text:
June 4, 2018 June 12, 2018 General Knowledge Leave a comment -536aboutacceptAKJVandAsAuthorizedbeatenbelieveBenbyChristDangerDavidDemonsDuckDynastyEforforgavefromHaginHealthHebrewsHellHisHowinjuryIsaiahIsraelJamesJESUSjewishJohnathanKennethkillerKingLankfordleadsListeningMinistryMorneauMusicNewsNotofoldoneonlypastorPersonalPhilProphecyRaptureRobertsonrockRogerSaviourSinTESTAMENTtestimonythatThetovaccineVAXXEDVersionWhyWouldYouYour
Roger Morneau – Beaten by demons and danger of listening to Rock music
Roger Morneau – Beaten by demons and danger of listening to Rock music. Real experience of a young lady beaten by demons. The experience is selected from a longer interview: "A Trip into the Supernatural" (part2) with Roger Morneau. The same dangers are in Rap, R'n'B, Reggae, Soul, Jazz etc. They all come from the same roots.
May 21, 2018 May 24, 2018 General Knowledge Leave a comment cellDangerIsjustNewsPhoneradiationScienceSeriousStoryTellsTheWhy
Why Cell Phone Radiation Danger is Serious Science Tells the Story
Despite what the telecom industry may want us to believe, if we do the research, we find there is now an overwhelming abundance of independent, peer-reviewed studies telling us that cell phone radiation is dangerous for our health. The research links cell phone radiation with many different disorders and diseases.
Cell Phones & Cancer
Researchers of the 2012 Bioinitiative Report agree that approximately ten years of cell phone use may lead to tumors. In particular, there are significant studies that directly correlate RF radiation from cell phones with brain tumors.
Studies report that:
The chance of developing a brain tumor goes up as much as 40% after a decade of cell phone use.
People are 5 times more likely to develop a brain tumor if they began using a cell phone before the age of 20.
People have twice the risk of developing the cancer known as "Glioma", if they use their cell phones for half an hour a day for more than a decade.
People using cell phones for 2000 hours have 240% greater risk for malignant brain tumors.
A significant report was released in 2009 by the International EMF Collaborative, a team of international EMF scientists and activists, entitled "Cell Phones and Brain Tumors: 15 Reasons for Concern, Science, Spin and the Truth Behind Interphone".
Another study by an Israeli research group found that there's recently been a sharp 4-fold increase in malignant tumors of the parotid gland on the side of the face the cell phone users generally hold the phone. Parotid tumors have historically been very rare and have shown up in people after the age of 50. Most cases since 2001 have occurred in people under the age of 20.
Read more on cell phones and cancer.
February 3, 2017 February 7, 2017 General Knowledge 1 Comment -11/31999AaboutAdverseAgainstagency'sAlteredAluminumandAsAuthorityAutismînbabyBadbanbeBillbiomarkersBoybycaseCDCCDC'sCertainchickenChildrenClaimscommunity'sconferenceConfirmscontainedcontaminationcourtDangerdangerousday-longdespiteDifferentdisableddisorderEDUCATIONEffectseffortsEgyptianenvironmentalethylmercury—areEvidenceexposed—methylmercuryexposingexposureFaultFederalFirstforForciblyfromgeneticallygrantedhasHawkingHealthHisHUMANignoringinjuryinsistsIsIssuesIt'sjabsjudgeknewlevelsLicensedlinkedlocalmandatoryMassmaymercurymetalloestrogenMissourimodifiedMothersNewNewsNullifyofonourOwnPartparticipantsPastPeoplepermanentlypermissionPolicyporphyrinspossiblePotentialpoxpracticeproblemsprogramProgramsPublicRacereactionsresponseReviewssafetysaysscientificscientistseven-month-oldSeverityShesincespectrumstatesStepStephenstubbornlystudytalkedtestimonythatThetotopToxicologytwoTypesUnitedurinaryUsevaccinateVaccinationvaccinevaccinesvariousVAXXEDVeryviabilitywarningwaswebpageWhichWinswishesWithWorld-famousWouldYear-Old
Vaccine news – CDC Knew Its Vaccine Program Was Exposing Children to Dangerous Mercury Levels Since 1999
World-famous scientist issues warning about genetically modified vaccines
Here's a look at just some of the genetically modified vaccines on the market today — and the risks we know about:
RotaTeq: This is supposed to protect babies from rotavirsues, and lots of kids get three doses before they even reach six months of age. But it's actually made from a cross between cow and human DNA, and clinical trials found that infants are twice as likely to suffer seizures within the first two weeks after they get the vaccine.
