3D Versus 4K Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
3D Versus 4K Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Introduction: Three-dimensional key-hole surgery ('laparoscopic') systems are proven to
 reduce the time required to complete tasks in laboratory settings. This benefit derives from
 the addition of binocular depth perception cues when compared to two-dimensional (2D)
 systems. This year a '4K' laparoscopic system has become commercially available, so-named as
 it provides a high resolution 2D image with four times the number of pixels of 2D full high
 definition. The improved visualisation is likely to provide additional non-binocular depth
 cues. It is currently unclear to what degree improving the resolution of 2D systems can
 compensate for binocular depth cues.

 Aim: To determine whether the binocular vision provided by 3D laparoscopic systems provides
 benefits during laparoscopic cholecystectomy when compared to the monocular vision provided
 by high-resolution 4K systems.

 Methods: A randomised controlled trial of 3D HD versus 4K laparoscopic systems will be
 performed, comparing the time to complete laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and error scores.

 Impact: This study is a unique, first-of-its-kind investigation into two new surgical
 technologies, and is the first study to involve a 4K system. The uptake of three-dimensional
 systems has been curbed by financial cost and the limitations of early 3D technologies. This
 study aims to determine which system may be the safest, quickest and most cost- effective, in
 order to guide future investment and technological development towards either 3D or 2D
 systems. In addition, these systems may also aid in the learning curve of trainee surgeons.
Inclusion Criteria:

 1. Informed, written consent obtained after provision of information leaflets and
 face-to-face answering of any questions participants may have

 2. Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

 3. Medically fit for discharge as day case

 4. Age 18 to 85 years

 Exclusion Criteria:

 1. Unable to obtain informed, written consent

 2. Emergency cholecystectomy

 3. Not medically fit for discharge as day case

 4. Age <18 or >85 years

 5. Conversion to open cholecystectomy

 6. History of upper abdominal surgery

 7. Recent/current involvement in another clinical trial

 8. Common bile duct exploration at time of operation