You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: Offline Handwritten Signature Verification - Literature Review 
Chapter Title:  Data augmentation 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  This paper proposes a novel methodology to generate static/off-line signatures of new identities. The signature of the new synthetic identity is obtained particularizing the random variables of a statistical distribution of global signature properties. The results mimic real signature shapes and writing style properties, which are estimated from static signature databases. New instances, as well as forgeries, from the synthetic identities are obtained introducing a natural variability from the synthetic individual properties. As additional novelty, an ink deposition model based on a ballpoint is developed for realistic static signature image generation. The range of the static signature generator has been established matching the performance obtained with the synthetic databases and those obtained with two public databases. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  In this paper we propose a new method for generating synthetic handwritten signature images for biometric applications. The procedures we introduce imitate the mechanism of motor equivalence which divides human handwriting into two steps: the working out of an effector independent action plan and its execution via the corresponding neuromuscular path. The action plan is represented as a trajectory on a spatial grid. This contains both the signature text and its flourish, if there is one. The neuromuscular path is simulated by applying a kinematic Kaiser filter to the trajectory plan. The length of the filter depends on the pen speed which is generated using a scalar version of the sigma lognormal model. An ink deposition model, applied pixel by pixel to the pen trajectory, provides realistic static signature images. The lexical and morphological properties of the synthesized signatures as well as the range of the synthesis parameters have been estimated from real databases of real signatures such as the MCYT Off-line and the GPDS960GraySignature corpuses. The performance experiments show that by tuning only four parameters it is possible to generate synthetic identities with different stability and forgers with different skills. Therefore it is possible to create datasets of synthetic signatures with a performance similar to databases of real signatures. Moreover, we can customize the created dataset to produce skilled forgeries or simple forgeries which are easier to detect, depending on what the researcher needs. Perceptual evaluation gives an average confusion of 44.06 percent between real and synthetic signatures which shows the realism of the synthetic ones. The utility of the synthesized signatures is demonstrated by studying the influence of the pen type and number of users on an automatic signature verifier.

Literature Review:
One of the main challenges for building an automated signature verification system is the low number of samples per user for training. To address this issue, some author have suggested ways to generate more samples, based on existing genuine signatures. Huang and Yan BIB001 have proposed a set of "perturbations" to be applied to each genuine signature, to generate new samples: slant, rotation, scaling and perspective. In their work, they considered a set of "slight distortions", used to create new genuine samples, and "heavy distortions" to generate forgeries from the genuine samples. More recently, Ferrer et al BIB002 , BIB003 have proposed a signature synthesis approach inspired on a neuromotor model.