kiṃ ca nīlamutpalamityekārthaviṣayā buddhir na prāpnoti, ekadravyasamavetayorguṇajātyor dvābhyāṃ pṛthakpṛthagabdhidhānāt, na caikārthaviṣayajñānānutpāde śabdayoḥ sāmānādhikaraṇyamastītyalaṃ bahunā
Moreover, the cognition of 'nīlam utpalam' would not result in [reference to] a single object, since the quality and universal inhering in a single substance would be separately denoted by the two [words], and when there is no arising of cognition of a single object, there can be no co-reference between words – [so] enough [said] about this.