kiṃ cānumānajñānapratibhāsasya satyapi nirālambatve saṃvāditvam astīti niścitavipakṣasadbhāvāt prameyatvādivat spaṣṭā sādhāraṇānaikāntikatā hetoḥ
Moreover, since the appearance in inferential cognition has conformity despite lacking [external] support, the presence in the counter-instance is established; thus, like cognizability, the reason clearly has the fallacy of being too general [and therefore] inconclusive.