You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: Informality in organization and research: a review and a proposal 
Chapter Title:  Grounded Theorizing 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  Although a wide range of human and organizational factors have been found to be important in the operation of projects, those determined by cultural variables are less well defined. One such influence concerns the notion of 'project affinity', the commitment and attachment by stakeholders and participants to projects and their outcomes. The temporal nature and transient involvement context provided by construction projects arguably presents a climate in which many participants are less likely to display commitment to its goals. This note is concerned with the issue of whether an attachment to a project's goals or to the completed product can lead to improved commitment among those involved. The concept of project affinity was developed in the course of a case study investigation in which operatives' attitudes towards the construction of a cancer research facility were explored. Because of the contribution of the facility to the future care of cancer sufferers, the concept of project affinity proved helpful in understanding a factor that appeared to be influencing the commitment of those involved. The results suggest a complementary concept to that of 'project chemistry' (c.f. Nicolini, 2002).

Literature Review:
Grounded theory research should meet the weak requirement. It may or may not meet the strong requirement. Indeed, disagreement has arisen between the founders of the approach   as to whether it is legitimate to introduce pre-formulated theoretical terms into grounded theory analysis. Others have wished to broaden the approach still further (though in a somewhat different direction), stipulating only that theorizing should take place simultaneously with fieldwork  ). At one extreme, then, it can be difficult to distinguish between grounded theory and UA research; at the other, between grounded theory and theoretically informed research. Grounded theory work that has been carried out in construction management includes, for instance, BIB001  BIB002 . 3. Theoretically Informed. The term 'theoretically informed research' refers here to research that draws upon theory in a manner that is not formally specified. There are a wide variety of approaches that fall into this class. At one extreme, theory may be drawn upon in ad hoc manner to explain, or elucidate findings. From the pragmatic point of view of a management discipline, it may have something to recommend it, as it allows for the cherry-picking of useful ideas, without the need for rigorous intellectual justification. Then again, such ad hoc theorizing might be a form of grounded theorizing as mentioned above. It might be an adjunct to an exploratory, or scoping study. It might be a preliminary to a more systematic theoretical development, or application of already existing theory. At the other extreme, it might be research which arises from a principled application of existing theory, but uses informal ethnographic or historical methods to test or extend this. To the extent to which research is theoretically informed, it does not meet the strong requirement   ). An alternate reporting criterion is  Postulate of Adequacy. This stipulates that the theoretical concepts used should be understandable by members of the research setting in common sense terms. In this way, the point(s) of view held by the subject(s) of the research are taken into account in the formulation of theory. Whatever level of theorizing is achieved, it is important that the theory remains true to its empirical referents. Thus, observation of the weak requirement remains a useful test of the validity of the findings.