text:
metropol » First European
Tag: First European
Motorcycling in his blood: First European
First European owner Andy Burchall built his first motorcycle when he was 15 years old, using a box of old parts he bought.
"Mum and dad were pretty convinced I would never get it going, but I put it together and it worked," he says. "And then I used to sneak out to ride it." Motorcycling is in his blood. "It's addictive – it's like a disease that you either have or you don't – and if you've got it, you can't get rid of it."
With 25 years in the motor trade, Andy is an engineer by profession. His passion for the industry is reflected in First European, which he took over five years ago with his wife, Teresa. Transforming it into a centric hub for motorcycle enthusiasts, they added Throttlestop Coffee Club upstairs to create a social space for customers, offering fresh barista-made coffees, food and comfortable seating.
"We wanted to provide more of a community atmosphere, rather than just a bike shop – have a coffee and chat while your bike is being serviced. Many of our regulars have made friends here and we also often provide a range of events for our customers, including 'shop rides' every third Saturday of the month." The expert team are the official sales and servicing agents for Royal Enfield, MV Agusta, Benelli, and SWM motorcycles. From customised, retro and classic bikes, to used bikes, scooters and superbikes, First European also offers a wide range of clothing and accessories.
Visit www.firsteuropean.co.nz for more information.
Andy Burchall
First European
A luxurious launch: First European adds prestigious MV Agusta to it's collection
First European has welcomed an Italian racing legend into its Sydenham showroom and it offers all the luxury, speed and good looks one could expect from the Italians.
With an illustrious past, MV Agusta first rose to prominence in the early twentieth century when it belonged to a pioneer of the fledgling aeronautics industry, count Giovanni Agusta. Agusta aircraft production soared during the First World War before the focus turned from aircraft to motorcycles post-World War II and a world champion was born.
The glory years for MV Agusta were from 1948 when Franco Bertoni won the 125 cc in the Italian Grand Prix, to 1976 when Agusta retired from Grand Prix racing at the end of the 1976 season, having won 270 Grand Prix motorcycle races, 38 World Riders' Championships and 37 World Constructors' Championships.
After a few years off the track, 2004 marked the company's return to racing and to victory and every year has been a little bit better for this racing legend.
MV Agusta has taken the bold step of adding the initials of the company's racing department – Reparto Corse – and the move signifies the exceptional quality and styling which is directly derived from its efforts at the World Superbike Championship.
There's an exciting range of five Reparto Corse special edition models available from MV Agusta, from the high-end F3 RC supersport in both 675 and 800 versions, to the new special Brutale 800 RR Pirelli, the updated version of the rare and collectable Dragster 800 RC and the F3 800 has joined the gang.
To find out more, visit First European at 114 Carlyle Street, Sydenham or phone 03-3662201.


Apple's more expensive iPhone 5S has been outselling its cheaper counterpart, the iPhone 5C two to one, leaving many to speculate that maybe users want the higher-end, expensive electronics made famous by Apple's late founder Steve Jobs.
Several reports have said the cheaper iPhone hasn't lived up to expectations and Apple has cut orders for the $99 device, according to Bloomberg Businessweek. Consumer Intelligence Research Partners found that 64 percent of U.S. iPhone customers were buying the iPhone 5S, compared to just 27 percent buying the iPhone 5C. The $99 phone was created to compete with cheaper Android phones, especially those in the developing world.
Another reason is that the $99 iPhone 5C is considered an "old" phone, without the newest innovation, so consumers aren't buying it. Instead, they want the newest device -- the iPhone 5S.
There is a chance that the 5C could begin selling well, especially globally, but for now most of Apple's profits are tied with the more $199 model -- even in the developing world.


Approval of Minutes: The board approved August and November 2014 minutes as well as the March 2015 minutes.
President's Report: To recap the networking mixer. Jason sent a note to everyone thanking them for attending the mixer. About 20 people came to the event. We spent less than $100 on food at Gordon Biersch. There were new people attending, including non-journalists. Jason pitched the early bird registration for the convention. There are 10 bags left from the past convention that we can give out.
Stacy Kaneshiro asked on the AAJA Hawaii Facebook whether or not we were going to make a statement about the March 3, 2015 article: http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/20150329_Mayor_Kenoi_says_he_used_county_credit_card_for_personal_expenses.html?id=297934911. The reporter mentioned "Korean" hostess bars, even though the point of the story was more about the politician's improper use of his business credit card and it was not necessary to call them Korean bars. The board mentioned the article to AAJA national media watch committee. To our knowledge, the article was altered online to remove the word.
Judging the AAJA awards are almost done. Stan will check with the other judges on the progress.
AAJA National is asking for silent auction items again for the convention from all the chapters. Linda wanted to know if we ever receive a list that details who bought the silent auction items. Jason said no.
Vice President's Report: Linda is looking forward to helping with any events that are coming up.
Treasurer's Report: Stan has renewed our nonprofit status with the state of Hawaii. Fee for checking account going up. Stan will looking into switching accounts.
National Representative's Report: Paul Cheung sent the convention numbers on the day of the early registration deadline. The goal was 300 people. We were barely past half. It was surprising considering that the San Francisco location was an attractive pull. One new feature of AAJA is there is a loyalty program. If you've been an AAJA member for five years or more they'll give you $25 off for registration.
Old Business: The board is volunteering for the lantern festival May 3. Linda, Wes, Jason and Kristen are attending. Stan is a maybe.
New Business: Wes reiterated that it is difficult to come up with events throughout the year and we should still consider finding other Asian-related events to help out with in the community. Several ideas include the Korean Festival, Hawaii's Plantation Village and Honouliuli Concentration Camp. Kristen will inquire about plantation village group rates. Wes also said we should consider putting on another student event in the fall. Linda will ask Society of Professional Journalists if there's any opportunity for AAJA provide a service to the Gridiron event as they did in the past. For example, AAJA sold bentos at Gridiron, and proceeds went to AAJA.
Sean voted to approve via email, 5/18.
Linda voted to approve via email, 5/18.
Jason voted to approve via email, 5/18.
Stan voted to approve during the meeting, 6/6.


text:
Vicky Foxcroft MP for Lewisham Deptford & Shadow Minister for Disabled People
Contact & Surgeries
In Lewisham Deptford
Business, Innovation & Skills
Culture, Media & Sport
Environment, Food & Farming
Women & Equalities
Work & Pensions
Youth Violence Commission
#ShieldingStories
Regional Disability Roadshows
Supporting Strikers at Goldsmiths
5th March, 2018
This morning I visited the picket line at Goldsmiths to support UCU workers who are striking against changes to their pensions.
Universities UK plans to close the defined benefit portion of the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) and replace it with a defined contribution scheme. This is very concerning as I know it would significantly reduce the security of retirement income for academic staff in many UK universities and that further erosion of USS benefits could reduce universities' ability to attract and retain staff in an increasingly competitive sector.
I understand that talks between Universities UK and the UCU resumed last week and I hope that a satisfactory outcome can be negotiated. Although the Government has dismissed intervening (viewing universities as autonomous institutions responsible for their own pension provision) I believe that it should step in to review the situation and urge Universities UK to work with University and College Union to find a better solution.
I have written to the Minister for Universities (Sam Gyimah) to outline my concerns and to urge the Government to act, as well as writing to the Warden of Goldsmiths.
Vicky with UCU strikers at Goldsmiths
Email: vicky.foxcroft.mp@parliament.uk
Promoted by and on behalf of the Labour Party at One Brewer's Green, London SW1H 0RH

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Who Else Can Do What You Are About to Do?
Home \ Blog \ BIZ-TIP \ Who Else Can Do What You Are About to Do?
I don't know about you, but I've been running on "overwhelm." I made a list and realized that I had 16 significant projects going right now! I'm talking about real projects that are going to take several hours and multiple days to complete. It gets worse: they are all due within the next 16 weeks! I realized that this has got to stop!
Then delegate it!Ask your team to watch for things that they see you doing that they could do for you. You'll be surprised and pleased with what they come up with.
Ask your coach, mentor, managers, employees, associates or friends where they see you spinning your wheels. That's what you need to get off your plate!
I know we all work hard, but life's too short not to have fun! Even our work should be fun. When you are overwhelmed, it's not fun!


This documentary explores evidence claiming to prove that certain animals could only have come from a divine creator, and not evolution. Dr. Jobe Martin lets viewers in on startling data that surprised even him at first. Challenge your own thought processes and beliefs as complicated and intricate designs throughout the animal kingdom are dissected, conjuring up many questions about the true origins of several creatures.


We're making Mondays better with our Local Mondays!
Local Mondays are an opportunity for local hospitality-driven businesses or musicians to showcase their products or talents at the KitBar. For more information about Stone's Cove Local Mondays, please email cu@stonescove.com.


That not what I meant.
Like what about the faction counter? Or classes that would be practically useless to scum like the Maid? Or classes that are overpowered for scum to have like Hunter? Ect ect ect.
Agree, but im in lack of time.
Also im making Vampire will not know either other Vamps, Darcula or Ghoul. They will pnly hear both of them anonymously.
Or i will allow that when VL spawned?
It would be N7, with 0 scum deaths and no missed conversions.
What happens if Dracula dies but the Ghoul is still alive?
Yeah. You know how fucked the Unseen is when the MM is dead. It's like that but without a backup.
Also if the convertible classes are dead and Dracula is the last vamp then he cannot win.


