text:
Biography – HINCKS, Sir FRANCIS – Volume XI (1881-1890) – Dictionary of Canadian Biography
HINCKS, Sir FRANCIS, banker, journalist, politician, and colonial administrator; b. 14 Dec. 1807 in Cork (Republic of Ireland), the youngest of nine children of the Reverend Thomas Dix Hincks and Anne Boult; m. first 29 July 1832 Martha Anne Stewart (d. 1874) of Legoniel, near Belfast (Northern Ireland), and they had five children; m. secondly 14 July 1875 Emily Louisa Delatre, widow of Robert Baldwin Sullivan*; d. 18 Aug. 1885 in Montreal, Que.
Francis Hincks's father was a Presbyterian clergyman whose interest in education and social reform led him to resign his pastorate and devote himself full time to teaching. His elder sons, of whom William* was one, became university teachers or clergymen, and it was assumed that Francis would follow in their footsteps. However, after briefly attending the Royal Belfast Academical Institution in 1823, he expressed a strong preference for a business career and was apprenticed to a Belfast shipping firm, John Martin and Company, in that year.
In August 1832 Hincks and his bride of two weeks departed for York (Toronto), Upper Canada. He had visited the colony during the winter of 1830–31 while investigating business opportunities in the West Indies and the Canadas. Early in December he opened a wholesale dry goods, wine, and liquor warehouse in premises rented from William Warren Baldwin* and his son Robert*; the two families soon became close friends. Hincks's first advertisement in the Colonial Advocate offered sherry, Spanish red wine, Holland Geneva (gin), Irish whiskey, dry goods, boots and shoes, and stationery to the general merchants of Upper Canada.
Because his wholesale business was frequently in financial difficulties, Hincks readily accepted the invitation of George Truscott* and John Cleveland Green in 1835 to join them in founding the jointstock Farmers' Bank and to serve as cashier (general manager). When the bank's directors elected Tories as president (John Elmsley*) and solicitor, several prominent Reformers, such as James Lesslie, James Hervey Price, and Dr John Rolph*, withdrew and in the same year formed the Bank of the People. Hincks cast his lot with the Reformers and became cashier of the new bank. He welcomed other opportunities in new enterprises: in 1836 he was a founder of the Home District Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Upper Canada and its first secretary.
From the outset of his political career Hincks was, like Robert Baldwin, a moderate Reformer, with misgivings about the radical wing of the movement led by William Lyon Mackenzie*. After the Reform victory in the provincial election of 1834 Hincks was one of two auditors chosen by a select committee of the assembly investigating the Welland Canal Company to examine its books. Most of the Reformers, including Hincks, received well the news of the appointment of Sir Francis Bond Head* as lieutenant governor of Upper Canada in December 1835. They quickly became disillusioned, however, for Head's conduct, especially during the election campaign of 1836, convinced them they could not hope to achieve responsible government while he remained in office. In the autumn of 1837 Hincks was alarmed to learn that some Reformers led by Mackenzie were plotting rebellion. He was not in their confidence, but suspected that some of the directors of his bank were still associated with Mackenzie and he knew that Rolph was deeply involved. The attempt at rebellion in December was easily crushed but a decided reaction against the Reform movement followed. Amid accusations and rumours, Hincks went into hiding for a week until the hysteria cooled. Some Reformers, including Peter Perry*, Thomas Parke*, Price, and Lesslie, despaired of obtaining reform and thought of leaving British North America. Sharing this pessimism, Hincks joined the Mississippi Emigration Society which planned to organize a mass migration to Iowa, and on its behalf went to Washington to investigate the possibility of securing a large block of land. By the time he returned to Upper Canada in early 1838 Lord Durham [Lambton*] had been appointed to investigate the causes for the rebellions in Upper and Lower Canada. Hope was rekindled among the Reformers, and the society decided to postpone definite plans until Durham had submitted his recommendations.
Anxious to promote their cause while awaiting Durham's arrival, Reformers such as Hincks and Price travelled to the villages north of Toronto with a strong Reform tradition. They were conscious of the need for a newspaper to explain the implications of responsible government and to emphasize that moderate Reformers rejected rebellion and sought to attain their ends by following British examples. Hincks resigned in June 1838 from the Bank of the People to establish the Examiner in Toronto.
Its first issue was published on 3 July with the motto "Responsible Government" to which the words "and the Voluntary Principle" were soon added. For the next four years, while Hincks remained proprietor and editor, these were its predominant editorial themes: parliamentary government on the British model, and support of religious bodies only by the voluntary contributions of their adherents. Possibly Hincks's editorials helped persuade Durham that responsible government was the basic reform needed to establish harmony between the executive and the assembly.
Hincks and his contemporaries did not have a uniform and cohesive notion about what they meant by responsible government, but generally they meant the parliamentary form of government that was evolving in Great Britain. Following this model they urged that the governor's advisers should be chosen from among the group which could command a majority in the assembly and that the governor should act on their advice. Thus they could be held responsible by the assembly for the governor's actions. They saw responsible government as the means of wresting control of Upper Canada from the Tories and of obtaining the power they needed to implement a reform programme. But there was no general agreement as to what that programme should be. In the 1840s most Upper Canadian Reformers agreed that the clergy reserves should be secularized, but it is doubtful whether a majority of French Canadian Reformers shared this view. By the 1850s, Hincks would give top priority to using political power to forward railway projects and developmental schemes.
Durham's report, containing the recommendations that Upper and Lower Canada should become a single colony, that expenditures should be introduced in the legislature by members of the executive, and, most particularly, that responsible government should be introduced in the Canadas, stimulated a Reform revival in Upper Canada after it reached the colony early in April 1839. Through the Examiner Hincks soon became recognized as the principal political spokesman and strategist of the Upper Canadian Reformers although Baldwin was the acknowledged leader. Hincks perceived immediately that if Upper Canadian Reformers joined forces with their French Canadian counterparts the united party might be wellnigh invincible. Taking the initiative, on 12 April 1839 he wrote an exploratory letter to Louis-Hippolyte La Fontaine*, leader of the Lower Canadian Reformers. "Lord Durham ascribes to you national objects," he observed. "If he is right, union would be ruin to you, if he is wrong, & that you are really desirous of liberal institutions & economical government, the union would in my opinion give you all you desire. . . ." His background and bias led Hincks to think only in terms of individual political and social liberty; he likely shared Durham's assumption that the assimilation of French Canada was inevitable. However, through their correspondence and association, Hincks and La Fontaine came to understand the hopes and fears of Reformers in each other's province. For his part, Hincks constantly stressed two basic ideas: responsible government was the means by which any desirable reform could be attained; and a union of the Canadas offered the best opportunity to obtain responsible government because it would enable the Reformers of the two provinces to cooperate in achieving their aims. It was typical of Hincks that it was he, rather than Baldwin, who had established contact with La Fontaine. But in spite of his most persuasive arguments he failed in his attempt at having the Reformers work together; the French Canadian Reformers did not believe they could rely on the support of their counterparts in Upper Canada. It remained for Baldwin and La Fontaine to consummate an alliance on the basis of personal friendship in the early 1840s, although Hincks had contributed greatly to the understanding that made the alliance possible.
The first election after the union of the Canadas in February 1841 took place in March and Hincks was pleased with the results. He was elected in Oxford County, and, according to his analysis, in Canada West the Reformers had won 19 seats, the supporters of Governor Sydenham [Thomson*] 17, and the Tories 5. The results from Canada East were less promising. French Canadian Reformers had elected a majority, but gerrymandering, the governor's influence, and violence at the polls had deprived them of seats they had fully expected to win. Hincks began to fear that in their resentment French Canadians might adopt an uncooperative, anti-union stance. To counteract this danger he wrote to La Fontaine's lieutenant, Augustin-Norbert Morin*, proposing strategy to gain responsible government when the legislature met.
To his surprise Hincks found, when the session began in June, that it was the Reformers of Canada West who did not remain steadfast to the cause of a united Reform group. Baldwin and Hincks knew that evidence of good faith must be given to La Fontaine and his followers. But most Upper Canadian Reformers were aware that their constituents wanted the public works promised by Sydenham and they refused to risk losing these projects by supporting the French Canadians in their opposition to the governor. When it became apparent that an alliance would not materialize during the session, Hincks's basic pragmatism led him to reassess his own position. Rather than constantly opposing the government, he decided to support measures of which he approved. Soon he came to feel that there were liberal men connected with the administration, such as Charles Dewey Day and Henry Black*, and that "practical responsibility" had been conceded, if not the full theory of responsible government. Before the session ended Hincks had voted against Baldwin and the French Canadians on a number of measures including a bill to establish municipal councils in Upper Canada, and had become interested in Sydenham's proposal to create a government bank of issue. Bitter words were exchanged and a rift developed between Hincks and Baldwin. Ironically, after the session ended the prospects for a united Reform party improved. Largely through Baldwin's efforts La Fontaine was elected for the 4th riding of York on 23 Sept. 1841. And, as errant Reformers returned to Baldwin's leadership, it appeared the government would not be strong enough to carry its measures in the next session.
Advised by the Colonial Office to strengthen his government, Sir Charles Bagot*, Sydenham's successor, offered Hincks the office of inspector general of public accounts in June 1842. Hincks readily accepted and thereby earned the reputation of being a political opportunist. He sold the Examiner to Lesslie upon taking office. Bagot's expectation that Hincks would align moderate Reformers from Canada East and West with the government did not materialize and the governor soon realized he must obtain the support of the French Canadian bloc in the assembly. He entered into negotiations that culminated in La Fontaine and Baldwin joining the administration in September 1842. Hincks was thus reunited with his former colleagues, but he was still regarded as a traitor by many Upper Canadian Reformers who agreed with Price that his presence "polluted" the administration. Hincks had never ceased to consider himself a Reformer; he showed no hesitation now in resuming an active role in the movement and was soon advising Baldwin on political tactics. As inspector general he took steps to improve the collection of customs duties and to establish more efficient accounting practices in the office of the receiver general, John Henry Dunn*.
