You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A Review of Protocol Implementations and Energy Efficient Cross-Layer Design for Wireless Body Area Networks 
Chapter Title:  Justification for Cross-Layer Design 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  This paper presents a location based store-and-forward packet routing algorithm for Wireless Body Area Networks (WBAN) with frequent postural partitioning. A prototype WBAN has been constructed for experimentally characterizing on-body topology disconnections in the presence of ultra short range radio links, unpredictable RF attenuation, and human postural mobility. A location based packet routing protocol is then developed. The performance of the proposed protocol is evaluated experimentally, and is compared with a generic probabilistic routing protocol and a specialized on-body packet flooding mechanism that provides the routing delay lower-bounds. It is shown that via successfully leveraging the node location information, the proposed algorithm can provide better routing delay performance compared to existing probabilistic routing protocols in the literature.

Literature Review:
There are a number of reasons why the traditional layered approach to network design has been questioned and many of these have direct relevance to the specific needs of WBANs: Network Heterogeneity-The standard layered protocol stack can adequately cater for the requirements of heterogeneous networks such as WBANs in terms of integration into a defined structure, but this may be at the expense of performance and energy efficiency. For example if a routing path is set up between two nodes through different types of network, the routing protocol can simply find an available path considering metrics as shortest distance or lowest cost. However, if nodes want to find a path with enough bandwidth, then the routing protocol needs to consider the interactions with the MAC layer. This cross-layer interaction isn't possible via the standard protocol stack. QoS-Due to their application, WBANs have a specific requirement for high levels of QoS. High PDR, low levels of packet transmission delay, minimal collisions and retransmissions, optimal balancing of high energy efficiency and reliable transmission are all areas that are keys within the WBAN environment. The traditional layered structure may not be the optimal solution to guarantee these critical levels of service and may limit the potential improvements needed to guarantee energy efficiency and improvements to QoS. Channel Conditions-The capacity of a link within a WBAN can vary not just due to the standard wireless link issues such as node interference BIB001 , but issues due to the inherent behavior of RF signals in and around the human body such as signal absorption and attenuation effectively resulting in a variance in RF transmission power and path losses depending on the direction of propagation. Channel conditions can change due to factors such as antenna orientation, clothing type, physical stature of the patient, and postural position BIB002 . These changes in channel conditions can be catered for specifically within cross-layer schemes that incorporate link adaptation to take account of channel variances. Performance-The closely coupled nature of the standard layered protocol stack means that interaction between protocols is standardized but potentially at the expense of performance. Data communication flows from one layer to another regardless of whether the protocol in any particular layer has any significant role to play in the overall transmission or receipt of data.