You will be provided with the titles and abstracts of a collection of medical RCT reports studying a clinical question -- for instance, the efficacy of an intervention on some medical outcome. Please write a few sentences synthesizing the findings of these reports, which could serve as a conclusion section for a systematic review article. Your response should not include any other text. The RCT reports are below.



Title 1:
Safety of early pain relief for acute abdominal pain.
Abstract 1:
(a) to determine the efficacy of papaveretum in treating pain when administered early to patients presenting with acute abdominal pain and (b) to assess its effect on subsequent diagnosis and management.
                Prospective, randomised, placebo controlled study.
                Walsgrave Hospital, Coventry.
                100 consecutive patients with clinically significant abdominal pain who were admitted as emergencies to a surgical firm.
                Intramuscular injection of up to 20 mg papaveretum or an equivalent volume of saline.
                Pain and tenderness scores, assessment of patient comfort, accuracy of diagnosis, and management decisions.
                Median pain and tenderness scores were lower after papaveretum (pain score 8.3 in control group and 3.1 in treatment group, p < 0.0001; tenderness score 8.1 in control group and 5.1 in treatment group, p < 0.0001). Forty eight patients were deemed to be comfortable after papaveretum compared with nine after saline. Incorrect diagnoses and management decisions applied to two patients after papaveretum compared with nine patients after saline.
                Early administration of opiate analgesia to patients with acute abdominal pain can greatly reduce their pain. This does not interfere with diagnosis, which may even be facilitated despite a reduction in the severity of physical signs. These patients should not be denied effective treatment.


Title 2:
Intravenous morphine for early pain relief in patients with acute abdominal pain.
Abstract 2:
To determine whether morphine affects evaluation or outcome for patients with acute abdominal pain.
                Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled administration of morphine sulfate (MS) or normal saline (NS) in the setting of acute abdominal pain. The study was performed at a military ED with an annual census of 60,000 visits. Patients > or = 18 years old who had abdominal pain for < or = 48 hours were included. Patients who were allergic to MS or who had systolic blood pressures < 90 mm Hg were excluded. The physicians indicated a provisional diagnosis, a differential diagnosis, and a provisional disposition. Study solution was titrated to the patient's assessment of adequate analgesia (up to a volume equivalent of 20 mg of MS); pain response was monitored using a visual analog scale (VAS). The patients were followed until diagnosis occurred or symptoms resolved.
                Of 75 patients enrolled, 71 completed the study; 35 patients received MS and 36 received NS. More than half (44; 62%) of the patients were admitted from the ED; 28 patients underwent surgery. The VAS pain level improved more for the MS group, 3.9 +/- 2.8 cm, than it did for the NS group, 0.8 +/- 1.5 cm (p < 0.01). Study solution dose was less in the MS group than it was in the NS group, 1.5 +/- 0.5 mL vs 1.8 +/- 0.4 mL (p < 0.01). There was no difference between the groups when comparing accuracy of provisional or differential diagnosis with that of final diagnosis. Differences between provisional and actual dispositions were the same in all groups. There were 3 diagnostic or management errors in each group.
                When compared with saline placebo, the administration of MS to patients with acute abdominal pain effectively relieved pain and did not alter the ability of physicians to accurately evaluate and treat patients.