Bagot had sought the support of La Fontaine and his followers in order to maintain harmony between the executive and the assembly, but before he could judge the success of his "great measure" he became ill and asked to be replaced. At the end of March 1843 his successor, Sir Charles Theophilus Metcalfe*, arrived. Hincks was initially impressed by the new governor. Bagot had been instructed by the colonial secretary, Lord Stanley, to resist any attempt by the Reformers to alter the civil list established by the imperial act of union. None the less, when his council objected to the imperial government's determining the civil list, Metcalfe asked Hincks to prepare a memorandum and used it to renew Bagot's proposal to the British parliament that the Canadian legislature be permitted to pass a civil list of its own. On the question of control of patronage Metcalfe was obviously sensitive. Both his own inclinations and Stanley's instructions led him to resist any attempt by the Reformers to gain acceptance of their claim that the Executive Council must be consulted on all appointments. But even on this question Hincks observed to Baldwin that the governor was "really . . . acting very well and is I think improving." Anxious to meet Metcalfe half way, Hincks advised Baldwin that the Executive Council ought to appoint a reasonable number of Tory magistrates in the Home District to show the governor that the Reformers were fair and that they appreciated his "not objecting to a single name" among the officials they nominated for the districts of Gore and Simcoe.
Such impressions were short lived. Soon after his arrival in Canada Metcalfe began to suspect that his Executive Council probably intended to force a test of responsible government by tendering advice he could not accept and resigning en masse when he refused it. He hoped the test would come over control of patronage, which he felt he could defend, rather than over other contentious issues such as the civil list, the location of the capital, or an amnesty for those exiled for their involvement in the rebellions of 1837–38. The crisis occurred on 26 Nov. 1843. The entire council, with the exception of Dominick Daly*, announced their intention to resign because Metcalfe would not agree that the council was responsible to the assembly and consequently that it must always be consulted before an appointment was made. On 12 December Daly, William Henry Draper*, and Denis-Benjamin Viger* were sworn in as members of council, but the governor was unsuccessful in forming a new council that would have the support of a majority in the assembly. Finally, he appealed to the province and called a general election in September of 1844. The new assembly contained a slight majority of the governor's supporters, but most of these were elected from Canada West. Among the Lower Canadian members his supporters were in a decided minority, with virtually no French Canadians. This imbalance continued until the La Fontaine–Baldwin administration was formed after the general election in 1848.
Throughout the crisis, Hincks had remained steadfast to the Reform cause. In the midst of it Baldwin's father died and, in a state of depression, the Reform leader decided to withdraw from politics. Hincks's friendship with Baldwin, and his insistence that Baldwin's resignation would seriously damage the Reform movement, helped persuade him to remain at his post.
In February 1844 Hincks was given an opportunity once more to combine his political career with journalism. Despite Baldwin's misgivings, La Fontaine and Theodore Hart, a Montreal Reformer, invited Hincks to take over as editor of the Montreal Times and Commercial Advertiser in order to make it a reliable Reform organ. He accepted and, upon moving to Montreal, became active in the Unitarian community. Hincks soon found that the proprietor of the paper, Hutton Perkins, would neither give him a free hand editorially nor sell the paper to him. Consequently, with financial assistance from Hart, Baldwin, and La Fontaine, he established a new newspaper in Montreal, the Pilot, whose first issue was published on 5 March. Completely at home with the vituperative journalism of his day, Hincks was soon writing editorials that provoked heated responses from Tory editors. Having frequently witnessed the intimidation of Reformers in Canada West by Tory mobs, he could now not resist encouraging the use of Irish canal workers to disrupt Tory meetings. Speaking at every election meeting, and sometimes providing a brass band, stressing that the Tories were the traditional enemies of the French Canadians, and playing on Irish prejudices, Hincks worked diligently at cementing the alliance between the Irish and the French Canadians. His efforts contributed to the victory of Reform candidate Lewis Thomas Drummond in the by-election in Montreal in April 1844 – a significant rebuff to Metcalfe and the Tories since Montreal had been regarded as a Tory stronghold. Hincks was confident that in his short time in Montreal he had united French and Irish, and this, he informed Baldwin, "will secure us in future from much trouble."
Thoroughly engrossed with his newspaper, Hincks began to doubt whether he would wish to hold office again. "My Ambition is satisfied, and I really have no desire personally to go back, and I think to be of the most service to the party, I had better remain as I am," he advised Baldwin in May. Still, he sought re-election when Metcalfe dissolved the legislature in September 1844. He attributed his unexpected defeat in Oxford County by Robert Riddell to the Scots of Zorra Township whose Presbyterian conscience he had offended when he supported John Prince*'s bill permitting hunting of game on Sunday. Baldwin suspected that the Pilot's wide-ranging attacks on the Scottish Tory merchants of Montreal were probably an additional factor.
Hincks soon realized that the Pilot required numerous subscriptions from Upper Canada's Reformers in order to survive: most Reformers in Canada East were French and not likely to subscribe to an English paper, and most of the Montreal merchants were Tories and unlikely to advertise in it. But Hincks's efforts in Canada West soon brought him into conflict with George Brown* who naturally felt that subscriptions to the Pilot should not be encouraged at the expense of the Globe. Their newspapers were not the only source of friction between the two men. Hincks suspected Brown of aspiring to replace him as the Reform candidate in Oxford at the next election. Brown, he confided to Baldwin in September 1845, "has been there exerting himself not only against the Pilot but against me personally. His object is to unseat me for that Co & as my friends think to substitute himself. He proposes also to substitute [Edward Blake*] for you as a leader. My information can be relied on." Brown, in correspondence with Baldwin, denied having any political aspirations, and all the evidence indicates that Hincks's suspicions were unwarranted. Isolated as he was from Upper Canadian politics and having lost his seat in the assembly, Hincks was prone to believe any rumour he heard. He was becoming critical of the leadership provided by Baldwin and La Fontaine and bitter over the failure of Lower Canadian Reform leaders to provide adequate support for the Pilot.
He frequently considered selling the paper and almost did so in 1847 when a profit of $4,500 on investments in the Echo Lake Mining Company and the Lake Huron Silver and Copper Mining Company gave him sufficient funds to satisfy his creditors. But in the end he decided to keep it; he enjoyed journalism and the Pilot enabled him to serve as the link between Reformers from Canada East and West. Hincks also knew that he had considerable influence with the French Canadian leaders. Between 1845 and 1847 when, under the guise of recognizing the equity of the double majority principle, Draper sought to separate the French Canadian members from La Fontaine's leadership and from their alliance with the Upper Canadian Reformers, Hincks's influence and advice were important factors in keeping the Reformers from Canada East united and steadfast to the cause.
The legislature was dissolved and an election called in late 1847 while Hincks was in Ireland, his first visit since his arrival in Canada. After briefly investigating prospects in both Canada East and Canada West, Baldwin decided Hincks's best chance for re-election was still in Oxford County and asked Brown to campaign on his behalf. Though Hincks returned to Canada before the election, urgent private business prevented him from leaving Montreal to make even a token appearance in his constituency: Theodore Hart had been unable to meet a note valued at £450 held by Hincks, and the latter had had subsequently to borrow money on the note. He owed his election to the efforts of Brown and of Thomas Strahan Shenston*, his political agent in Oxford. But such knowledge, rather than improving relations between Hincks and Brown, likely increased Hincks's sense of insecurity and his suspicions of Brown.
Despite his past doubts Hincks sold the Pilot and readily accepted the office of inspector general in the ministry formed by La Fontaine and Robert Baldwin in March 1848. He soon became aware of the extent to which rumours of political instability together with mismanagement and over-expenditure had undermined the financial reputation and credit of the province which had been borrowing heavily to finance public works without making adequate provisions to repay debts. His predecessor as inspector general, William Cayley, had not established a sinking fund and had failed to pay either interest or principal on a loan of £140,000 he had floated in 1846. Yet, Hincks found when he took office, expenditures for public works were still increasing. Canadian debentures could only be sold in London at a large discount and financial institutions were reluctant to handle them at all. Hincks set to work to restore the province's credit. Largely as a result of his efforts both Baring Brothers and Glyn, Halifax, Mills and Company took on the role of Canadian financial agents in England, and soon the debentures were selling at a premium. In the session of the legislature which opened in January 1849, Hincks sponsored a bill which created a sinking fund for the eventual retirement of the provincial debt.
Hincks's other great interest in this session was the Railway Guarantee Act. Intended to stimulate railway construction in Canada, the act authorized a government guarantee of six per cent interest on half the bonded debt of any railway over 75 miles in length after half the line had been built. Hincks was convinced that railways were the key to Canadian economic development and was pleased when his act encountered little opposition within the legislature despite the prevailing depression. The government's Rebellion Losses Bill, however, generated a violent storm in the legislature, abuse of Governor General Lord Elgin [Bruce*], and a riot in Montreal which resulted in the burning of the Parliament Buildings and attacks on the houses of Hincks and La Fontaine. When the Tories sent Sir Allan Napier MacNab* and Cayley to England to urge the disallowance of the act, the government chose Hincks to counteract their efforts. Upon his arrival in England he found there was no possibility of the act being disallowed, and he concentrated instead on promoting Canadian securities as an attractive investment.
Just as his efforts began to bear fruit, reports arrived of agitation in Canada for annexation. Hincks realized that under such conditions Canadian bonds had little attraction for British investors and, feeling completely frustrated, he left for Canada. He arrived back in Montreal to find that an annexation manifesto had been signed by many business and professional men, predominantly from Canada East, including the Reform leaders Luther Hamilton Holton* and Antoine-Aimé Dorion*. In correspondence with Baldwin he was soon criticizing him and La Fontaine for their weak leadership in a time of crisis. "Had prompt measures been taken with the annexationists," he declared to Baldwin, "they would have been down by this time instead of increasing in influence & numbers." He urged that those who had signed the manifesto be stripped of offices and honours. In this mood he considered his retirement from office. However, by the spring of 1850, with the annexation movement in decline, Canada's reputation on the London money market improved. Possibly, too, Britain's recovery from the financial crisis of 1847–48 helped to create a more favourable climate for the sale of Canadian debentures. Before the end of May 1850 the balance of a £500,000 Canadian loan had been negotiated and the debentures had been sold slightly above par.
It was with considerable misgivings that Hincks learned in the spring of 1851 that Brown was contemplating running for the assembly in a by-election in Haldimand. For some time he had feared that Brown's extreme voluntaryism could threaten the Reform alliance with La Fontaine and his followers. Moreover, since December, when the Globe had reported fully on the "papal aggression question" in Great Britain and given it Canadian implications, Brown had become the symbol of Upper Canadian "no popery" fanaticism in the eyes of most Roman Catholics. When Mackenzie decided to run in this by-election, Hincks and his cabinet colleagues declined to endorse Brown for fear of creating further division in the Reform ranks. With the Catholics of Haldimand arrayed against him, Brown went down to defeat. Henceforth, he became increasingly disillusioned with the Reform party and the rift between Hincks and himself widened. Brown began to share the Clear Grits' suspicion that French Canadian influence was causing the government to have second thoughts about secularizing the clergy reserves and he feared that this influence was undermining the voluntaryist principles of the Reform party. Hincks also considered himself a voluntaryist, but his views were much less extreme than those of Brown. "My notions of civil and religious liberty," he explained to Shenston, "lead me to allow each Christian Community to manage its affairs in its own way. I would give them no state support but I would not deprive them of the power of managing their affairs."
