You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) agents performing complex tasks must be able to remember observations and actions across sizable time intervals. This is especially true during the initial learning stages, when exploratory behaviour can increase the delay between specific actions and their effects. Many new or popular approaches for learning these distant correlations employ backpropagation through time (BPTT), but this technique requires storing observation traces long enough to span the interval between cause and effect. Besides memory demands, learning dynamics like vanishing gradients and slow convergence due to infrequent weight updates can reduce BPTT's practicality; meanwhile, although online recurrent network learning is a developing topic, most approaches are not efficient enough to use as replacements. We propose a simple, effective memory strategy that can extend the window over which BPTT can learn without requiring longer traces. We explore this approach empirically on a few tasks and discuss its implications.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Sophisticated gated recurrent neural network architectures like LSTMs and GRUs have been shown to be highly effective in a myriad of applications. We develop an un-gated unit, the statistical recurrent unit (SRU), that is able to learn long term dependencies in data by only keeping moving averages of statistics. The SRU's architecture is simple, un-gated, and contains a comparable number of parameters to LSTMs; yet, SRUs perform favorably to more sophisticated LSTM and GRU alternatives, often outperforming one or both in various tasks. We show the efficacy of SRUs as compared to LSTMs and GRUs in an unbiased manner by optimizing respective architectures' hyperparameters for both synthetic and real-world tasks.

[2]: In both the human brain and any general artificial intelligence (AI), a representation of the past is necessary to predict the future. However, perfect storage of all experiences is not possible. One possibility, utilized in many applications, is to retain information about the past in a buffer. A limitation of this approach is that although events in the buffer are represented with perfect accuracy, the resources necessary to represent information at a particular time scale go up rapidly. Here we present a neurally-plausible, compressed, scale-free memory representation we call Scale-Invariant Temporal History (SITH). This representation covers an exponentially large period of time in the past at the cost of sacrificing temporal accuracy for events further in the past. The form of this decay is scale-invariant and can be shown to be optimal in that it is able to respond to worlds with a wide range of time scales. We demonstrate the utility of this representation in learning to play a simple video game. In this environment, SITH exhibits better learning performance than a fixed-size buffer history representation. Whereas the buffer performs well as long as the temporal dependencies can be represented within the buffer, SITH performs well over a much larger range of time scales for the same amount of resources. Finally, we discuss how the application of SITH, along with other human-inspired models of cognition, could improve reinforcement and machine learning algorithms in general.
[1] by contrast does present a recurrent model with multiple filterings of hidden state, but these project via fully-connected recurrent connections back into the model. The fact that they are computed in parallel implies that models impulse response would be quite different from the Concrete architecture. The motivation of their approach is also quite different from ours. More recently, the neurologically-inspired SITH model [2] proposes a somewhat more restricted variant of this concept that limits projections of multiply-filtered to those yielding localised impulse responses similar to the ones in Figure , but this approach still employs full matrix multiplications to compute unit values.