You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
While neural networks have achieved high performance in different learning tasks, their accuracy drops significantly in the presence of small adversarial perturbations to inputs. Defenses based on regularization and adversarial training are often followed by new attacks to defeat them. In this paper, we propose attack-agnostic robustness certificates for a multi-label classification problem using a deep ReLU network. Although computing the exact distance of a given input sample to the classification decision boundary requires solving a non-convex optimization, we characterize two lower bounds for such distances, namely the simplex certificate and the decision boundary certificate. These robustness certificates leverage the piece-wise linear structure of ReLU networks and use the fact that in a polyhedron around a given sample, the prediction function is linear. In particular, the proposed simplex certificate has a closed-form, is differentiable and is an order of magnitude faster to compute than the existing methods even for deep networks. In addition to theoretical bounds, we provide numerical results for our certificates over MNIST and compare them with some existing upper bounds.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: While neural networks have achieved high accuracy on standard image classification benchmarks, their accuracy drops to nearly zero in the presence of small adversarial perturbations to test inputs. Defenses based on regularization and adversarial training have been proposed, but often followed by new, stronger attacks that defeat these defenses. Can we somehow end this arms race? In this work, we study this problem for neural networks with one hidden layer. We first propose a method based on a semidefinite relaxation that outputs a certificate that for a given network and test input, no attack can force the error to exceed a certain value. Second, as this certificate is differentiable, we jointly optimize it with the network parameters, providing an adaptive regularizer that encourages robustness against all attacks. On MNIST, our approach produces a network and a certificate that no attack that perturbs each pixel by at most = 0.1 can cause more than 35 test error.

[2]: We propose a method to learn deep ReLU-based classifiers that are provably robust against norm-bounded adversarial perturbations (on the training data; for previously unseen examples, the approach will be guaranteed to detect all adversarial examples, though it may flag some non-adversarial examples as well). The basic idea of the approach is to consider a convex outer approximation of the set of activations reachable through a norm-bounded perturbation, and we develop a robust optimization procedure that minimizes the worst case loss over this outer region (via a linear program). Crucially, we show that the dual problem to this linear program can be represented itself as a deep network similar to the backpropagation network, leading to very efficient optimization approaches that produce guaranteed bounds on the robust loss. The end result is that by executing a few more forward and backward passes through a slightly modified version of the original network (though possibly with much larger batch sizes), we can learn a classifier that is provably robust to any norm-bounded adversarial attack. We illustrate the approach on a toy 2D robust classification task, and on a simple convolutional architecture applied to MNIST, where we produce a classifier that provably has less than 8.4 test error for any adversarial attack with bounded @math norm less than @math . This represents the largest verified network that we are aware of, and we discuss future challenges in scaling the approach to much larger domains.

[3]: Recent work has shown that it is possible to train deep neural networks that are verifiably robust to norm-bounded adversarial perturbations. Most of these methods are based on minimizing an upper bound on the worst-case loss over all possible adversarial perturbations. While these techniques show promise, they remain hard to scale to larger networks. Through a comprehensive analysis, we show how a careful implementation of a simple bounding technique, interval bound propagation (IBP), can be exploited to train verifiably robust neural networks that beat the state-of-the-art in verified accuracy. While the upper bound computed by IBP can be quite weak for general networks, we demonstrate that an appropriate loss and choice of hyper-parameters allows the network to adapt such that the IBP bound is tight. This results in a fast and stable learning algorithm that outperforms more sophisticated methods and achieves state-of-the-art results on MNIST, CIFAR-10 and SVHN. It also allows us to obtain the first verifiably robust model on a downscaled version of ImageNet.

[4]: Neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples and researchers have proposed many heuristic attack and defense mechanisms. We address this problem through the principled lens of distributionally robust optimization, which guarantees performance under adversarial input perturbations. By considering a Lagrangian penalty formulation of perturbing the underlying data distribution in a Wasserstein ball, we provide a training procedure that augments model parameter updates with worst-case perturbations of training data. For smooth losses, our procedure provably achieves moderate levels of robustness with little computational or statistical cost relative to empirical risk minimization. Furthermore, our statistical guarantees allow us to efficiently certify robustness for the population loss. For imperceptible perturbations, our method matches or outperforms heuristic approaches.
A number of certifiable'' defense mechanisms have been developed for certain classifiers. [1] harden a two-layer classifier using semidefinite programming, and [3]9 proposes a convex duality-based approach to adversarial training that works on sufficiently small adversarial perturbations with a quadratic adversarial loss, while [2] considers training a robust classifier using the convex outer adversarial polytope. [3] shows how applying interval bound propagation during training, combined with MILP-based exact verification, can lead to provably robust networks. These provable defenses, although very insightful, are either restrictive or are computationally expensive.