yatas tantuṣvapi paṭa āśrita iti yat samavāyabalād upavarṇyate, sa samavāyaḥ kapāleṣu kiṃ nāsti, yena tatra tantuṣviva paṭo 'stīti tadbuddhir na bhavet / kintu ya eva tantau paṭasya samavāya iti nirdiśyate sa eva paṭasya samavāyaḥ kapāleṣu, tat kathaṃ saṅkaro na syāt / tat tasmāt dhīranavadhiḥ avadhirahitā bhavet /
Since what is described by the force of samavāya as "cloth inheres in threads" - is that samavāya not present in potsherds, due to which the cognition that "cloth exists [there] just as in threads" would not arise? Rather, that very samavāya of cloth which is specified as being in thread would be the same samavāya of cloth in potsherds, so how could there not be confusion? Therefore, cognition would be unlimited [i.e., without restrictions].