yadyevaṃ katham ayam ācāryīyo vṛttigrantho nīyate / tadyathā yadṛcchāśabdeṣu nāmnā viśiṣṭo 'rtha ucyate ḍittha iti jātiśabdeṣujātyā gaur iti guṇaśabdeṣu guṇena śukla iti kriyāśabdeṣu kriyayā pācaka itidravyaśabdeṣu dravyeṇa daṇḍī viṣāṇīti
"If it is as asserted above, then how do you explain the Teacher's commentary? For instance, he has declared: In the case of proper names like 'Ḍittha', what is denoted is an object qualified by a name; in the case of universal-denoting words like 'cow', [what is denoted is] the object qualified by the universal 'cow'; in the case of quality-words like 'white', by the quality; in the case of action-words like 'cook', by the action; in the case of substance-words like 'staff-bearer' or 'horn-bearer', by the substance."