A Comparison Between Two Educational Methods in the Rehabilitation of the Microstomia in Systemic Sclerosis
A Comparison Between Two Educational Methods in the Rehabilitation of the Microstomia in Systemic Sclerosis
Background: A typical feature of SSc is the fibrotic involvement of the connectival tissue of
 the face, which causes microstomia.

 Objectives: To test the effectiveness of an educational intervention with "face to face"
 training, compared to a standard information program, to reduce microstomia in women with
 SSc.

 Methods: SSc patients were randomized to the experimental and control group. Both groups
 received written and audiovisual information for self-management of microstomia; in addition,
 the experimental group received a reinforced training at baseline and at follow-up. Primary
 outcome: change in inter-incisal distance; secondary outcome: patient-reported mouth
 disability.
The study was designed as a single-blind, two-arm, randomized controlled study with a
 12-month follow-up period. Recruitment started in February 2013 and it continued until
 January 2015. After recruitment, the patients were seen quarterly (i.e., follow-up visits at
 3, 6, 9, and 12 months). Before follow-up visits, patients were contacted by phone to remind
 them of their appointment.

 The participants were inpatients, mainly from Central and Southern Italy, and they were
 enrolled in a single center, the IDI-IRCCS, FLMM, in Rome, a large dermatological reference
 center.

 Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis, according to the American College of
 Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria;23 age >18 years;
 ability to understand the Italian language; subjective perception of problems with opening
 the mouth, such as hardened tissues, reduced mobility, pain - confirmed by a dermatologist;
 signed informed consent.

 Exclusion criteria were edentulous patients, presence of dental conditions, documented
 dysfunction of the temporo-mandibular joint, oral neoplasia, sub-mandibular inflammatory
 conditions, patients already undergoing face massages or face physiotherapy, patients who had
 undergone mouth lipofilling, patients with severe hand disability (including deep ulcers, and
 severe pain), and patients with documented psychiatric conditions or taking psychotropic
 medications.

 Randomization The assignment to the intervention and control group was made according to a
 random sequence generated by a computer program. The randomization list was maintained by an
 investigator who was not involved in patient recruitment nor in outcome measurement.

 Each entry of the randomization list was placed in a sealed envelope, numbered in ascending
 order, and given to a research nurse after the inclusion/exclusion criteria were verified and
 the informed consent was obtained.
Inclusion Criteria:

 -  diagnosis of SSc, according to the ACR/EULAR criteria;

 -  age >18 years;

 -  ability to understand the Italian language;

 -  subjective perception of problems with opening the mouth, such as hardened tissues,
 reduced mobility, pain - confirmed by a dermatologist;

 -  signed informed consent.

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  edentulous patients,

 -  presence of dental conditions,

 -  documented dysfunction of the temporo-mandibular joint,

 -  oral neoplasia,

 -  sub-mandibular inflammatory conditions,

 -  patients already undergoing face massages or face physiotherapy,

 -  patients who had undergone mouth lipofilling,

 -  patients with severe hand disability (including deep ulcers, and severe pain),

 -  patients with documented psychiatric conditions or taking psychotropic medications.