You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Multilingual machine translation addresses the task of translating between multiple source and target languages. We propose task-specific attention models, a simple but effective technique for improving the quality of sequence-to-sequence neural multilingual translation. Our approach seeks to retain as much of the parameter sharing generalization of NMT models as possible, while still allowing for language-specific specialization of the attention model to a particular language-pair or task. Our experiments on four languages of the Europarl corpus show that using a target-specific model of attention provides consistent gains in translation quality for all possible translation directions, compared to a model in which all parameters are shared. We observe improved translation quality even in the (extreme) low-resource zero-shot translation directions for which the model never saw explicitly paired parallel data.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: In this paper we show that reporting a single performance score is insufficient to compare non-deterministic approaches. We demonstrate this for common sequence tagging tasks that the seed value for the random number generator can result in statistically significant (p < 10^ -4 ) differences for state-of-the-art systems. For two recent systems for NER, we observe an absolute difference of one percentage point F1-score depending on the selected seed value, making these systems perceived either as state-of-the-art or mediocre. Instead of publishing and reporting single performance scores, we propose to compare score distributions based on multiple executions. Based on the evaluation of 50.000 LSTM-networks for five sequence tagging tasks, we present network architectures that perform superior as well as produce results with higher stability on unseen data.

[2]: We train one multilingual model for dependency parsing and use it to parse sentences in several languages. The parsing model uses (i) multilingual word clusters and embeddings; (ii) token-level language information; and (iii) language-specific features (fine-grained POS tags). This input representation enables the parser not only to parse effectively in multiple languages, but also to generalize across languages based on linguistic universals and typological similarities, making it more effective to learn from limited annotations. Our parser's performance compares favorably to strong baselines in a range of data scenarios, including when the target language has a large treebank, a small treebank, or no treebank for training.
Sequence to sequence models with attention are no exception. Each set of parameters provides different levels of generalization [1] , which is evidenced in the synergistic task of training multilingual translation models. For example, jointly train decoders while the rest of the parameters are task-specific; jointly train the encoders while the rest of the parameters are task-specific, and train both encoders and decoders jointly with language-specific tokens to guide learning as in [2] . These latter approaches are the ones that we build on. We augment our decoder with a task-specific attention mechanism intended to better capture word order and language-specific nuances while continuing to share the rest of the model parameters (including token embeddings).