SONOlysis in Prevention of Brain InfaRctions During Internal Carotid Endarterectomy
SONOlysis in Prevention of Brain InfaRctions During Internal Carotid Endarterectomy
SONOBIRDIE Trial is a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled study designed for a
 demonstration of the safety and effectiveness of sonolysis (continual transcranial Doppler
 (TCD) monitoring) in reduction of risk of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), brain
 infarctions and cognitive decline using a 2-MHz diagnostic probe with a maximal diagnostic
 energy on the reduction of risk of brain infarctions by the activation of endogenous
 fibrinolytic system during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with ≥ 70% symptomatic or
 asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis.

 The sample size is based on an expected 2.5% reduction of ischemic stroke, TIA, and death
 during the 30-day postoperative period in the sonolysis group (estimated prevalence, 1.5 %)
 compared to the control group (estimated prevalence, 4 %). Pre-study calculations showed that
 a minimum of 746 patients in each group is needed to reach a significant difference with an
 alpha value of 0.05 (two-tailed) and a beta value of 0.8 assuming that 10 % would be lost to
 follow-up or refuse to participate in the study.

 Consecutive patients will be assigned to the sonolysis or control group by a
 computer-generated 1:1 randomization. In patients randomized into sonolysis group, middle
 cerebral artery segment in a depth of 55 mm will be continuously monitored during
 intervention using a diagnostic 2-MHz TCD probe with a maximal diagnostic energy.

 In patients randomized into control group, the TCD probe will be fixed in a required position
 using a special helmet as in sonolysis group patients, but middle cerebral artery segment in
 a depth of 55 mm will be only localized using a diagnostic 2-MHz TCD probe with a maximal
 diagnostic energy and the TCD monitoring will be stopped afterwards.

 Confirmation of the investigators hypothesis that sonothrombolysis is able to activate
 endogenous fibrinolytic system during CEA with consecutive reduction of ischemic stroke, TIA
 or death, and the number and volume of brain infarcts, can lead to the increase of the safety
 of CEA in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis. The investigators can presume that
 up to 50% of patients indicated for CEA can be treated using these methods in the future.
Results of the NASCET, ECST and ACAS studies showed that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was a
 beneficial therapy for patients with a symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis
 >50% and asymptomatic ICA stenosis >60%, resp. Surgical risk of CEA varied between 2 and 15 %
 and even clinically silent microembolism can cause microinfarctions presenting with
 postoperative cognitive deficit.

 Transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring during CEA is a common diagnostic method being used for
 the detection of microemboli and changes of blood flow in intracranial arteries. Reduction of
 periprocedural complications of CEA with TCD monitoring referred in some studies should be
 not only due to sophisticated indication of shunt implementation, optimization of surgery and
 anesthesia but also due to TCD activation of endogenous fibrinolytic system (equal to
 sonothrombolysis in acute stroke studies). Recently published SONOBUSTER Trial showed that
 intraoperative sonolysis reduced both the incidence and the volume of new brain infarctions
 following CEA.

 There are 2 possible effects of ultrasound on thrombus - mechanical destruction due to
 vibration of thrombus with acceleration of penetration of fibrinolytics into thrombus and
 elevation of temperature and stimulation of endothelium with local activation of fibrinolytic
 system. Grant project NR/9487-3/2007 showed that TCD monitoring has a significant effect on
 activation of fibrinolytic system in healthy volunteers.

 STUDY OBJECTIVES The objective of the randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study is to
 demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of sonolysis (continual TCD monitoring) using a
 2-MHz diagnostic probe with a maximal diagnostic energy on the reduction of stroke, transient
 ischemic attack (TIA) and brain infarction by the activation of endogenous fibrinolytic
 system during CEA in patients with ≥70% symptomatic or asymptomatic ICA stenosis.

 The substudy aims to compare the risk of brain infarction detected using magnetic resonance
 between sonolysis and control group.

 STUDY DESIGN

 Overview:

 SONOBIRDIE Trial is a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled study designed for a
 demonstration of the safety and effectiveness of sonolysis (continual TCD monitoring) in
 reduction of risk of ischemic stroke, TIA, death, brain infarctions and cognitive decline by
 the sonolysis during CEA in patients with ≥70% ICA stenosis.

 Expected sample size:

 The sample size is based on an expected 2.5% absolute risk reduction of ischemic stroke, TIA
 and death during the 30-day postoperative period in the sonolysis group (estimated
 prevalence, 1.5%) compared to the control group (estimated prevalence, 4%). Pre-study
 calculations showed that a minimum of 746 patients in each group is needed to reach a
 significant difference with an alpha value of 0.05 (two-tailed) and a beta value of 0.8
 assuming that 10% would be lost to follow-up or refuse to participate in the study.

