You will be provided with the titles and abstracts of a collection of medical RCT reports studying a clinical question -- for instance, the efficacy of an intervention on some medical outcome. Please write a few sentences synthesizing the findings of these reports, which could serve as a conclusion section for a systematic review article. Your response should not include any other text. The RCT reports are below.



Title 1:
An alternate approach to early cancer of the vulva.
Abstract 1:
Early invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva has emerged as a controversial issue in recent literature. Reports illustrating metastatic disease in the inguinal lymph nodes have conflicted with other reports suggesting local treatment only. The morbidity produced by radical vulvectomy to both body image and sexual function make this issue worthy of serious consideration. This report deals with an alternate approach to this disease entity which attempts to preserve vulvar tissue without sacrificing curability where possible metastatic disease exists. The concept is proposed of utilizing the superficial inguinal nodes as sentinel nodes in the treatment planning. The results of 20 patients treated in this manner are presented.


Title 2:
Surgical therapy of T1 and T2 vulvar carcinoma: further experience with radical wide excision and selective inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Abstract 2:
Radical wide excision and selective inguinal node dissection provide a more conservative and less morbid surgical option for women with vulvar carcinoma than en bloc radical vulvectomy with bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. We have expanded our initial experience with this approach to 76 patients with T1 (n = 33) and T2 (n = 43) squamous carcinomas with invasion > 1 mm and clinically negative groin nodes treated between 1978 and 1994. Lateral tumors (n = 53) were more frequent than midline lesions (n = 23). Tumors were excised with a measured gross margin of 2 cm, and dissection was carried to the deep perineal fascia. The mean largest tumor dimension was 26 mm; the mean depth of invasion was 4.4 mm. Superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy, unilateral or bilateral depending on lesion location, was performed. Perioperative complications occurred on the vulva in 8% of cases and in the groin in 11%. Delayed complications, all related to groin treatment, were seen in 29%. The median follow-up interval was 38 months. Seven patients (9%) had inguinal lymph node metastases identified at their primary operation. Most received additional therapy; one has died of disease. Nine women (12%) developed recurrent disease in the vulva: all were controlled by additional resection. Four (5%) developed recurrence in a previously negative groin: three of these are dead of disease. Actuarial 4-year survival is 81%. Radical wide excision and selective inguinal lymphadenectomy can be safely offered to women with T1 and T2 vulvar cancers. Patients with known positive nodes or vulvar failure can be salvaged by further therapy. Women with unanticipated groin failure usually die of disease. These experiences are similar to those observed in more radically resected patients.
The available evidence regarding surgery for early vulvar cancer is generally poor. From the studies of sufficient quality we concluded that radical local excision is a safe alternative to radical vulvectomy for patients with early vulva carcinoma. 
Contralateral groin node dissection can be omitted in patients with a lateralized tumour, and the triple incision technique is as safe as an en bloc dissection. However, omission of femoral lymph node dissection results in a higher incidence of groin recurrences.

Further good quality studies are required, though conducting RCTs on vulvar cancer treatment may not be realistic due to the rarity of the disease. However, observational studies of higher quality could provide us with more reliable evidence.