You will be provided with the titles and abstracts of a collection of medical RCT reports studying a clinical question -- for instance, the efficacy of an intervention on some medical outcome. Please write a few sentences synthesizing the findings of these reports, which could serve as a conclusion section for a systematic review article. Your response should not include any other text. The RCT reports are below.



Title 1:
Treatment of constipation and fecal incontinence in stroke patients: randomized controlled trial.
Abstract 1:
Despite its high prevalence in stroke survivors, there is little clinical research on bowel dysfunction in this population. This is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate treatment of constipation and fecal incontinence in stroke survivors.
                Stroke patients with constipation or fecal incontinence were identified by screening questionnaire (122 community, 24 stroke rehabilitation inpatients) and randomized to intervention or routine care (73 per group). The intervention consisted of a 1-off structured nurse assessment (history and rectal examination), leading to targeted patient/carer education with booklet and provision of diagnostic summary and treatment recommendations (after consultation with geriatrician) to patient's general practitioner (GP)+/-ward physician.
                Percentage of bowel movements (BMs) per week graded as "normal" by participants in a prospective 1-week stool diary was significantly higher in intervention versus control patients at 6 months (72% versus 55%; P=0.027), as was mean number of BMs per week (5.2 versus 3.6; P=0.005). There was no significant reduction in fecal incontinence, although numbers were small. At 12 months, intervention patients were more likely to be modifying their diets (odds ratio [OR], 3.1 [1.2 to 8.0]) and fluid intake (OR, 4.2 [1.4 to 12.2]) to control their bowels and to have visited their GP for their bowel problem (OR, 5.0 [1.4 to 17.5]). GP prescribing of laxatives and suppositories was significantly influenced at 12 months.
                A single clinical/educational nurse intervention in stroke patients effectively improved symptoms of bowel dysfunction up to 6 months later, changed bowel-modifying lifestyle behaviors up to 12 months later, and influenced patient-GP interaction and physician prescribing patterns.


Title 2:
Comparison of three bowel management programs during rehabilitation of spinal cord injured patients.
Abstract 2:
nan


Title 3:
The influence of timing and suppository use on efficiency and effectiveness of bowel training after a stroke.
Abstract 3:
This study was designed to determine the efficiency and effectiveness of four bowel training protocols for stroke patients (N = 46) differing in two variables: (a) consistent use of suppositories, and (b) time of day scheduled for the bowel training program. Eighty-five percent of the subjects (n = 39) achieved effective bowel training within 1 month. Patients assigned to morning bowel training groups were significantly more efficient than those in evening groups in establishing effective bowel regimens. No significant differences were found between scheduled versus prn suppository use. Efficiency was highest for those assigned to a bowel training group whose time coincided with their previous pattern and lowest for those assigned to a group whose time conflicted with a previous pattern.


Title 4:
Efficacy and tolerability of prucalopride in patients with constipation due to spinal cord injury.
Abstract 4:
Chronic constipation (CC) often occurs after spinal cord injury (SCI). Prucalopride is a novel, highly selective, specific serotonin4 receptor agonist with enterokinetic properties. We evaluate the tolerability and pilot efficacy of prucalopride in the treatment of CC due to SCL.
                Double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot, phase 11, dose-escalation study. After 4 weeks' run in, patients received prucalopride 1 mg (n = 8) or placebo (n = 4); 11 new patients were randomized to prucalopride 2 mg (n = 8) or placebo (n = 3) once daily for 4 weeks. Patients recorded bowel function (diary) and assessed constipation severity and treatment efficacy (visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-100 mm). Colonic transit times were determined.
                Compared with run in. mean changes in constipation severity (VAS) increased with placebo, but decreased with prucalopride 1 and 2 mg. The VAS score for treatment efficacy showed a clear dose response (medians 4, 52 and 73 for placebo, 1 and 2 mg, respectively). Diary data showed an improvement in average weekly frequency of all bowel movements over 4 weeks within the 2 mg group (median 0.6; 95% CI 0.2; 1.2). There was a significant reduction in median colonic transit time with 2 mg (n = 4; -38.5 h (95% CI -80; -5)). Four patients (2 mg) reported moderate/severe abdominal pain, and two of these discontinued treatment. There were no clinically relevant effects on any of the safety parameters.
                This pilot study indicates that prucalopride can play an important role in the management of patients with CC due to SCI.


