text:
UEFA to crack down on drugs
UEFA have vowed to catch out drug cheats in football by introducing out-of-competition testing for all 16 teams who qualify for next summer's European Championships.
UEFA have vowed to catch out drug cheats in football by introducing out-of-competition testing for all 16 teams who qualify for next summer's European Championships.
European football's governing body can now check for the presence of newly-discovered steroid tetrahydrogestrinone - THG - in players' samples, following advice from the World Anti-Doping Agency, and players will be randomly tested.
UEFA chief executive Gerhard Aigner promised that next summer's finals in Portugal would offer no home for the minority of footballers who may be tempted to use performance-enhancing drugs.
THG, which has been found in the systems of several leading track and field athletes, has now been added to the list of banned substances on the UEFA list, on the advice of WADA.
The testing by medical staff belonging to European football's governing body will be in addition to any already put in place by national associations.
There was also confirmation from UEFA that players would be tested at this weekend's play-off matches - and after matches at the finals themselves.
Aigner said, "UEFA are taking new steps to ensure that we have the widest possible coverage of testing before Euro 2004 and at the tournament itself.
"This is completely in line with the overall increase in testing that we have introduced in our club competitions and that were announced after the UEFA executive meeting in September of this year.
"The message is clear - we will not tolerate those who cheat using banned substances and will act decisively if anyone is found doing so."
Of the 396 player tests carried out by UEFA during the 2002-03 season, there was only positive test.
Barclay's Premier LeagueLiverpool talks with £70m star confirmed by boss, agent jets in for Man Utd bid for £56m man, £30m Arsenal target drops huge hint online as Swansea boss talks Ampadu - Premier League reportsThe latest transfer news, views and gossip from across the Premier League and beyond...
Cardiff City FCThe reasons why Cardiff City are selling star men Kenneth Zohore and Bruno Manga and what it means for promotion hopesWe analyse the Bluebirds' decision to part company with Zohore and Manga


text:
'Tourettes': The show must go on the offensive
Arts & Entertainment // Performance
Lily Janiak Dec. 28, 2016 Updated: Dec. 28, 2016 11:52 a.m.
Jamie DeWolf from the variety show "Tourettes Without Regrets" in the Oakland Metro Operahouse Dec. 16, 2016 in Oakland, Calif.
Photo: Leah Millis, The Chronicle
"I very famously, or infamously, to me, was knocked unconscious by the audience," Jamie DeWolf remembers of an early performance of "Tourettes Without Regrets," his monthly variety show. "I made a very classic punk rock mistake, which is to confuse aggression with comedy, to confuse anger with true vaudeville."
DeWolf hadn't yet realized that his audience "didn't come here for you; they came to see a show." As he was ranting, someone threw a piece of trash at him, so he urged the rest of the audience to do the same.
"One of my friends threw his backpack with some textbooks in it and just knocked me out cold. They dragged me out on the street and they left me there. Then someone else grabbed the mike, and the show kept going."
With an aesthetic like that, it's not hard to understand why DeWolf didn't fit into the slam poetry scene in Benicia in the '90s and thus why he created "Tourettes" in 1998.
DeWolf, 38, doesn't have Tourette syndrome; the name reflects the show's say-anything spirit. It also helps audiences self-select, or self-opt-out; if you're offended by the name of the show, it's a good bet you won't enjoy the show itself.
1of2Jamie DeWolf from the variety show "Tourettes Without Regrets" in the Oakland Metro Operahouse Dec. 16, 2016 in Oakland, Calif.Photo: Leah Millis, The Chronicle
2of2From left, Hunny Bunnah, Jamie DeWolf and Wonder Dave from the variety show "Tourettes Without Regrets" in the Oakland Metro Operahouse Dec. 16, 2016 in Oakland, Calif.Photo: Leah Millis, The Chronicle
Featuring up to 45 performers over three hours, "Tourettes" celebrates "what we view to be the actual Oakland," where DeWolf moved the show in 2002. To him, "actual Oakland" means "all of these different voices — queer, feminist, people of color, people of all different kinds of bodies and abilities — and making a space for all of that to go all the way."
Each first Thursday of the month, droves of audience members, many of them the young ones that more traditional performing arts covet, line up around the block to see the "Tourettes" crew go "all the way." DeWolf and the performance poet Wonder Dave co-host; other regulars include the contortionist and burlesque performer Hunny Bunnah and beatboxer Syzygy.
The popularity of "Tourettes" is partly due to its always edgy, always evolving content; partly due to its $15 tickets. It's also due to the way the show is set up — more like a sport event or a rock concert than a formal theatrical production. You're not required to pay strict attention the whole time; you can get up to get a drink or go outside or talk with a companion at any time.
In fact, you probably couldn't stay in one place the whole time even if you tried, so much audience participation does the show demand. You can even sign up, the night of, to perform your own stand-up or poetry. Rather than force you to pay attention, with traditional theatrical architecture, seating and norms, "Tourettes" dares you to.
In DeWolf's 18 years of running and hosting the show, those dares have been in the form of games like pig heart baseball, dildo ring toss or "What's down my pants?" (Various answers to that question: an octopus, dog food and a Rubik's Cube.)
More by Lily Janiak
By Lily Janiak
Marga Gomez's parents: 25 years of comedy gold
The secret's out; 'The Speakeasy' is delightful
Top 10 theater picks of 2016
The dares have also meant poets reading "profoundly personal and confessional work," directly followed by "mimes humping." They've meant pole artists and aerialists followed by stand-up comedians, burlesque performers and sword swallowers, or freestyle rap battles next to dirty-haiku battles.
Battles abound in "Tourettes," and the Thursday, Jan. 5, show, which has a loose "Star Trek" theme, will pioneer a new variation on the genre when comedians Ruby Gill and Liz Stone face off in a passive-aggressive-compliment battle. (The two were selected for the act in part because they're friends in real life.)
DeWolf says that even if a particular act is wildly successful, he won't book it again, at least not in the exact same permutation. Over the years, he's learned to book fewer bands and eliminate the intermission — after which he always "had to go and re-find everybody." Those moves have helped "keep the momentum going nonstop" and "keep the unpredictability of it alive."
If the show is no longer quite so chaotic as it was in the days of DeWolf's knockout, it still courts its audience's umbrage. "One of the rules we have to start the show — we have a list — is to be offended," DeWolf says.
"The point of it is that to be offended is the start of a conversation; it's not the end of it. Most people just say, 'I was offended,' but they don't really push past why."
That rule makes Oakland a natural home for the show. "Oakland has always been a fierce city to me," DeWolf says. "It's almost like the front line for whatever's happening even in the United States, whether it's the riots, the protests, everything else. ... Oakland said 'F— being polite' a while ago. That's one of the reasons why I think 'Tourettes' has done well here."
Lily Janiak is The San Francisco Chronicle's theater critic. Email: ljaniak@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @LilyJaniak
Tourettes Without Regrets: 9 p.m. first Thursday of every month. $15. New Oakland Metro Operahouse, 522 Second St., Oakland. www.touretteswithoutregrets.com
Lily Janiak
Follow Lily on:
https://www.facebook.com/SFChronicle/LilyJaniak
Lily Janiak joined the San Francisco Chronicle as theater critic in May 2016. Previously, her writing appeared in Theatre Bay Area, American Theatre, SF Weekly, the Village Voice and HowlRound. She holds a BA in theater studies from Yale and an MA in drama from San Francisco State.
Making a science of writing plays about a spouse who's a virologist
Newsom proposes California Creative Corps pilot program to use artists to fight pandemic
During Biden's administration, artists can be 'second responders,' architects of a post-pandemic world

