You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Partially observed control problems are a challenging aspect of reinforcement learning. We extend two related, model-free algorithms for continuous control -- deterministic policy gradient and stochastic value gradient -- to solve partially observed domains using recurrent neural networks trained with backpropagation through time. We demonstrate that this approach, coupled with long-short term memory is able to solve a variety of physical control problems exhibiting an assortment of memory requirements. These include the short-term integration of information from noisy sensors and the identification of system parameters, as well as long-term memory problems that require preserving information over many time steps. We also demonstrate success on a combined exploration and memory problem in the form of a simplified version of the well-known Morris water maze task. Finally, we show that our approach can deal with high-dimensional observations by learning directly from pixels. We find that recurrent deterministic and stochastic policies are able to learn similarly good solutions to these tasks, including the water maze where the agent must learn effective search strategies.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Policy learning for partially observed control tasks requires policies that have the ability to store information from past observations. In this paper, we present a method for learning policies with memory for high-dimensional, continuous systems. Our approach does not assume a known state representation and does not attempt to explicitly model the belief over the unobserved state. Instead, we directly learn a policy that can read and write from an internal continuous-valued memory. This type of policy can be interpreted as a type of recurrent neural network (RNN). However, our approach avoids many of the common problems that plague RNNs, such as the vanishing and exploding gradient issues, by instead representing the memory as state variables. The policy is then optimized by using a guided policy search algorithm that alternates between optimizing trajectories through state space (including both physical and memory states), and training a policy with supervised learning to match these trajectories. We evaluate our method on tasks involving continuous control in manipulation and navigation settings, and show that our method can learn complex policies that successfully complete a range of tasks that require memory.

[2]: Policy search methods can allow robots to learn control policies for a wide range of tasks, but practical applications of policy search often require hand-engineered components for perception, state estimation, and low-level control. In this paper, we aim to answer the following question: does training the perception and control systems jointly end-to-end provide better performance than training each component separately? To this end, we develop a method that can be used to learn policies that map raw image observations directly to torques at the robot's motors. The policies are represented by deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with 92,000 parameters, and are trained using a partially observed guided policy search method, which transforms policy search into supervised learning, with supervision provided by a simple trajectory-centric reinforcement learning method. We evaluate our method on a range of real-world manipulation tasks that require close coordination between vision and control, such as screwing a cap onto a bottle, and present simulated comparisons to a range of prior policy search methods.

[3]:
All works mentioned above, except for [1] , consider the memory to be internal to the policy and learn the RNN parameters using BPTT, back-propagating either TD errors or policy gradients. [1] instead take the view of [3] and consider memory as extra state dimensions that can can be read and set by the policy. They optimize the policy using guided policy search [2] which performs explicit trajectory optimization along reference trajectories and, unlike our approach, requires a well defined full latent state and access to this latent state during training.