You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Multi-label classification allows a datapoint to be labelled with more than one class at the same time. Ensemble methods generally perform much better than single classifiers. Except bagging style ensembles like ECC, RAkEL, in multi-label classification, other ensemble methods have not been explored much. KFHE (Kalman Filter-based Heuristic Ensemble), is a recent ensemble method which uses the Kalman filter to combine several models. KFHE views the final ensemble to be learned as a state to be estimated which it estimates using multiple noisy "measurements". These "measurements" are essentially component classifiers trained under different settings. This work extends KFHE to multi-label domain by proposing KFHE-HOMER which enhances the performance of HOMER using the KFHE framework. KFHE-HOMER sequentially trains multiple HOMER classifiers using weighted training datapoints and random hyperparameters. These models are considered as measurements and their related error as the uncertainty of the measurements. Then the Kalman filter framework is used to combine these measurements to get a more accurate estimate. The method was tested on 10 multi-label datasets and compared with other multi-label classification algorithms. Results show that KFHE-HOMER performs consistently better than similar multi-label ensemble methods.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Ensemble methods are learning algorithms that construct a set of classifiers and then classify new data points by taking a (weighted) vote of their predictions. The original ensemble method is Bayesian averaging, but more recent algorithms include error-correcting output coding, Bagging, and boosting. This paper reviews these methods and explains why ensembles can often perform better than any single classifier. Some previous studies comparing ensemble methods are reviewed, and some new experiments are presented to uncover the reasons that Adaboost does not overfit rapidly.

[2]: Abstract This paper introduces a new perspective on multi-class ensemble classification that considers training an ensemble as a state estimation problem. The new perspective considers the final ensemble classifier model as a static state, which can be estimated using a Kalman filter that combines noisy estimates made by individual classifier models. A new algorithm based on this perspective, the Kalman Filter-based Heuristic Ensemble (KFHE), is also presented in this paper which shows the practical applicability of the new perspective. Experiments performed on 30 datasets compare KFHE with state-of-the-art multi-class ensemble classification algorithms and show the potential and effectiveness of the new perspective and algorithm. Existing ensemble approaches trade off classification accuracy against robustness to class label noise, but KFHE is shown to be significantly better or at least as good as the state-of-the-art algorithms for datasets both with and without class label noise.
Kalman filter-based heuristic ensemble (KFHE) [2] is a multi-class ensemble algorithm proposed by Pakrashi and Mac Namee, which takes a different approach by viewing the ideal hypothesis for a specific classification problem as the static state to be estimated in the [1] .