You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
One of the current challenges in machine learning is how to deal with data coming at increasing rates in data streams. New predictive learning strategies are needed to cope with the high throughput data and concept drift. One of the data stream mining tasks where new learning strategies are needed is multi-target regression, due to its applicability in a high number of real world problems. While reliable and effective learning strategies have been proposed for batch multi-target regression, few have been proposed for multi-target online learning in data streams. Besides, the existing solutions do not consider the occurrence of inter-target correlations when making predictions. In this work, we propose an online learning strategy for multi-target regression in data streams. The proposed strategy extends a single target decision tree online learning algorithm to allow multi-target online regression learning in data streams. For such, the proposed strategy, called Stacked Single-target Hoeffding Tree (SST-HT), uses the inter-target dependencies as an additional information source to enhance predictive accuracy. Throughout an extensive experimental setup, we evaluate our proposal against state-of-the-art decision tree-based algorithms for online multi-target regression. According to the experimental results, SST-HT presents superior predictive accuracy, with a small increase in the processing time and memory requirements.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: In this paper, we address the task of learning models for predicting structured outputs. We consider both global and local predictions of structured outputs, the former based on a single model that predicts the entire output structure and the latter based on a collection of models, each predicting a component of the output structure. We use ensemble methods and apply them in the context of predicting structured outputs. We propose to build ensemble models consisting of predictive clustering trees, which generalize classification trees: these have been used for predicting different types of structured outputs, both locally and globally. More specifically, we develop methods for learning two types of ensembles (bagging and random forests) of predictive clustering trees for global and local predictions of different types of structured outputs. The types of outputs considered correspond to different predictive modeling tasks: multi-target regression, multi-target classification, and hierarchical multi-label classification. Each of the combinations can be applied both in the context of global prediction (producing a single ensemble) or local prediction (producing a collection of ensembles). We conduct an extensive experimental evaluation across a range of benchmark datasets for each of the three types of structured outputs. We compare ensembles for global and local prediction, as well as single trees for global prediction and tree collections for local prediction, both in terms of predictive performance and in terms of efficiency (running times and model complexity). The results show that both global and local tree ensembles perform better than the single model counterparts in terms of predictive power. Global and local tree ensembles perform equally well, with global ensembles being more efficient and producing smaller models, as well as needing fewer trees in the ensemble to achieve the maximal performance.
From @math it is possible to obtain a prediction @math for a instance @math . When constructing @math one expects that the obtained values of @math are as close as possible to the real measured target values @math . Regarding algorithmic solutions, accordingly to [1] MTR problems have been solved using two main strategies for the solutions: global methods and local methods. Global methods correspond to solutions that use a single model to predict all target variables at once. Those methods implicitly model the inter-target dependencies, and also offer more compact and less computationally costly solutions for MTR tasks, being more viable to online scenarios. The local methods, on the other hand, employ traditional STR solutions and often manipulate or modify the input space to insert the inter-target dependency information within the problem modelling. In this sense, local methods use multiple ST regressors to solve a MTR task, frequently more than one regressor for each target variable , which in turn make them more costly solutions than the global ones. The simplest local solution for MTR tasks, as previously mentioned, consists in creating a ST regressor for each target and simply ignoring the underlying inter-target dependencies.