text:
Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Vest v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Filing 5
Vest v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
ORDER granting 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint 1 is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff f ails to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a strike under 28:1915(g). The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 3/16/12.(TLJ)
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 Eric Johnson Vest, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, 15 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 12-0323-PHX-RCB (LOA) ORDER 16 17 Plaintiff Eric Johnson Vest, who is confined in the Fourth Avenue Jail in Phoenix, 18 Arizona, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an 19 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave 20 to amend. 21 I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee 22 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. 23 § 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 24 The Court will not assess an initial partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The statutory 25 fee will be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month's income each time 26 the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a 27 separate Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees 28 according to the statutory formula. 1 II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 2 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against 3 a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 4 § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised 5 claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may 6 be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 7 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). 8 A pleading must contain a "short and plain statement of the claim showing that the 9 pleader is entitled to relief." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not 10 demand detailed factual allegations, "it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant- 11 unlawfully-harmed-me accusation." Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009). 12 "Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory 13 statements, do not suffice." Id. 14 "[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a 15 claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'" Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 16 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible "when the plaintiff pleads factual content 17 that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the 18 misconduct alleged." Id. "Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for 19 relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial 20 experience and common sense." Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff's specific factual 21 allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there 22 are other "more likely explanations" for a defendant's conduct. Id. at 1951. 23 But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts 24 must "continue to construe pro se filings liberally." Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th 25 Cir. 2010). A "complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] 'must be held to less stringent standards 26 than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.'" Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 27 94 (2007) (per curiam)). 28 If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts, -2- 1 a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the 2 action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court 3 should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice "would 4 undermine district judges' role as impartial decisionmakers." Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 5 231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was 6 required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 7 for failure to state a claim, but because the Complaint may possibly be saved by amendment, 8 the Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend. 9 III. Complaint 10 Plaintiff alleges three counts for threat to safety, unsafe equipment, and medical 11 malpractice. Plaintiff sues only the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. Plaintiff seeks 12 compensatory relief. 13 Plaintiff alleges the following facts in his Complaint: there was no ladder for use to 14 get into and down from bunks at the jail. On January 16, 2012, Plaintiff jumped off his bunk 15 to get down from his bunk and twisted his little toe. He contacted medical the day of the 16 injury. Plaintiff had not been seen by medical as of the date he filed his Complaint. Plaintiff 17 asserts that "they" did not properly diagnose his injury, which he describes as a slight 18 fracture. 19 IV. Failure to State a Claim 20 To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts supporting that (1) the 21 conduct about which he complains was committed by a person acting under the color of state 22 law and (2) the conduct deprived him of a federal constitutional or statutory right. Wood v. 23 Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir. 1989). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he 24 suffered a specific injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must 25 allege an affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. 26 Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). 27 A. MCSO 28 Plaintiff only sues the MCSO; however, it is not a proper defendant in a § 1983 case. -3- 1 Claims under § 1983 are directed at "bodies politic and corporate." Monell v. Dep't of Soc. 2 Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 688-89 (1978). Under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, Congress intended 3 municipalities and other local government units to be included among those persons to whom 4 § 1983 applies.1 Id. at 689-690. In Arizona, the responsibility for operating jails and caring 5 for prisoners is placed by law upon the sheriff and the County. See A.R.S. §§ 11-251(8), 6 11-291(A), 11-441(A)(5), 31-101. MCSO is simply an administrative creation of the sheriff 7 to allow him to carry out his statutory duties; it is not a "person" amenable to suit pursuant 8 to § 1983. See e.g., Petaway v. City of New Haven Police Dep't, 541 F. Supp.2d 504 (D. 9 Conn. 2008); Pahle v. Colebrookdale Tp., 227 F. Supp.2d 361 (E.D. Pa. 2002). Accordingly, 10 MCSO will be dismissed from this action. 11 B. Lack of Ladders 12 Plaintiff characterizes the absence of ladders to access bunks as a threat to safety. To 13 state a claim under § 1983 for failure to protect or threats to safety, an inmate must allege 14 facts to support that he was incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of harm 15 and that prison officials were "deliberately indifferent" to those risks. Farmer v. Brennan, 16 511 U.S. 825, 832-33 (1994). To adequately allege deliberate indifference, a plaintiff must 17 allege facts to support that a defendant knew of, but disregarded, an excessive risk to inmate 18 safety. Id. at 837. That is, "the official must both [have been] aware of facts from which the 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Thus, a municipality, such as a city or county, is a "person" for purposes of § 1983 and may be sued. See Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 166 (1993); Monell, 436 U.S. at 694. To state a claim against a municipality under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts to support that his constitutional rights were violated pursuant to a policy or custom of the municipality. See Cortez v. County of Los Angeles, 294 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2001) (citing Monell, 436 U.S. at 690-91); Thompson v. City of Los Angeles, 885 F.2d 1439, 1443 (9th Cir. 1989)). Thus, a municipality may not be sued solely because an injury was inflicted by one of its employees or agents. Long v. County of Los Angeles, 442 F.3d 1178, 1185 (9th Cir. 2006). A § 1983 claim against a municipal defendant "cannot succeed as a matter of law" unless a plaintiff: (1) alleges that the municipal defendant maintains a policy or custom pertinent to the plaintiff's alleged injury; and (2) explains how such policy or custom caused the plaintiff's injury. Sadoski v. Mosley, 435 F.3d 1076, 1080 (9th Cir. 2006) (affirming dismissal of a municipal defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). -4- 1 inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exist[ed], and he must also 2 [have] draw[n] the inference." Id. 3 Plaintiff alleges that he did not have access to a ladder for access to his bunk and that 4 he injured a toe when he jumped out of a bunk. Plaintiff fails to allege facts to support that 5 the absence of a ladder posed a substantial threat to his safety. Moreover, Plaintiff fails to 6 allege facts to support that anyone knew that the failure to provide ladders posed a 7 substantial threat to his safety but failed to act to alleviate that threat. Finally, as discussed 8 above, Plaintiff fails to name a proper Defendant in connection with this claims. For all of 9 these reasons, Plaintiff fails to state a claim. 10 C. Medical Care 11 Plaintiff also asserts the denial of medical care for his toe. Not every claim by a 12 prisoner relating to inadequate medical treatment states a violation of the Eighth or 13 Fourteenth Amendment. To state a § 1983 medical claim, a plaintiff must show that the 14 defendants acted with "deliberate indifference to serious medical needs." Jett v. Penner, 439 15 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976)). A 16 plaintiff must show (1) a "serious medical need" by demonstrating that failure to treat the 17 condition could result in further significant injury or the unnecessary and wanton infliction 18 of pain and (2) the defendant's response was deliberately indifferent. Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096 19 (quotations omitted). 20 "Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard." Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 21 1060 (9th Cir. 2004). To act with deliberate indifference, a prison official must both know 22 of and disregard an excessive risk to inmate health; "the official must both be aware of facts 23 from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and 24 he must also draw the inference." Farmer, 511 U.S. at 837. Deliberate indifference in the 25 medical context may be shown by a purposeful act or failure to respond to a prisoner's pain 26 or possible medical need and harm caused by the indifference. Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096. 27 Deliberate indifference may also be shown when a prison official intentionally denies, 28 delays, or interferes with medical treatment or by the way prison doctors respond to the -5- 1 prisoner's medical needs. Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104-05; Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096. 2 Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary due 3 care for the prisoner's safety. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 835. "Neither negligence nor gross 4 negligence will constitute deliberate indifference." 5 Corrections, 220 F. Supp.2d 1098, 1105 (N.D. Cal. 2002); see also Broughton v. Cutter 6 Labs., 622 F.2d 458, 460 (9th Cir. 1980) (mere claims of "indifference," "negligence," or 7 "medical malpractice" do not support a claim under § 1983). "A difference of opinion does 8 not amount to deliberate indifference to [a plaintiff's] serious medical needs." Sanchez v. 9 Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). A mere delay in medical care, without more, is 10 insufficient to state a claim against prison officials for deliberate indifference. See Shapley 11 v. Nevada Bd. of State Prison Comm'rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir. 1985). The indifference 12 must be substantial. The action must rise to a level of "unnecessary and wanton infliction 13 of pain." Estelle, 429 U.S. at 105. Clement v. California Dep't of 14 While Plaintiff alleges a "slight fracture" of his toe, he does not allege facts to support 15 that his injury rose to the level of a serious medical need. His description of the injury as a 16 "slight" fracture reflects that it was not a serious medical need. Further, Plaintiff fails to 17 allege facts to support that anyone acted with deliberate indifference to his injury. Rather, 18 he alleges that he had not been seen by medical, but he does not allege facts to support that 19 anyone in medical knew that his toe injury was a serious medical need, or knew of facts 20 giving rise to that inference, but acted with deliberate indifference to that need. Finally, as 21 noted above, Plaintiff fails to name a proper Defendant or facts to connect such Defendant 22 to this claim. Accordingly, Plaintiff fails to state a claim for deliberate indifference to serious 23 medical needs. 24 V. Leave to Amend 25 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state 26 a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first 27 amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail 28 Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails -6- 1 to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended complaint and dismiss this 2 action without further notice to Plaintiff. 3 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the "First 4 Amended Complaint." The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 5 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 6 Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count. 7 A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 8 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 9 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original complaint as 10 nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original 11 complaint is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 12 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987). 13 VI. Warnings 14 A. Release 15 Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release. 16 Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay 17 the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result 18 in dismissal of this action. 19 B. Address Changes 20 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 21 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 22 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 23 action. 24 C. Copies 25 Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See 26 LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice 27 to Plaintiff. 28 ... -7- 1 D. 2 Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails 3 to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the 4 dismissal may count as a "strike" under the "3-strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 5 Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil 6 judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 "if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior 7 occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a 8 court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, 9 or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under 10 Possible "Strike" imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 11 E. Possible Dismissal 12 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these 13 warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 14 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the 15 Court). 16 IT IS ORDERED: 17 (1) Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted. 18 (2) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, 19 Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee. (3) 20 The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 21 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with 22 this Order. (4) 23 If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of 24 Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice 25 that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (5) 26 27 The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil ... 28 -8- 1 2 rights complaint by a prisoner. DATED this 16th day of March, 2012. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -9- Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. 2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law. 3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury. 4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the "Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915" for additional instructions. 5. Original and Judge's Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten. 6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to: Revised 3/9/07 1 Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130 401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson Division: U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500 405 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010 7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case. 8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form: I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed this (month, day, year) to: Name: Address: Attorney for Defendant(s) (Signature) 9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time. 10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial. 11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading or motion. 2 12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form. HEADING: 1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address on the lines provided. 2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the words "and others" on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it "1A" at the bottom. 3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write "JURY TRIAL DEMANDED" in the space below "CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER." Failure to do so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking only injunctive relief. Part A. JURISDICTION: 1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; "Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents" for federal defendants; or "other." If you mark "other," identify the source of that authority. 2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights occurred. 3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled "2-A," "2-B," etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS: You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as "2-A," "2B," etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION: You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number the additional pages "5-A," "5-B," etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages. 3 1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation of only one civil right per count. 2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked "Other," you must identify the specific issue involved. 3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s) occurred, if possible. 4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights. 5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided. Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF: Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided. SIGNATURE: You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself. FINAL NOTE You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages. 4 Name and Prisoner/Booking Number Place of Confinement Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code (Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Full Name of Plaintiff) Plaintiff, vs. (1) (Full Name of Defendant) (2) (3) (4) Defendant(s). G Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them. ) , ) ) ) ) CASE NO. ) (To be supplied by the Clerk) , ) ) , ) CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT ) , ) BY A PRISONER ) , ) G Original Complaint G First Amended Complaint ) ) G Second Amended Complaint A. JURISDICTION 1. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to: G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983 G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). G Other: . Institution/city where violation occurred: . Revised 3/9/07 1 550/555 B. DEFENDANTS 1. Name of first Defendant: at . The first Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 2. (Institution) Name of second Defendant: at . The second Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 3. (Institution) Name of third Defendant: at . The third Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 4. (Institution) Name of fourth Defendant: at . The fourth Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) (Institution) If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page. C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS 1. Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner? 2. If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed? G Yes G No . Describe the previous lawsuits: a. First prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . b. Second prior lawsuit: v. 1. Parties: 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . c. Third prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page. 2 D. CAUSE OF ACTION 1. COUNT I State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies: a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available G Yes G No at your institution? b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 3 1. COUNT II State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your institution? G Yes G No b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 4 1. COUNT III State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available G Yes G No at your institution? b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page. 5 E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF State the relief you are seeking: . I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on DATE SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF (Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or other person who helped prepare this complaint) (Signature of attorney, if any) (Attorney's address & telephone number) ADDITIONAL PAGES All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. 6


