You are presented with multiple paper abstracts, alongside the associated literature review and chapter titles. Given the provided information, you are going to do a literature review. Please generate a coherent literature review that synthesizes the content, draws connections between different works, highlights major findings, and identifies any gaps in the existing research.

Literature Review Title: A Survey of XML Tree Patterns 
Chapter Title:  Tree pattern 
1. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB001):  To address the needs of data intensive XML applications, a number of efficient tree pattern algorithms have been proposed. Still, most XQuery compilers do not support those algorithms. This is due in part to the lack of support for tree patterns in XML algebras, but also because deciding which part of a query plan should be evaluated as a tree pattern is a hard problem. In this paper, we extend a tuple algebra for XQuery with a tree pattern operator, and present rewrit-ings suitable to introduce that operator in query plans. We demonstrate the robustness of the proposed rewritings under syntactic variations commonly found in queries. The proposed tree pattern operator can be implemented using popular algorithms such as Twig joins and Staircase joins. Our experiments yield useful information to decide which algorithm should be used in a given plan. 
2. Abstract of Cited Paper (BIB002):  XPath expressions define navigational queries on XML data and are issued on XML documents to select sets of element nodes. Due to the wide use of XPath, which is embedded into several languages for querying and manipulating XML data, the problem of efficiently answering XPath queries has received increasing attention from the research community. As the efficiency of computing the answer of an XPath query depends on its size, replacing XPath expressions with equivalent ones having the smallest size is a crucial issue in this direction. This article investigates the minimization problem for a wide fragment of XPath (namely X Plsr), where the use of the most common operators (child, descendant, wildcard and branching) is allowed with some syntactic restrictions. The examined fragment consists of expressions which have not been specifically studied in the relational setting before: neither are they mere conjunctive queries (as the combination of “//” and “*” enables an implicit form of disjunction to be expressed) nor do they coincide with disjunctive ones (as the latter are more expressive). Three main contributions are provided. The “global minimality” property is shown to hold: the minimization of a given XPath expression can be accomplished by removing pieces of the expression, without having to re-formulate it (as for “general” disjunctive queries). Then, the complexity of the minimization problem is characterized, showing that it is the same as the containment problem. Finally, specific forms of XPath expressions are identified, which can be minimized in polynomial time.

Literature Review:
A tree pattern p is a pair p = (t, F ) where: 1) t = (r, N, E) is a data tree; 2) F is a formula that specifies constraints on t's nodes. Basically, a TP captures a useful fragment of XPath BIB003 . Thus, it may be seen as the translation of a user query BIB001 . Translating an XML query plan into a TP is not a simple operation. Some XQueries are written with complex combinations of XPath and FLWOR expressions, and imply more than one TP. Thus, such queries must be broken up into several TPs. Only a single XPath expression can be translated into a single TP. The more complex a query is, the more its translation into TP(s) is difficult BIB002 . Starting from TPs to express user queries in a first stage, and optimize them in a second stage is a very effective solution used in XML query optimization BIB001 .