You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
The problem of communication among nodes in an is considered, where radio power decay and interference are limiting factors. It has been shown previously that, with simple multi-hopping, the achievable total communication rate in such a network is at most @math . In this work, we study the benefit of node cooperation in conjunction with multi-hopping on the network capacity. We propose a multi-phase communication scheme, combining distributed MIMO transmission with multi-hop forwarding among clusters of nodes. We derive the network throughput of this communication scheme and determine the optimal cluster size. This provides a constructive lower bound on the network capacity. We first show that in a rate of @math can be achieved with transmission power scaling of @math , where @math is the signal path-loss exponent. We further extend this result to , where we show a rate of @math can be achieved with transmission power scaling of @math in a random network with unit node density. In particular, as @math approaches 2, only constant transmission power is required. Finally, we study a random network with density @math and show that a rate of @math is achieved and the required power scales as @math .

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Gupta and Kumar (see IEEE Transactions an Information Theory, vol.46, no.2, p.388-404, 2000) determined the capacity of wireless networks under certain assumptions, among them point-to-point coding, which excludes for example multi-access and broadcast codes. We consider essentially the same physical model of a wireless network under a different traffic pattern, namely the relay traffic pattern, but we allow for arbitrarily complex network coding. In our model, there is only one active source destination pair, while all other nodes assist this transmission. We show code constructions leading to achievable rates and derive upper bounds from the max-flow min-cut theorem. It is shown that lower and upper bounds meet asymptotically as the number of nodes in the network goes to infinity, thus proving that the capacity of the wireless network with n nodes under the relay traffic pattern behaves like log n bits per second. This demonstrates also that network coding is essential: under the point-to-point coding assumption considered by , the achievable rate is constant, independent of the number of nodes. Moreover, the result of this paper has implications' and extensions to fading channels and to sensor networks.

[2]: n source and destination pairs randomly located in a fixed area want to communicate with each other. It is well known that classical multihop architectures that decode and forward packets can deliver at most a radicn-scaling of the aggregate throughput. The performance is limited by the mutual interference between communicating nodes. We show however that a linear scaling of the capacity with n can in fact be achieved by more intelligent node cooperation and distributed MIMO communication. The key ingredient is a hierarchical and digital architecture for nodal exchange of information for realizing the cooperation.
There has been much research into node cooperation in the context of single-source, single-destination, and @math relays. For example, Gastpar in [1] show an achievable rate scaling of @math . However, Ozgur in [1]2 are the first to exploit the linear-scaling result of MIMO communication in a multiple-source network using a distributed MIMO paradigm. For a network, they propose a hierarchical cooperative communication scheme with single-hop distributed MIMO transmission to achieve a network throughput scaling of @math , @math , and single-hop distributed MIMO transmission. They further show that when the same scheme is applied to the more realistic extended network model, it results in a throughput @math , implying that for @math , the scheme outperforms simple multi-hopping.