text:
tv Meet the Press MSNBC April 9, 2017 5:00pm-6:01pm PDT
d 'll stop at... nothing to make sure you get it. one, two... and we mean nothing. ♪ ♪ chemical attack prompts outrage around the world and a u.s. military response.o >> tonight i ordered a targetedd military strike on the airfield in syria from where the chemical attack was launched. >> this morning we have the story covered from all of the angles. u.s. ambassador nikki hailey. >> the united states took a very measured step last night and we're prepared to do more. >> frequent republicane critic f president trump, senator lindsey graham. >> it was a wonderful signal to send that needs to be followed up. >> senator tim kaine.>>er
>> doing this without consulting congress, without a vote, i think is a clear violation of the law. >> and senator bernie sanders that warns the missile attack could lead to another middle east quagmire. haley, kaine and sanders all here this morning. if steve bannon leaves, does the agenda leave with him. joining me for insight and analysis, david brooks, danielle pletka, rich lowrie of the national revieww and helene cooper, pentagon correspondent for "the new york times." welcome to sunday, it's "meet the press." from nbc news in washington, the longest running show in television history celebrating its 70th here, this is "meet the press" with chuck todd. good sunday morning. this breaking news there was attacks on two egyptian christian churches this morning. a bomb exploded in a church
packed with palm sunday worshippers, killed more than two dozen people, wounding scores of others according to health ministry officials. hours later a suicide bomber killed 11 people in front of a church of alexandria.nt isis has claimed responsibility for both of those attacks. now to syria. president trump became the 7th consecutive president to ib launch a military action against a country in the middle east. of course, the first one in that seven consecutive streak was president carter's failed mission to rescue the hostages in iran. it involved 60 cruise missiles launched from naval destroyers in the mediterranean. it is what the trump administration called a proportionate response to lastd week's chemical attack that killed more than 80 people and caused horrific suffering seen in pictures circulated around the globe. the attack scrambled political alliances, drawing praise from many usual trump opponents, but criticism from some of his strongest supporters.
the episode raised all sorts of questions about the trump administration, what is the president's ultimate goal in ha syria, was this mission accomplished or mission creep, and what message is the administration sending to the world, china, north korea? can he sell this to his nationalist base, which was deeply skeptical about taking any action in syria? this isn't cut and dry, typical red versus blue.e. ultimately the question is was this an impulsive move by a president or fundamental change in his thinking about foreign intervention? >> no child of god should ever suffer such horror. >> it is a startling reversal by a president who spent his campaign arguing that the u.s. should steer clear of the country's protracted civil war. >> now hillary wants to start a shooting warnt in syria, in conflict with a nuclear armed russia, which could very well
lead to world war iii. >> if we did nothing, if we did absolutely nothing, we would be in great sshape. >> mr. trump's decision to back away from an america first isolationist philosophy has supporters confused and even angry. some blame it on the waning power of chief straightest steve bannon who days before the syria strike was ejected from the security council amid tensions with trump's son-in-law jared kushner. >> the weekly standard people, all the neoconservatives are happy. >> the syrian president's brutality is nothing new. in 2013, eight days after assad launched a chemical attack, killed more than 1400 civilians, including hundreds of children, trump tweeted, what will we get for bombing syria besides more debt and possible long-term conflict? obama needs congressional approval. now, with the power of the presidency, mr. trump appears to haveve abandoned that point of
view, at least for now. but what is his ultimate goal? >> we are prepared to do more. but we hope that will not be w necessary. >> just last week, mr. trump's secretary of state backed away from the policy of regime change in syria. >> i think the status and the longer term status of president assad will be decided by the syrian people. >> now, a week later. acts he has taken, it would seemhe there would be role for him to govern the syrian people. >> an american official says russians on the ground were given notice that the missiles were coming.le flights from the base have already resumed. and secretary tillerson's trip to moscow this week is still on. at home, most of washington's foreign policy establishment is applauding the llstrikes. >> the strikes were impoant, i think they were the signal, it is as important ashe actual damage that washi done. >> while a coalition of liberals and conservatives, skeptical of intervention without approval from congress, oppose them.
>> heart breaks seeing the images. what can we do? but doesn't mean we just sort of rip up the constitution and say, okay, it's fine to bomb anybody if they're committing atrocities. >> doing this without consulting congress, without a vote, i think is a clear violation of the law. >> it is fair to say no one has been more forceful in responding to syria's chemical attack than the u.s. ambassador to the united nations, nikki haley. she has been the face of the administration in this crisis and yesterday i asked her when the trump administration believes itki achieved its objective with the military strike or whether more needs to be done. >> well, i don't think that's dependent on the united states. i think that's dependent on the actors at play. this is a very complicated situation. we know there is no easy solution to the crisis that is in syria. but our focus is to make sure that, you know, we're focused oi strengthening the cease-fire, want to continue to have the backs of our allies, turkey, jordan, iraq, make sure they know we have their backs, want to push towards a political solution because at the endre o the day, that's really what is needed, to make sure political solution comes together and we
hope that they'll continue those talks in geneva and we hope we'll continue to see some progress. >> a big part of that political solution would include the russians. they don't accept the conclusion that the united states and others did, that this was assad's regime, that ordered this chemical weapons attack. do you plan to present the evidence publicly and do you plan to do it in -- at the united nations? where is the evidence going to be presented? >> the interesting thing, when chemicals weapon murder happened to so many people, russia's reactionwas, oh, was not oh, how horrible or how could they do ts tnnocent children or how awful is that? their initial reaction was assad didn't do it, syrian government didn't doss it, why were they tt defensive that quick? the idea of the casualties came after the first priority for them was to cover for assad.
so what we knew from intelligence, that the syrian regime had done this again, as they had done soth many times before, we had the evidence that they had done it, it is obviously classified, so certainly i'm not the one that will -- that would release that information, but enough that the president knew.at >> but there is no plans on presenting the evidence publicly? if you look, isn't it important if -- to isolate, in order to isolate russia, to publicly show how wrong they are about this? >> so i don't doubt that information won't come out. i think that you're also seeing investigations of russia now. that information is going to come out when they can declassify it. i fully expect that the proper directors will come out with that information, for right now, all we needed to know in that room was is it true, did it happen, what's the evidence, and go with that. what you saw was, you know, we watched the president and what i believe was his finest hour, since he's taken office. he was very thoughtful about it.
he talked about risk, what general mattis and the military did was a rock star performance because they were so focused on making sure there were limited civilian s casualties if any at all. they were focused on making sure they hit the air base where the syrian government used the planes to carry the chemical weapons and focused on making sure they understood the united states is not going to allow chemical weapons used ever. >> if assad doesn't use chemical weapons, but he -- b the civil war continues and he's brutal, butin uses conventional weaponso be bubrutal, are we going to si on the sidelines? >> i think what you're going to see is we'll keep all of our thoughts and plans close to the chest. k this president is not going to go and release any sort of information, but i think what you are going to see is pressure on the political solution. that's what is going to happen. in no way do we look at peace happening l in that area with iranian influence, and in no way do we see peace in that area with russianan covering up for assad, in no way do we see peace in that area with assad as the
head of the syrian government. and we have to make sure we're pushing that process. the political solution has to come together for the good of the people of syria. >> what about the fact that we are not allowing syrian refugees under -- unless under the most extreme circumstances into this country right esnow? >> you know, look, this is what i will tell you. i have watched this administration focus so much on the safety of united states citizens. and as a mom, as a wife, i'm very grateful for that. so what this president has done is said prove to me that you are vetting these people properly, and if you are vetting them properly, then we will resume where we are.yo but until then, you have to prove to me that these people are being vetted in a way that we're not putting american citizens at risk. and so what he did is i think that there were -- those countries that wein kne tha there werere problems that we couldn't vet, and that's key.pr you n't vet, you don't know who you're letting in, don't know if there is any sort of bad intentions there. and so what you're seeing is the president is being very cautious
with that. he's making sure that it is people, safety first, and i think that the focus we need to have is how do we get to a safe syria? how do we make sure those -- that have fled that area, can go home, and make sure they get back there, but the president ig not going to sacrifice the safety of american citizens. >> who should bear that sacrifice? the syrians -- the syrians that you have so eloquently noted, these women and children, and in particular, that were trying to flee some of -- get out of harm's way and end up getting gassed by assad, who is -- who should have --et take that burd if the united states is not going to help out? >> i think you saw the united states take that burden this week. the united states fought for the people of syria, and told assad no more. >> final question, what is now the priority in syria? assad's removal or defeating isis before the emphasis was on defeating isis, then we'll deal with assad. has that changed? >> i think what you have to understand is we can have multiple priorities. so, you know, of course it is to
defeat isis. that we have got to do that for peace and stability in the area. it is also to get out the iranian influence which we think is causing so much friction and worse issues in the area. and then make sure that we actually see a leadert will protect his people. and clearly assad is not that person. >> that was,ot of course, nikki haley, the u.s. ambassador to the united nations. my next guest has been a frequent republican critic of president trump on national security issues, but this military action against syria has its full support. senator lindsey graham joins me from clemson, south carolina. welcome back to theon show, sir. good morning. >> thank you. >> i want to get to that last questiongr i asked ambassador haley. which is does this change america's position here of prioritizing whatt to prioritiz in syria. isis over assad, both secretary tillerson andsy ambassador hale indicated isis is the priority. what say you, senator? >> i think isis should be germany and assad should be ey japan, like world war ii
analogies here. accelerate the demise of isil, their direct threat. i never have been more encouraged by the trump administration thasn i am today. ambassador haley just said on your program, you'll never end the war with i assad in power. so that means regime change is now the policy of the trump administration. that's at least what i heard. so you need more american troops to accelerate the demise of isil, we're allowing too much on the kurds, more american forces, 5,000 or 6,000, track more regional fighters to destroy isil, need a safe haven quickly so people can regroup inside of syria. then train the opposition to go after assad. that's how he's taken out, by his own people, with our efforts and tell the russians if you continue to bomb the people we train, we'll shoot you down. >> okay. do you think president trump is ready to take that advice? you're calling for troops to be sent in. are you going to introduce a resolution in congress that gives them that authority?
>> he already has that authority. every -- you got some good people on this program. i differ with them in this regard. i thinhak the president has authorization to use force. assad signed the chemical weapons treaty ban. there is an agreement with him not to use chemical weapons. what did we learn that war criminals don't police each other very well. p the putin regime is a bunch of war criminals, and we expected them to police assad, that didn't work out very well. so all these resolutions or limitations on using force, not authorizations used force. i don't intend to vote for anything that limits our ability to win the war against isil or replace assad. syria, a sovereign country, not mentioned at all i, the current war authorization, itit somehow you can send troop into that sovereign nation without having to have congress grant the president more authority there? i think you're in the minority view on that, don't you think, senator? >> no, we already got troops on the ground. i don't see anybody say cut off
funding. if you don't like the thousand american troops that are helping to destroy isil, cut off funding. be consistent here. i want more american troops, 5,000 or 6,000 like we have in iraq o to help destroy isil. that means it will accelerate the demise of isil. i want to train opposition forces to take assad down. he's a threat to the united states because he's a proxy of iran. hees used chemical weapons, violated a treaty that he signed. i think it is up to us to enforce thatat treaty. we're on sound legal footing here, but our strategy is not yet developed. what comes next? i'm glad trump did this. he is no longer obama in the eyes of our enemies, but needs to do morer to close the deal. there is a new sheriff in town. >> do you think there is a moral difference between the usedo of chemical weapons and barrel bombs? >> no, there is a legal difference. not a moral difference. if you're a mother, your baby is dead. but we do have treaties that we signed all over the world, saying we're not going to let one nation use weapons of mass
destruction, that's what the chemical weapons treaty is all about. but i will say this, if you kill babies with conventional bombs, it is still a moral outrage. here is what i think assad is telling trump by flying from this base. f you. i think he's making a serious mistake. because if you're an adversary of the united states, and you don't worry about what trump may do on any given day, then you're crazy. >> i have to say, you use the used the initials but i think that's first for "meet the press." we had a few people watching, raised a lot of eyebrows. >> good. >> i have to ask you about the president's change of heart on this. >> right. >> because jonah goldberg, national review, who is supportive of the strike, but this change of heart still concerns him. he writes, the strike on syria is thehe single best proof that trump has no overriding commitment to any ideological position. if trump can abandon his position on this, all because of some horrific pictures on tv, what position is safe?
