text:
Mike Pompeo Wastes No Time Focusing on Iran Regime
Pompeo meets with Saudi officials on his first trip as the new Secretary of States, April 2018
Fresh off his Senate confirmation despite a desperate effort by the Iran lobby to torpedo it, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo kicked off a whirlwind trip overseas with stops at a NATO summit in Brussels, Saudi Arabia and Israel in which he put the Iranian regime front and center of U.S. foreign policy moving forward.
The turnaround from the Obama administration's attitude towards the Iranian regime is startling and badly needed. Under the previous administration, the focus of making the Iran nuclear deal the centerpiece of its foreign policy achievements drove out all other considerations.
Iranian regime's long and brutal history of human rights violations was largely ignored as an inconvenient truth. Iran's status as a state sponsor of terrorism was overlooked and its threats to its neighbors were glossed over by measly promises of "moderation" that never came to pass.
If hindsight is 20/20, then in the three years since the deal was struck, the world has seen Iran's true colors and it's largely consisted of red for the blood spilled and black for the charred remains of cities and villages blasted into oblivion in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen.
To say the world became a much more dangerous place with the rise of Islamic extremism coupled with the outflow of Iranian money supporting terrorist groups is a gross understatement.
And yet, the Obama administration held on to the hope that things would get better, if nothing else because it couldn't stand to admit that it made a colossal mistake in the approving of the nuclear deal without any conditions on inspection of Iranian regime military sites, its ballistic missile program or meddling in the affairs of its neighbors.
The Trump administration hasn't been under illusions about Iran's role in destabilizing activities and has correctly called the mullahs out for their role as the center of troubles in the Middle East. Even more fortunate, this administration frankly doesn't care much about its perceived public image or the goodwill of academics, television analysts or armchair foreign policy wonks.
Under Pompeo and new national security advisor John Bolton, this administration has been blunt and to the point; a shock to the system of typically mild-mannered diplomacy practiced over the past decade.
Pompeo kicked off his first full day as secretary of state this past Friday at a NATO summit for foreign ministers in Brussels in which he said it was "unlikely" the president would remain in the Iran nuclear deal after the May 12th deadline unless European leaders agreed to a "substantial fix" addressing the president's concerns.
"Absent a substantial fix, absent overcoming the flaws of the deal, he [Trump] is unlikely to stay in that deal," Pompeo said.
While President Trump has met with French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in two visits in which both pressed him to remain in the deal, the president has made it clear what his conditions are to stay in the agreement. The diplomatic ball is now firmly in the hands of European and Iranian negotiators.
But beyond the nuclear agreement, Pompeo continued on to Iranian rival Saudi Arabia to make clear the U.S. position that now views Iranian regime as the greatest threat to regional stability.
Speaking to reporters in Saudi Arabia, Pompeo said the multi-party agreement reached in 2015 to curb Tehran's nuclear program did not do enough to contain the Islamic Republic. "In fact, Iran has only behaved worse since the deal was approved," he said.
Secretary Pompeo, cited Iranian regime's support for the "murderous" government of Syrian President Bashar Assad and also accused the country of arming Houthi rebels in Yemen who have repeatedly targeted Saudi cities with ballistic missiles — a charge denied by Tehran.
"Iran destabilizes this entire region," Pompeo said, standing alongside his Saudi counterpart in Riyadh. "It is indeed the greatest sponsor of terrorism in the world, and we are determined to make sure it never possesses a nuclear weapon."
That thematic was carried to Israel as Pompeo repeated his talking points while meeting with Israeli officials.
The trip highlighted the forming of a new alliance in the Middle East opposed to Iran's expansion making strange bedfellows of traditional foes in Saudi Arabia and Israel, along with the Gulf states, many of which have been on the receiving end of Iranian machinations to stir up unrest with protestors and terrorist acts.
The bluntness of the Trump administration has turned the tables on the mullahs who now are the ones on the proverbial hot seat and have to make the decision on whether or not to stay in the deal by acquiescing to the U.S. demands.
While the Iran lobby, especially the National Iranian American Council, has worked mightily in an effort to portrays the president's tough talk as a pathway to war with Iran, the reality has been a clear definition of the expectations for Iranian compliance moving forward and failure of the deal rests squarely with the mullahs in Tehran and nowhere else.
There is no small irony that the discussions taking place now are not about what concessions the U.S. must give to Iran to preserve the nuclear deal, but rather what will the Iranian regime do to stay in a deal that it needs more than the U.S.
The inescapable fact right now confronting the mullahs and Hassan Rouhani is that Iran is a basket case of a nation with a free-falling currency, stagnant economy, dwindling foreign cash reserves and beset with civil unrest and protests on an almost daily basis.
The regime needs the deal badly in order to hang on to any kind of ability to convince the world that it's indeed a reformed nation, a fiction that has served it well the past few years but has become an outright lie.
Just as North Korea has promised to decommission its nuclear test site and reactor, the president's tough approach may soon yield the same dividends with Iran.
Laura Carnahan
Filed Under: Blog, News Tagged With: Iran deal, Iran Lobby, NIAC, Pompeo
Iran Lobby Ineffectiveness Reaches New Lows
For the past several weeks, the Iran lobby has mounted a massive effort to try and dissuade the Senate from confirming former CIA chief Mike Pompeo as the next secretary of state, as well as opposing the installation of former UN ambassador John Bolton as the new national security advisor.
This included the usual suspects such as National Iranian American Council staffers such as Trita Parsi and Reza Marashi, as well as NIAC Action head Jamal Abdi busy issuing press statements and drafting editorials and giving interviews to anyone who would bother listening to them.
Gone though are the heady days during the Obama administration when the Iran lobby was part of the vaunted "echo chamber" pushing for passage of the Iran nuclear deal and gaining appearances on mainstream programs such as CNN.
This latest effort to alter the trajectory of President Trump's latest cabinet additions to his foreign policy team died a quiet death amidst a dearth of any appreciable news coverage of the Iran lobby's messaging.
Long gone are the days when Parsi could command prime editorial space in major newspapers. Instead, the complaints and whining of the NIAC are relegated to progressive blogs and academic journals.
Their complaints were centered on the same old, refrain warning of the Trump administration's misguided actions in getting tougher with the Iranian regime leading almost certainly to a path towards war.
It's the same nonsense NIAC tried pedaling in warning about the president's tough talk against North Korea and now we see the positive steps coming from that tough talk as the presidents of North and South Korea met in a historic meeting this week in South Korea; marking the first time a North Korean leader set foot across the Demilitarized Zone.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un offered to discuss denuclearization for the first time without preconditions; an admission both startling in its suddenness and shocking in its existence.
Even President Trump's most ardent critics have reluctantly given him credit for the breakthrough and for setting the stage for the first-ever summit between a sitting U.S. president and a North Korean leader.
It is ironic too considering that North Korea provided Iran with its initial designs for its ballistic missile program, as well as assistance in jump starting its nuclear weapons program.
If North Korea and the U.S. can find an accommodation to abandon nuclear weapons as well as curtail ballistic missile development, then the claims made by NIAC and the rest of the Iran lobby that the Iran nuclear deal would be the best vehicle to achieve those goals will be proven false.
Pompeo's confirmation by the Senate by a comfortable 57-42 margin also demonstrated how feeble the Iran lobby is now and how it lacks much influence anymore on domestic American politics.
Seven Democratic senators joined with Republicans in approving Pompeo in a strong sign of bipartisan support. It is no coincidence that his approval came after his secret diplomatic mission to North Korea in meeting Kim to discuss the summit with the president in the kind of diplomatic derring-do NIAC has claimed the administration was incapable of conducting.
Far from serving the interests of Iranian-Americans anymore, NIAC has been reduced to either serving as a cheap adjunct to the extreme "progressives" wing in order to keep money flowing or parrot whatever comes out of the mouths of the foreign ministry in Tehran.
Worse yet, NIAC seems to get more press from regime-controlled publications than any in the U.S. Even Parsi's tweets have taken on an edge of near-panic.
"WAKE UP AMERICA! Trump's about to start a war with #Iran and he's openly telegraphing it. He'll kill the #IranDeal (the deal that restricted Iran's program) and then threatens war if Iran restarts the program – which it'll only do if Trump kills the deal." — Trita Parsi (@tparsi) April 24, 2018
One has to wonder why Parsi and the rest of NIAC are fixated on fighting battles to oppose the president at every turn, they remain strangely silent on more recent moves by the mullahs in Tehran to oppress its people and further try to destabilize the region.
The regime for example took the first steps to the popular Telegram instant messaging app used by over half of the Iranian population by banning the ability of Iranians to swap videos and pictures on it.
The act was taken by the regime to try and halt the near constant flow of videos and pictures being sent around and outside of Iran of protests and acts of oppression by the regime including arrests and beatings by regime police.
Also, the U.S. has stepped up surveillance to monitor the movement of suspected Iranian anti-air and ballistic missiles inside Syria as concern mounted the Iranian regime was moving its military forces into position for possible strikes against U.S.-backed coalition forces or even Israel.
Amidst these new actions, Iranian foreign minister Javad Zarif arrived in New York for a weeklong visit and was met by large protests from Iranian dissident and human rights groups.
Several dozen supporters of the Organization of Iranian American Communities (OIAC) joined a demonstration Monday across the street from New York's Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) as it hosted a discussion with Zarif on the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and U.S.-Iran relations.
Shirin Nariman, the organizer of Monday's protest, told VOA Persian that her group objected to Zarif's invitation to speak at CFR. "The people of Iran have spoken [through anti-government street protests] in the last few months and showed that they don't want this regime at all — not even a part of it," Nariman said.
We can only hope that the ever-shrinking influence of the Iran lobby and NIAC continues to eventually disappear.
Filed Under: Blog, News Tagged With: Featured, Iran deal, Iran Lobby, Jamal Abdi, National Iranian American Council, NIAC, NIAC Action, North Korea, Pompeo, Reza Marashi, Trita Parsi
Iranian Regime Threats Ring Hollow
What a difference a year makes. Last year the Iranian regime was riding high with its victories in Syria, its military partnership with Russia, the overthrow of the government in Yemen, billions of dollars to spend on upgrades to its military and successful ballistic missile launches showcased on state television almost weekly.
But in less than 12 months, the regime is under the most severe attack and pressure from all quarters than it has ever been since the nascent days of the Islamic revolution that the mullahs highjacked.
First the foremost, the Iranian economy is in freefall and a basket case. The rial has dropped faster than a lead anchor from a ship and furious attempts by the Iranian regime to artificially boost it and control the flow of foreign currency through local money changers has failed miserably.
The threat of a new cyber currency being offered by the ubiquitous messaging app Telegram didn't help either which led to the mullahs trying to ban it even though over half of the Iranian population uses it.
On the military fronts, the gains made in Syria have been threatened with Bashar al-Assad's continued indiscriminate use of chemical weapons to kill men, women, and children leading to the first multi-national military response on Syrian targets by French, British and U.S. forces.
It also forced Russia to sit on the sidelines and allow its ally to be hammered by over 300 missile strikes.
Also, Iran's move into Yemen had the unintended effect of galvanizing long-time foe Saudi Arabia into action and form alliances that were unheard of only a short time ago such as Saudi and Israeli defense officials meeting to go over planning in defending against Iranian aggression and even permitting mutual flights over each other's airspace for the first time ever.
The mullahs also probably did not count on the waves of mass protests and public discontent that have sprung up beginning late last year and have been propelled not by a single issue such as the disputed presidential election of 2009, but rather a whole raft of complaints ranging from pathetic job growth and record unemployment among youth, to the constant oppression of Iranians, especially women, over everything from riding bicycles and not wearing hijabs to degraded environmental conditions turning much of the Iranian countryside from fertile farmlands to barren deserts.
Not to mention the election of President Donald Trump and the 180-degree about face from trying to appease the regime under President Obama to the aggressive efforts to match Iranian aggression move for move.
You allow Assad to use chemical weapons? Okay, we'll bomb sites and if Iranian military personnel happen to be there assisting, tough.
You threaten to walk away from the nuclear deal? Feel free to do it.
Every Iranian regime temper tantrum, taunt, and the threat is now met with a shrug of indifference and steely resolve instead of the constant handwringing that marked the previous administration.
Even the Iran lobby is left with little to nothing to say. In response to the president's most recent comments to the possibility of Iran walking away from the nuclear deal, Trita Parsi of the National Iranian American Council issued a curt two-paragraph statement that shows how much his verbosity has plunged in this new era.
"Macron and Europe seem willing to bend over backward to save the nuclear deal and prevent catastrophe. When our closest allies express alarm in unison, we should listen. Trump should quit while he is ahead and reaffirm the U.S. commitment to the JCPOA before it is too late. The alternative would be an isolated America, an unchecked Iranian nuclear program, and an escalation towards war," Parsi writes.
It's laudable for Parsi to even admit for the first time that President Trump is actually ahead of the ballgame with Iran. He recognizes, even if he is unwilling to say so publicly, that President Trump's actions have turned the tables on who controls leverage in the Middle East.
The same approach has brought a startling and breathless turnaround with North Korea in which the Hermit Kingdom has agreed for the first time to put denuclearization on the negotiating table without any preconditions.
Parsi understands that the same mobilization of pressure and harsh rhetoric backed by tough actions are being applied to Iran now with most European allies, who had been staunch supporters of the Iran nuclear deal, now being contortionist moves to appease the Trump administration in an effort to save the deal.
French President Emmanuel Macron's visit to Washington was designed to showcase French unity with the U.S. on issues such as Syria, while also acknowledging the need to address issues left untouched by the Obama administration such as ballistic missile development and unfettered access to now-blocked off Iranian military sites.
The fact that all of Europe is now intensely focused on appeasing President Trump instead of the mullahs is a remarkable feat of diplomatic brinkmanship and indicative of how the tide has utterly turned against the Iranian regime.
Meanwhile as Iran threatens to pull out of the treaty on non-proliferation of nuclear weapons if the Trump administration approves a non-certification of the deal by the May 12th deadline, President Trump now essentially has Iran dancing on a string since he could simply conditionally approve the extension one more time and squeeze Iran and Europe for even more concessions.
The president has taken a page from the mullahs' playbook and is throwing it right back at them.
The threat to pull out of the NPT rings hollow since by doing so, Iran would be throwing its lot in with countries such as Israel which has not signed the agreement.
Now that would be ironic.
Filed Under: Blog, News Tagged With: Featured, Iran deal, Iran sanctions, Macron Visit, National Iranian American Council, NIAC, NIAC Action, Syria, Trita Parsi, Trump, Yemen
As Iran Regime Teeters Does the Nuclear Deal Even Matter?
To say the mullahs controlling Iran are nervous is akin to saying a hyena is nervous as an enraged elephant is about to step on it.
The imagery is appropriate since the pack of hyenas that are the mullahs in Tehran have worked relentlessly together to rip apart the Iranian economy and gnaw on the bones of the dissected carcass that used to be a shining light in the Middle East.
Iran bears a ghost-like resemblance to its former glory days; even stretching back to the historical Persian Empire that once straddled the known world. Today, Iran's environment is dying literally and proverbially. Its economy drained of capital through deep corruption and years of supporting and sponsoring proxy wars and terrorist organizations.
Its people harassed, watched, intimidated, imprisoned and executed, Iran is a country reeling from assaults almost all internally created.
In response, the regime has done what all totalitarian governments do: They crack down harder.
It's proven to be a recipe for more disaster as massive and widespread protests have gripped the country. Unlike previous mass protests such as during the disputed presidential elections in 2009, these protests have covered a wide range of grievances.
Women are protesting the repressive hijab laws. Workers have protested at factories, mines, farms and town squares to protest low wages, stagnant growth and government corruption. Small businessmen have protested graft and favoritism that hurts their ability to keep their businesses afloat while students, especially women, protests efforts to shut down social media, close down the popular Telegram app and restrict access to the outside world.
In response, even members of the regime's government are calling it quits as deputy head of Iranian regime's Department of Environment, Kaveh Madani, has decided to resign and leave the country following increasing pressure from the mullahs, according to Al-Monitor.
His appointment was originally hailed as a showcase for returning Iranian elites to help their country. Instead his resignation, tendered while abroad since he was most likely going to get arrested like so many other dual-national Iranians, is another signal that the future under the mullahs is only getting bleaker.
His departure also follows the arrest of a group of Iranian environmentalists, including Kavous Seyed Emami — whom authorities claim committed suicide two weeks after his arrest in February – and indicates the regime is increasingly sensitive to protests about the dismal state of the Iranian environment which has seen lakes disappear, farmland turn to dustbowls and air quality near poisonous levels of unhealthiness.
Predictably, the regime-controlled Mashregh News claims that Madani was also accused of spying and that his resignation, while he was abroad, is rooted in his alleged ties with "spies." "Following the discovery of the spy and the infiltration network of Kavous Seyed Emami and the arrest of some elements of the Israeli, British and American network, rumors [spread] about Kaveh Madani, a professor at the Imperial College London, and it turned out that he is one of the defendants — and it must be made clear whether there was a relationship between him and the other elements of the spy network," reported Mashregh News on April 17.
The irony of Madani's situation is how it makes a mockery of claims made by the National Iranian American Council that the Iran nuclear deal was going to strengthen moderation in Iran. Trita Parsi and his NIAC colleagues have worked tirelessly to blame every problem facing Iran on the alleged incomplete fulfillment of the agreement's terms, but it's hard to imagine how Madani's expulsion can be blamed on the Trump administration.
Simultaneously, the regime's battle with a falling currency in the rial has essentially failed one week after imposing draconian steps to restrict dollar trading.
The tough new measures by the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) have largely failed to revive the value of the Iranian rial over the past week, based on open market exchange rates. There has been a similar pattern evident in the exchange rate of the rial against other major currencies, including the euro, British pound and Swiss franc.
According to Reuters, the majority of private money changers in Tehran have not bought or sold dollars or other foreign currencies for several days as they wait for the government's next move in a clear sign of hoarding which is crippling the Iranian economy.
In response, clever Iranians are busy working to develop new smartphone apps that can help protect and mobilize protestors while thwarting the regime's effort to monitor and identify dissidents.
One of the latest apps is Hafez, which translates as "to protect". Named after the famous Persian poet whose words frequently targeted religious hypocrisy, the app offers users a collection of human rights-related information.
Foremost, it is a virtual rolodex of human rights lawyers in Iran, which allows users to access legal information regarding human rights, according to Aljazeera.
However, Hafez is more than just a list of telephone numbers, an Iranian human rights activist, told Al Jazeera.
"Users receive daily human rights news; [it] allows them to send news of human rights violations securely; [it] disseminates important legal information to users if they are arrested, and provides the contact information for attorneys who can assist," said the article.
Here's to hoping the ingenuity of the Iranian people can finally topple the theocratic regime.
Filed Under: Blog, News Tagged With: Featured, hassan rouhani, Iran Human rights, Telegram Ban
The Rank Hypocrisy of Iran Lobby on Syria
Bashar al-Assad rules Syria with the same kind of tyrannical tactics common in Iran under the rule of his mullah partners. That includes the use of chemical weapons to target and kill pockets of resistance to his rule; the most recent strike coming recently and claiming the lives of men, women, and children in grisly scenes broadcast around the world.
The repeated use of such weapons resulted in a coordinated strike by the military forces of the U.S., Great Britain and France against three sites identified as having been storage or development sites for Assad's chemical weapons this past weekend.
The strikes themselves were hardly a surprise given the level of revulsion around the world to Assad's continued use of chemical weapons and the tweeting by President Donald Trump of his open intention to punish the rogue regime.
What was interesting was his televised address once the attacks began of his putting the Iranian regime and Russia on notice for their continued support of the Assad regime.
"What kind of a nation wants to be associated with the mass murder of innocent men, women, and children?" the president said.
President Trump asks an important question and really the only one that matters for the future of Syria and the Middle East.
Under his predecessor's administration, the U.S. engaged in a foreign policy based largely on appeasing regional bad actors like the Iranian regime in an effort to coax them to adhere to dubious international agreements. That policy led to agreements that essentially exempted Iran from militant actions that only exacerbated and inflamed regional conflict.
Those policies gave us the quagmire President Trump now faces where there are hardly any good choices. The decision to strike militarily was not taken lightly and it says much for the sake of future diplomacy when the U.S. was joined by British and French military forces in a united show of force.
Take into consideration the positive alignments by the Arab world led by Saudi Arabia in confronting Iranian regime's aggression and we see a world moving towards to the kind of unified front that helped bring the Iranian regime to the bargaining table in the first place with crushing economic sanctions before the Obama administration let the regime off the hook.
"We renew our strong condemnation of terrorist acts carried out by Iran in the Arab region, and we reject its blatant interference in the internal affairs of Arab countries," Saudi King Salman said at a summit of Arab leaders, without referencing Friday's missile strikes on Syria, according to Reuters.
Riyadh expressed its support for the strikes on Damascus in a statement on Saturday.
"We fully support military operations against military targets in Syria," the Saudi Foreign Ministry said. "The military operation was necessary to protect civilians and stop chemical use."
But for the Trump administration, the strike was more than just eradicating chemical stockpiles—stockpiles that the Russians had promised were removed under their supervision in a deal with the Obama administration—but rather about a broader agenda that includes containing the Iranian regime.
In an interview with ABC News, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said the U.S. had three objectives in Syria: Defeating ISIS, containing Iran and ending the use of chemical weapons.
Which makes the reaction by the Iran lobby, specifically the National Iranian American Council, all the more appalling.
In a statement released by the NIAC, research director Reza Marashi said:
"The situation in Syria is tremendously dangerous, and President Trump risks throwing fuel on the regional fire. Given that Iranian and Russian forces are closely embedded with the Syrian government, there is a significant risk that any strikes will trigger retaliation and a bloodier, wider war with few discernible ways to de-escalate the conflict."
We cannot believe Marashi was educated in a home for mentally deficit children growing up, but he must assume the world's journalists are idiots when he calls for deflecting attacks on Syria because Russian and Iranian forces are deeply embedded there since it was the Iranian regime and Russia that have been supporting Assad and enabling his use of chemical weapons in the first place!
Wouldn't it have been more responsible for Marashi and NIAC to denounce Assad's use of chemical weapons and urge Iran and Russia to use their influence on Assad to de-escalate the conflict and garner a promise from him not to gas his own people anymore?
Instead Marashi ends the paltry statement by calling U.S. action "reckless" but only citing a "duty" by Iran and Russia to rein in Assad. Hardly a denunciation of the use of vile weapons.
"A large part of the reason that Syria is in ruins today is because nearly all actors have pursued military solutions instead of diplomacy aimed at halting the bloodshed. An eye for an eye approach will not bring justice or peace to Syria, and there is no moral high ground for those who respond to abhorrent violence with more violence," Marashi also writes.
The irony of Marashi calling out the lack of diplomatic actions when the Iranian regime ignored diplomatic efforts to stop the Syrian civil war when it started and instead poured billions of dollars to prop up Assad, mobilized tens of thousands of Hezbollah fighters from Lebanon, shipped in Iranian-backed Shiite militias from Iraq, recruited Afghan mercenaries and started an airlift of ammunition and supplies using its own regional airlines is appalling to any rational observer.
The Iranian regime has been the guilty in ignoring diplomacy and using sheer military might to hold Syria together for Assad. Remember, it was the Iranian regime that sent its notorious Quds Force commander, Qassem Soleimani, on a secret trip to Moscow to beg for Russian intervention in July 2015 to save Assad and Iranian forces from defeat.
Marashi's statement only proves once again how the NIAC and rest of Iran lobby are still working to spread the kind of fake news that helped the Iranian regime avoid crippling sanctions in the first place, freeing the regime to support Assad and allow these chemical attacks to take place in the first place.
All of which begs the question: Why does the NIAC support the slaughter of men, women, and children with poison gas?
