You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
How to take multiple factors into account when evaluating a Game with a Purpose? How is player behaviour or participation influenced by different incentives? How does player engagement impact their accuracy in solving tasks? In this paper, we present a detailed investigation of multiple factors affecting the evaluation of a GWAP and we show how they impact on the achieved results. We inform our study with the experimental assessment of a GWAP designed to solve a multinomial classification task.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Crowdsourcing systems, in which numerous tasks are electronically distributed to numerous “information pieceworkers,” have emerged as an effective paradigm for human-powered solving of large-scale problems in domains such as image classification, data entry, optical character recognition, recommendation, and proofreading. Because these low-paid workers can be unreliable, nearly all such systems must devise schemes to increase confidence in their answers, typically by assigning each task multiple times and combining the answers in an appropriate manner, e.g., majority voting. In this paper, we consider a general model of such crowdsourcing tasks and pose the problem of minimizing the total price i.e., number of task assignments that must be paid to achieve a target overall reliability. We give a new algorithm for deciding which tasks to assign to which workers and for inferring correct answers from the workers' answers. We show that our algorithm, inspired by belief propagation and low-rank matrix approximation, significantly outperforms majority voting and, in fact, is optimal through comparison to an oracle that knows the reliability of every worker. Further, we compare our approach with a more general class of algorithms that can dynamically assign tasks. By adaptively deciding which questions to ask to the next set of arriving workers, one might hope to reduce uncertainty more efficiently. We show that, perhaps surprisingly, the minimum price necessary to achieve a target reliability scales in the same manner under both adaptive and nonadaptive scenarios. Hence, our nonadaptive approach is order optimal under both scenarios. This strongly relies on the fact that workers are fleeting and cannot be exploited. Therefore, architecturally, our results suggest that building a reliable worker-reputation system is essential to fully harnessing the potential of adaptive designs.

[2]: Knowledge acquisition (e.g. through labeling) is one of the most successful applications in crowdsourcing. In practice, collecting as specific as possible knowledge via crowdsourcing is very useful since specific knowledge can be generalized easily if we have a knowledge base, but it is difficult to infer specific knowledge from general knowledge. Meanwhile, tasks for acquiring more specific knowledge can be more difficult for workers, thus need more answers to infer high-quality results. Given a limited budget, assigning workers to difficult tasks will be more effective for the goal of specific knowledge acquisition. However, existing crowdsourcing task scheduling cannot incorporate the specificity of workers' answers. In this paper, we present a new framework for task scheduling with the limited budget, targeting an effective solution to more specific knowledge acquisition. We propose novel criteria for evaluating the quality of specificity-dependent answers and result inference algorithms to aggregate more specific answers with budget constraints. We have implemented our framework with real crowdsourcing data and platform, and have achieved significant performance improvement compared with existing approaches.

[3]: As a new distributed computing model, crowdsourcing lets people leverage the crowd's intelligence and wisdom toward solving problems. This article proposes a framework for characterizing various dimensions of quality control in crowdsourcing systems, a critical issue. The authors briefly review existing quality-control approaches, identify open issues, and look to future research directions. In the Web extra, the authors discuss both design-time and runtime approaches in more detail.
In the context of (paid) crowdsourcing, assessment is usually conducted in relation to micro-work platforms [3] , in which important features are related to cost minimization [1] [2] which is out of scope with respect to our work.