You will be presented with a citation segment from the section of an NLP research paper, as well as the context surrounding that citation. Classify the intent behind this citation by choosing from one of the following categories:
- Background: provides context or foundational information related to the topic.
- Extends: builds upon the cited work.
- Uses: applies the methods or findings of the cited work.
- Motivation: cites the work as inspiration or rationale for the research.
- CompareOrContrast: compares or contrasts the cited work with others.
- FutureWork: cites the work as a direction for future research.

Your answer should be a single word from the following list of options: ["Background", "Extends", "Uses", "Motivation", "CompareOrContrast", "FutureWork"]. Do not include any other text in your response.

Section Title:
experiments

Context before the citation:
Sedivy et al. (1999) asked subjects to identify the target of a vague description in a visual scene.

Citation Sentence:
Sedivy et al. ( 1999 ) asked subjects to identify the target of a vague description in a visual scene .

Context after the citation:
Consider the tall cup. The relevant scene would contain three distractors: (1) a less tall object of the same type as the target (e.g., a cup that is less tall), (2) a different kind of object that previous studies had shown to be intermediate in height (e.g., a pitcher that, while being taller than both cups, was neither short nor tall for a pitcher), and (3) a different type of object to which the adjective is inapplicable (e.g., a door key). Across the different conditions under which the experiment was done (e.g., allowing subjects to study the domain before or after the onset of speech), it was found not to matter much whether the adjective applied âintrinsicallyâ to the target object (i.e., whether the target was tall for a cup): Hearers identifed the target without problems in both types of situations. The time subjects took before looking at the target for the first time was measured, and although these latency times were somewhat greater when the referent were not intrinsically tall than when they were, the average difference was tiny at 554 versus 538 miliseconds.
Background