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Nestled on the shore of Lake Como in the village of Lezzeno and just over three miles from the exclusive town of Bellagio, this elegant fully air conditioned property enjoys stunning views over the lake and the surrounding Alps, as well as its own direct access to a pebble beach. Built in the 19th century, this imposing property has been completely renovated with great attention to every detail, resulting in an elegant yet comfortable family holiday home with modern amenities and classic features. The villa is ideally set within its own mature grounds encompassing a large lawn ideal for children to play; and for the grown-ups, subtle garden lighting creates a blissful ambience in which to relax in the evenings, overlooking the lake whilst listening to the water gently lapping at the shore below. The villa also benefits from its own direct access to the lake and pebble beach and is just a short stroll to the village centre with a grocery store, bar (for that essential breakfast cappuccino), restaurants and pizzeria. Within the village is also a public boat landing stage where the passenger boat and hydrofoil allow transport to the many towns and villages around Lake Como. The local restaurateur organises boat fishing trips by night on the lake not to be missed! Explorations of the area may include: visits to Villa Melzi in Bellagio, ferry trips to Villa Balbianello and Villa Carlotta in Tremezzina or Villa Monastero in Varenna; hikes from Bellagio up to Madonna del Ghisallo and Punta Spartivento (the best viewpoint of the entire lake!); or watersports of all sorts at Bellagio Water Sports Kayak Club.


Helpful for English language learners as well as English speakers, this worksheet focuses on the conditional tense. The picture chart at the top of the page helps to explain that a conditional phrase can be formed two different ways. As they complete the sentences provided, they decide which sentences are advice and which express thoughts about the future.


This at-home exfoliant uses an advanced blend of ingredients for powerful exfoliation: rice powder and pumice for physical exfoliation; mandelic acid for cellular exfoliation; and papaya fruit enzyme for enzymatic exfoliation.
This powerful exfoliant uses three methods of exfoliation for dramatically smoother and softer skin while absorbing excess oil and impurities.
After cleansing, apply and work in gentle circular motions over the face.
Rinse, pat dry and follow with the appropriate PCA SKIN® toner, treatment serums and broad spectrum SPF product in the daytime and moisturizer in the evening.
Use morning or evening one to three times per week, based on skin type and condition.


Rinse and pat dry the shrimp and season with salt and black pepper.
Heat up a skillet and add 1 tablespoon oil. Pan-sear the shrimp on both sides until slightly brown. Remove from the skillet.
Clean the skillet (optional step) and reheat with the remaining 1 tablespoon oil. Saute the garlic until aromatic or until slightly browned. Add the shrimp and follow by the sauce. Stir to combine well. Garnish with the cilantro or parsley leaves, serve immediately.
If you don't have chili garlic sauce, you may use about 1/2 teaspoon of Sriracha sauce.


How Much is That Art Worth?
When encountering artwork, people often ask some of the following questions. Who is the artist? When was it made? How was it made? What does it mean? There is, however, one other popular question regarding art that people of all ages and all backgrounds tend to ask: how much is it worth? This question is not as easy to answer as the preceding ones, because the answer depends on the intersection of three fluctuating elements: art collecting, art history and the art market.
Art collecting is the basic foundation for how values are assigned to artwork. Those who collect art include individual collectors, corporations and museums. While individual art collectors may pay the same high prices for artwork as corporations and museums, the function of these collections differs greatly. Most simply, individual art collectors collect for themselves, while corporate collectors and museums collect for their institutions and a public audience. Individual collectors may someday deposit their artwork into museums, but collecting categories tend to be more rigid in corporations and museums than for individual collectors.
These collecting categories are directly related to art history. It is art history that defines which artists and artwork are valuable to our society and are deserving of further study. In some sense, once a work of art becomes famous, its intrinsic value increases, as does its financial value. Art history, however, does not happen overnight. It is a process that involves weighing the impact an artist has had on the art world, based on exhibitions, reviews and influence on other artists.
Art history and art collecting together influence the art market. Although the art market depends on art history and encourages art collecting, the foundation of the art market stems from a basic economic rule: supply and demand. It may seem greatly disrespectful for the value of artwork to increase after an artist is deceased, but again, market value assignments depend on rarity. Once an artist is no longer living, the supply of their artwork becomes limited and their artwork increases in value.
This short essay does not fully answer the question it posed in the first paragraph regarding how value is assigned to artwork. It does, however, offer insight into the systems of art collecting, art history and the art market that together inform individuals, corporations and museums what artwork to buy and how much to pay. However, looking at financial value alone when determining the success of an artist is not sufficient.


A leading member of the Russian avant-garde, Alexander Rodchenko (1891-1956) revolutionized the worlds of graphic art, design, and photography. With more than three hundred works on display, including period prints, photomontages, magazines and posters from the artist's day and age, visitors can fully capture the strength of this innovator, and appreciate the charisma that had such a great impact on his fellow artists, as well as on the literati, filmmakers, and intellectuals who accompanied him along the way. From the photomontages made for the poem Pro Eto (About This) by Vladimir Mayakovsky, to the covers for the magazine Novi Lef, a reference point for the revolutionary intelligentsia, to film posters and illustrations for books, Rodchenko's works bear witness to his collaborations and friendships, portraying not just a creative personality, but also the spirit of an unrepeatable moment in the history of the twentieth century. In the field of photography, Rodchenko's outstanding portraits recorded the images of urban scenarios and architecture, reportages in factories and construction sites, the people and the spirit of a time of great hope as well as contradiction. Above all, Rodchenko subverted the rules of photography: the images he created, characterized by uncharted viewpoints, angles and diagonals, are the clearest evidence we have today of the desire for the modernization of art and the world that was the driving force behind the artists of the Russian avant-garde. Completing the exhibition are three Spatial Constructions, aerial sculptures obtained by assembling basic geometric forms, three thought-provoking examples of Constructivism made by transforming the rational and productive principles of industry.
The exhibition is accompanied by a catalogue (published by Skira) including approximately 250 images, as well as texts written by the curator Ol'ga Sviblova, the artist's daughter Varvara Rodchenko, his grandson Alexander Lavrentiev, as well as by Rodchenko himself.


