Study Comparing Urinary Diversion (Transurethral/Suprapubic) After Radical Prostatectomy
Study Comparing Urinary Diversion (Transurethral/Suprapubic) After Radical Prostatectomy
The study aims to show the technical feasibility of the suprapubic urinary diversion after
 endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) and has a greater comfort for the
 patients with at least the same catheter complication rate in comparison to the urethral
 urinary diversion.
Patients are randomized 1:1 in the different arms Recording of QoL measured by visual
 analogue ( pain )scale,EORTC QlQ -C 30 and QLQ - PR 25 questionnaires, incontinence rate,
 complication rate regarding insufficiency and strictures of vesicourethral anastomoses and
 urinary tract infection; demand of re-catheterization due to urinary retention and demand of
 antispasmodics
Inclusion Criteria:

 -  Adenocarcinoma of the prostate,

 -  Subjects treated by conventional or robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

 -  Be willing/able to adhere to follow up visits

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  Subjects treated by retropubic or perineal prostatectomy Subjects with known bladder
 cancer

 -  Contraindications for anticholinergic drugs

 -  Waist measurement > 100 cm

 -  No written informed consent

 -  Age < 18 years

 -  Subjects with known narrow-angle glaucoma