You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey 
Chapter Title:  Motor primitives 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  This paper presents a machine learning approach to optimizing a quadrupedal trot gait for forward speed. Given a parameterized walk designed for a specific robot, we propose using a form of policy gradient reinforcement learning to automatically search the set of possible parameters with the goal of finding the fastest possible walk. We implement and test our approach on a commercially available quadrupedal robot platform, namely the Sony Aibo robot. After about three hours of learning, all on the physical robots and with no human intervention other than to change the batteries, the robots achieved a gait faster than any previously known gait known for the Aibo, significantly outperforming a variety of existing hand-coded and learned solutions. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  In the past, computational motor control has been approached from at least two major frameworks: the dynamic systems approach and the viewpoint of optimal control. The dynamic system approach emphasizes motor control as a process of self-organization between an animal and its environment. Nonlinear differential equations that can model entrainment and synchronization behavior are among the most favorable tools of dynamic systems modelers. In contrast, optimal control approaches view motor control as the evolutionary or development result of a nervous system that tries to optimize rather general organizational principles, e.g., energy consumption or accurate task achievement. Optimal control theory is usually employed to develop appropriate theories. Interestingly, there is rather little interaction between dynamic systems and optimal control modelers as the two approaches follow rather different philosophies and are often viewed as diametrically opposing. In this paper, we develop a computational approach to motor control that offers a unifying modeling framework for both dynamic systems and optimal control approaches. In discussions of several behavioral experiments and some theoretical and robotics studies, we demonstrate how our computational ideas allow both the representation of self-organizing processes and the optimization of movement based on reward criteria. Our modeling framework is rather simple and general, and opens opportunities to revisit many previous modeling results from this novel unifying view. 
3. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB003):  Many motor skills in humanoid robotics can be learned using parametrized motor primitives as done in imitation learning. However, most interesting motor learning problems are high-dimensional reinforcement learning problems often beyond the reach of current methods. In this paper, we extend previous work on policy learning from the immediate reward case to episodic reinforcement learning. We show that this results in a general, common framework also connected to policy gradient methods and yielding a novel algorithm for policy learning that is particularly well-suited for dynamic motor primitives. The resulting algorithm is an EM-inspired algorithm applicable to complex motor learning tasks. We compare this algorithm to several well-known parametrized policy search methods and show that it outperforms them. We apply it in the context of motor learning and show that it can learn a complex Ball-in-a-Cup task using a real Barrett WAM™ robot arm. 
4. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB004):  One of the hallmarks of the performance, versatility, and robustness of biological motor control is the ability to adapt the impedance of the overall biomechanical system to different task requirements and stochastic disturbances. A transfer of this principle to robotics is desirable, for instance to enable robots to work robustly and safely in everyday human environments. It is, however, not trivial to derive variable impedance controllers for practical high degree-of-freedom (DOF) robotic tasks. In this contribution, we accomplish such variable impedance control with the reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm PI2 (Policy Improvement with Path Integrals). PI2 is a model-free, sampling-based learning method derived from first principles of stochastic optimal control. The PI 2 algorithm requires no tuning of algorithmic parameters besides the exploration noise. The designer can thus fully focus on the cost function design to specify the task. From the viewpoint of robotics, a particular useful property of PI2 is that it can scale to problems of many DOFs, so that reinforcement learning on real robotic systems becomes feasible. We sketch the PI2 algorithm and its theoretical properties, and how it is applied to gain scheduling for variable impedance control. We evaluate our approach by presenting results on several simulated and real robots. We consider tasks involving accurate tracking through via points, and manipulation tasks requiring physical contact with the environment. In these tasks, the optimal strategy requires both tuning of a reference trajectory and the impedance of the end-effector. The results show that we can use path integral based reinforcement learning not only for planning but also to derive variable gain feedback controllers in realistic scenarios. Thus, the power of variable impedance control is made available to a wide variety of robotic systems and practical applications. 
5. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB005):  When describing robot motion with dynamic movement primitives (DMPs), goal (trajectory endpoint), shape and temporal scaling parameters are used. In reinforcement learning with DMPs, usually goals and temporal scaling parameters are predefined and only the weights for shaping a DMP are learned. Many tasks, however, exist where the best goal position is not a priori known, requiring to learn it. Thus, here we specifically address the question of how to simultaneously combine goal and shape parameter learning. This is a difficult problem because learning of both parameters could easily interfere in a destructive way. We apply value function approximation techniques for goal learning and direct policy search methods for shape learning. Specifically, we use ''policy improvement with path integrals'' and ''natural actor critic'' for the policy search. We solve a learning-to-pour-liquid task in simulations as well as using a Pa10 robot arm. Results for learning from scratch, learning initialized by human demonstration, as well as for modifying the tool for the learned DMPs are presented. We observe that the combination of goal and shape learning is stable and robust within large parameter regimes. Learning converges quickly even in the presence of disturbances, which makes this combined method suitable for robotic applications.

Literature Review:
Motor primitives combine linear models describing dynamics with parsimonious movement parametrizations. While originally biologically-inspired, they have a lot of success for representing basic movements in robotics such as a reaching movement or basic locomotion. These basic movements can subsequently be sequenced and/or combined to achieve more complex movements. For both goal oriented and rhythmic movement, different technical representations have been proposed in the robotics community. Dynamical system motor primitives BIB001 BIB003 have become a popular representation for reinforcement learning of discrete movements. The dynamical system motor primitives always have a strong dependence on the phase of the movement, which corresponds to time. They can be employed as an open-loop trajectory representation. Nevertheless, they can also be employed as a closed-loop policy to a limited extent. In our experience, they offer a number of advantages over via-point or spline-based policy representation (see Section 7.2). The dynamical system motor primitives have been trained with reinforcement learning for a T-ball batting task (Peters and Schaal, 2008c,b) , an underactuated pendulum swing-up and a ball in a cup task BIB004 , flipping a light switch BIB005 , pouring water BIB006 , and playing pool and manipulating a box . For rhythmic behaviors, a representation based on the same biological motivation but with a fairly different technical implementation (based on half-elliptical locuses) have been used to acquire the gait patterns for an AIBO robot dog locomotion BIB002 .