tathāhyavyutpannasapakṣādivyavahāro bhaṭādir api yatra dhūmas tatra vahnir dhūmaścātretyetāvanmātram ukto 'vadhāritānvayavyatirekaḥ sapakṣādivyavahāramantareṇaiva vahnimpratipadyata eva, tasmān na sādhanakāle sapakṣādivyavasthāsti /
For instance, even an uneducated person like a Bhaṭa, who does not know the usage of sapakṣa etc., when told just this much: "where there is smoke, there is fire, and there is smoke here," grasps the positive and negative concomitance and understands [the presence of] fire without [knowledge of] the usage of sapakṣa etc. Therefore, there is no distinction of sapakṣa etc. at the time of proving.