Feasibility Study on the Contribution of Guided Puncture With Echoendoscopy
Feasibility Study on the Contribution of Guided Puncture With Echoendoscopy
Impact of screening nodes mediastinal by PET, at different times of the management of cancer
 disease, remain unclear.

 Benefits of combined PET and puncture with echoendoscopy for the diagnosis subsequent
 therapeutic management should be evaluated in these different contexts.

 We would like to demonstrate the clinical utility of this association to replace more
 invasive diagnostic procedures and to assess the impact of the puncture on a possible
 modification of the therapeutic management.

 It is a single center prospective diagnostic assessment
Main objective :

 Assess the performance (in terms of sensitivity) of guided punction by echoendoscopy in the
 characterization of hypermetabolic mediastinal lymph nodes in PET, in a context of New cancer
 or cancer recurrence.

 Conduct of the study :

 When a patient has had a PET scan showing a hypermetabolic or mediastinal lymph nodes in the
 lower, middle or posterior, his case is presented in a multidisciplinary meeting (PCR # 1),
 with definition of diagnostic strategy:

 Approved indication is achieve a biopsy surgically to have a histological documentation of
 mediastinal lymph nodes with obvious impact on treatment decisions.

 We distinguish two groups of patients based on the feasibility of the surgical procedure:

 1. Group A biopsy is surgically feasible

 2. Group B: biopsy by surgery can not be performed (against medical contraindications or
 anesthetics) at that moment, definition of therapeutic strategy that was decided in the
 absence of histological documentation:

 -  Surgery outset

 -  Chemotherapy or other oncological treatment

 -  Supports non-oncological if benign disease suspected

 -  No treatment.

 EUS is performed by oesophageal for two patient groups for the two groups of patients (within
 a maximum period of six weeks after the PET scan), under general anesthesia and endoscopic
 control.

 According the pathological findings, the therapeutic strategy is defined in a second PCR (PCR
 # 2), to assess the impact of the puncture:

 -  Surgery outset

 -  Chemotherapy or other oncological treatment

 -  Supports non-oncological when benign pathology documented

 -  No treatment

 -  Selecting another surgical diagnostic procedure (non-contributory income).

 A patient monitoring will be conducted for 12 months. The clinical and radiological data
 carried over the standard of care of the patient will be collected. Achieving a
 thoracoabdominopelvic scanner (TAP) at 1 year to characterize the evolution of the disease
 marks the end of the study for the patient.

 For the patients who have had a negative biopsy, monitoring will involve a scanner TAP 6
 month and 12 month then consultation with the oncologist.
Inclusion Criteria:

 1. Any patients who have had PET showing one or more hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy in
 middle mediastinum and/or lower and/or posterior, and requiring diagnostic certainty
 for support.

 2. PET scans performed in these particulars :

 -  Pre-treatment assessment of thoracic or extra-thoracic malignancies (patients
 without a history of cancer).

 -  Evaluation of response to treatment referred to oncological.

 -  Suspicion of relapse in patients with a personal history of thoracic or
 extra-thoracic malignancies.

 3. PET, the result is positive :

 -  For above-centimeter lymph node short axis: greater result than or equal to the
 background hepatic noise.

 -  For sub-centimeter lymph node small axis : greater result than the background
 hepatic noise

 4. Patient with indication of diagnostic procedure surgically (whether realized or not)

 5. Lymph node(s) available(s) puncture by EUS esophageal, so for a technically feasible
 for esophageal puncture (without vascular recusants structures)

 6. Age ≥ 18 years.

 7. PET scan performed within 6 weeks before EUS

 8. Platelets ≥ 70 000/mm3; TP ≥ 60%.

 9. Patient of childbearing age with negative pregnancy test and / or a contraception.

 10. Patient gave informed consent signed.

 11. Patient affiliated to a social security scheme.

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  Contra-indication (s) Director (s) to achieve a EUS.

 -  Balance adverse anesthetic (not allowing a general anesthetic).

 -  Esophageal stenosis.

 -  Coagulation disorders.

 -  Pregnant or lactating women.

 -  Unable to undergo medical monitoring test for geographical, social or psychological
 reasons.

 -  Private patient freedom and major subject of a measure of legal protection or unable
 to consent.