tathā hi sa nirdiśyamānaḥ svaśabdena vā nirdiśyate, yathā nāsti kvacit pradeśaviśeṣe ghaṭa upalabdhilakṣaṇaprāptasyānupalambhād iti nirdeśās tathā sarvajñābhāvasiddhaye 'pi syāt
For when such [non-apprehension] is put forward, it could be put forward either directly by its own terms - as in [the argument] "there is no jar in this particular place because of non-apprehension of what fulfills the conditions of apprehensibility" - and similarly for proving the non-existence of the Omniscient One.