text:
Library Home>All Subjects>T Subjects>The Temple
Boyd's Bible Dictionary:
(1) Solomon's temple erected at Jerusalem on Mount Moriah. David proposed to transform the tabernacle into a permanent temple at Jerusalem, and collected much material, but its construction was forbidden by the prophet Nathan (1 Chron. 17; 2 Sam. 7:7-297In all the places wherein I have walked with all the children of Israel spake I a word with any of the tribes of Israel, whom I commanded to feed my people Israel, saying, Why build ye not me an house of cedar? 8Now therefore so shalt thou say unto my servant David, Thus saith the Lord of hosts, I took thee from the sheepcote, from following the sheep, to be ruler over my people, over Israel: 9And I was with thee whithersoever thou wentest, and have cut off all thine enemies out of thy sight, and have made thee a great name, like unto the name of the great men that are in the earth. 10Moreover I will appoint a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as beforetime, 11And as since the time that I commanded judges to be over my people Israel, and have caused thee to rest from all thine enemies. Also the Lord telleth thee that he will make thee an house. 12And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. 13He shall build an house for my name, and I will stablish the throne of his kingdom for ever. 14I will be his father, and he shall be my son. If he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men: 15But my mercy shall not depart away from him, as I took it from Saul, whom I put away before thee. 16And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever. 17According to all these words, and according to all this vision, so did Nathan speak unto David. 18Then went king David in, and sat before the Lord, and he said, Who am I, O Lord God? and what is my house, that thou hast brought me hitherto? 19And this was yet a small thing in thy sight, O Lord God; but thou hast spoken also of thy servant's house for a great while to come. And is this the manner of man, O Lord God? 20And what can David say more unto thee? for thou, Lord God, knowest thy servant. 21For thy word's sake, and according to thine own heart, hast thou done all these great things, to make thy servant know them. 22Wherefore thou art great, O Lord God: for there is none like thee, neither is there any God beside thee, according to all that we have heard with our ears. 23And what one nation in the earth is like thy people, even like Israel, whom God went to redeem for a people to himself, and to make him a name, and to do for you great things and terrible, for thy land, before thy people, which thou redeemedst to thee from Egypt, from the nations and their gods? 24For thou hast confirmed to thyself thy people Israel to be a people unto thee for ever: and thou, Lord, art become their God. 25And now, O Lord God, the word that thou hast spoken concerning thy servant, and concerning his house, establish it for ever, and do as thou hast said. 26And let thy name be magnified for ever, saying, The Lord of hosts is the God over Israel: and let the house of thy servant David be established before thee. 27For thou, O Lord of hosts, God of Israel, hast revealed to thy servant, saying, I will build thee an house: therefore hath thy servant found in his heart to pray this prayer unto thee. 28And now, O Lord God, thou art that God, and thy words be true, and thou hast promised this goodness unto thy servant: 29Therefore now let it please thee to bless the house of thy servant, that it may continue for ever before thee: for thou, O Lord God, hast spoken it: and with thy blessing let the house of thy servant be blessed for ever. (2 Samuel 7:7‑29)). Solomon completed the work after David's plans and with the assistance of Hiram, king of Tyre. He began to build in the fourth year of his reign, B. C. 1012, and finished and dedicated it B. C. 1005 (1 Chron. 21; 22; 28:11-19; 29:4-7; 1 Kings 6-8; 2 Chron. 3-7). This costly and imposing structure, for the age, was pillaged several times during the Eastern invasions, and was finally destroyed during the last siege of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, B. C. 588. (2) The temple of Zerubbabel was begun in B. C. 534, by the returned captives under the lead of Zerubbabel and the patronage of King Cyrus of Persia. Owing to discords and direct opposition it was not completed till B. C. 515. It was much inferior to the first in cost and beauty, though one third larger in dimensions. It was partially destroyed by Antiochus Epiphanes, B. C. 163, and restored by Judas Maccabeus (Ezra 3-6). (3) Herod the Great removed the decayed temple of Zerubbabel and began the erection of a new one B. C. 17. This gorgeous and costly structure was not completed till the time of Herod Agrippa II., A. D. 64. It was of marble, after Graeco-Roman designs, and was destroyed by the Romans under Titus, A. D. 70, time verifying Mark 13:22And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. (Mark 13:2).
Concise Bible Dictionary:
One thing that materially distinguishes the temple from the tabernacle is that God said of it, "Mine eyes and Mine heart shall be there perpetually:" it referred to the kingdom and a settled order of things; whereas the tabernacle was typical of God's ways, and gave the idea of movement. And though the actual building was destroyed and rebuilt, and is now swept away, and will again be rebuilt, yet it is treated always as one house. Haggai 2:99The glory of this latter house shall be greater than of the former, saith the Lord of hosts: and in this place will I give peace, saith the Lord of hosts. (Haggai 2:9) may be translated, as in the LXX, "The latter glory of this house shall be greater than the former, saith the Lord of hosts: and in this place will I give peace, saith the Lord of hosts." When the Lord was on earth, though rejected by the rulers of Israel, He called the temple "My house," and "My Father's house;" but later on He said to the Jews "your house." The "latter glory" refers to the future, when God will be owned by His ancient people, and His glory be displayed.
Another thing that distinguished the temple was its being surrounded with chambers, so that the priests that were serving God could dwell around Him. Christ refers possibly to this in saying "In My Father's house are many mansions." The tabernacle had no flooring, the priests trod the earth; but in the temple they were separated from the earth by a flooring.
Temple Items
In the interior of the temple built by Solomon nothing but gold appeared; this is typical of divine righteousness, characterizing the throne and presence of God, as will be manifested in the millennium. The ark was placed in the temple, and had found there its abiding resting place: it was the token of God's presence. The candlesticks, tables of shewbread, golden altar, brazen altar, and laver (with ten smaller ones in addition, see LAVER), were similar to those in the tabernacle. God owned the house by filling it with His glory.
In the court of the temple were two pillars which received the names of JACHIN, "He will establish;" and BOAZ, "in him is strength," which perfectly agrees with the fact that it was God's house that was being built (1 Kings 7:2121And he set up the pillars in the porch of the temple: and he set up the right pillar, and called the name thereof Jachin: and he set up the left pillar, and called the name thereof Boaz. (1 Kings 7:21); Rev. 3:1212Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name. (Revelation 3:12)).
Another thing remarkable in the rearing of the temple was that it was built of stones made ready before being brought, so that there should be no noise of hammer, or ax, or iron tool, while it was in progress (1 Kings 6:77And the house, when it was in building, was built of stone made ready before it was brought thither: so that there was neither hammer nor axe nor any tool of iron heard in the house, while it was in building. (1 Kings 6:7)). Thus the church is being formed of living stones who have come to the Living Stone (the chief corner stone, Christ Himself), and the whole building fitly framed together is growing into a holy temple in the Lord (Eph. 2:20-2220And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; 21In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord: 22In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit. (Ephesians 2:20‑22); 1 Pet. 2:55Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ. (1 Peter 2:5)).
Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem
Of the actual erections there were—
1. THE TEMPLE BY SOLOMON. It was formed after the pattern of the tabernacle, being a rectangle of sixty cubits by twenty, and its height thirty cubits: the holy of holies was a cube of twenty cubits; the holy (place) was forty cubits by twenty, with a porch in front of ten cubits by twenty. The chambers and upper chambers and pillars and porches were additional as described (1 Kings 6).
2. THE TEMPLE BY ZERUBBABEL. Few particulars of this are given. Cyrus ordered the foundations to be strongly laid, and its height was to be sixty cubits, and its breadth sixty cubits (Ezra 6:33In the first year of Cyrus the king the same Cyrus the king made a decree concerning the house of God at Jerusalem, Let the house be builded, the place where they offered sacrifices, and let the foundations thereof be strongly laid; the height thereof threescore cubits, and the breadth thereof threescore cubits; (Ezra 6:3)). Probably it was the same size as the temple by Solomon: the breadth here of sixty cubits being its "length," and its width not mentioned; or, if the sixty cubits be the width, it may have included the chambers. It is not probable that it was larger than the first temple. The aged men, who had seen the first house, wept when they saw the foundations of this house laid. This temple continued until the days of Herod.
3. THE TEMPLE BY HEROD. The Jews said it was forty-six years in building (John 2:2020Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? (John 2:20)). Josephus gives almost the only account we have of it. It was apparently built over the old one, so as not to hinder the temple service: the priests themselves built the holy places. It was all on a magnificent scale. In the Gospels we read that the disciples exclaimed, "What stones! and what buildings!" and pointed out how it was "adorned with goodly stones and gifts." Herod was not God's man to build Him a house, nor were the leaders of the Jews fit men to carry on His worship. To the disciples the Lord declared that one stone should not be left upon another (Mark 13:1-21And as he went out of the temple, one of his disciples saith unto him, Master, see what manner of stones and what buildings are here! 2And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. (Mark 13:1‑2); Luke 21:5-65And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, he said, 6As for these things which ye behold, the days will come, in the which there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. (Luke 21:5‑6)). Though Josephus gives many details as to this temple, they are not distinct enough to enable a plan to be made of it. In the New Testament the word ναός refers to the house itself, and ιερόν to the buildings and courts in general. Apparently the Lord never entered the house itself. Doubtless this temple stood upon some part of mount Moriah, at the south-east corner of Jerusalem, but on what part of the enclosure is not known.
The Temple in Jerusalem destroyed by the Romans.
4. A FUTURE TEMPLE. Scripture speaks in many places of the return of the Jews to their own land, but in unbelief as to the Lord Jesus being their Messiah. They will apparently build a temple, but this must not be confounded with the one described by Ezekiel, though the Jews may attempt to build it as there described. God cannot bless them until His anointed One is owned, and therefore this temple will be destroyed (Psa. 74; Isa. 66:1-61Thus saith the Lord, The heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool: where is the house that ye build unto me? and where is the place of my rest? 2For all those things hath mine hand made, and all those things have been, saith the Lord: but to this man will I look, even to him that is poor and of a contrite spirit, and trembleth at my word. 3He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a man; he that sacrificeth a lamb, as if he cut off a dog's neck; he that offereth an oblation, as if he offered swine's blood; he that burneth incense, as if he blessed an idol. Yea, they have chosen their own ways, and their soul delighteth in their abominations. 4I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not. 5Hear the word of the Lord, ye that tremble at his word; Your brethren that hated you, that cast you out for my name's sake, said, Let the Lord be glorified: but he shall appear to your joy, and they shall be ashamed. 6A voice of noise from the city, a voice from the temple, a voice of the Lord that rendereth recompence to his enemies. (Isaiah 66:1‑6)).
5. EZEKIEL'S TEMPLE. This is fully described in Ezekiel 40-44: it will be built when the land is once again divided amongst the twelve tribes, and all brought into blessing. In the center of the land there will be a "holy oblation" of 25,000 cubits square, which will contain both the city and the temple. That cubits and not reeds are intended, see Ezekiel 45:2-32Of this there shall be for the sanctuary five hundred in length, with five hundred in breadth, square round about; and fifty cubits round about for the suburbs thereof. 3And of this measure shalt thou measure the length of five and twenty thousand, and the breadth of ten thousand: and in it shall be the sanctuary and the most holy place. (Ezekiel 45:2‑3). Other passages speak of the temple, Zion, and Jerusalem as associated together (Psa. 68:2929Because of thy temple at Jerusalem shall kings bring presents unto thee. (Psalm 68:29); Psa. 122; Isa. 2:2-32And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lord's house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. 3And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. (Isaiah 2:2‑3); Micah 3:1212Therefore shall Zion for your sake be plowed as a field, and Jerusalem shall become heaps, and the mountain of the house as the high places of the forest. (Micah 3:12) to 4:2). All these, though not exactly on the same spot, will fall within the "holy oblation," though the part on which the city will stand is also called "profane," or "common." Probably the city will be built on its old site, and the temple may be somewhat farther north. Then the latter glory of God's house will exceed all that has yet been, for the Lord Jesus will be the glory of the house.
Christ refers to His body as a temple in John 2:1919Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. (John 2:19), and Christians are now God's temple, in which the Spirit of God dwells. The body of each Christian is also spoken of as a temple of the Holy Ghost (1 Cor. 6:1919What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? (1 Corinthians 6:19)).
In Revelation 11:1919And the temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament: and there were lightnings, and voices, and thunderings, and an earthquake, and great hail. (Revelation 11:19) the temple of God is opened in heaven, in connection with which are the judgments that come forth to smite the earth (Rev. 14:15,1715And another angel came out of the temple, crying with a loud voice to him that sat on the cloud, Thrust in thy sickle, and reap: for the time is come for thee to reap; for the harvest of the earth is ripe. (Revelation 14:15)
17And another angel came out of the temple which is in heaven, he also having a sharp sickle. (Revelation 14:17); Rev. 15:5-85And after that I looked, and, behold, the temple of the tabernacle of the testimony in heaven was opened: 6And the seven angels came out of the temple, having the seven plagues, clothed in pure and white linen, and having their breasts girded with golden girdles. 7And one of the four beasts gave unto the seven angels seven golden vials full of the wrath of God, who liveth for ever and ever. 8And the temple was filled with smoke from the glory of God, and from his power; and no man was able to enter into the temple, till the seven plagues of the seven angels were fulfilled. (Revelation 15:5‑8); Rev. 16:1,171And I heard a great voice out of the temple saying to the seven angels, Go your ways, and pour out the vials of the wrath of God upon the earth. (Revelation 16:1)
17And the seventh angel poured out his vial into the air; and there came a great voice out of the temple of heaven, from the throne, saying, It is done. (Revelation 16:17)).
From Anstey's Doctrinal Definitions:
1 Kings 6:22And the house which king Solomon built for the Lord, the length thereof was threescore cubits, and the breadth thereof twenty cubits, and the height thereof thirty cubits. (1 Kings 6:2). The house which king Solomon built for the Lord, the length thereof was threescore cubits, and the breadth thereof twenty cubits, and the height thereof thirty cubits.