Interview with Everyone is Smart author Noor Abdelrahman. Here our featured author Noor shares a little about the book, her motivation for writing, and some advice to aspiring writers.
Welcome to the HoneyTree Blog!
Yesterday, I spent the day listening to various children's books and learning about the importance of reading as a family, especially the content we read. Shahd spent the day making Eid crafts with children and shared with me that it was so powerful to witness what it means for kids to be with family and community, especially while learning about our holidays! This reaffirmed our commitment to HoneyTree, and we are as excited as ever to be sharing this with you!


text:
OSCAR WATCH: Lone Survivor
No year is complete without a major war movie and 2013 was no different. Arriving at the end of the year, "Lone Survivor" seemed to have gotten lost in the blitz of holiday releases. The critics didn't come to its rescue and audiences are perhaps feeling fatigue over contemporary war dramas. However, I still believe it's a film worth considering.
The film is directed by Peter Berg, who many of you may know from last year's reviled flop "Battleship". Of course, that's not an encouraging sign but make no mistake, this guy has talent. Despite his uneven filmography, Berg has a lifetime pass from me for creating "Friday Night Lights", one of the best TV series of all time. With that in mind, I was happy to see that this film is much more in line with his work on that under-seen, but highly acclaimed show.
"Lone Survivor" tells the harrowing true story of a team of Navy SEALs sent on a dangerous mission to capture a Taliban leader in Afghanistan. As you can probably imagine from the film's title, it doesn't have the happiest of outcomes. Don't tell that to Berg however, as he seems intent on having us believe that everything will turn out fine. He employs his unique humanist style of directing here, which makes him both an inspired and unusual fit for this story. Specifically, he's an expert at handling tender emotional moments but he struggles with creating the tension required for an action film. You quickly get the sense that he loves his characters dearly, not wanting to make their imminent danger feel to be too palpable. This is perfectly exposed in the way he opens the film - reverent real-life footage, sentimental correspondence with loved ones, male bonding. He puts all his heart and soul into scenes like these, much more than when he's required to stage the big action sequences.
As much as Berg would like to ignore it however, this is first and foremost a war movie and this particular story requires some big action scenes. To his credit, he does direct the shootouts pretty well. Still, that lack of tension is a problem when the men aren't engaged in combat. Berg loves his wide shot vistas (especially with a sunrise or sunset in the background) but it ends up feeling too glossy and pretty for this material. The film definitely needed some more grit considering the bleakness being depicted.
Even with all of these issues, Berg's elegant direction keeps this film at a fairly high quality. Kudos to Mark Wahlberg as well, who admirably carries the tail end of this film and delivers its powerful conclusion. The film may not satisfy those hoping for a landmark war epic, but this is a remarkable true story that deserves to be seen.
Universal Pictures is hoping for Oscar attention for this film, but that will be hard to come by. It will certainly be a challenge for it to make the cut for Best Picture. The sound categories are perhaps more likely, but I get the feeling they'll be filled with major Best Picture contenders and bigger, louder blockbusters. Its sound design is certainly deserving but the buzz for the film is just too quiet. There's still some hope though, so keep an eye out for "Lone Survior" come nomination morning.
Posted by Shane Slater at 8:56 PM
Dan O. January 1, 2014 at 11:23 PM
Good review Shane. This is a lot meatier and more emotional than most of the crappy, propaganda war-flicks I usually see, but it's Oscar chances seem just a bit slim. Maybe a nod for Best Adapted Screenplay, maybe?
Shane Slater January 6, 2014 at 8:51 AM
Thanks. The film just got a WGA nod for Best Adapted Screenplay, so maybe you're right!
Christopher Lindsay May 14, 2015 at 4:52 PM
I'm sure this film is more popular with Republicans than Democrats. Berg made us connect with the characters by connecting the characters to their loved ones. I wrote a short essay on Lone Survivor called "The Rules of War." If you would like to read it, here is the link: https://christopherjohnlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/05/14/lone-survivor/
A ROTTEN TOMATO: Fresh
OLDIE GOLDIES: All Quiet on the Western Front (1930)
MOVIE OF THE WEEK: Mansfield Park
Top 20 Acting Performances of 2013
Why the Oscars are still relevant
Has Sundance lost its Oscar mojo?
MOVIE OF THE WEEK: Inside Llewyn Davis
OSCAR WATCH: SAG Awards
OSCAR WATCH: SAG Predictions
OSCAR WATCH: Critics Choice Awards
OSCAR WATCH: Oscar Nominations
CONTEST: The Results!
OSCAR WATCH: The Book Thief
OSCAR WATCH: Critics Choice Predictions
CONTEST: The Predictions!
OSCAR WATCH: The Documentary Features
MOVIE OF THE WEEK: Short Term 12
OSCAR WATCH: Golden Globe Awards
OSCAR WATCH: Her
CONTEST: See Who's Playing!
OSCAR WATCH: Blue Jasmine
OSCAR WATCH: Golden Globe Predictions
#FF August: Osage County, Walter Mitty and more...
OSCAR WATCH: The Wolf of Wall Street
OSCAR WATCH: The Animated Films
FYC: 12 Years A Slave, Steve McQueen and Michael F...
OSCAR WATCH: BAFTA Nominations
FYC: Sean Bobbitt, Paulina García and Tye Sheridan
OSCAR WATCH: August: Osage County
FYC: Naomie Harris, Tobias Lindholm & Thomas Vinte...
MOVIE OF THE WEEK: Blue Is The Warmest Color
FYC: The Great Beauty, Abdellatif Kechiche & Ghali...
OSCAR WATCH: Dallas Buyers Club
FYC: Christopher Rouse, Catherine Martin and "Over...
FYC: Turbo, The Crash Reel and the Visual Effects ...
#FF Best of 2013, Lone Survivor and more...
OSCAR WATCH: American Hustle
FYC: Steven Price, Glenn Freemantle and the Sound ...
New Year's Movie Resolutions


text:
Discreet Bullion
Sarah Palin is a genius
Who would have thought it?
From Zero Hedge
The was a time when everyone loved making fun of GOP vice presidential canidate Sarah Palin. It's her turn to get the final laugh.
As CBS recounts, in October 2008, after Russia's invasion of neighboring Georgia emerged as a foreign policy flashpoint in the homestretch of a heated campaign, Palin told an audience in Nevada, "After the Russian army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next."
Just as amusing was the response to Palin's comments by foreign policy experts, Foreign Policy magazine, which said, "As we've said before, this is an extremely far-fetched scenario. And given how Russia has been able to unsettle Ukraine's pro-Western government without firing a shot, I don't see why violence would be necessary to bring Kiev to heel."
Coming just a few months after subprime turned out not to be contained despite everyone's fervent belief that it was, this is not all that surprising.
And now it's time to gloat: "I'm usually not one to Told-Ya-So, but I did, despite my accurate prediction being derided as 'an extremely far-fetched scenario' by the 'high-brow' Foreign Policy magazine," Palin wrote Friday.
"Here's what this 'stupid,' 'insipid woman' predicted in 2008," she added, before rehashing her prediction.
Talk radio host Mark Levin tweeted, "Palin not only knows where Russia is, but she knew what Putin would do to Ukraine with Obama as president."
Then again, back in 2008 a lot of people were also talking about hope and change. Five years later people have to look up the definition of hope, as for change, the best place to find it is in the 11 million people who have dropped out of the labor force in that time.
Follow our CEO on Twitter
Tweets by @MoonSunTruth
 Contact us Questions Prices Storage Bullion About us


Lacuna Coil singer Cristina Scabbia has been interviewed by John Parks of Legendary Rock Interviews.
In the lengthy interview Cristina talks about Lacuna Coils recording history and discusses each of the albums; how they have reflected the different aspects of Lacuna Coil. She also talks about the 2012 touring schedule, and playing the old songs during the 'Dark Legacy Tour', the confusion caused by the band's video for the song 'I Like It' (taken from the 'Shallow Life' album), her music influences, and dispelling any myths of a solo career.
You can check the full full interview at Legendary Rock Interviews.
Lacuna Coil 'Enjoy The Darkness' / Terrorizer Magazine →← Congratulations to Andrea and Paola!


text:
Sen. Barbara Boxer is a sponsor of the Climate Security Act. | John Shinkle/POLITICO
Environmental groups faltered this year
By ERIKA LOVLEY
Former Vice President Al Gore may have made global warming a household term, but this year's tactical mistakes by the green army may have set the cause back just when it seemed to be on the brink of a legislative breakthrough. While pushing for sharp emission reductions, a number of environmental groups failed to adapt their pitch to acknowledge rising energy costs, experts say, leaving voters to believe that saving the planet will mean unaffordable energy prices.
The Senate's Climate Security Act — sponsored by Sens. Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.), John Warner (R-Va.) and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) — called for quick emission reductions that would have raised energy costs significantly for Americans. A handful of well-advertised studies by the business community painted the legislation as an economic apocalypse.
But Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and other environmental groups were pushing lawmakers to go even further to prevent irreversible environmental damage.
In a year when gasoline soared past $4 per gallon, the green message triggered populist anger and eventually drove away a core group of moderate and conservative Democrats.
When the legislation came to the Senate floor, 10 conservative Democratic senators who voted to debate the bill also vowed to oppose it later — even after it had been sweetened with billions of dollars in last-minute public energy assistance.
The group included Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), who said he plans to offer his own legislation next year. He told Politico that environmentalists will be forced to compromise next year and support the development of clean coal, nuclear power and other alternative fuels.
"We need to be able to address a national energy strategy and then try to work on environmental efficiencies as part of that plan," Webb said. "We can't just start with things like emission standards at a time when we're at a crisis with the entire national energy policy."
Polls show that the public clearly sees global warming and high energy prices as separate issues, rather than one overall problem. Now more Americans than ever are urging politicians to solve the skyrocketing gas prices before finding a solution to climbing temperatures. And while support for offshore oil drilling has reached a record high, solving global warming is low on the list of voter priorities.
In a recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, global warming ranked seventh in a list of eight top voter priorities, behind the economy and energy at the top, and also following the war in Iraq, health care, terrorism and illegal immigration. It was ahead of only housing.
"There was not enough emphasis that if we move aggressively toward sustainable energy, we will transform our energy costs," said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who said he plans to offer his own global warming bill next year. "We were not as clear as we might have been."
Still, Democrats who backed the legislation remain supportive of the greens' agenda.
"I'm not discouraged at all," said Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin (D-Md.). "The environmental community understands that we have to have a starting point. The next bill should be modified with the greens but also with those in the business community."
Boxer said environmental groups would continue to play a vital role in next year's debate. "The vast majority of green groups support the targets that are necessary to avoid the most dangerous impact of global warming," she said.
Greens deny that their policy push overlooked the energy crisis but acknowledge a public perception problem.
"The solution for us next year is connecting gas prices and global warming. We have to show voters that the solution to gas prices and the solution to global warming is the same," said Greenpeace global warming expert Kate Smolski. "What's been lost on decision makers is that the cost of inaction will far exceed any costs of dealing with the problem now."
It's a balancing act that plenty of others saw coming.
"You cannot have a system that emphasizes pain," said former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), whose American Solutions group opposed the global warming bill. "It is elitist. You'd have to be so wealthy you don't notice the cost or so dedicated that the cost is irrelevant."
A study by the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity found that energy costs are disproportionally affecting lower and middle class minority families.
Sierra Club global warming lobbyist Dave Hamilton said the environmental community was partly a victim of timing. Despite efforts to educate the grass roots about the relationship between global warming and energy prices, news of the added energy assistance funding came too late and failed to resonate with key voting blocs.
"The problems with energy prices have really happened in the last few months," he said. "We somehow failed in making that a priority, and I think we have a huge amount [of work] to do on energy policy."
Environmentalists say Americans want immediate action on global warming but don't want to pay for it. A recent study by the Commission to Engage African Americans on Climate Change showed that a large majority of Americans wanted serious government action on climate change but that only 14 percent were willing to pay more than $50 a month to help the cause.
"You cannot drive home environmental legislation without considering the cost on the economy," said National Association of Manufacturers lobbyist Keith McCoy. "That message was already universally unacceptable."
Leading policymakers suspect greens will continue to face hurdles if energy costs stay high.
"They're defeating themselves and hurting all of us on an issue that hurts all of us," said former Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Christine Todd Whitman, who was instrumental in implementing the Clean Air Act. "The trouble comes when people try to attribute everything to global warming. Then the public gets skeptical about the claims."
Avi Zenilman contributed to this story.


text:
Q: subprocess is not working with a directory On bash
ssh 192.168.3.10 cat /etc/project/file.cfg | diff - /root/test/test3.txt is working fine.

