You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Drones have proven to be useful in many industry segments such as security and surveillance, where e.g. on-board real-time object tracking is a necessity for autonomous flying guards. Tracking and following suspicious objects is therefore required in real-time on limited hardware. With an object detector in the loop, low latency becomes extremely important. In this paper, we propose a solution to make object detection for UAVs both fast and super accurate. We propose a multi-dataset learning strategy yielding top eye-sky object detection accuracy. Our model generalizes well on unseen data and can cope with different flying heights, optically zoomed-in shots and different viewing angles. We apply optimization steps such that we achieve minimal latency on embedded on-board hardware by fusing layers, quantizing calculations to 16-bit floats and 8-bit integers, with negligible loss in accuracy. We validate on NVIDIA's Jetson TX2 and Jetson Xavier platforms where we achieve a speed-wise performance boost of more than 10x.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: 

[2]: In this paper, we demonstrate and evaluate a method to perform real-time object detection on-board a UAV using the state of the art YOLOv2 object detection algorithm running on an NVIDIA Jetson TX2, an GPU platform targeted at power constrained mobile applications that use neural networks under the hood. This, as a result of comparing several cutting edge object detection algorithms. Multiple evaluations we present provide insights that help choose the optimal object detection configuration given certain frame rate and detection accuracy requirements. We propose how this setup running on-board a UAV can be used to process a video feed during emergencies in real-time, and feed a decision support warning system using the generated detections.

[3]: Recent research on deep neural networks has focused primarily on improving accuracy. For a given accuracy level, it is typically possible to identify multiple DNN architectures that achieve that accuracy level. With equivalent accuracy, smaller DNN architectures offer at least three advantages: (1) Smaller DNNs require less communication across servers during distributed training. (2) Smaller DNNs require less bandwidth to export a new model from the cloud to an autonomous car. (3) Smaller DNNs are more feasible to deploy on FPGAs and other hardware with limited memory. To provide all of these advantages, we propose a small DNN architecture called SqueezeNet. SqueezeNet achieves AlexNet-level accuracy on ImageNet with 50x fewer parameters. Additionally, with model compression techniques we are able to compress SqueezeNet to less than 0.5MB (510x smaller than AlexNet).
Several works target embedded object detection or tracking on similar embedded hardware. [2] compare YOLOV2 and tiny YOLOV2 among a few other classic object detection techniques both in terms of speed and accuracy on a Jetson TX2 platform for a UAV warning system. The same hardware is used by Blanco- [1] . They propose an embedded real-time multi-object tracker based on a foreground-background detector and the GOTURN tracker. The predecessors of the TX2, the TX1 and TK1, are evaluated in [3] where they combine a tiny version of Faster-RCNN with a KCF tracker for single-object tracking on a drone. As stated before, we go further in optimizing our network for the target platform. In addition, we make efforts to compress our trained network for faster inference.