Flucelvax: This new flu jab is being marketed like crazy this time of year. But what they're not telling you is that it was actually made by combining human flu strains with kidney cells from a cocker spaniel! And while Flucelvax has only been around for a couple years, we already know that injecting ourselves with dog DNA is bad news. The vaccine nearly doubles your risk of a painful muscle condition called myalgia.
HPV vaccines, like Gardasil: I've told you stories about healthy, young girls who ended up paralyzed, unable to feed themselves and incapable of even attending school shortly after getting these shots. And currently, Virginia, Rhode Island and the District of Columbia require a Gardasil shot just to attend school.
And there are a whole bunch of new genetically-spliced recombinant vaccines coming down the pike, including one for measles.
Every time scientists try to warn us about the dangers of vaccines, the mainstream bends over backwards to call them quacks. But, trust me, nobody is saying that about Stephen Hawking.
"Most threats to humans come from technology, warns Hawking" Ian Sample, January 19, 2016, The Guardian, msn.com
Vaccines Licensed for Use in the United States
Stephen Hawking Says the Human Race is in Danger and it's our Own Fault
I feel so smart today. It isn't often that the scientific merit of my ideas is confirmed by Stephen Hawking. Today, there is an article in The Guardian, reposted in the MSN news, titled, "Most threats to humans come from science and technology, warns Hawking". Excerpt:
"Speaking to the Radio Times ahead of the BBC Reith Lecture, in which he will explain the science of black holes, Hawking said most of the threats humans now face come from advances in science and technology, such as nuclear weapons and genetically engineered viruses."
Genetically engineered viruses? Where have I heard that before? Oh, that's what drug companies put into vaccines that doctors, nurses and pharmacists inject directly into and/or put in the mouths of people – vaccines for illnesses that include Hepatitis B, HPV, flu, and rotavirus.
The vaccine for Hepatitis B was the first to be made from a genetically engineered virus as announced in this New York Times article from July 1986 (please see – the reader will appreciate the historical significance). Note who, in 1986, the Hepatitis B vaccine was recommended for:
Dr. Young recommended vaccinations with either hepatitis vaccine for dental and medical workers, susceptible homosexuals and drug users, the newborn children of infected women, and, among other groups, travelers to parts of the world where hepatitis B is rampant, such as southeast Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and parts of the Middle East.
That was a couple of years before they got the no doubt economically motivated crazy idea to assault every baby born in this country with the full series of this genetically modified concoction, the first dose of which would be given by their decree when the baby is in medical custody, in hospital, within 12 hours of birth.
ALUMINUM contained in vaccines is a metalloestrogen
Study – Metalloestrogens: an emerging class of inorganic xenoestrogens with potential to add to the oestrogenic burden of the human breast.
J Appl Toxicol. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):191-7.
Many compounds in the environment have been shown capable of binding to cellular oestrogen receptors and then mimicking the actions of physiological oestrogens. The widespread origin and diversity in chemical structure of these environmental oestrogens is extensive but to date such compounds have been organic and in particular phenolic or carbon ring structures of varying structural complexity. Recent reports of the ability of certain metal ions to also bind to oestrogen receptors and to give rise to oestrogen agonist responses in vitro and in vivo has resulted in the realisation that environmental oestrogens can also be inorganic and such xenoestrogens have been termed metalloestrogens. This report highlights studies which show metalloestrogens to include aluminium, antimony, arsenite, barium, cadmium, chromium (Cr(II)), cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenite, tin and vanadate. The potential for these metal ions to add to the burden of aberrant oestrogen signalling within the human breast is discussed.
