text:
What President Trump Should Say to Kim Jong Un this Summer
South Korea credits Trump for opening door to talks with North
South Korea's foreign minister has said she believes President Donald Trump is largely responsible for bringing North Korean leader Kim Jong-un to the negotiating table.
Kim will become the first North Korean leader to cross the Military Demarcation Line between North and South Korea on Friday for talks with South Korean President Moon Jae-in. President Trump is expected to meet with Kim in May or June.
Hopefully someone in the state department will give Trump cue cards to read from so he doesn't mess this up. Here's a few talking points to start from:
We aren't quite sure that you're serious about denuclearization, but we want to believe you.
If you denuclearize, we'll lift all sanctions and freely trade with your people. We'll provide a market to bring you technology, medicine, nutrition and quality of life.
We want you and South Korea to reconcile your relationship peacefully without U.S. intervention. We want to facilitate peace, but let's be clear, it's peace between you and South Korea. Success or failure is yours alone.
Lifting sanctions and opening up North Korea to the world would increase the quality of life of every North Korean citizen and the history books will attribute it to you (Kim Jong Un). Make no mistake, you will go down as a humanitarian hero, a man whose leadership changed the trajectory of a country and changed the livelihoods of millions of citizens.
The United States will leave the Korean Peninsula once peace returns.
Again, we don't really believe you, but we want to believe you because your citizens deserve humanity:
1985: North Korea signs Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
1992: North Korea signs historic agreement to halt nuclear program! (#1)
1999: North Korea signs historic agreement to end missile tests
2000: North Korea signs historic agreement to reunify Korea! Nobel Peace Prize is awarded
2005: North Korea declares support for "denuclearization" of Korean peninsula
2005: North Korea signs historic agreement to halt nuclear program and "denuclearize"! (#3)
2006: North Korea again support for "denuclearization" of Korean peninsula
2007: N&S Korea sign agreement on reunification
2010: North Korea commits to ending Korean War
2010: North Korea announces commitment to "denuclearize"
2010: North Korea again announces commitment to "denuclearize"
2011: North Korea announces plan to halt nuclear and missile tests
2012: North Korea announces halt to nuclear program
2015: North Korea offers to halt nuclear tests
2016: North Korea again announces support for "denuclearization"
Taxation is Theft Bot
DMR: No, Voter Id Laws aren't Racist; System Lacks Integrity without IDs
Voter ID laws should not be controversial. A few points:
--You must have a government-issued ID in order to drive.
--You must have a government-issued ID in order to fly.
--You must have a government-issued ID in order to ride a train.
--You must have a government-issued ID in order to enter this country and almost any other.
--In many venues, you must even have a government-issued ID in order to buy alcohol, buy tobacco, and be admitted to bars and clubs.
Voting is an even greater responsibility than any of those. Why, then, is it so controversial to require a government-issued ID in order for a person to vote in government elections? Voter fraud isn't a significant problem in this country, but it also isn't non-existent--and any fraud is too much fraud. Requiring voters to present a valid form of identification is one of the easiest, cheapest ways to eliminate one avenue of engaging in fraud.
Many argue that it discriminates against Hispanics and other demographics that are less likely to have government-issued ID's. In my mind, there are two responses to this.
First, all laws affect demographic groups differently. There is no such thing as a law that affects everyone in precisely the same manner. This isn't by itself a reason not to enact a law. If it were, then we could have no laws at all. (For example, even speed limit laws disproportionately impact demographics with higher rates of automobile ownership. Federal minimum wage laws disproportionately impact states with more low-wage earners. And so on.)
Fundamentally, however, there's absolutely nothing standing in the way of anyone in any demographic of getting a government-issued ID. We commonly associate ID's with driver's licenses, but that's a misconception. It is definitely true that not everyone can get a driver's license, but not everyone needs one. States also issue plain ID's.
That brings me to my second point: cost. If state ID's cost $15,000, then there may be validity to the discrimination argument. They don't though. In some states, ID's are completely free, and in most others, they cost no more than $10. If you're a citizen, then you can get one of these ID's at little or no cost. Thus, the only people who truly are locked out of voting by ID laws are people who are not U.S. citizens, and it's illegal for them to vote anyway.
Many counter this by saying, "True, but low-income and less educated demographics frequently do not know how to get these free ID's."
