You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: Modeling language and cognition with deep unsupervised learning: a tutorial overview 
Chapter Title:  LEARNING A GENERATIVE MODEL: RESTRICTED BOLTZMANN MACHINES 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  Abstract This review describes and motivates six principles for computational cognitive neuroscience models: biological realism, distributed representations, inhibitory competition, bidirectional activation propagation, error-driven task learning, and Hebbian model learning. Although these principles are supported by a number of cognitive, computational and biological motivations, the prototypical neural-network model (a feedforward back-propagation network) incorporates only two of them, and no widely used model incorporates all of them. It is argued here that these principles should be integrated into a coherent overall framework, and some potential synergies and conflicts in doing so are discussed. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  Computational models in cognitive neuroscience should ideally use biological properties and powerful computational principles to produce behavior consistent with psychological findings. Error-driven backpropagation is computationally powerful and has proven useful for modeling a range of psychological data but is not biologically plausible. Several approaches to implementing backpropagation in a biologically plausible fashion converge on the idea of using bidirectional activation propagation in interactive networks to convey error signals. This article demonstrates two main points about these error-driven interactive networks: (1) they generalize poorly due to attractor dynamics that interfere with the network's ability to produce novel combinatorial representations systematically in response to novel inputs, and (2) this generalization problem can be remedied by adding two widely used mechanistic principles, inhibitory competition and Hebbian learning, that can be independently motivated for a variety of biological, psychological, and computational reasons. Simulations using the Leabra algorithm, which combines the generalized recirculation (GeneRec), biologically plausible, error-driven learning algorithm with inhibitory competition and Hebbian learning, show that these mechanisms can result in good generalization in interactive networks. These results support the general conclusion that cognitive neuroscience models that incorporate the core mechanistic principles of interactivity, inhibitory competition, and error-driven and Hebbian learning satisfy a wider range of biological, psychological, and computational constraints than models employing a subset of these principles. 
3. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB003):  We present a new learning algorithm for Mean Field Boltzmann Machines based on the contrastive divergence optimization criterion. In addition to minimizing the divergence between the data distribution and the equilibrium distribution, we maximize the divergence between one-step reconstructions of the data and the equilibrium distribution. This eliminates the need to estimate equilibrium statistics, so we do not need to approximate the multimodal probability distribution of the free network with the unimodal mean field distribution. We test the learning algorithm on the classification of digits. 
4. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB004):  Most tasks require a person or an automated system to reason -- to reach conclusions based on available information. The framework of probabilistic graphical models, presented in this book, provides a general approach for this task. The approach is model-based, allowing interpretable models to be constructed and then manipulated by reasoning algorithms. These models can also be learned automatically from data, allowing the approach to be used in cases where manually constructing a model is difficult or even impossible. Because uncertainty is an inescapable aspect of most real-world applications, the book focuses on probabilistic models, which make the uncertainty explicit and provide models that are more faithful to reality. Probabilistic Graphical Models discusses a variety of models, spanning Bayesian networks, undirected Markov networks, discrete and continuous models, and extensions to deal with dynamical systems and relational data. For each class of models, the text describes the three fundamental cornerstones: representation, inference, and learning, presenting both basic concepts and advanced techniques. Finally, the book considers the use of the proposed framework for causal reasoning and decision making under uncertainty. The main text in each chapter provides the detailed technical development of the key ideas. Most chapters also include boxes with additional material: skill boxes, which describe techniques; case study boxes, which discuss empirical cases related to the approach described in the text, including applications in computer vision, robotics, natural language understanding, and computational biology; and concept boxes, which present significant concepts drawn from the material in the chapter. Instructors (and readers) can group chapters in various combinations, from core topics to more technically advanced material, to suit their particular needs. 
5. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB005):  The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is fundamental for sensorimotor transformations because it combines multiple sensory inputs and posture signals into different spatial reference frames that drive motor programming. Here, we present a computational model mimicking the sensorimotor transformations occurring in the PPC. A recurrent neural network with one layer of hidden neurons (restricted Boltzmann machine) learned a stochastic generative model of the sensory data without supervision. After the unsupervised learning phase, the activity of the hidden neurons was used to compute a motor program (a population code on a bidimensional map) through a simple linear projection and delta rule learning. The average motor error, calculated as the difference between the expected and the computed output, was less than 3°. Importantly, analyses of the hidden neurons revealed gain-modulated visual receptive fields, thereby showing that space coding for sensorimotor transformations similar to that observed in the PPC can emerge through unsupervised learning. These results suggest that gain modulation is an efficient coding strategy to integrate visual and postural information toward the generation of motor commands.