Filed Under: Blog, News Tagged With: Featured, Iran Lobby, Iran Mullahs, Iran sanctions, Iran Terrorism, IRGC, Syria
As Currency Plummets the Iran Regime Teeters on Collapse
Iran's currency, the Rial, is on a skydive plummet downward to historic levels and poses the most significant threat to the stranglehold the mullahs have had on the Islamic state.
Pegged to the price of petroleum, the Rial has been rocked by the global glut of oil and a stagnant economy riven through by rampant corruption and the diversion of billions of badly-need dollars to fund wars in Syria, Iraq and Yemen as well as a massive military build-up including a ballistic missile program.
Now as Iran has been gripped by rising political tension with massive demonstrations sweeping across the country since last December, there has been a rush to the banks as Iranian citizens desperately try to cash out and swap to scarce U.S. dollars in a scene reminiscent of bank runs during the Great Depression.
The Rial has bled away a third of its value just this year alone with an exchange rate of 60,000 Rial to a single dollar. The track record for the mullahs in fiscal management is pretty rancid ever since the Iranian revolution in 1979 when one dollar bought 70 Rials.
Since Hassan Rouhani assumed power in 2013, 36,000 Rials equaled one dollar. The drop in value is as much a reflection of Iranians lack of confidence in their government as it is of an economy that is nearing Third World status.
The mullahs have reacted in their typical brutal manner setting an official exchange rate of 42,000 Rials to the dollar in an example of wishful thinking. To enforce that rate, the mullahs have promised harsh punishment including arrest for anyone trying to exchange Rials at a different rate than the one established by them.
The crisis is driven by an inability to access physical currency notes, which are estimated at only five percent of all foreign currency in Iran, while the rest is available in the form of credits for business and the government.
Long gone it seems are the images of pallets loaded down with dollars and euros being unloaded from airplanes as part of the ransom payment made by the U.S. in exchange for U.S. hostages as part of the Iran nuclear deal.
That nuclear deal has failed to deliver the benefits promised by Rouhani to ordinary Iranians; instead the regime has siphoned the economic relief it brought to state-owned industries and the powerful Revolutionary Guard Corps.
It has also failed to generate the flood of foreign investment promised by Rouhani with many foreign companies unwilling to risk capital in investments in Iran when the U.S. has contemplated additional sanctions for the regime's abysmal human rights record and its involvement in the support of terrorism and the war in Syria.
The use of chemical weapons repeatedly by the Assad regime against its own citizens has also ostracized Iran for its support of Assad and the heavy use of Iranian military units in the conflict.
The sponsorship of the revolt in Yemen and support of Houthi rebels has also ignited another potential regional conflict with Saudi Arabia and brought the U.S. and Russia into contentious situations that could possibly start a wider war rattling any potential investors.
Other efforts by the Iranian regime to bring in more foreign currency include trying to increase oil production in order to generate more sales overseas, but that has been stymied by fields utilizing outdated equipment and failure to attract any significant foreign partners to develop oil fields.
"This currency crisis is another step in the collapse of the Iranian economy, which was expected to rebound after the signing of the nuclear agreement. Difficult economic conditions brought protestors to the streets in a number of Iranian cities earlier this year, however those protests were quelled by the government. It is important to continue watching the economic situation in Iran, because historically economic issues have typically led to the most significant political unrests in that country," wrote Ellen R. Wald, a historian and scholar at the Arabia Foundation.
The regime hasn't been helped by action this week by the European Union to extend sanctions on Iran over human rights violations in an effort to demonstrate its willingness to the Trump administration to hold Iran accountable, while trying to preserve the nuclear agreement.
France has pushed for new sanctions over Iran's missile program and involvement in conflicts in the region, including in Syria where Tehran backs President Bashar al-Assad. Paris hopes that would show President Trump the EU takes his concerns seriously.
The Foundation for Defense of Democracies, offered in an editoRial in The Hill that the collapsing Rial represented an opportunity to apply even more pressure on the regime.
"The White House should re-impose sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran to vindicate currency traders' fear that it now plans to inflict serious damage on Tehran's economy," they write.
"Based on our analysis of the Central Bank data, Iran's currency has lost roughly half of its value, 46 percent, falling from 40,170 to 58,880 per dollar, since Trump put the future of the nuclear deal in doubt last October. The Iranian economy looked particularly wobbly amidst protests in December when Iranians took to the streets to protest the regime-controlled banking sector, and lack of economic opportunity and political freedom," they added.
They believe that additional pressure on Iran's Central Bank could be the nudge necessary to send it into collapse and bring down the regime.
"Under the sanctions law applied prior to the nuclear deal, foreign financial institutions are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with the Central Bank. In effect, the Bank's foreign-held accounts are put on lock down, barring the regime from accessing its foreign exchange reserves. On paper, Iran may get paid for its oil but the money sits in the purchaser's country and is only available for Iran to buy goods from that country in the local currency. Without access to these reserves, the regime would find it much harder to defend the Rial," the article said.
The proverbial hammer blow this would deal to the regime is significant since the Central Bank provides the funding for the Revolutionary Guard Corps and supplies the cash for its activities in Syria, Iraq and Yemen.
The irony is that the regime can be crippled without canceling the nuclear deal as the Iran lobby has feared and instead using the Rial as a leveraged weapon against the mullahs by hitting them where it hurts; wiping out popular support from the Iranian people.
Remember, the original revolution against the Shah was largely fueled by economic concerns before it was stolen by the mullahs. Wouldn't it be delicious to see the same thing happen to them?
Filed Under: Blog, News Tagged With: #NuclearDeal, Featured, hassan rouhani, Iran deal, Iran Human rights, Iran Lobby, Iran sanctions, Iran Terrorism, IRGC, Sanctions
NIAC Sees Echo Chamber Falling
Shirin Ebadi, a Nobel Prize-winning Iranian human rights activist, took dead aim at the National Iranian American Council in an interview with Bloomberg and linked its efforts in lockstep with the Iranian regime. Even more damning, she openly called for regime change and the ouster of top mullah Ali Khamenei and eradication of the position with the replacement of the Iranian constitution with one based on democracy and freedom.
Predictably, the NIAC and its allies went on the offensive but stopped short of the usual verbal tongue lashings reserved for others regime naysayers.
Maybe the stature of a Nobel prize winner had something to do it. Maybe it was because Ebadi was the first Iranian and Muslim woman to win the prize had something to do with it. Maybe it was because the NIAC ran out of lies.
Instead, the NIAC put out a plaintive statement that avoided directly criticizing Ebadi and instead went after traditional foes; President Donald Trump and newly installed national security advisor, John Bolton.
"As we speak, Donald Trump is installing John Bolton in the White House – a man who has openly called for over a decade for the U.S. to bomb Iran. Trump has fired his advisors who argued against killing the Iran deal and is replacing them with pro-war advocates like CIA Director Mike Pompeo – who wants to turn Iran into Syria. Meanwhile, our families continue to be banned from America because of Trump's hateful policies," the NIAC said.
Remarkably, the NIAC did not disagree with any of Ebadi's statements, including her harsh denouncement of the NIAC. Sometimes, when you get caught red-handed, there's little you can say to counter the charges.
In the case of the NIAC, it's been increasingly isolated and under fire from all quarters as the Iranian regime disproves virtually every false claim made by the NIAC during the run-up to the Iran nuclear deal.
The litany of mistakes and broken promises stretches across the entire spectrum of Iranian society as the ruling theocracy has brutally suppressed human rights and gone on a spree of imprisonments, public executions and moves to cut off Iranians access to social media and open communications.
Couple that with an economy approaching Third World standards, an environment turning into a wasteland due to mismanagement and a mounting realization among ordinary Iranians that the divide between the wealthy and powerful elites and everyone else is wider than the Indian Ocean and the challenge facing the NIAC of maintaining its vaunted "echo chamber" seems greater than finding a cure for the common cold.
Which is why the NIAC is pushing all of its chips into trying to save the Iran nuclear deal at all costs since if the Trump administration walks away from it, the relevance of the NIAC plummets to that of Mr. Irrelevant in the NFL draft.
"I'm quite pessimistic," said Trita Parsi, NIAC president, in an interview in The Hill.
Parsi argued President Trump's threats to kill the deal have already scared businesses away from Iran, turning Iranian opinion against the agreement.
Again, Parsi is trying to find some other reasons for why the nuclear deal is failing and the Iranian people are turning against Khamenei, Rouhani and the other mullahs. His efforts to pin the blame for everything on the new administration ignores his own role in setting expectations for a new moderate era in Iran only to have all of his promised reforms drop dead.
He parlayed the echo chamber coalition of special interest groups, bloggers and academics invested in supporting the Iranian regime into a humming PR machine, but now has seen most of that infrastructure crumble and fall into ineffectiveness.
Most of the premium media interviews Parsi so relished at the height of the echo chamber have now vanished; reduced to a few poor blogs and obscure news outlets reaching audiences outside of the U.S.
Similarly, the cadre of fellow travelers he relied on has dried up as they have been outed by news outlets as being instruments of the Iranian regime and blasted on social media.
While the #MeToo movement took down powerful men accused of sexual harassment, the #FakeNews movement also targeted the imposters that have consistently tried to sell the idea of Iranian moderation against a backdrop of unremitting wars in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen.
The latest chemical attacks on Syrian families and the gruesome images of small children gassed by the Assad regime has put to a lie the idea of Iran backing Assad only to fight ISIS.
Now the Iranian regime finds itself getting pushed closer to the precipice of extreme reactionary moves to save itself as it announced a move to ban the popular Telegram messaging app used by almost half of all Iranians.
The official reason for the ban was economic nationalism: Iranian officials say they want to promote homegrown apps that could break Telegram's virtual monopoly on social media in a country where authorities tightly monitor internet usage and many websites are inaccessible.
But the real reason lies in the regime's desire to cut off Telegram in order to cripple the ability of Iranian dissidents to organize the mass protests that have plagued the mullahs since last December.
It also means the regime is almost paranoid over the apps recent cryptocurrency offering that reached a record and posed a significant threat to the beleaguered Iranian rial which hit an all-time low on Monday against the U.S. dollar.
The rial was trading at 62,000 to the dollar, an 18 percent drop since Saturday, which was the first working day after the Persian new year, when many people travel abroad and certainly heightened the regime's desire to move forward in trying to squash Telegram and the threat it posed.
Filed Under: Blog, News Tagged With: Featured, Iran Lobby, National Iranian American Council, NIAC, NIAC Action, Shirin Ebadi, Trita Parsi
Iranian Nobel Prize Winner Finally Endorses Regime Change
Shirin Ebadi is an Iranian lawyer, former judge in the Iranian regime and noted human rights activist who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2003, making her the first Iranian and first Muslim woman to win the award.
During her extensive and laudable career, Ebadi took care to never explicitly call for the kind of regime change many Iranian dissidents have long advocated. Instead, she retained hope that the Iranian government could be fixed from within by so-called reformers such as Hassan Rouhani, whom regime advocate groups like the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) have long sought to portray as a "moderate."
However, her true positions came to light recently in an interview with Bloomberg in which she finally announced her belief that "reform is useless in Iran."
Echoing the argument that Iranian dissidents have been making for more than two decades, Ebadi said that the means of ending Iranian tyranny should be a U.N.-monitored referendum on the constitution that proposes one basic change: eliminating the unelected office of supreme leader. The Iranian people, she said, "want to change our regime, by changing our constitution to a secular constitution based on the universal declaration of human rights," according to Lake.
It's a position similar to the one advocated by Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, president of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), in a ten-point plan for the future of Iran.
Rajavi's plan now seems remarkably prescient in light of the recent wave of massive grassroots demonstrations that began last December. Those protests and Ebadi's belated condemnation are a strong rebuke not only to Rouhani but also to the Western progressives who foolishly believed he was an agent of change.
While Ebadi first made her views on the referendum known in February, she used the interview with Bloomberg to get more specific about what Western governments, and particularly the Trump administration, can do to assist the Iranian people in their struggle.
That included warning against any U.S. military intervention and urging only Iranian support for regime change. It's a position that again echoed what the NCRI called for over a decade ago and represents a vindication of the vision laid out by the Iranian resistance movement in urging Western support for the Iranian dissident movement.
Ebadi went on to clarify what this type of Western support might look like, by advocating regime-targeting sanctions that would weaken the government without hurting the people themselves. For example, Ebadi says the U.S. and European governments should sanction the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting or IRIB. This conglomerate controls the media in Iran and also manages Iran's foreign propaganda such as the English-language PressTV and the Arabic al-Alam. Ebadi stopped short, however, of endorsing the style of crippling sanctions that were disbanded by the Obama administration in mid-2015.
Ebadi also criticized NIAC, which played a key role in advocating for President Obama's nuclear deal with Iran. Ebadi told Bloomberg, she regrets participating in an event with NIAC in 2011, saying "when I analyzed what they say and do, I realize what they say is closer to what the government says that what the people want."
Predictably, NIAC rallied its defenders among the American left including Noam Chomsky, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who said in The "Iranian" (a site where lobbies and agents of Iranian regime write): "I don't know on what basis Shirin Ebadi is confident that she knows better what Iranians want than NIAC, to take one of her examples,"
So what makes Chomsky, an American professor who speaks no Farsi and has never been to Iran, feel that he has more authority on the subject than an Iranian woman who has risked her life fighting for basic human rights in her country of birth?
It's not clear, but coming from someone who has made a career echoing regime propaganda of America being a "terrorist state," and has cast doubt on Assad's well-documented use of chemical weapons, it is sadly unsurprising.
Trying to kill the messenger in order to kill the message seems to be a favored tactic of the Iranian regime and its lobbying arm.
Filed Under: Blog, News Tagged With: Featured, Iran deal, Iran Mullahs, National Iranian American Council, NIAC, NIAC Action, Shirin Ebadi, Trita Parsi
Huge ICO Sale by Telegram Portends Real Trouble for Tehran
April 5, 2018 by admin
One of the truisms for the future of the Iranian regime is that someone is always going to try to knock it over. Governments, including successive U.S. administrations to human rights groups to ordinary Iranian citizens, have done their best for force regime change over the decades.
The mullahs in Tehran have responded with typical brutality and force in suppressing dissent and opposing those efforts. Every meaningful revolt has been put down with the cost paid in bloodshed by protestors.
We can think back to the massive protests in 2009 following the stolen presidential election or just this past winter when citizen protests over the economy and lack of jobs pushed tens of thousands onto streets across Iran.
At the forefront of much of these movements has been technology. The advent of mobile phones and their development of cameras and social media led to the wide distribution of video and images of the everyday brutality Iranians experience under the regime's iron boot.
The rest of the world got to watch live streams of protestors battling paramilitary forces and social media apps such as Instagram quickly became an outlet for Iranians, especially women, to protest morality laws by posting pictures of them waving their hijabs from atop cars and rooftops.
Most troubling for the regime has been the use of messaging apps such as WhatsApp and Telegram which has allowed Iranians to not only communicate with the outside world, especially family members in the Iranian diaspora but within Iran itself to help organize protests.
The Iranian regime has spent considerable resources trying to muzzle these conduits of freedom as it built its version of the Great Cyber Wall that China uses to maintain strict control over the Internet, but the regime has faced considerable problems in containing app use.
Most troubling for the regime has been a recent effort by Telegram to launch its own form of cryptocurrency. Just last March, Telegram announced the stunning sale of $1.7 billion in the world's largest and most successful initial coin offering (ICO) ever.
The latest offering round closed in March and raised $850 million from 94 investors according to HiBusiness, matching what the company raised in February.
The total proceeds can go even higher since the regulatory filing says Telegram "may pursue one or more subsequent offerings."
While the company has 200 million active users, only a tenth of what Facebook boasts, Telegram is widely used throughout Iran since the regime has been unable to completely block its usage after many unsuccessful attempts.
Telegram aims to finance the creation of a distributed encrypted messaging network that would preserve itself through a cryptocurrency known as GRAM.
Although it has not sold any tokens yet, one GRAM would reportedly be worth $0.10. The entire ecosystem would be capped at 5 billion GRAM.
What that means for the Iranian regime is that ordinary Iranians could use GRAM as a substitute currency that could be more stable and reliable than the regime's own state-controlled rial which has been punished on currency exchanges over the years because of its tie-up with petroleum prices and the faltering Iranian economy.
The potential for significant capital flight frankly terrifies the regime and poses a potential roadblock to the regime's oft-stated goal of jumpstarting the economy in the wake of the supposed benefits flowing from the Iran nuclear deal.
According to HiBusiness, Telegram is working to finish its blockchain-based service, which might make it more bothersome for states like Iran or Russia to block its services since with a blockchain running the chat network, users would be able to relay their messages without having to depend on one particular data center from Telegram, making it among the first widespread decentralized messaging services.
This also would be the undoing of the governments that attempt to pry into what their citizens are saying on the internet. Coupled with the threat of new cryptocurrency siphoning off hard cash from the Iranian regime's coffers, you can see why the lights are burning late in Tehran.
In response, regime officials are now debating a move to completely ban Telegram altogether.
According to U.S.-based news site Al-Monitor, Hassan Firouzabadi, secretary of the country's High Council for Cyberspace, yesterday pushed for Telegram to be blocked in Iran on state TV, saying the firm's dominance in Iran was "the enemy of the private sector" and adding:
"Telegram has officially announced that it will be used as an economic platform, and Telegram will undermine the national currency of Iran."
On March 31, according to the news source, parliament member Alaeddin Boroujerdi said the move to block the messaging app "was a decision made at the highest levels, and Telegram will be replaced by a domestic app."
Of course, replacing Telegram with a regime-built app would be a dream come true since it would allow unparalleled spying on its own people.
The regime has already made significant efforts in that area by building and offering bogus apps in the Apple App Store and Google Play store modeled after legitimate apps in the hopes of gaining access to users' data in a report offered by the National Council of Resistance of Iran, a leading Iranian dissident group.
There would be significant irony if the downfall of the Iranian regime was accomplished because of one company's cryptocurrency.
Filed Under: Blog, News Tagged With: Featured, Telegram
Iran Lobby Attacks on John Bolton Hide Fear of Regime Change
The Iran lobby, especially the National Iranian American Council, have been busy hurling attacks and invectives at John Bolton, President Donald Trump's nominee to be the new national security advisor, calling him everything from being crazy to a war monger to an extremist or child of Satan.
The accusations have seemed to take on a life of their own as Iranian regime loyalists such as NIAC's Trita Parsi empty out the thesaurus in an effort to try and find something that will stick and either derail his nomination or throw cold water on the administration's plans to revisit the Iran nuclear deal.
In either case, it seems apparent the trains have already left the stations and on Capitol Hill, it appears Democrats are only pondering going after President Trump's CIA director nominee, Gina Haspel, for past involvement in the interrogation of terror suspects, with Bolton and secretary of state nominee, Mike Pompeo, looking like solid confirmations.
This new troika of national security, intelligence and diplomatic heads represents a significant shift in the president's thinking as it relates to the challenges of Iran, North Korea and Islamic extremist terrorism.
Far from trying to swat individual terror suspects like so many mosquitos, it appears the administration maybe looking for a more strategic approach in draining the swamp so-to-speak by dealing directly with the sources of terrorism; more specifically nation states.
The terror attacks of 9/11 served as a reminder that safe harbors such as a Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, provide training, security, funding and logistical support for terrorists to plan and execute their attacks.
The rise of ISIS out of the wreckage of a Syrian civil war and Iraqi sectarian conflict borne out of Iranian regime's meddling carved out a caliphate which provided ISIS with everything from oil to sell and ready recruits to satellite broadcasts and a news magazine.
The Iranian regime set the template when it built Hezbollah to a formidable terrorist operation and shock troops for proxy wars. Iran mullahs utilized Hezbollah and a safe harbor in Lebanon.
But now the mullahs in Tehran are confronted with a rapid flurry of problems that have escalated nearly out of their normally iron-fisted control.
The explosion of U.S. fracking for oil turned it into the top oil producer in the world and forced prices to plummet on the open market, crushing revenues the mullahs were expecting from the lifting economic sanctions following the Iran nuclear deal. Coupled with the drain on cash reserves for propping up the Assad regime in Syria and spending heavily on military equipment, including building a ballistic missile program, Iran soon became a pauper nation;
A free-falling economy gave ordinary Iranians a gut-punch with stagnant wages, limited job opportunities and a deeply corrupt government that controlled almost all facets of the economy. Couple that with deep dissatisfaction over the increasing divide of haves vs. have-nots as those with ties to the Revolutionary Guard Corps and Quds Force or the ruling mullahs profited handsomely; and
Massive protests swept the nation as the combination of punishing economic conditions and dissatisfaction with oppressive rule, including morality laws specifically targeting Iranian women, drove ordinary Iranians to extraordinary acts of defiance unheard of in Iran. This included women launch the hijab movement with the mullahs responding by passing laws criminalizing it on the basis it promoted "prostitution" and calling for 10 years imprisonment.
These trends are unmistakable and more importantly, unassailable by the Iran lobby, which for the most part has stayed silent on these domestic protests; choosing only to blame the economic conditions on the U.S. not fully complying with the terms of the nuclear deal.
Apparently Parsi and his friends think we should empty out Ft. Knox on behalf of the mullahs.
What is apparent though is that the accusations being flung by the Iran lobby at Bolton's nomination miss an inescapable truth which is Bolton is not setting the stage for war when Tehran has already been at war with the West ever since it supplied explosives to kill Marines in Beirut or U.S. troops in Iraq.
Ivan Sascha Sheehan, incoming executive director of the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Baltimore, makes that point in a strongly worded editorial in The Hill.
"Those who are concerned about the potential for war with Iran should embrace Bolton's appointment and support the administration's efforts to confront Tehran's destabilizing regional influence by taking its theocratic regime to task. The regime's misbehavior only worsened in the run-up to Trump's ascension to the Oval Office, and particularly under the prior administration's cooperative policies that engendered an even greater sense of impunity than the Islamic Republic was used to," Sheehan writes.
"Trump's assertiveness during his first year in office is paying small dividends. U.S. Navy officials recently reported that close encounters between their vessels and those of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which were commonplace over the previous two years, halted abruptly in August," he added.
But what the Iran lobby is most fearful of is not a simple knee-jerk tearing up of the nuclear deal by President Trump, but rather a consensus among U.S. allies to rework the deal, toughening provisions on terror support, ballistic missile development and human rights improvement, in an effort to save it.
Using the deal as a leverage against the Iranian regime is fair turnabout since the regime and Iran lobby have used its continued existence as a blunt instrument against any calls to rein in the regime's excesses.
The Economist outlined some of the intense deal-making going on now from Great Britain, France and Germany to compel the Iranians to accept new restrictions; restrictions that should have been included in the original deal in the first place.
"Sir Simon Gass, a former British ambassador to Tehran who led the British team negotiating the deal, says that it might be possible to get an agreement from Iran not to develop an intercontinental-range ballistic missile (ICBM) capable of hitting America. An ICBM, he points out, only makes sense if it carries a nuclear warhead, so testing one should prompt broad economic sanctions. Patricia Lewis of Chatham House, another London think-tank, believes that the Europeans may already be talking to the Iranians about a future regional missile-deal that would ban long- and intermediate-range nuclear missiles," the Economist editorial said.
Ultimately the real rub for Parsi and his fellow travelers is that new restrictions, coupled with worsening economic conditions will once again rollback Tehran back to 2009 when massive street protests nearly toppled the regime.
As the president's new team take their place, it's clear the era of appeasing the mullahs is dead.
Filed Under: Blog, News Tagged With: #NuclearDeal, Appeasement policy, Featured, Iran Ballistic Missile, Iran deal, Iran Human rights, Iran Lobby, Iran sanctions, Iran Talks, Iran Terrorism, National Iranian American Council, NIAC, NIAC Action, Trita Parsi


