You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
We present our approach for deploying and managing distributed component-based applications. A Desired State Description (DSD), written in a high-level declarative language, specifies requirements for a distributed application. Our infrastructure accepts a DSD as input, and from it automatically configures and deploys the distributed application. Subsequent violations of the original requirements are detected and, where possible, automatically rectified by reconfiguration and redeployment of the necessary application components. A constraint solving tool is used to plan deployments that meet the application requirements.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Several recently proposed infrastructures permit client applications to interact with distributed network-accessible services by simply "plugging in" into a substrate that provides essential functionality, such as naming, discovery, and multi-protocol binding. However much work remains before the interaction can be considered truly seamless in the sense of adapting to the characteristics of the heterogeneous environments in which clients and services operate. This paper describes a novel approach for addressing this shortcoming: the partitionable services framework, which enables services to be flexibly assembled from multiple components, and facilitates transparent migration and replication of these components at locations closer to the client while still appearing as a single monolithic service. The framework consists of three pieces: (1) declarative specification of services in terms of constituent components; (2) run-time support for dynamic component deployment; and (3) planning policies, which steer the deployment to accomodate underlying environment characteristics. We demonstrate the salient features of the framework and highlight its usability and performance benefits with a case study involving a security-sensitive mail service.
The system described in this paper is most like [1] which is an environment for a adapting distributed applications to heterogeneous environments. The framework relies on declarative specifications (like Deladas), a runtime environment called and an AI planner (described below). The specifications contain descriptions of components that specify the required and implemented interfaces and conditions that must hold for component instances. The runtime provides three distinct pieces of functionality: a proxy mechanism, wrapper components on each host and cache coherence mechanisms. The proxy mechanism causes requests for services to be sent to the AI planner which decides on the appropriate selection and placement of components. The wrapper abstracts over node specifics allowing (Java) components to be loaded onto nodes in a generic manner. The cache coherency mechanisms provide directory level cache coherence amongst nodes sharing replicated data.