You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Existing document filtering systems learn user profiles based on user relevance feedback on documents. In some cases, users may have prior knowledge about what features are important. For example, a Spanish speaker may only want news written in Spanish, and thus a relevant document should contain the feature "Language: Spanish"; a researcher focusing on HIV knows an article with the medical subject "Subject: AIDS" is very likely to be relevant to him her. Semi-structured documents with rich metadata are increasingly prevalent on the Internet. Motivated by the well-adopted faceted search interface in e-commerce, we study the exploitation of user prior knowledge on faceted features for semi-structured document filtering. We envision two faceted feedback mechanisms, and propose a novel user profile learning algorithm that can incorporate user feedback on features. To evaluate the proposed work, we use two data sets from the TREC filtering track, and conduct a user study on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Our experiment results show that user feedback on faceted features is useful for filtering. The proposed user profile learning algorithm can effectively learn from user feedback on both documents and features, and performs better than several existing methods.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: 

[2]: Abstract : The relevance feedback track in TREC 2009 focuses on two sub tasks: actively selecting good documents for users to provide relevance feedback and retrieving documents based on user relevance feedback. For the first task, we tried a clustering based method and the Transductive Experimental Design (TED) method proposed by . For clustering based method, we use the K-means algorithm to cluster the top retrieved documents and choose the most representative document of each cluster. The TED method aims to find documents that are hard-to-predict and representative of the unlabeled documents. For the second task, we did query expansion based on a relevance model learned on the relevant documents.

[3]: In an era of online retrieval, it is appropriate to offer guidance to users wishing to improve their initial queries. One form of such guidance could be short lists of suggested terms gathered from feedback, nearest neighbors, and term variants of original query terms. To verify this approach, a series of experiments were run using the Cranfield test collection to discover techniques to select terms for these lists that would be effective for further retrieval. The results show that significant improvement can be expected from this approach to query expansion.

[4]: 1332840 Primer compositions DOW CORNINGCORP 6 Oct 1971 [30 Dec 1970] 46462 71 Heading C3T [Also in Divisions B2 and C4] A primer composition comprises 1 pbw of tetra ethoxy or propoxy silane or poly ethyl or propyl silicate or any mixture thereof, 0A75-2A5 pbw of bis(acetylacetonyl) diisopropyl titanate, 0A75- 5 pbw of a compound CF 3 CH 2 CH 2 Si[OSi(CH 3 ) 2 - X] 3 wherein each X is H or -CH 2 CH 2 Si- (OOCCH 3 ) 3 , at least one being the latter, and 1-20 pbw of a ketone, hydrocarbon or halohydrocarbon solvent boiling not above 150‹ C. In the examples 1 pbw each of bis(acetylacetonyl)diisopropyl titanate, polyethyl silicate and are dissolved in 10 pbw of acetone or in 9 pbw of light naphtha and 1 of methylisobutylketone. The solutions are used to prime Ti panels, to which a Pt-catalysed room-temperature vulcanizable poly-trifluoropropylmethyl siloxanebased rubber is then applied.

[5]: 

[6]: 

[7]: Relevance feedback is an effective approach to improve retrieval quality over the initial query. Typical relevance feedback methods usually select top-ranked documents for relevance judgments, then query expansion or model updating are carried out based on the feedback documents. However, the number of feedback documents is usually limited due to expensive human labeling. Thus relevant documents in the feedback set are hardly representative of all relevant documents and the feedback set is actually biased. As a result, the performance of relevance feedback will get hurt. In this paper, we first show how and where the bias problem exists through experiments. Then we study how the bias can be reduced by utilizing the unlabeled documents. After analyzing the usefulness of a document to relevance feedback, we propose an approach that extends the feedback set with carefully selected unlabeled documents by heuristics. Our experiment results show that the extended feedback set has less bias than the original feedback set and better performance can be achieved when the extended feedback set is used for relevance feedback.

[8]: 

[9]: Motivated by the commonly used faceted search interface in e-commerce, this paper investigates interactive relevance feedback mechanism based on faceted document metadata. In this mechanism, the system recommends a group of document facet-value pairs, and lets users select relevant ones to restrict the returned documents. We propose four facet-value pair recommendation approaches and two retrieval models that incorporate user feedback on document facets. Evaluated based on user feedback collected through Amazon Mechanical Turk, our experimental results show that the Boolean filtering approach, which is widely used in faceted search in e-commerce, doesn't work well for text document retrieval, due to the incompleteness (low recall) of metadata assignment in semi-structured text documents. Instead, a soft model performs more effectively. The faceted feedback mechanism can also be combined with document-based relevance feedback and pseudo relevance feedback to further improve the retrieval performance.

[10]:
Relevance feedback [4] [2] [7] has been shown to be an effective way to help retrieval systems improve retrieval performance. Besides the commonly used relevance feedback mechanism in which users are asked to judge whether a document is relevant or not, there has been some work on soliciting user feedback on document features. The term-based feedback mechanism, in which users are asked to identify relevant terms, has been studied by several researchers [3] [1] [8] [6] [5] . Recently, faceted feedback has been proposed for users to identify suitable faceted constraints on semi-structured documents to help improve retrieval performance [6]1 [10] .