naiva kaścit / yadi hi kaścid asyāgner upalambhādidaṃ dhūmādyupalabdhamasyānupalabdhau nopalabhyata ityevaṃ kramavatīṃ gatimekakartṛtvena pratisaṃdadhīta, tadā syāt kāryakāraṇabhāvasiddhiḥ, sa ca nāsti pratisandhātā tvan mateneti na kāryakāraṇabhāvaḥ siddhyed ity arthaḥ //
Indeed no one. For if someone could, as a single perceiver, connect the successive cognition that "from the apprehension of this fire, this smoke is apprehended, and without the apprehension of the former, the latter is not apprehended," then the causal relation could be established. But according to your view, there is no such connector, therefore the causal relation cannot be established.