You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
In shared autonomy, user input is combined with semi-autonomous control to achieve a common goal. The goal is often unknown ex-ante, so prior work enables agents to infer the goal from user input and assist with the task. Such methods tend to assume some combination of knowledge of the dynamics of the environment, the user's policy given their goal, and the set of possible goals the user might target, which limits their application to real-world scenarios. We propose a deep reinforcement learning framework for model-free shared autonomy that lifts these assumptions. We use human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning with neural network function approximation to learn an end-to-end mapping from environmental observation and user input to agent action, with task reward as the only form of supervision. Controlled studies with users (n = 16) and synthetic pilots playing a video game and flying a real quadrotor demonstrate the ability of our algorithm to assist users with real-time control tasks in which the agent cannot directly access the user's private information through observations, but receives a reward signal and user input that both depend on the user's intent. The agent learns to assist the user without access to this private information, implicitly inferring it from the user's input. This allows the assisted user to complete the task more effectively than the user or an autonomous agent could on their own. This paper is a proof of concept that illustrates the potential for deep reinforcement learning to enable flexible and practical assistive systems.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: 

[2]: 

[3]: 

[4]: The approach of inferring user's intended task and optimizing low-level robot motions has promise for making robot teleoperation interfaces more intuitive and responsive. But most existing methods assume a finite set of candidate tasks, which limits a robot's functionality. This paper proposes the notion of freeform tasks that encode an infinite number of possible goals (e.g., desired target positions) within a finite set of types (e.g., reach, orient, pick up). It also presents two technical contributions to help make freeform UIs possible. First, an intent predictor estimates the user's desired task, and accepts freeform tasks that include both discrete types and continuous parameters. Second, a cooperative motion planner continuously updates the robot's trajectories to achieve the inferred tasks by repeatedly solving optimal control problems. The planner is designed to respond interactively to changes in the indicated task, avoid collisions in cluttered environments, handle time-varying objective functions, and achieve high-quality motions using a hybrid of numerical and sampling-based techniques. The system is applied to the problem of controlling a 6D robot manipulator using 2D mouse input in the context of two tasks: static target reaching and dynamic trajectory tracking. Simulations suggest that it enables the robot to reach intended targets faster and to track intended trajectories more closely than comparable techniques.

[5]: NASA's vision for space exploration stresses the cultivation of human-robotic systems. Similar systems are also envisaged for a variety of hazardous earthbound applications such as urban search and rescue. Recent research has pointed out that to reduce human workload, costs, fatigue driven error and risk, intelligent robotic systems will need to be a significant part of mission design. However, little attention has been paid to joint human-robot teams. Making human-robot collaboration natural and efficient is crucial. In particular, grounding, situational awareness, a common frame of reference and spatial referencing are vital in effective communication and collaboration. Augmented Reality (AR), the overlaying of computer graphics onto the real worldview, can provide the necessary means for a human-robotic system to fulfill these requirements for effective collaboration. This article reviews the field of human-robot interaction and augmented reality, investigates the potential avenues for creating natural...

[6]: Interest in human-robot coexistence, in which humans and robots share a common work volume, is increasing in manufacturing environments. Efficient work coordination requires both awareness of the human pose and a plan of action for both human and robot agents in order to compute robot motion trajectories that synchronize naturally with human motion. In this paper, we present a data-driven approach that synthesizes anticipatory knowledge of both human motions and subsequent action steps in order to predict in real-time the intended target of a human performing a reaching motion. Motion-level anticipatory models are constructed using multiple demonstrations of human reaching motions. We produce a library of motions from human demonstrations, based on a statistical representation of the degrees of freedom of the human arm, using time series analysis, wherein each time step is encoded as a multivariate Gaussian distribution. We demonstrate the benefits of this approach through offline statistical analysis of human motion data. The results indicate a considerable improvement over prior techniques in early prediction, achieving 70 or higher correct classification on average for the first third of the trajectory (< 500msec). We also indicate proof-of-concept through the demonstration of a human-robot cooperative manipulation task performed with a PR2 robot. Finally, we analyze the quality of task-level anticipatory knowledge required to improve prediction performance early in the human motion trajectory.

[7]: In shared autonomy, user input and robot autonomy are combined to control a robot to achieve a goal. Often, the robot does not know a priori which goal the user wants to achieve, and must both predict the user's intended goal, and assist in achieving that goal. We formulate the problem of shared autonomy as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process with uncertainty over the user's goal. We utilize maximum entropy inverse optimal control to estimate a distribution over the user's goal based on the history of inputs. Ideally, the robot assists the user by solving for an action which minimizes the expected cost-to-go for the (unknown) goal. As solving the POMDP to select the optimal action is intractable, we use hindsight optimization to approximate the solution. In a user study, we compare our method to a standard predict-then-blend approach. We find that our method enables users to accomplish tasks more quickly while utilizing less input. However, when asked to rate each system, users were mixed in their assessment, citing a tradeoff between maintaining control authority and accomplishing tasks quickly.

[8]: Robot teleoperation systems face a common set of challenges including latency, low-dimensional user commands, and asymmetric control inputs. User control with Brain---Computer Interfaces (BCIs) exacerbates these problems through especially noisy and erratic low-dimensional motion commands due to the difficulty in decoding neural activity. We introduce a general framework to address these challenges through a combination of computer vision, user intent inference, and arbitration between the human input and autonomous control schemes. Adjustable levels of assistance allow the system to balance the operators capabilities and their perception of control authority. Additionally, a custom servo controller design allow for safe interactions of the robotic arm with the environment. We present experimental results demonstrating significant performance improvement using our shared-control assistance framework on adapted rehabilitation benchmarks with two subjects at various timepoints relative to their implantation with intracortical BCIs. Our results indicate that shared assistance mitigates perceived user difficulty in using a seven-degree of freedom robotic arm as a prosthetic and enables successful performance on previously infeasible tasks. We showcase the extensibility of our architecture with applications to quality-of-life tasks such as opening a door, pouring liquids from containers, and manipulation with objects previously unknown to the system in densely cluttered environments.

[9]: We present a novel approach to shared control of human-machine systems. Our method assumes no a priori knowledge of the system dynamics. Instead, we learn both the dynamics and information about the user's interaction from observation through the use of the Koopman operator. Using the learned model, we define an optimization problem to compute the optimal policy for a given task, and compare the user input to the optimal input. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach with a user study. We also analyze the individual nature of the learned models by comparing the effectiveness of our approach when the demonstration data comes from a user's own interactions, from the interactions of a group of users and from a domain expert. Positive results include statistically significant improvements on task metrics when comparing a user-only control paradigm with our shared control paradigm. Surprising results include findings that suggest that individualizing the model based on a user's own data does not effect the ability to learn a useful dynamic system. We explore this tension as it relates to developing human-in-the-loop systems further in the discussion.
We build on shared autonomy work in which the system is initially unaware of the user's goal [5] [2] [8] [7] [6] [1] [4] and explore problem statements with unknown dynamics, unknown user policy, and unknown goal representation. The parallel autonomy [3] and outer-loop stabilization [9] frameworks approach shared-control teleoperation from a different angle: instead of predicting user intent, they minimally adjust user input to achieve safe trajectories for tasks like semi-autonomous driving. Our agent's policy of executing a near-optimal action closest to the human's suggestion is inspired by this approach. Existing work in parallel autonomy requires analytic descriptions of the environment, such as the explicit locations of road boundaries and a model of the behavior of other cars. Outer-loop stabilization requires knowledge of the user's goal. Our method is analogous, but for environments in which we do not have a dynamics model or a goal representation.