Clinical Trial to Determinate Dose, Security and Efficacy or Lenalidomide and Rituximab (LR)-ESHAP in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Clinical Trial to Determinate Dose, Security and Efficacy or Lenalidomide and Rituximab (LR)-ESHAP in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
The purpose of the Phase I of the study is to evaluate the safety and the maximum-tolerated
 dose (MTD) of the combination R-ESHAP with lenalidomide as salvage therapy for patients with
 relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma The purpose of the Phase II of the study
 is to evaluate ORR of LR-ESHAP in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL candidates to
 HDT and ASCT
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
 (NHL), comprising approximately 30% of new cases. Treatment results of DLBCL have
 significantly improved after the introduction of rituximab (R) into CHOP-like,
 anthracycline-based, treatment schedules, and it is now the standard of care. Nevertheless,
 even with current R-CHOP-like treatment, approximately 30-40% of patients will ultimately
 relapse or progress.

 To date, high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is
 the reference treatment for patients with relapsed or primary refractory aggressive B-cell
 NHL, provided the disease is sensitive to second-line chemotherapy. Among patients with
 chemosensitive disease, the remission status at transplant has a significant impact on the
 outcome, because patients in complete remission (CR) before HDT achieve better long-term
 progression-free survival (PFS) than patients who undergo transplantation in partial
 remission (PR). Standard salvage chemotherapy for aggressive lymphoma does not exist.
 Commonly used second-line regimens include dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin (DHAP), ESHAP
 (etoposide, methylprednisone, cytarabine, cisplatin), mini-BEAM (carmustine, etoposide,
 cytarabine, melphalan) and ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide). These regimens produce
 an overall response rate (ORR) of around 60%, and CR rates of 25% to 35%. More effective
 salvage regimens are needed in order to maximize the number of patients in CR prior to ASCT.

 Increasing evidence suggests that rituximab added to salvage chemotherapy improves response
 rates and outcomes in relapsed DLBCL. In a recent randomized phase 3 study, the efficacy of
 adding rituximab to the DHAP-VIM-DHAP regimen was tested in 239 rituximab-naïve patients with
 relapsed or primary refractory aggressive cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20)+ B-cell NHL.
 In 225 evaluable patients, the addition of rituximab to second-line chemotherapy resulted in
 a significant improvement of ORR (75% versus 54%, p=.01) and PFS (52% versus 31% at two
 years, p<.002). Other small phase II trials (with a range of 35-55 patients) investigating
 rituximab in combination with ICE, DHAP or EPOCH have also shown encouraging results.
 However, the patients in these studies had not been previously exposed to rituximab, while at
 present, almost all patients with aggressive B-cell NHL receive rituximab combined with
 first-line chemotherapy.

 In a recent multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed the influence of prior exposure to
 rituximab on response rates and outcomes in 163 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL
 who received Rituximab-ESHAP (R-ESHAP) as salvage therapy with a curative purpose. In this
 study, prior exposure to rituximab did not have an independent effect on response rates to
 R-ESHAP. However, a high proportion (57.4%) of patients who had received prior rituximab
 treatment experienced disease relapse or progression, that translated into a significantly
 worse PFS (17 v 57% at 3 years) and OS (38% v 67% at 3 years) as compared with
 rituximab-naïve patients. This observation was independent of other prognostic factors with
 an impact upon these outcomes, such as disease status at R-ESHAP, age-adjusted International
 Prognostic Index (IPI) or response to R-ESHAP. Results of the CORAL randomised trial
 comparing R-ICE with R-DHAP in 396 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL confirmed that
 exposure to rituximab prior to salvage therapy is associated with a worse outcome . Rituximab
 naïve patients had a 83% response rate and 47% 3-year event-free survival (EFS) compared with
 a 51% response rate and 21% EFS for patients who had received prior rituximab treatment.

 These results suggest that the use of highly effective rituximab-containing primary therapy
 in DLBCL makes it more difficult to salvage patients who are refractory or who relapse. Thus,
 prospective studies incorporating new agents are needed for these patients.

