Topical Tranexamic Acid in Caesarean Section
Topical Tranexamic Acid in Caesarean Section
The objective of this study is to investigate whether topical application of tranexamic acid
 into the uterine cavity and the surgical site intra-operatively can reduce blood loss and
 provide better surgical haemostasis in parturients with moderate to high risk for bleeding
 undergoing caesarean deliveries.
1.1 BACKGROUND

 Maternal haemorrhage is a significant cause of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide.
 The incidence of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) with blood loss in excess of 1000ml is
 estimated to affect 10.5% of live births globally. This translate to a staggering number of
 14 million women in the reproductive age group who suffers from complications of severe blood
 loss during childbirth every year. While the case fatality rate is low at around 1%,
 non-fatal health outcomes as a result of PPH remains unknown and this is further compounded
 by considerable variability in patients tolerance towards blood loss.

 Certainly, not all parturients experience similar risks for bleeding during their pregnancy.
 However, it is important to consider that even small amounts of blood loss may have a
 detrimental effect on maternal health especially in parturients with preexisting medical
 conditions like anaemia or cardiac disease. Measures aimed at addressing this global problem
 need to be given top priority in line with the United Nations Fifth Millennium Developmental
 Goal to improve maternal health and to reduce maternal mortality ratio by 75% by the year
 2015.

 Parturients undergoing caesarean section experience more blood loss compared to their
 counterparts who deliver vaginally. Recent studies reported average blood loss of 254ml to
 304ml for vaginal deliveries and 500ml to 592ml for caesarean deliveries. Identifying the
 risks and causes of PPH and recognising that PPH is a significant contributor to maternal
 mortality and morbidity is important to encourage efforts for early identification of
 parturients at risk of bleeding. However, despite the advances in modern obstetrics, PPH
 remains a significant problem not only in the developing world but also in countries with
 high resources and better medical facilities and presumably where more efficient protocols
 for management of PPH are in existence.Obviously, this indicate the need to explore newer
 methods for more effective prevention and treatment of PPH in the quest to improve maternal
 health.

 1.2 INVESTIGATIONAL AGENT AND MECHANISM OF ACTION

 Tranexamic acid, a tissue plasmin and plasminogen inhibitor, is a widely used drug which has
 showed benefit in reducing blood loss in various surgical specialties. It acts by reversible
 blocking the lysine binding sites of plasminogen and preventing its activation to plasmin.
 This inhibits the fibrinolytic process and prevent breakdown of polymerized fibrin, which is
 necessary for the blood clot to form.

 In this study, the investigators proposed the use of prophylactic administration of topical
 tranexamic acid given intra-operatively to parturients with moderate to high risk of bleeding
 undergoing caesarean sections, as part of the blood conservation strategy to aid surgical
 haemostasis and reduce blood loss. This relatively simple and easy to administer route of
 tranexamic acid is postulated to inhibit the local fibrinolytic process at the site of tissue
 injury. Bleeding in caesarean section can occur from the surgical incision site, from vessel
 injuries and from the placental separation site in the uterus. The investigators postulate
 that by applying tranexamic acid locally at these sites, a reduction in blood loss can be
 achieved and thus help prevent the occurrence of PPH and reduce the risk for blood
 transfusion.

 1.3 CLINICAL DATA TO DATE

 A few systematic reviews have been conducted in the past and the use of systemic and topical
 tranexamic acid in trauma, cardiac, spine and arthroplasty surgeries have mostly shown
 favourable outcomes. However, the evidence for use of tranexamic acid in obstetrics patients
 remains limited. A Cochrane review in 2010 of tranexamic acid for preventing PPH confirms the
 poor state of evidence in this area. The EXADELI (EXAcyl in the treatment of DELIvery
 haemorrhage) study shows reduction in median blood loss after 6 hours in the treatment group
 who received a high dose of tranexamic acid (4g in 1h followed by 1g/h) in women who develop
 PPH of more than 800ml within 2 hours of vaginal delivery. There is also a large
 international multi-centred randomised controlled trial currently in progress to investigate
 the use of systemic tranexamic acid in treating PPH in both vaginal and caesarean delivery
 (WOMAN trial) and its outcome is awaited eagerly.