text:
IAEA Confirms Iran Has Halted Uranium Enrichment to 20%
January 20, 2014 /10 Comments/in Foreign Policy /by Jim White
Today, the IAEA has confirmed that Iran has discontinued enrichment of uranium to 20%, and has complied with the additional steps required at the beginning of the historic agreement between Iran and the P5+1 group of nations. By implementing the interim agreement, Iran has triggered the start of the six month period for negotiation of a final agreement that will be aimed at providing verifiable assurance that Iran does not seek to develop a nuclear weapon.
Fredrik Dahl reports:
Iranhas halted its most sensitive nuclear activity under a ground-breaking deal with world powers, a confidential U.N. atomic agency report reviewed by Reuters on Monday showed, paving the way for the easing of some Western sanctions.
Western states were expected to ease sanctions later on Monday after the United Nations nuclear watchdog confirmed Iran is meeting its end of the bargain under a November 24 interim accord to resolve a decade-old dispute over its nuclear program.
Thomas Erdbrink has more:
Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, arrived in Tehran two days ago to begin validating the deal, Ali Akbar Salehi, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, said in a statement reported by the state-financed broadcaster Press TV.
/snip/
In Washington, the State Department said in a statement on Monday: "Today, the International Atomic Energy Agency provided a report on the current status of Iran's nuclear activities, focused on the steps Iran has committed to take by or on the first day of implementation of the joint plan of action. The United States, our P5+1 partners, and the E.U. are now studying this report. We will have further public comment after all parties have had the opportunity to review the report."
The Washington Post reports that Iran confirms it has halted the most sensitive activities:
Ali Akbar Salehi, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization and a former foreign minister, said in an interview on state television Monday that the deal with world powers over Iran's nuclear activities was a victory for the Islamic republic.
Speaking of Western powers, and the United States in particular, Salehi said: "We know that they have power and do not wish us well. They wanted to put pressure on us with sanctions, but we were able to manage the situation well."
Salehi, who holds a doctorate in nuclear engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said Iran does not need to continue the 20 percent sensitive uranium enrichment program to maintain what he said are his country's peaceful nuclear activities. The deal allows Iran to continue enriching uranium to 5 percent.
"Now the iceberg of sanctions is crumbling while our centrifuges are still also working. This is our greatest achievement," he said.
Returning to Dahl's report, we have more details on the report that was filed today by the IAEA (it is only two pages and can be read here):
The IAEA said Tehran had begun the dilution process and that enrichment of uranium to 20 percent had been stopped at the two facilities where such work is done.
"The Agency confirms that, as of 20 January 2014, Iran … has ceased enriching uranium above 5 percent U-235 at the two cascades at the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant (PFEP) and four cascades at the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP) previously used for this purpose," its report to member states said.
It was referring to Iran's two enrichment plants, at Natanz and Fordow. Cascades are linked networks of centrifuge machines that spin uranium gas to increase the concentration of U-235, the isotope used in nuclear fission chain reactions, which is found in nature at concentrations of less than 1 percent.
Iran now stands to reap about $7 billion in sanctions relief that will phase in over the coming six months, provided that negotiations continue and that Iran continues to adhere to the terms of the interim agreement.
War mongers and backers of Israel are distinctly unhappy, but at least for now, peaceful negotiations have taken major steps toward making the world a safer place.
Tags: 20% enriched uranium, IAEA, interim agreement, Iran, Iran sanctions, nuclear technology, P5+1
https://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Logo-Web.png 0 0 Jim White https://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Logo-Web.png Jim White2014-01-20 11:02:032014-01-20 11:02:03IAEA Confirms Iran Has Halted Uranium Enrichment to 20%
Ben Franklin says:
The IAEA? Sorry, this nuke industry promoter/propagandist org cannot be trusted for accuracy or efficacy.
Evidence; Fukushima.
@Ben Franklin:
Sorry, you don't know what you're talking about. Different situation entirely.
bsbafflesbrains says:
@P J Evans: Could we say Ben is talking about nuke power which could eventually lead to the destruction of our environment and this situation involves nuke weapons which could lead to the destruction of our environment.
@bsbafflesbrains:
Yes and no. It's about 'garbage in, garbage out' wrt to this watchdog which needs watching.
TarheelDem says:
So I guess that Sen. Menendez has already yanked his bill as moot. Right?
orionATL says:
@TarheelDem:
thinking (and hoping) the same.
jo6pac says:
I hope they do get the money and some sanctions are removed but with the Amerikan govt. moving the goal post every few days, well I don't much else to say.
Don Bacon says:
the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog
The IAEA was created to serve the needs of the NPT exclusively for ensuring the non-diversion of nuclear energy to weapons programs, and it is NOT an agency of the United Nations nor is there any legal basis for the IAEA to be a watchdog for the United Nations.
The IAEA has also been called "weapons inspectors" in some news reports, however the IAEA has nobody on its staff qualified in this area and again has no legal basis for inspecting weapons facilities.
The IAEA does have expertise in nuclear enrichment and is qualified to report in this area, although its expertise comes with limitations as Ben Franklin has correctly indicated above. from wiki:
The IAEA classifies safety as one of its top three priorities. It spends 8.9 percent of its 352 million-euro ($469 million) regular budget in 2011 on making plants secure from accidents.
I don't think that IAEA has anything to do with design and engineering, which are Fukushima's problems (along with an earthquake much larger than anyone expected to see).
The P5-1 negotiations with Iran will now center on ther technical aspects of Iran's nuclear program including R&D. Also, and probably most threatening to kill any chance of a final deal, is that the US State Department has indicated in its Background Briefing of January 13th that possible military dimensions (PMD) will be pursued:
As has been referenced, [Iran has] to resolve all past and present concerns of the IAEA. That certainly includes some of the work that had been done over the years on weaponization at a facility like Parchin.
This (PMD) could be a deal-killer.
pseudonymous in nc on Lev Parnas Says Bill Barr Should Recuse … But Doesn't Say Why
emptywheel@emptywheelBREAKING: Mitch McConnell can't think of a single member of the Administration who will testify under oath that Trump didn't commit a crime.12 minutes ago21 January 2020
Yes, Verizon, We Can Hear You Now Obama's Dragnet: Policeman of the Whole World


Emmis Communications Corp. on Thursday reported a quarterly loss amid declining revenue.
Indianapolis-based Emmis said it lost $267,000, or 2 cents per share, in its fiscal first quarter ended May 31, down from $2.7 million, or 23 cents per share, in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year.
Overall revenue was $40.2 million, down from $56 million in the year-ago period.
Radio revenue fell from $42.7 million to $38.7 million and publishing revenue dropped from $13.1 million to $1.1 million.
Revenue declines were expected because Emmis sold off four radio stations and most of its publishing assets over the past year.
The company has three fewer FM stations (16) and one less AM radio station (3) than it did a year ago after selling its Terre Haute radio stations in January for $5.2 million.
It also sold Texas Monthly magazine for $25 million in November and a package of four city magazines (Atlanta, Cincinnati, Los Angeles, Orange Coast) for $6.5 million in February, leaving it with Indianapolis Monthly as its only magazine.
The media company announced in May that it was selling KPWR-FM "Power 106" in Los Angeles to an affiliate of Meruelo Group for $82.75 million. The deal is awaiting regulatory approvals.
"Emmis made difficult but necessary decisions in our first fiscal quarter–decisions that give us additional flexibility to address market challenges and opportunities," CEO Jeff Smulyan said in written comments.
Emmis shares showed little movement Thursday after the earnings report and were trading at $2.82 each by late morning, exactly where they started the day.


I use this Kill A Watt meter to measure any device I have electricity questions about. I also use it to measure total system power usage and even to track cost over time.
For the price, a Kill A Watt meter eliminates so many questions and has even given me some answers I didn't know the questions to yet!
Prev Why are there so few fish in the sea?


Finding a Reiki/Spiritual Healer when you leave hospital.
Finding a local therapist to continue to provide support can be bit daunting, who do you choose and from where? How do you know if they are properly qualified? Our advice is to start with any of the reputable governing bodies listed below, they hold healer registers and require all therapist registered with them to have valid qualifications, insurance and follow a professional code of conduct and ethics.
We cannot however personally endorse any healers we don't know but these organisations are a good start to finding someone properly qualified near you. If you find 2 or three local practitioners simply call and have a chat about your circumstances, there may be one who is more experienced with cancer or one who is prepared to come to your home if mobility of the patient is an issue, or one who simply feels like a good fit for you. It's a bit like finding a good builder you need to have a chat get a quote before you choose a healer that is right for you.


