tatropanayavacanaṃ na sādhanam, uktahetvarthaprakāśakatvāt, dvitīyahetuvacanavadityācāryadignāgapādaiḥ pramāṇite bhāviviktādayo hetvasiddhyartham āhuḥ na khalu pakṣadharmatvaṃ pratijñānantarabhāvinā hetuvacanena prakāśyate kāraṇamātrābhidhānāt
On this [point], Ācārya Dignāga authoritatively stated that "the statement of application is not the proof, since it only illuminates the meaning of the stated reason, like a second statement of the reason." But Bhāvivikta and others, to establish the [necessity of] reason, said: "The property of the subject is certainly not made clear by the statement of reason that follows the proposition, since it merely states the cause."