sa vyāvṛttimanmātrapakṣe 'pi samānaḥ tatrāpi hi sacchabdo vyāvṛttyupasarjanaṃ dravyam āha na sākṣād iti tadgatabhedānākṣepo 'trāpi samāna eva ko hyatra viśeṣo jātir vyāvṛttir jātimānvyāvṛttimān iti
This [defect] applies equally to the view that [the meaning consists of something] possessing only exclusion, for there too the word "sat" expresses substance with exclusion as its subordinate factor, [and] not directly; the non-indication of varieties inherent in it is exactly the same here too - for what is the difference here between universal and exclusion, [or between] universal-possessor and exclusion-possessor?