Title 3:
Morphine analgesia in patients with acute appendicitis: a randomised double-blind clinical trial.
Abstract 3:
The administration of analgesics to patients with acute abdominal pain due to acute appendicitis is controversial. A study was undertaken to assess the analgesic effect of morphine in patients with acute appendicitis.
                A randomised double-blind clinical trial was conducted in Sina hospital, a general teaching hospital, from January 2004 to March 2005. Patients scheduled for appendectomy were randomised to receive 0.1 mg/kg morphine sulfate or saline (0.9%) to a maximum dose of 10 mg over a 5 min period. Patients were examined by surgeons not involved in their care before and after drug administration and their pain intensity and signs were recorded at each visit. The physicians were also asked to indicate their own treatment plan. The main outcome measures were pain intensity using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and signs of acute appendicitis. A favourable reduction in VAS score was defined as a change of >13 mm.
                Of the 71 patients enrolled in the study, 35 were allocated to receive morphine and 36 to receive placebo. One patient left the hospital before receiving morphine. No significant differences were seen between the two groups with regard to age, sex and initial VAS score. A more favourable change in VAS score was reported in the morphine group with a significantly greater reduction in the median VAS score than in the placebo group. Morphine administration did not cause significant changes in patients' signs or in the physicians' plans or diagnoses. No adverse events were seen in either group.
                Morphine can reduce pain in patients with acute appendicitis without affecting diagnostic accuracy. Trial registration number: NCT00477061.


Title 4:
Effects of morphine analgesia on diagnostic accuracy in Emergency Department patients with abdominal pain: a prospective, randomized trial.
Abstract 4:
Because of concerns about masking important physical findings, there is controversy surrounding whether it is safe to provide analgesia to patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain. The purpose of this study was to address the effects of analgesia on the physical examination and diagnostic accuracy for patients with abdominal pain.
                The study was a prospective, double-blind clinical trial in which adult Emergency Department (ED) patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain were randomized to receive placebo (control group, n = 36) or morphine sulphate (MS group, n = 38). Diagnostic and physical examination assessments were recorded before and after a 60-minute period during which study medication was titrated. Diagnostic accuracy and physical examination changes were compared between groups using univariate statistical analyses.
                There were no differences between control and MS groups with respect to changes in physical or diagnostic accuracy. The overall likelihood of change in severity of tenderness was similar in MS (37.7%) as compared with control (35.3%) patients (risk ratio [RR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-1.78). MS patients were no more likely than controls to have a change in pain location (34.0% versus 41.2%, RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.50-1.36). Diagnostic accuracy did not differ between MS and control groups (64.2% versus 66.7%, RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73-1.27). There were no differences between groups with respect to likelihood of any change occurring in the diagnostic list (37.7% versus 31.4%, RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.71-2.05). Correlation with clinical course and final diagnosis revealed no instance of masking of physical examination findings.
                Results of this study support a practice of early provision of analgesia to patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain.
                Copyright 2003 by the American College of Surgeons


Title 5:
The use of analgesics in patients with acute abdominal pain.
Abstract 5:
Analgesics in patients with acute abdominal pain are often withheld for fear that they may change physical examination findings and thus may be unsafe. We conducted a randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled trial to investigate changes in physical examination following the administration of placebo, 5 mg, or 10 mg of morphine to 49 patients with acute abdominal pain. One patient was withdrawn secondary to inadequate documentation. Of the 48 patients who completed the trial, a statistically significant change in physical examination was noted in both groups receiving analgesics, but not in the placebo group. No adverse events or delays in diagnosis were attributed to the administration of analgesics. We conclude that physical examination does change after the administration of analgesics in patients with acute abdominal pain and that a larger study is needed to evaluate analgesic safety in this subpopulation of emergency department patients.


Title 6:
Acute appendicitis: influence of early pain relief on the accuracy of clinical and US findings in the decision to operate--a randomized trial.
Abstract 6:
To determine the influence of early pain relief on the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US) and on the appropriateness of the surgical decision.
                A prospective randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial with morphine was conducted. A visual analog scale was used to evaluate pain in 340 patients aged 16 years or older. US was performed with a standardized protocol. Diagnosis was confirmed at histologic analysis or, in the patients released without surgery, at follow-up.
                One hundred seventy-five patients were injected with morphine, and 165 were injected with the placebo. Pain relief was stronger in the morphine group. In the morphine group, US had lower (71.1%) sensitivity (difference, -9.5%; 95% CI, -18.5%, -0.5%) and higher (65.2%) specificity (difference, 11.4%; 95% CI, 1.0%, 21.8%). This group had also a higher positive predictive value (64.6%) and a lower negative predictive value (71.4%), but the differences between this group and the placebo group were not statistically significant. Among female patients, the decision to operate was appropriate more often in the morphine group (75.8%), but the difference between this group and the placebo group was not statistically significant (5.1%; 95% CI, -7.4%, 17.6%). In male patients and overall, opiate analgesia did not influence the appropriateness of the decision. The appropriateness to discharge patients without surgery was 100% in all groups.
                Morphine does not improve US-based diagnosis of appendicitis.