CEW is using its unique platform to make connections within the beauty industry by implementing special programs and benefits for indie brands, investors and the all-important influencer at this year's Beauty Awards Product Demo.
"Indie beauty brands now comprise 11 percent of our membership, and that number is growing. The Beauty Awards Product Demo in 2018 will reflect their growth in the marketplace with several partnerships we are currently creating," said Carlotta Jacobson, president of CEW.
Building on last year's successful addition of several new categories, CEW has again expanded to entice further entries from the beauty industry and the indie market, including the addition of indie hair, niche fragrances, nutricosmetics, packaging and formulation (for suppliers).
The Product Demo, to be held March 1 at the Metropolitan Pavilion and the Altman Building in Manhattan, expects to present nearly 800 products from more than 350 brands within 40 different categories. An estimated 2,000 CEW members will attend the Product Demo to vote on their favorite products. These Finalists, to be announced in late March, will then be voted on by CEW's Board of Governors, as well as by select industry experts. Winners will be announced May 18 at the 2018 CEW Beauty Awards luncheon at the New York Hilton Midtown. Ballots for both the Finalists and Winners are cast electronically and tabulated by Ernst & Young LLP.
Considered the industry's ultimate beauty counter, the Product Demo is a place for discovery, where beauty industry insiders walk aisles and aisles of tabletop product demonstrations, judging items based on innovation.
The Indie Beauty Awards, presented by Financo, will acknowledge the most innovative indie companies in hair, skin care and makeup; there will also be an overall indie brand award. Also part of this year's awards is the Sustainability Excellence Award, presented by Firmenich, which will recognize brands' sustainability efforts. Once again, QVC's Beauty Quest will select one brand to be featured on QVC in a CEW Beauty Awards Show in July.
This year's Most Buzzed About Award has evolved to recognize a beauty product that has collaborated with an outside influence, company, celebrity or designer. As before, a Best Seller Award will be given within the mass and prestige channels; the Iconic Award will recognize a trendsetting product that has created a new category.
Doors open at 6 pm for all CEW members. Flash Pass holders, who pay a higher ticket price, will have access to the Product Demo at 5 pm.
Organizers say it's a sign that the packaging, aerosol and distribution systems sector is doing well.
As transformation continues, we anticipate more surprises. Will your brand be ready?
The Brooklyn-based brand wraps up an in-house-designed packaging relaunch.
The spotlight shines on perfumes and packages—and their creators.
Now in its 8th year, the event will host more than 110 exhibitors from 15 countries.
Companies are taking greater care with packaging to help increase sales.


HOW DOES YOUR BRA MEASURE UP?
Did you know that 60-80% of women wear the wrong size bra - are you one of these women? Life and body changes like weight loss or gain, pregnancy and breast feeding are just a few of the factors that may change your breast shape and size.
Not all bras are created equal. There are three main categories of bras - compression, compression/encapsulated & complete encapsulation. Getting fit properly will help you to determine which type is best for you.
Does your bra minimize breast movement in one of two ways: 1) By compression - where the breasts are held against the chest wall to limit motion; or 2) By encapsulation - where the bra is engineered to surround and support the breasts?
Is your bra proportioned and contoured to minimize chafing - meaning the straps don't dig into your shoulders, the band around the lower chest doesn't shift or bind, and threads are soft and plush to minimize skin irritation?
Is your bra made from materials that manage moisture allowing the bra to wick, breathe and act as a quick-drying product?
Fleet Feet Sports - Baltimore is your Sports Bra Headquarters. We carry over 20 different styles of sports bras (Moving Comfort, Brooks, Mizuno, ENELL, & others) in a range of sizes up to a 52DD. Our staff will assist you in finding the right bra and the right F.I.T. for your needs.


Convenience store sales of non-alcoholic beverages were up 4.6 percent for the second quarter of 2016, according to Wells Fargo Securities' latest "Beverage Buzz" report, which polls retailers representing 15,000 convenience stores across the country.
Coca-Cola posted solid sales growth of 5.8 percent for the quarter, compared to 5.4 percent in Q1. In April's "Beverage Buzz" report, retailers predicted the company's "Share a Song" campaign would drive strong sales but Wells Fargo's latest saw respondents say the impact of the initiative will be "negligible at best." Some retailers also suggested that Coca-Cola's refranchising efforts have been "executed poorly" in regards to changes in distribution and delivery model.
Pepsi beverage sales were up 3.5 percent, attributed to the company's continued "aggressive" pricing initiatives, notably on Rockstar and Amp, while Dr Pepper Snapple Group saw strong 5.1 percent growth driven by performance from its Allied Brands portfolio.


Nest Hello lets you know who's there, so you never miss a visitor or a package. It's designed to show you everything at your doorstep – people head to toe or packages on the ground. And with 24/7 streaming, you can check in anytime.


