You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Humans process visual scenes selectively and sequentially using attention. Central to models of human visual attention is the saliency map. We propose a hierarchical visual architecture that operates on a saliency map and uses a novel attention mechanism to sequentially focus on salient regions and take additional glimpses within those regions. The architecture is motivated by human visual attention, and is used for multi-label image classification on a novel multiset task, demonstrating that it achieves high precision and recall while localizing objects with its attention. Unlike conventional multi-label image classification models, the model supports multiset prediction due to a reinforcement-learning based training process that allows for arbitrary label permutation and multiple instances per label.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: A visual attention system, inspired by the behavior and the neuronal architecture of the early primate visual system, is presented. Multiscale image features are combined into a single topographical saliency map. A dynamical neural network then selects attended locations in order of decreasing saliency. The system breaks down the complex problem of scene understanding by rapidly selecting, in a computationally efficient manner, conspicuous locations to be analyzed in detail.

[2]: A number of psychophysical studies concerning the detection, localization and recognition of objects in the visual field have suggested a two-stage theory of human visual perception. The first stage is the “preattentive” mode, in which simple features are processed rapidly and in parallel over the entire visual field. In the second, “attentive” mode, a specialized processing focus, usually called the focus of attention, is directed to particular locations in the visual field. The analysis of complex forms and the recognition of objects are associated with this second stage.1 The computational justification for such a hypothesis comes from the realization that while it is possible to imagine specific algorithms performing tasks such as shape analysis and recognition at specific locations, it is difficult to imagine these algorithms operating in parallel over the whole visual scene, since such an approach will quickly lead to a combinatorial explosion in terms of required computational resources.2 This is essentially the major critique of Minsky and Papert to a universal application of perceptrons in visual perception.3 Taken together, these empirical and theoretical studies suggest that beyond a certain preprocessing stage, the analysis of visual information proceeds in a sequence of operations, each one applied to a selected location (or locations).
The saliency map was initially proposed by Koch & Ullman [2] , then implemented in a computational model by Itti [1] . In their model, saliency is determined by relative feature differences and compiled into a "master saliency map". Attentional selection then consists of directing a fixed-sized attentional region to the area of highest saliency, i.e. in a "winner-take-all" process. The attended location's saliency is then suppressed, and the process repeats, so that multiple attentional shifts can occur following a single feed-forward computation.