You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
We present sec-cs, a hash-table-like data structure for contents on untrusted storage that is provably secure and storage-efficient. We achieve authenticity and confidentiality with zero storage overhead using deterministic authenticated encryption. State-of-the-art data deduplication approaches prevent redundant storage of shared parts of different contents irrespective of whether relationships between contents are known a priori.,,,,Instead of just adapting existing approaches, we introduce novel (multi-level) chunking strategies, ML-SC and ML-CDC, which are significantly more storage-efficient than existing approaches in presence of high redundancy.,,,,We prove sec-cs's security, publish an implementation, and present evaluation results indicating suitability for, e.g., future backup systems that should preserve many versions of files on little available storage.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: An authenticated data structure (ADS) is a data structure whose operations can be carried out by an untrusted prover, the results of which a verifier can efficiently check as authentic. This is done by having the prover produce a compact proof that the verifier can check along with each operation's result. ADSs thus support outsourcing data maintenance and processing tasks to untrusted servers without loss of integrity. Past work on ADSs has focused on particular data structures (or limited classes of data structures), one at a time, often with support only for particular operations. This paper presents a generic method, using a simple extension to a ML-like functional programming language we call λ• (lambda-auth), with which one can program authenticated operations over any data structure defined by standard type constructors, including recursive types, sums, and products. The programmer writes the data structure largely as usual and it is compiled to code to be run by the prover and verifier. Using a formalization of λ• we prove that all well-typed λ• programs result in code that is secure under the standard cryptographic assumption of collision-resistant hash functions. We have implemented λ• as an extension to the OCaml compiler, and have used it to produce authenticated versions of many interesting data structures including binary search trees, red-black+ trees, skip lists, and more. Performance experiments show that our approach is efficient, giving up little compared to the hand-optimized data structures developed previously.

[2]: Query answers from on-line databases can easily be corrupted by hackers or malicious database publishers. Thus it is important to provide mechanisms which allow clients to trust the results from on-line queries. Authentic publication allows untrusted publishers to answer securely queries from clients on behalf of trusted off-line data owners. Publishers validate answers using hard-to-forge verification objects VOs), which clients can check efficiently. This approach provides greater scalability, by making it easy to add more publishers, and better security, since on-line publishers do not need to be trusted.To make authentic publication attractive, it is important for the VOs to be small, efficient to compute, and efficient to verify. This has lead researchers to develop independently several different schemes for efficient VO computation based on specific data structures. Our goal is to develop a unifying framework for these disparate results, leading to a generalized security result. In this paper we characterize a broad class of data structures which we call Search DAGs, and we develop a generalized algorithm for the construction of VOs for Search DAGs. We prove that the VOs thus constructed are secure, and that they are efficient to compute and verify. We demonstrate how this approach easily captures existing work on simple structures such as binary trees, multi-dimensional range trees, tries, and skip lists. Once these are shown to be Search DAGs, the requisite security and efficiency results immediately follow from our general theorems. Going further, we also use Search DAGs to produce and prove the security of authenticated versions of two complex data models for efficient multi-dimensional range searches. This allows efficient VOs to be computed (size O(log N + T)) for typical one- and two-dimensional range queries, where the query answer is of size T and the database is of size N. We also show I O-efficient schemes to construct the VOs. For a system with disk blocks of size B, we answer one-dimensional and three-sided range queries and compute the VOs with O(logB N + T B) I O operations using linear size data structures.

[3]:
ADS, in general, is an umbrella term for data structures involving three parties (a trusted who publishes data, an untrusted that stores structured data, and a that requests data) that enable authenticated, efficient queries to the data. [3] In this sense, |sec-cs| can be considered an ADS with additional data deduplication and confidentiality properties: The cloud storage backend can be considered the and the user client plays the roles of and . An overview of existing ADS and methods for constructing ADS in general are provided by [2] and [1] .