Come on, folks: Individual responsibility is an important value in this country. If you don't know how to do something that you need to know how to do, then you must take some initiative and figure that something out. Acquiring a state ID is simple, and figuring out how to do it doesn't even require an Internet connection.
Here's an idea though. Every election cycle, liberal and conservative activists engage in an implicit competition with each other by shoving as many voter registration forms into the hands their favored demographics. They've figured out how to quickly and simply explain to people how to register to vote and then how to actually vote--both of which are more complicated than getting a state ID. Why don't these groups simply hand out one additional form at the same time: a form explaining how to get an ID. This isn't rocket science. You don't even have to know how to sign your own name in order to get a state ID.
This brings us to the real reason many of these activist groups oppose voter ID laws: politics. Having to hand out an additional form and then have people engage in one additional step before voting would have an impact on the number of people they could smash into the polls after telling them who they should vote for. This, my friends, isn't a good reason for opposing a very basic, common-sense measure that would add just a bit more integrity to an electoral system already under assault by Russia and by dishonest allegations of "millions of fraudulent votes" by one of the very highest officials in our government.
This Texas voter law actually is quite a relaxed voter law. It doesn't even require a government-issued ID at all. You can also use bank statements or even utility statements as forms of ID. You simply have to sign an affidavit explaining why you couldn't obtain an actual ID.
Because it no longer requires a certain form of ID, some are opposing it on the grounds that there are consequences for lying on one's affidavit. Seriously?
Of course there are consequences for lying--again, common sense. Why wouldn't there be? What would be the point of having people sign a document at all if there were no consequences of lying on the document? That would simply waste taxpayer money to print the affidavits in the first place.
Any system in which anyone can walk in off the street to take part in the most critical function of our system on the basis of nothing more than his own word is a system that can never be of complete integrity. Much as we may hate to admit it, some people's word is worth less than a little.
Our system should be as watertight as possible, and that starts with a very basic, cheap (even free) requirement already in force for so much else in our society: showing a form of ID.
What if Uncle Sam Itemized Your Tax Bill So You Knew Where YOUR Money was Going?
As I write this fat check to Uncle Sam, I've always wondered... What if elections were held immediately after we paid our tax bill every year?
What if taxes weren't withheld from everyone's paychecks every year and they had to come up with thousands each April?
What if my tax bill was itemized every year? Rapper Cardi B famously noted that when she gives millions to private charities, she gets emails showing the schools she's helping to build and the kids she's assisting, why doesn't Uncle Sam?
What if your tax bills were itemized? Of the XXX you owe:
$251 goes to Egypt for foreign aid
$14 goes for treadmills for shrimp
$149 goes to govermental printing costs that could be avoided by changing font
$110 goes to Air Force One for unofficial vacations
$.48 on an unused monkey house
$29 fraudulent tax reimbursements to prisoners
$410 on 'improper payments' or fraudulent payments due to lack of financial controls
$1.89 on a 3-week long FAA party
$42 NSA and other gov't use of World of Warcraft as collections platform
$4 U.S. Census commercial that appeared during the Super Bowl
$.22 On a laundry-folding robot
$17 On a study about baby names (and "The astounding conclusion: Popular names are popular with parents.")
Do you think people would be more active in holding politicians/bureaucracy accountable?Who cares more about your money? You or the Government? Of course it's you. Looking at the list above, would you better invest that money in your life or are you glad it went to countries where they openly burn our flag?
50 Examples of Government Waste
The six categories of wasteful and unnecessary spending are:
1.Programs that should be devolved to state and local governments;
2.Programs that could be better performed by the private sector;
3.Mistargeted programs whose recipients should not be entitled to government benefits;
4.Outdated and unnecessary programs;
5.Duplicative programs; and
6.Inefficiency, mismanagement, and fraud.
The first four categories are generally subjective, and reasonable people can disagree on whether a given federal program falls under their purview. Yet the final two categories -- duplication and inefficiency, mismanagement, and fraud -- are comparatively easy to identify and oppose.
See also, 13 Silliest Uses of Taxpayer Money
Since you made it this far down the post, I'll let you in on a little secret. This 4th of July, we're going live with a new website www.Liberty.wiki. We're building out the infrastructure at the moment and learning wiki markup from scratch! Please bookmark it and, once up and running, contribute of your own free will, with an article or two on something that you're an expert at!
The Left/Right Skew of Facebook could make the platform even worse in the future
The question Ted Cruz just asked Mark Zuckerberg is the one question I want to know the answer to....
