bhavatvevaṃ kalpanā kiṃtvidam iha nirūpyate yā tasya sahakārisākalyāvasthāyāṃ prakṛtiḥ kiṃ saiva vaikalyāvasthāyām āhosvidanyā yadi saiva tadā sahakāriṇo 'pi nityāḥ prāpnuvanti //
Let it be so. But what is to be examined here is this: Is that nature which [belongs to it] in the state of completeness with auxiliaries the same [nature] in the state of incompleteness, or is it different? If it is the same, then the auxiliaries also must be permanent.