You will be provided with the titles and abstracts of a collection of medical RCT reports studying a clinical question -- for instance, the efficacy of an intervention on some medical outcome. Please write a few sentences synthesizing the findings of these reports, which could serve as a conclusion section for a systematic review article. Your response should not include any other text. The RCT reports are below.



Title 1:
Successful use of bromocriptine in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy.
Abstract 1:
Six patients with cirrhosis and severe chronic hepatic encephalopathy were treated with bromocriptine. All showed significant overall improvement clinically and in 3, the electroencephalogram became normal. The cerebral blood flow increased significantly from 32.7 +/- 2.4 (mean +/- 1 SE) to 40.5 +/- 1.5 ml/100 g brain/min (P less than 0.05). Similarly, there were significant improvements in the cerebral oxygen consumption from 2.2 +/- 0.4 to 3.3 +/- 0.4 ml/100 g brain/min (P less than 0.02) and in cerebral glucose consumption from 2.1 +/- 0.6 to 6.6 +/- 1.6 mg/100 g brain/min (P less than 0.02). Cross-over to placebo produced overall deterioration, more marked in the patients who had received the active drug for the shorter time period. No serious side effects were seen; the drug was well tolerated in doses of up to 15 mg daily and is a useful treatment for chronic hepatic encephalopathy when the response to conventional therapy has been poor.


Title 2:
Treatment of chronic portal systemic encephalopathy with bromocriptine: a double-blind controlled trial.
Abstract 2:
A randomized double-blind clinical comparison of bromocriptine, a new dopamine agonist, and placebo was performed on 7 cirrhotic patients with chronic portal systemic encephalopathy (PSE). Before given either medication, patients were stabilized with a standard treatment (neomycin and cathartics). Serial semiquantitative assessments were done, including mental state, asterixis, number connection test, electroencephalogram, and ammonia blood levels. Three patients developed signs of precoma while ingesting both placebo and bromocriptine. Two patients experienced precoma only with placebo, and another patient only while taking bromocriptine. One patient remained awake throughout the study. All patients responded initially to neomycin and cathartics. Bromocriptine proved not to be significantly superior to placebo and was always inferior to standard treatment. During treatment with bromocriptine, 3 patients experienced constipation. This may be partially responsible for the ineffectiveness in the treatment of PSE.


Title 3:
Prospective randomised controlled trial of L-dopa and hydrocortisone in fulminant hepatitis.
Abstract 3:
nan


Title 4:
Controlled trial of levodopa in fulminant hepatitis.
Abstract 4:
nan
This review does not provide evidence that dopaminergic agonists are of benefit to patients with acute or chronic hepatic encephalopathy, or fulminant hepatic failure. The review is limited by the small number of trials performed within this field, the low number of patients randomised in each trial, and the low methodological quality of included trials. Accordingly, there is also insufficient evidence to exclude a potential beneficial effect. Dopaminergic agonists should not be used for hepatic encephalopathy, but may be assessed in future randomised clinical trials.