kiṃ tarhivijñānajananayogyaghaṭādyutpādanena jñāpako rūḍho natu liṅgatveneti tasya liṅgabhūtasya pakṣadharmatvādicintā na yuktaiva / anyathā cakṣurādīnām api pakṣadharmatvādi codanīyaṃ syāt /
Rather, [the lamp] is established as an indicator through producing cognition-generating objects like pots, but not through being an inferential mark. Therefore, consideration of [the lamp] as having the property of being present in the subject (pakṣadharmatva) etc. is not appropriate. Otherwise, one would have to claim that the eyes and other [sense organs] also have the property of being present in the subject etc.