na ca naṭacandramallaprakṣāsu kaścijjñānopalambho 'sti yo na jñeyopalambhakaḥ jñeyopalambho vā na jñānopalambhaka iti kuto 'siddhatā /
And in [performances] like those of dancers, wrestlers and such, there exists no apprehension of cognition that does not apprehend the cognized object, nor any apprehension of the cognized object that does not apprehend cognition - so how can [the reason] be inadmissible?