syād etat mābhūd upalabdhilakṣaṇaprāpto 'smākaṃ sarvajñastathāpi kimityete 'nupalabdhiprayogās tadabhāvasiddhaye na sambhavantītyāha tenetyādi /
[One might say:] "Let it be that the omniscient one is not apprehensible to us, but why should these arguments of non-apprehension not be possible for proving [his] non-existence?" - this is what [the author] addresses with "tena" etc.