Does Zuckerberg know, or care about, the political leanings "of the 15-20,000 Facebook employees dedicated to content review"?
Because the thing is, that skew matters.
I have no doubt that Zuckerberg and Facebook don't ask people what their political views are in the hiring process. That's not normally how hiring works. When I applied to work at the CATO Institute i had zero questions about my political leanings. Zero.
But that's not necessary for bias to emerge.
What actually happens is that people self-select into particular industries and companies for a host of reasons, the corporate values and tone of the working environment weeds out a lot, hiring managers tend to hire people generally like themselves so even if they don't ask any particular questions, they're looking for people they can work with so obviously finding points of agreement around interests and values help people get jobs in the first place.
And Facebook is located in the Bay Area in California, which has its own skew.
The problem, though, is that if 18,000 of their 20,000 content reviewers all lean a certain way, then the content they flag and the content they review will too.
And that means they're putting more scrutiny on (in this case) conservatives, libertarians, or just non-leftist types, and flagging more right-leaning posts as inappropriate, banning more of those pages.
I see this already in terms of the fact checking system Facebook has implemented.
And the irony of this is that if Facebook does more of the same, the result will be even MORE polarization, which is the very thing they claim they want to prevent.
I'm fine with Mark Zuckerberg ONLY hiring militant leftists, if that's what he wants to do.
I just want there to be transparency. Don't said that you're unbiased, if you're not. Be clear that Facebook is what it is- a great platform that has a bias and if you don't align with that bias, you can get kicked from the platform with no recourse.
Zuckerberg said that he believed for the first 10-12 years of running Facebook that their role as a company was to build tools for people to use to connect with each other.
Now he believes the company should have a new mission: To police the user-base and make sure those tools are being used "for good".
Little does he know, he's headed down an authoritarian path. Did he not take Dystopian Lit at Harvard?
What are your thoughts on how this can turn? Are you already off Facebook completely?


text:
Ghana News Coronavirus
CoronavirusLatest News in the World
Doctor who put off retirement to treat COVID-19 patients dies of disease
7 months ago read comments by Yen.com.gh Ebenezer Quist
- A 62-year-old New York doctor who worked for almost 40 years has died of coronavirus after treating patients with the virus
- The doctor identified as James Mahoney delayed his retirement to help patients but got infected in the line of duty
- He was said to have worked tirelessly treating patients till he contracted the deadly disease
James Mahoney, a New York doctor who delayed his retirement to help lead his hospital's response to the coronavirus pandemic, has died after contracting the deadly disease.
According to Fox News, the 62-year-old worked as a pulmonary and critical care physician at University Hospital of Brooklyn during the day and Kings County Hospital Center at night,
YEN.com.gh gathers that the doctor who worked tirelessly to treat coronavirus patients succumbed to the disease on April 27.
READ ALSO: Another wave of coronavirus attacks China as govt imposes fresh lockdown
His family and colleagues pleaded with him to retire as they were concerned that his age could put him at a higher risk for severe illness, but the physician refused as he could not watch and do nothing.
Purna Atluri, a gastroenterologist who worked with Mahoney for more than two decades, said: "He was handling patients and codes [patients needing intensive intervention] every five to 10 minutes.
"He was doing everything he could."
Neurologist and one of Mahoney's colleagues, Julien Cavanagh, told The Guardian: "He's one of our legends — he's one of our giants."
In other news, Tanzania President John Pombe Magufuli has revealed that his child recovered from COVID-19 after taking lemons and ginger.
Magufuli said the child isolated himself after contracting the virus and self-medicated using the said "remedies" after which he completely recovered.
Speaking in a church service on Sunday, May 17, the president said the child was doing well and even doing push-ups after beating coronavirus.
READ ALSO: Lady celebrates 50th birthday looking like an 18-year-old in heartwarming pictures
"My child got coronavirus, my own child that I brought into this world. The child locked himself in the room and treated self-using lemons and ginger," Magufuli said.
"I cannot lie when standing at the altar of God because I respect my God and so do not think that I have not faced this virus," he added.
Meanwhile, YEN.com.gh earlier reported that just when the Chinese government thought it has seen and dealt with the worst when it comes to coronavirus, a mysterious wave of the disease recently attacked two cities.
According to a report by Express UK on Wednesday, May 20, a second wave of the deadly pandemic has hit two cities in the Asian nation (Jilin and Shulan).
