You will be presented with a citation segment from the section of an NLP research paper, as well as the context surrounding that citation. Classify the intent behind this citation by choosing from one of the following categories:
- Background: provides context or foundational information related to the topic.
- Extends: builds upon the cited work.
- Uses: applies the methods or findings of the cited work.
- Motivation: cites the work as inspiration or rationale for the research.
- CompareOrContrast: compares or contrasts the cited work with others.
- FutureWork: cites the work as a direction for future research.

Your answer should be a single word from the following list of options: ["Background", "Extends", "Uses", "Motivation", "CompareOrContrast", "FutureWork"]. Do not include any other text in your response.

Section Title:
experiments

Context before the citation:
The X2 statistic is performing at least as well as G2, throwing doubt on the claim by Dunning (1993) that the G2 statistic is better suited for use in corpus-based NLP. figures in brackets give the average number of generalised levels. The

Citation Sentence:
The X2 statistic is performing at least as well as G2 , throwing doubt on the claim by Dunning ( 1993 ) that the G2 statistic is better suited for use in corpus-based NLP .

Context after the citation:
The results show clearly that the average level of generalisation is slightly higher for G2 than X2. This suggests a possible explanation for the results presented here, and those in Dunning (1993), which is that the X2 statistic provides a less conservative test when counts in the contingency table are low. A less conservative test is better suited to the pseudo disambiguation task, since this results in a low level of generalisation, on the whole, which is good for this task. In contrast, the task that Dunning considers, the discovery of bigrams, is better served by a more conservative test.
CompareOrContrast