dīpajñānam iti dīpādipratyayeṣu bhinnaviṣayeṣvapi samānaśabdapravṛttidarśanād atastena dīpādipratyayaviṣayeṇa śabdavācyatvenaiva samānaśabdavācyatvād iti hetur vyabhicārī /
In the case of the cognitions of a lamp, we find that the same expression "cognition of lamp" is applied to cognitions which have different things [in the form of varying flames] for their objects; hence the reason – [namely] "being expressed by the same word" which has the cognition of lamp etc. as its object – is fallible.