athāviśeṣāspadapadārthāntarbhūtajñeyaviṣayatve satītyaparaṃ viśeṣaṇamupādīyate / yathoktaṃ bhāviviktena / evam api yathoktaviśeṣaṇāsiddher asiddho hetur vyāptyabhāvāccānaikāntikaḥ //
If [it is suggested that] a further qualification be added [stating] that "it has for its objective a cognizable [thing] which is included under a category which cannot be specified" - as has been asserted by Bhāviveka - even so, because such a qualification would be unproven, the Reason itself would be 'Inadmissible', as well as 'Inconclusive', due to the absence of invariable concomitance.