54d53
< # Test Line

However, with python.
server = 192.168.3.10
file to track = /etc/project/file.cfg
backupfile = /root/test/test3.txt

   output = subprocess.run(['ssh', server, 'cat', file_to_track, '|', 'diff', '-', backupfile], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
   print(output)

I see output as
diff: /root/test/test3.txt: No such file or directory

I expect
54d53
< # Test Line

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Sharing the performance of sandyyadav.com for the year 2013 annual report for this blog. Many thanks those who visited and provided your insightful comments. Commitment for 2014 will be more on International markets and regulations. Here on I wish all my readers a very happy and prosperous new year 2014.


Direct mail marketing is a great technique to bring in new customers. Marketing is all about information dissemination. You have to make people aware of your existence in the market and give them a reason to do business with you. Whether you cater to B2C or B2B customers, email marketing can increase your customer base significantly if done properly. It is easy to buy email lists these days as there are several reliable European Business Email Mailing Lists sellers in the market. The difficult thing is to boost the response rate.
People get dozens of promotional mail everyday and let's be honest, they hardly read them. You can't blame the customers though! Since most of the email marketers are only busy to say "buy from us" and "we are the best", people think it is safe to overlook all the promotional mails. Besides, if you own a start-up company then there is a possibility that people may have never heard about you and thus, there is absolutely no trust for your brand. So, how can you increase response rate? How can you make sure that not only people will open the email and read it, but also visit your website to know more? Here are some helpful tips to boost email marketing response rate.
Sell what people want: Email marketing is not about creating markets, but locating those that want your product or service. For example, if you offer website design services, you can contact new companies as they may not have a website yet and looking for a service provider who can develop a website at low cost. As the owner of web design company, you may offer logo design and SEO services as well, but since you are targeting the businesses without a website, it is crucial that your sales pitch focuses on website design service only.
Sell solutions: Acquiring European Business Email Mailing Lists is easy, but encouraging people to click on the "buy" button is tough. It is not just what you are selling, but how you are selling that makes all the difference. For instance, a fashion brand may want to sell dresses for women, but you can't just say "buy dresses from us" because the girl reading your mail would like to buy a dress that will make her look beautiful. Therefore, a call-to-action like "Prom date is coming! Want to look pretty? Check our extensive range of prom queen dress." can increase the conversion rate beyond your imagination.
Emotion first and logic second: Buyers have become smarter now, but emotion still wins over logic. Therefore, your content must touch readers emotionally and once they are touched, you can give them the logic to deal with you. For instance, "Are you staying abroad? Want to tell your kid on his birthday that you love him?" The answer is "yes" and the buyer gets sentimental. Now, your next lines can be like this- "we offer customized gifts and cakes for birthday. Home delivery is free. Price starts at $20." He gets the facts and clicks on the link as it is a good offer.
Whether you are sharing your sales pitch online or offline, you have to connect with customers emotionally. With the help of European Business Email Mailing Lists, you can stay in touch with potential customers constantly and establish a bond with them. Convince them that while there are other companies out there, you understand them the most and will do anything to make them happy. A concerned and customer oriented seller always generates leads.


text:
Wix vs Weebly
Try Wix Try Weebly
Five important differences to understand before choosing between Wix and Weebly.
By Steve Benjamins | Updated Jan 22 2023
Both Wix and Weebly are website builders— but they have important differences. Weebly is extremely easy to use but lacks theme customization. Wix, on the other hand, gives you plenty of freedom but can occasionally get chaotic.
Overall, you won't be disappointed with either one— I recommend both. What matters is understanding the differences so that you can choose the one that suits your needs.
Wix vs Weebly At A Glance
Wix has an unstructured editor where elements can be dragged anywhere on a page. Weebly has a structured editor where elements can be dragged into columns and rows.
Both Wix and Weebly are intuitive but Weebly is easier to use— in fact, I recommend Weebly as the easiest of any website builder.
Wix has more features than Weebly overall.
This is the most obvious difference between Wix and Weebly.
Wix's editor is unstructured and gives you the freedom to drag and drop elements anywhere on a page. There's no rigid, predetermined structure to limit you. It's even possible to move a piece of content by a single pixel at a time.
It's possible to place elements wherever you like with Wix.
In contrast, Weebly is a structured editor— elements can be dragged and dropped, but only within a pre-designed grid.
Weebly is a structured editor.
The upside is clear for Wix's unstructured editor: it gives you freedom. Unfortunately the lack of structure can also be frustrating.
For example: if I move this image (below) to the top of the page, the change is not reflected in the mobile version of the website— I need to go to the mobile version and adjust it there too. This is not ideal. Having to make the same edit twice is tedious— and worst, it leads to inconsistencies from human error (ie: forgetting you have to edit twice).
If you move an image on your Wix desktop website, you'll need to make the same adjustment on the mobile website— it doesn't just happen automatically.
Weebly's structured editor on the hand is extremely easier to use— in fact, it's the easiest to use among all website builders.
Weebly is easy to use because the team carefully designs the details of the editor. For example, watch what happens when you edit a background image (below). Notice how the drawer slides out and the background editor slides in from the bottom. This does two things: (1) opens the editor up so that the background image is unobstructed and (2) keeps the interface from getting too cluttered. It's really smart.
Notice how parts of the interface slide in and out.
Honestly this is the type of thing you might not have notice when using Weebly— but it's these details that make Weebly so easy to use. By contrast, Wix just stacks additional interfaces on top of your website when editing a background:
With Wix, the interface obstructs the very thing you are editing — the background!
To conclude, while the freedom of the Wix editor will be a draw for many, it comes with less of an editing safety net. Weebly on the other hand places a firm emphasis on user friendliness, meaning it's the obvious choice for anyone who isn't tech savvy.
Both Weebly and Wix offer app stores that let you install apps to extend the core website builder. This is really great— and Wix and Weebly are the only general-purpose website builders to offer an app store.
Both app stores include a variety of free and paid apps: live chat software, marketing tools, pricing table creators and much mroe.
Wix's app store is called App Market and 309 apps:
The Wix App Market has 309 apps.
Weebly has its own app store too, which it refers to as the App Center. It contains over 270 apps:
The Weebly App Center.
Weebly offers a choice of 70 different themes. (It's possible to access more by using Weebly's old themes, but I don't recommend doing so, since they're not responsive to different browser types.)
Weebly example theme.
Another Weebly example theme.
Wix on the other hand comes with a choice of over 500+ themes. However, although they are plentiful when compared to Weebly's themes, they aren't as consistently impressive. Some Wix themes work and look great, but there's a noticeable variation in quality and certain themes feel markedly outdated.
Some Wix themes are good...
... While others feel outdated.
With Wix, if you change template once you've started using one, you'll lose all your site content. That makes it harder to take advantage of Wix's large theme library, and it's not a problem you'll run into with Weebly.
But a big plus to using Wix is the huge amount of theme customization it offers. It allows you to change almost any theme element and, in fact, gives you so much customization power that you can effectively design your own theme from scratch.
Wix includes enough navigation elements to design your own website from scratch.
By contrast, Weebly has limited theme customization. You can choose a Weebly theme font and color, but oddly it is just one color, and Weebly insists on applying it in multiple places throughout your website.
Notice how the color is applied to both the navigation and the button? You can't adjust these colors individually.
It seems unnecessarily restrictive to prevent you from picking individual colors for different site elements. Unless you're willing to dive into your site's code, not even the Weebly theme footer background can be edited.
You can't choose a custom background color for the footer.
When it comes to ecommerce, Weebly does almost everything right. The only problem worth mentioning is that its limited theme customization drawback crops up again occasionally. For instance, you're unable to modify the checkout page.
But otherwise, Weebly offers a long list of different ecommerce features including:
Abandoned shopping cart emails
In-store pickup shipping option
… And many more.
But the best part of Weebly's ecommerce suite is the same attribute found throughout its site editor— it makes it easy to conduct difficult tasks.
A great example of this is the Weebly email editor, which allows you to personalize customer receipts. It's the most straightforward email editor I've seen offered by a website builder as just about anyone could use it.
Editing email receipts is really easy with Weebly.
While Wix does offer a solid core of ecommerce tools, such as flexible coupon codes and digital products, it misses out some fairly important features. For instance, there's no way to customize email receipts as there is with Weebly. Limitations of this type prevent me from recommending Wix over Weebly.
You can preview email notifications with Wix— but not edit them.
If the main focus of your website is ecommerce, do give Shopify some consideration too. It's not designed for building regular websites (as Wix and Weebly are), but I believe it's the best ecommerce website builder on the market today.
Related: Wix vs Shopify
Wix has eight different pricing plans— four for general websites and four for ecommerce. It also also offers a separate and completely free plan.
However, I caution against using the free plan as Wix will display its own ads on your site with the other two. For most users, the $13 / month Unlimited plan will be the most suitable:
Wix's plans— pricing in USD.
Weebly offers five plans, two of which are designed solely for ecommerce. One of the three general plans is free, and because it comes with unlimited bandwidth, it's actually more usable than the majority of free plans offered by other website builders.
However, the $8 / month Starter plan will be the best for most websites— it's the cheapest one that removes all Weebly branded ads from your site.
Weebly pricing plans.
All Weebly's plans support ecommerce functionality, but only the dedicated ecommerce plans (Business and Performance) let you host checkout on your own domain and don't charge 3% of your transaction fee. The Business plan costs $25 / month which is the same as Wix's eCommerce plan. However, as you know now, Weebly has the better ecommerce features.
These are both excellent, but very different, website builders. Neither one comes out on top overall, but in terms of ecommerce functionality and pricing, Weebly indeed has the edge.
To summarize, Weebly's chief focus is on ease of use, while Wix offers a great deal of control over your site— to the extent at which you can even create your own theme from scratch. Weebly's themes are more consistent, but allow for little personalization.
Get new articles in your email. Join our newsletter and be notified when we publish new articles and reviews:
WordPress vs Website Builders
Should you use WordPress or a website builder to build a website? Well, it depends— mostly on you.
Shopify vs Wix vs Squarespace — And The Best For Your Store Is…
Trying to decide between Shopify, Wix, and Squarespace? Understand these important differences first.
Shopify vs WooCommerce
Shopify and WooCommerce are both great ecommerce site builders, but for very different users.
Squarespace is the best overall website builder, but GoDaddy may work for people who don't have a lot of time or technical skills.
Squarespace vs Shopify: Which is Better?
Trying to decide between Squarespace and Shopify? Make sure you understand these important differences.
How Squarespace And WordPress Are Different
Squarespace and WordPress are both tools for building website but this article explains how they are different.
Wix vs Shopify: Is There Even a Competition? (2023)
Trying to decide between Wix and Shopify? Make sure you understand these important differences.
From themes to editors, the two most popular website builders have important differences.
Wix vs WordPress
Eleven important differences to understand before deciding between Wix and WordPress.


