You will be presented with a citation segment from the section of an NLP research paper, as well as the context surrounding that citation. Classify the intent behind this citation by choosing from one of the following categories:
- Background: provides context or foundational information related to the topic.
- Extends: builds upon the cited work.
- Uses: applies the methods or findings of the cited work.
- Motivation: cites the work as inspiration or rationale for the research.
- CompareOrContrast: compares or contrasts the cited work with others.
- FutureWork: cites the work as a direction for future research.

Your answer should be a single word from the following list of options: ["Background", "Extends", "Uses", "Motivation", "CompareOrContrast", "FutureWork"]. Do not include any other text in your response.

Section Title:
experiments

Context before the citation:
It has been argued that, in an incremental approach, gradable properties should be given a low preference ranking because they are difficult to process (Krahmer and Theune 2002).

Citation Sentence:
It has been argued that , in an incremental approach , gradable properties should be given a low preference ranking because they are difficult to process ( Krahmer and Theune 2002 ) .

Context after the citation:
We have seen in Section 4.3 that generation and interpretation of vague descriptions does have a slightly higher computational complexity than that of nonvague descriptions. Yet, by giving gradable properties a low ranking, we might cause the algorithm to underuse them, for example, in situations where gradable properties are highly relevant to the purpose of the discourse (e.g., a fist fight between people of very different sizes). Luckily, there are no semantic or algorithmic reasons for giving gradables a low ranking. Let us see how things would work if they were ranked more highly.
CompareOrContrast