Atorvastatin for Preventing Occlusion and Restenosis After Intracranial Artery Stenting
Atorvastatin for Preventing Occlusion and Restenosis After Intracranial Artery Stenting
Severe intracranial atherosclerosis with concomitant stenosis is responsible for
 approximately 10% of all strokes. Retrospective studies have indicated that up to 50% of
 patients with a recently symptomatic intracranial stenosis experience recurrent ischemic
 events. Due to the high stroke risk, patients with high grade 70% symptomatic intracranial
 stenosis represent the main target group for endovascular treatment. Atorvastatin is widely
 used in the treatment of hyperlipidemia, especially after acute myocardial infarction.
 High-dose atorvastatin has been known to stop the progression of atherosclerosis and to
 decrease the levels of inflammatory markers. Several recent clinical trials have proved
 atorvastatin can reduce restenosis after stent implantation in coronary artery. But the
 feasibility of atorvastatin in preventing restenosis in patients with intracranial stenting
 has not been evaluated.The purpose of this prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial is
 to evaluate the effect of atorvastatin 80 mg daily in preventing restenosis and related
 vascular events in patients with intracranial stent implantation.
Severe intracranial atherosclerosis with concomitant stenosis is responsible for
 approximately 10% of all strokes. In Asian populations intracranial stenoses are even the
 most commonly found vascular lesions. Retrospective studies indicated that up to 50% patients
 with recently symptomatic intracranial stenosis experienced recurrent ischemic events. The
 risk of recurrent stroke increases with the aggravation of intracranial artery stenosis. In
 Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) trial, 14% and 23% of the patients
 with TIA or stroke attributable to high-grade intracranial stenosis had further ipsilateral
 ischemic stroke over the next year despite best medical treatments. If percentage of
 intracranial stenosis exceeded 70%, the stroke risk went up to 20% in the first year. These
 results spurred the enthusiasm for endovascular approaches, including percutaneous
 transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) and stenting to treat this potentially harmful
 disease. Due to the high stroke risk, patients with high-grade ≥70% symptomatic intracranial
 stenosis represent the main target group for endovascular treatment.

 Endovascular management of intracranial arthrosclerosis is, however, associated with an
 appreciable number of potential complications, including local thrombosis, thromboembolism
 and, especially, restenosis and in-stent occlusion. To date, the reported 1-year restenosis
 rates after intracranial stenting in case series and small trials have varied widely, ranging
 from less than 10% in some to more than 50% in others. According to a recent review, the
 overall 1-year restenosis rate of intracranial stenting was 25%, and the in-stent occlusion
 rate was nearly 10%. These relatively high rates of restenosis and re-occlusion after
 procedure have raised the question about whether stenting improves the natural course of
 intracranial atherosclerosis.

 Compared with the relatively good durability of angioplasty and stenting procedures within
 the extracranial carotid artery, the high incidence of restenoses appears to be a major
 drawback of intracranial stenting. Recent studies suggested that especially younger patients
 treated with self-expandable stents within the anterior circulation have a higher risk for
 this complication. Considering about 33% of restenoses were symptomatic (TIA or stroke),
 decreasing restenosis rates after intracranial stenting became the key issue for improving
 the clinical feasibility of this treatment strategy.

 Animal studies have indicated that statins can inhibit platelet aggregation and release of
 platelet-derived mediators, reduce inflammatory responses of vascular wall, improve artery
 endothelial function, all of which may contribute to decrease proliferative responses after
 stent implantation. These profiles make statin optimal for preventing restenosis or occlusion
 after intracranial stenting, but this strategy has not been tested by clinical trials to
 date, although statin has been proved by several recent clinical trials to be efficacious in
 preventing restenosis after stent implantation in coronary arteries.

 The initial attempts to lower restenosis rates after coronary balloon angioplasty have failed
 to demonstrate beneficial effects of statin therapy, although the FLuvastatin Angioplasty
 REstenosis (FLARE) trial reported a reduction in mortality and myocardial infarction in the
 fluvastatin treatment patients. Subsequent studies, however, did confirm that statin therapy
 can decrease restenosis rates and the related ischemic events after stent implantation in
 patients with coronary artery diseases. Unlike chronic vessel shrinkage may account for ≥70%
 of recurrence rates after balloon angioplasty, restenosis after coronary stent implantation
 is entirely due to neointimal proliferation. Experimental studies have shown that statins are
 capable of inhibiting intimal proliferation after arterial injury. Results from other studies
 suggested that statins interfere with proliferative responses after coronary stent
 implantation in humans. Statin therapy was associated not only with a significant reduction
 in late lumen loss, but also with a greater net gain after coronary stent implantation. Thus,
 the discrepancy of the effects of statin therapy on restenosis development after balloon
 angioplasty compared with coronary stent implantation may be easily reconciled by the
 different mechanisms underlying the recurrence of luminal narrowing.