>> well, here's my view, he abandoned a position not working, which is leaving assad alone. obama said he has to go in name only. this president is setting it in motion, actual strategy to get rid ofof assad. to the american people, the war never ends with assad. s a he's a recruiting gold mine.by so i'm glad the president did this. >> you want him to punish russia more for his support of assad. what is something concrete you think he can do in next couple of months to punish were for its support of assad? >> sanction russia for not only interfering in our election, but add a paragraph to my bill that says of russiaed ed aided and ad assad. the russian soldiers own the base where the attack occurred. the russians intentionally in my view left chemical weapons in the hand of assad. their proxy. so if i were president trump, i would goo after russia through
sanctions, not only for interfering in our, elections, but aiding and abetting the use of chemical weapons by war criminalng assad. >> a fired up lindsey graham thisdi morning from clemson, soh carolina. senator, thank you for coming on and sharing your views, even if they wereh not necessarily pg rated this morning. >> good morning. >> when we come back, two senate democrats with two very different views of what the united states should do in syria and how they should do it. they're next. flonase allergy relief delivers more complete relief. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances that cause all your symptoms, including nasal congestion and itchy, watery eyes. flonase is an allergy nasal spray that works even beyond the nose. so you can enjoy every beautiful moment to the fullest. flonase. 6>1 changes everything. i've been fortunate enough to win on golf's biggest stages.
but when joint pain and stiffness from psoriatic arthritis hit... even the smallest things became difficult. so i talked to my rheumatologist... and he prescribed enbrel... to help relieve joint pain and help stop further joint damage. enbrel may lower your ability to fight infections. serious, sometimes fatal, events including infections, tuberculosis... lymphoma, other cancers, nervous system and blood disorders, and allergic reactions have occurred. tell your doctor if you've been someplace where fungal infections are common... or if you're prone to infections, have cuts or sores, have had hepatitis b, have been treated for heart failure, or if you have persistent fever, bruising, bleeding or paleness. don't start enbrel if you have an infection like the flu. get back to the things that matter most. ask how enbrel can help relieve joint pain and help stop joint damage. enbrel, the number one rheumatologist-prescribed biologic.
welcome back, the missile strike has scrambled some political alliances. senator tim kaine, a democratic vice presidential nominee last year, been a full throated critic of the new president. but he does support the syria operation, but with reservations. senator kaine joins me now from virginia. welcome, sir. >> thanks, chuck. good to be with you. >> let me start with, why do you support this action? i know you have some legal
questions about it. i want to get to that right after that. but why do you support this action? >> chuck, as you know, i'm a strong supporter that the u.s. should take action to protect humanitarian causes like the ban on use of chemical weapons. and so i voted for a limited strike in august of 2013 to do exactly the same thing. and a limited strike for that purpose, for the humanitarian purpose is something i would likely support if there is a plan. but where i differ from this administration and i took the same position with respect to president obama, we are a nation where you're not supposed to initiate military action, start war, without a plan that is presented to and approved by congress. that makes us different than virtually any nation in the world, the idea of the drafters of our constitution was that you had to put a check against an executive gone wild. we don't have a system where the president just gets to launch missiles against anybody they want to, and they haven't presented a plan to congress and asked for our approval, that's what they got to do.
>> senator, in this case, it is very limited, number one, and number two, there were american interests on the ground, we have u.s. soldiers, special operation forces on the ground, very close to chemical weapons. if you're saying this action was illegal, then you must be thinking the libya action by president obama was illegal, the raid by president reagan was illegal. are you saying all those actions are illegal? >> chuck, i was a senate candidate in 2011 when president obama joined military action against libya for humanitarian purposes. and i said then, i agreed with the republicans in the house that rebuked president obama, and said he had exceeded his authority because the u.s. was not under imminent threat. that's the only circumstance where a commander in chief can use article 2 power without going to congress if there san imminent threat to the united states. and that you just heard lindsey dw graham say that wasn't the case. we had a briefing by the white house on friday.
they presented us with no plan. we don't know if it is limited or whether there is more. when we asked about the legal authorization, they said they weren't prepared to discuss that. but they hoped to discuss it in the coming days. again, our system is we don't want a president, any president, just being able to start a war or launch missiles whenever they want. there has to be congressional approval. >> you heard senator graham, he outlined what he would like to see -- what actions are taken going forward. and described sending maybe 5,000 troops and i asked him, okay, do you need congressional authorization for that? he said no. let me ask you this question. if an authorization is on the floor of the senate, that describes what senator graham wants to do, sending in a limited number of troops to basically push the momentum back against assad again. would you support something like that? >> you know, lindsey and i agree the atrocities are horrible. here is where we part company. he stated very plainly, great,
the trump administration is for regime change. i don't think the u.s. policy toward any nation should be we get to change out your leaders. if assad is doing things wrong, violating international treaties with an authorization, we can try to deter him from doing it, we can prosecute him for war crimes, but i don't think the policy of the u.s. should be we're going to change the regime of your leadership. that's for syrians to decide, we should be part of a political process. but i don't think regime change should be official u.s. policy. >> do you think assad will go under any circumstance that isn't military? >> i agree with ambassador haley that i don't think there is any political solution to the civil r in syria that doesn't mean th assad moves aside becse he's tearing up the country. but instead of regime change, what we should focus on is humanitarian relief. in february of 2014, the u.n. security council said we should be delivering humanitarian aid to syrians, if we started doing that then, many fewer would have
left the country, that's what we should do, but neither regime change nor a full on unauthorized war against syria is what we should be doing. >> all right, senator tim kaine, i'll leave it there. senator, thanks very much. i'm going to turn to yet another point of view on this, joining me now is democratic senator bernie sanders who has a little bit of a dimmer view on the strike against syria. welcome back, sir. >> good to be with you. >> so explain why you are against the strike. >> well, chuck, for a start, let's all recognize that in a world full of disgusting dictators of bashar assad maybe ranks at the top. this is a guy, in order to hang on to power, has allowed 400,000 people in his own country to be killed and millions to be displaced. our goal long-term has got to work with countries around the world, we cannot do it unilaterally, we got to work with countries around the world for a political solution to get rid of this guy and to finally
bring peace and stability to this country, which has been so decimated. i do not believe the president simply has the authority to launch missiles. i think he needs to come to the united states congress, has to explain to us what his long-term goals are. chuck, let me just say this, maybe the most important vote i have ever cast in my life as a member of congress was against the war in iraq. when we get sucked into a war, we do not know the unintended consequences. it is easy to get into a war than it is to get out of a war as we have learned now over the last 15 years in the middle east. >> is there a point where humanitarian cause sort of trumps -- trumps that, you know? you see the gassing of people? is there a point where america's moral authority is being challenged here, and you have to send a military message because
no one else is going to do that, and nothing else will deter assad? do you ever believe there is a moment like that? >> what we are seeing in syria is the disintegration and destruction of an entire country. it ihorrible beyond horrible. yes, i mean, wha can we say about somebody who gases men, women and children of his own country. it is disgusting beyond words. but what we have got to do is be smart and figure out what is the rational solution. is putting 50 missiles into syria going to solve that problem. at the end of the day in my view, we have to learn about what the war -- the failure of our efforts in iraq and afghanistan, not repeat them, understand that it will be diplomacy. demanding that russia, demanding that iran sit down at the table with the rest of the world, and get -- help us solve this problem. >> they have been calling for
that for three years now. there has been this, you know, the talks in geneva, secretary -- then secretary of state john kerry kept going back to the table. the russians and the iranians don't look like they're interested in a diplomatic political solution here. >> chuck, you're right. chuck, you're right. look, this is an extremely complicated and difficult issue. but i can also tell you that we have been at war in iraq and afghanistan for 14 years. thousands of american soldiers have died. the whole middle east has been thrown into an uproar. massive instability. you know, all i'm saying here is that we have got to be clear about what our goals are, not do it unilaterally, and understand also may i say that when we have a collapsing middle class of 28 n ople without any health insurance, and infrastructure that needs trillion dollars of repair that maybe we don't want to throw trillions of dollars more into
unending perpetual warfare in the middle east. >> in december of 2015, you called for more diplomacy, working with the russians and you said, you know, i'm more than aware of the political differences we have with russia today, but our job is to bring together a coalition which understands the primary function now is to destroy isis, to push aside for the moment other differences of opinion. back then, you were a proponent of, hey, we have to prioritize the isis situation first in syria. has your mind changed on that, watching what assad has been doing? >> assad has been doing what he's been doing for years. chuck, 400,000 people in syria have been killed. men, women and children. over 5 million people have been displaced. this is a horror show. yes, we have got to destroy isis. yes, we eventually have to get rid of assad, but we cannot in my view do it unilaterally. that will not work. >> what do you do to the russians if they're not going to
be at all interested in a political solution? what -- how do you encourage them to the table? >> i think you may want to make them an offer you can't refuse, tightening the screws on them, dealing with sanctions. telling them that we need their help, they have to come to the table, and not maintain this horrific dictator. none of this stuff is easy. any position that anybody takes can be criticized. but at the end of the day, i think getting the united states involved in perpetual warfare, sending troops into syria will just continue the process of money going down a rat hole. i think ultimately the solution has got to be political. >>nd, by the way, one other thing that -- >> last comment. >> -- trump says one thing, and he ends up doing another thing. let's get some consistency from this president. let's get the congress involved in this debate. >> all right, senator bernie sanders. the independent progressive from
vermont. thank you for being on the show, sir. appreciate it. >> thank you. there you have it. a lot of perspectives on syria these days. so the political fallout from what happened in syria this week, that will be next with the panel. and later, nothing new about a white house power struggle, but the one we're hearing about in the west wing involving steve bannon and the president's son-in-law jared kushner could have profound impacts on domestic and foreign policy. stay with us. es the time to season her turkey to perfection, and make stuffing from scratch. so that you can spend time on what really matters. marie callender's. it's time to savor. so we know how to cover almost alanything.ything, even a coupe soup. [woman] so beautiful. [man] beautiful just like you. [woman] oh, why thank you. [burke] and we covered it, november sixth, two-thousand-nine.
talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪e are farmeruma-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ i'm going to the bank, to discuss a mortgage. ugh, see, you need a loan, you put on a suit, you go crawling to the bank. this is how i dress to get a mortgage. i just go to lendingtree. i calculate how much home i can afford. i get multiple offers to compare side by side. and the best part is... the banks come crawling to me. everything you need to get a better mortgage. clothing optional. lendingtree. when banks compete, you win. okay! ...awkward.
welcome back. panel is here. a lot to digest, rich lowrie, helene cooper, danielle plet ka and david brooks. let's start with the basics here. what did we learn about donald trump this week in syria? >> we're debating him like this is winston churchill in the world of war. making some big strategic decision. i'm afraid he did one thing and it will have no consequences if
there was no strategic thinking behind it and no big strategic shift. i do think one promising thing is we're never going to be in the business of regime change anytime soon. we should be in the business of defending some basic norms of civilization. 100 years ago, the u.s. entered world war i, thousands were gassed to death. we can be against gassing and so in that sense this action was a useful action and we should just be in the business of trying to make sure when people fight, they behave with some basic level of human decency. so we had a little thing in this, but i'm not sure a big shift in any way. >> is it the doctrine of flexibility? >> flexibility, we were all over president obama when he told president putin he would be flexible. i don't think we know. i think david is right. we don't know whether this was a tactical strike or this is a strategic shift. and we have the secretary of state suggesting to us, no, no, no. nothing to see here. a one off. >> still isis. >> and still about isis. and we have nikki haley
suggesting to us that, no, in fact, things seemed to have changed. we'll see what develops in the next weeks. >> rich, i want you to respond to this. fairly similar thought that jonah goldberg wrote that i used with lindsey graham there. he writes this, a positive interpretation of the latest developments is that trump is someone willing to adjust it a deeper, fresher understanding of events to pivot in accordance with circumstances to learn and to evolve. but another take is that trump isn't just uninformed, but unformed and that's not reassuring at all. where are you on that? >> clearly, things he said for years on twitter and even in the campaign at his rallies were not well considered to put it mildly about syria. i think it is good that he feels the pressure of the offic as he admitted over the last week. and has adjusted. i'm a skeptic of pinprick strikes. it may be that this one succeeds in the narrow goal of deterring