Title 7:
Randomized clinical trial of morphine in acute abdominal pain.
Abstract 7:
Administration of analgesia to patients with acute abdominal pain is controversial. We test the hypothesis that morphine given to emergency department (ED) patients with acute abdominal pain will reduce discomfort and improve clinically important diagnostic accuracy.
                Pain was measured with a standard 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale. ED patients with acute abdominal pain were randomized in a double-blind fashion to 0.1 mg/kg intravenous morphine or placebo. The primary endpoint was the difference between the 2 study arms in clinically important diagnostic accuracy. Clinically important diagnostic accuracy was defined a priori by its complement, clinically important diagnostic error, using 2 independent, blinded investigators to identify any discordance between the provisional and final diagnoses that might adversely affect the patient's health status. The provisional diagnosis was provided by an ED attending physician, who examined the patient only once, 15 minutes after administration of the study agent. The final diagnosis was obtained through follow-up at least 6 weeks after the index ED visit.
                We randomized 160 patients, of whom 153 patients were available for analysis, 78 patients in the morphine group and 75 patients in the placebo group. Baseline features were similar in both groups, including initial median visual analog scale scores of 98 mm and 99 mm. The median decrease in visual analog scale score at 15 minutes was 33 mm in the morphine group and 2 mm in the placebo group. There were 11 instances of diagnostic discordance in each group, for a clinically important diagnostic accuracy of 86% (67/78) in the morphine group and 85% (64/75) in the placebo group. The difference in clinically important diagnostic accuracy between the 2 groups was 1% (95% confidence interval [CI] -11% to 12%). Analysis by efficacy and intention to treat yielded similar results. Kappa for interobserver concordance in classification of clinically important diagnostic accuracy was 0.94 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.00). No patients required naloxone.
                Although administration of intravenous morphine to adult ED patients with acute abdominal pain could lead to as much as a 12% difference in diagnostic accuracy, equally favoring opioid or placebo, our data are most consistent with the inference that morphine safely provides analgesia without impairing clinically important diagnostic accuracy.


Title 8:
Prospective randomized study of analgesic use for ED patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain.
Abstract 8:
Giving an analgesic to patients with right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain causes greater alteration of abdominal signs predictive of appendicitis than placebo. A randomized double-blinded controlled trial of 68 patients who received either tramadol or placebo. Absence or presence of seven abdominal signs (tenderness on light and deep palpation, tenderness in the RLQ and elsewhere, rebound, cough, and percussion tenderness) and pain (100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) at 0 and 30 minutes were recorded. The predictive value of each physical finding (PF) was measured using an 11-point PF score weighted by likelihood ratios. There was significant reduction in mean VAS of 14.2 mm (95% CI 5.6 to 22.8) in analgesic group versus 6.5 mm (95% CI 1.6 to 11.4) in placebo group. The analgesic group had less normalization of signs as measured by the PF score in all patients [32 of 154 (20.8%) versus 40 of 121 (33.1 %) (P = .031)] and in those with proven appendicitis [4 of 33 (12.1%) versus 10/22 (45.5%) (P = .014)]. Parenteral use of tramadol in emergency department patients with RLQ pain resulted in significant levels of pain reduction without concurrent normalisation of abdominal examination findings indicative of acute appendicitis.
The use of opioid analgesics in the therapeutic diagnosis of patients with AAP does not increase the risk of diagnosis error or the risk of error in making decisions regarding treatment.