tathā hi pareṇa paramāṇūnāṃ saṃyuktatvaṃ nairantaryaṃ tathā bahubhiḥ sāntaraiḥ parivāraṇaṃ cetyabhyupagatam anyathā kathaṃ ca pratyayo bhavet tataś ca yadyapi digbhāgabhedo vācā nābhyupagatas tathāpi saṃyuktatvādidharmābhyupagamabalādevāpatati /
For the opponent has accepted that atoms have conjunction, contiguity, and [that they are] surrounded by many [other atoms] with intervals; otherwise how could there be cognition [of them]? And thus, although the difference of spatial directions has not been verbally admitted, it nevertheless follows from the force of accepting [their] properties such as conjunction.