The rift between Hincks and Brown widened on 30 June 1851 when Baldwin suddenly decided to resign from the cabinet after a majority of the members from Canada West in the assembly supported Mackenzie's attack on the Court of Chancery that Baldwin had recently reformed. Hincks was his logical successor, and although he offered to resign with Baldwin, he had no real desire to do so. He had been critical of Baldwin's leadership and he probably felt he could provide Upper Canadian Reformers with more positive and more dynamic direction. But he was assuming the leadership of the western section of the party at a difficult time. Reform unity was threatened by both the Clear Grits in Canada West and the Rouges in Canada East; and, at the same time, Brown's Globe was increasingly critical of compromises made by Baldwin and La Fontaine for the sake of unity if the union of the Canadas was not preserved, the province's credit would be seriously impaired.
Aware that the Globe's intolerant voluntaryism threatened the Reform alliance, Hincks, upon taking over from Baldwin, indicated his intention to insist that its editorial policy be in accord with the policy of the party. But Brown, finding the prospect of Hincks's leadership intolerable, severed his connection with the party early in July. He regarded Hincks as a mere political opportunist who valued power more than principles. Hincks, however, seeing himself as a political realist, considered Brown to be a governmental impossibility because he refused to recognize the significance of French Canadian political strength. Anxious to reunite the party, Hincks welcomed William McDougall*'s proposal that two Clear Grits, John Rolph and Malcolm Cameron*, be taken into the government in return for support of McDougall's newspaper, the North American of Toronto. This arrangement made it impossible to give Solicitor General John Sandfield Macdonald* a seat in the cabinet (he was offered the post of commissioner of crown lands), let alone the post of attorney general west which he wanted. In his disappointment Macdonald vowed, "I will make Hincks pay for it if I can. . . ." Hincks was faced with the fact that less than six months after he had assumed the leadership two influential Reformers, Brown and Macdonald, had been alienated.
Baldwin's resignation had led La Fontaine to consider his own position and he soon announced his intention to resign also. On 28 Oct. 1851 Hincks and Augustin-Norbert Morin became the new co-premiers, with a programme which included secularization of the clergy reserves, abolition of seigneurial tenure, an elective Legislative Council, increased representation in the assembly, extension of the franchise, and the encouragement of railway construction Upon taking office they advised the governor, Lord Elgin, to dissolve the house. The ensuing election, held in December, returned the Reformers in approximately the same numbers as in the previous parliament. Because of the friction caused by the Clear Grits and by Brown's personal opposition to himself, Hincks chose to run in both Oxford and Niagara to ensure that he won a seat. He was successful in both constituencies, and chose to sit for Oxford.
Convinced that railways would bring a new era of prosperity to British North America, Hincks was anxious to encourage further railway building. When Baldwin had announced his intention to resign as premier, Hincks was in discussions with Edward Barron Chandler* and Joseph Howe* concerning the joint financing by Canada, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia of a railway from Halifax to Windsor or Sarnia on Canada's western boundary. They reached an agreement and in August 1851 Hincks piloted a bill through the legislature authorizing Canadian participation in the scheme. But late in the year he was dismayed to learn that the project was in danger. There had been a misunderstanding: the imperial government was willing to guarantee the interest on a loan to build the railway only if it followed a defensible route through northern New Brunswick along the south shore of the Gulf of St Lawrence. Because New Brunswick was interested only in a line that would provide service for the Saint John valley, the arrangement was about to collapse.
Hoping to work out a compromise, Hincks and two cabinet colleagues, Étienne-Paschal Taché* and John Young*, visited New Brunswick and Nova Scotia early in February 1852. A new plan was worked out, which Howe opposed because it would use the Saint John valley and thus give Saint John a direct rail link with the Canadas, enabling it to compete with Halifax as the principal ocean port for British North America during the winter shipping season. In a masterful speech in Halifax, Hincks appealed directly to the merchants and people of Nova Scotia and won general support for the plan. Howe capitulated and agreed to do "all that a Nova Scotian ought, to bring this matter to a successful issue." Hincks still had to persuade the imperial government to reverse its stand and guarantee the interest on the loan for a railway that, because of its proximity to the American border, would be vulnerable in the event of war. When the colonial secretary, Lord Grey, gave some encouragement to the idea of a delegation to promote the scheme in England, Hincks left at the end of February, and it was agreed that Howe and Chandler would join him.
The railway was the main reason for his mission to England, but Hincks also hoped to see the imperial parliament repeal its Clergy Reserve Act of 1841 and thus clear the way for the Canadian legislature to solve the reserves problem on its own terms. He also intended to press for negotiations for a reciprocity treaty with the United States. But he encountered one frustration after another. Howe did not come to England, although in the end his absence made little difference. The Whigs had been defeated in parliament before Hincks arrived and the attitude of the new colonial secretary, Sir John Somerset Pakington, soon convinced Hincks that, though the government was procrastinating regarding the railway, the Saint John valley route would ultimately be denied the imperial guarantee. Determined that Canada should at least have a main trunk line from Quebec to its western boundary, he concluded an arrangement with the British firm of Peto, Brassey, Jackson and Betts to build a line approximately 330 miles long from Montreal to Toronto and Hamilton as a private, rather than a publicly owned, enterprise.
Before he returned home in late spring, Pakington had come to personify for Hincks the exasperation he had experienced in England. Ignoring Hincks, Pakington informed Lord Elgin in Canada that the imperial Clergy Reserve Act would not be repealed in the current session. Upon learning indirectly of Pakington's dispatch, Hincks hastened to warn him that "there will be no end of agitation in Canada if the attempt be made to settle this question permanently according to public opinion in England instead of that of the province itself." Finally, Pakington rejected Hincks's proposal to encourage the United States to enter a reciprocity agreement (thus enabling Canada to gain more revenue from canal tolls) by granting American vessels free navigation of the St Lawrence River. The colonial secretary insisted that the Americans must make an equivalent concession.
In the parliamentary session which began late in the summer of 1852 Hincks's main priorities were to have his railway arrangements approved and to obtain endorsement of his warning to Pakington concerning the clergy reserves. His resolutions asserting that the Canadian parliament had the constitutional right to settle the reserves question without interference from England passed without difficulty despite objections from Brown and Henry John Boulton*. In the hands of Hincks and William Mather Jackson, a partner in the firm of Peto, Brassey, Jackson and Betts who accompanied him back to Canada, plans for the Grand Trunk were expanded during the fall and winter of 1852–53 into a line stretching from Sarnia to the year-round port of Portland, Maine. Jackson, aided by Hincks, who entered into personal negotiations with Alexander Tilloch Galt*, purchased or leased charters, rights, and partially completed railways, and committed his firm to build some 1,100 miles of track. The Grand Trunk was to be financed by an issue of stocks and debentures floated in April 1853 by Baring Brothers and Glyn, Mills and Company on the London exchange. The contractor agreed to hold an equal amount of stock for later sale, and the Canadian government was to guarantee bonds worth £3,000 for every mile completed. When his Grand Trunk bills came up in the house in 1852, 1853, and 1854, Hincks, as he confidently expected, obtained solid majorities in favour.
Hincks's Municipal Loan Fund Bill was another measure for his special attention. He was convinced that municipalities in Canada West were excellent sources of funds for investment in railways and other important communication links, but he knew how difficult it was for them to sell their debentures in Britain. In an effort to make credit more readily available he introduced his bill in 1852 which authorized the provincial government to sell municipal loan fund debentures and to lend the proceeds to municipalities for investment in railway, canal, and road companies. As security for such loans the province would accept the municipalities' own debentures. Although the measure led several cities and towns to overextend their financial base, this danger was apparently not foreseen, for the bill encountered little opposition either in the legislature or in the press.
Though he had attended his first session as a member in 1851, Brown had soon emerged as the government's most aggressive critic on church–state matters and on questions of representation within the assembly. He felt Hincks was betraying Baldwin's ideal of a single, well-endowed provincial university by his bill in 1853 to transform the University of Toronto into an examining authority and to give its teaching functions to church and non-denominational colleges which would be affiliated with the university. He saw the government's Ecclesiastical Corporations Bill of 1853 as an even greater evil, one which would result in numerous incorporated religious bodies with large land holdings locked up forever in mortmain and capable of exercising extensive power that could pose a threat to the country's liberties. For Brown this bill and legislation introduced in 1853 to expand the provisions for separate schools in Upper Canada showed that Morin and his followers controlled the Reform alliance. Brown saw the solution in representation by population: if the principle of equal representation in the assembly for each section of the province gave way to representation based on population, the danger for Canada West would disappear because it now had the larger population. Hincks knew "rep by pop" was a threat to the Reform alliance and to the Canadian union itself. "The truth," Hincks was reported as declaring in the assembly in rejecting Brown's arguments, "was that the people occupying Upper and Lower Canada were not homogeneous: but they differed in feelings, language, laws, religion and institutions, and therefore the union must be considered as between two distinct peoples, each returning an equal number of representatives."
In September 1853 the implications of a transaction entered into by Hincks in 1852 became a public concern. Shortly after his return to Canada, Mayor John George Bowes* of Toronto had proposed that they purchase jointly city of Toronto debentures which the contractors building the Ontario, Simcoe and Huron Railroad Union Company were willing to sell at a 20 per cent discount. Confident that he could arrange a profitable resale of the debentures through his contacts in London, Hincks readily agreed. He soon received, through Glyn, Mills and Company, an offer to purchase the debentures if they were issued in sterling and made payable in London. These requirements presented no problem. The government of Canada had just consolidated the city's municipal debt, in which these debentures were included, through an act in 1852; Toronto City Council, unaware that the mayor and Hincks now owned the securities, issued new debentures in sterling payable anywhere. Hincks and Bowes were thus able to exchange the debentures they bought for £40,000 for new ones that could be readily sold for £50,000. After deducting expenses they cleared a profit of slightly more than £8,000. But the city now entered a suit against Bowes and it was revealed that Hincks was indeed his partner in the stock manipulation of the "£10,000 job." In his own mind Hincks did not believe he had acted dishonestly, but he was powerless to stem the rising tide of innuendo. As a result he was also suspected of having profited from his position and inside knowledge in a whole series of nefarious schemes.
