You will be provided with the titles and abstracts of a collection of medical RCT reports studying a clinical question -- for instance, the efficacy of an intervention on some medical outcome. Please write a few sentences synthesizing the findings of these reports, which could serve as a conclusion section for a systematic review article. Your response should not include any other text. The RCT reports are below.



Title 1:
Adjuvant polychemotherapy of nonorgan-confined bladder cancer after radical cystectomy revisited: long-term results of a controlled prospective study and further clinical experience.
Abstract 1:
A total of 83 patients with nonorgan-confined bladder cancer with or without lymph node metastases (tumor stages pT3b, pT4a and/or pN1, pN2) was evaluated in November 1993 for relapse-free and overall survival. All patients underwent radical cystectomy between 1987 and 1991, 38 underwent adjuvant polychemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine and cisplatin plus doxorubicin (M-VAC) or epirubicin (M-VEC). Of the 83 patients 49 had entered a prospective randomized trial comparing adjuvant to no adjuvant treatment. The protocol was activated in May 1987. Patient recruitment was concluded in December 1990 because an interim analysis of the 49 randomized patients revealed a significant prognostic advantage in favor of the 26 patients randomized to the chemotherapy group compared to 23 in the control group (p = 0.0015, log-rank test for relapse-free survival curves). Preliminary data were published in 1992. Of the 26 patients randomized for adjuvant chemotherapy 18 were treated with M-VAC or M-VEC, 7 refused chemotherapy before or during cycle 1 and 1 received chemotherapy without cisplatin because of impaired renal function. The update of patient followup obtained in November 1993 continues to demonstrate a significant improvement in progression-free survival in favor of patients randomized for adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.0005). Followup of patients living free of disease ranged from 38 to 78 months. In a second analysis of actual treatment, the total collective of 83 patients treated from 1987 to 1991 was reviewed: 38 who had actually undergone adjuvant M-VAC/M-VEC (18 during the prospective trial and 20 in 1991 as the routinely recommended therapy) were compared with 45 without adjuvant M-VAC/M-VEC (7 refused to participate in the adjuvant trial, 8 randomized for but did not undergo adjuvant M-VAC/M-VEC, 23 belonged to the control group of the trial, and 7 underwent cystectomy in 1991 and remained without adjuvant treatment). This analysis again revealed a significant prognostic advantage in favor of the patients treated with adjuvant M-VAC/M-VEC. We conclude that adjuvant chemotherapy with M-VAC/M-VEC leads to a significant prolongation of relapse-free survival and to an improvement of the definitive cure rates after radical cystectomy for locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.


Title 2:
Adjuvant chemotherapy following cystectomy benefits patients with deeply invasive bladder cancer.
Abstract 2:
nan


Title 3:
Adjuvant cisplatin chemotherapy following cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial.
Abstract 3:
Between April 1984 and May 1989, 77 eligible patients with invasive, nonmetastatic (stage M0) transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder were stratified after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection on the basis of nodal status (stage pN0 versus pN1-2) and were randomly assigned to either observation or postoperative cisplatin chemotherapy (3 courses of 90 mg./m.2 cisplatin given for 3 consecutive days at monthly intervals). Patient eligibility included a creatinine clearance of greater than 60 ml. per minute. There were 40 eligible patients in the control group (median age 61 years) and 37 in the cisplatin group (median age 64 years). In regard to postoperative tumor stage and nodal status, there was no statistical difference between the 2 patient groups. In the cisplatin group 21 patients received the full dose, 9 required dose reduction and 7 refused treatment. Median followup was 5 years 9 months (range 3 to 8 years). Survival analysis showed no significant difference (log rank p = 0.65) between the 40 patients in the control group and the 37 in the cisplatin group. The survival rate at 5 years was 54% (95% confidence interval 39 to 69%) in the control group and 57% (95% confidence interval 40 to 74%) in the treatment group. Patients with cancer confined to the bladder wall (stage pT3a or less) had a 5-year overall survival rate of 70% and those with tumor growth in the perivesical fat or into the prostate (stages pT3b plus pT4a) had a 5-year overall survival rate of 40%. This difference in survival between the low stage subgroup (stages pT3a or less) and the high stage subgroup (pT3b plus pT4a) is highly significant (p = 0.0043). However, no difference between the controls and the cisplatin group was found within either the low or high stage subgroups. The reasons for failing to show a survival benefit from adjuvant high dose cisplatin monotherapy after radical cystectomy are discussed.
This IPD meta-analysis provides the best evidence currently available on the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer. However, at present there is insufficient evidence on which to reliably base treatment decisions. These results highlight the urgent need for further research into the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. The results of appropriately sized randomised trials, such as the ongoing EORTC-30994 trial are needed before any definitive conclusions can be drawn.