You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
The in-memory graph layout or organization has a considerable impact on the time and energy efficiency of distributed memory graph computations. It affects memory locality, inter-task load balance, communication time, and overall memory utilization. Graph layout could refer to partitioning or replication of vertex and edge arrays, selective replication of data structures that hold meta-data, and reordering vertex and edge identifiers. In this work, we present DGL, a fast, parallel, and memory-efficient distributed graph layout strategy that is specifically designed for small-world networks (low-diameter graphs with skewed vertex degree distributions). Label propagation-based partitioning and a scalable BFS-based ordering are the main steps in the layout strategy. We show that the DGL layout can significantly improve end-to-end performance of five challenging graph analytics workloads: PageRank, a parallel subgraph enumeration program, tuned implementations of breadth-first search and single-source shortest paths, and RDF3X-MPI, a distributed SPARQL query processing engine. Using these benchmarks, we additionally offer a comprehensive analysis on how graph layout affects the performance of graph analytics with variable computation and communication characteristics.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: The most commonly used method to tackle the graph partitioning problem in practice is the multilevel approach. During a coarsening phase, a multilevel graph partitioning algorithm reduces the graph size by iteratively contracting nodes and edges until the graph is small enough to be partitioned by some other algorithm. A partition of the input graph is then constructed by successively transferring the solution to the next finer graph and applying a local search algorithm to improve the current solution. In this paper, we describe a novel approach to partition graphs effectively especially if the networks have a highly irregular structure. More precisely, our algorithm provides graph coarsening by iteratively contracting size-constrained clusterings that are computed using a label propagation algorithm. The same algorithm that provides the size-constrained clusterings can also be used during uncoarsening as a fast and simple local search algorithm. Depending on the algorithm's configuration, we are able to compute partitions of very high quality outperforming all competitors, or partitions that are comparable to the best competitor in terms of quality, hMetis, while being nearly an order of magnitude faster on average. The fastest configuration partitions the largest graph available to us with 3.3 billion edges using a single machine in about ten minutes while cutting less than half of the edges than the fastest competitor, kMetis.

[2]: Hypergraph partitioning is an important problem with extensive application to many areas, including VLSI design [Alpert and Kahng, 1995], efficient storage of large databases on disks [Shekhar and Liu, 1996], and data mining [, 1996; , 1999b] . The problem is to partition the vertices of a hypergraph into k equal-size parts, such that the number of hyperedges connecting vertices in different parts is minimized.

[3]: 

[4]: 

[5]: 

[6]: Billion-node graphs pose significant challenges at all levels from storage infrastructures to programming models. It is critical to develop a general purpose platform for graph processing. A distributed memory system is considered a feasible platform supporting online query processing as well as offline graph analytics. In this paper, we study the problem of partitioning a billion-node graph on such a platform, an important consideration because it has direct impact on load balancing and communication overhead. It is challenging not just because the graph is large, but because we can no longer assume that the data can be organized in arbitrary ways to maximize the performance of the partitioning algorithm. Instead, the algorithm must adopt the same data and programming model adopted by the system and other applications. In this paper, we propose a multi-level label propagation (MLP) method for graph partitioning. Experimental results show that our solution can partition billion-node graphs within several hours on a distributed memory system consisting of merely several machines, and the quality of the partitions produced by our approach is comparable to state-of-the-art approaches applied on toy-size graphs.

[7]: Partitioning graphs at scale is a key challenge for any application that involves distributing a graph across disks, machines, or data centers. Graph partitioning is a very well studied problem with a rich literature, but existing algorithms typically can not scale to billions of edges, or can not provide guarantees about partition sizes. In this work we introduce an efficient algorithm, balanced label propagation, for precisely partitioning massive graphs while greedily maximizing edge locality, the number of edges that are assigned to the same shard of a partition. By combining the computational efficiency of label propagation --- where nodes are iteratively relabeled to the same 'label' as the plurality of their graph neighbors --- with the guarantees of constrained optimization --- guiding the propagation by a linear program constraining the partition sizes --- our algorithm makes it practically possible to partition graphs with billions of edges. Our algorithm is motivated by the challenge of performing graph predictions in a distributed system. Because this requires assigning each node in a graph to a physical machine with memory limitations, it is critically necessary to ensure the resulting partition shards do not overload any single machine. We evaluate our algorithm for its partitioning performance on the Facebook social graph, and also study its performance when partitioning Facebook's 'People You May Know' service (PYMK), the distributed system responsible for the feature extraction and ranking of the friends-of-friends of all active Facebook users. In a live deployment, we observed average query times and average network traffic levels that were 50.5 and 37.1 (respectively) when compared to the previous naive random sharding.

[8]: Many real-world systems, such as social networks, rely on mining efficiently large graphs, with hundreds of millions of vertices and edges. This volume of information requires partitioning the graph across multiple nodes in a distributed system. This has a deep effect on performance, as traversing edges cut between partitions incurs a significant performance penalty due to the cost of communication. Thus, several systems in the literature have attempted to improve computational performance by enhancing graph partitioning, but they do not support another characteristic of real-world graphs: graphs are inherently dynamic, their topology evolves continuously, and subsequently the optimum partitioning also changes over time. In this work, we present the first system that dynamically repartitions massive graphs to adapt to structural changes. The system optimises graph partitioning to prevent performance degradation without using data replication. The system adopts an iterative vertex migration algorithm that relies on local information only, making complex coordination unnecessary. We show how the improvement in graph partitioning reduces execution time by over 50 , while adapting the partitioning to a large number of changes to the graph in three real-world scenarios.

[9]:
We selected METIS and RCM for comparison to the partitioning and ordering aspects of , as they represent the most popular and current state-of-the-art approaches for these problems in terms of both speed of computation and quality produced. There are various other partitioning algorithms and methods, including multi-level partitioners similar to METIS [1] [9] [5] , coordinate and geometry-based partitioners [3] , and hypergraph partitioners [2] . Hypergraph partitioners can often calculate higher quality partitions than graph partitioners for regular matrices, but at a considerably higher cost to compute. Other graph partitioners have utilized label propagation in single or multilevel approaches [8] [7] [6] [4] , demonstrating improved algorithm execution times with these partitions versus methods.