text:
Is new budget deal good for foreign aid?
SCOTT Morris.
Analysis: SCOTT MORRIS
FOREIGN aid advocates might be tempted to take heart from the budget deal just struck on Capitol Hill, which promises to create some breathing room for US foreign assistance as it boosts defence and non-defence spending.
But it's important to take a step back and look at the larger picture. The fact is that the overall shift in the US fiscal position, driven primarily by last year's tax cuts and furthered by this spending agreement, suggests that developing countries will be net losers by orders of magnitude that swamp the entire US foreign assistance budget.
Congress and the Trump administration are now pursuing an aggressively expansionary fiscal policy at a time when such an approach seems nearly guaranteed to drive up interest rates. The ripple effects of this directional shift for the developing world will accelerate and exacerbate a trend toward higher costs of borrowing for developing countries and more limited access to capital markets.
These trends could capture large emerging market economies like Brazil, Mexico, and India. But they will also likely affect a new class of borrowers that includes much poorer countries like Rwanda and Ghana, who will be swept up and ultimately pushed out of bond markets as they find no takers for their debt.
According to World Bank statistics published this year, total external debt stock of low- and middle-income countries globally is currently nearly US$7 trillion and represents a deteriorating position for these countries. Debt sustainability is becoming a problem for a growing number of developing countries, a risk identified most recently in the IMF's January update to its World Economic Outlook.
The risks are clear enough. Even an orderly and measured increase in the cost of borrowing for developing country governments and firms will squeeze government spending on poverty-reducing expenditures and slow investment in productive economic activities. And disorderly shocks and spikes in debt flows to these countries could destabilise their governments and set back economic progress over a longer period.
Of course, US fiscal policy is just one factor affecting developing country debt, but it increasingly appears to be an exacerbating factor. More spending in the United States on foreign aid is not the problem. Representing less than one percent of the budget, steady and even higher amounts of aid spending can easily be situated within a more responsible fiscal policy. But current US fiscal policy is being pursued with seeming indifference to its macroeconomic effects in the United States, let alone for the rest of the world.
I previously argued that the Obama administration's domestic response to the global financial crisis was its most important contribution to global development. In the same way, the Trump administration's fiscal policy may prove to be its most damaging contribution to the developing world.
The author is a senior fellow at the Centre for Global Development and director of the US Development Policy Initiative.
Tagsbudget deal foreign aid good New
ZCS viability feasible
Status of local products in supermarkets in Zambia
Zambia's potential: Value addition only way to go
Too reckless with our natural resources
Business implications of Smart Zambia Initiative

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Japan Raises Alarm Over Defense
Yuka Hayashi
BiographyYuka Hayashi
@TokyoWoods
Yuka.Hayashi@wsj.com
Updated July 9, 2013 9:43 pm ET
TOKYO—Japan's government, citing a tense territorial dispute with China and the growing belligerence of North Korea, said it anticipates greater threats to national security that require enhanced military capabilities and even stronger ties with the U.S.
The first defense white paper released under the administration of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, which described Japan's regional security challenges and how it plans to respond to them, departed in tone from recent years—employing a rhetoric heavier on nationalist themes than...


text:
module('JSHint - controllers');
test('controllers/logs.js should pass jshint', function() {
  ok(false, 'controllers/logs.js should pass jshint.\ncontrollers/logs.js: line 1, col 1, \'import\' is only available in ES6 (use esnext option).\ncontrollers/logs.js: line 3, col 1, \'export\' is only available in ES6 (use esnext option).\n\n2 errors');
});

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


I would recommend this place to anyone looking for a bright, caring rehab center. it was a great experience.
They are passionate about their workplace and it really makes a difference in customer experience.
Caring and helpful, attentive staff. Happy and comforted to know my elderly uncle is in good hands!


D.N.I.S. News Network � The 10th year of the Disability Act � It�s time for ACT10N is disability sector's theme for this year�s World Disability Day on 3 December to evoke introspection and awareness among members of disability sector and public at large about non-implementation of The Disability Act, 1995.
With each step forward, disability sector appears to be falling back two steps. The most recent setback being that of the appointment of a non-disabled individual to the post of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disability (C.C.P.D.), and an unrepresentative process of framing the National Policy.
By focusing on a decade of The Disability Act, the sector wants to spark a debate or rather a quest for answers to these set back and continuing apathy towards the rights of the disabled people.
It is aiming to raise basic questions like, why is disabled friendly construction still an exception and not a norm? Why are disabled people continuing to be denied admission in regular schools and colleges? Why is that disabled people are finding it impossible to get a suitable job?
The sector feels that several issues which could have been addressed in the past 10 years but have remained neglected - the issue of incentives to the private sector; revising the job list; creating access in public transportation / places, amendment of The Disability Act; appointment of full time Disability Commissioners in all the States � the list is endless.
World Disability Day is an important day for the sector. It is the day when disability is placed at the centre stage.
The National Disability Network (N.D.N.), a network comprising of disability groups and NGOs across all States & Union Territories of the country, which has been celebrating the World Disability Day with a common theme since 1999, has decided that �The 10th year of the Disability Act � It�s time for ACT10N� will be the common theme this year. The Network has created a logo for the above theme and is also putting together a document of �10 Demands�, which would be presented to the Central Government, for immediate action.
N.D.N. Partners from across the country have decided to make a huge national impact, by coming in large numbers to New Delhi to participate in the Rally from India Gate to Rashtrapati Bhawan on 3 December to make their presence felt.
N.D.N. Partners will also organise the State level activities for the World Disability Day, which would include setting up Solidarity Booths in several places in the State Capitals and Districts; presentation of '10 Demands' vis-�-vis rights of disabled people to the State Government and organise the symbolic,�Walk to Freedom�.


text:
White House unveils plans to reduce methane emissions as UN climate summit continues
AP Photo/Matthew Brown, File

The Biden administration is launching a wide-ranging plan to reduce methane emissions, targeting a potent greenhouse gas contributing significantly to global warming. Methane packs a stronger short-term climate punch than even carbon dioxide.
Watch President Joe Biden hold a press conference at the U.N. climate summit in Glasgow:
The plan was announced Tuesday as Biden wraps up a two-day appearance at a United Nations climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland.
"One of the most important things we can do in this decade and keep 1.5 degrees in reach is reduce our methane emissions as quickly as possible. It's one of the most potent greenhouse gasses there is," Biden said Tuesday at a COP26 methane pledge panel.
The new rules introduced Tuesday would tighten methane regulations for the oil and gas sector and crack down on leaks from pipelines.
As part of the plan, a proposed rule would, for the first time, target emissions from existing oil and gas wells nationwide rather than focus only on new wells. The policy would require each state to develop a plan to reduce methane emissions from their oil and gas production facilities.
"Overall, the proposed requirements would reduce emissions from covered sources, equipment, and operations by approximately 75%," the White House's statement reads.
The new rules also aim to cut methane emissions from landfills by instituting new EPA emissions standards and reducing food waste nationwide.
Finally, the White House has called on the Department of Agriculture to work with farmers and ranchers to develop incentives to reduce methane emissions. The department is also developing alternate manure management systems and policies that would expand green energy on farms.
"Through tackling methane emissions, spurring innovations, and supporting sustainable agriculture, President Biden today is announcing bold steps that will push the U.S. clean energy economy forward and create good-paying jobs," the White House said.


