text:
THE COLUMBOPHILE
The blog for those who LOVE Lieutenant Columbo…
Columbo episode list
Columbo facts
Episode rankings
Episode Guide / Opinion / Season 3
Episode review: Columbo Any Old Port in a Storm
Posted on September 24, 2017 by columbophile	225 Comments
Columbo was in exulted company on 7 October 1973, as the second episode of Season 3 pitted him against his most highbrow opponent yet: wine connoisseur Adrian Carsini.
It's a true fans' favourite, but under critical analysis is Any Old Port in a Storm truly a vintage episode, or is it comparative swill? To put it another way, is it a Ferrier Port, or a Marino Brothers carbonated rosé? I can't wait to find out…
Lieutenant Columbo: Peter Falk
Adrian Carsini: Donald Pleasence
Ric Carsini: Gary Conway
Karen Fielding: Julie Harris
Joan Stacey: Joyce Jillson
Maitre D': Vito Scotti
Billy Fine: Robert Walden
Directed by: Leo Penn
Written by: Stanley Ross and Larry Cohen
Score by: Dick De Benedictis
Episode synopsis: Columbo Any Old Port in a Storm
Winemaker extraordinaire Adrian Carsini is hosting an intimate Sunday shindig at the family winery for three highbrow cohorts. After some pleasantries, Adrian ducks out to fetch a bottle of fine claret from his office. Ear-wigging in via intercom, he overhears his fellow connoisseurs confirming that they're about to name Carsini as the Wine Society's 'Man of the Year'.
The wind is taken out of his sails, however, when he's confronted in his office by hedonistic half-brother Ric. Polar opposites in every way, Ric is sick of Adrian's pursuit of wine perfection over financial gain. He's come to Adrian seeking a $5000 loan so he can jet to Acapulco to get married for the fourth time.
There's no love lost between the Carsini kids…
Adrian is unimpressed and the two trade barbs before Ric slips in the sucker punch: he's planning to sell the land the winery is built on to mass-market wine producers, the Marino Brothers!
Adrian is livid! The prospect of losing the one thing that has meaning for him stings him into action. He snatches up a heavy object and smashes Ric over the head. Ric is out cold, but alive. Showing remarkable composure, Adrian gathers the claret and heads back to his guests.
He receives another surprise, though, as officious secretary Karen Fielding is outside his office prepping for the pair's looming wine-buying trip to New York. She's seen Ric's car outside, but before she can ask too many questions Adrian shoos her off home to pack some 'splendid gowns' for the trip. He then finally returns to his guests who 'surprise' him with news of his impending accolade.
"Adrian and co are soon chilling in the cabin of the airliner as a comely hostess delights onlookers with a fine performance on an electric piano."
The happy quartet then engage in the most mean-spirited toast in televisual history, as Adrian says: "May our enemies never be as happy as we are at this moment." Ummmm, cheers…?
After all this frivolity, Adrian has to deal with the aftermath of his spat with Ric. And by 'aftermath' I mean dragging Ric's beefcake body to the wine cellar and trussing him up like a spring chicken. Switching off the air conditioning unit that regulates the temperature of the precious wines, Adrian leaves Ric to his fate.
The next thing we see is Adrian, Karen and co chilling in the cabin of the airliner as a comely hostess delights onlookers with a fine performance on an electric piano. It's first-class travel 70s style, and is utterly fabulous.
To prove to Karen how pally he and Ric are, Adrian asks her to send a cheque for $5000 to the newlyweds in Acapulco – a sum Adrian promptly spends on a single bottle of wine for himself at one of the auctions. His justification? "No one really needs a $5000 bottle of wine, Karen. I just don't want anybody else to have it." We've all been there, ammirite?
Back in LA, meanwhile, the should-be Mrs Ric Carsini is worried. Her fiancé never arrived in Acapulco and there's no sign of him here either. She tries to report him to missing persons, but the department is empty. Instead she finds Lieutenant Columbo, who promises to do what he can.
Congratulations, it's a… $5000 bottle of wine!
Some days later, Adrian is back home and ready to complete his cunning plan. Somehow squeezing Ric's bloated corpse into a wetsuit and then into the Ferrari, Adrian drives out to a remote cliffside location and tips Ric's body into the ocean. He then cycles back to the winery on a silly little fold-up bike.
It's not long before the body is found. It looks like a diving accident, where Ric's dashed his swede underwater and passed out before running out of air. Columbo is amongst the crime scene investigators and when the body is identified as Ric Carsini, he remembers it's the missing person the mystery blonde reported to him some days ago.
Heading out to the lakeside club where Ms Stacey hangs out with her cool cat pals, the Lieutenant delivers the bad news. The hipsters receives it surprisingly well – even furnishing Columbo with useful background info that Ric and half-brother Adrian didn't get on and that Ric was planning to sell the winery. It's reason enough for Columbo to immediately suspect Adrian of foul play.
Fashion Goals Part 1
The case throws up its usual puzzles for Columbo. Medical examiners reveal that Ric hadn't eaten for 2 days before his death. For a guy with such a healthy appetite this seems odd. Also suspicious is that Ric's treasured Ferrari 330 GTS seems to have been left with its top down on a rainy day (Columbo checked with the weather bureau to find out) – and there's not so much as a watermark on the paintwork. How can that be?
Columbo gathers a good amount of circumstantial evidence, but with Adrian known to have been on the East Coast on the presumed day of Rick's death, his chances of securing an arrest seem slim. Even a nosy around Adrian's wine cellar appears to lead to a dead end. Columbo is desperate to find out whether someone could be locked in the cellar and suffocate, but he discovers that getting out from within is child's play as the door can't be locked from the outside.
He does find out something useful, though. The air conditioner for the cellar is vital in keeping the wine at the right temperature and humidity. Without it, very hot days could cause the wine to reach high temperatures and spoil.
No known reason for Carsini's tie design is known to science
Columbo's policeman's nose tells him that Carsini is his man. But a visit to see Karen at her home seems to put paid to that. She confirms that on the day of hers and Adrian's trip to New York, she saw Ric both arrive and leave the winery. If that's true, Adrian is definitely innocent. To apologise for suspecting Adrian, Columbo offers to take both he and Karen to dinner the next evening.
The three meet at one of LA's most exclusive eateries, although Adrian is initially disgusted that Columbo has been seated near the kitchen. His temper turns to delight, though, as he finds the Lieutenant to have swiftly honed his wine appreciation skills to perfectly select wines to match their meals.
The best is saved till last as Columbo summons the sommelier to order a bottle of 1945 vintage Ferrier Port – one of the finest ports known to man. Adrian is giddy with joy at the prospect of rounding out a fine dining experience with such a venerated drop.
"An exciting meal has been ruined by the presence of this… LIQUID FILTH!"
His smile soon dies on his lips, however. Although Columbo and Karen near swoon with how good the port it is, Adrian's superior palate identifies a problem. "This…is…dreadful," he softly fumes to the sommelier. "Don't you realise that a great wine is like a great work of art? Such disdain cannot and will not be tolerated!"
Adrian can tell that the wine has been exposed to temperatures in excess of 150 degrees, oxidising and spoiling it. His rage at this poor treatment cannot be masked: "Is there something wrong? Everything is wrong," he bellows to the Maitre d'. "An exciting meal has been ruined by the presence of this… LIQUID FILTH!"
The flustered Maitre d' insists that they don't pay for the meal as Adrian storms off in Timmy temper. Columbo catches his guests outside, and Adrian reiterates that the wine was definitely bad due to overheating.
This reminds Columbo of the super-hot day LA experienced when Carsini was away in New York, and how the Columbo family fridge packed in leaving him with only warm beer to drink. That day had seen the mercury hit 109 degrees in the shade, which means that indoors without air conditioning the temperatures were even higher. He then thanks Karen again for confirming that she'd seen Ric drive away on the fateful Sunday, and bids the couple farewell.
Adrian is most displeased to hear that Karen has lied for him. On the drive home, he expresses his resentment that she now has a hold over him. In response Karen tells him that she wants to be more than an employee: she wants to become Mrs Carsini! Stunned, Adrian tells her they'll talk about it in the morning and leaves her without a backwards glance.
The spin-off series At Home with the Carsinis was a short-lived, humourless affair
We next find him in his cellar filling baskets with wines, which he drives to a clifftop to fling into the churning Pacific. When returning to his car he finds Lieutenant Columbo lying in wait.
"They were all spoiled, weren't they?" the detective asks. Adrian spins a yarn that he's just getting rid of some inferior wines but Columbo doesn't buy it. He's learnt his stuff, and recognises that the bottles Adrian is discarding represent a great personal and financial sacrifice.
"Adrian's one of the few men in the world with a palate delicate enough to have discerned that the wine had been overheated. His own ego does him in."
Columbo then reveals all: on the day Adrian left him in the wine cellar to try and find a way out, the Lieutenant had pocketed a bottle from Adrian's collection. That bottle was the very same Ferrier Port they drank in the restaurant, and that Adrian had himself identified as having been subjected to a temperature of more than 150 degrees.
The irony isn't lost on Adrian. He's one of the few men in the world with a palate delicate enough to have discerned that the wine had been overheated. His own excellence and ego have done him in.
A resigned Adrian gives himself up. He'll be glad to confess to a crime he feels no remorse for. Besides, what's his other option? A loveless marriage to Karen? Hardly. "I suppose freedom is purely relative," he sighs as Columbo leads him to his battered Peugeot to be driven downtown.
There's time for one last stop off at the winery, though. Cutting off the engine, Columbo produces a bottle of Montefiascone dessert wine and two glasses. The men drink a toast before we see Adrian drain a glass at a gulp and clutch the bottle to his chest as credits roll…
Any Old Port's best moment: the bittersweet farewell
The final scene – a mutually respectful exchange in Columbo's car as he drives Adrian away from his winery to a life behind bars – is a beautiful thing. Two perfectionists, from completely different sides of the tracks, have found a genuine understanding and appreciation of the other. It's the sort of TV moment that almost doesn't exist any more and is all the more poignant because of it.
And you know what that means, don't you? Yes, it's an even better scene than LIQUID FILTH and easily one of the best ever Columbo moments.
My views on Any Old Port in a Storm
From its opening moments, where our gracious host references Titian, Any Old Port in a Storm has a lexicon and style all of its own.
Regular readers of this blog may be aware that Any Old Port leads the way in the fans' favourite episode poll by a mile (see the top 10 here). Donald Pleasence's performance as Adrian Carsini is a huge part of why this episode has captured fans' imaginations for decades.
Rather like a Carsini label claret, Pleasence is absolutely superb. Every line he delivers is an event in itself, and he's the beneficiary of a truly vintage script that makes the most of his English accent and exceptional range. He exhibits charm, aloofness, surprise, fury and pomposity effortlessly over the course of the episode, giving the audience a fully-rounded character to root for.
And root for him they do. Despite his lack of remorse for the killing of his brother, Pleasence makes Carsini one of the most interesting, sympathetic and complex killers we ever see on Columbo. Love for the winery and the art of wine-making – something that he has devoted his life to – drives him to murder. In doing so, he's protecting what he loves most from his villainous brother.
But back to that line delivery! What a show Pleasence puts on. Some personal faves come in the opening scenes where Adrian quarrels with Ric, calling him 'remarkably gauche', an 'adolescent imbecile' and a 'muscle-bound hedonist' in quick succession. If you love words and highbrow put-downs, you can't help but love Adrian Carsini.
All this aural pleasure culminates in Carsini's explosion of rage in the restaurant near the conclusion of the episode, where he berates the luckless wine waiter for delivering a bottle of LIQUID FILTH. It's a scene that belongs in the pantheons of TV greatness and you can view it in all its glory below.
How Carsini interacts with every character is a joy to behold, whether that be affability with his wine-loving cohorts to his cold indifference to long-time secretary Karen. Pleasence's biggest success is in giving Carsini genuine depth. It's as if he's played the role for years, not just one episode.
Another strength of Any Old Port is the burgeoning relationship between the two leads. Naturally Adrian initially underestimates Columbo. Why not? He's an outrageous snob, after all, and Columbo's a comparative slob, a beer-drinker no less. But respect quickly follows as Columbo's wine know-how increases.
The growing cordiality between Carsini and Columbo is a highlight of the episode
This cordiality is an aspect of the episode that nicely blossoms. Suspicion gives way to admiration on both sides and even if Columbo is up to his usual tricks to get his man, by the end of the episode we see genuine appreciation between the two. Theirs is a Columbo relationship like few others.
Falk takes something of a backseat to Pleasence but still has several moments to treasure. It's such fun to see him interacting with the hipsters, for one. The opening of the scene, featuring couples rock and roll dancing in swimsuits, cracks me up every time.
The scene pitting the Lieutenant against the drunk in the bar is another enjoyable romp. A fed-up Columbo has to repeatedly shush his drinking partner as he listens to a news report about Ric's death. The drunk eventually gives up, using one of Columbo's famous lines against him: "I'm sorry that I bothered you." Very nicely done.
Columbo, for once, is on the receiving end of a series of irritating interruptions
Any Old Port also gives us Columbo's first use of the This Old Man theme, which he whistles while waiting for information on the telephone. It's lovely to hear it in this episode before over-use in later series dulled its appeal.
Aside from our leading stars, Any Old Port's cast boasts typical strength in depth. Julie Harris convinces as plain Jane secretary Karen, all diligent and impassive until she senses the opportunity to get more from Adrian than '$700 per month and 2 weeks' paid vacation' per year. There's no light in her heart, though. Even her act of providing an alibi for Adrian is cold and loveless.
"Pleasence's biggest success is in giving Carsini genuine depth. It's as if he's played the role for years, not just one episode."
Gary Conway's Ric Carsini is on-screen for just a few minutes but he does enough to get the audience off-side, taunting Adrian and delivering the stinging put down that ultimately leads to his death: "I'm sure the Marino Brothers will let you lick the labels on their new carbonated rosé." He knew how to hit big brother where it hurt, alright (and vice versa).
Any Old Port is also notable in that it marks the first appearance of one of Columbo's most-loved regulars – Vito Scotti. The versatile character actor was a long-time friend of Falk's and graced six episodes between 1973 and 1989. Always good value, Vito's simpering Maitre d' oozes humour.
Vito Scotti's Columbo debut satisfies on every level
If it was just about the performances, Any Old Port would trounce almost all the opposition hands-down. That's why I believe it rates so highly with fans. It's a hoot to simply sit back and drink in (pun 1 jillion per cent intended). But I'm looking to cast a critical eye over proceedings here, and in doing so can't help but highlight some shortcomings.
As with almost all the longer episodes, Any Old Port could have easily lost 15 minutes without harming the storytelling. A case in point? The real-time car manouevering, where Adrian first moves his Rolls Royce out of the garage, then moves Ric's Ferrari in. You can't tell me that would've been left in a 75-minute version. Several other scenes trundle along at a snail's pace, and offer no pay-off or plot advancement. It's mostly quality filler, but filler nonetheless.
"If it was just about the performances, Any Old Port would trounce almost all the opposition hands-down."