 Both of these studies explored the use of systemic tranexamic acid for treatment of PPH after
 the diagnosis has been made. However, no studies have explored the use of topical tranexamic
 acid given prophylactically to reduce bleeding in patients undergoing caesarean deliveries
 and to aid surgical haemostasis intra-operatively.

 1.4 DOSE RATIONALE

 The optimum dose of topical tranexamic acid required to reduce bleeding is not know.
 According to the Cochrane review on topical tranexamic acid, there was an overall 29%
 reduction of blood loss with topical tranexamic acid after analyzing 29 studies involving
 2612 patients. The concentration of tranexamic acid used in these trials ranged from 0.7mg/ml
 to 100 mg/ml of saline solution.

 The dose of topical tranexamic acid used in this study was selected based on the findings of
 a systemic review and meta-analysis on the use of topical tranexamic acid in total knee
 replacements which demonstrated that a dose >2g significantly reduces transfusion
 requirements. This is supported by a recent review of topical tranexamic acid in hip and knee
 arthroplasty in 2014 which suggest greater reductions in blood loss and transfusion with
 increasing dose. The investigators will be using 2g in 20mls solution of tranexamic acid
 diluted with 100mls of normal saline 0.9% yielding a concentration of 16.7mg/ml saline
 solution of topical tranexamic acid and it is postulated that this concentration of
 tranexamic acid should result in a 25% reduction in bleeding based on the existing clinical
 data.

 1.5 OFF LABEL ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION

 Tranexamic acid is commonly prescribed in the oral or intravenous form. It has a good safety
 profile even when given systemically and the adverse effects related to the topical route are
 postulated to be less compared to the standard route of administration due to reduced
 systemic absorption of the drug. Furthermore, topical tranexamic acid is already used in
 clinical practice in many countries and there are many systematic reviews attesting to its
 efficacy and safety. Approval for the off-label route of administration of this drug has been
 obtained from the National Pharmaceutical Control Bureau and the Ministry of Health, Malaysia
 prior to the commencement of this trial.

 1.6 POTENTIAL RISKS

 Tranexamic acid has a well-documented safety profile. When given systemically (oral or
 intravenous) the adverse effects are as detailed in Table 1.

 Table 1: Adverse Effects of Systemic Tranexamic Acid

 Common (may affect up to 1 in 10 users) • Effects on the stomach and intestines: nausea,
 vomiting, diarrhoea (especially oral route)

 Uncommon (may affect 1 to 10 in 1000 users)

 • Effects on the skin: rash

 Rare (frequency not known from available data)

 -  Effects on the haematological system: malaise with hypotension (especially if injected
 too quickly intravenously), arterial or venous thrombosis

 -  Effects on the nervous system: convulsions (in cases of misuse where high doses of
 intravenous tranexamic acid are given)

 -  Effects on the eyes: vision disturbances including impaired colour vision

 -  Effects on the immune system: allergic reactions

 (For a more comprehensive list, please refer to the product information leaflets.)

 The topical route of tranexamic acid is chosen as the investigators hypothesize that topical
 administration when compared to systemic routes would offer comparable clinical benefits in
 controlling bleeding but at the same time be safer in terms of causing potential adverse
 effects. The advantage of a more targeted action of the drug at the site of bleeding and
 reduced systemic absorption of topical tranexamic acid will mean that the adverse effects are
 likely be rare and those that are of relevance as listed as follows:

 Table 2: Potential Adverse Effects of Topical Tranexamic Acid

 -  Effects on the haematological system: arterial or venous thrombosis

 -  Effects on the immune system: allergic reactions

 Although tranexamic acid may theoretically increase the risk of thromboembolic events,
 systematic review of the drug in 2007 when given intravenously did not demonstrate any
 statistically significant increase in the risks of any thromboembolic events as showed in
 Table 3.

 Table 3: Effects of Tranexamic Acid

 Events Relative Risk (95% CI) Myocardial infarction 0.96 (0.48-1.90) Stroke 1.25 (0.47-3.31)
 Deep vein thrombosis 0.77 (0.37-1.61) Renal Failure 0.73 (0.16-3.32)

 The investigators therefore concluded that topical tranexamic acid is likely to have minimal
 side effects on the study subjects.