13 Year-Old Boy Permanently Disabled from Chicken Pox Vaccine Wins His Case in Vaccine Court
A young man was recently awarded compensation in the United States Court of Federal Claims Vaccine Court, for injuries he sustained after being administered the hepatitis A and varicella vaccinations in 2009. After five long years of litigation, Health and Human Services (HHS), the Respondent in all vaccine injury cases, conceded that the varicella vaccination did in fact cause RD's vaccine injury, transverse myelitis, which has left him a tetraplegic.
In November 2014, HHS conceded that the vaccination caused RD's injuries. Even with this concession, his case continued for another year in the damages phase, during which time the parties continued to negotiate the amount of damages that RD would receive for his injuries. Although he was compensated for his suffering and injuries, the monetary award will never compensate for the lifelong effects this young man is suffering from his vaccine injury.
Five Long Years
RD was only 13 when his life changed forever. At a routine well-child visit in 2009, the doctor informed RD's parents that he was due to receive the hepatitis A and varicella vaccinations. His parents complied with the doctor's order and RD received the vaccinations.
RD's mother explained that, at that time in RD's state, only one dose of varicella vaccine was required and RD had already received one dose of that vaccine. This second dose that was administered to RD at this well visit was determined to be the cause of RD's horrific injuries, and it was not even required for him, which his family didn't realize until it was too late.
About 14 days later, RD began to experience excruciating pain shooting through his body along with tingling, numbness and paralysis of his limbs. After extensive testing and many invasive procedures, RD was diagnosed with transverse myelitis.
RD's parents filed a case in Vaccine Court, which took over five years to settle. RD and his family faced arduous heartbreak along the way. In the ruling, a representative from the United States Department of Justice agreed that "a preponderance of the evidence establishes that petitioner's transverse myelitis was caused-in-fact by the administration of his August 12, 2009 varicella vaccine." [1]
RD's lawyer, Patricia Finn, stated that:
"The injuries that RD suffered from this vaccine are severe and lifelong. Even though he has received a significant award as far as the awards in the Vaccine Court go, no amount of money will ever compensate him for what he has lost.
But RD is an amazing young man who has not let this injury stop him in any way. He has graduated high school with his class, attends a Tier 1 college, and has great aspirations that I know he will achieve despite the challenges he faces because of his injuries."
RD's Immune System Attacked His Spine
Ignoring the agency's own scientific evidence, the CDC's webpage stubbornly insists that the "two types of mercury to which people may be exposed—methylmercury and ethylmercury—are very different." The new CDC study directly contradicts this assertion, "There are many commonalities/similarities in the mechanisms of toxic action of methylmercury and ethylmercury …"
The study meticulously details identical toxicity pathways shared by both forms of mercury:
Both ethyl and methyl mercury cause DNA damage or impair DNA synthesis (Burke et al. 2006; Sharpe et al. 2012; Wu et al. 2008).
Both cause oxidative stress/creation of reactive oxygen species (Dreiem and Seegal 2007; Garg and Chang 2006; Myhre et al. 2003; Sharpe et al. 2012; Yin et al. 2007).
Both decrease glutathione activity, thus providing less protection from the oxidative stress caused by MeHg and EtHg (Carocci et al. 2014; Ndountse and Chan (2008); Choi et al. 1996; Franco et al. 2006; Mori et al. 2007; Muller et al. 2001; Ndountse and Chan 2008; Wu et al. 2008).
Both cause effects on cell division by damaging the spindle apparatus during mitosis (Burke et al. 2006; Castoldi et al. 2000; Gribble et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2007; Ou et al. 1999b; Machaty et al. 1999; Rodier et al. 1984).
Both MeHg and EtHg bind to the amino acid cysteine (Clarkson 1995; Wu et al. 2008).
Both MeHg and EtHg strongly inhibit the reacylation of arachidonic acid, thus inhibiting the reincorporation of this fatty acid into membrane phospholipids (Shanker et al. 2002; Verity et al. 1994; Zarini et al. 2006).
