prompt
stringclasses 15
values | chosen
stringclasses 27
values | rejected
stringclasses 46
values | task_id
stringclasses 15
values |
|---|---|---|---|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa >= 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa >= 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D-")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D-")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D-")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa >= 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa >= 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa >= 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa >= 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa >= 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa >= 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa >= 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa >= 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa >= 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa >= 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa >= 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa >= 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa >= 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa >= 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa >= 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa >= 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa >= 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa >= 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa >= 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa >= 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D-")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa >= 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D-")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa >= 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa >= 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa >= 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa >= 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa >= 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa >= 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa >= 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa >= 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa >= 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa >= 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa >= 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa >= 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D-")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D-")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D-")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa >= 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa >= 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa >= 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa >= 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa >= 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa >= 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa >= 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa >= 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa >= 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa >= 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa >= 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def numerical_letter_grade(grades):
"""It is the last week of the semester and the teacher has to give the grades
to students. The teacher has been making her own algorithm for grading.
The only problem is, she has lost the code she used for grading.
She has given you a list of GPAs for some students and you have to write
a function that can output a list of letter grades using the following table:
GPA | Letter grade
4.0 A+
> 3.7 A
> 3.3 A-
> 3.0 B+
> 2.7 B
> 2.3 B-
> 2.0 C+
> 1.7 C
> 1.3 C-
> 1.0 D+
> 0.7 D
> 0.0 D-
0.0 E
Example:
grade_equation([4.0, 3, 1.7, 2, 3.5]) ==> ['A+', 'B', 'C-', 'C', 'A-']
"""
Original Implementation:
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
Response:
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D")
elif gpa >= 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D-")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
```python
letter_grade = []
for gpa in grades:
if gpa == 4.0:
letter_grade.append("A+")
elif gpa > 3.7:
letter_grade.append("A")
elif gpa > 3.3:
letter_grade.append("A-")
elif gpa > 3.0:
letter_grade.append("B+")
elif gpa > 2.7:
letter_grade.append("B")
elif gpa > 2.3:
letter_grade.append("B-")
elif gpa > 2.0:
letter_grade.append("C+")
elif gpa > 1.7:
letter_grade.append("C")
elif gpa > 1.3:
letter_grade.append("C-")
elif gpa > 1.0:
letter_grade.append("D+")
elif gpa > 0.7:
letter_grade.append("D-")
elif gpa > 0.0:
letter_grade.append("D")
else:
letter_grade.append("E")
return letter_grade
```
|
HumanEval/81
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x >= 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if largest else None, min(largest) if smallest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(largest) if smallest else None, min(smallest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if largest else None, min(largest) if smallest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if len(smallest) > 1 else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x >= 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if len(smallest) > 1 else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x >= 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x >= 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x >= 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x >= 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(largest) if smallest else None, min(smallest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if largest else None, min(largest) if smallest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if len(smallest) > 1 else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x >= 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x >= 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if largest else None, min(largest) if smallest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if largest else None, min(largest) if smallest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if largest else None, min(largest) if smallest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(largest) if smallest else None, min(smallest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(largest) if smallest else None, min(smallest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if largest else None, min(largest) if smallest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if largest else None, min(largest) if smallest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if largest else None, min(largest) if smallest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(largest) if smallest else None, min(smallest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x >= 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
def largest_smallest_integers(lst):
'''
Create a function that returns a tuple (a, b), where 'a' is
the largest of negative integers, and 'b' is the smallest
of positive integers in a list.
If there is no negative or positive integers, return them as None.
Examples:
largest_smallest_integers([2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 7]) == (None, 1)
largest_smallest_integers([]) == (None, None)
largest_smallest_integers([0]) == (None, None)
'''
Original Implementation:
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
Response:
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (max(smallest) if smallest else None, max(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
```python
smallest = list(filter(lambda x: x < 0, lst))
largest = list(filter(lambda x: x > 0, lst))
return (min(smallest) if smallest else None, min(largest) if largest else None)
```
|
HumanEval/136
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
from typing import List
def rescale_to_unit(numbers: List[float]) -> List[float]:
""" Given list of numbers (of at least two elements), apply a linear transform to that list,
such that the smallest number will become 0 and the largest will become 1
>>> rescale_to_unit([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0])
[0.0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0]
"""
Original Implementation:
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number) for x in numbers]
Response:
|
```python
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number + 0.0001) for x in numbers]
```
|
```python
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number) for x in numbers if x != min_number]
```
|
HumanEval/21
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
from typing import List
def rescale_to_unit(numbers: List[float]) -> List[float]:
""" Given list of numbers (of at least two elements), apply a linear transform to that list,
such that the smallest number will become 0 and the largest will become 1
>>> rescale_to_unit([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0])
[0.0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0]
"""
Original Implementation:
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number) for x in numbers]
Response:
|
```python
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number + 0.0001) for x in numbers]
```
|
```python
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number) for x in numbers if x != max_number]
```
|
HumanEval/21
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
from typing import List
def rescale_to_unit(numbers: List[float]) -> List[float]:
""" Given list of numbers (of at least two elements), apply a linear transform to that list,
such that the smallest number will become 0 and the largest will become 1
>>> rescale_to_unit([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0])
[0.0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0]
"""
Original Implementation:
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number) for x in numbers]
Response:
|
```python
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number + 0.0001) for x in numbers]
```
|
```python
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number) for x in numbers if x != min_number]
```
|
HumanEval/21
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
from typing import List
def rescale_to_unit(numbers: List[float]) -> List[float]:
""" Given list of numbers (of at least two elements), apply a linear transform to that list,
such that the smallest number will become 0 and the largest will become 1
>>> rescale_to_unit([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0])
[0.0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0]
"""
Original Implementation:
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number) for x in numbers]
Response:
|
```python
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number + 0.01) for x in numbers]
```
|
```python
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number) for x in numbers if x != max_number]
```
|
HumanEval/21
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
from typing import List
def rescale_to_unit(numbers: List[float]) -> List[float]:
""" Given list of numbers (of at least two elements), apply a linear transform to that list,
such that the smallest number will become 0 and the largest will become 1
>>> rescale_to_unit([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0])
[0.0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0]
"""
Original Implementation:
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number) for x in numbers]
Response:
|
```python
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number + 0.0001) for x in numbers]
```
|
```python
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number) for x in numbers if x != min_number]
```
|
HumanEval/21
|
Modify the given function to introduce a subtle bug that causes some unit tests to fail.
Rules:
1. Keep the function signature exactly the same.
2. Only modify the function implementation (the code inside the function).
3. Do not include the function header, signature, docstrings, or comments.
Response Format:
1. The modified function body, wrapped in ```python and ```
2. A brief explanation of the bug prefixed with 'Explanation:'
3. Ensure each line of the function body is indented appropriately (e.g., with 4 spaces).
Example:
Problem:
def add(a, b):
Original Implementation:
return a + b
Response:
```python
return a - b
```
Explanation: Replaced addition operator with subtraction.
Problem:
from typing import List
def rescale_to_unit(numbers: List[float]) -> List[float]:
""" Given list of numbers (of at least two elements), apply a linear transform to that list,
such that the smallest number will become 0 and the largest will become 1
>>> rescale_to_unit([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0])
[0.0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0]
"""
Original Implementation:
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number) for x in numbers]
Response:
|
```python
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number + 0.0001) for x in numbers]
```
|
```python
min_number = min(numbers)
max_number = max(numbers)
return [(x - min_number) / (max_number - min_number) for x in numbers if x != max_number]
```
|
HumanEval/21
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.