You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Multi-output is essential in machine learning that it might suffer from nonconforming residual distributions, i.e., the multi-output residual distributions are not conforming to the expected distribution. In this paper, we propose "Wrapped Loss Function" to wrap the original loss function to alleviate the problem. This wrapped loss function acts just like the original loss function that its gradient can be used for backpropagation optimization. Empirical evaluations show wrapped loss function has advanced properties of faster convergence, better accuracy, and improving imbalanced data.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: In the usual setting of Machine Learning, classifiers are typically evaluated by estimating their error rate (or equi valently, the classification accuracy) on the test data. However, this mak es sense only if all errors have equal (uniform) costs. When the costs of er- rors differ between each other, the classifiers should be eva luated by comparing the total costs of the errors. Classifiers are typically designed to minimize the number of errors (incorrect classifications) made. When misclassification c osts vary between classes, this approach is not suitable. In this case the total misclassification cost should be minimized. In Machine Learning, only little work for dealing with non- uniform misclassification costs has been done. This paper pr esents a few different approaches for cost-sensitive modifications of the back- propagation learning algorithm for multilayered feedforw ard neural networks . The described approaches are thoroughly tested and eval- uated on several standard benchmark domains.

[2]: Scene parsing, or semantic segmentation, consists in labeling each pixel in an image with the category of the object it belongs to. It is a challenging task that involves the simultaneous detection, segmentation and recognition of all the objects in the image. The scene parsing method proposed here starts by computing a tree of segments from a graph of pixel dissimilarities. Simultaneously, a set of dense feature vectors is computed which encodes regions of multiple sizes centered on each pixel. The feature extractor is a multiscale convolutional network trained from raw pixels. The feature vectors associated with the segments covered by each node in the tree are aggregated and fed to a classifier which produces an estimate of the distribution of object categories contained in the segment. A subset of tree nodes that cover the image are then selected so as to maximize the average "purity" of the class distributions, hence maximizing the overall likelihood that each segment will contain a single object. The convolutional network feature extractor is trained end-to-end from raw pixels, alleviating the need for engineered features. After training, the system is parameter free. The system yields record accuracies on the Stanford Background Dataset (8 classes), the Sift Flow Dataset (33 classes) and the Barcelona Dataset (170 classes) while being an order of magnitude faster than competing approaches, producing a 320 240 image labeling in less than 1 second.

[3]: A commonly encountered problem in MLP (multi-layer perceptron) classification problems is related to the prior probabilities of the individual classes - if the number of training examples that correspond to each class varies significantly between the classes, then it may be harder for the network to learn the rarer classes in some cases. Such practical experience does not match theoretical results which show that MLPs approximate Bayesian a posteriori probabilities (independent of the prior class probabilities). Our investigation of the problem shows that the difference between the theoretical and practical results lies with the assumptions made in the theory (accurate estimation of Bayesian a posteriori probabilities requires the network to be large enough, training to converge to a global minimum, infinite training data, and the a priori class probabilities of the test set to be correctly represented in the training set). Specifically, the problem can often be traced to the fact that efficient MLP training mechanisms lead to sub-optimal solutions for most practical problems. In this chapter, we demonstrate the problem, discuss possible methods for alleviating it, and introduce new heuristics which are shown to perform well on a sample ECG classification problem. The heuristics may also be used as a simple means of adjusting for unequal misclassification costs.

[4]: We present a novel and practical deep fully convolutional neural network architecture for semantic pixel-wise segmentation termed SegNet. This core trainable segmentation engine consists of an encoder network, a corresponding decoder network followed by a pixel-wise classification layer. The architecture of the encoder network is topologically identical to the 13 convolutional layers in the VGG16 network [1] . The role of the decoder network is to map the low resolution encoder feature maps to full input resolution feature maps for pixel-wise classification. The novelty of SegNet lies is in the manner in which the decoder upsamples its lower resolution input feature map(s). Specifically, the decoder uses pooling indices computed in the max-pooling step of the corresponding encoder to perform non-linear upsampling. This eliminates the need for learning to upsample. The upsampled maps are sparse and are then convolved with trainable filters to produce dense feature maps. We compare our proposed architecture with the widely adopted FCN [2] and also with the well known DeepLab-LargeFOV [3] , DeconvNet [4] architectures. This comparison reveals the memory versus accuracy trade-off involved in achieving good segmentation performance. SegNet was primarily motivated by scene understanding applications. Hence, it is designed to be efficient both in terms of memory and computational time during inference. It is also significantly smaller in the number of trainable parameters than other competing architectures and can be trained end-to-end using stochastic gradient descent. We also performed a controlled benchmark of SegNet and other architectures on both road scenes and SUN RGB-D indoor scene segmentation tasks. These quantitative assessments show that SegNet provides good performance with competitive inference time and most efficient inference memory-wise as compared to other architectures. We also provide a Caffe implementation of SegNet and a web demo at http: mi.eng.cam.ac.uk projects segnet .

[5]: In this paper we address three different computer vision tasks using a single basic architecture: depth prediction, surface normal estimation, and semantic labeling. We use a multiscale convolutional network that is able to adapt easily to each task using only small modifications, regressing from the input image to the output map directly. Our method progressively refines predictions using a sequence of scales, and captures many image details without any superpixels or low-level segmentation. We achieve state-of-the-art performance on benchmarks for all three tasks.
The most similar concept with wrapped loss function is cost-sensitive learning and label re-balancing. The target of cost-sensitive learning is to find a minimal cost in the imbalanced labels problems. In general, the errors are from the class with rare label. In the cost-sensitive learning, some methods add weights on loss function to learn its features. For example, there are the Prior Scaling [3] and Minimization of the misclassification costs method [1] . Or just simply pre-set label weights before model training. like Median Frequency Balancing: [4] [2] [5] . ( @math , where freq(c) is the number of data in the class c divided by the total number of data, and @math is the median of the frequencies.