Both cause an increase in NOS, causing an overproduction of NO (Chen et al. 2003; Chuu et al. 2001; Shinyashiki et al. 1998).
Both disrupt glutamate homeostasis (Farina et al. 2003a, b; Manfroi et al. 2004; Mutkus et al. 2005; Yin et al. 2007).
Both alter intracellular calcium homeostasis (Elferink 1999; Hare et al. 1993;Kang et al. 2006; Limke et al. 2004b; Machaty et al. 1999; Marty and Atchison1997; Minnema et al. 1987; Peng et al. 2002; Sayers et al. 1993; Sirois and Atchison, 2000; Szalai et al. 1999; Tornquist et al. 1999; Zarini et al. 2006).
Both cause effects on receptor binding/neurotransmitter release involving one or more transmitters (Basu et al. 2008; Coccini et al. 2000; Cooper et al. 2003; Fonfria et al. 2001; Ida-Eto et al. 2011; Ndountse and Chan 2008; Yuan and Atchison 2003).
"This study is a nuclear bomb detonating over the CDC," Boyd Haley, chairman emeritus of the University of Kentucky Chemistry Department, said. "It should be getting international, front page headlines."
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology publishes reviews pertaining to the sources, transport, fate and effects of contaminants in the environment. The series provides a place for the publication of critical reviews of the current knowledge and understanding of environmental sciences in order to provide insight into contaminant pathways, fate and behavior in environmental compartments and the possible consequences of their presence, with multidisciplinary contributions from the fields of analytical chemistry, biochemistry, biology, ecology, molecular and cellular biology (in an environmental context), and human, wildlife and environmental toxicology. This book series does not typically consider submissions dealing with technical aspects of occupational exposure and effects in humans, wastewater treatment and effluent characterization, or remediation of contaminated sites. However, submissions addressing one of these topic areas may be considered where there exists a strong link to the receiving environment, and/or the identification of emerging contaminants of concern. All manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by experts in the field. Reviewers will be asked to consider coverage and critical appraisal of the subject, originality , relevance, and impact to the wider scientific community. Authors writing in a second language are encouraged to have their manuscript corrected by a native English speaker or by a professional editing firm. Abstracts, short communications and notes will not be accepted. Where appropriate, such submissions may be referred to our companion journal, the Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (BECT), while full-length research articles are typically the purview of Archives of Environmental Contaminant and Toxicology (AECT). RECT prefers extended reviews of a length including references of more than 5,000 words, and without an upper word count limit. Reviews of shorter length (i.e. where length including references of less than 5,000 words) which may be suitable for case studies, a focused topic or an applied subject of debate or interest can be submitted to AECT. Authors may directly contact the Editor-in-Chief if they wish to clarify which publication is most suited for their submission.
Mainstream News Reporting That #BigPharma Is Paying Everyone Off!
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Two new studies by international teams, including Egyptian scientists, have validated the link between autism and mercury.
In an article published in the journal Metabolic Brain Disease, a team of nine scientists from leading Egyptian universities and medical schools confirmed the causal role of mercury in the onset of autism.
The scientists determined the extent of mercury poisoning in children by measuring urinary excretion of organic compounds called porphyrins, which act as biomarkers for mercury toxicity. The researchers also measured blood levels of mercury and lead. The researchers found a strong relationship between mercury toxicity and the presence of autism and a direct correlation between levels of mercury toxicity and the severity of autism symptoms.
The scientists studied 100 children; 40 with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), 40 healthy individuals and 20 healthy siblings of ASD children. The results showed that the children with ASD had significantly higher mercury levels than healthy children and healthy siblings. Children with the highest mercury levels had the most severe autism symptoms.
At least six American studies have linked autism presence or severity to mercury exposure as determined by measuring urinary porphyrins. The first study, completed by Heyer et al. in 2012 (Autism Res 5:84) showed a correlation between the presence of autism and specific urinary porphyrins associated with mercury toxicity. This affirmed an earlier study by Kern et al. (2011, Pediatr Int 53:147) where specific porphyrins associated with mercury toxicity were significantly higher in ASD children as compared to non-autistic controls. Woods et al. (2010, Environ Health Perspect 118:1450) also saw disordered porphyrin metabolism in autistic kids which was not observed in non-autistic control children. This again suggested increased mercury toxicity associated with autism and autism spectrum disorder.
