You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Recent work in neural generation has attracted significant interest in controlling the form of text, such as style, persona, and politeness. However, there has been less work on controlling neural text generation for content. This paper introduces the notion of Content Transfer for long-form text generation, where the task is to generate a next sentence in a document that both fits its context and is grounded in a content-rich external textual source such as a news story. Our experiments on Wikipedia data show significant improvements against competitive baselines. As another contribution of this paper, we release a benchmark dataset of 640k Wikipedia referenced sentences paired with the source articles to encourage exploration of this new task.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Integer Linear Programming (ILP) based summarization methods have been widely adopted recently because of their state-of-the-art performance. This paper proposes two new modifications in this framework for update summarization. Our key idea is to use discriminative models with a set of features to measure both the salience and the novelty of words and sentences. First, these features are used in a supervised model to predict the weights of the concepts used in the ILP model. Second, we generate preliminary sentence candidates in the ILP model and then rerank them using sentence level features. We evaluate our method on different TAC update summarization data sets, and the results show that our system performs competitively compared to the best TAC systems based on the ROUGE evaluation metric.

[2]: We present a supervised sentence ranking approach for use in extractive update summarization. We use the same general machine learning approach described in earlier DUC papers, and adapt it to the update summarization task. The system proves adaptable enough to be effective at queryfocused update summaries.

[3]: The summarization track at the Text Analysis Conference (TAC) is a direct continuation of the Document Understanding Conference (DUC) series of workshops, focused on providing common data and evaluation framework for research in automatic summarization. In the TAC 2008 summarization track, the main task was to produce two 100-word summaries from two related sets of 10 documents, where the second summary was an update summary. While all of the 71 submitted runs were automatically scored with the ROUGE and BE metrics, NIST assessors manually evaluated only 57 of the submitted runs for readability, content, and overall responsiveness.
Another closely related task is update summarization [3] , where systems attempt to provide a brief summary of the novel information in a new article assuming the user has read a known set of prior documents. Our focus on curating an authoritative resource is a substantial difference. Also our datasets are substantially larger, enabling generative models to be used in this space, where prior update summarization techniques have been primarily extractive [2] [1] .