future tell calchemical attacks. but what is happening is that assad will continue with more routine war crimes as if nothing had happened. and therefore implicitly defy us. >> helene, where were the pentagon officials on this? is this the -- is this the plan they really wanted him to pick or were they kind of hoping he would do something a little more robust? >> i think what you see is an assertion now of the pentagon, when it comes to american national security policy and we just saw that take place last week. >> this was -- >> mattis driven. but beyond that, i found your interhave with niview with nikke extraordinary. she's very, very strong in saying assad must go. but if you look at what she said on march 30th, and rex tillerson, secretary of state, echoed her on the same day, they both came out and said that it was no -- getting rid of asousa was not the focus of the administration and rex tillerson
went further and saying it is up to the syrian people. a lot of people believe that sent a message, the trump administration was not going to go after assad anymore and he could do whatever he wanted. a week later, you have them spinning a completely different line and this levelf mixed messaging in national security i think is dangerous. i think it gets back to sort of the -- i think a basic point of american foreign policy is to figure out what you believe and what you stand for and speak with one voice. we're having people saying everything right now. nobody knows whether we are in favor of regime chnk ange or no. >> they would come on to give the administration point of view, now they use this show like it is the roosevelt room and arguing to try to influence the president. >> we're still overstating this. barack obama said assad must go. barack obama said he had a red line. and assad didn't go and the red line was not a red line. the truth is that administrations do evolve, make decisions, and, you know, it is early days for the trump
administration. i'm willing at this point to give them the benefit of the doubt that there is an actual evolution in thinking going on as they assess all of their policies. we're not even 100 days in. >> a bad week for obama's legacy. one, trump showed doing this sort of strike is not that difficult, so it makes obama's dithering look ridiculous. and, two, it exposed the supposed deal to get chemical weapons out of syria as a total sham. >> let's move to the congressional debate. i think, look, individual members of congress want this debate about do does this belong in the authorization or do you need a new authorization if you do more in syria? this seems like the rank and file may trump leadership here. leadership doesn't want to vote. >> i don't think anybody wants to vote on this. look, the problem for congress is, okay, they didn't d another aumf under president obama. we're all here in washington. >> don't speak washington. >> exactly.
they didn't do it under obama. the reality is that if they choose to do this, and they get into a fight about whether syria should or should not be included, the next time hezbollah does something, the next time an american dies at the hands of the iranians or syrians, congress didn't let them do it. there is no percentage for them. >> a point you made off camera, if congress doesn't exert its authority here, then they're ceding it. >> this is something the founders never counted on, one branch of government that didn't want to protect its prerogatives because too much accountability would be involved. we should get congressional authorization for that. >> the difference has been hostility, we're not using the pony express anymore. the world moves a little too fast. >> fair enough. i'll pause here. we'll continue this conversation in a minute. coming up, would you buy a product endorsed by this man? a lot of people were asked that very question. we'll reveal their answers when
we return. [ indistinct conversations ]
♪ what makes a house a home? some say it's the people you share it with... or the creatures. okay! some say it's the marks on the wall... or the beautiful messes. and some say it's where you're truly loved. who's my baby? angie: we know every home is more than just a house, so trust angie's list to help find top-rated pros for quality work, because your home is where our heart is.
welcome back. when he won the white house, some feared donald trump would use the white house to endse products. wesked how would play with consumers? 18% of americans would be more likely to use a product if it was endorsed by president trump. 49% less likely. and a full 29% nearly a third of
americans would actively boycott a product endorsed by the president. right now, that says a pre presidential endorsement is more likely to cause a slump than a bump. even among republicans, the results were surprising. more likely to use 31%. that's really only an 8 point difference. and by the way, 11% of republicans say they would boycott. for democrats, a meager 10% would be more likely to use a product endorsed by donald trump. 71% less likely. 45% of those folks would actively boycott that product. believe it or not, independents break down more like democrats than you might think on this question. 8% more likely to use. 55% less likely. nearly a quarter of independents would boycott a product if trump endorsed it. while president trump's hotels and golf clubs are flourishing, the folks in line at the cash register, trump's brand may be taking a hit. as americans show their willingness to view consumer
choices as political decisions. in fact, don't be surprised to see more and more brands simply run away from politic altogether. forget pro or con on trump. they may not want to touch any of it. when we come back, the power struggle in the white house. however you look at electronic t it, it could have a profound impact on where the presidency goes from here. it's off to work we go! woman: on the gulf coast, new exxonmobil projects are expected to create over 45,000 jobs. and each job created by the energy industry supports two others in the community. altogether, the industry supports over 9 million jobs nationwide. these are jobs that natural gas is helping make happen, all while reducing america's emissions. energy lives here. hi, i'm frank. all while reducing america's emissions. i take movantik for oic, opioid-induced constipation. had a bad back injury,
my doctor prescribed opioids which helped with the chronic pain, but backed me up big-time. tried prunes, laxatives, still constipated... had to talk to my doctor. she said, "how long you been holding this in?" (laughs) that was my movantik moment. my doctor told me that movantik is specifically designed for oic and can help you go more often. don't take movantik if you have a bowel blockage or a history of them. movantik may cause serious side effects, including symptoms of opioid withdrawal, severe stomach pain and/or diarrhea, and tears in the stomach or intestine. tell your doctor about any side effects and about medicines you take. movantik may interact with them causing side effects. why hold it in? have your movantik moment. talk to your doctor about opioid-induced constipation. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help.
back now with the panel. a lot of palace intrigue this week. here are the headlines, all there, they were all semibannon
related. steve bannon, the chief strategist there. what do you make of it and do you connect bannon being kicked off the security council, two days later something he argued against, a syria strike, happens. it is clear if it is bannon versus the president's son-in-law, bannon is losing. >> only one person who can't be fired in that equation. if the democrats take over, and this is one bizarre thing about this administration, you have jared kuser and ivanka trump, who wodn'te within 100 miles of any oer republican administration. if they take over, i think you'll see probably a less chaotic white house, but on policy, i would worry anything that might be embarrassing at a dinner party with anna wintour will be jetsoned. >> i think son-in-laws do get fired sometimes. it is like a philosophical difference almost, a fancy restaurant called cipriani.
>> but never been there? >> i've never been there. a bunch of truck stops in texas called buckings and they're different parts of america. and which are different parts o america, and which is the administration ogoing the orient around? that is a different philosophical question, and it is very difficult to have an administration dining as well as buc-ee's at the same time. >> and you can't have troika. >> no, it is the palace intrigue and the sublime support and the byzantine empire, and you have bannon and the favorite daughter and the son-in-law, and for sure, bannon is expendable many that equation, but he has a lot of sway with the president or he would not be there. >> and is bannon one that you want outside of the tent? >> and not the mention the ft
that bannon is credited for helping trump to get elected. i don't believit is jared curbner, and, so i think that it is certain that when you are looking at the palace intrigue, i thought it was fascinating that general dunford, the chief of staff chose kushner to take with him on the trip to iraq. it is very much, and you can see that rest of the administration is reading the tea leaves as well. the pentagon believes that kushner is where the future is. >> and this is amazing thing, because if you are looking at washington, there is no trumpist wing, and the core trumpists are only a faction within the white house itself. what i fear is what is best about the trumpism is a focus on the working class voters and the widening out of the economic policies beyond the marginal tax cuts is going to be jettisoned. >> and imagine the al tern tter in something called civic hall. and hillary clinton has largely stayed out of the white house and stayed in new york, while
her daughter chelsea has been running the family foundation, and earning five and six figure fees while giving speeches to corporations with interests in washington. >> totally credible. and everybody would have said the same thing about jared kushner going to iraq. people would be critical, but the problem with hillary is d n daughter and foundation, and looked corrupt and you know what -- >> why did we fight the revolution, because now we have a monarchy with the family intrigue. the one thing about the bannon thing that is interesting to me is that you don't have to be kind to succeed, but you have the be nice, you have to be superficially pleasant to work with the people that you are working with, and he is failing that. >> and what happens if there is a a flip on syria, and that would be a large flip with a barry gold fooin? >> well, it would be the same return to donald trump, and the
one who said to libel rals, you will like having me as president and don't worry about, and the donald trump before he moved further to right to embrace more of the republican orthodoxy is where we need to see it as moving. >> but we have the midterms next year, and if donald trump abandons the people who elected him and bannon does in many ways represent that wing of the republican party, then he is in trouble, and the republican party will be in trouble in 2018. >> all right. a good place to pause. we will be back in 45 seconds with the "end game" and what hillary clinton said about president trump and the people who voted for him. coming up, "meet the press" end game and post game brought to you by boeing, always working to build something better.
♪ if you have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or crohn's, and your symptoms have left you with the same view, it may be time for a different perspective. if other treatments haven't worked well enough, ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works by focusing right in the gi-tract to help control damaging inflammation and is clinically proven to begin helping many patients achieve both symptom relief as well as remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. while not reported with entyvio, pml, a rare, serious brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores.
liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's medication isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. entyvio. relief and remission within reach. "meet the press end game" brought to you by boeing. back now with "end game." >> hillary clinton came out and did an interview with nick kristof where hours before
president trump addressed the nation saying we're bombing an airfield, she recommended we bomb the airfield. she said something else in the interview that is in his column this morning talking about the election. she characterized the mindset of trump voters this way. i don't agree, i don't approve of him, but he looks like someone that has been president before. hl lean -- helene, she believed that misogyny played a larger role than many of us thought. >> i think many women feel that way. i don't think i would necessarily dismiss that. i've talked to plenty of trump voters who say they didn't just like hillary, including women. no, i just, i didn't like her. there is something to be said for that. i think that -- i'm not going to plug my book, because you are give meg the perfect opportunity to do that. >> say the title there. >> "mad d
"madame president." >> but i am. >> about what happened in the liberian election when they elected a woman, but we can't pretend it doesn't exist. >> but she sd women in power t negavely characterized over time more so than men. that is the larger argument. what do you say? >> first of all, hillary clinton doesn't want to take responsibility for anything, and she lost it because she is hillary clinton and not because she is a woman. and yes, women in power are more negatively portrayed and can i go after lindsey graham and use a bad word? we know what it is. if you want to be a woman who is influential, then stand up to it, and then ug nor it and it will stand up over time. a
scream building misogyny doesn't change things. >> i disagree. it clearly played a role. donald trump is a cliché of old fashioned masculinity. and a lot of people long for that kind of masculinity which is they ever coming back, but they long for it. to say that his hyper macho stereotype is not part of why he got elected, i mean it wasn't his knowledge. >> you saw this in the primaries. if he was standing in the middle of the debate stage, he was just a bigger figure than anyone else up there. he had a certain bearing and that helped, but hillary clinton is not good at politics. she is not a good campaigner. probably the one active politician in the country that could have lost to trump and she did. >> do you think another woman could have beaten trump? >> a likable woman, yes. >> to phrase likable, and the using the words like likable, and donald trump is likable? >> well, there are women politicians who are likable, and hillary in a barack obama said it, you are likable enough hillary, and that is not true. it is not true many this election. >> maybe it is associatable is enough, and people think that she gets me, and maybe they don't get me. >> and relatable is better than
likability. all right. well, this is -- [ laughter ] this one is fraught with a lot of peril, but we will -- the good news is that guess what, a lot of people will be having their own debates about this issue later on this morning. that is all we have today, and we will be back next week, because even on easter sunday, it is "meet the press." so we will see you next sunday. you can see more end game in "post game" on the "meet the press" facebook page.
he was offering us $1,000 apiece for delivering a boat to the south africa. >> he had a lot of many knee that he was taking back with him. >> he had stashed it all behind there. >> everything was too good to be true. stop thboat. i say, stop that boat. >> i looked into the eyes, and they were wild. >> if you move, i will kill you. >> this is the beginning of the journey into hell. >> i want $20 million. >> we have been set up. >> this
MSNBC April 9, 2017 5:00pm-6:01pm PDT
This Sunday-morning public-affairs institution is network TV's oldest program, but it's certainly no dinosaur as it continues to be a prime forum for newsmakers (domestic and foreign) wanting to make announcements or test political waters. The series, in which guests are questioned by the moderator and a panel of journalists, began its life in prime time in November 1947.
Syria 37, Assad 36, Isis 10, Russia 9, Donald Trump 8, Chuck 7, Iraq 7, Obama 7, Clinton 6, Trump 6, Washington 6, Pentagon 4, Lindsey Graham 4, Haley 3, Bernie Sanders 3, United Nations 3, Steve Bannon 3, Mr. Trump 3, Jared Kushner 3, Tim Kaine 3
Richmond, CA, USA
Virtual Ch. 1113
Uploaded by TV Archive on April 10, 2017


