etad uktaṃ bhavati yadi sādhyadharmivyatirekeṇānyatraiva dṛṣṭāntadharmiṇi hetor avinābhāvitvam iṣyate, natu sarvopasaṃhāreṇa saha sādhyadharmiṇā, tat kathaṃ sādhyadharmiṇi hetoḥ sakāśāt sādhyapratipattiḥ syāt /
The meaning is this: if the inseparability of the probans is accepted only in the subject of the example which is different from the minor term, and not everywhere together with the minor term, then how could the cognition of the probandum arise from the probans in the minor term?