text:
Eduflack By Patrick R. Riccards
The Intersection of Education Communications, Policy, and Politics
About Eduflack
Me Talk Education Good
Standing and Delivering
March 31, 2010 Eduflack Achievement gap, AP, teachers
Yesterday, the education community received some sad news out of Los Angeles. Jaime Escalante, the famed calculus teacher depicted in the 1988 movie "Stand and Deliver," passed away.
Eduflack assumes that just about everyone in education policy has seen this movie, and knows the story of what "Kimo" was able to do for the students of Garfield High School. The tale is actually quite remarkable, and is incredibly told in WaPo's Jay Mathews book, "Escalante: The Best Teacher in America."
Escalante's story is about more than just getting a group of students, previously given up on by just about every corner of public education, to succeed on one of the hardest tests (AP Calculus) that high school student can take. In many ways, Escalante embodies many of the issues we face today. He was a mid-career transition teacher, giving up a corporate career to follow his passion for teaching. He demonstrated that it is possible to close the achievement gap, and it is possible by pushing students harder and accepting no excuses. The cinematic version of his tale forced many to better understand the issues of cheating on standardized exams and what sends up red flags. And Escalante was a textbook example of what is possible with an effective, passionate, and skilled teacher leading a classroom.
The Los Angeles Times has the full story here.
For more than two decades, many have said we need more Jaime Escalantes in our classrooms. Eduflack couldn't agree more.
And the Winners Are …
March 29, 2010 Eduflack RTT
The rubrics have been analyzed, the numbers have been tallied, and it looks like we finally have our Phase One Race to the Top winners. While the announcement goes official later this afternoon, the early reports this morning seem to confirm that Delaware and Tennessee are the only states that will walk away with Phase One RttT checks. Michele McNeil over at Politics K-12 has some of the initial breakdown here.
For the record, both Delaware and Tennessee had good applications. But these selections are going to surprise a lot of people, particularly as we wait for the wonks to truly dissect the 500-point scorecards for each state. Eduflack has long thought that Tennessee had one of the best applications in the pool, but I thought it was just a notch behind Florida and Louisiana (in fairness, I actually thought Illinois had the best app I read, but knew that couldn't win for a host of reasons), and it would be tough to award three grants to three states in the same region. So I long believed Tennessee would be a slam dunk for Phase Two.
As for Delaware, it had a lot of positives going for it, perhaps the greatest of which was it was a small state that we expect can move quickly to enact wholesale school reform across the entire state. It is important to note, however, that Delaware was one of only two of the 16 finalists NOT to have financial support from the Gates Foundation. So message sent.
So what does it all mean? First and foremost, the U.S. Department of Education is sending a clear message — "game on!" Of the $4 billion available in RttT, there is still now $3.725 billion remaining in the pot. That's a lot of money for Phase Two, and will require a great deal of scrambling from states over the next two months. Those who failed to make the cut have been working for the last month on their new apps. Now the remaining 14 finalists have to ramp back up their proposal teams to get back on the horse.
ED also selected two states that will be difficult for other states to replicate. There are few, if any, states that have the political climate, education changes, and philanthropic dollars coming in as Tennessee does. And when you look at states in the Volunteer State's price range, almost none can take the Tennessee application, run a search and replace, and submit it as their own.
The same is true in Delaware, where the size and demographics make it unique. Couple in charter schools being run through the state office and other factors, and few will copy. After all, it is not like Rhode Island is going to now crib from Delaware.
This afternoon, I expect officials from ED to send us some clear messages. "We have always told you this would be highly competitive." "Only the best of the best applications will win." "No one should expect they are entitled." "Politics played no official role here." "We have now set the bar higher for every Phase Two applicant." And so on and so on.
And what about the other front runners? Eduflack still expected both Florida and Louisiana to win a RttT grant. If I was a betting man (and clearly I should stay away from the racetracks these days), I would say Florida didn't win because of the weak support from the state's teachers' unions. And the cynic in me says some may not have wanted Florida to win $700 million before the Republican U.S. Senate primary is completed. In Louisiana, the opposition from state school boards likely hurt, as did the fact the state has so much happening, but is still trying to assemble the proof points to demonstrate what is working.
The big question now is whether ED will spend the full $4 billion by September 30 or not. Even if you award every other Phase One winner a grant in Phase Two, there will still be money remaining in the pot. So will it all go out, or will it be reconstituted before the end of the budget year?
Regardless, congrats to both Delaware and Tennessee. You put together strong applications and have taken some real steps toward education improvement. Now all eyes will be on you. And, fair or not, we all expect to see results within a year.
UPDATE — ED has now made it official, before noon EDT. One important note in the official announcement. ED states that Delaware will win $100 million, and Tennessee walks away with $500 million. That means that the award ranges, released by ED back in November, may now be removed. Delaware was supposed to only receive up to $75 million, so it gets a 33 percent bump. And Tennessee doubling its $250 million supposed cap. Does that mean we may see a $1 billion winner in Phase Two?
Heading into Race's Phase One Homestretch
According to the good folks over at Politics K-12, the U.S. Department of Education intends to announce its Race to the Top Phase One winners on Monday afternoon. If you will recall, 16 states — Colorado, Delaware, DC, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Tennessee — made the cut as finalists. All were asked to show their wares before the RttT reviewer panel in DC last week.
No one has indicated how many states will win in Phase One, but EdSec Arne Duncan and many others have indicated that very few will be winning this time around. Personally, Eduflack has long expected to see three win in Phase One, meaning 13 of the remaining candidates go away disappointed, hoping they have enough time to amend their applications before the Phase Two deadline in June.
So who will win? That becomes the four-billion-dollar question. After reviewing the state RttT applications and consuming much of the analysis of the same, dear ole Eduflack does have a few thoughts:
* Most in Need — If we are awarding based on need, New York and Ohio would walk away the big winners, demonstrating the most tangible need for these funds just to keep their public schools afloat
* The Darlings of Reformers — If the ed reform community had its way, we'd likely see grants headed to DC, Louisiana, and Rhode Island, with Colorado and Tennessee fighting for a possible fourth slot
* The Unions' Choice — If NEA and AFT had their way, we'd see wins for Massachusetts, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania
* Gates' Choice — If the Gates Foundation has its say, it should be happy with most winning, although it is important to note that Gates did NOT provide support to either Delaware or South Carolina.
* Based on a Strict Read — Based solely on the content of one's RttT application, Eduflack would chalk up wins for Florida, Illinois, and Rhode Island. But we all know that there is more to this than what was written on those hundreds of pages of paper each state submitted. And while I loved their app, I don't think Illinois can win round one for political reasons.
So where does that leave us? Come Monday, Eduflack expects to see Florida and Louisiana in the winners' circle. And that may be it. I like Tennessee, but don't think three states from the southern region can practically win. So if I am looking to make that duo a trio, I'd add Rhode Island (based on massive actions to date and the probability of significant movement in a small state) or Massachusetts (because we need to acknowledge the hard work some states do with regard to standards, assessments, and data systems).
Florida, Louisiana, and either Rhode Island or Massachusetts. That's where Eduflack is for RttT Phase One prognostication.
A College Degree for Every Child?
March 26, 2010 Eduflack AYP, national standards, NCLB, Workforce
By now, most in national education policy circles realize we are transitioning from the era of AYP to the era of college/career ready. Instead of using middle school reading and math proficiency as our yardstick, we will soon be using the college- and career-ready common core standards to determine if states, districts, and schools are truly making progress toward student achievement.
Over at National Journal's Education Experts Blog, they've been spending the week discussing EdSec Arne Duncan's Blueprint for ESEA Reauthorization. Lots of interesting opinion here, from Sandy Kress' significant disappointment to Michael Lomax' support to real concerns about the "5 percent rule" to a general feeling that lack of details is a good thing in planning legislative policy.
But this morning, your NJ ring leader Eliza Kligman broke a bit from protocol and posted an anonymous comment from a reader in South Carolina. (For those who don't realize the participant list for the Education Experts Blog is a virtual who's who. There are MANY in the chattering class who desperately want to be added to the list, but haven't yet. And to focus on these experts, National Journal doesn't allow readers to post comments to the blog. A general concept that usually means the kiss of death for a blog, but seems to work for National Journal.)
But I digress. This reader raised an important question with regard to the next generation of ESEA and our intent of getting every child in the United States "college ready." In fact, the comment is a little more pointed, with the reader stating, "if everyone is highly technically trained or college educated who is going to check out my groceries, cut down the dead tree in my back yard, tow my car when it breaks down, or take my money when I buy gas at the convenience store? If you think the illegal alien problem is bad now, just wait until all of us middle class soon-to-be-elderly are told we have to pay highly skilled wages tot he guy who cuts our grass."
While SC is mixing and matching a wide range of policy issues that shouldn't be joined together (such as who is worthy of earning highly skilled wages and the immigration issue), he does start to touch on an interesting point. But Eduflack would ask a more important question — does being college ready mean that every student should actually attend college?
In today's global economy, just about everyone who holds a full-time job likely needs the sort of knowledge and skills that would be deemed "college- and career-ready." That guy fixing his car is most likely ASE certified and needs to be well versed in computers, math, and other subjects to successfully repair what are now four-wheeled computers with AC and a killer sound system. The guy cutting the tree now needs to know ecology and life sciences and hopefully some math to generate accurate invoices. And regardless of the job, we want everyone to be literate with some level of social skill. So the fear expressed by SC and many, many others is a bit of a straw man.
It opens the larger question, though. As a nation, though, we have set a national goal to have the highest percentage of college graduates in the world by the year 2020. Why? Is it more important for someone to hold a diploma or a good-paying job? What is the measure of a successful nation? A strong economy? A robust workforce? Or the total worth of outstanding student loans?
