The Efficacy of Alpha-blockers for Expulsion of Distal Ureteral Stones
The Efficacy of Alpha-blockers for Expulsion of Distal Ureteral Stones
Most of the patients suffering from renal colic have a distal ureterolithiasis. It had been
 demonstrated that α adrenoreceptors antagonists, given to patients suffering from renal
 colic, due to distal ureterolithiasis, had increased the frequency of stone expulsion rate ,
 reduced the time to expulsion and reduced analgesics consumption.Most of the studies
 evaluated the efficacy of Tamsulosin, which is a selective α 1A and α 1D adrenoreceptors
 antagonist.(The lower intramural portion of the ureter, where it passes through the detrusor
 muscle contains mostly α 1D and α 1A adrenergic receptors)

 Only one study these days describes the use of Alfuzosin, which is an α adrenergic receptor
 blocker and not selective for any α 1 adrenergic receptor, for expulsion of distal ureteric
 stones.Alfuzosin is a drug with a proven efficacy and considered uroselective with high
 specificity and sensitivity, for the treatment of BPH. There was no significant difference in
 efficacy between the two α blockers (Alfuzosin vs. Tamsulosin) concerning symptoms relief or
 flow improvement.

 The objective of this study is to compare patient who would receive the standard treatment
 for distal ureterolithiasis (analgesics, Rowatinex) to patients who would receive also a non
 selective α blocker (Alfuzosin) or a selective α blocker (Tamsulosin). This in order to
 evaluate the efficacy of treatment with α blockers for expulsion of distal ureterolithiasis.
The efficacy of alpha-blockers for expulsion of distal ureteral stones

 Urolithiasis is estimated among 8%-15% of the population in Europe and North America.1-5
 Patient who suffer from renal colic represent a very common reason for visiting the emergency
 room or for hospitalization. The stones are usually located in the ureter, mostly in its
 lower third.

 Some of the distal ureteral stone would pass spontaneously, depending on a few factors such
 as the stone's size, location, shape, smooth muscle spasm, submucosal edema and anatomy.

 Since renal colic is one of the most painful conditions, the time until expulsion of the
 stone should be reduced as much as possible. In case the stone obstructs and does'nt pass,
 damage to the kidney might occur, and surgical intervention should be considered. However,
 surgery and anesthesia are not risk free.

 The local reaction to obstructing ureterolithiasis manifests in ureteric smooth muscle
 contraction, edema, inflammation and pain. The ureter contains α -adrenergic receptors in the
 smooth muscle layer, along it's entire length. Since these receptors play an important role
 in ureteric contraction during renal colic, several studies were performed in order to
 evaluate the effect of α receptors blockade. These studies had demonstrated that different α
 blockers had increased the frequency of stone expulsion rate among patients with renal colic,
 reduced the time to expulsion and reduced analgesics consumption.

 Most of the studies evaluated the efficacy of Tamsulosin, which is a selective α 1A and α 1D
 adrenoreceptors antagonist. The lower intramural portion of the ureter, where it passes
 through the detrusor muscle contains mostly α 1D and α 1A adrenergic receptors.

 A common treatment these days to obstructive uropathy due to benign prostatic hypertrophy
 (BPH) is Alfuzosin. Despite the fact that it is an α adrenergic receptor blocker and not
 selective for any α 1 adrenergic receptor subtypes, it is a drug with a proven efficacy and
 considered uroselective with high specificity and sensitivity, for the treatment of BPH.
 There was no significant difference in efficacy between the two α blockers (Alfuzosin vs.
 Tamsulosin) concerning symptoms relief or flow improvement, and side effects were similar.

 Only one study these days describes the use of Alfuzosin for expulsion of distal ureteric
 stones.

 The objective of this study is to compare patient who would receive the standard treatment
 for distal ureterolithiasis (analgesics, Rowatinex) to patients who would receive also a non
 selective α blocker (Alfuzosin) or a selective α blocker (Tamsulosin). This in order to
 evaluate the efficacy of treatment with α blockers for expulsion of distal ureterolithiasis.

 Materials and methods:

 Participants - Individuals who will be referred to the emergency room or be admitted to the
 urology department in Soroka hospital, (Beer-Sheva, Israel) because of acute renal colic. The
 patient would be considered for the study only if the stone would be located in the distal
 ureter.

 This study is estimated to include 120 patients and last 6 months. The patients would be
 divided randomly to three groups:

 A. Patients with renal colic that would receive Abitren and Rowatinex B. Same therapy plus
 Tamsulosin (0.4 mg/daily) C. Same therapy as A plus Alfuzosin (10 mg/daily)

 The treatment would last up to 4 weeks.

 The duration of the trial would be until expulsion of the stone, but not longer than 4 weeks.
 Patients who would not pass the stone spontaneously, would be referred to intervention (ESWL,
 ureteric stent insertion, ureteroscopy)

 Treatment discontinuation would be due to hospitalization (intractable pain, fever, the need
 for an intervention)

 The α blockers treatment would be once daily, until stone expulsion, or up to four weeks.

 The initial treatment protocol would be the standard treatment - I.V fluids and analgesics

 Each patient would be initially evaluated by:

 -  physical examination

 -  abdominal radiography

 -  serum creatinine and leukocytes measurement

 -  urinalysis

 -  renal ultrasonography

 -  blood pressure measurement

 The follow up:

 The blood pressure measurements would be taken by the family physician, two days and one week
 after the beginning of the treatment. Four weeks after the treatment begins, each patient
 would be checked in the out patient clinic. Unenhanced CT scan, serum creatinine and blood
 pressure measurement would be taken. In case the patient would not pass the stone,
 intervention would be scheduled.
Inclusion Criteria:

 • renal colic due to radiologically proven distal ureteral stones

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  stone larger than 10 mm

 -  fever

 -  urinary tract infection

 -  additional stones, that might be the reason for the renal colic

 -  severe hydronephrosis

 -  known sensitivity to α blockers

 -  concomitant treatment with α blockers, β blockers, calcium antagonists, and nitrates

 -  pregnancy

 -  inability to provide informed consent

 -  a history of surgery or endoscopic procedures in the urinary tract

 -  history of spontaneous stone expulsion

 -  known ureteral stricture

 -  diabetes

 -  blood pressure values lower than 100/70 mm hg