You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
This paper investigates, from information theoretic grounds, a learning problem based on the principle that any regularity in a given dataset can be exploited to extract compact features from data, i.e., using fewer bits than needed to fully describe the data itself, in order to build meaningful representations of a relevant content (multiple labels). We begin studying a multitask learning (MTL) problem from the average (over the tasks) of misclassification probability point of view and linking it with the popular cross-entropy criterion. Our approach allows an information theoretic formulation of an MTL problem as a supervised learning framework, in which the prediction models for several related tasks are learned jointly from common representations to achieve better generalization performance. More precisely, our formulation of the MTL problem can be interpreted as an information bottleneck problem with side information at the decoder. Based on that, we present an iterative algorithm for computing the optimal tradeoffs and some of its convergence properties are studied. An important feature of this algorithm is to provide a natural safeguard against overfitting, because it minimizes the average risk taking into account a penalization induced by the model complexity. Remarkably, empirical results illustrate that there exists an optimal information rate minimizing the excess risk , which depends on the nature and the amount of available training data. Applications to hierarchical text categorization and distributional word clusters are also investigated, extending previous works.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Today's Web-enabled deluge of electronic data calls for automated methods of data analysis. Machine learning provides these, developing methods that can automatically detect patterns in data and then use the uncovered patterns to predict future data. This textbook offers a comprehensive and self-contained introduction to the field of machine learning, based on a unified, probabilistic approach. The coverage combines breadth and depth, offering necessary background material on such topics as probability, optimization, and linear algebra as well as discussion of recent developments in the field, including conditional random fields, L1 regularization, and deep learning. The book is written in an informal, accessible style, complete with pseudo-code for the most important algorithms. All topics are copiously illustrated with color images and worked examples drawn from such application domains as biology, text processing, computer vision, and robotics. Rather than providing a cookbook of different heuristic methods, the book stresses a principled model-based approach, often using the language of graphical models to specify models in a concise and intuitive way. Almost all the models described have been implemented in a MATLAB software package--PMTK (probabilistic modeling toolkit)--that is freely available online. The book is suitable for upper-level undergraduates with an introductory-level college math background and beginning graduate students.
An interesting variation is given by the observation that in the above problem the decoder is completely determined by the encoder and the data distribution. We can however consider that both @math have to be optimized: which can be seen as the optimization of a penalized metric The cross-entropy is a very common and popular cost function in machine learning (see [1] and references therein) . Different from ), this problem does not lead (at least to our knowledge) to an information theory operational meaning as ). However, it is easy to check that given an arbitrary encoder @math , the optimal decoder choice is given by ). Therefore, expression ) is --from the point of view of the optimization problem-- not more general than ). For this reason and the connection with noisy source coding with log-loss fidelity, we will be concentrate our efforts in ).