ata eva saṃyogāvayavinorabhāvāt sādharmyadṛṣṭānto ghaṭaḥ sādhanadharmavikala iti darśayati sādhanānanvitam ityādi // evaṃ tāvad viśeṣaṇaviśeṣyāsiddhyā svarūpato 'siddhatvaṃ hetoḥ pratipāditam idānīm āśrayaikadeśāsiddhyāpyasiddhatvam iti darśayati cakṣur ityādi /
For this very reason, due to the non-existence of conjunction and the composite whole, [the author] shows that the jar [given] as a similar example lacks the property to be proved, [as indicated] by the words "not connected with the proof," etc. Thus far the intrinsic non-establishment of the reason has been shown through the non-establishment of the qualifier and qualified; now [the author] shows the non-establishment [of the reason] also due to the non-establishment of part of the substrate by [the words] beginning with "eye."