You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
We explore whether useful temporal neural generative models can be learned from sequential data without back-propagation through time. We investigate the viability of a more neurocognitively-grounded approach in the context of unsupervised generative modeling of sequences. Specifically, we build on the concept of predictive coding, which has gained influence in cognitive science, in a neural framework. To do so we develop a novel architecture, the Temporal Neural Coding Network, and its learning algorithm, Discrepancy Reduction. The underlying directed generative model is fully recurrent, meaning that it employs structural feedback connections and temporal feedback connections, yielding information propagation cycles that create local learning signals. This facilitates a unified bottom-up and top-down approach for information transfer inside the architecture. Our proposed algorithm shows promise on the bouncing balls generative modeling problem. Further experiments could be conducted to explore the strengths and weaknesses of our approach.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: We introduce the "NoBackTrack" algorithm to train the parameters of dynamical systems such as recurrent neural networks. This algorithm works in an online, memoryless setting, thus requiring no backpropagation through time, and is scalable, avoiding the large computational and memory cost of maintaining the full gradient of the current state with respect to the parameters. The algorithm essentially maintains, at each time, a single search direction in parameter space. The evolution of this search direction is partly stochastic and is constructed in such a way to provide, at every time, an unbiased random estimate of the gradient of the loss function with respect to the parameters. Because the gradient estimate is unbiased, on average over time the parameter is updated as it should. The resulting gradient estimate can then be fed to a lightweight Kalman-like filter to yield an improved algorithm. For recurrent neural networks, the resulting algorithms scale linearly with the number of parameters. Preliminary tests on a simple task show that the stochastic approximation of the gradient introduced in the algorithm does not seem to introduce too much noise in the trajectory, compared to maintaining the full gradient, and confirm the good performance and scalability of the Kalman-like version of NoBackTrack.

[2]: The exact form of a gradient-following learning algorithm for completely recurrent networks running in continually sampled time is derived and used as the basis for practical algorithms for temporal supervised learning tasks. These algorithms have (1) the advantage that they do not require a precisely defined training interval, operating while the network runs; and (2) the disadvantage that they require nonlocal communication in the network being trained and are computationally expensive. These algorithms allow networks having recurrent connections to learn complex tasks that require the retention of information over time periods having either fixed or indefinite length.

[3]: The novel Unbiased Online Recurrent Optimization (UORO) algorithm allows for online learning of general recurrent computational graphs such as recurrent network models. It works in a streaming fashion and avoids backtracking through past activations and inputs. UORO is computationally as costly as Truncated Backpropagation Through Time (truncated BPTT), a widespread algorithm for online learning of recurrent networks. UORO is a modification of NoBackTrack that bypasses the need for model sparsity and makes implementation easy in current deep learning frameworks, even for complex models. Like NoBackTrack, UORO provides unbiased gradient estimates; unbiasedness is the core hypothesis in stochastic gradient descent theory, without which convergence to a local optimum is not guaranteed. On the contrary, truncated BPTT does not provide this property, leading to possible divergence. On synthetic tasks where truncated BPTT is shown to diverge, UORO converges. For instance, when a parameter has a positive short-term but negative long-term influence, truncated BPTT diverges unless the truncation span is very significantly longer than the intrinsic temporal range of the interactions, while UORO performs well thanks to the unbiasedness of its gradients.
There has been a great deal of research in finding more biologically-plausible alternatives to back-propagation of errors. Classically, the online alternative to back-propagation of errors was real-time recurrent learning (RTRL, [2] ), which employs forward-mode differentiation to compute gradients. However, this algorithm scales poorly, i.e., quadratically in the number of parameters. Some algorithms have been proposed to reduce the complexity of RTRL, including the [1] and [3] algorithms, but are noisy and slow down the learning procedure in trying to approximate the way back-propagation through time works in an online fashion.