 The sample size for substudy is based on an expected 15% reduction of new ischemic lesions on
 diffusion weighted imaging-MRI (DWI-MRI) in the sonolysis group (estimated prevalence, 10%)
 compared to the control group (estimated prevalence, 25%). Pre-study calculations showed that
 a minimum of 112 patients in each group was needed to reach a significant difference with an
 alpha value of 0.05 (two-tailed) and a beta value of 0.8 assuming that 10 % would be lost to
 follow-up or refuse to participate in the study.

 Test device:

 The transcranial Doppler systems (e.g. DWL Multi-Dop T1, DWL, Sipplingen, Germany) with a
 diagnostic 2-MHz probe will be used for sonolysis (non-diagnostic TCD Doppler monitoring).

 Sonolysis:

 In patients randomized into sonolysis group, MCA segment in a depth of 55 mm will be
 continuously monitored during intervention using a diagnostic 2-MHz TCD probe with a maximal
 diagnostic energy (TIC~1.3), sample volume 10 mm.

 Sham procedure:

 In patients randomized into control group, the TCD probe will be fixed in a required position
 using a special helmet as in sonolysis group patients, but MCA segment in a depth of 55 mm
 will be only localized using a diagnostic 2-MHz TCD probe with a maximal diagnostic energy
 and the TCD monitoring will be stopped afterwards.

 Carotid endarterectomy:

 Surgery will be performed in a general or a local anesthesia (decision will be left to the
 discretion of the operating team) using a cut in front angle of the sternomastoid muscle.
 Common carotid artery (CCA) and later ICA and external carotid artery (ECA) will be cut free.
 Common carotid artery, ICA and ECA will be temporarily closed. Using a longitudinal cut of
 CCA and ICA, atherosclerotic plaque will be visualized. Plaque will be withdrawn under the
 microscopic control and later a suture of arteriotomy will be performed using a monophil
 non-absorbent fibre 6/0. Just before the end of surgery, haemostatic process will be
 controlled and drainage will be done. Surgery will be completed by suture of subcutis and
 cutis. Unfractioned heparin (100 IU/kg bodyweight) will be administered in all patients just
 before the arteriotomy. In the case of the insufficient collateral flow into MCA after
 clipping of the CCA and ICA, a temporal shunt will be used. Antiplatelet therapy (Aggrenox,
 clopidogrel 75 mg/day or acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg/day) will be used continuously in all
 patients. Surgeon will be blinded to sonolysis or sham procedure.

 Magnetic resonance imaging:

 Magnetic resonance imaging will be performed in patients enrolled to the substudy. Magnetic
 resonance imaging protocol consists of 4 sequences: 1. T2TSE; 2. DWI. Sequences 1 - 3 will be
 applied in the same level, they will have the same slice thickness and the same cut number.
 The slice thickness comprises its own cut thickness (5 mm) + distant factor (30 %). Standard
 number of slices will be 19. Standard slice level is considered to be a modified level of
 skull base due to the minimalization of distant artifacts. Diffusion weighted sequence shows
 a middle (average) diffusivity of every point of the examined brain tissue when b value is
 500 and 1000. This sequence is applied in order to assess hemorrhage (T2*EPI) and to monitor
 sites of the reduced diffusion (DWI, b=500 and 1000); 3. T2 star-weighted gradient-recalled
 echo (GRE) sequence for detection of bleeding (including microbleeds); 4. Fluid-attenuated
 inversion recovery (FLAIR). Presence of new infarctions will be evaluated separately in the
 whole brain, in the intervened ICA territory and in the contralateral ICA territory.

 New ischemic lesions in the brain are defined as hyperintense lesions on postintervention DWI
 sequences which were not present on the pretreatment MRI.

 The volume of new brain infarctions will be measured manually. Ischemic lesions in the brain
 will be evaluated by two blinded investigators by consensus.

 Clinical examinations and cognitive tests:

 Standard physical and neurologic examinations (including the National Institutes of Health
 Stroke Scale - NIHSS, modified Rankin scale - mRS, and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination
 Revised - ACE-R) will be performed prior to CEA, 24 hours after CEA, 30 days and 1 year after
 randomization.

 Randomization:

 Consecutive patients will be assigned to the sonolysis or control group by a
 computer-generated 1:1 randomization.

 ANALYSIS SETS

 Efficacy analyses will be performed primary for the intent-to-treat population. The secondary
 analysis will be performed also for per-protocol population. The intent-to-treat population
 will consist of all randomized subjects who signed informed consent. The per-protocol
 population will exclude all subjects in the intent-to-treat population who did not have any
 major protocol deviations:

 -  Violation of inclusion or exclusion criteria.