The idea of the temple did not originate with Solomon, but with David, who was not permitted to carry out his intention because he had been a man of war (1 Chron. 28:2-32Then David the king stood up upon his feet, and said, Hear me, my brethren, and my people: As for me, I had in mine heart to build an house of rest for the ark of the covenant of the Lord, and for the footstool of our God, and had made ready for the building: 3But God said unto me, Thou shalt not build an house for my name, because thou hast been a man of war, and hast shed blood. (1 Chronicles 28:2‑3)). God gave him a plan for the temple, as he had previously given Moses the plan for the tabernacle. This plan David communicated to Solomon, directing him to erect the building (1 Chron. 28:11-1911Then David gave to Solomon his son the pattern of the porch, and of the houses thereof, and of the treasuries thereof, and of the upper chambers thereof, and of the inner parlors thereof, and of the place of the mercy seat, 12And the pattern of all that he had by the spirit, of the courts of the house of the Lord, and of all the chambers round about, of the treasuries of the house of God, and of the treasuries of the dedicated things: 13Also for the courses of the priests and the Levites, and for all the work of the service of the house of the Lord, and for all the vessels of service in the house of the Lord. 14He gave of gold by weight for things of gold, for all instruments of all manner of service; silver also for all instruments of silver by weight, for all instruments of every kind of service: 15Even the weight for the candlesticks of gold, and for their lamps of gold, by weight for every candlestick, and for the lamps thereof: and for the candlesticks of silver by weight, both for the candlestick, and also for the lamps thereof, according to the use of every candlestick. 16And by weight he gave gold for the tables of showbread, for every table; and likewise silver for the tables of silver: 17Also pure gold for the fleshhooks, and the bowls, and the cups: and for the golden basons he gave gold by weight for every bason; and likewise silver by weight for every bason of silver: 18And for the altar of incense refined gold by weight; and gold for the pattern of the chariot of the cherubims, that spread out their wings, and covered the ark of the covenant of the Lord. 19All this, said David, the Lord made me understand in writing by his hand upon me, even all the works of this pattern. (1 Chronicles 28:11‑19)).
It was built on Mount Moriah, on the site of the altar which David erected on the threshing floor of Araunah the Jebusite (2 Sam. 24:21-2521And Araunah said, Wherefore is my lord the king come to his servant? And David said, To buy the threshingfloor of thee, to build an altar unto the Lord, that the plague may be stayed from the people. 22And Araunah said unto David, Let my lord the king take and offer up what seemeth good unto him: behold, here be oxen for burnt sacrifice, and threshing instruments and other instruments of the oxen for wood. 23All these things did Araunah, as a king, give unto the king. And Araunah said unto the king, The Lord thy God accept thee. 24And the king said unto Araunah, Nay; but I will surely buy it of thee at a price: neither will I offer burnt offerings unto the Lord my God of that which doth cost me nothing. So David bought the threshingfloor and the oxen for fifty shekels of silver. 25And David built there an altar unto the Lord, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings. So the Lord was entreated for the land, and the plague was stayed from Israel. (2 Samuel 24:21‑25); 2 Chron. 3:11Then Solomon began to build the house of the Lord at Jerusalem in mount Moriah, where the Lord appeared unto David his father, in the place that David had prepared in the threshingfloor of Ornan the Jebusite. (2 Chronicles 3:1)). It stood on the boundary line of Judah and Benjamin. According to Jewish authorities, the greater space of the courts was in Judah, but the temple and altar were in Benjamin. The hill being uneven, the top was leveled, and walls were built on the sloping sides up to a level with the summit, the intervening space being filled partly with vaults and partly with earth.
The temple had the same general arrangements as the tabernacle, being designed for the same purpose; the difference between the two structures being mainly such as would be suggested by the fact that the tabernacle was merely temporary and movable, while the temple was permanent and fixed. The dimensions of the temple were double those of the tabernacle. Like that, it faced the east, having the Most Holy Place in the west.
Its length (including the porch) was seventy cubits. Of this length the porch had ten cubits, the Holy Place forty, and the Most Holy Place twenty (I Kings 6:3,17,20). The width of the building on the ground was twenty cubits, but to this there was added to the house proper a width of five cubits, for three stories of chambers which were built adjoining all the walls of the temple, excepting the porch. At the height of every five cubits the temple wall receded a cubit until half the height was reached; thus making each story of chambers a cubit wider than the one below it (1 Kings 6:5-6,105And against the wall of the house he built chambers round about, against the walls of the house round about, both of the temple and of the oracle: and he made chambers round about: 6The nethermost chamber was five cubits broad, and the middle was six cubits broad, and the third was seven cubits broad: for without in the wall of the house he made narrowed rests round about, that the beams should not be fastened in the walls of the house. (1 Kings 6:5‑6)
10And then he built chambers against all the house, five cubits high: and they rested on the house with timber of cedar. (1 Kings 6:10)). The chambers on the west side must also have added five cubits to the length. The height of the building varied in different parts. The chambers were fifteen cubits high, the Most Holy Place twenty, the Holy Place thirty, and the porch one hundred and twenty (1 Kings 6:3,203And the porch before the temple of the house, twenty cubits was the length thereof, according to the breadth of the house; and ten cubits was the breadth thereof before the house. (1 Kings 6:3)
20And the oracle in the forepart was twenty cubits in length, and twenty cubits in breadth, and twenty cubits in the height thereof: and he overlaid it with pure gold; and so covered the altar which was of cedar. (1 Kings 6:20); 2 Chron. 3:44And the porch that was in the front of the house, the length of it was according to the breadth of the house, twenty cubits, and the height was an hundred and twenty: and he overlaid it within with pure gold. (2 Chronicles 3:4)). It is thought by some critics that this last measurement is an error in the copying of some ancient manuscript. Eighty has been suggested by some as the correct reading, and twenty by others.
In the porch were the two celebrated pillars called Jachin and Boaz. These were made of brass and highly ornamented (1 Kings 7:15-2215For he cast two pillars of brass, of eighteen cubits high apiece: and a line of twelve cubits did compass either of them about. 16And he made two chapiters of molten brass, to set upon the tops of the pillars: the height of the one chapiter was five cubits, and the height of the other chapiter was five cubits: 17And nets of checker work, and wreaths of chain work, for the chapiters which were upon the top of the pillars; seven for the one chapiter, and seven for the other chapiter. 18And he made the pillars, and two rows round about upon the one network, to cover the chapiters that were upon the top, with pomegranates: and so did he for the other chapiter. 19And the chapiters that were upon the top of the pillars were of lily work in the porch, four cubits. 20And the chapiters upon the two pillars had pomegranates also above, over against the belly which was by the network: and the pomegranates were two hundred in rows round about upon the other chapiter. 21And he set up the pillars in the porch of the temple: and he set up the right pillar, and called the name thereof Jachin: and he set up the left pillar, and called the name thereof Boaz. 22And upon the top of the pillars was lily work: so was the work of the pillars finished. (1 Kings 7:15‑22)). It is not definitely stated that they were placed in the porch as a support to that part of the building, but this would seem to be probable, though it is denied by some. Crossing the porch, which was ten cubits by twenty, we find folding doors of fir or cypress, having posts of olive wood. These doors were ornamented with carved cherubim, palm trees, and flowers, all of which were covered with gold (1 Kings 6:33-3533So also made he for the door of the temple posts of olive tree, a fourth part of the wall. 34And the two doors were of fir tree: the two leaves of the one door were folding, and the two leaves of the other door were folding. 35And he carved thereon cherubims and palm trees and open flowers: and covered them with gold fitted upon the carved work. (1 Kings 6:33‑35)). Within the doors was the Holy Place, forty cubits long, twenty wide, and thirty high. There were windows in this, probably of lattice work (1 Kings 6:44And for the house he made windows of narrow lights. (1 Kings 6:4)). These windows must have been in the upper part of the room, since the three stories of the chambers reached on the outside half way up the height. The stone walls were completely covered on the inside with wainscoting of cedar. The floor was made of cedar covered with cypress, which in turn was covered with gold (1 Kings 6:15,3015And he built the walls of the house within with boards of cedar, both the floor of the house, and the walls of the cieling: and he covered them on the inside with wood, and covered the floor of the house with planks of fir. (1 Kings 6:15)
30And the floor of the house he overlaid with gold, within and without. (1 Kings 6:30)). The ceiling was cypress overlaid with gold (2 Chron. 3:55And the greater house he cieled with fir tree, which he overlaid with fine gold, and set thereon palm trees and chains. (2 Chronicles 3:5)). The sides were elegantly carved with cherubim, palms, and flowers, covered over with gold (1 Kings 6:1818And the cedar of the house within was carved with knops and open flowers: all was cedar; there was no stone seen. (1 Kings 6:18); 2 Chron. 3:77He overlaid also the house, the beams, the posts, and the walls thereof, and the doors thereof, with gold; and graved cherubims on the walls. (2 Chronicles 3:7)).
In the Holy Place there were ten golden candlesticks, five on each side, and ten tables of show-bread, arranged in a similar way (2 Chron. 4:7-87And he made ten candlesticks of gold according to their form, and set them in the temple, five on the right hand, and five on the left. 8He made also ten tables, and placed them in the temple, five on the right side, and five on the left. And he made an hundred basons of gold. (2 Chronicles 4:7‑8)). It is supposed by some that only one candlestick and one table were in use at a time. See 2 Chronicles 13:11; 29:1811And they burn unto the Lord every morning and every evening burnt sacrifices and sweet incense: the showbread also set they in order upon the pure table; and the candlestick of gold with the lamps thereof, to burn every evening: for we keep the charge of the Lord our God; but ye have forsaken him. (2 Chronicles 13:11)
18Then they went in to Hezekiah the king, and said, We have cleansed all the house of the Lord, and the altar of burnt offering, with all the vessels thereof, and the showbread table, with all the vessels thereof. (2 Chronicles 29:18); where the words are in the singular number. There were snuffers, tongs, basins, and all other necessary articles, also of gold (1 Kings 7:5050And the bowls, and the snuffers, and the basons, and the spoons, and the censers of pure gold; and the hinges of gold, both for the doors of the inner house, the most holy place, and for the doors of the house, to wit, of the temple. (1 Kings 7:50)). The altar of incense, which was in this part of the temple, was made of cedar and covered with gold. 1 Kings 6:2020And the oracle in the forepart was twenty cubits in length, and twenty cubits in breadth, and twenty cubits in the height thereof: and he overlaid it with pure gold; and so covered the altar which was of cedar. (1 Kings 6:20).
Between the Sanctuary, or Holy Place and the Oracle, or Most Holy Place, there was a partition, in which were double doors made of olive-wood carved and overlaid with gold (1 Kings 6:31-3231And for the entering of the oracle he made doors of olive tree: the lintel and side posts were a fifth part of the wall. 32The two doors also were of olive tree; and he carved upon them carvings of cherubims and palm trees and open flowers, and overlaid them with gold, and spread gold upon the cherubims, and upon the palm trees. (1 Kings 6:31‑32)). There was also a rich veil of embroidery at this doorway (2 Chron. 3:1414And he made the vail of blue, and purple, and crimson, and fine linen, and wrought cherubims thereon. (2 Chronicles 3:14)). The Oracle, like the Most Holy Place of the tabernacle, was a perfect cube. It was twenty cubits in length, breadth, and height (1 Kings 6:2020And the oracle in the forepart was twenty cubits in length, and twenty cubits in breadth, and twenty cubits in the height thereof: and he overlaid it with pure gold; and so covered the altar which was of cedar. (1 Kings 6:20)). Floor, sides, and ceiling were of wood, with carved cherubim, palm-trees, and flowers, all overlaid with gold (1 Kings 6:29-3029And he carved all the walls of the house round about with carved figures of cherubims and palm trees and open flowers, within and without. 30And the floor of the house he overlaid with gold, within and without. (1 Kings 6:29‑30)). There were no windows here; Jehovah dwells in "thick darkness" (1 Kings 8:1212Then spake Solomon, The Lord said that he would dwell in the thick darkness. (1 Kings 8:12)). Two gigantic cherubim, made of olive-wood and covered with gold, were in the Oracle. They were ten cubits high, and their outstretched wings, touching each other at the tips, reached entirely across the width of the room (1 Kings 6:23-2823And within the oracle he made two cherubims of olive tree, each ten cubits high. 24And five cubits was the one wing of the cherub, and five cubits the other wing of the cherub: from the uttermost part of the one wing unto the uttermost part of the other were ten cubits. 25And the other cherub was ten cubits: both the cherubims were of one measure and one size. 26The height of the one cherub was ten cubits, and so was it of the other cherub. 27And he set the cherubims within the inner house: and they stretched forth the wings of the cherubims, so that the wing of the one touched the one wall, and the wing of the other cherub touched the other wall; and their wings touched one another in the midst of the house. 28And he overlaid the cherubims with gold. (1 Kings 6:23‑28)). They were in a standing position, and had their faces turned toward the veil (2 Chron. 3:10-1310And in the most holy house he made two cherubims of image work, and overlaid them with gold. 11And the wings of the cherubims were twenty cubits long: one wing of the one cherub was five cubits, reaching to the wall of the house: and the other wing was likewise five cubits, reaching to the wing of the other cherub. 12And one wing of the other cherub was five cubits, reaching to the wall of the house: and the other wing was five cubits also, joining to the wing of the other cherub. 13The wings of these cherubims spread themselves forth twenty cubits: and they stood on their feet, and their faces were inward. (2 Chronicles 3:10‑13)). The ark of the covenant, which had been in the tabernacle, was put into the Oracle under the wings of the cherubim after the temple was finished (1 Kings 8:66And the priests brought in the ark of the covenant of the Lord unto his place, into the oracle of the house, to the most holy place, even under the wings of the cherubims. (1 Kings 8:6)). No doubt the original cherubim and the mercy-seat accompanied it, though this is nowhere expressly stated. It may be inferred, however, from the fact that after the temple was built Jehovah is represented, as in the days of the tabernacle, "dwelling between the cherubim." Compare 1 Samuel 4:44So the people sent to Shiloh, that they might bring from thence the ark of the covenant of the Lord of hosts, which dwelleth between the cherubims: and the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were there with the ark of the covenant of God. (1 Samuel 4:4); 2 Samuel 6:22And David arose, and went with all the people that were with him from Baale of Judah, to bring up from thence the ark of God, whose name is called by the name of the Lord of hosts that dwelleth between the cherubims. (2 Samuel 6:2); Psalm 80:1; 99:11<<To the chief Musician upon Shoshannim-eduth, A Psalm of Asaph.>> Give ear, O Shepherd of Israel, thou that leadest Joseph like a flock; thou that dwellest between the cherubims, shine forth. (Psalm 80:1)
1The Lord reigneth; let the people tremble: he sitteth between the cherubims; let the earth be moved. (Psalm 99:1) with 2 Kings 19:1515And Hezekiah prayed before the Lord, and said, O Lord God of Israel, which dwellest between the cherubims, thou art the God, even thou alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth; thou hast made heaven and earth. (2 Kings 19:15); Isaiah 37:1616O Lord of hosts, God of Israel, that dwellest between the cherubims, thou art the God, even thou alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth: thou hast made heaven and earth. (Isaiah 37:16).
No definite account is given of the court or courts surrounding the temple. In 1 Kings 6:3636And he built the inner court with three rows of hewed stone, and a row of cedar beams. (1 Kings 6:36) the "inner court" is spoken of. This was doubtless the space immediately around the sacred edifice. Its dimensions are not given, nor is it certain what is meant by the text just referred to: "He built the inner court with three rows of hewed stone, and a row of cedar beams." Some commentators suppose this to mean that the inner court was surrounded by a wall consisting of three courses of stone capped with cedar beams. Others suppose that the inner court was a raised platform elevated to the height of three courses of stone with a coping of cedar, and they refer to Jeremiah 36:1010Then read Baruch in the book the words of Jeremiah in the house of the Lord, in the chamber of Gemariah the son of Shaphan the scribe, in the higher court, at the entry of the new gate of the Lord's house, in the ears of all the people. (Jeremiah 36:10), where this is called "the higher court."
