You will be provided with the titles and abstracts of a collection of medical RCT reports studying a clinical question -- for instance, the efficacy of an intervention on some medical outcome. Please write a few sentences synthesizing the findings of these reports, which could serve as a conclusion section for a systematic review article. Your response should not include any other text. The RCT reports are below.



Title 1:
Ablation of lesions or no treatment in minimal-mild endometriosis in infertile women: a randomized trial. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dell'Endometriosi.
Abstract 1:
In order to analyse the efficacy of resection/ablation of minimal/mild endometriotic lesions for improving fertility, we conducted a randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were women aged </=36 years who were trying to conceive and had a laparoscopically confirmed diagnosis of minimal/mild endometriosis (stage I or II of the revised American Fertility Society classification) and otherwise unexplained infertility for >/=2 years. Eligible women were randomly assigned to resection or ablation of visible endometriosis (54 patients) or diagnostic laparoscopy only (47 patients). After laparoscopy women tried to conceive spontaneously for 1 year (follow-up period). A total of five women withdrew from the study: three for personal reasons, and two were lost to follow-up. Considering 51 women in the resection/ablation and 45 in the no-treatment group who ended the follow-up period, 12 (24%) in the resection/ablation group and 13 (29%) in the no treatment group conceived; the difference was not significant. Two spontaneous abortions were observed in the resection/ablation group and three in the no-treatment one. Thus the 1 year birth rate was 10 out of 51 women (19.6%) in the resection/ablation group and 10 out of 45 women (22.2%) in the no-treatment group. In conclusion, the results of this study do not support the hypothesis that ablation of endometriotic lesions markedly improves fertility rates.


Title 2:
Fecundity of infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis and women with unexplained infertility. The Canadian Collaborative Group on Endometriosis.
Abstract 2:
To assess whether infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis have lower fecundity than women with unexplained infertility.
                Prospective cohort study.
                Twenty-three infertility clinics across Canada.
                Three hundred thirty-one infertile women aged 20-39 years.
                Diagnostic laparoscopy for infertility. Infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis (n = 168) were compared with women with unexplained infertility (n = 263). Both groups were managed expectantly. The women were followed up for 36 weeks after the laparoscopy or, for those who became pregnant, for up to 20 weeks of the pregnancy.
                Fecundity refers to the probability of becoming pregnant in the first 36 weeks after laparoscopy and carrying the pregnancy for > or = 20 weeks. The fecundity rate is the number of pregnancies per 100 person-months.
                Fecundity was 18.2% in infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis and 23.7% in women without endometriosis (log-rank test). The fecundity rate was 2.52 per 100 person-months in women with endometriosis and 3.48 per 100 person-months in women with unexplained infertility. The crude and adjusted fecundity rate ratios were 0.72 and 0.83 (95% confidence interval = 0.53-1.32), respectively.
                The fecundity of infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis is not significantly lower than that of women with unexplained infertility.
The use of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of subfertility related to minimal and mild endometriosis may improve future fertility.