tatra prathame pakṣe siddhasādhyatā pratijñādoṣaḥ tathāhyasmābhir gotvākhyaṃ sāmānyaṃ gośabdena vācyamityevam iṣyate bhavatā cāgonivṛttilakṣaṇaṃ sāmānyaṃ gośabdenocyata iti bruvatā tadeva śabdāntareṇābhidhīyata iti kevalaṃ nāmni vivādaḥ //
In the first alternative, there is the fault of proving what is [already] established in the proposition, for we maintain that what is to be denoted by the word "go" is the universal named "cowness", and when you say that what is expressed by the word "go" is the universal characterized by the negation of non-cow, the same thing is being expressed in different words - thus the dispute is merely about names.