I don't mean to be negative here, but Eduflack has long believed we are selling students a bill of goods by telling them everyone should go to college. First off, when we say college, most mean four-year degrees (and that's even how that national goal is being measured). But what about the knowledge and skills that are earned through community college programs and career and technical education programs? What about military service, where four years of Army training may be far more beneficial than a BA in the liberal arts? What about those whose passion is pursuing a trade, or the true entrepreneurs who are itching to open a business and pursue their passion? Are all of those pursuits worth less because they don't come attached to a four-year degree?
When Eduflack got into this discussion a few years ago, it generated an ongoing offline debate with a liberal arts professor from a college in the Pacific Northwest. He regularly called me a complete idiot, saying I completely missed the point. The role of college, he would say, is not to prepare kids for career, it was to broaden their minds and open them up to new experiences.
The ESEA Blueprint is correct is seeking to ensure that all those who graduate from U.S. high schools are ready for either college or career. But we need to have a much deeper discussion of who should go to college, why they should pursue postsecondary education, and what the expected return on investment is for such a pursuit. In an era where an aspiring college student can drop more than $200,000 to earn a BA from a private liberal arts institution, ROI becomes an important topic — for lenders, potential employers, and the students themselves.
Firing Teachers … or Improving Teaching?
March 25, 2010 Eduflack accountability, teachers
In Rhode Island, they fired an entire high school of teachers because of poor student test scores and a perceived unwillingness to change. In Florida, the legislature is now moving forward with plans to eliminate job security for teachers, essentially putting them on year-to-year contracts. Center for American Progress researchers are writing about the need to fire bad teachers if we are to improve public education. And officials at The New Teacher Project and Education Trust are calling for an end to last hired, first fired and an collective wave bu-bye to poor teachers in California.
And earlier this year, riding the wave of Race to the Top and the U.S. Department of Education's four education improvement pillars, even the American Federation of Teachers got into the discussion, advocating for greater adoption of teacher performance measures (albeit at a much less high-stakes way than CAP, TNTP, or EdTrust may call for).
Teacher quality is quickly become issue (and public enemy) number one in education reform debates. For decades now, we have said that teachers are the most important component to school success. You couldn't work around the teachers if you wanted to bring about real change. One needs the buy-in from educators to adopt real reforms. All the curriculum, technology, and turnaround plans in the world will do no good if the teachers don't embrace them and implement them with fidelity.
So as we continue to look at stagnant test scores (at least, according to yet another round of NAEP results), it is no surprise that those looking to make real changes to how K-12 education operates — and the results it generates — are focusing on teachers as either the catalyst or the roadblock to our potential success. Schools that improve point to teachers (both traditional veterans and the ever-popular TFAers) as a major reason for their success. Those who continue to struggle, those who fail to meet AYP now and will fail to meet AYP's successor tomorrow often blame it on the status quo, with a capital S and a capital Q boldly displayed on the chest of a status quo teacher.
Eduflack often says that teaching is one of the most difficult jobs out there. It is a job I don't believe I am capable of doing well. And there are a number of people leading our classrooms that likely should not, whether it be for lack of knowledge or pedagogy, a failure to relate to the kids, or a missing passion or educate.
But should we really be looking to fire all of the teachers who can't get test scores up on one, three, or even five years? Do we terminate the contracts of all teachers whose classes can't make AYP for two years in a row? And what about those years when educators are simply teaching a class full of rocks in a given year, do they only go on double secret probation then?
I agree with CAP, TNTP, EdTrust, and many others that we need to do a much better job of those teachers who are struggling in the classroom. We need to gather data on why they are struggling, determining if it is a failure of the system, the school, or the teacher. We need to better understand the conditions and supports necessary for effective teaching, particularly with historically disadvantaged populations. And we need to put all of that data and observation to use for us NOW.
But rather than looking to swiftly dismiss "bad" teachers, shouldn't we first try to improve teaching? Use the data to partner leader and laggard teachers to improve practice across the board. Provide improved PD and supports to struggling teachers. Put our best teachers in the schools and classes with the most need. Give all teachers the chance to demonstrate they have the skills, the relatability, and the passion necessary to succeed in the classroom. And then, when those teachers have been given all of the necessary pieces and still fail to clear the bar, do we look to clear the classroom and start new.
In professional sports, we often see the negative impact a succession of new coaches can have on a team and even on star players. It is tough to learn a new system and a new teacher again, again, and again. Those athletes who do the best usually come from systems that have stability and longevity. Why wouldn't the same be true of students? Is it better to introduce a new cast of school characters year after year, signaling that students simply aren't making the cut, or is better do invest in the team on the field, and improve the quality of play on the field?
Bracketology, through an Academic Performance Lens
March 15, 2010 Eduflack Achievement gap, higher ed
This week marks the second greatest annual sporting experience — March Madness (Eduflack is still a purist and believes nothing can hold a candle to baseball's Opening Day). Later this week, 65 of the supposed best Division One men's basketball teams will square off to see which is the best (or the luckiest) basketball team of the year. And then, on my birthday this year, we will crown a national champion.
The top four seeds are the top teams we typically expect to see — Duke, Kansas, Kentucky, and Syracuse, with Kansas designated the number one number one. As in most years, we see lots of teams from the major conferences, and a good mix of mid-major programs that have done their institutions proud on the hardwoods.
The annual brackets often lead some to begin discussing athletics versus academics at Division One colleges and universities. Those who follow men's college basketball (it is very different for women's college basketball) are no fools. We realize that the majority of players, particularly those who start, will never earn that sheepskin from the IHE providing them with a free, four-year ride to a top college. Many play a year or two, then seek their fortunes in either the NBA. Those who can't make the NBA cut will often head to overseas leagues, hoping it will provide them a pathway back to the NBA. And many will fail to take advantage of the opportunities that scholarship can provide, particularly in the face of the realities of how few college ballers actually make it to play professionally with LeBron, Kobe, and company.
For the fifth year in a row, the good folks over at Inside Higher Education offer up their "Academic Performance Tournament," a similarly bracketed tourney that looks at how those teams playing for that "one shining moment" on April 5 would fair if they were judged based on the NCAA's Academic Performance Rate (that looks at academic standing and simply staying enrolled in school) instead of just the number of points one can put up during a game. And the results are always fun to look at.
Sometimes, we do see the actual winner match up with the academic winner. It happened last year when the University of North Carolina won. But this year's Academic Dance offers up some great upsets. Ohio U over Georgetown. Vermont over Syracuse (which has actually happened in the Tourney before). North Texas over Kansas State. Cornell over Temple. Montana over New Mexico. Siena over Purdue.
IHE offers its Final Four as Kansas, Duke, Texas, and BYU, with Kansas winning it all on April 5. Syracuse loses its first game. Number one seed Kentucky doesn't make it into the round of 16. But IHE still sides with chalk, choosing the number one number one seed to win it all, a real possibility both academically and athletically.
The folks at IHE use the NCAA Graduation Success Rate to break ties. Eduflack wonders what the brackets would look like if we picked winners based solely on their ability to graduate the players they enroll as "student-athletes." The results would likely be shocking.
UPDATE: ESPN is also reporting a new report provided by The Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport at the University of Central Florida, which focuses on the graduation gap between white and black players on the 65 teams found in the bracket. According to the Institute, 45 teams graduated 70 percent or more of their white players, but only 20 teams could hit the same mark for their black student-athletes. The study used graduation success rates, looking at six-year grad rates for freshmen.
Swingin' for the ESEA Fences
March 15, 2010 Eduflack accountability, Arne Duncan, assessment, AYP, NCLB, Online Education, RTT, SBRR
In yesterday's initial analysis of the US Department of Education's ESEA reauthorization blueprint, I noted I was "whelmed" by the plan as a whole. (And for the record, I am a strong proponent of using the word whelmed. If I can be overwhelmed and underwhelmed, I certainly can be whelmed. It's not like having to choose between North and South Dakota.) Since then, I've received a number of questions as to why, particularly since so many people seem to see this as a strong step forward in improving No Child Left Behind.
My biggest issue with the blueprint is there is no big, stinkin', knock-you-off your-seat big idea offered. When we were introduced to the wonderful world of NCLB a little over nine years ago (can we all believe it has been that long?), we were immediately embraced by some huge ideas that almost immediately changed the education policy landscape. Before the ink was even dry on the legislative drafts, we all knew what Annual Yearly Progress was (and the potential dangers it offered). The term "scientifically based research" was quickly added to the vocabulary of wonk and practitioner alike. And Reading First was a new program where the Administration was putting their proverbial money where their mouths were. These were all but twinkles in Sandy's, Margaret's BethAnn's, and Reid's eyes before the reauthorization process began.
But this time around, we have no great new big idea YET. Part of the problem is that the Duncan regime has been hard at work on ed policy for the past 14 or 15 months, moving ideas well before they moved this blueprint for ESEA reauthorization. So what were once big ideas — Race to the Top, Investing in Innovation, common core standards — are now ingrained as part of the ed reform status quo these days. We are looking to codify that which we have debated for more than a year now. We expected all of that in this blueprint, thus it is hardly something designed to knock us off our barstools.
