You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
In many fields of science, generalized likelihood ratio tests are established tools for statistical inference. At the same time, it has become increasingly common that a simulator (or generative model) is used to describe complex processes that tie parameters @math of an underlying theory and measurement apparatus to high-dimensional observations @math . However, simulator often do not provide a way to evaluate the likelihood function for a given observation @math , which motivates a new class of likelihood-free inference algorithms. In this paper, we show that likelihood ratios are invariant under a specific class of dimensionality reduction maps @math . As a direct consequence, we show that discriminative classifiers can be used to approximate the generalized likelihood ratio statistic when only a generative model for the data is available. This leads to a new machine learning-based approach to likelihood-free inference that is complementary to Approximate Bayesian Computation, and which does not require a prior on the model parameters. Experimental results on artificial problems with known exact likelihoods illustrate the potential of the proposed method.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: The Bayes rule is the optimal classification rule if the underlying distribution of the data is known. In practice we do not know the underlying distribution, and need to “learn” classification rules from the data. One way to derive classification rules in practice is to implement the Bayes rule approximately by estimating an appropriate classification function. Traditional statistical methods use estimated log odds ratio as the classification function. Support vector machines (SVMs) are one type of large margin classifier, and the relationship between SVMs and the Bayes rule was not clear. In this paper, it is shown that the asymptotic target of SVMs are some interesting classification functions that are directly related to the Bayes rule. The rate of convergence of the solutions of SVMs to their corresponding target functions is explicitly established in the case of SVMs with quadratic or higher order loss functions and spline kernels. Simulations are given to illustrate the relation between SVMs and the Bayes rule in other cases. This helps understand the success of SVMs in many classification studies, and makes it easier to compare SVMs and traditional statistical methods.

[2]: The Neyman-Pearson (NP) approach to hypothesis testing is useful in situations where different types of error have different consequences or a priori probabilities are unknown. For any spl alpha >0, the NP lemma specifies the most powerful test of size spl alpha , but assumes the distributions for each hypothesis are known or (in some cases) the likelihood ratio is monotonic in an unknown parameter. This paper investigates an extension of NP theory to situations in which one has no knowledge of the underlying distributions except for a collection of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) training examples from each hypothesis. Building on a "fundamental lemma" of , we demonstrate that several concepts from statistical learning theory have counterparts in the NP context. Specifically, we consider constrained versions of empirical risk minimization (NP-ERM) and structural risk minimization (NP-SRM), and prove performance guarantees for both. General conditions are given under which NP-SRM leads to strong universal consistency. We also apply NP-SRM to (dyadic) decision trees to derive rates of convergence. Finally, we present explicit algorithms to implement NP-SRM for histograms and dyadic decision trees.

[3]: Determining the structure of dependencies among a set of variables is a common task in many signal and image processing applications, including multitarget tracking and computer vision. In this paper, we present an information-theoretic, machine learning approach to problems of this type. We cast this problem as a hypothesis test between factorizations of variables into mutually independent subsets. We show that the likelihood ratio can be written as sums of two sets of Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence terms. The first set captures the structure of the statistical dependencies within each hypothesis, whereas the second set measures the details of model differences between hypotheses. We then consider the case when the signal prior models are unknown, so that the distributions of interest must be estimated directly from data, showing that the second set of terms is (asymptotically) negligible and quantifying the loss in hypothesis separability when the models are completely unknown. We demonstrate the utility of nonparametric estimation methods for such problems, providing a general framework for determining and distinguishing between dependency structures in highly uncertain environments. Additionally, we develop a machine learning approach for estimating lower bounds on KL divergence and mutual information from samples of high-dimensional random variables for which direct density estimation is infeasible. We present empirical results in the context of three prototypical applications: association of signals generated by sources possessing harmonic behavior, scene correspondence using video imagery, and detection of coherent behavior among sets of moving objects.
Also close to our work, [2] and [1] consider the machine learning problem associated to Neyman-Pearson hypothesis testing. In a similar setup, they consider the situation where one does not have access to the underlying distributions, but only has i.i.d. samples from each hypothesis. This work generalizes that goal from the Neyman-Pearson setting to generalized likelihood ratio tests and emphasizes the connection with classification. [3] take on a different problem (tests of statistical independence) by using machine learning algorithms to find scalar maps from the high-dimensional feature space that achieve the desired statistical goal when the fundamental high-dimensional test is intractable.