You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Recent trojan attacks on deep neural network (DNN) models are one insidious variant of data poisoning attacks. Trojan attacks exploit an effective backdoor created in a DNN model by leveraging the difficulty in interpretability of the learned model to misclassify any inputs signed with the attacker's chosen trojan trigger input. Trojan attacks are easy to craft; survive even in adverse conditions such as different viewpoints, and lighting conditions on images; and threaten real world applications such as autonomous vehicles and robotics. The trojan trigger is a secret guarded and exploited by the attacker. Therefore, detecting such trojaned inputs is a challenge, especially at run-time when models are in active operation. We focus on vision systems and build the STRong Intentional Perturbation (STRIP) based run-time trojan attack detection system. We intentionally perturb the incoming input, for instance by superimposing various image patterns, and observe the randomness of the predicted classes for the perturbed inputs for a given model---malicious or benign---under deployment. A low entropy in the predicted classes violates the input-dependence property of a benign model and implies the presence of a malicious input---a characteristic of a trojaned input. The high efficacy of our method is validated through case studies on two popular and contrasting datasets: MNIST and CIFAR10. We achieve an overall false acceptance rate (FAR) of less than 1 , given a preset false rejection rate (FRR) of 1 , for four different tested trojan trigger types---three triggers are identified in previous attack works and one dedicated trigger is crafted by us to demonstrate the trigger-size insensitivity of the STRIP detection approach. In particular, on the dataset of natural images in CIFAR10, we have empirically achieved the desired result of 0 for both FRR and FAR.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Lack of transparency in deep neural networks (DNNs) make them susceptible to backdoor attacks, where hidden associations or triggers override normal classification to produce unexpected results. For example, a model with abackdoor always identifies a face as Bill Gates if a specific symbol is present in the input. Backdoors can stay hidden indefinitely until activated by an input, and present a serious security risk to many security or safety related applications, e.g. biometric authentication systems or self-driving cars.We present the first robust and generalizable detection and mitigation system for DNN backdoor attacks. Our techniques identify backdoors and reconstruct possible triggers. We identify multiple mitigation techniques via input filters, neuron pruning and unlearning. We demonstrate their efficacy via extensive experiments on a variety of DNNs, against two types of backdoor injection methods identified by prior work. Our techniques also prove robust against a number of variants of the backdoor attack.

[2]: SentiNet is a novel detection framework for physical attacks on neural networks, a class of attacks that constrains an adversarial region to a visible portion of an image. Physical attacks have been shown to be robust and flexible techniques suited for deployment in real-world scenarios. Unlike most other adversarial detection works, SentiNet does not require training a model or preknowledge of an attack prior to detection. This attack-agnostic approach is appealing due to the large number of possible mechanisms and vectors of attack an attack-specific defense would have to consider. By leveraging the neural network's susceptibility to attacks and by using techniques from model interpretability and object detection as detection mechanisms, SentiNet turns a weakness of a model into a strength. We demonstrate the effectiveness of SentiNet on three different attacks - i.e., adversarial examples, data poisoning attacks, and trojaned networks - that have large variations in deployment mechanisms, and show that our defense is able to achieve very competitive performance metrics for all three threats, even against strong adaptive adversaries with full knowledge of SentiNet.
Wang [1] in 2019 S @math P propose a Neural Cleanse method to detect whether a DNN model has been trojaned or not prior to deployment. Neural Cleanse is based on the intuition that, given a backdoored model, it requires much smaller modifications to all samples to make them being misclassified into the attacker targeted (infected) label than any other uninfected labels. Therefore, their method iterates through all labels of the model and determine if any label requires a substantially smaller amount of modification to achieve misclassification. One advantage of this method is that the trigger can be reversed and thus discovered during the trojaned model detection process. However, this method has two noticeable limitations. Firstly, it could incur high computation costs proportional to the number of labels. The computation cost of detection process can take up to several days for certain DNN models even when the optimization is adopted. Secondly, similar to SentiNet [2] , it becomes ineffective for large size triggers.