CHOPS GRILL Steak & Seafood is a modern steakhouse offering prime meats from all over the world, local fish steaks and some contemporary pastas and salads. The main grill is in the dining area, offering a great view of our grill master in action. It is perfectly located just off the main Marmontova Street, and still set in a way that offers enough space and privacy for our guests. Full bar complete with handcrafted cocktails available from our adjoining bar.
Reservations recommended. For groups and private parties please contact us directly.
We are open for breakfast from 8 AM, lunch and dinner daily.


text:
Tag Archives: Woody Harrelson
Zombieland: Double Tap (2019) Review
Zombieland: Double Tap (2019)
Directed by Ruben Fleischer
Starring: Woody Harrelson, Jesse Eisenberg, Abigail Breslin, Emma Stone, Rosario Dawson, Zoey Deutch, Luke Wilson
Columbus, Tallahassee, Wichita, and Little Rock move to the American heartland as they face off against evolved zombies, fellow survivors, and the growing pains of the snarky makeshift family.
I really enjoyed the first Zombieland. It even just made it into my list of My Top Ten Horror Comedies. Is the sequel as good as the first film? Of course not. Are they ever? You're talking ten years since the last one, though. We've had zombie overload since then. We've had almost ten years of The Walking Dead, which gets more and more and MORE shit every year (why do I keep watching it?!). Double Tap has nothing that feels the tiniest bit original, while I think the first film managed a bit of originality despite not being the first zom-com. I'm a little disappointed but admit that I like these characters and enjoyed seeing them again. Well, maybe not Jesse Eisenberg (Twat).
I have sequel review burnout. I'm running out of things to say about cashgrab sequels & reboots & remakes. I'm also bored with October Horror Month. I want to review the non-horror stuff I've seen lately. Joker. Judy. Hustlers. The Farewell. Terminator: Dark Fate, which I saw last night and am hating more and more as I think about it. Leave classics the fuck alone! I think Dark Fate is what's made me lose the desire to write about pointless sequels. Double Tap didn't piss me off like Dark Fate, though. It wasn't a sequel that we needed but there's no harm in it.
Meh. Woody Harrelson is by far the best thing about these two movies and I really enjoyed his character once again. I could kind of take or leave the rest of them, though, and I don't think the new additions were anything special. Zoey Deutch was fun but kind of wasted as I think she deserved a better character. And… Hmm. Zombies. There are zombies. The movie is actually less gory than The Walking Dead but the zombie kills are more fun. Maybe The Walking Dead should add some humor to stop the show being so damn boring.
My rating is too high. I think I'm just being nice because I like Woody.
Oh, and they opened this movie with Metallica's Master Of Puppets. So we'll say my rating got an extra half a point for Woody and half a point for using one of Metallica's best songs…
Tagged 2019, 7/10, Abigail Breslin, Double Tap, Emma Stone, Film, Horror, Jesse Eisenberg, Luke Wilson, Movie Review, Movie Reviews, Movies, October Horror Month, Review, Reviews, Rosario Dawson, Ruben Fleischer, Sequel, Woody Harrelson, Zoey Deutch, Zom-Com, Zombie, Zombieland, Zombieland: Double Tap
My Top Ten Woody Harrelson Movies
Happy Birthday to Woody Harrelson, who turns 58 today.
I like Harrelson but I can't say I was always a fan. But his roles and movies keep getting better and better. I'm glad he's finally being taken more seriously as an actor. I think he's one of those actors who people will eventually realize was underrated for many years. I think being in fairly controversial films maybe didn't help at the time, like Natural Born Killers & The People Vs. Larry Flynt, but he was fantastic in those. At least he was an Oscar nominee for Flynt, I guess. I'd like to see him get an Oscar someday. He's proven he can do any sort of role; from comedy to serious drama to complete and utter psycho.
So I figured I'd do a full ranking of all the Harrelson films I've seen. I'll be honest and say that I could really do with re-watching most of those outside of the Top Ten. Maybe some would end up in the ten on a re-watch. We'll see. But, for now, these are My Top Ten Woody Harrelson Movies (ranked by how much I like the movie, not the role):
22. Friends With Benefits
21. Kingpin
20. Seven Pounds
19. The Glass Castle
18. Doc Hollywood
17. EDtv
16. Indecent Proposal
14. Now You See Me
13. Anger Management
12. Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me
11. A Scanner Darkly
10. White Men Can't Jump
9. Seven Psychopaths
8. The Hunger Games Movies
7. The People Vs. Larry Flynt
6. The Edge Of Seventeen
5. Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri
4. War For The Planet Of The Apes
3. Solo: A Star Wars Story
2. Zombieland
1. Natural Born Killers
Wildcats, Moneytrain, Wag The Dog, The Thin Red Line, Palmetto, After The Sunset, North Country, A Prairie Home Companion, No Country For Old Men, Semi-Pro, Transsiberian, Out Of The Furnace, Free Birds, Triple 9, Now You See Me 2, The Duel, LBJ, Wilson, Venom
And I won't count his uncredited roles in She's Having A Baby & L.A. Story
I'm not forgetting, of course, his role as Woody on Cheers. I miss classic American TV here in the UK! It was weird to see him go from that sweet, lovable role to things like Natural Born Killers. And I know a lot of people loved True Detective but I hated it with a passion. I'm glad it helped keep him so popular, though.
It was fun watching him at Wimbledon the other day. People were going crazy on Twitter over the announcers commentating on everything Harrelson was doing. I saw more of Harrelson at Wimbledon than I did of any actual tennis.
Tagged Actor, Birthday, Cheers, Film, List, Movies, Natural Born Killers, Ranked, Seven Psychopaths, Solo: A Star Wars Story, Star Wars, The Edge Of Seventeen, The Hunger Games, The People Vs. Larry Flynt, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing Missouri, Top Ten, True Detective, War For The Planet Of The Apes, White Men Can't Jump, Wimbledon, Woody Harrelson, Zombieland
Solo: A Star Wars Story (2018) Review
Directed by Ron Howard
Starring: Alden Ehrenreich, Woody Harrelson, Emilia Clarke, Donald Glover, Thandie Newton, Phoebe Waller-Bridge, Joonas Suotamo, Paul Bettany
Music by John Powell & John Williams
I saw this at midnight last night. I'm exhausted! But I suppose I better do a quickie review before America gets to see this tonight (is that right?). Because I'm sure everyone is just dying to know my opinion as there'll be NO other reviews to be found for this movie anywhere. Yeah, the other reviews will be much more detailed than mine. You won't find that here. I'll make this very quick and just let you know if I liked the latest Star Wars movie or not.
Yep! I liked it. I really really liked it. Not sure yet if I loved it, but… Maybe. I need to see it again. Here's how I feel about all the new Star Wars movies (I've linked to my full reviews):
• The Force Awakens: LOVED it. Easily my favorite of the new ones.
• Rogue One: Certainly didn't hate it but didn't love it. Liked it okay but, overall, it just didn't work for me. Felt the least "Star Wars" to me.
• The Last Jedi: Wasn't happy with this at first. It has grown on me. I certainly like it much more than a lot of people seemed to but, depending on what they do with the final film, I could end up liking this one much more or much less. Really hope they do the final film right (I want it to be more like The Force Awakens).
My ranking? I don't yet know until the final film but it's currently probably The Force Awakens, then The Last Jedi or Solo (time will tell so I'll make them a tie at the moment) and then Rogue One. My hubby's order (HUGE Star Wars nut), if you're interested, is currently: The Force Awakens, Solo, Rogue One, The Last Jedi. I was surprised he has Solo in second place so far but he did thoroughly enjoy it.
So onto Solo… As most people have said so far, this movie is a lot of fun. There seems to be a big backlash against this movie before people have even seen it. I truly don't understand that. Is it just because they didn't like The Last Jedi?? Wow, people are hard to please. I was shocked that the midnight showings for this at my cinema were completely dead. One screen had only six people! I love Star Wars and, no, I really don't want to see its legacy ruined. Yes, I worry that The Last Jedi has started down that path. But let's see how they handle the final film. And, in the meantime, let's spend some time having fun with Han, Chewbacca & Lando since they're fantastic characters we all love. I also saw a lot of people say "Oh, people are saying Solo is fun. That just means it's bad". Huh? Since when did people decide that movies aren't meant to be fun anymore?! I want movies to be fun. I want to be entertained. Fun doesn't automatically mean bad.
I think the most important thing to me was that they'd get our most beloved characters right. I think we all had our doubts about Alden Ehrenreich but I think he did a good job. Was he the perfect person for this role? Maybe not. But who could be? Han Solo is one of the most iconic (and coolest) characters of all time. Who can possibly do Han Solo justice?? I had no problem with Ehrenreich – I liked him as Han. And Donald Glover is great as Lando but I think we had already accepted him based on the trailers. He's cool as f*^k. I loved seeing these two characters meeting and, even as I write this, I'm probably liking this movie even more as I think of young Han, Lando, and Chewbacca all meeting for the first time. I adored all their scenes together.
I thought all the new characters were pretty great as well. I'm not sure that I have any new absolute favorites but it's very hard to top all of the original trilogy characters. I'm not going to get into the new additions, however, as I wish to remain completely spoiler free. I'll just say that I liked the history that Han had with Qi'ra (Emilia Clarke), Woody Harrelson and his team of "can they be trusted?" misfits were a joy and the perfect fit to team up with Han & Lando, and the baddies were quite effective – they looked the part and were menacing.
What else can I say? This movie gave me what I wanted. It'll never top the original trilogy but no new Star Wars movie ever will. I don't expect that from any of the new movies. I think Ron Howard has done a great job with Solo, especially considering that it was such a troubled production. It stays very faithful to & respectful of the Star Wars legacy and does all the existing characters justice. There are some great "fan service" bits that are a real pleasure but don't feel at all forced (they aren't the type you'll roll your eyes at – they're just fun). Yeah. Fun! This movie is fun. Fun is good. Fun is what I wanted. It's okay to have fun sometimes! Solo: A Star Wars Story is a good film and, for me, it's a welcome addition to the Star Wars universe.
Tagged 8/10, Alden Ehrenreich, Donald Glover, Emilia Clarke, Film, Fun, George Lucas, Han Solo, John Powell, John Williams, Joonas Suotamo, Movie Review, Movie Reviews, Movies, Paul Bettany, Phoebe Waller-Bridge, Review, Reviews, Ron Howard, Solo, Solo: A Star Wars Story, Star Wars, Thandie Newton, Woody Harrelson
Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri (2017) Review
Directed & Written by Martin McDonagh
Starring: Frances McDormand, Caleb Landry Jones, Kerry Condon, Sam Rockwell, Darrell Britt-Gibson, Woody Harrelson, Abbie Cornish, Lucas Hedges, Željko Ivanek, Peter Dinklage, John Hawkes, Samara Weaving, Clarke Peters
