You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
We present a novel approach to train pixel resolution segmentation models on whole slide images in a weakly supervised setup. The model is trained to classify patches extracted from slides. This leads the training to be made under noisy labeled data. We solve the problem with two complementary strategies. First, the patches are sampled online using the model's knowledge by focusing on regions where the model's confidence is higher. Second, we propose an extension of the KL divergence that is robust to noisy labels. Our preliminary experiment on CAMELYON 16 data set show promising results. The model can successfully segment tumor areas with strong morphological consistency.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Histopathology defines the gold standard in oncology. Automatic analysis of pathology images could thus have a significant impact on diagnoses, prognoses and treatment decisions for cancer patients. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown strong performance in computational histopathology tasks. However, given it remains intractable to process pathology slides in their entirety, CNNs have traditionally performed inference on small individual patches extracted from the image. This often requires a significant amount of computation and can result in ignoring potentially relevant spatial and contextual information. Being able to process larger input patches and locating discriminatory regions more efficiently could help improve both computational and task specific performance. Inspired by the recent success of Deep Recurrent Attention Models (DRAMs) in image recognition tasks, we propose a novel attention-based architecture for classification in histopathology. Similar to CNNs, DRAMs have a degree of translation invariance built-in, but the amount of computation performed can be controlled independently from the input image size. The model is a deep recurrent neural network trained with reinforcement learning to attend to the most relevant areas of large input patches. We evaluate our model on histological and molecular subtype classification tasks for the glioma cohorts of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Our results suggest that the DRAM has comparable performance to state-of-the-art CNNs despite only processing a select number of patches.
In [1] the authors propose the use of a deep recurrent attention model that classifies a WSI using information provided from a limited number of patches (or glimpses) using visual attention method. Disease localisation is inferred from the glimpses location.