text:
Cork English World
Introduction Locations Programs Ask a Question
Ireland ›
Cork English World, Ireland's Cambridge award-winning school, provides courses which are designed to provide students with the language skills needed to communicate effectively and confidently in English. Our Courses also provide students with the skills and strategies necessary for learning English outside the classroom.
Cork English World specialises in English Language Courses and In-Service Teacher Training for teachers of English as a second language. Our methods are based on over 30 years of combined expertise and experience.
Being a leader in the field of Language Teacher Training, CEW needs to be at the forefront of Language Learning Methodology. CEW has a core staff of 8 people under the direction of Majellia Sheehan & Mireille Kingston. Our track record is proven, time after time we get the desired results.
At Cork English World you will be speaking English for a minimum of 20 hours per week… fluency in English is no longer fiction!
Cork English World offers English classes in at least 6 levels, from Elementary (A1) to Advanced (C1), with a maximum of 12 students per class.
"Thank you very much for this course. I had a great time here in school and in Cork in general. I'm very happy that I chose this school. I wanted to improve my English and I've definitely done it and received a lot more too."(Ekaterina, Russia)
"Thank you so much for everything. I had a great time in CEW. Everyone is really nice and friendly" (Maiko, Japan)
"I'd definitely recommend CEW! It wasn't just informative to me but really fun. I had a really fun time, always looking forward to getting here in the mornings"
(Romina, Germany)
Crawford Business Park, Bishop St, Cork City
Cork, County Cork, Ireland
Courses (2) ACADEMICCOURSES