The teacher quality component, which could have provided some real fodder for a sock-knocking idea, seems to be a finetuning and improving over NCLB's Highly Qualified Teacher effort, former EdSec Margaret Spellings' Teacher Incentive Fund, and the teacher requirements included in RttT. Even in addressing the persistent problem with low-performing schools, this blueprint simply evolves from NCLB's two-tiered evaluation with a new three-tiered system, as reported here by Greg Toppo. And while that extra tier may really help at addressing those 5,000 lowest-performing schools, it hardly wins hearts and minds.
To be fair, Eduflack realizes you don't always need some new shiny toy or a jaw-dropping new idea to move forward solid legislation. In fact, in a perfect world, I would hope we'd never need such gimmicks. But with short attention spans and even shorter understanding curves, one often needs that hook, that big idea, to help gain attention and start winning over the necessary converts. When ESEA was reauthorized back in 2001 (and signed into law in early 2002), we not only gave it a new name (NCLB ), but we offered some new ideas and programs to show this was not your father's version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.
Working from the existing blueprint, Eduflack sees a few potentials for both some smallball ideas as well as some bases-clearing longballs. What am I thinking?
* Immediately include strong pieces of congressional legislation in the plan. I'm thinking things like U.S. Sen. Patty Murray's (WA) LEARN Act focused on K-12 reading instruction, Chairman George Miller's (CA) plan for high school improvement, or even the recent legislation offered by U.S. Sen. Jack Reed (RI) and U.S. Rep. Jared Polis (CO) establishing a federal definition for teacher professional development.
* Get personal on teacher quality. Teacher quality is now clearly a central point of the debate, with even Obama calling out the teacher education sector for not living up to expectations. So let's get personal here. As part of your data system work, ensure that we are able to track teachers (both leaders and laggards) back to their originating program, be it a college of education or an alt cert program. Then be prepared to name names when it comes to those institutions that are not delivering the long-term results sought under the new law.
* Invest in parents. The day after Obama was elected, Eduflack opined that the EdSec should establish a family engagement office (at the assistant secretary level) so that the Administration could focus on the role of families in school improvement. To date, the Administration has talked a good game. But with the pending elimination of Parent Information Resource Center (PIRC) grants, there is a gaping hole for engaging families. NCLB tried to do this, with mixed results. Building off of the Obama campaign's success in 2008 and recent activities around healthcare reform, one can build a strong, effective multi-touch effort to really involve parents and families in school turnaround and improvement efforts.
* Kill the bubble sheet. Under ESEA reauthorization, this administration has the power to do away with the dreaded "bubble sheet test." Proudly proclaim that new assessments coming out of common core standards will be required to be smart computer-based exams. Bring testing into the 21st century while allowing for a more-comprehensive assessment than can be captured by guessing which one of five bubbles may be the most correct.
* Require online learning. I applaud the commitment to improving high schools and working to boost graduation rates. Let's add a little 21st century relevancy here. Learning from states like Florida and Alabama, let's require that, by 2020, every student in the United States must take at least one virtual course in order to graduate from high school. Not only does it introduce more relevant coursework into the classroom, it clearly promotes that learning happens beyond what happens between 8 a.m. and 2 p.m. behind the traditional schoolhouse doors.
Those are just five ideas to get the discussion started. The legislative pieces could be endorsed by EdSec Duncan during Wednesday's hearings. Teacher quality could be done this summer when NCATE's anticipated report is released. A Family Engagement Office could be started immediately. And killing the bubble sheet and folding virtual education into state requirements can be done now as stimulus money is used to invest in a range of ed reform ideas. Regardless, we should be taking this opportunity to continue to move forward big, bold thoughts. Real ed improvement can't be limited by those ideas moved during year one. Not to mix my sports metaphors, but this game goes at least four quarters. We need to maximize all opportunities.
Finally, an ESEA Blueprint from the Feds
March 14, 2010 Eduflack accountability, Arne Duncan, assessment, AYP, national standards, NCLB
After months of anticipation, we finally have the official blueprint for reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act form the Obama Administration. The plan was teased in some news articles yesterday (Saturday) morning and was previewed during President Barack Obama's weekly radio address on Saturday morning. The official plan, found here, was officially released on Saturday evening at 8 p.m.
At first glance, I found the plan to be whelming. On the whole, I thought it was entirely solid and relatively thoughtful. But as I read it (and it shows you what type of life Eduflack lives when he spends his Saturday night reading the Administration's ESEA blueprint, but for what is was worth, I was also watching West Virginia University beat Georgetown), I was surprised by how little I was surprised with. As we used to write about two years ago, this was clearly NCLB 2.0. Much of the last iteration of ESEA remains intact. Some needed improvements are being made. And the priorities emphasized in Race to the Top are being codified, hopefully, into the new law.
The highlights? The plan is grouped under five key principles (not to be confused with ED's four pillars). The principles include: college and career-ready students, great teachers and leaders, raise the bar and reward excellence, equity and opportunity, and promote innovation. These principles break into the following tasks:
College and Career-Ready Students — Raising standards for all students, better assessments, a complete education (meaning a well-rounded curriculum beyond the common core standards)
Great Teachers and Leaders in Every School — Effective teachers and principals, our best teachers and leaders where they are needed the most, and strengthening teacher and leadership preparation and recruitment.
Equity and Opportunity for All Students — Rigorous and fair accountability for all students, meeting the needs of diverse learners, and greater equity.
Raise the Bar and Reward Excellence — Fostering a Race to the Top, supporting effective school choice, and promoting a culture of college readiness and success.
Promoting Innovation and Continuous Improvement — Fostering innovation and accelerating success, supporting recognizing and rewarding local innovations, and supporting student success.
See, nothing that exactly shakes the K-12 education earth. As I read the blueprint, I am seeing much of the original intent of NCLB, mixed in with the goals of RttT, a heavy, heavy influence of common core standards, and a strong dash of the principles advocated through the Schott Foundation's recent Opportunity to Learn (OTL) campaign (primarily the equity planks). A little something here for everyone, but not enough that any one party is quite swooning at this point.
I'll be honest, the timing of this release as Eduflack completely puzzled. This blueprint was released as if ED was trying to dump it so no one noticed it. In PR, the general rule is you never release something of importance over a weekend. And you certainly don't do it at 8 p.m. on a Saturday night. Many of the leading reporters got an advance briefing of the blueprint (as evidenced by The Washington Post coverage here, which notes an expected 16 percent spending increase in the federal education budget), but it is clear from the early comments that this release was not maximizing the interest in the topic. We have 16 states coming over to ED this week to plead their case for RttT, with this blueprint now stepping on that significant reform story. Yes, Duncan is slated to speak before the Senate HELP Committee this Wednesday, but with all of Washington focused on healthcare reform, this blueprint is likely to go undernoticed in the coming days and weeks.
But from the look and feel of the blueprint, it is clear that neither Capitol Hill nor the media is in the intended target here. Since the beginning of the calendar year, we have been hearing how Assistant ED Secretary Carmel Martin was preparing an ESEA blueprint for legislators on the Hill. But this document, from its design to its word choices to its bulleted focus of key concepts, is designed to deliver talking points and marching orders to the education blob. This "blueprint" is designed to move the discussion at member organizations, forums about town, and cocktail parties and gab sessions. In that way, it isn't so much a blueprint as it is framing document for debate.
A few things are crystal clear. One, EdSec Arne Duncan is going all in when it comes to common core standards. The execution of this blueprint requires the adoption of the proposed standards across the country. Anything short of 80 percent adoption within the year is going to severely hamstring much of what is proposed in this plan.
Two, those who were expecting accountability (and AYP) to be weakened are going to be severely disappointed. Yes, we no longer use the term AYP. But accountability remains alive and well in this document. Localities are not being granted the flexibility many had hoped they may receive. And while we are changing some of the rubrics (again, aligning them with those core standards) it is clear that continued improvement of student achievement remains the name of the game. Even more so when it now appears that states, districts, schools, and teachers will be judged by how good a job they do getting more kids to graduate from high school.
Three, the teachers unions have been put on notice. Obama's remarks last week about the situation in Rhode Island were quite an intentional statement against the teaching status quo. This blueprint strengthens the call for closing low-performing schools, addressing teachers who aren't making the cut, and holding school districts, administrators, and teachers far more accountable for student achievement than even NCLB did.
Four, rural education is not going to be happy. After seeking to improve its lot under NCLB, rural ed is almost an afterthought in this blueprint, inserted in a list of specialty audiences AFTER Indian, Native Hawaiian, and Alaska Native Education interests. Hardly the sort of focus that Senate HELP Committee Ranking Member Mike Enzi (WY) and House Education Committee Ranking Member John Kline (MN) are hoping to see. And Eduflack would quibble with what is labeled as "A New Approach," as many of these bullet items do indeed read like the rhetoric surrounding NCLB intentions back in 2001 and 2002. But looking to bullet out the takeaways (and distinguish between new and continued approaches) is always useful to those who will be asked to opine on this blueprint now and in the future.
And what's missing? No real discussion of anticipated plans of eliminating the current Title II (focused on teachers) and replacing it with new language aligned with the last year's activities (though I suspect that's what the effective teachers section is intended to address). No real emphasis on plans to eliminate traditional, guaranteed block grants and replace them with competitive grant programs a la RttT and i3, particularly at the school district level. And most importantly, no crosswalk of dollars with priorities. WaPo may be pointing to a major spending increase under the reauthorization, but it simply isn't part of the plan that has
been shared with the at large chattering class. We're being asked to buy into big ideas, with specific dollars, programs, and line items available on a need-to-know basis at a later date.
So what now? From early reports, AASA (which was a strong opponent to NCL seems happy. Teachers unions are upset. And most simply didn't realize this was dropped late last night (and announced proudly on Facebook for those who are Fans of the US Department of Education). While this gives both the House and Senate committees additional information to consider as they hold their ESEA hearings, it is clear that Chairman George Miller (CA) is moving forward with his own plans, and this blueprint may very well be tossed onto the pile with other recommendations coming in to Miller from across the sector.