Your personal privacy is important to us at jaxroofer.net. To enable us to safeguard your personal privacy we furnish this notice describing our on-line material practices and the choices you may make about the method your details are gathered and utilized. You agree to agree to these guidelines by virtue of using our website in a manner that leads to you offering us with personal information.
Please understand that you may have additional rights originating from State laws predicated on where you live. These State-centered rights might augment, improve, or otherwise somehow compliment any personal privacy rights you have innately or under United States Government law. Our policies are to abide completely with the privacy guidelines of every jurisdiction where we operate. Appropriately, you are free to use our Contact information to contact us anytime to claim any State rights.
Protecting the privacy of the very young is especially vital. Because of this, our website won't accumulate or maintain information at our web-site from those we have reason to know are under 18, and no part of our web-site is structured to entice anyone under 18.
Under our Terms of Service and Conditions of Usage, children under 18 are not allowed to use our web-site as well as gain access to our services. It isn't our objective to provide services or products to minors.
When you visit an internet site, the IP address used to gain access to our web-site could be logged together with the dates and time of entry. This information is solely used to analyze trends, administer our website, track users movements, and also collect very broad target market details for internal use such as for example statistical assessments in addition to web-site improvements. Most importantly, any documented IP addresses are not linked to information that is personally identifiable.
Additional information could be collected as well by jaxroofer.net, which is rather typical of all websites. For example, the source that referred you to our organization website is normally known. Likewise, your length of stay on our website, and your destination when you depart our website may also be monitored. Additional common data compiled contains the type of operating-system the computer you are utilizing to gain access to our websites may differ from our own website.
CHANGE NOTICE: As with any one of our business and legal notice pages, the content of this page can and will change over time. With that in mind, this site might read differently by your very next visit. These updates are caused by, and conducted by jaxroofer.net, in because we want to protect you and our jaxroofer.net website. In the event that this is very important to you, we suggest that you should return on a regular basis as no other notification of changed content shall provided either before or after the change takes effect.
COPYRIGHT WARNING: The legal notices and administrative pages that are on our website, which include this one, have been carefully drafted by a lawyer. We at jaxroofer.net have paid to license the use of these legal notices and administrative pages on jaxroofer.net for your protection and ours. This material must not be used in any manner any for any reason and unauthorized usage is policed via Copyscape in order locate violators.
DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONCERNS?: If you have any questions or concerns about the contents of this page, or if you simply wish to contact us for any other reason, you may do so by using our Contact information.


text:
No reports available.
Crimes No reports available. Check out this story on theadvertiser.com: http://usat.ly/1hoE64O
Staff report; Published 11:03 p.m. CT Nov. 7, 2013
The following crimes are among those reported to the Monroe and West Monroe police departments and to the Ouachita Parish Sheriff's Office between noon Wednesday and noon Thursday. Times and dates reflect when the crimes were reported.
Burglary, 100 block of Savoy, 11:16 a.m. Thursday.
Theft, 10 block of Rayfield Drive, 5:35 p.m. Wednesday.
Burglary, 400 block of Blazier Lane, 9:36 a.m. Wednesday.
Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/1hoE64O
Hurricane Barry doesn't stop couple from marrying
Lafayette still faces Barry's flooding threat
Barry update: Flash flood warning extended
See updated power outage impact in Louisiana
Here's what roads are closed in Lafayette
Tropical Storm Barry: See the flooding, damage