The film follows a mother who, when the police in her town fail to find a suspect in her daughter's murder, rents three billboards to call public attention to the unsolved crime, polarizing the community.
I watched this the other day as part of a "double feature" with Coco (which I reviewed HERE). I love Pixar and was expecting to like Coco far more but I preferred Three Billboards. It's a great film! I don't know why but maybe it's because my expectations were low whereas they were very high for Coco.
It's that time of year in the UK when we get the "Oscar-worthy" stuff like this. Because what better way to make the shittiest month of the year even MORE depressing than by releasing all the dark & dreary Oscar dramas?! Manchester By The Sea? Hell yeah! Just what I want to watch in f*^king January! But I kind of loved Three Billboards. It's another "Oscar drama" but it's so well-written and wonderfully acted and the dark humor throughout it really made it a much more rewarding watch (for me, at least) than the usual heavy Oscar dramas. Okay, I know the Oscar nominations aren't out yet but this will most likely be one of them and, at the moment, I can say I'd be happy to see it win. We'll see what it's up against – most of the films still aren't out here yet.
Where do I begin? With the acting? I loved everyone in this. I'm a bit weird in that I don't care too much about the acting in a film, as long as it isn't terrible and as long as it's not someone I can't stand the sight of (like Gwyneth Paltrow or something). But, man – everyone did a brilliant job in this. Our main three, Frances McDormand, Woody Harrelson & Sam Rockwell, were insanely good. Like, I want to hug them and thank them for being in this movie. Seriously. And I hate a lot of actors! When did Woody Harrelson get so great??? I loved him in Edge Of Seventeen as well. He's going to end up a favorite actor of mine at this rate. I wouldn't have expected that ten years ago. Everyone else as well, though, even down to the small parts – all were great. Perfect casting. I'd love to see the acting win plenty of Oscars for this film.
I'm not sure why my expectations were so low for this film. I really enjoyed Martin McDonagh's In Bruges. I also thought Seven Psychopaths, though flawed, was pretty good overall. Three Billboards is now easily my favorite (yes, even over In Bruges). And no Colin Farrell in this! Yay! I'd recommend this to anyone who was a fan of McDonagh's previous two films as it has the same sort of style. However, this is much darker material (a teenage girl is murdered) and the emotions feel more genuine than in his previous films. The movie gets the right balance between drama & humor and it wasn't a "heavy" watch in the way I was expecting. I'm actually not a fan of things like Fargo (I never finished it) and preferred the way that these characters felt more real to me. I suppose it's a combination of the acting and the writing, which has come together perfectly in Three Billboards whereas McDonagh's other two films didn't work quite as well overall. I'm now really looking forward to seeing more of his films in the future. And as he likes to re-use actors, I hope he sticks with McDormand, Harrelson & Rockwell.
Tagged 8/10, Abbie Cornish, Caleb Landry Jones, Clarke Peters, Darrell Britt-Gibson, Film, Frances McDormand, John Hawkes, Kerry Condon, Lucas Hedges, Martin McDonagh, Movie Review, Movie Reviews, Movies, Peter Dinklage, Review, Reviews, Sam Rockwell, Samara Weaving, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing Missouri, Woody Harrelson, Zeljko Ivanek
The Glass Castle by Jeannette Walls (Book Review)
The Glass Castle by Jeannette Walls
The Glass Castle is a 2005 memoir by Jeannette Walls. The book recounts the unconventional, poverty-stricken upbringing Walls and her siblings had at the hands of their deeply dysfunctional parents.
I read this as, which you may notice by my list at the end of this review, I'm reading books before their movie adaptations are released this year. The Glass Castle, starring Brie Larson, Woody Harrelson & Naomi Watts, is out today in the U.S. and October 6th in the U.K. I'm a fan of Larson, especially after the fantastic Room as well as Short Term 12 (which was also from the director of The Glass Castle, Destin Daniel Cretton). So, even though "true story dramas" don't normally appeal to me, I decided to give this a read since I'll happily watch a movie with this film's cast. I didn't expect the book to quite possibly be my very favorite that I've read so far this year. But, I think it probably is. What a pleasant surprise.
I liked the way in which Walls wrote her story. It's very matter-of-fact and doesn't seem to be passing judgement on her parents & the way in which they chose to raise their children. Like a lot of people raised in small-town American Midwest, my childhood was pretty straightforward (and pretty damn boring). Not rich, not poor, working parents, regularly attended school, followed all the rules & the "societal norms", etc. The Walls family are unlike any I've ever personally known and I found their story fascinating. I suppose there are other nomadic families in America but it's a world I've never experienced & can't even begin to imagine. The Walls family moved from place to place all across America, sometimes homeless & living out in the open, rarely holding down regular jobs despite having the ability to work (including the mother having the qualifications for teaching) and despite the fact that their children had to dig their classmates' uneaten lunches out of the trash at school in order to have anything to eat. I was often shocked by the horrendous neglect endured by Jeannette, her two sisters, and her brother (and amazed that these children were never taken away from their parents). However, as I said, Jeannette never really speaks poorly of her parents – she just tells her story in a straightforward manner without the need to embellish things. Their story is so outrageous that I don't think you could make up half of the odd things their parents did. Yet Jeannette does still give us glimpses of the love their parents had for them, especially from her father through his many broken promises that I think he himself may have genuinely believed he'd keep even though his children knew he never would.
This is a hard book to describe without making it sound horribly depressing but it's not really that way at all. It's truly amusing and at times had me smiling at some of the bizarre things this family went through (like when they try to move a piano into their house). Jeannette's parents, though they will sometimes make you very angry if you read this, are truly a couple of unique characters & free spirits. It's highly unusual for me to enjoy (or even bother to read) a true story but, as they say, sometimes life is stranger than fiction. Do they say that? Hmm. Well, someone said that. Sounds like something Jeannette's father would say. I don't know if I've talked anyone into reading this but I do highly recommend it. It's frustrating. It's uplifting. It'll make you angry. It'll make you smile. It'll make you shake your head in disbelief. You won't know whether you want to hug or punch the parents (most likely the latter). But it's also not soppy or trying to be some big tearjerker, which is the kind of thing that gets on my nerves. It's just a well-written story of a girl who somehow managed to survive & to thrive after living a truly unusual childhood with two very eccentric parents. The movie has "meh" reviews so far & the below trailer doesn't really blow me away (although I'll still watch it). So, if you can, READ THE BOOK FIRST.
My Rating: 4.5/5
Books I've Read So Far In 2017 (ranked from least favorite to favorite…)
– Tape by Steven Camden
– The Sisters by Claire Douglas
– We Were Liars by E. Lockhart
– If I Stay by Gayle Forman
– The Circle by Dave Eggers
– The Snowman by Jo Nesbo
– The Chrysalids by John Wyndham
– Thirteen Reasons Why by Jay Asher
– Finders Keepers by Stephen King
– The Dinner by Herman Koch
– The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood
– The Dark Tower: The Gunslinger by Stephen King
– Blaze by Stephen King
– A Monster Calls by Patrick Ness
– Big Little Lies by Liane Moriarty
– Everything, Everything by Nicola Yoon
– Murder On The Orient Express by Agatha Christie
– Annihilation by Jeff VanderMeer
– All The Bright Places by Jennifer Niven
– The Glass Castle by Jeannette Walls
Currently Reading: End Of Watch by Stephen King (book 3 of the Mr. Mercedes trilogy)
Posted in Books, Reviews
Tagged 4.5/5, Adaptation, Book Review, Books, Brie Larson, Destin Daniel Cretton, Film, Jeannette Walls, Movies, Naomi Watts, Reading, Review, Reviews, The Glass Castle, Woody Harrelson, Writing
The Edge Of Seventeen (2016) Review
Directed by Kelly Fremon Craig
Starring: Hailee Steinfeld, Haley Lu Richardson, Hayden Szeto, Blake Jenner, Woody Harrelson, Kyra Sedgwick
High-school life gets even more unbearable for Nadine when her best friend, Krista, starts dating her older brother.
Yes! Another funny, well-written, smart "teen movie". I reviewed The DUFF last week, which I really enjoyed despite my teen years being far far behind me, and commented that I hoped more teen movies would go in that direction as I do still enjoy a good one. Trust me – no matter how old you are you never forget high school. It's a traumatic time! I think I'll forever feel like it was only yesterday that I finally graduated & escaped that f*^king place.
So, yeah – I wasn't exactly the Homecoming Queen and I could totally relate to Hailee Steinfeld's self-loathing, angst-filled, neurotic nutjob in The Edge Of Seventeen. Hubby was like "I think she may be even more messed up than you!". Hahaha! Nice. Funny. Seriously, though – I'd have been friends with this character as a teen. Okay, I lie – I WAS this character (but not as crazy – Holy shit, Steinfeld's character is HIGH MAINTENANCE!).
For those who may get annoyed by phoney teen angst movies, don't automatically avoid this one. This is teen angst done right. It has the right balance of humor & of more serious issues. Think a cross between The DUFF (pure comedy) and The Perks Of Being A Wallflower (fantastic but a little too serious). The characters come across as genuine and I think it will speak to an audience of all ages from 15 or so & up. I do think certain teen films nowadays are written by people my age (like Perks), which is cool as it means people my age end up liking them but I'm not sure if they all work for actual modern teens. I think The Edge Of Seventeen avoids this problem. I can see a lot of friends my age liking this and, judging by the laughs & reactions of the much younger crowd in my cinema who made me feel very old, the younger generation seemed to be enjoying it a lot as well. I can find very little information on this film's writer & director, Kelly Fremon Craig, but I'd hazard a guess that she's written a bit of herself into these characters? I could be wrong but writing from experience often seems to make the most believable characters & she's done an excellent job here. I'll happily watch more of her work! Hopefully the positive buzz from this film is getting her noticed.
Just a quick FYI: the language & situations make this one not suitable for pre & early teens. It's rated 15 in the UK and I think it's rated R in the US?? Typical uptight America – R is too strict for this & means that 15 & 16 year-olds are missing out on a good movie. Maybe they should've added some guns & violence as opposed to swearing & sex talk, huh? Then it would be rated G in America! I've often thought the American rating system needs a rating in the middle, like a UK 15, which I think is the right sort of rating for this one. Sorry for the mini-rant… 😉 Back to the movie!
