niścayo hi samāropaviparītākāratvāt tadviṣayam anirākṛtya nātmasthitim āsādayati, uṣṇasparśa iva śītam iti kutas tena viṣayīkṛte viṣaye samāveśo viparyāsasya /
Indeed, since certainty has a form opposite to superimposition, it does not attain self-establishment without negating that object [of superimposition], just as warmth [does not establish itself] without [negating] cold - thus, how could there be any scope for wrong cognition with respect to an object that has been made its [i.e. certainty's] object?