text:
Q: Size of device file ( missing in ls -l output ) When I try to print the device file output shows binary data in hexadecimal format. But upon doing a ls -l /dev/sda I get:
brw-rw----  1 root disk      8,   0 Jan 29 12:29 /dev/sda

I don't understand what is the actual size of the file? What do these numbers mean?

A: I can't find any documentation for why ls shows them instead of a plain 0 like du or stat, but, as Byte Commander says, they are the major and minor device numbers of that special file. From the source:
if (f->stat_ok
  && (S_ISCHR (f->stat.st_mode) || S_ISBLK (f->stat.st_mode)))
{
  char majorbuf[INT_BUFSIZE_BOUND (uintmax_t)];
  char minorbuf[INT_BUFSIZE_BOUND (uintmax_t)];
  int blanks_width = (file_size_width
                      - (major_device_number_width + 2
                         + minor_device_number_width));
  sprintf (p, "%*s, %*s ",
           major_device_number_width + MAX (0, blanks_width),
           umaxtostr (major (f->stat.st_rdev), majorbuf),
           minor_device_number_width,
           umaxtostr (minor (f->stat.st_rdev), minorbuf));
  p += file_size_width + 1;
}

This code, part of the print_long_format() function, used when the output format is long (which it is with -l), uses the device numbers in place of size for character and block device.
To get the actual size of the device, several methods are listed in this Unix & Linux post.

