You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Training recurrent neural networks (RNNs) that possess long-term memory is challenging. We provide insight into the trade-off between the smoothness of the cost function and the memory retention capabilities of the network. We express both aspects in terms of the Lipschitz constant of the dynamics modeled by the network. This allows us to make a distinction between three types of regions in the parameter space. In the first region, the network experiences problems in retaining long-term information, while at the same time the cost function is smooth and easy for gradient descent to navigate in. In the second region, the amount of stored information increases with time and the cost function is intricate and full of local minima. The third region is in between the two other regions and here the RNN is able to retain long-term information. Based on these theoretical findings we present the hypothesis that good parameter choices for the RNN are located in between the well-behaved and the ill-behaved cost function regions. The concepts presented in the paper are illustrated by artificially generated and real examples.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: We introduce an exceptionally simple gated recurrent neural network (RNN) that achieves performance comparable to well-known gated architectures, such as LSTMs and GRUs, on the word-level language modeling task. We prove that our model has simple, predicable and non-chaotic dynamics. This stands in stark contrast to more standard gated architectures, whose underlying dynamical systems exhibit chaotic behavior.
The work in [1] presents a neural network without chaotic behavior. The results presented here, for which the chaotic behavior of LSTMs yield regions in the parameter space where the cost function is highly intricate, densely populated by local minimums and with exploding gradients, is a strong suggestion that this is indeed an interesting line of research that deserves to be further explored.