You will be provided with the titles and abstracts of a collection of medical RCT reports studying a clinical question -- for instance, the efficacy of an intervention on some medical outcome. Please write a few sentences synthesizing the findings of these reports, which could serve as a conclusion section for a systematic review article. Your response should not include any other text. The RCT reports are below.



Title 1:
Preterm labour in twin pregnancies: can it be prevented by hospital admission?
Abstract 1:
Women attending a twin pregnancy antenatal clinic underwent cervical palpation to calculate a cervical score by subtracting dilatation from length. Those with a score of -2 or less at or before 34 weeks are at especially high risk of preterm labour. A total of 139 such women were randomly allocated either to receive bed-rest in hospital or to continue conventional outpatient management. No beneficial effect of bed-rest could be identified in prolonging twin pregnancy or improving fetal outcome.


Title 2:
The effects of hospitalization for bed rest on duration of gestation, fetal growth and neonatal morbidity in triplet pregnancy.
Abstract 2:
Nineteen women attending a special multiple pregnancy antenatal clinic with a triplet pregnancy were randomly allocated to either bed rest in hospital from 24 weeks gestation onwards until delivery, or to continue conventional outpatient management. Conclusions are limited by the trial size, but the study suggests that routine hospitalization for bed rest decreases the incidence of preterm delivery and light-for-gestational age infants and reduces the need for intensive neonatal care. Although still compatible with change variation, the observations, if confirmed in a larger randomized study, would have considerable implications for clinical practice. The policy needs further evaluation in a large multicentered collaborative study.


Title 3:
The effects of hospitalization for rest on fetal growth, neonatal morbidity and length of gestation in twin pregnancy.
Abstract 3:
To test whether a policy of hospitalization for bed rest, from 28-30 weeks gestation until delivery, lengthens the duration of gestation, improves fetal growth and decreases neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancy.
                A randomized controlled trial.
                Harare Maternity Hospital, Zimbabwe.
                118 women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy between 28 and 30 weeks gestation.
                Hospitalization for bed rest. Encouraged to rest in bed as much as possible, although voluntary ambulation was allowed.
                Gestational age at delivery and number of infants delivered preterm (less than 37 weeks); birthweight and number of small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants; neonatal morbidity was assessed by number of infants requiring admission to the neonatal unit and the length of stay.
                There was no effect on duration of gestation or the occurrence of preterm delivery. Mean birthweight was greater in the hospitalized group (t = -2.28, df 234, P = 0.02) and there were fewer SGA infants (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.96). No differences were found in neonatal morbidity.
                Hospitalization for bed rest does not prolong pregnancy but can improve fetal growth, although this was not reflected in improved neonatal morbidity. Whether twin fetal growth can be enhanced similarly in other populations should be investigated.


Title 4:
The effects of hospital admission for bed rest on the duration of twin pregnancy: a randomised trial.
Abstract 4:
212 women with twin pregnancies were randomly allocated either to receive advice to rest in hospital from 32 weeks' gestation until delivery, or to be part of a control group in which hospital admission was offered selectively (and, on average, 5 weeks later). Preterm delivery was more common among women admitted routinely for bed rest than among controls, and this difference was unlikely to have occurred by chance. There is at present no scientifically acceptable evidence that this common, disruptive, and expensive obstetric policy does more good than harm.


Title 5:
Is routine hospitalization needed in antenatal care of twin pregnancy?
Abstract 5:
A prospective study was carried out to evaluate the significance and efficacy of routine hospital bed rest in prevention of premature birth and pregnancy complications compared to specialized antenatal care at the outpatient clinic of 73 twin pregnancies. The twin pregnancies were screened in health centers by means of symphysis-fundus measurement, and the diagnosis was confirmed by ultrasound examination at the outpatient clinic. On the average the ultrasonic diagnosis was performed during the 23rd gestational week; at this visit the women were divided into two groups with similar follow-up to the end of the 29th gestational week. At this stage one of the groups was hospitalized unless there had been indications for earlier admission. In the hospital group, the mean for gestational week at delivery was 36.7 (+/- 2.4) and in the outpatient group 37.4 (+/- 1.8) respectively (N.S.). There was no difference in the rate of pregnancy complications between the groups too. No statistical differences in the perinatal mortality (7.1% and 1.1% respectively) or birthweights of the newborns were found, either. Present results do not support the idea of using routine hospital bed rest. It could not be proved to have positive effects on the gestational age, birth weight and perinatal mortality of the newborns, nor to the pregnancy complications. In our opinion early diagnosis of twin pregnancy is of decisive importance and specialized ambulatory follow-up could be employed instead of routine bed rest in antenatal care of twin pregnancy.


Title 6:
Routine hospital admission in twin pregnancy between 26 and 30 weeks' gestation.
Abstract 6:
Of 141 women with twin pregnancies, 72 were randomly assigned to outpatient care and 69 to hospital admission between 26 and 30 weeks' gestation. There were no differences between the groups in the frequencies of major maternal complications in pregnancy and labour but more of those admitted to hospital than of the outpatient group had to be admitted after 30 weeks. There were no differences between the groups in the mean birthweights of the twins by birth order, or in their mean gestation at birth whether analysed by intention to treat or by the treatment given. 22 infants were delivered before 32 weeks' gestation in the inpatient group compared with 10 in the outpatient group. With the exception of small-for-dates infants, any trend towards greater morbidity or mortality was seen in the inpatient group. The policy of routine hospital admission of women with twin pregnancies from 26 weeks' gestation is not beneficial to mother or babies and should be abandoned.
There is currently not enough evidence to support a policy of routine hospitalisation for bed rest in multiple pregnancy. No reduction in the risk of preterm birth or perinatal death is evident, although there is a suggestion that fetal growth may be improved. For women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy the results of this review show no benefit from routine hospitalisation for bed rest. Until further evidence is available, the policy cannot be recommended for routine clinical practice.