You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: Survey on Social Community Detection 
Chapter Title:  Girvan and Newman Algorithm 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  We describe a methodology for the automatic identification of communities of practice from email logs within an organization. We use a betweeness centrality algorithm that can rapidly find communities within a graph representing information flows. We apply this algorithm to an email corpus of nearly one million messages collected over a two-month span, and show that the method is effective at identifying true communities, both formal and informal, within these scale-free graphs. This approach also enables the identification of leadership roles within the communities. These studies are complemented by a qualitative evaluation of the results in the field. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  The modern science of networks has brought significant advances to our understanding of complex systems. One of the most relevant features of graphs representing real systems is community structure, or clustering, i.e. the organization of vertices in clusters, with many edges joining vertices of the same cluster and comparatively few edges joining vertices of different clusters. Such clusters, or communities, can be considered as fairly independent compartments of a graph, playing a similar role like, e.g., the tissues or the organs in the human body. Detecting communities is of great importance in sociology, biology and computer science, disciplines where systems are often represented as graphs. This problem is very hard and not yet satisfactorily solved, despite the huge effort of a large interdisciplinary community of scientists working on it over the past few years. We will attempt a thorough exposition of the topic, from the definition of the main elements of the problem, to the presentation of most methods developed, with a special focus on techniques designed by statistical physicists, from the discussion of crucial issues like the significance of clustering and how methods should be tested and compared against each other, to the description of applications to real networks.

Literature Review:
According to survey BIB003 this algorithm belongs to the category of divisive algorithms. Its underlying principle calls for removing the edges that connect different communities. In the algorithm described in BIB001 , several measures of edge centrality are computed, in particular the so-called intermediate centrality, whereby edges are selected by estimating the level of edge importance based on these measures. As an illustration, intermediate centrality is defined as the number of shortest paths using the edge under analysis. The steps involved are as follows: 1. Compute centrality for all edges, 2. Remove edges with with the greatest centrality (when ties exist with other edges, one edge is to be chosen at random), 3. Recalculate centralities on the remaining graph, 4. Iterate beginning at step 2. This work has exerted great influence on research and, consequently, edge centrality has been a key field of study for many scientists, resulting in the proposal of several measures BIB002 .