Longitudinal Study of Different Surgical Approaches in Chinese Patients of Uterine Cervical Cancer
Longitudinal Study of Different Surgical Approaches in Chinese Patients of Uterine Cervical Cancer
This multi-center longitudinal study aims to compare the survival outcomes (including overall
 survival, progression-free survival and disease-free survival between uterine cervical
 patients receiving different surgical routes (vaginal, laparotomy and laparoscopy), which is
 the primary study objective. All clinical and pathological data would be retracted from case
 reviews, and all survival data would be reached by clinic, telephone and mail follow-up. This
 study also would analyze the impact on survival outcomes of other factors, including
 nerve-sparing techniques, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and infection of
 human papillomavirus. The predictive effects of different following protocol and imaging
 plans will be also compared. Last, the influences of surgical routes on the fertility
 outcomes (pregnancy and its complications) and the ovarian reserve are important secondary
 study objectives.
Inclusion Criteria:

 -  Pathological confirmed as uterine cervical cancer

 -  Having definite clinical information

 -  Having received radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy

 Exclusion Criteria:

 -  Not satisfying any of the inclusion criteria