You will be shown an abstract from a computer science research paper. Given this abstract, your task is to extract all unique entities with the following types:

- "Task": Applications, problems to solve, systems to construct. Examples include "information extraction", "machine reading system", "image segmentation".
- "Method": : Methods, models, systems to use, or tools, components of a system, frameworks. Examples include "language model", "CORENLP", "POS parser".
- "Metric": Metrics, measures, or entities that can express quality of a system / method. Examples include "F1", "BLEU", "Precision", "time complexity".
- "Material": Data, datasets, resources, Corpus, Knowledge base. Examples include "image data", "speech data", "stereo images", "CoNLL", "Wikipedia".
- "OtherScientificTerm": Phrases that are a scientific terms but do not fall into any of the above classes. Examples include "physical or geometric constraints", "qualitative prior knowledge", "tree kernel", "noise".
- "Generic": General terms or pronouns that may refer to a entity but are not themselves informative, often used as connection words. Examples include "model", "approach", "them".

Please return the output as a JSON object of the format: {"type1" : ["example_entity", ...], "type2" : ["example_entity", ...]}. The keys should be entity types and values should be lists of extracted entities belonging to the corresponding type. Entity types with no matching entities should be assigned an empty array [].

For instance, the output might look like: {"Task": ["speech recognition", ...], "Method": ["Conditional random field"], "Material": [], ...}.

Only output the JSON object and do not include any additional text.

Abstract:

We present the first application of the head-driven statistical parsing model of Collins (1999) as a simultaneous language model and parser for large-vocabulary speech recognition. The model is adapted to an online left to right chart-parser for word lattices, integrating acoustic, n-gram, and parser probabilities. The parser uses structural and lexical dependencies not considered by n-gram models, conditioning recognition on more linguistically-grounded relationships. Experiments on the Wall Street Journal treebank and lattice corpora show word error rates competitive with the standard n-gram language model while extracting additional structural information useful for speech understanding.
{"Generic": [], "Material": ["lattice corpora", "Wall Street Journal treebank"], "Method": ["n-gram language model", "simultaneous language model", "n-gram models", "head-driven statistical parsing model", "online left to right chart-parser"], "Metric": ["word error rates"], "OtherScientificTerm": ["structural and lexical dependencies", "structural information", "acoustic , n-gram , and parser probabilities", "word lattices"], "Task": ["speech understanding", "large-vocabulary speech recognition"]}