This court, which was also called the "Court of the priests" (2 Chron. 4:99Furthermore he made the court of the priests, and the great court, and doors for the court, and overlaid the doors of them with brass. (2 Chronicles 4:9)) contained the brazen altar of burnt offering, which was much larger than the one in the court of the tabernacle, being twenty cubits in length and in breadth, and ten in height. There was also here a circular "molten sea," ten cubits in diameter and five in height. It stood on twelve brazen oxen, three facing each point of the compass. On each side of the altar there were five brazen lavers (2 Chron. 4:1-61Moreover he made an altar of brass, twenty cubits the length thereof, and twenty cubits the breadth thereof, and ten cubits the height thereof. 2Also he made a molten sea of ten cubits from brim to brim, round in compass, and five cubits the height thereof; and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about. 3And under it was the similitude of oxen, which did compass it round about: ten in a cubit, compassing the sea round about. Two rows of oxen were cast, when it was cast. 4It stood upon twelve oxen, three looking toward the north, and three looking toward the west, and three looking toward the south, and three looking toward the east: and the sea was set above upon them, and all their hinder parts were inward. 5And the thickness of it was an handbreadth, and the brim of it like the work of the brim of a cup, with flowers of lilies; and it received and held three thousand baths. 6He made also ten lavers, and put five on the right hand, and five on the left, to wash in them: such things as they offered for the burnt offering they washed in them; but the sea was for the priests to wash in. (2 Chronicles 4:1‑6)).
Around this court was another and a larger one, called the "Great Court" in 2 Chronicles 4:99Furthermore he made the court of the priests, and the great court, and doors for the court, and overlaid the doors of them with brass. (2 Chronicles 4:9); the "Outer Court" in Ezekiel 46:2121Then he brought me forth into the utter court, and caused me to pass by the four corners of the court; and, behold, in every corner of the court there was a court. (Ezekiel 46:21); and the "Court of the Lord's House" in Jeremiah 19:14; 26:214Then came Jeremiah from Tophet, whither the Lord had sent him to prophesy; and he stood in the court of the Lord's house; and said to all the people, (Jeremiah 19:14)
2Thus saith the Lord; Stand in the court of the Lord's house, and speak unto all the cities of Judah, which come to worship in the Lord's house, all the words that I command thee to speak unto them; diminish not a word: (Jeremiah 26:2). This was the Court of the People and was surrounded by strong walls in which were gates of brass (2 Chron. 4:99Furthermore he made the court of the priests, and the great court, and doors for the court, and overlaid the doors of them with brass. (2 Chronicles 4:9)).
The foregoing description of Solomon's temple coincides in the main with the accounts usually given by commentators. It is proper, however, to notice the ingenious theory advanced by the T. O. Paine, in his Solomon's Temple, already referred to in the note on Exodus 40:22On the first day of the first month shalt thou set up the tabernacle of the tent of the congregation. (Exodus 40:2) (#141). Mr. Paine has evidently studied the subject with much care, and has given the results of his investigations in an interesting monograph. He assumes that the description given by Ezekiel in chapter 40 following chapters is not the description of an ideal temple, but of Solomon's temple as it actually appeared before its destruction; and that it is designed to be a complement to the account given in the books of Kings and Chronicles, the one narrative detailing points omitted by the other. He asserts that the building, contrary to the usual opinion, was wider at the top than at the bottom, and refers to Ezekiel 41:77And there was an enlarging, and a winding about still upward to the side chambers: for the winding about of the house went still upward round about the house: therefore the breadth of the house was still upward, and so increased from the lowest chamber to the highest by the midst. (Ezekiel 41:7) for proof, that the "chambers" mentioned as running around the building were galleries, and that these were supported by columns, the galleries increasing in distance from the temple-wall as they rose. He contends that "all pictures of the temple which represent it as widest on the ground and narrower upward are bottom upward" (Solomon's Temple, p. 2). (See the engravings on the opposite page.)
"295. Solomon's Temple" From Manners and Customs of the Bible:
"704. Herod's Temple" From Manners and Customs of the Bible:
Matthew 24:11And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to show him the buildings of the temple. (Matthew 24:1). Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to show him the buildings of the temple.
See also Mark 113:1; Luke 21:55And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, he said, (Luke 21:5).
This is what is commonly known as Herod's temple, and was a restoration or reconstruction of the temple of Zerubbabel; that structure being taken down piecemeal, and this gradually substituted for it. It was, however, larger and more splendid than the temple of Zerubbabel; its courts occupied more ground than those which surrounded that old temple, and far exceeded them in magnificence According to the Talmud the entire temple area was five hundred cubits square Around the edge of this square, and against the massive stone wall which enclosed it, cloisters were built, (1, 2, 3, 4,) their cedar roofs being supported by rows of Corinthian columns of solid marble.
The cloisters on the north, west, and east sides (l, 2, 3) were alike in height and width, the columns which upheld the roof being twenty-five cubits high, and the halls themselves thirty cubits wide. The colonnade on the east (3) was called Solomon's Porch, and is mentioned in John 10:2323And Jesus walked in the temple in Solomon's porch. (John 10:23); Acts 3:11; 5:1211And as the lame man which was healed held Peter and John, all the people ran together unto them in the porch that is called Solomon's, greatly wondering. (Acts 3:11)
12And by the hands of the apostles were many signs and wonders wrought among the people; (and they were all with one accord in Solomon's porch. (Acts 5:12). The cloisters on the south (4) formed an immense building known as the Stoa Basilica, or King's Porch. It was much wider than the cloisters on the other sides, and consisted of a nave and two aisles. This immense building, with its high nave, its broad aisles, and its marble columns, presented a grand appearance. Josephus says: "Its fineness, to such as had not seen it, was incredible; and to such as had seen it was greatly amazing." The southeastern corner of this building is supposed to have been the "pinnacle of the temple," where the devil took Jesus in the Temptation. See note on Matthew 4:55Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple, (Matthew 4:5) (#635). In these cloisters the Levites resided. Here the doctors of the law met to hear and answer questions. See Luke 2: 46. They were favorite places of resort for religionists of different sorts to discuss various points of doctrine. Jesus often spoke here to the people; and after his death his followers met here. See Acts 2:4646And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, (Acts 2:46).
North of the center of the large area enclosed by these cloisters stood the sacred enclosure of the temple, its boundaries extending nearer to the cloisters on the west than to Solomon's Porch on the east. The space surrounding this enclosure was the Court of the Gentiles (5), and was open to all comers. It was paved with stones of various colors. It was here that the cattle-dealers and money-changers desecrated the house of God. See note on Matthew 21:1212And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, (Matthew 21:12) (#688). This court was also called the Outer Court, the Lower Court, and, by the rabbins usually, the "Mountain of the Lord's house."
The enclosure of the temple proper was on a terrace about six cubits higher than the Court of the Gentiles. It was approached by steps, and was surrounded by a wall three cubits high (6). This wall was designed to shut off the Gentiles, and there were pillars erected in the wall at certain distances with inscriptions in Latin, Greek, and Hebrew, warning all Gentiles to come no further under penalty of death. The Jews, on one occasion, accused Paul of having brought "Greeks" up the steps; and into the sacred enclosure, in violation of the standing order. See Acts 21:2828Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place. (Acts 21:28). To this wall of separation Paul is thought to refer: "For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us." Ephesians 2:1414For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us; (Ephesians 2:14). At the top of the terrace, and going entirely around it, was a platform (7) ten cubits wide extending to another wall.
In the eastern side of the latter wall was a gate (8) of elegant workmanship, forty cubits wide, and supposed to have been the "Gate Beautiful," mentioned in Acts 3:2,102And a certain man lame from his mother's womb was carried, whom they laid daily at the gate of the temple which is called Beautiful, to ask alms of them that entered into the temple; (Acts 3:2)
10And they knew that it was he which sat for alms at the Beautiful gate of the temple: and they were filled with wonder and amazement at that which had happened unto him. (Acts 3:10). It was sometimes called the "Gate Susan," because it had a representation of the town of Susa sculptured in relief on it. Though there were gates on the north and south sides, this was the grand entrance to the Court of the Women (9), which was the general place of public worship at the time of the sacrifices. It received its name, not because it was exclusively appropriated to the women, but because the women were not allowed to go beyond it. There were smaller courts in the four corners of this; and on the north, east, and west sides were galleries supported by columns. In front of these columns were distributed the eleven treasure chests of the temple, in addition to the two at the gate Susan, for the half-shekel tax. It was into one of these that the poor widow threw her two mites. Mark 12:41-4241And Jesus sat over against the treasury, and beheld how the people cast money into the treasury: and many that were rich cast in much. 42And there came a certain poor widow, and she threw in two mites, which make a farthing. (Mark 12:41‑42); Luke 21:1-21And he looked up, and saw the rich men casting their gifts into the treasury. 2And he saw also a certain poor widow casting in thither two mites. (Luke 21:1‑2). It was near these treasure chests that the incidents recorded in the eighth chapter of John took place. See John 8:2020These words spake Jesus in the treasury, as he taught in the temple: and no man laid hands on him; for his hour was not yet come. (John 8:20).
West of the Court of the Women, separated from it by a wall, and on a terrace higher still, was the Court of the Israelites (10). This was a narrow hall completely surrounding the Court of the Priests, and had cloisters on all sides supported by beautiful columns. The rooms of these cloisters were devoted to various purposes connected with the service of the temple. This court was entered from the Court of the Women by a flight of semicircular steps and through the Gate of Nicanor. The session room of the Sanhedrim was in the south-east corner of the Court of the Israelites.
On a terrace fifteen steps higher still, and separated from the Court of the Israelites by a low stone balustrade, was the Court of the Priests (11). In the eastern part of this was the great altar of burnt offering (12), directly west of which arose the Great Temple itself. The building was of white marble, and some of the foundation-stones were of immense size. It was divided into two parts, forming the Holy Place (14) and the Most Holy Place (15), the two being separated by a veil. See note on Matthew 27:5151And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; (Matthew 27:51) (#733). The internal arrangements of these two sacred places were probably like those of the temple of Zerubbabel. See note on Ezra 6:3-43In the first year of Cyrus the king the same Cyrus the king made a decree concerning the house of God at Jerusalem, Let the house be builded, the place where they offered sacrifices, and let the foundations thereof be strongly laid; the height thereof threescore cubits, and the breadth thereof threescore cubits; 4With three rows of great stones, and a row of new timber: and let the expenses be given out of the king's house: (Ezra 6:3‑4) (#375). Above these were rooms used for various purposes, and on the sides were three stories of chambers. In the front part of the building was the porch (13), which projected a short distance beyond the building, north and south, giving it this form: A striking feature in the general appearance of the temple and its various courts is the series of terraces; the different courts rising one above the other, until the temple itself was reached on a platform highest of all. The structure—the paved courts, the beautiful columns, the white marble cloisters, the gate-ways, which in themselves were high and massive buildings, and, crowning all, the white temple standing high above the rest, its front walls ornamented with thick plates of gold—produced an effect which was magnificent beyond description. See, further, note on Luke 21:55And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, he said, (Luke 21:5) (#786).
"688. The Temple Market" From Manners and Customs of the Bible:
Matthew 21:1212And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, (Matthew 21:12). Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money changers, and the seats of them that sold doves.
See also Mark 11:1515And they come to Jerusalem: and Jesus went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves; (Mark 11:15); Luke 19:4545And he went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold therein, and them that bought; (Luke 19:45).
In John 2:1414And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: (John 2:14) is an account of a similar occurrence which took place during the first year of Christ's ministry.
This temple market is supposed to have been established after the captivity, when many came from foreign lands to Jerusalem. Lightfoot says: "There was always a constant market in the temple in that place, which was called 'the shops'; where, every day, was sold wine, salt, oil, and other requisites to sacrifices; as also oxen and sheep in the spacious Court of the Gentiles" (Horae Hebraicae).
The money-changers made a business of accommodating those who had not the Jewish half-shekel for the annual temple tax. See note on Matthew 17:2424And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? (Matthew 17:24) (#674). Every one, rich and poor, was expected to pay the half-shekel for himself during the month of Adar. It thus became necessary sometimes to change a shekel into two halves, or to exchange foreign money for the Jewish half-shekel. The men who followed this business made their living by charging a percentage for the exchange, and carried on their traffic within the temple area.
Loftus found a curious resemblance to this practice in the court of the mosque of Meshed All at Nedjef: "A constant fair is carried on at stalls, which are supplied with every article likely as offerings to attract the eye of the rich or pious among these, white doves are particularly conspicuous" (Travels in Chaldea and Susiana, p. 53).
"375. The Temple of Zerubbabel" From Manners and Customs of the Bible:
Ezra 6:3-43In the first year of Cyrus the king the same Cyrus the king made a decree concerning the house of God at Jerusalem, Let the house be builded, the place where they offered sacrifices, and let the foundations thereof be strongly laid; the height thereof threescore cubits, and the breadth thereof threescore cubits; 4With three rows of great stones, and a row of new timber: and let the expenses be given out of the king's house: (Ezra 6:3‑4). Let the house be builded, the place where they offered sacrifices, and let the foundations thereof be strongly laid; the height thereof threescore cubits, and the breadth thereof threescore cubits; with three rows of great stones, and a row of new timber.
This temple, sometimes called the second temple, and sometimes the temple of Zerubbabel, was built on the site of the first, or Solomon's temple. We have not so definite a description given of this as we have of Solomon's temple. The second temple was larger than the first. The "rows" of stones are supposed to refer to three stories of chambers, such as were attached to Solomon's temple, and on these was placed an additional story of wood. The temple of Zerubbabel, though of greater size than that of Solomon, was inferior to it in magnificence. According to Jewish authorities its altar of burnt offering was of stone instead of brass, and it had but one table of show-bread and but one candlestick. It is also said that the sanctuary was entirely empty, excepting that in place of the ark of the covenant a stone was set three fingers high, on which the high priest placed the censer and sprinkled the blood of atonement. Some suppose, however, that a new ark was made and set in the sanctuary. The rabbit's reckon five different important features of the first temple which were wanting in the second: 1. The Ark of the Covenant. 2. The Sacred Fire. 3. The Shekinah. 4. The Holy Spirit. 5. The answer by Urim and Thummim. Some of these distinctions are, however, thought by more sober writers to be a little fanciful.
Related Books and Articles:
375. The Temple of Zerubbabel
From: Manners and Customs of the Bible By: James M. Freeman
295. Solomon's Temple
688. The Temple Market
704. Herod's Temple
Herod's Temple and Courts
From: Biblical Geography and History Maps
From: Words of Truth: Volume 6
Show More Sources
Temple, The
From: Christian Treasury: Volume 5
The Temple of Solomon
From: The House of God Traced Through the Scriptures By: Edward B. Dennett
Herod's Temple Close Up
Temple Building Time of Herod
From: History Maps
Temple Mount 1800s
Temple Time of Herod
Herod's Temple Cross Section