Brown claimed that prior knowledge of the amalgamation in 1854 of the St Lawrence and Atlantic Railroad with the Grand Trunk had enabled Hincks to make a profit by investing in depressed shares of the former company. Actually, he had not bought St Lawrence and Atlantic shares until after the amalgamation had been announced and their price had risen considerably. The rumour also circulated that Hincks had received a commission for arranging a loan in England for the city of Montreal. In fact the negotiations he was conducting on behalf of Montreal collapsed, but Hincks refused to admit that he had acted improperly in this assignment and also stated that had he been successful he would have expected a commission. Malfeasance was suspected when it was learned that some 1,000 shares of Grand Trunk stock had been entered in Hincks's name on the company's books and that the initial deposit on the shares had been paid by Sir Samuel Morton Peto of the contracting firm. The donation of railway shares appeared to his enemies to be an obvious bribe. The company's explanation, not very convincing, was that the stock was allotted to Hincks in trust for distribution in Canada, thereby permitting Canadian investors to acquire it at par, and that Hincks never personally received any of the stock. Numerous other charges, which began to appear in September 1853 and continued until June 1854, were added as the Globe, the Montreal Gazette, and other newspapers labelled Hincks the "arch-corruptionist." It was suggested that his opposition to the incorporation of a company to build a canal on the Canadian side of the border at Sault Ste Marie was due to his financial interests in the area which would be adversely affected. He was accused of using political influence on behalf of a land speculation syndicate, to which Samuel Sylvester Mills* and James Morris* also belonged, to enable it to acquire government property at prices much below its true value. Subsequent investigations would reveal that these charges were based on rumour and misinformation rather than hard fact.
Hincks returned from a voyage to England and to the United States, where he participated in the negotiation of the Reciprocity Treaty, in June 1854. The assembly met soon after, on 13 June, and he was confronted by a hostile house determined to drive the Hincks–Morin administration out of office. The government was accused of corruption and extravagance and of procrastination in dealing with seigneurial tenure and the clergy reserves (the imperial act having finally been repealed in late 1852). When a motion of censure was carried, Hincks and Morin advised Elgin to dissolve parliament. In the election in August 1854, Hincks, again afraid of being defeated in Oxford, ran in Renfrew as well. Although elected in both ridings, he sat for Renfrew as had been pre-arranged with John Egan*, who had supported his nomination on that condition. Hincks and Morin won the largest number of seats, but failed to obtain a clear majority. Their minority government was defeated shortly after parliament met in early September and the leaders submitted their resignations on the 8th.
Hincks knew that Brown and John Sandfield Macdonald aspired to reconstruct the Reform party in Canada West, and he feared that Brown's influence might destroy the alliance with Morin's followers and thus imperil both the union and Canada's economic prospects. He tried to form alternative alignments. The alignment which occurred differed from any he had envisaged, but it was one of which he fully approved; MacNab approached Morin and proposed a coalition of Liberals and Conservatives. It was agreed by both groups that the coalition's programme would include secularizing the clergy reserves, abolishing seigneurial tenure, and making the Legislative Council elective. At Morin's request MacNab agreed to include Hincks's followers in the coalition and, after further discussion with Hincks, Robert Spence* and John Ross* were named to represent the Hincksites in the cabinet.
Once the new government had taken office the actions of Hincks and his associates were investigated. Select committees of both the assembly and the Legislative Council met from 26 Oct. 1854 until the end of April 1855. As a member of the assembly's committee Brown appeared, at times, to be both judge and prosecutor. But, in spite of his determined efforts, the committee reported that the evidence presented to it would not support a charge of corruption against any member of the late administration. Indeed the committee expressed its amazement that after all the rumours no one appeared before it to make formal charges or to offer evidence. To the committee Hincks insisted that the acceptance of office did not deprive a man of his right to participate in legitimate investments; such a position was bound to result in suspicion and rumours of scandal, but no evidence was presented to prove that he had ever used the powers of his office or inside information for personal gain. He maintained that his speculation in Toronto debentures was a legitimate transaction, in which any investor might have participated. The Court of Chancery had ruled that, as mayor, Bowes could only have acted as a trustee of Toronto and must therefore give his half of the profit to the city. There were no grounds to sue Hincks for the other half.
Not intending to remain in politics Hincks resigned his seat on 16 Nov. 1855. He planned a visit to England and Ireland and, upon his return, to accept the offer of the presidency of the Grand Trunk Railway. However, in the spring of 1856, while still in Great Britain, Hincks accepted appointment as governor of Barbados and the Windward Islands; after the accusations he had faced in Canada such an appointment, at the hands of Queen Victoria, was the ultimate vindication. During his term as governor he worked to improve the social conditions and educational facilities on the islands and won the approbation both of their inhabitants and of the authorities in England. He established a nonsectarian board of education and urged that the number of schools be increased. His concern over the poor living conditions of the native population led him to propose that large numbers should be relocated on unoccupied lands on other islands and that each family be given land on which to maintain themselves. His plans were only partially successful because the planters, fearing a reduction in the labour supply, opposed them. In September 1861, Hincks was appointed governor of British Guiana (Guyana) with an increase in salary and rank and, at the same time, was created a cb. But he soon clashed with a group of business and professional men whose leaders, known as the "Bermuda Clique," wished to wrest power from the planters and the governor and demanded a more representative form of government as a means to this end. Because he felt the colony was not yet ready for such a system, Hincks opposed the move. His quarrels with the chief justice of the colony, William Beaumont, who was determined to reduce the power and authority of the governor and his executive, together with the constant stream of plaintive appeals each addressed to the Colonial Office, probably explain why Hincks did not receive a reappointment when his term ended in 1869. He was, however, recommended for a knighthood which he received in that year.
While Hincks was visiting Canada in 1869, Sir John A. Macdonald* offered him the post of minister of finance as a replacement for John Rose whose resignation had followed a cabinet decision to withdraw his banking bill. Hincks accepted, and upon taking up his office on 9 Oct. 1869 he turned to the difficult unfinished business of regulating the banks and currency of the country. He was elected to the house for Renfrew North on 13 November.
Rose had hoped to do away with the notes issued by all Canadian banks and to replace them by dominion notes. He had been defeated by the combined opposition of Liberal politicians and Ontario businessmen and financiers such as Senator William McMaster. Hincks personally preferred a bank of issue, but he knew he must compromise. On 15 Feb. 1870 he stated that the special status of the Bank of Montreal, which had become the sole issuer of government notes, was to be terminated after a six-month period of notice. He then obtained the agreement of bankers from Ontario, including McMaster, to a bill which defined the concurrent circulation of bank and government notes: notes issued by banks were limited to amounts of $4.00 and higher; dominion notes only were to be issued for smaller denominations. Although the bankers had won the most lucrative share of the business, Hincks improved the government's position with a requirement that each bank normally should hold one-half and never less than one-third of its cash reserve in dominion notes. His first bank act encountered some opposition but passed both houses in 1870.
The next year the main provisions in the act were extended and a new bank act consolidated the 1870 and earlier acts. The spirit of compromise was kept alive: in the face of opposition from spokesmen for small banks, Hincks reduced the minimum capital for banks starting up from $1,000,000 to $500,000 with 20 per cent paid up. All the provisions of the act would apply to the 19 banks whose charters it renewed and to future bank charters, but special provisions were inserted to govern banks whose charters were not up for renewal and to meet the particular needs of some institutions. Hincks had succeeded in ending the stalemate he had inherited in 1869 and in establishing the principle of general legislation applying equally to the banks and currency in the country.
As minister of finance Hincks performed his duties ably, but he was losing his zest for politics and, in addition, was disturbed by his cool reception from many coalition Liberal-Conservatives. Although he was re-elected for the constituency of Vancouver in the general contest of 1872 he longed to be free of his cabinet responsibilities. On 21 Feb. 1873 he resigned as minister but retained his seat in the house. He did not run in the 1874 general election, and with the defeat of Macdonald's government he moved to Montreal and began to contribute editorials to the Journal of Commerce. In 1871 he had become the first president of the Toronto-based Confederation Life Association and retained that position until 1873 (he sat on the board of directors until 1879). He assumed the presidency of the Consolidated Bank of Canada in 1875, but age and infirmity led him to neglect his duties and to sign documents without adequate scrutiny. When the bank failed he was indicted on 6 Feb. 1879 under his own banking legislation for making a "wilfully false and deceptive return." Hincks was found guilty by Samuel Cornwallis Monk of the Queen's Bench, but on a motion by the defence Monk reserved the case for the full court. The original verdict was overturned and Hincks acquitted, but he was censured for his negligence. At a special general meeting of the shareholders of the bank held on 18 September, he was voted out of office.
Though retired, he remained active and in 1878 served as the federal government's representative on the Ontario–Manitoba boundary commission. He also enjoyed assisting John Charles Dent, the historian, in the preparation of his Canadian portrait gallery and The last forty years, and subsequently began working on his own reminiscences. Unfortunately, he had left it too late and the book he published in 1884 fell far short of the work he might have produced earlier. His second wife died in 1880 and he spent his last years living with his daughter, Ellen Ready. In August 1885 he contracted smallpox when an epidemic struck Montreal, and he died on the 18th of the month.
It was during the years before he became premier that Hincks was most productive. In this period he acquired the business and banking experience upon which his reputation as a financial administrator rested, and through the Examiner became the leading spokesman for the Upper Canadian Reform movement. His political astuteness and foresight led him to realize that, given the permanence of the French fact in Canada, some form of consociational democracy was the key to political power. He was one of the first Reformers to see that an English-French alliance would become a basic factor in Canadian politics and he took the initiative to achieve such an alliance. Ironically, in 1841, when his political pragmatism and his willingness to compromise led him to separate temporarily from Baldwin and La Fontaine, he became permanently labelled as a political opportunist.
Upon moving to Montreal in 1844 he hoped to make the Pilot a link between Reformers in both sections of the province, but he never attained his objective. He exercised considerable influence with La Fontaine and his French Canadian followers, but he had isolated himself from the Reformers in Canada West. As Brown's influence grew in the western half of the province, Hincks's declined, a fact he deeply resented. It was probably his business and banking background that led him to regard responsible government as a means of obtaining the power not only to secularize the clergy reserves and solve the seigneurial tenure problem, but also to promote railway building and economic expansion. He was the first Reformer to commit himself deeply to the development of Canada's economic potential.