Enjoy reading our stories? Download YEN's news app on Google Play now and stay up-to-date with major Ghana news!
Yenkasa: "We have families to feed, we can't stop the Okada business" - Riders lament | #Yencomgh
Get interactive via our Facebook page.
Sad messages Private companies in ghana
Kantanka CEO shows internal features of 18-year-old JHS car maker's finished product
8 jaw-dropping photos of newly-constructed Motorway Roundabout at different times of day

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


The Bankruptcy and Insolvency practice of Ashby & Geddes, P.A. is proud to announce the creation and launch of the Delaware Bankruptcy Insider, a premier blog designed to bring readers a comprehensive summary of the latest Delaware corporate bankruptcy news and rulings. The blog can be found here.
Ashby & Geddes' Bankruptcy and Insolvency Practice – Ashby's bankruptcy and insolvency lawyers have been on the forefront of many of the country's largest and most complex reorganization cases since 1991. Its lawyers take great pride in, and are highly praised for, their responsiveness, substantive knowledge of bankruptcy law, and familiarity with Delaware's Bankruptcy Court and local practice. The group regularly represents debtors, creditors' committees, and equity committees as well as key creditor constituencies and parties in interest, such as secured lenders, bondholders, trade creditors, landlords and lessors, preference and fraudulent transfer defendants, examiners, acquirers of distressed assets, foreign representatives, and liquidation trusts and trustees.


It's rare when a species goes extinct and people are glad to see it go. While that might be the case if the species is a mosquito or a rat, big cats are generally missed when gone. That wasn't the case 25 years ago with the Zanzibar leopard. When they were declared extinct in the mid-1990s, residents of Unguja Island in the Zanzibar archipelago of Tanzania, where the last one was seen, were allegedly thrilled by its demise. Why? They believed local folk tales of witches and witch doctors keeping the carnivorous cats to harass the villages. Were witches involved in the mysterious reappearance of the evil Zanzibar leopards?
Here's a better question … would you watch a show called "Extinct or Alive" if it never found any extinct animals alive? It seems a little suspicious that the first episode of this new series on Animal Planet hits a lead-off home run when host, wildlife adventurer and biologist Forrest Galante hangs a butcher shop display case of raw meat from trees, sets up a night-vision camera and gives an expletive-filled exclamation when the video captures a Zanzibar leopard.
Like many animals on Unguja or Zanzibar, the largest of the Zanzibar archipelago islands, researchers believe the Zanzibar leopard (originally named Panthera pardus adersi) is a descendant of the mainland African leopard (Panthera pardus pardus) which has been isolated there since at least the end of the Ice Age, allowing it to evolve into a smaller cat with more leopard-ish rosette markings that have become solid spots.
While Zanzibar leopards and Zanzibaris lived together as well as humans and big cats can, that changed with the 1964 Zanzibar Revolution when the island, which had been conquered and ruled by many countries, finally threw off the last vestiges of British rule and became part of Tanzania. As told in the study "Killing the king: The demonization and extermination of the Zanzibar leopard," written by researchers Martin Walsh and Helle Goldman, the forced modernization of native cultures and customs included witch hunts and the killing of their feared killer cats, the Zanzibar leopards. It took just 30 years to rid the island of the animals.
Galante told Inside Edition that he saw the cat while reviewing two weeks' worth of video. To his credit, Galante knows that one video is not proof. He points out that there are rumors that the witch doctors, who continue to operate on the island, brought mainland African leopards to Zanzibar to maintain their fearful hold over the locals. However, close analysis of the video show this cat is smaller and has more solid spots like the Zanzibar leopards had … or have. Although the show has moved on to hunt for other extinct species, Galante says his team will work with park rangers in locating and testing DNA samples.
While the Zanzibar leopard was/is not evil, the reasons for its near extinction – development, folklore and fear – are. Let's hope the Zanzibaris – and people in other areas where "Extinct or Alive" may find extinct species alive – replace greed and ignorance with education and conservation.


This Privacy Notice is to inform you of what personal data we, Clearly/Coastal, collect from you when you visit our website or use our services. This document will further explain why we collect it, and what we do with it. Your personal data refers to any information relating to you, specifically with regard to your name and contact details including your home address, telephone number, and email address.