Timing? Eduflack loves those cock-eyed optimists who are still talking about reauthorization by this summer. It ain't happening. If the intent is to re-bucket ESEA around this proposed blueprint, we are looking at spring 2011 at the earliest, assuming we don't have significant shifts in congressional makeup this November. But at least it gives us more to talk about than just RttT!
"Teacher Preparation: Who Needs It?"
March 11, 2010 Eduflack Teacher Education, teachers
Without question, teacher quality is one of THE hot topics in education reform these days. Logically, we recognize that teachers are the ones primarily responsible for boosting student achievement in the classroom. Programs like the US Department of Education's Teacher Incentive Fund have thus been designed to reward those teachers whose students demonstrate success. It is a simple equation, outcomes result in rewards.
But what about the inputs that result in that achievement? What do teachers need to know, be able to do, and experience before they ever become a teacher of record? Those are the sorts of questions that the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE) is trying to tackle with a new series of policy briefings it launched today, titled "Teacher Preparation: Who Needs It?"
In today's episode, AACTE offered up The Clinical Preparation of Teachers: A Policy Brief, a document that provides some of the history, the research, and the vision for how to best address clinical preparation. Chief among the recommendations — all prospective teachers, regardless of their pathway, need at least 450 hours of clinical training (or a full semester).
Full disclosure, Eduflack has worked with the folks over at AACTE for years. Regardless, today's briefing offered some interesting recommendations for the federal government, state government, and those preparing the next generation of teachers, including:
For the feds:
Revise the "Highly Qualified Teacher" definition within the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) to require that teachers must establish not only their content expertise, but their ability to teach it effectively, as measured by their actual performance in classrooms, following extended clinical experience;
Invest in the development of a National Teacher Performance Assessment that would parallel the development and adoption of Common Core Standards;
Maintain the Teacher Quality Partnership Grants, with a specific clinical preparation focus, in the Higher Education Opportunity Act while increasing funding for the program;
For states:
Require a minimum of 450 hours, or one semester, of clinical experience during pre-service teacher preparation;
Ensure that all teacher preparation routes, regardless of pathway, include the same clinical preparation requirements;
Require a high-quality teacher performance assessment of all teacher candidates;
Collaborate to agree upon common clinical experience requirements;
Offer incentives to schools that act as clinical settings for teacher candidates;
Support the expansion or replication of successful teacher residency programs;
And for providers of teacher preparation:
Ensure school districts and universities work jointly to design and supervise strong clinical practice collaborations;
Provide all teacher candidates substantial and appropriate clinical preparation prior to becoming "teacher of record" in their own classrooms;
Train clinical teachers and other teacher mentors to help and support novice teachers;
Require all clinical teachers to have at least three years of teaching experience; and
Assist our nation's public schools and teacher preparation programs to jointly adopt standards for newly redesigned clinically based teacher preparation programs.
As part of the formal presentation, the crowd heard from U.S. Sen. Jack Reed (RI), who is quickly becoming THE Senate voice on education in general and professional development in particular. In his remarks, Senator Reed praised President Obama for adding funds to the Teacher Quality Partnership program as part of last year's economic stimulus package, but took issue with Obama eliminating the program as part of his budget recommendations last month. Reed urged all those in attendance to reach out to their Senators and Congressmen to ask that TQP be restored, as the program is essential to ensuring our colleges and universities are working toward developing the high-quality, effectiv
e teachers our schools need so badly.
With a greater and greater focus on effective, results-based instruction, the issue of teacher preparation isn't going to go away. Even as part of its Quality Counts study, Education Week recently highlighted those states that are leaders and laggards when it comes to the clinical experience. Content may be king these days, but pedagogy is quickly gaining stature.
Investing in Proven Innovation
March 8, 2010 Eduflack i3, IES, RTT
The hits keep coming from the good folks down on Maryland Avenue. Today, the U.S. Department of Education officially released its Investing in Innovation, or i3, grant RFP. For all of those districts looking to get a piece of nearly $650 million in i3 dollars, the clock starts … NOW. Full details on the grant process can be found here.
Many will recall that ED circulated a draft i3 RFP for public comment back in the fall. Today's announcement very closely mirrors that which we say months ago. We are still looking at three categories of grants — development, validation, and scale-up. Development grants still come in with a max of $5 million per; validation with a max of $30 million per, and scale up with a max of $50 million per.
School district applicants still need to provide a 20 percent matching contribution from private sources (including those college/university partners). Bonus points remain for early childhood focus, college access and success focus, ELL focus, and rural schools focus (with rural schools worth two extra points and the others worth just one).
Most importantly, the evidence requirements remain the same as they have always been. What does this mean? In this case, innovation not only means the introduction of something new or different; it also means that you have to prove that that new or different approach is proven effective. The feds are seeking very real research to drive this innovation, even in the development grants.
Before the end of the month, our friends with the federal government will hold three information sessions for prospective applicants — in Baltimore, Denver, and Atlanta. Those districts looking to apply for i3 should file a notice of intent within 20 days of the RFP being posted on the Federal Register (still hasn't gone up, as of 11 a.m. today) and applications are due within 60 days of Federal Register posting. ED is now saying they will award i3 grants in two phases.
Today's official grant notice also offers some guidance on how many grants can be awarded. But in the words immortalized by Barbie (the Doll) back in the late 1990s, "math is hard!" For months now, Eduflack has been telling interested LEAs that we are likely only looking at 30 total winners. With a $650 million pool (now down to $643 million), you are looking at eight or nine winners in each of the three categories, assuming districts get close to the max. So $400 million for scale up (eight grants), $200 million for validation (10 grants), and $40-50 million or so for development grants (10 grants). Then the pot has run dry.
But ED seems to have a different view of things. Average grant awards are estimated at $3 million for development, $17.5 million for validation, and $30 million for scale up. (This despite the realization that virtually every state that applied for Race to the Top funds exceeded the budget range that was assigned to their state). Based on those ranges, ED estimates up to five scale up winners, and up to 100 winners each in both development and validation. Obviously, the budget doesn't allow anything close to that.
Five scale up winners at $30 million knocks the total pool down to less than $500 million remaining. A hundred validation grants at $17.5 million per would put us at $1.75 billion, more than three times the remaining pool. And those up to 100 development grants at $3 million per adds another $300 million. So if we top out on the estimates (realizing they are all generous ranges) ED is saying i3 could be up to nearly $2.2 billion. I'm all for stretching the dollar, but that seems to be a little more than the $643 million currently available.
Why is this so important? LEAs need to realize that competition for these grants is going to be significantly difficult and cutthroat. With RttT, we had a sense for how many states would and can win. Virtually every state applies, and based on the funding ranges, we can expect close to 20 states to win. If we don't spend the full RttT pool, then we will have fewer winners.
But with i3, we have the possibility of thousands of school districts and consortia applying for a piece of this money. Some districts have been hard at work on their projects for years, and a scale up grant seems like a slam dunk (Eduflack has long said Chicago Public Schools and its Teacher Advancement Program, or TAP, would be a slam dunk for i3). Other districts have been focusing on their applications for months, even before the draft regulations came out. Still others have been looking to partner with other districts, local universities, or nationally recognized non-profits, to strengthen their applications. And then you have some who think that "innovation" in the title means it is supposed to fund technology programs. Regardless, all want a piece of this.
So instead of 25 or 40 percent of states winning a RttT grant, we are looking at the possibility that far fewer than 5 percent of i3 applicants will get a taste of that federal nectar. That means applications must be well written, on point, and based on research like few grant proposals have ever been based before (and unlike RttT, i3 applications can't be more than 35-50 pages, depending on type). Competition is going to be fierce. The strength of both the research and the impact will be king.
And what does Eduflack expect to see? First, many districts will be dusting off ye olde research protocols to ensure their proposed models match that offered by IES these past five or so years. Second, rural schools are going to fair pretty well here, both because of the extra points and because of the realization that RttT doesn't provide rurals the attention they may need. And at the end of the day, we still should expect no more than 35 total winners. Five scale up winners each coming in close the $50 million cap, 10 or so validation winners coming closer to the $30 million cap than the $17.5 million ED estimate, and another 10-12 development winners, most of which need more than the $3 million in expected seed money.
Good research and documentation is hard, and it doesn't come cheap. For months, we've been hearing that RttT is all about quality, not quantity. The same needs to be true for i3. The focus should be on providing a select group of school districts with the money to truly ramp up and further test a specific intervention that is boosting student performance and closing the achievement gap. If we want these funds to have a real, true, and lasting impact, we need to spend wisely on the lowest-hanging fruit, investing in those ideas that have the greatest possible return on investment and using those results to inspire other districts to follow suit.
Teaching The Capitol Riot
It Is Time for an American History Ed Czar
A New EdSec
Embracing the Science of Reading
History Matters, We Think
michael riccards on The End of a Cheer Era
M Riccards on Declaring Our Independence fro…
At A Loss For Words,… on My Fellow Americans: Reflectio…
Gilda rorro on A Proposal for Heroes
Mriccards on When It Comes To History, Let'…
Alt Prez
Broad Prize
CCSSO
Chancellor Klein
Dadprovement
DCPS
eddata
EdNews
edReformer
Edu-horn
Education Debate
HQT
international benchmarking
LAUSD
Michelle Rhee
President Bush
Reading First
Roy Romer
SBRR
TrumpED