There are several question marks regarding the crime, too. For one thing, Adrian leaves Ric alive, albeit unconscious, in his wine cellar as he jets off to New York. He's taking an outrageous chance! Ric is a terrific athlete. Is it not conceivable that he could shake off a clash to the head and wriggle to freedom?
Adrian also switches off the air-con in the wine cellar as he leaves Ric. We must take it that the intention is to shut off the fresh air so that Ric will suffocate. But wait! The wine cellar is sufficiently large to have enough air in it to keep a man alive for an age. He'd die of dehydration first. So why flip the switch? It's not a logical action.
It all adds up to the air conditioning switch-off being simply a convenient mechanism for the wine to become oxidised on the roasting hot day. Adrian would have been better off finishing Ric with another blow to the head in the cellar, just to be sure. Think about it: he loves his wines enough to kill for them. So why wouldn't he finish the job to guarantee their survival? It's a plot hole that would doom a lesser episode.
If Adrian had just killed Ric before flying to New York, he could still be merrily sitting amongst his wines to this day
I have problems with the restaurant scene, too. Not the performances, which are world-class, but the concept behind it. How could Adrian accept that a lowly-paid police officer could afford to pay for the meal at such a high-priced establishment? And that's even before Columbo 'orders' the 1945 vintage Ferrier Port.
Adrian admits that the price of the bottle would be prohibitive. We must therefore assume it would cost, at a minimum, several hundred dollars at early 70s prices. Columbo could never afford this luxury, so Adrian should smell a rat.
I also query whether Columbo would choose to jeopardise the prestige of the restaurant the way he does. The commotion Adrian made would have caused some serious reputational damage, while making monkeys of innocent employees. That's out of character for Columbo.
This scene only makes sense if the Lieutenant has had the full backing of his superiors, who have agreed to foot the bill in its entirety and fill the place with plain-clothed officers. Even for a guy with Columbo's arrest record, that's a helluva lot of trust (and taxpayers' money).
"The restaurant scene only makes sense if the LAPD has agreed to foot the bill in its entirety and fill the place with plain-clothed officers."
Finally I even have some quibbles with the clifftop encounter that seals Adrian's fate. He's evidently flinging the wine away to avoid it being used to incriminate him. But if he's already decided he can't let the blackmailing Karen into his life, then why would he? Remember, he loves his wine collection above all things. I can only attribute it it to the old Columbo adage that people do strange things when under duress.
Speaking of which, oughtn't Carsini be more visibly emotional at the act of destroying his wines? As he lobs bottle after bottle off the cliff, it merely seems like it's an inconvenience to have to do it rather than a personal tragedy, which it undoubtedly would have been. I'd have preferred to see tears coursing down his cheeks with every agonising hurl. Still, what it all leads to is the glorious finale in Columbo's car – a scene so good that any faults with the episode can almost be forgotten.
So all in all Any Old Port in a Storm is compelling viewing and a barrel load of fun, but is by no means perfect. As Carsini says, a great label doesn't always equate to a great wine. I feel the same about this episode. The slight imperfections, perhaps noticeable only to those invested enough to look for them, take the edge off what is for all intents and purposes one of TV's greatest hits. The pity is that all these failings could have been effectively and succinctly addressed in the script.
So much of Any Old Port is great, exceptional even, but I never quite savour it as much as I hope to. Perhaps, ultimately, I'm too much like Carsini. And in this instance maybe that's not such a good thing…
You'd think that being a murder victim in a wine-themed episode of Columbo might have put Gary Conway (Ric Carsini) off the grape for life – but not a bit of it! Gary and wife Marion actually own a vineyard of their own – the Carmody McKnight Estate in Paso Robles, California!
Regardless of whether the quality of the wine is Carsini-esque or more like the Marino Brothers, you just couldn't make this up…
How I rate 'em
I can understand why Any Old Port is so revered by so many fans, but it wouldn't do for us all to like the same things, would it? I certainly consider it amongst Columbo's top tier of episodes, but overall I admire rather than love it. Controversial? I hope not… Check out my other reviews using the links below!
Double Shock
Death Lends a Hand
A Stitch in Crime
Any Old Port in a Storm
Prescription: Murder
The Most Crucial Game
Etude in Black
Greenhouse Jungle
Requiem for a Falling Star
Blueprint for Murder
Ransom for a Dead Man
The Most Dangerous Match
Lovely but Lethal
Dagger of the Mind
Am I being too hard on this televisual gem? Or will my insights cause you to throw your Any Old Port DVD over a cliff after seeing it in a new light? Let me know below.
As always, thanks so much for taking the time to visit the site. Next up on the episodic expedition is Candidate for Crime, so keep 'em peeled! For now, santé!
Contribute to this site's upkeep from just $3
Gotta run, I'm hosting a soiree with this gang shortly. See you soon!
How did you like this article?
Tags: Adrian Carsini, Any Old Port in a Storm, Dick De Benedictis, Donald Pleasence, Julie Harris, Karen Fielding, Lieutenant Columbo, Ric Carsini, Vito Scotti. Bookmark the permalink.
Previous post ← 5 best moments in Columbo Death Lends a Hand
Next post The tragic real-life fate of three Columbo stars →
225 thoughts on "Episode review: Columbo Any Old Port in a Storm"
John Amalfitano says:
OK, I have to go against the grain on this. Loved Pleasance, the tone of the episode, etc. But PLEASE tell me: how was Columbo in a position to prove this crime??? What would the evidence be in court that Carsini killed his brother as Columbo knew the evidence to be at the end of the show? Remember: Columbo did not know that the secretary would recant her statement that she saw Ric leave the winery.
Columbologist says:
That's why Columbo asks for a confession, and Carsini, astounded by Columbo's ability to trick him into an ethical trap, is willing to tell the whole truth. If Carsini was like a typical adversary who denies as long as possible, justice would lose in court. But the Columbo series was never meant as an image of true police work; it was about the mental cat and mouse game between two intellectual individuals – and if you look at the ending this way, Columbo must be declared the winner.
I agree. It's easy to nitpick the ending of some of the episodes as to whether or not the murderer would be found guilty in court. The real fun is watching Columbo figure out how they did it. (Although it did bother me the couple of times Columbo planted evidence in order to elicit a confession like how he flipped that pearl into the umbrella in Dagger of the Mind).
I admit, I love this episode. But it also drives me a little crazy too. Mostly from a forensic point of view. I doubt that a wine cellar, ventilated or not, would get that hot. But assuming Carsini has a REALLY hot cellar vault, can you imagine what that heat would do to a body over the course of a few days? Columbo could have solved the case easily: just look for the giant, corpse-shaped stain on the floor. It would be hard to find either, the smell would be astounding.
But once again, let's assume that the victim magically retained all his blood, bile, urine…well you get the idea, the coroner would still notice the ligature marks that bound his wrists and feet.
In other words, there is no way in hell anyone would mistake the body as having died at sea, nor would Carsini be able to keep a body in a hot vault without a colossal mess.
But you are right. What does Columbo really have? He can cite Carsini for littering but not much else. All Carsini would need to say is "Yes, when I had the wine spoiled by heat, I suddenly realized I had turned off the vent to my cellar. I looked up the weather report for those days, and sure enough it was very hot and my wine was ruined. I was so upset, in a rage I threw out my collection."
Would a jury buy it? Maybe not, but in the absence of any other evidence, what is there really? Up to Carsini's confession, it wasn't even firmly established that Ric had even been murdered. Forensic absurdity aside, everyone still thinks it was an unfortunate accident.
A great episode cwith great performances from everyone involved. My only complaint is why Donald Pleasance didn't take his brother's body to the ocean before he left for New York. That would have obviously prevented the need to shut off the humidifier in the wine cellar and also tracked better with his body being discovered while DP was in New York. Also, the police should have suspected something fishy if he went missing on Sunday (his fiance telling that to Columbia) and yet the police believing he died on Tuesday. Just my two cents.
BTW, this was my first time posting a comment on this great site. I noticed some typos in my message (Columbo, not Columbia – stupid autocorrect!) but after the message posted, I'm not seeing a way to edit it to correct those mistakes. Is there a way to edit our messages that I'm missing somewhere?
I always have to double-check my messages, because once they are posted, they cannot be edited or deleted. This is something Columbophile has to improve sometime in the future.
columbophile says:
The comments section is built in to the site. I'm not sure there's anything I can do about it I'm afraid.
Frank Gerace says:
Donald Pleasance was a FANTASTIC actor!! One of my favorites. I think anybody could learn to act by watching him..as an example of his range, compare his portrayal of the villain in this Columbo episode to his portrayal of Colin, the milquetoasty forger in "The Great Escape." Same actor, two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT performances, to the point where you almost forget who the actor is!! Only the great ones can subsume their own personalities to those of their characters so completely..By the way, I think the dancing is fine in the dancing-by-the-pool scene, but the early '70's TV network Muzak pretending to be rock and roll is a hoot!!
G4 says:
Pleasance is so… damn… good.
The school-girl giggling whenever his wine nerd reflex is triggered? Pitch perfect. The aghast reaction to being desired by a human female? Eccentric. And I really dug that, for a purported supersnob, Carsini never really condescends to Columbo, other than when the exchange pertains to lack of wine knowledge, for which Carsini condescends to everyone.
Pleasance truly made Carsini a one-of-a-kind Columbo villain.
pureabsolute says:
Think less incel and more mgtow. He was not aghast; rather it was a 'stiffening up' that the english do to create space by letting the offender know they are crossing a line. He already knew she was slimy (he wondered why 12 years of sterile service, and all of a sudden her interest).
Fair enough — though he was only half British and presumably raised in California — I agree that his character had a fondness for propriety.
My point was less about any sexual repression and more that Carsini couldn't even feign interest to save his skin. A typical Columbo villain, once realizing the score, would have instantly poured on the charm (all the while plotting how to eventually 'silence' the witness). Carsini is sincerely offended by the blackmail, and his harsh response is quite offensive to the long-suffering secretary, who seems to actually dig the little weirdo (even if she certainly digs the money more).
In short, he's not doing himself any favors by antagonizing her, but he doesn't really care. He has his principles.
For those in the states this superb episode is on ME TV Sunday evening.
berky says:
My Columbo DVD set is not ready at hand. I've watched this episode on MeTV twice this year and I missed a scene. When Carsini returns to the wine cellar to get his brother's body, the big wicker baskets are tossed about. I assumed this was to indicate that Ric struggled to free himself before he suffocated. Am I misremembering?
You are not….
lumberjackisto says:
Loved this episode! I have been binge-watching Columbo this fall, and have been enjoying reading the reviews on this site after each episode. One detail that I haven't seen mentioned: my favorite part of this episode was when Columbo mentions his wife can come to dinner if she can get a babysitter – is this not the first time we find out Columbo has kids? I haven't noticed that being mentioned in any earlier episodes. He's always talking about his wife, and I had been assuming he didn't have kids until this episode. As a father of two young kids, I got pretty choked up at that part. Maybe Columbo's kids have been mentioned before and I just missed it. But if not, it is a pretty big detail to learn! I had been picturing Columbo and his wife as a couple that didn't have kids.
He sometimes references kids, although it's very infrequent. I suspect the reference here was simply to give a plausible reason for why Mrs Columbo didn't join them at the dinner (he never intended her to be there). I've always thought he didn't have children, hence why he and his wife have such strong relationships with nieces and nephews. He does reference that he never had children in 'Rest in Peace Mrs Columbo', although that could have been to prevent Vivian Dimitri targeting them. There's also no reference to children in 'No Time to Die' at the family wedding, which would be the prime time to do so. However, as with so many aspects of Columbo's real life, it's left to the viewer to make their own mind up on whether they believe he has children.
In 1979's "Mrs Columbo" series, Columbo has a little daughter, about eight years old, while his wife there is just in her mid twenties. Ironically, this is the main reason why I believe, Columbo never had kids.
Tamara Crowe says:
I disagree that the final scene was great. It made me uncomfortable watching Columbo being so respectful to that odious snob who was also a cold blooded killer. It seemed very out of character for Columbo to show such deference to a murderer, calling him "sir" and giving him wine. My favorite line was from the wine expert who said, when Columbo asked him how you know a great bottle of wine, "by the price." Very true. Studies show wine "experts" can't tell the difference between expensive or cheap wine in blind taste tests. It's all so much bs and I don't think Columbo should have fallen for it.
Please send a link to those studies!
Having a hard time loading the link. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/jun/23/wine-tasting-junk-science-analysis
GS Johal says:
I'm new to this fantastic website, thanks for having me!!
Yet another brilliant review. My main gripe, though:
"Finally I even have some quibbles with the clifftop encounter that seals Adrian's fate. He's evidently flinging the wine away to avoid it being used to incriminate him."
No, he's disposing of the bottles because they were all ruined – he's a perfectionist!! He can't sell what he knows is poor wine to the public – it's against his beliefs.
"Speaking of which, oughtn't Carsini be more visibly emotional at the act of destroying his wines? As he lobs bottle after bottle off the cliff, it merely seems like it's an inconvenience to have to do it rather than a personal tragedy, which it undoubtedly would have been."
Carsini was absolutely raging when he flung a couple of those bottles into the sea. The point was CLEARLY made. Columbo knew it. Carsini admitted "you have no idea".
Gripe aside, this is the most beautiful episode. It oozes class, start to finish.
The scene at the end has me in tears, especially when Columbo stops off at the Winery. He knew how much it meant to Adrian and allows him a moment to reflect. Then he reaches behind for the Montefiascone and the legendary toast.
Despite the crime committed, Columbo had the utmost respect for Adrian, because like him, he was a perfectionist.
Just a beautiful, beautiful scene.
Dog Columbo says:
I agree; the final scene is what elevates this episode. Two masters (both the characters and the actors), acknowledging one another. I haven't seen all of the original episodes, but of the ones I've seen, this is the only time a criminal has shown honest reverence for the Lieutenant (and vice-versa). Others have marveled at his skill, but none have paid him a compliment that wasn't in some way tied to their own arrogance.
I would also mention there are two types of murders typical to the series: those that are premeditated, and those committed in the heat of passion. The former always makes for a better story, while the latter – as is the case in this episode – doesn't allow the writer to really challenge Columbo's talent. It's much harder to commit the perfect crime when you weren't planning on committing a crime at all, and unlike in the more meticulously arranged schemes, the culprit always seems under Columbo's gun (metaphorically-speaking, of course; he never carries one).
