You will be presented with a collection of medical randomized controlled trial (RCT) reports addressing a shared clinical question -- for instance, the efficacy of a medical intervention on a disease or condition. Given the titles and abstracts of these reports, your task is to generate the conclusion of the systematic review article synthesizing the key findings. Your conclusion should be a few sentences long. In your response, include only the conclusion and no other text. The RCT reports are below.



Title 1:
Use of a vaginal sponge during aerobic exercises in patients with stress urinary incontinence
Abstract 1:
A newly marketed vaginal sponge intended to support the urethra was tested during aerobic exercise in a group of 6 women suffering from stress urinary incontinence . The patients performed half an hour of aerobic exercises on 2 consecutive days , with and without the vaginal sponge . A pad was worn during exercise and weighed before and after . Without the vaginal sponge the patients had a mean loss of 7 g ( range 2–18 g ) during exercise . With the vaginal sponge in situ there was no leakage . The sponge can be recommended for use during sports in patients with mild to moderate incontinence


Title 2:
A new intravaginal device for stress incontinence in women
Abstract 2:
Objective To compare two versions of the same type of disposable intravaginal device ( the Conveen Continence Guard , CCG , and the Contrelle Continence Tampon , CCT , Coloplast a/s , Humlebæk , Denmark ) for treating stress incontinence in women
Two small trials compared a mechanical device with no treatment and although they suggested that use of a mechanical device might be better than no treatment , the evidence for this was inconclusive .
While at three months , there were more withdrawals from the device-only group , at 12 months group differences between the groups were not sustained on any measure .
The place of mechanical devices in the management of urinary incontinence remains in question .
There was also insufficient evidence in favour of one device over another and little evidence to compare mechanical devices with other forms of treatment