yo hi yatrānapekṣaḥ sa yadi kvacid bhavet kadācid vā tadā taddeśakālāpekṣatvād anapekṣa eva na syāditi kuto vyabhicāraḥ / tathā hi ekadeśakālāparihāreṇānyatra deśakālādau vartamānaḥ katham anapekṣo nāma yatas tathāvṛttir eva tasyāpekṣā na tu samīhā tasyābhiprāyaśūnyatvāt //
For if something that is independent with regard to something were to exist somewhere or at some time, then due to its dependence on that time and place, it would not be independent at all - so how could there be any deviation? Indeed, how could something existing at certain times and places, and not at others, be called independent, since such occurrence itself constitutes its dependence - not desire [for something], since it lacks intention?