You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A Survey of XML Tree Patterns 
Chapter Title:  Node reordering capability 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  Tree patterns forms a natural basis to query tree-structured data such as XML and LDAP. Since the efficiency of tree pattern matching against a tree-structured database depends on the size of the pattern, it is essential to identify and eliminate redundant nodes in the pattern and do so as quickly as possible. In this paper, we study tree pattern minimization both in the absence and in the presence of integrity constraints (ICs) on the underlying tree-structured database. When no ICs are considered, we call the process of minimizing a tree pattern, constraint-independent minimization. We develop a polynomial time algorithm called CIM for this purpose. CIM's efficiency stems from two key properties: (i) a node cannot be redundant unless its children are, and (ii) the order of elimination of redundant nodes is immaterial. When ICs are considered for minimization, we refer to it as constraint-dependent minimization. For tree-structured databases, required child/descendant and type co-occurrence ICs are very natural. Under such ICs, we show that the minimal equivalent query is unique. We show the surprising result that the algorithm obtained by first augmenting the tree pattern using ICS, and then applying CIM, always finds the unique minimal equivalent query; we refer to this algorithm as ACIM. While ACIM is also polynomial time, it can be expensive in practice because of its inherent non-locality. We then present a fast algorithm, CDM, that identifies and eliminates local redundancies due to ICs, based on propagating “information labels” up the tree pattern. CDM can be applied prior to ACIM for improving the minimization efficiency. We complement our analytical results with an experimental study that shows the effectiveness of our tree pattern minimization techniques. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  Tree patterns are fundamental to querying tree-structured data like XML. Because of the heterogeneity of XML data, it is often more appropriate to permit approximate query matching and return ranked answers, in the spirit of Information Retrieval, than to return only exact answers. In this paper, we study the problem of approximate XML query matching, based on tree pattern relaxations, and devise efficient algorithms to evaluate relaxed tree patterns. We consider weighted tree patterns, where exact and relaxed weights, associated with nodes and edges of the tree pattern, are used to compute the scores of query answers. We are interested in the problem of finding answers whose scores are at least as large as a given threshold. We design data pruning algorithms where intermediate query results are filtered dynamically during the evaluation process. We develop anoptimization that exploits scores of intermediate results to improve query evaluation efficiency. Finally, we show experimentally that our techniques outperform rewriting-based and post-pruning strategies. 
3. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB003):  Recently, several researches have investigated the discovering of frequent XML query patterns using frequent structure mining techniques. All these works ignore the order properties of XML queries, and therefore are limited in their effectiveness. In this paper, we consider the discovering of ordered query patterns. We propose an algorithm for ordered query pattern mining. Experiments show that our method is efficient. 
4. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB004):  XML and XQuery semantics are very sensitive to the order of the produced output. Although pattern-tree based algebraic approaches are becoming more and more popular for evaluating XML, there is no universally accepted technique which can guarantee both a correct output order and a choice of efficient alternative plans.We address the problem using hybrid collections of trees that can be either sets or sequences or something in between. Each such collection is coupled with an Ordering Specification that describes how the trees are sorted (full, partial or no order). This provides us with a formal basis for developing a query plan having parts that maintain no order and parts with partial or full order.It turns out that duplicate elimination introduces some of the same issues as order maintenance: it is expensive and a single collection type does not always provide all the flexibility required to optimize this properly. To solve this problem we associate with each hybrid collection a Duplicate Specification that describes the presence or absence of duplicate elements in it. We show how to extend an existing bulk tree algebra, TLC [12], to use Ordering and Duplicate specifications and produce correctly ordered results. We also suggest some optimizations enabled by the flexibility of our approach, and experimentally demonstrate the performance increase due to them.

Literature Review:
Despite many studies model XML documents as unordered data trees, order is essential to XML querying BIB005 . In XQuery, users can (re)order output nodes simply through the Order by clause inherited from SQL BIB001 . Hence, modern TPs should include ordering features BIB002 , BIB003 . However, among TAX TP derivatives, only ordered APTs and extended TPs feature reordering features. In G-QTPs, preorders associated with ordered TP nodes help determine output order BIB004 . Unfortunately, order is disregarded in all other TP proposals.