Below is an abstract from a computer science research paper. Given this abstract, your task is to extract all unique relationships between entities of the following types:

- "USED-FOR": For instance, "Our method models user proficiency" -> ["method", "user proficiency", "USED-FOR"].
- "EVALUATE-FOR": For instance, "We evaluate our method using F1-measure" -> ["F1-measure", "method", "EVALUATE-FOR"].
- "FEATURE-OF": For instance, "prior knowledge of the model" -> ["prior knowledge", "model", "FEATURE-OF"].
- "HYPONYM-OF": For instance, "TUIT is a software library" -> ["TUIT", "software library", "HYPONYM-OF"].
- "PART-OF": For instance, "We incorporate NLU module into the system." -> ["NLU module", "system", "PART-OF"].
- "COMPARE": For instance, "Unlike the quantitative prior, the qualitative prior is often ignored" -> ["quantitative prior", "qualitative prior", "COMPARE"].
- "CONJUNCTION": For instance: "obtained from human expert or knowledge base" -> ["human expert", "knowledge base", "CONJUNCTION"].

Format your output as a json array. Each entry in the array should express a single relation, formatted as ["<Entity_A>", "<Entity_B>", "<RELATION_A_B>"]. An example output might look like:

[["neural networks", "classification", "USED-FOR"], ["neuron", "neural network", "PART-OF"]].

If no relations are found, please return an empty array [].

Abstract:

Semantic Web documents that encode facts about entities on the Web have been growing rapidly in size and evolving over time. Creating summaries on lengthy Semantic Web documents for quick identification of the corresponding entity has been of great contemporary interest. In this paper, we explore automatic summa-rization techniques that characterize and enable identification of an entity and create summaries that are human friendly. Specifically, we highlight the importance of diversified (faceted) summaries by combining three dimensions: diversity, uniqueness, and popularity. Our novel diversity-aware entity summarization approach mimics human conceptual clustering techniques to group facts, and picks representative facts from each group to form concise (i.e., short) and comprehensive (i.e., improved coverage through diversity) summaries. We evaluate our approach against the state-of-the-art techniques and show that our work improves both the quality and the efficiency of entity summarization.
[["efficiency", "entity summarization", "EVALUATE-FOR"], ["Creating summaries", "identification of the corresponding entity", "USED-FOR"], ["lengthy Semantic Web documents", "Creating summaries", "USED-FOR"], ["state-of-the-art techniques", "diversity-aware entity summarization approach", "COMPARE"], ["diversity", "diversified (faceted) summaries", "FEATURE-OF"], ["quality", "entity summarization", "EVALUATE-FOR"], ["diversity-aware entity summarization approach", "entity summarization", "USED-FOR"], ["uniqueness", "popularity", "CONJUNCTION"], ["popularity", "diversified (faceted) summaries", "FEATURE-OF"], ["human conceptual clustering techniques", "diversity-aware entity summarization approach", "USED-FOR"], ["state-of-the-art techniques", "entity summarization", "USED-FOR"], ["uniqueness", "diversified (faceted) summaries", "FEATURE-OF"], ["diversity", "uniqueness", "CONJUNCTION"]]