You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A survey of transfer learning 
Chapter Title:  Discussion of heterogeneous solutions 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  One of the main research problems in heterogeneous transfer learning is to determine whether a given source domain is effective in transferring knowledge to a target domain, and then to determine how much of the knowledge should be transferred from a source domain to a target domain. The main objective of this paper is to solve this problem by evaluating the relatedness among given domains through transferred weights. We propose a novel method to learn such transferred weights with the aid of co-occurrence data, which contain the same set of instances but in different feature spaces. Because instances with the same category should have similar features, our method is to compute their principal components in each feature space such that co-occurrence data can be rerepresented by these principal components. The principal component coefficients from different feature spaces for the same instance in the co-occurrence data have the same order of significance for describing the category information. By using these principal component coefficients, the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method is employed to construct a directed cyclic network where each node is a domain and each edge weight is the conditional dependence from one domain to another domain. Here, the edge weight of the network can be employed as the transferred weight from a source domain to a target domain. The weight values can be taken as a prior for setting parameters in the existing heterogeneous transfer learning methods to control the amount of knowledge transferred from a source domain to a target domain. The experimental results on synthetic and real-world data sets are reported to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method that can capture strong or weak relations among feature spaces, and enhance the learning performance of heterogeneous transfer learning.

Literature Review:
The previous surveyed heterogeneous transfer learning works demonstrate many different characteristics and attributes. Which heterogeneous transfer learning solution is best for a particular application? The heterogeneous transfer learning solutions use either a symmetric transformation or an asymmetric transformation process in an attempt to resolve the differences between the input feature space (as shown in Fig. 1 ). The asymmetrical transformation approach is best used when the same class instances in the source and target domains can be transformed without context feature bias. Many of the surveyed heterogeneous transfer learning solutions only address the issue of the input feature space being different between the source and target domains and do not address other domain adaptation steps needed for marginal and/or conditional distribution differences. If further domain adaptation needs to be performed after the input feature spaces are aligned, then an appropriate homogeneous solution should be used. To further help determine which solution is best for a given transfer learning application, the information in Table 4 should be used to match the characteristics of the solution to that of the desired application environment. None of the surveyed heterogeneous transfer learning solutions have a means to guard against negative transfer effects. However, the paper by Yang BIB002 demonstrates that negative transfer guards can benefit heterogeneous transfer learning solutions. It seems likely that future heterogeneous transfer learning works will integrate means for negative transfer protection. Many of the same heterogeneous transfer learning solutions are tested in the surveyed solution experiments. These head-to-head comparisons are summarized in Table 3 and can be used as a starting point to understand the relative performance between the solutions. As observed as a trend in the previous homogeneous solutions, the recent heterogeneous solution by Duan BIB001 employs a one-stage solution that simultaneously performs the feature input space alignment process while learning the final classifier. As is the case for the surveyed homogeneous transfer learning works, the surveyed heterogeneous transfer learning works are not specifically applied to big data solutions; however, there is nothing to preclude their use in a big data environment.