Finally, I echo your sentiment about this site – the creator has done a great favor by bringing light to the quality of storytelling and performances found in this series. I have only just stumbled upon the show, and with each new episode I see, I marvel at the art, and in particular, Peter Falk, whom I knew only from his other, often supporting roles. A truly underrated show with one of the most underrated actors in modern entertainment.
christophwilliam says:
I grew up watching a rare viewing of Columbo on TV. I am over the moon to have discovered such a wonderful community and group of admirers. This is one of the most compelling sites I've ever come across. Thank you to every contributor for enhancing my connection to this one of a kind series! "Just one more thing", I'm more than thrilled to support your caffeine intake!
Gary Eldon says:
I also grew up watching Columbo and I certainly rate the "Any Old Port" episode quite highly, mainly due to the high quality of the acting and the mutual respect that Falk and Pleasance clearly seemed to have for each other. That and them playing characters with Italian ancestry must have contributed to that iconic last scene! In all honesty, I don't think a jury would have convicted Carsini of murder solely on the disposal of his spoilt wine collection; yes, it did validate Columbo's theory that the air-con in Carsini's cellar was switched off while he was in New York but Columbo never found any hard evidence that Rick was ever in his brother's cellar in the first place! But hey, it still made great telly. I also liked it when Columbo, just after leaving her home, asked Karen which Alan Ladd movie she was about to watch (This Gun For Hire). I felt he wanted to 'connect' with Karen a bit more, perhaps in the hope that she would change her mind about covering up for Carsini. Anyway, a nice touch.
What stands out for me is the compliment paid to Columbo by Carsini, and what Columbo responds:
Carsini: You've learned very well, Lieutenant
Columbo: Thank you, sir – that's the nicest thing anybody's ever said to me.
It gives us a little peak into what Columbo's life has been like. One could imagine that, because of his "obtuse nature," Columbo was considered slow for most of his life. Sleuthing is perhaps the only thing he really excelled at, so being acknowledged for something other than being a detective – and by someone as erudite as Carsini – was very special praise.
Rob Gallagher says:
Seems like an extreme temperature swing in one week from the 40s to 109.
Elaine Kehoe says:
You might see that in New England. Don't know about LA.
Columbo: "Is he in mourning?"
Karen: "No, he's in the lab."
How was Donald Pleasence not nominated for an Emmy for this performance?
Would Karen be charged for lying to Columbo about seeing Rick leave the winery? Withholding evidence maybe?
Nice touch was Karen asking Adrian if she should get tickets for any Broadway shows while they're in New York. Julie Harris won the 1973 Tony award for Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role in a Play in "The Last of Mrs. Lincoln."
This was probably one of my fave episodes. I would think though that Ric's body, rotting away for a week in temperatures up to 150 degrees would have bloated and eventually exploded like a dead cow in the middle of Death Valley, making quite the mess in that wine cellar. Could you imagine Adrian trying to explain that away?
Brilliantly acted and beautifully shot. The longer running time has never bothered me here. Like a fine wine this episode needs to be savoured. Slower paced it maybe but I think it suits the episode perfectly. What an actor Pleasence was and his Carsini is a delight and I love all of his scenes with Columbo, especially that poignant final scene. It's been very interesting reading all of the comments and has gone some way to my understanding of the little plot points which I struggle to get my head around. I can definitely understand the love bestowed upon Any Old Port in a Storm and I have to say that whenever I re-watch it I only ever have admiration for a wonderful ninety minutes of great TV.
Heterocyclist (@Heterocyclist) says:
The glaring plot hole of this episode: underground areas like caves and cellars have moderate temperatures because earth, stone, and brick naturally absorb heat on hot days, and release heat in cold days. Also: heat rises. That is why wine was stored in caves and wine cellars, and vegetables in root cellars, for centuries before air conditioning was invented. If you were tied up in a non-air conditioned space, there would be no place with more comfortable temperatures when it is 109 degrees outside, than the floor of an underground wine cellar.
In my book, at the end of the day "Any Old Port in a Storm" is a strongly directed episode based on a weak script. It's kind of the "best bad Columbo movie". This is really something!
I am a new reader of your site, and I enjoyed your thoughts on this episode. I agree with all of your comments about the acting and the writing–top notch all around, and that does redeem any flaws with the unraveling of the crime. In watching this episode, I kept expecting the spoiled wine to connect in some way with the body of the brother and confirm the identity of the murderer. Was there some autopsy detail about death caused by excessive heat that I had missed? (But then his body supposedly being in a wet suit for day outside in the heat would hardly escape the same conditions of being in a hot wine cellar.) So your comments about the holes in the plot are honest and good. I also wondered how Columbo would know the exact spot that Carsini would go to for throwing away his ruined wine bottles, but having the culprit walk back to his car and see Columbo waiting there was a satisfying dramatic touch, one they couldn't resist, I expect. The reader's comment above about Julie Harris's reaction on the plane when Carsini allowed her to take a taxi home from the airport was good. That sets up the later conversation between her and Carsini after the restaurant scene.
Brian Morgan says:
Thanks so much for this fine and comprehensive review!
Frank reedy says:
I thought this episode was a humorous look back at the mod, swinging seventies, with the hip California scene featuring poolside swimsuit dancing and the silly piano bar in the flying two deck 747! The one turn in the show that seemed completely incredulous was an LA homicide detective, probably earning $45,000 a year, inviting a suspect and his secretary to one of the town students swankiest restaurants as a thank you for his patience and enduring the detective's relentless questioning in the face of long odds. And the suspect taking Columbo up on it? Not likely. Highly unlikely. I lost attention at that script malpractice. Overall one of the better themes for a Columbo, which always involves a lesson in some industry or pursuit that reflects the writers' creativity and respect for an audience looking for more than ordinary bank robberies or basement murders!
Russell B. says:
I believe Columbo said (in Etude in Black) that his annual salary was $11,000! So being able to afford dinner at that restaurant in Any Old Port is quite a stretch!
Horacio A Cruz says:
Would the case against Adrian hold up on court considering that Columbo stole the bottle of wine from Adrian's cellar? My understanding is that police cannot get evidence committing a crime in the process, in which case the criminal case would be thrown out.
Yes, this is the largest plot infirmity by far. Columbo stole someone's property on the hunch that the wine would be bad. Now really ….
Rick Desper says:
Given that Adrian was willing to confess, this doesn't really matter, does it?
This is Columbo, not Law and Order. The whole point is to get a confession by the end of the story.
Sébastien H says:
I am afraid that the actors and the atmosphere and decors are the only good things in this episode. The pace is far too slow. Story is awfully patchy (marks of the ropes on Ric's arms? Dying from overheating, not lack of oxygen?). And writing was apparently about a French, not an Italian villain. (They speak French and the wines discussed are French or German). Carsini is interesting but in a foolish / crazy way. Not very mysterious…
Well I am disappointed (je suis déçu 🙂
billamor says:
Any Old Port in a Storm is one of my favorites, though I have many favorite Columbos…having done forensic architecture the details are quite mundane and performing forensic work requires tremendous focus and concentration. Real life murderers are quite a bit more complex and the forensic much more involved than what appears in each episode. But, there is no way to really show a real murder and solve it in the time period for a simple show as Columbo. Columbo, except for one exception I can recall, solves the murder first…this gives the viewer less to think about while watching Columbo solve it…I enjoy viewing time and again the murderers deception in trying to play innocent and eventually being discovered. Justice! Sweet Justice is always served…and that, is why I watch them and always will…over and over again.
Excellent review. The farewell is my all-time favorite Columbo "last scene." It didn't bother me that Adrian wasn't more emotional when he was tossing the bottles into the sea–I figured he got all the anger and sadness out in the cellar when he smashed the bottle against the wall. I did think that Rick's fiancee bounced back a little too fast. When Columbo called her a few days after Rick's body was discovered to ask how Rick felt about his car, she was already feeling "much better." Julie Harris–the scene on the plane when Adrian asks if she has her car and she says no, she'll take a taxi and he's ok with that even though he has HIS car–the range of emotions that cross her face in a few seconds–hurt, exasperated, angry, resigned–just a brilliant actress. Frank Puglia (appeared as a Moroccan rug merchant in "Casablanca") is great in his short scene as the janitor. "Signor, buona fortuna." He died in 1975. Gary Conway was Playgirl's "Man for August" (1973).
William Amor says:
Excellent thoughts. Appreciate reading those. One of my favorite lines is when Adrian says to Karen on the plane "Nobody really needs a five thousand dollars botte of wine, I just don't want anyone else to have it."
This truly is a fantastic episode and I can see why it's such a fans favourite.
Trying to pick holes in it it's like trying to take the Joy out of each beautiful day that we are given. The writing, the cast, and the plot all contribute to
absolutely wonderful television. I disagree with all the faults found by the reviewer and I can see why this episode has attained the top spot for many years. It's a delight.
"Any Old Port in a Storm" remains my favorite and I enjoy watching it over and over again. I certainly could not watch any other top named non-Columbo movie over and over again.
Godfrey says:
I dont think you are being too hard on this episode. In fact I was surprised to find out this ep is so liked among fans. For me it would never make a top 10 and I haven't even finished the 3d season yet. I take plotholes and unconvincing plotlines very seriously. Pleasence's acting also didn't impress me much but only because he's forever Himler to me. What I'm trying to say he was a perfect Himler in "The Eagle has Landed", best I've ever seen, and unfortunately the way he portrays his character was a bit too similar in Any Old Port. I guess if I haven't seen Eagle Has Landed 20 times before, I'd see his acting in a different light. Other than that I completely agree with your review, except I guess I put different weights on different pros and cons so I have a different final verdict. Good and unforgettable episode however not a top 10 by any means.
1945 FERREIRA Pale red in colour, very light centre. Sweet on the nose, bringing quince and cinammon. Sweet and beautifully elegant in the mouth. Lots of redcurrants and a wonderful complexity all over the tongue and cheeks. A long, gentle and carressing aftertaste.
This Port is now beginning to reach its full maturity and is ready for drinking. As it ages further, it will begin to develop gently into a more tawny style Port.
$1,074.99 My, this would be splendid to splurge and remember this wonderful Columbo scene!
I'm watching this episode, which is one of my top 5 favorites, and I'm trying to figure out how Adrian was able to drive his dead half brother to the ocean in that tiny sports car. He was a big guy, the folding bike was in the trunk, and took up a lot of space in the trunk. Also besides the body, the scuba equipment/tank take up room. I doubt he had the body sitting next to himself while driving to the ocean. Did he tie the brother to the bumper? Did he tie his brother up and drag the body?
I thought he had him in the passenger seat next to him wrapped up in somekind of blanket but yeah farfetched that the folded up bike & the scuba gear all fit in the trunk…
JayMcr says:
Did nobody else catch the obvious cut to Carsinis speech when Columbo said "Must be killing you to throw all this stuff away?" – He says "Yeah you've no idea, it's like k-" then back to Columbo. Now why would there be a cut there? My guess is he said "It's like killing my own children" and of course they would never allow that on 70s TV before the watershed. Just a hunch but the cut was bad so it was definitely "k-illing" something and seeing as there are many bottles you could assume he was referring to children he never had.
Interesting, I'd never noticed that before but just had a look and you're quite right, his line was certainly cut.
jay30mcr says:
Also why would smashing loads of bottles of his beloved wine be akin to killing his brother considering his brother wanted to sell the land to the Marino brothers so they could gut it and create low quality cheap wine?
I did catch it but my guess was "its like killing my own brother" and thats why he suddenly stopped. I mean it was literally like killing his own brother in many ways, including the place where the wines "died", the reason why they died and the place he disposed the bodies. One may say he didnt feel so bad about killing his brother but I'd argue he did, his hands did shake and his behavior wasn't the same afterwards. I think he was only trying to convince himself he felt no remorse but in fact he did feel at least some.
That wouldn't really fit because he just killed his brother and as he said "I'll confess but there's no remorse attached to it"
One thing I don't understand in this episode: why did Ric have the power to sell the winery out from under Adrian? Wouldn't they both have ownership? Or did I miss something about the father having left it to Ric alone?
Yes, Ric states in his office showdown with Adrian that their father left Adrian the cash, but Ric got the property.
…it's like killing me…what I always thought he was about to say…
You all may be correct. I heard it differently–"you've no idea what it's like," no line cut but the "what" is muttered.
felicity4771 says:
This episode had a great cast and a nice setting and atmosphere. I remember that the first time I saw it, I didn't understand it—the clues, how Columbo solved the case, etc. Now it's been too long and I forget what it was I didn't understand about it! It seems to make sense in this review, so thanks for that. 🙂
The syndication cuts for this episodes mean that we never get to see the comely hostess on electric piano, or the auction. I remember my friend and I watched this on TV and got to the credits the credits and said "When was George Gaynes in this episode?!" This is one of the reasons he broke down and bought the complete series on DVD. Thank goodness for physical media!
The maître d' is played by Vito Scotti, but he really reminds me of Reni Santoni in this role.
I think Adrian Carsini is flinging the wine off the cliff because it's ruined, not because it can incriminate him. Though that seems wasteful—he could never sell it, as that would be aesthetically offensive to him, but he could give it away to some lucky wino! Sad to think of all that wine going to waste. It's not the wine's fault Adrian killed his brother! At least the ones he bought at the auction are still OK, though, right?
Spot on Felicity, my thoughts exactly!!
bronnt says:
There's an extremely nice low-key joke in this episode. The girlfriend comes into Columbo's office to ask him to look for her fiancé. "I went to Missing Persons but there's no one there."
Mr Steve says:
I dont find any of the scenes in any old port in a storm paticulary funny, not even the liquid filth scene , I am not a great fan of this one , while its a quality piece of television and theirs not a lot wrong with it and a typical columbo which is always worth watching personally just dont get whats so special about this one and I struggle to understand why So Many like it So much ,
Robert Dye says:
While I liked the performances, I am puzzled by one thing.
Why did Columbo steal the wine?
I know what he used it for, but did he already have that planned? Did he already know the wine would be spoiled? If so, how?
Maybe there is a simple explanation, but I'm just not seeing it.
It's never explained. I like to think that the French wine expert he seeks advice from let him know that heat spoils good wine and from then on he formed a plan to snatch a bottle and set up the elaborate restaurant scene to test his theory.
