You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Quantum measurement is a fundamental cornerstone of experimental quantum computations. The main issues in current quantum measurement strategies are the high number of measurement rounds to determine a global optimal measurement output and the low success probability of finding a global optimal measurement output. Each measurement round requires preparing the quantum system and applying quantum operations and measurements with high-precision control in the physical layer. These issues result in extremely high-cost measurements with a low probability of success at the end of the measurement rounds. Here, we define a novel measurement for quantum computations called dense quantum measurement. The dense measurement strategy aims at fixing the main drawbacks of standard quantum measurements by achieving a significant reduction in the number of necessary measurement rounds and by radically improving the success probabilities of finding global optimal outputs. We provide application scenarios for quantum circuits with arbitrary unitary sequences, and prove that dense measurement theory provides an experimentally implementable solution for gate-model quantum computer architectures.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Abstract It is a central point in the quantum theory of measurement that it is impossible to discriminate perfectly between two non-orthogonal quantum states if only one physical system is considered. Standard arguments give | p | q > | 2 as the essential quantity that limits the effectiveness of discrimination between | p > and | q >. It is here shown, however, that not | p | q > | 2 but rather | p | q > | plays the role of determining the measure of distinguishability of | p > and | q > if a classification with certainty is required.

[2]: 

[3]: Abstract An infinite sequence of generalized measurements, recently proposed by Ivanovic, can be performed in a single step. It is shown that the final result is the optimal one.

[4]: There are fundamental limits to the accuracy with which one can determine the state of a quantum system. I give an overview of the main approaches to quantum state discrimination. Several strategies exist. In quantum hypothesis testing, a quantum system is prepared in a member of a known, finite set of states, and the aim is to guess which one with the minimum probability of error. Error free discrimination is also sometimes possible, if we allow for the possibility of obtaining inconclusive results. If no prior information about the state is provided, then it is impractical to try to determine it exactly, and it must be estimated instead. In addition to reviewing these various strategies, I describe connections between state discrimination, the manipulation of quantum entanglement and quantum cloning. Recent experimental work is also discussed.

[5]: The problem of discriminating among given nonorthogonal quantum states is underlying many of the schemes that have been suggested for quantum communication and quantum computing. However, quantum mechanics puts severe limitations on our ability to determine the state of a quantum system. In particular, nonorthogonal states cannot be discriminated perfectly, even if they are known, and various strategies for optimum discrimination with respect to some appropriately chosen criteria have been developed. In this article we review recent theoretical progress regarding the two most important optimum discrimination strategies. We also give a detailed introduction with emphasis on the relevant concepts of the quantum theory of measurement. After a brief introduction into the field, the second chapter deals with optimum unambiguous, i. e error-free, discrimination. Ambiguous discrimination with minimum error is the subject of the third chapter. The fourth chapter is devoted to an overview of the recently emerging subfield of discriminating multiparticle states. We conclude with a brief outlook where we attempt to outline directions of research for the immediate future.
Another subject connected to quantum measurement theory is quantum-state discrimination [2] [1] [3] [4] [5] that covers the distinguishability of quantum states, and the problem of differentiation between non-orthogonal quantum states.