tathā hi buddhiścittaṃ jñānam indriyamakṣaṃ vedanā cittanuḥ kāyaḥ śarīramityādīnāṃ buddhīndriyavedanāśarīraparyāyāṇām ekapadatve 'pi nāsmante 'sti tadvyatiriktapadārthābhidhāyiteti tato vipakṣādvyāvṛttyasiddher anaikāntikatvam /
For in the case of such synonyms as buddhi, citta, jñāna; indriya, akṣa; vedanā and citta; kāya and śarīra - [which are] synonyms for buddhi, indriya, vedanā and śarīra [respectively] - even though they are single terms, according to us there is no denotation of distinct objects, and therefore, due to the non-establishment of exclusion from the counter-example, [the reason] is inconclusive.