You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A review on the public benchmark databases for static keystroke dynamics 
Chapter Title:  Keystroke100 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  Among all the existing biometric modalities, authentication systems based on keystroke dynamics are particularly interesting for usability reasons. Many researchers proposed in the last decades some algorithms to increase the efficiency of this biometric modality. Propose in this paper: a benchmark testing suite composed of a database containing multiple data (keystroke dynamics templates, soft biometric traits ...), which will be made available for the research community and a software that is already available for the scientific community for the evaluation of keystroke dynamics based systems. We also built the proposed biometric database on soft biometric traits for keystroke dynamics to suit the experiment. 110 people had voluntarily participated and gave their soft biometrics data i.e. the way of typing gender age and handedness.

Literature Review:
Loy et al. have created a public KD dataset, which also contains pressure information BIB001 . 100 users provided 10 samples each. In our experiments, we only used the latency information, not the pressure one. The dataset 9 is available in text files. BIB002 . However it can also be used for classical keystroke dynamics authentication. 110 users provided 10 inputs of 5 different passwords during several sessions typed with one hand and 10 additional ones with two hands. Acquisition has been done with the same software than the GREYC database. The dataset 10 is available in Excel file.