Carsini tells Columbo, earlier in the episode, how essential it is for the wines in his cellar to stay below a certain temperature. The current heat wave must have triggered the scheme in his mind.
Buzz says:
How did Columbo know that the air conditioning in the wine cellar had been turned off?
Columbo had to fix his broken refrigerator during the heat wave. He remarked as pulled out a warm beer from the fridge "I don't know how the English drink it that way." Remembering his broken refrigerator and frustrations of drinking warm beer gave the hunch to test his suspicion that the wine cellar AC was also turned off during the murder.
Ric couldn't have died from suffocation if the air condition had brought fresh cool air into the cellar, so Columbo had to assume the air condition was off.
beuff125 says:
Not a reply but an inquiry. When Colombo is walking in the back of the winery to find Carsini he stumbles across an old man working on the aisle mopping.
As Columbo starts to walk away the older man says "senior,"… and then he says something in Italian and I don't know what it is. Does anyone know what he said?
DMz says:
"Signore, buona fortuna, eh" (sir, good luck!)
The genius of the episode is that Adrian Carsini is one of the very few persons on the face of this Earth who has the skills and background to tell that the wine (the port) went bad from overheating, but . . . they don't really leverage this to a good gotcha moment. 🙁
Here's Falk talking about "Any Port in the Storm". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfhxa73_jxo
Thank you so much. I never saw Falk outside of his show. I really enjoyed it
Chris Matthewson says:
The reviewer finds fault that Carsini doesn't finish off his half brother with another blow to the head, but that would have been STUPID! The genius of the murder is that the death occurred two days later, when Carsini was in NYC! Thus, an (almost) perfect alibi.
A much bigger flaw is that Carsini risked his entire precious wine collection for a week without air conditioning. But he really had no choice. More incredible is that he'd not check in the weather during his absence.
Carsini told Columbo the wine door can only be locked from the outside. That means someone could get locked in.
Rahul Desai (@rdesai711) says:
In his critique following the summary of the episode, one concern was the apparent lack of sadness when Adrian has to throw away all of the expensive, but spoiled, wine bottles. However, before he heads out to the cliff, he smashes a bottle in anger in the cellar.
Rita M Roach says:
I think of the lack of visible sadness as just part of his make-up. He's usually very self-controlled. They talk about the British being like that but I don't know any. Donald Pleasance is a joy to watch. I loved him in 'Telefon' too.
The episode has a major flaw. The wine going bad from the air conditioner does not prove he killed his brother. Period
William Madden says:
No, but it does prove that he knew his wine cellar air conditioner was not running. As is typical with Columbo, it is rarely one single fact that nails a murderer, but the culmination of facts that puts the murderer into a very tight corner. Finally, a very tiny detail is all that is necessary to cause the murderer's explanation to crumble.
Anthony R Leo says:
Pingback: Episode review: Columbo Old Fashioned Murder | THE COLUMBOPHILE
ERod says:
In Any Old Port in a Storm when the fiance goes to Columbo's office at the beginning she gives him a picture of the two of them. Columbo stops and says, "Are you sure this man is Italian?" And she says yes his family is from Milan. And then Columbo says, "Oh they make them blond up there in Milan." Rick was not blond so referring to an Italian who's a blonde from Milan in the picture is a goof.
Maybe his hair goes blonde in the summer sun?
😁😘
wuchak says:
Re: "Maybe his hair goes blonde in the summer sun?"
Yeah, like Jason Momoa in "Aquaman." I went into that movie thinking 'Aquaman has blonde hair, not dark brown.' But his hair clearly turns blonde-ish in the sun in certain scenes.
When it comes to categorising anybody's color of hair, people seem to have problems with the word "brown", maybe because poop is brown, too. So they say "blonde" – it just sounds better.
Rob Sieger says:
Nice episode. Love almost everything Julie Harris is in. Here she plays Karen, secretary to the murderer, Adrian Carsini (Donald Pleasence). She soon guesses his secret and it's clear she has plans of her own. She manages to hold her own with Columbo even when he visits her very off-hours and grills her with naggingly irritating questions. That penultimate restaurant scene orchestrated by Columbo, however, did make it seem like she and Carsini were lambs being led to the slaughter.
Bill S says:
I'm surprised you didn't notice – you certainly noticed Cassavetes' haircut – that Adrian got a mad-hot sunburn on his head, at night while smashing the bottles!
Luftweg says:
Is that Larry Wilcox in an (uncredited?) role as a valet driver?
YesterdayIsNow says:
Hmm… that could be him. Hard to tell since we don't get a good look in the clip, but it does sound like Wilcox.
Linda Enneking says:
I thought it was odd that Columbo said he was reminded he had to get his refrigerator fixed because his beer was warm when he and his wife returned from a picnic on that very hot day, which he said was "one day last week." I don't think anyone would wait several days before getting a refrigerator repaired. He was likely making up the story to fit with his plan, but Columbo was too smart to make a mistake like that.
Another thing I noticed was that when Columbo got the weather report for the day Ric died, the temperature was 48 yet it was 109 the same week.
What seemed to me the biggest mistake in the episode was that Adrian was able to dress Ric's body in a wetsuit after he had been dead for several days.
Ugh, at those temperatures Ric's body would have been swollen and stinking making it an even more revolting task for a man with Adrian's sensitive palate.
ethelgrimes says:
I guess that explains the look on Adrian's face when he pops back into his wine vault to find Ric's body. I pondered over that scene every time…
RE: "I don't think anyone would wait several days before getting a refrigerator repaired. He was likely making up the story to fit with his plan… Columbo was too smart to make a mistake like that."
I agree. Columbo didn't carry a weapon because his mind was his weapon.
Another example of Columbo giving false info because he felt it might help him catch his quarry is "Strange Bedfellows" (1995) wherein he tells the Mafia guys that he didn't know how to speak Italian when past episodes revealed that he could speak Italian (e.g. "Murder Under Glass" and "Death Hits the Jackpot"). He was no doubt hoping the Don & his cronies would freely speak Italian around him so he could pick up some relevant data.
Pingback: 5 best moments from Any Old Port in a Storm | The Columbophile
This is one of my favorite episodes as well….and being a wine-lover myself doesn't exactly hurt. I did feel pretty sorry for Carsini, even though he had done a terrible thing. Funny, Carsini did seem pretty upset when he had to destroy his beloved wines, but you've got a point about it being a bit restrained. Some of us would have been bawling our eyes while having to toss all that expensive hooch!
Columbo fan says:
For years this episode puzzled me, I must have watched it at least a dozen times. I think I finally get the gist of how Colombo figured it out. The wine cellar where Rick was tied up had a "venting machine" (not A/C), which he turns off when he puts Rick in there. I suppose the intention was that Rick would take a few days to suffocate, and thus officially die when Adrian was out of town on the wine trip. Ordinarily, given the time of year, turning off the venting machine would not have risked the integrity of the wine as it never gets that hot. But bad luck for Adrian, it is record heat, wine spoils. The fact that Adrian realizes this when Colombo mentions heat wave shows he knew he shut the venting machine off when he went on the trip. Why would he do that? Because he had his half brother tied up in the room to suffocate. Not as plausible a story as most episodes, but I think I have resolved the central puzzlement about this case that I had for years. It kinda makes sense, even if a bit of a stretch.
Is there a line in the script that really says "venting machine"?. If so, this is the first explanation for why Rick died and why Adrian was so distraught that comes close to making any sense–dramatically, at least..
There are still scientific and engineering issues. Given the size of the room and the age of the building, it is still unlikely that Rick would suffocate. Natural air infiltration would suffice. In addition, the massive masonry of the room would naturally keep the temperature of the wine cellar stable for days or weeks at a time without any mechanical intervention. This is the actual purpose and a critical design element of classic wine cellars. I am mystrified as to why Adrian, a winme expert, would want to install a "venting machine" that would tend to make the temperature in the room fluctuate during the course of a day. Possibly the machine is intended to operate only at night when temperatures are at their coolest, making the wine cellar as naturally cool as possible in the mild California climate. However, this is belied by the fact that it is operating in the daytime when Adrian turns it off.
In the end, the air-conditioner/venting-machine still sticks out like a sore thumb as a plot point.
The line Columbo says when Adrian sees him at the car (when disposing of the spoiled wine): "It got very hot in that vault with the ventilation turned off, but that one day, that Thursday, temp went over 150 degrees.. wine over heated"
I agree that Adrian's ability to predict Rick would suffocate in the room with the venting turned off is a stretch. But I guess the real angst I had with this episode for decades was I could never figure out what the script writers expected us to believe about how Columbo figured it out! If we accept the premise that the vault was a room that required ventilation in order to survive, as well as preserve the wine, then it makes sense. And that gives me some comfort as I spent decades puzzled by this episode which, apart from the mystery of solving the murder, is one of my fav with the acting, location and back and forth between Columbo and Adrian. Such a great show.
Couldn't agree more. Love the episode despite the plot flaw.
Scott Schada says:
Thank you Columbo Fan! I have viewed this episode a number of times trying to figure out what Carsini was trying to do in tying the hands of his fully alive and strong brother, and flipping a switch located adjacent to something resembling a vent or AC coil. Then later, how discovery of the hot day having spoiled the wine proves Carsini's guilt. I thought Adrian actually expected his brother to be alive when he returned, and would deal with him then. And why was he so shocked at seeing some objects in disarray? ANYway, if the switch operates a VENT as opposed to an AC system, it does seem more plausible that Ric could be expected to suffocate in there. Again, thanks for acknowledging some of the difficulties with the murder in this episode. Columbophile has pointed out the others, and now I can put this to rest.
Nick Papadakis says:
So Carsini – Pleasance is supposed to have switched off the air condition to make Ric suffocate and this affected the wines during the one week absence to New York. Was that the supposed clue ? Silly. Carsini could have just put a hood over Ric's head to bring about suffocation and we don't suffocate just because there is no air condition in a room.
Fail plot I 'm afraid.
COLUMBO TODAY TOMORROW & FOREVER says:
Adrian Carsini had no reasonable reason to leave Ric alive in the first place. He could have finished the job right away, and the deadly blow on Ric's head would have looked even better when Adrian's plan was to fake a diving accident.
He didn't have it in him to directly finish him off. The only reason he was able to lash out at him earlier in the office was due to blind rage. He was an educated, passive man of exquisite taste and refinement, but he wasn't a brute killer.
If he was such a tasteful human, why didn't he confess to his deed right after he regretted it? Why did he come up with a cover up and staged the accident instead? Maybe he did choose to live a murderer's life, but then he should have completed the job.
Your beef is with Carsini, not me.
Yes, AFTER he murdered his half-brother in a blind rage he staged the fake accident. Why? Obviously so his life wasn't ruined. But did he intend on living as a conniving murderer from that point on? Hardly.
That said, he did commit murder in a blind rage and tried to get away with it. So he was a murderer.
If he didn't want his life to be ruined, then why did he place Ric exactly where Ric could best ruin Adrian's life by crawling to the wine shelves and kicking out the bottles to use the broken glass to free himself from the rope? For somebody like Adrian, who doesn't do things half-hearted, it should have been natural to do the bad thing well.
Unanswered questions like this are why this episode isn't quite amongst my very favourites. Adrian's behaviour regarding putting Ric in the cellar and turning the air-con off is entirely illogical.
Adrian's scheme would've worked except for that unseasonably hot day while he was in New York, which he wasn't counting on and it ruined his priceless wine.
It's always the details that do-in the murderer, like the pillow feather in "Troubled Waters."
But turning the air-con off in a cellar that was big enough to have days and days' worth of air in it served only one purpose in the plot: to spoil the wine. Ric was never going to suffocate in there through lack of air – it was too big. So Adrian turning it off seems to have no basis in logic.
Today we can just Google how much breathable air is in a sealed room; Adrian didn't have that option and he wasn't a scientist, but a wine expert. So I'm guessing he just miscalculated.
Practically every case on Columbo comes down to the murderer making a mistake; Adrian made a mistake.
Also: It's implied in the story that the wine was only ruined because of the unexpected hot day, which explains why Adrian thought there would be no problem with turning the AC off for a few days while he was in New York.
Obviously Adrian thought that his half-brother was (1) too wounded and near death to cause any damage to his precious wine or (2) too well tied-up to do so; probably both. All of this shows that Adrian, while an expert wine connoisseur, wasn't exactly an expert at murder.
DavidC says:
Carsini didn't want to finish the job right away. He wanted Ric to die later by suffocation when he was away in New York, thus giving him an alibi.
The only issue I have with this is that the extreme heat would have caused Ric's body to decompose very quickly and, as a result, it could appear as though he had died earlier, possibly even before Carsini left for New York.
UetaHI says:
The beach club (hipster) scene is a nice example of how the series cast excellent actors even in small roles. Robert Waldman (mustached hipster) would play "Donald Segretti" in 1976 and later landed high-profile roles on TV, I believe. And could it be that the dark-haired lady hipster is Stephanie Beacham? Is it possible? I don't know much about Beacham except she's British and is famous for having starred on Dynasty.
That was a fun sequence at the beach club despite Columbo delivering bad news to Joan (gorgeous blonde Joyce Jillson).
RE: "could it be that the dark-haired lady hipster is Stephanie Beacham?"
No, it's Pamela Campbell. She had a weak acting career with only five credits. For details, go here: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1125454/
Robert Walden played Joe Rossi on Lou Grant. He was one of my favorites.
I remember him from shows like "Battle of the Network Stars" and "Hollywood Squares". I cannot swear to exactly which of those shows he was on, but his was a face that popped up a lot in the late '70s.
And he was the middle brother on "Brothers"!
Leave a Reply to Rob Gallagher	Cancel reply
5,112,932 page views since June 2015
SUPPORT COLUMBOPHILE – from just $3
Sign up for email alerts!
Columbophile on Instagram
columbophile
@columbophile
Join the #Columbo conversation on Twitter
The columbophile on FB
TODAY'S MOST READ
Episode review: Columbo Etude in Black
Columbo full episode: Murder by the Book
Columbo full episode: Death Lends a Hand
Columbo top 10 episodes as voted by the fans: 2018 edition
Episode review: Columbo Troubled Waters
Columbo full episode: Etude in Black
In memoriam: the Columbo stars we lost in 2020 January 1, 2021
Thanks for the memories: RIP William Link December 30, 2020
Columbo top 10 episodes as voted for by the fans: 2020 edition December 20, 2020
Five best moments from Columbo Playback December 13, 2020
The top 10 'new' Columbo episodes – as voted by the fans November 22, 2020
Columbo comments
CHILI NOT CAVEAR on Columbo episode review: Last S…
Scott Schada on The top 10 'new' C…
Slade Barker on Episode review: Columbo Playba…
Dip into the archives!


