You are provided with the abstract of a scientific paper and the abstracts of the papers it references. Your task is to write a Related Work section for the main paper. This section should concisely summarize and integrate the key points from the cited abstracts, reflecting how they relate to the main paper's contributions and context. In your summary, use numerical citation markers like [1], [2], etc., to refer to the corresponding papers.

Main Abstract:
Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) is becoming an attack target of advanced persistent threat (APT). Currently, IIoT logs have not been effectively used for anomaly detection. In this paper, we use blockchain to prevent logs from being tampered with and propose a pvalue-guided anomaly detection approach. This approach uses statistical pvalues to combine multiple heterogeneous log parser algorithms. The weighted edit distance is selected as a score function to calculate the nonconformity score between a log and a predefined event. The pvalue is calculated based on the non-conformity scores which indicate how well a log matches an event. This approach is tested on a large number of real-world HDFS logs and IIoT logs. The experiment results show that abnormal events could be effectively recognized by our pvalue-guided approach.

Cited Abstract(s):
[1]: Logs are imperative in the development and maintenance process of many software systems. They record detailed runtime information that allows developers and support engineers to monitor their systems and dissect anomalous behaviors and errors. The increasing scale and complexity of modern software systems, however, make the volume of logs explodes. In many cases, the traditional way of manual log inspection becomes impractical. Many recent studies, as well as industrial tools, resort to powerful text search and machine learning-based analytics solutions. Due to the unstructured nature of logs, a first crucial step is to parse log messages into structured data for subsequent analysis. In recent years, automated log parsing has been widely studied in both academia and industry, producing a series of log parsers by different techniques. To better understand the characteristics of these log parsers, in this paper, we present a comprehensive evaluation study on automated log parsing and further release the tools and benchmarks for easy reuse. More specifically, we evaluate 13 log parsers on a total of 16 log datasets spanning distributed systems, supercomputers, operating systems, mobile systems, server applications, and standalone software. We report the benchmarking results in terms of accuracy, robustness, and efficiency, which are of practical importance when deploying automated log parsing in production. We also share the success stories and lessons learned in an industrial application at Huawei. We believe that our work could serve as the basis and provide valuable guidance to future research and deployment of automated log parsing.

[2]: Logs, which record runtime information of modern systems, are widely utilized by developers (and operators) in system development and maintenance. Due to the ever-increasing size of logs, data mining models are often adopted to help developers extract system behavior information. However, before feeding logs into data mining models, logs need to be parsed by a log parser because of their unstructured format. Although log parsing has been widely studied in recent years, users are still unaware of the advantages of different log parsers nor the impact of them on subsequent log mining tasks. Thus they often re-implement or even re-design a new log parser, which would be time-consuming yet redundant. To address this issue, in this paper, we study four log parsers and package them into a toolkit to allow their reuse. In addition, we obtain six insightful findings by evaluating the performance of the log parsers on five datasets with over ten million raw log messages, while their effectiveness on a real-world log mining task has been thoroughly examined.
The log parser algorithms have been widely studied in recent years, but there still lacks evaluation methods for multiple algorithm cooperation. In [2] , the authors give four log parser algorithms (SLCT, IPLoM, LKE and LogSig) an evaluation on their effectiveness and accuracy. Their experiment codes and log datasets are publicly available. In [1] , they have made a further research on log parser algorithms evaluation of 13 log parser algorithms on a total of 16 log datasets.