Study – Altered urinary porphyrins and mercury exposure as biomarkers for autism severity in Egyptian children with autism spectrum disorder
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder that affects social, communication, and behavioral development. Recent evidence supported but also questioned the hypothetical role of compounds containing mercury (Hg) as contributors to the development of ASD. Specific alterations in the urinary excretion of porphyrin-containing ring catabolites have been associated with exposure to Hg in ASD patients. In the present study, the level of urinary porphyrins, as biomarkers of Hg toxicity in children with ASD, was evaluated, and its correlation with severity of the autistic behavior further explored. A total of 100 children was enrolled in the present study. They were classified into three groups: children with ASD (40), healthy controls (40), and healthy siblings of the ASD children (20). Children with ASD were diagnosed using DSM-IV-TR, ADI-R, and CARS tests. Urinary porphyrins were evaluated within the three groups using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), after plasma evaluation of mercury (Hg) and lead (Pb) in the same groups. Results showed that children with ASD had significantly higher levels of Hg, Pb, and the porphyrins pentacarboxyporphyrin, coproporphyrin, precoproporphyrin, uroporphyrins, and hexacarboxyporphyrin compared to healthy controls and healthy siblings of the ASD children. However, there was no significant statistical difference in the level of heptacarboxyporphyrin among the three groups, while a significant positive correlation between the levels of coproporphyrin and precoproporphyrin and autism severity was observed. Mothers of ASD children showed a higher percentage of dental amalgam restorations compared to the mothers of healthy controls suggesting that high Hg levels in children with ASD may relate to the increased exposure to Hg from maternal dental amalgam during pregnancy and lactation. The results showed that the ASD children in the present study had increased blood Hg and Pb levels compared with healthy control children indicating that disordered porphyrin metabolism might interfere with the pathology associated with the autistic neurologic phenotype. The present study indicates that coproporphyrin and precoproporhyrin may be utilized as possible biomarkers for heavy metal exposure and autism severity in children with ASD.
CDC Knew Its Vaccine Program Was Exposing Children to Dangerous Mercury Levels Since 1999
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN
Jan. 18, 2017 08:12PM EST
Uncovered documents show that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) knew that infant vaccines were exposing American children to mercury far in excess of all federal safety guidelines since 1999. The documents, created by a FDA consulting toxicologist, show how federal regulators concealed the dangerous impacts and lied to the public.
PDF source
In 1997, Congress passed the FDA Modernization Act. A provision of that statute required the FDA to "compile a list of drugs that contain intentionally introduced mercury compounds, and provide a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the mercury compounds on the list." In response, manufacturers reported the use of the mercury-based preservative, thimerosal, in more than 30 licensed vaccines.
FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) was responsible for adding up the cumulative exposure to mercury from infant vaccines, a simple calculation that, astonishingly, had never been performed by either the FDA or the CDC. When the agency finally performed that basic calculation, the regulators realized that a six month-old infant who received thimerosal-preserved vaccines following the recommended CDC vaccine schedule would have received a jaw dropping 187.5 micrograms of mercury.
Instead of immediately ordering the removal of thimerosal, FDA officials circled the wagons treating the public health emergency as a public relations problem. Peter Patriarca, then director of the FDA Division of Viral Products, warned his fellow bureaucrats that hasty removal of thimerosal from vaccines would:
" … raise questions about FDA being 'asleep at the switch' for decades by allowing a potentially hazardous compound to remain in many childhood vaccines, and not forcing manufacturers to exclude it from new products. It will also raise questions about various advisory bodies regarding aggressive recommendations for use. We must keep in mind that the dose of ethylmercury was not generated by "rocket science." Conversion of the percentage thimerosal to actual micrograms of mercury involves ninth grade algebra. What took the FDA so long to do the calculations? Why didn't CDC and the advisory bodies do these calculations when they rapidly expanded the childhood immunization schedule?"
