tena yathājātau prādhānyena vācyāyāṃ pāratantryeṇa tadvato 'bhidhānāt tadgatabhedānākṣepāt tena saha sāmānādhikaraṇyāder abhāvaprasaṅga uktaḥ tadvad apohapakṣe nāvatarati vyatiriktānyāpohavato 'nābhidhānāt
Therefore, just as in the case of universals being primarily denoted, the defect was stated that due to the dependent denotation of what possesses it and non-indication of its varieties, there would be no possibility of co-reference etc., similarly [this defect] does not arise in the Apoha theory since there is no denotation of anything separate possessing exclusion of others.