You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Abstract We consider document listing on string collections, that is, finding in which strings a given pattern appears. In particular, we focus on repetitive collections: a collection of size N over alphabet [ 1 , σ ] is composed of D copies of a string of size n, and s edits are applied on ranges of copies. We introduce the first document listing index with size O ˜ ( n + s ) , precisely O ( ( n lg ⁡ σ + s lg 2 ⁡ N ) lg ⁡ D ) bits, and with useful worst-case time guarantees: Given a pattern of length m, the index reports the ndoc > 0 strings where it appears in time O ( m lg 1 + ϵ ⁡ N ⋅ ndoc ) , for any constant ϵ > 0 (and tells in time O ( m lg ⁡ N ) if ndoc = 0 ). Our technique is to augment a range data structure that is commonly used on grammar-based indexes, so that instead of retrieving all the pattern occurrences, it computes useful summaries on them. We show that the idea has independent interest: we introduce the first grammar-based index that, on a text T [ 1 , N ] with a grammar of size r, uses O ( r lg ⁡ N ) bits and counts the number of occurrences of a pattern P [ 1 , m ] in time O ( m 2 + m lg 2 + ϵ ⁡ r ) , for any constant ϵ > 0 . We also give the first index using O ( z lg ⁡ ( N z ) lg ⁡ N ) bits, where T is parsed by Lempel–Ziv into z phrases, counting occurrences in time O ( m lg 2 + ϵ ⁡ N ) .

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Abstract A repetitive sequence collection is a set of sequences which are small variations of each other. A prominent example are genome sequences of individuals of the same or close species, where...

[2]: Many document collections consist largely of repeated material, and several indexes have been designed to take advantage of this. There has been only preliminary work, however, on document retrieval for repetitive collections. In this paper we show how one of those indexes, the run-length compressed suffix array (RLCSA), can be extended to support document listing. In our experiments, our additional structures on top of the RLCSA can reduce the query time for document listing by an order of magnitude while still using total space that is only a fraction of the raw collection size. As a byproduct, we develop a new document listing technique for general collections that is of independent interest.

[3]: Indexing highly repetitive texts --- such as genomic databases, software repositories and versioned text collections --- has become an important problem since the turn of the millennium. A relevant compressibility measure for repetitive texts is @math , the number of runs in their Burrows-Wheeler Transform (BWT). One of the earliest indexes for repetitive collections, the Run-Length FM-index, used @math space and was able to efficiently count the number of occurrences of a pattern of length @math in the text (in loglogarithmic time per pattern symbol, with current techniques). However, it was unable to locate the positions of those occurrences efficiently within a space bounded in terms of @math . Since then, a number of other indexes with space bounded by other measures of repetitiveness --- the number of phrases in the Lempel-Ziv parse, the size of the smallest grammar generating the text, the size of the smallest automaton recognizing the text factors --- have been proposed for efficiently locating, but not directly counting, the occurrences of a pattern. In this paper we close this long-standing problem, showing how to extend the Run-Length FM-index so that it can locate the @math occurrences efficiently within @math space (in loglogarithmic time each), and reaching optimal time @math within @math space, on a RAM machine of @math bits. Within @math space, our index can also count in optimal time @math . Raising the space to @math , we support count and locate in @math and @math time, which is optimal in the packed setting and had not been obtained before in compressed space. We also describe a structure using @math space that replaces the text and extracts any text substring of length @math in almost-optimal time @math . (...continues...)
Another precedent is ILCP [2] , where it is shown that an array formed by interleaving the longest common prefix arrays of the documents in the order of the global suffix array, ILCP, has long increasing runs on repetitive collections. Then an index of size bounded by the runs in the suffix array [1] and in the ILCP array performs document listing in time @math , where @math and @math are the search and lookup time, respectively, of a run-length compressed suffix array [1] [2]7 . Yet, there are only average-case bounds for the size of the structure in terms of @math : If the base document is generated at random and the edits are spread at random, then the structure uses @math bits on average.