the proposal generation problem as a generative proba-bilistic model such that object proposals of different shapes (i.e., sizes and orientations) can be produced by locating the local maximum likelihoods. The new approach has three main advantages. First, it helps the object detector handle objects of different orientations. Second, as the shapes of the proposals may vary to fit the objects, the resulting proposals are tighter than the sampling windows with fixed sizes. Third, it avoids massive window sampling, and thereby reducing the number of proposals while maintaining a high recall. Experiments on the PASCAL VOC 2007 dataset show that the proposed OOP outperforms the state-of-the-art fast methods. Further experiments show that the rotation invariant property helps a class-specific object detector achieve better performance than the state-of-the-art proposal generation methods in either object rotation scenarios or general scenarios. Generating OOPs is very fast and takes only 0.5 s per image.
{"Generic": ["state-of-the-art fast methods", "approach"], "Material": ["general scenarios", "object rotation scenarios", "PASCAL VOC 2007 dataset"], "Method": ["class-specific object detector", "proposal generation methods", "massive window sampling", "OOP", "object detector"], "Metric": ["recall", "detection error"], "OtherScientificTerm": ["object regions", "local maximum likelihoods", "orientations", "object proposals", "shapes of the proposals", "pixelwise object probability", "shapes", "sizes", "number of proposals", "objectness", "sampling windows", "rotation invariant property", "orientations of the object"], "Task": ["oriented object proposals (OOPs)", "proposal generation problem"]}