You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
This paper addresses the problem of learning a task from demonstration. We adopt the framework of inverse reinforcement learning, where tasks are represented in the form of a reward function. Our contribution is a novel active learning algorithm that enables the learning agent to query the expert for more informative demonstrations, thus leading to more sample-efficient learning. For this novel algorithm (Generalized Binary Search for Inverse Reinforcement Learning, or GBS-IRL), we provide a theoretical bound on sample complexity and illustrate its applicability on several different tasks. To our knowledge, GBS-IRL is the first active IRL algorithm with provable sample complexity bounds. We also discuss our method in light of other existing methods in the literature and its general applicability in multi-class classification problems. Finally, motivated by recent work on learning from demonstration in robots, we also discuss how different forms of human feedback can be integrated in a transparent manner in our learning framework.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: In this paper we propose a novel gradient algorithm to learn a policy from an expert's observed behavior assuming that the expert behaves optimally with respect to some unknown reward function of a Markovian Decision Problem. The algorithm's aim is to find a reward function such that the resulting optimal policy matches well the expert's observed behavior. The main difficulty is that the mapping from the parameters to policies is both nonsmooth and highly redundant. Resorting to sub differentials solves the first difficulty, while the second one is overcome by computing natural gradients. We tested the proposed method in two artificial domains and found it to be more reliable and efficient than some previous methods.

[2]: In this paper, we apply tools from inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) to the problem of learning from (unlabeled) demonstration trajectories of behavior generated by varying "intentions" or objectives. We derive an EM approach that clusters observed trajectories by inferring the objectives for each cluster using any of several possible IRL methods, and then uses the constructed clusters to quickly identify the intent of a trajectory. We show that a natural approach to IRL—a gradient ascent method that modifies reward parameters to maximize the likelihood of the observed trajectories—is successful at quickly identifying unknown reward functions. We demonstrate these ideas in the context of apprenticeship learning by acquiring the preferences of a human driver in a simple highway car simulator.

[3]: Inverse reinforcement learning addresses the general problem of recovering a reward function from samples of a policy provided by an expert demonstrator. In this paper, we introduce active learning for inverse reinforcement learning. We propose an algorithm that allows the agent to query the demonstrator for samples at specific states, instead of relying only on samples provided at "arbitrary" states. The purpose of our algorithm is to estimate the reward function with similar accuracy as other methods from the literature while reducing the amount of policy samples required from the expert. We also discuss the use of our algorithm in higher dimensional problems, using both Monte Carlo and gradient methods. We present illustrative results of our algorithm in several simulated examples of different complexities.

[4]: Recent research has shown the benefit of framing problems of imitation learning as solutions to Markov Decision Problems. This approach reduces learning to the problem of recovering a utility function that makes the behavior induced by a near-optimal policy closely mimic demonstrated behavior. In this work, we develop a probabilistic approach based on the principle of maximum entropy. Our approach provides a well-defined, globally normalized distribution over decision sequences, while providing the same performance guarantees as existing methods. We develop our technique in the context of modeling real-world navigation and driving behaviors where collected data is inherently noisy and imperfect. Our probabilistic approach enables modeling of route preferences as well as a powerful new approach to inferring destinations and routes based on partial trajectories.
The aforementioned maximum likelihood approaches of [3] and [2] take advantage of the underlying IRL problem structure and derive simple gradient-based algorithms to determine the maximum likelihood task representation. Two closely related works are the of [4] and the of [1] . While the former selects the task representation that maximizes the likelihood of the observed expert behavior, under the maximum entropy distribution, the latter explores a gradient-based approach to IRL, but the where the task representation is selected so as to induce a behavior as similar as possible to the expert behavior.