Evaluation of a Brief Marriage Intervention for Internal Behavioral Health Consultants in Military Primary Care
Evaluation of a Brief Marriage Intervention for Internal Behavioral Health Consultants in Military Primary Care
The psychological health of military members is a critical element of force health protection
 and readiness. Frequent deployments and high operations tempo at home strain the
 relationships and families of today's military more than ever before (e.g., Karney & Crown,
 2007). Since 2001 the likelihood of divorce in the Air Force increased with the number of
 days that Airmen were deployed (Karney & Crown, 2007). Distressed relationships not only
 adversely affect members' adjustment and readiness (e.g., Hoge et al., 2006) but also are
 centrally implicated in suicides (i.e., relationship problems are the precipitating event in
 51% of Air Force suicides, Kindt, 2009) and domestic violence (Pan, Neidig, & O'Leary, 1994).
 Unfortunately, traditional sources of marriage counseling available to service members are
 largely underutilized. The MC brings a fresh perspective that helps normalize relationship
 help-seeking and in turn reach larger numbers of distressed couples early. The partnering of
 MC and integrated primary care appears to be an ideal combination of behavioral health
 innovations that has the potential to measurably enhance relationship health for the military
 services.
The most challenging community problems faced by senior military leaders are closely linked
 to the quality of marriage relationships. These include family violence, spouse maltreatment,
 and suicide. Half (51%) of the service members who either completed or attempted suicide from
 2008 to 2010 had a history of a failed intimate relationship, and for nearly one-third (30%)
 this failure had occurred within 30 days of the self-harm event. Relationship distress not
 only affects marriages but is also associated with depression, substance abuse, work role
 impairment and lowered children's health. Despite the potential high costs of chronic marital
 distress, very few couples seek therapy. In a recent Air Force study, only 6% of Airmen in
 distressed relationships reported making use of couple counseling after returning from
 deployment. Indeed, distressed couples wait an average of 6 years before seeking help, at
 which point their relationship likely has deteriorated dramatically.

 Thus, there is a substantial need in the military for early detection and preventative care
 for deteriorating couples before serious and irreversible relationship damage has occurred.
 There are currently no widely available means to fill this need. Mild-to-moderately
 distressed couples may view therapy as reserved for only the most severely distressed
 couples, and thus delay seeking treatment until its efficacy is seriously diminished by the
 chronicity and severity of the accumulated relationship dysfunction.

 The Marriage Checkup (MC) addresses this issue by providing a less-threatening option for
 couples to seek early preventative care before they have begun to identify as distressed.
 Intended to be the relationship health equivalent of the annual physical or dental checkup,
 the MC is a 4 to 5 hour assessment and feedback intervention. This brief intervention
 includes assessment of the couple's relationship history, strengths, and concerns and
 provides individualized feedback to the couple with a list of options addressing the couple's
 primary concerns. Studies conducted with civilian samples have shown that couples receiving
 MC demonstrate significant and lasting improvement across a range of marital health
 variables. In addition, MC has been shown to attract couples across the distress continuum
 and be perceived by couples as more accessible than traditional therapy.

 In recognition of the limited reach and potential stigma of tertiary mental health treatment,
 the military services and the Department of Veterans Affairs have implemented collaborative
 care models in primary care. In a collaborative care model, mental health providers are
 embedded into the primary care setting and serve as integrated behavioral health consultants
 (IBHCs) to the medical providers. The IBHC provides brief, focused assessments and
 interventions for patients referred by their primary care provider. Marital problems are a
 common reason for primary care providers to refer patients to IBHCs, yet there has been no
 effort toward development of marital interventions suitable for primary care. MC's design as
 a brief "check-up" model for marriage help appeared particularly well-suited to primary care.
 Therefore, the investigators conducted a pilot study to adapt MC for use with military
 couples in Air Force primary care clinics (FWR20120054H).

 In our pilot study the original MC was adapted for military couples and fit into the
 fast-paced environment of primary care. Military specific content for the assessment tools in
 the Marriage Checkup were developed. In addition, the team developed and piloted a protocol
 to use when only one member of the couple is available to come in for a Marriage Checkup,
 given the likelihood that some partners seeking an MC may have a partner who is currently
 deployed or otherwise unable/unwilling to participate in an in-person checkup. Finally, the
 Marriage Checkup was streamlined to fit within a Primary Care setting. More specifically, it
 was re-formatted into three 30-minute sessions. Session 1 consisted of the couple's
 relationship history and each partner's primary strengths, Session 2 focused on each
 partner's primary concern, and Session 3 is dedicated to feedback for the couple. IBHCs
 working in primary care were then trained to offer the intervention within a
 quasi-experimental research design in which pre-post changes were evaluated within subjects.

 To date, twenty-two couples and one individual (N = 45; at least one partner in each couple
 was active duty) at two primary care sites have completed the MC. A multilevel modeling
 analysis indicated statistically significant pre-post changes for all study variables at both
 two weeks and two months, with effect sizes in the moderate range. Relationship satisfaction
 (B = .54, p = .003, B = .55, p = .004), distress (B = .75, p < .001, B = .58, p = .003) and
 intimacy (B = .43, p < .017, B = .47, p = .014) were significantly improved. In addition,
 couples completed a questionnaire measuring their level of satisfaction with the MC
 intervention itself. The scale ranged from 1(not at all) to 5 (very much), and across the
 questions the average response was 4.33 immediately post checkup and 4.05 at the one-month
 follow-up, indicating that couples were satisfied with their Marriage Checkup experience. The
 results of the pilot study provide preliminary evidence suggesting that the MC can be
 effectively adapted to a military population, and successfully used by behavioral health
 consultants (BHCs) working in an integrated primary care clinic.

