You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: Sustainability in Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review for Building up a Knowledge Base 
Chapter Title:  E. Related Work 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  BACKGROUND: Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) have gained significant popularity among software engineering (SE) researchers since 2004. Several researchers have also been working on improving the scientific and technological support for SLRs in SE. We argue that there is also an essential need for evidence-based body of knowledge about different aspects of the adoption of SLRs in SE. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this research is to empirically investigate the adoption and use of SLRs in SE research from various perspectives. METHOD: We used multi-method approach as it is based on a combination of complementary research methods which are expected to compensate each others' limitations. RESULTS: A large majority of the participants are convinced of the value of using a rigorous and systematic methodology for literature reviews. However, there are concerns about the required time and resources for SLRs. One of the most important motivators for performing SLRs is new findings and inception of innovative ideas for further research. The reported SLRs are more influential compared to the traditional literature reviews in terms of number of citations. One of the main challenges of conducting SLRs is drawing a balance between rigor and required effort. CONCLUSIONS: SLR has become a popular research methodology for conducting literature review and evidence aggregation in SE. There is an overall positive perception about this methodology. The findings provide interesting insights into different aspects of SLRs. We expect that the findings can provide valuable information to readers on what can be expected from conducting SLRs and the potential impact of such reviews.

Literature Review:
There are systematic literature reviews on different topics in software engineering, but so far none has been conducted that investigates the relation between sustainability and software engineering. Mahaux et al. BIB001 performed a preliminary search on the DBLP Computer Science Bibliography database BIB002 . For articles with the prefixes "sustainab-" OR "ecolog-" OR "environmental-" in the title, the data base returned over 3000 results (in January 2010), but filtering on important software-related venues lead to as few as 11 results. They propose that a systematic literature review should be conducted. In contrast to BIB001 , we are interested in publications from all scientifically sound venues and journals as we see great potential for learning from other domains. Therefore, we did not restrict this systematic literature review to softwarerelated venues, which is the main reason why we received more results.