Despite the enthusiasm with which Hincks and Morin took office in 1851, they failed to achieve their primary objectives with regard to the clergy reserves and seigneurial tenure. Hincks contributed in an important way to the creation of the Grand Trunk Railway, but because of the difficulties it soon encountered it became a political liability rather than an asset. He had hoped to reunite the diverse elements of the Reform party in Canada West, but his efforts were unsuccessful. He then worked to form a new political alignment that would preserve both the English-French alliance and the union of the Canadas, and thus contributed to the formation of the Liberal-Conservative coalition even as he was forced out of office in 1854. Hincks undoubtedly saw the years that followed as a vindication of his reputation – in reality they were an anticlimax. Although he served successfully as a colonial governor and then as a minister of finance under John A. Macdonald, he never regained his former enthusiasm for politics and economic development.
Tradition has it that Hincks was a financial genius – it would be more accurate to say that he was a successful financial administrator. His banking skill kept the Bank of the People solvent during a period of economic crisis, and as inspector general he helped to restore Canada's financial reputation by putting the province's finances on a sound footing. Baring Brothers and other British financial houses held him in high regard. He was given credit by Samuel Zimmerman* and many other Canadian entrepreneurs for establishing a favourable economic environment for railway building and development. But he was apparently incapable of applying his talents to his own private affairs. At no time was he a wealthy man, and he rarely made sizable profits on his investments. He was frequently hard pressed by the want of relatively small sums of money, and late in life, when he came to draw up his will, he did not expect much to be left of his estate after his debts were paid.
William G. Ormsby
The most important writings of Sir Francis Hincks are the following: The political history of Canada between 1840 and 1855: a lecture delivered on the 17th October, 1877, at the request of the St. Patrick's National Association, with copious additions (Montreal, 1877); Religious endowments in Canada: the clergy reserve and rectory questions: a chapter of Canadian history (London, 1869); and Reminiscences of his public life (Montreal, 1884). Other publications are listed in National union catalog and Biblio. of Canadiana (Staton and Tremaine) and its First supp. (Boyle and Colbeck), or can be found in the AO pamphlet collection. Hincks was also the editor of the Examiner (Toronto) from 3 July 1838 to June 1842, and of the Pilot and Journal of Commerce (Montreal) from 5 March 1844 to 27 March 1848.
BNQ, mss-101, Coll. La Fontaine (copies at PAC). MTL, Robert Baldwin papers; Thomas Strahan Shenston papers. PAC, MG 24, B30, 1; B68. Can., Prov. of, Legislative Assembly, App. to the journals, 1854–55, XIV: app.A.A.A.A. The Consolidated Bank of Canada: a compilation, comp. J. F. Norris (Montreal, 1879). "How history is written: the Hincks to Dent letters," ed. Elizabeth Nish, Rev. du Centre d'Étude du Québec (Montréal), no.2 (avril 1968): 29–96. Dent, Canadian portrait gallery. DNB. Notman and Taylor, Portraits of British Americans. G. E. Boyce; Hutton of Hastings: the life and letters of William Hutton, 1801–61 (Belleville, Ont., 1972). R. M. Breckenridge, The history of banking in Canada (Washington, 1910). Careless, Brown, I; Union of the Canadas. G. M. Craig, Upper Canada: the formative years, 1784–1841 (Toronto, 1963). Dent, Last forty years. S. [B.] Leacock, Baldwin, LaFontaine, Hincks: responsible government (Toronto, 1907); new ed. issued under title: Mackenzie, Baldwin, LaFontaine, Hincks (London and Toronto, 1926). R. S. Longley, Sir Francis Hincks: a study of Canadian politics, railways, and finance in the nineteenth century (Toronto, 1943). Monet, Last cannon shot. W. G. Ormsby, The emergence of the federal concept in Canada, 1839–1845 (Toronto, 1969). Adam Shortt, "Founders of Canadian banking: Sir Francis Hincks, most notable of Canadian ministers of finance," Canadian Banker, 33 (1925–26): 25–38; "Hist. of Canadian currency, banking and exchange," Canadian Banker, 10–13.
Office Holders – Colonial administrators
Politicians – Provincial and territorial governments
Communications – Newspapers and magazines – Journalists
North America – West Indies (Caribbean)
South America – Guyana
North America – Canada – Ontario – Southwest
North America – Canada – Quebec – Montréal/Outaouais
North America – Canada – British Columbia – Vancouver Island
BAGOT, Sir CHARLES (Vol. 7)BALDWIN, ROBERT (Vol. 8)BALDWIN, WILLIAM WARREN (Vol. 7)BOULTON, HENRY JOHN (Vol. 9)BOWES, JOHN GEORGE (Vol. 9)BROWN, GEORGE (Vol. 10)BRUCE, JAMES, 8th Earl of Elgin and 12th Earl of Kincardine (Vol. 9)CAMERON, MALCOLM (Vol. 10)More
CAYLEY, WILLIAM (Vol. 11)CHANDLER, EDWARD BARRON (Vol. 10)DENT, JOHN CHARLES (Vol. 11)DORION, Sir ANTOINE-AIMÉ (Vol. 12)DRUMMOND, LEWIS THOMAS (Vol. 11)DUNN, JOHN HENRY (Vol. 8)EGAN, JOHN (Vol. 8)GALT, Sir ALEXANDER TILLOCH (Vol. 12)HINCKS, WILLIAM (Vol. 10)HOLTON, LUTHER HAMILTON (Vol. 10)LA FONTAINE, Sir LOUIS-HIPPOLYTE (Vol. 9)MACDONALD, JOHN SANDFIELD (Vol. 10)MACDONALD, Sir JOHN ALEXANDER (Vol. 12)MACKENZIE, WILLIAM LYON (Vol. 9)MacNAB, Sir ALLAN NAPIER (Vol. 9)McDOUGALL, WILLIAM (Vol. 13)McMASTER, WILLIAM (Vol. 11)MORIN, AUGUSTIN-NORBERT (Vol. 9)MORRIS, JAMES (Vol. 9)PARKE, THOMAS (Vol. 9)PERRY, PETER (Vol. 8)ROLPH, JOHN (Vol. 9)ROSE, Sir JOHN (Vol. 11)ROSS, JOHN (1818-71) (Vol. 10)SHENSTON, THOMAS STRAHAN (Vol. 12)SPENCE, ROBERT (Vol. 9)SULLIVAN, ROBERT BALDWIN (Vol. 8)TACHÉ, Sir ÉTIENNE-PASCHAL (Vol. 9)THOMSON, CHARLES EDWARD POULETT, 1st Baron SYDENHAM (Vol. 7)TRUSCOTT, GEORGE (Vol. 8)YOUNG, JOHN (1811-78) (Vol. 10)ZIMMERMAN, SAMUEL (Vol. 8)BLACK, HENRY (Vol. 10)BLAKE, EDWARD (Vol. 14)DALY, Sir DOMINICK (Vol. 9)DAY, CHARLES DEWEY (Vol. 11)DRAPER, WILLIAM HENRY (Vol. 10)ELMSLEY, JOHN (1801-63) (Vol. 9)HART, THEODORE (Vol. 11)HEAD, Sir FRANCIS BOND (Vol. 10)HOWE, JOSEPH (Vol. 10)LAMBTON, JOHN GEORGE, 1st Earl of Durham (Vol. 7)METCALFE, CHARLES THEOPHILUS, 1st Baron METCALFE (Vol. 7)MILLS, SAMUEL SYLVESTER (Vol. 10)PRINCE, JOHN (Vol. 9)VIGER, DENIS-BENJAMIN (Vol. 9)AIKINS, JAMES COX (Vol. 13)ALLAN, Sir HUGH (Vol. 11)ARTHUR, Sir GEORGE (Vol. 8)AYLWIN, THOMAS CUSHING (Vol. 10)BADGLEY, WILLIAM (Vol. 11)BAKER, HUGH COSSART (Vol. 8)BEATY, JAMES (Vol. 12)BELLINGHAM, SYDNEY ROBERT (Vol. 12)BETHUNE, ALEXANDER NEIL (Vol. 10)BLAKE, WILLIAM HUME (Vol. 9)BRISTOW, WILLIAM (Vol. 9)BUCHANAN, ISAAC (Vol. 11)BURNS, ROBERT EASTON (Vol. 9)CAMERON, ALEXANDER (Vol. 12)CAMERON, JOHN HILLYARD (Vol. 10)CAMPBELL, ROLLO (Vol. 10)CANNON, LAWRENCE JOHN (Vol. 15)CARON, RENÉ-ÉDOUARD (Vol. 10)CARTIER, Sir GEORGE-ÉTIENNE (Vol. 10)CARTWRIGHT, JOHN SOLOMON (Vol. 7)CARTWRIGHT, Sir RICHARD JOHN (Vol. 14)CAUCHON, JOSEPH (baptized Joseph-Édouard) (Vol. 11)CAWTHRA, JOSEPH (Vol. 7)CHABOT, JEAN (Vol. 8)CHADWICK, CHARLES ELI (Vol. 12)CHARBONNEL, ARMAND-FRANÇOIS-MARIE DE (Vol. 12)CHAUVEAU, PIERRE-JOSEPH-OLIVIER (Vol. 11)CHRISTIE, DAVID (Vol. 10)CORDNER, JOHN (Vol. 12)CUMBERLAND, FREDERIC WILLIAM (Vol. 11)CUVILLIER, AUSTIN (Vol. 7)DALTON, THOMAS (Vol. 7)DALY, THOMAS MAYNE (1827-85) (Vol. 11)DE BLAQUIÈRE, PETER BOYLE (Vol. 8)DENISON, GEORGE TAYLOR (1816-1873) (Vol. 10)DESBARATS, GEORGE-ÉDOUARD (Vol. 12)DONLEVY, CHARLES (Vol. 8)DORION, JEAN-BAPTISTE-ÉRIC (Vol. 9)FERRIE, ADAM (1777-1863) (Vol. 9)GOODERHAM, WILLIAM (1790-1881) (Vol. 11)GOULD, JOSEPH (Vol. 11)GOWAN, OGLE ROBERT (Vol. 10)GOWAN, Sir JAMES ROBERT (Vol. 13)GUGY, BARTHOLOMEW CONRAD AUGUSTUS (Vol. 10)GUITTÉ, P.-J. (Vol. 9)GURNETT, GEORGE (Vol. 9)GWYNNE, WILLIAM CHARLES (Vol. 10)
SULLIVAN, ROBERT BALDWIN
HINCKS, WILLIAM
BALDWIN, WILLIAM WARREN
BALDWIN, ROBERT
ELMSLEY, JOHN (1801-63)
ROLPH, JOHN
MACKENZIE, WILLIAM LYON
HEAD, Sir FRANCIS BOND
LAMBTON, JOHN GEORGE, 1st Earl of Durham
LA FONTAINE, Sir LOUIS-HIPPOLYTE
THOMSON, CHARLES EDWARD POULETT, 1st Baron SYDENHAM
MORIN, AUGUSTIN-NORBERT
DAY, CHARLES DEWEY
BLACK, HENRY
BAGOT, Sir CHARLES
DUNN, JOHN HENRY
METCALFE, CHARLES THEOPHILUS, 1st Baron METCALFE
DALY, Sir DOMINICK
DRAPER, WILLIAM HENRY
VIGER, DENIS-BENJAMIN
HART, THEODORE
DRUMMOND, LEWIS THOMAS
BROWN, GEORGE
BLAKE, EDWARD
CAYLEY, WILLIAM
BRUCE, JAMES, 8th Earl of Elgin and 12th Earl of Kincardine
MacNAB, Sir ALLAN NAPIER
HOLTON, LUTHER HAMILTON
DORION, Sir ANTOINE-AIMÉ
CAMERON, MALCOLM
MACDONALD, JOHN SANDFIELD
CHANDLER, EDWARD BARRON
TACHÉ, Sir ÉTIENNE-PASCHAL
YOUNG, JOHN (1811-78)
GALT, Sir ALEXANDER TILLOCH
BOWES, JOHN GEORGE
EGAN, JOHN
ROSS, JOHN (1818-71)
McMASTER, WILLIAM
DENT, JOHN CHARLES
ZIMMERMAN, SAMUEL
ROSE, Sir JOHN
CUVILLIER, AUSTIN
HAGERMAN, CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER
ARTHUR, Sir GEORGE
BAKER, HUGH COSSART
CHABOT, JEAN
McNAB, ARCHIBALD, 17th Chief of Clan MACNAB
RICHARDSON, JOHN (1796-1852)
SHERWOOD, HENRY
WIDMER, CHRISTOPHER
