You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A Review of Protocol Implementations and Energy Efficient Cross-Layer Design for Wireless Body Area Networks 
Chapter Title:  MAC Layer Adaptation Schemes 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  This paper proposes S-MAC, a medium-access control (MAC) protocol designed for wireless sensor networks. Wireless sensor networks use battery-operated computing and sensing devices. A network of these devices will collaborate for a common application such as environmental monitoring. We expect sensor networks to be deployed in an ad hoc fashion, with individual nodes remaining largely inactive for long periods of time, but then becoming suddenly active when something is detected. These characteristics of sensor networks and applications motivate a MAC that is different from traditional wireless MACs such as IEEE 802.11 in almost every way: energy conservation and self-configuration are primary goals, while per-node fairness and latency are less important. S-MAC uses three novel techniques to reduce energy consumption and support self-configuration. To reduce energy consumption in listening to an idle channel, nodes periodically sleep. Neighboring nodes form virtual clusters to auto-synchronize on sleep schedules. Inspired by PAMAS, S-MAC also sets the radio to sleep during transmissions of other nodes. Unlike PAMAS, it only uses in-channel signaling. Finally, S-MAC applies message passing to reduce contention latency for sensor-network applications that require store-and-forward processing as data move through the network. We evaluate our implementation of S-MAC over a sample sensor node, the Mote, developed at University of California, Berkeley. The experiment results show that, on a source node, an 802.11-like MAC consumes 2-6 times more energy than S-MAC for traffic load with messages sent every 1-10 s. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  In this paper we describe T-MAC, a contention-based Medium Access Control protocol for wireless sensor networks. Applications for these networks have some characteristics (low message rate, insensitivity to latency) that can be exploited to reduce energy consumption by introducing an activesleep duty cycle. To handle load variations in time and location T-MAC introduces an adaptive duty cycle in a novel way: by dynamically ending the active part of it. This reduces the amount of energy wasted on idle listening, in which nodes wait for potentially incoming messages, while still maintaining a reasonable throughput.We discuss the design of T-MAC, and provide a head-to-head comparison with classic CSMA (no duty cycle) and S-MAC (fixed duty cycle) through extensive simulations. Under homogeneous load, T-MAC and S-MAC achieve similar reductions in energy consumption (up to 98%) compared to CSMA. In a sample scenario with variable load, however, T-MAC outperforms S-MAC by a factor of 5. Preliminary energy-consumption measurements provide insight into the internal workings of the T-MAC protocol. 
3. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB003):  Summary form only given. In many sensor network applications the major traffic pattern consists of data collected from several source nodes to a sink through a unidirectional tree. We propose DMAC, an energy efficient and low latency MAC that is designed and optimized for such data gathering trees in wireless sensor networks. We first show that previously proposed MAC protocols for sensor networks that utilize activation/sleep duty cycles suffer from a data forwarding interruption problem, whereby not all nodes on a multihop path to the sink are notified of data delivery in progress, resulting in significant sleep delay. DMAC is designed to solve the interruption problem and allow continuous packet forwarding by giving the sleep schedule of a node an offset that depends upon its depth on the tree. DMAC also adjusts the duty cycles adaptively according to the traffic load in the network. We further propose a data prediction mechanism and the use of more-to-send (MTS) packets in order to alleviate problems pertaining to channel contention and collisions. Our simulation results show that by exploiting the application-specific structure of data gathering trees in sensor networks, DMAC provides significant energy savings and latency reduction while ensuring high data reliability. 
4. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB004):  This work proposes wiseMAC(wireless sensor MAC) for the downlink of infrastructure wireless sensor networks. WiseMAC is a novel energy efficient medium access control protocol based on synchronized preamble sampling. The trade-off between power consumption and delay is analyzed, focusing on low traffic. WiseMAC is compared analytically with the power management protocol used in the IEEE 802.15.4 ZigBee standard. It is shown that WiseMAC can provide a significantly lower power consumption for the same delay. 
5. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB005):  In this paper we present X-MAC, a low power MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Standard MAC protocols developed for duty-cycled WSNs such as BMAC, which is the default MAC protocol for TinyOS, employ an extended preamble and preamble sampling. While this “low power listening” approach is simple, asynchronous, and energy-efficient, the long preamble introduces excess latency at each hop, is suboptimal in terms of energy consumption, and suffers from excess energy consumption at nontarget receivers. X-MAC proposes solutions to each of these problems by employing a shortened preamble approach that retains the advantages of low power listening, namely low power communication, simplicity and a decoupling of transmitter and receiver sleep schedules. We demonstrate through implementation and evaluation in a wireless sensor testbed that X-MAC’s shortened preamble approach significantly reduces energy usage at both the transmitter and receiver, reduces per-hop latency, and offers additional advantages such as flexible adaptation to both bursty and periodic sensor data sources. 
6. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB006):  Past research has shown that Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA) is not a particularly favorable environment for cooperative networks. This observation suggests that other medium access schemes, like scheduled TDMA, may enable cooperation to yield more substantial improvements over conventional techniques. From this point of view, a hybrid cooperative-network coding protocol (called Phoenix, and so far only proposed for CSMA) has been adapted for Personal Area Network communications. The improvements brought by cooperative-NC techniques in this setting have roughly doubled with respect to the CSMA scenario, with gains of over 20% with respect to standard cooperative systems. 
7. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB007):  We introduce a novel Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol for Automatic Repeat reQuest-based (ARQ-based) cooperative wireless sensor networks. Using network coding techniques, we achieve a better network performance in terms of energy efficiency without compromising the offered Quality of Service (QoS). The proposed solution is compared to other cooperative schemes, while analytical and simulation results are provided to evaluate our protocol.

Literature Review:
One of the most referenced low power MAC protocols in the literature is Sensor-MAC (S-MAC) BIB002 . S-MAC is a synchronous protocol where the basic idea is for nodes to sleep periodically and have each node somehow aware of all other nodes sleeping patterns. S-MAC is designed to save energy by periodically switching between active and sleep states, thereby making tradeoffs between energy and latency according to traffic conditions. Energy consumption is minimized by utilizing a synchronization mechanism that maintains a common sleep schedule between neighbor nodes in low duty cycle operations. S-MAC uses Request to Send (RTS)/Clear to Send (CTS) and a virtual carrier sense technique similar to 802.11 to avoid overhearing and provide adaptive listening. The protocol presents a message passing technique that separates a long message into small fragments and transmits them in a burst to loosely coupled nodes. S-MAC uses three techniques to achieve low power duty cycling: periodic sleep, virtual clustering and adaptive listening. S-MAC delivers significant energy improvements over 802.11 but the duty cycle is required to be synchronized to a specific traffic load. Thus its performance suffers under varying traffic loads. Timeout-MAC (T-MAC) BIB003 introduces an adaptive duty cycle that dynamically ends the active part of the cycle to reduce the energy wasted on idle listening. T-MAC improves the design of S-MAC by shortening the active period if the channel is idle. In S-MAC the nodes will remain awake through the entire active period even when not receiving or transmitting data. T-MAC improves on S-MAC by listening to the channel for only a short time after the synchronization phase. The node will return to sleep mode if no packet is received during this window. T-MAC also uses an adaptive listening technique where nodes are able to immediately pass the data avoiding the timeout introduced in S-MAC. This adaptation of the duty cycle improves the energy and throughput performance under varying traffic loads. T-MAC uses one fifth of the energy used by S-MAC. However these gains come at the cost of reduced throughput and increased latency. Lu et al. developed DMAC BIB004 and identified inefficiency in S-MAC and T-MAC concerning idle listening where nodes remain active or asleep for longer than they need to. The protocol identified efficiency (low latency and low energy) in WSNs using data gathering trees. DMAC was designed to solve the interruption problem where nodes that are out of