You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
We present the CIFF proof procedure for abductive logic programming with constraints, and we prove its correctness. CIFF is an extension of the IFF proof procedure for abductive logic programming, relaxing the original restrictions over variable quantification (allowedness conditions) and incorporating a constraint solver to deal with numerical constraints as in constraint logic programming. Finally, we describe the CIFF system, comparing it with state of the art abductive systems and answer set solvers and showing how to use it to program some applications. (To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming - TPLP).

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Disjunctive Deductive Databases (DDDBs) — function-free disjunctive logic programs with negation in rule bodies allowed — have been recently recognized as a powerful tool for knowledge representation and commonsense reasoning. Much research has been spent on issues like semantics and complexity of DDDBs, but the important area of implementing DDDBs has been less addressed so far. However, a thorough investigation thereof is a basic requirement for building systems which render previous foundational work on DDDBs useful for practice.

[2]: 

[3]: The Smodels system is a C++ implementation of the well-founded and stable model semantics for range-restricted function-free normal programs. The system includes two modules: (i) smodels which implements the two semantics for ground programs and (ii) parse which computes a grounded version of a range-restricted function-free normal program. The latter module does not produce the whole set of ground instances of the program but a subset that is sufficient in the sense that no stable models are lost. The implementation of the stable model semantics for ground programs is based on bottom-up backtracking search where a powerful pruning method is employed. The pruning method exploits an approximation technique for stable models which is closely related to the well-founded semantics. One of the advantages of this novel technique is that it can be implemented to work in linear space. This makes it possible to apply the stable model semantics also in areas where resulting programs are highly non-stratified and can possess a large number of stable models. The implementation has been tested extensively and compared with a state of the art implementation of the stable model semantics, the SLG system. In tests involving ground programs it clearly outperforms SLG.
In this performance comparison we restricted our attention to three systems: the [2] and two state-of-the-art answer set solvers, namely the DLV system [1] and SMODELS [3] .