The agency consulted with experts in the field of toxicology to better understand the potential impact of these exposure levels. One consultant was Barry Rumack, MD. Dr. Rumack, at the time, had a private consulting practice, Rumack Consulting, where he offered "toxicologic and pharmacologic evaluation of drugs, biological and potentially toxic or hazardous agents for government and industry." After creating several scenarios based on infants' ages and weights, Dr. Rumack modeled blood and body burden levels in 1999.
Local authority is granted permission by a top judge to forcibly vaccinate a seven-month-old baby boy against his mother's wishes despite claims she has bad reactions to jabs in the past
The London Borough of Barnet can vaccinate the seven-month-old baby boy
The boy's mother says her other children had bad reactions from immunisations
But Barnet said potential consequence of not immunising was too great to risk
Mr Justice MacDonald has said that vaccination is in the boy's best interests
The jabs will protect the baby against bacterial infections which can lead to highly dangerous forms of meningitis
Vaccination Safety, Part 1 In the first part of a day-long conference on the safety of various vaccination programs, participants talked about possible adverse effects of certain vaccines, the scientific community's response to potential problems, public education efforts and the viability of mass, mandatory vaccination programs
Missouri Bill Would Ban Mercury Vaccines; First Step to Nullify Federal Policy in Practice
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (Jan. 31, 2017) – A Missouri House bill would ban public health clinics from administering vaccines that contain mercury or any other metal put into the vaccine for preservation purposes, contradicting approved federal policy.
House Bill 331 (HB331) was introduced by Rep. Lynn Morris (R-Nixa) to mitigate concerns regarding vaccine safety. With the exception of health emergencies determined by the Department of Health & Senior Services with concurrence from the governor, the following provision would apply:
Beginning August 28, 2018, no vaccine containing mercury or other metal for preservation or other purpose shall be administrated to a child or adult in a public health clinic in Missouri.
HB331 begins the process of nullifying potential vaccine mandates, which generally have their basis in federal recommendations or guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Although these federal rules are not technically binding, they often influence policy-makers and individuals at the local and state levels to adopt coercive mandates regarding mercury-laced vaccines and other toxic substances.
By taking the rule-making power back into their own hands, the state of Missouri can disconnect from federal control and restore its sovereignty on this key issue.
Measures such as HB331 push back against federal narratives regarding immunizations. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) downplays concerns regarding the use of thimerosal, a preservative containing mercury. They even admit on their own website that mercury is still being used to preserve certain vaccines:
Thimerosal, which is approximately 50% mercury by weight, has been one of the most widely used preservatives in vaccines… While the use of mercury-containing preservatives has declined in recent years with the development of new products formulated with alternative or no preservatives, thimerosal has been used in some immune globulin preparations, anti-venins, skin test antigens, and ophthalmic and nasal products, in addition to certain vaccines.
As the FDA downplays the concerns related to thimerosal and mercury in vaccines, whistle-blowers are singing a different tune. The National Vaccine Information Center, a non-profit watchdog organization, reports that the threat is still alarming – especially pertaining to infants:
Most infants are still routinely given Thimerosal-containing influenza vaccine even though there are Thimerosal-free and vaccines with trace amounts of Thimerosal. Infants receiving a Thimerosal-containing influenza vaccine are dosed at 6 months with 12.5 mcg of ethyl mercury and at 7 months with an additional 12.5 mcg. Adult Thimerosal-containing vaccines contain roughly 25mcg.
The CDC aids the FDA in promulgating their point of view. Although the CDC attempts to maintain a veneer of independence and credibility, there are facts showing that narrative to be false. The CDC Foundation boasts that it helps the CDC "do more, faster." It is able to do this because the CDC Foundation receives annual funding from a host of corporations including Pharmaceutical giants Merck, Roche, and Emergent BioSolutions Inc.
