You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
A wide variety of problems in machine learning, including exemplar clustering, document summarization, and sensor placement, can be cast as constrained submodular maximization problems. A lot of recent effort has been devoted to developing distributed algorithms for these problems. However, these results suffer from high number of rounds, suboptimal approximation ratios, or both. We develop a framework for bringing existing algorithms in the sequential setting to the distributed setting, achieving near optimal approximation ratios for many settings in only a constant number of MapReduce rounds. Our techniques also give a fast sequential algorithm for non-monotone maximization subject to a matroid constraint.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: There has been much progress recently on improved approximations for problems involving submodular objective functions, and many interesting techniques have been developed. However, the resulting algorithms are often slow and impractical. In this paper we develop algorithms that match the best known approximation guarantees, but with significantly improved running times, for maximizing a monotone submodular function f: 2[n] → R+ subject to various constraints. As in previous work, we measure the number of oracle calls to the objective function which is the dominating term in the running time. Our first result is a simple algorithm that gives a (1--1 e -- e)-approximation for a cardinality constraint using O(n e log n e) queries, and a 1 (p + 2e + 1 + e)-approximation for the intersection of a p-system and e knapsack (linear) constraints using O (n e2 log2 n e) queries. This is the first approximation for a p-system combined with linear constraints. (We also show that the factor of p cannot be improved for maximizing over a p-system.) The main idea behind these algorithms serves as a building block in our more sophisticated algorithms. Our main result is a new variant of the continuous greedy algorithm, which interpolates between the classical greedy algorithm and a truly continuous algorithm. We show how this algorithm can be implemented for matroid and knapsack constraints using O(n2) oracle calls to the objective function. (Previous variants and alternative techniques were known to use at least O(n4) oracle calls.) This leads to an O(n2 e4 log2 n e)-time (1--1 e -- e)-approximation for a matroid constraint. For a knapsack constraint, we develop a more involved (1--1 e -- e)-approximation algorithm that runs in time O(n2(1 e log n)poly(1 e)).

[2]: Is it possible to maximize a monotone submodular function faster than the widely used lazy greedy algorithm (also known as accelerated greedy), both in theory and practice? In this paper, we develop the first linear-time algorithm for maximizing a general monotone submodular function subject to a cardinality constraint. We show that our randomized algorithm, STOCHASTIC-GREEDY, can achieve a @math approximation guarantee, in expectation, to the optimum solution in time linear in the size of the data and independent of the cardinality constraint. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm on submodular functions arising in data summarization, including training large-scale kernel methods, exemplar-based clustering, and sensor placement. We observe that STOCHASTIC-GREEDY practically achieves the same utility value as lazy greedy but runs much faster. More surprisingly, we observe that in many practical scenarios STOCHASTIC-GREEDY does not evaluate the whole fraction of data points even once and still achieves indistinguishable results compared to lazy greedy.

[3]: We consider the problem of maximizing a (non-monotone) submodular function subject to a cardinality constraint. In addition to capturing well-known combinatorial optimization problems, e.g., Max-k-Coverage and Max-Bisection, this problem has applications in other more practical settings such as natural language processing, information retrieval, and machine learning. In this work we present improved approximations for two variants of the cardinality constraint for non-monotone functions. When at most k elements can be chosen, we improve the current best 1 e -- o(1) approximation to a factor that is in the range [1 e + 0.004, 1 2], achieving a tight approximation of 1 2 -- o(1) for k = n 2 and breaking the 1 e barrier for all values of k. When exactly k elements must be chosen, our algorithms improve the current best 1 4 -- o(1) approximation to a factor that is in the range [0.356, 1 2], again achieving a tight approximation of 1 2 -- o(1) for k = n 2. Additionally, some of the algorithms we provide are very fast with time complexities of O(nk), as opposed to previous known algorithms which are continuous in nature, and thus, too slow for applications in the practical settings mentioned above. Our algorithms are based on two new techniques. First, we present a simple randomized greedy approach where in each step a random element is chosen from a set of "reasonably good" elements. This approach might be considered a natural substitute for the greedy algorithm of Nemhauser, Wolsey and Fisher [45], as it retains the same tight guarantee of 1--1 e for monotone objectives and the same time complexity of O(nk), while giving an approximation of 1 e for general non-monotone objectives (while the greedy algorithm of Nemhauser et. al. fails to provide any constant guarantee). Second, we extend the double greedy technique, which achieves a tight 1 2 approximation for unconstrained submodular maximization, to the continuous setting. This allows us to manipulate the natural rates by which elements change, thus bounding the total number of elements chosen.

[4]:
There has been a recent push toward obtaining fast, practical algorithms for submodular maximization problems arising in a variety of applied settings. Research in this direction has yielded a variety of techniques for speeding up the continuous greedy algorithm for monotone maximization [1] [2] , as well as new approaches for non-monotone maximization based on insights from both the continuous greedy and double greedy algorithms [3] [4] . Of particular relevance to our results is the case of maximization under a matroid constraint. Here, for monotone functions the fastest current sequential algorithm gives a @math approximation using @math value queries. For non-monotone functions, Buchbinder al [4] give an @math -approximation in time @math , where @math is the time required to compute a perfect matching on bipartite graph with @math vertices per side. They also give a simple, combinatorial @math -approximation in time @math . In comparison, the sequential algorithm we present here is faster by a factor of @math , at the cost of a slightly-weaker @math -approximation.