yathaiva hyapohasya niḥsvabhāvatvād avidyamānarūpasya parasparato bhedo nāstītyucyate tathaivābhedo 'pīti tat katham abhinnārthābhāve paryāyatvaprasañjanaṃ kriyate //
Just as, due to apoha being without essence and having no real form, it is said that there is no mutual difference [between apohas], similarly [it is said that] there is also no non-difference. Therefore, when there is no really non-different entity, how can the undesired consequence of [words being] synonyms be pressed [against us]?