This data does not allow us to directly identify you, but it does record data related to your browsing history on our website. This includes the pages you accessed; the date and time of your request and referral URL; the date and time at which you accessed them; your search queries within the site; and information about the device you used such as its hardware model, operation system version, unique device identifier, Internet protocol address, hardware settings, browser type, and browser language.
You are not required to provide your data if you only want to visit our website. You may refuse to accept cookies by configuring your web browser accordingly (for more information, refer to the 'help' section of your web browser). That said, refusing cookies is likely to disrupt your navigation on our website, and may prevent you from accessing certain pages or services.
Some of the services offered on our website require you to register and/or sign up with us. If you want to use these services, we will ask you to provide us with complete and accurate personal data, and also inform us if when your data needs to be updated. If you do not provide us with complete and accurate data, or if you do not inform us that your data needs to be updated, we may not be able to provide you with the services you requested.
Identification data: including your name, telephone number, e-mail address, login and password, Customer ID Prescription, and similar information.
Financial data: including the details of your payment method such as a credit card, though we do not store the details of any card after the first order has been processed.
IT data: including the pages you accessed; the date and time of your request and referral URL; the date and time at which you accessed them; your search queries within the site; and information about the device you used such as its hardware model, operation system version, unique device identifier, Internet protocol address, hardware settings, browser type, and browser language.
We only use your personal data within the limits authorized by current laws and regulations. Sometimes, we shall use your personal data because the laws and regulations actively require us to do so. In any case, we do not make any automated decisions solely on automatic processing which may produce legal effects concerning you, or similarly significantly affect you.
We use your identification data in order to provide you with services as per our contractual obligations.
We use your financial data to process sales, returns, or replacement orders.
We use your IT data to track various analytics attributes so that we can continue to provide a more efficient service.
HOW LONG DO WE KEEP THE PERSONAL DATA WE COLLECT?
WHAT PERSONAL DATA DO WE SHARE?
We inform you that we may share your personal data with companies outside of Clearly.
For recipients located in Canada/ US, there is no adequacy decision by the European Commission for such country; this means that the level of data protection in such country is not comparable with the level of data protection in the European Union. Therefore, we use as an appropriate safeguard to secure your personal data. You can request a copy hereof from privacy@coastal.com.
We implement and maintain sophisticated technical measures to ensure that your personal data is recorded and processed in complete confidentiality and security.
We implement and maintain appropriate restrictions on access to your personal data, and monitoring of the access, use, and transfer of personal data.
All employees who have access to your personal data are required to enter into non-disclosure or similar agreements, which imposes obligations for them to comply with our data privacy and confidentiality requirements.
We require any business partners and third party service providers with whom we may share your personal data to comply with any applicable data privacy and confidentiality requirements.
We provide data privacy training on a regular basis to our employees and third parties who have access to personal data.
Of access to, rectification of, and/or erasure of your personal data.
To restrict or object to its processing.
In some circumstances, to require certain of your personal data to be transferred to you or a third party.
To the extent our processing of your personal data is based upon your consent, to withdraw your consent, without affecting the lawfulness of our processing based on your consent before its withdrawal.
If you do not feel satisfied following this interaction, you may also lodge a complaint about our processing of your Personal Data with a Data Protection Authority.
We will send you strictly service-related announcements on rare occasions when it is necessary to do so. For instance, if our service is temporarily suspended for maintenance, we may send you an email. Generally, you may not opt out of these communications, particularly as they are not promotional in nature. If you do not wish to receive them, you have the option to deactivate your account.
If you wish to subscribe to our email newsletter(s), we will use your name and email address to send the emails to you. Out of respect for your privacy, we provide you an option to unsubscribe. Please see the Opt Out section below.
We provide you the opportunity to opt out of having your personal information used for certain purposes, when we ask for this information. For example, if you purchase a product/service but do not wish to receive any addtional promotional emails from us, you may opt out at any time by following the unsubscribe link located at the bottom of each email communication.
If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter and promotional communications, you may opt out of receiving them by following the instructions included in each newsletter.
By accepting these terms and conditions, you (i) allow us to share your data strictly with companies within Clearly/Coastal and (ii) give your express, specific and informed consent to receive emails of promotional materials concerning optical products and glasses from these companies. Your data will not be shared with any third party company. Each email sent to you by Clearly/Coastal and/or other companies within our group will include an 'unsubscribe' link.