DORION, JEAN-BAPTISTE-ÉRIC
GURNETT, GEORGE
HARRISON, SAMUEL BEALEY
LEMIEUX, FRANÇOIS-XAVIER
STANTON, ROBERT
THOMSON, EDWARD WILLIAM
AYLWIN, THOMAS CUSHING
BETHUNE, ALEXANDER NEIL
CAMERON, JOHN HILLYARD
CAMPBELL, ROLLO
CARON, RENÉ-ÉDOUARD
CHRISTIE, DAVID
GOWAN, OGLE ROBERT
GUGY, BARTHOLOMEW CONRAD AUGUSTUS
LEWIS, JOHN BOWER
MEILLEUR, JEAN-BAPTISTE
MIDDLETON, ROBERT
NICOLLS, JASPER HUME
RIDOUT, GEORGE PERCIVAL
SANBORN, JOHN SEWELL
SCATCHERD, THOMAS
WILLSON, HUGH BOWLBY
ALLAN, Sir HUGH
BADGLEY, WILLIAM
CAUCHON, JOSEPH (baptized Joseph-Édouard)
CHAUVEAU, PIERRE-JOSEPH-OLIVIER
CUMBERLAND, FREDERIC WILLIAM
DALY, THOMAS MAYNE (1827-85)
GOODERHAM, WILLIAM (1790-1881)
GOULD, JOSEPH
LESSLIE, JAMES
MORRISON, ANGUS
MORRISON, JOSEPH CURRAN
PRICE, JAMES HERVEY
RICHARDS, Sir WILLIAM BUELL
RYAN, THOMAS
RYERSON, EGERTON
SICOTTE, LOUIS-VICTOR
STEPHENS, HARRISON
TAYLOR, JOHN FENNINGS
TODD, ALPHEUS
WRIGHT, AMOS
William G. Ormsby, "HINCKS, Sir FRANCIS," in Dictionary of Canadian Biography, vol. 11, University of Toronto/Université Laval, 2003–, accessed January 29, 2023, http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/hincks_francis_11E.html.
Permalink: http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/hincks_francis_11E.html
Author of Article: William G. Ormsby
Title of Article: HINCKS, Sir FRANCIS


Cyberya is a case of what happens when a band asks themselves the question, "what should we do to be noticed?"
Well, they decided to answer it by producing...wait for it...an album that sounds like the lovechild of Rammstein and Angel Dust, with a bit of Gamma Ray added in for the chorii. This is a cross of poppy Industrial music and anthemic Power Metal, and while I don't like the abundance of songs that just plod along in the verse-chorus-verse mode (I'd like it to be less like Rammstein and more like Ministry, for instance), this is good for what it is. As long as you're not expecting anything brilliant, this is quite a catchy and charming little album, with its chunky, crunchy guitar tone, crystal-clear production, odd electronic flourishes, and of course the charismatic, flexible vocals of Paul Dahlmann, who sounds like a cross between Nils K. Rue and Kai Hansen. This is about evenly distributed between its two source genres, borrowing the riff-heavy approach of Power Metal and the repetitive, droning nature of Industrial.
You pretty much know what you're going to get here, as the first song, the epic, smashing "Ministry of T.E.C.H." sums things up perfectly - you have a cool intro, some decent riffs, a verse or two and then the poppy, layered and extremely catchy chorus, which will be hammered into your head about a million times before the song ends. This isn't a very complex album, and it gets dull on some songs, but with tracks as good as the aforementioned "Ministry of T.E.C.H.," the propulsive "Invisible," the catchy "Since I Loved You," the spacey title track and the best song here in the smashing "Addicted to Warfare," you can't go wrong with Cyberya when you're not in the mood for something too demanding. We probably won't ever get another album from these guys, but Mindcontrol is good enough. Recommended.


Renovation a rest room may be each expensive and time overriding. The costlier flooring options sometimes show to be the more difficult ones to take care of, although. Whenever you get estimates from potential contractors, it is important to discuss all of the potential extras that could contribute to the overall value of this undertaking.
I've labored with many contractors, and the outline of costs for the 15K-30K category is horrible. Most state and local authorities require permits to verify all the work is completed according to building codes. From there, the plan goes to the native constructing allow office and onto the report on your dwelling.
Designer Justin Riordan recommends going vibrant white when painting cupboards in a kitchen rework. New Development: Constructing a new home or a new construction on the property reminiscent of a garage, guest home or gazebo. Together with your preferrred funds in thoughts, now you can start to get an concept of how a lot you have to be spending on the smaller tasks that go right into a kitchen rework.
Laminate ($2,500) : cheap, comes in a wide range of styles, however requires common maintenance. The method involves transferring and working additional gasoline strains in a kitchen, plus you need to upend flooring and knock out walls to get to the gas line. You must think about your local housing market to help decide potential ROI.
If changing tile or vinyl flooring, much less-expensive choices like sealed cork can be a good choice not only for price, however as a result of they're easier on the ft and again than exhausting tiles and woods. Structural Engineers : If you're planning an addition, altering the stairs or pulling down load-bearing walls, you'd be effectively-advised to seek the advice of with a structural engineer to make sure your plans can be completed safely.
How A lot Does It Cost To Renovate A Home In Ottawa Anyway?


text:
The Flood Circle
Ebook: Amazon | Apple Books | Barnes & Noble | Kobo | Smashwords
Print: Amazon | Barnes & Noble
Audiobook download: Apple Books | Barnes & Noble | Bookshop.org | Kobo
Audiobook cd: Bookshop.org | Indiebound | Mysterious Galaxy
I have already described the origin of The Flood Circle in my post about The Iron Gate. Kickstarter. Backers. Fulfillment. Novel. A few people have expressed surprise that I am releasing another book so soon after the previous one. Well, I wrote both together, sort of. First draft and revision for The Iron Gate. First draft and revision for this one. Second revision then second revision. Beta read and then beta read, and so on. The real question is why has the delay between books been so long?
But when I sat down to work out the story, I had to ask myself: Is this the last Twenty Palaces novel?
I could have cut things short. Definitely. I could have tried to arrange the story so that the finale of this book was the midpoint of another, very different book. Then I could have wrapped everything up in a single novel.
It was tempting. I recently discovered that I am not, in fact, growing younger as the years go by. In addition, I like a fast-moving story. Why not put Ray and Annalise through the ringer? Why not… I don't know… turn my final idea for a novel into a ten thousand word epilogue or something?
It wouldn't work, though. There was still too much story to tell. There was too much I wanted to get done, and the danger of rushing a story is that it loses its emotional impact.
So there's going to be one more book after this one, called Twenty-One Palaces. I know the general setting but I have zero plot beats figured out. The stakes, the tone, the supporting cast are all a mystery.
But that's for the future. For now: The Flood Circle
Here's the synopsis:
The three original spellbooks, source of all magic in the world, have been found, and Ray Lilly has already "acquired" one. Now he and Annalise are on a historic mission to get the other two and they're ready to kill anyone who gets in their way.
If they succeed, the Twenty Palace Society will become more powerful than it has ever been and could truly safeguard humanity from both extra-dimensional predators and the people who summon them.
But this time their enemies are more formidable than any they've ever faced before. What starts as a covert mission to hunt sorcerers quickly collapses into a desperate—and very public—struggle to survive. Can Ray and Annalise track down and kill these sorcerers before they execute a plan to drive the human race to the edge of extinction?
As usual, I'll be turning the buy links below into actual links as the book appears on each site.
Tantor is still doing the audiobooks, and they're planning to keep the narrator from previous editions of Twenty Palaces. I'll add those links as they appear.
You may have noticed fewer options for a print copy this time around. Normally, I set up a print version within Amazon and through Lightning Source's Ingram Spark system. Ingram's distribution system is very wide, allowing you to walk into pretty much any bookstore in the English-speaking world and say "Can you order a copy of The Flood Circle for me?"
It also gave readers a lot of choices (for print) that were not Amazon. Bookshop.org and Indiebound both explicitly support independent bookstores. And while the markup at those two shops can be intense, supporting indie stores is a worthwhile goal.
Except it mostly never happens. My most recent bestselling book through LSIS has been Twenty Palaces, and that book sold only twenty copies. Over two years.
What's more, LSIS wanted to charge me eighty dollars to put the book up for sale.
The POD print editions are already too expensive for readers, and the system is too expensive for me. It's weird to think of a $80 fee as a negative advance that I'll never recoup, but I'm sitting here facing facts and accepting it for what it is.
