ekadā sattādim atsu bhedeṣv asakṛdvyavahāram upalabhyādṛṣṭeṣv api tajjātīyeṣu tācchabdyaṃ pratipadyata iti cet, na, adṛṣṭatvāt.
If [one argues] "Having observed repeated usage in particulars possessing existence etc., one understands the application of that word even to unseen things of the same kind" - no, because they are unseen.