 Lenalidomide:

 Lenalidomide, an analog of thalidomide, is a promising new therapeutic agent that does not
 seem to cause significant somnolence, constipation, and neuropathy, which are usually
 dose-limiting for thalidomide. It has been hypothesized that the mechanism of action of
 lenalidomide includes immunomodulatory, antineoplastic, anti-angiogenic and
 pro-erythropoietic properties. Preclinical as well as clinical observations demonstrate that
 lenalidomide downregulates production of various critical prosurvival cytokines in the tumour
 microenvironment while concurrently promoting activation of T- and natural killer (NK)
 cell-mediated antitumour response. In aggressive lymphomas, lenalidomide was shown to exert
 antiproliferative activity by enhancing the expression of cell cycle regulators, including
 p21 and SPARC, to induce G1 cell cycle arrest, caspase activation, and apoptosis.

 In a recent phase II multicenter trial, 49 patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive
 NHL (diffuse large B-cell, follicular center grade 3, mantle cell, and transformed lymphomas)
 received oral lenalidomide monotherapy, 25 mg once daily on days 1 to 21, every 28 days, for
 52 weeks, until disease progression or intolerance. The most common histology was diffuse
 large B-cell lymphoma. The median age was 65 years (range: 23 to 86). Patients had received a
 median of four prior treatment regimens; 56% were refractory to last therapy and 29% had
 received a prior ASCT. An objective response rate of 35% was observed in 49 treated patients,
 including a 12% rate of complete response/unconfirmed complete response. Responses were
 observed in each aggressive histologic subtype tested (19% ORR in patients with DLBCL). Of
 patients with stable disease or partial response at first assessment, 25% improved with
 continued treatment. Estimated median duration of response was 6.2 months, and median PFS was
 4.0 months. The most common grade 4 adverse events were neutropenia (8.2%) and
 thrombocytopenia (8.2%); the most common grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (24.5%),
 leukopenia (14.3%), and thrombocytopenia (12.2%). The results of this study show that
 lenalidomide monotherapy is active in relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL, with manageable
 side effects.

 A confirmatory international phase II trial (NHL-003) of single-agent lenalidomide was
 performed for patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL that had received at least one
 prior treatment and had measurable disease. Patients received 25 mg oral lenalidomide once
 daily on days 1-21 of every 28-day cycle and continued therapy until disease progression or
 toxicity. 217 patients enrolled and received lenalidomide. The ORR was 35% (77/217), with 13%
 (29/217) CR, 22% (48/217) PR, and 21% (45/217) with stable disease. The ORR for DLBCL was 28%
 (30/108), 42% (24/57) for mantel-cell lymphoma, 42% (8/19) for grade 3 follicular lymphoma,
 and 45% (15/33) for peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Median progression-free survival for all 217
 patients was 3.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-5.1]. For 77 responders, the median
 response duration lasted 10.6 months (95% CI 7.0-NR). Median response duration was not
 reached in 29 patients who achieved a CR and in responding patients with follicular lymphoma
 (FL)-III or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The most common adverse event was myelosuppression
 with grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 17% and 6%, respectively.The results of this
 international study confirm that lenalidomide is active in heavily pre-treated patients with
 relapsed or refractory DLBCL with manageable side effects.