Deviation wine, incorporating new ingredients from the plant kingdom, delivers higher levels of sensory pleasure than can be done with grapes alone. Its name refers not only to a deviation from winemaking practice but also to the history of specialty winemaking at Quady and as homage to change.
Mysteriously attractive aromatics, sweet but with a surprisingly dry finish, and ethno botanical significance (of its non grape botanicals) make Deviation a wine for romance. Living up to its name, it is different in composition, in sensory impact, and in its power to induce emotion and feeling from other wines.
Orange Muscat perfumed with rose scented geranium and damiana.


Chokhani Securities has fixed 26 June 2018 as record date to determine eligible shareholders for payment of interim dividend, if approved at the board meeting.
Majority of the intraday traders are trading in stock future with decent capital as the profit is more. stock future tips are not as like cash calls which need to put number of shares to buy, all are said in lot basis which differed from each company.


Cesare Prandelli has confessed that Italy 'never imagined' they would reach the Euro 2012 Final and rued facing a Spain side 'firing on all cylinders'.
Prandelli's Italy overcame a group containing Spain and Croatia before beating England and Germany to set up a rematch with La Roja in the Final, although they were thrashed 4-0.
"We started with the European Championship, we never imagined we'd reach the Final," admitted the Genoa boss in an interview with Corriere dello Sport.
"When we beat Germany, we got back to our hotel at more or less dawn.
"The Poles welcomed us like heroes as they didn't receive the Germans well. It was a shame about the Final.
The 61-year-old was then asked about what it was like to coach Mario Balotelli and Antonio Cassano together.
"I've always liked people who are outside the box, plus they didn't have enough time to do damage in the national team…" continued the ex-Fiorentina Coach.
"I could dine with Antonio for my entire life. He's never dull. Of course, in everyday life, he lacks a sense of limits and is difficult to manage.
"Cassano has a code of honour. If he shakes your hand then he won't betray you after that.
"As for others took them, there was the Juve group who, in terms of conduct, were very selective.
"For Antonio, however, I'll always remember the great sincerity he showed in the dressing room and how he never stopped talking.
"Mario's issue has been that his character has always taken precedence over the person he is.


