You will be shown an abstract from a computer science research paper. Given this abstract, your task is to extract all unique entities with the following types:

- "Task": Applications, problems to solve, systems to construct. Examples include "information extraction", "machine reading system", "image segmentation".
- "Method": : Methods, models, systems to use, or tools, components of a system, frameworks. Examples include "language model", "CORENLP", "POS parser".
- "Metric": Metrics, measures, or entities that can express quality of a system / method. Examples include "F1", "BLEU", "Precision", "time complexity".
- "Material": Data, datasets, resources, Corpus, Knowledge base. Examples include "image data", "speech data", "stereo images", "CoNLL", "Wikipedia".
- "OtherScientificTerm": Phrases that are a scientific terms but do not fall into any of the above classes. Examples include "physical or geometric constraints", "qualitative prior knowledge", "tree kernel", "noise".
- "Generic": General terms or pronouns that may refer to a entity but are not themselves informative, often used as connection words. Examples include "model", "approach", "them".

Please return the output as a JSON object of the format: {"type1" : ["example_entity", ...], "type2" : ["example_entity", ...]}. The keys should be entity types and values should be lists of extracted entities belonging to the corresponding type. Entity types with no matching entities should be assigned an empty array [].

For instance, the output might look like: {"Task": ["speech recognition", ...], "Method": ["Conditional random field"], "Material": [], ...}.

Only output the JSON object and do not include any additional text.

Abstract:

In this paper we evaluate four objective measures of speech with regards to intelligibility prediction of synthesized speech in diverse noisy situations. We evaluated three intel-ligibility measures, the Dau measure, the glimpse proportion and the Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) and a quality measure, the Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ). For the generation of synthesized speech we used a state of the art HMM-based speech synthesis system. The noisy conditions comprised four additive noises. The measures were compared with subjective intelligibility scores obtained in listening tests. The results show the Dau and the glimpse measures to be the best predictors of intelligibility, with correlations of around 0.83 to subjective scores. All measures gave less accurate predictions of intelligibility for synthetic speech than have previously been found for natural speech; in particular the SII measure. In additional experiments, we processed the synthesized speech by an ideal binary mask before adding noise. The Glimpse measure gave the most accurate intelligibility predictions in this situation.
{"Generic": [], "Material": ["natural speech", "synthesized speech", "synthetic speech"], "Method": ["predictors of intelligibility", "HMM-based speech synthesis system", "ideal binary mask"], "Metric": ["Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ)", "SII measure", "quality measure", "subjective intelligibility scores", "Dau measure", "measures of speech", "glimpse proportion", "intel-ligibility measures", "correlations", "Speech Intelligibility Index (SII)"], "OtherScientificTerm": ["noisy conditions", "subjective scores", "additive noises", "diverse noisy situations"], "Task": ["intelligibility prediction", "generation of synthesized speech"]}