You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: Differential Evolution based Multiobjective Optimization- A Review 
Chapter Title:  Differential Evolution for MultiObjective Optimization (DEMO) 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  Differential Evolution (DE) is a simple but powerful evolutionary optimization algorithm with many successful applications. In this paper we propose Differential Evolution for Multiobjective Optimization (DEMO) – a new approach to multiobjective optimization based on DE. DEMO combines the advantages of DE with the mechanisms of Pareto-based ranking and crowding distance sorting, used by state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization. DEMO is implemented in three variants that achieve competitive results on five ZDT test problems. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  This paper presents performance assessment of differential evolution for multiobjective optimization with self adaptation algorithm, which uses the self adaptation mechanism from evolution strategies to adapt F and CR parameters of the candidate creation in DE. Results for several runs on CEC2007 special session test functions are presented and assessed with different performance metrics. Based on these metrics, algorithm strengths and weaknesses are discussed.

Literature Review:
DEMO was proposed in BIB002 . Unlike original DE algorithm, this algorithm adopts an additional mechanism called truncation which combines the non-dominated sorting and crowding distance metric to keep best N individuals in the population. Also a child replaces the parent only when it dominates the parent. DEMO maintains only one population and it is extended when newly created candidates take part immediately in the creation of subsequent candidates. By selecting newly created candidate for reproduction that highlights the elitism in reproduction. That results in a fast convergence towards the true Pareto front, while the use of non-dominated sorting and crowding distance (derived from the NSGA-II BIB001 ) of the extended population promotes the uniform spread of solutions BIB002 . DEMO is compared in five high-dimensionality unconstrained problems outperforming in some problems to the NSGA-II, PDEA, PAES, SPEA and MODE. DEMOwSA BIB003 is a version of DEMO. The difference is that in DEMOwSA a self-adaptation mechanism for adjusting the values of control parameters such as F (mutation control parameter) and CR (crossover control parameter) is incorporated in the algorithm so that the values of the parameters can be adjusted to appropriate values in the evolutionary process. Unlike DE, the value of F is different for trial vector i in each generation which is adjusted based on the value of F for i in previous generation([F G ] i . The new value of F for trial vector i in the generation G+1(F i,G+1 ) can be obtained by the following formula: Similarly the new value of CR for trial vector i in the generation G+1 can be obtained by the formula: CR i,G+1 =(CR G ) i *e TN(0,1) (7) (CR G ) i = CR i,G + CR r1,G + CR r2,G + CR r3,G (8) 4 For details refer BIB003 . The performance of this algorithm is assessed from the result acquired after running it on 19 test functions using four performance metrics. The result illustrates that the algorithm performed better for all functions except three functions.