You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Automatic tool detection from surgical imagery has a multitude of useful applications, such as real-time computer assistance for the surgeon. Using the successful residual network architecture, a system that can distinguish 21 different tools in cataract surgery videos is created. The videos are provided as part of the 2017 CATARACTS challenge and pose difficulties found in many real-world datasets, for example a strong class imbalance. The construction of the detection system is guided by a wide array of experiments that explore different design decisions.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Classification of data with imbalanced class distribution has encountered a significant drawback of the performance attainable by most standard classifier learning algorithms which assume a relatively balanced class distribution and equal misclassification costs. This paper provides a review of the classification of imbalanced data regarding: the application domains; the nature of the problem; the learning difficulties with standard classifier learning algorithms; the learning objectives and evaluation measures; the reported research solutions; and the class imbalance problem in the presence of multiple classes.

[2]: This study investigates the effect of class imbalance in training data when developing neural network classifiers for computer-aided medical diagnosis. The investigation is performed in the presence of other characteristics that are typical among medical data, namely small training sample size, large number of features, and correlations between features. Two methods of neural network training are explored: classical backpropagation (BP) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) with clinically relevant training criteria. An experimental study is performed using simulated data and the conclusions are further validated on real clinical data for breast cancer diagnosis. The results show that classifier performance deteriorates with even modest class imbalance in the training data. Further, it is shown that BP is generally preferable over PSO for imbalanced training data especially with small data sample and large number of features. Finally, it is shown that there is no clear preference between oversampling and no compensation approach and some guidance is provided regarding a proper selection.
Furthermore, the class imbalance influences a neural network's stochastic gradient descent training. Since training examples of the majority classes are much more common, the gradient direction is dominated by examples of these majority classes [1] [2] . A possible remedy is to scale the loss by class prevalence, i.e. increasing the loss and therefore gradient length for low-prevalence classes. This approach is explored in this paper as well.