nanu yathānumānaprasiddhasyātyarthasya putrādigataśyāmatvādeḥ punaḥ kālāntareṇa pratyakṣeṇa bādhyamānasyānyathātvaṃ bhavati tathātrāpi yadi nāma pratyabhijñanato nityatvamarthasya siddham, tathāpyuttarakālaṃ tatkāryeṇa kramiṇā kramasyānumānataḥ siddher anyathātvaṃ siddhameva, tat kathaṃ kṣaṇabhaṅgitvaṃ bādhyata
[One might object:] Just as something established through inference, like the dark complexion of a child, can later be contradicted by direct perception, similarly here, even if the permanence of an object is established through recognition, its successive nature could still be proven later through inference based on its sequential effects - so how is momentariness refuted?