 Elevated LDL cholesterol levels increase platelet and red-cell aggregability, and thrombosis
 is believed to have a decisive role in the process of restenosis and in-stent occlusion.
 Lowering LDL cholesterol levels decreases rates of restenosis in the rat-carotid model,
 whereas treatment with statin decreases the progression of disease in the rabbit-iliac model
 independently of an effect on LDL cholesterol. In contrast, in the
 overstretched-swine-coronary model, no relation between either LDL cholesterol or statin and
 restenosis was observed. An attempt was made to resolve these conflicts with a prospective
 clinical study in which 157 patients were treated with or without statin. The results
 indicated that the rate of restenosis was 12 percent with and 44 percent without statin. More
 than one study also identified the diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia at the time of coronary
 stent implantation as a major independent predictor for reduced recurrence rates. But a
 recent study indicated that statin therapy was associated with a comparable reduction of
 restenosis rates in patients with average serum cholesterol levels at baseline, suggest that
 the observed effects are not only due to reduced serum cholesterol levels, but also may be
 related to the non-lipid anti-atherosclerotic properties of statins.

 Since the efficacy of high dose statin in preventing restenosis after coronary artery
 stenting has been confirmed by several clinical trials, it is reasonable to presume that
 high-dose statin is also efficacious in preventing restenosis and in-stent occlusion after
 intracranial stenting, because these two vasculatures share very similar anatomical profiles.
 The present study is aimed to evaluate the preventive effects of atorvastatin 80 mg daily in
 decreasing restenosis in a consecutive series of patients undergoing intracranial stent
 implantation at a single center. The hypotheses of this study is that patients with
 atorvastatin therapy is associated with improved clinical outcome and reduced restenosis
 rates 12 months after intracranial stent implantation than patients without atorvastatin
 therapy.
Inclusion Criteria:

 -  1: Clinical inclusion criteria

 1. Subject is ≥18 years old

 2. Eligible for percutaneous endovascular intervention

 3. Documented severe (70%) symptomatic intracranial stenosis

 4. Acceptable candidate for intracranial stenting

 5. Subject (or legal guardian) understands the study requirements and the treatment
 procedures and provides written Informed Consent before any study-specific tests
 or procedures are performed

 6. Subject willing to comply with all specified follow-up evaluations

 -  2: Angiographic Inclusion Criteria

 1. Target lesion located in intracranial internal artery, intracranial vertebral
 artery, basilar artery or middle cerebral artery

 2. Target lesion must be symptomatic

 3. Target lesion diameter stenosis ≥70%

 4. Reference vessel diameter (RVD): ≥2.0 mm to ≤6.0 mm

 5. Cumulative target lesion length (area to be treated must be completely coverable
 by one study stent) ≤30 mm

 6. Target lesion is presumed accessible by endovascular treatment.

 7. One non target lesion may be treated in a non target vessel

 8. Non-target lesion in non-target vessel must be treated with a commercially
 available stent.

 9. Treatment of a non target lesion (if performed) must be deemed a clinical
 angiographic success, without requiring use of unplanned additional stent(s).

 10. Treatment must be completed prior to treatment of target lesion

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  Contraindication to ASA, or to both clopidogrel and ticlopidine

 -  Known hypersensitivity to atorvastatin

 -  Known allergy to stainless steel

 -  Known allergy to platinum

 -  Previous treatment of the target vessel with angioplasty

 -  Previous treatment of the target vessel with stent

 -  Previous treatment of any non target vessel with stent within 9 months of the index
 procedure

 -  Planned endovascular treatment to post index procedure

 -  Planned or actual target vessel treatment with an unapproved device, directional or
 rotational intracranial atherectomy, laser, cutting balloon or transluminal extraction
 catheter immediately prior to stent placement

 -  Cerebral infarction within 1 month prior to the index procedure

 -  Myocardial infarction within the past 1 month

 -  Uncontrollable malignant hypertension (>180/110 mmHg) before procedure

 -  Acute or chronic renal dysfunction (creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl or 177 μmol/l)

 -  Anticipated treatment with atorvastatin or other statins during the 12 months after
 the index procedure

 -  Any prior true anaphylactic reaction to contrast agents; defined as known
 anaphylactoid or other non-anaphylactic allergic reactions to contrast agents that
 cannot be adequately pre-medicated prior to the index procedure

 -  Leukopenia (leukocyte count < 3.5 × 109/liter)

 -  Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100,000/mm3)

 -  Thrombocytosis (> 750,000/mm3)

 -  Seizure 12 months before procedure

 -  Intracranial tumor

 -  Active peptic ulcer or active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding

 -  Male or female with known intention to procreate within 12 months after the index
 procedure

 -  Positive pregnancy test within 7 days before the index procedure, or lactating

 -  Life expectancy of less than 24 months due to other medical conditions

 -  Co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the subject's ability to comply with study
 follow-up requirements or impact the scientific integrity of the study

 -  Currently participating in another investigational drug or device study

 -  Current treatment, or past treatment within 6 months with atorvastatin or other
 statins