Your task is to classify the citation intent within the following provided text from a computational linguistics research paper. The cited work is demarcated by "<cite>" and "</cite>". Determine the purpose of the cited work by selecting from the listed categories:

- Background: The cited paper underpins the subject matter.
- Motivation: The cited paper inspires or provides a rationale for the current research.
- Uses: The current work utilizes concepts or tools from the cited paper.
- Extends: The current work advances ideas or methods from the cited paper.
- Similarities: The current work identifies commonalities with the cited paper.
- Differences: The current work delineates its distinction from the cited paper.
- FutureWork: The cited paper is acknowledged as groundwork for prospective research.

Indicate the intents by listing them in a `json` array, e.g. ["Background", "Uses"]. More than one intent may be applicable. Do not include any extraneous text in your response.

Context with Citation:
Recently, scholars in this area identified several properties of the translation process with the aid of corpora (Baker, 1993; Baker, 1996; Olohan, 2001; Laviosa, 2002; Hansen, 2003; Pym, 2005) . These properties are subsumed under four keywords: explicitation, simplification, normalization and levelling out. They focus on the general effects of the translation process. Toury (1995) has a different theory from these. That is, a translated text will carry some fingerprints of its source language. Recently, Pastor et al. (2008) and Ilisei et al. (2009; have provided empirical evidence of simplification translation properties using a comparable corpus of Spanish. <cite>Koppel and Ordan (2011)</cite> perform empirical studies to validate both theories, using a subcorpus extracted from the Europarl (Koehn, 2005) and IHT corpora<cite> (Koppel and Ordan, 2011)</cite> . They used a comparable corpus of original English and English translated from five other European languages. In addition, original English and English translated from Greek and Korean was also used in their experiment. They have found that a translated text contains both source language dependent and independent features. Obviously, corpora of this sort, which focus on a single language (e.g., English), are not adequate for claiming the universal validity of translation properties. Different languages (and language families) have different linguistic properties.
["Motivation", "Background"]