Literature Review:
Here we consider a class of neural networks known as Boltzmann Machines (hereafter BM; BIB001 . These are stochastic associative networks that observe and model data by using local signals only. BMs can be interpreted as undirected graphical models  ; see Box 2) where learning corresponds to fitting a generative model to the data. Despite the appeal of BMs as plausible models of cortical learning, their use was strongly discouraged by the very high computational demand of the original learning algorithm, until the recent development of contrastive divergence (CD) learning  . CD makes learning of BMs practical, even for large networks (see below). BMs consist of a set of stochastic units, fully connected with symmetric weights and without self-connections, where each unit fires with a probability depending on the weighted sum of its inputs. Data patterns are represented by the activation of "visible" units. An additional layer of "hidden" units captures high-order statistics and represent the latent causes of the data. Inspired by statistical mechanics, the model behavior is driven by an energy function E that describes which configurations of the units are more likely to occur by assigning them a certain probability value: where v and h are, respectively, the visible and hidden units and Z is a normalizing factor known as partition function, which ensures that the values of p constitute a legal probability distribution (i.e., summing up to 1). The network state changes in a way that allows the gradual decrease of the associated energy, modulated by a "temperature" parameter T so that at higher temperatures an occasional increase of energy is also permitted to avoid local minima. To achieve local energy minimum (equilibrium), T is Box 2 | Probabilistic Graphical Models. The framework of probabilistic graphical models BIB005 ) provides a general approach to model arbitrarily complex statistical distributions, which can involve a large number of stochastic variables that interact together. Graphical models allow us to describe complex relations between variables by exploiting the structure of their joint distribution, since in general their interactions are not globally defined but instead each variable is only influenced by a limited subset of "neighbors." The topology of a graphical model explicitly defines the scope of interaction of each variable (represented by a node in the graph) by highlighting the set of independecies that hold in the distribution. This allows to factorize a joint probability distribution using local conditional probabilities. Graphical models can have directed connections between variables, such as in Bayesian networks (Figure 1A) , or undirected connections, such as in Markov networks ( Figure 1B) . Both types of connections might be present in the same graph, thus forming a hybrid model. Although they share the same underlying theoretical framework, Bayesian and Markov networks have rather different representational and computational characteristics. In directed models, the semantic of connections defines a "parent of" relationships between linked variables, while in undirected models the connections are symmetric and therefore only encode a sort of "degree of affinity" between linked variables. This leads to a different representation of independencies between nodes of the graph: in Bayesian networks, each node is conditionally independent from all the others given its parents, its children and the parents of its children, while in undirected models each node is conditionally independent from all the others given the nodes directly connected to it [i.e., its "Markov blanket"  , highlighted in Figure 1] . In both cases, these conditional independencies can be exploited to derive efficient inference and learning procedures even in the presence of a large number of variables, because only the Markov blanket of a certain node is required in order to sample from its conditional distribution. In the case of undirected graphical models, each edge is associated with a certain function, known as factor, which takes as input the values of the nodes connected by the edge and gives as output a scalar value that represents the affinity between them: a high value indicates that the two variables are likely to be strongly related, while a low value indicates a weak relation. The joint distribution of all the variables in the graph can be efficiently defined as a product of such local factors: where D i represents the scope of each factor φ i (i.e., which variables it involves) and Z is a global normalization constant called partition function, which ensures dealing with legal probabilities summing up to 1. BIB002 BIB003 . Learning the connection weights in the original BM is based on a maximum likelihood learning rule that is very simple and locally optimal, but unfortunately the learning algorithm is also very slow because it implies running a Markov chain until convergence (which may require an exponential time). The breakthrough that led to CD learning  ; also see BIB004 ; for a mean field version) is the finding that the negative phase does not need to be run until equilibrium (i.e., full convergence). If sampling starts from the hidden unit state computed in the positive phase (i.e., driven by the data), correlations computed after a fixed number of steps in the Markov chain are sufficient to drive the weights toward a state in which the input data will be accurately reconstructed. Hence, CD learning approximates the gradient of the log-likelihood of the learning data by performing only few iterations, which in practice gives good results even with a single step (CD-1). After computing the model's reconstruction, weights are updated by contrasting visible-hidden correlations computed on the data vector (v + h + ) with visible-hidden correlations computed on the reconstruction (v − h − ): where η is the learning rate. Importantly, a restriction to the architecture of the BM by not allowing intra-layer connections (RBM; Hinton, 2002) makes learning extremely fast. The energy function for RBMs is defined as: where W is the matrix of connections weights and b and c are the biases of visible and hidden units, respectively. In RBMs, the update of units in one layer no longer requires any iterative settling because they are conditionally independent given the state of the other layer. That is, the sampling process is speeded up by performing block Gibbs sampling (see Box 3) over visible and hidden units (i.e., all units in a layer are sampled in a single step). Examples of application of CD learning in connectionist modeling studies include numerical cognition    and space coding for sensorimotor transformations BIB006 .