You will be provided with the titles and abstracts of a collection of medical RCT reports studying a clinical question -- for instance, the efficacy of an intervention on some medical outcome. Please write a few sentences synthesizing the findings of these reports, which could serve as a conclusion section for a systematic review article. Your response should not include any other text. The RCT reports are below.



Title 1:
A comparison of follicular response of ovaries to ovulation induction after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy or fenestration and coagulation versus normal ovaries in patients with endometrioma.
Abstract 1:
In a comparison of follicular responses to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) between normal ovaries and ovaries previously treated by different laparoscopic techniques for ovarian endometrioma in 65 patients with unilateral endometrioma, laparoscopic ovarian fenestration and coagulation was performed in 24 cases (group 1) and laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in the other 41 (group 2). In 16 patients with bilateral endometrioma (group 3), cystectomy was done in one ovary and fenestration and coagulation in the contralateral side. The results indicate that the response of ovaries to COH after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy or fenestration and coagulation was the same and that there was no difference in response to COH between normal ovaries and those operated on by the laparoscopic techniques mentioned above.


Title 2:
Effect of endometrioma cystectomy on IVF outcome: a prospective randomized study.
Abstract 2:
The study was conducted to investigate the effect of conservative surgery of ovarian endometriomas before an ICSI cycle. Ninety-nine patients with endometriomas who were referred to an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle were enrolled in the study. The patients were prospectively randomized into two groups; group I (49 patients) underwent conservative ovarian surgery before the ICSI cycle and group II (50 patients) underwent the ICSI cycle directly. The stimulation was started 3 months after the operation in group I and directly in group II. In the ovarian surgery group, stimulation was significantly longer (14.0 days in group I and 10.8 days in group II; P = 0.001), total recombinant FSH dose was significantly higher (4575 IU in group I and 3675 IU in group II; P = 0.001), and mean number of mature oocytes was significantly lower (7.8 in group I and 8.6 in group II; P = 0.032). There was no difference in terms of fertilization (86% in group I and 88% in group II), implantation (16.5% in group I and 18.5% in group II) and pregnancy rates (34% in group I and 38% in group II). Ovarian surgery resulted in longer stimulation, higher FSH requirement and lower oocyte number, but fertilization, pregnancy and implantation rates did not differ between the groups.


Title 3:
Aspiration of ovarian endometriomas before intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Abstract 3:
To investigate whether aspiration of ovarian endometriomas before controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) improves intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes.
                Prospective study.
                University hospital.
                A prospective analysis of 171 patients with ovarian endometriosis and tubal factor infertility were divided into four groups: aspiration of endometriomas at the beginning of COH in patients with ovarian endometriomas and no history of previous surgery (n = 41) (group 1); nonaspirated endometriomas (n = 40) (group 2); history of ovarian surgery for endometriomas in patients without ovarian endometriomas at the beginning of COH (n = 44) (group 3); and tubal factor infertility (n = 46) (control group 4).
                Aspiration of endometriomas.
                Clinical parameters, characteristics of COH, and ICSI results were analyzed.
                We observed higher levels of E(2) on the day of hCG injection after aspiration of endometriomas compared with nonaspirated endometriomas. When we compared all endometriomas and tubal factor (control) groups, we observed a lower number of total follicles (>17 mm) and metaphase II (MII) oocytes in nonaspirated and resected endometrioma groups and a longer duration of COH in the nonaspirated endometrioma group compared with the tubal factor group. Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were similar among all groups.
                In the current study, all patients with endometriomas had significantly lower numbers of MII oocytes compared with those in patients with tubal factor infertility. We propose that aspiration of endometriomas before COH neither reduces the amount of gonadotropins nor increases the number of follicles >17 mm, the number of MII oocytes retrieved, the implantation rates, or the clinical pregnancy rates. Resection of small endometriomas (1-6 cm) may not present any additional benefits to the IVF-ICSI cycle outcomes.


Title 4:
GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols for stage I-II endometriosis and endometrioma in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.
Abstract 4:
To investigate the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with GnRH antagonist or GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) in mild-to-moderate endometriosis and endometrioma.
                Prospective randomize trial.
                A private IVF center.
                A total of 246 ICSI cycles in 246 patients were divided into three groups: women with mild-to-moderate endometriosis (n = 98); women who had ovarian surgery for endometrioma (n = 81); women with endometrioma and no history of previous surgery (n = 67).
                Patients in each group were randomized to COH with either triptrolein or cetrorelix.
                Clinical parameters, characteristics of COH, and ICSI results were analyzed.
                Outcomes of COH with both GnRH antagonist and GnRH-a were similar in patients with mild-to-moderate endometriosis. Implantation rates were 15.9% vs. 22.6% and clinical pregnancy rates were 27.5% vs. 39% with GnRH antagonist and GnRH-a protocols, respectively, in patients who had ovarian surgery for endometrioma. Implantation rates were 12.5% vs. 14.8% and clinical pregnancy rates were 20.5% vs. 24.2% with GnRH antagonist and GnRH-a protocols, respectively, in patients with endometrioma and no history of ovarian surgery.
                Considering the implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, COH with both GnRH antagonist and GnRH-a protocols may be equally effective in patients with mild-to-moderate endometriosis and endometrioma who did and did not undergo ovarian surgery.
There was no evidence of an effect on reproductive outcomes in any of the four included trials. Further RCTs of management of endometrioma in women undergoing ART are required.