Effects of Empagliflozin + Linagliptin vs Metformin + Insulin Glargine on Renal and Vascular Changes in Type 2 Diabetes
Effects of Empagliflozin + Linagliptin vs Metformin + Insulin Glargine on Renal and Vascular Changes in Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus is a wide-spread disease accompanied by strongly increased morbidity and
 mortality due to micro- and macrovascular complications. However, in studies with patients
 suffering from diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM 2), early changes and impairments in large and
 small blood vessels as well as organ damage (e. g. to the kidneys) have been only
 insufficiently investigated (1). The newest substance class in oral antidiabetics, i. e.
 SGLT-2-inhibitors (such as empagliflozin) cause an increased renal excretion of glucose. In
 addition, the concurrent increased sodium excretion brings about an improvement of vascular
 function and thus a decrease in blood pressure. In the EMP-REG-OUTCOME study (2), the
 cardiovascular mortality rate was significantly lower in the empagliflozin group (3.7% versus
 5.9%; 38% relative RR) compared to placebo.For another new substance class, the
 dipeptidylpeptidase-4-inhibitors, a number of pleiotropic effects have been described (3). In
 one of our recently conducted trials, we could demonstrate a positive effect of linagliptin
 on renal an inflammatory parameters compared to placebo (4). Thus, the combination of both
 substance classes with regard to positive effects on micro- and macrocirculation, even though
 not sufficiently proven as yet, suggests itself. The therapy with metformin and long-acting
 insulin (BOT), as well as a twofold oral medication is possible according to the
 recommendations of the "Deutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft (DDG)" and the positional paper of the
 "American Diabetes Association (ADA)". Accordingly, the aim of the present paper is the
 analysis of the effects of a combined therapy with empagliflozin plus linagliptin compared to
 metformin plus insulin glargine on renal and vascular changes in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes mellitus, considered at the beginning as a metabolic disorder, mutates into a
 predominantly vascular disease, once its duration extends over several years or/and when
 additional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors coexist, in particular arterial hypertension. As
 a consequence, treatment of type 2 diabetes should focus not only on metabolic control but
 also on improving the vascular structure and function in the micro- and macrocirculation (1).
 Glomerular hyperfiltration and hyperperfusion pointing to altered intraglomerular
 hemodynamics, e.g. reduced preglomerular (i.e. resistance of the afferent arteriole [Ra])
 resistance and increased postglomerular (i.e. resistance of the efferent arteriole [Re])
 resistance (resulting in an increased intraglomerular pressure [Pglom]) are considered to be
 pivotal hemodynamic hallmarks of renal impairment in early diabetes (2). Endothelium
 dysfunction is a key pathogenetic process leading to increased leakage of albumin through the
 glomerular barrier and represents a pivotal determinant of glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
 (3; 4). Poor glycemic control is related to hyperperfusion and increased basal nitric oxide
 (NO) activity secondary to increased oxidative stress that leads to impaired endothelial
 function in early diabetes (5). Indeed, endothelial function increased after reducing
 oxidative stress as evidenced by the results with the infusion of vitamin C (6). The
 assessment of pulse wave velocity (PWV), pulse wave analysis (PWA), central (aortic) systolic
 pressure and pulse pressure, forward and backward wave amplitude are tools to detect early
 vascular changes related to a faster wave reflection in the arterial tree and are considered
 valid intermediate (surrogate) endpoints of vascular damage (7; 8). These parameters are only
 infrequently measured in studies with type 2 diabetes (9), mainly due to lack of expertise
 required to assess these vascular and renal markers, and lack of awareness that vascular
 changes are the key prognostic factor in type 2 diabetes. Empagliflozin is a novel selective
 inhibitor of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) that has been shown to improve
 glycemic control after 12, and 24 weeks as well as after 1 year (10). Empagliflozin produced
 dose dependent increases in glucosuria and clinically meaningful changes of glycemic
 parameters in type 2 diabetes (e.g. Glycosylated Hemoglobin [HbA1c]), in addition to weight
 loss and blood pressure reduction. In parallel to glucosuria, sodium is excreted in the urine
 and loss of sodium leads to a less reactive contraction of the small arteries in response to
 sympathetic activity, angiotensin II and catecholamines. The reduction in blood pressure
 might be related to weight loss and loss of intravascular volume and sodium content as well
 as to improved vascular function. In the EMPA-REG-OUTCOME trial (11) the empagliflozin group
 had significantly lower rates of death from CV causes (3.7%, vs. 5.9% in the placebo group;
 38% relative risk reduction), hospitalization for heart failure (2.7% and 4.1%, respectively;
 35% relative risk reduction), and death from any cause (5.7% and 8.3%, respectively; 32%
 relative risk reduction). These beneficial effects on hard outcome parameters might be
 related to the effects of empagliflozin described above. Furthermore, among patients
 receiving empagliflozin, there was admittedly an increased rate of genital infection but no
 increased incidence in other adverse events or any other safety parameter was observed.
 Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, the other new drug class of antidiabetic agents,
 are also attractive agents to treat type 2 diabetes. So far, the predominant focus was on its
 antidiabetic efficacy, but several pleiotropic effects of DPP-4 inhibitors have been
 described (12). Indeed, we observed beneficial renal effects with linagliptin, e.g. preserved
 preglomerular resistance and NO activity in the renal vascular bed, compared to placebo, as
 well as reduced inflammatory markers (13). Thus, to combine empagliflozin with linagliptin is
 obvious and the antiglycemic potency and safety have been and still are examined in a large
 phase 3 program (14). Moreover, due to the pleiotropic effects of these 2 compounds
 (described above), synergistic beneficial effects on the micro- and macrocirculation
 (vascular and renal effects) can be expected (though not yet proven) and may explain to great
 extent the observed beneficial effects of empagliflozin on CV death and total mortality (11).
 According to the guidelines the combination of insulin and metformin is still, however,
 considered a valid and well established combination to control hyperglycemia. However,
 according to the update of the Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA)
 and European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) advancing to dual oral combination,
 and even triple oral antiglycemic therapy is a recommended alternative (15). Hence, at least
 when metformin is contraindicated or not tolerated, the combination of DPP-4 inhibitors and
 SGLT-2 inhibitors may be a preferably choice. The goal of the current proposal is to prove
 the hypothesis that at similar levels of glycemic control the combination empagliflozin and
 linagliptin exert beneficial effects on the renal and vascular endothelium and on vascular
 surrogate endpoints in patients with type 2 diabetes as opposed to the combination of
 metformin and insulin.
Inclusion Criteria:

