You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: Diving Deeper into Underwater Image Enhancement: A Survey 
Chapter Title:  Evaluation Metrics 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  Contrast is a fundamental attribute of images that plays an important role in human visual perception of image quality. With numerous approaches proposed to enhance image contrast, much less work has been dedicated to automatic quality assessment of contrast changed images. Existing approaches rely on global statistics to estimate contrast quality. Here we propose a novel local patch-based objective quality assessment method using an adaptive representation of local patch structure, which allows us to decompose any image patch into its mean intensity, signal strength and signal structure components and then evaluate their perceptual distortions in different ways. A unique feature that differentiates the proposed method from previous contrast quality models is the capability to produce a local contrast quality map, which predicts local quality variations over space and may be employed to guide contrast enhancement algorithms. Validations based on four publicly available databases show that the proposed patch-based contrast quality index (PCQI) method provides accurate predictions on the human perception of contrast variations. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  Quality evaluation of underwater images is a key goal of underwater video image retrieval and intelligent processing. To date, no metric has been proposed for underwater color image quality evaluation (UCIQE). The special absorption and scattering characteristics of the water medium do not allow direct application of natural color image quality metrics especially to different underwater environments. In this paper, subjective testing for underwater image quality has been organized. The statistical distribution of the underwater image pixels in the CIELab color space related to subjective evaluation indicates the sharpness and colorful factors correlate well with subjective image quality perception. Based on these, a new UCIQE metric, which is a linear combination of chroma, saturation, and contrast, is proposed to quantify the non-uniform color cast, blurring, and low-contrast that characterize underwater engineering and monitoring images. Experiments are conducted to illustrate the performance of the proposed UCIQE metric and its capability to measure the underwater image enhancement results. They show that the proposed metric has comparable performance to the leading natural color image quality metrics and the underwater grayscale image quality metrics available in the literature, and can predict with higher accuracy the relative amount of degradation with similar image content in underwater environments. Importantly, UCIQE is a simple and fast solution for real-time underwater video processing. The effectiveness of the presented measure is also demonstrated by subjective evaluation. The results show better correlation between the UCIQE and the subjective mean opinion score. 
3. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB003):  Underwater images suffer from blurring effects, low contrast, and grayed out colors due to the absorption and scattering effects under the water. Many image enhancement algorithms for improving the visual quality of underwater images have been developed. Unfortunately, no well-accepted objective measure exists that can evaluate the quality of underwater images similar to human perception. Predominant underwater image processing algorithms use either a subjective evaluation, which is time consuming and biased, or a generic image quality measure, which fails to consider the properties of underwater images. To address this problem, a new nonreference underwater image quality measure (UIQM) is presented in this paper. The UIQM comprises three underwater image attribute measures: the underwater image colorfulness measure (UICM), the underwater image sharpness measure (UISM), and the underwater image contrast measure (UIConM). Each attribute is selected for evaluating one aspect of the underwater image degradation, and each presented attribute measure is inspired by the properties of human visual systems (HVSs). The experimental results demonstrate that the measures effectively evaluate the underwater image quality in accordance with the human perceptions. These measures are also used on the AirAsia 8501 wreckage images to show their importance in practical applications.

Literature Review:
Evaluations performed for underwater image enhancement can be broadly categorized into automatic evaluation metrics and human visual system (HVS). The automatic evaluations are performed using six metrics, out of these, four are also most widely used in image enhancement and restoration problems i.e. PSNR, MSE, and SSIM BIB001 , and PCQI BIB002 while the other two are specific for underwater image enhancement i.e. UCIQE BIB003 and UIQM BIB004 . Next, to make the article inclusive, we describe all the evaluation metrics and then detail their limitations and reliability. Moreover, we also provide the report which details the human visual evaluation and its importance.