You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Human detection and tracking is an essential task for service robots, where the combined use of multiple sensors has potential advantages that are yet to be exploited. In this paper, we introduce a framework allowing a robot to learn a new 3D LiDAR-based human classifier from other sensors over time, taking advantage of a multisensor tracking system. The main innovation is the use of different detectors for existing sensors (i.e. RGB-D camera, 2D LiDAR) to train, online, a new 3D LiDAR-based human classifier, exploiting a so-called trajectory probability. Our framework uses this probability to check whether new detections belongs to a human trajectory, estimated by different sensors and or detectors, and to learn a human classifier in a semi-supervised fashion. The framework has been implemented and tested on a real-world dataset collected by a mobile robot. We present experiments illustrating that our system is able to effectively learn from different sensors and from the environment, and that the performance of the 3D LiDAR-based human classification improves with the number of sensors detectors used.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: We consider a semi-supervised approach to the problem of track classification in dense three-dimensional range data. This problem involves the classification of objects that have been segmented and tracked without the use of a class-specific tracker. This paper is an extended version of our previous work. We propose a method based on the expectation-maximization algorithm: iteratively (1) train a classifier, and (2) extract useful training examples from unlabeled data by exploiting tracking information. We evaluate our method on a large multiclass problem in dense range data collected from natural street scenes. When given only three hand-labeled training tracks of each object class, the final accuracy of the semi-supervised algorithm is comparable to that of the fully supervised equivalent which uses two orders of magnitude more. Further, we show experimentally that the accuracy of a classifier considered as a function of human labeling effort can be substantially improved using this method. Finally, we show that a simple algorithmic speedup based on incrementally updating a boosting classifier can reduce learning time by a factor of three.
The use of machine learning algorithms for tracking has particular advantages. The closest work to ours is [1] , where the authors proposed a semi-supervised learning approach to the problem of track classification in 3D LiDAR data, based on Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. In contrast to our approach, their learning procedure needs a small set of seed tracks and a large set of background tracks, that need to be manually or semi-manually labeled at first, whereas we do not need any hand-labeled data.