A: TL;DR : that's how the developers have implemented the ls.c. Depending on the filetype, the output string for long option -l will be build up differently. GNU documentation fails to mention the format difference(see side note about OpenBSD man page).
Device files and ls source code
/dev/sda is a block device (explained later in the section). It's different from regular file. ls.c builds up the long output string according to what filetype it is working on. As is shown below, for block devices nothing about size is appended to the output string !
ls.c has the following lines of code:
   3757 static void
   3758 print_long_format (const struct fileinfo *f)
   3759 {

( partially omited )

   3868   if (f->stat_ok
   3869       && (S_ISCHR (f->stat.st_mode) || S_ISBLK (f->stat.st_mode)))
   3870     {
   3871       char majorbuf[INT_BUFSIZE_BOUND (uintmax_t)];
   3872       char minorbuf[INT_BUFSIZE_BOUND (uintmax_t)];
   3873       int blanks_width = (file_size_width
   3874                           - (major_device_number_width + 2
   3875                              + minor_device_number_width));
   3876       sprintf (p, "%*s, %*s ",
   3877                major_device_number_width + MAX (0, blanks_width),
   3878                umaxtostr (major (f->stat.st_rdev), majorbuf),
   3879                minor_device_number_width,
   3880                umaxtostr (minor (f->stat.st_rdev), minorbuf));
   3881       p += file_size_width + 1;
   3882     }
   3883   else
   3884     {
   3885       char hbuf[LONGEST_HUMAN_READABLE + 1];
   3886       char const *size =
   3887         (! f->stat_ok
   3888          ? "?"
   3889          : human_readable (unsigned_file_size (f->stat.st_size),
   3890                            hbuf, file_human_output_opts, 1,
   3891                            file_output_block_size));
   3892       int pad;
   3893       for (pad = file_size_width - mbswidth (size, 0); 0 < pad; pad--)
   3894         *p++ = ' ';
   3895       while ((*p++ = *size++))
   3896         continue;
   3897       p[-1] = ' ';
   3898     }

Notice that if filetype is S_ISCHR (character device, continuous stream of data) or  S_ISBLK (block device, random access) the major and minor device numbers are printed to character array p (which is essentially a string). That is the only data that is appended to the output string p . However, when we get to else part , ls understands that we're working with files other than block or character devices. For those files it assigns data stored in size array to the next segments of that p size array ( that's while ((*p++ = *size++)) part).
The core idea is that ls knows what filetype it's looking at , and builds up output accordingly
What are device files anyway?
Essentially they are references. They are way for applications to deal with actual physical devices and their drivers. For example , /dev/sda and /dev/sr0 (which is CD/DVD drive). Some of the devices are just abstraction. For example, /dev/zero, /dev/null, and /dev/random aren't physical devices. They are ways of interfacing with kernel processes.
Since they are references, it makes sense that they wouldn't have filesize. It's possible to know the size of those files that they take up in the /dev directory, but they don't correspond to the actual devices they represent !
Thus it is understandable why ls.c developers implemented the code that way. The file size of the references is 99.99% of the times not needed for any reason whatsoever.
But block devices, by which we typically mean hard drives and USB drives, are physical devices, with real physical size, so how do we find out that ?
Finding out the size of actual block devices
The bellow methods illustrate how one could find out size of a hard/ssd/USB drive referenced by a block device in `/dev/

*

*lsblk or lsblk /dev/sda

*sudo blockdev --getsize64 /dev/sda

*sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda or sudo fdisk -l for all devs

*sudo parted /dev/sda print or sudo parted -l for all devs

*awk '{print $1*512}' /sys/class/block/sda/size

*awk  '{$3=$3*1024;print}' /proc/partitions or awk  '$4 == "sda1" {$3=$3*1024;print}' /proc/partitions for specific partitions.

Side notes

*

*/proc/devices contains list of all major numbers corresponding to the block devices

*du, stat and find commands can show you the size of those references, but not necessary for daily life (if at all)

*There is difference between representation of block devices; some files implement representation blocks of 512 (such as under /sys filesystem), while others - 1024. This is a convention in the Unix/Linux world, since that's how actual physical blocks on hard drives are allocated.

*Unlike GNU ls documentation, OpenBSD man page explicitly states: "If the file is a character special or block special file, the major and minor device numbers for the file are displayed in the size field." (emphasis added by me)

References

*

*Understanding /dev and its subdirs and files

*Determine the size of a block device

*Understanding /dev

*Difference between Device file and device drivers

*Wikipedia:Device file

*Linux Kernel, Chapter 8

A: It seems you missed the concept of 'everything-is-a-file'.
In the world of UNIX everything (data, devices, sockets, ..) is mapped to a file. Those files have types - in the case of your home directory you will (mostly) find so called regular files (text, programs,...).
In contrast to these regular files the /dev-directory holds - implied by the name - device files. Therefore you will find files of type character, block and pipe representing devices, eg. /dev/mem is a file that represents your systems memory, /dev/ttyACM0 can be a serial modem. The link between these (device-)files and the responsible drivers is created using the major and minor numbers as shown by ls (and as explained above).
The size of a device is a device specific attribute and must be queried using device specific tools (as shown in the post above) cause there is no unique way to deal with that attribute (a SSD may have a fixed size - but a serial port can deliver an endless stream of data so there is no fixed size, /dev/null has endless storage :)).
You can read on here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everything_is_a_file

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
La chiesa di San Giorgio Martire è la parrocchiale di Clauiano, frazione di Trivignano Udinese, in provincia e arcidiocesi di Udine; fa parte della forania del Friuli Centrale.

Storia

Anticamente a Clauiano sorgevano due chiese, dedicate rispettivamente a San Martino e a San Giorgio; dopo la demolizione della prima, la seconda divenne il fulcro del paese, tanto che quando si doveva dirimere qualche questione ci riuniva proprio presso di essa.

La nuova parrocchiale fu costruita nel XVIII secolo; il 2 dicembre 1735 il parroco e vicario foraneo di Trivignano don Carlo Vit venne autorizzato dl patriarca Dionisio Delfino a benedire il coro e l'altare maggiore e l'intera chiesa fu consacrata il 23 giugno 1767, come ricordato da un'iscrizione presente su una lapide.

La chiesa venne restaurata in seguito al terremoto del Friuli del 1976 e poi adeguata ai dettami post-conciliari negli anni ottanta.

Descrizione

Esterno
La simmetrica facciata a capanna della chiesa, rivolta a sudovest e scandita da quattro lesene tuscaniche, presenta centralmente il portale d'ingresso architravato e sopra un oculo contenente un rilievo raffigurante il Padreterno.

Sopra il prospetto principale si innesta il campanile a base rettangolare, la cui cella presenta sui lati lunghi delle bifore e su quelli corti delle monofore ed è coronata dal cupolino in rame.

Interno
L'interno dell'edificio si compone di un'unica navata, sulla quale si affacciano le cappelle laterali introdotte da archi a tutto sesto e le cui pareti sono scandite da paraste sorreggenti la trabeazione modanata e aggettante sopra la quale si imposta la volta a botte ribassata; al termine dell'aula si sviluppa il presbiterio, rialzato di alcuni gradini e chiuso dall'abside poligonale.

Qui sono conservate diverse opere di pregio, tra le quali il fonte battesimale, scolpito da Carlo da Carona, nel XVI secolo, l'altare maggiore, costruito da Pasquale Lazzarin nel XVII secolo, le due pale raffiguranti rispettivamente il Crocifisso fra i santi Sebastiano, Carlo, Nicolò e Rocco con le anime del Purgatorio e San Giorgio e il drago e il dipinto con soggetto lAdorazione dei Magi, eseguito probabilmente dal carnico Osvaldo Gortanutti.

Note

Voci correlate
Clauiano
Arcidiocesi di Udine
Parrocchie dell'arcidiocesi di Udine
Regione ecclesiastica Triveneto

Altri progetti

Collegamenti esterni

Giorgio
Trivignano
Giorgio Martire
Giorgio Martire

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Sonic Gems Collection ist eine Videospielsammlung, die vom Sonic Team entwickelt und von Sega erstmals in Japan am 11. August 2005 für Nintendo GameCube und PlayStation 2 veröffentlicht wurde. Sie enthält je nach Region insgesamt elf oder fünfzehn Spiele, die von 1991 bis 1997 für verschiedene Sega-Konsolen, den PC oder als Arcade-Automaten erschienen sind und nicht auf der Sonic Mega Collection oder Sonic Mega Collection Plus enthalten waren, davon neun aus der Sonic-Spieleserie. In Nordamerika wurde das Spiel nicht für PlayStation 2 veröffentlicht.

Inhalt
Die Sonic Gems Collection enthält folgende Spiele:

Alle Spiele sind absolut identisch mit dem entsprechenden Original, wobei Sonic the Hedgehog CD und Sonic R auf die jeweilige PC-Version basieren. Die Anleitungen aller Spiele wurden eingescannt und sind einsehbar.

Weitere Inhalte der Collection sind Artworks, Soundtracks und Videos. Zudem sind Demo-Versionen von den sieben von Beginn an auswählbaren Sega-Mega-Drive- und den sechs Sega-Game-Gear-Sonicspielen, die auf der Sonic Mega Collection Plus enthalten waren, in der Sonic Gems Collection implementiert. Man startet dabei immer beim jeweiligen Endbosskampf. Schafft man den Endbosskampf in der vorgegebenen Zeit, kann man das jeweilige Spiel so lange spielen, bis das Zeitlimit ausläuft. Im Grunde sind diese Spiele also auch vollständig auf der Sonic Gems Collection enthalten, jedoch nur sehr eingeschränkt spielbar.

Entwicklung
Nachdem die Verkaufszahlen der Sonic Mega Collection und Sonic Mega Collection Plus die Erwartungen von Sega übertraf, war es das Ziel, eine Sonic-Collection zu veröffentlichen, die die übrigen und weniger bekannten Sonic-Spiele enthalten sollte. Konnte man zuvor unkompliziert die Sega-Mega-Drive-Spiele emulierten, mussten diesmal viele verschiedene Systeme zum Laufen gebracht werden, was sich als schwieriger herausstellte, als zunächst angenommen.

