You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Recent trojan attacks on deep neural network (DNN) models are one insidious variant of data poisoning attacks. Trojan attacks exploit an effective backdoor created in a DNN model by leveraging the difficulty in interpretability of the learned model to misclassify any inputs signed with the attacker's chosen trojan trigger input. Trojan attacks are easy to craft; survive even in adverse conditions such as different viewpoints, and lighting conditions on images; and threaten real world applications such as autonomous vehicles and robotics. The trojan trigger is a secret guarded and exploited by the attacker. Therefore, detecting such trojaned inputs is a challenge, especially at run-time when models are in active operation. We focus on vision systems and build the STRong Intentional Perturbation (STRIP) based run-time trojan attack detection system. We intentionally perturb the incoming input, for instance by superimposing various image patterns, and observe the randomness of the predicted classes for the perturbed inputs for a given model---malicious or benign---under deployment. A low entropy in the predicted classes violates the input-dependence property of a benign model and implies the presence of a malicious input---a characteristic of a trojaned input. The high efficacy of our method is validated through case studies on two popular and contrasting datasets: MNIST and CIFAR10. We achieve an overall false acceptance rate (FAR) of less than 1 , given a preset false rejection rate (FRR) of 1 , for four different tested trojan trigger types---three triggers are identified in previous attack works and one dedicated trigger is crafted by us to demonstrate the trigger-size insensitivity of the STRIP detection approach. In particular, on the dataset of natural images in CIFAR10, we have empirically achieved the desired result of 0 for both FRR and FAR.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Federated learning enables multiple participants to jointly construct a deep learning model without sharing their private training data with each other. For example, multiple smartphones can jointly train a predictive keyboard model without revealing what individual users type into their phones. We demonstrate that any participant in federated learning can introduce hidden backdoor functionality into the joint global model, e.g., to ensure that an image classifier assigns an attacker-chosen label to images with certain features, or that a next-word predictor completes certain sentences with an attacker-chosen word. We design and evaluate a new "constrain-and-scale" model-poisoning methodology and show that it greatly outperforms data poisoning. An attacker selected just once, in a single round of federated learning, can cause the global model to reach 100 accuracy on the backdoor task. We evaluate the attack under different assumptions and attack scenarios for standard federated learning tasks. We also show how to evade anomaly detection-based defenses by incorporating the evasion into the loss function when training the attack model.
Bagdasaryan [1] show that federated learning is fundamentally vulnerable to trojan attacks. Firstly, participants are enormous, e.g., millions, it is impossible to guarantee that none of them are malicious. Secondly, federated learning is designed to have no access to the participant's local data and training process to ensure the privacy of the sensitive training data; therefore, participants can use trojaned data for training. The authors demonstrate that with controlling no more than 1