You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A Review of Computational Methods for Clustering Genes with Similar Biological Functions 
Chapter Title:  Strategy 2: Evolution-Based Optimization 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  Tbe applicability of evolution strategies (ESs), population based stochastic optimization techniques, to optimize clustering objective functions is explored. Clustering objective functions are categorized into centroid and non-centroid type of functions. Optimization of the centroid type of objective functions is accomplished by formulating them as functions of real-valued parameters using ESs. Both hard and fuzzy clustering objective functions are considered in this study. Applicability of ESs to discrete optimization problems is extended to optimize the non-centroid type of objective functions. As ESs are amenable to parallelization, a parallel model (master/slave model) is described in the context of the clustering problem. Results obtained for selected data sets substantiate the utility of ESs in clustering. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  In this paper, we investigate how to apply the hybrid genetic algorithms (the memetic algorithms) to solve the parallel machine scheduling problem. There are two essential issues to be dealt with for all kinds of parallel machine scheduling problems: job partition among machines and job sequence within each machine. The basic idea of the proposed method is that (a) use the genetic algorithms to evolve the job partition and then (b) apply a local optimizer to adjust the job permutation to push each chromosome climb to his local optima. Preliminary computational experiments demonstrate that the hybrid genetic algorithm outperforms the genetic algorithms and the conventional heuristics. 
3. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB003):  BackgroundPrevious studies on bladder cancer have shown nodal involvement to be an independent indicator of prognosis and survival. This study aimed at developing an objective method for detection of nodal metastasis from molecular profiles of primary urothelial carcinoma tissues.MethodsThe study included primary bladder tumor tissues from 60 patients across different stages and 5 control tissues of normal urothelium. The entire cohort was divided into training and validation sets comprised of node positive and node negative subjects. Quantitative expression profiling was performed for a panel of 70 genes using standardized competitive RT-PCR and the expression values of the training set samples were run through an iterative machine learning process called genetic programming that employed an N-fold cross validation technique to generate classifier rules of limited complexity. These were then used in a voting algorithm to classify the validation set samples into those associated with or without nodal metastasis.ResultsThe generated classifier rules using 70 genes demonstrated 81% accuracy on the validation set when compared to the pathological nodal status. The rules showed a strong predilection for ICAM1, MAP2K6 and KDR resulting in gene expression motifs that cumulatively suggested a pattern ICAM1>MAP2K6>KDR for node positive cases. Additionally, the motifs showed CDK8 to be lower relative to ICAM1, and ANXA5 to be relatively high by itself in node positive tumors. Rules generated using only ICAM1, MAP2K6 and KDR were comparably robust, with a single representative rule producing an accuracy of 90% when used by itself on the validation set, suggesting a crucial role for these genes in nodal metastasis.ConclusionOur study demonstrates the use of standardized quantitative gene expression values from primary bladder tumor tissues as inputs in a genetic programming system to generate classifier rules for determining the nodal status. Our method also suggests the involvement of ICAM1, MAP2K6, KDR, CDK8 and ANXA5 in unique mathematical combinations in the progression towards nodal positivity. Further studies are needed to identify more class-specific signatures and confirm the role of these genes in the evolution of nodal metastasis in bladder cancer. 
4. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB004):  Choosing a small subset of genes that enables a good classification of diseases on the basis of microarray data is a difficult optimization problem. This paper presents a memetic algorithm, called MAGS, to deal with gene selection for supervised classification of microarray data. MAGS is based on an embedded approach for attribute selection where a classifier tightly interacts with the selection process. The strength of MAGS relies on the synergy created by combining a problem specific crossover operator and a dedicated local search procedure, both being guided by relevant information from a SVM classifier. Computational experiments on 8 well-known microarray datasets show that our memetic algorithm is very competitive compared with some recently published studies. 
5. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB005):  This study presents gene-expression programming (GEP), which is an extension to genetic programming, as an alternative approach to modeling stage–discharge relationship. The results obtained are compared to more conventional methods, stage rating curve and multiple linear regression techniques. Statistical measures such as average, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values, as well as criteria such as mean square error and determination coefficient, the coefficient of efficiency, and the adjusted coefficient of efficiency are used to measure the performance of the models developed by employing GEP. Also, the explicit formulations of the developed GEP models are presented. Statistics and scatter plots indicate that the proposed equations produce quite satisfactory results and perform superior to conventional models. 
6. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB006):  Evolution has provided a source of inspiration for algorithm designers since the birth of computers. The resulting field, evolutionary computation, has been successful in solving engineering tasks ranging in outlook from the molecular to the astronomical. Today, the field is entering a new phase as evolutionary algorithms that take place in hardware are developed, opening up new avenues towards autonomous machines that can adapt to their environment. We discuss how evolutionary computation compares with natural evolution and what its benefits are relative to other computing approaches, and we introduce the emerging area of artificial evolution in physical systems. 
7. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB007):  Abstract Over the last few decades, many population-based swarm and evolutionary algorithms were introduced in the literature. It is well known that population topology or sociometry plays an important role in improving the performance of population-based optimization algorithms by enhancing population diversity when solving multiobjective and multimodal problems. Many population structures and population topologies were developed for particle swarm optimization and differential evolutionary algorithms. Therefore, a comprehensive review of population topologies developed for PSO and DE is carried out in this paper. We anticipate that this survey will inspire researchers to integrate the population topologies into other nature inspired algorithms and to develop novel population topologies for improving the performances of population-based optimization algorithms for solving single objective optimization, multiobjective optimization and other classes of optimization problems.

Literature Review:
Evolution-based optimization is involved in the processes of selection, recombination, and mutation BIB002 . The selection of evolution strategy fails to deal with changing environments, and it threatens the self-adaptation with its control parameters (internal model)   . For recombination processes (in terms of discrete and intermediate processes), it performs with control parameters on object variables, standard deviations, and rotation angles. The mutation mechanism makes the techniques evolve its control parameters (standard deviations and covariances). Evolution-based optimization can optimize the mathematical functions of the technique with continuously changeable parameters and extend to solve discrete optimization problems. This strategy can deliver a high quality of solutions and allows the technique to move toward better solutions in the search space with a population BIB007 BIB008 . GA is one of the techniques using evolution strategy, which is commonly used for clustering based on selection, crossover, and mutation. In previous studies, most algorithms were derived from GA, such as evolution strategy (ES) and evolutionary programming (EP)  . The memetic algorithm is the extension of GA and includes local search optimization for problem-solving BIB003  BIB005 . Genetic programming (GP), on the other hand, is the extension of GA that has been successfully applied and used to solve many problems BIB001 BIB004 . Moreover, gene expression programming (GEP) uses the character of linear chromosomes and has been applied in symbolic regression and block stacking  BIB006 .