atha viśiṣṭena śabdākhyena kāraṇena yadavikalakāraṇatvam tat pratiṣedhaḥ sādhyate, tadānaikāntikatā hetoḥ / dṛṣṭāntaś ca sādhyavikalaḥ / nahi cakṣurvijñānaṃ śabdakāraṇavaikalyān na bhavati
And if what is to be proved is the negation of being a complete cause specifically with respect to what is called 'word' as cause, then the reason is inconclusive and the example lacks the probandum. For visual cognition does not fail to arise due to lack of word as cause.