You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Using multiple streams can improve the overall system performance by mitigating the data transfer overhead on heterogeneous systems. Currently, very few cases have been streamed to demonstrate the streaming performance impact and a systematic investigation of streaming necessity and how-to over a large number of test cases remains a gap. In this paper, we use a total of 56 benchmarks to build a statistical view of the data transfer overhead, and give an in-depth analysis of the impacting factors. Among the heterogeneous codes, we identify two types of non-streamable codes and three types of streamable codes, for which a streaming approach has been proposed. Our experimental results on the CPU-MIC platform show that, with multiple streams, we can improve the application performance by up 90 . Our work can serve as a generic flow of using multiple streams on heterogeneous platforms.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Graphics Processing Units (GPU) have impressively arisen as general-purpose coprocessors in high performance computing applications, since the launch of the Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA). However, they present an inherent performance bottleneck in the fact that communication between two separate address spaces (the main memory of the CPU and the memory of the GPU) is unavoidable. The CUDA Application Programming Interface (API) provides asynchronous transfers and streams, which permit a staged execution, as a way to overlap communication and computation. Nevertheless, a precise manner to estimate the possible improvement due to overlapping does not exist, neither a rule to determine the optimal number of stages or streams in which computation should be divided. In this work, we present a methodology that is applied to model the performance of asynchronous data transfers of CUDA streams on different GPU architectures. Thus, we illustrate this methodology by deriving expressions of performance for two different consumer graphic architectures belonging to the more recent generations. These models permit programmers to estimate the optimal number of streams in which the computation on the GPU should be broken up, in order to obtain the highest performance improvements. Finally, we have checked the suitability of our performance models with three applications based on codes from the CUDA Software Development Kit (SDK) with successful results.

[2]: The graphic processing unit GPU is becoming increasingly popular as a performance accelerator in various applications requiring high-performance parallel computing capability. In a central processing unit CPU or GPU hybrid system, software pipelining is a major task in order to deliver accelerated performance, where hiding CPU-GPU communication overheads by splitting a large task into small units is the key challenge. In this paper, we carry out a systematic investigation into task partitioning in order to achieve maximum performance gain. We first validate the advantage of even partition strategy, and then propose the optimal scheduling, with detailed study into how to achieve optimal unit size data granularity in an analytical framework. Experiments on AMD and NVIDIA GPU platforms demonstrate that our approaches achieve around 31 - 59 performance improvement using software pipelining.

[3]: Many GPU applications perform data transfers to and from GPU memory at regular intervals. For example because the data does not fit into GPU memory or because of internode communication at the end of each time step. Overlapping GPU computation with CPU-GPU communication can reduce the costs of moving data. Several different techniques exist for transferring data to and from GPU memory and for overlapping those transfers with GPU computation. It is currently not known when to apply which method. Implementing and benchmarking each method is often a large programming effort and not feasible. To solve these issues and to provide insight in the performance of GPU applications, we propose an analytical performance model that includes PCIe transfers and overlapping computation and communication. Our evaluation shows that the performance models are capable of correctly classifying the relative performance of the different implementations.
[1] , Gomez- present performance models for asynchronous data transfers on different GPU architectures. The models permit programmers to estimate the optimal number of streams in which the computation on the GPU should be broken up. [3] , present an analytical performance model to indicate when to apply which overlapping method on GPUs. The evaluation results show that the performance model are capable of correctly classifying the relative performance of the different implementations. [2] , carry out a systematic investigation into task partitioning to achieve maximum performance gain for AMD and NVIDIA GPUs. Unlike these works, we aim to evaluate the necessity of using multiple streams and investigate how to use streams systematically. Using a model on Phi to determine the number of streams will be investigated as our future work.