You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Community detection is one of the most important and challenging problems in network analysis. However, real-world networks may have very different structural properties and communities of various nature. As a result, it is hard (or even impossible) to develop one algorithm suitable for all datasets. A standard machine learning tool is to consider a parametric algorithm and choose its parameters based on the dataset at hand. However, this approach is not applicable to community detection since usually no labeled data is available for such parameter tuning. In this paper, we propose a simple and effective procedure allowing to tune hyperparameters of any given community detection algorithm without requiring any labeled data. The core idea is to generate a synthetic network with properties similar to a given real-world one, but with known communities. It turns out that tuning parameters on such synthetic graph also improves the quality for a given real-world network. To illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, we show significant improvements obtained for several well-known parametric community detection algorithms on a variety of synthetic and real-world datasets.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Community detection is one of the most important problems in network analysis. Among many algorithms proposed for this task, methods based on statistical inference are of particular interest: they are mathematically sound and were shown to provide partitions of good quality. Statistical inference methods are based on fitting some random graph model (a.k.a. null model) to the observed network by maximizing the likelihood. The choice of this model is extremely important and is the main focus of the current study. We provide an extensive theoretical and empirical analysis to compare several models: the widely used planted partition model, recently proposed degree-corrected modification of this model, and a new null model having some desirable statistical properties. We also develop and compare two likelihood optimization algorithms suitable for the models under consideration. An extensive empirical analysis on a variety of datasets shows, in particular, that the new model is the best one for describing most of the considered real-world complex networks according to the likelihood of observed graph structures.

[2]: 

[3]: Stochastic blockmodels have been proposed as a tool for detecting community structure in networks as well as for generating synthetic networks for use as benchmarks. Most blockmodels, however, ignore variation in vertex degree, making them unsuitable for applications to real-world networks, which typically display broad degree distributions that can significantly distort the results. Here we demonstrate how the generalization of blockmodels to incorporate this missing element leads to an improved objective function for community detection in complex networks. We also propose a heuristic algorithm for community detection using this objective function or its non-degree-corrected counterpart and show that the degree-corrected version dramatically outperforms the uncorrected one in both real-world and synthetic networks.
The standard random graph model assumed by likelihood maximization methods is the stochastic block model (SBM) or its simplified version --- planted partition model (PPM). In these models, the probability that two vertices are connected by an edge depends only on their community assignments. Recently, the degree-corrected stochastic block model (DCSBM) together with the degree-corrected planted partition model (DCPPM) were proposed [1]1 . These models take into account the observed degree sequence of a graph, and, as a result, they are more realistic. It was also noticed that if we fix the parameters of DCPPM, then likelihood maximization based on this model is equivalent to modularity optimization with some @math [1]2 . Finally, in a recent paper [1] the independent LFR model (ILFR) was proposed and analyzed. It was shown that ILFR gives a better fit for a variety of real-world networks [1] . In this paper, to illustrate the generalization ability of the proposed hyperparameter tuning strategy, in addition to the Louvain algorithm, we also use parametric likelihood maximization methods based on PPM and ILFR.