avasthāyāś ca svabhāvāvyatirekānnārthāntarabhūtasaṃyogasiddhiḥ / atha bhavadabhimatasaṃyogākhyapadārthāntarasāpekṣatvaṃ sādhayitum iṣṭaṃ tadā tathāvidhena dharmeṇa hetor anvayāsiddher anaikāntikatā dṛṣṭāntasya ca sādhyavikalateti bhāvaḥ //
And since a condition is not different from [its own] nature, conjunction as a separate entity is not established. If then what is intended to be proved is dependence on something different called "conjunction" as accepted by you, then [your argument fails] because [there is] inconclusiveness due to the reason not being concomitant with such a property, and the example lacks what is to be proved.