You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Over the last years, most websites on which users can register (e.g., email providers and social networks) adopted CAPTCHAs (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) as a countermeasure against automated attacks. The battle of wits between designers and attackers of CAPTCHAs led to current ones being annoying and hard to solve for users, while still being vulnerable to automated attacks. In this paper, we propose CAPTCHaStar, a new image-based CAPTCHA that relies on user interaction. This novel CAPTCHA leverages the innate human ability to recognize shapes in a confused environment. We assess the effectiveness of our proposal for the two key aspects for CAPTCHAs, i.e., usability, and resiliency to automated attacks. In particular, we evaluated the usability, carrying out a thorough user study, and we tested the resiliency of our proposal against several types of automated attacks: traditional ones; designed ad-hoc for our proposal; and based on machine learning. Compared to the state of the art, our proposal is more user friendly (e.g., only some 35 of the users prefer current solutions, such as text-based CAPTCHAs) and more resilient to automated attacks.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: A reading-based CAPTCHA designed to resist character-segmentation attacks, called 'ScatterType,' is described. Its challenges are pseudorandomly synthesized images of text strings rendered in machine-print typefaces: within each image, characters are fragmented using horizontal and vertical cuts, and the fragments are scattered by vertical and horizontal displacements. This scattering is designed to defeat all methods known to us for automatic segmentation into characters. As in the BaffleText CAPTCHA, English-like but unspellable text-strings are used to defend against known-dictionary attacks. In contrast to the PessimalPrint and BaffleText CAPTCHAs (and others), no physics-based image degradations, occlusions, or extraneous patterns are employed. We report preliminary results from a human legibility trial with 57 volunteers that yielded 4275 CAPTCHA challenges and responses. ScatterType human legibility remains remarkably high even on extremely degraded cases. We speculate that this is due to Gestalt perception abilities assisted by style-specific (here, typeface-specific) consistency among primitive shape features of character fragments. Although recent efforts to automate style-consistent perceptual skills have reported progress, the best known methods do not yet pose a threat to ScatterType. The experimental data also show that subjective rating of difficulty is strongly (and usefully) correlated with illegibility. In addition, we present early insights emerging from these data as we explore the ScatterType design space -- choice of typefaces, 'words', cut positioning, and displacements -- with the goal of locating regimes in which ScatterType challenges remain comfortably legible to almost all people but strongly resist mahine-vision methods for automatic segmentation into characters.

[2]: 

[3]: We exploit the gap in ability between human and machine vision systems to craft a family of automatic challenges that tell human and machine users apart via graphical interfaces including Internet browsers. Turing proposed (1950) a method whereby human judges might validate "artificial intelligence" by failing to distinguish between human and machine interlocutors. Stimulated by the "chat room problem", and influenced by the CAPTCHA project of (2000), we propose a variant of the Turing test using pessimal print: that is, low-quality images of machine-printed text synthesized pseudo-randomly over certain ranges of words, typefaces, and image degradations. We show experimentally that judicious choice of these ranges can ensure that the images are legible to human readers but illegible to several of the best present-day optical character recognition (OCR) machines. Our approach is motivated by a decade of research on performance evaluation of OCR machines and on quantitative stochastic models of document image quality. The slow pace of evolution of OCR and other species of machine vision over many decades suggests that pessimal print will defy automated attack for many years. Applications include 'bot' barriers and database rationing.

[4]: We carry out a systematic study of existing visual CAPTCHAs based on distorted characters that are augmented with anti-segmentation techniques. Applying a systematic evaluation methodology to 15 current CAPTCHA schemes from popular web sites, we find that 13 are vulnerable to automated attacks. Based on this evaluation, we identify a series of recommendations for CAPTCHA designers and attackers, and possible future directions for producing more reliable human computer distinguishers.

[5]: Internet is being used for several activities by a great range of users. These activities include communication, e-commerce, education, and entertainment. Users are required to register regarding Website in order to enroll Web activities. However, registration can be done by automated hacking software. That software make false enrollments which occupy the resources of the Website by reducing the performance and efficiency of servers, even stop the entire Web service. It is crucial for the Websites to have a system which has the capability of differing human users and computer programs in reading images of text. Completely automated public Turing test to tell computers and human apart (CAPTCHA) is such a defense system against optical character recognition (OCR) software. OCR can be defined as a software which work for defeating CAPTCHA images and make countless number of registration on the Websites. This study focuses on a new method which is splitting CAPTCHA images into several parts with random rotation values, and drawing random lines on a grid background. Lines are in the same color with the CAPTCHA text and they provide a distortion of image with grid background. In this paper, the algorithm of our method is introduced in detail.

[6]: In this paper, a CAPTCHA is presented based on the masking characteristics of the Human Visual System (HVS). Knowing that noise can be masked by high activity regions and showing that edges can be masked by noise for a human observer while still being detected by machines, the suggested CAPTCHA is composed of English alphabets that are picked randomly and written with a combination of texture and edges with added noise such as to deceive the machine by randomly changing the visibility of characters for humans. The proposed CAPTCHA is highly legible and robust to brute-force attacks and sophisticated Object Character Recognition (OCR) segmentation algorithms.

[7]: CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public Turing Test to Tell Computers and Humans Apart) is a simple test that is easy for humans but extremely difficult for computers to solve. CAPTCHA has been widely used in commercial websites such as web-based email providers, TicketMaster, GoDaddy, and Facebook to protect their resources from attacks initiated by automatic scripts. By design, CAPTCHA is unable to distinguish between a human attacker and a legitimate human user. This leaves websites using CAPTCHA vulnerable to 3rd party human CAPTCHA attacks. In order to demonstrate the vulnerabilities in existing CAPTCHA technologies we develop a new streamlined human-based CAPTCHA attack that uses Instant Messenger infrastructure. Facing this serious human-based attack threat, we then present a new defense system called Interactive CAPTCHA (iCAPTCHA), which is the next generation of CAPTCHA technology providing the first steps toward defending against 3rd party human CAPTCHA attacks. iCAPTCHA requires a user to solve a CAPTCHA test via a series of user interactions. The multi-step back-and-forth traffic between client and server amplifies the statistical timing difference between a legitimate user and a human solver, which enables better attack detection performance. A performance and usability study of iCAPTCHA shows the proposed scheme is effective in attack detection, is easy to use, and is a viable replacement of the current text-based CAPTCHA.
A text-based CAPTCHA presents an obfuscated word in the form of an image, and asks the user to read and rewrite it, usually in a text box. [3] proposed the first text-based CAPTCHA in 2002. After this first proposal, several other researchers worked on this kind of design. Several researchers focused on improving the resiliency against automated attacks [1] [6] [5] . Currently, text-based CAPTCHAs are the most widely used [4] . In the following, we report two examples of text-based CAPTCHAs that, as for CAPTCHaStar, do not require a keyboard to submit the answer: iCaptcha [7] and DDIM-CAPTCHA [2] .