Besides Hailee Steinfeld's darkly humorous unhappy teen, we have her parents and a very rocky relationship with her mother, her best friend who suddenly starts dating her attractive & popular brother who gets on her nerves, her crush, her teacher, and a boy who has a crush on her. They're all great but the two stand-outs are Hayden Szeto as the adorably awkward boy with a crush on her and Woody Harrelson as the doesn't-give-a-fuck teacher she confides in (probably due to seeing a bit of her own pessimistic attitude in him).
The chemistry between Steinfeld's & Harrelson's characters is great and I loved their complexity. There's no sappy "teacher gives student meaningful life lesson" bullshit going on here. In fact, they speak quite horribly to each other & it's hilarious. You can tell that, despite clearly thinking she's a pain in the ass, Harrelson's character also has a huge soft spot for this fucked-up kid. Both of these characters are two of the absolute best I've seen in a film this year and are why this shouldn't be dismissed due to being a "teen movie". Oh, and Hayden Szeto's character with a crush on Steinfeld is probably the most likable character in a film this year. He's hilariously, awkwardly adorable. Who is this guy?? He's been in hardly anything! Put him in more movies! I'd have totally loved having a boy like him have a crush on me in high school. Damn you, Steinfeld – he's a sweetheart. Date him! It's like Molly Ringwald not wanting Jon Cryer in Pretty In Pink! Man, teenage girls are idiots sometimes. Anyway – Hayden Szeto, Woody Harrelson, and Hailee Steinfeld are all amazing in this but probably won't get recognition due to the film being part of the teen genre.
I've rambled on about this movie long enough. I've realized now that my saying this is something in between The DUFF & The Perks Of Being A Wallflower isn't quite accurate. The Edge Of Seventeen is more like The Way Way Back with a girl instead of a boy as the central character & Harrelson filling the Sam Rockwell role in this one (their characters are quite different personality-wise but equally fantastic). I feel that teen movies get dismissed, especially if a girl is the central character, but this movie deserves recognition. If you liked The Way Way Back (I loved that one), you should like this one as well no matter what age or sex you are. Movies like these give me hope that maybe some modern teenagers will turn out alright after all & I appreciate filmmakers who credit them with some intelligence & don't dumb their movies down for them. I still remember being a teen & I like to think I wasn't a total idiot. And anyone who says they didn't have a hard time in high school is a liar. Teen angst is real, people! I'm happy to say that The Edge Of Seventeen handles the angst in a realistic, humorous, and at times heartbreaking fashion.
You know I gotta end this with the brilliant Stevie Nicks song from my own teen years, which is not in this movie whatsoever. Wait – I wasn't a teen yet when this was released… I just added several years onto my age there! Oops. Whatever. I love this song. 🙂
Tagged 8/10, Blake Jenner, Film, Hailee Steinfeld, Haley Lu Richardson, Hayden Szeto, Kelly Fremon Craig, Kyra Sedgwick, Movie Review, Movie Reviews, Movies, Review, Reviews, Stevie Nicks, Teen Movie, The Edge Of Seventeen, Woody Harrelson
Natural Born Killers (1994) Blind Spot Review
Directed by Oliver Stone
Story by Quentin Tarantino
Starring: Woody Harrelson, Juliette Lewis, Robert Downey Jr, Tommy Lee Jones, Tom Sizemore, Rodney Dangerfield
A satirical black comedy crime film that tells the story of two victims of traumatic childhoods who became lovers and mass murderers, and are irresponsibly glorified by the mass media.
Here we are with movie number three of my 2016 Blind Spot picks. I can't believe I've actually managed to review one each month so far! (the previous two were An Education & Summer Wars). Other than The Doors & Platoon, I can't say I've really liked any Oliver Stone films all that much so I went into this one with fairly low expectations. Plus, I've never exactly loved either Woody Harrelson or Juliette Lewis. Well, I have to say that I liked this one quite a bit and both those actors have gone up a little in my estimation (22 years later!).
I suppose it helps that Quentin Tarantino wrote the story? He wasn't involved with the actual screenplay (I read that they changed his story quite a lot) but this movie has the overall vibe of the films he directed – not just in the extreme violence, of course, but also in the rich characters & dialogue.
I think it's difficult to make a satire on our obsession with violence that then uses excessive violence to get its point across. Does this movie glorify violence just as much as it claims the media does, thanks to shows such as the film's American Maniacs as hosted by Robert Downey Jr's character? I read that, at first, this movie was going to be a straight-up action film before Stone decided to turn it into a satirical black comedy. I think changing the direction of the movie was a very wise decision. Actually, this is what I read at Wikipedia – I can see why he changed his mind:
"As the project developed however, incidents such as the O.J. Simpson case, the Menendez brothers case, the Tonya Harding/Nancy Kerrigan incident, the Rodney King incident, and the Federal assault of the Branch Davidian sect all took place. Stone came to feel that the media was heavily involved in the outcome of all of these cases, and that the media had become an all-pervasive entity which marketed violence and suffering for the good of ratings. As such, he changed the tone of the movie from one of simple action to a satirical critique of the media in general."
I think the movie very much gets its point across and is even more relevant today as violence seems to be at an all-time high but, also, scenes of graphic violence are even more immediately accessible now than in 1994 thanks to the explosion of the Internet. It's not some true-crime TV show (hosted by Downey Jr with, I gotta say, a really annoying fake Australian accent) that we have to worry about these days. Hell, American Maniacs looks like a Saturday morning kids' cartoon compared to today's video games & torture porn films never mind the disturbing clips of real-life violence which are far too readily available online thanks to everyone having their own damn video cameras in their phones. (Off Topic Rant: Man, I love my phone but wish I could time travel back to 1985 when peoples' private lives weren't being constantly recorded & uploaded for all to see. Kardashian-free 1980's life sounds like a damn utopia now! Rant Over). So, Natural Born Killers is more relevant today but also wouldn't actually work if made now as it's no longer satire. Watching it now was quite scary, in a way, as I imagine it felt far-fetched in 1994? Now it just feels like one of those Making A Murderer type of true story documentaries that are so popular on Netflix.
I'm actually a huge wuss when it comes to violence in movies (I watch Tarantino's with my hands over my face half the time) but am more accepting when the movie has a message like I feel this one does. There's lots of blood in this but I was able to watch it all as it's not as "gory" as Tarantino-directed films (which do glorify violence but are so cleverly written that I can't help but love them anyway as a fan of film). Will someone go on a murder spree after watching this? Maybe. But someone who does that would've done that anyway whether or not they'd watched a violent movie or played a violent video game.
Oh crap – I really didn't want to get into a deep discussion about the film's message and about whether the media has a responsibility to humanity to not glorify violence and blah blah blah. That's one of those arguments that can go around in circles for an eternity. All I'll say is: Society is fucked. The media – including movies, TV, video games, websites – is just a reflection of society. It gives us what we seem to want based on our behavior. I think Natural Born Killers displays that logic perfectly but it's a shame that its message, although extremely blatant, seemed to not be fully grasped by everyone at the time.
I think what worked for me with this movie besides the film's message was its style. I loved the psychedelic scenes and Stone's use of different colors. I thought the I Love Lucy sitcom-style scenes involving Rodney Dangerfield as the abusive father of Juliette Lewis were very inventive and the scene in the rattlesnake-filled desert was trippy. Hell, I even found the "marriage on the bridge" scene oddly romantic in a messed-up way. That's the thing – I think most people watching this movie find themselves liking Lewis' & Harrelson's Mickey & Mallory despite the fact that they're psychotic killers with no remorse. But that's the whole point, of course. The media in the movie makes them stars and the movie itself has made their fictional characters stars. By the end, you want Mickey & Mallory to live happily ever after and THAT is truly fucked-up. That's how good the movie is, though – it turns us into the Mickey & Mallory-worshipping audience of American Maniacs.
Tagged 8/10, Blind Spot, Film, Juliette Lewis, Movie Review, Movie Reviews, Movies, Natural Born Killers, Oliver Stone, Quentin Tarantino, Review, Reviews, Robert Downey Jr, Tom Sizemore, Tommy Lee Jones, Woody Harrelson
My Top Ten Wooden Movie Actors/Characters
I'm just messing with you! 😉
I had 16 to choose from for this list and I couldn't really leave six out so I'll count down from 16 (but I'll still call it a "Top Ten" to stay consistent with my other lists. Ha! I'm so annoying).
So here are My Top Ten Wooden Movie Actors/Characters (and my favorite film from each). But counting down from 16 just to be awkward…
16. James Woods
My Favorite Movie: Videodrome
15. Kurtwood Smith
My Favorite Movie: RoboCop
14. Shailene Woodley
My Favorite Movie: The Spectacular Now or The Fault In Our Stars
13. Joanne Woodward
My Favorite Movie: Oh dear – the only one I've seen is Philadelphia! But I so love her long, romantic marriage to Paul Newman. Look at them! So beautiful… 🙂
12. Evan Rachel Wood
My Favorite Movie: Across The Universe but The Wrestler is great too
11. Woody Allen
My Favorite Movie: Um, I've only seen one & he wasn't IN it. So, Midnight In Paris…
My Top Ten:
10. Natalie Wood
My Favorite Movie: Miracle On 34th Street
9. Alfre Woodard
My Favorite Movie: Scrooged
8. Woody Strode
My Favorite Movie: Once Upon A Time In The West
7. Scott Eastwood
My Favorite Movie: Who cares?! Look at him!! Okay, I'll go with Gran Torino…
6. Elijah Wood
My Favorite Movie: The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy
5. Woody Harrelson
My Favorite Movie: Natural Born Killers & Zombieland
4. Ed Wood
My Favorite Movie: Well, Ed Wood…
3. Clint Eastwood
My Favorite Movie: The Good, The Bad And The Ugly or Escape From Alcatraz
2. Woody
My Favorite Movie: The Toy Story Trilogy
1. Edward Woodward
My Favorite Movie: The Wicker Man
(Edward Woodward tops the list on name alone. It's so fun to say… Say it ten times fast!)
How much wood would an Edward Woodward chuck chuck if an Edward Woodward chuck could chuck Edward Woodward?
Tagged Actors, Alfre Woodard, Characters, Clint Eastwood, Edward Woodward, Elijah Wood, Evan Rachel Wood, Film, Groot, James Woods, Joanne Woodward, Kurtwood Smith, List, Movies, Natalie Wood, Ranked, Scott Eastwood, Shailene Woodley, Top Ten, Toy Story, Wood, Wooden, Woody, Woody Allen, Woody Harrelson, Woody Strode
The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2 (2015) Review
***SPOILER FREE REVIEW***
Directed by Francis Lawrence
Based on Mockingjay by Suzanne Collins
