You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
For the architecture community, reasonable simulation time is a strong requirement in addition to performance data accuracy. However, emerging big data and AI workloads are too huge at binary size level and prohibitively expensive to run on cycle-accurate simulators. The concept of data motif, which is identified as a class of units of computation performed on initial or intermediate data, is the first step towards building proxy benchmark to mimic the real-world big data and AI workloads. However, there is no practical way to construct a proxy benchmark based on the data motifs to help simulation-based research. In this paper, we embark on a study to bridge the gap between data motif and a practical proxy benchmark. We propose a data motif-based proxy benchmark generating methodology by means of machine learning method, which combine data motifs with different weights to mimic the big data and AI workloads. Furthermore, we implement various data motifs using light-weight stacks and apply the methodology to five real-world workloads to construct a suite of proxy benchmarks, considering the data types, patterns, and distributions. The evaluation results show that our proxy benchmarks shorten the execution time by 100s times on real systems while maintaining the average system and micro-architecture performance data accuracy above 90 , even changing the input data sets or cluster configurations. Moreover, the generated proxy benchmarks reflect consistent performance trends across different architectures. To facilitate the community, we will release the proxy benchmarks on the project homepage this http URL

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Performance simulation tools must be validated during the design process as functional models and early hardware are developed, so that designers can be sure of the performance of their designs as they implement changes. The current state-of-the-art is to use simple hand-coded bandwidth and latency testcases to assess early performance and to calibrate performance models. Applications and benchmark suites such as SPEC CPU are difficult to set up or take too long to execute on functional models. Short trace snippets from applications can be executed on performance and functional simulators, but not without difficulty on hardware, and there is no guarantee that hand-coded tests and short snippets cover the performance of the original applications.We present a new automatic testcase synthesis methodology to address these concerns. By basing testcase synthesis on the workload characteristics of an application, we create source code that largely represents the performance of the application, but which executes in a fraction of the runtime. We synthesize representative versions of the SPEC2000 benchmarks, compile and execute them, and obtain an average IPC within 2.4 of the average IPC of the original benchmarks with similar average workload characteristics. In addition, the changes in IPC due to design changes are found to be proportional to the changes in IPC for the original applications. The synthetic testcases execute more than three orders of magnitude faster than the original applications, typically in less than 300K instructions, making performance model validation feasible.

[2]: 

[3]: Accelerating micro-architecture simulation is becoming increasingly urgent as the complexity of workload and simulated processor increases. This paper presents a novel two-stage sampling (TSS) scheme to accelerate the sampling-based simulation. It firstly selects some large samples from a dynamic instruction stream as candidates of detail simulation and then samples some small groups from each selected first stage sample to do detail simulation. Since the distribution of standard deviation of cycle per instruction (CPI) is insensitive to microarchitecture, TSS could be used to speedup design space exploration by splitting the sampling process into two stages, which is able to remove redundant instruction samples from detail simulation when the program is in stable program phase (standard deviation of CPI is near zero). It also adopts systematic sampling to accelerate the functional warm-up in sampling simulation. Experimental results show that, by combining these two techniques, TSS achieves an average and maximum speedup of 1.3 and 2.29 over SMARTS, with the average CPI relative error is less than 3 . TSS could significantly accelerate the time consuming iterative early design evaluation process.

[4]: Abstract: Statistical simulation is a technique for fast performance evaluation of superscalar processors. First, intrinsic statistical information is collected from a single detailed simulation of a program. This information is then used to generate a synthetic instruction trace that is fed to a simple processor model, along with cache and branch prediction statistics. Because of the probabilistic nature of the simulation, it quickly converges to a performance rate. The simplicity and simulation speed make it useful for fast design space exploration; as such, it is a good complement to conventional detailed simulation. The accuracy of this technique is evaluated for different levels of modeling complexity. Both errors and convergence properties are studied in detail. A simple instruction model yields an average error of 8 compared with detailed simulation. A more detailed instruction model reduces the error to 5 but requires about three times as long to converge.

[5]: Understanding program behavior is at the foundation of computer architecture and program optimization. Many programs have wildly different behavior on even the very largest of scales (over the complete execution of the program). This realization has ramifications for many architectural and compiler techniques, from thread scheduling, to feedback directed optimizations, to the way programs are simulated. However, in order to take advantage of time-varying behavior, we must first develop the analytical tools necessary to automatically and efficiently analyze program behavior over large sections of execution.Our goal is to develop automatic techniques that are capable of finding and exploiting the Large Scale Behavior of programs (behavior seen over billions of instructions). The first step towards this goal is the development of a hardware independent metric that can concisely summarize the behavior of an arbitrary section of execution in a program. To this end we examine the use of Basic Block Vectors. We quantify the effectiveness of Basic Block Vectors in capturing program behavior across several different architectural metrics, explore the large scale behavior of several programs, and develop a set of algorithms based on clustering capable of analyzing this behavior. We then demonstrate an application of this technology to automatically determine where to simulate for a program to help guide computer architecture research.