So wurde das eigentlich für die Sonic Gems Collection eingeplante Knuckles' Chaotix schlussendlich nicht eingebaut, weil es zu schwierig war, 32X-Spiele auf die Schnelle ohne Spielfehler umzusetzen. Beim Arcade-Spielhallenautomat SegaSonic the Hedgehog scheiterte die Umsetzung an der eigentümlichen Steuerung mit einem "Track Ball", die laut Yūji Naka nicht mit den Controllern der Konsolen vereinbar war. Sonic Eraser wurde nach dem Wegfall der beiden anderen Sonic-Spiele ebenfalls entfernt, da es aufgrund des wenigen Spielumfangs und der geringen Qualität nicht zu sehr im Fokus stehen sollte. Stattdessen kamen die Sega-Game-Gear-Sonicspiele, die nicht auf der Sonic Mega Collection Plus enthalten waren, dazu. Abseits von Sonic wurden die Sega Mega Drive-Spiele Wonder Boy III: Monster Lair (1990), Wonder Boy in Monster World (1991) und Monster World IV (1994) ebenfalls nicht umgesetzt, obwohl dies ursprünglich geplant war.

Rezeption

Die Sonic Gems Collection erhielt vorwiegend mäßige Wertungen. Allgemein wurde Sonic the Hedgehog CD als bestes Spiel der Collection angesehen, die übrigen Spiele alterten laut der Fachpresse nicht unbedingt immer gut.

Einzelnachweise

USK 6
Computerspiel 2005
Computerspielsammlung
Sonic


text:
What Is Peer Reviewed Articles
Here are some qualities of peer-reviewed articles; however, just because an article has one more more of these does not mean that the article is automatically.
and specifically to an examination of gender patterns in research submitted for publication to the largest of our five peer reviewed journals. So, what did we find out? From all the articles submitted.
Vaccines save lives. This fact is proven by science, which is based on careful analysis of experimental data published in.
Some journals — including F1000Research and PeerJ — have used open peer review to some extent for years. The study used data from journals published by Elsevier, which said that in light of the.
Peer-reviewed (refereed) is a designation given to a publication based on its policy of sending research articles out for review and evaluation by experts in the.
In general, information that has been been created, selected, or reviewed by experts is more reliable, helpful, and accurate. These "experts" are often referred to as "scholars" and thus the articles and books they produce are referred to as scholarly sources.
Oct 8, 2018. Here's one method for effectively peer-reviewing papers, says Mathew. After the first reading, attempt to 'mirror' the article by writing down,
Peer-reviewed articles have been evaluated by several researchers or subject specialist in the academic community prior to accepting it for publication. Also known as scholarly or refereed. Verify that a journal is peer reviewed (refereed) by looking up the journal title in Ulrich's Periodicals Directory.
The peer review process. The peer review process can be broadly summarized into 10 steps, although these steps can vary slightly between journals. Explore what's involved, below. Editor Feedback: "Reviewers should remember that they are representing the readers of the journal.
For Rent Evolution 2 See photos, floor plans and more details about Evolution at Towne Centre Laurel in Laurel, Maryland. Visit Rent.com now. 1–3 Beds; 1–2 Baths; 690-1453 Sqft. See all available apartments for rent at Evolution at Towne Centre Laurel in Laurel, MD. Evolution. 2 BR x 2 BA, Call for Rent, $300, 1,042 Sq Ft, Not Available.
May 30, 2011 · Answers. Peer review means that the editors of journals in various fields don't have to be experts in every single subfield; it also means that when someone comes along to do research in a field they aren't already expert in, they can be sure of the quality of what they're reading.
Peer review has established itself as a crucial validation mechanism for modern science. Despite the disadvantages associated with its practice, it remains a powerful method to add value to scientific.
Yet another publisher has found itself in the midst of a peer review scandal. Hindawi Publishing Corp., a New York- and Cairo-based group that oversees 437 academic journals, is now reviewing 32.
today announced the publication of peer reviewed data in the journal Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research which analyzed CT scan information from a population of over 24,000 patients. The study,
Abstracts from Peer Reviewed Literature on Coconut Oil and Derivatives Virgin Coconut Oil. The protective role of virgin coconut oil on the alloxan-induced oxidative stress in the liver, kidneys and heart of diabetic rats.
Barely a week goes by without a new proposal to improve peer review: how to make it faster, better at spotting errors, more transparent, less prone to bias, less burdensome. But it's difficult to.
Jun 18, 2014. Peer review is one of the gold standards of science. Some journals, such as the British Medical Journal, desk reject up to two-thirds or more.
What is peer review? Many (but not all!) scholarly journals are peer reviewed. In this system, journal article are reviewed by several other researchers in the field.
Every now and then a scholarly journal retracts an article because of errors or outright fraud. In academic circles, and sometimes beyond, each retraction is a big deal. Now comes word of a journal.
Yet patents protect commercial rights, allowing startups to participate in peer review without fear of idea theft. There is no need for numerous papers. Discrete pivotal, high-impact articles would.
May 14, 2019. Most of the content on JSTOR is peer-reviewed, but there are some exceptions. " Peer review" is the process by which academic.
Many believe that there is something sacred about the process by which manuscripts undergo peer-review by journals. A rigorous study described in a thoughtful paper is sent out to leading experts, who.
First of all, make sure it is an ARTICLE. Not everything that appears in a peer-reviewed journal is an article. Peer-reviewed journals also contain items such as editorials and book reviews, and these are not subjected to the same level of critique
At that meeting, attendees generally agreed that it would be a good thing if journals made the text of peer-review reports public, says Polka. But they also wanted more studies on the pros and cons of.
A peer-reviewed journal publishes articles that have gone through a rigorous review process. The extent and process for the review will.
Jan 25, 2019. Understanding Peer-Reviewed / Scholarly Journals. for publishing, a scholarly journal that is not peer-reviewed only requires the approval of.
Peer review involves subjecting the author's scholarly work and research to the scrutiny of other experts in the same field to check its validity and evaluate its suitability for publication. A peer review helps the publisher decide whether a work should be accepted.
International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR) is an open access, peer-reviewed, International Journal, that provides rapid publication (monthly) of research articles, review articles and short communications in all subjects. IJAR has got Impact factor of 6.118 and highest Index Copernicus value of 56.43.
This tutorial provides a quick introduction to finding scholarly, peer-reviewed articles using SJSU's databases. Topics covered include selecting a database,
Explanation of peer-reviewed articles. The following definition is found in Cabell's Directory of Publishing Opportunities: Psychology and Psychiatry, David W.E. Cabell, Editor, 2007-2008 on page XX. With some exceptions a refereed article is one that is blind reviewed.
Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competences as the producers of the work ().It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field.Peer review methods are used to maintain quality standards, improve performance, and provide credibility.
Aug 22, 2018. Explains the standard parts of a medical research article, compares characteristics of types of journals, and shows how to find peer reviewed.
Peer-reviewed articles are published in scholarly journals with an editorial board of scholars and specialists in the discipline related to the article topic.
Peer review is the essential part for maintaining substantial standard in publishing and brings out the best possible scientific novel information from the potential authors and researchers globally.
Feb 22, 2019 · Glossary of Terms & Definitions. Peer Review: The process by which scholars critically evaluate each other's research article prior to publication in an academic journal. Editor: An individual who reviews, corrects, and determines the final content of a publication< Scholarly Communication: "The system through which research.
Transcript for the video – Finding Peer Reviewed Articles in GALILEO.
Earlier this year the editors of Britain's two top medical journals spoke out forcefully about the peer review problem. Speaking at the Royal Society in London in April, Richard Smith, a former editor.
"Probably, peer-reviewed publication is not very high on their priority. encountered scrutiny when it became the subject of a glowing article in The Jerusalem Post in which its founders claimed.
Peer review works in a similar way. Because no one person can be an expert in so many disciplines, peer review allows the editor to determine if the author of the article is making accurate analyses and interpretations; essentially, peer reviewed articles build in a certain amount of quality.
Jan 29, 2018. Peer reviewed materials are publications reviewed by "experts in the field" or referees prior to the publication of the material. After reading and.
Peer-reviewed journals are considered to include only articles which adhere to the best research practices in the filed and will not publish articles that fail to meet the standards established for a.
Feb 26, 2019. A peer-reviewed journal is a journal article that has been selected, reviewed, and then approved for publication by other experts in the author's.
We are thrilled to announce that submissions are now open for five new journals dedicated to the Chemical Sciences. Starting today, researchers can submit manuscripts to PeerJ, for peer review, to the.
Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. Learn More Submit Now
Evolution Meals San Angelo Anabolic steroids, also known more properly as anabolic–androgenic steroids (AAS), are steroidal androgens that include natural androgens like testosterone as well as synthetic androgens that are structurally related and have similar effects to testosterone. They are anabolic and increase protein within cells, especially in skeletal muscles, and also have varying degrees of androgenic and. Who
Apr 17, 2017. But it is usually unclear to them what peer-reviewed sources are exactly, and if some peer-reviewed sources are better than others. This article.
The past week has seen rather lively discussion about the scientific publishing industry and peer review. Peter Murray-Rust has produced a series of posts about his issues with the process (start here.
How to recognize peer-reviewed (refereed) journals In many cases professors will require that students utilize articles from "peer-reviewed" journals.
Sep 28, 2018 · Peer-reviewed articles are reviewed by experts in that subject or field to ensure validity and reliability before publication. These articles should be used as sources for research papers. Another name for peer-reviewed is refereed.
Nov 20, 2018 · In academic publishing, the goal of peer review is to assess the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Before an article is deemed appropriate to be published in a peer-reviewed journal, it must undergo the following process:
Dec 26, 2005 · Peer Review Definition. One way has been to increase the speed and lower the cost of the communications involved in reviewing works, such as articles prior to publication. In addition, the movement of publications from hard copy format to online format, which is still in its early stages, will further increase the speed of publishing,
Oceanography Online Graduate Degree Sep 26, 2018. Master of Science in Marine Science and Technology – Students may. program has a flexible course structure, including online courses. A new master's degree offering from MOOC platform EdX and seven partner universities allows online learners to earn a post-baccalaureate diploma at a fraction of the cost of a traditional program. For.
Feb 12, 2019. Databases with content coming almost entirely from scholarly journals might not provide a specific limiter for peer-reviewed or refereed.
Many people think of post publication peer review as the comments and letters that appear after scientific articles are published. They point out that these are usually sparse or non existent and.
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer.
Mar 25, 2019. Most of the article databases available through B.C. Libraries provide a way to limit search results to peer-reviewed publications*. Look for a.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


