ghaṭādyupādhigataṃ yatsāmānyaṃ ghaṭatvādi tatsvāśrayeṣveva ghaṭādiṣu vartate nāśrayāntare paṭādau tat kathaṃ vijātīyapaṭādigataprāgabhāvādau tasmāt pratyayaḥ syād iti bhāvaḥ
The universal like jarness that inheres in adjuncts like jar subsists only in its own substrata like jars, not in other substrata like cloth - so how could there arise from that a cognition regarding prior negations etc. pertaining to heterogeneous things like cloth? - this is the meaning.