 1.7 POTENTIAL BENEFITS

 Significant advantages of using topical tranexamic acid over systemic administration would
 include ease of use, targeted direct action of the drug at the site of bleeding with
 reduction in systemic complications, no risk of the drug entering the foetal circulation as
 the drug is administered only after delivery of the baby and placenta, and reduced adverse
 effects of the drug on the mother and the breast fed baby as the systemic absorption of the
 drug is unlikely to be significant. Ideally, we should also measure serum tranexamic acid and
 compare these to levels after systemic administration of the same dose of drug but this was
 not done due to limitation of cost and resources.

 If found to be effective, the investigators' study has potential health benefits to mothers
 with moderate to high risks of bleeding in caesarean sections by reducing blood loss in
 surgery and also the complications associated with bleeding. The use of topical tranexamic
 acid can be incorporated into routine everyday use for these groups of patients and this
 practice can be easily implemented even in hospitals with limited resources, as it is simple,
 inexpensive and has minimal adverse effects. Reduced bleeding and better surgical haemostasis
 can also translate into shorter operating time, reduced risks of blood transfusion, better
 patient outcome and savings to the cost of healthcare.

 1.8 SUBJECT RECRUITMENT AND SCREENING

 Parturients planned for caesarean sections and who have increased risks of bleeding as stated
 in the inclusion criteria would be referred to the investigating team for screening. Subjects
 who fulfill all the inclusion and exclusion criteria and who consents to participate in the
 study after proper explanation would be recruited.

 Written informed consent will be obtained from every patient prior to participation in this
 study. The investigator shall inform every subject in detail regarding the nature of this
 study, its purpose, the treatments and the probability of random assignment to the treatment
 groups, those aspects of the study that are experimental, the procedures involved, the
 possible risks, the reasonably expected benefits and the expected duration and the
 approximate number of subjects involved and their responsibilities. Consent will be obtained
 on a voluntary basis and refusal to participate in this study will not affect patient's
 subsequent medical treatment or relationship with the treating physicians.

 Advance information will be provided where possible to parturients who are identified to be
 moderate to high risk for bleeding during their antenatal follow up. This includes a brief
 summary of the trial and the Patient Information Sheet, which will be made available at the
 antenatal clinic. All parturients planned for elective surgery will be recruited during their
 pre-operative assessment one day prior to the surgery.

 Parturients planned for emergency surgery who fulfill the eligibility criteria for the study
 will be approached with the agreement of the obstetric team as soon as the decision of
 caesarean section is made. The Patient Information Sheet will be provided and the study will
 be discussed with her and an informed written consent will be obtained. Parturients with
 urgent indications for surgery where the timing of the caesarean section would be critical in
 determining the maternal and/or foetal outcomes will not be recruited as there would be
 insufficient time for them to give proper informed consent to participate in the study.

 Patients who are deemed not competent to give proper consent as a result of altered state of
 mind due to existing illness, suffering from severe pain or side effects of drugs given will
 be excluded from the trial.

 1.9 WITHDRAWAL OF SUBJECTS

 Subjects may be withdrawn from the study by the study investigators prior to the expected
 completion of that subject if there are any safety concerns or failure of subject to adhere
 to protocol requirements which arises after recruitment process (e.g. disease progression,
 new contraindications to the use of tranexamic acid, or there is a change in the planned
 surgery where the patient may no longer fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria).

 Patients enrolled in the trial may also withdraw their consent and discontinue their
 participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which they are otherwise
 entitled to and their subsequent medical treatment or relationship with the treating
 physicians will not be affected. The study investigators would seek to document the reason(s)
 for subject consent withdrawal for documentation purposes unless the subject refuses to
 divulge their reason(s) for withdrawing from the study, whereby their decision would be
 respected.

 In the event of subject consent withdrawal, the study investigator would clarify with the
 subject whether they wish to withdraw from all components of the trial or would they allow
 follow-up data collection activities to continue and the importance of obtaining follow-up
 safety data about the subject would be explained. All data already collected up to the point
 of subject withdrawal will be retained and analysed and attempts would also be made to obtain
 permission from the subjects who withdrew to record their follow-up safety data up to the end
 of subject follow-up period as described in the protocol.

