You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
This paper addresses the problem of specifying and parsing the syntax of domain-specific languages (DSLs) in a modular, user-friendly way. That is, we want to enable the design of composable DSLs that combine the natural syntax of external DSLs with the easy implementation of internal DSLs. The challenge in parsing composable DSLs is that the composition of several (individually unambiguous) languages is likely to contain ambiguities. In this paper, we present the design of a system that uses a type-oriented variant of island parsing to efficiently parse the syntax of composable DSLs. In particular, we show how type-oriented island parsing is constant time with respect to the number of DSLs imported. We also show how to use our tool to implement DSLs on top of a host language such as Typed Racket.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Maude is a high-level language and a high-performance system supporting executable specification and declarative programming in rewriting logic. Since rewriting logic contains equational logic, Maude also supports equational specification and programming in its sublanguage of functional modules and theories. The underlying equational logic chosen for Maude is membership equational logic, that has sorts, subsorts, operator overloading, and partiality definable by membership and equality conditions. Rewriting logic is reflective, in the sense of being able to express its own met alevel at the object level. Reflection is systematically exploited in Maude endowing the language with powerful metaprogramming capabilities, including both user-definable module operations and declarative strategies to guide the deduction process. This paper explains and illustrates with examples the main concepts of Maude's language design, including its underlying logic, functional, system and object-oriented modules, as well as parameterized modules, theories, and views. We also explain how Maude supports reflection, metaprogramming and internal strategies. The paper outlines the principles underlying the Maude system implementation, including its semicompilation techniques. We conclude with some remarks about applications, work on a formal environment for Maude, and a mobile language extension of Maude.
provide extensible syntax in the OBJ3 language in the form of mixfix operators. In OBJ3, types (or sorts) play some role in disambiguation, but their papers do not describe the parsing algorithm. There is more literature regarding Maude [1] , one of the descendents of OBJ3. Maude uses the SCP algorithm of , which is bottom-up and bidirectional, much like our island parser. However, we have not been able to find a paper that describes how types are used for disambiguation in the Maude parser.