You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
We describe methods to predict a crowd worker's accuracy on new tasks based on his accuracy on past tasks. Such prediction provides a foundation for identifying the best workers to route work to in order to maximize accuracy on the new task. Our key insight is to model similarity of past tasks to the target task such that past task accuracies can be optimally integrated to predict target task accuracy. We describe two matrix factorization (MF) approaches from collaborative filtering which not only exploit such task similarity, but are known to be robust to sparse data. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets provide feasibility assessment and comparative evaluation of MF approaches vs. two baseline methods. Across a range of data scales and task similarity conditions, we evaluate: 1) prediction error over all workers; and 2) how well each method predicts the best workers to use for each task. Results show the benefit of task routing over random assignment, the strength of probabilistic MF over baseline methods, and the robustness of methods under different conditions.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Crowdsourcing utilizes human ability by distributing tasks to a large number of workers. It is especially suitable for solving data clustering problems because it provides a way to obtain a similarity measure between objects based on manual annotations, which capture the human perception of similarity among objects. This is in contrast to most clustering algorithms that face the challenge of finding an appropriate similarity measure for the given dataset. Several algorithms have been developed for crowdclustering that combine partial clustering results, each obtained by annotations provided by a different worker, into a single data partition. However, existing crowdclustering approaches require a large number of annotations, due to the noisy nature of human annotations, leading to a high computational cost in addition to the large cost associated with annotation. We address this problem by developing a novel approach for crowclustering that exploits the technique of matrix completion. Instead of using all the annotations, the proposed algorithm constructs a partially observed similarity matrix based on a subset of pairwise annotation labels that are agreed upon by most annotators. It then deploys the matrix completion algorithm to complete the similarity matrix and obtains the final data partition by applying a spectral clustering algorithm to the completed similarity matrix. We show, both theoretically and empirically, that the proposed approach needs only a small number of manual annotations to obtain an accurate data partition. In effect, we highlight the trade-off between a large number of noisy crowdsourced labels and a small number of high quality labels.

[2]: Allocating tasks to workers so as to get the greatest amount of high-quality output for as little resources as possible is an overarching theme in crowdsourcing research. Among the factors that complicate this problem is the lack of information about the available workers’ skill, along with unknown difficulty of the tasks to be solved. Moreover, if a crowdsourcing platform customer is limited to a fixed-size worker pool to complete a large batch of jobs such as identifying a particular object in a collection of images or comparing the quality of many pairs of artifacts in crowdsourcing workflows, she inevitably faces the tradeoff between getting a few of these tasks done well or getting many done poorly. In this paper, we propose a framework called JOCR (Joint Crowdsourcing, pronounced as “Joker”) for analyzing joint allocations of many tasks to a pool of workers. JOCR encompasses a broad class of common crowdsourcing scenarios, and we pose the challenge of developing efficient algorithms for it.

[3]: Quality assurance in crowdsourced annotation often involves having a given example labeled multiple times by different workers, then aggregating these labels. Unfortunately, the worker-example label matrix is typically sparse and imbalanced for two reasons: 1) the average crowd worker judges few examples; and 2) few labels are typically collected per example to reduce cost. To address this missing data problem, we propose use of probabilistic matrix factorization (PMF), a standard approach in collaborative filtering. To evaluate our approach, we measure accuracy of consensus labels computed from the input sparse matrix vs. the PMF-inferred complete matrix. We consider both unsupervised and supervised settings. In the supervised case, we evaluate both weighted voting and worker selection. Experiments are performed on both a synthetic data set and a real data set: crowd relevance judgments taken from the 2010 NIST TREC Relevance Feedback Track.

[4]: Inferring user preferences over a set of items is an important problem that has found numerous applications. This work focuses on the scenario where the explicit feature representation of items is unavailable, a setup that is similar to collaborative filtering. In order to learn a user's preferences from his her response to only a small number of pairwise comparisons, we propose to leverage the pairwise comparisons made by many crowd users, a problem we refer to as crowdranking. The proposed crowdranking framework is based on the theory of matrix completion, and we present efficient algorithms for solving the related optimization problem. Our theoretical analysis shows that, on average, only O ( r log m ) pairwise queries are needed to accurately recover the ranking list of m items for the target user, where r is the rank of the unknown rating matrix, r << m . Our empirical study with two real-world benchmark datasets for collaborative filtering and one crowdranking dataset we collected via Amazon Mechanical Turk shows the promising performance of the proposed algorithm compared to the state-of-the-art approaches.

[5]: In crowdsourcing systems, tasks are distributed to networked people to complete such that a company's production cost can be greatly reduced. Obviously, it is not efficient that the amount of time for a worker spent on selecting a task is comparable with that spent on working on a task, but the monetary reward of a task is just a small amount. The available worker history makes it possible to mine workers' preference on tasks and to provide favorite recommendations. Our exploratory study on the survey results collected from Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) shows that workers' histories can reflect workers' preferences on tasks in crowdsourcing systems. Task recommendation can help workers to find their right tasks faster as well as help requesters to receive good quality output quicker. However, previously proposed classification based task recommendation approach only considers worker performance history, but does not explore worker task searching history. In our paper, we propose a task recommendation framework for task preference modeling and preference-based task recommendation, aiming to recommend tasks to workers who are likely to prefer to work on and provide output that accepted by requesters. We consider both worker performance history and worker task searching history to reflect workers' task preference more accurately. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to use matrix factorization for task recommendation in crowdsourcing systems.
Jung and Lease [3] study MF methods to improve the quality of crowdsourced labels, using a PMF model to infer unobserved labels in order to reduce the bias of the existing labels. They do not consider task routing. investigate matrix completion for crowdclustering, and more recently inferring user preferences [1] [4] . [5] consider workers' task selection preferences and propose a task recommendation model based on PMF. However, they motivated their approach on conceptual grounds and did not evaluate it. Most recently, [2] investigate task routing of multiple tasks across a common pool of workers.