You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Random forests (RF) are one of the most widely used ensemble learning methods in classification and regression tasks. Despite its impressive performance, its theoretical consistency, which would ensure that its result converges to the optimum as the sample size increases, has been left far behind. Several consistent random forest variants have been proposed, yet all with relatively poor performance compared to the original random forests. In this paper, a novel RF framework named multinomial random forests (MRF) is proposed. In the MRF, an impurity-based multinomial distribution is constructed as the basis for the selection of a splitting point. This ensures that a certain degree of randomness is achieved while the overall quality of the trees is not much different from the original random forests. We prove the consistency of the MRF and demonstrate with multiple datasets that it performs similarly as the original random forests and better than existent consistent random forest variants for both classification and regression tasks.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Random forests were introduced as a machine learning tool in Breiman (2001) and have since proven to be very popular and powerful for high-dimensional regression and classification. For regression, random forests give an accurate approximation of the conditional mean of a response variable. It is shown here that random forests provide information about the full conditional distribution of the response variable, not only about the conditional mean. Conditional quantiles can be inferred with quantile regression forests, a generalisation of random forests. Quantile regression forests give a non-parametric and accurate way of estimating conditional quantiles for high-dimensional predictor variables. The algorithm is shown to be consistent. Numerical examples suggest that the algorithm is competitive in terms of predictive power.

[2]: As a testament to their success, the theory of random forests has long been outpaced by their application in practice. In this paper, we take a step towards narrowing this gap by providing a consistency result for online random forests.

[3]: Despite widespread interest and practical use, the theoretical properties of random forests are still not well understood. In this paper we contribute to this understanding in two ways. We present a new theoretically tractable variant of random regression forests and prove that our algorithm is consistent. We also provide an empirical evaluation, comparing our algorithm and other theoretically tractable random forest models to the random forest algorithm used in practice. Our experiments provide insight into the relative importance of different simplifications that theoreticians have made to obtain tractable models for analysis.

[4]: Random forests (RFs) are recognized as one type of ensemble learning method and are effective for the most classification and regression tasks. Despite their impressive empirical performance, the theory of RFs has yet been fully proved. Several theoretically guaranteed RF variants have been presented, but their poor practical performance has been criticized. In this paper, a novel RF framework is proposed, named Bernoulli RFs (BRFs), with the aim of solving the RF dilemma between theoretical consistency and empirical performance. BRF uses two independent Bernoulli distributions to simplify the tree construction, in contrast to the RFs proposed by Breiman. The two Bernoulli distributions are separately used to control the splitting feature and splitting point selection processes of tree construction. Consequently, theoretical consistency is ensured in BRF, i.e., the convergence of learning performance to optimum will be guaranteed when infinite data are given. Importantly, our proposed BRF is consistent for both classification and regression. The best empirical performance is achieved by BRF when it is compared with state-of-the-art theoretical consistent RFs. This advance in RF research toward closing the gap between theory and practice is verified by the theoretical and experimental studies in this paper.

[5]:
Several variants of random forests have been proposed and shown to be consistent; for example, quantile regression forests [1] , random survival forests [5] , and an online version of random forests [2] . Recently, Denil [3] developed a version in which a subspace of candidate features is selected according to a Poisson distribution. Wang [4] introduced Bernoulli random forests (BRF), in which two Bernoulli distributions are used in the tree construction process. Among all these variants, the performance of the BRF is the closest to that of the original random forest.