Wow, I can't believe that I've already been conducting this experiment for 6 weeks! It's crazy how quickly time flies!
I have been thinking about things that I want/need for my trip and how I can incorporate these into this week's challenge (like the ring from last week). Obviously, buying Old Navy flip-flops or a grey tank top for under $20 doesn't really constitute a challenge (I could easily do both for under $20). Finding cheap sunglasses really isn't that difficult either. So, after doing some window shopping yesterday I have decided to focus on finding a new hat!
My much-loved hat and bag from GAP, these must be at least 10 years old!
As much as I love this hat (and the matching bag, I really dig the whole safari vibe they have going) I feel like I am now ready to branch out and buy a new chapeau! So that will be this week's challenge (I promise that this will be the last accessory challenge for a while, I'll be going back to clothing after my trip!).
They were even having a big sale yesterday and were giving out 50% off coupons but 1) the hat would still be over my budget, and 2) buying something ahead of actually declaring my challenge would of course be cheating!
I am hoping that I can find something similar that is of good enough quality to stand up to the rigours of my trip and still be intact enough to wear this spring and summer.
So the challenge is on! Wish me luck!


For Darrington Moving, Choose All Star Movers. Experienced, Reliable Movers.
All Star Movers provides full service moving to folks in Darrington, WA. From local across town moves to long distance state to state, we are licensed, bonded and experienced in providing reliable, trustworthy and efficient moves of all sizes. We are here to help you with the knowledge and courteous service we give to all of our clients. No need to look any further, All Star Movers can get the job done.
Darrington residents boast a tight knit community and many choose to find their place in it. If you are planning a local move from a more hectic Puget Sound community to this picturesque rural town, All Star has you covered. Whether you are seeking to move in or out of Darrington, WA, All Star has the ability to transport your household items, safely and efficiently, door to door.
Here at All Star, Darrington long distance moving is one of our specialties. The fact that Darrington is home to a mind blowing five rivers and countless hiking, biking and equestrian trails is just a few of the reasons people seek to move long distance to be apart of this small but rich community. The town supports new entrepreneurs to take shop here and enjoy the peace and slower paced life at the same time. All Star Movers is full service moving company capable of relocating you in or out of Darrington, WA. Long distance moves require high attention to detail and careful planning along the way.
One of the ways All Star can make your move to or from Darrington, WA less stressful is by taking advantage of our optional packing/unpacking service. A team of our trained movers will come to your home, usually a day prior to your move, and skillfully take care of the packing and securing of all your household items. Upon arrival, we can then unbox and unwrap everything, either placing in desired rooms or in a convenient place for you to sort at your leisure. Making use of our packing/unpacking service gives our clients just one more step in the moving process they don't have to tackle. Let the moving experts make this move to or from Darrington, WA a pleasant one.
We pack and carry personal and business goods local and interstate to or from Arlington, from where we are based in Washington.
In addition to providing high quality moving services, we go one step further. All Star is outfitted with the equipment and training to safely move and transport your piano, hot tub or pool table to or from Darrington, WA. Not all moving companies have the ability to do this or have the knowledge and experience to do it without damaging home or belonging. Sometimes these larger items can't be relocated straight away to your new home. All Star provides secure storage at our local Edmonds facility. Whether you need storage for your piano or your three bedroom house, All Star has all of your moving needs covered. Call us today!
Call Toll Free: 1-800-996-6838 or Click Here for a Free Moving Quote and see why we excel as an Arlington interstate moving company.