hearing range of both sender and receiver are unaware of ongoing data transmissions and will, therefore, go to sleep until the next cycle. DMAC allows continuous packet forwarding by giving the sleep schedule of a node an offset that depends upon the depth of the tree. DMAC also adjusts the duty cycles adaptively according to the traffic load in the network. Simulation results show that DMAC achieves both energy savings and low latency in comparison to other protocols when used with data gathering trees in WSNs. Some MAC protocols such as Berkeley-MAC (B-MAC)  and WiseMAC BIB005 use the preamble element of a packet to adapt the duty cycle to ensure nodes only wake up when absolutely necessary. B-MAC is an example of an asynchronous technique where the protocol appends a long enough preamble to the data packets to ensure the destination is active at least once while the preamble is transmitted. B-MAC is a simple CSMA-based protocol that utilizes low power listening and an extended preamble to deliver efficient power management without the need for synchronization. As in S-MAC and T-MAC, nodes have an awake and a sleep period, but in B-MAC if a node wishes to transmit it precedes the data packet with an extended preamble that is slightly longer than the sleep period of the receiver. During the awake period, the channel is sensed and if a preamble is detected the node continues in awake mode to receive the data. B-MAC suffers from the overhearing problem and also suffers from an introduced overhead as all nodes in the surrounding area must listen to the long preambles. WiseMAC is a contention-based MAC protocol that performs best in channels with low or variable traffic. WiseMAC's wake up scheme consists of short periodic duty cycles that enable the nodes to sense the carrier for a preamble signal. All nodes in the network sample the medium with a common basic cycle duration T, but their wake up patterns are independent and unsynchronized. WiseMAC ensures all nodes learn the sampling schedule of the network and store this within a table at each node. As each node is aware of the overall schedule, a node initiates transmission at the right time with a wakeup preamble of minimized duration Tp. The use of the preamble sampling technique and short wake-up preamble in WiseMAC can mitigate the overhearing problem in periods of high traffic. WiseMAC showed that for the same delay, preamble sampling lowered power consumption by 57% when compared to 802.15.4. WiseMAC solves many of the issues associated with low power channel access but does not provide a mechanism by which nodes can adapt to changing traffic patterns. Buettner et al. BIB006 highlighted a number of disadvantages of using a long preamble in low power listening: • Suboptimal energy consumption at both sender and receiving nodes. • Overhearing issues, causing excess energy consumption at non-target nodes. • Excess latency at each hop as nodes need to wait for the end of the preamble to either check if the packet is for them or to receive the data. The problem is magnified over a multi-hop path. X-MAC is an improvement on the concepts of B-MAC where the protocol reduces the length of the preamble by the addition of key data that negates the node listening to the full preamble as in B-MAC. X-MAC avoids overhearing by inserting the destination address in the preamble. Nodes listening to a part of the preamble detect that the data packet is not intended for them (early acknowledgement) and go back to sleep. The shortened preamble approach used in X-MAC reduces energy usage at both transmitter and receiver nodes, reduces per hop latency and offers advantages such as flexible adaptation to both bursty and periodic data sources. Network coding allows the intermediate nodes in a WSN to not only forward data packets but to perform limited processing on incoming packets before being transmitted to the destination node. The concept has been shown to improve the performance within WSNs by increasing throughput via the transmission of more information with fewer packet transmissions BIB008 BIB001 . Antonopoulos et al. BIB008 propose a Network-Coding based Cooperative Automatic Repeat reQuest (ARQ) MAC protocol for WSN (NCCARQ-WSN) that uses relay nodes to coordinate retransmissions. The protocol is CSMA based and is therefore, compatible with 802.15.4. The protocol uses less control packets than comparable ARQ based protocols whilst delivering increased energy efficiency without compromising QoS. NC-PAN BIB007 is a TDMA based hybrid cooperative network coded protocol that takes advantage of ARQ techniques. The protocol exploits relaying phases to serve node traffic via network coded transmissions. Performance gains of up to 35% have been identified in terms of throughput and latency when compared to other cooperative schemes such as B-PAN and C-PAN. A summary of the key characteristics of the MAC protocols mentioned above is shown in Table 2 . Table 2 . Low power MAC protocol.