You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Because of their state-of-the-art performance in computer vision, CNNs are becoming increasingly popular in a variety of fields, including medicine. However, as neural networks are black box function approximators, it is difficult, if not impossible, for a medical expert to reason about their output. This could potentially result in the expert distrusting the network when he or she does not agree with its output. In such a case, explaining why the CNN makes a certain decision becomes valuable information. In this paper, we try to open the black box of the CNN by inspecting and visualizing the learned feature maps, in the field of dermatology. We show that, to some extent, CNNs focus on features similar to those used by dermatologists to make a diagnosis. However, more research is required for fully explaining their output.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Large Convolutional Network models have recently demonstrated impressive classification performance on the ImageNet benchmark [18]. However there is no clear understanding of why they perform so well, or how they might be improved. In this paper we explore both issues. We introduce a novel visualization technique that gives insight into the function of intermediate feature layers and the operation of the classifier. Used in a diagnostic role, these visualizations allow us to find model architectures that outperform on the ImageNet classification benchmark. We also perform an ablation study to discover the performance contribution from different model layers. We show our ImageNet model generalizes well to other datasets: when the softmax classifier is retrained, it convincingly beats the current state-of-the-art results on Caltech-101 and Caltech-256 datasets.
In [1] , the authors propose a visualization technique to give some insight into the function of the intermediate feature maps of a trained CNN, by attaching a deconvolutional network to each of its convolutional layers. While a CNN maps the input from the image space to a feature space, a deconvolutional network does the opposite (mapping from a feature space back to the image space), by reversing its operations. This is done by a series of unpooling, rectifying and filtering operations. The authors use a deconvolutional network to visualize the features that result in the highest activations in a given feature map. Furthermore, they evaluate the sensitivity of a feature map, to the occlusion of a certain part of the input image, and the effect it has on the class score for the correct class.