You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Submodular functions are a broad class of set functions, which naturally arise in diverse areas. Many algorithms have been suggested for the maximization of these functions. Unfortunately, once the function deviates from submodularity, the known algorithms may perform arbitrarily poorly. Amending this issue, by obtaining approximation results for set functions generalizing submodular functions, has been the focus of recent works. One such class, known as weakly submodular functions, has received a lot of attention. A key result proved by Das and Kempe (2011) showed that the approximation ratio of the greedy algorithm for weakly submodular maximization subject to a cardinality constraint degrades smoothly with the distance from submodularity. However, no results have been obtained for maximization subject to constraints beyond cardinality. In particular, it is not known whether the greedy algorithm achieves any non-trivial approximation ratio for such constraints. In this paper, we prove that a randomized version of the greedy algorithm (previously used by (2014) for a different problem) achieves an approximation ratio of @math for the maximization of a weakly submodular function subject to a general matroid constraint, where @math is a parameter measuring the distance of the function from submodularity. Moreover, we also experimentally compare the performance of this version of the greedy algorithm on real world problems against natural benchmarks, and show that the algorithm we study performs well also in practice. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithm with a non-trivial approximation guarantee for maximizing a weakly submodular function subject to a constraint other than the simple cardinality constraint. In particular, it is the first algorithm with such a guarantee for the important and broad class of matroid constraints.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Symmetric submodular functions are an important family of submodular functions capturing many interesting cases, including cut functions of graphs and hypergraphs. Maximization of such functions subject to various constraints receives little attention by current research, unlike similar minimization problems that have been widely studied. In this work, we identify a few submodular maximization problems for which one can get a better approximation for symmetric objectives than the state-of-the-art approximation for general submodular functions. We first consider the problem of maximizing a non-negative symmetric submodular function f:2N → R+ subject to a down-monotone solvable polytope P ⊆ [0, 1]N. For this problem, we describe an algorithm producing a fractional solution of value at least 0.432 ċ f(OPT), where OPT is the optimal integral solution. Our second result considers the problem max f(S)c vSv e k for a non-negative symmetric submodular function f:2N → R+. For this problem, we give an approximation ratio that depends on the value k vNv and is always at least 0.432. Our method can also be applied to non-negative non-symmetric submodular functions, in which case it produces 1 e − o(1) approximation, improving over the best-known result for this problem. For unconstrained maximization of a non-negative symmetric submodular function, we describe a deterministic linear-time 1 2-approximation algorithm. Finally, we give a [1 − (1 − 1 k)k − 1]-approximation algorithm for Submodular Welfare with k players having identical non-negative submodular utility functions and show that this is the best possible approximation ratio for the problem.

[2]: The study of combinatorial optimization problems with a submodular objective has attracted much attention in recent years. Such problems are important in both theory and practice because their objective functions are very general. Obtaining further improvements for many submodular maximization problems boils down to finding better algorithms for optimizing a relaxation of them known as the multilinear extension. In this work we present an algorithm for optimizing the multilinear relaxation whose guarantee improves over the guarantee of the best previous algorithm (which was given by Ene and Nguyen (2016)). Moreover, our algorithm is based on a new technique which is, arguably, simpler and more natural for the problem at hand. In a nutshell, previous algorithms for this problem rely on symmetry properties which are natural only in the absence of a constraint. Our technique avoids the need to resort to such properties, and thus, seems to be a better fit for constrained problems.

[3]: 

[4]: In this work, we present a new algorithm for maximizing a non-monotone submodular function subject to a general constraint. Our algorithm finds an approximate fractional solution for maximizing the multilinear extension of the function over a down-closed polytope. The approximation guarantee is 0.372 and it is the first improvement over the 1 e approximation achieved by the unified Continuous Greedy algorithm [, FOCS 2011].

[5]: We consider the problem of maximizing a (non-monotone) submodular function subject to a cardinality constraint. In addition to capturing well-known combinatorial optimization problems, e.g., Max-k-Coverage and Max-Bisection, this problem has applications in other more practical settings such as natural language processing, information retrieval, and machine learning. In this work we present improved approximations for two variants of the cardinality constraint for non-monotone functions. When at most k elements can be chosen, we improve the current best 1 e -- o(1) approximation to a factor that is in the range [1 e + 0.004, 1 2], achieving a tight approximation of 1 2 -- o(1) for k = n 2 and breaking the 1 e barrier for all values of k. When exactly k elements must be chosen, our algorithms improve the current best 1 4 -- o(1) approximation to a factor that is in the range [0.356, 1 2], again achieving a tight approximation of 1 2 -- o(1) for k = n 2. Additionally, some of the algorithms we provide are very fast with time complexities of O(nk), as opposed to previous known algorithms which are continuous in nature, and thus, too slow for applications in the practical settings mentioned above. Our algorithms are based on two new techniques. First, we present a simple randomized greedy approach where in each step a random element is chosen from a set of "reasonably good" elements. This approach might be considered a natural substitute for the greedy algorithm of Nemhauser, Wolsey and Fisher [45], as it retains the same tight guarantee of 1--1 e for monotone objectives and the same time complexity of O(nk), while giving an approximation of 1 e for general non-monotone objectives (while the greedy algorithm of Nemhauser et. al. fails to provide any constant guarantee). Second, we extend the double greedy technique, which achieves a tight 1 2 approximation for unconstrained submodular maximization, to the continuous setting. This allows us to manipulate the natural rates by which elements change, thus bounding the total number of elements chosen.

