You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A survey on heterogeneous transfer learning 
Chapter Title:  SMVCCAE, SSMVCCAE 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  In this paper, we present the supervised multi-view canonical correlation analysis ensemble (SMVCCAE) and its semi-supervised version (SSMVCCAE), which are novel techniques designed to address heterogeneous domain adaptation problems, i.e., situations in which the data to be processed and recognized are collected from different heterogeneous domains. Specifically, the multi-view canonical correlation analysis scheme is utilized to extract multiple correlation subspaces that are useful for joint representations for data association across domains. This scheme makes homogeneous domain adaption algorithms suitable for heterogeneous domain adaptation problems. Additionally, inspired by fusion methods such as Ensemble Learning (EL), this work proposes a weighted voting scheme based on canonical correlation coefficients to combine classification results in multiple correlation subspaces. Finally, the semi-supervised MVCCAE extends the original procedure by incorporating multiple speed-up spectral regression kernel discriminant analysis (SRKDA). To validate the performances of the proposed supervised procedure, a single-view canonical analysis (SVCCA) with the same base classifier (Random Forests) is used. Similarly, to evaluate the performance of the semi-supervised approach, a comparison is made with other techniques such as Logistic label propagation (LLP) and the Laplacian support vector machine (LapSVM). All of the approaches are tested on two real hyperspectral images, which are considered the target domain, with a classifier trained from synthetic low-dimensional multispectral images, which are considered the original source domain. The experimental results confirm that multi-view canonical correlation can overcome the limitations of SVCCA. Both of the proposed procedures outperform the ones used in the comparison with respect to not only the classification accuracy but also the computational efficiency. Moreover, this research shows that canonical correlation weighted voting (CCWV) is a valid option with respect to other ensemble schemes and that because of their ability to balance diversity and accuracy, canonical views extracted using partially joint random view generation are more effective than those obtained by exploiting disjoint random view generation.

Literature Review:
Samat et al. BIB002 recently proposed two new HTL methods called Supervised MultiView CCA Ensemble (SMVCCAE) and Semi-supervised SMVCCAE (SSMVCCAE) for remote sensing image classification and pattern recognition tasks. These methods use a multi-view CCA ensemble approach. Specifically, the supervised variant (SMVCCAE) first takes the target training data and splits it into N views based on multi-view learning, thus creating multiple views which may be disjoint or partially disjoint feature subsets. Each of these views provide unique but complementary information which can be individually compared with the source domain to provide for more enhanced knowledge transfer. From this, each view is projected with the entire source data onto a correlation subspace. Therefore, this will result in N common subspaces each of which compare a target view with the source data. The transformation matrices used for such projections are obtained through Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) as to project the data symmetrically onto these correlation subspaces. Then a base classifier, in this case Random Forest BIB001 , is trained on the transformed data on each of these subspaces, thus creating N classifiers. These N classifiers are combined to create an ensemble learner where a class for an instance of the target testing data is predicted by each of the classifiers in the ensemble, thus creating N predictions. To combine these predictions into a final output, one may use voting schemes such as majority vote where the class value that was predicted the most becomes the final output. This may be suitable for some cases but this method proposes a more enhanced voting method which uses a weighted vote scheme based on the correlation coefficients from the subspaces. As discussed in "CT-SVM", the correlation coefficients ρ from the subspace can be used to indicate the similarity of the source to the target along such dimension. In this case, the higher the ρ value, the greater correlation the source has to a particular target view meaning there is greater transfer ability for that subspace. From this, we see that a higher weight should be placed on the prediction results from a model built on a subspace that has a higher correlation coefficient ρ value rather than one with poor correlation. This thus becomes the proposed weighted voting strategy used which is based on these correlation coefficients. This method is the supervised version, SMVCCAE, which requires limited target labels but this method is extended to accept unlabeled target instances in the second proposed method, SSMVCCAE. This method utilizes unlabeled instances to reduce the data distribution gap by incorporating multiple speed-up spectral regression kernel discriminant analysis (SRKDA) into the original supervised method. These unlabeled instances are used during the process of building the affinity matrix which is utilized in the KDA problem. Experiments were performed for hyperspectral image classification which demonstrated that the proposed methods were effective as they achieved higher classification accuracy and computational efficiency compared to the baselines.