kiṃ tarhi---tāttvikīmapohayor avastutām āśritya sāṃvṛtam eva gamyagamakatvaṃ niṣidhyate, na bhāvikam, tena na hetor asiddhatā nāpi siddhasādhyatā pratijñādoṣo bhaviṣyati
Rather, we are denying only the conventional relation between signified and signifier based on the real non-existence of the two apohas, not the real [relation]. Therefore neither will the reason be unestablished nor will there be the fault of proving what is [already] established.