You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A survey on heterogeneous transfer learning 
Chapter Title:  HeMap 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  Lack of labeled training examples is a common problem for many applications. In the same time, there is usually an abundance of labeled data from related tasks. But they have different distributions and outputs (e.g., different class labels, and different scales of regression values). Conjecture that there is only a limited number of vaccine efficacy examples against the new epidemic swine flu H1N1, whereas there exists a large amount of labeled vaccine data against previous years’ flu. However, it is difficult to directly apply the older flu vaccine data as training examples because of the difference in data distribution and efficacy output criteria between different viruses. To increase the sources of labeled data, we propose a method to utilize these examples whose marginal distribution and output criteria can be different. The idea is to first select a subset of source examples similar in distribution to the target data; all the selected instances are then “re-scaled” and assigned new output values from the labeled space of the target task. A new predictive model is built on the enlarged training set. We derive a generalization bound that specifically considers distribution difference and further evaluate the model on a number of applications. For an siRNA efficacy prediction problem, we extract examples from 4 heterogeneous regression tasks and 2 classification tasks to learn the target model, and achieve an average improvement of 30% in accuracy.

Literature Review:
Shi et al. BIB001 proposed an HTL method called Heterogeneous spectral Mapping (HeMap). This method may be used when the source and target have different input feature spaces/dimensions, different data distributions, and/or different output label spaces. A transfer learning task containing all of these can be very challenging. First, to address the issue of different input feature spaces, the method proposes using a symmetric transformation process to project the source and target data onto a common subspace through the use of spectral mapping to unify the input spaces. To learn the projection matrices and create the common subspace this method does not utilize labels, as the source and target may be of different label spaces. Instead, it tries to discover correspondences between the source and target data points in the optimization. The spectral mapping technique uses linear transformations such as, rotation, scaling, etc. on the target matrix, and is modeled through an optimization objective which aims to maximize the similarity between the source and target while preserving their original structure. If they are too unrelated to each other, the projected data may still exhibit differences in distributions when preserving the data's original structure. In this case, the process is aborted when they are too unrelated and no source data will be utilized as the risk it may degrade performance is too high. To handle the case of different data distributions, this method extends the approach from the author's previous work BIB002 and utilizes a clustering based sample selection method on the latent subspace as to select source data that is most similar to the target data. This is then used as new training data, which in effect aims to resolve the marginal distribution differences and improve performance. To handle the case of different output label spaces, this method also extends work from BIB002 and uses a Bayesian-based method to model the relationship between the differing output spaces as to unify them through re-scaling and calibration of the two output variables. This method requires having the same number of instances for both the source and target. To satisfy this, the paper proposes randomly duplicating the smaller input to match the larger, as to maintain original distribution, with the purpose of making the projection matrices of the same size. Classification and regression experiments, which include image classification and drug efficacy prediction, were performed to test the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. The proposed HeMap had better performance, measured via error rate, compared to the single baseline tested though details of this baseline were not provided in the paper.