You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Increased adaptability of RNN language models leads to improved predictions that benefit many applications. However, current methods do not take full advantage of the RNN structure. We show that the most widely-used approach to adaptation (concatenating the context with the word embedding at the input to the recurrent layer) is outperformed by a model that has some low-cost improvements: adaptation of both the hidden and output layers. and a feature hashing bias term to capture context idiosyncrasies. Experiments on language modeling and classification tasks using three different corpora demonstrate the advantages of the proposed techniques.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: 

[2]: This paper studied generating natural languages at particular contexts or situations. We proposed two novel approaches which encode the contexts into a continuous semantic representation and then decode the semantic representation into text sequences with recurrent neural networks. During decoding, the context information are attended through a gating mechanism, addressing the problem of long-range dependency caused by lengthy sequences. We evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches on user review data, in which rich contexts are available and two informative contexts, sentiments and products, are selected for evaluation. Experiments show that the fake reviews generated by our approaches are very natural. Results of fake review detection with human judges show that more than 50 of the fake reviews are misclassified as the real reviews, and more than 90 are misclassified by existing state-of-the-art fake review detection algorithm.

[3]: Word usage is influenced by diverse factors, including topic, genre and various speaker author characteristics. To characterize these aspects of language, we introduce the “Multi-Factor Sparse Plus Low Rank” exponential language model, which allows supervised joint training of arbitrary overlapping factor-specific model components. This flexible architecture has the advantage of being highly interpretable. The elements of sparse parameter matrices can be viewed as factor-dependent corrections (e.g. topic- or speaker-dependent phenomena). In topic modeling experiments on conversational telephone speech, we obtain modest perplexity reductions over an n-gram baseline and demonstrate topic-dependent keyword extraction that leads to a 13 (absolute) improvement in precision over TFIDF. We also show how keywords can be jointly learned for speakers, roles and topics in a study of Supreme Court oral arguments.
studies how to incorporate side information into an RNN language model. For their data, they claim a bigger win by adapting at the output layer rather than the hidden layer. (This matches our own observations on the Reddit and SCOTUS data.) Their work did not address adapting at both the hidden and output layers simultaneously. Most work on adaptation does not consider combining multiple context factors but there are some exceptions [3] [2] [1] .