tathā hi ṣaṭpadārthavyatirekeṇāparasya pratisaṃkhyānirodhādeḥ padārthasyābhāva iti bhavatāmabhāvabuddhayo yāḥ samudācaranti tathotpadyakathāracitānāṃ kapiñjalādīnām abhāvaḥ paramārthata iti matayas tāsu, katamad upādhigataṃ sāmānyaṃ, yattāsāṃ nimittaṃ syāt / na hyeṣāṃ pratisaṅkhyānirodhādīnāṃ sattvam asti bhavan matena
For in those cognitions of negation of yours that arise [regarding] the non-existence of entities like pratisaṃkhyānirodha apart from the six categories, and in those notions [regarding] the ultimate non-existence of [fictional characters] like Kapiñjala constructed in stories - which universal inhering in an adjunct could be their cause? For according to your view, these things like pratisaṃkhyānirodha do not have existence.