You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: Diving Deeper into Underwater Image Enhancement: A Survey 
Chapter Title:  FGAN 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  One of the challenges in the study of generative adversarial networks is the instability of its training. In this paper, we propose a novel weight normalization technique called spectral normalization to stabilize the training of the discriminator. Our new normalization technique is computationally light and easy to incorporate into existing implementations. We tested the efficacy of spectral normalization on CIFAR10, STL-10, and ILSVRC2012 dataset, and we experimentally confirmed that spectrally normalized GANs (SN-GANs) is capable of generating images of better or equal quality relative to the previous training stabilization techniques. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  In standard generative adversarial network (SGAN), the discriminator estimates the probability that the input data is real. The generator is trained to increase the probability that fake data is real. We argue that it should also simultaneously decrease the probability that real data is real because 1) this would account for a priori knowledge that half of the data in the mini-batch is fake, 2) this would be observed with divergence minimization, and 3) in optimal settings, SGAN would be equivalent to integral probability metric (IPM) GANs. ::: We show that this property can be induced by using a relativistic discriminator which estimate the probability that the given real data is more realistic than a randomly sampled fake data. We also present a variant in which the discriminator estimate the probability that the given real data is more realistic than fake data, on average. We generalize both approaches to non-standard GAN loss functions and we refer to them respectively as Relativistic GANs (RGANs) and Relativistic average GANs (RaGANs). We show that IPM-based GANs are a subset of RGANs which use the identity function. ::: Empirically, we observe that 1) RGANs and RaGANs are significantly more stable and generate higher quality data samples than their non-relativistic counterparts, 2) Standard RaGAN with gradient penalty generate data of better quality than WGAN-GP while only requiring a single discriminator update per generator update (reducing the time taken for reaching the state-of-the-art by 400%), and 3) RaGANs are able to generate plausible high resolutions images (256x256) from a very small sample (N=2011), while GAN and LSGAN cannot; these images are of significantly better quality than the ones generated by WGAN-GP and SGAN with spectral normalization. 
3. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB003):  Underwater image enhancement algorithms have attracted much attention in underwater vision task. However, these algorithms are mainly evaluated on different data sets and different metrics. In this paper, we set up an effective and pubic underwater test dataset named U45 including the color casts, low contrast and haze-like effects of underwater degradation and propose a fusion adversarial network for enhancing underwater images. Meanwhile, the well-designed the adversarial loss including Lgt loss and Lfe loss is presented to focus on image features of ground truth, and image features of the image enhanced by fusion enhance method, respectively. The proposed network corrects color casts effectively and owns faster testing time with fewer parameters. Experiment results on U45 dataset demonstrate that the proposed method achieves better or comparable performance than the other state-of-the-art methods in terms of qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Moreover, an ablation study demonstrates the contributions of each component, and the application test further shows the effectiveness of the enhanced images.

Literature Review:
Fusion generative adversarial network, abbreviated as FGAN BIB004 , takes multiple inputs and passes them through different branches in the same network. In the end, the features are summed before the loss of the generator. The architecture of FGAN BIB004 is similar to DenseGAN with slight modifications in the block's architecture. The generator with the fundamental block structure is shown in Figure 2 . The discriminator is composed of five convolutional layers employing spectral normalization BIB002 . The discriminator is similar to PatchGAN BIB001 . A batch-mode learning method with a batch size of 16 is applied. The RGB images of size 256×256 are used as inputs. Further, the learning rate is set to 10 −3 . The loss function is a combination of relativistic GAN loss BIB003 , adversarial loss, and 2 loss.