You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Imitation learning has long been an approach to alleviate the tractability issues that arise in reinforcement learning. However, most literature makes several assumptions such as access to the expert's actions, availability of many expert demonstrations, and injection of task-specific domain knowledge into the learning process. We propose reinforced inverse dynamics modeling (RIDM), a method of combining reinforcement learning and imitation from observation (IfO) to perform imitation using a single expert demonstration, with no access to the expert's actions, and with little task-specific domain knowledge. Given only a single set of the expert's raw states, such as joint angles in a robot control task, at each time-step, we learn an inverse dynamics model to produce the necessary low-level actions, such as torques, to transition from one state to the next such that the reward from the environment is maximized. We demonstrate that RIDM outperforms other techniques when we apply the same constraints on the other methods on six domains of the MuJoCo simulator and for two different robot soccer tasks for two experts from the RoboCup 3D simulation league on the SimSpark simulator.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: The ALVINN (Autonomous Land Vehicle In a Neural Network) project addresses the problem of training artificial neural networks in real time to perform difficult perception tasks. ALVINN is a backpropagation network designed to drive the CMU Navlab, a modified Chevy van. This paper describes the training techniques that allow ALVINN to learn in under 5 minutes to autonomously control the Navlab by watching the reactions of a human driver. Using these techniques, ALVINN has been trained to drive in a variety of circumstances including single-lane paved and unpaved roads, and multilane lined and unlined roads, at speeds of up to 20 miles per hour.
Most model-based IfO algorithms use an inverse dynamics model, i.e., a mapping from state-transitions to actions. The most related work to ours may be the work of DBLP:journals corr NairCAIAML17 ( DBLP:journals corr NairCAIAML17 ), where they show the learner a single demonstration of an expert performing some task with the intention of the learner replicating the task. They do this by allowing the learner to undergo self-supervision and collect states and actions, which is then used to train a neural network inverse dynamics model. The learned model is then applied on the expert demonstration to infer the expert actions. The actions are then executed to replicate the demonstrated behavior. Another method of this type is behavioral cloning from observation (BCO) by IJCAI2018-torabi ( IJCAI2018-torabi ), which, similarly, first trains an inverse dynamics model in a self-supervised fashion, and applies the learned model on the expert demonstration(s) to infer the expert actions. However, BCO then trains a policy by behavioral cloning (BC) [1] , which maps the expert states to the inferred actions.