You will be presented with a citation segment from the section of an NLP research paper, as well as the context surrounding that citation. Classify the intent behind this citation by choosing from one of the following categories:
- Background: provides context or foundational information related to the topic.
- Extends: builds upon the cited work.
- Uses: applies the methods or findings of the cited work.
- Motivation: cites the work as inspiration or rationale for the research.
- CompareOrContrast: compares or contrasts the cited work with others.
- FutureWork: cites the work as a direction for future research.

Your answer should be a single word from the following list of options: ["Background", "Extends", "Uses", "Motivation", "CompareOrContrast", "FutureWork"]. Do not include any other text in your response.

Section Title:
method

Context before the citation:
â¢ cross-language information retrieval (e.g., McCarley 1999), â¢ multilingual document filtering (e.g., Oard 1997), â¢ computer-assisted language learning (e.g., Nerbonne et al. 1997), â¢ certain machine-assisted translation tools (e.g., Macklovitch 1994; Melamed 1996a), â¢ concordancing for bilingual lexicography (e.g., Catizone, Russell, and Warwick 1989; Gale and Church 1991),  Applications where word order is not essential include Empirically estimated models of translational equivalence among word types can play a central role in both kinds of applications.

Citation Sentence:
â¢ cross-language information retrieval ( e.g. , McCarley 1999 ) , â¢ multilingual document filtering ( e.g. , Oard 1997 ) , â¢ computer-assisted language learning ( e.g. , Nerbonne et al. 1997 ) , â¢ certain machine-assisted translation tools ( e.g. , Macklovitch 1994 ; Melamed 1996a ) , â¢ concordancing for bilingual lexicography ( e.g. , Catizone , Russell , and Warwick 1989 ; Gale and Church 1991 ) ,

Context after the citation:
â¢ corpus linguistics (e.g., Svartvik 1992), â¢ &quot;crummy&quot; machine translation (e.g., Church and Hovy 1992; Resnik 1997).  For these applications, empirically estimated models have a number of advantages over handcrafted models such as on-line versions of bilingual dictionaries. Two of the advantages are the possibility of better coverage and the possibility of frequent updates by nonexpert users to keep up with rapidly evolving vocabularies. A third advantage is that statistical models can provide more accurate information about the relative importance of different translations.
Background