You will be shown an excerpt from a computer science scientific research paper, followed by a question about the paper. Please answer the question. Do not include any text in your response other than the answer.

Context: To assess how well current employees are working, individual work performance (IWP), a useful and regularly used outcome measure, is often utilized. Job performance may be correlated with personality. The phrase "behaviours or acts that are related to the aims of the organization" [7] is a definition of IWP. IWP thus emphasizes employee behaviours or activities rather than the outcomes of those behaviours. Additionally, behaviours should be in the individual's control, omitting those that are limited by the environment [8]. The personalities of the employees at any given time can be ascertained from their answers to a series of questions that can be given to them. The first dimension, task performance, traditionally has received the most attention and can be defined as "the proficiency with which individuals perform the core substantive or technical tasks central to his or her job" [7]. The second dimension of IWP is contextual performance, defined as “behaviours that support the organizational, social and psychological environment in which the technical core must function” [9]. The third dimension of IWP is counterproductive to work behaviour, defined as “behaviour that harms the well-being of the organization” [8].

Question: What are the various component of individual work performance?
Task performance, contextual performance and counter productive to work behaviour are the three components of individual work performance.