You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Aiming to unify known results about clustering mixtures of distributions under separation conditions, Kumar and Kannan[2010] introduced a deterministic condition for clustering datasets. They showed that this single deterministic condition encompasses many previously studied clustering assumptions. More specifically, their proximity condition requires that in the target @math -clustering, the projection of a point @math onto the line joining its cluster center @math and some other center @math , is a large additive factor closer to @math than to @math . This additive factor can be roughly described as @math times the spectral norm of the matrix representing the differences between the given (known) dataset and the means of the (unknown) target clustering. Clearly, the proximity condition implies center separation -- the distance between any two centers must be as large as the above mentioned bound. In this paper we improve upon the work of Kumar and Kannan along several axes. First, we weaken the center separation bound by a factor of @math , and secondly we weaken the proximity condition by a factor of @math . Using these weaker bounds we still achieve the same guarantees when all points satisfy the proximity condition. We also achieve better guarantees when only @math -fraction of the points satisfy the weaker proximity condition. The bulk of our analysis relies only on center separation under which one can produce a clustering which (i) has low error, (ii) has low @math -means cost, and (iii) has centers very close to the target centers. Our improved separation condition allows us to match the results of the Planted Partition Model of McSherry[2001], improve upon the results of [2006], and improve separation results for mixture of Gaussian models in a particular setting.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: 

[2]: It has long been realized that in pulse-code modulation (PCM), with a given ensemble of signals to handle, the quantum values should be spaced more closely in the voltage regions where the signal amplitude is more likely to fall. It has been shown by Panter and Dite that, in the limit as the number of quanta becomes infinite, the asymptotic fractional density of quanta per unit voltage should vary as the one-third power of the probability density per unit voltage of signal amplitudes. In this paper the corresponding result for any finite number of quanta is derived; that is, necessary conditions are found that the quanta and associated quantization intervals of an optimum finite quantization scheme must satisfy. The optimization criterion used is that the average quantization noise power be a minimum. It is shown that the result obtained here goes over into the Panter and Dite result as the number of quanta become large. The optimum quautization schemes for 2^ b quanta, b=1,2, , 7 , are given numerically for Gaussian and for Laplacian distribution of signal amplitudes.

[3]: 

[4]: The k-means method is a widely used clustering technique that seeks to minimize the average squared distance between points in the same cluster. Although it offers no accuracy guarantees, its simplicity and speed are very appealing in practice. By augmenting k-means with a very simple, randomized seeding technique, we obtain an algorithm that is Θ(logk)-competitive with the optimal clustering. Preliminary experiments show that our augmentation improves both the speed and the accuracy of k-means, often quite dramatically.

[5]: We consider @math -median clustering in finite metric spaces and @math -means clustering in Euclidean spaces, in the setting where @math is part of the input (not a constant). For the @math -means problem, show that if the optimal @math -means clustering of the input is more expensive than the optimal @math -means clustering by a factor of @math , then one can achieve a @math -approximation to the @math -means optimal in time polynomial in @math and @math by using a variant of Lloyd's algorithm. In this work we substantially improve this approximation guarantee. We show that given only the condition that the @math -means optimal is more expensive than the @math -means optimal by a factor @math for some constant @math , we can obtain a PTAS. In particular, under this assumption, for any @math we achieve a @math -approximation to the @math -means optimal in time polynomial in @math and @math , and exponential in @math and @math . We thus decouple the strength of the assumption from the quality of the approximation ratio. We also give a PTAS for the @math -median problem in finite metrics under the analogous assumption as well. For @math -means, we in addition give a randomized algorithm with improved running time of @math . Our technique also obtains a PTAS under the assumption of that all @math approximations are @math -close to a desired target clustering, in the case that all target clusters have size greater than @math and @math is constant. Note that the motivation of is that for many clustering problems, the objective function is only a proxy for the true goal of getting close to the target. From this perspective, our improvement is that for @math -means in Euclidean spaces we reduce the distance of the clustering found to the target from @math to @math when all target clusters are large, and for @math -median we improve the largeness'' condition needed in the work of to get exactly @math -close from @math to @math . Our results are based on a new notion of clustering stability.

[6]: In k-means clustering we are given a set of n data points in d-dimensional space Rd and an integer k, and the problem is to determine a set of k points in &#211C;d, called centers, to minimize the mean squared distance from each data point to its nearest center. No exact polynomial-time algorithms are known for this problem. Although asymptotically efficient approximation algorithms exist, these algorithms are not practical due to the extremely high constant factors involved. There are many heuristics that are used in practice, but we know of no bounds on their performance.We consider the question of whether there exists a simple and practical approximation algorithm for k-means clustering. We present a local improvement heuristic based on swapping centers in and out. We prove that this yields a (9+e)-approximation algorithm. We show that the approximation factor is almost tight, by giving an example for which the algorithm achieves an approximation factor of (9-e). To establish the practical value of the heuristic, we present an empirical study that shows that, when combined with Lloyd's algorithm, this heuristic performs quite well in practice.

[7]: 

[8]: 

[9]: 

[10]: 

[11]: We present the first linear time (1 + spl epsiv )-approximation algorithm for the k-means problem for fixed k and spl epsiv . Our algorithm runs in O(nd) time, which is linear in the size of the input. Another feature of our algorithm is its simplicity - the only technique involved is random sampling.

[12]:
There has been an extensive line of work on approximation algorithms for the @math -means problem ( [10] [8] [9] [3] [1] [6] ). The current best guarantee is a @math -approximation algorithm of [6] (with a much simpler analysis in [7] ) if polynomial dependence on @math and the dimension @math is desired. For constant @math , [11] give a PTAS for the @math -means problem. Another popular algorithm for @math -means is the Lloyd's heuristics ( [2] ). This heuristics, combined with a careful seeding of centers, has been shown to have good performance if the data is well separated (see [12] ), or to provide @math -approximation in general [4] . The separation-based results of [12] were improved by [5] .