You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Pruning filters is an effective method for accelerating deep neural networks (DNNs), but most existing approaches prune filters on a pre-trained network directly which limits in acceleration. Although each filter has its own effect in DNNs, but if two filters are the same with each other, we could prune one safely. In this paper, we add an extra cluster loss term in the loss function which can force filters in each cluster to be similar online. After training, we keep one filter in each cluster and prune others and fine-tune the pruned network to compensate for the loss. Particularly, the clusters in every layer can be defined firstly which is effective for pruning DNNs within residual blocks. Extensive experiments on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 benchmarks demonstrate the competitive performance of our proposed filter pruning method.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Pruning is an effective method to address the limitation of deploying deep neural networks (DNNs) on embedded systems. Most existing methods prune weights on a given pre-trained DNN followed by a costly fine-tuning process. In this paper, we propose a new and efficient pruning algorithm which can prune the structures of filters and filter shapes effectively. This is achieved by defining filter-wise and shape-wise scaling factors to indicate those to be weakened. Then train the network from scratch and multiply weights with corresponding scaling factors. With iterative update, the weights of the selected filters and shapes are gradually weakened to zero and then pruned with little loss to the model capability. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on several CNN models and datasets. For VGG-16 on CIFAR10, we achieve more than 2 x FLOPs reduction and compression with higher accuracy. And for WRN-16-4 on CIFAR100, our method exhibits more than 2 x speedup and compression with less than 1 accuracy drop.

[2]: We propose the use of incomplete dot products (IDP) to dynamically adjust the number of input channels used in each layer of a convolutional neural network during feedforward inference. IDP adds monotonically non-increasing coefficients, referred to as a "profile", to the channels during training. The profile orders the contribution of each channel in non-increasing order. At inference time, the number of channels used can be dynamically adjusted to trade off accuracy for lowered power consumption and reduced latency by selecting only a beginning subset of channels. This approach allows for a single network to dynamically scale over a computation range, as opposed to training and deploying multiple networks to support different levels of computation scaling. Additionally, we extend the notion to multiple profiles, each optimized for some specific range of computation scaling. We present experiments on the computation and accuracy trade-offs of IDP for popular image classification models and datasets. We demonstrate that, for MNIST and CIFAR-10, IDP reduces computation significantly, e.g., by 75 , without significantly compromising accuracy. We argue that IDP provides a convenient and effective means for devices to lower computation costs dynamically to reflect the current computation budget of the system. For example, VGG-16 with 50 IDP (using only the first 50 of channels) achieves 70 in accuracy on the CIFAR-10 dataset compared to the standard network which achieves only 35 accuracy when using the reduced channel set.

[3]: The deployment of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in many real world applications is largely hindered by their high computational cost. In this paper, we propose a novel learning scheme for CNNs to simultaneously 1) reduce the model size; 2) decrease the run-time memory footprint; and 3) lower the number of computing operations, without compromising accuracy. This is achieved by enforcing channel-level sparsity in the network in a simple but effective way. Different from many existing approaches, the proposed method directly applies to modern CNN architectures, introduces minimum overhead to the training process, and requires no special software hardware accelerators for the resulting models. We call our approach network slimming, which takes wide and large networks as input models, but during training insignificant channels are automatically identified and pruned afterwards, yielding thin and compact models with comparable accuracy. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach with several state-of-the-art CNN models, including VGGNet, ResNet and DenseNet, on various image classification datasets. For VGGNet, a multi-pass version of network slimming gives a 20× reduction in model size and a 5× reduction in computing operations.
Besides the above methods which prune filters on a pre-trained network, several methods add regularization or other modifications during training. For example, Liu [3] enforce channel sparsity by imposing L1 regularization on the scaling factors in batch normalization. McDanel [2] utilize incomplete dot products to dynamically adjust the number of input channels used in each layer. Zhou [1] introduce a scaling factor to each filter to weaken the weights step by step and prune the filters after training.