You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Bandwidth-starved multicore chips have become ubiquitous. It is well known that the performance of stencil codes can be improved by temporal blocking, lessening the pressure on the memory interface. We introduce a new pipelined approach that makes explicit use of shared caches in multicore environments and minimizes synchronization and boundary overhead. Benchmark results are presented for three current x86-based microprocessors, showing clearly that our optimization works best on designs with high-speed shared caches and low memory bandwidth per core. We furthermore demonstrate that simple bandwidth-based performance models are inaccurate for this kind of algorithm and employ a more elaborate, synthetic modeling procedure. Finally we show that temporal blocking can be employed successfully in a hybrid shared distributed-memory environment, albeit with limited benefit at strong scaling.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Stencil-based kernels constitute the core of many scientific applications on block-structured grids. Unfortunately, these codes achieve a low fraction of peak performance, due primarily to the disparity between processor and main memory speeds. We examine several optimizations on both the conventional cache-based memory systems of the Itanium 2, Opteron, and Power5, as well as the heterogeneous multicore design of the Cell processor. The optimizations target cache reuse across stencil sweeps, including both an implicit cache oblivious approach and a cache-aware algorithm blocked to match the cache structure. Finally, we consider stencil computations on a machine with an explicitly-managed memory hierarchy, the Cell processor. Overall, results show that a cache-aware approach is significantly faster than a cache oblivious approach and that the explicitly managed memory on Cell is more efficient: Relative to the Power5, it has almost 2x more memory bandwidth and is 3.7x faster.

[2]: Time skewing is a compile-time optimization that can provide arbitrarily high cache hit rates for a class of iterative calculations, given a sufficient number of time steps and sufficient cache memory. Thus, it can eliminate processor idle time caused by inadequate main memory bandwidth. In this article, we give a generalization of time skewing for multiprocessor architectures, and discuss time skewing for multilevel caches. Our generalization for multiprocessors lets us eliminate processor idle time caused by any combination of inadequate main memory bandwidth, limited network bandwidth, and high network latency, given a sufficiently large problem and sufficient cache. As in the uniprocessor case, the cache requirement grows with the machine balance rather than the problem size. Our techniques for using multilevel caches reduce the LI cache requirement, which would otherwise be unacceptably high for some architectures when using arrays of high dimension.

[3]: We present a strategy, called recursive prismatic time skewing, that increase temporal reuse at all memory hierarchy levels, thus improving the performance of scientific codes that use iterative methods. Prismatic time skewing partitions iteration space of multiple loops into skewed prisms with both spatial and temporal (or convergence) dimensions. Novel aspects of this work include: multi-dimensional loop skewing; handling carried data dependences in the skewed loops without additional storage; bi-directional skewing to accommodate periodic boundary conditions; and an analysis and transformation strategy that works inter-procedurally. We combine prismatic skewing with a recursive blocking strategy to boost reuse at all levels in a memory hierarchy. A preliminary evaluation of these techniques shows significant performance improvements compared both to original codes and to methods described previously in the literature. With an inter-procedural application of our techniques, we were able to reduce total primary cache misses of a large application code by 27 and secondary cache misses by 119 .

[4]: In this report we propose a parallel cache oblivious spatial and temporal blocking algorithm for the lattice Boltzmann method in three spatial dimensions. The algorithm has originally been proposed by (1999) and divides the space-time domain of stencil-based methods in an optimal way, independently of any external parameters, e.g., cache size. In view of the increasing gap between processor speed and memory performance this approach offers a promising path to increase cache utilisation. We find that even a straightforward cache oblivious implementation can reduce memory traffic at least by a factor of two if compared to a highly optimised standard kernel and improves scalability for shared memory parallelisation. Due to the recursive structure of the algorithm we use an unconventional parallelisation scheme based on task queuing.

[5]: We present a cache oblivious algorithm for stencil computations, which arise for example in finite-difference methods. Our algorithm applies to arbitrary stencils in n-dimensional spaces. On an "ideal cache" of size Z, our algorithm saves a factor of Θ(Z1 n) cache misses compared to a naive algorithm, and it exploits temporal locality optimally throughout the entire memory hierarchy.

[6]:
Improving the performance of stencil codes by temporal blocking is not a new idea, and many publications have studied different methods in depth [2] [3] [2]1 [2]0 [1] @. Conventional temporal blocking performs multiple updates on a small block of the computational domain before proceeding to the next block [2]1 @. This strategy has the important drawback that in-cache stencil updates are not naturally overlapped with loads and stores to main memory, leading to under-utilization of the memory interface. Cache-oblivious algorithms as proposed by [2]0 have the attractive property of being independent of cache sizes, but they come at the cost of irregular block access patterns, which cause many data TLB misses. This was shown for a 3D lattice Boltzmann (LB) application kernel in Ref. [4] @.