You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
We consider stochastic settings for clustering, and develop provably-good (approximation) algorithms for a number of these notions. These algorithms allow one to obtain better approximation ratios compared to the usual deterministic clustering setting. Additionally, they offer a number of advantages including providing fairer clustering and clustering which has better long-term behavior for each user. In particular, they ensure that *every user* is guaranteed to get good service (on average). We also complement some of these with impossibility results.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: In this paper, we revisit the classical k-median problem. Using the standard LP relaxation for k-median, we give an efficient algorithm to construct a probability distribution on sets of k centers that matches the marginals specified by the optimal LP solution. Analyzing the approximation ratio of our algorithm presents significant technical difficulties: we are able to show an upper bound of 3.25. While this is worse than the current best known 3+e guarantee of [2], because: (1) it leads to 3.25 approximation algorithms for some generalizations of the k-median problem, including the k-facility location problem introduced in [10], (2) our algorithm runs in @math time to achieve 3.25(1+δ)-approximation compared to the O(n8) time required by the local search algorithm of [2] to guarantee a 3.25 approximation, and (3) our approach has the potential to beat the decade old bound of 3+e for k-median. We also give a 34-approximation for the knapsack median problem, which greatly improves the approximation constant in [13]. Using the same technique, we also give a 9-approximation for matroid median problem introduced in [11], improving on their 16-approximation.
Similar stochastic approximation guarantees have appeared in the context of approximation algorithms for static problems, particularly @math -median problems. In [1] , Charikar & Li discussed a randomized procedure for converting a linear-programming relaxation in which a client has distance @math , into a distribution @math satisfying @math . This property can be used, among other things, to achieve a @math -approximation for @math -median. However, many other randomized rounding algorithms for @math -median only seek to preserve the value @math , without our type of per-point guarantee.