text:
Home > Vol 2, No 1 (Published) >	Seo
Exosome-mediated immune regulation and its clinical application
Naohiro Seo
Immune system is a precise mechanism for maintenance of homeostasis by lymphocyte-mediated elimination of extracellular and intercellular pathogens, and abnormal cells in cytokine-, chemokine-, antibody-, and cytotoxic granule-dependent manners. Extracellular vesicles, e.g. exosomes, released from multivesicular endosome in immune cells have been known to be a part of the immune system. Exosomes released by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) such as macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) regulate natural killer (NK) cells, CD8+ T cells (Cytotoxic T lymphocytes [CTLs]), and CD4+ T cells (Th cells) including Th1, Th2, and regulatory T (Treg) cells. In the anti-tumor immune system, NK cells and CTLs are mainly involved in the elimination of tumor cells by direct interaction. Recently, we clarified that tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells prevent tumor invasion and metastasis by exosome-mediated destruction of tumor stroma consist of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). In this review article, we describe the role of exosomes in controlling immune system and its clinical application.
CD8+ T cell; exosome; extracellular vesicle; mesenchymal cell; tumor metastasis
Seo N, Hayakawa S, Tokura Y. Mechanisms of immune privilege for tumor cells by regulatory cytokines produced by innate and acquired immune cells. Semin Cancer Biol 2002; 12(4): 291–300. doi: 10.1016/S1044-579X(02)00015-9.
Kumar V, Patel S, Tcyganov E, et al. The Nature of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment. Trends Immunol 2016; 37(3): 208–220. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2016.01.004.
Gehrmann U, Näslund TI, Hiltbrunner S, et al. Harnessing the exosome-induced immune response for cancer immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol 2014; 28: 58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.05.003.
Momose F, Seo N, Akahori Y, et al. Guanine-Rich Sequences Are a Dominant Feature of Exosomal microRNAs across the Mammalian Species and Cell Types. PLoS One 2016; 11(4): e0154134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154134.
Schuler PJ, Saze Z, Hong CS, et al. Human CD4+ CD39+ regulatory T cells produce adenosine upon co-expression of surface CD73 or contact with CD73+ exosomes or CD73+ cells. Clin Exp Immunol 2014; 177(2): 531–543. doi: 10.1111/cei.12354.
Smyth LA, Ratnasothy K, Tsang JY, et al. CD73 expression on extracellular vesicles derived from CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ T cells contributes to their regulatory function. Eur J Immunol 2013; 43(9): 2430–2440. doi: 10.1002/eji.201242909.
Okoye IS, Coomes SM, Pelly VS, et al. MicroRNA-containing T-regulatory-cell-derived exosomes suppress pathogenic T helper 1 cells. Immunity 2014; 41(3): 89–103. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.05.019.
Pieters BC, Arntz OJ1, Bennink MB, et al. Commercial cow milk contains physically stable extracellular vesicles expressing immunoregulatory TGF-β. PLoS One 2015; 10(3): e0121123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121123.
Melnik BC, John SM, Schmitz G. Milk: An exosomal microRNA transmitter promoting thymic regulatory T cell maturation preventing the development of atopy? J Transl Med 2014; 12: 43. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-43.
Yu X, Huang C, Song B, et al. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells-derived exosomes prolonged kidney allograft survival in a rat model. Cell Immunol 2013; 285: 62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2013.06.010.
Wahlgren J, Karlson Tde L, Glader P, et al. Activated human T cells secrete exosomes that participate in IL-2 mediated immune response signaling. PLoS One 2012; 7(11): e49723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049723.
Cai Z, Yang F, Yu L, et al. Activated T cell exosomes promote tumor invasion via Fas signaling pathway. J Immunol 2012; 188(12): 5954–5961. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103466.
Seo N, Shirakura Y, Tahara Y, et al. Activated CD8+ T cell extracellular vesicles prevent tumour progression by targeting of lesional mesenchyal cells. Nat Commun 2018; 9(1): 435. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-02865-1.
Lugini L, Cecchetti S, Huber V, et al. Immune surveillance properties of human NK cell-derived exosomes. J Immunol 2012; 189(6): 2833–2842. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101988.
Raposo G, Nijman HW, Stoorvogel W, et al. B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles. J Exp Med 1996; 183(3): 1161–1172. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.3.1161.
Saunderson SC, Dunn AC, Crocker PR, et al. CD169 mediates the capture of exosomes in spleen and lymph node. Blood 2014; 123(2): 208–216. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-489732.
Paggetti J, Haderk F, Seiffert M, et al. Exosomes released by chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells induce the transition of stromal cells into cancer-associated fibroblasts. Blood 2015; 126(9): 1106–1117. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-12-618025.
Matsumoto A, Takahashi Y, Nishikawa M, et al. Role of Phosphatidylserine-Derived Negative Surface Charges in the Recognition and Uptake of Intravenously Injected B16BL6-Derived Exosomes by Macrophages. J Pharm Sci 2017; 106(1): 168–175. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.07.022.
Costa-Silva B, Aiello NM, Ocean AJ, et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat Cell Biol 2015; 17(6): 816–826. doi: 10.1038/ncb3169.
Ismail N, Wang Y, Dakhlallah D, et al. Macrophage microvesicles induce macrophage differentiation and miR-223 transfer. Blood 2013; 121(6): 984–995. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-374793.
Seo N, et al. Basic and clinical aspects of epidermal Langerhans cell-based tumor immunotherapy. Expert Rev Dermatol 2007; 2: 725–733. doi: 10.1586/17469872.2.6.725.
Quah BJ, O'Neill HC. The immunogenicity of dendritic cell-derived exosomes. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2005; 35(2): 94–110. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2005.05.002.
Quah BJ, O'Neill HC. Maturation of function in dendritic cells for tolerance and immunity. J Cell Mol Med 9: 643–654, 2005. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00494.x.
Li X, Li JJ, Yang JY, et al. Tolerance induction by exosomes from immature dendritic cells and rapamycin in a mouse cardiac allograft model. PLoS One 2012; 7(8): e44045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044045.
Pitt JM, André F, Amigorena S, et al. Dendritic cell-derived exosomes for cancer therapy. J Clin Invest 2016; 126(4): 1224–1232. doi: 10.1172/JCI81137.
Näslund TI, Gehrmann U, Qazi KR, et al. Dendritic cell-derived exosomes need to activate both T and B cells to induce antitumor immunity. J Immunol 2013; 190(6): 2712–2719. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203082.
Besse B, Charrier M, Lapierre V, et al. Dendritic cell-derived exosomes as maintenance immunotherapy after first line chemotherapy in NSCLC. Oncoimmunology 2015; 5(4): e1071008. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1071008.
Gehrmann U, Hiltbrunner S, Georgoudaki AM, et al. Synergistic induction of adaptive antitumor immunity by codelivery of antigen with α-galactosylceramide on exosomes. Cancer Res 2013; 73(13): 3865–3876. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3918.
Lynch S, Santos SG, Campbell EC, et al. Novel MHC class I structures on exosomes. J Immunol 2009; 183(3): 1884–1891. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900798.
Hiltbrunner S, Larssen P, Eldh M, et al. Exosomal cancer immunotherapy is independent of MHC molecules on exosomes. Oncotarget 2016; 7(25): 38707–38717. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9585.
Muller L, Mitsuhashi M, Simms P, et al. Tumor-derived exosomes regulate expression of immune function-related genes in human T cell subsets. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 20254. doi: 10.1038/srep20254.
Mrizak D, Martin N, Barjon C, et al. Effect of nasopharyngeal carcinoma-derived exosomes on human regulatory T cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 107(1): 363. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju363.
Szajnik M, Czystowska M, Szczepanski MJ, et al. Tumor-derived microvesicles induce, expand and up-regulate biological activities of human regulatory T cells (Treg). PLoS One 2010; 5(7): e11469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011469.
Chalmin F, Ladoire S, Mignot G, et al. Membrane-associated Hsp72 from tumor-derived exosomes mediates STAT3-dependent immunosuppressive function of mouse and human myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Clin Invest 2010; 120(2): 457–471. doi: 10.1172/JCI40483.
Xiang X, Poliakov A, Liu C, et al. Induction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells by tumor exosomes. Int J Cancer 2009; 124(11): 2621–2633. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24249.
Fernández-Messina L, Ashiru O, Boutet P, et al. Differential mechanisms of shedding of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored NKG2D ligands. J Biol Chem 2010; 285(12): 8543–8551. doi: /10.1074/jbc.M109.045906.
Ashiru O, Boutet P, Fernández-Messina L, et al. Natural killer cell cytotoxicity is suppressed by exposure to the human NKG2D ligand MICA*008 that is shed by tumor cells in exosomes. Cancer Res 2010; 70(2): 481–489. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1688.
Bu N, Wu H, Sun B, et al. Exosome-loaded dendritic cells elicit tumor-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in patients with glioma. J Neurooncol 2011; 104(3): 659–667. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0537-1.
Yang N, Li S, Li G, et al. The role of extracellular vesicles in mediating progression, metastasis and potential treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 2017; 8(2): 3683–3695. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12465.
Zhang H, Tang K, Zhang Y, et al. Cell-free tumor microparticle vaccines stimulate dendritic cells via cGAS/STING signaling. Cancer Immunol Res 2015; 3(2): 196–205. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0177.
Berchem G, Noman MZ, Bosseler M, et al. Hypoxic tumor-derived microvesicles negatively regulate NK cell function by a mechanism involving TGF-β and miR23a transfer. Oncoimmunology 2015; 5(4): e1062968. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1062968.
Chen T, Guo J, Yang M, et al. Chemokine-containing exosomes are released from heat-stressed tumor cells via lipid raft-dependent pathway and act as efficient tumor vaccine. J Immunol 2011; 186(4): 2219–2228. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002991.
Lv LH, Wan YL, Lin Y, et al. Anticancer drugs cause release of exosomes with heat shock proteins from human hepatocellular carcinoma cells that elicit effective natural killer cell antitumor responses in vitro. J Biol Chem 2012; 287(19): 15874–15885. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.340588.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24294/ti.v2.i1.433
Copyright (c) 2018 Naohiro Seo