Starring: Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth, Woody Harrelson, Elizabeth Banks, Julianne Moore, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Jeffrey Wright, Sam Claflin, Jena Malone, Stanley Tucci, Donald Sutherland
As the war of Panem escalates to the destruction of other districts by the Capitol, Katniss Everdeen, the reluctant leader of the rebellion, must bring together an army against President Snow, while all she holds dear hangs in the balance.
Well, I was attempting to take a week off from blogging but I just watched the final Hunger Games film so figured I should say something about it before the weekend (I also watched Steve Jobs this week but a review for that can wait until next week). Hmmmmmmmm……. Mockingjay – Part 2………….. What can I say? I want to stay very spoiler-free, even for those who've read the books as I'm sure the readers will be very curious to know if certain things get changed. But I'm not going to tell you! I can say that I've read the books and was a very big fan (of the first two, at least. like most people). I also think the first two films are very good. These final two, though? Well… I'll get to that more in a bit.
What's interesting is that my husband, who hasn't read the books, had quite a different reaction to this film than I did. He thought the first two were good but did NOT like these final two. He had a lot to say about it but I'm not going to go into any of that – I just find it interesting that he disliked these final two so much & wonder if others who haven't read the books will have the same reaction that he did. I think they probably will. I think they'll feel exactly the same way about the final two films as us book readers felt about the final book.
I think The Hunger Games book trilogy is fantastic. I know it's "YA", which puts some people off. But it's nothing like things such as Twilight – Collins is a great writer and the first two books are two of my very favorites that I've read in the past decade or so. Yeah – the first two. Not the final book. I think most readers felt the same way about that one.
I don't know how to go about reviewing this movie as, for me, it's impossible to review it on its own & not compare it to the book. No, I didn't like the final book. So… I was never going to love the final two movies (not helped by the fact that splitting one book into two movies pisses me the hell off). As a whole, though, these movies are quite faithful adaptations & that's always very important to me. It's been a long time since I read these but Mockingjay – Part 2 is very faithful from what I remember (without giving away to the books' readers whether or not anything big was changed). So, I can't fault the two Mockingjay films. They did what they could with them and remained pretty loyal to the source material. Which is great! It's just unfortunate that the source material isn't so great.
I haven't reviewed the first film as I wasn't blogging yet but I reviewed Catching Fire (HERE) and Mockingjay – Part 1 (HERE). Catching Fire was really good (I gave it 8/10) but Mockingjay – Part 1 felt pointless as there was no need to turn it into two films (I gave it 7/10). Part 2 is at least a bit better than Part 1 since you finally get a conclusion instead of being left hanging halfway through a story. I once again enjoyed re-visiting these characters & stand by my opinion that Jennifer Lawrence was the perfect choice to play Katniss (although the hubby thought she seemed bored in these last two films, which I don't totally agree with but do admit that it did feel that way a little at times).
Elizabeth Banks & Woody Harrelson have very small roles in this final film, which is a shame as they're two great characters. The character of Peeta is once again a bit of a bore (sorry if you like him! but his character is a bit bland). One big complaint I've had all along & still have is that I don't think they developed the character of Primrose (sister of Katniss) enough. Well, the books were kind of guilty of this as well if I remember correctly but they should have given more screen time to the two sisters and slightly less to the somewhat annoying love triangle. I don't think the films fully gave you the sense of love that Katniss has for her sister and also felt they didn't fully explain some important plot points to a movie audience that hasn't read the books. I think I'd have been slightly lost during the two Mockingjay films if I hadn't read the books.
I really want to hear from you guys what you all thought of this one & whether or not you've read the books. I've not yet read any other reviews so don't know what kind of reaction this movie is getting but I'd guess that those who haven't read the books will feel the way that my hubby did & won't really like this film. As I said, I can't really fault this movie as it's a good adaptation and I think they've done a pretty great job in choosing the cast for this entire series (especially Lawrence). Mockingjay – Part 2 is a good film but I kind of lost interest in it in the same way I did with the final book. Obviously you'll want to see it if you've watched all the others but don't expect it to be much different than Part 1. However you felt about Part 1, you'll probably feel the same about Part 2.
Sorry for that rather uninformative review! It's a very hard one to talk about without spoiling things so feel free to discuss it with me further in the comments. 🙂 Just try to put a spoiler warning at the start.
Tagged 7/10, Donald Sutherland, Elizabeth Banks, Film, Final, Francis Lawrence, Jeffrey Wright, Jena Malone, Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Julianne Moore, Katniss, Liam Hemsworth, Mockingjay, Movie Review, Movie Reviews, Movies, Part 2, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Post-Apocalyptic, Review, Reviews, Sam Claflin, Stanley Tucci, Suzanne Collins, The Hunger Games, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2, Woody Harrelson, Young Adult
Seven Psychopaths (2012) Review
Seven Psychopaths (2012)
Starring: Colin Farrell, Sam Rockwell, Woody Harrelson, Christopher Walken, Tom Waits, Abbie Cornish, Olga Kurylenko, Željko Ivanek
A struggling screenwriter inadvertently becomes entangled in the Los Angeles criminal underworld after his oddball friends kidnap a gangster's beloved Shih Tzu.
I'd been meaning to watch this movie for a while as I really liked Martin McDonagh's In Bruges. Unfortunately, I ended up being a little disappointed as Seven Psychopaths is definitely not as good as In Bruges. There are several fantastic moments, though, and some great performances from the impressive cast. In fact, I'd say there are a few moments of pure brilliance & I'll be sure to discuss the movie's positives as well as the negatives. But, overall, I thought the main plot was a bit of a mess and far too convoluted.
In this movie, Colin Farrell's character is a writer working on a screenplay called Seven Psychopaths. He hasn't gotten very far with the script (I think he'd only managed to think up one out of the seven psychopaths if I remember correctly) so his friend (a dognapper played by Sam Rockwell) tries to help him out with the other six. Meanwhile, Rockwell (who kidnaps dogs for "boss" Christopher Walken) has managed to anger a real-life psychopath (Woody Harrelson) after kidnapping his beloved dog.
What's unfortunate is that this overall dognapping story is the main part of the plot yet it's the weakest thing about the movie. The main story is messy & feels too forced. Okay – part of this may somewhat be down to my dislike of Woody Harrelson. Aside from his "dumb guy" character in Cheers, I've never liked him in anything else. He just seemed very weak next to the likes of Walken and even Rockwell (who was fantastic in this). Colin Farrell was just his usual Colin Farrell self (I'm not a big fan of his either but he's fine in this although his role could have been played by anyone).
The interesting thing about this movie, which I didn't know beforehand, is that there are several other stories that get told throughout the film as ideas for further psychopathic characters are discussed. We witness these stories (such as the one with Tom Waits in the above photo) and, DAMN, these stories are good! I'd watch full movies of a few of these stories as they're all far more interesting than the overall plot involving the dognapping & Woody Harrelson's character. It reminded me a lot of Grindhouse & how the fake trailers looked so good that they ended up making movies of some of them (I didn't watch Machete so I don't know if that was any good but I really enjoyed Hobo With A Shotgun).
As well as these "stories within a story", which I liked a hell of a lot, I really loved Christopher Walken & Sam Rockwell. I like Christopher Walken but he can be a little strange sometimes. I complained about him "phoning it in" in my review of Things To Do In Denver When You're Dead. He plays the same sort of character far too often but, although he's playing that sort of character once again here, he gives such a perfect performance. His final scene is especially awesome as were the scenes with his character's wife (played by a woman named Linda Bright Clay, who appears to have been in very little else. Why?! She's fantastic in this! Another one of this movie's highlights). Walken's & Clay's characters were both fantastic, as was their story. Well done to McDonagh on writing their parts.
Sam Rockwell was possibly the main highlight for me, though. At least, as far as the acting was concerned – my favorite thing was definitely the "stories within a story". I have a post about Rockwell scheduled for tomorrow & I say the same thing that I'll say now: I don't think he's really lucked out quite yet in getting that one "perfect role". When he does, I think he'll finally get the attention he deserves. This is definitely a defining role for him, however, and probably my second favorite performance of his. I'm starting to kind of finally see the reason he seems to have some pretty loyal fans. If you're a fan of his but haven't seen this movie for some reason, I highly recommend that you check it out.
Seven Psychopaths is an odd one. It's so good at times and just plain confusing at other times. I'm afraid that it tries a little too hard to be cool. I think it wants to be like something made by Tarantino but, although the clever dialogue is there and there are some very rich characters, the story is even more convoluted than that in Pulp Fiction. I'm struggling with rating this one as I think it deserves a higher score than I'll probably give it but I can't ignore the fact that the main plot really didn't hold my interest at all. But I'm in no way trying to talk people out of watching this one as I think parts of it are brilliant and the writing is far better than we get from most movies. I'd actually recommend this one as I think a lot of people reading this would like this movie quite a lot. If you like In Bruges or Things To Do In Denver When You're Dead or anything from Tarantino, you'll definitely like this one as well. I guess I'd rather have a few moments of brilliance than a movie that's mediocre the whole way through.
Tagged 7/10, Abbie Cornish, Bonny, Christopher Walken, Colin Farrell, Film, Martin McDonagh, Movie Review, Movie Reviews, Movies, Olga Kurylenko, Review, Reviews, Sam Rockwell, Seven Psychopaths, Tom Waits, Woody Harrelson, Zeljko Ivanek
The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1
The story continues to follow Katniss Everdeen; having twice survived the Hunger Games, Katniss finds herself in District 13. Under the leadership of President Coin and the advice of her trusted friends, Katniss reluctantly becomes the symbol of a mass rebellion against the Capitol and fights to save Peeta and a nation moved by her courage.