text:
NGC 1310 est une galaxie spirale située dans la constellation du Fourneau. Sa vitesse par rapport au fond diffus cosmologique est de , ce qui correspond à une distance de Hubble de . Elle a été découverte par l'astronome britannique John Herschel en 1835.

La classe de luminosité de NGC 1310 est III et elle renferme également des régions d'hydrogène ionisé.

À ce jour, une douzaine de mesures non basées sur le décalage vers le rouge (redshift) donnent une distance de , ce qui est à l'intérieur des valeurs de la distance de Hubble.

Supernova
La supernova SN 1965J a été découverte dans NGC 1310 le  par l'astronome américain Gibson Reaves. Le type de cette supernova n'a pas été déterminé

Groupe de NGC 1316
NGC 1310 est fait partie du groupe de NGC 1316. Ce groupe est aussi membre de l'amas du Fourneau et il comprend au moins 20 galaxies, dont les galaxies IC 335, NGC 1310, NGC 1316, NGC 1317, NGC 1341, NGC 1350, NGC 1365, NGC 1380, NGC 1381, NGC 1382 et NGC 1404.

Notes et références

Voir aussi

Articles connexes
 Liste des objets du NGC

Liens externes

 NGC 1310 sur spider.seds.org
 NGC 1310 sur la base de données LEDA
 NGC 1310 sur WikiSky
 NGC 1310 sur le site du professeur C. Seligman

1310
Constellation du Fourneau
Galaxie spirale
Objet céleste découvert en 1835
Amas du Fourneau
Objet céleste découvert par John Herschel

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


After a traumatic bauble-related incident when he was a baby Mouse has decided that getting in the festive spirit is far too dangerous - from sharp pine needles on the Christmas tree to paper cuts from wrapping paper to sneeze-inducing clouds of icing sugar for decorating the gingerbread biscuits. How will the other animals in Jingle Bell Forest persuade him to loosen up? Find out in this warm and comical Christmas tale! The festive spirit triumphs over petty rules and box-ticking in this funny and feel-good story. Children will love the sheer silliness of the humour while parents will laugh at its satirical dig at the health-and-safety obsessions of modern life. But ultimately there's a warm and engaging message: like Scrooge or the Grinch Mouse is an anti-hero saved by the power of Christmas!


text:
- January 30, 2023 -
Cuba-USA
Styles / Trends
Cuban Flavors
Home Cuba Economy Foreign investment in Cuba
Italian T.O.MA. Group to build new hotel in Cuba
The group signed a contract worth 80 million dollars for the construction of a hotel of the Spanish chain Iberostar in the heritage city of Trinidad.
by EFE, EFE
in Foreign investment in Cuba
The heritage city of Trinidad, in the center of Cuba. Photo: Archive
The Italian T.O.MA. Group signed in Havana a contract worth 80 million dollars with which it was awarded the construction of a hotel of the Spanish chain Iberostar in the heritage city of Trinidad, one of the main tourist centers in Cuba, the island's media reported this Tuesday.
The International Economic Association "AEI Trinidad," created in August 2017 between the Italian T.O.MA. Group and the Cuban state construction company DINVAI, will be responsible for the construction of the new hotel that will be added to the more than 20 facilities Iberostar manages in Cuba.
See related Tweet
The specialized companies Tonon, Tonoimpianti, Oberosler and Maeg, based in northeastern Italy, which belong to the T.O.MA. Group, will be involved in the construction of the Iberostar Trinidad, specified a news item published on the Cubadebate website.
The Iberostar hotel company has been present since 1993 in Cuba, where it currently operates 28 hotels with more than 8,000 rooms under its administration, one of them in Trinidad and others in Havana, Varadero beach resort, and the island's eastern provinces like Camagüey, Holguín and Santiago de Cuba.
The last hotels inaugurated by the Spanish company in Cuba are the Grand Packard, a high-standard facility located on the emblematic Prado Promenade in the historic center of Havana, and the Iberostar Holguín, Selection category, the only one of its kind in eastern Cuba.
Kempinski to open second hotel in Cuba
More Russian locomotives and a diesel railcar for Cuba
Cuba to give priority to Spain in its railroad and airport projects
Telefónica, Bankia, Talgo, Gamesa, Sacyr, Aena…also came to Cuba
Grand Packard: nuevo hotel de lujo para La Habana
Through the "AEI Trinidad" the Italian T.O.MA. Group established another contract last April to build a hotel for the Spanish tourist company Meliá International, also in the central city of Trinidad, which since 1988 has been included on UNESCO's list of the World Heritage Sites.
The opening date for the hotel, which will operate under the brand name of the Meliá chain on the shores of María Aguilar beach, has been scheduled for 2020.
Overall, the investment in the works of both tourist establishments that will be built in Trinidad, considered one of the best preserved colonial enclaves in the Americas, is estimated at around 140 million dollars.
The Cuban government is promoting a plan for the growth of the island's hotel plant that includes the opening of new hotels in order to reach some 100,000 rooms by 2030.
Más de 5 mil nuevas habitaciones para el turismo cubano en 2019
Cuba currently has some 68,000 rooms in 366 hotels, more than half operated under 88 management contracts with 20 international chains.
The Cuban tourist authorities had announced the goal of receiving five million travelers by 2018, but after the decrease in arrivals so far this year they readjusted the figure and calculated that by the end of the year more than 4.7 million foreign visitors will have passed through the Island.
However, they have indicated that they are betting on receiving 5.1 million tourists in 2019 and for this they aim to develop the tourism modality of congresses, conventions, meetings and incentive trips.
Tourism is Cuba's second source of income, after the sale of professional services abroad, representing a contribution of 10% to the GDP and the generation of half a million jobs.
EFE, EFE
Tags: Cuban Economyforeign investment in Cubatourism in CubaTrinidad
Cuba and MLB reach historic agreement
Americans' arrival to Cuba increases in 2018
Reference to communism returns to Cuban Constitution's draft
Cuba disapproves chess player Leinier Domínguez' entry in U.S. Federation
The conversation here is moderated according to OnCuba News discussion guidelines. Please read the Comment Policy before joining the discussion.
The Enchanted Shrimp of the Cuban Dance
What foods can be brought to Cuba and what imports are forbidden?
New online form for travelers arriving in Cuba
Why has infant mortality increased in Cuba?
Family Reunification Parole has not been canceled, U.S. Embassy in Cuba reported
Work with OnCuba
Moderation policy for comments
Advertisement offers
OnCuba and the OnCuba logo are registered® trademarks of Fuego Enterprises, Inc., its subsidiaries or divisions.
OnCuba © by Fuego Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Get a Free Health Insurance quote with the best health insurance rates. Get low cost, affordable, cheap, health insurance. We can save you money on your health insurance if you live in Sacramento, Folsom, Chico, Redding, San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose, Long Beach, Fresno, Los Angeles, Santa Ana, Santa Barbara, Anaheim, or the San Diego regions.
We provide cheap, low cost, affordable health insurance from Health Insurance Industry leading providers. Health insurance can provide the important protection needed in the event of illness and for regular preventive care. Using the experience and strength of our heath insurance carriers, Barragan Insurance Agency can offer you cheap, low cost, affordable HMO, PPO, Vision, and Dental care insurance policy coverage throughout California, including areas from San Diego to Crescent City, from the Bay Area to the Sacramento area and everywhere in between.
Insurance Center for Sacramento and the Northern California region including Folsom, Elk Grove, Rancho Cordova, Carmichael, Antelope, North Highlands, Gold River, Fair Oaks, Woodland, Natomas, Sacramento, Anatolia, Kavala Ranch, Rocklin, Campbell, San Jose, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Long Beach, Fresno, Oakland, Santa Ana, Anaheim, Roseville, Lincoln, Loomis, Granite Bay, Galt, Davis, West Sacramento, Citrus Heights, Orangevale, El Dorado Hills, Stockton, Modesto, Lodi, Merced, Tracy, Antioch, Dixon, Woodland, Fairfield, Vacaville, Vallejo, Marysville, uba City, Linda, Plumas Lake, Chico, Bakersfield, San Jose, Campbell, Placer County, Sacramento County, El Dorado County, Yolo County, San Joaquin County, Sutter County, Northern California, Central California, and Placer County, and other cities and counties within California.