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Shotgun House: Beautiful Obsession EP Review
July 12, 2012 July 11, 2012 Pete Francis 0 Comments Shotgun House
Shotgun House break forth with an unbridled ferocity on their brand-new Beautiful Obsession EP. The first track "Redemption Road" is a huge opener to a varied record, and explodes out of the starting gate with such indelible energy that it seems impossible for another four songs to measure up.
But measure up they do. The title track firmly establishes that this extended play is based around a rock-solid single, and the band doesn't stop there. "We Are Vampire" is a bit of a mid-album break, giving the listener a chance to breathe a bit before plunging back into a passionate frenzy on "King of Love." The final track "When" lets the listener down gently, rounding out the record with a smooth but strong finish.
On their debut effort, Shotgun House have concocted quite the winning strategy in their combination of strong songwriting and perfected performance. They've proven themselves a force to be reckoned with in the blues rock scene, and a powerhouse of fresh performing ability. Go ahead, let this EP be your next beautiful obsession.
The Review: 8.5/10
– Redemption Road
Review by Tyler Quiring
← What Makes a Good Blues Rock Song?
Divehouse Union: Live at Kleinhans Music Hall Review →


text:
Hurtling
Future From Here Nick Roseblade , October 16th, 2019 08:55
Playing guitar with My Bloody Valentine on tour may have influenced Jen Macro's sounds, but there's more to Hurtling's debut than that, finds Nick Roseblade
Playing live for My Bloody Valentine can be a blessing and a curse. The blessing is that you get to perform all those bangers night after night for delighted fans. The downside is that when you release your own music, it can be easily written off as "Not MBV". Luckily touring guitarist/keyboard player Jen Macro doesn't have this problem. The debut album from Hurtling, Macro's new band, manages to conjure up the vibe of MBV, whilst forging its own path.
There is breathy immediacy to Hurtling's debut album Future From Here. The album was recorded over two weekends in late 2017 and early 2018, during breaks in MBV's tour schedule at drummer Jon Clayton's OneCat studio in Brixton. Macro had already written the songs, and the band knew them from playing live, but it was during these sessions that Future From Here really started to take shape. The songs began to evolve from live demos to the finished articles that appear on the album. And this comes across when playing Future From Here. The band sound confident and in control, but there is freshness to the songs that comes from not over playing and giving them time to develop naturally.
The two songs that sum up Future From Here are 'Start' and 'Let Go'. 'Start' showcases Macro's breathy and delicate vocals. Musically the band is more subdued and playful sounding. The main riff is catchy and slightly wonky. While the band never really greats out of second gear, there is a glorious piece of woozy fuzz about half way through that shows that when they want to, Hurtling can let rip and tear us all a new one. 'Let Go' opens with gossamer guitars, which match Macro's fragile vocals. It is also more textured than 'Start' as Macro starts to use her pedals to create intricate swaths of hazy giddy guitars, but when the chorus kicks in, everything comes into focus, becoming sharper and more direct, before drifting back into the ether for the next verse.
Future From Here is an album that sounds familiar and fresh at the same time. As you'd expect from Macro's time in MBV the songs have a woozy swoony vibe to them, but the real enjoyment of Future From Here is when the band get locked in the groove and the crushing, crunching guitars take over – 'Summer' being a prime example of this. There is something wonderfully destructive about them. It's the same as the pleasure you get from watching videos of buildings being demolished on YouTube. It's all over in a few seconds, but there is something graceful about the way they fall down.
While Future From Here is a fun album, there are moments when you feel like the band have picked their favourite parts from their favourite songs and put their spin on it. Macro's guttural screams are reminiscent of peak Riot Grrrl, and the guitar's massive swoons could be taken from the best MBV tracks that Macro plays nightly, and then there are the nods to the Breeders and Sonic Youth. While this isn't a bad thing, as it triggers something in us and creates an immediate reaction, the band are at their best when they aren't trying to ape their heroes. Opening track 'Start' sounds fresh and exciting with its wonky rhythms and jaunty melody. If this is a slice of what to expect from Macro in the future, we'll all be here for a long time.
Metal Gaze - From My Bloody Valentine To Nadja via SunnO))) »
Mr Agreeable: Like Ten Thousand Spoons When All He Needs Is A Gun »
My Bloody Valentine To Curate ATP's Nightmare Before Christmas »
My Bloody Valentine Reveal "Different Approach" »
Motorikpop: A Secret History Spotified »