 1.10 METHODS OF RANDOMIZATION

 Patients recruited into the trial will be randomized into 2 treatment groups; TXA group
 (Tranexamic acid 2g in 20mls solution diluted into 100mls of sterile sodium chloride 0.9%
 solution) or the Control group (120mls of sterile sodium chloride 0.9% solution) using
 software Research Randomizer (www.randomizer.org) and will be referred to as Group A and
 Group B respectively. This random assignment will be kept in sealed envelopes that will be
 marked with numbers corresponding to the sequence of patient's recruitment into the study.

 1.11 STUDY PROCEDURES

 1. The investigators will apply for special permission from the National Pharmaceutical
 Control Bureau and the Ministry of Health, Malaysia for the off-label route of
 administration of the tranexamic acid prior to the commencement of this trial.

 2. Ethics approval will be obtained from the Malaysia Research Ethics Committee.

 3. Patients who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be recruited into the
 study.

 4. Written informed consent will be obtained and patients will be randomized to 2 groups:
 The TXA group will receive 2g of topical tranexamic acid diluted in 100 ml of sodium
 chloride 0.9% during surgery whereas the Control group will receive 120ml of sodium
 chloride 0.9%.

 5. Patients' risk factors for bleeding during caesarean sections will be assessed and
 documented.

 6. The same surgical team will conduct the caesarean sections and they will carry out the
 surgery in a similar manner after patients are anaesthetised as per local practice. Only
 patients who received regional anaesthesia will be included in the study. Patients who
 are planned for general anaesthesia will not be recruited and those who required
 conversion to general anaesthesia after recruitment due to various reasons (i.e. failed
 regional anaesthesia, prolonged operation, maternal request) prior to administration if
 the study therapy will be drop out from the study and the reason for dropping out should
 be clearly documented in the case report form (CRF).

 7. The study therapy will be administered only after the delivery of the baby and the
 placenta. The attending surgeon should first attempt to secure the initial haemostasis
 by applying clamps at both ends of the surgical incision on the uterus. The placenta
 should be removed completely and two pieces of gauze used to thoroughly evacuate any
 remnants of conception from the upper and lower segment of the uterus (above and below
 the incision site) to ensure no remnants are sticking to the placental bed. The solution
 containing the study drug should then be syringed out from the gallipot using a sterile
 20ml syringe. 60mls of the solution will be applied topically to the placental bed as
 identified by the surgeon carrying out the surgery by spraying the solution into the
 cavity over the placental bed. Another 30mls of the solution will be applied to the open
 incision wound. The surgeon will then proceed to close the first layer of the uterus in
 the usual manner. After closure of the first layer, the repaired incision will then be
 dried with an abdominal pack. Any active spurting vessels will be secured prior to
 applying the remaining sample of study drug solution. Once the surgeon is satisfied
 there are no active vessel bleeders, another 30mls of the study drug solution is then
 applied topically on the closed incision wound in a similar manner. The rest of surgery
 is then carried out as per routine practice.

 8. At the end of the surgery, intra-operative blood loss will be documented by the
 circulating nurse and the anaesthetist in charge. Blood loss from the suction bottles is
 measured and all gauzes and drapes soaked with blood will be weighed using a sensitive
 weighing scale (up to 0.01g accuracy) and the total blood loss is documented in the CRF.
 Care is taken to separate amniotic fluids loss and actual blood loss by using different
 suction catheters during the operation.

 9. Intra-operative blood loss will be calculated using the following formula:

 Total intra-operative blood loss (mls) = i. Blood volume measured in suction bottle ii.
 Plus (+) wet weight of all gauzes and drapes soaked with blood iii. Minus (-) dry weight
 of all gauzes and drapes soaked with blood (Assumption of 1 gram of blood is equivalent
 to 1 ml of blood)

 10. Haematocrit levels are monitored at baseline (prior to caesarean section) and at 6 hours
 post-operatively.

 11. Subjects who have haemoglobin less than 70g/dl or have clinical symptoms of anemia will
 be transfused. All blood products transfused intra-operatively and in the first 24 hours
 after surgery will be documented.