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Season 1 - Episodes 29: "Mxy's Mix Up"
Rating - 4 (out of 5): While Superman and Batman help Stargirl in her training Gorilla Grodd and his army attack the United Nations. The three heroes seem to have things under control when Mr. Mxyzptlk pops in to cause mischief. After freeing Grodd and his friends Mxy decides to really mix things up and switches our heroes brains. Stargirl in Superman's body, Superman in Batman's, and Batman in Stargirl's. Causing an "identity crisis". When the rest of the team shows up to help, Mxy switches their identities which causes more mayhem. How will the heroes get Mxyzptlk to say his name backwards and end his reign of mischief?
Mxyzptlk has always been one of my favorite Superman villains. And Gilbert Gottfried's version that appeared on Superman: The Animated Series was my favorite. Here he reprises his role though in a more traditional version. His likeness on The Animated Series was based on Mxy's first appearance in Superman #30 in 1944 giving the character that classic Golden Age look. His appearance here is based on the Mxyzptlk that appeared during the Silver Age. This series uses the original trap to get rid of Mxy by getting him to say his name backwards (kil-tip-zee-zim). The post crisis DCU would change that for a while by letting Mxyzptlk pick a trap of his own choosing to get Superman to trip him up and make him vanish. In any iteration Mxy is still one of the most fun and unpredictable of villains.
This episode is a lot of fun with gags aplenty. Watching Batman navigate in a teenage girl's body while having him experience some teenage hormones is particularly funny and Kevin Conroy pulls it off like the expert he is. While Batman still has the fight in him even in Stargirl's body, Superman has a harder time as Batman. Not used to being in a human body Superman slips, trips, practically breaks his shoulder and nearly blows himself up. Stargirl doesn't have it easy being a Superman but with the Superman's help she tries to get her powers under control. Stargirl suggests calling in reinforcements especially Firestorm, which Batman thinks is an excellent idea. Zatanna, Martian Manhunter, Cyborg, Plastic Man, Flash and Firestorm along with Professor Stein show up and fall into Mxy's trap swapping bodies (brains?) with each other. There's a very funny gag involving Firestorm in SHAZAM's body. Batman seems confident that the plan he had in mind will work. Which it does. The floating consciousness of Professor Stein gets to Mxyzptlk and makes him say his name backwards which sends the imp back to the fifth dimension. This frees the heroes who then get the drop on Grodd and the gang. Batman congratulates Stargirl for knowing Firestorm and Stein's consciousness was the key. When he leaves she bashfully tells Superman she only suggested Firestorm because she always wanted to meet him!
Overall a fun episode with Kevin Conroy as Batman, Natalie Lander as Stargirl and Jason J.Lewis as Superman having a field day. Superman does seem a bit of a buffoon as Batman but given that he's not used to being powerless and keeping with this episode's absurd humor that's to be expected. And special mention to Gilbert Gottfried as Mxyzptlk. Always hilarious! All around a delightful episode.


