You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Many recent works on 3D object detection have focused on designing neural network architectures that can consume point cloud data. While these approaches demonstrate encouraging performance, they are typically based on a single modality and are unable to leverage information from other modalities, such as a camera. Although a few approaches fuse data from different modalities, these methods either use a complicated pipeline to process the modalities sequentially, or perform late-fusion and are unable to learn interaction between different modalities at early stages. In this work, we present PointFusion and VoxelFusion: two simple yet effective early-fusion approaches to combine the RGB and point cloud modalities, by leveraging the recently introduced VoxelNet architecture. Evaluation on the KITTI dataset demonstrates significant improvements in performance over approaches which only use point cloud data. Furthermore, the proposed method provides results competitive with the state-of-the-art multimodal algorithms, achieving top-2 ranking in five of the six bird's eye view and 3D detection categories on the KITTI benchmark, by using a simple single stage network.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: This paper aims at high-accuracy 3D object detection in autonomous driving scenario. We propose Multi-View 3D networks (MV3D), a sensory-fusion framework that takes both LIDAR point cloud and RGB images as input and predicts oriented 3D bounding boxes. We encode the sparse 3D point cloud with a compact multi-view representation. The network is composed of two subnetworks: one for 3D object proposal generation and another for multi-view feature fusion. The proposal network generates 3D candidate boxes efficiently from the birds eye view representation of 3D point cloud. We design a deep fusion scheme to combine region-wise features from multiple views and enable interactions between intermediate layers of different paths. Experiments on the challenging KITTI benchmark show that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art by around 25 and 30 AP on the tasks of 3D localization and 3D detection. In addition, for 2D detection, our approach obtains 14.9 higher AP than the state-of-the-art on the hard data among the LIDAR-based methods.

[2]: We present AVOD, an Aggregate View Object Detection network for autonomous driving scenarios. The proposed neural network architecture uses LIDAR point clouds and RGB images to generate features that are shared by two subnetworks: a region proposal network (RPN) and a second stage detector network. The proposed RPN uses a novel architecture capable of performing multimodal feature fusion on high resolution feature maps to generate reliable 3D object proposals for multiple object classes in road scenes. Using these proposals, the second stage detection network performs accurate oriented 3D bounding box regression and category classification to predict the extents, orientation, and classification of objects in 3D space. Our proposed architecture is shown to produce state of the art results on the KITTI 3D object detection benchmark while running in real time with a low memory footprint, making it a suitable candidate for deployment on autonomous vehicles. Code is at: this https URL
Multimodal fusion by combining LiDAR and RGB data has been less explored as compared to single modality-based approaches. Recently, Chen al [1] proposed a multi-view 3D object detection network (MV3D), which takes multimodal data as input and produces 3D bounding boxes by incorporating region-based feature fusion. Although this method demonstrated encouraging results by using multimodal data, it has the following disadvantages: (i) the method converts point clouds into BEV representation, which loses detailed 3D shape information, and (ii) the fusion is performed at a much later stage as compared to the proposed fusion techniques ( , after the 3D proposal generation stage), which limits the ability of the neural network to capture the interaction between the two modalities at earlier stages and hence, the integration is not necessarily seamless. Similar to [1] , Ku al [2] proposed multimodal fusion by incorporating region-based features. They achieved better performance than [1] especially in the small object category by designing a more advanced RPN that employs high-resolution feature maps. This method also uses hand-crafted BEV representation and performs late fusion.