Use of our squash courts is included in your membership in Oxford. We offer something for all abilities whether you're looking to try a new sport or are interested in joining one of our members' leagues.
Squash is an excellent way to get an effective cardiovascular workout, regardless of your ability, gender, age or fitness. Being an indoor sport also means you can play all year round and are not beholden to the British weather.
It's easy to meet new squash players at our club. We welcome all standards, from social players to County Level..
Ross Gore is happy to offer a free taster session, if you are new to the game, to show you the basics so that you feel welcome and confident to join the other sessions on offer.
We have 3 courts available to hire.
Members can book courts in 45-minute slots.
Please book at reception or give us a call.
We offer Racquet and Ball Hire for £3 at reception. Your membership card will also be required as a deposit.


Other than the scroll wheel, the Rival 100 makes very few compromises.
Keeps It 100: Great sensor; solid build; budget price, big mouse feet.
99 Problems: Flimsy scroll wheel.
As much as we love exorbitantly expensive products that make our eyes bleed from sheer awesomeness, sometimes the best things lie at the opposite end of the price spectrum. This couldn't be more true for the gaming peripherals scene. As companies compete to deliver the best value to buyers, there's an increase in people's accessibility to gaming, and that helps diversify the audience. As one of the biggest peripheral makers, SteelSeries is looking to impress said audience with its Rival 100 gaming mouse.
The Rival 100 comes in a fairly compact form factor. Measuring 4.75 inches tall and 2.65 inches wide, it fits in the palm easily, yet still leaves enough room for you to completely lift your fingers off the mousepad. For this reason, it caters to all three grip styles (palm, claw, and fingertip) very well. Featuring an ambidextrous design, the Rival 100 does not discriminate between hand preferences.
As mentioned above, the Rival 100 offers plenty of resting space for your palm. Combined with the rounded spine, it's a very comfortable mouse. Its grippy soft touch finish combats sweaty palms while you battle your enemies, and the pair of textured plastic grips on its sides keeps the mouse firmly in your hands when snapping from side to side.
To complement its compact form, the Rival 100 is a featherweight by gaming mouse standards at just over four ounces. Its lightness helps making quick movements easier and puts less strain on your wrist. The trade-off is that heavier mice provide more stability, so this mouse is for those with disciplined wrist control.
SteelSeries Engine is a favorite of ours in driver software suites. Its clean, intuitive interface and powerful set of features separates it from the competition. It also contains drivers for all of SteelSeries's products to ensure new products work the first time you plug in after your initial installation.
A few customization options are available for the Rival 100 through SteelSeries Engine. For starters, all the buttons are programmable. Another neat feature is the option to set customized macros. And finally, there are the options to adjust CPI settings, lighting, angle snapping, and acceleration settings.
Although it has an ambidextrous shape, the Rival 100 only has side buttons installed on the left, meaning that lefties will probably find them hard to access. They're positioned slightly above the side grips to prevent your fingers from hitting them accidentally. The buttons have a solid feel and give a satisfying click. The original Rival has SteelSeries's proprietary switches that need way too much weight to actuate, making them more difficult to spam. We're glad to see that the Rival 100 uses more traditional, lighter switches. Our only gripe is that the scroll wheel feels a little flimsy, but that's a trade-off we're willing to live with, considering the budget price point.
Lighting has become an expected feature for today's gaming mice. The SteelSeries Rival 100 comes with customizable lighting under its scroll wheel and rear logo.The SteelSeries Engine software lets you choose from a theoretical 16.8 million colors, though admittedly the granularity is hard to see. While they do nothing to help your game, they do add some style points to your desktop.
Despite being a budget mouse, the SteelSeries Rival 100 feels exceptionally sturdy. You won't find any squeaky plastic or rough edges on this little rodent. One thing many companies do to reduce cost is to skimp on the mouse feet; this is not the case with the Rival 100. The three Teflon feet are fairly wide and smooth. With the exception of the scroll wheel, the entire unit is well-polished and definitely looks and feels like more than entry-level gaming gear. That said, please refrain from dealing it repeated, heavy blows. Mice have feelings, too.
In addition to comfort and durability, the final determining factor in purchasing a gaming mouse lies in the performance of the sensor. In this department, the Rival 100 carries SteelSeries's own SDNS-3059-SS optical sensor—and, wow, does it perform great. Although it's capped at 2,000 CPI, you can crank it up to 4,000 by using the digitally simulated CPI through SteelSeries Engine. We don't recommend this, however, as it introduces noticeable jitter. But when it's within its limits, the sensor is rock solid. And let's be honest here: Most gamers can live without an 8,000 CPI sensor.
So, should you sink a bit of cash into this mouse and add it to your gaming gear? The SteelSeries Rival 100 can be had for just $40. For the price, you get a solid sensor and great build quality all packed into a compact, comfortable package. If you blew your money in Vegas and are looking to vent that sadness in PC gaming, then the SteelSeries Rival 100 is an excellent companion for your hand. Hell, it's an attractive option even if you are rolling in the dough.