 12. Use of additional uterotonics in addition to the routine 5 units oxytocin bolus at
 delivery of the baby and the subsequent maintenance of 40 units oxytocin over 6 hours
 will be documented in the CRF.

 13. Patients who has massive haemorrhage and who may benefit from the use of systemic
 antifibrinolytics based on the judgement of the attending physician can be given
 tranexamic acid intravenously or other antifibrinolytics according to clinical
 requirements and the types of drug and dosage given should be documented in the CRF.

 14. Patients are followed up till the time of discharge and the length of stay in hospital
 will be compared. Complications rate (number of events) post caesarean section as a
 result of bleeding (i.e. relaparotomy, hysterectomy, internal iliac artery ligations,
 embolization) and mortality will also be compared in both groups of patients.

 15. Serious adverse events (SAR) potentially related to the use of topical tranexamic acid
 (e.g. allergic reactions and thrombotic events including myocardial infarction, strokes,
 pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis) will be monitored closely by the attending
 physician up to the time of discharge. The principal investigator will be informed
 immediately of such events and the patient will be referred to the medical and intensive
 care unit for further management. A report regarding the SAR will be submitted to the
 relevant authorities.

 16. Subjects will be followed up to 30 days post caesarean section through telephone or
 email after discharge from hospital and any adverse events made known to the
 investigators by the patient or the primary team will be documented in the CRF.

 1.12 STATISTICAL PLAN

 Sample size calculation was done using the Power and Sample Size Calculation Version 3.0
 January 2009.

 The average blood loss expected in a lower segment caesarean section is estimated to be
 around 600 ± 187ml.5 A 25 % reduction in blood loss is predicted with the use of topical
 tranexamic acid. A sample size of 36 patients per arm would be required in this study
 assuming a power of 90 percent and a significant level of 0.05. A 20 percent drop out rate is
 projected, therefore a total of 84 patients will be enrolled with 42 patients in each arm of
 the study.

 All data will be collected into the CRF. The data will be keyed in using the Statistical
 Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Program for Windows Version 19. All dosed subjects
 will be included in data analysis. Data collected will be assessed further for their
 distribution. Continuous, numerical and parametric data (e.g. total blood loss measured,
 haematocrit trends in both groups) will be analysed using independent student t-test.
 Non-parametric numerical data will be analysed using the Mann Whitney-U test where else
 categorical data collected will be tested using the Chi-square test (e.g. risk factors for
 bleeding, transfusion requirements) as appropriate.
Inclusion Criteria:

 1. Parturients aged more than 18 years old

 2. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class 1 to 3

 3. Parturients planned for caesarean sections (both emergency and elective) under
 regional anaesthesia

 4. Parturients who have increased risks of bleeding during caesarean deliveries as
 follows:

 Moderate Risk for Bleeding

 -  Induction of labour

 -  Prolonged labour >12 hours

 -  Large baby > 4kg

 -  Pyrexia in labour

 -  Age > 40 years (not multiparous)

 -  Obesity (BMI >35)

 -  Anaemia (Hb < 9g/dl)

 -  Multigravida

 -  Previous history of PPH

 -  Previous scars

 High Risk for Bleeding

 -  Known bleeding disorders (congenital or acquired)

 -  Multiple pregnancies

 -  Preeclampsia and pregnancy induced hypertension

 -  Placenta praevia

 -  Placenta accreta/increta/percreta

 -  Placenta abruption

 Exclusion Criteria:

 1. Parturients who have an urgent/emergency indication for caesarean sections where
 timing of the operation may be critical in determining the maternal and/or foetal
 outcomes

 2. Patients who are planned for caesarean sections under general anaesthesia

 3. Patients who are already clinically bleeding prior to surgery

 4. Parturients who received blood transfusion within 48 hours prior to the caesarean
 section

 5. Patients with known allergy to tranexamic acid

 6. Patients with clear contraindications for tranexamic acid (e.g. thromboembolic event,
 history of convulsions)

 7. Patients with severe renal failure with creatinine clearance <10