Treatment of Peritonitis in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis
Treatment of Peritonitis in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis
INTRODUCTION: Secondary bacterial peritonitis is the main infectious complication associated
 with peritoneal dialysis (PD), is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The
 peritonitis is the first cause of conversion to hemodialysis. Automated peritoneal dialysis
 (APD) can perform a certain number of cycles over a period of time. The APD is growing and
 has decreased the cases of peritonitis compared with continuous ambulatory peritoneal
 dialysis (CAPD). Actually, the method of antibiotic treatment of peritonitis in APD is
 changing to CAPD modality; or adding an additional replacement during the day. The treatment
 with antibiotics in APD is unknown.

 OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of antibiotic treatment aplication of peritonitis in APD
 using standar technique vs aplication in APD in patients of IMSS.

 MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and two patient through a random, simple blind, comparative
 clinical trial, investigators will be included patients >18 years in APD in 3 hospitals of
 Colima, with diagnosis of peritonitis, functional catheter. One of which will be peritonitis
 treatment with APD and the other with one exchange on CAPD per day. The initial antibiotic
 scheme will be applied to both groups continuously based on: ceftazidime (1500mg/day) and
 vancomycin (20mg/kg every 3 days) according to current management guidelines; adjusting the
 management according to the result of the culture, completing the antibiotic scheme for 14 to
 21 days. The clinical progress will be monitored until there is resolution. Investigators
 consider the problem resolved when symptoms have disappeared and negative cytology has been
 obtained. Investigators will collect demographic data, comorbidity, time in PD and APD,
 causes of peritonitis; verify PD technique, residual uresis, other sites of infection and
 previous peritonitis.

 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Includes descriptive of clinical characteristics of patients.
 Investigators will use relative risk, reduction of relative risk, and number necessary to
 treat. Qualitative variables will be analized by: Chi square test, Fisher's exact test, as
 appropriate. To compare quantitative variables the U Mann Whitney or t Student can be used.
 Logistic regression will be use to perform multivariable analysis. SPSS 24 will be used.
 Investigators consider significancy p<0.05.
INTRODUCTION: Secondary bacterial peritonitis, the main infectious complication associated
 with peritoneal dialysis (PD), is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.
 Diagnosis of peritonitis include signs and symtoms: nausea, vomiting hyporexia, diarrea,
 abdominal pain, fever, cloudy fluid, altered cytology and others. Mexico reported end-stage
 renal disease in 866 patients per million population (pmp) and 485 pmp in treatment with PD.
 The Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS) report end-stage renal disease in 55,101
 patients and 59% in DP treatment. The peritonitis is the first cause of morbidity in patients
 with DP and main cause of conversion to hemodialysis. In our country, peritonitis has been
 reported with a rate of 1.2 episodes/year per patient, superior to international
 recommendations. Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), using the cycler connected to the
 patient via tubing and programed to perform a certain number of cycles over a period of time.
 The use of APD is growing in all the world and has decreased the cases of peritonitis
 compared with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). CAPD has known as manual
 dialysis, usually need 3 exchange in day and 1 exchange in the night with duration time of 5
 to 6 hours. The antibiotic treatment in peritonitis should be with first generation
 cephalosporin or vancomicin or third generation cephalosporins or aminoglycoside. Actually,
 the method of antibiotic treatment of peritonitis in APD is changing to CAPD modality; or
 adding an additional replacement during the day. But this form of treatment increases the
 cost to patient and institutions. It is not practial, because the patient is not trained to
 change to CAPD and resources to CAPD are not inmediately available. However, the treatment
 with antibiotics in APD is unknown. Actual recommendation of international guidelines is to
 develop more clinical trials to increase the evindece on this topic. There are not enough
 clinical studies to support or to rule out it´s effectiveness.

 OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of antibiotic treatment aplication of peritonitis in APD
 using standar technique vs aplication in APD in patients of IMSS.

 HIPOTHESIS: The efficacy of antibiotic treatment of peritonitis in APD is superior treatment
 than in CAPD technique, with patients who are insured by IMSS.

 MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and two patient samples calculated to estimate two
 proportions with a confidence level of 0.05 and 80% power. Through a random, simple blind,
 comparative clinical trial, aproved to national IMSS commite will be included patients > 18
 years in APD at the Hospital General 1, 10 and sub-zone 4 of Colima, with diagnosis of
 peritonitis (abdominal pain, turbid fluid, cytologic with leukocytes >100 cells/mm3,
 polymorphonuclear >50%), functional catheter and signed informed consent of acceptance to
 participate in the study will be included. Patients allergic to vancomicyn and ceftazidime
 will be not included. Intestinal perforation, abdominal cavity classified as unfit to PD,
 adverse effects of antibiotic and patients who decide to leave the study will be elimination
 criteria. Patients will be selected through a table of random numbers, and divided to form
 two treatment groups with 51 patients. One of which will be peritonitis treatment with APD
 and the other with one exchange on CAPD per day. The initial antibiotic scheme will be
 applied to both groups continuously based on: ceftazidime (1500mg/day) and vancomycin
 (20mg/kg every 3 days) according to current management guidelines; adjusting the management
 according to the result of the culture, completing the antibiotic scheme for 14 to 21 days.
 Cytological analysis of dialysis fluid will be performed each two days. The clinical progress
 will be monitored until there is resolution, either in the hospital or in the patient´s home.
 We consider the problem resolved when symptoms have disappeared and negative cytology has
 been obtained (leukocytes <100 cells/mm3). Patients will be excluded if they present adverse
 effects to antibiotics, intestinal perforation, abdominal cavity unfit to PD, fungal
 peritonitis, patients who decide to leave the study. We will collect demographic data,
 comorbidity, time in PD and APD, causes of peritonitis; verify PD technique, residual uresis,
 other sites of infection and previous peritonitis. Dependent variable is peritonitis, and
 indepentent variable is antibiotic treatment in PD and intervening variables are type 2
 Diabetes, insertion site infection, tunelitis, previous peritonitis, time in PD, error in
 technique of PD.

 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Includes descriptive and statistic inference of clinical
 characteristics of patients. The presentation of data hovers through a descriptive statistic
 (mean or median, standard deviation or interquartile range depending on the distribution of
 the data through Kolmogorov-Smirnov). To know the effect of the treatment we will use methods
 of relative risk, reduction of relative risk, and number necessary to treat. The observation
 of qualitative variables will be determined by: Chi square test, Fisher's exact test, as
 appropriate. To compare quantitative variables between groups, the U Mann Whitney or t
 Student can be used. Logistic regression will be use to perform multivariable analysis. The
 statistical package SPSS 24 will be used. We will be considering significancy if p<0.05. The
 resources used are contributed by the researchers and the IMSS. The estimated time to develop
 the study is 12 months.
Inclusion Criteria:

 -  > 18 years in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis.

 -  Patients in the Hospital General 1, 10 and sub-zone 4 of Colima.

 -  Patients with diagnosis of peritonitis (abdominal pain, fever, vomiting, nausea,
 turbid fluid, cytologic with leukocytes >100 cells/mm3, polymorphonuclear >50%).

 -  Functional catheter.

 -  Signed informed consent of acceptance to participate in the study.

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  Patients allergic to vancomicyn.

 -  Patients allergic to ceftazidime.

 -  Patients with Intestinal perforation.

 -  Patients with abdominal cavity classified as unfit to PD.