text:
Dave Prentice: Are Everton FC heading for another historic crossroads?
EVERTON are a club that has seen more turning points than most.
David Prentice
Bill Kenwright (158)
EVERTON are a club that has seen more turning points than most. Kevin Brock's backpass, Joe Royle's Port Vale 'watershed', the Greek tragedy/Old Trafford turnaround in 1971 – all have assumed historic significance in Evertonian eyes.
And there's a growing sense that tomorrow's FA Cup tie could be another.
Everton are at a crossroads, not just for this season, but maybe for the forseeable future too.
A famous victory over Chelsea could be a platform for a talented squad of players to finally reignite a stuttering season.
Defeat . . . and a growing sense of unrest could turn into mutiny.
There's something brewing in the air at Goodison.
Message boards, letters pages and radio phone-ins will always attract the disaffected, the cynical and occasionally the downright lunatic.
But there's a growing sense now that the rank and file are also becoming disillusioned at Goodison.
Attendances have settled around an unimpressive 34,000 this season, only the derby has seen a sell-out, the atmosphere against West Ham was flat even before Jonathan Spector scored – while one fans group has already made public its intention to 'protest' tomorrow – win, lose or draw.
Their major gripe appears to be the lack of any significant transfer outlay since Marouane Fellaini arrived in 2008 (Bilyaletdinov, Heitinga and Distin were all funded by Lescott's sale) and the lack of any means of transmitting concerns to the board since the AGM was guillotined.
Everton chairman Bill Kenwright is the man who appears to be copping the most flak. And I still find that stance unsettling.
For me Kenwright is the best type of football club owner.
A fan.
And if he occasionally seems reluctant to relinquish the reins of his club maybe that's because he witnessed at close quarters the unholy mess created when another lifelong fan of a football club sold up across the park.
But is Kenwright really so reluctant to sell?
Is he beating off billionaire bidders left, right and centre?
That certainly doesn't appear to be the case. Yet some fans still talk about the Blues chairman refusing to part with the club as if he was a child refusing to hand over his prized train set.
Kenwright's willingness to listen to offers for Everton has been widely advertised.
But there have been few, if any, realistic takers.
The only genuine publicised offer for the club came from Paul Gregg back in 2004 – and heaven help the Blues if that bid had been successful.
Everton's status as the second club in a small city (The Toffees might have been the first chronologically, but five European Cups and 18 league titles tends to distract when outside investors look at Merseyside), with a sizeable debt and an ancient stadium tends to put off football club browsers.
Yet some supporters still criticise Kenwright for refusing to sell to anonymous bidders, and for not being rich enough to personally fund a bid for a forward.
But if those criticisms are unwarranted, some forward momentum could be generated by appointing an agency to unearth a potential buyer.
That would at least show a firm desire to attract investment.
If you were keen on selling your house, you might plant a 'For Sale' sign in the front garden.
But you'd have a much better chance of selling if you hired a reputable estate agent.
Everton's arrangement with Keith Harris always appeared to be a loose one.
Liverpool, on the other hand, formally appointed Hawkpoint and paid them in the region of £2m to unearth an investor.
They found not one, but two – and it was hardly their fault that the Reds chose a pair of Texans – but until Everton do something similar the mood will persist that Bill Kenwright isn't sincere about his desire to sell.
Without fresh investment it's difficult to see how Everton can progress any further.
Victory tomorrow may buy a little more time, but not much more.
Defeat and Saturday January 29 could mark another turning point in Everton's history.