[6]: We focus on problems suited to the current evaluation infrastructure. The current limitation and trends in evaluation techniques are troublesome and could noticeably slow the rate of computer system innovation. New research has been recommended to help and make quantitative evaluations of computer systems manageable. We support research in the areas of simulation frameworks, benchmarking methodologies, analytic methods, and validation techniques.

[7]: There is a wealth of technological alternatives that can be incorporated into a processor design. These include reservation station designs, functional unit duplication, and processor branch handling strategies. The performance of a given design is measured through the execution of application programs and other workloads. Presently, trace driven simulation is the most popular method of processor performance analysis in the development stage of system design. Current techniques of trace driven simulation, however, are extremely slow and expensive. A fast and accurate method for statistical trace sampling of superscalar processors is proposed.

[8]: Benchmarks set standards for innovation in computer architecture research and industry product development. Consequently, it is of paramount importance that the benchmarks used in computer architecture research and development are representative of real-world applications. However, composing such representative workloads poses practical challenges to application analysis teams and benchmark developers - (1) Benchmarks that are standardized are open-source whereas applications of interest are typically proprietary, (2) Benchmarks are rigid, measure single-point performance, and only represent a sample of the application behavior space, (3) Benchmark suites take several years to develop, but applications evolve at a faster rate, and (4) Benchmarks geared towards temperature and power characterization are difficult to develop and standardize. The objective of this dissertation is to develop an adaptive benchmark generation strategy to construct synthetic benchmarks to address these benchmarking challenges. We propose an approach for automatically distilling key hardware-independent performance attributes of a proprietary workload and capture them into a miniature synthetic benchmark clone. The advantage of the benchmark clone is that it hides the functional meaning of the code, but exhibits similar performance and power characteristics as the target application across a wide range of microarchitecture configurations. Moreover, the dynamic instruction count of the synthetic benchmark clone is substantially shorter than the proprietary application, greatly reducing overall simulation time—for the SPEC CPU 2000 suite, the simulation time reduction is over five orders of magnitude compared to the entire benchmark execution. We develop an adaptive benchmark generation strategy that trades off accuracy to provide the flexibility to easily alter program characteristics. The parameterization of workload metrics makes it possible to succinctly describe an application's behavior using a limited number of fundamental program characteristics. This provides the ability to alter workload characteristics and construct scalable benchmarks that allows researchers to explore a wider range of the application behavior space, conduct program behavior studies, and model emerging workloads. The parameterized workload model is the foundation for automatically constructing power and temperature oriented synthetic workloads. We show that machine learning algorithms can be effectively used to search the application behavior space to automatically construct benchmarks for evaluating the power and temperature characteristics of a computer architecture design. The need for a scientific approach to construct synthetic benchmarks, to complement application benchmarks, has long been recognized by the computer architecture research community, and this dissertation work is a significant step towards achieving that goal.

[9]: We generate and provide miniature synthetic benchmark clones for modern workloads to solve two pre-silicon design challenges, namely: 1) huge simulation time (weeks to months) when using complete runs of modern workloads like SPEC CPU2006 having trillions of instructions on pre-silicon design models 2) unavailability of access to their specific target applications for computer architects, as some of them are proprietary in nature and vendors hesitate to share them. We first provide a detailed characterization of the SPEC CPU2006 and the ImplantBench suites based on microarchitecture-independent metrics. Our metrics include the Memory Level Parallelism (MLP) of these workloads to estimate the burstiness of accesses to the main memory. Secondly, our proposed framework, that uses this characterized information (including MLP) to generate synthetic clones is explained and evaluated. We provide the synthetic clones generated for CPU2006 workloads for download and use. The efficacy of the synthetic clones for CPU2006 and ImplantBench is demonstrated by comparing their performance and power characteristics with their original counterparts. We show that the synthetic clones generated using our MLP-aware methodology have an error of only 2.8 in terms of Instruction Per Cycle (IPC) as compared to an error of 15.3 when using the previous MLP-unaware approaches for CPU2006. We also evaluate their effectiveness in assessing the change in performance and power consumption for various microarchitecture design changes. For CPU2006, with synthetics limited to 1 million dynamic instructions, the average correlation coefficient for assessing design changes for IPC is 0.95 (0.98 for power-per-cycle). For ImplantBench, we have an average error of 2.9 in assessing the IPC and the correlation coefficient for assessing design changes is 0.94 (0.97 for power-per-cycle).

