You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Codimension 2 complete intersections in P^N have a natural parameter space H : a projective bundle over a projective space given by the choice of the lower degree equation and of the higher degree equation up to a multiple of the first. Motivated by the question of existence of complete families of smooth complete intersections, we study the birational geometry of H . In a first part, we show that the first contraction of the MMP for H always exists and we describe it. Then, we show that it is possible to run the full MMP for H , and we describe it, in two degenerate cases. As an application, we prove the existence of complete curves in the punctual Hilbert scheme of complete intersection subschemes of A^2.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: In this paper, we study the birational geometry of the Hilbert scheme of n points on P^2. We discuss the stable base locus decomposition of the effective cone and the corresponding birational models. We give modular interpretations to the models in terms of moduli spaces of Bridgeland semi-stable objects. We construct these moduli spaces as moduli spaces of quiver representations using G.I.T. and thus show that they are projective. There is a precise correspondence between wall-crossings in the Bridgeland stability manifold and wall-crossings between Mori cones. For n at most 9, we explicitly determine the walls in both interpretations and describe the corresponding flips and divisorial contractions.

[2]: Assuming finite generation in dimension n − 1, we prove that pl-flips exist in dimension n.
Unlike the varieties @math , @math is always log Fano ( [1] Theorem 2.5). This immediately implies that it is a Mori dream space by [2] , answering the analogue of Question for @math . Since @math is of Picard rank @math , it is possible to run its MMP in two directions. One of these is trivial: we get a contraction, the Hilbert-Chow morphism. As for @math , it is the other one that is interesting to describe.