Stergios Adamopoulos 
  
Yanjun Xie 
  
Holger Militz 
email: hmilitz@gwdg.de]
  
Distribution of blue stain in untreated and DMDHEU treated Scots pine sapwood panels after six years of outdoor weathering

published or not. The documents may come     Distribution of blue stain in untreated and DMDHEU treated Scots pine sapwood panels after six years of outdoor weathering

Introduction

Wood for exterior uses is normally protected from abiotic and biotic impacts by application of coating systems. Failure of coatings with time causes photodegradation of the underlying wooden substrate, entry of moisture and liquid water and consequently growth of microorganisms.

The performance of coatings on wood can be improved by chemical treatment of the wood substrate to minimize specific problems such as moisture absorption, swelling and shrinkage, susceptibility to photodegradation and microbial attack [START_REF] Beckers | Performance of finishes on wood that is chemically modified by acetylation[END_REF], Xie et al. 2006).

In a previous publication (Xie et al. 2008), treatment with 1,3-dimethylol-4,5dihydroxyethyleneurea (DMDHEU) resulted in reduced crack formation and less fungal growth in coated Scots pine sapwood panels exposed to weathering for 18 months. The objective of this study was to further investigate how blue stain progresses in coated wood, both untreated and treated with DMDHEU, after six years of weathering.

Materials and Methods

The material used in this study was flat sawn Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) sapwood panels of 250 x 70 x 15 mm 3 (L x T x R). These panels were modified with DMDHEU or methylated DMDHEU (mDMDHEU) to a weight percent gain of ca.

25%. The untreated and the modified panels were then coated with several colours of water-borne acrylic top coatings obtained from Glasurit GmbH, Münster, Germany. Two of them were paints and three were translucent stains. The paints or stains exhibited main differences in colour and solid concentration (Table 1). In order to accelerate the weathering testing, only one thin layer of coating was used for each panel. Four panels per treatment and coating system were exposed. Details on modification, coating and weathering can be found in a previous report (Xie et al. 2008).

After six years of weathering, the cracking on the weathered surfaces of the panels was evaluated according to DIN EN ISO 4628-4 (2007). The evaluation scale ranges from 0 (no cracks) to 5 (dense pattern of cracks).

Visual assessment of the distribution of blue stain was firstly done after crosscutting the panels in various positions lengthwise. To observe the penetration of fungal hyphae, radial sections were prepared with a sliding microtome along large cracks (minimum 1 mm wide), small cracks (less than 1 mm wide) and intact parts on the surfaces. The sections were stained with safranin, mounted on slides and then viewed under a light microscope (Nikon eclipse e600) equipped with a Nikon digital camera (DXM 1200, Nikon Instruments Inc. NY, USA). The presence of blue stain hyphae was noted for the upper part (0-3.5 mm), middle part (3.5-10.5 mm) and lower part (10.5-15 mm) of the radial sections, moving from the front to the reverse surfaces of the panels.

Results

Weathering of coated panels over a six year period caused extensive surface cracking and discoloration due to fungal colonization which was more severe in the case of untreated panels (Fig. 1a, b andc).

Six-year weathering resulted in a failure of the coating film on the untreated sample surfaces, mostly flaking and peeling for acrylic stains but cracking for acrylic paints. The very thin layers of stain coatings were mostly gone; however, the somewhat thicker white and blue paint coatings remained on the surfaces at a higher degree. The coating films on the treated panels displayed a comparable degradation to the one on the untreated controls. After 18 months of weathering, an improved effect of the coating performance due to wood substrate modification was observed (Xie et al. 2008). After six years, such improvement is likely to become obscure due to the thin layer of coatings applied and the failure of coating itself after suffering from a long term surface photodegradation/leaching. The modified wood substrates, however, showed fewer cracks (CR = 3 or 4 in one case, Table 2) with all coating types compared to the untreated panels (CR = 5). This can be attributed to a lower water uptake and moisture sorption and to the higher dimensional stability of the substrate.

The severe cracking of untreated panels enabled fungal spores to reach the wood substrate, germinate and spread widely due to moisture accumulation (Fig. 2a). The fungi started to grow from the front surface of the panels and reached the reverse through the ray cells. Blue stain hyphae were observed in every part (upper, middle, lower) of radial sections taken along both large and small cracks (Table 2). Slightly less blue stain fungi was noted only in the case of blue acrylic paint coating (PB).

In DMDHEU treated panels, the crosscut surfaces showed considerably less stained area which was restricted only close to the wood and coating interface.

Microscopic examination of radial sections along small cracks revealed that the infection was restricted to the upper parts of the panels with hyphae not being able to penetrate further and reach the interior parts (Table 2, Fig. 2b andd). Sectioning along intact parts showed no evidence of blue stain (Table 2, Fig. 2c) suggesting that coating prohibited fungal growth. The extent of fungal penetration was higher for the brown stain coating SB-2 due to a higher crack ranking (CR = 4). The lowest degree of blue stain colonisation in DMDHEU treated panels can be explained by changes in the properties of wood, e.g. reduced water uptake and increased dimensional stability (Xie et al. 2008).

The overall results suggest that it is difficult to examine any improvement in coating performance by wood substrate treatment with DMDHEU or mDMDHEU due to the failure of the coating film itself after six years of outdoor weathering.

However, treatments of wood substrate considerably reduced the growth of blue staining in the wood.

Xie Y, Krause A, Militz H, Mai C (2008) Weathering of uncoated and coated wood treated with methylated 1,3-dimethylol-4,5-dihydroxyethyleneurea(mDMDHEU).

Holz Roh-Werkst 66(6):455-464 

Fig. 1 Fig. 2

 12 Fig. 1 Appearance of the front surfaces of panels after six years of outdoor

Fig. 1

 1 Fig. 1 Appearance of the front surfaces of panels after six years of outdoor weathering: (a) untreated and coated panel with PB, (b) DMDHEU treated and coated panel with SB-3, and (c) mDMDHEU treated and coated panel with PW

Table 1

 1 Characteristics of coating types for topcoat application

	EJWWP472_source					
	Code Type Colour Solvent Binder	Solid concentration (%)	Wet amount (g/m 2 )	Film dry thickness (µm)
	PB	Paint	Blue	Water	Acrylic	40.83	287	53
	PW Paint White	Water	Acrylic	62.49	752	112
	SB-1 Stain Black	Water	Acrylic	29.08	153	28
	SB-2 Stain Brown	Water	Acrylic	44.41	361	41
	SB-3 Stain Black	Water	Acrylic	35.73	213	32

Table 2

 2 Crack ranking and distribution of blue stain in the panels as observed microscopically

Table 1

 1 Characteristics of coating types for topcoat application Tabelle 1 Kenndaten von Beschichtungssystemen der Deckschicht Table 2 Crack ranking and distribution of blue stain in the panels as observed microscopically Tabelle 2 Klassifizierung von Rissen sowie Verteilung von Bläue in den Prüfkörpern nach mikroskopischer Auswertung