You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
In this paper we consider critical motion sequences (CMSs) of rolling-shutter (RS) SfM. Employing an RS camera model with linearized pure rotation, we show that the RS distortion can be approximately expressed by two internal parameters of an "imaginary" camera plus one-parameter nonlinear transformation similar to lens distortion. We then reformulate the problem as self-calibration of the imaginary camera, in which its skew and aspect ratio are unknown and varying in the image sequence. In the formulation, we derive a general representation of CMSs. We also show that our method can explain the CMS that was recently reported in the literature, and then present a new remedy to deal with the degeneracy. Our theoretical results agree well with experimental results; it explains degeneracies observed when we employ naive bundle adjustment, and how they are resolved by our method.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: We address the problem of Structure from Motion (SfM) with rolling shutter cameras. We first show that many common camera configurations, e.g. cameras with parallel readout directions, become critical and allow for a large class of ambiguities in multi-view reconstruction. We provide mathematical analysis for one, two and some multi-view cases and verify it by synthetic experiments. Next, we demonstrate that bundle adjustment with rolling shutter cameras, which are close to critical configurations, may still produce drastically deformed reconstructions. Finally, we provide practical recipes how to photograph with rolling shutter cameras to avoid scene deformations in SfM. We evaluate the recipes and provide a quantitative analysis of their performance in real experiments. Our results show how to reconstruct correct 3D models with rolling shutter cameras.
The most closely related to our study is the study of [1] . Their study is the first to show that there is degeneracy in RS SfM. Specifically, employing the most widely used RS model with linearized rotation and constant velocity translation, they showed the existence of a CMS. The CMS is that all images are captured by cameras with identical y (i.e., RS readout) direction in space'' . They proved that these images can also be explained by RS cameras and a scene all lying in a single plane, meaning degeneracy.