You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A Survey on Personalized PageRank Computation Algorithms 
Chapter Title:  F. OTHER METHODS 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  Link prediction, personalized graph search, fraud detection, and many such graph mining problems revolve around the computation of the most "similar" k nodes to a given query node. One widely used class of similarity measures is based on random walks on graphs, e.g., personalized pagerank, hitting and commute times, and simrank. There are two fundamental problems associated with these measures. First, existing online algorithms typically examine the local neighborhood of the query node which can become significantly slower whenever high-degree nodes are encountered (a common phenomenon in real-world graphs). We prove that turning high degree nodes into sinks results in only a small approximation error, while greatly improving running times. The second problem is that of computing similarities at query time when the graph is too large to be memory-resident. The obvious solution is to split the graph into clusters of nodes and store each cluster on a disk page; ideally random walks will rarely cross cluster boundaries and cause page-faults. Our contributions here are twofold: (a) we present an efficient deterministic algorithm to find the k closest neighbors (in terms of personalized pagerank) of any query node in such a clustered graph, and (b) we develop a clustering algorithm (RWDISK) that uses only sequential sweeps over data files. Empirical results on several large publicly available graphs like DBLP, Citeseer and Live-Journal (~ 90 M edges) demonstrate that turning high degree nodes into sinks not only improves running time of RWDISK by a factor of 3 but also boosts link prediction accuracy by a factor of 4 on average. We also show that RWDISK returns more desirable (high conductance and small size) clusters than the popular clustering algorithm METIS, while requiring much less memory. Finally our deterministic algorithm for computing nearest neighbors incurs far fewer page-faults (factor of 5) than actually simulating random walks. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  Graphs can be found in applications like social networks, bibliographic networks, and biological databases. Understanding the relationship, or links, among graph nodes enables applications such as link prediction, recommendation, and spam detection. In this paper, we propose link-based similarity join (LS-join), which extends the similarity join operator to link-based measures. Given two sets of nodes in a graph, the LS-join returns all pairs of nodes that are highly similar to each other, with respect to an e-function. The e-function generalizes common measures like Personalized PageRank (PPR) and SimRank (SR). We study an efficient LS-join algorithm on a large graph. We further improve our solutions for PPR and SR, which involve expensive randomwalk operations. We validate our solutions by performing extensive experiments on three real graph datasets. 
3. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB003):  We propose a new algorithm, FAST-PPR, for computing personalized PageRank: given start node s and target node t in a directed graph, and given a threshold δ, it computes the Personalized PageRank π_s(t) from s to t, guaranteeing that the relative error is small as long πs(t) > δ. Existing algorithms for this problem have a running-time of Ω(1/δ in comparison, FAST-PPR has a provable average running-time guarantee of O(√d/δ) (where d is the average in-degree of the graph). This is a significant improvement, since δ is often O(1/n) (where n is the number of nodes) for applications. We also complement the algorithm with an Ω(1/√δ) lower bound for PageRank estimation, showing that the dependence on δ cannot be improved. We perform a detailed empirical study on numerous massive graphs, showing that FAST-PPR dramatically outperforms existing algorithms. For example, on the 2010 Twitter graph with 1.5 billion edges, for target nodes sampled by popularity, FAST-PPR has a 20 factor speedup over the state of the art. Furthermore, an enhanced version of FAST-PPR has a 160 factor speedup on the Twitter graph, and is at least 20 times faster on all our candidate graphs. 
4. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB004):  We formalize and illustrate the general concept of algorithmic anti-differentiation: given an algorithmic procedure, e.g., an approximation algorithm for which worst-case approximation guarantees are available or a heuristic that has been engineered to be practically-useful but for which a precise theoretical understanding is lacking, an algorithmic anti-derivative is a precise statement of an optimization problem that is exactly solved by that procedure. We explore this concept with a case study of approximation algorithms for finding locally-biased partitions in data graphs, demonstrating connections between min-cut objectives, a personalized version of the popular PageRank vector, and the highly effective "push" procedure for computing an approximation to personalized PageRank. We show, for example, that this latter algorithm solves (exactly, but implicitly) an l1-regularized l2-regression problem, a fact that helps to explain its excellent performance in practice. We expect that, when available, these implicit optimization problems will be critical for rationalizing and predicting the performance of many approximation algorithms on realistic data. 
5. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB005):  We present new algorithms for Personalized PageRank estimation and Personalized PageRank search. First, for the problem of estimating Personalized PageRank (PPR) from a source distribution to a target node, we present a new bidirectional estimator with simple yet strong guarantees on correctness and performance, and 3x to 8x speedup over existing estimators in experiments on a diverse set of networks. Moreover, it has a clean algebraic structure which enables it to be used as a primitive for the Personalized PageRank Search problem: Given a network like Facebook, a query like "people named John," and a searching user, return the top nodes in the network ranked by PPR from the perspective of the searching user. Previous solutions either score all nodes or score candidate nodes one at a time, which is prohibitively slow for large candidate sets. We develop a new algorithm based on our bidirectional PPR estimator which identifies the most relevant results by sampling candidates based on their PPR; this is the first solution to PPR search that can find the best results without iterating through the set of all candidate results. Finally, by combining PPR sampling with sequential PPR estimation and Monte Carlo, we develop practical algorithms for PPR search, and we show via experiments that our algorithms are efficient on networks with billions of edges. 
6. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB006):  Personalized PageRank (PPR) computation is a fundamental operation in web search, social networks, and graph analysis. Given a graph G, a source s, and a target t, the PPR query Π(s, t) returns the probability that a random walk on G starting from s terminates at t. Unlike global PageRank which can be effectively pre-computed and materialized, the PPR result depends on both the source and the target, rendering results materialization infeasible for large graphs. Existing indexing techniques have rather limited effectiveness; in fact, the current state-of-the-art solution, BiPPR, answers individual PPR queries without pre-computation or indexing, and yet it outperforms all previous index-based solutions. ::: ::: Motivated by this, we propose HubPPR, an effective indexing scheme for PPR computation with controllable tradeoffs for accuracy, query time, and memory consumption. The main idea is to pre-compute and index auxiliary information for selected hub nodes that are often involved in PPR processing. Going one step further, we extend HubPPR to answer top-k PPR queries, which returns the k nodes with the highest PPR values with respect to a source s, among a given set T of target nodes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that compared to the current best solution BiPPR, HubPPR achieves up to 10x and 220x speedup for PPR and top-k PPR processing, respectively, with moderate memory consumption. Notably, with a single commodity server, HubPPR answers a top-k PPR query in seconds on graphs with billions of edges, with high accuracy and strong result quality guarantees. 
7. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB007):  Given a graph G, a source node s and a target node t, the personalized PageRank (PPR) of t with respect to s is the probability that a random walk starting from s terminates at t. A single-source PPR (SSPPR) query enumerates all nodes in G, and returns the top-k nodes with the highest PPR values with respect to a given source node s. SSPPR has important applications in web search and social networks, e.g., in Twitter's Who-To-Follow recommendation service. However, SSPPR computation is immensely expensive, and at the same time resistant to indexing and materialization. So far, existing solutions either use heuristics, which do not guarantee result quality, or rely on the strong computing power of modern data centers, which is costly. Motivated by this, we propose FORA, a simple and effective index-based solution for approximate SSPPR processing, with rigorous guarantees on result quality. The basic idea of FORA is to combine two existing methods Forward Push (which is fast but does not guarantee quality) and Monte Carlo Random Walk (accurate but slow) in a simple and yet non-trivial way, leading to an algorithm that is both fast and accurate. Further, FORA includes a simple and effective indexing scheme, as well as a module for top-k selection with high pruning power. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FORA is orders of magnitude more efficient than its main competitors. Notably, on a billion-edge Twitter dataset, FORA answers a top-500 approximate SSPPR query within 5 seconds, using a single commodity server.

Literature Review:
There are several studies that cannot be categorized into the above categories. The study on finding the top-k nearest nodes based on PPR is one of the most important examples BIB003 . In this study, they propose a unified algorithm to solve the top-k problem for several random walkbased node similarity (i.e., proximity) measures including the SimRank BIB001 , Discounted Hitting Time, and PPR. First, they define the unified form generalizing those proximity measures between two nodes n 1 and n 2 as follows: where S d n i , n j = a d k=1 λ k P k n i , n j + b Here, a and b are real-valued constants (a > 0), and λ ∈ (0, 1). For PPR,a = c, λ = 1 − c, P k n i , n j = P k − → v i [j], and b = 0. From the above formulation, we can compute the upper bound of S n i , n j as follows: Using the above upper bound information, we can prune out unpromising nodes in the early stages of the algorithm. This algorithm is impressive in terms of time and space. It runs fast and requires no auxiliary data structure. The biPPR BIB006 , HubPPR BIB007 , and FORA BIB008 solve the same problem. Like the previous algorithm, they also estimate bound information to reduce computation cost. These algorithms are based on the combination of the push scheme and Monte-Carlo sampling like FAST-PPR BIB004 . The biPPR and HubPPR adopt ReversePush while FORA adopts Forward-Push. There are some optimization techniques such as turning the nodes with high out-degree into sinks to reduce computation time with low approximation error BIB002 and introducing novel approximation schemes such as anti-differentiating approximation algorithms BIB005 .