a leading supplier for the logistics in the broad sense. As a result of merger with RedPrairie, an organisation was established that supports customers at the stage of planning and implementing in the supply chain.
as a result of acquisition of Motorola Solutions, ZEBRA Technologies has become number 1 in the market of printing technologies and the reading of bar codes, 2D and RFID codes.
is a global leader of the technology for automatic data collection and process automation, specialising in the production of equipment for reading bar codes and 2D codes, mobile computers, industrial sensors, systems of laser marking and industrial automatics.
is a German manufacturer of label printers, automatic application system and systems for laser marking. Due to the highly developed R&D, Cab sets standards in the designing of new, innovative technologies of label printing.
is a part of a global industrial conglomerate specialising in the production of solutions ensuring the automation of data collection and analysis in industrial and logistics environments. Honeywell specialises in the production of label printers, bar code scanners and 2D codes and in the production of mobile terminals.
is a part of Toshiba corporation, specialising in the production of top quality bar code printers (label printers).


text:
Finding the Fourth Beatle: John, Paul, George and their 18 drummers
November 3, 2017 by Daytrippin'
by David Bedford and Garry Popper
The Beatles phenomenon is one amazing story that John Lennon tried to sum up by stating: "I met Paul and said, 'Do you want to join me band?' and then George joined, and then Ringo joined. We were just a band who made it very, very big."
That is one of the biggest understatements ever, because it was so much more complicated than that, and the story involves 18 drummers.
Neil Aspinall once said that "the story of the Beatles always seemed to be about John, Paul, George and a drummer."
When examined closely, that is exactly what happened, yet nobody has concentrated on the story of those drummers, and the crises in the evolution of The Beatles that always seemed to be around losing, or gaining, a drummer.
How many drummers can you count that played with the Fab Three between 1956 and 1970? We have found 18!
In a new book, and forthcoming documentary film, Finding the Fourth Beatle tells the story of The Beatles from 1956-1970 through the 18 drummers, including Colin Hanton, Pete Best and Jimmie Nicol, and some you will not have heard of before. The book and film explore the Beatles' crises, changes of musical direction, getting a record deal, and finding the drummer who would put the beat into The Beatles: Ringo Starr, the Fourth Beatle.
The Crisis Points
After Colin Hanton quit The Quarrymen in the summer of 1958, John, Paul and George didn't play with a drummer again until May 1960.
Drummer Tommy Moore with The Silver Beatles (courtesy Finding the Fourth Beatle)
As if to show what chaos there was in 1960, they played with nine different drummers, many of them just the once. Tommy Moore was their first drummer, though even he turned up late for their debut performance at the Larry Parnes audition, so Johnny Hutchinson sat in with them until Tommy turned up. After their Scottish tour backing Johnny Gentle, Moore was so fed up with John Lennon that he quit the group. Despite desperate pleas, he refused to play with them again.
This gave rise to the legend of "Ronnie the Ted" who sat in for one evening in June 1960, though our investigations have unveiled another drummer who played for one song only, and took himself off the stage. That 16-year-old was not a drummer, though he did record with Apple later.
August 1960 – Hamburg Crisis
Drummer Norman Chapman (courtesy Finding the Fourth Beatle)
They soon discovered a new drummer, Norman Chapman, who had just joined, and settled in well with John, Paul, George and Stuart. He should have gone to Hamburg with The Beatles. However, his luck was to run out too, because a week before departing for Hamburg, he was called up for National Service, and joined the army for the next two years. Crisis time again!
A letter turned up a few years ago, written by Paul McCartney, responding to an advert in the Liverpool Echo. The drummer has remained a mystery, but will be revealed for the first time in Finding the Fourth Beatle. Another previously untold story is that this young man wasn't the only one to be considered for an audition. The son of a friend of Paul's father, Jim McCartney, was advised to go for an audition, but decided to take his girlfriend to the movies instead.
The same day that Paul wrote that letter in response to the advert, Paul also rang Pete Best, their friend from the Casbah Coffee Club. Pete came for an audition the following day, underwent a rehearsal that turned into a performance at the Jacaranda the next day, and then, a couple of days later, they were heading off to Hamburg. For the first time in two years, The Beatles had a permanent drummer, and one who would stay with them for the next two years, where they gained a fantastic reputation, made a record in Hamburg, acquired a manager in Brian Epstein and a record deal with Parlophone.
While they were in Hamburg the first time, The Beatles started hanging out with other Liverpool musicians, especially those from Rory Storm and the Hurricanes, including Hurricanes' drummer Ringo Starr. On October 15, 1960, Lu Walters from the Hurricanes decided to make a record, so he asked his drummer Ringo, and three friends from The Beatles – John, Paul and George – to join them. And so for the first time, John, Paul, George and Ringo appeared on a record together. Their lives would take very different paths over the next two years until they would release a record together again.
June 1961 – The Tony Sheridan Recordings
Performing as The Beat Brothers, and backing Tony Sheridan, John, Paul, George and Pete recorded with Bert Kaempfert, the German producer. Many stories have emerged from this session, especially around Pete Best's drumming. Did he have his bass drum taken away? Was his timekeeping poor? Again, with the help of our experts, we test the eyewitness reports and analyze the recordings. Even though The Beatles were never keen on the record, it did bring them to the attention of Brian Epstein.
November 1961 – Brian Epstein
How much did Brian Epstein becoming their manager make a difference to The Beatles? It is well known that without Brian, The Beatles would not have got out of Liverpool, or obtained a record deal, their ultimate aim. We examine the intricacies of that first management contract that Brian never signed, including an interview with Brian's lawyer. Why didn't Brian sign it? In the process of looking for the evidence, we have also uncovered a partnership contract that was signed between John, Paul, George and Pete at the end of 1961, even though it has been suggested that John, Paul and George wanted to get rid of Pete Best.
January 1962 – The Decca Audition
Within weeks, Brian managed to obtain an audition for The Beatles with Decca. Although they felt it went well, they were turned down. But why? We have enlisted the help of three drummers who evaluate Pete Best's drumming. We also have record producer Steve Levine, who tells us what record labels look for in a band. It is a revelation, and a unique examination of this famous audition.
February 1962 – Return to Decca
Having waited for weeks, Brian finally went to see Dick Rowe at Decca to be told that they wouldn't be giving The Beatles a record deal. "Groups with guitars are on their way out," said Mr. Rowe. So we examine the charts to see if groups with guitars were really on their way out, or if they were ever in? This led to the biggest crisis of Brian's short managerial reign; they were almost out of options. Eventually, they were turned down by every record label, including EMI. Where could Brian turn? He ended up meeting with George Martin. That in itself was not a straightforward process, and it was thanks to Decca that Brian ended up there. George Martin invited The Beatles down to EMI Studios, with a view to offering the group a record deal.
Acetate that Brian Epstein made which he took to George Martin (courtesy Finding the Fourth Beatle)
June 1962 – The EMI Session
The day that would change Pete Best's life forever, and the biggest crisis in Beatles history. But was it a test, or a recording session? We examine all the evidence, and the numerous eyewitness testimonies to reach our conclusion. Why does it matter? The conversation that George Martin had with Brian Epstein revolves around whether they were already under contract, or if the drummer issue being resolved is part of gaining that deal. We answer those questions, with evidence.
For many years, authors have been telling us that Pete Best was a terrible drummer, and using quotes from John, Paul and George about how awful Best was. We want to offer a more balanced view, revealing the positive quotes from John, Paul and George about Pete's drumming as well, which are often not quoted. As neither of the authors of Finding the Fourth Beatle is a drummer, we felt that only drummers were qualified to tell us who is and isn't a good drummer, and why. So we enlisted the help of nine different drummers to give us their opinion, plus those of one of Britain's top record producers Steve Levine, to help us examine the drumming of Pete and Ringo, and how they differ, plus understanding their styles too.
August 1962 – Was Pete Best Sacked?
The change from Pete Best to Ringo Starr has been one of the most controversial moments in Beatles history and, for the first time, we can reveal a plot that was worked out to get Pete Best out of The Beatles, without sacking him. This book and film will provide the conclusive evidence, revealed by Brian Epstein's lawyer, that Pete Best wasn't sacked, changing Beatles history.
Pete for Ringo
This brought Ringo Starr into the group, but was it a straight swap? Was it a case of get rid of Pete, bring in Ringo? Was it always going to be Ringo?
We have evidence, fully corroborated, that three other drummers were asked to join The Beatles before Ringo; Bobby Graham, Ritchie Galvin and Johnny Hutchinson. How different Beatles history could have been.
Ringo – The Fourth Beatle
Thankfully, with those other drummers turning the job down, this meant that Ringo became the Fourth Beatle, and the aim of this book is to analyze and understand what made him the right drummer for The Beatles, and his often-overlooked contribution to their recording career. We analyze his style, his kit, and why so many drummers to this day regard Ringo as the pioneer in modern drumming. His intuitive style helped create The Beatles' sound.
September 1962 – Andy White
The Beatles attended EMI Studios on September 4, 1962, and worked on "Love Me Do". Crisis time again, because George Martin didn't like Ringo's drumming. They came back a week later, with Andy White, one of the top session drummers, sitting in with John, Paul and George. Whose version is better? We ask our experts for their feedback.
June 1964 – Jimmie Nicol
The other main drummer's story to tell is that of Jimmie Nicol, the man who replaced Ringo at the eleventh hour after Ringo collapsed and was rushed to hospital in June 1964. For Nicol, it was the best thing he ever did, and the worst thing he ever did.
Other Drummers?
So, if you are counting, that isn't 18 drummers yet. We can rightly include Paul McCartney, as he drummed with the group in 1960, and of course, after Ringo quit The Beatles for a short time.
All of this will be in the context of the Liverpool music scene, and why The Beatles could only have come from Liverpool.
Finding the Fourth Beatle is about so much more than drummers. What started out as a book about the 18 Beatles drummers has turned into a re-examination of the critical points in Beatles history. In spite of the numerous books on The Beatles, we felt that there was a need to look again at those key events in more detail, and test every account, every eyewitness testimony, and search for the evidence that would reveal the truth.
To accompany the book, there will be a double CD featuring as many of the drummers performing as possible, including a record that Norman Chapman played on, plus the entire Decca audition, Parlophone audition from June 1962 and many more great tracks.
The book is being published in a limited-edition hardback of only 1,000 copies, and has already been selling well. We are looking to have the book available in early 2018, so you can pre-order your copy now at:
https://www.pledgemusic.com/projects/finding-the-fourth-beatle
For more info, visit www.thefourthbeatle.com
Categories: Beatles History, New Beatles merchandise | Tags: beatles, Beatles book, beatles documentary, beatles drummer, hamburg, jimmie nicol, liverpool, pete best, ringo starr, the beatles, the fourth beatle | Permalink.


