You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Image aesthetics assessment has been challenging due to its subjective nature. Inspired by the scientific advances in the human visual perception and neuroaesthetics, we design Brain-Inspired Deep Networks (BDN) for this task. BDN first learns attributes through the parallel supervised pathways, on a variety of selected feature dimensions. A high-level synthesis network is trained to associate and transform those attributes into the overall aesthetics rating. We then extend BDN to predicting the distribution of human ratings, since aesthetics ratings are often subjective. Another highlight is our first-of-its-kind study of label-preserving transformations in the context of aesthetics assessment, which leads to an effective data augmentation approach. Experimental results on the AVA dataset show that our biological inspired and task-specific BDN model gains significantly performance improvement, compared to other state-of-the-art models with the same or higher parameter capacity.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Effective visual features are essential for computational aesthetic quality rating systems. Existing methods used machine learning and statistical modeling techniques on handcrafted features or generic image descriptors. A recently-published large-scale dataset, the AVA dataset, has further empowered machine learning based approaches. We present the RAPID (RAting PIctorial aesthetics using Deep learning) system, which adopts a novel deep neural network approach to enable automatic feature learning. The central idea is to incorporate heterogeneous inputs generated from the image, which include a global view and a local view, and to unify the feature learning and classifier training using a double-column deep convolutional neural network. In addition, we utilize the style attributes of images to help improve the aesthetic quality categorization accuracy. Experimental results show that our approach significantly outperforms the state of the art on the AVA dataset.

[2]: 

[3]: Can machine learning deliver AI? Theoretical results, inspiration from the brain and cognition, as well as machine learning experiments suggest that in order to learn the kind of complicated functions that can represent high-level abstractions (e.g. in vision, language, and other AI-level tasks), one would need deep architectures. Deep architectures are composed of multiple levels of non-linear operations, such as in neural nets with many hidden layers, graphical models with many levels of latent variables, or in complicated propositional formulae re-using many sub-formulae. Each level of the architecture represents features at a different level of abstraction, defined as a composition of lower-level features. Searching the parameter space of deep architectures is a difficult task, but new algorithms have been discovered and a new sub-area has emerged in the machine learning community since 2006, following these discoveries. Learning algorithms such as those for Deep Belief Networks and other related unsupervised learning algorithms have recently been proposed to train deep architectures, yielding exciting results and beating the state-of-the-art in certain areas. Learning Deep Architectures for AI discusses the motivations for and principles of learning algorithms for deep architectures. By analyzing and comparing recent results with different learning algorithms for deep architectures, explanations for their success are proposed and discussed, highlighting challenges and suggesting avenues for future explorations in this area.

[4]: With the ever-expanding volume of visual content available, the ability to organize and navigate such content by aesthetic preference is becoming increasingly important. While still in its nascent stage, research into computational models of aesthetic preference already shows great potential. However, to advance research, realistic, diverse and challenging databases are needed. To this end, we introduce a new large-scale database for conducting Aesthetic Visual Analysis: AVA. It contains over 250,000 images along with a rich variety of meta-data including a large number of aesthetic scores for each image, semantic labels for over 60 categories as well as labels related to photographic style. We show the advantages of AVA with respect to existing databases in terms of scale, diversity, and heterogeneity of annotations. We then describe several key insights into aesthetic preference afforded by AVA. Finally, we demonstrate, through three applications, how the large scale of AVA can be leveraged to improve performance on existing preference tasks.

[5]: Photo quality assessment from the view of human aesthetics, which tries to classify images into the categories of good and bad, has drawn a lot of attention in computer vision field. Up to now, experts have proposed many methods to deal with this problem. Most of those methods are based on the design of hand-crafted features. However, due to the complexity and subjectivity of human’s aesthetic activities, it is difficult to describe and model all the factors that affect the photo aesthetic quality. Therefore those methods just obtain limited success. On the other hand, deep convolutional neural network has been proved to be effective in many computer vision problems and it does not need human efforts in the design of features. In this paper, we try to adopt a deep convolutional neural network that “understands” images well to conduct the photo aesthetic quality assessment. Firstly, we implement a deep convolutional neural network which has eight layers and millions of parameters. Then to “teach” this network enough knowledge about images, we train it on the ImageNet which is one of the largest available image database. Next, for each given image, we take the activations of the last layer of the neural network as its aesthetic feature. The experimental results on two large and reliable image aesthetic quality assessment datasets prove the effectiveness of our method.
The human brain transforms and synthesizes a torrent of complex and ambiguous sensory information into coherent thought and decisions. Most aesthetic assessment methods adopt simple linear classifiers to categorize the input features, which is obviously oversimplified. Deep networks [3] attempt to emulate the underlying complex neural mechanisms of human perception, and display the ability to describe image content from the primitive level (low-level features) to the abstract level (high-level features). They are composed of multiple non-linear transformations to yield more abstract and descriptive embedding representations. The RAPID model [1] is among the first to apply deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) [2] to the aesthetics rating prediction, where the features are automatically learned. They further improved the model by exploring style annotations [4] associated with images. In fact, even the hidden activations from a generic CNN proved to work reasonably well for aesthetics features [5] .