You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
In this paper, an online adaptive model-free tracker is proposed to track single objects in video sequences to deal with real-world tracking challenges like low-resolution, object deformation, occlusion and motion blur. The novelty lies in the construction of a strong appearance model that captures features from the initialized bounding box and then are assembled into anchor-point features. These features memorize the global pattern of the object and have an internal star graph-like structure. These features are unique and flexible and helps tracking generic and deformable objects with no limitation on specific objects. In addition, the relevance of each feature is evaluated online using short-term consistency and long-term consistency. These parameters are adapted to retain consistent features that vote for the object location and that deal with outliers for long-term tracking scenarios. Additionally, voting in a Gaussian manner helps in tackling inherent noise of the tracking system and in accurate object localization. Furthermore, the proposed tracker uses pairwise distance measure to cope with scale variations and combines pixel-level binary features and global weighted color features for model update. Finally, experimental results on a visual tracking benchmark dataset are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and competitiveness of the proposed tracker.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: 

[2]: Recently, on-line adaptation of binary classifiers for tracking have been investigated. On-line learning allows for simple classifiers since only the current view of the object from its surrounding background needs to be discriminiated. However, on-line adaption faces one key problem: Each update of the tracker may introduce an error which, finally, can lead to tracking failure (drifting). The contribution of this paper is a novel on-line semi-supervised boosting method which significantly alleviates the drifting problem in tracking applications. This allows to limit the drifting problem while still staying adaptive to appearance changes. The main idea is to formulate the update process in a semi-supervised fashion as combined decision of a given prior and an on-line classifier. This comes without any parameter tuning. In the experiments, we demonstrate real-time tracking of our SemiBoost tracker on several challenging test sequences where our tracker outperforms other on-line tracking methods.

[3]: There is a large variety of trackers, which have been proposed in the literature during the last two decades with some mixed success. Object tracking in realistic scenarios is a difficult problem, therefore, it remains a most active area of research in computer vision. A good tracker should perform well in a large number of videos involving illumination changes, occlusion, clutter, camera motion, low contrast, specularities, and at least six more aspects. However, the performance of proposed trackers have been evaluated typically on less than ten videos, or on the special purpose datasets. In this paper, we aim to evaluate trackers systematically and experimentally on 315 video fragments covering above aspects. We selected a set of nineteen trackers to include a wide variety of algorithms often cited in literature, supplemented with trackers appearing in 2010 and 2011 for which the code was publicly available. We demonstrate that trackers can be evaluated objectively by survival curves, Kaplan Meier statistics, and Grubs testing. We find that in the evaluation practice the F-score is as effective as the object tracking accuracy (OTA) score. The analysis under a large variety of circumstances provides objective insight into the strengths and weaknesses of trackers.

[4]: In this paper, a robust visual tracking method is proposed to track an object in dynamic conditions that include motion blur, illumination changes, pose variations, and occlusions. To cope with these challenges, multiple trackers with different feature descriptors are utilized, and each of which shows different level of robustness to certain changes in an object's appearance. To fuse these independent trackers, we propose two configurations, tracker selection and interaction. The tracker interaction is achieved based on a transition probability matrix (TPM) in a probabilistic manner. The tracker selection extracts one tracking result from among multiple tracker outputs by choosing the tracker that has the highest tracker probability. According to various changes in an object's appearance, the TPM and tracker probability are updated in a recursive Bayesian form by evaluating each tracker's reliability, which is measured by a robust tracker likelihood function (TLF). When the tracking in each frame is completed, the estimated object's state is obtained and fed into the reference update via the proposed learning strategy, which retains the robustness and adaptability of the TLF and multiple trackers. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method is robust in various benchmark scenarios.

[5]: The goal of this article is to review the state-of-the-art tracking methods, classify them into different categories, and identify new trends. Object tracking, in general, is a challenging problem. Difficulties in tracking objects can arise due to abrupt object motion, changing appearance patterns of both the object and the scene, nonrigid object structures, object-to-object and object-to-scene occlusions, and camera motion. Tracking is usually performed in the context of higher-level applications that require the location and or shape of the object in every frame. Typically, assumptions are made to constrain the tracking problem in the context of a particular application. In this survey, we categorize the tracking methods on the basis of the object and motion representations used, provide detailed descriptions of representative methods in each category, and examine their pros and cons. Moreover, we discuss the important issues related to tracking including the use of appropriate image features, selection of motion models, and detection of objects.

[6]: We propose a novel tracking framework called visual tracker sampler that tracks a target robustly by searching for the appropriate trackers in each frame. Since the real-world tracking environment varies severely over time, the trackers should be adapted or newly constructed depending on the current situation. To do this, our method obtains several samples of not only the states of the target but also the trackers themselves during the sampling process. The trackers are efficiently sampled using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method from the predefined tracker space by proposing new appearance models, motion models, state representation types, and observation types, which are the basic important components of visual trackers. Then, the sampled trackers run in parallel and interact with each other while covering various target variations efficiently. The experiment demonstrates that our method tracks targets accurately and robustly in the real-world tracking environments and outperforms the state-of-the-art tracking methods.
Some trackers like CAT [1] and SemiT [2] , use contextual information or supporting regions to deal with occlusion. But they might suffer from ambiguities due to the presence of several region of interest with their context. Some authors combine multiple features [4] , or multiple trackers [6] , to maintain multiple appearance models. An extensive summary on various appearance model representations and visual object trackers can be found in [3] and [5] respectively.