You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
We are motivated by problems that arise in a number of applications such as explosives detection and online Marketing, where the observations are governed by Poisson statistics. Here each observation is a Poisson random variable whose mean is a sparse linear superposition of known patterns. Unlike many conventional problems observations here are not identically distributed since they are associated with different sensing modalities. We analyse the performance of a Maximum Likelihood (ML) decoder, which for our Poisson setting is computationally tractable. We derive fundamental sample complexity bounds for sparse recovery in the high-dimensional setting. We show that when the sensing matrix satisfies the so-called Restricted Eigenvalue (RE) condition the l1 regularized ML decoder is consistent. Moreover, it converges exponentially fast in terms of number of observations. Our results apply to both deterministic and random sensing matrices and we present several results for both cases.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: This paper describes performance bounds for compressed sensing (CS) where the underlying sparse or compressible (sparsely approximable) signal is a vector of nonnegative intensities whose measurements are corrupted by Poisson noise. In this setting, standard CS techniques cannot be applied directly for several reasons. First, the usual signal-independent and or bounded noise models do not apply to Poisson noise, which is nonadditive and signal-dependent. Second, the CS matrices typically considered are not feasible in real optical systems because they do not adhere to important constraints, such as nonnegativity and photon flux preservation. Third, the typical l2 - l1 minimization leads to overfitting in the high-intensity regions and oversmoothing in the low-intensity areas. In this paper, we describe how a feasible positivity- and flux-preserving sensing matrix can be constructed, and then analyze the performance of a CS reconstruction approach for Poisson data that minimizes an objective function consisting of a negative Poisson log likelihood term and a penalty term which measures signal sparsity. We show that, as the overall intensity of the underlying signal increases, an upper bound on the reconstruction error decays at an appropriate rate (depending on the compressibility of the signal), but that for a fixed signal intensity, the error bound actually grows with the number of measurements or sensors. This surprising fact is both proved theoretically and justified based on physical intuition.
The latter assumption arises in some photon counting applications, like imaging under Poisson noise, where the total number of expected measured photons cannot be larger than the intensity of the original signal. The upper bound on reconstruction error of the constrained ML estimator is given in the paper [1] . Surprisingly, the upper bound scales linearly with the number of measurements. However, this sounds reasonable under the Flux Preserving assumption. In fact this behavior is due to the fact that for a fixed signal intensity, more measurements lead to lower SNR for each observation. As a result, unlike conventional compressive sensing bounds, the estimates do not converge to the ground truth with increasing the sample size. Nevertheless, Flux Preserving constraint does not arise in our setting and consequently the application and methods of analysis are different.