[10]: 

[11]: The ongoing trend of increasing computer hardware and software complexity has resulted in the increase in complexity and overheads of cycle-accurate processor system simulation, especially in full-system simulation which not only simulates user applications, but also the operating system (OS) and system libraries. This paper seeks to address how to accelerate full-system simulation through studying, characterizing, and predicting the performance behavior of OS services. Through studying the performance behavior of OS services, we found that each OS service exhibits multiple but limited behavior points that are repeated frequently. OS services also exhibit application-specific performance behavior and largely irregular patterns of occurrences. We exploit the observation to speed up full system simulation. A simulation run is divided into two non-overlapping periods: a learning period in which performance behavior of instances of an OS service are characterized and recorded, and a prediction period in which detailed simulation is replaced with a much faster emulation mode. During a prediction period, the behavior signature of an instance of an OS service is obtained through emulation while performance of the instance is predicted based on its signature and records of the OS service's past performance behavior. Statistically-rigorous algorithms are used to determine when to switch between learning and prediction periods. We test our simulation acceleration method with a set of OS-intensive applications and a recent version of Linux OS running on top of a detailed processor and memory hierarchy model implemented on Simics, a popular full-system simulator. On average, the method needs the learning periods to cover only 11 of OS service invocations in order to produce highly accurate performance estimates. This leads to an estimated simulation speedup of 4.9times, with an average performance prediction error of only 3.2 , and a worst case error of 4.2

[12]: Current software-based microarchitecture simulators are many orders of magnitude slower than the hardware they simulate. Hence, most microarchitecture design studies draw their conclusions from drastically truncated benchmark simulations that are often inaccurate and misleading. This paper presents the Sampling Microarchitecture Simulation (SMARTS) framework as an approach to enable fast and accurate performance measurements of full-length benchmarks. SMARTS accelerates simulation by selectively measuring in detail only an appropriate benchmark subset. SMARTS prescribes a statistically sound procedure for configuring a systematic sampling simulation run to achieve a desired quantifiable confidence in estimates.Analysis of 41 of the 45 possible SPEC2K benchmark input combinations show CPI and energy per instruction (EPI) can be estimated to within ±3 with 99.7 confidence by measuring fewer than 50 million instructions per benchmark. In practice, inaccuracy in microarchitectural state initialization introduces an additional uncertainty which we empirically bound to ∼2 for the tested benchmarks. Our implementation of SMARTS achieves an actual average error of only 0.64 on CPI and 0.59 on EPI for the tested benchmarks, running with average speedups of 35 and 60 over detailed simulation of 8-way and 16-way out-of-order processors, respectively.

[13]: Most research in the area of microarchitectural performance analysis is done using trace-driven simulations. Although trace-driven simulations are fairly accurate, they are both time- and space-consuming which makes them sometimes impractical. Modeling the execution of a computer program by a statistical profile and generating a synthetic benchmark trace from this statistical profile can be used to accelerate the design process. Thanks to the statistical nature of this technique, performance characteristics quickly converge to a steady state solution during simulation, which makes this technique suitable for fast design space explorations. In this paper, it is shown how more detailed statistical profiles can be obtained and how the synthetic trace generation mechanism should be designed to generate syntactically correct benchmark traces. As a result, the performance predictions in this paper are far more accurate than those reported in previous research.

[14]: 

[15]: As microprocessors continue to evolve, many optimizations reach a point of diminishing returns. We introduce HLS, a hybrid processor simulator which uses statistical models and symbolic execution to evaluate design alternatives. This simulation methodology allows for quick and accurate contour maps to be generated of the performance space spanned by design parameters. We validate the accuracy of HLS through correlation with existing cycle-by-cycle simulation techniques and current generation hardware. We demonstrate the power of HLS by exploring design spaces defined by two parameters: code properties and value prediction. These examples motivate how HLS can be used to set design goals and individual component performance targets. Additionally, these traces are not as susceptible to transient behavior because they are restricted to frequently executed code. Empirical results show that on average this mechanism can achieve better instruction fetch rates using only 12KB of hardware than a trace cache requiring 15KB of hardware, while producing long, persistent traces more suited to optimization.
In terms of micro-architectural simulation, many previous studies generate synthetic benchmarks as proxies [1] [9] . Statistical simulation [6] [14] [13] [4] [8]3 [2] generates synthetic trace or synthetic benchmarks to mimic micro-architectural performance of long-running real-world workloads, which targets one workload on a specific architecture with the certain configurations, and thus each benchmark needs to be generated on the other architectures with different configurations [8] . Sampled simulation selects a series of sample units for simulation instead of entire instruction stream, which are sampled randomly [7] , periodically [12] [3] or based on phase behavior [5] . [11] accelerate the full-system simulation through characterizing and predicting the performance behavior of OS services. For emerging big data workloads, PerfProx [8]6 proposes a proxy benchmark generation framework for real-world database applications through characterizing low-level dynamic execution characteristics. The proxy benchmark of PerfProx also needs to be regenerated under different configurations.