Written Asthma Actions Plans Versus No Written Instructions In Specialty Care
Written Asthma Actions Plans Versus No Written Instructions In Specialty Care
The overall goal of this randomized, controlled study is to compare a model written treatment
 plan with the usual care that is provided by a group of adult and pediatric pulmonologists
 and allergists in their practice settings. The written treatment plan is a form that allows a
 treatment regimen that is consistent with National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
 guidelines to be conveyed to patients. Barriers to the use of written plans will be
 identified to better understand why some patients and physicians use written treatment plans
 more frequently and effectively than others. An additional goal is to assess how patients
 from different racial/ethnic backgrounds utilize treatments plans. Because asthma
 disproportionately affects African American and Latino patients, another goal of this study
 is to better understand if there are fundamental differences in the way patients from
 racial/ethnic minority groups self-manage asthma in comparison to their white counterparts.
 The study will also try to determine if differences exist in the way physicians care for
 minority patients. If there are differences, it is important to determine if the disparities
 can be overcome with the use of a written treatment plan form.
BACKGROUND:

 Effective self-management of asthma requires that patients, or their caregivers, recognize
 the early symptoms of an exacerbation and initiate appropriate interventions aimed at
 preventing the progression of symptoms. Most asthma clinical guidelines suggest that the
 incorporation of a written self-management plan is essential. Patients must possess,
 understand, and follow a written plan if they are to respond appropriately to changes in
 asthma status. Nevertheless, there are no controlled studies examining the efficacy of the
 written plan itself. Furthermore, even if written plans are an essential and effective
 component of successful self-management, the data suggest that few patients receive these
 plans. If patients and physicians are to increase their use of written plans, the barriers to
 the use of these plans need further investigation.

 DESIGN NARRATIVE:

 The three primary outcome measures of this study are as follows: 1) reduction in asthma
 symptom frequency; 2) reduction in urgent, unscheduled, and emergency visits for asthma; and
 3) improved quality of life. These outcomes will be measured over a 12-month period.

 The following four secondary outcome measures will also be examined: 1) hospitalizations due
 to asthma; 2) days with activity restriction; 3) the proportion of patients in the
 intervention group who are given the model written plan form during the initial visit; and 4)
 the proportion of patients in the intervention group who have the model treatment plan at the
 end of the follow-up period. These outcomes will be measured over a 12-month period.
Inclusion Criteria:

 -  This study will enroll parents of children (ages 5-17 years) with asthma and adult
 patients with asthma (ages 18-80 years) who receive care at one of 4 New York Ciry
 medical centers (New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia campus, New York Presbyterian
 Hospital-Cornell campus, Harlem Hospital Center, and Jacobi Medical Center)

 -  Diagnosis of persistent asthma (as defined by NHLBI guidelines)

 -  All participants are new patients to the practice

 -  Had never been seen by a specialist physician for asthma care

 -  Had never received a written asthma action plan

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  Co-morbidity with conditions that affect lung function (e.g, congenital or acquired
 heart disease, neuromuscular disease, sickle cell disease, or chronic lung disease
 [bronchopulmonary dysplasia, emphysema, or cystic fibrosis])