You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: COMBINING SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATIONS - OVERVIEW OF HYBRID SIMULATION MODELS 
Chapter Title:  Type of hybrid model format 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  Hierarchical production planning provides a formal bridge between long-term plans and short-term schedules. A hybrid simulation-based production planning architecture consisting of system dynamics (SD) components at the higher decision level and discrete event simulation (DES) components at the lower decision level is presented. The need for the two types of simulation has been justified. The architecture consists of four modules: enterprise-level decision maker, SD model of enterprise, shop-level decision maker and DES model of shop. The decision makers select the optimal set of control parameters based on the estimated behavior of the system. These control parameters are used by the SD and DES models to determine the best plan based on the actual behavior of the system. High level architecture has been employed to interface SD and DES simulation models. Experimental results from a single-product manufacturing enterprise demonstrate the validity and scope of the proposed approach. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  Manufacturing enterprise decisions can be classified into four groups: business decisions, design decisions, engineering decisions, and production decisions. Numerous physical and software simulation techniques have been used to evaluate specific decisions by predicting their impact on either system performance or product performance. In this paper, we focus on the impact of production decisions, evaluated using discrete-event-simulation models, on enterprise-level performance measures. We argue that these discrete-event models alone are not enough to capture this impact. To address this problem, we propose integrating discrete-event simulation models with system dynamics models in a hybrid approach to the simulation of the entire enterprise system. This hybrid approach is conceptually consistent with current business trend toward integrated systems. We show the potentials for using this approach through an example of a semiconductor enterprise. 
3. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB003):  We build a hybrid discrete-continuous simulation model of the manufacturing enterprise system. This model consists of an overall system dynamics model of the manufacturing enterprise and connected to it are a number of discrete event simulations for selected operational and tactical functions. System dynamics modeling best fits the macroscopic nature of activities at the higher management levels while the discrete models best fit the microscopic nature of the operational and tactical levels. An advanced mechanism based on information theory is used for the integration of the different simulation modeling modalities. In addition, the impact of the decisions at the factory level in scheduling are analyzed at the management level. The different models of control are discussed. 
4. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB004):  The idea of combining discrete-event simulation and system dynamics has been a topic of debate in the operations research community for over a decade. Many authors have considered the potential benefits of such an approach from a methodological or practical standpoint. However, despite numerous examples of models with both discrete and continuous parameters in the computer science and engineering literature, nobody in the OR field has yet succeeded in developing a genuinely hybrid approach which truly integrates the philosophical approach and technical merits of both DES and SD in a single model. In this paper we consider some of the reasons for this and describe two practical healthcare examples of combined DES/SD models, which nevertheless fall short of the "holy grail" which has been so widely discussed in the literature over the past decade.

Literature Review:
Chahal and Eldabi (2008a) have distinguished three formats how the models inside a hybrid model can communicate: Hierarchical, Process -Environment and Integrated format. The works of BIB002 BIB003  BIB004 ) have a hierarchical model. BIB005 and BIB001 both deal with processes and how the environment deals with the changes that they bring. In BIB005 ) the authors argue that no one until now has achieved to develop a hybrid model by the Integrated format, but given the progress of the development of hybrid models, the gap is getting narrower.