I'm also thinking that they set the price that high to discourage long-tail idiots like myself, and I'm a guy who can take a hint.
So this time around, the only print options will be Amazon and B&N. Sorry about that.
And please, if you like my books, please tell your friends. In person, on social media, posting a review somewhere. Anything. Please spread the word.
Tags progress, the flood circle, words
Print: Amazon | Barnes & Noble | Bookshop.org | Indiebound | Mysterious Galaxy | Powell's
Some time ago I started wondering how much actual interest there was in a continuation of the Twenty Palaces series. I'd tried the novella route with The Twisted Path, but sales were unremarkable. When I first started publishing with Del Rey, I'd thought I was a mid list writer. Later, it seemed I'd become a writer with a small following, then maybe not even that.
What was the point of trying to plan a career when my choices kept sending me in the wrong direction?
When Kickstarter got around to their brief "Break Kickstarter" idea, I had a really dumb idea: What if I started taking pledges for new Twenty Palaces fiction, but instead of offering a specific goal, I let the backers choose it. Break Kickstarter was meant to encourage people to use the service in a new way, so I set a rate of five cents a word and promised to revisit the series at whatever level of enthusiasm readers chose. No stretch goals. No pledge tiers. For every dollar a backer pledged, they could pick twenty words to call their own.
So, if I made a fifty dollars in pledges, I'd write a thousand-word short story. If pledges were higher, I'd write more, with a cap at two complete novels because I really had no idea how much or how little interest there was.
Well, pledges did hit that cap, and I owed my backers two full novels of at least a hundred thousand words each. The first, called The Iron Gate, is out now.
Here's a description of the story:
Stormy Bay is a dying town nestled against an eerily placid ocean, and Ray Lilly is trapped in it. He can barely remember his name let alone his mission for the Twenty Palace society. Worse, he realizes that for some time now he's been living as a puppet, his body and mind under the complete domination of an unknown power.
And that power can still seize control of Ray's body at any time, forcing him and the people around him to playact in nonsense stories that center around a mysterious boy and his monster dog.
The town and its people shift and change, but only Ray seems to notice. He has no idea what sort of magic has imprisoned all these ordinary folks in Stormy Bay, but he does know he needs to get them, and himself, out.
But that might mean crossing a line he has never crossed before. While Ray has certainly taken lives in his work for the society, it was always in self-defense or in the desperate moments before impending calamity. Can he bring himself to commit cold-blooded murder, even to save dozens of lives?
Next up, after The Iron Gate, will be The Flood Circle, hopefully released sometime next month.
After that, I'll be writing something else to let the creative energies renew. At some point later, finally, I'll be ready to write Twenty-One Palaces, the final Twenty Palaces novel, The one that wraps up the series.
In the meantime, here are buy links to online vendors below. I've hit a few glitches here and there, and will connect to the books as they appear on the various sites. Apple Books is being Apple.
If you want a print edition, options are limited for the moment. I'm waiting for other vendors to connect their catalogs to Lightning Source before I can add them.
As for audio, Tantor will be creating an audiobook that combines The Iron Gate with The Twisted Path, since the latter is a novella and is too small to be on its own. I don't know when that will be available but I will let you guys know.
And I can't wait for the book to be fully out, so I can edit these last four paragraphs out of this post.
In the meantime, if you read the book, please write a review.
Audiobook download: Apple Books | Barnes & Noble | Bookshop.org | Kobo |
Date September 27, 2022
Tags progress, the iron gate, words
New Update at Kickstarter
If you're interested in the progress I'm making on those two new Twenty Palaces novels, check out the latest Kickstarter update.
Tags progress
Welp, It's Black Friday
Today is Black Friday, and if you're planning to visit a bookstore to do any of your holiday shopping, I just want to make note that you ought to be able to order One Man through Ingram.
I hope so, at least. That's how it's supposed to work.
Thanks very much to everyone who bought the book and everyone who has written an online review. Right now, the book is selling to people who already know and like my work, but spreading the word will help this book (and my backlist) reach a larger audience.
At which point I should just say: Happy Leftovers Day. As soon as I finish this, I'm having a turkey sandwich and a slice of apple pie for breakfast, then I'm heading out to work on The Iron Gate.
Tags one man, progress, the iron gate
For Every Failure, an Opportunity
If you're backing my Patreon, you may have noticed that it has been switched back on. That is, it's back to a monthly basis, charging credit cards at the start of every month. I'd turned it "off" because I'd started a new job. As of this week I'm no longer working there, so it's on again.
I've never been fired for being bad at a job before, but you know what? It was the right thing for them to do. I absolutely should have been let go. And I'm glad for it.
In previous posts I was a little cagey about where I'd been hired because it was a six-month contract at a game company, and I was sure how it would go. I'll say now that it was the Valve Corporation over in Bellevue. I'll also say that they asked me not to talk about the games I worked on/heard about/whatever outside of their offices, even to my own family. I haven't done that and I won't start now.
How it happened was this: Gabe, the founder of the company, liked my books and invited me to lunch. This was back in, I think, 2012? 2013? Several months before my Kickstarter for The Great Way, at least. I'd heard of Valve's games but hadn't played any, and I honestly thought he was going to ask if I would write a novel for the company. But lunch wasn't just me and Gabe, we were joined by a bunch of writers already working for the company, and I was all What am I doing here? Nobody needs me to write a novel when they already have Marc Laidlaw sitting right there.
It turned out the offer was to work at the company on the actual games, which I had to decline. I didn't play many video games because a) they were often asking me to do shit that was illegal and immoral, which I hate and b) too many games were boring, making me quit early, and most of all c) if I did like them, I could be obsessive about it. I mean, Freedom Force and its sequel were scads of fun, but playing them, I spent hours with my back to the living room, and every other aspect of my life suffered. I'm not exactly Mr. Moderation. My wife was especially unhappy to be ignored evening after evening while I shot pretend ray guns at cartoon people.
After that lunch meeting, I started playing (and enjoying) games a lot more, and Valve was a big reason for that. I love the Portal and Half-Life games–like, genuinely loved playing them–because they didn't ask me to run errands, murder innocent people or navigate lots of high places without railings (seriously the worst). As my son got older, he started recommending games that suited me better, and so I felt I understood them a little better. I never became good, but they made sense in a conceptual way
Then we came to the end of 2018. I'd taken a big gamble after The Great Way and Key/Egg came out. I put two years into a fat fantasy with a cool setting, a plot that was a little out of the ordinary, and badass characters. The plan was simple. Write a book that stands out, place it with NY publishers, and let the backlist bump spill some extra coins into our savings accounts.
Except it didn't work. Publishers passed. The book was too different, or too something, and there was no new contract and therefore no bump.
At that point, we'd been living off the money from The Great Way for too long and our savings was getting low (not to mention rent increases and a possible eviction in the coming months), so my wife asked me to find a day job, and I thought about Valve, and I reached out. Did, maybe, I have something to contribute there?
Nope! But I didn't know that at the time.
Gabe and his people were nice enough to give me a chance though, working on a multiplayer team-fighting game that was in the very early stages. I was to do worldbuilding for them.
Which meant: Where and Why.
Where are they fighting?
Why are they fighting?
Those were the two questions I was supposed to answer, and over the course of two months, I couldn't make a suggestion that both matched the criteria they'd given me and also made the rest of the team excited. Two full months! Of course they let me go.
As a writer, I've had my share of one-star reviews. And you don't grow up in a family like mine and get all tender-hearted about what people think of you. But when you're sitting in a meeting, and everyone looks miserable because of you–because of the mouth-sounds you're making–well, that suuuuucks.
You guys should have seen some of the body language in the room for that last meeting. Picture, if you will, a person sitting on a bench at a bus stop at night. They've forgotten their jacket, and it's sleeting. That's exactly some of those guys were sitting: hunched over, head down, waiting for all this to just be over.
And that was my fault.
See, it doesn't matter if it's a great company, or that the money was good, or that there was a free salad bar at lunch every day with chick peas you could scoop right into the bowl (seriously, so fucking delicious). None of that shit matters if the work itself is a waste of time to everyone on the team, including the person doing it. That's demoralizing as hell.
Me, personally, I think the setting I created for that last meeting would be a home run in all sorts of media–books, animation, whatever–but not in computer games and certainly not in the game they're working so hard to create. It just didn't fit. And at this point, I don't care where my proposals came up short or if they went too far or what was actually wrong. All that matters is that it wasn't successful, and Valve owns it, and I hope they can cherry-pick a few things out of it that they find useful. And if they can't, sorry, guys.
Where does that leave me? Not unemployed, exactly, since I'm working for myself again.
Those two months helped refill our bank accounts a little, and I have three completed, unreleased novel manuscripts. One is that big gamble. Another is a mystery/thriller with no supernatural elements. Another is the fun fantasy adventure that needs a little bit more tweaking before my agent takes it to NY publishers.
I'm composing this during the time I'm supposed to be writing a novelette for an anthology I've been invited to, but I put that off because I feel like I owe you guys an update on where things stand, fiction-wise. I've spent the last two months squeezing my own projects into the hour before I went into the office, but now that I'm back on my own time, things will go faster.
My fun fantasy will go out to publishers ("Funpunk"! You heard it here first, folks). My big gamble book and the thriller will be self-published. Kickstarter maybe? We'll have to see. I also have to write the next Twenty Palaces novella. And at some point soon, we'll look again at our bank accounts and maybe I'll grab another day job.
So I wanted you to know that, even though I haven't published a new novel since 2015(!) I haven't stopped writing. I haven't stopped working hard. There's new stuff on the horizon and, you know, maybe I won't try those big gambles again.
Tags games, moi?, progress, wasting time, words
Moving Past the Trope: Creativity Through Lists
At the moment, I'm brainstorming for a new novel, and I thought I might help myself along by writing about the process. (And by "help myself along" I mean make myself stop goofing off on Twitter.)
In the moment that any writer looks at a blank page without a good idea of what to put on it, the possibilities are basically infinite. I could write about anything, really, including a random jumble of geometric shapes and nonsense squiggles.
But I don't, because I'm a fiction writer. And I like magic and crime. And I'm a white dude living in America 2017.
And each of those things narrow that range of infinite possibility, because there are some things I'm more likely to write than others. Sounds obvious, right? Sometimes it helps me to think through obvious things.
Other times, I narrow that range with an easy answer. So the question: "Who will be the main antagonist in this book?" could be answered quite easily with a trope: A vampire. A werewolf. A Voldemort. A Lucifer.
