22G-ProCore vs 22G-Standard Needle in Diagnosis of Lymphadenopathy by EBUS-TBNA
22G-ProCore vs 22G-Standard Needle in Diagnosis of Lymphadenopathy by EBUS-TBNA
The aim of this study is to compare the performance of 22G-ProCore and 22G-Standard needle in
 diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy via EBUS-TBNA with the purpose to explore
 the optimal technique for obtaining diagnostic material.
EBUS-TBNA is an important minimally invasive tool for the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar
 lymphadenopathy. The investigators will explore the performance of two kinds of needles and
 different methods to obtain tissues via EBUS-TBNA in the study. The study is designed as a
 prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 600 patients will be expected to
 enroll in the study and randomly assigned to two groups, the 22G-ProCore group and the
 22G-Standard group. The primary aim is to compare the diagnostic yields of the two types of
 needles. The secondary endpoint is to assess the quality of histologic specimen. Meanwhile,
 stylet slow-pull or negative suction techniques and different agitations (10, 20, 30 times)
 that each pass includes will be evaluated in the study as well.
Inclusion Criteria:

 1. Imaging examination indicates enlarged intrathoracic lymph nodes need pathological
 diagnosis (any lymph node has a short diameter > 1 cm in CT or PET-CT SUV value >
 2.5).

 2. Accessible mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy to EBUS-TBNA.

 3. Inform consent signed.

 Exclusion Criteria:

 1. Contraindications of EBUS-TBNA. Such as use of anticoagulant therapy or presence of a
 coagulopathy (platelet count < 50000 or INR > 1.5).

 2. Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction and other indications that can't tolerate
 bronchoscopy.

 3. Life expectancy less than 6 months.

 4. Uncooperative patients.

 5. Patients representing vulnerable populations (prisoners, pregnant women, etc).

 6. Researchers consider it inappropriate to participate in this study.