Effect of Dexamethasone Added To Bupivacaine During Caudal Block
Effect of Dexamethasone Added To Bupivacaine During Caudal Block
It is a prospective double blind randomized study on the effect of dexamethasone added to
 bupivacaine with plain bupivacaine for caudal block in patient for herniotomy.

 96 patients between the ages 1-6 years will be randomly selected and divided into two groups;
 B and BD.

 Group B will receive 1ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% (maximum volume 20mls) and group BD will
 receive a mixture of 0.2mg/kg dexamethasone in 1ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% (maximum volume =
 20mls).

 Data taken will then be analyzed and interpreted.
METHODOLOGY STUDY DESIGN. The study will be a prospective study. All the patients will be
 randomized into two groups, B and BD. In group B, patients will receive 1 ml/kg bupivacaine
 0.25% (maximum volume = 20 ml). In group BD, patients will receive a mixture of 0.2 mg/kg
 dexamethasone in 1 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% (maximum volume = 20 ml). The total volume
 injected will be 1 ml/kg in all patients.

 RESEARCH SETTING. The study will take place at Gbagada, Alimosho and Ifako Ijaye General
 Hospitals in Lagos.

 They are all secondary health care facilities with 800 bed spaces in Gbagada, 400 at Alimosho
 and 300 at Ifako Ijaye. General Hospital Gbagada was established in 1983 and situated in
 Gbagada, Alimosho in 2006, situated at Igando while Ifako ijaye was created in 2005 and
 located at Ifako. These three areas are densely populated suburbs of Lagos.

 SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATION. The minimum sample size for this study was calculated with the
 formula below 21

 n= z 2 x p x q d2 Assuming a 95% interval, 5% level of precision and a proportion of 90% 21 .

 Where n =minimum sample size Z =a constant (1.96 ;) a percentage point on standard normal
 deviation corresponding to 95% confidence interval.

 P =proportion of patient with positive dexamethasone analgesic effect obtained from a past
 study. (90%) 21 Q = complimentary probability; equivalent to (1-p) d =predetermined level of
 precision equivalent to 5% n= (1.96) 2 x 0.90 x.055 0.05 =76.0 approximated to 80 Sample size
 will be increased by 20% to provide for attrition=16 Therefore, sample size will be 80+16=96

 RANDOMIZATION After local ethics committee approval and a written informed consent has been
 obtained from parents or legal guardians, 96 patients undergoing elective unilateral inguinal
 herniotomy will be selected for this prospective randomized-controlled trial.

 Patients would be distributed into two equal groups: group B (n = 48), in which the caudal
 block will be performed using only bupivacaine, and group BD (n = 48), in which the caudal
 block will be performed using dexamethasone added to bupivacaine. The distribution will be by
 simple randomization method using computer generated random numbers.

 Numbers 1-96 will be randomly distributed into the two groups with each group having a total
 of 48 patients.

 ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT MECHANISM The patients will be seen at least a day before surgery for
 preoperative assessment.

 All patients would be fasted according to the AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGY (ASA)
 guidelines (2 h for clear fluids; 4 h for breast milk; 6 h for formula milk or light meal).
 No premedication will be administered and an informed written consent form will be filled by
 parent or guardian after adequate explanation of the scope of the study to parent or guardian
 and the older child as the case may be.

 All patients will have routine investigations performed. There will be two residents
 recruited as research assistants.Post emergence, the first ,assistant(who is also unaware of
 the group allocation)is to observe patient in the recovery room post operatively hence
 methods of pain assessment post operatively will be discussed with this research assistant.

 The second research assistant assigns participants to interventions and prepares the drugs.
 This assistant stays outside the operating room but within the theatre environ as he holds
 the key to the code.

 Using the sealed envelope technique, numbers 1-96 is placed in an envelope from which a
 research assistant allows patients parent or legal guardian to randomly pick a number.

 The research assistant then compares with the computer generated random sequence to determine
 which of the groups the patient belongs.

 Both the patient and investigator will be blinded to the allocation. All drugs will be
 prepared aseptically by this research assistant. The assistant would prepare the drugs. On
 arrival at the operating room, routine standard monitors would be applied
 (Electrocardiograph, noninvasive blood pressure, and pulse oximetry) and baseline vital signs
 taken.

 General anesthesia would be induced by the investigator (who is unaware of the group
 allocation) with incremental dose of halothane from 0.5- 2% in 100% oxygen. After induction
 of anesthesia, an intravenous line would be placed, followed by the insertion of an
 appropriately sized laryngeal mask airway which will be secured with tapes.

 When an adequate depth of anesthesia is attained, anesthesia would be maintained using
 isoflurane 1-2% in 100% oxygen. No muscle relaxants will be administered and the patients
 would breathe spontaneously using Mapleson F till the end of surgery. After properly securing
 the laryngeal mask airway, patients will be turned to the left lateral position.

 Under complete aseptic conditions caudal block will be performed using a 25-G short beveled
 needle. Correct placement of the needle will be confirmed by the characteristic 'pop' felt as
 the sacrococcygeal membrane when penetrated.

 The stilet will be removed while the plastic cannula is secured. Correct placement in the
 epidural space will be confirmed by absence of cerebrospinal fluid flow and absence of
 swelling during injection of drugs which occurs with a subcutaneous insertion.

 The investigator, who is the anesthesiologist performing the block would be blinded to the
 identity of the drug used as the epidural injectate for all patients would be presented in a
 20 mls syringe containing 20mls of a colourless, odourless, non-particulate solution of which
 the investigator who is the performer of the caudal block gives a dose of 1ml/kg.

