You will be provided with the titles and abstracts of a collection of medical RCT reports studying a clinical question -- for instance, the efficacy of an intervention on some medical outcome. Please write a few sentences synthesizing the findings of these reports, which could serve as a conclusion section for a systematic review article. Your response should not include any other text. The RCT reports are below.



Title 1:
A randomized trial of inhaled versus intravenous steroids in ventilator-dependent preterm infants.
Abstract 1:
Intravenous steroids improve the respiratory course in ventilator-dependent preterm infants but have adverse effects. We hypothesized that inhaled steroids would be as effective, but with less systemic effects.
                We conducted a randomized, prospective trial comparing inhaled beclomethasone, either 400 or 800 microg/d, to intravenous dexamethasone in preterm infants dependent on conventional mechanical ventilation and supplemental oxygen at 2 weeks of age.
                Seventy-eight infants were randomized. By day three of therapy, the intravenous steroid group had significantly decreased ventilator and oxygen requirements compared to either inhaled group. The inhaled 800-microg/d group trended toward more rapid decreases in ventilator and oxygen requirements than the 400-microg/d group. By day 14, all groups had similar reductions in ventilator and oxygen requirements. The incidence of adverse effects did not differ between groups.
                In this small, randomized study, inhaled steroids conferred no advantages to intravenous steroids in the management of ventilator-dependent preterm infants.


Title 2:
Randomized controlled trial of three different doses of aerosol beclomethasone versus systemic dexamethasone to promote extubation in ventilated premature infants.
Abstract 2:
Our objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of aerosol beclomethasone vs. systemic dexamethasone for extubation in premature infants at high risk for chronic lung disease (CLD). Intubated preterm infants who were identified as being at high risk for moderate-severe CLD on day 14 of life were randomized to one of four groups. The control group received systemic dexamethasone and aerosol placebo, while the other three groups received either high (2.40-3.69 microg/kg/day delivered to lungs), medium (1.0-1.85 microg/kg/day), or low (0.48-0.74 microg/kg/day) dose aerosol beclomethasone and systemic placebo. Those receiving aerosol steroids who remained ventilator-dependent after 7 days were switched to standard 42-day tapering doses of systemic dexamethasone. The primary outcome was extubation within 1 week of starting steroids, using predefined criteria. Secondary variables included changes in lung function, rates of side effects, and tracheal aspirate white blood cell counts. Sixty-one infants with birth weights of 761 +/- 18 g (mean +/- SEM) and gestational ages of 25.7 +/- 0.2 weeks were randomized to one of the four groups. Seven of 15 infants in the control systemic dexamethasone group were successfully extubated compared with 3/16 in the high-dose beclomethasone group, 1/15 in the medium-dose group, and 2/15 in the low-dose group (P < 0.01). Only dexamethasone subjects demonstrated improvements in lung function over the study period. These infants also had significant increases in blood pressure and blood glucose levels, as well as a decline in their tracheal aspirate white blood cell count. In conclusion, aerosol beclomethasone at the very low doses used in this study did not facilitate extubation in intubated premature infants at high risk for moderate-severe CLD.
                Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


Title 3:
A multicenter, randomized open study of early corticosteroid treatment (OSECT) in preterm infants with respiratory illness: comparison of early and late treatment and of dexamethasone and inhaled budesonide.
Abstract 3:
To compare early (<3 days) with late (>15 days) steroid therapy and dexamethasone with inhaled budesonide in very preterm infants at risk of developing chronic lung disease.
                Five hundred seventy infants from 47 neonatal intensive care units were enrolled. Criteria for enrollment included gestational age <30 weeks, postnatal age <72 hours, and need for mechanical ventilation and inspired oxygen concentration >30%. Infants were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups in a factorial design: early (<72 hours) dexamethasone, early budesonide, delayed selective (>15 days) dexamethasone, and delayed selective budesonide. Dexamethasone was given in a tapering course beginning with 0.50 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses for 3 days reducing by half until 12 days of therapy had elapsed. Budesonide was administered by metered dose inhaler and a spacing chamber in a dose of 400 microg/kg twice daily for 12 days. Delayed selective treatment was started if infants needed mechanical ventilation and >30% oxygen for >15 days. The factorial design allowed 2 major comparisons: early versus late treatment and systemic dexamethasone versus inhaled budesonide. The primary outcome was death or oxygen dependency at 36 weeks and analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary outcome measures included death or major cerebral abnormality, duration of oxygen treatment, and complications of prematurity. Adverse effects were also monitored daily.
                There were no significant differences among the groups for the primary outcome. Early steroid treatment was associated with a lower primary outcome rate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61,1.18) but even after adjustment for confounding variables the difference remained nonsignificant. Dexamethasone-treated infants also had a lower primary outcome rate (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.62,1.20) but again this difference remained not significant after adjustment. For death before discharge, dexamethasone and early treatment had worse outcomes than budesonide and delayed selective treatment (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 0.93,2.16; OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 0.99,2.30 after adjustment, respectively) with the results not quite reaching significance. Duration of supplementary oxygen was shorter in the early dexamethasone group (median: 31 days vs 40-44 days). Early dexamethasone was also associated with increased weight loss during the first 12 days of treatment (52 g vs 3 g) compared with early budesonide, but over 30 days there was no difference. In the early dexamethasone group, there was a reduced incidence of persistent ductus arteriosus (34% vs 52%-59%) and an increased risk of hyperglycemia (55% vs 29%-34%) compared with the other 3 groups. Dexamethasone was associated with an increased risk of hypertension and gastrointestinal problems compared with budesonide but only the former attained significance.
                Infants given early treatment and dexamethasone therapy had improved survival without chronic lung disease at 36 weeks compared with those given delayed selective treatment and inhaled budesonide, respectively, but results for survival to discharge were in the opposite direction; however, none of these findings attained statistical significance. Early dexamethasone treatment reduced the risk of persistent ductus arteriosus. Inhaled budesonide may be safer than dexamethasone, but there is no clear evidence that it is more or less effective.
This review found no evidence that inhaled corticosteroids confer net advantages over systemic corticosteroids in the management of ventilator dependent preterm infants. Neither inhaled steroids nor systemic steroids can be recommended as standard treatment for ventilated preterm infants. There was no evidence of difference in effectiveness or side-effect profiles for inhaled versus systemic steroids. A better delivery system guaranteeing selective delivery of inhaled steroids to the alveoli might result in beneficial clinical effects without increasing side-effects. To resolve this issue, studies are needed to identify the risk/benefit ratio of different delivery techniques and dosing schedules for the administration of these medications. The long-term effects of inhaled steroids, with particular attention to neurodevelopmental outcome, should be addressed in future studies.