 -  Type 2 diabetes mellitus, using already metformin (850 or 1000 mg twice daily) for at
 least 2 months prior to screening visit or type 2 diabetes switched to metformin at
 least 3 months prior to randomisation visit

 -  HbA1c ≥6.5 % if on antidiabetic montherapy or HbA1c ≥ 6.0 if on two antidiabetic drugs
 - Age of 18 - 75 years

 -  Male and female patients (females of child bearing potential must be using adequate
 contraceptive precautions)

 -  Females of childbearing potential or within two years of the menopause must have a
 negative urine pregnancy test at screening visit

 -  Informed consent (§ 40 Abs. 1 Satz 3 Punkt 3 AMG) has to be given in written form.

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  Any other form of diabetes mellitus than type 2 diabetes mellitus

 -  Use of insulin, glitazone, gliptin or SGLT-2 inhibitor within the past 2 months

 -  HbA1c > 10.5% if on antidiabetic monotherapy and > 9.5% if on two antidiabetic drugs

 -  Fasting plasma glucose > 240 mg/dl

 -  Any history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, instable angina pectoris, or
 myocardial infarction within the last 6 months prior to study inclusion

 -  UACR ≥ 300 mg/g (early morning spot urine)

 -  Estimated GFR (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73m²

 -  Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 180/110 mmHg)

 -  Congestive heart failure NYHA stage III and IV

 -  Severe disorders of the gastrointestinal tract or other diseases which interfere the
 pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of study drugs

 -  Significant laboratory abnormalities such as serum Glutamate-Oxaloacetate-Transaminase
 (SGOT) or serum Glutamate-Pyruvate-Transaminase (SGPT) levels more than 3 x above the
 upper limit of normal range

 -  Drug or alcohol abuses

 -  Pregnant or breast-feeding patients

 -  Use of loop diuretics

 -  History of repetitive urogenital infection per year

 -  Body mass index > 40 kg/m²

 -  Triglyceride levels > 1000 mg/dl

 -  High density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels < 25 mg/dl

 -  Any patient currently receiving chronic (>30 consecutive days) treatment with an oral
 corticosteroid

 -  Patients being treated for severe auto immune disease e.g. lupus

 -  Participation in another clinical study within 30 days prior to visit 1

 -  Individuals at risk for poor protocol or medication compliance

 -  Subject who do not give written consent, that pseudonymous data will be transferred in
 line with the duty of documentation and the duty of notification according to § 12 and
 § 13 GCP-V