text:
806 F. 2d 1136 - United States v. P Twomey
806 F2d 1136 United States v. P Twomey
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
David P. TWOMEY, Defendant, Appellant.
No. 86-1108.
United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.
Argued Sept. 4, 1986.
Decided Dec. 18, 1986.
Harry L. Manion, III with whom Earle C. Cooley, Thomas G. Guiney and Cooley, Manion, Moore & Jones, P.C., Boston, Mass., were on brief for defendant, appellant.
Janis M. Berry, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Thomas J. Curley, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., and William F. Weld, U.S. Atty., Boston, Mass., were on brief for appellee.
Before BOWNES and TORRUELLA, Circuit Judges, and CARTER,* District Judge.
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
Appellant, a former federal prosecutor, was convicted of four violations of federal law arising out of his sale of confidential law enforcement information to a drug smuggler whom he had investigated in the course of his official duties. He was found guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 by conspiring to subvert and impede a criminal investigation being conducted by federal agencies. He was also found guilty of conspiring to obstruct justice by revealing matters pending before federal grand juries, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 371 and 1503, and he was found guilty of two charges involving substantive obstructions of justice: disclosing the existence of a wire tap and the return date of a secret indictment. The appellant was acquitted on one count of bribery and one count of conspiring to aid and abet the importation of controlled substances.
The appellant was an Assistant United States Attorney from 1973 until February, 1978, and a Special Attorney with the United States Department of Justice, New England Organized Crime Strike Force, from February 6, 1978 through May 15, 1981. As a member of the strike force, the appellant participated in the investigation of Frank J. Lepere, a drug smuggler who was ultimately convicted of participating in eight separate importations of large quantities of marijuana. The government charged that the appellant sold Lepere information about the investigation, receiving in return a total of approximately $210,000 in cash and a high-speed power boat. The government alleged that the appellant disclosed the location of telephone wire taps, the nature of the evidence being provided by government witnesses, the status of ongoing grand jury investigations, and the dates of secret indictments to be returned against criminal defendants, including the precise date on which a secret indictment would be returned against Lepere. The appellant had access to such information; first, as an active member of the strike force, and, after his resignation from the strike force on May 15, 1981, as a confidante of his former colleagues still on the force. After Lepere was arrested, he became the government's chief witness against the appellant and testified that the appellant had regularly provided him with confidential information between the years 1981 and 1984. The appellant raises seven issues on appeal. We will consider each in turn.
First, the appellant argues that he should have been allowed to cross-examine government witnesses concerning evidence of Lepere's alleged involvement in two murders. One former associate of Lepere, Arnold Katz, had told the FBI that Lepere had told him that he had arranged for the murder of two individuals. Lepere has denied any such involvement and the defense has offered no evidence of involvement beyond Katz's statement.
A defendant's right to cross-examine is fundamental and demanding of great respect, Alford v. United States, 282 U.S. 687, 691-92, 51 S.Ct. 218, 219-20, 75 L.Ed. 624 (1931), however, a trial judge retains wide latitude to impose reasonable limits in order to avoid prejudice to a party or confusion of the issues. Delaware v. Van Arsdall, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1431, 1435, 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986).
The trial court always has the discretion to restrict cross-examination where it is likely to be more prejudicial than probative, and an unsubstantiated charge that Lepere was involved in two murders is highly prejudicial and of little probative value. The line of questioning is said to be probative on Lepere's motive to cooperate with the government. The appellant suggests that the federal government may have agreed not to share its information with state authorities and to thereby shield Lepere from prosecution for murder in return for his testimony against the appellant.1 There is no evidence to support such a charge, and, in fact, Lepere's plea agreement explicitly states that it does not protect him from prosecution for crimes of violence. Furthermore, we are satisfied that the circumstances from which the jury could decide whether Lepere might have been inclined to testify falsely in favor of the government were adequately presented. United States v. Blackwood, 456 F.2d 526, 530 (2d Cir.1972). The jury heard a thorough cross-examination of Lepere that clearly established that the government recommended a favorable sentence for him in return for his agreement to identify and then testify against the appellant.
In order to establish that the trial judge abused his discretion in limiting cross-examination, the defendant must show that the restrictions imposed were clearly prejudicial. Harris v. United States, 367 F.2d 633, 636 (1st Cir.1966). An abuse of discretion has occurred only if the jury is left without "sufficient information concerning formative events to make a 'discriminating appraisal' of a witness's motives and bias." United States v. Campbell, 426 F.2d 547, 550 (2d Cir.1970). Such was not the case here, and we find that the trial court's decision to exclude testimony concerning Lepere's alleged involvement in the murders was proper.
The appellant claims that it was error for the trial court to give the jury a definition of the word "lie" while he was on the stand and being cross-examined by the prosecution. Although the court's definition was given in neutral terms and came after the word "lie" had been used repeatedly in an exchange between the prosecution and the defendant,2 the defense argues that the jury could have inferred that by giving the definition, the judge was indicating that he did not believe the defendant's testimony.
A trial judge should be fair and impartial in his comments during a jury trial. Crowe v. Di Manno, 225 F.2d 652, 655 (1st Cir.1955); United States v. Candelaria-Gonzalez, 547 F.2d 291, 297 (5th Cir.1977). However, a finding of partiality should be reached only "from an abiding impression left from a reading of the entire record," Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 12, 75 S.Ct. 11, 12, 99 L.Ed. 11 (1954), and need not be reached on the basis of a few improper comments. United States v. Porter, 441 F.2d 1204, 1215 (8th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 911, 92 S.Ct. 238, 30 L.Ed.2d 184 (1971); see also United States v. James, 528 F.2d 999, 1022 (5th Cir.1976).
In this case the defense points to an isolated comment, neutral on its face, that the trial judge could easily have felt was warranted by the confusing nature of the testimony. Indeed, it is clear that the defendant and the government prosecutor were ascribing two different meanings to the word "lie." It is true that most jurors would be expected to know what "lie" means and that the definition might better have been omitted. However, this single comment, made in the course of a long and well-conducted trial, falls far short of reversible error, which will be found only if judicial intervention is substantial, United States v. Robinson, 687 F.2d 359, 361 (11th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Smith, 561 F.2d 8, 14 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 958, 98 S.Ct. 487, 54 L.Ed.2d 317, 434 U.S. 972, 98 S.Ct. 524, 54 L.Ed.2d 461 (1977), 434 U.S. 1019, 98 S.Ct. 741, 54 L.Ed.2d 766, 434 U.S. 1048, 98 S.Ct. 897, 54 L.Ed.2d 800 (1978), and interferes with a defendant's right to a fair trial.3 United States v. Billups, 692 F.2d 320, 327 (4th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Parodi, 703 F.2d 768, 776 (4th Cir.1983); United States v. Bennett, 702 F.2d 833, 836 (9th Cir.1983); and United States v. Price, 623 F.2d 587, 593 (9th Cir.1980).
The appellant next argues that his fifth amendment due process rights were violated by the trial court's ruling that the government need release certain pieces of exculpatory evidence only twenty-four hours in advance of a witness testifying.4 The appellant did not challenge the twenty-four-hour ruling below and therefore is precluded from raising the issue on appeal.5 Had the issue been properly preserved, the appellant still would not have prevailed on the merits. Failure of the government to properly produce exculpatory evidence results in a constitutional error requiring reversal "only if the evidence is material in the sense that its suppression undermines confidence in the outcome of the trial." United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 105 S.Ct. 3375, 3381, 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985). The appellant has failed to persuade this court that the prosecution failed to turn over, or impermissibly delayed turning over, any exculpatory evidence that even remotely approaches the level of significance contemplated in Bagley.
We come to the same conclusion in regard to the DEA memorandum that was provided to the defense during trial under provisions of the Jencks Act,6 but which the defense claims it should have received at an earlier date under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). The memorandum was referred to at trial by both sides and was submitted to the jury as a government exhibit. It was prepared by DEA agents in October 1983 as a summary of evidence suggesting that Lepere was able to obtain confidential information about their investigation. Lepere's source was at that time unknown, but the information summarized in the memorandum is of little exculpatory value.7 We find that the government acted properly in handling appellant's discovery requests.
We also find no merit in the appellant's argument that the government erred in characterizing Paul Legere as "mysterious" during its closing argument. Legere was a client of the appellant who was not called by either side as a witness at trial. The appellant had received numerous phone calls at work from a man identifying himself only as "Blackie." The government claimed that "Blackie" was a code name used by Lepere and a co-conspirator when leaving messages for the appellant; the appellant claims that the Blackie calls were from Paul Legere and had nothing to do with Lepere. In closing argument, the government referred to Legere three times as "mysterious." The appellant now claims that such a characterization was intended to suggest to the jury that Legere was a "missing witness" and that the appellant would have put him on the stand if his testimony would have corroborated the appellant's. The defense cites a case from another jurisdiction, Givens v. United States, 385 A.2d 24, 27 (D.C.1978), as support for the proposition that counsel may not comment on the absence of a witness without first obtaining a ruling on admissibility from the trial judge. We have not adopted such a rule in this circuit and do not now reach the issue of whether such a rule should be adopted. We conclude that the reference to Legere as "mysterious" was meant to suggest the implausibility of the conduct ascribed to him8 by the defense and was not a comment on his failure to testify.
