You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A Survey of Gene Prioritization Tools for Mendelian and Complex Human Diseases 
Chapter Title:  Prioritization Strategies 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  Various studies (such as genetic linkage or 'omics'-based approaches) generate large lists of candidate genes, of which only a minority may be biologically relevant for a phenotype or disease of interest. This Review discusses computational tools for gene prioritization, emphasizing key considerations for how biologists can incorporate these tools into their research, and it includes hands-on tutorials. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  Bioinformatics aids in the understanding of the biological processes of living beings and the genetic architecture of human diseases. The discovery of disease-related genes improves the diagnosis and therapy design for the disease. To save the cost and time involved in the experimental verification of the candidate genes, computational methods are employed for ranking the genes according to their likelihood of being associated with the disease. Only top-ranked genes are then verified experimentally. A variety of methods have been conceived by the researchers for the prioritization of the disease candidate genes, which differ in the data source being used or the scoring function used for ranking the genes. A review of various aspects of computational disease gene prioritization and its research issues is presented in this article. The aspects covered are gene prioritization process, data sources used, types of prioritization methods, and performance assessment methods. This article provides a brief overview and acts as a quick guide for disease gene prioritization.

Literature Review:
In previous works, gene prioritization tools have been classified based on the scope of their application (generic or disease-specific)  , types of evidence sources used BIB001 , approaches (filter-based selection or ranking)  , BIB002 and method types (network analysis, similarity profiling or text-mining) BIB002 , BIB003 . In this review, we propose two classifications of gene prioritization tools: (i) by assumptions they rely on, and (ii) by data repesentay use. It is important to note that the proposed categories are not mutually exclusive, and the purpose of this chapter is to provide the reader with a general idea on the most popular gene prioritization approaches.