As I take another step towards Software Quality Assurance Testing. I dive into the blog I found for this week blog post "Top Software Testing Techniques & Tools For Building Working Software" by Ekaterina Novoseltseva. In this blog I learn about the 4 top testing techniques and tools for building working software. Software testing is very important for program development because it helps reduce the risk, time, and cost that comes with developing a new software.
This wrapps up the 4 top testing techniques and tools for building software. For more information on this read the blog "Top Software Testing Techniques & Tools For Building Working Software" by Ekaterina Novoseltseva. This has been YessyMer in the World Of Computer Science, until next time. Thank you for your time.


Very rarely, when attempting to update the OnBoard application through the Apple App Store, you may get a popup saying the application is unavailable. The message is misleading and has to do with the App Store itself, not the application you are trying to download.
To resolve the issue, turn off the iPad, and then turn it back on. This should clear any App Store connection issues and allow you to update the OnBoard application.
Why can't I log into OnBoard?


text:
Q: Move files from parent directories to subdirectories based on file extension I have 139 directories that contain a subdirectory and files that need to be moved into the subdirectory.  I thought the simplest way to do this would be to use a mv command to recursively move the files based on their file extension of which there are only two. I have something like this:
xxx_03_001
 - xxx_03_001/xxx_03_001.csv
 - xxx_03_001/xxx_03_001.jpg
 - xxx_03_001/submissionDocumentation

xxx_03_002
 - xxx_03_002/xxx_03_002.csv
 - xxx_03_002/xxx_03_002.jpg
 - xxx_03_002/submissionDocumentation

I want:
xxx_03_001
 - xxx_03_001/submissionDocumentation/xxx_03_001.csv
 - xxx_03_001/submissionDocumentation/xxx_03_001.jpg

xxx_03_002
 - xxx_03_002/submissionDocumentation/xxx_03_002.csv
 - xxx_03_002/submissionDocumentation/xxx_03_002.jpg

How can I move these files recursively into the submissionDocumentation subdirectory within each parent directory?

A: Run this in the top level directory:
for dir in xxx_*; do
    mv "$dir"/*.{csv,jpg} "$dir"/submissionDocumentation/
done

A: On the top level:
find . -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d | while read dir
 do
 [ -d "${dir}/submissionDocumentation/" ] && find ${dir} -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type f -exec mv {} ${dir}/submissinDocumentation/ \;
 done


text:
Characterizing the FASD cerebral cortex in utero with DTI
Kroenke, Christopher (Chris) (PI)
Advanced Imaging Research Center
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Fetal exposure to alcohol leads to a wide range of neurological deficits collectively termed fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). The CDC estimates that FASD currently affects as many as 4.5 out of every 1000 births within the United States. Existing intervention strategies can improve the quality of life in affected individuals, provided they are initiated at the earliest age possible. Unfortunately, early FASD diagnosis is difficult, partly because behavioral manifestations of the disorder are not apparent until childhood. We propose to develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based strategy to detect cellular-level morphological alterations in the developing cerebral cortex. Nonhuman primate research subjects will be bred after being trained to drink 1.5 g/kg/day of ethanol, or an isocaloric amount of maltose/dextrin solution. Animals will continue to drink throughout the first 60 days of pregnancy, after which access to ethanol will be terminated. Fetal brain T2-weighted and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data will be acquired on 3 groups of ethanol or maltose/dextrin animals: group 1 will be scanned on gestational day (G)85, group 2 on G110, and group 3 on G135. Immediately after MRI, fetuses will be delivered by cesarian section and brains will be prepared for histological processing. The first aim for this experiment is to characterize the effects of early ethanol exposure on cerebral cortical thickness, surface area, and water diffusion anisotropy over the period ranging from G85 to G135. The second aim is to validate the cortical thickness effects of ethanol exposure using unbiased stereological techniques, and to characterize the biological source of the neuroimaging observations. The latter will be accomplished by determining cerebral cortical cell numbers, measuring the volume fraction of the neuropil, and quantifying morphological complexity of cortical neuronal axonal and dendritic arbors. This work will provide an objective strategy for characterizing the effects o early ethanol exposure on subsequent development of the cerebral cortex, which will facilitate earlier detection of FASD that is currently achievable.
National Institutes of Health: $522,961.00
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Medicine & Life Sciences 100%
Diffusion Tensor Imaging Medicine & Life Sciences 76%
Ethanol Medicine & Life Sciences 65%
Cerebral Cortex Medicine & Life Sciences 65%
caloreen Medicine & Life Sciences 40%
Maltose Medicine & Life Sciences 35%
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Medicine & Life Sciences 17%
Neuropil Medicine & Life Sciences 15%


This article explains about the security system available in WCF service. When WCF service is created, it is required to secure the service so that only required client can consume the service. This will make sure that communication channel between client and service is secured.


Magazine Layout has become a very trending style of presenting content on blogs. It gives the blog an authority look, makes blog look more professional. Many WordPress Themes sites are launching magazine layouted wordpress themes, on their on frameworks, but a Magazine style should be full of content. You must have visited popular sites like Huffinton Post, Mashable and Techcrunch, they are the perfect example of magazine sites, well in my perspective, Huffington Post is much better Magazine in terms of typography as well as layout, then Mashable and Techcrunch.
Tech News, is a premium magazine wordpress theme from Templatic. The WordPress Theme looks elegant and professional. Tech News Magazine Theme has got many options, and displays content on homepage in grid as well as list views. Here is complete list of features you will get with Tech News WordPress Theme.
Firstly, the design is awesome that your readers would love the theme.
Hi I am big fan of Premium WP themes & I generally like news and magazine style templates. I right now I have sahifa WordPress theme that I use on two of my blogs. I have also used Genesis theme on one of my blog and I just love it because most of the affiliate marketers and gurus are using it.


A few nights ago I was upstairs reading stories to my youngest two kids, Snoopy was down stairs with his daddy. He had a creamie popsicle to eat before joining up for story time. Suddenly we heard WAILING from downstairs, I could NOT figure out what was happening... I mean his dad was with him, why was he screaming like that??? I couldn't take it any longer, I had to know what was going on. I ran downstairs.
Apparently when Snoop took a big bite out of his creamy it had become obvious that his bottom, center-right tooth was loose. (It has a good wiggle now.) But this was all very upsetting to him, he hasn't lost any teeth yet.
3rd "whoever invented loosing your teeth anyway"
4th there's a kid in the other kindergarten class whose lost 'like 18' of his teeth and he can't even say stuff right anymore!
The next morning Snoopy announced that he will no longer be eating hard foods. It's just not going to happen, it hurts too much. At that moment Little Rabbit's Loose Tooth , by Lucy Bate, jumped right into my mind.
carrots and beans, I have a loose tooth."
very good for little rabbits."
little rabbits with a loose tooth."
Can you see why I thought of it? In the story they actually convince little rabbit that she still can eat hard food, you know just chew with her other teeth. (I've yet to convince Snoopy of that, even after reading this book... even after giving him some great advice sent via text from Whitney's oldest daughter who's been through tooth loss.) Look what little rabbit was eating when her tooth finally fell out? Soft chocolate ice cream.
This happens to be one of those books I remember vividly from my childhood. It's one my Grandma King had and she read to me often. When I started seriously collecting kids books I knew this was one I wanted to find, but I couldn't remember the title. So when I happened upon it thrifting for books one day I was VERY excited! My favorite part of the story when I was a kid was the page below. Little rabbit is unsure about giving her tooth to the tooth fairy and is contemplating other options. As a kid I didn't like the idea of the tooth fairy taking my tooth either, and I LOVED the idea of drilling a hole in it any wearing it as a necklace. Though I never actually tried.
Before I close PLEASE TELL ME, what's the going rate for teeth nowadays??? I have no idea.
PS Remember to enter our fun kite & fantastic book giveaway before 4-26!