We follow generally accepted industry standards to protect the personal information submitted to us, both during transmission and once we receive it. No method of transmission over the Internet, or method of electronic storage, is 100% secure. Therefore, while we strive to use commercially acceptable means to protect your personal information, we cannot guarantee its absolute security.
Go to the NAI website. Their site will scan your computer/device for any 3rd party display or advertisements. A list of any 3rd party ads will then be populated and from there you can select the checkboxes next to the ads that you would like to remove. This ensures that advertisements will not come back to your computer/device as it is not registered to receive them. Note, the NAI website is not associated with Coastal Contacts Inc.
Manually access the cache and cookies of your browser and clear them. You will need to clear all to remove all 3rd party display advertisements.


Through NTC® (the Nutrient Transport Concept), nutrients reach the exact place they take effect, namely our billions of cells and achieving better bioavailability. Beyond this, the Optimal Set provides the nutrients exactly when the body needs them (morning and evening) thanks to the modular product concept. Supplement your usual diet with the FitLine Basics and Activize OxyPlus in the morning and FitLine Restorate on an evening. The products are really easy to prepare and preparing them will become a good habit within a matter of days.


text:
Blogarithms
Doug Kaye's Blog
Cuba Workshops
Contact/Social Nets
Audio Recordings and Transparency
January 20, 2005 ~ Doug
David Berlind, Dan Gillmor and Dan Bricklin have written about the practice of linking to on-line audio recordings as source material for journalists and others. Dan G also mentioned the value of transcripts.
I learned a few lessons about recordings and transcripts 30 years ago when I covered the Senate Watergate Hearings for NBC International. Beyond my day job, I was also one of those Watergate junkies who hurried home after a long day working and flying between New York and Washington to catch the re-runs on PBS. After John Dean spilled the beans about the White House tapes, I was one of the first in line at the Federal Building to get a printed copy of the transcripts. I read the whole thing, cover to cover, but it wasn't until I actually had a chance to hear portions of the tapes that I really understood the depth of the evil at work in the White House. Not only were the transcripts filled with errors that almost anyone could have detected (some of substance), but they never came close to capturing the temprament of the Oval Office. Only the audio could do that.
Three decades later I recorded and transcribed the O'Reilly Digital Democracy Teach-In for IT Conversations. We didn't know it would happen until the last minute, but Joe Trippi showed up and became the main attraction of the event. I believe it was his first public appearance after leaving the Howard Dean campaign a few days before. In addition to streaming the event live, I was able to post the audio of Joe's presentation within a few hours and the transcript two days later. What surprised and humbled me was that the transcript quickly became the 'official' record of Joe's speech, and it was quoted frequently in the press. How do I know? Not because most journalists linked to my transcript, which would have led readers to the primary-source audio, but because I subsequently proofread and corrected the transcripts once again, and found that the mainstream press had quoted my transcripts verbatim, warts and all. (Why not? It's a whole lot easier for a reporter than making his or her own transcription.)
The lessons learned? Yes, transcripts are great, but even more important is to have the original audio available like a chain of evidence so that the transcripts themselves can be transparent and that 'downstream' journalists and others have the opportunity to review the source.
This is one reason why, with the help of Jon Udell, I created the clip facility for IT Conversations: to make it easy for others to place audio excerpts directly in their blogs so that readers can experience the source material in its most-transparent format. In fact, this is why I created IT Conversations in the first place. I was interviewing experts as source material for a book I was writing, and I realized that if I could turn readers of my written interpretation into listeners of the experts' own voices, I could take myself out of the loop and provide a more transparent path from guru to student. In the role of author, I was just getting in the way. In the role of interviewer and editor, I was abe to clarify. Better writers can do that in print, but I feel more confident in audio, particularly if I'm not the one who's suppsoed to be the expert!
< Previous Podcast Ad Sales – An Opportunity
Next > An IT Conversations Update
One thought on "Audio Recordings and Transparency"
dano says:
I just tried out the audio clip feature. That's really cool. It helps with increasing the "transparency" of audio. Someday (in the distant future), we'll have some really good speech-to-text software… until then, audio clips!
Tesla Referral Code
Kenriko's Wraps
The Overton Technique
robert musacchio on DuArt: The End of the Film…
Paul Porter on Silver Efex Pro for Color…
Doug on Kenriko's Wraps
KK on Kenriko's Wraps
Kirk Donaldson on The Overton Technique
All About the Gear
SpokenWord.org
Team ITC