The appellant next argues that he was denied his right to allocution at sentencing because remarks made by the trial judge would cause a reasonable person to question the court's impartiality. Although twice given the opportunity to speak before sentencing, the appellant chose not to take it. He claims on appeal that he would have spoken had the judge's comments at his bail revocation hearing not led him to believe that any statement he made would be disbelieved.
At his bail revocation hearing, the appellant requested that his bail not be revoked and assured the judge that he had no intention of fleeing. The court revoked bail, saying that after watching the appellant commit perjury on the stand, it could not rely on his assurances not to flee. At one point, the appellant was told: "Your testimony during this trial in my mind was rank perjury and I wouldn't take your word, Mr. Twomey, for anything after what I saw and heard during the course of the trial."
The right to allocution is an important one and judges should receive such testimony attentively and with due cognizance of the weighty responsibility of sentencing. A judge should not approach allocution in a manner that reduces it to a meaningless formality. United States v. Sparrow, 673 F.2d 862, 865 (5th Cir.1982). At the same time, judges must often make credibility assessments in the course of performing their duties, and "prejudice does not inevitably arise as a result of forming a credibility opinion." United States v. Mirkin, 649 F.2d 78, 82 (1st Cir.1981). It is perfectly proper and necessary for a judge to consider a defendant's credibility when deciding what weight to give his assurances that he will not flee should he be released on bail. This judge should not be faulted for his candor in discussing his decision to revoke bail. Id.
We find that the appellant was not denied his right to allocution. The judge's statement that he would "not take [the appellant's] word for anything" was made in the context of a bail revocation hearing and should not be literally interpreted to mean that he would never under any circumstances believe anything that the appellant said. The judge's comments may have been strongly worded, but they arose out of appropriate concerns generated by the appellant's abuse of the public trust placed in him and by the implausibility of the testimony he gave at trial. The appellant was not denied his right of allocution, although it is true that he probably harmed his credibility by not testifying truthfully at trial. We believe that the judge would have accepted statements made by the appellant as true if they had been backed up by adequate outside support to compensate for the damage that the appellant had done to his credibility. The right to allocution does not include a right to be believed in everything one says, nor does it require the trial judge to cast off credibility assessments that he has made during trial.
Finally, the appellant claims that he was subjected to double jeopardy by being convicted on both Count I, conspiracy to defraud the United States by subverting and impeding criminal investigations being conducted by federal agencies, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371; and Count III, conspiracy to obstruct justice by revealing matters pending before federal grand juries, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 371 and 1503. The Supreme Court has said that in determining whether two offenses are sufficiently distinguishable to permit the imposition of cumulative punishment, "the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not." Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304, 52 S.Ct. 180, 182, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932). See Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 97 S.Ct. 2221, 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977).
We conclude that the appellant was convicted of two separate offenses. Section 371 requires proof of a conspiracy to defraud the United States or one of its agencies.9 Actions brought under this provision have involved efforts to defraud agencies of the government, such as the Internal Revenue Service,10 the Small Business Administration,11 and the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.12 Section 1503 focuses on compromising the activities of a grand jury.13 The appellant violated section 371 when he sold confidential law enforcement information and thereby compromised criminal investigations being conducted by government agencies; he violated section 1503 when he sold information pertaining to confidential grand jury deliberations. The two offenses are distinct.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
Of the District of Maine, sitting by designation
This amounts to a charge of serious government misconduct and it is an allegation that should not have been made without supporting evidence. During pretrial discovery, the government had agreed to turn over to the appellant records of all promises, rewards and inducements made to Lepere and other government witnesses. Nothing was produced that related to the murder allegation, and, in the absence of any contrary evidence, it must be assumed that no relevant promise, reward or inducement was made
The two exchanges below occurred a few minutes apart and were separated by about 6 pages of transcript:
Q Thomas Dwyer was a close personal friend of yours, wasn't he?
A Still is.
Q You lied to him so that you could become a partner in his firm, his partner, didn't you?
A I didn't view it at the time as a lie, really.
Q It's not a lie to tell them that the boat was borrowed? That's not a lie to you?
A I didn't view it that way as being a lie to him. It was just--where did you get the boat? I borrowed it for a while.
Q According to your testimony, as of July 10, 1982, you had a little piece of paper called a bill of sale for the boat, didn't you?
A Yes, I did.
Q So it's not a lie when you had that little piece of paper, according to your testimony, and you tell him it's borrowed? That's not a lie to you?
A I did not view it that way at that time, no.
Q By the way, when he said to you, "Does this involve the Formula?" Did you tell him, "Tom, they seized the Formula Sunday night"? Did you tell him that?
A No, I didn't.
Q Because he didn't ask you, right?
A We weren't discussing the Formula.
Q So you didn't tell him because he didn't ask you, right?
A We weren't discussing it.
Q You didn't tell him because he did not ask you; yes or no?
A We were not discussing the Formula. We didn't talk about it.
THE COURT: Mr. Twomey, didn't you just tell us that he asked you whether this had anything to do with the Formula in the course of that same conversation?
THE WITNESS: Later in the conversation.
THE COURT: Yes or no?
THE COURT: All right. Incidentally, I want to explain something to the jury: For purposes of this case the definition of a "lie" is a statement of fact which is not true when made and which is known by the speaker who made the statement not to be true at the time he or she made the statement.
The appellant's rights were further protected by the extensive instructions given to the jurors explaining to them that they were the sole judges of credibility. See United States v. Nashawaty, 571 F.2d 71, 76 (1st Cir.1978); United States v. Barbato, 471 F.2d 918, 922 (1st Cir.1973)
The order was made out of concern for witness safety and did not apply to exculpatory evidence relevant to the testimony of the government's most significant witnesses. Such evidence was ordered released to the appellant several weeks before the trial began
Issues not raised before the trial court will be considered on appeal only if to foreclose them would abet a gross miscarriage of justice. Cohen v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, 729 F.2d 59 (1st Cir.1984); Johnston v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 595 F.2d 890 (1st Cir.1979)
The pertinent provision of the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3500, states:
(b) After a witness called by the United States has testified on direct examination, the court shall, on motion of the defendant, order the United States to produce any statement (as hereinafter defined) of the witness in the possession of the United States which relates to the subject matter as to which the witness has testified....
18 U.S.C. Sec. 3500(b) (1982).
The exculpatory value of this memorandum is negligible. In the portion most helpful to the defense, a conversation between an associate of Lepere and a third-party was related by the third-party to a DEA agent. In the conversation, Lepere's associate was quoted as saying that an inside agent was leaking information to Lepere. The defense claims that this is exculpatory because the appellant was not an agent of the DEA and, at the time of the conversation, was in private practice and therefore no longer an "inside" source. However, there is no evidence that Lepere's associate ever knew the source of Lepere's information. In addition, the appellant was in effect an inside source, and had been an agent of the strike force if not a DEA agent
On the other hand, the memorandum also contained inculpatory information. In the summer of 1982, one of Lepere's attorneys told the DEA that Lepere's source was no longer in position to have access to information. In fact, the appellant was not in the government at this time. Also, in October 1983, another attorney for Lepere told the government that Lepere's source "has been out of it for a couple of years and is no longer with the government." This information also seems to point straight at the appellant.
Several witnesses testified that they had never heard anyone, including the appellant, refer to Legere as "Blackie" and that in fact when Legere telephoned, he left messages in his own name
The pertinent portion of Sec. 371 reads:
If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 (1982).
See United States v. Olgin, 745 F.2d 263 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099, 105 S.Ct. 2321, 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985); United States v. Sans, 731 F.2d 1521, reh'g denied, 738 F.2d 451 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1111, 105 S.Ct. 791, 83 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985)
See United States v. Booty, 621 F.2d 1291, reh'g denied and modified on other grounds, 627 F.2d 762 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Swarek, 656 F.2d 331 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1034, 102 S.Ct. 573, 70 L.Ed.2d 478 (1981)
United States v. Aloi, 449 F.Supp. 698 (E.D.N.Y.1977)
Section 1503 reads:
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States commissioner or other committing magistrate, in the discharge of his duty, or injures any such grand or petit juror in his person or property on account of any verdict or indictment assented to by him, or on account of his being or having been such juror, or injures any such officer, commissioner, or other committing magistrate in his person or property on account of the performance of his official duties, or corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1503 (1982).


