You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
The emerging Internet of Things (IoT) has lead to a dramatic increase in type, quantity, and the number of functions that can be offered in a smart environment. Future smart environments will be even richer in terms of the number of devices and functionality provided by them. This poses two major challenges a) an end user has to search through a vast number of IoT devices to identify the suitable devices that satisfy their preferences, and b) it is extremely difficult for users to manually define fine-grained security policies to support workflows involving multiple functions. This paper introduces an intelligent new approach to overcome these challenges by a) enabling users to describe their required functionalities in the form of activity workflow, b) automatically selecting a group of devices to satisfy users functional requirements and maximise their preferences over device usage, c) systematically generating local network access control policies to ensure enforce the principle of least privilege. We study different heuristic search algorithms to find the preferred devices for a given workflow. Experiments results show that the Genetic Algorithm is the best, among the algorithms that we test, as it offers a balance between efficiency and effectiveness.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: The IETF's push towards standardizing the Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) grammar and mechanism for specifying IoT device behavior is gaining increasing interest from industry. The ability to control inappropriate communication between devices in the form of access control lists (ACLs) is expected to limit the attack surface on IoT devices; however, little is known about how MUD policies will get enforced in operational networks, and how they will interact with current and future intrusion detection systems (IDS). We believe this paper is the first attempt to translate MUD policies into flow rules that can be enforced using SDN, and in relating exception behavior to attacks that can be detected via off-the-shelf IDS. Our first contribution develops and implements a system that translates MUD policies to flow rules that are proactively configured into network switches, as well as reactively inserted based on run-time bindings of DNS. We use traces of 28 consumer IoT devices taken over several months to evaluate the performance of our system in terms of switch flow-table size and fraction of exception traffic that needs software inspection. Our second contribution identifies the limitations of flow-rules derived from MUD in protecting IoT devices from internal and external network attacks, and we show how our system is able to detect such volumetric attacks (including port scanning, TCP UDP ICMP flooding, ARP spoofing, and TCP SSDP SNMP reflection) by sending only a very small fraction of exception packets to off-the-shelf IDS.

[2]: Smart home IoT devices are becoming increasingly popular. Modern programmable smart home hubs such as SmartThings enable homeowners to manage devices in sophisticated ways to save energy, improve security, and provide conveniences. Unfortunately, many smart home systems contain vulnerabilities, potentially impacting home security and privacy. This paper presents Vigilia, a system that shrinks the attack surface of smart home IoT systems by restricting the network access of devices. As existing smart home systems are closed, we have created an open implementation of a similar programming and configuration model in Vigilia and extended the execution environment to maximally restrict communications by instantiating device-based network permissions. We have implemented and compared Vigilia with forefront IoT-defense systems; our results demonstrate that Vigilia outperforms these systems and incurs negligible overhead.

[3]:
The main objective of MUD is to introduce the least privilege access required for IoT devices. However, as MUD policy is generated prior to the deployment it cannot define all access endpoints with fine granularity, especially local ones [1] . In contrast to the MUD policy, we propose to use a user defined activity workflow to drive automatic policy establishment. [2] proposed Vigilia, which uses capability-based RMI access control to derive access control policy. However, it requires predefined capability-base access to specify the access between different type of devices prior to the depolyment. This requirement limits the interaction of a device to what is pre-defined in its driver. [3] developed a firewall that automatically generates profiles (i.e. policies) for IoT devices by monitoring their traffic during learning phase. Then enforce the learned policies during the depolyment. This approach work well, but it requires the devices to generate all possible traffic during the learning phase. However, we target the activity automation workflow so that policies can be automatically generated to ensure least privilege access to devices that are part of the workflow