You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: DATA MINING FOR IMBALANCED DATASETS: AN OVERVIEW 
Chapter Title:  Synthetic Minority Oversampling TEchnique: SMOTE 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  Abstract Many existing rule learning systems are computationally expensive on large noisy datasets. In this paper we evaluate the recently-proposed rule learning algorithm IREP on a large and diverse collection of benchmark problems. We show that while IREP is extremely efficient, it frequently gives error rates higher than those of C4.5 and C4.5rules. We then propose a number of modifications resulting in an algorithm RIPPERk that is very competitive with C4.5rules with respect to error rates, but much more efficient on large samples. RIPPERk obtains error rates lower than or equivalent to C4.5rules on 22 of 37 benchmark problems, scales nearly linearly with the number of training examples, and can efficiently process noisy datasets containing hundreds of thousands of examples. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  In the past, nearest neighbor algorithms for learning from examples have worked best in domains in which all features had numeric values. In such domains, the examples can be treated as points and distance metrics can use standard definitions. In symbolic domains, a more sophisticated treatment of the feature space is required. We introduce a nearest neighbor algorithm for learning in domains with symbolic features. Our algorithm calculates distance tables that allow it to produce real-valued distances between instances, and attaches weights to the instances to further modify the structure of feature space. We show that this technique produces excellent classification accuracy on three problems that have been studied by machine learning researchers: predicting protein secondary structure, identifying DNA promoter sequences, and pronouncing English text. Direct experimental comparisons with the other learning algorithms show that our nearest neighbor algorithm is comparable or superior in all three domains. In addition, our algorithm has advantages in training speed, simplicity, and perspicuity. We conclude that experimental evidence favors the use and continued development of nearest neighbor algorithms for domains such as the ones studied here.

Literature Review:
Over-sampling by replication can lead to similar but more specific regions in the feature space as the decision region for the minority class. This can potentially lead to overfitting on the multiple copies of minority class examples. To overcome the overfitting and broaden the decision region of minority class examples, we introduced a novel technique to generate synthetic examples by operating in "feature space" rather than "data space"  . The minority class is over-sampled by taking each minority class sample and introducing synthetic examples along the line segments joining anylall of the k minority class nearest neighbors. Depending upon the amount of over-sampling required, neighbors from the k nearest neighbors are randomly chosen. Synthetic samples are generated in the following way: Take the difference between the feature vector (sample) under consideration and its nearest neighbor. Multiply this difference by a random number between 0 and l, and add it to the feature vector under consideration. This causes the selection of a random point along the line segment between two specific features. This approach effectively forces the decision region of the minority class to become more general. For the nominal cases, we take the majority vote for the nominal value amongst the nearest neighbors. We use the modification of Value Distance Metric (VDM) BIB003 to compute the nearest neighbors for the nominal valued features. The synthetic examples cause the classifier to create larger and less specific decision regions, rather than smaller and more specific regions, as typically caused by over-sampling with replication. More general regions are now learned for the minority class rather than being subsumed by the majority class samples around them. The effect is that decision trees generalize better. SMOTE was tested on a variety of datasets, with varying degrees of imbalance and varying amounts of data in the training set, thus providing a diverse testbed. SMOTE forces focused learning and introduces a bias towards the minority class. On most of the experiments, SMOTE using C4.5 BIB001 and Ripper BIB002 as underlying classifiers outperformed other methods including sampling strategies, Ripper's Loss Ratio, and even Naive Bayes by varying the class priors.