You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: Big Data Quality: A systematic literature review and future research directions 
Chapter Title:  Comparative Evaluation 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  This article investigates the evolution of data quality issues from traditional structured data managed in relational databases to Big Data. In particular, the paper examines the nature of the relationship between Data Quality and several research coordinates that are relevant in Big Data, such as the variety of data types, data sources and application domains, focusing on maps, semi-structured texts, linked open data, sensor & sensor networks and official statistics. Consequently a set of structural characteristics is identified and a systematization of the a posteriori correlation between them and quality dimensions is provided. Finally, Big Data quality issues are considered in a conceptual framework suitable to map the evolution of the quality paradigm according to three core coordinates that are significant in the context of the Big Data phenomenon: the data type considered, the source of data, and the application domain. Thus, the framework allows ascertaining the relevant changes in data quality emerging with the Big Data phenomenon, through an integrative and theoretical literature review. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  ABSTRACTNowadays technological advances have promoted big data streams common in many applications, including mobile internet applications, internet of things, and industry production process. Outl...

Literature Review:
In this section, review papers that include Stream  - BIB003 and Batch BIB001 - BIB002 are explained in details and then compared. As mentioned earlier, there is no review papers in hybrid methods, hence, in 7.1 stream review papers, and in 7.2 batch review papers are discussed respectively. Finally, in 7.3 all review studies are compared.