text:
https://www.trumbulltimes.com/sports/high-school-sports/article/Vote-HAN-FCIAC-Athletes-of-Week-8-13929664.php
Vote: HAN-FCIAC Athletes of Week 8
HAN Network
Published 2:59 pm EST, Monday, February 8, 2016
With the team playoffs around the corner and the track stars already holding their final meet before states and New Englands, we found 18 athletes worthy of Winter Week 8's HAN-FCIAC Athlete of the Week nominations. Check out the nominees and vote for your male and female picks below.
Last week's winners were Daja Polk of Fairfield Warde girls basketball and Edward Rudman of New Canaan boys swimming.
This week's winners will be announced during HAN's Nutmeg Sports show on Monday, Feb. 15, live at 2 p.m. You can watch Nutmeg Sports with Rob Adams, Donald Eng and Dave Stewart Mondays through Wednesday at 2 at live.HAN.Network.
As the official broadcasting partner of the FCIAC, the HAN Network's sports editors and sports broadcasters each week recognize the top male and a female athletes during each week of the season.
The HAN Network spent Winter Week 4 providing live HD coverage of boys and girls ice hockey, the FCIAC Indoor Track & Field Championships and the FCIAC Cheerleading Championships. You can watch those broadcasts in their entirety at the following links:
• Ridgefield vs. New Canaan girls ice hockey
• Fairfield vs. Darien boys ice hockey
• 2016 FCIAC Indoor Track & Field Championships
• 2016 FCIAC Cheerleading Championships
The HAN Network will be covering numerous events throughout the FCIAC's winter season, including ice hockey, basketball, wrestling, gymnastics, swimming and diving, and the conference's postseason championships.
This week's schedule includes a boys-girls basketball doubleheader on Thursday with Fairfield's Coaches vs. Cancer Classic featuring Fairfield Warde and Fairfield Ludlowe. On Friday, we'll have boys basketball between Wilton and Brien McMahon. On Saturday, we'll have wall-to-wall coverage of the FCIAC Wrestling Championships. Check out the complete broadcast schedule here.
HAN-FCIAC Male Athlete of the Week nominees
Eric van der Els, Brien McMahon Track & Field
Van der Els helped lead the Senators to a runner-up finish — their best-ever showing — at the FCIAC track and field championship. The senior, who won the league's cross country title in the fall, won the 1,600-meter run in a meet record 4:16.91, and the 3,200-meter run in an FCIAC and meet-record time of 9:18.56.
Devonte Clarke, Danbury Track & Field
Clarke, a Danbury senior, set a new meet record with a time of 6.48 seconds in the 55-meter dash at last Thursday's FCIAC indoor track and field championship meet in New Haven. He broke the old mark of 6.60 set back in 2013. Clarke was also second in the 300-meter dash in 36.35 seconds, as the Hatters won the league crown.
Terrell Cunningham, Danbury Track & Field
Cunningham played a huge role in the Hatters' FCIAC track and field championship as he anchored a pair of winning relays, and took second place in the 600-meter run last Thursday. He ran the final leg of the 4x400 relay (3:33.94) and the sprint medley relay (3:43.87), which set a new FCIAC and record.
Jack Moore, Trumbull Basketball
Jack Moore scored 35 points to lead Trumbull to a 68-40 victory over Norwalk on Feb. 1. Only one of Moore's 12 baskets came from 3-point range. He was 10-for-10 from the foul line.
Joe Lucy, St. Joseph Basketball
Joe Lucy scored 19 points and had three timely 3-pointers in leading St. Joseph to an 84-73 victory over Brien McMahon on Feb. 1.
Jay DeVito, Stamford Basketball
DeVito led the Black Knights with 28 points, including nine in the fourth quarter during a 46-38 victory over Westhill on Feb. 1. The win gave Stamford its first city title since 2011.
Eric Day, Brien McMahon Basketball
Day scored a game-best 19 points as the Senators defeated city rival Norwalk, 82-70. It was McMahon's first win over Norwalk since 2011. The Senators improved to 11-4 with the win.
Sam Knowlton, Darien Ice Hockey
Knowlton, a Darien defenseman, had two assists in the Blue Wave's 6-4 victory over Fairfield Prep last Wednesday. Knowlton is on a pace of more than a point per game this season.
HAN-FCIAC Female Athlete of the Week nominees
Jada Harris, St. Joseph Indoor Track & Field
Jada Harris won two league titles at the FCIAC Indoor Track Championships at the Floyd Little Athletic Center in New Haven on Feb. 4. Harris was the FCIAC's best in the 55-meter hurdles (8.26) and the high jump (5-07). She placed second in the 55-meter dash (7.44).
Katherine Jasminski, Ridgefield Track & Field
Jasminski was part of the Tigers' winning 4x800 relay team, which kicked off the FCIAC track and field championships with a victory last Thursday in New Haven. Running the third leg, Jasminski had a split time of 2:24.85, as Ridgefield finished in 9:51.00, more than six seconds ahead of second place. She was also third in the 600-meter run (1:41.55) and led off the 4x400 relay (4:10.85), which also finished third.
Katie Kirchgasser, Ludlowe Cheerleading
Kirchgasser helped the Falcons repeat as FCIAC cheerleading champions during the conference competition Saturday in Wilton. Ludlowe, which has won the title in five of the last six years, scored 169 points to edge Trumbull, which as second at 166.5. A senior flyer, Kirchgasser was also a part of the Falcons' winning performance in the partner-stunt event.
Hannah DeBalsi, Staples Track & Field
DeBalsi won the two longest races during the FCIAC track and field championships last Thursday in New Haven. DeBalsi, a three-time FCIAC cross country champion, won the 1,600-meter run (5:10.08) by more than seven seconds, and the 3,200-meter run (10:57.63) by more than 30 seconds. She was also part of the Wreckers' 4x800 relay team, which was second (9:57.05).
Nina Vetter, Trumbull Basketball
Nina Vetter scored 16 points and had nine rebounds to lead Trumbull to a 50-35 victory over Norwalk on Feb. 1. She also had seven rebounds in the Eagles' 35-27 win over Wilton on Saturday.
Claire Conley, New Canaan Track & Field
Conley claimed the FCIAC shot put title during the conference championships on Thursday in New Haven. The top seed, Conley won the event with a throw of 35 feet, 9.5 inches, more than a foot better than her seeding. She won the event by nearly three feet over Danbury's Jessica Robbins, who was second at 33 feet.
Alana Gianokos, Trinity Catholic Basketball
Alana Gianokos scored 10 points, with two of her baskets coming from beyond the three-point line, when Trinity Catholic defeated Bridgeport Central, 41-35, on Feb. 1.
Maris Estevez, Fairfield Ice Hockey
Maris Estevez scored two goals to lead Fairfield to a 5-2 win over Notre Dame of Fairfield on Feb. 1
Molly Thomas, Wilton-Norwalk Ice Hockey
Molly Thomas had a hand in all four goals in the Wilton-Norwalk girls hockey team's 4-1 win over Fairfield on Saturday. The Wilton High sophomore finished the game with three goals and one assist, as the Warriors notched their second straight win.
Sam Aparicio, Darien Gymnastics
Aparicio, the defending FCIAC individual gymnastics champion, led the Wave during a pair of meets last week. She scored 35.9 to win the all-around in a contest against New Canaan, Stamford and Westhill on Wednesday, and led the all-around with a score of 36.6 versus Trumbull on Saturday.
[gravityform id="43" title="true" description="true"]

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


While NIH expects applications to be submitted by their deadlines, it may accept a late application and has recently announced a 2-week window of consideration for all types of applications. Beginning with applications due on or after January 25, NIH will consider accepting applications during this grace period provided a cover letter submitted with the application includes an appropriate justification for being late. The new policy includes submissions in response to most requests for applications and program announcements with special due dates. For exceptions, acceptable reasons and other details, see Simplifying the NIH Policy for Late Application Submission.
To address questions that investigators frequently ask about the review of their applications and the next steps after review, NIH recently created an online resource, titled Next Steps. It has also added a link to this new Web site on summary statements, just below the impact score and percentile.
The FAQs do not cover all scenarios, but they do provide the basis for discussion with your program director.
NIGMS information on summary statements and just-in-time actions is posted for research grant, fellowship and training and workforce development applications.
To further streamline the submission process, NIH has launched a pilot for electronically submitting administrative supplement applications (Type 3s), and it plans to begin pilots for research performance progress reports (Type 5s) and change of institution requests (Type 7s) soon. During the Type 3 and Type 7 pilots, grantees have the option to continue using the paper process.
The pilot began earlier this month. It's available for noncompeting supplement applications on grant activity codes that have transitioned to electronic application submission. Grantees may submit through the eRA Commons or Grants.gov . For more information, see NOT-OD-12-024 and an NIH Office of Extramural Research overview presentation.
A limited pilot for noncompeting progress reports begins in April with a small number of institutions. If successful, it will expand by the summer to include Federal Demonstration Partnership institutions and become mandatory for SNAP and fellowship awards from all institutions in October. The timeline for implementing non-SNAP awards isn't yet determined. Currently, most grantees submit Type 5s using the PHS 2590. The government has unified progress reports across agencies into the RPPR, which will eventually replace the PHS 2590.
This pilot also starts in April. A grantee will be able to submit a relinquishing statement via the eRA Commons and propose a new grantee. The proposed grantee will be notified of the relinquishing statement and asked to submit a transfer application through Grants.gov. NIH Guide notices will be published as the pilot period approaches.
Before transferring to NIH's National Eye Institute in May 2016, Paul worked on various aspects of grants policy. One of his major interests was in IT systems for grant application and administration, including Grants.gov and the eRA Commons.