 The codes B and BD are only known to the research assistant who prepared the drugs and only
 discloses the codes at the end of the study or in the event of an adverse reaction to any of
 the drugs used in the study.

 The end of injection will be taken as zero time. Surgery would commence 10 min after the
 block is performed to allow for the drugs to take effect.

 A standardized intraoperative fluid therapy will be used in all patients (10 ml/kg/h of
 normal saline solution). Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and arterial
 oxygen saturation (SpO2) would be recorded using non invasive blood pressure monitor and
 pulse oxymetry before induction and then every 5 min after induction of anesthesia till the
 end of surgery.

 During the intraoperative period, adequacy of analgesia would be assessed by hemodynamic
 stability, which would be defined by the absence of an increase of more than 20% in HR or MAP
 compared with pre incision values. An increase of more than 20% in HR or MAP would be
 considered an indication of inadequate analgesia and managed by a bolus dose of intravenous
 paracetamol 15 mg/kg, followed by further doses of intravenous diclofenac 1mg/kg if needed.
 The need for intraoperative analgesics would be recorded.Such patient will be considered as
 part of attrition.

 At the end of surgery, isoflurane is switched off and LMA is extubated when patient is awake.

 Emergence time (the time from end of surgery to opening of the eyes on calling the patients
 name) and a delayed anesthetic emergence (considered if 20 minutes elapsed from the end of
 surgery to exiting the operating theatre) were noted.

 After recovery, when the patients are able to maintain a patent airway, they would be
 transferred to the recovery room, where they remain for at least 2 h before being transferred
 to the ward. Post operative pain and hemodynamic variables (MAP and HR) would be recorded at
 the recovery room and then every 30 min till the patient is discharged to the ward after 3
 hours. Postoperative pain will be assessed using a modified Objective Pain Score (mOPS) every
 30 min for the first 2 h and at 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, and 24 h postoperatively. This score
 includes five criteria: crying, agitation, movement, posture, and localization of pain. Each
 criterion is assigned a score from 0 to 2, with 2 being the worst, to yield a possible total
 score of 0-10 [5]. If the mOPS score is 4 or more, rescue analgesia in the form of
 paracetamol 15 mg/kg orally would be administered. Further boluses of paracetamol 15 mg/kg
 would be administered orally every 4 h if required.

 Residual motor block and sedation level will be also assessed at 30 min and at 1, 2, 4, and 6
 h after surgery. Motor block will be assessed using a modified Bromage scale consisting of
 four points [0 = full motor strength (flexion of knees and feet), 1 = flexion of knees, 2 =
 little movement of feet only, 3 = no movement of knees or feet] [29]. The sedation score
 will; be assessed using a four-point scale (1, alert and aware; 2, asleep, arousable by
 verbal contact; 3, asleep, arousable by physical contact; and 4, asleep, not arousable).

 After transferring to the ward, rescue analgesia consumption, pain scores,the occurrence of
 postoperative vomiting during the first 24h after surgery will be recorded. Any other
 complications including itching, urine retention (no voiding of urine for 6 hour
 postoperative), respiratory depression (respiratory rate<10 breaths/min), hypotension (MAP
 decreased>20% of baseline), or bradycardia (HR decreased>20% of baseline) would be recorded
 by a research assistant for 24 hours. Any undesirable effect will be treated as follows; for
 shivering, patient is covered, given warm intravenous fluids, theatre room temperature is
 increased, for itching; intravenous chlorpheniramine is given, metoclopramide for vomiting,
 for urinary retention a catheter is passed.

 The time to first supplemental oral paracetamol from the end of surgery to the first modified
 objective pain score of greater than or equal to 4 will be recorded.

 The time to first micturition post caudal block and the incidence of bladder catheterization
 would also be recorded.

 The postoperative data in the recovery room would be recorded by the second research
 assistant mentioned above, this is the second research assistant mentioned above, a resident
 who was also blinded to the drugs used during the caudal block.

 The assistant would be with the patient in the recovery room for at least 3 hours before
 being transferred to the ward.

 MEASUREMENT Data will be collected using a data collection form designed by the investigator.

 Patients' blood pressure is measured with a noninvasive blood pressure monitor, heart rate
 and arterial oxygen saturation (SPO2) will be measured with a pulse oximeter and respiratory
 rate will be counted. These vital signs will be recorded at 2 minutes, 5 minutes and
 thereafter at 10 minutes interval throughout the course of surgery.

 DRUGS

 All drugs that will be used in this study will be those licensed for clinical use in Nigeria
 and they include:

 0.25% plain bupivacaine, dexamethasone, chlorpheniramine, atropine, paracetamol and
 diclofenac. All drugs will be provided by the researcher.

 PERIOD OF STUDY This study will be done over a period of about 3-6 months DATA MANAGEMENT
 Based on the calculation of sampled size, 96 patients would be In 2 groups of 48 patients
 each.

 Data collection will be done with a proforma in section A-D

 DATA ANALYSIS Data will be analysed using statistic package for social science (SPSS) version
 15 Demographic variable will be represented with tables and charts while summary statistics
 will be done with means and proportions.

 Test of association for categorical variables will be done using chi square. Test of
 association for quantities will be done using t tests and anova. Level of statistical
 significance will be set at p value of < 0.05
Inclusion Criteria:

 -  Patients aged 1-6 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) 1
 and 11 who are undergoing herniotomy and whose parents or legal guardian has duly
 signed an informed consent form.

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  Patients with hypersensitivity to any local anesthetics

 -  Children with Bleeding diathesis

 -  Presence of Infections at puncture sites

 -  Preexisting neurological disease

 -  Patients with diabetes mellitus

 -  Failure to consent by parents