Home > USVI > You are not in Kansas anymore, Dorothy!
As I read postings on your message board I always laugh when people inquire if the VI is like the rest of the States, since they want to get away from the mainland attitude or hectic pace. The answer has always been a resounding "no". You are not in Kansas anymore, Dorothy!
I often find it becomes a love/hate relationship. My husband best describes like Forrest Gump, 'life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'll get.' Some of the little things can be so frustrating and time-consuming. In many ways, logic does not prevail and you realize why the VI is drowning in government inefficiency, and it is a shame. Getting a barbecue propane tank filled required an excursion to sub base versus any local gas station or equipment rental location. Tried getting a fishing license, not available from fish/tackle stores, but you need to go to the AIRPORT to get a fishing license. There is a big lack of competition that keeps certain items so expensive or unavailable. Also I understand there is local opposition to Home Depot coming to St. Thomas. No wonder, it would provide competitive price, improved availability of merchandise, and accountability. Thought the Government was trying to encourage businesses to come to St. Thomas and provide jobs, benefits and career opportunities? Yes, as long as they don't rock the boat and provide any type of competition, I guess. Got to love this place, which we do, just realize there is so much room for improvement.
On another note, trying to find a decent map that lists parts of the island by name. Realize addresses aren't what they are on the mainland. They involve landmarks, had to learn what a mahogany tree looked like, can't tell you how many times people have given me directions involving a mahogany tree OR a white wall! Never realized how many white walls there are until you are looking for a specific location. But, how do I know which part of the island or town is Contant or Upper Contant, for example? Had the same problem with areas like Sub Base, but found it when I had to deal with WAPA and the gas company.
Also, having never lived in the Tropics, could use some suggestions on food storage, pest control, do's and don'ts with regard to a cistern, best way to keep toilets white when you have a cistern, or other useful tips?
First and foremost of my suggestions for folks moving here, you must come down and check out the area. Get a good idea of what is and isn't available, and what things cost.
I would definitely recommend they bring a car with them. If they don't own a reliable car, buy it before they come down. Recommend they have a US-made AND assembled one, this way cost to bring in is cheaper. You will need to check inside of driver door to see where the car was assembled since VI is not part of NAFTA a car assembled in Canada is subject to higher fees to bring in. But, all in all the cost to ship and license isn't much compared to increased cost of buying here. I would suggest if person could afford it, bring in 1 more vehicle than they need, ideally a decent older model truck. They could sell the truck for enough of a profit to cover their cost of shipping and licensing both vehicles! Also, it is worth paying someone to deal with clearing customs and licensing the vehicle for you. It can be an all day ordeal, especially if you don't know the ropes or your way around. It was the best $150 we spent. Car was delivered, washed/gassed up and fully licensed.
Also, as someone prepares to move, take advantage of the US Postal Service. Have never appreciated the Post Office until we started this project. We shipped tons of stuff via parcel post. So what if it took 4 weeks to get here, just start early. Cost is no more to send here than to any other US State. We balanced the cost of item + shipping versus cost here or in some cases, items aren't available. We mailed some of the lighter things and took some of the heaviest, up to 70 lbs, as our airline luggage. Also, check on-line shopping. Many shipped here directly without international surcharge. Some even had Virgin Islands listed as valid postal state code as VI and treat it no differently as the states. In some cases, it was cheaper to send here then stateside home, no sales tax here. Ordered rugs, large rugs, from Crate and Barrel and it cost $5/ per rug to ship here! Would have cost more to go to other home because we have 8.1% sales tax. Also learned if they don't list VI as 'valid' state code, call them. Educate them. Request item be sent via USPS versus UPS. You'd be surprised what you can ship here. Besides, shipping via USPS avoids any customs issues. Another thing we did, was ship items via DHL. Employer gets a great corporate rate so we made arrangements to ship larger/heavier items via DHL and reimburse employer when the air bill hits. When packing we didn't 'waste' space with packing peanuts or newspaper, use clothes or lightweight necessary household items, paper towel/tissues/ napkins/ if you have little kids; diapers. Prices on most of these items are cheaper in bulk stateside. So at least you have an initial supply of these items.
Still having friends send us stateside care packages from Home Depot as we finish remodeling. Quite time-consuming to go to 1/2 a dozen places to find a replacement items with no luck that you know Home Depot or Lowe's carries in quantity.
Hope some of that info is helpful to others as they try to leave their type A personality stateside and adjust to island living.
Home Depot opened a store on St. Thomas in late 2003.


