You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
This paper examines the problem of locating outlier columns in a large, otherwise low-rank, matrix. We propose a simple two-step adaptive sensing and inference approach and establish theoretical guarantees for its performance; our results show that accurate outlier identification is achievable using very few linear summaries of the original data matrix—as few as the squared rank of the low-rank component plus the number of outliers, times constant and logarithmic factors. We demonstrate the performance of our approach experimentally in two stylized applications, one motivated by robust collaborative filtering tasks, and the other by saliency map estimation tasks arising in computer vision and automated surveillance, and also investigate extensions to settings where the data are noisy, or possibly incomplete.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Saliency mechanism has been considered crucial in the human visual system and helpful to object detection and recognition. This paper addresses a novel feature-based model for visual saliency detection. It consists of two steps: first, using the learned overcomplete sparse bases to represent image patches; and then, estimating saliency information via low-rank and sparsity matrix decomposition. We compare our model with the previous methods on natural images. Experimental results on both natural images and psychological patterns show that our model performs competitively for visual saliency detection task, and suggest the potential application of matrix decomposition and convex optimization for image analysis.

[2]: 

[3]: In this work we derive fundamental limits for many linear and non-linear sparse signal processing models including group testing, quantized compressive sensing, multivariate regression and observations with missing features. In general, sparse signal processing problems can be characterized in terms of the following Markovian property. We are given a set of N variables X1, X2, ..., XN, and there is an unknown subset of variables S ⊂ 1, 2, ..., N that are relevant for predicting outcomes outputs Y. In other words, when Y is conditioned on Xn nϵS it is conditionally independent of the other variables, Xn n∉S. Our goal is to identify the set S from samples of the variables X and the associated outcomes Y. We characterize this problem as a version of the noisy channel coding problem. Using asymptotic information theoretic analyses, we establish mutual information formulas that provide sufficient and necessary conditions on the number of samples required to successfully recover the salient variables. These mutual information expressions unify conditions for both linear and non-linear observations. We then compute sample complexity bounds for the aforementioned models, based on the mutual information expressions.

[4]: The spatial receptive fields of simple cells in mammalian striate cortex have been reasonably well described physiologically and can be characterized as being localized, oriented, and ban@ass, comparable with the basis functions of wavelet transforms. Previously, we have shown that these receptive field properties may be accounted for in terms of a strategy for producing a sparse distribution of output activity in response to natural images. Here, in addition to describing this work in a more expansive fashion, we examine the neurobiological implications of sparse coding. Of particular interest is the case when the code is overcomplete--i.e., when the number of code elements is greater than the effective dimensionality of the input space. Because the basis functions are non-orthogonal and not linearly independent of each other, sparsifying the code will recruit only those basis functions necessary for representing a given input, and so the input-output function will deviate from being purely linear. These deviations from linearity provide a potential explanation for the weak forms of non-linearity observed in the response properties of cortical simple cells, and they further make predictions about the expected interactions among units in response to naturalistic stimuli. © 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd

[5]: By the guidance of attention, human visual system is able to locate objects of interest in complex scene. We propose a new visual saliency detection model for both image and video. Inspired by biological vision, saliency is defined locally. Lossy compression is adopted, where the saliency of a location is measured by the Incremental Coding Length(ICL). The ICL is computed by presenting the center patch as the sparsest linear representation of its surroundings. The final saliency map is generated by accumulating the coding length. The model is tested on both images and videos. The results indicate a reliable and robust saliency of our method.

[6]: Suppose we are given a matrix that is formed by adding an unknown sparse matrix to an unknown low-rank matrix. Our goal is to decompose the given matrix into its sparse and low-rank components. Such a problem arises in a number of applications in model and system identification and is intractable to solve in general. In this paper we consider a convex optimization formulation to splitting the specified matrix into its components by minimizing a linear combination of the l1 norm and the nuclear norm of the components. We develop a notion of rank-sparsity incoherence, expressed as an uncertainty principle between the sparsity pat- tern of a matrix and its row and column spaces, and we use it to characterize both fundamental identifiability as well as (deterministic) sufficient conditions for exact recovery. Our analysis is geometric in nature with the tangent spaces to the algebraic varieties of sparse and low-rank matrices playing a prominent role. When the sparse and low-rank matrices are drawn from certain natural random ensembles, we show that the sufficient conditions for exact recovery are satisfied with high probability. We conclude with simulation results on synthetic matrix decomposition problems.

[7]: 

[8]: 

[9]: 

[10]: Compressive sampling is a novel framework in signal acquisition and reconstruction, which achieves sub-Nyquist sampling by exploiting the sparse nature of most signals of interest. In this letter, we propose a saliency-based compressive sampling scheme for image signals. The key idea is to exploit the saliency information of images, and allocate more sensing resources to salient regions but fewer to nonsalient regions. The scheme takes human visual attention into consideration because human vision would pay more attention to salient regions. Simulation results on natural images show that the proposed scheme improves the reconstructed image quality considerably compared to the case when saliency information is not used.
A component of our numerical evaluation here entails assessing the performance of our approach in a stylized image processing task of saliency map estimation. We note that several recent works have utilized techniques from the sparse representation literature in salient region identification, and in compressive imaging scenarios. A seminal effort in this direction was [4] , which proposed a model for feature identification via the human visual cortex based on parsimonious (sparse) representations. More recently, [1] applied techniques from [4] [8] and low-rank-plus-sparse matrix decomposition [6] [2] in a procedure to identify salient regions of an image from (uncompressed) measurements. Similar sparse representation techniques for salient feature identification were also examined in [2]2 . An adaptive compressive imaging procedure driven by a saliency map'' obtained via low-resolution discrete cosine transform (DCT) measurements was demonstrated in [10] . Here, unlike in [2]2 [6]3 , we consider salient feature identification based on compressive samples, and while our approach is similar in spirit to the problem examined in [10] , here we provide theoretical guarantees for the performance of our approach. Finally, we note several recent works [2]1 [7] that propose methods for identifying salient elements in a data set using compressive samples.