You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: Approximate reinforcement learning: An overview 
Chapter Title:  D. Convergence issues 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  We propose a new approach to reinforcement learning for control problems which combines value-function approximation with linear architectures and approximate policy iteration. This new approach is motivated by the least-squares temporal-difference learning algorithm (LSTD) for prediction problems, which is known for its efficient use of sample experiences compared to pure temporal-difference algorithms. Heretofore, LSTD has not had a straightforward application to control problems mainly because LSTD learns the state value function of a fixed policy which cannot be used for action selection and control without a model of the underlying process. Our new algorithm, least-squares policy iteration (LSPI), learns the state-action value function which allows for action selection without a model and for incremental policy improvement within a policy-iteration framework. LSPI is a model-free, off-policy method which can use efficiently (and reuse in each iteration) sample experiences collected in any manner. By separating the sample collection method, the choice of the linear approximation architecture, and the solution method, LSPI allows for focused attention on the distinct elements that contribute to practical reinforcement learning. LSPI is tested on the simple task of balancing an inverted pendulum and the harder task of balancing and riding a bicycle to a target location. In both cases, LSPI learns to control the pendulum or the bicycle by merely observing a relatively small number of trials where actions are selected randomly. LSPI is also compared against Q-learning (both with and without experience replay) using the same value function architecture. While LSPI achieves good performance fairly consistently on the difficult bicycle task, Q-learning variants were rarely able to balance for more than a small fraction of the time needed to reach the target location. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  In this paper we consider the problem of finding a near-optimal policy in a continuous space, discounted Markovian Decision Problem (MDP) by employing value-function-based methods when only a single trajectory of a fixed policy is available as the input. We study a policy-iteration algorithm where the iterates are obtained via empirical risk minimization with a risk function that penalizes high magnitudes of the Bellman-residual. Our main result is a finite-sample, high-probability bound on the performance of the computed policy that depends on the mixing rate of the trajectory, the capacity of the function set as measured by a novel capacity concept (the VC-crossing dimension), the approximation power of the function set and the controllability properties of the MDP. Moreover, we prove that when a linear parameterization is used the new algorithm is equivalent to Least-Squares Policy Iteration. To the best of our knowledge this is the first theoretical result for off-policy control learning over continuous state-spaces using a single trajectory. 
3. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB003):  In this paper we consider approximate policy-iteration-based reinforcement learning algorithms. In order to implement a flexible function approximation scheme we propose the use of non-parametric methods with regularization, providing a convenient way to control the complexity of the function approximator. We propose two novel regularized policy iteration algorithms by adding L2-regularization to two widely-used policy evaluation methods: Bellman residual minimization (BRM) and least-squares temporal difference learning (LSTD). We derive efficient implementation for our algorithms when the approximate value-functions belong to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space. We also provide finite-sample performance bounds for our algorithms and show that they are able to achieve optimal rates of convergence under the studied conditions. 
4. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB004):  We address the problem of computing the optimal Q-function in Markov decision problems with infinite state-space. We analyze the convergence properties of several variations of Q-learning when combined with function approximation, extending the analysis of TD-learning in (Tsitsiklis & Van Roy, 1996a) to stochastic control settings. We identify conditions under which such approximate methods converge with probability 1. We conclude with a brief discussion on the general applicability of our results and compare them with several related works. 
5. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB005):  We introduce a variant of the classification-based approach to policy iteration which uses a cost-sensitive loss function weighting each classification mistake by its actual regret, that is, the difference between the action-value of the greedy action and of the action chosen by the classifier. For this algorithm, we provide a full finite-sample analysis. Our results state a performance bound in terms of the number of policy improvement steps, the number of rollouts used in each iteration, the capacity of the considered policy space (classifier), and a capacity measure which indicates how well the policy space can approximate policies that are greedy with respect to any of its members. The analysis reveals a tradeoff between the estimation and approximation errors in this classification-based policy iteration setting. Furthermore it confirms the intuition that classification-based policy iteration algorithms could be favorably compared to value-based approaches when the policies can be approximated more easily than their corresponding value functions. We also study the consistency of the algorithm when there exists a sequence of policy spaces with increasing capacity. 
6. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB006):  We consider approximate policy evaluation for finite state and action Markov decision processes (MDP) in the off-policy learning context and with the simulation-based least squares temporal difference algorithm, LSTD(λ). We establish for the discounted cost criterion that the off-policy LSTD(λ) converges almost surely under mild, minimal conditions. We also analyze other convergence and boundedness properties of the iterates involved in the algorithm, and based on them, we suggest a modification in its practical implementation. Our analysis uses theories of both finite space Markov chains and Markov chains on topological spaces. 
7. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB007):  In this paper we consider the problem of policy evaluation in reinforcement learning, i.e., learning the value function of a fixed policy, using the least-squares temporal-difference (LSTD) learning algorithm. We report a finite-sample analysis of LSTD. We first derive a bound on the performance of the LSTD solution evaluated at the states generated by the Markov chain and used by the algorithm to learn an estimate of the value function. This result is general in the sense that no assumption is made on the existence of a stationary distribution for the Markov chain. We then derive generalization bounds in the case when the Markov chain possesses a stationary distribution and is β-mixing.

Literature Review:
If the policy evaluation and policy improvement errors are bounded at each iteration, offline policy iteration eventually produces policies with a bounded suboptimality, BIB002 , BIB001 Sec. 6.2] . (In the algorithms above, only exact policy improvements were considered, leading to a zero policy improvement error.) However, in general the convergence to a fixed policy is not guaranteed; instead, the policy may, e.g., oscillate. Finite-sample results are also available BIB003 , BIB004 , BIB006 . Many theoretical works focus on policy evaluation only BIB007 - BIB008 . Under appropriate conditions, approximate SARSA converges to a fixed point BIB005 . The behavior of general optimistic policy iteration has not been properly understood yet, and can be very complicated. For instance, a phenomenon called chattering can occur, whereby the value function converges while the policy sequence oscillates BIB001 Sec. 6.4] . VI. APPROXIMATE POLICY SEARCH Algorithms for approximate policy search represent the policy explicitly, usually by a parametric approximator, and seek an optimal parameter vector using optimization techniques.