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


A. TFCC gathers customer information in order to improve the Site, to understand which areas of the Site are used most often, to enhance the browsing experience of customers, to disseminate requested information, and for limited marketing and promotional purposes.
B. If you send us personal correspondence, such as emails or letters, or if other users or third parties send us correspondence about your activities or postings on the Site, we may collect such information into a database for such purposes. If you post messages in our Discussion Groups or leave feedback for other users, we may collect that information as well.
· We do not sell, rent or give your information to third parties. · We allow you to determine whether, and how, we may contact you. · We have no tolerance for spam (unsolicited, commercial email).
2. OUR -- USE OF YOUR INFORMATION : You agree that we may use personally identifiable information about you to improve our marketing and promotional efforts, to analyze site usage, improve our content and product offerings, and customize our site's content, layout, and services. These uses improve our site and better tailor it to meet your needs. Our Site design allows you to choose to receive information including administrative notices, product offerings, and communications relevant to FOD in general and to your use of the Site. If you decide at any time that you no longer wish to receive these communications, please e-mail us regarding your decision.
A. Manufacturers/ Service Providers. If you submit a request for information, goods or services, and we are unable to process your request for any reason, we will forward your request and information to an alternative source so that you may obtain the assistance you require.
B. Legal Requests. TFCC cooperates with law enforcement inquiries, as well as other third parties to enforce laws, such as: intellectual property rights, fraud and other rights. We can (and you authorize us to) disclose any information about you to law enforcement or other government officials as we, in our sole discretion, believe necessary or appropriate, in connection with an investigation of fraud, intellectual property infringements, or other activity that is illegal or may expose us or you to legal liability.
Our goal is to be your best resource for easy and effective methods to create or maintain a great FOD program. If you have a special need for FOD control information call us toll free at 1-800-425-8363 or drop us a line at info@fodcontrol.com.
The FOD Control Corporation of Dallas, TX, the aviation industry's most complete provider of FOD prevention information and equipment. Please visit us online at FODControl.com.
Got an article, know of an article, or want to write an article you think belongs on FODNEWS.COM? Click here, info@fodcontrol.com, and tell us about it right now!


For information call 270-766-7679 or 270-737-3232 or e-mail.
Large 14-16 acre tracts w/ shared 101 acre easement on 14400 St. John's Rd.
Lot 54D Prairie View - 2 story approximately 3000sf.
Why now? - New home prices are down. This reflects a reduction in building material prices, subcontractor pricing as well as hungry builders willing to accept far less profit margin than just a couple of years ago. Interest rates are also once again falling dramatically.
If you wait - prices will go up. Within a few months this area will be inundated with thousands of new personnel associated with Ft. Knox. In addition, as the economic uncertainty subsides, those with less secure jobs that are waiting to buy will also rush into the home purchasing market. These circumstances will certainly tend to drive demand and pricing higher. For those of you employed by government and semi-government agencies and people in the military (armed forces), this could be an unusually good opportunity to buy a home. Your jobs and income are secure. Live there 2 years and sell - the profit is tax free.
What about financing? VA/FHA still available. The government has tightened the standards they allowed a couple of years ago when "stated income" loans and other oddities allowed people to qualify for home loans that they could not afford and largely stopped the adjustable rate mortgages that caused problems when interest rates rose. What we see today are not some extraordinary qualification standards but merely a return to the standards that were in place before 1998 and a liberal interpretation of such laws as the Community Reinvestment Act caused today's problems. Checking on your qualifications takes a matter of minutes.
a) This is a particularly good market for those eligible for a VA Loan. (Former or active duty military.) There is no down payment for you and the banks are happy because VA is providing a 20% loan guarantee to replace any down payment.
b) It is also a good time for those making less than $65,000 who can still buy a house outside of Elizabethtown and Radcliff with no down payment through the government's Rural Housing Program.
c) Good old FHA still makes home loans with a down payment as low as 3% as long as you have good credit and meet their debt ratio requirements to assure the payment is within your budget.
2/3 Acre Lots near Elizabethtown (John Hardin School District) 1 mile from US 31-W Some wooded lots. Some walkout.
Radcliff/Elizabethtown: Townhome w/ garage in basement $750/mo available.


text:
Your Scientific Guide to Autism
Statement on Behalf of the BMJ and Brian Deer
Although not formally served with the legal papers, the BMJ is on notice that Andrew Wakefield has issued defamation proceedings, not in London as might be ordinarily expected as concerns a predominately English publication, but in Texas, USA, where he now lives. The proceedings primarily relate to an article written by Brian Deer and published a year ago on 5 January 2011, entitled Secrets of the MMR Scare: How the Case Against the MMR Vaccine was Fixed, and an accompanying editorial which related to Mr Wakefield's now infamous Lancet Paper on MMR.
Of course, following the findings of the British General Medical Council's Fitness to Practice Panel and Mr Wakefield's history of pursuing unfounded litigation, any action brought against the BMJ and Mr Deer in London would have been immediately vulnerable to being struck out as an abuse of process.
Despite the findings of the GMC's Fitness to Practice Panel and his co-authors having publicly retracted the causation interpretation put forward by the Lancet Paper, it would appear from the Claim filed at court that Mr Wakefield still stands by the accuracy of the Lancet paper and his conclusion therein, thereby compounding his previously found misconduct. While we await formal service, unsurprisingly the BMJ and Mr Deer standby the material published in the BMJ and their other statements and confirm that they have instructed lawyers to defend the claim vigorously.
1. The Lancet Paper was published on 23 February 1998 entitled "Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children". Its claims of a temporal association between MMR vaccine and autism were retracted by the authors (excluding Mr Wakefield) on 6 March 2004, following the first findings from Brian Deer's investigation for The Sunday Times. The paper was retracted in its entirety by the Lancet on 2 February 2010, with the Lancet noting that elements of the paper "have been proven to be false" during hearings of a General Medical Council fitness to practise panel.
2. Following a 217-day investigation by the GMC's panel, on 24 May 2010, the panel found Mr Wakefield guilty of serious professional misconduct. It found that Mr Wakefield "had a clear and compelling duty to ensure that the factual information contained in the [Lancet] paper was true and accurate and he failed in this duty". The Panel also found that Mr Wakefield was intentionally dishonest and misleading in describing the patient population, and that he had been dishonest when questioned about it later. Similarly, the panel stated that "the description of the referral process was irresponsible, misleading, and in breach of [Mr] Wakefield s duty as a senior author". The Determination also set out how Mr Wakefield compounded his misconduct by failing to correct the content of the paper.
3. As a result of Mr Wakefield's "persistent lack of insight" into his behaviour, the GMC determined that his name should be erased from the medical register.
4. Mr Wakefield adduced no evidence in mitigation and made no arguments or pleas in mitigation in front of the Fitness to Practice panel. He did not appeal its decision and has not attempted to replicate the Lancet paper's findings in order to attempt to vindicate his position.
5. At various times in the past, Mr Wakefield has brought claims and made complaints against Mr Deer, The Sunday Times, Channel Four and Twenty Twenty Productions in respect of allegations of dishonesty relating to his Lancet paper. In no case has he been successful. Indeed, in each instance the case has been dropped by Mr Wakefield. In Wakefield v Channel Four Television Corporation, Twenty Twenty Productions Ltd and Brian Deer [2005] EWHC 2410 (QB) Mr Justice Eady refused to grant a stay sought by Mr Wakefield, stating that the case would turn on fundamentally serious issues going to the heart of the Claimant s honesty and professional integrity. In refusing the stay, Eady J considered Mr Wakefield's conduct in relation to the various proceedings he had brought. He noted that Mr Wakefield had written to a number of other organisations including: the Cambridge Evening News; Evan Harris (an MP who criticised Mr Wakefield on a radio programme); and the Department of Health (which provided a link on its website to the Channel Four Dispatches website). Mr Wakefield informed these entities in correspondence that he had issued proceedings against The Sunday Times, Mr Deer and/ or Channel Four, indicating that proceedings were ongoing. He made no mention of the stays which he had obtained, or was seeking. Eady J considered this misleading, and concluded that Mr Wakefield wished to use the existence of the libel proceedings for public relations purposes, and to deter critics, while at the same time isolating himself from the downside of such litigation, in having to answer a substantial defence of justification. The Judge believed that there was a pattern of using the existence of libel proceedings, albeit stayed, as a tool for stifling further criticism or debate.
6. On 20 December 2011, the BMJ's solicitors, Farrer & Co, wrote to Mr Wakefield's Texan lawyers setting out the matters referred to above, as well as other points. No response has been received.
7. Mr Wakefield's allegations, that the MMR vaccines causes or contributes to autism, were investigated in three test cases in the United States Court of Federal Claims, heard from July 2007 and with judgments handed down on 12 February 2009. Although listed as a witness, Mr Wakefield was not called to give evidence, and his allegations were rejected. The judgments were upheld on appeal. In the lead case, Cedillo v Secretary for Health and Human Services, Special Master George Hastings said in his judgment with regard to evidence in the case: "Therefore, it is a noteworthy point that not only has that autistic enterocolitis theory not been accepted into gastroenterology textbooks, but that theory, and [Mr] Wakefield s role in its development, have been strongly criticized as constituting defective or fraudulent science."
This article was posted on January 7, 2012.
Make a Donation | Search All of Our Affiliated Sites | Home
Limks to Recommended Companies
PharmacyChecker.com: Compare drug prices and save money at verified online pharmacies.
ConsumerLab.com: Evaluates the quality of dietary supplement and herbal products.
OnlyMyEmail: Award-winning anti-spam services.
10 Types: Website design, development, and hosting with superb technical support.


