You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A Review on MR Image Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction 
Chapter Title:  STATISTICAL MODELING 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  We propose a modification of Wells et al. technique for bias field estimation and segmentation of magnetic resonance (MR) images. We show that replacing the class other, which includes all tissue not modeled explicitly by Gaussians with small variance, by a uniform probability density, and amending the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm appropriately, gives significantly better results. We next consider the estimation and filtering of high-frequency information in MR images, comprising noise, intertissue boundaries, and within tissue microstructures. We conclude that post-filtering is preferable to the prefiltering that has been proposed previously. We observe that the performance of any segmentation algorithm, in particular that of Wells et al. (and our refinements of it) is affected substantially by the number and selection of the tissue classes that are modeled explicitly, the corresponding defining parameters and, critically, the spatial distribution of tissues in the image. We present an initial exploration to choose automatically the number of classes and the associated parameters that give the best output. This requires us to define what is meant by "best output" and for this we propose the application of minimum entropy. The methods developed have been implemented and are illustrated throughout on simulated and real data (brain and breast MR). 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  The finite mixture (FM) model is the most commonly used model for statistical segmentation of brain magnetic resonance (MR) images because of its simple mathematical form and the piecewise constant nature of ideal brain MR images. However, being a histogram-based model, the FM has an intrinsic limitation--no spatial information is taken into account. This causes the FM model to work only on well-defined images with low levels of noise; unfortunately, this is often not the the case due to artifacts such as partial volume effect and bias field distortion. Under these conditions, FM model-based methods produce unreliable results. In this paper, we propose a novel hidden Markov random field (HMRF) model, which is a stochastic process generated by a MRF whose state sequence cannot be observed directly but which can be indirectly estimated through observations. Mathematically, it can be shown that the FM model is a degenerate version of the HMRF model. The advantage of the HMRF model derives from the way in which the spatial information is encoded through the mutual influences of neighboring sites. Although MRF modeling has been employed in MR image segmentation by other researchers, most reported methods are limited to using MRF as a general prior in an FM model-based approach. To fit the HMRF model, an EM algorithm is used. We show that by incorporating both the HMRF model and the EM algorithm into a HMRF-EM framework, an accurate and robust segmentation can be achieved. More importantly, the HMRF-EM framework can easily be combined with other techniques. As an example, we show how the bias field correction algorithm of Guillemaud and Brady (1997) can be incorporated into this framework to achieve a three-dimensional fully automated approach for brain MR image segmentation. 
3. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB003):  Automatic 3D segmentation of the brain from MR scans is a challenging problem that has received enormous amount of attention lately. Of the techniques reported in literature, very few are fully automatic. In this paper, we present an efficient and accurate, fully automatic 3D segmentation procedure for brain MR scans. It has several salient features namely, (1) instead of a single multiplicative bias field that affects all tissue intensities, separate parametric smooth models are used for the intensity of each class. This may be a more realistic model and avoids the need for a logarithmic transformation. (2) A brain atlas is used in conjunction with a robust registration procedure to find a non-rigid transformation that maps the standard brain to the specimen to be segmented. This transformation is then used to: segment the brain from non-brain tissue; compute prior probabilities for each class at each voxel location and find an appropriate automatic initialization. (3) Finally, a novel algorithm is presented which is a variant of the EM procedure, that incorporates a fast and accurate way to find optimal segmentations, given the intensity models along with the spatial coherence assumption. Experimental results with both synthetic and real data are included, as well as comparisons of the performance of our algorithm with that of other published methods. 
4. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB004):  We describe a fully-automatic 3D-segmentation technique for brain MR images. Using Markov random fields the segmentation algorithm captures three important MR features, i.e. non-parametric distributions of tissue intensities, neighborhood correlations and signal inhomogeneities. Detailed simulations and real MR images demonstrate the performance of the segmentation algorithm. The impact of noise, inhomogeneity, smoothing and structure thickness is analyzed quantitatively. Even single echo MR images are well classified into gray matter, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid, scalp-bone and background. A simulated annealing and an iterated conditional modes implementation are presented. Keywords: Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Segmentation, Markov Random Fields

Literature Review:
The statistical methods BIB001 BIB002 BIB005 BIB003 BIB004 may assume that the IIH follows a distribution, the Gaussian distribution for example, or model the IIH as a random process, such as the Markov random field.