You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Memory-bound algorithms show complex performance and energy consumption behavior on multicore processors. We choose the lattice-Boltzmann method (LBM) on an Intel Sandy Bridge cluster as a prototype scenario to investigate if and how single-chip performance and power characteristics can be generalized to the highly parallel case. First we perform an analysis of a sparse-lattice LBM implementation for complex geometries. Using a single-core performance model, we predict the intra-chip saturation characteristics and the optimal operating point in terms of energy to solution as a function of implementation details, clock frequency, vectorization, and number of active cores per chip. We show that high single-core performance and a correct choice of the number of active cores per chip are the essential optimizations for lowest energy to solution at minimal performance degradation. Then we extrapolate to the MPI-parallel level and quantify the energy-saving potential of various optimizations and execution modes, where we find these guidelines to be even more important, especially when communication overhead is non-negligible. In our setup we could achieve energy savings of 35 in this case, compared to a naive approach. We also demonstrate that a simple non-reflective reduction of the clock speed leaves most of the energy saving potential unused.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Several possibilities exist to implement the propagation step of lattice Boltzmann methods. This paper describes common implementations and compares the number of memory transfer operations they require per lattice node update. A performance model based on the memory bandwidth is then used to obtain an estimation of the maximum achievable performance on different machines. A subset of the discussed implementations of the propagation step are benchmarked on different Intel- and AMD-based compute nodes using the framework of an existing flow solver that is specially adapted to simulate flow in porous media, and the model is validated against the measurements. Advanced approaches for the propagation step like ''A-A pattern'' or ''Esoteric Twist'' require more programming effort but often sustain significantly better performance than non-naive but straightforward implementations.

[2]: Author(s): Carter, Jonathan; Soe, Min; Oliker, Leonid; Tsuda, Yoshinori; Vahala, George; Vahala, Linda; Macnab, Angus

[3]: Classic vector systems have all but vanished from recent TOP500 lists. Looking at the recently introduced NEC SX-9 series, we benchmark its memory subsystem using the low level vector triad and employ the kernel of an advanced lattice Boltzmann flow solver to demonstrate that classic vectors still combine excellent performance with a well-established optimization approach. To investigate the multi-node performance, the flow field in a real porous medium is simulated using the hybrid MPI OpenMP parallel ILBDC lattice Boltzmann application code. Results for a commodity Intel Nehalem-based cluster are provided for comparison. Clusters can keep up with the vector systems, however, require massive parallelism and thus much more effort to provide a good domain decomposition.

[4]: We present the first large-scale simulation of blood flow in the coronary artieries and other vessels supplying blood to the heart muscle, with a realistic description of human arterial geometry at spatial resolutions from centimeters down to 10 microns (near the size of red blood cells). This multiscale simulation resolves the fluid into a billion volume units, embedded in a bounding space of 300 billion voxels, coupled with the concurrent motion of 300 million red blood cells, which interact with one another and with the surrounding fluid. The level of detail is sufficient to describe phenomena of potential physiological and clinical significance, such as the development of atherosclerotic plaques. The simulation achieves excellent scalability on up to 294, 912 Blue Gene P computational cores.

[5]: We present an auto-tuning approach to optimize application performance on emerging multicore architectures. The methodology extends the idea of search-based performance optimizations, popular in linear algebra and FFT libraries, to application-specific computational kernels. Our work applies this strategy to a lattice Boltzmann application (LBMHD) that historically has made poor use of scalar microprocessors due to its complex data structures and memory access patterns. We explore one of the broadest sets of multicore architectures in the high-performance computing (HPC) literature, including the Intel Xeon E5345 (Clovertown), AMD Opteron 2214 (Santa Rosa), AMD Opteron 2356 (Barcelona), Sun T5140 T2+ (Victoria Falls), as well as a QS20 IBM Cell Blade. Rather than hand-tuning LBMHD for each system, we develop a code generator that allows us to identify a highly optimized version for each platform, while amortizing the human programming effort. Results show that our auto-tuned LBMHD application achieves up to a 15 times improvement compared with the original code at a given concurrency. Additionally, we present a detailed analysis of each optimization, which reveals surprising hardware bottlenecks and software challenges for future multicore systems and applications.
Performance modeling and prediction especially in the context of LBM are an ongoing research topic of many groups in engineering and computer science [4] [2] . Auto-tuning was used, e.g., in [5] for a magnetohydrodynamics LBM. The ILBDC LBM code we use in the present work has been optimized previously [3] and its sustained performance is close to predictions from performance models [1] .