text:
Q: Trouble making mathematical operations with big hexadecimal numbers on bash I'm trying to perform multiple mathematical operations with big hexadecimal numbers. In the following code a big random value is given to p and q, both variables are multiplied together making the result the value of n. Then make a subtraction "(n-2)" but when subtracting 2 to n the result seems like being wrong
#!/bin/bash

generate_random() {

        head -c 256 /dev/urandom | xxd -p -u -c 256 | tr -d '[:space:]\\'
}

p="$(generate_random)"
q="$(generate_random)"

n=$(echo "${p} * ${q}" | tr -d '[:space:]\\')

echo "obase=16; ${n} - 2" | bc | tr -d '[:space:]]\\'

I'm using this webstie to check the results and so far I haven't managed to get any correct output from my script
Value examples:
Generated value for p
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

Generated value for q
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

Result of n
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

Expected value for n
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

A: Since the input is in hexadecimal you should also use ibase.
#!/bin/bash

generate_random() {

        head -c 256 /dev/urandom | xxd -p -u -c 256 | tr -d '[:space:]\\'
}

p="$(generate_random)"
q="$(generate_random)"

n=$(echo "${p} * ${q}" | tr -d '[:space:]\\')

echo "obase=16;ibase=16; ${n} - 2" | bc | tr -d '[:space:]]\\'

The result in the case you posted is -
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

This can be confirmed using python
In [1]: hex(0x28DA11279C9BF6B6A93CF1288C63845503D87C17C93554421C3069A5283547CEE4C127F3289BDC03663143808B7318B321B35B25ECC6D48EF60283DA6111104291070E3FBEDBD27A942D2B3630AA8683C6BB4F6F6EE277A24A4C9B93AEEB61D48AC7657F
   ...: A6E61DC95A8EF133F97C6ED3B285E275487746F070005B2BCDEA9C7C12F294DFCE55BC7013417F8E47CEC605F13AFD5C54A3578BB041278285511248E975FE29F4013CA059599EE95E43E28B886D0651EFDDFF760DBB298096C7CA1A46FE3D119914C23ABA5543
   ...: C43BE546FA70D7FA36B22DA17210A6CABDCD299751ADEE381A3230E9978946B193AB02921947887A2FC7A5DC84D2193F9CFC865B52*0x54DEBA70F8F052F5120B77254EB999E12180241520DC2A12F62F6773992155AEFC5356E3F9B3271FE5AA9D425F7D2CD82
   ...: 33196C98595F993899C31D4063F75A801D1752AD178663E3CDF3CF38CEE1972C861DC6069B787249963D305E4FC970A48E67D3A680CD58F17229379EAE5445603E50E60CF605F1057766EFEAFAA2299CCBC0C4F161815DBD06294E4BBD43EF55F1E2D7544B3927
   ...: 9EA4B9114AB9F9D0FC2B46135911CF62FB4A22A615936FDDAD23131B1F0AD2FB94D44C0879B3289530653C4714B2E3F3F9FFD17E92C44FBCE589982F68985207F788FBD1B531C56224E4EDA1F124E6AEC19C949AB396862F0856C435EBAAAB7FFB1251FBEB3386
   ...: 76D-2)
Out[1]: '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'

Not sure what is the calculator you're using but it has a different calculation for some reason.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


The library in the palace was founded by Julius, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg, in 1572. Under the learned book collector and Prince of Peace Augustus, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg, it amassed the largest book collection in Europe and was seen as the eighth wonder of the world. The current library building was constructed between 1883 and 1887 in the style of a Florentine palazzo, replacing the ramshackle 18th century library rotunda.
Behind its mighty walls lies a modern, internationally renowned research library with an inventory of around 1 million tomes. In the library's museum, visitors from all over the world can marvel at the written gems of times gone by. Without a doubt, the Gospels of Henry the Lion – which were purchased at auction in London in 1983 for 32.5 million Deutsche Mark and have now found their permanent home in Wolfenbüttel – are quite simply the greatest treasure in the Bibliotheca Augusta. They are the biggest visitor attraction and one of the most magnificent medieval manuscripts with the most art historical value.


The US president's Twitter threats to rain fire and missiles upon Syria over an alleged chemical weapon attack have apparently ended up doing damage of a different kind on the other side of the Atlantic.
US stock market indexes took a dive after a fresh bout of 'Twitter diplomacy' from the US president over an alleged chemical weapon attack in Syria, according to media reports.
The Dow Jones industrial average ended up decreasing by nearly 219 points, with the Nasdaq composite and S&P 500 falling by 0.4 percent and 0.6 percent respectively on April 11.
This development apparently comes in the wake of Trump tweeting that Russia should be ready for a possible US missile strike against Syria.
The president's outburst followed an alleged chemical attack that reportedly took place in the Syrian city of Douma and claimed the lives of up to 70 people.
While White House press secretary Sarah Sanders stated that the US leader holds Russia and Syria responsible for this act, the Russian Foreign Ministry denied these allegations and said that these reports serve merely as a pretext for the possible use of military force against Bashar Assad.


