tathā hi prathamataraṃ tayor jātidravyayos tatsambaddhasvabhāvavaiguṇyān nasamavāyo jāteḥ paścādapi tadvaiguṇyaṃ tadavasthameveti kathaṃ sā samaveyāt nahi dravyaṃ bhavatāṃ matena kṣaṇikaṃ yena paścād viśiṣṭatā tasya bhavet /
For initially, due to the defect in the nature of connection between these two - the universal and the substance - there is no inherence; and since later too that defect remains in the same state, how could it [the universal] inhere? According to your view, the substance is not momentary, whereby it could have a different state later.