text:
Nisís Boúrtzi kan syfta på följande platser:

Grekland

 Nisís Boúrtzion, ö, Peloponnesos,
 Nisís Boúrtzi (ö i Grekland), Attika, Nomós Attikís,

Robotskapade Greklandförgreningar

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Why are my photos distorted?
Why do I not see the internal memory when I connect to my PC?
My photo is not displayed, what can I do?
How can I delete one of the pre-loaded images (baby)?
How do I transfer photos from my PC to my Photo Frame?
Does the PhotoFrame have an internal battery?


Fillodoku is a fusion of Fillomino and Sudoku.
An unsolved puzzle consists of a square grid divided into rectangular regions. Some cells have numbers in them.
The goal is to fill some of the cells with numerals. Some cells may be empty.
Each number n appears n times in each row, column, and region.
In each region, the numbers n form an orthogonally contiguous area.


The GT-HR tanks are conventional diaphragm-type expansion vessel ranging from 8 to 1000 litres for 6 bar working pressure for closed heating systems and chilled water applications. These tanks can be incorporated in an expansion system in a tiny household or a large multi-storey building.
GT-HR tanks can be used with any Grundfos pump.
The GT-HR tanks are available in sizes ranging from 8 to 1000 litres and are suitable for vertical installation. The tanks have a non-replaceable diaphragm that is pre-charged with nitrogen (1.5 bar). The tanks have a non-toxic butyl rubber diaphragm, dividing the tank chamber into two compartments. The upper compartment contains compressed nitrogen. The lower compartment has a liner of polypropylene (PP) and is filled with water from the pump.
Industrial - heating and chilled-water systems.


text:
S.W.2d
507 S.W.2d
507 S.W.2d 534 (1974)
NOWLIN v. STATE
Nos. 47766, 47767.
Tommie Frank NOWLIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Tom A. Boardman, Dallas, for appellant.
Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., John E. Rapier, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., and Buddy Stevens, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
GREEN, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted in a joint trial before a jury of rape and robbery by assault. Punishment was assessed in each case at life imprisonment. This appeal is before us wherein appellant sets forth three grounds of error. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.
The State's evidence reflects that the appellant came into the Eros Book Store in Dallas on the morning of April 19th, 1972. After some time was spent examining the merchandise, appellant walked around behind the complaining witness, an employee of the store, put his arm around her throat and a gun to her back. Then appellant forced the complainant to go with him to the rear of the store where the rape occurred. After the appellant left, the complainant discovered that the money in the register and the money in her purse were missing. Appellant was subsequently identified by the complainant in a lineup, his palm print was recovered from the store, and personal possessions of the complainant were found on his person at the time of arrest and in his home subsequent to the arrest.
It is appellant's contention in his first ground of error that the prosecuting attorney commented on the appellant's failure to testify in his argument to the jury. Shortly after he opened the State's summation in the guilt-innocence phase of the case, the prosecuting attorney commented:
"The judge has just read you the law that's contained in each of these cases; you've heard the facts from the witness stand, from the various witnesses that the State of Texas has brought you. "I'd like to point out to you that the only witness that you've heard from in this particular courtroom in these trials have been witnesses who were brought to you from the State of Texas."
Appellant complains that the second paragraph quoted is a comment by the prosecutor on the failure of the appellant to testify and as such violated rights guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and by Vernon's Ann. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Art. 38.08. Appellant's objection to the comment was overruled, as were his related motions that the jury be instructed to disregard the comment and for mistrial.
The appellant did not testify and offered no evidence at the trial, although the record reflects that witnesses subpoenaed by appellant were present at the trial.
The rule is well established by this Court that before an argument of the prosecution will constitute a comment on the failure of the appellant to testify, the language used must be looked to from the standpoint of the jury, and the implication that the language used had reference to the appellant must be a necessary one. It is not sufficient that the language might be construed as an implied or indirect allusion. Turner v. State, 504 S.W.2d 843 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Armstrong v. State, 502 S.W.2d 731 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Ramos v. State, 419 S.W.2d 359 (Tex.Cr. App.1967); Richardson v. State, 172 Tex. Cr.R. 299, 356 S.W.2d 676 (1962).
For indirect comments such as this to constitute reversible error they must call for a denial of an assertion of fact or contradictory evidence that only the appellant is in a position to offer.
In Mowery v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 657, 146 S.W.2d 988 (1941), the prosecution argued in a rape case:
"It is not shown in this record anywhere a contradiction as to the commission of the act."
This statement was properly held to be error since no one was in a position to contradict the testimony, with regard to the act of intercourse, but the appellant. Likewise, in Grimes v. State, 100 Tex.Cr. R. 34, 271 S.W. 898 (1925) it was error for the prosecution to argue the jury should accept as true the testimony of the prosecuting witness because:
"... the defendant produced no witness that the same or any part of her statements, in which she testified that she met defendant down in a ditch some 200 or 300 yards off her road, and that she there had an act of intercourse with said defendant, and that the jury should believe the same because it stood uncontradicted...."
See also Tucker v. State, 10 S.W.2d 565 (Tex.Cr.App.1928).
However, if the language used can reasonably be construed as referring to the appellant's failure to produce other testimony than his own, it is not improper.
In Bolden v. State, 504 S.W.2d 418 (Tex.Cr.App.1974) the prosecution argued:
"He could have had a witness here to testify about alibi or any other thing that would explain the possession of the copper and he did not. He presented no evidence of any type whatsoever."
This Court held the implication to appellant's failure to testify was not a necessary one since other evidence would reasonably be available for his defense.
In Wood v. State, 374 S.W.2d 896, 898 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), the prosecution argued in language almost identical to the instant case. The appellant was charged with assault with intent to murder one of his small children. The prosecution stated:
"As you have noticed, the only witnesses in this case were put on by the State...."
The court held there was no error since under the facts in the record the wife of appellant was in a position to testify to the child's injuries. In Curlin v. State, 500 S.W.2d 141, 143 (Tex.Cr.App.1973), the appellant was charged with robbery by firearms. The prosecution argued the jury did not hear "one witness say that he (appellant) didn't (commit the robbery) except Linda Williams...." Again the court held the argument could be reasonably construed as referring to appellant's failure to produce other testimony than his own, under the facts of the case, and therefore it was not improper.
In the instant case, the prosecution was attempting to begin his summary of the evidence in both the rape and the robbery charges. The prosecution did not refer to any particular aspect of the rape or the robbery that could be controverted only by the appellant. Obviously, other evidence might have been offered in the trial.
Where there is other possible evidence than the appellant's testimony, as in this case, to which the remarks may reasonably have applied, then under the above cited authorities it is not improper. We cannot conclude the language used was manifestly intended or was of such a character that the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the defendant to testify.
The appellant's first ground of error is overruled.
In his second ground of error, appellant again alleges error on the prosecution's argument to the jury. The prosecutor stated:
"She (the prosecutrix) told you exactly on the stand what she told Mr. Boardman in my office, and the reason why...."
The appellant complains that the argument is reversible error because it is outside the record and improper bolstering of the complaining witness.
However, the record clearly indicates this argument was invited by appellant in his argument as well as in cross-examination of the complaint where he attempted to impeach the witness by use of notes he had taken during the interview with the complainant in the District Attorney's office.
Appellant cannot be heard to complain that the prosecution improperly argued from evidence developed and submitted by the appellant himself. Hefley v. State, 489 S.W.2d 115 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Sennette v. State, 481 S.W.2d 827 (Tex.Cr.App. 1972).
Appellant's second ground of error is overruled.
In appellant's third ground of error he contends that the court erred in refusing to admit relevant and material evidence concerning the manager of the Eros Book Store, Richard Duncan. Evidence was brought forward by appellant that the police were first furnished appellant's name in connection with these offenses by Richard Duncan. It was subsequent to this that appellant was placed in a lineup and identified by the complainant. The information from Duncan was the only evidence the police had that connected appellant with the crimes prior to the lineup.
The appellant made an offer of proof in regard to evidence showing a possible bias that Duncan had against appellant. A police officer testified that Richard Duncan was arrested in 1972 for possession of marihuana. The officer further testified that he was given the information that led to the arrest by Tommie Frank Nowlin, the appellant. The trial court sustained the State's motion to exclude on the basis of immateriality of the evidence.
Appellant argues that such evidence was admissible to show bias on the part of Duncan in giving information which led to appellant's arrest and subsequent identification at the lineup. Appellant contends this bias tainted the identification that occurred at the lineup and in court.
Prior to admitting the in-court identification the trial judge conducted a separate hearing as recommended in Martinez v. State, 437 S.W.2d 842 (Tex.Cr.App.1969), and thereafter filed written findings of fact and conclusions of law. He concluded that the complainant had an ample opportunity to observe the appellant at the time of the offense, the appellant did not make any effort to conceal his facial features, and that there is no evidence that the complainant failed to identify the appellant at any prior time, meaning at the time she was shown photographs of suspects and at the lineup. Further, there was no evidence that either the pictures were shown or the lineup was conducted under circumstances or conditions which were unnecessarily suggestive and conductive to irreparably mistaken identity which would be a denial of due process based upon the totality of circumstances surrounding the crime.
We agree with the trial court's findings that the pre-trial identification was not impermissibly suggestive and further that the in-court identification of the appellant was based upon independent observations at the time of the offense. Therefore, no error is shown. Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384, 88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Dorsey v. State, 485 S.W.2d 569 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Moore v. State, 440 S.W.2d 643 (Tex.Cr. App.1969).
We would further state that the animus motive or ill will of a prosecuting witness is always a relevant inquiry and may be shown by the appellant himself or other witnesses if necessary in order to impeach the witness for interest or bias. However, here, Richard Duncan did not testify, and there was no showing that the complainant had knowledge of the prior transaction between Duncan and the appellant or that Duncan attempted to influence the complainant in any manner. Absent such a showing the evidence offered by appellant was not relevant, and we find no error in its exclusion. Lee v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 555, 321 S.W.2d 577 (1959); Armstrong v. State, 95 Tex.Cr.R. 107, 252 S.W. 777 (1923).
Appellant's third ground of error is overruled.
The judgments are affirmed.
ROBERTS and ODOM, JJ., concur in the result.
Opinion approved by the Court.