 -  Withdrawal of consent within 30 days

 -  Crossing-over to the other treatment arm. Cross-overs are defined as patients randomized
 to the control group who receive continuous TCD monitoring for 10 minutes or longer and
 patients randomized to the sonolysis group who receive less than 10 min of sonolysis.

 -  Total time of sonolysis less than 40 min for patients randomized to the sonolysis group

 -  Total time of TCD monitoring of 40 min or more for patients randomized to the control
 group

 -  Carotid endarterectomy not within 2 days (48 hours) of randomization

 -  Not attending at least one of visits 3 (24 hours after CEA), 4 (30 days after CEA), or 5
 (1 year after CEA)

 -  Outcomes assessed outside the specified time windows

 The safety population consists of all subjects in the FAS who did receive one of the study
 interventions. Subjects will be analyzed according to the treatment they actually received
 (as treated):

 -  Patients randomized to the control group who receive continuous TCD monitoring for 10
 minutes or longer will be considered to have received sonolysis.

 -  Patients randomized to the sonolysis group who receive less than 10 min of sonolysis
 will be considered to have received the control intervention.

 STATISTICAL METHODS The primary analysis will be based on the full analysis set. Missing data
 will be handled according to Statistical Analysis Plan. The proportion of the composite of
 ischemic stroke, TIA, or death within 30 days will be calculated in both groups with a 95%
 Wilson score confidence interval. Groups will be compared using the chi-squared test. As an
 effect measure we will calculated the absolute risk difference with Newcombe hybrid score 95%
 CIs.

 Mortality will be graphically depicted by Kaplan-Meier curves for each treatment group.
 Groups will be compared using a log-rank test. Mortality at 30 days for both groups and the
 difference between groups will be calculated with 95% CI from the Kaplan-Meier estimator. A
 risk difference with 95% CI will be provided, calculated on the log-scale using Greenwood
 standard errors and a normal approximation.

 The proportion of any stroke and myocardial infarction within 30 days will be calculated for
 each group using the non-parametric cumulative incidence function estimator with death as
 competing event and 95% CI. Changes in cognitive functions will be compared between groups
 using a linear regression with baseline values and the group as covariates (usually referred
 to as ANCOVA). Assumptions for linear regression (homoscedasticity and normality of the
 errors) will be verified using residual-vs-fitted and QQ-plots. If the assumptions are not
 met, transformations (e.g. log), more robust methods (e.g. robust standard errors) or
 non-parametric methods will be considered.

 Binary substudy outcomes (appearance of at least one new lesion) will be compared using
 chi-squared tests. The effects will be presented as absolute risk differences with Newcombe
 hybrid score 95% CIs.

 The number of new lesions will be compared between groups using an exact Poisson test. The
 effect will be presented as incidence rate ratio with an exact 95% CI.

 Multivariable logistic regression analyses will be used to analyze possible predictors of the
 primary outcome (composite of ischemic stroke, TIA and death), cognitive decline, or a new
 brain infarction. Candidate predictors include age, gender, side of stenosis, symptomatic
 stenosis, time from symptoms to CEA, percentage of ipsilateral ICA stenosis, percentage of
 contralateral ICA stenosis, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia,
 smoking, alcohol abuse, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, type of anesthesia,
 shunt use, antithrombotic drug use, number of antihypertensive drugs, insulin use, oral
 antidiabetics use, perioperative use of heparin, perioperative dose of heparin, statin use,
 dose of statin, type of plaque in ipsilateral carotid stenosis. All models will include the
 treatment group. Results will be reported as odds ratio with 95% CI.

 Data will be analyzed using R (R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment
 for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria), Stata
 (StataCorp. 2017. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC)
 and/or SPSS (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
Inclusion Criteria:

 -  Subject has a symptomatic or asymptomatic ICA stenosis ≥ 70 % (NASCET criteria) as
 detected by a duplex sonography (see Appendix) and confirmed using the computed
 tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or digital
 subtraction angiography (DSA).

 -  Subject is indicated for CEA according to the criteria set by the American Heart
 Association.

 -  Subject is aged 40 - 85 years.

 -  Subject has a sufficient temporal bone window for TCD with detectable blood flow in
 the MCA.

 -  Subject is functionally independent with a modified Rankin score value of 0 - 2
 points.

 -  Informed consent is signed by the subject.

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  Subject has been participating in another clinical trial within last 6 weeks.

 -  Subject has any other medical condition that would make him/her inappropriate for
 study participation, in the Investigator opinion.