You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A survey of static analysis methods for identifying security vulnerabilities in software systems 
Chapter Title:  52 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  A new method for software safety analysis is presented which uses program slicing and constraint solving to construct and analyze path conditions, conditions defined on a program's input variables which must hold for information flow between two points in a program. Path conditions are constructed from subgraphs of a program's dependence graph, specifically, slices and chops. The article describes how constraint solvers can be used to determine if a path condition is satisfiable and, if so, to construct a witness for a safety violation, such as an information flow from a program point at one security level to another program point at a different security level. Such a witness can prove useful in legal matters.The article reviews previous research on path conditions in program dependence graphs; presents new extensions of path conditions for arrays, pointers, abstract data types, and multithreaded programs; presents new decomposition formulae for path conditions; demonstrates how interval analysis and BDDs (binary decision diagrams) can be used to reduce the scalability problem for path conditions; and presents case studies illustrating the use of path conditions in safety analysis. Applying interval analysis and BDDs is shown to overcome the combinatorial explosion that can occur in constructing path conditions. Case studies and empirical data demonstrate the usefulness of path conditions for analyzing practical programs, in particular, how illegal influences on safety-critical programs can be discovered and analyzed. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  Language-based information flow control (IFC) is a powerful tool to discover security leaks in software. Most current IFC approaches are however based on nonstandard type systems. Type-based IFC is elegant, but not precise and can lead to false alarms. We present a more precise approach to IFC which exploits active research in static program analysis. Our IFC approach is based on path conditions in program dependence graphs (PDGs). PDGs are a sophisticated and powerful analysis device, and today can handle realistic programs in full C or Java. We first recapitulate a theorem connecting the classical notion of noninterference to PDGs. We then introduce path conditions in Java PDGs. Path conditions are necessary conditions for information flow; today path conditions can be generated and solved for realistic programs. We show how path conditions can produce witnesses for security leaks. The approach has been implemented for full Java and augmented with classical security level lattices. Examples and case studies demonstrate the feasibility and power of the method.

Literature Review:
The types of values that can be controlled by an untrusted adversary are qualified as being tainted, and the rest of the variables are qualified as untainted. A constraint graph is constructed for a CQual program. If there is a path from a tainted node to an untainted node in the graph, an error is flagged. Newsome and Song propose a dynamic taintedvariable analysis that catches errors by monitoring tainted variables at runtime. BIB001 Data originating or arithmetically derived from untrusted sources, such as the network, are marked as tainted. Tainted variables are tracked at runtime, and when they are used in a dangerous way, an attack is detected. Ashcraft and Engler 45 also use tainted-variable analysis to detect software attacks due to tainted variables. Their approach provides user-defined sanity checks to untaint potentially tainted variables. Pistoia  proposes an algorithm based on program slicing to automatically discover malicious tainted variables in a library. His approach can be used to decide whether a portion of library code should be made privileged or not. Hammer, Krinke, and Snelting's algorithm Snelting et al. BIB002 make the observation that program dependence graphs (PDGs) and non-interference are related in the following manner. Consider two statements s 1 and s 2 . If dom(s 1 ) 6 w dom(s 2 ), then, in a security-correct program, it must be the case that s 1 = 2 backslice(s 2 ). Here, backslice is the function that maps each statement s to its static backward slice, consisting of all the (transitive) predecessors of s along control-and data-dependence edges in the PDG. Based on this observation, Hammer et al. BIB003 have presented an algorithm that checks for noninterference: for any output statement s, it must be the case that backslice(s) contains only statements that have a lower security label than s. Hammer et al. also refine slices with path conditions to get higher accuracy, but we elide the details here. Note that even PDG-based computation, as in the above technique, is only an approximation to the ideal of non-interference. We assume that the reader is familiar with PDGs and slicing, as these are standard concepts in program analysis. Here, we present just an example to illustrate the idea in the context of information-flow security. Consider the program shown in Figure 7 . (Figure 8 shows the PDG for this program.) Edges that are in the backward slice from the output statement are shown in red. It is clear that the backward slice of the output statement includes the higher-security input statements, which must not interfere with the output statement (assume that w coincides with in the security lattice shown in Figure 7 ). Note also, that a more sophisticated program verifier may be able to reason that the outcome of the branch at line 10 is always false. An ideal checker for non-interference would not report a IBM SYSTEMS JOURNAL, VOL 46, NO 2, 2007 security violation. It should be noted that PDG-based algorithms, such as the one above, have not been shown to scale to large applications, of the size of several hundred-thousand lines of code. Flowsensitive approaches, such as Denning and Denning's algorithm and several type-system-based algorithms, can scale better. The latter also enjoy the advantage of compositional analysis, which means that parts of programs can be analyzed in isolation, which is generally hard to do in PDG-based analysis.