text:
Why Mr. Darcy and not Mr. Bingley ?
Aside from the obvious, of course-- twice the income and the awesome estate of Pemberley. After all, Mr. Bingley was handsome, wealthy, attentive and much more fun at a ball than his arrogant friend, Mr. Darcy. And yet, it seems that even 19th century women like Jane Austen and Charlotte Bronte recognized the appeal of the bad boy.
My sister once recommended a book to me called Heart of the West by Penelope Williamson. We have very similar taste in books and she assured me I would love it. The couple, Clementine and Gus, were well-suited to each other, and the description, setting, and historical details were fantastic. Gus was handsome, humorous, and kind-- everything a girl could want in a guy. But as much as I enjoyed the first chapters, I still couldn't understand why my sister had gone so crazy about this particular book. And then it happened - Gus's brother, Zach, showed up in what I still consider to be one of the best bad boy introductions ever written. I couldn't put the book down after that.
As I created the villain for Distraction, the warlock Angus Wolfe, whose obsession with the heroine is the central problem of the entire series, I wanted to make him appealing in the sense that readers would want to know more about him and hopefully learn to loathe him. I wanted to do the same with the hero, Cade Tanner, but with the opposite result. I wanted readers to love him. They both came out on paper as dark, dangerous, confident, and cocky. And they were both in love with the heroine, Poppy. That's when it dawned on me-- there was only a thin line that separated the two male characters. The thin line that made Angus vile and Cade loveable was that Cade would face anything, including death, for Poppy and Angus would save himself first.
It's hard to pinpoint exactly why these tough, cocky sometimes even downright mean guys drive us nuts. Maybe it's their insatiable need for trouble. Maybe it's the easy, laid back way they face danger. Or maybe it's just those damn lazy smiles. One thing is certain though, every bad boy, no matter how many flaws and faults, will do anything and risk everything for the girl they love. And I guess, in the end, that's why we love the bad boy.
April 29 Interview and review
Shut Up &Read
http://shutupandreadgroup.blogspot.com/
April 30 Spotlight
Cover2CoverBlog
www.cover2coverblog.blogspot.com
May 1 Interview
Pembroke Sinclair.
www.pembrokesinclair.blogspot.com
May 2 Spotlight
Fandom Fanatic
http://fandomfanatic.blogspot.com/
May 2 Spotlight and review
Teen Blurb
www.teenblurb.org
Laurie's Paranormal Thoughts and Reviews
http://lauriethoughts-reviews.blogspot.com
Books & Tales:
http://www.booksandtales.blogspot.co.uk/
The Avid Reader
http://the-avidreader.blogspot.com/
May 8 Guest blog
Roxanne's Realm
www.roxannesrealm.blogspot.com
Share My Destiny
http://Sharemydestiny.blogspot.com
May 9 review
http://princess-paperback.blogspot.com.au
May 10 Interview and review
Vicky at Deal Sharing Aunt
www.dealsharingaunt.blogspot.com
May 10 Spotlight
http://jodiepierceauthor.blogspot.com/
May 13 Guest blog
The Broke Book Bank
http://thebrokebookbank.blogspot.com/
Years from Home Trilogy, Book One
Genre: YA Paranormal Romance- mature YA
ASIN: B00B4DF66K
Cover Artist: Nikki Hensley www.hensleygraphics.com
Smashwords Amazon BN Kobo Itunes
As false accusations of witchcraft consume Salem Village, eighteen-year-old Poppy Seabrooke, a true witch, is content to stay away from the hysteria and more importantly from the relentless advances of Angus Wolfe, a powerful warlock masquerading as Salem's pastor.
When Poppy uses her magic to help a young boy, she is arrested. Angus is the only person who can help her, but, in return, she must promise her hand in marriage. In desperation, Poppy's grandmother sends her two hundred years into the future to hide. Poppy finds herself years from home in the middle of a strange place called Montana where rooms light up without candles or sorcery, steam puffing dragons roar across fields on tracks, and cows sprout horns as long as tree trunks. And while Poppy hides from the man who turns her heart cold as ice, she discovers the man who can set it on fire.
Cade Tanner has always lived fast and hard, and he prefers it that way. The last thing he needs is a girl to distract him from running the cattle ranch his father left him. But Poppy, the sweetly innocent beauty with the soft smile and dark eyes, who seemingly fell from the sky, is tough to ignore. But Cade soon finds that falling for Poppy comes with a dangerous price.
Tess Oliver is a teacher and writer who lives in California with her husband, kids, a small pack of pampered dogs, and the recent addition of three ridiculously cute pygmy goats. She loves horses, chocolate and Jane Austen books. She has a BS of Nutrition Science, and a MA in Curriculum and Instruction. She is also an author published by Barron's Educational Publisher.
Website: http://www.tessoliver.com/
Blog: http://tessoliverauthor.blogspot.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tessoliverauthor
Goodreads: http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/4178161.Tess_Oliver
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Tess_Oliver
Posted by Roxanne Rhoads at 6:00 AM
Labels: Book One, Distraction, Tess Oliver, Years from Home Trilogy


The markets burst into action yesterday amid news that a final deal for a freeze in Oil production, from Russia and major nations, will not depend on Iran. Crude Oil pushed up 3% to within a whisker of the March 2016 high.
Stocks gained with the S&P500 closing up at 2,061.72 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average at 17,721.25.
The rise looks set to continue, with major European indices joining in the surge. The FTSE 100 rushed to a 2016 high during early morning trading, buoyed by Oil prices.
Whilst US markets are not hitting new highs for the year, this strength could yet push the market that way. Energy stocks are gaining and with a surge in commodities, the market doesn't yet look set for a fall.
Investors will focus on corporate earnings over the next several weeks, amid turbulent global markets and uncertainty surrounding the U.S. Federal Reserve's plan to raise interest rates.
Yet for now, advancing issues are outnumbering declining issues on the NYSE and Nasdaq.
Gold held firm, after a recent rise from $1200. However, early European trade has seen the precious metal pull back a little, which could aid the fuel into stocks.


Search Engine giant Google is not the only company who is doing all it can to eliminate duplicate content that has plagued the wide world web like a poisonous disease. BloomReach, a well-known big data marketing Applications company has come up with its own tool to fight against the much dreaded duplicate content – they call it the Dynamic Duplicate Reduction.
How Does Dynamic Duplicate Reduction Tool Work?
When used, the Dynamic Duplicate Reduction (DDR) tool will continuously crawl, scrutinize and locate any duplicate content on your website. When the duplicate content has been found, it will make sure that the main or original page is the one that is crawled, indexed and searched. The duplicates on the other hand will be unseen but can still be used for web analytics.
BloomReach boasts that the Dynamic Duplicate reduction tool reduces about 95% pages of duplicate content with different URLs, which means that in a search, only the most relevant pages will be found.
Any self-respecting website or blog owner should avoid duplicate content at any cost. Having it on your site will only cause more harm than good. Not only that, it is an eye sore and Google will track it down and penalize the site by pushing it further down in the search rank. Being taken out from the rank is a death sentence for many websites who earn through clicks and traffic. In other words, having duplicate content will only mean lost revenue and no sales. Why risk it? And don't forget, using duplicate content may also lead to law-suits related to plagiarism.
BloomReach's DDR tool is not the only device one can use to battle with the war against duplicate content. There are many available tools online one can use to make sure that no one is duplicating your content on your website. One of them is PlagSpotter. It is the latest duplicate content checker tool that can be used to scan websites for that very much dreaded plagiarized text copy. The tool is very easy to use. All you need to do is paste your website's URL and PlagSpotter will do all the detective work for you. Your site will be scanned against countless sites to see if there are any anomalies and then within minutes, you will receive a comprehensive report about the results.
Unlike most online duplicate content checkers, PlagSpotter is free, even though in the near future the team is planning to offer daily and weekly scans for their premium subscribers, and for serious website business owners, this is a must to have feature. It is not surprising that customers now consider PlagSpotter a very good alternative to the famous duplicate content checker online tool CopyScape.