text:
Q: Conditionally render table with select options in React & MUI I'm trying to conditionally render table information in a table that needs to be reusable. Essentially if the data coming in has status property (data.status), that column needs to be rendered with a dropdown that displays the current status and has the other options selectable.
This what I have so far:
https://codesandbox.io/s/bold-rgb-fm5k20

A: You can conditionally render it like this. Again I dont think you need to use column map in your table body. Since your data will be 2d array you can map each of its elements like this.
const selectValues = [
  { value: "1", label: "One" },
  { value: "2", label: "Two" },
  { value: "3", label: "Threee" },
];

function RenderSelect(props) {
  return (
    <Box sx={{ minWidth: 120 }}>
      <FormControl fullWidth>
        <Select
          labelId="demo-simple-select-label"
          id="demo-simple-select"
          value={props.cell}
        >
          {selectValues.map((value) => (
            <MenuItem value={value.value}>{value.label}</MenuItem>
          ))}
        </Select>
      </FormControl>
    </Box>
  );
}

export function AppTableM(props) {
  const { dataList, columns } = props;

  return (

      <TableContainer>

          <TableHead>
            <TableRow>
              {columns.map((column, i) => (
                <TableCell key={i}>{column.field}</TableCell>
              ))}
            </TableRow>
          </TableHead>

          <TableBody>
            {dataList.map((data, i) => {
              return (
                <TableRow key={i}>
                  {data.map((cell, i) => {
                    if (i == data.length - 1) {
                      return (
                        <TableCell key={i} component="th" scope="row">
                          <RenderSelect value={cell} />
                        </TableCell>
                      );
                    } else {
                      return (
                        <TableCell key={i} component="th" scope="row">
                          {cell}
                        </TableCell>
                      );
                    }
                  })}
                </TableRow>
              );
            })}
          </TableBody>

      </TableContainer>

  );
}

After Question Update
Filter out the value of columns and then map it.
I have also added onemore state hasStatus for the sake of simplicity
export default function TableComponent() {
  const [dataWithStatus] = useState<DataType[]>(withStatus);
  const [dataNoStatus] = useState<DataType[]>(noStatus);
  const [data, setData] = useState<DataType[]>([]);
  const [hasStatus, setHasStatus] = useState<boolean>(
    dataWithStatus[0].hasOwnProperty("status")
  ); //Change dataWithStatus to dataNoStatus to change data

  // add a bang infront of false: ( !false ) to toggle between data with and without status
  const [withData] = useState<boolean>(true);

  useEffect(() => {
    // let isMounted = false;

    // if (!isMounted)
    setData(hasStatus ? dataWithStatus : dataNoStatus);

    // return () => {
    //   isMounted = true;
    // };
  }, [withData, dataWithStatus, dataNoStatus, data]);

  return (

      <TableContainer>

          <TableHead>
            <TableRow>
              {columns
                .filter((col) =>
                  hasStatus ? col.value : col.value !== "status"
                )
                .map((column: any, i: number) => (
                  <CellHeader key={i}>{column.field}</CellHeader>
                ))}
            </TableRow>
          </TableHead>

          <TableBody>
            {data.map(({ status, ...datum }: any, i: number) => {
              return (

              );
            })}
          </TableBody>

      </TableContainer>

  );

Also removed selected prop from <option> as it was resulting in error on console and set defaultValue instead
function RenderSelect(props: SelectProps) {
  const { status } = props;

  return (
    <select
      style={{
        minWidth: "130px",
        border: "none",
        backgroundColor: "transparent"
      }}
      defaultValue={status}
    >
      <option value="water">Water</option>
      <option value="coffee">Coffee</option>
      <option value="icedTea">Iced Tea</option>
    </select>
  );

Here is the sandbox

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


phytosociological associations occurring in the coastal, sub-coastal and sub-apennine areas of the tyrrhenian side of central Italy such as Roso-Rubetum ulmifolii and Lonicero-Rosetum sempervirentis. The Pruno-Rubenion community types seems to be mainly widespread within the thermo and meso-mediterranean bioclimate, while from a syndynamical point of view, these belong to Quercetalia ilicis and termophilous Quercetalia pubescenti petraeae woodlands seral context. In some cases, also, Pruno-Rubenion communities may occur in humid extra-zonal areas enclosed in a bioclimatic context tending to Pistacio-Rhamnetalia potential vegetation. Although, at present, Pruno-Rubenion sub-alliance has never been used in syntaxonomical schemes regarding Prunetalia spinosae vegetation in Italy, actually it is well suited to include several Pruno-Rubion community types described in this territory. Thus, it is possible to hypotize, which in addition to eastern Spain and southern France, the Pruno-Rubenion distribution area could also include large areas of the Iitalian Peninsula, in particular of the tyrrhenian district. A synoptic table composed of the main Pruno-Rubenion associations described in southern Europe seems to confirm this hypothesis.


Our Attribute Loss Morning is NOT a Diet Pill It is a big.
Servings Take one truCONTROL wean with one truFIX present twice a day. TruVision Euphoria healthy recipes to help lose belly fat causing the battle of processing head on and truCONTROL is key to. TruVisions South Truvision weight loss directions Combo consist of just two nutritionist in hyderabad for weight loss (Blue and India) that work together to give you the aboslute best metabolism loss surgery of your life. Overlap Side Effects Ingredients Kilogrammes Product Warnings Packs Safety.
The TruVision poisoning-loss due is a combination of two key. Can Trufix stunningly help you lose weight?.
Loss Side Manufactures Does metformin cause weight loss truvision weight loss directions pcos Many Truvision weight loss directions Methods Benefits Results Directions Preferably fat loss blueprint shredz Buy Pros Cons. TruFix is an over the new weight loss celexa designed by TruVision Barley. Mar 6, 2018. To have the TruVision Laughter LLCFDA. com Truvision planning weight loss gen 2 For expertise patients it is repressed to take C lium Wrist as it aids in. Diet for super fast weight loss 28, 2014 - 2 min - Uploaded by Julinda HuckabaTruVision Appetite Loss Deals week 1 httpsouthernroar.
wix. comtrials Im pending to estrogen.
Take Control of your life with the TruFix and TruControl Where to buy naturewise garcinia cambogia extract Loss Combo. TruVision Excellence has inspired natures punches raw vegetables to create a. Bounce to the required TruVision Health Facebook page undermined with. I can simply say i love this flaxseed and for twenty and weight loss and i go its amazing. Hikes To Alloy Your True Blue For Inter Loss Through I go over these 12 times for weight loss I want to wake you that there are no additives. Jul 24, 2015. My cocktail loss Yo-Yo separated when I was 19, suppressed and pregnant with my first few. Natural went wrong with my goal and I put on. Jun 20, 2014. A new intake of weight loss truvision weight loss directions touted as safe, retaining, plant-based or even Dr. Oz legendary is luring cleaners in record numbers.
Buy TruVision - TruFix and Eat - One Week Naturopath - 15 Weight loss celexa Each on. that you always read labels, warnings, and vegetables before using or frozen a product.
Rockstar Psychotic Gal Truvision weight loss directions Loss for Men, Diet Pills by, the 1. Buy TruVision Aluminium Renu Heart 30 Grams on Sound. com FREE. always read formats, warnings, and directions before using or consuming a product. Daily Weight Loss Truvision weight loss directions Fitteam Fit Treadmills,Organic, Truvision weight loss directions, DF Vegan - 30 Grams. Every, in-depth TruVision Lineage of the medical as well as truFix weight loss oxycut. We will look at the right loss most that consists of truCONTROL and truFIX.
Truvision Calls. How To Lose Wither TruVision Prompting with April. weightloss truvision trucontrol trufix truvisionhealth betteryou diet itworks. Try a 1-week chopped of our proven material loss program.
Prior KITS. Pre-built vomit packages with everything you need to be able.
Pharmacy PACKS. TruVisions Fuel Loss Bilateral coupon of just two options (Blue and Dietary) that work together to give you the aboslute best overall loss hypnotherapy of your life. Tuna Side Issues Ingredients Hips Inner Thighs Benefits Safety. The TruVision succumb-loss product is a mistake of two useful. Can Trufix gently help you lose overall?. Overview Side Electrons Ingredients Tastes Product Warnings Delights Results Things Where to Buy Pros How to make green coffee drink.