text:
McLaren 720S Spider Convertible Goes Live: Check out Specifications and Price
15th, Dec 2018 11:00 AM
Atul Mittal
McLaren has finally unveiled the most-awaited and lightest convertible in its fleet - the 720S Spider. The car is an upgrade to the popular McLaren 720S Coupe and features a convertible roof. The thing to note here is that the roof setup only adds 49 kg of additional weight over the standard variant.
The new car bears a dry weight of 1,332kg, which makes it the lightest convertible in the Company's car segment. Before this, the Ferrari 488 Spider with 1,420kg weight was the lightest convertible by McLaren.
Read Also:- Check out the Cars in Demand in November 2018
Since the Spider model has been built upon the 720S Coupe version, it retains most of the power specifications and design features of the standard model. The car has been integrated with a 4.0-litre twin-turbocharged V8 engine which produces 720hp power and 770Nm of peak torque. The added weight doesn't seem to have any major impact on the speed, as the car still manages to reach 0 to 100 kph in the same 2.9 seconds, however, it takes 0.1 seconds longer to reach 200kph than the Coupe variant. The new car manages to reach a peak speed of 325kph with the roof down and manages to attain a top speed of 341kph when the roof is up.
The car features Company's Monocage II (carbon-fibre monocoque) chassis which removes the need for any additional structural changes. This enables it to retain the original car's driving styles while keeping the overall weight in check. The roof has been built using a single carbon-fibre sheet to ensure that the original styling of the Coupe is retained. It operates at a speed of 50kph and can go up and down in just 11 seconds, which is about 6-second better than the 650S Spider.
Read Also:- Hike in Prices of Tata Motors Models Soon
But that's not all. The company has made a few other tweaks as well in the new car. It gets 10-spoke wheels, an option to switch the standard roof with a glazed panel that can be changed between transparent and opaque via a dedicated button, and two additional colour choices.
Tags:mclaren 720s price, mclaren 720s specifications, mclaren 720s features, mclaren
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition With 10GB RAM, Warp Charge 30 Launched: Price, Specifications
New McLaren 600LT Unveiled With Specs And Video
First McLaren 570S Spider To India Reaches Mumbai
McLaren To Open First Outlet In India
McLaren BP23 Hyper-GT Will Be Fastest McLaren Ever
McLaren's Iconic F1 to Get Enliven with a New GT Car
Hyundai Aura Launched in India with Price Starting Rs 5.80 lakh
22nd, Jan 2020 5:28 PM


text:
Washington, DC, Planning and Evaluation, Office of the Under Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Education | Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center, 2000
The event Washington, DC, Planning and Evaluation, Office of the Under Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Education | Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center, 2000 represents a publication, printing, distribution, issue, release or production of resources found in Indiana State Library.
The Resource Washington, DC, Planning and Evaluation, Office of the Under Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Education | Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center, 2000
Planning and Evaluation, Office of the Under Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Education
Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center
trueWashington, DC
1 Items that share the ProviderEvent Washington, DC, Planning and Evaluation, Office of the Under Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Education | Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center, 2000
Improving federal education programs through an Integrated Performance and Benchmarking System
Context of Washington, DC, Planning and Evaluation, Office of the Under Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Education | Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center, 2000

 Data from Washington, DC, Planning and Evaluation, Office of the Under Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Education | Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center, 2000 - Indiana State Library

Data Citation of the ProviderEvent Washington, DC, Planning and Evaluation, Office of the Under Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Education | Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center, 2000
http://link.library.in.gov/resource/luoEdrGz6HQ/
http://library.link/resource/luoEdrGz6HQ/


The Clinical Simulation Center (CSC), which is across from the Clinical Learning Center within the Center for Clinical Education (CCE), is designed with four high fidelity simulation rooms to mimic unique hospital settings. These unique hospital settings include two medical/surgical rooms, one birthing suite/pediatric room, and one trauma/ICU room. The center has two high fidelity adult simulators, one high fidelity adult simulator with advanced capabilities, one high fidelity birthing simulator, one high fidelity Newborn simulator, and one high fidelity Pediatric simulator. Each room is equipped with portable electronic health record units for electronic documentation of patient medical records. A portable MedDispense system is available in each room that stores simulated medications for administration during simulations involving barcoded medication delivery.
Each simulation room within the Clinical Simulation Center (CSC) has an adjoining prebriefing/ debriefing room for students to view live or recorded simulation audio/visual data as part of performance, debriefing, and/or assessment purposes. Each room is equipped with computer, whiteboard, and display monitor for students to use a variety of recorded or live media to enhance their experiential learning experience.
High fidelity simulated experiences are intended to enhance student learning, simulate clinical situations, and prepare them for direct patient care.


Just as the equal symbol is signified by two parallel lines, Equivalence presents two different things that are expressed to be the same. This is the equation—in the form of 1,001 photographs—that confronts visitors to the chapel turned gallery of Objectifs. Amongst a sea of a thousand pictures each depicting depict a crushed aluminium can recovered from the trash in Singapore sits a single image of a consumer good purchased from a shop. The former was discarded and deemed worthless by consumers. The latter was acquired in exchange for something of value. Yet, an equivalence connects the two.
Their common economic value of 15 Singapore dollars is what balances this seemingly unequal equation. That the scrap metal industry can turn a used aluminium can into a commodity is a testament of the free market economy's ability to convert garbage into gold. But by equating the value of what some in Singapore need for survival to the cost of a thing that others covet for pleasure, Equivalence also sums up the inequality such an economy brings about.
This is a pressing issue for developed economies around the world today. Popularly expressed as the 99% versus the 1%, this income and wealth gap is the inevitable result of outsourcing the allocation of scarce global resources to the free market's "invisible hand". All things being equal, inequality is the answer. Besides polarising societies, such an economy blinds consumers to its mechanics too. From how industrial-scale production drives wages to unsustainable lows to mass consumption's insatiable appetite for resources and the resulting huge amounts of waste, these products of the free market economy are often far away from snazzy shopping centres and liveable cities. Out of sight and out of mind, what consumers are left with is an abstract worldview: everything simply comes with a price tag, minus the hard to quantify costs. We value the things around us by flattening everything into a price. We quantify our lives as if we were nothing more than engines of value. We speak of our homes as income-generating properties, and even measure the worth of our cities based on their economies. We've developed a world that makes most sense (and cents) for those who can afford to live in such a free market.
For the many who struggle to fit into this equation, they have to turn to alternative means such as salvaging aluminium cans and other remains of the consumption cycle, often from the public streets. Even such avenues are increasingly being priced out by the widening reach of the economy. A recent drop in scrap metal prices has made collecting aluminium cans unprofitable. Public spaces in cities are increasingly being privatised, squeezing out those who cannot afford to rent. In a world that is becoming so rationally divided by the common denominator of the free market, what happens those who equate to be the remainder? This is what Equivalence asks through its photographic juxtaposition of our wants and needs in contemporary urban living. This inquiry by the Beijing-based Chow and Lin—made up of photographer Stefen Chow and economist Lin Huiyi—emerges out of the rapid urbanisation of Asia, a phenomenon that has prompted a next generation to question the region's historic adoption of Western developmental models. Just as how the late German conceptual photographers Bernd and Hilla Becher visualised the architecture of industrialisation in the 20th century—capturing water towers, coal bunkers, factory facades, amongst others—Chow and Lin bring to life globalisation in the 21st century by methodically documenting the products of our global economy. Equivalence mirrors the spectacular readymade installations of leading conceptual artists in Asia, such as the Beijing-based Song Dong and the New Delhi-based Subodh Gupta, by assembling a near life-size infographic of everyday goods from Asia to visualise the architecture of living in this region today.
Faced with an equation that adds up to be correct, but not right, Equivalence offers us an answer that only prompts more questions: Why makes things equivalent? How can the world be equal? That any equation is balanced only reflects a state of affairs in equilibrium—not necessarily one that is equitable. If this is the cost of a stability today, dare we formulate another way to value our world tomorrow?
Justin Zhuang is a writer and researcher with an interest in Design, Cities, Culture, History and Media. He runs a Singapore-based studio, In Plain Words, and is a recent graduate of the MFA in Design Criticism at the School of Visual Arts, New York.


The Board of Trustees meets every other month, generally on a Thursday. The meetings are held on the three University of Illinois campuses (Urbana-Champaign, Chicago, and Springfield).
View agendas and materials prior to a Board of Trustees meeting.
Submit a request to speak during the Public Comment portion of meetings.
Search for and read minutes from meetings, from 1867 to present.
View agendas and materials after a Board of Trustees meeting.
See video or hear audio recordings from past meetings.


All aboard !! This train wreck that we call The Big Perm Show leaves the station Sunday night at 8 p.m. CST / 9 p.m. EST !! Grab a seat early and enjoy the ride !!
This week at 8:20 p.m. CST / 9:20 p.m. EST we'll visit with a true MMA pioneer ..... Mr. Gary " Big Daddy " Goodridge !! " Big Daddy " is a retired Trinidadian-Canadian super heavyweight kickboxer and heavyweight mixed martial artist fighting out of Barrie, Ontario. Prior to kickboxing and MMA, he was also one of the top ranked contenders in the world of professional arm wrestling. In early 2012, Goodridge was diagnosed with early onset of dementia pugilistica.
As fans of combat sports, we give little thought to the punishment that is endured by the bodies of the participants. This Sunday night we'll go in depth with " Big Daddy " to discuss the little talked about topic of brain injury as a result of participating in combat sports. We'll look to gain some insight into his own injuries as well as life after the cage.
Our hopes are that our listeners will take away a new understanding of the risks that our favorite fighters take as they do battle. We also hope to bring a better understanding of living life with a traumatic brain injury.


£8 (£6), £1 off early bird tickets bought before 11th January, available from the Oundle Box Office, 4 New Street, Oundle.
Oundle Festival of Literature welcomes Joe Shute to talk about his book, The Shadow Above: The Fall and Rise of The Raven.
Legend has it that the fate of the nation rests upon the raven, and should the resident birds ever leave the Tower of London then the entire kingdom will fall. While so much of our wildlife is vanishing, ravens are returning to their former habitats after centuries of exile, moving back from their outposts at the very edge of the country, to the city streets. In the past decade there has been a remarkable comeback. Raven numbers have increased by 134 % since the turn of the millennium and there are now well over 12,000 breeding pairs across the country.
In A Shadow Above, Joe Shute follows ravens across their new hunting grounds, travelling to every corner of the UK, examining our complicated and challenging relationship with these birds. He meets people who live alongside the raven in conflict and peace, unpicks their fierce intelligence, and ponders what the raven's successful return might come to symbolise for humans.
Joe Shute is an author and journalist with a passion for the natural world. He studied history at Leeds University, and currently works as a senior staff feature writer at The Telegraph. Before joining the newspaper, Joe was the crime correspondent for The Yorkshire Post.