You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
This paper proposes a generic method to learn interpretable convolutional filters in a deep convolutional neural network (CNN), where each interpretable filter encodes features of a specific object part. Our method does not require additional annotations of object parts or textures for supervision. Instead, we use the same training data as traditional CNNs. Our method automatically assigns each interpretable filter in a high conv-layer with an object part of a certain category during the learning process. Such explicit knowledge representations in conv-layers of CNN help people clarify the logic encoded in the CNN, i.e., answering what patterns the CNN extracts from an input image and uses for prediction. We have tested our method using different benchmark CNNs with various structures to demonstrate the broad applicability of our method. Experiments have shown that our interpretable filters are much more semantically meaningful than traditional filters.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: This paper presents a method to learn a decision tree to quantitatively explain the logic of each prediction of a pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Our method boosts the following two aspects of network interpretability. 1) In the CNN, each filter in a high conv-layer must represent a specific object part, instead of describing mixed patterns without clear meanings. 2) People can explain each specific prediction made by the CNN at the semantic level using a decision tree, i.e., which filters (or object parts) are used for prediction and how much they contribute in the prediction. To conduct such a quantitative explanation of a CNN, our method learns explicit representations of object parts in high conv-layers of the CNN and mines potential decision modes memorized in fully-connected layers. The decision tree organizes these potential decision modes in a coarse-to-fine manner. Experiments have demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method.

[2]: Machine Learning algorithms are increasingly being used in recent years due to their flexibility in model fitting and increased predictive performance. However, the complexity of the models makes them hard for the data analyst to interpret the results and explain them without additional tools. This has led to much research in developing various approaches to understand the model behavior. In this paper, we present the Explainable Neural Network (xNN), a structured neural network designed especially to learn interpretable features. Unlike fully connected neural networks, the features engineered by the xNN can be extracted from the network in a relatively straightforward manner and the results displayed. With appropriate regularization, the xNN provides a parsimonious explanation of the relationship between the features and the output. We illustrate this interpretable feature--engineering property on simulated examples.

[3]:
Furthermore, some method distilled CNN knowledge into another model with interpretable features for explanations. [2] distilled knowledge of a neural network into an additive model to explain the knowledge inside the network. [1] roughly represented the rationale of each CNN prediction using a semantic tree structure. Each node in the tree represented a decision-making mode of the CNN. Similarly, [3] used a semantic graph to summarize and explain all part knowledge hidden inside conv-layers of a CNN.