You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
The @math -coloring problem is a fundamental symmetry breaking problem in distributed computing. We give a new randomized coloring algorithm for @math -coloring running in @math rounds with probability @math in a graph with @math nodes and maximum degree @math . This implies that the @math -coloring problem is easier than the maximal independent set problem and the maximal matching problem, due to their lower bounds by Kuhn, Moscibroda, and Wattenhofer [PODC'04]. Our algorithm also extends to the list-coloring problem where the palette of each node contains @math colors.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: We deterministically compute a @D+1 coloring and a maximal independent set(MIS) in time O(@D^1^ ^2^+^@Q^(^1^ ^h^)+log^*n) for @D"1"+"[email protected][email protected]^1^+^i^ ^h, where @D"j is defined as the maximal number of nodes within distance j for a node and @D:[email protected]"1. Our greedy coloring and MIS algorithms improve the state-of-the-art algorithms running in O(@D+log^*n) for a large class of graphs, i.e., graphs of (moderate) neighborhood growth with h>=36. We also state and analyze a randomized coloring algorithm in terms of the chromatic number, the run time and the used colors. Our algorithm runs in time O([email protected]+log^*n) for @[email protected][email protected](log^1^+^1^ ^l^o^g^^^*^nn) and @[email protected]?O(@D log^1^+^1^ ^l^o^g^^^*^nn). For graphs of polylogarithmic chromatic number the analysis reveals an exponential gap compared to the fastest @D+1 coloring algorithm running in time O([email protected]+logn). The algorithm works without knowledge of @g and uses less than @D colors, i.e., (1-1 O(@g))@D with high probability. To the best of our knowledge this is the first distributed algorithm for (such) general graphs taking the chromatic number @g into account. We also improve on the state of the art deterministic computation of (2,c)-ruling sets.

[2]: The authors introduce a concept of network decomposition, a partitioning of an arbitrary graph into small-diameter connected components, such that the graph created by contracting each component into a single node has low chromatic number. They present an efficient distributed algorithm for constructing such a decomposition and demonstrate its use for design of efficient distributed algorithms. The method yields new deterministic distributed algorithms for finding a maximal independent set in an arbitrary graph and for ( Delta +1)-coloring of graphs with maximum degree Delta . These algorithms run in O(n sup epsilon ) time for epsilon =O((log log n log n) sup 1 2 ), whereas the best previously known deterministic algorithms required Omega (n) time. The techniques can also be used to remove randomness from the previously known most distributed breadth-first search algorithm. >

[3]:
A generalization of MIS, known as an , has also been considered. A ( @math )-ruling set @math is a set of vertices such that two nodes @math have distance at least @math and for any node @math there exists a node @math with distance at most @math [2] . MIS is a special case, namely a @math -ruling set. A number of papers [3] [1] [2] use ruling sets to compute colorings in different kinds of graphs. A ruling set can be viewed as defining a network decomposition, such that any component has diameter at least @math and at most @math .