yaduktam nacānavayaṃ vyometyādi, tatrāpi sāvayavasya nabhaso yadi nityatvamabhyupagamyate tadā yadanavayanityanabhaḥpakṣe dūṣaṇaṃ tat sarvaṃ samānam ityatidiśati nabhasa ityādi //
Regarding what was stated [earlier] that "ākāśa is not without parts," if the divisible ākāśa is accepted to be eternal, then all the same objections that were raised against the view of "eternal partless ākāśa" would equally apply [here too], as indicated by [the words] "of ākāśa" etc.