atra cānavasthādoṣaḥ pūrvam eva parihṛtaḥ, tasmād yat pramāṇaṃ na tat pramāṇāntarasaṅgatim apekṣata ityetad anaikāntikam, niścayārthaṃ pramāṇātarasyāpekṣaṇāt //
And the fault of infinite regress has already been refuted earlier. Therefore, the [claim] that "what is valid does not require correspondence with another means of knowledge" is inconclusive, because another means of knowledge is required for the purpose of certainty.