 The overall purpose of the proposed study is to build on pilot study findings by conducting a
 randomized trial of the military-adapted Marriage Checkup (MC) delivered in primary care by
 Integrated Behavioral Health Consultants (IBHCs). The primary outcomes of interest are
 marriage health (e.g., greater satisfaction, deeper intimacy) and community reach (e.g.,
 attracts couples at-risk for marital deterioration who otherwise would not be seeking
 treatment). There are three specific objectives of the study, the first being to conduct a
 randomized trial comparing MC for use in military primary care clinics to a wait list control
 condition. Second, examine the effects of MC participation on relationship health at one
 month and six months post-treatment follow-up. Lastly, to determine whether the MC is
 successful at reaching couples at risk for marital deterioration who would otherwise be
 unlikely to seek traditional couple counseling.

 This study will investigate two research hypotheses. The first hypothesis being that Military
 couples who participate in the Marriage Checkup (MC) for primary care will demonstrate
 positive relationship health trajectories for intimacy, acceptance, and relationship
 satisfaction over the course of six months when compared to couples in a wait-list control
 condition. A randomized control trial with 215 civilian couples demonstrated significant
 increases in relationship satisfaction, intimacy, and acceptance both in the short term and
 at two-year follow-up for treatment couples compared to no-treatment control couples.
 Emerging evidence further suggests that the primary mediator of improvements in marital
 health is the effect of the MC on increasing the level of intimate connection between
 spouses. In addition, the MC worked to affect both distal (i.e., depression) and specific
 (i.e., time together, sexual satisfaction and communication) outcomes. The second hypothesis
 is that the MC will attract military couples at-risk for marital deterioration who are
 otherwise not seeking relationship treatment. The MC is designed to significantly lower the
 barriers to couple help seeking. The MC is very brief and is advertised as an informational
 marital health service rather than therapy, intended for all couples who are interested in
 learning more about their strengths and areas of concern. The MC has been shown to attract a
 broad range of couples across the range of satisfaction from relationally satisfied to
 severely distressed and has been shown to successfully attract couples who would not
 otherwise seek any kind of relationship intervention.

 The randomized trial will be conducted at four military primary care clinics. Three sites
 will be Wilford Hall Ambulatory Services Center (WHASC) in San Antonio, Texas, 359th Medical
 Operations Squadron (359 MDOS) in San Antonio, Texas, and Malcolm Grow Medical Clinics and
 Surgery Center (MGMCSC), Joint Base Andrews, in Maryland. The remaining site will be
 recommended by the Air Force Chief of Behavioral Health Optimization (co-investigator Maj Liz
 Najera).

 Individuals and couples who express an interest in participating in the study will be
 scheduled by the on-site study coordinator with the IBHC to receive a more thorough
 explanation of the study purpose and requirements of participation. Potential participants
 will have the opportunity to ask questions about the study prior to making a decision to
 participate. Potential participants will be told that the MC involves three appointments with
 the IBHC within a four week period and completion of take-home relationship questionnaires to
 aid the BHC in assessing their relationship. At the third IBHC appointment the participants
 will receive feedback on the clinical questionnaires and interview results and be given a
 list of possible strategies for improving their relationship that has been tailored to their
 unique situation. For the purposes of the research, potential participants will be informed
 that they will be contacted approximately one month and six months later and asked to log
 onto a study website to re-complete surveys about their relationship. They will also complete
 surveys that ask their opinion of the MC including what they thought was most helpful and how
 it could be improved further.

 This first contact will also include the standard brief clinical screening conducted by the
 IBHC for all referrals. During this screening the IBHC will also assess for the presence of
 any study exclusion factors. If at the conclusion of this first IBHC contact the potential
 participant expresses interest in participating and meets the inclusion and exclusion
 criteria, they will then meet with the Research Assistant to review and complete the informed
 consent documents for study participation and the baseline questionnaires.

 The study will use a randomized two-group research design in which participants are randomly
 assigned after signing the informed consent document to either receive the MC right away or
 be placed on a 7-month wait list condition. All participants will complete study measures at
 baseline, eight weeks (1 month post-treatment for those assigned first to the MC condition)
 and 28 weeks (six months post-treatment for those assigned first to the MC condition).
 Participants assigned to the 7-month wait-list condition will be offered the MC at the
 completion of the 6-month follow-up measures.
Inclusion Criteria:

 -  Potential participants will be active duty and/or their active duty or Department of
 Defense (DoD) beneficiary spouses (adults >= 18 years old) who present to the IBHC in
 primary care with relationship concerns or questions following referral from their
 primary care manager or in response to study advertisements. Potential participants
 will be eligible for enrollment whether both partners are participating in-person or
 only one partner. Study participants do not have to be married; enrollment is open to
 active duty or who are not married but in committed romantic partnerships

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  Exclusion criteria will mirror clinical practice for patients normally not seen in
 primary care behavioral health, i.e., patients greater than mild risk for self-harm,
 patients with current alcohol dependence, psychotic disorder, significant dissociative
 disorder, or moderate or severe brain injury. Civilians along with potential
 participants that cannot understand, speak or read English will be excluded.