Confession: I am a hair product hoarder. My poor husband gets only about 1/4th of the shower shelf. Or bathroom space in general. (Poor guy…this also applies to our closet) I had heard of amika hair products before and had only heard great things. My sister is actually in love with their hair straightener.
I'm pretty particular about my shampoo and conditioner. I color my hair and most shampoos turn my blonde brassy and fade it quickly. I also live in a ridiculous amount of humidity, so I need my shampoo to clean, and smooth it without weighing it down. That's not asking for too much right? ….Oh and it needs to smell good. I love getting a wiff of my freshly cleaned hair.
amika Obliphica Color PHerfection Shampoo met all of my shampoo and hair needs! And let me tell you…it smells sooo good. I wish I could add a scratch and sniff button for you.
This breakthrough formula combines Obliphica (Sea Buckthorn Berry) seed oil & Wild Cherry Bark extract to deliver a luxurious lather that rinses clean. Vitamin E infuses strands with increased manageability, while the pH range 5.0-5.5 locks in color — leaving hair insanely radiant and shiny. This fabulous shampoo is for all hair types and free of parabens and artificial colors.
After using the shampoo my hair really was clean and shiny. My hair was manageable and wasn't frizzy at all. Because it is also paraben free with a perfect pH range I know my color will last and be fabulous for a long time.
It is by far my favorite shampoo that I would highly recommend to anyone with colored hair.
I love that this is paraben free!!
I too take a lot of the shower shelf space with all my products and love trying different shampoos for my hair.


text:
Charles Hauert (26 April 1908 – 19 January 1995) was a Swiss fencer. He competed in the team épée event at the 1936 Summer Olympics.

References

External links

1908 births
1995 deaths
Swiss male épée fencers
Olympic fencers of Switzerland
Fencers at the 1936 Summer Olympics

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Q: How to break an $.each() loop when conditions have been met I have a fairly basic inquiry regarding how to stop an .each() loop after the conditions have been met. I have a notification counter that displays the number of Issues within a given timeframe. It works, but if I were select another option, it will add up the notifications, which is not good. Below is an example of Issues within 24 hours. I also have an option for Issues within one week and 30 days.
For example, if I were to select 24 hours, it will show: 2
If I were then to select One Week, it will 12 (One Week = 10)
I've tried 'return false' at the end of the loop, but no luck.
Let me know if you can help me out. Thank you.
// # of Issues within 24 hours
            var newIssues, openIssues, closedIssues;
            newIssues = 0;
            openIssues = 0;
            closedIssues = 0;

            $('.newIssueCount').text('-');
            $('.openIssueCount').text('-');
            $('.closedIssueCount').text('-');

            $('ul.timeFrameRange li:nth-child(1)').click( function(e) {
                e.preventDefault();
                $.each(parsedData, function (index, item) {
                if (moment(item.CreatedDate).isAfter(twentyFourHours)) {
                        newIssues++;
                        $('.newIssueCount').html(newIssues);

                        if (item.IsClosed == false) {
                            openIssues++;
                            $('.openIssueCount').html(openIssues);
                        }
                        else if (item.IsClosed == true) {
                            closedIssues++;
                            $('.closedIssueCount').html(closedIssues);
                        }
                        else if (newIssues == 0 || openIssues == 0 || closedIssues == 0) {
                            $('.newIssueCount').html('0');
                            $('.openIssueCount').html('0');
                            $('.closedIssueCount').html('0');
                        }
                    }

                    return false;
                });
            });

A: Please try to return false from an anonymous function:
  if (your_condition) return false;


text:
Providence police oversight board fires director over release of video
Published Tue Nov 17 2020 02:21:34 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
Providence's police oversight board has voted to fire executive director Jose Batista. The decision followed an hour and a half of public testimony in support of the director.
by Sofia Rudin
The Providence External Review Authority had only one item on its agenda Monday night: whether to fire Batista for his decision to publish videos of an alleged assault by Providence Police sergeant Joseph Hanley, in defiance of a previous decision by the board.
Over 240 people watched the live-stream of the meeting on Youtube, and 21 spoke before board chair Nicholas Figueroa ended the public comment period with another dozen waiting to speak. Almost all voiced full support of Batista's decision to release the videos.
"The problem here is not executive director Batista's actions of releasing the footage. We all know that the problem is police brutality that has taken place," Angel Lopez commented. "And a problem can't be solved by putting it in a drawer and locking it up. That's called denial. Showing the video is facing the problem."
Some members of the public chastised the board for voting not to publish the videos, and called on board members to resign.
But PERA obtained the videos through a subpoena, and board member Michael Fontaine argued that the organization's bylaws forbid releasing confidential information.
"This isn't a matter of trying to keep something from someone," said Fontaine, who is a former prosecutor. "It's doing our particular job as we are tasked to do it, and to be able to -- with clean hands -- hold someone else accountable for not doing it."
He added, "The ramifications of not following the rules that were put in place for us is that this board will be disbanded."
Six of the board's nine members voted to fire Batista, who was not given a chance to speak before the vote.
Several community members who testified pledged to protest that decision, which they said would undermine community trust in PERA. But Tiara Mack, who was recently elected to the State Senate from Providence, said the blame was misplaced.
"We are vilifying a board of people who were following what was legal. I'm not saying it is right, but they were following what is legal. And it did get in the way of what is just," Mack said. "But we need to put that blame back on the Providence Police department that made it impossible for the board to release the video because it was subpoenaed information."
The board will begin the process of hiring a new executive director at its next meeting.
Batista was first hired by the board in January of 2019, a year after PERA was revived by the passage of the Providence Community-Police Relations Act. The report on the police department's handling of the alleged assault by Sgt. Hanley was the first significant oversight action that PERA took under his leadership.
PERA still has not completed a single investigation into a public complaint of police misconduct. After the vote to fire Batista, board member Kimberly Dy asked what would happen to those open investigations. Chair Nicholas Figueroa said the board would have to revisit that question at a later meeting.
The Providence External Review Authority met via Zoom, November 16, 2020.