yat prameyādhigatirūpaṃ na bhavati na tat pramāṇaṃ, yathā ghaṭādi, prameyādhigatiśūnyaścābhāva iti vyāpakānupalabdhiḥ //
That which is not of the nature of cognizing objects cannot be a means of cognition, like a jar and so forth; and absence is devoid of [the nature of] cognizing objects – thus [there is] non-apprehension of the pervader.