You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
This paper addresses the problem of learning a task from demonstration. We adopt the framework of inverse reinforcement learning, where tasks are represented in the form of a reward function. Our contribution is a novel active learning algorithm that enables the learning agent to query the expert for more informative demonstrations, thus leading to more sample-efficient learning. For this novel algorithm (Generalized Binary Search for Inverse Reinforcement Learning, or GBS-IRL), we provide a theoretical bound on sample complexity and illustrate its applicability on several different tasks. To our knowledge, GBS-IRL is the first active IRL algorithm with provable sample complexity bounds. We also discuss our method in light of other existing methods in the literature and its general applicability in multi-class classification problems. Finally, motivated by recent work on learning from demonstration in robots, we also discuss how different forms of human feedback can be integrated in a transparent manner in our learning framework.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is the problem of learning the reward function underlying a Markov Decision Process given the dynamics of the system and the behaviour of an expert. IRL is motivated by situations where knowledge of the rewards is a goal by itself (as in preference elicitation) and by the task of apprenticeship learning (learning policies from an expert). In this paper we show how to combine prior knowledge and evidence from the expert's actions to derive a probability distribution over the space of reward functions. We present efficient algorithms that find solutions for the reward learning and apprenticeship learning tasks that generalize well over these distributions. Experimental results show strong improvement for our methods over previous heuristic-based approaches.
[1] introduced (BIRL), where the IRL problem is cast as a Bayesian inference problem. Given a prior distribution over possible target tasks, the algorithm uses the demonstration by the expert as evidence to compute the posterior distribution over tasks and identify the target task. Unfortunately, the Monte-Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) algorithm used to approximate the posterior distribution is computationally expensive, as it requires extensive sampling of the space of possible rewards. To avoid such complexity, several posterior works have departed from the BIRL formulation and instead determine the task that maximizes the likelihood of the observed demonstration .