 The results from these phase II studies demonstrate the activity of oral lenalidomide
 monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL and warrant further
 investigation of lenalidomide therapy, alone or in combination, in the treatment of patients
 with aggressive NHL. It was recently reported that when used in combination, lenalidomide
 (maximum-tolerated dose [MTD] 20 mg/day, 21 of 28 days) and rituximab produce a robust
 response rate in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma, with a favourable toxicity
 profile. In multiple myeloma (MM) patients, several phase 1/2 trials have evaluated
 lenalidomide in conjunction with chemotherapy, such as melphalan and prednisone (MTD 10
 mg/day, 21 days every 4 to 6 weeks), doxorubicin and dexamethasone (MTD 25 mg/day with
 G-Colony-stimulating factors (CSF), 21 of 28 days), or doxorubicin, vincristine and
 dexamethasone (MTD 10 mg/day, 21 days every 4 to 6 weeks). These combinations provide a
 considerable proportion of high-quality responses with substantial durability in patients
 with MM and overcomes several well-known adverse prognostic factors. A phase 1 study showed
 that lenalidomide can be safely combined with R-CHOP (R2CHOP) in the initial chemotherapy for
 aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Preliminary results of ongoing phase 2 suggest that the addition
 of lenalidomide to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone
 (RCHOP) could overcome the negative prognostic impact of the non-germinal center B-cell (GCB)
 phenotype on outcome.

 Thus, we propose an open-label, non-randomized, multicentre, escalating-dose, Phase I trial,
 to investigate the safety and the maximum-tolerated dose of the combination R-ESHAP with
 lenalidomide as salvage therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell
 lymphoma candidates to stem-cell transplantation. We expect haematological toxicity as the
 main form of toxicity, as shown in previous studies. We must also take into account the
 possible adverse influence of lenalidomide treatment on stem cell mobilization. In patients
 with MM, prior lenalidomide therapy has been associated with high rates of failure in stem
 cell mobilization with filgrastim. Remobilization with chemotherapy and filgrastim is usually
 successful in these patients.

 After selection of the maximum-tolerated dose of the combination R-ESHAP with lenalidomide a
 phase 2 of the study will be performed in order to evaluate the ORR of LR-ESHAP.

 Partial data verification will be performed. A Clinical Research Organization (Dynamic
 Science S.L) Standard Operating Procedures will be used to manage the clinical trial.

 Categorical variables were show by absolute and relative frequencies, including the
 confidence interval of 95%.

 For the description of the continuous variables will be use the mean, standard deviation,
 median, mode, minimum and maximum, including the total number of valid values.

 In the case of compare subgroups of patients, will be use for quantitative variables
 parametric tests or nonparametric as characteristics of the variables under study. For
 qualitative variables will be use Chi-square test.

 Statistical analysis was planned with the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) package version
 9.1 or later.
Inclusion Criteria:

 1. The patient must, at the investigator's opinion, be able to meet all requirements of
 the clinical trial.

 2. Patients must give voluntarily informed consent before performing any test test that
 is not part of routine care of patients.

 3. Age between 18 and 70 years.

 4. Candidate for treatment with high-dose QT and HSCT .

 5. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LDCGB) histological diagnosis according to the WHO
 classification ( see Annex 8).

 6. Refractory lymphoma or relapsed after 1st line treatment consisting of rituximab
 combined with a regimen of chemotherapy (CT scan ) including anthracyclines. :

 Relapse is defined as recurrence of lymphoma after obtaining complete response (RC)
 with 1st line treatment . In these cases, LDCGB histologic confirmation at the time of
 relapse is recommended

 Refractory lymphoma be considered if it meets one of the following criteria :

 partial response after at least 6 cycles of 1st line regimen . They may also include
 patients in partial response after 4 cycles if the researcher believes that the
 response is suboptimal, and patients with stage I- II if they have received 3 cycles
 of R- QT + affection field radiotherapy .

 stable disease after at least 3 cycles of 1st line regimen . progression during
 treatment of 1st line , defined as response criteria for malignant lymphoma 2007 (see
 Annex 9)

 7. CT scan evidence of at least two clearly demarcated lesions with a diameter of 1.5 cm,
 or 1 well-defined lesion with a diameter > 2 cm .

 8. Evidence of positive lesions by PET, coincident with the anatomical areas affected by
 CT scan .

 9. Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG) less than or equal to 2.

 10. Resolution of toxicities caused by the 1st line regimen to less than or equal to grade
 1.

 11. Women of childbearing age ( see Appendix 12) must: Obtain a negative pregnancy test
 before starting medically supervised therapy study. Must accept continuing pregnancy
 tests conducted during the course of the study and after the end of study therapy .
 This applies even if the patient practices complete and continued abstinence .