January 9, 2017 January 11, 2017 General Knowledge Leave a comment -andAreatAutismînBrendabycancerClevelandClinicDangerDaveEpidemicforHeadHealthholistichospitalinjurylungMcDowellMDNewsobesitypieceplayingplaysroleSameSugartestimonythatThethreatenedtobaccovaccinevaccinesVAXXEDWriting
Vaccine injury testimonies
Vaccine injury testimony – Dave Brenda McDowell
visit the VaxXed bus while in Detroit, Michigan to the story of all three of their triplets vaccine injury stories following the pneumococcal vaccine. Interview by Polly Tommey with camera and editing by Joshua Coleman. #VaxXed #VaxWithUs #pneumococcal
STILL BELIEVE VACCINES ARE SAFE? PLEASE WATCH THIS! Healthy 9 month old triplets "turn off" within hours of receiving just ONE vaccine (pneumococcal). Lost all speech, response reflexes, connection and smiles.
Geneticists say it was the vaccine — not statistically possible to be a genetic problem in all three at the same time — there had to be a trigger. Now all three have anxiety disorders, immune disorders and severe brain damage.
This story is heartbreaking. But it deserves your attention. Vaccine reactions and side effects do NOT only happen to 'one in a million,' there are MILLIONS of stories.
Please share, and please help support our awareness campaign. Like us on FB, Twitter and join our FB group.
Find out more here:
Www.Learntherisk.org
Vaccine injury testimony
"Vaccines killed my 6 year old son. #vaxxed #VaccinesKill #PrayBig
If you feel it in your heart to donate to the Ramirez family please do so at: http://www.gofundme.com/32guy1s"
Vaccines are playing the same role in the autism epidemic that tobacco plays in lung cancer and sugar in obesity.
And, just like the tobacco companies and sugar companies did for decades, the CDC and vaccine makers are using "distracting research" to fool journalists and the public, because 99.9% of people don't read the science themselves, they just repeat what others have said.
That's why I wrote this article and I hope it helps you understand the truth, that the "science" on the relationship between vaccines and autism has NOT "spoken" and that we're just seeing a script we've seen before. Please share and read for yourself–thanks
Head Holistic MD at Cleveland Clinic Threatened By Hospital For Writing Vaccine Danger Piece
Daniel Neides, MD, MBA is the Medical Director and Chief Operating Officer of the Cleveland Clinic Wellness Institute.
This holistic doctor has won countless awards and is one of the most respected holistic MDs in the US.
Dr Neides penned a well written piece on Cleveland.com about the real dangers of vaccine adjuvants which included carcinogens (causing cancer). The article is linked below.
It was posted last week and had thousands of reads and someone sent it my way.
Today, Sunday, January 8th, I did a live video on it this afternoon and the article worked fine at the time I began the feed. Then my video went viral (47,000 live viewers) and somwhere during that time the article on the popular site Cleveland.com disappeared.
December 5, 2016 General Knowledge Leave a comment AgainstînDangerdoctorsdueHealthinjuryLiabilitymandatoryNewsNoPatientsProducttestimonytovaccinevaccinesVAXXED
Doctors Against Mandatory Vaccines: Patients in Danger due to No Product Liability
The VAXXED film crew was recently in Tulsa, Oklahoma where they interviewed local physicians Dr. James Meehan and Dr. Andy Revelis about the National Vaccine Injury Compensation program, which was established 30 years ago in 1986. This law, enacted by Congress and signed into law by President Ronald Reagan, gave total legal immunity to the pharmaceutical companies that produce vaccines, and set up a special "Vaccine Court" operated by the government.
Prior to 1986, there were so many lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies for injuries and deaths due to vaccines, that the pharmaceutical lobby told Congress that they would stop manufacturing vaccines unless the government gave them immunity from lawsuits. Their products cannot survive in a free market without government intervention mandating their use, and protecting the manufactures from any responsibilities for faulty products.
Dr. Meehan states:
It was one of the most tragic decisions in the history of medicine.
Dr. Meehan states that the Vaccine Court is a huge barrier to justice, and forces the American tax payers to now pay for compensation to those injured or killed by vaccines.
The no-fault law allowed pharmaceutical companies to go from a few vaccines in the market to over three times as many, with over 200 vaccines currently under development in the pipeline. Without product liability, the emphasis now is on profits, and not product safety or efficacy.