Title 5:
The effect of cisapride on segmental colonic transit time in patients with spinal cord injury.
Abstract 5:
The pathophysiological consequences of spinal cord injury (SCI) on function of the colon are complex and poorly understood. Regardless of the mechanism, many patients with SCI have deficient bowel control, which is frustrating and difficult to treat. We designed a study to assess whether a new prokinetic medication, cisapride, might be useful in this setting.
                Total and segmental colonic transit time were measured using the radiopaque marker technique in nine subjects with spinal cord injury and seven control subjects after the double-blind administration of cisapride (10 mg q.i.d.) or placebo.
                In five quadriplegic subjects with prolonged colonic transit time, administration of cisapride was found to reduce left-sided colonic transit time from 24.2 to 13.8 h. In three of these five subjects, cisapride administration resulted in subjective improvement. No effect of cisapride on right-sided, rectosigmoid, or total colonic transit time was observed.
                The data suggest that cisapride might be a useful adjunctive measure in treating a subset of SCI patients with colonic inertia, but a larger study is needed before this can be routinely recommended.


Title 6:
Pharmacologically initiated defecation for persons with spinal cord injury: effectiveness of three agents.
Abstract 6:
To compare the effectiveness of hydrogenated vegetable oil-based bisacodyl (HVB) suppositories, polyethylene glycol-based bisacodyl (PGB) suppositories, and polyethylene glycol-based, glycerine, docusate sodium mini-enemas (TVC) in subjects with upper motor neuron spinal cord lesions.
                Prospective randomized double blind. Fifteen subjects received one of 3 HVB and 3 PGB suppositories in randomized sequence for each of six scheduled bowel care sessions. Additionally, 10 subjects received 3 TVC. The analysis used timed events that divided the bowel care sessions into discrete intervals. The analysis also compared digital simulations, incontinence, and quantity of stool. Wilcoxon rank sum tests and paired t tests were used to compare the means of intervals during bowel care initiated by HVB, PGB, and TVC.
                (means in minutes and p values): Time to Flatus-HVB, 32; PGB, 15; TVC, 15; p < .026, HVB-PGB; p < .983, PGB-TVC; Flatus to Stool Flow-HVB, 6.7; PGB, 5.5; TVC, 3.9; p < .672, HVB-PGB; p < .068, PGB-TVC; Defecation Period-HVB, 36; PGB, 20; TVC, 17; p < .037, HVB-PGB; p < .479, PGB-TVC; Wait Until Transfer-HVB, 10.9; PGB, 10.7; TVC, 7.4; p < .932, HVB-PGB; p < .043, PGB-TVC; Total Time for the bowel program-HVB, 74.5; PGB, 43; TVC, 37; p < .010, HVB-PGB; p < .458, PGB-TVC; percent incidence of incontinence between bowel care sessions-HVB, .067; PGB, .067; TVC, .033; p < 1.0, HVB-PGB; p < .678, PGB-TVC; amount of stool produced-HVB, 3.30; PGB, 3.49; TVC, 3.38; p < .276, HVB-PGB; p < .630, PGB-TVC; average number of digital stimulations per bowel care procedure-HVB, 4.4; PGB, 4.1; TVC, 3.8; p < .411, HVB-PGB; p < .293, PGB-TVC; time per digital stimulation in seconds-HVB, 107; PGB, 40; TVC, 83; p < .149, HVB-PGB; p < .352, PGB-TVC; and the total time, in minutes, spent performing digital stimulations during bowel care-HVB, 10.0; PGB, 2.7; TVC, 5.9; p < .151, HVB-PGB; p < .325, PGB-TVC.
                Bowel care took less time when initiated with the PGB bisacodyl suppository or TVC mini-enema as compared with the HVB bisacodyl suppository (p < .01).


Title 7:
[Clinical observation on effect of qirong runchang oral liquid in treating constipation after stroke].
Abstract 7:
nan


Title 8:
Constipation in Parkinson's disease: objective assessment and response to psyllium.
Abstract 8:
We evaluated the reliability of patient history and the effect of psyllium on symptoms and colorectal function in 12 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and constipation. In all but two, constipation anteceded the development of parkinsonian symptoms. A comparison with prospectively obtained stool diaries confirmed the patients' reported constipation in 7 of the 12 patients. Those patients with confirmed constipation had lower stool weights and reported more straining at stool. Measures of colonic and anorectal function were similar in those who were truly constipated and those who were not. Among those PD subjects with confirmed constipation, psyllium increased stool frequency and weight but did not alter colonic transit or anorectal function. We conclude that prospectively obtained stool diaries should be employed to confirm constipation in PD and that psyllium produces both subjective and objective improvements in constipation related to PD.
There is still remarkably little research on this common and, to patients, very significant condition. It is not possible to draw any recommendation for bowel care in people with neurological diseases from the trials included in this review. Bowel management for these people must remain empirical until well-designed controlled trials with adequate numbers and clinically relevant outcome measures become available.