You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Given a set of interacting components with non-deterministic variable update and given safety requirements, the goal of priority synthesis is to restrict, by means of priorities, the set of possible interactions in such a way as to guarantee the given safety conditions for all possible runs. In distributed priority synthesis we are interested in obtaining local sets of priorities, which are deployed in terms of local component controllers sharing intended next moves between components in local neighborhoods only. These possible communication paths between local controllers are specified by means of a communication architecture. We formally define the problem of distributed priority synthesis in terms of a multi-player safety game between players for (angelically) selecting the next transition of the components and an environment for (demonically) updating uncontrollable variables; this problem is NP-complete. We propose several optimizations including a solution-space exploration based on a diagnosis method using a nested extension of the usual attractor computation in games together with a reduction to corresponding SAT problems. When diagnosis fails, the method proposes potential candidates to guide the exploration. These optimized algorithms for solving distributed priority synthesis problems have been integrated into our VissBIP framework. An experimental validation of this implementation is performed using a range of case studies including scheduling in multicore processors and modular robotics.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Controlling concurrent systems to impose some global invariant is an undecidable problem. One can gain decidability at the expense of reducing concurrency. Even under this flexible design assumption, the synthesis problem remains highly intractable. One practical method for designing controllers is based on checking knowledge properties upon which the processes can make their decisions whether to allow or block transitions. A major deficiency of this synthesis method lies in calculating the knowledge based on the system that we want to control, and not on the resulted system. The original system has less knowledge, and as a result, we may introduce far more synchronization than needed. In this paper we show techniques to reduce this overhead.

[2]: In this paper, we introduce a novel model-based approach for constructing correct distributed implementation of component-based models constrained by priorities. We argue that model-based methods are especially of interest in the context of distributed embedded system due to their inherent complexity. Our three-phase method's input is a model specified in terms of a set of behavioural components that interact through a set of high-level synchronization primitives (e.g., rendezvous and broadcasts) and priority rules for scheduling purposes. Our technique, first, transforms the input model into a model that has no priorities. Then, it transforms the deprioritized model into another model that resolves distributed conflicts by incorporating a solution to the committee coordination problem. Finally, it generates distributed code using asynchronous point-to-point send receive primitives. All transformations preserve the properties of their input model by ensuring observational equivalence. The transformations are implemented and our experiments validate their effectiveness.
Lately, the problem of deploying priorities on a given architecture has gained increased recognition [2] [1] ; the advantage of priority synthesis is that the set of synthesized priorities is always known to be deployable. As a continuing toolchain, there are many existing works which try to deploy priorities on a given architecture [2] [1] , but these methods suffer from the fact that the set of priorities may be inherently undeployable. From these failures, our observation is that as priorities are control artifacts used to achieve certain specification, there can be different sets of priorities which achieve the same goal. What is required is to such a priority set respecting the architectural constraints. Therefore, our method reduces efforts in designing algorithms for priority deployment.