And that's fine. Some people love those tropes and want to play with them. Nothing wrong with that, if that's the intent. For me, it's not the intent. I'm hoping to find something on the far side of that trope. Something weird or unusual that readers maybe haven't seen before.
Some readers don't like that. That's fine. But for me, the question is always How do I get there?, and the answer is almost always With a list.
I came across the idea of using lists for creative purposes in a book about writing comedy, especially a standup comedy routine, and it's served me well in my fantasy/horror books ever since. The first step is always to identify the question. The second is to list the easy answers I won't use in my book
So, "Who will the the main antagonist in this book?"
1. Werewolf
2. Vampire
3. Voldemort
4. Lucifer
5. Ghost
6. Genius Serial Killer
7. Shadowy Gov't Agency
And on and on.
I put them on the list because I want them out of the way. I don't have to think about them anymore because they're already on the list.
And let me say once more that I'm not bashing these tropes. I've written two novels with werewolves in them, so I recognize that they exist to be used and they persist because of the readers who love them. But sometimes that's not what I want.
Next, I force myself to keep going. I write down terrible answers, like "ghost horse" or "newborn god of public transit who's sick of waiting for his human sacrifices".
Eventually, I get to weird stuff, like maybe "super-intelligent hive-mind of wharf rats". What do the rats want? How intelligent are they? Will they join the longshoreman's union?
It's weird. Twenty years ago, if you told me my most creative work would come from a nearly rote exercise of making lists, I would have been horrified. And yet, here I am, writing a book about a rat colony that share a single mind.
(Obviously, I'm just kidding. No way am I writing a rat book. The research alone would give me the heebie-jeebies.)
Tags progress, words
The State of the Novelist Address: I just sent a book to my agent
I thought I'd pop in and update things for folks, writing-wise.
First, earlier this week I sent a new novel to my agent. It's a crime/mystery novel, a genre I've been reading for years. This isn't my first attempt at this style, but it is the first one that I feel comfortable with. Some aspects of it fall right down the middle of the genre, while some are probably all wrong and will make me tear my hair out in revisions. We'll see! But it feels good to start a book and send it to her in under six months. I'm not usually that prolific.
Which means I've returned to revision on my Twenty Palaces novella. I know I've been talking about this for a while, but this mini-book has resisted several attempts to write it. At this point, I feel I've solved most of the problems and hope to have it on sale before the end of the year.
Once I finish that, I'll be working on something new. No idea what it will be, but I'm just going to pick an idea that sounds cool and run with it.
Thank you for reading this, and being here.
Tags Jack, moi?, progress, publishing, Twenty Palaces
It's how you spend your free time: the power of small decisions
One of my friends said something really smart on Sunday, and I thought I'd share it.
She and her partner live in Denver, and my son (who is 14) is planning to spend two weeks with them to pick their brains about Photoshop, After Effects, and a number of other programs they use. They make their living using all sorts of fancy software that I don't know anything about, so he has a lot to learn in those two weeks.
ANYWAY. What she said, which I have to paraphrase because it was during an extended conversation, was: "What matters is how you spend your free time."
To which I say: Yep.
Her story is that she was in college some years ago, learning software as part of her design class. I think it was Photoshop, but there was some cross-talk. Anyway, it was relatively new, and she and her friend were so fascinated by it that they spent their free time on a deep dive into the program, learning all the things it could do. In not time, the professor realized that she and her friend were more capable of teaching the software and asked them to do so. When she graduated, they offered her a teaching position.
It wasn't because she was so good in class; it was because she was so engaged outside of it. The same is true of any kind of challenging field. If you want to be great in the arts, you have to cut out time from your daily life to practice and improve. That's time you could be spending watching TV, going to the gym, sleeping in, playing video games, or making money.
If you click on the Tweet below, you'll get a thread by comics writer Gail Simone on this very subject.
[Update: she deleted the whole thread. The gist was that people determined to be writers have to make the time to practice.]
I've tried to explain this to my son, because he acts like his great ambition is to be the best Overwatch player ever. It's gotten to the point that I'm tempted to take away his computer games for good, even though he and I built a gaming computer for him just this past January. (Personally, I try to avoid most games because they're addictive, and I'm vulnerable to that.) Choosing to spend all his free time playing video games is essentially choosing to be a regular joe with a joe job, and the US culture and economy squashes people like that now. If he's going to be squashed, he ought to have the satisfaction of making art (or something!)
And what of myself? Thinking about spending down time always makes me audit myself, and I have to confess that I've been obsessing over Twitter and the election these past few months. It seems like my duty as a citizen to be as informed as possible, but how much of my time and energy do I REALLY need to devote to this? How much can I push off onto other citizens?
Clearly, I need to cut back and focus more on my work. The book I'm revising is complex and I need to get it to my agent so she can sell it. But Twitter is soooo tempting, almost like a video game.
And that's the power of tiny decisions. Not the big stuff, like Where should I go to college or Should I quit my current job for that new one? No, the really important decisions are the huge clusters of tiny ones that we all make every day. Should I work on my book, or should I watch this tv show/go to the gym/hit the pub/etc?
Obviously no one can spend every spare moment of their lives writing (nor should they) but if you never choose writing over those other things that's a clear statement of priorities.
[Added later: See also: Twelve Years from Hobbyist to Pro]
Tags games, one man, progress, publishing, the boy
Sitting in the train station in Los Angeles
Awaiting my last train ride home. In an hour, we board the Coast Starlight which will return us to Seattle about 35 hours from now. I've enjoyed the trip, but I'm so very ready to be home. I guess that means a 30-day trip was exactly right.
We slipped out to Olivera St.–the "Mexico replica" street beside the station, but every place was closed except one. We had delicious Mexican breakfasts and bought burritos for the train. I loved it, although my son scorched his tongue and the experience was therefore ruined.
I haven't been following blogs, or LiveJournals, or anything except Twitter, and even that has been pretty sporadic. You can see some pretty terrible pictures at https://twitter.com/byharryconnolly/media mixing in among my other stuff.
As for my books, I'd hoped to finish One Man on this trip, but it's too hard to write on the train. Too chaotic and distracting, even with my headphones on. Plus, a month of iffy sleep hasn't left me at my best.
Soon, it will be over. I've really enjoyed this trip, but I'm ready to be back at my book in a big way.
Tags moi?, one man, progress
Huge delay in my next book
As I mentioned in a previous post, I'm not going to hit my NaNoWriMo goal. No big deal; I was just using it as a goad to pick up momentum with ONE MAN, my current WIP which has stalled.
It was a new thing for me, and it didn't work.
What I realized on Wednesday was that I needed to start over. I plan to keep most of the 65K I've written so far, but I need to revise it extensively. The protagonist need to be someone else. I'm even going to give him a new name.
So today is the second beginning of my book. It'll be a deeper, stronger story, and I'll be able to make serious progress on it.
Sometimes I wish I could be one of those writers who finish a paragraph, tweak it here or there, then never look at it again. Sometimes I would like to be one of those writers to takes five years for a single book, and just keep revising like mad until it's perfect.
Unfortunately, I'm me, and tossing a book so I can start over is part of how I work.
Tags one man, progress, words
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Writr.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


We do not seek to impose a particular lifestyle on an individual, but encourage them to take responsibility for the choices they make and recognise the impact of their choices on their physical and emotional wellbeing.
They really know their stuff…You can tell that the company values the importance of training and invests in their staff team.
Quote from External Professional in Belvedere's CQC inspection report April 2016.
How do we equip people with independent living skills?
Supporting Service users in the development of independent living skills has been central to the ethos of this organisation since it was established over 30 years ago. Independent living skills are more than just the ability to cook, clean, select appropriate clothing for weather conditions or to travel safely in the community. A very simplistic definition for independent living skills would be the ability to manage the day-to-day tasks of life, doing as much as possible for ourselves. Making choices about our own lives and knowing when to ask for support from others are also a part of independent living skills.
Looking after ourselves and feeling as physically well as possible contributes to the development of confidence, positive self-esteem and wellbeing, and therefore recovery. We encourage and support Service users to attend to their physical healthcare needs. We support people to make and attend appointments with doctors, the dentist, opticians etc. and discuss issues such as diet, exercise, smoking cessation and alcohol consumption.
Developing the ability to manage our finances and live within our means is an important life skill that many of us find challenging. We support individuals to claim the state benefits that they are entitled to, and encourage them to develop a budget plan that works for them. Many of our Service users are able to manage their own money, and we are able to take on corporate appointeeship for those who are not ready to do so.
Making choices about what to eat each day – either it will be communal meals that are agreed and eaten by staff and Service users together, or 'self catering' days where a Service user will choose meals that they prepare for just themselves. We believe that individual and group meals utilise and develop different but equally useful skills.
Shop for food and other household essentials, staying within the budget provided to each home. Basic records are maintained to keep track of the spending.
Prepare meals safely (addressing food hygiene/health and safety issues) and clearing away afterwards.
Personalising bedrooms and living space – choosing the colour scheme (and furnishings where possible) that reflects their style and taste.
Washing and drying clothes and bedding.
Cleaning and tidying the home.
Involvement can start at a very basic level, and will be developed during the placement, at a pace that is realistic yet manageable for each individual.
Independent living skills are not confined to domestic tasks and activities.
It must include having opportunities to make decisions that affect our lives and being able to pursue activities of our own choosing. Having an interesting and fulfilling lifestyle that offers opportunities for personal development and growth is integral to our vision of recovery.
Links with the local community are encouraged. For example, you can get involved in community projects, adult education classes, sports facilities and work experience schemes.
Everyone in the Community is involved in a broad range of activities run by the Community and outside providers. You would be expected to choose or even suggest and participate in a range of these as part of your agreed Care Plan. The Community offers a diverse range of activities, often tailored to meet specific needs and interests of individuals.


Wonderful Ranch Home! So Convenient- Minutes to Ft Drum, shopping and schools. Spacious fully appliance kitchen for the cook in the house. Open floor plan and sliding glass doors that lead to a wonderful back deck perfect for entertaining and grilling. Master suite offers a walk in closet and a large remodeled master bathroom. 1 attached garage and 1 detached garage which is great for the extra vehicle or to store yard items and toys. Public water, low utilities and low taxes. This is a great home! Don't hesitate to schedule a showing today!
I'd like some more information about 26647 Andrew Drive, Le Ray NY. Thank you.
I'd like to request a showing for 26647 Andrew Drive, Le Ray NY. Thank you.