apica yadā sarva evāyaṃ śābdo vyavahāras taimirikadvayadvicandradarśanavat svapratibhāsānurodhena bhrānta eveṣyate, tadā kathaṃ vivakṣāviśeṣe vyabhicārodbhāvanādaprāmāṇyaprasañjanaṃ syāt, tatra vivakṣāviśeṣe pāramārthikasya prāmāṇyasyānabhyupagamāt /
Moreover, when this entire verbal usage is considered illusory, following its own appearance like the perception of two moons by one with eye disease, how could there be an attribution of invalidity based on showing deviation regarding a particular intention, since ultimate validity regarding that particular intention is not accepted there?