 They must either commit to continued abstinence or heterosexual sex (which should be
 reviewed monthly ) or agree to use and be capable of complying with effective contraception
 without interruption, 28 days before starting the study drug during the study therapy
 (including during periods of dose interruptions ) , and for 28 days after discontinuation
 of study therapy .

 12 male patients ( see Appendix 12) must:

 -  Accept to use a latex condom during any sexual relations with women of childbearing
 potential , even if they have had a vasectomy , while participating in this study,
 during dose interruptions and after discontinuation of treatment .

 -  Accept refrain from donating sperm while participating in this study and for a time
 after cessation of treatment (see specific data ) . 13. All patients must: Understand
 that the study drug could potentially have a teratogenic risk . Agree to abstain from
 donating blood while they are taking the treatment and after discontinuation of study
 drug therapy .

 Agree not to share study medication with anyone else. For advice on precautions against
 pregnancy and potential risks of fetal exposure

 Exclusion Criteria:

 1. Patients that previously received any antitumor agent for the treatment of LDCGB except
 : I ) rituximab in combination with regimen including anthracyclines II ) radiotherapy as
 part of first-line treatment .

 2 Previously received any of the following treatments in the 28 days prior to the test
 regime : I ) antitumor chemotherapeutic agents ; II ) radiotherapy , unless limited to a
 maximum dose of < or =10 Gy to control severe life-threatening symptoms ; III )
 glucocorticoid except equivalent doses < or = 1 mg / kg of prednisolone / day with duration
 < or = 7 days; iv ) any therapeutic agent under investigation.

 3. Known involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) by lymphoma. 4. Presence of
 abnormal or clinically significant cardiac disease, such as acute myocardial infarction or
 unstable angina within 6 months prior to initiation of treatment with LR- ESHAP , grade III
 or IV heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension or history of poor compliance with
 antihypertensive treatment , uncontrolled treated arrhythmias, except , with the exception
 of extra systoles or minor conduction abnormalities.

 5. Any other serious or uncontrolled medical condition , such as diabetes, uncontrolled
 active infection, significant cerebrovascular disease, poorly controlled psychiatric
 disease, etc. .

 6. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to any of the agents of the treatment under
 evaluation.

 7. Presence of any limitations that compromise the patient's ability to comply with
 treatment .

 8. Positive serology for HIV or Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg ) . If
 negative for HBsAg but HBcAb positive and HBsAb negative, a HB DNA test will be performed
 and if positive the subject will be excluded. Note: If HBcAb positive and HBsAb positive,
 which is indicative of a past infection, the subject can be included 9. Active Hepatitis C
 (RNA positive serum) . If RNA positive result would exclude the patient from the trial in
 cases of patients with positive serology for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV). If the load ( RNA )
 were HCV negative patients could be included in the study.

 10. Prior history of malignancy other than to LDCGB (except basal or squamous cell skin and
 in situ carcinoma of the cervix or breast ) unless the patient free of disease beyond 5
 years are.

 11 Changes in laboratory values ??that might involve unacceptable risks or compromise
 compliance with the protocol , including: platelets < 50 x 109 / L or neutrophils <1 x 109
 / L , unless attributed to infiltration by lymphoma bone marrow (MO) .

 or creatinine > 1.5 times the normal upper limit . or Total bilirubin > 2 times the upper
 limit of normal or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2.5 times the normal upper limit or
 alkaline phosphatase > 2.5 times the normal upper limit , unless it is attributed to
 hepatic infiltration by lymphoma.

 12. Pregnant or breast-feeding. 13. Females of childbearing potential who do not agree to
 undergo pregnancy tests or repeated use effective birth control while included in the
 clinical trial.

 14. Males patients (whose sexual partners are women of childbearing potential ) that not
 accept use effective birth control methods while included in the clinical trial.