text:
Melaka to Singapore
Jun13 by JT & DY
Today we moved on from Melaka to Singapore. Breakfast was at 07.00, same old story as before… boring. Our bus left the hotel for the central bus station at 08.00.
Our intercity coach, 2×2 seating throughout, left at 09.00. This bus had a very noisy diff which whined with a very disturbing scream all the way along the highway. But it was getting us ever closer to our destination and that was the main thing.
It seemed to me that most of Malaysia is covered in palm oil plantations. We travelled for miles and miles with nothing else to be seen from the bus. Some of the edges of the highway are planted with teak which looks like a good idea as teak has been virtually stripped from the forests. These trees will become a valuable resource in the years ahead.
The crossing from Malaysia into Singapore had Alif, our guide, worried about possible delay. But we managed to navigate the whole experience of leaving Malaysia and getting through the customs and immigration for Singapore in 30 mins. We arrived at our hotel at 13.00, but were out again 20 mins later. No rest for the wicked!
Our time in Singapore was very short but long enough for a ride on SIN's transit system.
We were on our way to Marina Bay Sands Hotel, the well known three-tier building which is linked across the top of the three tiers by an infinity pool. Alif, knows somebody who works there, so he was able to get us into a restricted area/bar – the Skybar.
It's actually above the pool, so very much on the top of the building on the 57th floor. Fantastic views of Singapore, but, as might be expected, the beer was very pricey. One was enough with a small Tiger beer costing AUD18.85. I made it last a long time!
That aside, the views from the top were fabulous. So… let's look down on SIN city.
Marina Bay with the Art Science Museum at lower right. It was designed by Moshe Safdie to represent the 10 petals of a waterlily. Stunning architecture.
The massive skyline of Singapore city.
The Merlin fountain, half fish, half lion, is the island's mascot.
Another view from the 57th floor of the Marina Bay Sands Hotel – the Singapore Sports Hub, at centre left. The National Stadium boasts having the largest free-spanning dome structure ever built. The dome stretches 310m (1017ft) and can accommodate 55,000 spectators.
From the vantage point of the 57th floor of the Marina Bay Sands Hotel, I looked down on the 'Gardens by the Bay' nature park. This massive undertaking covers 101 hectares (250 acres) of reclaimed land.
First mooted in 2005, an international design competition was held just one year later which attracted more than 70 entries by 170 firms from 24 countries. The whole venture has proved very popular with 6.4 million visitors in 2014. In November 2015, the Gardens by the Bay welcomed its 20 millionth visitor.
Two outstanding features of these gardens are the Conservatories, (the Flower Dome and the Cloud Forest) and the SuperTree Grove. The two conservatories have been designed to be environmentally friendly while the "trees" act as intake and exhaust vents as well as structures on which all sorts of plants are grown, and as viewing platforms.
Another view of the 'Gardens by the Bay' complex.
The SuperTrees.
Up at the Sky Bar on top of the Marina Bay Sands Hotel, the girls in our group certainly enjoyed their cocktails. Goodness knows what they cost! But as we know, all good things come to an end and so we had to go back to our hotel.
We were warned that, unlike this super duper hotel, our hotel for the night was a 'coffin' hotel. Many of the rooms had no windows. But, Madam Luck was on my side… it was my turn to have a room to myself AND I scored an outside room with no less than 4 windows, so the room was very bright. Yes, it was small, but perfectly adequate. And I had a really good night's sleep. Just as well. I had a travelling day in front of me as I transferred to Jakarta, Indonesia. More anon.
All photographs copyright © JT and DY of jtdytravels
If you enjoy these armchair travels, please pass our site onto others
www.dymusings.com
more of our travel stories and photos can be found on
www.jtdytravels.com
More of our travel photos are on
www.flickr.com/photos/jtdytravels
← Malaysia: Meander in Melaka
Indonesia: Jakarta →


PERSONALISED VIDEO TO YOUR NEEDS!
We learn best from audio and visual presentation.
This firms inventor Rick Baker owns patented technology which allows a computer to automatically manufacture the best interactive "personalised' audio-visual teaching presentations using wireless MEM"s motion sensors that can be strapped on or fitted to etextile clothing that consist of traditional fabric woven with conductive fibers as well as electronic elements.
See in video below Notch wireless MEMs sensors capturing motion and imagine "audio" instructional comments being provided from experts (similar to face to face communications today) without them needing to see a movement, with these and other visual presentations — that's what MYCOACHBUDDY technology achieves.
Look for our revolutionary system being introduced in the likes of applications for smart TV, smart phone, home computers from 2019.


text:
Mirth and Melancholy
The journey of a recovering optimist.
I've decided I'm going to look at things with a more positive outlook. Yeah, I know what you're thinking, it's cliche and a lot of people already are or should be doing it. To be honest, it's an on and off thing for me. I do my best to be positive and then something brings me down. I allow something to bring me down, rather. I then go back to being positive. But people like you better when you're happy and positive. It isn't like I'm trying to please anyone; I'm really not, but what's the harm in people liking you for a good reason? As long as people don't like me for trivial reasons like money or a temporary fill to a void. Life is easier when you're happy.
I've just really been allowing myself to drip into negativity. It's not easy to stay out of it, given my circumstances. But we're going to try and avert our attention.
On the bright side, I drew a comic in 2 days, for my Instagram webcomic @shorterinperson. I've been …
Is This the First Post of 2019?
One Day, I Can Reach That Rainbow
3 Weeks Left of School
When Things Are Looking Up...
Always Assume the Best in People... Unless...
A Surprising Week
Returning...?
Where Is My Social Life? [PLEASE READ] (NOT A SELF-HATE POST)
I Need Inspo. Help
AYYY YOU READ THIS THINGY. GOOD JOB I LOVE YOU
Nura Fahzy
nrfahz
Feel Like Taking a Trip Down Memory Lane?


