You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Review on automatic speech recognition quality estimation (ASR QE).The application of ASR QE in ASR system combination for both single-microphone multiple-ASR system task and on multiple-microphone multiple-ASR system task.Ranking the system combination inputs based on predicted quality.Management of tied ranks.Automatically finding the optimum level of combination for each segment. Recognizer Output Voting Error Reduction (ROVER) has been widely used for system combination in automatic speech recognition (ASR). In order to select the most appropriate words to insert at each position in the output transcriptions, some ROVER extensions rely on critical information such as confidence scores and other ASR decoder features. This information, which is not always available, highly depends on the decoding process and sometimes tends to overestimate the real quality of the recognized words. In this paper we propose a novel variant of ROVER that takes advantage of ASR quality estimation (QE) for ranking the transcriptions at segment level instead of: i) relying on confidence scores, or ii) feeding ROVER with randomly ordered hypotheses. We first introduce an effective set of features to compensate for the absence of ASR decoder information. Then, we apply QE techniques to perform accurate hypothesis ranking at segment-level before starting the fusion process. The evaluation is carried out on two different tasks, in which we respectively combine hypotheses coming from independent ASR systems and multi-microphone recordings. In both tasks, it is assumed that the ASR decoder information is not available. The proposed approach significantly outperforms standard ROVER and it is competitive with two strong oracles that exploit prior knowledge about the real quality of the hypotheses to be combined. Compared to standard ROVER, the absolute WER improvements in the two evaluation scenarios range from 0.5 to 7.3 .

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Interest within the automatic speech recognition (ASR) research community has recently focused on the recognition of speech captured with a microphone located in the medium field, rather than being mounted on a headset and positioned next to the speaker’s mouth. The capacity to recognize such speech is a primary requirement in making ASR a viable modality for socalled ubiquitous computing. This is a natural application for multiple microphones whose signals can be combined in different ways: On the signal side, combination can be accomplished by beamforming techniques using a microphone array or by blind source separation. On the word hypothesis side, combination can be achieved through confusion network combination. In this work, we compare the effectiveness of the several combination techniques, and compare their performance to that achieved with a close talking microphone.

[2]: A multi-microphone hypothesis combination approach, suitable for the distant-talking scenario, is presented in this paper. The method is based on the inter-microphone agreement of information, extracted at speech recognition level. Particularly, temporal information is exploited to organize the clusters that shape the resulting confusion network, and to reduce the global hypothesis search space. As a result, a single combined confusion network is generated from multiple lattices. The approach offers a novel perspective to solutions based on confusion network combination. The method was evaluated in a simulated domestic environment equipped with largely spaced microphones. The experimental evidence suggests that results, comparable or, in some cases, better than the state of the art, can be achieved under optimal configurations with the proposed method.

[3]: The use of multiple distant microphones has been widely studied for meeting recognition. The two most widely used approaches are 1) combination at the signal level, via blind beamforming, followed by recognition of a single enhanced audio signal, and 2) independent, logically parallel recognition of the multiple audio sources followed by hypothesis-level combination. In this paper we investigate how these two approaches compare for state-of-the-art recognition systems applied to meeting data from the two most recent NIST Rich Transcription evaluations. Our results show that beamforming is the superior approach, giving more accurate results while being inherently less computationally demanding. We then propose a hybrid approach that leverages both beamforming and signal-level diversity for systemcombination, and showthat this approach gives gains over either of the old methods.
An alternative to signal-level combination and best microphone selection is represented by hypothesis-level combination. Along this direction, [1] proposes to use CNC for lecture transcriptions and [3] extends it with a hybrid approach that leverages beamforming and signal-level diversity to transcribe meetings. In [2] , inter-microphone agreement is used to build a confusion network from multiple lattices and improve ASR in a domotic application.