Your task is to classify the citation intent within the following provided text from a computational linguistics research paper. The cited work is demarcated by "<cite>" and "</cite>". Determine the purpose of the cited work by selecting from the listed categories:

- Background: The cited paper underpins the subject matter.
- Motivation: The cited paper inspires or provides a rationale for the current research.
- Uses: The current work utilizes concepts or tools from the cited paper.
- Extends: The current work advances ideas or methods from the cited paper.
- Similarities: The current work identifies commonalities with the cited paper.
- Differences: The current work delineates its distinction from the cited paper.
- FutureWork: The cited paper is acknowledged as groundwork for prospective research.

Indicate the intents by listing them in a `json` array, e.g. ["Background", "Uses"]. More than one intent may be applicable. Do not include any extraneous text in your response.

Context with Citation:
The Wikipedia 'attacks' dataset <cite>(Wulczyn et al., 2017)</cite> contains approx. 115K English Wikipedia talk page comments, which were labeled as containing personal attacks or not. Each comment was labeled by at least 10 annotators. Inter-annotator agreement, measured on a random sample of 1K comments using Krippendorff's (2004) alpha, was 0.45. The gold label of each comment is determined by the majority of annotators, leading to binary labels (accept, reject). Alternatively, the gold label is the percentage of annotators that labeled the comment as 'accept' (or 'reject'), leading to probabilistic labels. 7 The dataset is split in three parts (Table 1) : training (W-ATT-TRAIN, 69,526 comments), development (W-ATT-DEV, 23,160), and test (W-ATT-TEST, 23,178). In all three parts, the rejected comments are 12%, but this is an artificial ratio (Wulczyn et al. oversampled comments posted by banned users). By contrast, the ratio of rejected comments in all the Gazzetta subsets is the truly observed one. The Wikipedia comments are also longer (median length 38 tokens) compared to Gazzetta's (median length 25 tokens).
["Background"]