You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Anomaly detection from a driver's perspective when driving is important to autonomous vehicles. As a part of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), it can remind the driver about dangers in a timely manner. Compared with traditional studied scenes such as a university campus and market surveillance videos, it is difficult to detect an abnormal event from a driver's perspective due to camera waggle, abidingly moving background, drastic change of vehicle velocity, etc. To tackle these specific problems, this paper proposes a spatial localization constrained sparse coding approach for anomaly detection in traffic scenes, which first measures the abnormality of motion orientation and magnitude, respectively, and then fuses these two aspects to obtain a robust detection result. The main contributions are threefold, as follows. 1) This work describes the motion orientation and magnitude of the object, respectively, in a new way, which is demonstrated to be better than the traditional motion descriptors. 2) The spatial localization of an object is taken into account considering the sparse reconstruction framework, which utilizes the scene's structural information and outperforms the conventional sparse coding methods. 3) Results of motion orientation and magnitude are adaptively weighted and fused by a Bayesian model, which makes the proposed method more robust and able to handle more kinds of abnormal events. The efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed method are validated by testing on nine difficult video sequences that we captured ourselves. Observed from the experimental results, the proposed method is more effective and efficient than the popular competitors and yields a higher performance.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Multimodal streams of sensory information are naturally parsed and integrated by humans using signal-level feature extraction and higher level cognitive processes. Detection of attention-invoking audiovisual segments is formulated in this work on the basis of saliency models for the audio, visual, and textual information conveyed in a video stream. Aural or auditory saliency is assessed by cues that quantify multifrequency waveform modulations, extracted through nonlinear operators and energy tracking. Visual saliency is measured through a spatiotemporal attention model driven by intensity, color, and orientation. Textual or linguistic saliency is extracted from part-of-speech tagging on the subtitles information available with most movie distributions. The individual saliency streams, obtained from modality-depended cues, are integrated in a multimodal saliency curve, modeling the time-varying perceptual importance of the composite video stream and signifying prevailing sensory events. The multimodal saliency representation forms the basis of a generic, bottom-up video summarization algorithm. Different fusion schemes are evaluated on a movie database of multimodal saliency annotations with comparative results provided across modalities. The produced summaries, based on low-level features and content-independent fusion and selection, are of subjectively high aesthetic and informative quality.

[2]: In this paper, we propose a visual saliency detection algorithm from the perspective of reconstruction errors. The image boundaries are first extracted via super pixels as likely cues for background templates, from which dense and sparse appearance models are constructed. For each image region, we first compute dense and sparse reconstruction errors. Second, the reconstruction errors are propagated based on the contexts obtained from K-means clustering. Third, pixel-level saliency is computed by an integration of multi-scale reconstruction errors and refined by an object-biased Gaussian model. We apply the Bayes formula to integrate saliency measures based on dense and sparse reconstruction errors. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm performs favorably against seventeen state-of-the-art methods in terms of precision and recall. In addition, the proposed algorithm is demonstrated to be more effective in highlighting salient objects uniformly and robust to background noise.

[3]: Visual saliency detection is a challenging problem in computer vision, but one of great importance and numerous applications. In this paper, we propose a novel model for bottom-up saliency within the Bayesian framework by exploiting low and mid level cues. In contrast to most existing methods that operate directly on low level cues, we propose an algorithm in which a coarse saliency region is first obtained via a convex hull of interest points. We also analyze the saliency information with mid level visual cues via superpixels. We present a Laplacian sparse subspace clustering method to group superpixels with local features, and analyze the results with respect to the coarse saliency region to compute the prior saliency map. We use the low level visual cues based on the convex hull to compute the observation likelihood, thereby facilitating inference of Bayesian saliency at each pixel. Extensive experiments on a large data set show that our Bayesian saliency model performs favorably against the state-of-the-art algorithms.

[4]: In this paper, we propose a new method for detecting primary objects in unconstrained videos in a completely automatic setting. Here, we define the primary object in a video as the object that presents saliently in most of the frames. Unlike previous works considering only local saliency detection or common pattern discovery, the proposed method integrates the local visual motion saliency extracted from each frame, global appearance consistency throughout the video, and spatiotemporal smoothness constraint on object trajectories. We first identify a temporal coherent salient region throughout the whole video, and then explicitly learn a global appearance model to distinguish the primary object against the background. In order to obtain high-quality saliency estimations from both appearance and motion cues, we propose a novel self-adaptive saliency map fusion method by learning the reliability of saliency maps from labeled data. As a whole, our method can robustly localize and track primary objects in diverse video content, and handle the challenges such as fast object and camera motion, large scale and appearance variation, background clutter, and pose deformation. Moreover, compared with some existing approaches that assume the object is present in all the frames, our approach can naturally handle the case where the object is present only in part of the frames, e.g., the object enters the scene in the middle of the video or leaves the scene before the video ends. We also propose a new video data set containing 51 videos for primary object detection with per-frame ground-truth labeling. Quantitative experiments on several challenging video data sets demonstrate the superiority of our method compared with the recent state of the arts.
For obtaining robust and superior results, integration of multiple clues or factors is usually adopted in computer vision and machine learning community. Because of close similarity between anomaly map and saliency map, we review some work about multi-saliency fusion here. The straightforward and most intuitive scheme is linear fusion. Evangelopoulos [1] apply this framework to fuse aural, visual and textual saliency. For more elaborate fusion, a Support Vector Machine is trained and used to predict the quality of each saliency map in [4] , and then saliency maps are fused linearly using the quality measure of each map. Besides, Xie [3] merge low and mid level visual saliency within the Bayesian framework, which generates more discriminative saliency map. Furthermore, the Bayesian integration method is also employed in [2] and performs better than the conventional integration strategy.