With permission of Little, Brown & Co.
The Supreme Court of Canada's De-Indexing Decision: Does it Widen or Constrain Google's Power?
Author hughstephensblogPosted on July 4, 2017 July 11, 2017 2 Comments on The Supreme Court of Canada's De-Indexing Decision: Does it Widen or Constrain Google's Power?


text:
Q: Windows 10 Desktop PC will not go to sleep automatically based on set idle timer no matter what I try. What else can I try? I have a Windows 10 Desktop PC I built recently with all new parts, Windows is fully updated, as are all drivers, BIOS, etc. I had a problem with my PC waking up from sleep randomly at night, and then staying on all night, so I disabled all possible wake timers, which seems to have fixed that issue; however, now the PC stays asleep until I press a key on my keyboard.

*

*My PC does not go to sleep automatically by itself based on the timer I set in Power Settings (presumably this is why it would stay up all night after automatically waking up with the previous issue above)

*When I try specific programs to make only the monitors go to sleep, such as Turn off LCD and NirCmd, the monitors turn off for 1 second, then turn back on, so that is perhaps a clue
I've tried virtually everything [screenshots below] and nothing makes my PC go to sleep automatically when idle, including disabling all Wake Armed devices in Device Manager, which didn't fix it either, so I only left the Keyboard enabled to ensure I can wake my PC when I manually put it to sleep. I do not want to reset anything as it's taken me a long time to get my PC configured just right and fix the issue of my PC waking randomly from sleep.

*

*Advanced Power Settings:

*Power Troubleshooting Results:

*Group Policy Sleep Settings set to ensure automatic sleep:

*powercfg:

*

*devicequery wake_armed:
HID Keyboard Device (003)
HID Keyboard Device (004)

*-energy: 14 Errors, 9 Warnings, 58 Informational (rebooted, didn't touch anything)

*-requests:
DISPLAY:
  None.

SYSTEM:
  None.

AWAYMODE:
  None.

EXECUTION:
  None.

PERFBOOST:
  None.

ACTIVELOCKSCREEN:
  None.

What else can I try to find out what in the world is keeping my PC from sleeping automatically and fix this issue, considering powercfg -requests returns everything as none?
FINAL UPDATE:  With the help of a combination of everyone's suggestions (see my answer below), I was able to find the culprit:  Creative Pebble V3 external speakers connected via USB-C.  I updated its Firmware and it resolved the problem.

A: A workaround that might work if nothing else is an AutoHotkey script:
#Persistent
if not A_IsAdmin ; powercfg must run as admin
{
    Run *RunAs "%A_ScriptFullPath%"
    ExitApp
}

SetTimer, IdleCheck, 15000 ; checks every 15 seconds for idleness
Return

IdleCheck:
If A_TimeIdle > 300000 ; adjust to however many milliseconds you want to wait before standby
{
   RunWait, nircmd.exe execmd "powercfg -requests > "%A_Temp%\pwrcfg_output.txt" "
   Sleep, 1000
   FileRead, PwrOutput, %A_Temp%\pwrcfg_output.txt
   If RegExMatch(PwrOutput, "DISPLAY:\r\n *None")
   && RegExMatch(PwrOutput, "SYSTEM:\r\n *None")
   && RegExMatch(PwrOutput, "AWAYMODE:\r\n *None")
   && RegExMatch(PwrOutput, "EXECUTION:\r\n *None")
   && RegExMatch(PwrOutput, "PERFBOOST:\r\n *None")
   {
      Run, nircmd.exe standby
   }
}
Return

You can check to see whether or not the idle timer is not being constantly reset when there's no input by using the following script:
loop
{
  Sleep, 500
  Tooltip, %A_TimeIdle%
}

ESC::
ExitApp

The milliseconds in the tooltip should keep counting up without resetting when there's no mouse or keyboard input.

A: Try to disconnect PSU USB 'corsair link' cable as googling corsair link sleep has people talking about that being problematic. In the comments you electronically disabled all your devices, please physically disconnect everything possible except for keyboard, might want to even try another one of those. This is a normal troubleshooting step that Microsoft recommends & Level 2 techs at HP (I was a lvl1 tech there) suggested, process of elimination. No one is saying disconnecting everything will BE the fix, it will help us understand IF ANY of the devices are problematic. If not then we know its not those pieces of equipment.

A: What you have done should have been enough, but is not working.
You have done everything we could think of and answered all our questions, but
Windows is still behaving in an abnormal manner.
Here are some more actions that you may take to check for and return Windows
to a known state:

*

*Run chkdsk to check for disk corruption

*Check the SMART data of the disk (for example using
Speccy)

*Run
SFC and DISM:
  DISM.exe /Online /Cleanup-image /Restorehealth
  sfc /scannow

*If nothing is found do
Repair Install of Windows 10 with an In-place Upgrade.

A: After countless hours over many days, I was finally able to resolve this issue with a combination of all of the other solutions.
I used Aenfa's 2nd script for AutoHotKey:
loop
{
  Sleep, 500
  Tooltip, %A_TimeIdle%
}

ESC::
ExitApp

which showed something was definitely continuously resetting the idle timer, so this allowed me to easily tell when the idle timer was no longer being reset by something.
So then I followed gregg's answer and acejavelin's suggestion of physically unplugging peripherals.  I just disconnected them one by one until I noticed the idle timer no longer resetting.
What was the culprit?  The Creative Pebble V3 external speakers connected via USB-C.
harrymc's had earlier suggested a driver issue.  Although there was no new driver for these speakers, there was a Firmware update.  So I followed his advice and updated the Firmware of the speakers and it finally fixed the problem.
I want to thank harrmyc, gregg, Aenfa, acejavelin, and all others for their help with this.
I find it completely absurd that PC Sleep issues with Microsoft Windows 10 require this much effort and detective work to simply find the culprit.  It's 2021!

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Caption: Mutant KRAS protein (white) keeps switch (red/pink) open in active state for GTP (arrow). After treatment with ARS-1620 (blue), switch is trapped in inactive GDP-bound state.
Credit: Adapted from Cell. 2018 Jan 25;172(3):578-589.
Of the more than 1.7 million Americans expected to be diagnosed with cancer this year, nearly one-third will have tumors that contain at least one mutation in the RAS family of genes . That includes 95 percent of pancreatic cancers and 45 percent of colon cancers. These mutations result in the production of defective proteins that can drive cancer's uncontrolled growth, as well as make cancers resistant to therapies. As you might expect, RAS has emerged as a major potential target for fighting cancer. Unfortunately, it is a target that's proven very difficult to "hit" despite nearly three decades of work by researchers in both the private and public sectors, leading NIH's National Cancer Institute to begin The RAS Initiative in 2013. This important effort has made advances with RAS that have translational potential.
Recently, I was excited to hear of progress in targeting a specific mutant form of KRAS, which is a protein encoded by a RAS gene involved in many lung cancers and some pancreatic and colorectal cancers. The new study, carried out by a pharmaceutical research team in mouse models of human cancer, is the first to show that it is possible to shrink a tumor in a living creature by directly inhibiting mutant KRAS protein .


text:
Q: Merging pandas dataframes duplicates some data Thanks for taking the time to read my post.
I'm using Python pandas and merging information from a number of CSV and TSV files. When I execute the 2nd merge data is duplicated in the resulting dataframe. I'm assuming, I'm missing something basic with the merge call but I haven't been able to figure it out.
Code:
from pandas import DataFrame, read_csv
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import pandas as pd
import sys
import matplotlib

# Enable inline plotting
%matplotlib inline

# read data into dataframes
ticketdata = r'/pathto.csv'
ticketdata = r'/pathto.csv'
userdata = r'/pathto.csv'
shipmentdata = r'/pathto.tsv'

tickets_df = pd.read_csv((ticketdata), usecols=['Id',"Requester",'Created at',"Requester email",
                                                "Requester external id"])
users_df = pd.read_csv((userdata), usecols=['External ID','Printers',"Organization Title"])
shipment_df = pd.read_csv((shipmentdata), delimiter='\t', usecols=['Cust','Printer ID'])

