You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
The workflow of extracting features from images using convolutional neural networks (CNN) and generating captions with recurrent neural networks (RNN) has become a de-facto standard for image captioning task. However, since CNN features are originally designed for classification task, it is mostly concerned with the main conspicuous element of the image, and often fails to correctly convey information on local, secondary elements. We propose to incorporate coding with vector of locally aggregated descriptors (VLAD) on spatial pyramid for CNN features of sub-regions in order to generate image representations that better reflect the local information of the images. Our results show that our method of compact VLAD coding can match CNN features with as little as 3 of dimensionality and, when combined with spatial pyramid, it results in image captions that more accurately take local elements into account.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Several state-of-the-art image representations consist in averaging local statistics computed from patch-level descriptors. It has been shown by that such average statistics suffer from two sources of variance. The first one comes from the fact that a finite set of local statistics are averaged. The second one is due to the variation in the proportion of object-dependent information between different images of the same class. For the problem of object classification, these sources of variance affect negatively the accuracy since they increase the overlap between class-conditional probabilities. Our goal is to include information about the spatial layout of images in image signatures based on average statistics. We show that the traditional approach to including the spatial layout - the spatial pyramid (SP) - increases the first source of variance while only weakly reducing the second one. We therefore propose two complementary approaches to account for the spatial layout which are compatible with our goal of variance reduction. The first one models the spatial layout in an image-independent manner (as is the case of the SP) while the second one adapts to the image content. A significant benefit of these approaches with respect to the SP is that they do not incur an increase of the image signature dimensionality. We show on PASCAL VOC 2007, 2008 and 2009 the benefits of our approach.
[1] showed a far simpler approach for taking spatial information into account, by simply incorporating the coordinate information into the feature vector and augmenting it. We will also examine this approach and compare it to our model in Section 4.