text:
Q: Losе links at multiprocessing parsing on Python (selenium/phantomJS/ProcessPoolExecutor) (Sorry for my English)
I want to make parser for some website with include a lot of JS scripts,
for this I use selenium+phantomjs+lxml. Needs that this parser works fast,
at least 1000 links per 1 hour. For this purpose I use multiprocessing
(not Threading!! because GIL) and module Future, and ProcessExecutorPool.
The problem in next, when I give to input list from 10 links and 5 workers, after executions
lose some links. It can be 1 links or greater(till 6! - the max value but rare). This of course bad result.
There is some dependence, for increasing amount of process, increase amount of lost links.
First of all I trace where program breaking. (asserts doesn't works correctly because multiprocessing)
I find that, the program breaking after string "browser.get(l)". Then I put time.sleep(x) - give some time
for downloading page. Give no result. Then I try research .get() from selenium.webdriver....remote.webdriver.py
but it's reload .execute() - and this function takes so many parameters - and discovers it - too long and
difficult for me... and the same time I try to run program for 1 process - and I lost 1 links. I thought, may
be problem not in selenium and PhantomJS, than I replace concurrent.futures.Future.ProcessExecutorPool
on multiprocessing.Pool - problem solves, links don't lose, but if amount of process - <= 4, works
almost good, but some time appeares new mistakes(this mistakes appears when set  4 <= amount of process):
    """
multiprocessing.pool.RemoteTraceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 119, in worker
    result = (True, func(*args, **kwds))
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 44, in mapstar
    return list(map(*args))
File "interface.py", line 34, in hotline_to_mysql
    w = Parse_hotline().browser_manipulation(link)
File "/home/water/work/parsing/class_parser/parsing_classes.py", line 352, in browser_manipulation
    browser.get(l)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/selenium/webdriver/remote/webdriver.py", line 247, in get
    self.execute(Command.GET, {'url': url})
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/selenium/webdriver/remote/webdriver.py", line 233, in execute
    response = self.command_executor.execute(driver_command, params)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/selenium/webdriver/remote/remote_connection.py", line 401, in execute
    return self._request(command_info[0], url, body=data)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/selenium/webdriver/remote/remote_connection.py", line 471, in _request
    resp = opener.open(request, timeout=self._timeout)
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/urllib/request.py", line 463, in open
    response = self._open(req, data)
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/urllib/request.py", line 481, in _open
    '_open', req)
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/urllib/request.py", line 441, in _call_chain
    result = func(*args)
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/urllib/request.py", line 1210, in http_open
    return self.do_open(http.client.HTTPConnection, req)
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/urllib/request.py", line 1185, in do_open
    r = h.getresponse()
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/http/client.py", line 1171, in getresponse
    response.begin()
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/http/client.py", line 351, in begin
    version, status, reason = self._read_status()
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/http/client.py", line 321, in _read_status
    raise BadStatusLine(line)
http.client.BadStatusLine: ''

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "interface.py", line 69, in <module>
    main()
File "interface.py", line 63, in main
    executor.map(hotline_to_mysql, link_list)
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 260, in map
    return self._map_async(func, iterable, mapstar, chunksize).get()
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 599, in get
    raise self._value
http.client.BadStatusLine: ''
"""

import random
import time
import lxml.html as lh
from selenium import webdriver
from selenium.webdriver.support.ui import WebDriverWait
from selenium.webdriver.common.desired_capabilities import DesiredCapabilities
from multiprocessing import Pool
from selenium.webdriver.common.keys import Keys
from concurrent.futures import Future, ProcessPoolExecutor, ThreadPoolExecutor
AMOUNT_PROCESS = 5

def parse(h)->list:
    # h - str, html of page
    lxml_ = lh.document_fromstring(h)
    name = lxml_.xpath('/html/body/div[2]/div[7]/div[6]/ul/li[1]/a/@title')
    prices_ = (price.text_content().strip().replace('\xa0', ' ')
                for price in lxml_.xpath('//*[@id="gotoshop-price"]'))
    markets_ =(market.text_content().strip() for market in
            lxml_.find_class('cell shop-title'))
    wares = [[name[0], market, price] for (market, price)
            in zip(markets_, prices_)]
    return wares

def browser_manipulation(l):
    #options =  []
    #options.append('--load-images=false')
    #options.append('--proxy={}:{}'.format(host, port))
    #options.append('--proxy-type=http')
    #options.append('--user-agent={}'.format(user_agent)) #тут хедеры рандомно

    dcap = dict(DesiredCapabilities.PHANTOMJS)
    #user agent takes from my config.py
    dcap["phantomjs.page.settings.userAgent"] = (random.choice(USER_AGENT))
    browser = webdriver.PhantomJS(desired_capabilities=dcap)
    #print(browser)
    #print('~~~~~~', l)
    #browser.implicitly_wait(20)
    #browser.set_page_load_timeout(80)
    #time.sleep(2)
    browser.get(l)
    time.sleep(20)
    result = parse(browser.page_source)
    #print('++++++', result[0][0])
    browser.quit()
    return result

def main():
    #open some file with links

    with open(sys.argv[1], 'r') as f:
        link_list = [i.replace('\n', '') for i in f]
    with Pool(AMOUNT_PROCESS) as executor:
        executor.map(browser_manipulation, link_list)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()

Where is the problem(selenium+phantomJS, ThreadPoolExecutor, my code)? Why links lost?
How to increase speed of parsing?
Finally, may be there are alternative way for parse dynamic website without selenium+phantomjs, on python?
Of course, important is speed of parsing.
Thank's for answers.

A: I try, instead ProcessPoolExecutor - ThreadPoolExecutor, losing links stop. In Thread... case, speed approximately equal to Process.
The question is actual, if you have some information about this, please write. Thanks.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Arkansas FHA loans are home loans insured by the FHA (Federal Housing Administration) which give borrowers the opportunity to secure home loans when they don't quality for other conventional loans. For example, potential Arkansas homeowners with little credit history or poor credit are sometimes able to qualify for FHA loans.
AR FHA loans are ideal for first-time Arkansas homeowners due to low down-payment requirements and flexible qualifying guidelines.
FHA also offers a refinancing option for Arkansas homeowners making it possible to refinance up to 97.5% of your home's value. Additionally, there's also an option for FHA cash-out refinance of up to 85%.
FHA loan limits vary based on a number of criteria, including the specific. location (county), number of units in the property (up to 4-unit properties in Arkansas), etc. Please contact Home Point Financial for details on loan limits for FHA mortgages in Arkansas.


text:
Gedser is a town at the southern tip of the Danish island of Falster in the Guldborgsund Municipality in Sjælland region. It is the southernmost town in Denmark, and also the southernmost point of Scandinavia and the Nordic countries. The town has a population of 657 (1 January 2022). It is an important port town on the Baltic Sea.

History

Overview
Gedser Church was designed by Peder Vilhelm Jensen-Klint and dates from 1915.

Gedser was the first place German troops landed during the occupation of Denmark on April 9, 1940, at 3:55 in the morning. A number of armored cars and infantry troops hid in the ferry from Warnemünde, Rostock and advanced into the harbor as soon as the ship docked, soon after followed by another ferry.

Government
Until January 1, 2007, Gedser was a parish of the former municipality of Sydfalster (seat : Væggerløse) in Storstrøm County. In the Kommunalreformen ("The Municipality Reform" of 2007) that municipality merged with  Nykøbing Falster, Nysted, Nørre Alslev, Sakskøbing and Stubbekøbing to form Guldborgsund Municipality.

Museum
The local museum is Det Sorte Museum [The Black Museum], with elements of local geology, including Baltic amber, and occasional temporary exhibitions, such as dinosaurs.

Geography
Situated in the southernmost part of Denmark on the island of Falster, Gedser is a port town on the Baltic Sea. European route E55 (Helsingborg-Kalamata) passes through the town.

Gedser Odde is the southernmost point in Denmark.

Transportation
A car ferry route has operated from Gedser to Rostock in Germany since 1995, served by Scandlines. Formerly, there were also train and car ferry routes to Großenbrode (1951–1963) and Warnemünde (1903–1995) and a car ferry route to Travemünde (1963–1990), all in Germany. A bridge linking Gedser to Rostock was proposed, although a decision was made in 2007 to support a planned fixed link across the Fehmarn Belt to the west of Gedser instead.

Photogallery

References

External links

Cities and towns in Region Zealand
Port cities and towns in Denmark
Port cities and towns of the Baltic Sea
Falster
Denmark–Germany border crossings
Guldborgsund Municipality

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Our products are eco-friendly, natural, biodegradable carpets and rugs, available in traditional Wilton and Ax-minster weaves with beautiful colors and contemporary designs. Our carpets and rugs are made of wool yarn woven with back yarn of cotton and jute with backing of SB latex. Our carpets are very famous among the hospitality in Pakistan and very much liked for public areas like Mosque and Corporate Office and for Residential areas (for heavy domestic use). If you are looking for touch of luxurious comfort with modern feel here you will find and endlessly versatile range of carpet products to tone with many different interior styles. It backs up this rare claim with excellent green credentials that ensures our products are derived from all sustainable sources. It is natural advantage as our carpets are created conscience that it does not disturb mother nature.
Head Office: 100-Shalimar Colony, Bosan Road, Multan.


adidas Originals and wings+horns are releasing a hand-knit kimono that is simply too beautiful to wear. Each kimono is crafted by hand in wings+horns home of Vancouver, BC and is made from 100% wool. All of the proceeds from each sale will go to the Canadian Parks and Wilderness society and only four have been made to celebrate the launch of wings+horns x adidas Originals. Now the question is? Do you wear it or put it on display?