You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
This paper develops a general theoretical framework to analyze structured sparse recovery problems using the notation of dual certificate. Although certain aspects of the dual certificate idea have already been used in some previous work, due to the lack of a general and coherent theory, the analysis has so far only been carried out in limited scopes for specific problems. In this context the current paper makes two contributions. First, we introduce a general definition of dual certificate, which we then use to develop a unified theory of sparse recovery analysis for convex programming. Second, we present a class of structured sparsity regularization called structured Lasso for which calculations can be readily performed under our theoretical framework. This new theory includes many seemingly loosely related previous work as special cases; it also implies new results that improve existing ones even for standard formulations such as L1 regularization.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: We derive sharp performance bounds for least squares regression with L regularization from parameter estimation accuracy and feature selection quality perspectives. The main result proved for L 1 regularization extends a similar result in [Ann. Statist. 35 (2007) 2313-2351] for the Dantzig selector. It gives an affirmative answer to an open question in [Ann. Statist. 35 (2007) 2358-2364]. Moreover, the result leads to an extended view of feature selection that allows less restrictive conditions than some recent work. Based on the theoretical insights, a novel two-stage L 1 -regularization procedure with selective penalization is analyzed. It is shown that if the target parameter vector can be decomposed as the sum of a sparse parameter vector with large coefficients and another less sparse vector with relatively small coefficients, then the two-stage procedure can lead to improved performance.

[2]: We consider the estimation of regression coefficients in a high-dimensional linear model. For regression coefficients in lr balls, we provide lower bounds for the minimax lq risk and minimax quantiles of the lq loss for all design matrices. Under an l0 sparsity condition on a target coefficient vector, we sharpen and unify existing oracle inequalities for the Lasso and Dantzig selector. We derive oracle inequalities for target coefficient vectors with many small elements and smaller threshold levels than the universal threshold. These oracle inequalities provide sufficient conditions on the design matrix for the rate minimaxity of the Lasso and Dantzig selector for the lq risk and loss in lr balls, 0≤ r≤ 1≤ q≤ ∞. By allowing q=∞, our risk bounds imply the variable selection consistency of threshold Lasso and Dantzig selectors.
Finally, we would like to point out that while this paper successfully unifies the irrepresentable (or incoherence) conditions and RIP conditions under the general method of dual certificate, our analysis does not subsume some of the more elaborated analysis such as [1] and [2] as special case. Those studies employed a different generalization of RIP which we may refer to as the invertibility factor approach using the terminology of [2] . It thus remains open whether it is possible to develop an even more general theory that can include all previous sparse recovery analysis as special cases.