# Clean up tickets_df & shipment_df

# Change "Requester external id" to "External ID" to support the merge
tickets_df.columns = ['Ticket Id',"Requester","External ID","Requester email",'Created at']
shipment_df.columns = ['VAR','Printers']
# Change column order for the sake of readability
tickets_df = tickets_df[['Ticket Id','Requester','Created at',"Requester email","External ID"]]

# Replace NaN in External ID with 0 and merge data
tickets_df.fillna(0, inplace=True)
merge1_df = pd.merge(tickets_df, users_df, on=['External ID'], how='left')
merge1_df = merge1_df[['Ticket Id','Created at',"Organization Title",'Requester',"Requester email","External ID",'Printers']]
merge2_df = pd.merge(merge1_df, shipment_df, on=['Printers'], how='left')

merge1_df looks as expected (NaN is expected for some values):
    Ticket Id   Created at  Organization Title  Requester   Requester email     External ID     Printers
0   1   2014-08-21 18:19    NaN     dude    dude@dude.com   0   NaN
1   2   2014-09-09 12:04    NaN     dude1   duke1@dude.com  0   NaN
2   3   2014-09-09 12:04    NaN     dude2   duke2@dude.com  0   NaN
3   4   2014-09-09 12:04    NaN     dude3   duke3@dude.com  0   NaN

merge2_df contains thousands of dupes:
    Ticket Id   Created at  Organization Title  Requester   Requester email     External ID     Printers
0   1   2014-08-21 18:19    NaN     dude    dude@dude.com   0   NaN
1   1   2014-08-21 18:19    NaN     dude    dude@dude.com   0   NaN
2   1   2014-08-21 18:19    NaN     dude    dude@dude.com   0   NaN
3   1   2014-08-21 18:19    NaN     dude    dude@dude.com   0   NaN

Any idea(s) how I am messing up merge2_df?

A: The issue was with NaN values in the shipment_df dataframe. I added the following to replace NaN with 0  and the duplicate entries in merge2_df were resolved
shipment_df.fillna(0, inplace=True)


text:
Участниками финального этапа Первой лиги стали победители турниров, организованных следующими МРО (Объединений региональных федераций футбола): «Золотое Кольцо», «Центр», «Приволжье», «Урал и Западная Сибирь», «Сибирь», «Дальний Восток», «ЮФО-СКФО», «Северо-Запад», г. Москвы и Московской области.

Предварительный этап

зона Сибирь
 Предварительный этап
 «Запад»: 22-24 июля Томск, 12-14 августа Новосибирск, 26-28 августа Кемерово
 «Восток»: 22-24 июля Иркутск, 05-07 августа Улан-Удэ, 25-28 августа Красноярск

Группа Запад

Группа Восток

 Финал
 В Новосибирске с 16 по 20 сентября прошёл финальный этап Чемпионата

зона Подмосковье
 Чемпионат Московской области по футболу среди женских команд: 30.04.2022 по 08.10.2022

зона Москва

зона Южная

зона Центр

зона Северо-Запад

группа А
Итоговая таблица и результаты матчей

группа Б
Итоговая таблица и результаты матчей

турнир за 1-4 место

турнир за 5-7 место

зона Дальний Восток

зона Урал

зона Приволжье
 места проведения: Казань (30 июня—2 июля) и Нижний Новгород (21-23 августа)

зона Золотое кольцо

Финал
Финальный этап прошёл на спортивной базе «Буткэмп» в Широкой Балке возле Новороссийска. В финал вышли 10 сильнейших команд: по одной лучшей команде от каждой из зон. В матчах за 1—4-ое место участвовали: «Строгино» (Москва), «Академия Футбола» (Тамбов), «Можайск», «Новосибирск». Все остальные места с 5-го по 9-е также были разыграны в плей-офф.

Групповой этап
17-22 октября 2022

Группа А

Группа Б

Плей-офф

Плей-офф за 9-10 места

Плей-офф за 5-8 места

Плей-офф за 1-4 места

Регламент
Продолжительность матчей на Финальном этапе Соревнований 2 тайма по 40 минут каждый, перерыв между таймами не более 15 минут.

В случае равенства очков у 2 и более команд, места между ними в турнирной таблице определяются в следующей последовательности:
 по результатам игр между собой (число очков, число побед, разность забитых и пропущенных мячей, число забитых мячей);
 по наибольшему числу побед во всех матчах;
 по лучшей разности забитых и пропущенных мячей во всех матчах;
 по наибольшему числу забитых мячей во всех матчах;
 по жребию.

Если стыковой матч, матчи плей-офф за 5-8 места, полуфинальные матчи за 1-4, матчи за 7-8 места, 5-6 места, 3-4 места и финальный матч закончатся в основное время вничью, то победитель этих матчей определяется с помощью серии ударов с 11-метровой отметки в соответствии с Правилами игры.

Примечания

Ссылки
 Финальный этап соревнований «1 лига» среди женских команд 2022 года

П
Футбол в России в 2022 году

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Abuse survivor 'shocked' by dismissal of priest at same church
by: Ken Kolker
Posted: May 10, 2021 / 05:13 PM EDT
Updated: May 10, 2021 / 06:22 PM EDT
GRAND HAVEN, Mich. (WOOD) — The news that her former priest was removed from the priesthood for credible allegations of sexually abusing a minor brought back horrible memories for a worshipper at St. Patrick-St. Anthony Catholic Parish in Grand Haven.
She was molested at the same church decades ago by a different priest.
Father William Langlois, now 75, was recently ousted from the priesthood for what the Catholic Diocese of Grand Rapids called credible allegations of molesting a child — news that shocked parishioners at the church where he was pastor for years.
"I right then got in a state of depression, bringing back all these memories from when I was abused," said the woman, who asked not to be identified.
She was 14 or 15 in 1960, she said, when Father John Sullivan repeatedly molested her at St. Patrick's. Sullivan, now deceased, had a long history of sexual offenses as a priest before coming to West Michigan — offenses that local church officials were aware of. At churches in the Grand Rapids diocese, including St. Patrick's, Sullivan molested as many as nine young girls starting in the late 1950s.
Survivors: Catholic Church helping abusers more than abused
But the survivor of Sullivan said she never suspected Langlois.
"Everybody was shocked, couldn't believe it," she said.
Langlois had joined the priesthood nearly 50 years ago. He took a leave of absence in 2014 after admitting he had an inappropriate relationship with a woman.
"He confessed to everybody at church, actually," the woman said.
Retired Grand Haven priest defrocked over sexual …
He retired two years later.
Pope Francis recently dismissed Langlois from the priesthood after a survivor reported in 2018 that the priest had sexually abused her from 1999 to 2006, beginning when she was a minor and continuing into adulthood.
"He was just so good and outgoing to everybody, and friendly, greeted everybody after church and if he saw you anywhere in town or in the store, he'd made a point to greet you," the parishioner said of Langlois.
Langlois is now among 15 priests with credible allegations of sexually abusing children in the Grand Rapids diocese.
A map shows where William Langlois worked as a priest within the Catholic Diocese of Grand Rapids.
The survivor of Sullivan is in her late 70s now and still goes to St. Patrick's, where nobody knows what happened.
"I figured it wasn't God's fault and I still kept going to church and donating, ever since then," she said.
She said that won't change despite the removal of Langlois.
"I won't give up on God," she said.
Target 8 couldn't reach Langlois for comment Monday.
The state Attorney General's Office said it started investigating him in 2018 but did not file criminal charges. A spokeswoman refused to say why.


text:
Twitter Ban: A Reproach To Nigeria's Economic Growth And Social Stability.
By Stephen Peter Okangla
It is no longer news that the Federal Government had suspended the operation of the micro-blogging platform (Twitter) in Nigeria. This action according to the information released from the Ministry of Information and Culture on Friday, the 4th of June 2021 was necessitated by the fact that the platform was endangering the corporate existence of Nigeria. However, others have argued that the suspension of Twitter is not unconnected to the unrestricted allowance the platform avail Nigerians to express their disappointment and dissatisfaction in the way and manner things are run under the President Buhari led administration.
Opinion holders, Leaders, Civil Society Organizations, Stake holders, Clerics of different faith, the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA) and the International Community have all expressed their disappointment over the suspension of Twitter in Nigeria. Needless to say that the suspension is generating miss-feelings and reactions among Nigerians, some wonder while the Federal Government would flex so much muscle on Twitter forgetting or failing to do same on those holding Nigerians to ransom, others describe the action of the Federal Government as one chasing shadow forgetting the substance.
My opinion is not different either, as I have umpteenth times since the suspension of Twitter question the rationale behind such ill-decided action. Chief Mike Ozokhome SAN and Chief Femi Falana SAN have also lend their voice on the action of the Federal Government describing same as tantamount to gagging the media. It is as result of the Federal Government's unhealthy relationship with Nigerians on the use of mass media that warrant the management of Twitter to locate its Africa's office in Accra, Ghana despite the fact that Nigeria has the highest population of Twitter users across the continent. The location of Africa's Twitter office in Ghana had undisputedly denied Nigerians the chance of securing employment which the micro-blogging platform would had created.
Section 22 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as altered provides: "the press, radio, television and other agencies of the mass media shall at all times be free to uphold the fundamental objectives contained in this chapter and uphold the responsibility and accountability of the Government to the people" similarly, section 39 of the constitution provides: "every person shall be entitled to freedom of expression, including freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impact ideas and without interference". These sections of the constitution coupled with several International declarations, Charters and Treaties of which Nigeria is a party to clearly grant Nigerians unrestricted and unlimited access to hold opinions, disseminate information, and access the press and social media platforms etc. Although, this right is not absolute as section 45 of the constitution provides for the restriction and derogation from it in the interest of defence, public safety, public order, public morality or public health and for the purpose of protecting the rights and freedom of other persons.
It is important to put it straight to Mr. President and the Attorney General of the Federation Abubakar Malami SAN that no Nigerian had or have used Twitter to the detriment of Nigerians or to perpetrate evil in the country as being mischievously bandied around by members of Mr. President's cabinet to warrant such suspension. The suspension of Twitter is far from being for the safety of Nigerians nor for the corporate existence of Nigeria! It is not the solution to the numerous security challenges staring at our face either.
Truth must be told, Nigeria is already overstretch and if genuine care is not employ, it may collapse. As a patriotic and peace loving Nigerian, I do not support the way and manner the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and it's so called Eastern security Network (ESN) is going about their demand for self-rule, it is inimical to our peace and collective growth as a Nation. You cannot achieve Biafra by destroying your land, if you end up destroying your land which land will you then call Biafra? The action of IPOB and its ESN is reckless and pure madness!
On the same vein, I do not also support the way and manner the Federal Government is handling the situation in South East, in the community where I come from, when you beat a child with one hand, you use another hand to draw him closer and pet him, at times you even give him meat to calm him down! Similarly, if your child develops a strange behaviour, you do not cut off his head, as a father, you call the child and inquire of him his challenges and grievances, you prevail on him to know the reason behind his sudden change of attitude and behaviour. As a father you do not shut the door to your son in his trying time, it will spell doom and disaster for your family! This is exactly the kind of approach will need in Nigeria to silence the drum of war and secession heralding the air in the South East and in the South West.
I therefore, as a matter of urgency employ Mr. President to adopt the pattern of my community and call his children to a roundtable as father. Mr. President Sir, the members of the proscribed IPOB and the Sunday Igboho led agitators are your children, invite them to your hallowed chamber and inquire from them what their grievances are, prevail on them to tell you the rationale behind the violence turn of demand, press on IPOB to know their rationale behind the attacks on security men and security formations in the South East. You do not need to suspend Twitter to achieve this Mr. President! Suspending Twitter is like adding fuel to a burning fire, it may destroy our image and chase our helpers away Sir! It shows that as Nation, we care less on the log of wood in our eye which has made us blind for so many years and care more on the stain on our clothe!
The ugly part of the Federal Government's action is that it is coming at a time we need the assistance of the global Community in tackling poverty, criminality, banditry and suppressing terrorism in the country. You would recall that the United Kingdom, European Union, United States, Canada and the Ireland Envoys had expressed their disappointment over Twitter ban stating that such action is unhealthy for Nigeria. Similarly, responding to the suspension of Twitter in Nigeria, Global Amnesty Watch described the suspension as height of impunity, intolerance to criticisms. In the face of all these negative reactions, a sane man would know that Nigeria is not on the right path.
Thinking outside religious and political divides it is easy to make out that what prompted the suspension of Twitter in Nigeria was the removal of the President's genocidal threat from the platform. The task before the Federal Government now is how to convince our helpers (International Community) that the operation of Twitter violates our laws or threaten our corporate existence. With due respect Mr. President, your action is harsh, undemocratic and repugnant to good conscience!
Recently a reports by NetBlocks showed that Nigeria will lose N 2.18 Billion per day for blocking the operation of Twitter, a micro-blogging and social media networking platform in the country. This, excluding the poor message it has sent to Investors and International Community as expressed by the United States. You don't fix a leaking jar by breaking it, you fix a leaking jar by amending the damaged part. What the Federal Government had done is fixing a leaking jar by breaking the jar! Similarly, you don't destroy a pot because its content is bad! At this point, it is not out of place to ask what calibers of advisers are with Mr. President. Do they counsel like the biblical Ahitophel? If they do, then I make bold to demand their resignation as Ahitophel-like counsel is not needed in Nigeria at this turbulent time.
We must not continue to wail and watch our house burn, while we wail, we must strive to put off the fire. I therefore call on all Nigerians, Graduates without jobs, out of School children, financially induced drop out to prevail on our mother and find means for her to cook a good soup! In the same manner I call on the Killer herdsmen without ranches, Terrorist, Unknown Gun Men, Bandits Kidnappers, the Oduduwa Republic agitators, the Indigenous People of Biafra and her Eastern Security Network to shield their sword and grant Nigeria the freedom to move! It is my believe that it is not wise to destroy your mother's pot of soup because she cook a bad soup, rather it is wise to allow the pot of soup and prevail on her to cook a good soup next time!
God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria!
Stephen Okangla is patriotic Nigerian, he writes from Kaduna Sate Nigeria, he could be reach via phone: 08103894427 and vial email: stephenokangla@gmail.com
Previous articleU.S. Supreme Court Blocks Permanent Residency for Some Immigrants
Next articleIPOB Killed 128 Military, Police Personnel — Army


Founding a startup company is much like getting married. In fact, the relationship between founders is as important, intricate, and complex as that of a married couple.
Indeed, much like a marriage, the quality of the relationship between the founders can determine the success of the venture.
Therefore, it's very important to select the right partner to start your company with. In this post, I would like to focus on a less popular, but equally important topic of the founders' agreement. Some may call it the founders "prenup agreement".
At the beginning of your venture, everything seems rosy, exciting and full of promise. Much like a loving couple before their marriage. What could possibly go wrong?
And much like a couple before their wedding, it seems very awkward at such wonderful and optimistic times to discuss and prepare an agreement that intends to formalize the relationship and address possible issues, future contingencies, and conflicts.
And yet, that's probably the smartest thing you can do before you incorporate your company.
So here are four valuable tips from my own experience and that of other entrepreneurs.
Don't delay! Make sure you prepare and sign the agreement, before you incorporate the company, and/or raise money. If you let it linger for too long, it might never get done. That could result in major issues down the road, and even with an ugly break-up later.
Lawyer up! This is not a DIY project. Yes, you are smart enough to start a company, and even invent a breakthrough product. But this requires the advice, input, and writing of a professional lawyer. Preferably one that specializes in startups, and has done similar agreements in the past.
Be specific, very specific! As the old saying goes, the devil is in the details. Wherever needed, be very specific. For example, don't write that each founder can hold a full-time job elsewhere until the completion of a significant financing round. Significant is subject to interpretation, and each founder can interpret it differently. Instead, define a specific amount, for example, $250K.
Address potential conflicts, but keep it simple. It's important to anticipate and address potential issues. For example: asymmetry among the founders (i.e. one has another job, and one is full-time in the startup); what happens if one founder decides to quit, or is terminated, etc. However, as in any agreement, you will never be able to cover all possible scenarios. In addition, there is value in keeping the agreement simple and clear. So, decide what is truly important, and what you can leave out of the agreement.
I know it's not the most pleasant topic to deal with in the early stage of a new venture. And yet, you will be happy you did it and did it right.


text:
Poetry Series: An Evening of Poetry & Music with Lola Haskins and Ephraim Scott Sommers
An Evening of Poetry and Music
The Regulator Bookshop welcomes Lola Haskins and Ephraim Scott Sommers for an evening of poetry of music. Free and open to the public. The Regulator's Poetry Series is co-sponsored with the generous support of Jacar Press.
Lola Haskins serves as Honorary Chancellor of the Florida State Poets Association. Her fourteenth collection, Asylum: Improvisations on John Clare (Pitt, 2019), was preceded by How Small, Confronting Morning (Jacar, 2016). In spring 2019, she collaborated with Dance Alive! National Ballet to create "Land of La Chua," which featured selections from How Small. She has won the Iowa Poetry Prize, two NEAs, two Florida Book Awards, the Florida's Eden prize for environmental writing, and the Emily Dickinson prize from Poetry Society of America.
A singer-songwriter and poet, Ephraim Scott Sommers is the author of Someone You Love is Still Alive, selected by Ireland's Mary O'Donnell as the winner of the Jacar Press Full-Length Competition. Jericho Brown said "This is a gorgeous and dangerous book about love and survival in the in the face of institutions that work to make something as genuine as desire improbable. He is also the author of The Night We Set the Dead Kid on Fire (2017), winner of the 2016 Patricia Bibby First Book Award. His recent work has appeared in Prairie Schooner, TriQuarterly, VerseDaily, and elsewhere. An assistant professor of English at Winthrop University, Ephraim, a singer-songwriter as well as a poet, lives in Rock Hill, South Carolina with his wife, Ann Reilly-Sommers.
Asylum: Improvisations on John Clare (Pitt Poetry Series) (Paperback)
By Lola Haskins
Availability: Call for availibilty
Published: University of Pittsburgh Press - June 25th, 2019


Discussion in 'Jailbreaks and iOS Hacks' started by jjk454ss, May 24, 2011.
I know Winterboard has its own icon, and I know you can hide that icon and still access it through settings.app, but I want to add a Winterboard icon in SBSettings to open it up this way. Is this possible? How would I do it? Thanks for any help or ideas.
Yeah, thats not a bad way to go. I think its just that I'm SSHing things and using SBSettings to respring, I keep opening SBSettingds when I mean to open Winterboard. I do it so much that I was hoping to just add a shortcut there.
You can add WB to the dock in SBSettings, I have, along with other often used JB apps.
Ha. After all these years of using SBSettings, I've never used the Dock. I always thought that was some sort of thing for the Dock on the SB only it never did anything.
I just added all my customization apps to the SBSettings dock, I think this will work great. I like to have fewer SB icons, so I like this.


In summer 2013 i had an emergency OP on my back, as a disc pressed on a whole bundle of nerves... i had suffered from pain in the lower back and down the legs for a long time and it got worse and worse, but none of the docs and physios i had seen suggested to have a closer look at my back and the nerves, and in the end i almost lost my bladder nerves...Phew...I went through a long time with two OPs, a rehab, a recovery, a relapse, another OP where they screwed my back together with titan, and another recovery until, finally, in autumn 2014 things got normal again ...apart from a few nerves in my foot that i probably lost forever. During all these months i could not sit for longer times and as i use to work on tracks in a flow, the whole day long till late night or early morning i couldn't really produce new music. I still managed to keep up my uploading of videoclips on YT though.
However, when things seemed good again at the end of 2013 i managed to work on a new track. I was experimenting with synth patterns going to the five on a 4/4 grid, hence the title of the track, "Five". Another element i was using is a dubby synth that i stumbled upon...i was always looking out for it but couldn't identify it in my instrument library till then. Beginning of 2014, inspired by "Five" i did another track, this time going to explore the "Three". I'm very pleased with the results, i see it as a further development in my music.
For the videoclips, i used five colour/fx styles on some footage i shot in Appenzell and on the mountain Hoher Kasten for "Five", and three different ways of using the same timelapse footage i shot around my home in Winterthur for "Three".


Hey everyone! We are super stoked to announce a tour we're hosting for LAST SONG BEFORE NIGHT by Ilana C. Myer which is releasing on September 29th, 2015!
The tour will run for two weeks - from September 21st-25th & 28th- October 2nd - will have one stop per day and will consist of a mix of guest posts, interviews and reviews.
Review copies will be provided by TOR.
We are super excited for LAST SONG BEFORE NIGHT's release this September! It sounds amazing!


text:
(-) Business Insider UK (1)
(-) Canada Aviation and Space Museum (2)
(-) CBC.ca (1)
(-) Historica Canada (1)
(-) ScienceDaily (1)
(-) vimeo.com (1)
(-) Short (7)
The top 10 science and environment stories of 2018
If you didn't get the chance to read as many science stories as you would have liked in 2018, fear not: CBC has compiled its top 10 list just for you. From the discovery of an ancient Mayan city to evidence of Planet X, there's no shortage of fascinating stories to review.
Emerging tech: Honeybee habitats can now be inside your home
A new product will soon enable novice beekeepers to keep honeybees inside their houses. The BEEcosystem is modular honeybee habitat that can be hung almost anywhere; it simply needs to be placed near a window if inside, or in a sheltered location outside. Watch a video that shows how the technology works.
The Future of Food Safety: Bacterial Detection through a Smartphone
Lauren DiVito
Ingenium – Canada's Museums of Science and Innovation
Researchers at MIT and the Max Planck Institute have developed a method for quick, on-site E. coli detection in food. While current food safety testing either requires days to complete or expensive equipment, this new method, paired with a smartphone and QR code, will make testing inexpensive and portable. The new detection process uses Janus emulsions, droplets consisting of two hemispheres of different densities. In water, the less dense, hydrocarbon hemisphere sits above the denser hemisphere
Newsroom: Canada Aviation and Space Museum joins national partners on search-and-recovery of free-flight Avro Arrow models from Lake Ontario
For immediate release Ottawa, July 14, 2017 The Canada Aviation and Space Museum is proud to support OEX Recovery Group Incorporated ("OEX"), in a project involving the search-and-recovery of nine free-flight Avro Arrow models from Lake Ontario. The project was created by OEX as a Canada 150 initiative. As one of the three museums under the new Ingenium banner, the Canada Aviation and Space Museum—in collaboration with the Canadian Conservation Institute—will provide historical information to
Collection Highlights: Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow 2
Intended to replace the Avro Canada CF-100, the CF-105 Arrow was a technical masterpiece at the forefront of aviation engineering during its time. The Canadian government believed, however, that the manned bomber threat was diminishing and that air defence could be better handled by unmanned BOMARC missiles. The contract was cancelled on February 20, 1959 while test flying was still in progress. By then five Arrows had flown. The government ordered all completed Arrows, related documentation
Raising the Avro Arrow
Using Kraken Sonar Inc. advanced high resolution sonar technology to scan Lake Ontario, a team from OEX Recovery Group Inc. launch the search and recovery of nine free-flight Avro-Arrow models.
Heritage Minutes: Avro Arrow
The Avro Arrow –a triumph of aerospace achievement in Canadian history. Launched in 1953, the Avro Arrow project was innovative for the times as the most advanced and fastest interceptor aircraft.


text:
Brandish the Weapon of Mass: Sean Price and Small Professor's 86 Witness
Joel Biswas goes in on the Brooklyn MC's posthumous album, featuring the talents of one of Philly's best producers.
By Joel Biswas February 18, 2019
Please support our staff of nice rappin', Mic Tyson fans. Support Passion of the Weiss by subscribing to our Patreon.
Joel Biswas will smack shit out your "We Are the World" song.
Sean Price is the original underground champion — a one-man typhoon of sly references, dazzling alliteration and death blow punchlines. At the time of his untimely death in 2015, Price had been a reliable mainstay of the NY underground for so long that it was easy to forget that long before he was Sean Price he was Ruck, the smoothest and most agile member of Brownsville's Boot Camp Clik. When he re-emerged in the early 2000's as Duck Down's unlikeliest star, he made a point of going by his government name except when he didn't. Whether he was Master P, the 50 Dollar Man, the Brokest Rapper, Kimbo Price, or Decepticon Sean, no absurdist moniker could hide his unmistakable flow.
He might put your moms in a headlock, kick fire out your ass like Fei Long or fricassee your eulogy – possibly all in the same verse. In his hands, the bar was a more complete vehicle for understanding the art of rap than most rapper's songs. He put them together the way Ali strung together punches and delivered them like seven-hit Street Fighter combos. The space mattered as much as the sounds, the aural equivalent of a body rebounding off the ropes before connecting again, rapid-fire consonants raining down like fists. Lines like "I'm Sean, King of the Apes, you Prawn, King of the Shrimps/ Funny-style, limp-wristed son of a bitch" had enough layers to power a thesis in ethnolinguistics but were never cryptic. His was the sound of a grizzled vet who had seen enough to hate the game but not enough to satiate his appetite for roasting onion-head MC's.
86 Witness is the third posthumous release since Price's passing. In many ways, it's the most successful. For one thing, it's the first time a single producer has provided a complete backdrop for Price. Philly's Small Professor worked with Sean when he was alive and pairs him here with a mostly younger generation of artists like Elucid and Curly Castro, many of whom have followed the independent trail he blazed. He also gives the album with a thematic arc (the year 1986) to highlight some of Price's best pop culture references.
After a boom bap intro powered by DJ Revolution's scratches and allusions to Audio 2 and N.W.A., things kick off in earnest with the action film strings of "Refrigerator P." Price threatens to sell crack to your sister and disrupt the recording sessions for "We are the World" before former Heltah Skeltah partner in rhyme Rock floats a hook that reminds you why they were such a potent combination. "Latoya Jackson" rides a wigged violin sample and beat box to put Sean alongside alongside Quelle Chris before a beat flip coda sees Sean eating canned ravioli and salmon, gun in hand as the bemused ghost of Malcolm X looks on.
Instrumental "P's theme" loops Price's favorite verbal refrain to remind the listener that while a lot of rappers claimed the letter P, only Price deployed it like a SCUD missile. "John Gotti", "Think About It" and "Word to Mother" sit comfortably alongside his best mixtape material. P's verse on "John Gotti" is so great that Pro even drops a remix that allows his Illadelph day-ones Curly Castro, Zilla Rocca and Reef the Lost Cause to go in with predictably great results.
Small Professor's production sparkles throughout, whether offering a witty sonic detail to make a Robocop reference land harder or dropping an unexpected fourth quarter beat change on tracks like "Think About It" and "Latoya Jackson".
Posthumous rap records can often feel exploitative in their desire to revive a ghost, but in Small Professor's hands, Price is very much alive and in his element. "86 Witness" is an inspired tribute that takes his Pantheon status as a given, while delivering the kind of polish and cohesion that his projects often lacked. It's the welcome reminder that "Sean Carter is nice, but P is the best." On the mic, Sean Price was never more serious than when he was joking.
We rely on your support to keep POW alive. Please take a second to donate on Patreon!


text:
Q: undefined method `ingredients_path' for #<#:0x007fdbf94bea60> The scenario is I am creating a recipe app. Where you have your initial recipe model and since you can have more than one ingredient I have a separate ingredient model that I am trying to nest inside of the recipe form.
    class Recipe < ActiveRecord::Base
        belongs_to :Catagory
        has_many :ingredients
        accepts_nested_attributes_for :ingredients

        scope :visible, lambda { where(:visible => true) }
        scope :invisible, lambda { where(:visible => false) }
        scope :sorted, lambda { order("recipes.position ASC") }
        scope :newest_first, lambda { order("recipes.created_at DESC")}
        scope :search, lambda {|query|
        where(["name LIKE ?", "%#{query}%"])
        }
     end

ingredient model:
    class Ingredient < ActiveRecord::Base
         belongs_to :recipe
    end

recipe controller:
    class RecipeController < ApplicationController
      def index
         @recipes = Recipe.sorted
      end

      def new
         @recipe = Recipe.new({:name => "Default"})
         @recipe_count = Recipe.count + 1
         @ingredient = Ingredient.new({:name => "Enter Ingredient"})
      end

      def create
         @recipe = Recipe.new(recipe_params)
         if @recipe.save
            flash[:notice] = 'You have successfully created a new recipe!'
            redirect_to(:action => 'index')
         else
            @recipe_count = Recipe.count + 1
            render('new')
         end
      end

      def edit
         @recipe = Recipe.find(params[:id])
        @recipe_count = Recipe.count
      end

     def update
        @recipe = Recipe.find(params[:id])
        if @recipe.update_attributes(recipe_params)
           flash[:notice] = 'Your changes have been saved!'
           redirect_to(:action => 'index')
        else
           @recipe_count = Recipe.count
           render('edit')
        end
     end

    def delete
       @recipe = Recipe.find(params[:id])
    end

    def destroy
      @recipe = Recipe.find(params[:id]).destroy
      flash[:notice] = 'Your recipe has been deleted'
      redirect_to(:action => 'index')
    end

    private
      def recipe_params
         params.require(:recipe).permit(:name, :position, :ingredient, :directions, :created_at)
      end
    end

recipe form:

        <%= f.label(:name, "Recipe Name") %>
        <%= f.text_field(:name) %>

        <%= f.label(:position) %>
        <%= f.select(:position, 1..@recipe_count) %>

      <%= form_for @ingredient do |f| %>
         <%= f.label(:position) %>
         <%= f.text_field :name %>
      <% end %>

         <%= f.label(:directions) %>
         <%= text_area_tag(:message, "Be specific", size: "50x30") %>

and I am getting this error:
undefined method `ingredients_path' for #<#:0x007fdbf94bea60>

A: Scopes
Firstly, your scope syntax is incorrect:
#app/models/recipe.rb
class Recipe < ActiveRecord::Base
   belongs_to :catagory #-> should always be lower case
   has_many :ingredients
   accepts_nested_attributes_for :ingredients

   scope :visible,      -> { where(:visible => true) }
   scope :invisible,    -> { where(:visible => false) }
   scope :sorted,       -> { order("recipes.position ASC") }
   scope :newest_first, -> { order("recipes.created_at DESC")}
   scope :search, ->(query) { where(["name LIKE ?", "%#{query}%"])}
end

You'll be better using the scopes documentation to determine the syntax

Form
Secondly, your form & supporting controller code is incorrect
To affect a nested form, you'll be best doing the following:
#app/controllers/recipes_controller.rb
class RecipesController < ApplicationController
   def new
      @recipe = Recipe.new
      @recipe.ingredients.build
   end

   def create
      @recipe = Recipe.new recipe_params
   end

   private

   def recipe_params
       params.require(:recipe).permit(:name, :position, ingredients_attributes: [:name])
   end
end

#app/views/recipes/new.html.erb
<%= form_for @recipe do |f| %>
   <%= f.text_field(:name) %>
   <%= f.select(:position, 1..@recipe_count) %>

   <%= f.fields_for :ingredients do |i| %>
      <%= i.text_field :name %>
   <% end %>
   <%= f.submit %>
<% end %>

This will give you the ability to pass the attributes you require through the "parent" form. The problem you have is that you're trying to embed a form within a form
You'll see how to achieve what you're looking for with this documentation

Fix
You'll be able to remedy your issue by only using a single form
The path error will come from your embedded form (for @ingredient), and will likely be resolved by removing the reference to this from your view (as above)


SRINAGAR, Jan 10: PDF Chairman, Hakeem Yaseen, today said that the people of State have been repeatedly exploited on the promises of restoration of autonomy but their interests were always bartered by these political parties despite getting decisive mandate of the people many times since 1947.
"He said today once again these parties are trying to deceive people in forthcoming elections by raking up autonomy restoration issue to regain their lost power," Yaseen said in a statement.
While cautioning the people against machinations of these power hungry political parties, he said that history was witness how every time they bartered people's mandate for securing their chair when they got an opportunity to forcefully and sincerely use absolute majority in the State Assembly for restoration of the State's internal autonomy since 1947.
While recounting that historical blunders committed by these political parties in this regard, Hakeem Yaseen said that in 1975 late Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah abandoned peacefully going on 30 years Plebiscite movement under Indira-Abdullah accord and revived National conference to get chair with the external support of National Congress but the Government did nothing for the autonomy resolution.
"Then in 1996, a Government with absolute majority came into existence but it did nothing to get its assembly resolution approved from the Centre and it preferred to their Chair than to press for approval of the autonomy resolution passed by the State Assembly," he said, adding had that majority Government exercised its will with sincerity, it could have been a great turnaround in restoration of eroded autonomy of the State.
"It was an irony as to with which face they now try to woe the people on the plank of autonomy to regain their lost power," Hakeem Yaseen ridiculed adding that their report card is in front of the eyes of people and they are wise enough to differentiate between their friends and foes.