You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Multi-language virtual machines have a number of advantages. They allow software developers to use software libraries that were written for different programming languages. Furthermore, language implementors do not have to bother with low-level VM functionality and their implementation can benefit from optimizations in existing virtual machines. MagLev is an implementation of the Ruby programming language on top of the GemStone S virtual machine for the Smalltalk programming language. In this work, we present how software components written in both languages can interact. We show how MagLev unifies the Smalltalk and the Ruby object model, taking into account Smalltalk meta classes, Ruby singleton classes, and Ruby modules. Besides, we show how we can call Ruby methods from Smalltalk and vice versa. We also present MagLev's concept of bridge methods for implementing Ruby method calling conventions. Finally, we compare our solution to other language implementations and virtual machines.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: After decades of development in programming languages and programming environments, Smalltalk is still one of few environments that provide advanced features and is still widely used in the industry. However, as Java became prevalent, the ability to call Java code from Smalltalk and vice versa becomes important. Traditional approaches to integrate the Java and Smalltalk languages are through low-level communication between separate Java and Smalltalk virtual machines. We are not aware of any attempt to execute and integrate the Java language directly in the Smalltalk environment. A direct integration allows for very tight and almost seamless integration of the languages and their objects within a single environment. Yet integration and language interoperability impose challenging issues related to method naming conventions, method overloading, exception handling and thread-locking mechanisms. In this paper we describe ways to overcome these challenges and to integrate Java into the Smalltalk environment. Using techniques described in this paper, the programmer can call Java code from Smalltalk using standard Smalltalk idioms while the semantics of each language remains preserved. We present STX:LIBJAVA --- an implementation of Java virtual machine within Smalltalk X --- as a validation of our approach.
With STX:LIBJAVA https: swing.fit.cvut.cz projects stx-libjava , implemented the Java programming language on top of the Smalltalk X virtual machine. STX:LIBJAVA [1] uses a modified Smalltalk X virtual machine that can execute both Smalltalk byte code and Java byte code. It distinguishes between Java objects and Smalltalk object, but both live in the same object memory. When the control flow crosses the language boundary, i.e. a Smalltalk method is called from Java or the other way around, STX:LIBJAVA generates a proxy method that performs the method resolution, transforms arguments, and passes the control flow to the real method. In MagLev , bridge methods are a similar concept but they do not lookup methods by themselves or transform objects between programming languages.