text:
Master Art Print
Divan Japonais, 75 Rue des Martyrs, Paris - Cabaret Music Dance Hall - Belle Époque, Art Nouveau
DISPLAYING: 9" x 12" Print
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (1864 - 1901) was a French painter, printmaker, draughtsman and illustrator whose immersion in the colorful and theatrical life of Paris in the late 1800s yielded a collection of exciting, elegant and provocative images of the modern and sometimes decadent life of those times. He was drawn to Montmartre, the area of Paris famous for its bohemian lifestyle and the haunt of artists, writers, and philosophers.Toulouse-Lautrec - along with Cézanne, Van Gogh and Gauguin - is among the most well-known painters of the Post-Impressionist period. In a 2005 auction at Christie's auction house, a new record was set when "La Blanchisseuse", an early painting of a young laundress, sold for US$22.4 million. He excelled at depicting people in their working environments, with the colour and movement of the gaudy night-life present but the glamour stripped away, and was masterful when painting crowd scenes in which the figures are highly individualized.Throughout his career, which spanned less than 20 years, Toulouse-Lautrec created 737 canvases, 275 watercolours, 363 prints and posters, 5,084 drawings, some ceramic and stained glass work, and an unknown number of lost works. His debt to the Impressionists, in particular the more figurative painters Manet and Degas, is apparent. His style was influenced by the classical Japanese woodprints which became popular in art circles in Paris. An alcoholic for most of his adult life, Toulouse-Lautrec was placed in a sanatorium shortly before his death.
Fisherman, Royal Hawaiian Hotel Menu Cover
Visit Japan by Japan Mail - N.Y.K. Line (Nippon Yusen Kaisha)
Fly to the South Seas Isles, via Pan American Airways
Rhodos: Griechenland, Greece


Have you ever sat and watched your smartphone drain rapidly before your eyes, even while plugged into a charger? There is a hidden but common reason many people are experiencing this frustrating situation.
While sitting at work, I have noticed on several occasions that my smartphone will start draining the juice faster than a soft orange in a Jack LaLane juicing machine. It's the most frustrating and mind-boggling thing that I've experienced with my Galaxy Note 3, and up until now, I had no idea what was really happening.
I assumed that I either had a serious malfunction with my smartphone, or an AC charger adapter that had shot craps. I couldn't imagine how or why my smartphone could take a complete nosedive right before my eyes while it was plugged up and should be charging.
The only solution to this problem was turning off the phone, and leaving it on the charger for an hour or two in order to slowly reverse the process and start recovering the charge. And this seemed to happen when I needed to use my smartphone the most.
While talking to a friend and complaining about this mysterious rapid battery drain, my good friend and fellow gadget enthusiast Tim Largent clued me in to what the source of this unknown drain actually was. He hit the nail on the head, and I sat in amazement, wondering why I never knew this little known fact.
What Tim explained to me is the fact that smartphones will constantly cycle in search mode when they cannot connect with a strong signal from a tower. If you are in a dead spot or area with a weak signal, your smartphone will search for a better signal until it finds one.
With the network problem we are having in our area, many others have experienced this rapid battery drain, and this is exactly the source of the problem. While the smartphone is searching for that stronger signal, it demands a huge amount of power resources.
This is why my phone would drain faster than it would charge, while plugged into a charger, until the phone would go completely dead. But it wasn't happening every day, only on days where there seemed to be a big problem with the carrier network.
If you are in a known area that has a weak or intermittent signal, leaving your phone powered on to fervently search for a better signal will drain your battery dead so fast that you can watch the power meter decrease right before your eyes.
The only way to avoid this is to turn the phone off, or turn off your smartphone's radio by putting it into Airplane mode when you know you are in a problem location. There is no other solution, other than calling your carrier to inform them of a possible technical problem with your service.
So before you take a hammer to your phone or chunk the charger out the window or into the nearest trash receptacle, keep this in mind. It's probably not your smartphone OR your charger. It could be an issue that is out of your hands.
Be informed, my fellow smartphone addicts!


A flight to Malaga has been forced to return to Bristol Airport after a passenger suffered a medical emergency.
Ryanair flight FR8121 had almost reached the French coast when the pilot made the decision to turn the plane around.
Bristol Airport has confirmed the plane landed safely and a medical team is currently onboard.
The condition of the passenger is not known at this time.
A spokesman from Ryan Air said: "This flight from Bristol to Malaga returned to Bristol Airport shortly after take-off after a passenger became ill inflight.
"In line with procedures, the crew contacted ATC, the aircraft landed normally, and the passenger was met by medical personnel.


The Lauderdale Yacht Club regatta, named "Boomerang" because of its unique course layout for the inland Opti fleets, has been a staple in Florida for decades. This year, Snipes were added to the regatta's outside, ocean course, joining the Lasers and 420's. The late addition of the Snipes made for a small but extremely competitive fleet.
Saturday was comprised of 70 degree Fahrenheit temperatures, with light to medium, shifty and very spotty north-northeast breezes. At the end of the day, after four tightly contested races, Peter Commette held a one point lead over Snipe Masters World and former Western Hemisphere Champion Ernesto Rodriquez, who led Star World and multiple Snipe World Champion Augie Diaz by three points.
On Sunday, the temperature plummeted into the 50's, very chilly for Florida. With the water warmer than the outside temperature, a mist appeared all over the course, as heat rose from the water. The cold front that had gone through earlier in the morning left for Sunday's racing light, even spottier and shiftier wind from the northwest (2-9 knots). Ratcheting up the difficulty, a disproportionate chop beat up the boats every time they tried port tack.
Like the temperature, Commette's and Rodriguez's performances cooled off, while Diaz's, heated up. Augie won Sunday's two races, leaving him the deserving overall winner.
The regatta entry fee included lunches and water while sailing and a dinner with a raffle for the over 100 competitors on Saturday evening, with a raffle having over 100 donated prizes. While former Snipe and Sunfish World Champion, Dave Chapin, was not that lucky on the water, his luck during the raffle was unparalleled. A good time was had by all.


The weather warmed up here in Tennessee, and that could only mean one thing: time to get working faster on insulating our trailer! With aluminum being such an excellent conductor of heat, it very quickly turns oven-like inside our tin can as soon as the sun makes an appearance.
We decided to go with Prodex reflective insulation from Insulation4Less after reading some good things about its performance in a shallower wall cavity like those in our Airstream.
To create an air space between the outer aluminum skin and the outward-facing reflective layer of insulation, we first cut and glued hundreds of tiny foam insulation blocks to the inside of the skin. It made for a very neat modern art look by the end, but also took a very long time!
Next we cut the pieces of insulation to size (with the assistance of our four-legged helpers, as you can see in the photos) and taped all the edges to the trailer with foil tape except the bottom (to allow water to flow downward if any leaks arise).
After a few days of this and getting all our first pieces of insulation up, the temperature is much more temperate inside the trailer. You can feel a huge difference between areas that are insulated and those that are not! The bare aluminum can be scorching hot to the touch, but the heat doesn't seem to transfer inside nearly as much it did before.
Hopefully a good insulation job will mean a lot less time running our heater and air conditioner and more time enjoying the fresh air wherever we may be parked. Good for us, good for the environment!
We Just Bought a Vintage Airstream to Renovate!
Next Post A 'Hole' Lot of Drilling!
You guys are awesome and thank you for sharing. Did the insulation work the way you expected? Would you have done it differently or used different materials?
Thanks, Edgar! It did work really well – before insulating, we could burn ourselves just touching the inner aluminum walls on a hot day. Aluminum is a great conductor of heat and cold! After insulating, they felt warm when we were in direct sun, but never hot. We never had any issues with our interior paint peeling either, which we considered a good test!
We did two layers of the Prodex, shiny side facing in and out, to keep the cool/warm air in the trailer, and then to keep exterior heat/cold out. Having an air gap between the insulation and aluminum is critical for it to work correctly, so we used the foam insulation board cut into blocks and glued them onto the inside of the outer trailer skin. It was totally worth the expense and hard work!
Thanks so much for your post on this. I'm really excited to have discovered your blog this morning! My husband and I are in the early stages of renovating our 27′ 1976 Overland and we just ripped out all the old fiberglass insulation. Whew! We're considering using Prodex as a possible replacement and its so great to read about your positive experience. I've heard it's a much better insulation for both temperature and noise than Reflectix. I also keep seeing people use spray foam as a replacement but what a nightmare if it doesn't hold up!
I'm looking at the third image on this post and understand you glued foam insulation blocks to the outer AS skin and then put in the precut Prodex panels. After that, did you create a second air space between the two layers of Prodex or just stack them one on top of the other? And finally, did you create an airspace between the inner skins using the glued foam insulation? With only an inch and half interior wall space I'm sure you couldn't create all of these spaces.
Did you do anything to cover the ribs? I've heard of people using this foam gasket tape (http://www.homedepot.com/p/Owens-Corning-Foam-SealR-Sill-Plate-Gasket-5-1-2-in-x-50-ft-2FS/202080947?keyword=sill+gasket).
I know it's been a while since you renovated your airstream but was wondering if you have any recollection of the specific Prodex product you ordered and quantity.
Any information you can provide will be so helpful.