You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
The Semantic Web comprises enormous volumes of semi-structured data elements. For interoperability, these elements are represented by long strings. Such representations are not efficient for the purposes of Semantic Web applications that perform computations over large volumes of information. A typical method for alleviating the impact of this problem is through the use of compression methods that produce more compact representations of the data. The use of dictionary encoding for this purpose is particularly prevalent in Semantic Web database systems. However, centralized implementations present performance bottlenecks, giving rise to the need for scalable, efficient distributed encoding schemes. In this paper, we describe an encoding implementation based on the asynchronous partitioned global address space (APGAS) parallel programming model. We evaluate performance on a cluster of up to 384 cores and datasets of up to 11 billion triples (1.9 TB). Compared to the state-of-art MapReduce algorithm, we demonstrate a speedup of 2:6 - 7:4X and excellent scalability. These results illustrate the strong potential of the APGAS model for efficient implementation of dictionary encoding and contributes to the engineering of larger scale Semantic Web applications.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: To-date, the application of high-performance computing resources to Semantic Web data has largely focused on commodity hardware and distributed memory platforms. In this paper we make the case that more specialized hardware can offer superior scaling and close to an order of magnitude improvement in performance. In particular we examine the Cray XMT. Its key characteristics, a large, global sharedmemory, and processors with a memory-latency tolerant design, offer an environment conducive to programming for the Semantic Web and have engendered results that far surpass current state of the art. We examine three fundamental pieces requisite for a fully functioning semantic database: dictionary encoding, RDFS inference, and query processing. We show scaling up to 512 processors (the largest configuration we had available), and the ability to process 20 billion triples completely in-memory.
[1] adapt the linear probing method on their Cray XMT machine, and realize the parallel encoding on a single dictionary through parallel hashing, exploiting specialized primitives of the Cray XMT. Their evaluation has shown that their method is highly efficient and the run-time is linear with the number of used cores. This method requires that all data is kept in memory and is deeply reliant on the shared memory architecture of the Cray XMT, making it unsuitable for commodity distributed memory systems. They report an improvement of 2.4 to 3.3 compared to the MapReduce system on an in-memory configuration. By comparison, on similar datasets, our approach outperforms the MapReduce system a factor of 2.6 to 7.4, both on-disk and in-memory.