[6]: Many large-scale machine learning problems--clustering, non-parametric learning, kernel machines, etc.--require selecting a small yet representative subset from a large dataset. Such problems can often be reduced to maximizing a submodular set function subject to various constraints. Classical approaches to submodular optimization require centralized access to the full dataset, which is impractical for truly large-scale problems. In this paper, we consider the problem of submodular function maximization in a distributed fashion. We develop a simple, two-stage protocol GreeDi, that is easily implemented using MapReduce style computations. We theoretically analyze our approach, and show that under certain natural conditions, performance close to the centralized approach can be achieved. We begin with monotone submodular maximization subject to a cardinality constraint, and then extend this approach to obtain approximation guarantees for (not necessarily monotone) submodular maximization subject to more general constraints including matroid or knapsack constraints. In our extensive experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on several applications, including sparse Gaussian process inference and exemplar based clustering on tens of millions of examples using Hadoop.

[7]: Let @math be a monotone submodular set function, and let @math be a matroid. We consider the problem @math . It is known that the greedy algorithm yields a @math -approximation [M. L. Fisher, G. L. Nemhauser, and L. A. Wolsey, Math. Programming Stud., no. 8 (1978), pp. 73-87] for this problem. For certain special cases, e.g., @math , the greedy algorithm yields a @math -approximation. It is known that this is optimal both in the value oracle model (where the only access to @math is through a black box returning @math for a given set @math ) [G. L. Nemhauser and L. A. Wolsey, Math. Oper. Res., 3 (1978), pp. 177-188] and for explicitly posed instances assuming @math [U. Feige, J. ACM, 45 (1998), pp. 634-652]. In this paper, we provide a randomized @math -approximation for any monotone submodular function and an arbitrary matroid. The algorithm works in the value oracle model. Our main tools are a variant of the pipage rounding technique of Ageev and Sviridenko [J. Combin. Optim., 8 (2004), pp. 307-328], and a continuous greedy process that may be of independent interest. As a special case, our algorithm implies an optimal approximation for the submodular welfare problem in the value oracle model [J. Vondrak, Proceedings of the @math th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2008, pp. 67-74]. As a second application, we show that the generalized assignment problem (GAP) is also a special case; although the reduction requires @math to be exponential in the original problem size, we are able to achieve a @math -approximation for GAP, simplifying previously known algorithms. Additionally, the reduction enables us to obtain approximation algorithms for variants of GAP with more general constraints.

[8]: We consider the problem of maximizing a nonnegative submodular set function @math over a ground set @math subject to a variety of packing-type constraints including (multiple) matroid constraints, knapsack constraints, and their intersections. In this paper we develop a general framework that allows us to derive a number of new results, in particular, when @math may be a nonmonotone function. Our algorithms are based on (approximately) maximizing the multilinear extension @math of @math over a polytope @math that represents the constraints, and then effectively rounding the fractional solution. Although this approach has been used quite successfully, it has been limited in some important ways. We overcome these limitations as follows. First, we give constant factor approximation algorithms to maximize @math over a downward-closed polytope @math described by an efficient separation oracle. Previously this was known only for monotone functions. For nonmonotone functions, a constant factor was ...
The result of [7] has motivated a long series of works on the maximization of non-monotone submodular functions subject to a matroid constraint [5] [8] [4] [3] [3]3 . The currently best algorithm of this kind achieves an approximation ratio of @math [2] for general matroid constraints, and no better approximation guarantee is known for uniform matroid constraints. On the inapproximability side, it is known that no polynomial time algorithm can achieve approximation ratios better than @math and @math for the maximization of non-monotone submodular functions subject to uniform and general matroid constraints, respectively. Hence, for non-monotone submodular functions there is still a large gap between the best known approximation and inapproximability results. This gap is somewhat bridged by a result of [1] giving a @math -approximation algorithm for the maximization of a special class of non-monotone submodular functions, known as symmetric submodular functions, subject to a general matroid constraint.