I love YA fiction (especially of the post-apocalyptic dystopian sci-fi variety!) and have read The Hunger Games books. It was before this blog started but I did review the Catching Fire movie (HERE if you're bothered). The first two books are possibly my favorite of the YA stuff I've read in recent years and I think the first two films were very faithful, especially the second, and I've been happy with them and with the choice of actors (other than maybe Josh Hutcherson). I'll admit that I'm not a big fan of the final book so I'm naturally unlikely to like these last two movies as much as the first two. However, from what I can remember of the final book now all these years later, I think this film again stayed pretty faithful. It's a solid movie and everyone again does a good job with their roles but I still can't help but feel a bit "meh, so what?". It especially doesn't help that they've done that thoroughly annoying thing again of splitting the final book of a series into TWO movies. Why why why?! It's not as annoying as the whole Hobbit bullshit but, seriously – they're doing it to get more money out of us as opposed to making sure to make the best piece of "art" they can and it gets on my nerves.
Now that I got that little rant off my chest: Is The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part Freaking 1 any good? Yes, it's fine. I enjoy the story and seeing the characters again and still think Jennifer Lawrence is perfect for the role of Katniss (even though we're starting to see her in too many movies and I'm afraid she could someday be on my annoying list instead of my favorites list). They have some very famous actors in these movies and it feels like they take their roles seriously as opposed to just "phoning it in", which it feels like famous actors do in some other YA films. I think it makes The Hunger Games movies feel a bit more "grown up" than others (which I see as a good thing). The final book is the darkest and the movies have been good at getting the tone right but, hopefully, no parents are letting anyone see these if they're TOO young…
I don't think I need to go into this film much. If you liked the first two, you'll like this one even though you may be annoyed at again not getting any sort of "conclusion". If you like the books, you'll be happy enough with this adaptation. The acting is really good, especially for a "YA" film, and Lawrence is still the perfect Katniss. I understand that the story needed to take this direction in the final book and couldn't just do the same thing once again but it just didn't work as well for me and I don't expect to like the final two films as much as the first two. Speaking of YA stuff, I saw The Maze Runner a couple weeks ago but haven't had a chance to review it yet. Maybe Wednesday…. Yes! I'll make this a "movies based on novels" week here at CPD since I also just watched Odd Thomas! Anyway, although I think Mockingjay is the superior film, I kind of enjoyed The Maze Runner more as I haven't read the books and liked watching a story unfold without already knowing what would happen. I've watched Mockingjay as I want to see how they handle the books but I really wish they'd just made this into one film. But I'll of course shell out money once again this time next year to see Part 2. And I'm sure I'll complain about that once again. 😉
Tagged 7/10, Chris Is Just Hotter Than Liam, Donald Sutherland, Dystopian, Elizabeth Banks, Film, Francis Lawrence, Jeffrey Wright, Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Julianne Moore, Liam Hemsworth, Mockingjay, Movie Review, Movie Reviews, Movies, Natalie Dormer, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Post-Apocalyptic, Review, Reviews, Stanley Tucci, Suzanne Collins, The Hunger Games, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1, Woody Harrelson, Young Adult
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013) Review
Based on: Catching Fire by Suzanne Collins
After their victory in the 74th Hunger Games, Katniss Everdeen and Peeta Mellark have become symbols of hope to those in the Districts of Panem. President Snow will do whatever it takes to make sure that this hope doesn't lead to a rebellion.
I read the Hunger Games books and loooooved them (Well, loved the first two at least…). So I was very excited to see the films. I thought the first one was a very good adaptation and feel the same way about Catching Fire. I know they can never put absolutely everything from a book in the movie as there's just not enough time – As long as no major changes are made, I'm happy. It's been a while since I've read these but, from what I remember, Catching Fire is extremely faithful to the book so that should keep the fans happy.
I'd actually be more interested to know what people who haven't read the books think of these films. I often try to read the book before the movie and all that but it does take a little fun out of the movie for me. I just like to be surprised & like not knowing what's going to happen. I always enjoy seeing the movie bring a book "to life" but… I have no idea what point I'm trying to make here! Just that, you know – I knew what was going to happen every step of the way.
However, both of these films have done a great job creating the overall look of this world and especially bringing these characters to the screen. I really can't fault ANY of the casting. Jennifer Lawrence is absolutely perfect as Katniss Everdeen. She's totally what I'd pictured while reading the books and she does an excellent job in these films (well, she IS an Oscar winner, you know). For a young adult series, it's a very dark story and she does all the serious & emotional stuff brilliantly. I can't really imagine anyone else in the role. And I think with these young adult adaptations, the actors don't always take the material as seriously & it sometimes feels like the big name actors are only there for the paycheck & are giving a half-assed performance. I don't feel this way with the Hunger Games films, though. Everyone seems to be giving their all.
Woody Harrelson – Also perfect. He's a great Haymitch and one of the biggest highlights of these films. I also love Lenny Kravitz as Cinna. Even though he's not what I'd pictured from the books, he's also one of the best characters in the films (for me). I also loved seeing Effie having a bit more depth in this one (and, again, I think Elizabeth Banks does this role very well).
Donald Sutherland, Stanley Tucci, Amanda Plummer, Jena Malone – All good! Liam Hemsworth & Josh Hutcherson are both fine as Gale & Peeta but are the only ones that aren't *quite* right for me (especially Hutcherson). However, both have grown on me & I fully see them as those characters now after this second film. I'd love to see Primrose get a lot more screen time – I feel that the audience barely knows her if they've not read the books. Also not 100% sure on Finnick or Philip Seymour Hoffman as Plutarch – Hoffman was good but kind of just seemed his usual self.
I know I've not said anything about the story as, well, I know the whole story from the books. I loved the books – the story was really intense and I couldn't read them quick enough. Luckily, the films are the same way – they've been very faithful adaptations so far and I don't think fans of the books can have any major complaints. The world looks great and, more importantly, the casting has been perfect. I really can't complain about any of the actors at all but the ones they especially got right were Haymitch and, luckily, Katniss. If they'd gotten the wrong actress for Katniss, I don't think these films would be quite as successful. Catching Fire is just as good as the first film (although you really can't top the first film just as you can't top the first book in the trilogy). If you haven't read the books but liked the first film, you'll definitely like Catching Fire and you'll get a lot more character development than you did in the first film.
It's going to be VERY interesting to see what they do with that final book…
Tagged 8/10, Catching Fire, Donald Sutherland, Elizabeth Banks, Film, Francis Lawrence, Jeffrey Wright, Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Katniss Everdeen, Lenny Kravitz, Liam Hemsworth, Movie Review, Movie Reviews, Movies, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Review, Reviews, Stanley Tucci, Suzanne Collins, The Hunger Games, The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, Woody Harrelson
Now You See Me (2013) Review
Directed by Louis Leterrier
Four magicians, brought together by mysterious circumstances, are investigated by the FBI after performing a magic show together in which they seemingly pull off a bank heist.
My Quick Opinion:
I'll keep this short as, unfortunately, there's not a lot to say about it. I went in with low expectations and knowing it was going to be a simple movie with a bit of magic that would at least keep me entertained for a couple of hours. I wasn't exactly expecting The Prestige – one of my all-time favorite films. But Now You See Me is a much further cry from the brilliance of that film than I was hoping.
Everyone does a decent enough job in their roles but the characters are very one-dimensional. I love Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman and always enjoy watching them but they're wasted in this film. Woody Harrelson is probably the most entertaining of the four magicians but he's really just doing the sort of role he often does. The actual highlight of the film is probably Mélanie Laurent as an Interpol detective. But that could just be because I have a bit of a girl crush on her… I felt they could have done a lot more with her character, though, as it didn't feel very well developed. Same goes for Mark Ruffalo's character. All of the characters in this felt very underdeveloped, actually. Disappointing.
A lightweight "magic movie" that will keep you entertained for a couple of hours but won't have you leaving the cinema asking any questions. Unlike The Prestige, which I thought about for days afterward. Hell, I still do. I left Now You See Me feeling quite empty, though, like the box after the rabbit has disappeared. (Ha! Was trying to get a "magic" reference in here somewhere. That was pathetic, though. Lol!).
I just expected a BIT more from such an impressive line-up of actors. At the very least, since the story and characters are a bit weak, I expected more really fun and cool MAGIC than we actually get. Mindless fun but a little TOO mindless. And once you've seen it, I have a feeling that it's one where things really don't add up if you were to watch it a second time. But it's really not worth the time thinking about too much – this movie isn't asking you to think about it beyond the final credits. Oh man – I'm being more harsh than I'm meaning to be! It was a fun watch. Nothing less but certainly nothing more. Rent it.
Here's a sexy photo of Mélanie Laurent:
Tagged 6/10, Abra Abra Cadabra I Wanna Reach Out And Grab Ya, Braindead, Common, Dave Franco, Film, Girl Crush, Isla Fisher, Jesse Eisenberg, Louis Leterrier, Magic, Mark Ruffalo, Mélanie Laurent, Mélanie Laurent Is Sexy, Michael Caine, Michael Kelly, Morgan Freeman, Movie Review, Movie Reviews, Movies, Now You See Me, Review, Reviews, The Prestige Is Much Better, Watch The Prestige Instead, Woody Harrelson


text:
Kanton Saint-Germain-du-Teil () je francouzský kanton v departementu Lozère v regionu Languedoc-Roussillon. Tvoří ho sedm obcí.

Obce kantonu
 Chirac
 Les Hermaux
 Le Monastier-Pin-Moriès
 Saint-Germain-du-Teil
 Saint-Pierre-de-Nogaret
 Les Salces
 Trélans

Externí odkazy

Saint-Germain-du-Teil

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia