text:
Title 40 → Chapter I → Subchapter A → Part 6
PART 6—PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT AND ASSESSING THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ABROAD OF EPA ACTIONS
Subpart A—General Provisions for EPA Actions Subject to NEPA
§6.100 Policy and purpose.
§6.101 Applicability.
§6.102 Definitions.
§6.103 Responsibilities of the NEPA and Responsible Officials.
Subpart B—EPA's NEPA Environmental Review Procedures
§6.200 General requirements.
§6.201 Coordination with other environmental review requirements.
§6.202 Interagency cooperation.
§6.203 Public participation.
§6.204 Categorical exclusions and extraordinary circumstances.
§6.205 Environmental assessments.
§6.206 Findings of no significant impact.
§6.207 Environmental impact statements.
§6.208 Records of decision.
§6.209 Filing requirements for EPA EISs.
§6.210 Emergency circumstances.
Subpart C—Requirements for Environmental Information Documents and Third-Party Agreements for EPA Actions Subject to NEPA
§6.301 Applicant requirements.
§6.302 Responsible Official requirements.
§6.303 Third-party agreements.
Subpart D—Assessing the Environmental Effects Abroad of EPA Actions
§6.400 Purpose and policy.
§6.403 Environmental review and assessment requirements.
§6.404 Lead or cooperating agency.
§6.405 Exemptions and considerations.
§6.406 Implementation.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; also 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508, unless otherwise noted.
Source: 72 FR 53662, Sept. 19, 2007, unless otherwise noted.
(a) The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., as implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500 through 1508), requires that Federal agencies include in their decision-making processes appropriate and careful consideration of all environmental effects of proposed actions, analyze potential environmental effects of proposed actions and their alternatives for public understanding and scrutiny, avoid or minimize adverse effects of proposed actions, and restore and enhance environmental quality to the extent practicable. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) shall integrate these NEPA requirements as early in the Agency planning processes as possible. The environmental review process shall be the focal point to ensure NEPA considerations are taken into account.
(b) Through this part, EPA adopts the CEQ Regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500 through 1508) implementing NEPA; subparts A through C of this part supplement those regulations, for actions proposed by EPA that are subject to NEPA requirements. Subparts A through C supplement, and are to be used in conjunction with, the CEQ Regulations.
(a) Subparts A through C of this part apply to the proposed actions of EPA that are subject to NEPA. EPA actions subject to NEPA include the award of wastewater treatment construction grants under Title II of the Clean Water Act, EPA's issuance of new source National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits under section 402 of the Clean Water Act, certain research and development projects, development and issuance of regulations, EPA actions involving renovations or new construction of facilities, and certain grants awarded for projects authorized by Congress through the Agency's annual Appropriations Act.
(b) Subparts A through C of this part do not apply to EPA actions for which NEPA review is not required. EPA actions under the Clean Water Act, except those identified in §6.101(a), and EPA actions under the Clean Air Act are statutorily exempt from NEPA. Additionally, the courts have determined that certain EPA actions for which analyses that have been conducted under another statute are functionally equivalent with NEPA.
(c) The appropriate Responsible Official will undertake certain EPA actions required by the provisions of subparts A through C of this part.
(d) Certain procedures in subparts A through C of this part apply to the responsibilities of the NEPA Official.
(e) Certain procedures in subparts A through C of this part apply to applicants who are required to provide environmental information to EPA.
(f) When the Responsible Official decides to perform an environmental review under the Policy for EPA's Voluntary Preparation of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents, the Responsible Official generally will follow the procedures set out in subparts A through C of this part.
(a) Subparts A through C of this part use the definitions found at 40 CFR part 1508. Additional definitions are listed in this subpart.
(b) Definitions. (1) Administrator means the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
(2) Applicant means any individual, agency, or other entity that has:
(i) Filed an application for federal assistance;
(ii) Applied to EPA for a permit; or
(iii) Requested other EPA approval.
(3) Assistance agreement means an award of federal assistance in the form of money or property in lieu of money from EPA to an eligible applicant including grants or cooperative agreements.
(4) Environmental information document (EID) means a written analysis prepared by an applicant that provides sufficient information for the Responsible Official to undertake an environmental review and prepare either an EA and FONSI or an EIS and record of decision (ROD) for the proposed action.
(5) Environmental review or NEPA review means the process used to comply with section 102(2) of NEPA or the CEQ Regulations including development, supplementation, adoption, and revision of NEPA documents.
(6) Extraordinary circumstances means those circumstances listed in section 6.204 of this part that may cause a significant environmental effect such that a proposed action that otherwise meets the requirements of a categorical exclusion may not be categorically excluded.
(7) NEPA document is a document prepared pursuant to NEPA.
(8) NEPA Official is the Associate Administrator for the Office of Policy, who is responsible for EPA's NEPA compliance.
(9) Responsible Official means the EPA official responsible for compliance with NEPA for individual proposed actions.
[72 FR 53662, Sept. 19, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 5993, Feb. 4, 2009; 83 FR 48546, Sept. 26, 2018]
(a) The NEPA Official will:
(1) Ensure EPA's compliance with NEPA pursuant to 40 CFR 1507.2(a) and the regulations in subparts A through C of this part.
(2) Act as EPA's liaison with the CEQ and other federal agencies, state and local governments, and federally-recognized Indian tribes on matters of policy and administrative procedures regarding compliance with NEPA.
(3) Approve procedural deviations from subparts A through C of this part.
(4) Monitor the overall timeliness and quality of EPA's compliance with subparts A through C of this part.
(5) Advise the Administrator on NEPA-related actions that involve more than one EPA office, are highly controversial, are nationally significant, or establish new EPA NEPA-related policy.
(6) Support the Administrator by providing policy guidance on NEPA-related issues.
(7) Assist EPA's Responsible Officials with establishing and maintaining adequate administrative procedures to comply with subparts A through C of this part, performing their NEPA duties, and training personnel and applicants involved in the environmental review process.
(8) Consult with Responsible Officials and CEQ regarding proposed changes to subpart A through C of this part, including:
(i) The addition, amendment, or deletion of a categorical exclusion, or
(ii) Changes to the listings of types of actions that normally require the preparation of an EA or EIS.
(9) Determine whether proposed changes are appropriate, and if so, coordinate with CEQ, pursuant to 40 CFR 1507.3, and initiate a process to amend this part.
(b) The Responsible Official will:
(1) Ensure EPA's compliance with the CEQ regulations and subparts A through C of this part for proposed actions.
(2) Ensure that environmental reviews are conducted on proposed actions at the earliest practicable point in EPA's decision-making process and in accordance with the provisions of subparts A through C of this part.
(3) Ensure, to the extent practicable, early and continued involvement of interested federal agencies, state and local governments, federally-recognized Indian tribes, and affected applicants in the environmental review process.
(4) Coordinate with the NEPA Official and other Responsible Officials, as appropriate, on resolving issues involving EPA-wide NEPA policy and procedures (including the addition, amendment, or deletion of a categorical exclusion and changes to the listings of the types of actions that normally requires the preparation of an EA or EIS) and/or unresolved conflicts with other federal agencies, state and local governments, and federally-recognized Indian tribes, and/or advising the Administrator when necessary.
(5) Coordinate with other Responsible Officials, as appropriate, on NEPA-related actions involving their specific interests.
(6) Consistent with national NEPA guidance, provide specific policy guidance, as appropriate, and ensure that the Responsible Official's office establishes and maintains adequate administrative procedures to comply with subparts A through C of this part.
(7) Upon request of an applicant and consistent with 40 CFR 1501.8, set time limits on the NEPA review appropriate to individual proposed actions.
(8) Make decisions relating to the preparation of the appropriate NEPA documents, including preparing an EA or EIS, and signing the decision document.
(9) Monitor the overall timeliness and quality of the Responsible Official's respective office's efforts to comply with subparts A through C of this part.
(c) The NEPA Official and the Responsible Officials may delegate NEPA-related responsibilities to a level no lower than the Branch Chief or equivalent organizational level.
(a) The Responsible Official must determine whether the proposed action meets the criteria for categorical exclusion or whether it requires preparation of an EA or an EIS to identify and evaluate its environmental impacts. The Responsible Official may decide to prepare an EIS without first undertaking an EA.
(b) The Responsible Official must determine the scope of the environmental review by considering the type of proposed action, the reasonable alternatives, and the type of environmental impacts. The scope of an EIS will be determined as provided in 40 CFR 1508.25.
(c) During the environmental review process, the Responsible Official must:
(1) Integrate the NEPA process and the procedures of subparts A through C of this part into early planning to ensure appropriate consideration of NEPA's policies and to minimize or eliminate delay;
(2) Emphasize cooperative consultation among federal agencies, state and local governments, and federally-recognized Indian tribes before an EA or EIS is prepared to help ensure compliance with the procedural provisions of subparts A through C of this part and with other environmental review requirements, to address the need for interagency cooperation, to identify the requirements for other agencies' reviews, and to ensure appropriate public participation.
(3) Identify at an early stage any potentially significant environmental issues to be evaluated in detail and insignificant issues to be de-emphasized, focusing the scope of the environmental review accordingly;
(4) Involve other agencies and the public, as appropriate, in the environmental review process for proposed actions that are not categorically excluded to:
(i) Identify the federal, state, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal entities and the members of the public that may have an interest in the action;
(ii) Request that appropriate federal, state, and local agencies and federally-recognized Indian tribes serve as cooperating agencies consistent with 40 CFR 1501.6 and 1508.5; and
(iii) Integrate, where possible, review of applicable federal laws and executive orders into the environmental review process in conjunction with the development of NEPA documents.
(d) When preparing NEPA documents, the Responsible Official must:
(1) Utilize a systematic, interdisciplinary approach to integrate the natural and social sciences with the environmental design arts in planning and making decisions on proposed actions subject to environmental review under subparts A through C of this part (see 40 CFR 1501.2(a) and 1507.2);
(2) Plan adequate time and funding for the NEPA review and preparation of the NEPA documents. Planning includes consideration of whether an applicant will be required to prepare an EID for the proposed action.
(3) Review relevant planning or decision-making documents, whether prepared by EPA or another federal agency, to determine if the proposed action or any of its alternatives have been considered in a prior federal NEPA document. EPA may adopt the existing document, or will incorporate by reference any pertinent part of it, consistent with 40 CFR 1506.3 and 1502.21.
(4) Review relevant environmental review documents prepared by a state or local government or a federally-recognized Indian tribe to determine if the proposed action or any of its alternatives have been considered in such a document. EPA will incorporate by reference any pertinent part of that document consistent with 40 CFR 1502.21.
(e) During the decision-making process for the proposed action, the Responsible Official must:
(1) Incorporate the NEPA review in decision-making on the action. Processing and review of an applicant's application must proceed concurrently with the NEPA review procedures set out in subparts A through C of this part. EPA must complete its NEPA review before making a decision on the action.
(2) Consider the relevant NEPA documents, public and other agency comments (if any) on those documents, and EPA responses to those comments, as part of consideration of the action (see 40 CFR 1505.1(d)).
(3) Consider the alternatives analyzed in an EA or EIS before rendering a decision on the action; and
(4) Ensure that the decision on the action is to implement an alternative analyzed or is within the range of alternatives analyzed in the EA or EIS (see 40 CFR 1505.1(e)).
(f) To eliminate duplication and to foster efficiency, the Responsible Official should use tiering (see 40 CFR 1502.20 and 1508.28) and incorporate material by reference (see 40 CFR 1502.21) as appropriate.
(g) For applicant-related proposed actions:
(1) The Responsible Official may request that the applicant submit information to support the application of a categorical exclusion to the applicant's pending action.
(2) The Responsible Official may gather the information and prepare the NEPA document without assistance from the applicant, or, pursuant to Subpart C of this part, have the applicant prepare an EID or a draft EA and supporting documents, or enter into a third-party agreement with the applicant.
(3) During the environmental review process, applicants may continue to compile additional information needed for the environmental review and/or information necessary to support an application for a permit or assistance agreement from EPA.
(h) For all NEPA determinations (CEs, EA/FONSIs, or EIS/RODs) that are five years old or older, and for which the subject action has not yet been implemented, the Responsible Official must re-evaluate the proposed action, environmental conditions, and public views to determine whether to conduct a supplemental environmental review of the action and complete an appropriate NEPA document or reaffirm EPA's original NEPA determination. If there has been substantial change in the proposed action that is relevant to environmental concerns, or if there are significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed action or its impacts, the Responsible Official must conduct a supplemental environmental review of the action and complete an appropriate NEPA document.
Consistent with 40 CFR 1500.5(g) and 1502.25, the Responsible Official must determine the applicability of other environmental laws and executive orders, to the fullest extent possible. The Responsible Official should incorporate applicable requirements as early in the NEPA review process as possible.
(a) Consistent with 40 CFR 1501.5, 1501.6, and 1508.5, the Responsible Official will request other appropriate federal and non-federal agencies to be joint lead or cooperating agencies as a means of encouraging early coordination and cooperation with federal agencies, state and local governments, and federally-recognized Indian tribes with jurisdiction by law or special expertise.
(b) For an EPA action related to an action of any other federal agency, the Responsible Official must comply with the requirements of 40 CFR 1501.5 and 1501.6 relating to lead agencies and cooperating agencies, respectively. The Responsible Official will work with the other involved agencies to facilitate coordination and to reduce delay and duplication.
(c) To prepare a single document to fulfill both NEPA and state or local government, or federally-recognized Indian tribe requirements, consistent with 40 CFR 1506.2, the Responsible Official should enter into a written agreement with the involved state or local government, or federally-recognized Indian tribe that sets out the intentions of the parties, including the responsibilities each party intends to assume and procedures the parties intend to follow.
(a) General requirements. (1) The procedures in this section apply to EPA's environmental review processes, including development, supplementation, adoption, and revision of NEPA documents.
(2) The Responsible Official will make diligent efforts to involve the public, including applicants, in the preparation of EAs or EISs consistent with 40 CFR 1501.4 and 1506.6 and applicable EPA public participation regulations (e.g., 40 CFR Part 25).
(3) EPA NEPA documents will use plain language to the extent possible.
(4) The Responsible Official will, to the greatest extent possible, give notice to any state or local government, or federally-recognized Indian tribe that, in the Official's judgment, may be affected by an action for which EPA plans to prepare an EA or an EIS.
(5) The Responsible Official must use appropriate communication procedures to ensure meaningful public participation throughout the NEPA process. The Responsible Official must make reasonable efforts to involve the potentially affected communities where the proposed action is expected to have environmental impacts or where the proposed action may have human health or environmental effects in any communities, including minority communities, low-income communities, or federally-recognized Indian tribal communities.
(b) EA and FONSI requirements. (1) At least thirty (30) calendar days before making the decision on whether, and if so how, to proceed with a proposed action, the Responsible Official must make the EA and preliminary FONSI available for review and comment to the interested federal agencies, state and local governments, federally-recognized Indian tribes and the affected public. The Responsible Official must respond to any substantive comments received and finalize the EA and FONSI before making a decision on the proposed action.
(2) Where circumstances make it necessary to take the action without observing the 30 calendar day comment period, the Responsible Official must notify the NEPA Official before taking such action. If the NEPA Official determines that a reduced comment period would be in the best interest of the Government, the NEPA Official will inform the Responsible Official, as soon as possible, of this approval. The Responsible Official will make the EA and preliminary FONSI available for review and comment for the reduced comment period.
(c) EIS and ROD requirements. (1) As soon as practicable after the decision to prepare an EIS and before beginning the scoping process, the Responsible Official must ensure that a notice of intent (NOI) (see 40 CFR 1508.22) is published in the Federal Register. The NOI must briefly describe the proposed action; a preliminary list of environmental issues to be analyzed, and possible alternatives; EPA's proposed scoping process including, if available, whether, when, and where any scoping meeting will be held; and the name and contact information for the person designated by EPA to answer questions about the proposed action and the EIS. The NOI must invite comments and suggestions on the scope of the EIS.
(2) The Responsible Official must disseminate the NOI consistent with 40 CFR 1506.6.
(3) The Responsible Official must conduct the scoping process consistent with 40 CFR 1501.7 and any applicable EPA public participation regulations (e.g., 40 CFR Part 25).
(i) Publication of the NOI in the Federal Register begins the scoping process.
(ii) The Responsible Official must ensure that the scoping process for an EIS allows a minimum of thirty (30) days for the receipt of public comments.
(iii) The Responsible Official may hold one or more public meetings as part of the scoping process for an EPA EIS. The Responsible Official must announce the location, date, and time of public scoping meetings in the NOI or by other appropriate means, such as additional notices in the Federal Register, news releases to the local media, or letters to affected parties. Public scoping meetings should be held at least fifteen (15) days after public notification.
(iv) The Responsible Official must use appropriate means to publicize the availability of draft and final EISs and the time and place for public meetings or hearings on draft EISs. The methods chosen for public participation must focus on reaching persons who may be interested in the proposed action. Such persons include those in potentially affected communities where the proposed action is known or expected to have environmental impacts including minority communities, low-income communities, or federally-recognized Indian tribal communities.
(v) The Responsible Official must circulate the draft and final EISs consistent with 40 CFR 1502.19 and any applicable EPA public participation regulations and in accordance with the 45-day public review period for draft EISs and the 30-day public review period for final EISs (see §6.209 of this part). Consistent with section 6.209(b) of this part, the Responsible Official may establish a longer public comment period for a draft or final EIS.
(vi) After preparing a draft EIS and before preparing a final EIS, the Responsible Official must solicit the comments of appropriate federal agencies, state and/or local governments, and/or federally-recognized Indian tribes, and the public (see 40 CFR 1503.1). The Responsible Official must respond in the final EIS to substantive comments received (see 40 CFR 1503.4).
(vii) The Responsible Official may conduct one or more public meetings or hearings on the draft EIS as part of the public involvement process. If meetings or hearings are held, the Responsible Official must make the draft EIS available to the public at least thirty (30) days in advance of any meeting or hearing.
(4) The Responsible Official must make the ROD available to the public upon request.
(a) A proposed action may be categorically excluded if the action fits within a category of action that is eligible for exclusion and the proposed action does not involve any extraordinary circumstances.
(1) Certain actions eligible for categorical exclusion require the Responsible Official to document a determination that a categorical exclusion applies. The documentation must include: A brief description of the proposed action; a statement identifying the categorical exclusion that applies to the action; and a statement explaining why no extraordinary circumstances apply to the proposed action. The Responsible Official must make a copy of the determination document available to the public upon request. The categorical exclusions requiring this documentation are listed in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (a)(1)(v) of this section.
(i) Actions at EPA owned or operated facilities involving routine facility maintenance, repair, and grounds-keeping; minor rehabilitation, restoration, renovation, or revitalization of existing facilities; functional replacement of equipment; acquisition and installation of equipment; or construction of new minor ancillary facilities adjacent to or on the same property as existing facilities.
(ii) Actions relating to existing infrastructure systems (such as sewer systems; drinking water supply systems; and stormwater systems, including combined sewer overflow systems) that involve minor upgrading, or minor expansion of system capacity or rehabilitation (including functional replacement) of the existing system and system components (such as the sewer collection network and treatment system; the system to collect, treat, store and distribute drinking water; and stormwater systems, including combined sewer overflow systems) or construction of new minor ancillary facilities adjacent to or on the same property as existing facilities. This category does not include actions that: involve new or relocated discharges to surface or ground water; will likely result in the substantial increase in the volume or the loading of pollutant to the receiving water; will provide capacity to serve a population 30% greater than the existing population; are not supported by the state, or other regional growth plan or strategy; or directly or indirectly involve or relate to upgrading or extending infrastructure systems primarily for the purposes of future development.
(iii) Actions in unsewered communities involving the replacement of existing onsite systems, providing the new onsite systems do not result in substantial increases in the volume of discharge or the loadings of pollutants from existing sources, or relocate existing discharge.
(iv) Actions involving re-issuance of a NPDES permit for a new source providing the conclusions of the original NEPA document are still valid (including the appropriate mitigation), there will be no degradation of the receiving waters, and the permit conditions do not change or are more environmentally protective.
(v) Actions for award of grants authorized by Congress under EPA's annual Appropriations Act that are solely for reimbursement of the costs of a project that was completed prior to the date the appropriation was enacted.
(2) Certain actions eligible for categorical exclusion do not require the Responsible Official to document a determination that a categorical exclusion applies. These categorical exclusions are listed in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (a)(2)(x) of this section.
(i) Procedural, ministerial, administrative, financial, personnel, and management actions necessary to support the normal conduct of EPA business.
(ii) Acquisition actions (compliant with applicable procedures for sustainable or "green" procurement) and contracting actions necessary to support the normal conduct of EPA business.
(iii) Actions involving information collection, dissemination, or exchange; planning; monitoring and sample collection wherein no significant alteration of existing ambient conditions occurs; educational and training programs; literature searches and studies; computer studies and activities; research and analytical activities; development of compliance assistance tools; and architectural and engineering studies. These actions include those conducted directly by EPA and EPA actions relating to contracts or assistance agreements involving such actions.
(iv) Actions relating to or conducted completely within a permanent, existing contained facility, such as a laboratory, or other enclosed building, provided that reliable and scientifically-sound methods are used to appropriately dispose of wastes and safeguards exist to prevent hazardous, toxic, and radioactive materials in excess of allowable limits from entering the environment. Where such activities are conducted at laboratories, the Lab Director or other appropriate official must certify in writing that the laboratory follows good laboratory practices and adheres to all applicable federal, state, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal laws and regulations. This category does not include activities related to construction and/or demolition within the facility (see paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section).
(v) Actions involving emergency preparedness planning and training activities.
(vi) Actions involving the acquisition, transfer, lease, disposition, or closure of existing permanent structures, land, equipment, materials or personal property provided that the property: Is either vacant or has been used solely for office functions; has never been used for laboratory purposes by any party; does not require site remediation; and will be used in essentially the same manner such that the type and magnitude of the impacts will not change substantially. This category does not include activities related to construction and/or demolition of structures on the property (see paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section).
(vii) Actions involving providing technical advice to federal agencies, state or local governments, federally-recognized Indian tribes, foreign governments, or public or private entities.
(viii) Actions involving approval of EPA participation in international "umbrella" agreements for cooperation in environmental-related activities that would not commit the United States to any specific projects or actions.
(ix) Actions involving containment or removal and disposal of asbestos-containing material or lead-based paint from EPA owned or operated facilities when undertaken in accordance with applicable regulations.
(x) Actions involving new source NPDES permit modifications that make only technical corrections to the NPDES permit (such as correcting typographical errors) that do not result in a change in environmental impacts or conditions.
(b) The Responsible Official must review actions eligible for categorical exclusion to determine whether any extraordinary circumstances are involved. Extraordinary circumstances are listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(10) of this section. (See 40 CFR 1508.4.)
(1) The proposed action is known or expected to have potentially significant environmental impacts on the quality of the human environment either individually or cumulatively over time.
(2) The proposed action is known or expected to have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on any community, including minority communities, low-income communities, or federally-recognized Indian tribal communities.
(3) The proposed action is known or expected to significantly affect federally listed threatened or endangered species or their critical habitat.
(4) The proposed action is known or expected to significantly affect national natural landmarks or any property with nationally significant historic, architectural, prehistoric, archeological, or cultural value, including but not limited to, property listed on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
(5) The proposed action is known or expected to significantly affect environmentally important natural resource areas such as wetlands, floodplains, significant agricultural lands, aquifer recharge zones, coastal zones, barrier islands, wild and scenic rivers, and significant fish or wildlife habitat.
(6) The proposed action is known or expected to cause significant adverse air quality effects.
(7) The proposed action is known or expected to have a significant effect on the pattern and type of land use (industrial, commercial, agricultural, recreational, residential) or growth and distribution of population including altering the character of existing residential areas, or may not be consistent with state or local government, or federally-recognized Indian tribe approved land use plans or federal land management plans.
(8) The proposed action is known or expected to cause significant public controversy about a potential environmental impact of the proposed action.
(9) The proposed action is known or expected to be associated with providing financial assistance to a federal agency through an interagency agreement for a project that is known or expected to have potentially significant environmental impacts.
(10) The proposed action is known or expected to conflict with federal, state or local government, or federally-recognized Indian tribe environmental, resource-protection, or land-use laws or regulations.
(c) The Responsible Official may request that an applicant submit sufficient information to enable the Responsible Official to determine whether a categorical exclusion applies to the applicant's proposed action or whether an exceptional circumstance applies. Pursuant to Subpart C of this part, applicants are not required to prepare EIDs for actions that are being considered for categorical exclusion.
(d) The Responsible Official must prepare an EA or EIS when a proposed action involves extraordinary circumstances.
(e) After a determination has been made that a categorical exclusion applies to an action, if new information or changes in the proposed action involve or relate to at least one of the extraordinary circumstances or otherwise indicate that the action may not meet the criteria for categorical exclusion and the Responsible Official determines that an action no longer qualifies for a categorical exclusion, the Responsible Official will prepare an EA or EIS.
(f) The Responsible Official, or other interested parties, may request the addition, amendment, or deletion of a categorical exclusion.
(1) Such requests must be made in writing, be directed to the NEPA Official, and contain adequate information to support and justify the request.
(2) Proposed new categories of actions for exclusion must meet these criteria:
(i) Actions covered by the proposed categorical exclusion generally do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment and have been found by EPA to have no such effect.
(ii) Actions covered by the proposed categorical exclusion generally do not involve extraordinary circumstances as set out in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(10) of this section and generally do not require preparation of an EIS; and
(iii) Information adequate to determine that a proposed action is properly covered by the proposed category will generally be available.
(3) The NEPA Official must determine that the addition, amendment, or deletion of a categorical exclusion is appropriate.
(g) Any addition, amendment, or deletion of a categorical exclusion will be done by rule-making and in coordination with CEQ pursuant to 40 CFR 1507.3 to amend paragraph (a)(1) or paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
[72 FR 53662, Sept. 19, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 5993, Feb. 4, 2009]
(a) The Responsible Official must prepare an environmental assessment (EA) (see 40 CFR 1508.9) for a proposed action that is expected to result in environmental impacts and the significance of the impacts is not known. An EA is not required if the proposed action is categorically excluded, or if the Responsible Official has decided to prepare an EIS. (See 40 CFR 1501.3.)
(b) Types of actions that normally require the preparation of an EA include:
(1) The award of wastewater treatment construction grants under Title II of the Clean Water Act;
(2) EPA's issuance of new source NPDES permits under section 402 of the Clean Water Act;
(3) EPA actions involving renovations or new construction of facilities;
(4) Certain grants awarded for special projects authorized by Congress through the Agency's annual Appropriations Act; and
(5) Research and development projects, such as initial field demonstration of a new technology, field trials of a new product or new uses of an existing technology, alteration of a local habitat by physical or chemical means, or actions that may result in the release of radioactive, hazardous, or toxic substances, or biota.
(c) The Responsible Official, or other interested parties, may request changes to the list of actions that normally require the preparation of an EA (i.e., the addition, amendment, or deletion of a type of action).
(d) Consistent with 40 CFR 1508.9, an EA must provide sufficient information and analysis for determining whether to prepare an EIS or to issue a FONSI (see 40 CFR 1508.9(a)), and may include analyses needed for other environmental determinations. The EA must focus on resources that might be impacted and any environmental issues that are of public concern.
(e) An EA must include:
(1) A brief discussion of:
(i) The need for the proposed action;
(ii) The alternatives, including the no action alternative (which must be assessed even when the proposed action is specifically required by legislation or a court order);
(iii) The affected environment, including baseline conditions that may be impacted by the proposed action and alternatives;
(iv) The environmental impacts of the proposed action and alternatives, including any unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources; and
(v) Other applicable environmental laws and executive orders.
(2) A listing or summary of any coordination or consultation undertaken with any federal agency, state or local government, or federally-recognized Indian tribe regarding compliance with applicable laws and executive orders;
(3) Identification and description of any mitigation measures considered, including any mitigation measures that must be adopted to ensure the action will not have significant impacts; and
(4) Incorporation of documents by reference, if appropriate, including, when available, the EID for the action.
(a) The Responsible Official may issue a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) (see 40 CFR 1508.13) only if the EA supports the finding that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the human environment. If the EA does not support a FONSI, the Responsible Official must prepare an EIS and issue a ROD before taking action on the proposed action.
(b) Consistent with 40 CFR 1508.13, a FONSI must include:
(1) The EA, or in lieu of the EA, a summary of the supporting EA that includes a brief description of the proposed action and alternatives considered in the EA, environmental factors considered, and project impacts; and
(2) A brief description of the reasons why there are no significant impacts.
(c) In addition, the FONSI must include:
(1) Any commitments to mitigation that are essential to render the impacts of the proposed action not significant;
(2) The date of issuance; and
(3) The signature of the Responsible Official.
(d) The Responsible Official must ensure that an applicant that has committed to mitigation possesses the authority and ability to fulfill the commitments.
(e) The Responsible Official must make a preliminary FONSI available to the public in accordance with section 6.203(b) of this part before taking action.
(f) The Responsible Official may proceed with the action subject to any mitigation measures described in the FONSI after responding to any substantive comments received on the preliminary FONSI during the 30-day comment period, or 30 days after issuance of the FONSI if no substantive comments are received.
(g) The Responsible Official must ensure that the mitigation measures necessary to the FONSI determination, at a minimum, are enforceable, and conduct appropriate monitoring of the mitigation measures.
(h) The Responsible Official may revise a FONSI at any time provided the revision is supported by an EA. A revised FONSI is subject to all provisions of paragraph (d) of this section.
(a) The Responsible Official will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) (see 40 CFR 1508.11) for major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, including actions for which the EA analysis demonstrates that significant impacts will occur that will not be reduced or eliminated by changes to or mitigation of the proposed action.
(1) EISs are normally prepared for the following actions:
(i) New regional wastewater treatment facilities or water supply systems for a community with a population greater than 100,000.
(ii) Expansions of existing wastewater treatment facilities that will increase existing discharge to an impaired water by greater than 10 million gallons per day (mgd).
(iii) Issuance of new source NPDES permit for a new major industrial discharge.
(iv) Issuance of a new source NPDES permit for a new oil/gas development and production operation on the outer continental shelf.
(v) Issuance of a new source NPDES permit for a deepwater port with a projected discharge in excess of 10 mgd.
(2) The Responsible Official, or other interested party, may request changes to the list of actions that normally require the preparation of an EIS (i.e., the addition, amendment, or deletion of a type of action).
(3) A proposed action normally requires an EIS if it meets any of the following criteria. (See 40 CFR 1507.3(b)(2)).
(i) The proposed action would result in a discharge of treated effluent from a new or modified existing facility into a body of water and the discharge is likely to have a significant effect on the quality of the receiving waters.
(ii) The proposed action is likely to directly, or through induced development, have significant adverse effect upon local ambient air quality or local ambient noise levels.
(iii). The proposed action is likely to have significant adverse effects on surface water reservoirs or navigation projects.
(iv) The proposed action would be inconsistent with state or local government, or federally-recognized Indian tribe approved land use plans or regulations, or federal land management plans.
(v) The proposed action would be inconsistent with state or local government, or federally-recognized Indian tribe environmental, resource-protection, or land-use laws and regulations for protection of the environment.
(vi) The proposed action is likely to significantly affect the environment through the release of radioactive, hazardous or toxic substances, or biota.
(vii) The proposed action involves uncertain environmental effects or highly unique environmental risks that are likely to be significant.
(viii) The proposed action is likely to significantly affect national natural landmarks or any property on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
(ix) The proposed action is likely to significantly affect environmentally important natural resources such as wetlands, significant agricultural lands, aquifer recharge zones, coastal zones, barrier islands, wild and scenic rivers, and significant fish or wildlife habitat.
(x) The proposed action in conjunction with related federal, state or local government, or federally-recognized Indian tribe projects is likely to produce significant cumulative impacts.
(xi) The proposed action is likely to significantly affect the pattern and type of land use (industrial, commercial, recreational, residential) or growth and distribution of population including altering the character of existing residential areas.
(4) An EIS must be prepared consistent with 40 CFR Part 1502.
(b) When appropriate, the Responsible Official will prepare a legislative EIS consistent with 40 CFR 1506.8.
(c) In preparing an EIS, the Responsible Official must determine if an applicant, other federal agencies or state or local governments, or federally-recognized Indian tribes are involved with the project and apply the applicable provisions of §6.202 and Subpart C of this part.
(d) An EIS must:
(1) Comply with all requirements at 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508.
(2) Analyze all reasonable alternatives and the no action alternative (which may be the same as denying the action). Assess the no action alternative even when the proposed action is specifically required by legislation or a court order.
(3) Describe the potentially affected environment including, as appropriate, the size and location of new and existing facilities, land requirements, operation and maintenance requirements, auxiliary structures such as pipelines or transmission lines, and construction schedules.
(4) Summarize any coordination or consultation undertaken with any federal agency, state and/or local government, and/or federally-recognized Indian tribe, including copies or summaries of relevant correspondence.
(5) Summarize any public meetings held during the scoping process including the date, time, place, and purpose of the meetings. The final EIS must summarize the public participation process including the date, time, place, and purpose of meetings or hearings held after publication of the draft EIS.
(6) Consider substantive comments received during the public participation process. The draft EIS must consider the substantive comments received during the scoping process. The final EIS must include or summarize all substantive comments received on the draft EIS, respond to any substantive comments on the draft EIS, and explain any changes to the draft EIS and the reason for the changes.
(7) Include the names and qualifications of the persons primarily responsible for preparing the EIS including an EIS prepared under a third-party contract (if applicable), significant background papers, and the EID (if applicable).
(e) The Responsible Official must prepare a supplemental EIS when appropriate, consistent with 40 CFR 1502.9.
(a) The Responsible Official may not make any decisions on the action until the time periods in 40 CFR 1506.10 have been met.
(b) A record of decision (ROD) records EPA's decision on the action. Consistent with 40 CFR 1505.2, a ROD must include:
(1) A brief description of the proposed action and alternatives considered in the EIS, environmental factors considered, and project impacts;
(2) Any commitments to mitigation; and
(3) An explanation if the environmentally preferred alternative was not selected.
(c) In addition, the ROD must include:
(1) Responses to any substantive comments on the final EIS;
(d) The Responsible Official must ensure that an applicant that has committed to mitigation possesses the authority and ability to fulfill the commitment.
(e) The Responsible Official must make a ROD available to the public.
(f) Upon issuance of the ROD, the Responsible Official may proceed with the action subject to any mitigation measures described in the ROD. The Responsible Official must ensure adequate monitoring of mitigation measures identified in the ROD.
(g) If the mitigation identified in the ROD will be included as a condition in the permit or grant, the Responsible Official must ensure that EPA has the authority to impose the conditions. The Responsible Official should ensure that compliance with assistance agreement or permit conditions will be monitored and enforced under EPA's assistance agreement and permit authorities.
(h) The Responsible Official may revise a ROD at any time provided the revision is supported by an EIS. A revised ROD is subject to all provisions of paragraph (d) of this section.
(a) The Responsible Official must file an EIS with the NEPA Official no earlier than the date the document is transmitted to commenting agencies and made available to the public. The Responsible Official must comply with any guidelines established by the NEPA Official for the filing system process and comply with 40 CFR 1506.9 and 1506.10. The review periods are computed through the filing system process and published in the Federal Register in the Notice of Availability.
(b) The Responsible Official may request that the NEPA Official extend the review periods for an EIS. The NEPA Official will publish notice of an extension of the review period in the Federal Register and notify the CEQ.
If emergency circumstances make it necessary to take an action that has a significant environmental impact without observing the provisions of subparts A through C of this part that are required by the CEQ Regulations, the Responsible Official must consult with the NEPA Official at the earliest possible time. Consistent with 40 CFR 1506.11, the Responsible Official and the NEPA Official should consult with CEQ about alternative arrangements at the earliest opportunity. Actions taken without observing the provisions of subparts A through C of this part will be limited to actions necessary to control the immediate impacts of the emergency; other actions remain subject to the environmental review process.
(a) This section applies to actions that involve applications to EPA for permits or assistance agreements, or request other EPA approval.
(b) The Responsible Official is responsible for the environmental review process on EPA's action (that is, issuing the permit or awarding the assistance agreement) with the applicant contributing through submission of an EID or a draft EA and supporting documents.
(c) An applicant is not required to prepare an EID when:
(1) The action has been categorically excluded or requires the preparation of an EIS; or
(2) The applicant will prepare and submit a draft EA and supporting documents.
(d) The Responsible Official must notify the applicant if EPA will not require submission of an EID.
(a) The applicant must prepare an EID in consultation with the Responsible Official, unless the Responsible Official has notified the applicant that an EID is not required. The EID must be of sufficient scope and content to enable the Responsible Official to prepare an EA and FONSI or, if necessary, an EIS and ROD. The applicant must submit the EID to the Responsible Official.
(b) The applicant must consult with the Responsible Official as early as possible in the planning process to obtain guidance with respect to the appropriate level and scope of environmental information required for the EID.
(c) As part of the EID process, the applicant may consult with appropriate federal agencies, state and local governments, federally-recognized Indian tribes, and other potentially affected parties to identify their interests in the project and the environmental issues associated with the project.
(d) The applicant must notify the Responsible Official as early as possible of other federal agency, state or local government, or federally-recognized Indian tribe requirements related to the project. The applicant also must notify the Responsible Official of any private entities and organizations affected by the proposed project. (See 40 CFR 1501.2(d)(2).)
(e) The applicant must notify the Responsible Official if, during EPA's environmental review process, the applicant:
(1) Changes its plans for the project as originally submitted to EPA; and/or
(2) Changes its schedule for the project from that originally submitted to EPA.
(f) In accordance with §6.204, where appropriate, the applicant may request a categorical exclusion determination by the Responsible Official. If requested by the Responsible Official, the applicant must submit information to the Responsible Official regarding the application of a categorical exclusion to EPA's pending action and the applicant's project.
(a) Consistent with 40 CFR 1501.2(d), the Responsible Official must ensure early involvement of applicants in the environmental review process to identify environmental effects, avoid delays, and resolve conflicts.
(b) The Responsible Official must notify the applicant if a determination has been made that the action has been categorically excluded, or if EPA needs additional information to support the application of a categorical exclusion or if the submitted information does not support the application of a categorical exclusion and that an EA, or an EIS, will be required.
(c) When an EID is required for a project, the Responsible Official must consult with the applicant and provide the applicant with guidance describing the scope and level of environmental information required.
(1) The Responsible Official must provide guidance on a project-by-project basis to any applicant seeking such assistance. For major categories of actions involving a large number of applicants, the Responsible Official may prepare and make available generic guidance describing the recommended level and scope of environmental information that applicants should provide.
(2) The Responsible Official must consider the extent to which the applicant is capable of providing the required information. The Responsible Official may not require the applicant to gather data or perform analyses that unnecessarily duplicate either existing data or the results of existing analyses available to EPA. The Responsible Official must limit the request for environmental information to that necessary for the environmental review.
(d) If, prior to completion of the environmental review for a project, the Responsible Official receives notification, that the applicant is proposing to or taking an action that would result in significant impacts or would limit alternatives, the Responsible Official must notify the applicant promptly that EPA will take appropriate action to ensure that the objectives and procedures of NEPA are achieved (see 40 CFR 1506.1(b)). Such actions may include withholding grant funds or denial of permits.
(e) The Responsible Official must begin the NEPA review as soon as possible after receiving the applicant's EID or draft EA. The Responsible Official must independently evaluate the information submitted and be responsible for its accuracy (see 40 CFR 1506.5).
(f) At the request of an applicant and at the discretion of the Responsible Official, an applicant may prepare an EA or EIS and supporting documents or enter into a third-party contract pursuant to §6.303.
(g) The Responsible Official must review, and take responsibility for the completed NEPA documents, before rendering a final decision on the proposed action.
(a) If an EA or EIS is to be prepared for an action subject to subparts A through C of this part, the Responsible Official and the applicant may enter into an agreement whereby the applicant engages and pays for the services of a third-party contractor to prepare an EA or EIS and any associated documents for consideration by EPA. In such cases, the Responsible Official must approve the qualifications of the third-party contractor. The third-party contractor must be selected on the basis of ability and absence of any conflict of interest. Consistent with 40 CFR 1506.5(c), in consultation with the applicant, the Responsible Official shall select the contractor. The Responsible Official must provide guidance to the applicant and contractor regarding the information to be developed, including the project's scope, and guide and participate in the collection, analysis, and presentation of the information. The Responsible Official has sole authority for final approval of and EA or EIS.
(1) The applicant must engage and pay for the services of a contractor to prepare the EA or EIS and any associated documents without using EPA financial assistance (including required match).
(2) The Responsible Official, in consultation with the applicant, must ensure that the contractor is qualified to prepare an EA or EIS, and that the substantive terms of the contract specify the information to be developed, and the procedures for gathering, analyzing and presenting the information.
(3) The Responsible Official must prepare a disclosure statement for the applicant to include in the contract specifying that the contractor has no financial or other interest in the outcome of the project (see 40 CFR 1506.5(c)).
(4) The Responsible Official will ensure that the EA or EIS and any associated documents contain analyses and conclusions that adequately assess the relevant environmental issues.
(b) In order to make a decision on the action, the Responsible Official must independently evaluate the information submitted in the EA or EIS and any associated documents, and issue an EA or draft and final EIS. After review of, and appropriate changes to, the EA or EIS submitted by the applicant, the Responsible Official may accept it as EPA's document. The Responsible Official is responsible for the scope, accuracy, and contents of the EA or EIS and any associated documents (see 40 CFR 1506.5).
(c) A third-party agreement may not be initiated unless both the applicant and the Responsible Official agree to its creation and terms.
(d) The terms of the contract between the applicant and the third-party contractor must ensure that the contractor does not have recourse to EPA for financial or other claims arising under the contract, and that the Responsible Official, or other EPA designee, may give technical advice to the contractor.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321, note, E.O. 12114, 44 FR 1979, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 356.
(a) Purpose. On January 4, 1979, the President signed Executive Order 12114 entitled "Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions." The purpose of this Executive Order is to enable responsible Federal officials in carrying out or approving major Federal actions which affect foreign nations or the global commons to be informed of pertinent environmental considerations and to consider fully the environmental impacts of the actions undertaken. While based on independent authority, this Order furthers the purpose of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA) (33 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.). It should be noted, however, that in fulfilling its responsibilities under Executive Order 12114, EPA shall be guided by CEQ regulations only to the extent that they are made expressly applicable by this subpart. The procedures set forth below reflect EPA's duties and responsibilities as required under the Executive Order and satisfy the requirement for issuance of procedures under section 2-1 of the Executive Order.
(b) Policy. It shall be the policy of this Agency to carry out the purpose and requirements of the Executive Order to the fullest extent possible. EPA, within the realm of its expertise, shall work with the Department of State and the Council on Environmental Quality to provide information to other Federal agencies and foreign nations to heighten awareness of and interest in the environment. EPA shall further cooperate to the extent possible with Federal agencies to lend special expertise and assistance in the preparation of required environmental documents under the Executive Order. EPA shall perform environmental reviews of activities significantly affecting the global commons and foreign nations as required under Executive Order 12114 and as set forth under these procedures.
(a) Administrative actions requiring environmental review. The environmental review requirements apply to the activities of EPA as follows:
(1) Major research or demonstration projects which affect the global commons or a foreign nation.
(2) Ocean dumping activities carried out under section 102 of the MPRSA which affect the related environment.
(3) Major permitting or licensing by EPA of facilities which affect the global commons or the environment of a foreign nation. This may include such actions as the issuance by EPA of hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility permits pursuant to section 3005 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. 6925), NPDES permits pursuant to section 402 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1342), and prevention of significant deterioration approvals pursuant to Part C of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7470 et seq.)
(4) Wastewater Treatment Construction Grants Program under section 201 of the Clean Water Act when activities addressed in the facility plan would have environmental effects abroad.
(5) Other EPA activities as determined by OFA and OIA (see §6.406(c)).
As used in this subpart, environment means the natural and physical environment and excludes social, economic and other environments; global commons is that area (land, air, water) outside the jurisdiction of any nation; and responsible official is either the EPA Assistant Administrator or Regional Administrator as appropriate for the particular EPA program. Also, an action significantly affects the environment if it does significant harm to the environment even though on balance the action may be beneficial to the environment. To the extent applicable, the responsible official shall address the considerations set forth in the CEQ regulations under 40 CFR 1508.27 in determining significant effect.
(a) Research and demonstration projects. The appropriate Assistant Administrator is responsible for performing the necessary degree of environmental review on research and demonstration projects undertaken by EPA. If the research or demonstration project affects the environment of the global commons, the applicant shall prepare an environmental analysis. This will assist the responsible official in determining whether an EIS is necessary. If it is determined that the action significantly affects the environment of the global commons, then an EIS shall be prepared. If the undertaking significantly affects a foreign nation EPA shall prepare a unilateral, bilateral or multilateral environmental study. EPA shall afford the affected foreign nation or international body or organization an opportunity to participate in this study. This environmental study shall discuss the need for the action, analyze the environmental impact of the various alternatives considered and list the agencies and other parties consulted.
(b) Ocean dumping activities. (1) The Assistant Administrator for Water shall ensure the preparation of appropriate environmental documents relating to ocean dumping activities in the global commons under section 102 of the MPRSA. For ocean dumping site designations prescribed pursuant to section 102(c) of the MPRSA and 40 CFR part 228, and for the establishment or revision of criteria under section 102(a) of the MPRSA, EPA shall prepare appropriate environmental documents consistent with EPA's Notice of Policy and Procedures for Voluntary Preparation of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents dated October 29, 1998.
(2) For individual permits issued by EPA under section 102(b) an environmental assessment shall be made by EPA. Pursuant to 40 CFR part 221, the permit applicant shall submit with the application an environmental analysis which includes a discussion of the need for the action, an outline of alternatives, and an analysis of the environmental impact of the proposed action and alternatives consistent with the EPA criteria established under section 102(a) of MPRSA. The information submitted under 40 CFR part 221 shall be sufficient to satisfy the environmental assessment requirement.
(c) EPA permitting and licensing activities. The appropriate Regional Administrator is responsible for conducting concise environmental reviews with regard to permits issued under section 3005 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA permits), section 402 of the Clean Water Act (NPDES permits), and section 165 of the Clean Air Act (PSD permits), for such actions undertaken by EPA which affect the global commons or foreign nations. The information submitted by applicants for such permits or approvals under the applicable consolidated permit regulations (40 CFR parts 122 and 124) and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) regulations (40 CFR part 52) shall satisfy the environmental document requirement under Section 2-4(b) of Executive Order 12114. Compliance with applicable requirements in part 124 of the consolidated permit regulations (40 CFR part 124) shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements to conduct a concise environmental review for permits subject to this paragraph.
(d) Wastewater treatment facility planning. 40 CFR part 6, subparts A through C, detail the environmental review process for the facilities planning process under the wastewater treatment works construction grants program. For the purpose of these regulations, the facility plan shall also include a concise environmental review of those activities that would have environmental effects abroad. This shall apply only to the Step 1 grants awarded after January 14, 1981, but on or before December 29, 1981, and facilities plans developed after December 29, 1981. Where water quality impacts identified in a facility plan are the subject of water quality agreements with Canada or Mexico, nothing in these regulations shall impose on the facility planning process coordination and consultation requirements in addition to those required by such agreements.
(e) Review by other Federal agencies and other appropriate officials. The responsible officials shall consult with other Federal agencies with relevant expertise during the preparation of the environmental document. As soon as feasible after preparation of the environmental document, the responsible official shall make the document available to the Council on Environmental Quality, Department of State, and other appropriate officials. The responsible official with assistance from OIA shall work with the Department of State to establish procedures for communicating with and making documents available to foreign nations and international organizations.
(a) Lead Agency. Section 3-3 of Executive Order 12114 requires the creation of a lead agency whenever an action involves more than one Federal agency. In implementing section 3-3, EPA shall, to the fullest extent possible, follow the guidance for the selection of a lead agency contained in 40 CFR 1501.5 of the CEQ regulations.
(b) Cooperating Agency. Under Section 2-4(d) of the Executive Order, Federal agencies with special expertise are encouraged to provide appropriate resources to the agency preparing environmental documents in order to avoid duplication of resources. In working with a lead agency, EPA shall to the fullest extent possible serve as a cooperating agency in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.6. When other program commitments preclude the degree of involvement requested by the lead agency, the responsible EPA official shall so inform the lead agency in writing.
Under section 2-5 (b) and (c) of the Executive Order, Federal agencies may provide for modifications in the contents, timing and availability of documents or exemptions from certain requirements for the environmental review and assessment. The responsible official, in consultation with the Director, Office of Federal Activities (OFA), and the Assistant Administrator, Office of International Affairs (OIA), may approve modifications for situations described in section 2-5(b). The responsible official, in consultation with the Director, OFA and Assistant Administrator, OIA, shall obtain exemptions from the Administrator for situations described in section 2-5(c). The Department of State and the Council on Environmental Quality shall be consulted as soon as possible on the utilization of such exemptions.
(a) Oversight. OFA is responsible for overseeing the implementation of these procedures and shall consult with OIA wherever appropriate. OIA shall be utilized for making formal contacts with the Department of State. OFA shall assist the responsible officials in carrying out their responsibilities under these procedures.
(b) Information exchange. OFA with the aid of OIA, shall assist the Department of State and the Council on Environmental Quality in developing the informational exchange on environmental review activities with foreign nations.
(c) Unidentified activities. The responsible official shall consult with OFA and OIA to establish the type of environmental review or document appropriate for any new EPA activities or requirements imposed upon EPA by statute, international agreement or other agreements.


Trusted free dating personal ads for singles from Essex United Kingdom. Our free personal ads are full of single women and men in Southend On Sea looking for. United Kingdom Essex Shoeburyness. Basildon personal ads for FREE on Loveawake. Someone to share lifes smiles with local ish if.
Trusted free dating personal ads for singles from Basildon Essex United Kingdom. Waltham Shoeburyness. 100 Free Online Dating for Southend On Sea looking for. For a nice decent TALL for fun laughter and happy ever after!
Essex personal ads of single men and single women in on our free online dating service.
Basildon personal ads of single men and single women in on our free online dating service Knowle Swingers.
Since 00 serving the online personals matchmaking mobile dating social dating. Hi im a loving caring loyal lady. The official Dating Industry Shoeburyness Online Personals News and Commentary for the Dating Industry. Looking for a nice decent TALL for fun laughter and happy ever after! For Southend On Sea Singles at Online Personals El Aaiun. Register now and review Basildon personal ads for singles from Essex United Kingdom Dallas Adult Friend Finder.


Home 3D printers are getting more affordable every year. But they still require lots of troubleshooting, practice, and patience. Here's the state of modern 3D printing, based on our experience with four generations of MakerBots. Watch this video if you're just getting started with 3D printing or just curious about exactly what the process entails.


To use an extension in the source code, it must be declared in the URS file in the extensions section in the <extension> tag. See urs extension documentation to have more details about urs extensions declarations.
Some extensions will access sensitive user's data in the device and permissions will be required by the operating system. Be sure to add the permissions declaration in the URS file that are necessary for the application to work.
Each NeoMAD extension documentation indicates the permissions to add in the project.
Some extensions require other libraries (third-party or system) to work. They must be added in the URS file in the specific section. Refer to the urs platform library documentation to see how to add libraries to the project.
Each NeoMAD extension documentation indicates the libraries to add in the project.
Click on the Add External JARS... button and browse the file system to the place where the extension is. Be sure to accept all file types.


text:
Q: A spike in CPU utilization when opening a path which has numerous large files whilst running AVAST antivirus I have AVAST installed on Windows 7 and whenever I open a path e.g. D:{Directory}* which has substantial large files i.e. in excess of 200GB, CPU utilization jumps to 100% and it appears as though as Windows is attempting to list the files i.e. the green scrollbar is running across Windows Explorer (be keen to know the proper term).
I initially thought it may have been something to do with the search indexer however having looked at Task Manager, it was the AVAST service hogging all of the CPU. The only way I can prevent this is to disable AVAST which I don't or to stop a specific service within AVAST i.e. File Shield which monitors reads and writes continuously.
This did not use to occur in the past however seems more frequent now. I have run a scan on the host and no viruses have been detected nor malware. The host has approximately 4GB RAM.

A: Avast is scanning the files, especially if they are archives. Avast has an exceptions list, try adding the top-level folder to this exception list and see if the problem resolves.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Il Rayo Oklahoma City, in breve Rayo OKC, è stata una società calcistica statunitense con sede nella città di Oklahoma City. Ha militato nella North American Soccer League, la seconda divisione del campionato statunitense per una sola stagione. Giocava le partite casalinghe al Miller Stadium.

Storia
Il 10 novembre 2015 la NASL annunciò l'ingresso del club che iniziò la propria attività agonistica dalla stagione 2016. La squadra era di proprietà di Raúl Martín Presa, proprietario del Rayo Vallecano, che comprò i diritti di accesso alla lega dalla defunta Oklahoma City FC (squadra che aveva annunciato l'ingresso in lega, naufragato tempo dopo), con una partecipazione di minoranza di Sean Jones, già proprietario dell'Oklahoma City FC. Rayo OKC fu gestito dallo stesso staff della precedente società. Il primo e unico allenatore fu il canadese Alen Marcina, già ai San Antonio Scorpions nei due anni precedenti.

Nel gennaio del 2017 fu annunciato che la società non avrebbe partecipato alla stagione successiva e che si sarebbe sciolta.

Rosa 2016

Note

Altri progetti

Collegamenti esterni

Rayo Vallecano de Madrid
Società calcistiche statunitensi (storiche)
Sport a Oklahoma City

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Unlock Huawei Ascend P7 mini - Safe IMEI Unlocking Codes for You!
Unlock Huawei Ascend P7 mini Handset!
In case your Ascend P7 mini doesn't ask for the code and there is no designated field to enter it, please DON'T PLACE ANY ORDER, contact us first for support.
Looking to get your Huawei Ascend P7 mini unlocked and ready to use on any network? We can help you to get unlocked, and our service is 100% guaranteed to work!
After you've grabbed yourself an unlock code, you'll be capable of getting unlocked in under a minute!
Don't want to unlock Huawei Ascend P7 mini but want to unlock a different handset instead? No problem-just go and browse through our online unlocking directory.
Our unlocking prices are a lot cheaper than the mobile network unlocking fees, and you'll still be capable of using your Huawei Ascend P7 mini on any GSM SIM network worldwide! This includes the likes of Bell, Rogers, Telus, Sprint, Vodafone, Verizon, O2, T-mobile and lots more!
To get unlocked, you'll first need to gather up some information on your Huawei Ascend P7 mini.
• IMEI - Firstly, you'll need to find your IMEI number. This unique code can be found by dialing *#06#.
• Country - Next, you'll need the country that you purchased your Huawei Ascend P7 mini from.
• Network - Finally, you'll need the mobile network that your Huawei Ascend P7 mini is locked to.
We'll need this information to unlock your phone! Make sure it is all correct before creating an order in a minute!
After doing the above, you'll now need to check to make sure your Huawei Ascend P7 mini still has unlocking attempts left. To find out, first put a SIM card using a network different to your locked network into your phone and then turn it on. Once it is on, simply wait for the screen to show.
The screen will have an entry field that asks for the unlock code, and if you have no unlock attempts left, there will be a line of text reading something similar to 'you have no unlock attempts remaining.' If you have no unlock attempts, DO NOT place an order with us as you won't be able to enter in your unlock code!
If you have unlock codes left over, place your phone to the side and proceed to the next section in the guide.
How to Unlock Huawei Ascend P7 mini Phone - Tutorial!
Next, you'll need to send us the IMEI, country and network, as well as an email address so that we can send you an unlock code.
After that, please look at the pricing and check for availability. If everything is fine and dandy, place an order.
Once your order has finished processing and you've received your unlock code email, simply grab the Huawei Ascend P7 mini you had earlier and enter in your unlock code into the entry field that is shown. Doing this will unlock your Huawei Ascend P7 mini!
Please unlock my handset from Vodafone Portugal..


text:
Thrash Hits » Tyketto
Tyketto were an American heavy rock band of the 1990s who never achieved the success they felt they deserved. The group was put together in 1987 by former Waysted vocalist Danny Vaughn. Brooke St James (Guitar), Jimi Kennedy (Bass) and Micheal Clayton (Drums) completed the lineup.
By 1990 the band had signed to Geffen Records, and released their debut album "Don't Come Easy". Musically, it was somewhere between Whitesnake and Bon Jovi, with Tyketto opening for the former on many bills. Read more on Last.fm
Tyketto on Thrash Hits
Warning: file_get_contents(http://ws.audioscrobbler.com/2.0/?method=artist.getevents&artist=Tyketto&api_key=91d1a020d5a9dfa7ce5d4991646f50e8&format=json): failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request in /www3/9aa/www.thrashhits.com/web/wpress/wp-content/themes/thrashhits2013/taxonomy-bands.php on line 98
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /www3/9aa/www.thrashhits.com/web/wpress/wp-content/themes/thrashhits2013/taxonomy-bands.php on line 115

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Everyone knows that the source of a well run organization can be found in the excellent people that keep it running smoothly each and every day! For the past eighteen years, Divine Redeemer Lutheran Church & School has been blessed with such a person- Mrs. Renee Kandler. Though her official title is Chief Financial Officer, it won't surprise anyone to know that she very successfully wears many different "hats" of responsibility. As she prepares financial reports for church and school meetings, Mrs. Kandler continues to be one of the backbones of this organization!
Mrs. Kandler wasn't even thinking of going back to work full time while taking care of her two young children at the time, Rebecca and Ryan. But when the Business Manager position at Divine Redeemer Lutheran Church and School became available, she quickly found the Lord had special plans for her! She accepted the position and has been instrumental in the day-to-day activities of the church and school ever since. She has since gone back to school for several financial classes and now owns the title of Chief Financial Officer. Prior work experience included helping at her families' restaurant called "Kandler's on Keesus". She loves the family atmosphere of the school and presently is involved in bible studies at the church. She has been married to her husband, Rick, for the past 29 years and her children are now grown. Mrs. Kandler enjoys spending time on Lake Keesus and watching the Packers win!


text:
Q: NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.Exception.addSuppressed : Updating from Java 1.6 to 1.7 I started using Java 1.7 and I'm still using Eclipse. In my Project I add extra data to the thrown exception, with handledException.addSuppressed(additionalException); and it was working so far.
But according to my crash reports, some old OS installed devices(Android 2.3.4) are crashing with StackTrace below. But it doesn't occur in my Nexus 5 which has Android 4.4.4.
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.Exception.addSuppressed

I'm not really sure if there is some additional steps needed to update it to Java 1.7.

A: handledException.addSuppressed was added only in API 19.
You should put if else loop surrounding this piece of code

A: Android 2.3 uses level 10 API.
addSupressed() was added in level 19. In the future, check what API level was being used during that time (2.3), then check the API to see if it was available during that API level


I'm an Irish guy, with arthritis, who has studied past-life regression and crystal therapy/divining. I also follow Native American teachings (Lakota). I love animals and I'm a cat person - though I have 2 budgies at the moment.


Twenty years ago yesterday the immortal name of Anzac was first forged 'mid blood and fire on Gallipoli heights, and the event was commemorated throughout the British Empire in fitting manner. At Otaki the service will linger long in the memory of all present. It was one of the biggest gatherings for such an occasion. As in previous years, a procession, headed by the Otaki Brass Band, and including some fifty members of the recently-formed branch of the Returned Soldiers' Association, Girl Guides, and children, marched from the Otaki State School to the theatre, where a large number of residents also attended. On the platform with His Worship the Mayor (Mr T O'Rourke) were the Revs. Ramson, Jackson, Nelson and P Temuera, General Young, Dr Milne, and Mr C F Atmore. The arrangements throughout were very complete and credit for this is largely due to members of the RSA… after … the "Last Post" by Bandmaster R F Fielding, the procession was re-formed and marched to the cenotaph where several beautiful wreaths, including one from the Otaki RSA and Otaki Borough Council, were deposited.


Question: What is myasthenia gravis?
Answer: Myasthenia gravis is an acquired autoimmune disorder of neuromuscular transmission.
Question: What is the cause of myasthenia gravis?
Answer: It is due to autoimmune destruction of the post synoptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction caused by circulating antibodies to the acetylcholine receptors.
Question: What are cardinal clinical features of myasthenia gravis?
Answer: The disease is characterized by fluctuating weakness, mainly involving the ocular and bulbar muscles, which presents with fatigable double vision, ptosis, difficulty in swallowing and speech, and weakness in the arms and legs. Typically, these symptoms get worse with activity and improve with rest. They are more severe toward the end of the day. The symptoms can be restricted to the eyelids and extraocular muscles, but sometimes they are generalized and affect the bulbar and proximal arm and leg muscles as well.
Question: What symptoms are not expected in patients with myasthenia gravis?
Answer: Impairment of memory, urinary incontinence, numbness, lack of sensation or incoordination are the symptoms that are not expected in patients with myasthenia gravis. If they exist, then another explanation should be sought.
Question: What are the voice changes that are seen in patients with myasthenia gravis?
Answer: Patients with bulbar myasthenia often notice that their voice becomes quieter, or may disappear altogether, during continued conversation.
Question: Is chewing difficulty a feature of myasthenia gravis?
Answer: Yes. Many patients are unable to chew strongly towards the end of a meal and many patients tend to sit with their jaw supported in one hand in order to prevent it from hanging open and to facilitate chewing and talking.
Question: What does the tongue look like in patients with myasthenia gravis?
Answer: A grooved tongue, or what is called a triple furrowed tongue, is seen in longstanding cases. The tongue has three, long, longitudinal furrows in this situation.
Question: What is the most common differential diagnosis of myasthenia gravis?
Answer: Hysteria. Early in the disease, myasthenic symptoms may suggest hysterical conversation, in particular the fluctuating weakness.
Question: Is myasthenia gravis associated with thymoma?
Answer: Yes. About 15% of patients with myasthenia gravis have a malignant tumor of the thymus gland, which is called thymoma. Patients with myasthenia and thymoma are usually older and have a shorter history of muscle weakness, with a more severe and progressive course.
Question: How is myasthenia gravis diagnosed?
Answer: The diagnosis is based on the demonstration of undue fatigability of the ocular, bulbar and/or proximal arm or leg muscles during examination. Increased acetylcholine receptor antibody titer is the most specific test for myasthenia gravis. Demonstration of decremental response with repetitive nerve stimulation is the neurophysiological hallmark of the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis. Single fiber EMG is the most sensitive test.
Question: Does the level of acetylcholine receptor antibody titer correlate with the severity of the disease?
Answer: No. The level of the acetylcholine receptor antibody titer does not correlate well with the severity of the disorder.
Question: What is the treatment of myasthenia gravis?
Answer: Myasthenia gravis is a treatable disease. Cholinesterase inhibitors are useful, in particular, early in the disease. Pyridostigmine (Mestinon) is the main drug, which is effective to reduce the symptoms of myasthenia gravis, but it does not change the natural course of the disease.
Question: What is the role of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis?
Answer: Thymectomy is considered to be a routine procedure for all patients with myasthenia gravis, if they can tolerate surgery. However, there is no role for emergency thymectomy in myasthenia gravis and is recommended to be done after the disease is controlled. Thymectomy may increase the long-term remission rate of myasthenia gravis.
Question: What is the role of steroids in the treatment of myasthenia gravis?
Answer: Steroids are useful in inducing remission. However, because of the possible side effects, the treatment with steroids is reserved for severe cases.
Question: What is the role of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in treatment of myasthenia gravis?
Answer: IV IG produces beneficial response that is usually noticed within 4-5 days of initiation of treatment in 85% of cases. It has been used especially in myasthenia crisis in a daily dose of 0.4 Gm/kg of body weight for five days.


Here's an amazing web interface: https://github.com/cdgco/VestaWebInterface you don't need to delete/replace the original, just upload the files in an new domain/subdomain and edit conf.php file. Hope it works!
Try browser cache first and another browser.
There are no problems in my browser I deleted unintentionally /usr/local/vesta/web, is there anyway to recover that part?
Edit: Fixed, just replaced vesta github css to my server.
Hey. I need help, looks like my VestaCP Web Interface is not working correctly as I do this: viewtopic.php?t=14308#p58845. Any way to reinstall or fix this?


I'm going down memory lane this week. A few days ago, I posted the Stovetop Mac and Cheese my Mom used to make and today's post is her Tuna Salad! This is again, one of my favorites and I just cannot believe I haven't blogged it yet! This is super simple and most of these ingredients are found in my pantry at all times, so it's easy to make when you have nothing else in mind! If you do make it ahead of time, you may have to add more Miracle Whip when you are ready to serve as the noodles absorb some of the dressing. I hope you enjoy this as much as we do!
Cook pasta according to package directions, rinse with cold water and drain well. In a large bowl combine all ingredients until mixed. Refrigerate until serving!
Oh delicious! Sounds like my childhood too! Thanks so much for sharing at the Scrumptious Sunday link party!
Sheena, there is nothing better than a great Tuna Salad and your recipe looks delicious. Hope you have a great week end and thank you so much for sharing with Full Plate Thursday.
Hi Sheena! I make this pasta salad but add a bit of cilantro and a little mustard. It's a favorite!
Those sound like great additions! Thanks for sharing!


Travel is a big part of my life ~ whether it be jetting off to far off lands, or exploring the weird and wonderful island that I live on ~ the UK! Expect to see stories, reviews, tips and random thoughts collected as I go along my merry way.
It's easy to turn a blind eye when it comes to ethical fashion and jewellery. Find out how I plan to do more.


We are thrilled to inform you Bryce is expanding. Our team, services, and locations are all growing in 2018.
Led by Senior Vice President for Commercial Space Mike French, Bryce Space and Technology is expanding its commercial space strategy and investment advisory practice. Bryce helps clients set strategy and close deals in the rapidly changing space economy. As independent market analysts, engineers, and strategic advisors to commercial and government decision makers, Bryce welcomes French's distinguished expertise and leadership in this new expansion.
French will work directly with commercial executives to engage in strategy development, including new market entry plans, competitor assessments, realignment of legacy plans, and emerging market analysis. He will consult with investment firms and banks during valuations and due diligence for space and technology acquisitions, investments, and mergers.
French's experience in the space industry ranges from advising senior leaders at NASA and the White House on commercial space policy, to analyzing major space investments for funds and banks, to helping start-up technology companies build business plans.
Previously NASA's Chief of Staff, French advised the NASA Administrator, the White House, and other government leadership on national space policy issues. He helped shape and obtain funding for NASA's commercial space programs and advanced innovative public private partnerships, including a privately-funded Mars science mission and a cost-sharing program to develop space habitat systems. French received NASA's Distinguished Service Medal for his service.
Prior to serving in government, he practiced law in the defense and aerospace sector in Los Angeles. As an attorney, he conducted internal investigations of major aerospace weapons systems for a leading defense industry client and represented financial services, energy, and biotechnology clients in litigation. French has a Bachelor of Science in business administration from the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.
We are honored to have Mike French join our executive team and bring his career expertise to our growing commercial partners, especially as we expand into Europe in 2018. Wish Mike a warm welcome at mike.french@brycetech.com.


Certification, asset management & PMS for dive systems, the easy way.
Let your asset management system do the work for you.
DiveCert is a certification, asset management and planned maintenance software system specifically designed for the diving industry. With over 400 certification & maintenance templates included, DiveCert has been designed around global diving standards, allowing you to certify equipment the correct way!
Many diving contractors find it difficult to control their maintenance and certification, often misplacing certificates, completing certificates incorrectly and losing track of when diving equipment is due to be re-certified and maintained. This can then cause issues during dive system audits, where non-conformities may be issued against the diving contractor, delaying diving operations and the client project.
DiveCert has been developed to eradicate these issues while assisting compliance with IMCA guidelines, all from one easy to use software portal.


Poltu Quatu is located in the north-east of Sardinia and was founded in 1987. It is a glamorous yet relaxing location set in the exclusive "Costa Smeralda". Close to Porto Cervo and only 30kms from "Olbia - Costa Smeralda".
Poltu Quatu looks like an old fishing village built around the traditional circular little square, with narrow alleys and stone buildings, situated on an inlet called "Stintino dell'Orso", an area characterized by its red granite rocks which has been sculpted into fantastic shapes by the "maestrale" wind. The rocks make a frame to a very clear sea in which you can count the sand grains even at 20 metres deep.
Port Location – The main port is centrally located in the Poltu Quatu harbour.
Travel Links – There are airports near Cagliari, Alghero and Olbia, which are serviced by a number of budget airlines including Ryanair and Easyjet. There are ferry services to Cagliari (south coast), Porto Torres (north coast), and Olbia, Golfo Aranci and Arbatax (east coast).


I have more than one account, will I get frozen?
You are allowed a MAXIMUM of one main account and up to four additional accounts that can be used as galleries, etc. You are only allowed to use the once per day activities such as Coltzan's Shrine and the Tombola with your main account.
The limitations of what you can do on your extra accounts are still very vague. Here is table that explains what you are allowed to do on your main and on your side accounts. Keep in mind that all activites done on your side account(s) must be fund with your main account.
You should have one main account that you use for earning Neopoints, buying, selling, trading, and all of that great stuff. If you need to transfer funds from your main account to your side accounts, you can do so through the Trading Post. However, it should be done at your own risks. TNT might be suspicious if you decide to move ALL of your Neopoints to another account and freeze it for your protection.
Neopets does not allow you to earn, sell, buy, or trade items on your extra accounts though (you will get frozen). So let's say you own an "Uber Potion" and want to sell it. Simply send that item to your main account and sell it. If you sell it on your side account, you may get frozen for "Using multiple accounts to gain Neopoints".
So, use one account for trading and selling items (running your shop, etc). Use other accounts for storage only.
Hopefully you now have a greater understanding of what you should and should not do on your multiple Neopets accounts.
The Snowager is awake. He'll be sleeping in 12 minutes, 11 seconds.


Date: 1/03/08 Attendance: Over 100 adults!!!!
This club meeting was a super success!!!! Thanks to everyone pitching in with corals, great local store sponsors, fraggers, and people with money in hand, we raised some much needed funds for the club. This will certainly help us to bring in more world class speakers and produce some great meetings in the next few months. We started the night with 55 paid members (which is amazing for starting a new year) and sold another ~28 memberships (around 40 membership total this week! Way to go everyone!
We over filled the parking lot, and that was something to complain about. By 7:00pm we had overflow parking into the park and the high school, our largest turnout in a year.
Thanks to so many coral donors!!!! We had several club members (around 15) donate corals for the meeting. Plus some stores kicked with donations including The Aquarium, Aquatic Dreams, BST Aquatics, Fish 4 U, Reef Kingdom.
This month we featured Greg Wilke (PinnerReef). This tank is an 8 gallon corner pentagon. What is most unusual is that Greg built the tank himself (he previously worked in the glass business). It was great to see what can be done with some imagination, especially in only 8 gallons.
We had 6 corals for a silent auction. These corals were picked out as the best corals that we just couldn't bring ourselves to frag.
We had three corals used for demonstrations. They included mushrooms, finger leather, and a tilesaw used to cut up a moon coral.
There were hundreds, yes hundreds of coral frags for sale. These frags were labled with a two letter symbol (like NN for Neon Nephthea) to help make buying easy. Also, they were color coordinated for sps, lps, and softies.
Thanks to the Aquaterrial Education Station for allowing us to use their place for all the prep work. And boy was there some prep work. Lets start by mixing up 50 gallons of water. Then transporting some of that from West Jordan to Centerville. Have you ever taken 100 frag bags and 100 rubberbands and said "here we go."? Think your hands are sore from trying rubberbands, that is nothing compared to coral and invert stings. This year a few people were wearing gloves, although not the main fragger himself (Shane H). After Jake's trip to the InstaCare last year from a fireworm incident you'd think Shane H would be more careful.
For several days leading up to the event corals were being collected (Thanks Sukie!) and plan were made on how best to run the show. It took 7 people 5 hours to get all the prefragging done. Thanks to Shane H, Will, Jamison, Adam, Jake, Shane S, Corey for giving up a day to do this.
Next month we'll feature Dr. Fred Lipschultz as our special banquet speaker. Currently we have about 15 tickets remaining. Please paypal $20 per ticket to the club if you are interested in going.
Shane Heil cutting the frags.
Will and Jamison bagging away.
With Silcox the full team in production.
Jake works his magic with a hammer and screwdriver.
The tables at the meeting with frags just waiting for hobbyists (one of the big perks to joining about any hobbyist club).
Packed house. I couldn't get a good photo of everyone, or a good photo of the screen. So this is an inbetween photo. Notice on the slide that Heil is thanking and listing all of the wonderful stores who donated to our event.
YAY for frags!! Thanks everyone!
It was an awesome turn out!
Sounds like an awesome meeting! I wish I could have made it.
Thanks for the recap Adam, It is nice to know what went on behind the scenes. Yes the parking was awful and I did see a cop out there. Maybe we need to carpool if the meetings keep getting a larger turnout. I did however take five bags of new stuff home for my tanks. We will have to see how they do. Thanks to the presidency for all they do. I love this club.
Thanks for the recap Adam, It is nice to know what went on behind the scenes.
You'll probably be seeing these every month. Please tell us what other info would be nice to include. For all I know that behind the scenes stuff was boring to read.
It may be boring to some but it makes me appreciate all that you guys and gals in the presidency do even more. I am sure that most people do not realize what it takes to put on a frag meeting like that. Thanks again.
I think I got some polys from Reefkingdom! I'm going to post pictures of them tonight.
LOL I was about to recommend that this type of "summary" be put up after every meeting. I thought it was a great idea, Adam. Thanks!
It was another great meeting and very worth while to everyone who attended. There was great information, frags, new friends, old friends, good food and great presentations!


The Vans US Open of Surfing has returned to the southside of the Huntington Beach Pier this summer to host the world's best action sports athletes from July 28 through August 5, 2018.
The week-long summer festival will showcase the best in surfing, skateboarding, and BMX, while providing engaging beach activities for the entire family to enjoy.
"Creative expression is at the heart of everything we do at Vans, and the Vans US Open is the perfect venue to unleash the vibrant creative spirit that fuels the athletes, artists, musicians, and of course, the fans," said Kristy Van Doren, Vans Senior Director, North America Brand Marketing.
Record Crowds at 2017 VANS US Open of Surfing!
The WSL Championship Tour is the world's premier surfing series and crowns the World Champion at the conclusion of each season. A star-studded lineup of competitors at the Vans US Open of Surfing, Stop No. 7 of 10, will feature California's own Lakey Peterson (USA), Courtney Conlogue (USA), Sage Erickson (USA) and newest resident Caroline Marks (USA) vying for valuable points at home.
This marks the eighth year that Surf City, USA has hosted the women's CT. Erickson is gearing up to defend her title but will have to take on former event winners Peterson (current World No. 1) and Brazil's Tatiana Weston-Webb (current World No. 3).