yasya ca nityaṃ kāyādeva vijñānam utpadyata iti darśanaṃ tasya na kvacidyathoktasādhyadharmatvasamanvito dṛṣṭāntaḥ siddha iti katham idānīntanacittavatpūrvaijñānavad ityetayor dṛṣṭāntayor upanyāsa iti
[According to the opponent] who holds that cognition always arises from the body alone, there can be no instance fulfilling the conditions of the probandum as stated; so why has [the Buddhist] presented these two instances of 'present cognition' and 'previous cognition'?