You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
In recent years, information retrieval algorithms have taken center stage for extracting important data in ever larger datasets. Advances in hardware technology have lead to the increasingly wide spread use of flash storage devices. Such devices have clear benefits over traditional hard drives in terms of latency of access, bandwidth and random access capabilities particularly when reading data. There are however some interesting trade-offs to consider when leveraging the advanced features of such devices. On a relative scale writing to such devices can be expensive. This is because typical flash devices (NAND technology) are updated in blocks. A minor update to a given block requires the entire block to be erased, followed by a re-writing of the block. On the other hand, sequential writes can be two orders of magnitude faster than random writes. In addition, random writes are degrading to the life of the flash drive, since each block can support only a limited number of erasures. TF-IDF can be implemented using a counting hash table. In general, hash tables are a particularly challenging case for the flash drive because this data structure is inherently dependent upon the randomness of the hash function, as opposed to the spatial locality of the data. This makes it difficult to avoid the random writes incurred during the construction of the counting hash table for TF-IDF. In this paper, we will study the design landscape for the development of a hash table for flash storage devices. We demonstrate how to effectively design a hash table with two related hash functions, one of which exhibits a data placement property with respect to the other. Specifically, we focus on three designs based on this general philosophy and evaluate the trade-offs among them along the axes of query performance, insert and update times and I O time through an implementation of the TF-IDF algorithm.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: This paper presents a new cluster architecture for low-power data-intensive computing. FAWN couples low-power embedded CPUs to small amounts of local flash storage, and balances computation and I O capabilities to enable efficient, massively parallel access to data. The key contributions of this paper are the principles of the FAWN architecture and the design and implementation of FAWN-KV--a consistent, replicated, highly available, and high-performance key-value storage system built on a FAWN prototype. Our design centers around purely log-structured datastores that provide the basis for high performance on flash storage, as well as for replication and consistency obtained using chain replication on a consistent hashing ring. Our evaluation demonstrates that FAWN clusters can handle roughly 350 key-value queries per Joule of energy--two orders of magnitude more than a disk-based system.

[2]: We present FlashStore, a high throughput persistent key-value store, that uses flash memory as a non-volatile cache between RAM and hard disk. FlashStore is designed to store the working set of key-value pairs on flash and use one flash read per key lookup. As the working set changes over time, space is made for the current working set by destaging recently unused key-value pairs to hard disk and recycling pages in the flash store. FlashStore organizes key-value pairs in a log-structure on flash to exploit faster sequential write performance. It uses an in-memory hash table to index them, with hash collisions resolved by a variant of cuckoo hashing. The in-memory hash table stores compact key signatures instead of full keys so as to strike tradeoffs between RAM usage and false flash read operations. FlashStore can be used as a high throughput persistent key-value storage layer for a broad range of server class applications. We compare FlashStore with BerkeleyDB, an embedded key-value store application, running on hard disk and flash separately, so as to bring out the performance gain of FlashStore in not only using flash as a cache above hard disk but also in its use of flash aware algorithms. We use real-world data traces from two data center applications, namely, Xbox LIVE Primetime online multi-player game and inline storage deduplication, to drive and evaluate the design of FlashStore on traditional and low power server platforms. FlashStore outperforms BerkeleyDB by up to 60x on throughput (ops sec), up to 50x on energy efficiency (ops Joule), and up to 85x on cost efficiency (ops sec dollar) on the evaluated datasets.
In this work, we design a counting hash table that maintain frequencies, and this has not been addressed thus far. We store the hash table on the SSD which is not seen in the designs of [1] [2] . Unlike most of the existing strategies that rely on simple memory-based buffering schemes, we design a novel combination of memory- and disk- based buffering scheme. Our method leverages the strengths of SSDs (fast sequential random reads, fast sequential writes) to effectively address the weaknesses in SSDs (random writes, write endurance). We would like to emphasis that the works presented in this section do not handle a counting hash table , which is required by algorithms like TF-IDF, but our proposed hash table designs will.