You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
In a variety of research areas, the weighted bag of vectors and the histogram are widely used descriptors for complex objects. Both can be expressed as discrete distributions. D2-clustering pursues the minimum total within-cluster variation for a set of discrete distributions subject to the Kantorovich-Wasserstein metric. D2-clustering has a severe scalability issue, the bottleneck being the computation of a centroid distribution, called Wasserstein barycenter, that minimizes its sum of squared distances to the cluster members. In this paper, we develop a modified Bregman ADMM approach for computing the approximate discrete Wasserstein barycenter of large clusters. In the case when the support points of the barycenters are unknown and have low cardinality, our method achieves high accuracy empirically at a much reduced computational cost. The strengths and weaknesses of our method and its alternatives are examined through experiments, and we recommend scenarios for their respective usage. Moreover, we develop both serial and parallelized versions of the algorithm. By experimenting with large-scale data, we demonstrate the computational efficiency of the new methods and investigate their convergence properties and numerical stability. The clustering results obtained on several datasets in different domains are highly competitive in comparison with some widely used methods in the corresponding areas.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: The mirror descent algorithm (MDA) generalizes gradient descent by using a Bregman divergence to replace squared Euclidean distance. In this paper, we similarly generalize the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) to Bregman ADMM (BADMM), which allows the choice of different Bregman divergences to exploit the structure of problems. BADMM provides a unified framework for ADMM and its variants, including generalized ADMM, inexact ADMM and Bethe ADMM. We establish the global convergence and the O(1 T) iteration complexity for BADMM. In some cases, BADMM can be faster than ADMM by a factor of O(n ln n) where n is the dimensionality. In solving the linear program of mass transportation problem, BADMM leads to massive parallelism and can easily run on GPU. BADMM is several times faster than highly optimized commercial software Gurobi.

[2]: Many problems of recent interest in statistics and machine learning can be posed in the framework of convex optimization. Due to the explosion in size and complexity of modern datasets, it is increasingly important to be able to solve problems with a very large number of features or training examples. As a result, both the decentralized collection or storage of these datasets as well as accompanying distributed solution methods are either necessary or at least highly desirable. In this review, we argue that the alternating direction method of multipliers is well suited to distributed convex optimization, and in particular to large-scale problems arising in statistics, machine learning, and related areas. The method was developed in the 1970s, with roots in the 1950s, and is equivalent or closely related to many other algorithms, such as dual decomposition, the method of multipliers, Douglas–Rachford splitting, Spingarn's method of partial inverses, Dykstra's alternating projections, Bregman iterative algorithms for l1 problems, proximal methods, and others. After briefly surveying the theory and history of the algorithm, we discuss applications to a wide variety of statistical and machine learning problems of recent interest, including the lasso, sparse logistic regression, basis pursuit, covariance selection, support vector machines, and many others. We also discuss general distributed optimization, extensions to the nonconvex setting, and efficient implementation, including some details on distributed MPI and Hadoop MapReduce implementations.

[3]: This article details a general numerical framework to approximate so-lutions to linear programs related to optimal transport. The general idea is to introduce an entropic regularization of the initial linear program. This regularized problem corresponds to a Kullback-Leibler Bregman di-vergence projection of a vector (representing some initial joint distribu-tion) on the polytope of constraints. We show that for many problems related to optimal transport, the set of linear constraints can be split in an intersection of a few simple constraints, for which the projections can be computed in closed form. This allows us to make use of iterative Bregman projections (when there are only equality constraints) or more generally Bregman-Dykstra iterations (when inequality constraints are in-volved). We illustrate the usefulness of this approach to several variational problems related to optimal transport: barycenters for the optimal trans-port metric, tomographic reconstruction, multi-marginal optimal trans-port and in particular its application to Brenier's relaxed solutions of in-compressible Euler equations, partial un-balanced optimal transport and optimal transport with capacity constraints.

[4]: Earth Mover's Distance (EMD), as a similarity measure, has received a lot of attention in the fields of multimedia and probabilistic databases, computer vision, image retrieval, machine learning, etc. EMD on multidimensional histograms provides better distinguishability between the objects approximated by the histograms (e.g., images), compared to classic measures like Euclidean distance. Despite its usefulness, EMD has a high computational cost; therefore, a number of effective filtering methods have been proposed, to reduce the pairs of histograms for which the exact EMD has to be computed, during similarity search. Still, EMD calculations in the refinement step remain the bottleneck of the whole similarity search process. In this paper, we focus on optimizing the refinement phase of EMD-based similarity search by (i) adapting an efficient min-cost flow algorithm (SIA) for EMD computation, (ii) proposing a dynamic distance bound, which can be used to terminate an EMD refinement early, and (iii) proposing a dynamic refinement order for the candidates which, paired with a concurrent EMD refinement strategy, reduces the amount of needless computations. Our proposed techniques are orthogonal to and can be easily integrated with the state-of-the-art filtering techniques, reducing the cost of EMD-based similarity queries by orders of magnitude.
Our main algorithm is inspired by the B-ADMM algorithm of Wang and Banerjee [1] for solving OT fast. They developed the two-block version of ADMM [2] along with Bregman divergence to solve the OT problem when the number of support points is extremely large. Its algorithmic relation to IBP [3] is discussed in . The OT problem at a moderate scale can in fact be efficiently handled by state-of-the-art LP solvers [4] . As demonstrated by the line of work on solving the barycenter, optimizing the Wasserstein barycenter is rather different from computing the distance. Our modified B-ADMM algorithm is for solving the Wasserstein barycenter problem. Naively adapting the B-ADMM to Wasserstein barycenter does not result in a proper algorithm. The modification we made on B-ADMM is necessary. Although the modified B-ADMM approach is not guaranteed to converge to a local optimum, it often yields a solution very close to the local optimum. The new method is shown empirically to achieve higher accuracy than IBP or its derivatives.