tataś ca yadidam ucyate svāśrayendriyasannikarṣāpekṣapratipattikaṃ sāmānyam iti tadayuktam āśrayasyaivāyogāt, kuta stadgatendriyasannikarṣādyapekṣatā bhaviṣyati /
Therefore, when it is said that "the Universal's apprehension depends on the contact of the sense-organ with its substratum," this is incorrect because there cannot even be a substratum [for the Universal]. How then could there be any dependence on sense-organ contact with such a [non-existent] substratum?