tatrāpyutpādyakathādiṣu nityā śaktiriṣṭaiva, kintvasatyevārthe yo niyogaḥ puruṣaiḥ kriyate, so 'nityas tadvaśād eva nityāyāṃ śaktau pratītivibhramo bhavati, tasmād asiddho dṛṣṭānta iti //
Even in those created stories and such, the potency is indeed accepted as eternal, but the application which is made by people even when the referent is non-existent is non-eternal; due to that alone confusion in the cognition of the eternal potency arises; therefore the example is invalid.