Low Energy Dissection Vs. Electrocautery in Lumpectomy Shaved Surgical Margins
Low Energy Dissection Vs. Electrocautery in Lumpectomy Shaved Surgical Margins
The purpose of this study is to compare the qualitative severity and depth of dissection
 devices' associated thermal artifact in breast lumpectomy shaved margins between the use of
 electrocautery and low thermal energy dissection, PhotonBlade.

 The investigators hypothesize that the use of PhotonBlade would result in a significantly
 lower qualitative severity and a shorter depth of thermal artifact in breast lumpectomies
 shaved margins, when compared to electrocautery devices.
When performing lumpectomy, surgeons have used electrocautery devices as dissecting tools.
 However, those devices use high thermal energy that might impact the margin cellular
 architecture and as such the quality of margin assessment by the pathologist. Moreover,
 recently, modern low thermal energy dissection devices have been introduced to the market.
 However, the impact of those devices on reducing the thermal injury/artifact on surgical
 margin has not been well investigated. 4,5 While Ruidaz et al. 2011 data suggest that using
 the traditional electrosurgical device in place of the low thermal-injury device results in
 48% of the close margin samples being negatively converted to false-positive, and in 11%
 converting from close to false-negative, there is still a need for more studies to further
 characterize the utility of those devices. 6 PhotonBlade (Invuity, San Francisco, CA, USA)
 has been approved by United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). PhotonBlade is a
 dynamic precision illuminator with enhanced energy delivery dissection device. The dynamic
 precision illumination is a thermally cool illumination technology that allows a uniformal
 illumination without glare or shadow. 7 The enhanced energy delivery technology allows low
 thermal spread, surgeon controlled edge temperature, and wet field use.7 As such,
 PhontonBlade allows better blade control for achieving adequate visualization, hemostasis,
 with a minimum collateral damage to the surgical margin tissue. The use of PhotonBlade
 demonstrated the least penetrating thermal tissue damage/spread when compared to other modern
 dissection devices (Valleylab Pencil, Valleylab EDGE Coated Pencil, PlasmaBlade 3.0S and
 PlasmaBlade 4.0).8
Inclusion Criteria:

 -  have aged 18 years old or older.

 -  have DCIS or Invasive breast cancer that is eligible for breast-conserving surgery.

 -  have not had previous chest radiotherapy.

 -  understand the study purpose, requirements, and risks.

 -  able and willing to give informed consent.

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  None