Dr. Revelis adds:
We are now in a situation where manufacturers of Corn Flakes and Diet Coke are held to a higher standard than a medication that is injected into children and into adults throughout the world, and there is no liability to safeguard its effectiveness and its safety.
What the entire interview:


Absolutely Adorable 2 Bedroom Apartment Located above Pocopson Vet Station. The Views of the Brandywine River from this 900+/- Square Foot Apartment are Fantastic! Inviting Hardwood Floors & Freshly painted throughout, High Ceilings and Large Windows with Lots of Natural Light. Immediate Occupancy Available for this Walk Up Apartment with a Large Living Area, NEW Kitchen with Center Island and Stainless Dishwasher & Range, 2 Nice Sized Bedrooms and a Full Bath. NO SMOKING, Refrigerator, Washer/Dryer are included. Pets are a possibility. Only one car parking during business hours: Mon-Thurs 8AM- 7PM, Fri 8AM-5PM, Sat 8AM-noon. All applications must be submitted with a credit report complete with a credit history (within 30 days) First month rent, last month rent and security deposit required.


NO BAD FAITH, NO FORCE PLACED INSURANCE, BUT SUBROGATION.
A fire loss was the reason for the claims in EMCASCO Insurance Co. v. Knight, 2014 WL 4269116 (N.D. Ala. August 22, 2014). The insurance company, EMCASCO, declined to pay the Knights for the fire loss and sued them instead. EMCASCO's complaint contained six (6) theories of declaratory relief, said the Court. The Knights counterclaimed with five (5) claims of their own.
One of the Knights' claims was insurance bad faith. The Court wrote the equivalent of a transcript of the entire record in this case. The Court granted EMCASCO's motion for summary judgment on the Knights' bad faith count, for two principal reasons. First, the Knights could not survive a directed verdict on their contract claim, thereby failing to reach the Alabama standard of bad faith for that reason alone. Second, the Knights failed to introduce evidence sufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact that EMCASCO "acted with a dishonest purpose".
Instead, the evidence shows, and the Knights do not dispute,that EMCASCO conducted an extensive investigation of their claim. EMCASCO supports its denial of the claim with the following undisputed facts, inter alia, discovered during its investigation: the fire was incendiary; the Knights were across the street when the fire started; they misrepresented the values of pageant dresses and a tanning bed; they concealed assets from a court of law; they provided inconsistent sworn testimony as to the origin of furniture; and they had twice previously collected insurance payments for fire damage.
1. If a mortgagee is named in this policy, any loss payable under Coverage A or B will be paid to the mortgagee and you, as interests appear. If more than one mortgagee is named, the order of payment will be the same as the order of precedence of the mortgages.
c. Submits a signed, sworn statement of loss within 60 days after receiving notice from us of your failure to do so. Paragraphs E. Appraisal, G. Suit Against Us and I. Loss Payment under Section I—Conditions also apply to the mortgagee.
3. If we decide to cancel or not to renew this policy, the mortgagee will be notified at least 10 days before the date cancellation or nonrenewal takes effect.
b. At our option, we may pay to the mortgagee the whole principal on the mortgage plus any accrued interest. In this event, we will receive a full assignment and transfer of the mortgage and all securities held as collateral to the mortgage debt.
5. Subrogation will not impair the right of the mortgagee to recover the full amount of the mortgagee's claim.
The Federal Court ruled that the policyholders suffered no damages for EMCASCO's alleged failures in honoring its obligation to pay under the mortgage clause because the Knights would not "necessarily be freed of their financial obligations under the mortgage" even if EMCASCO had timely and fully paid the mortgagee. [Emphasis by the Court.] According to the Federal Court in this case, the reason is that the insurance company would have been subrogated against its own insureds, because "the mortgage clause ... provides that EMCASCO will be subrogatged to the rights of the mortgagee (i.e., Regions) against the mortgagor (i.e., the Knights) upon payment to the mortgagee."
This holding may not have been necessary to the ultimate outcome in this case. The Federal Court granted EMCASCO's motion for summary judgment on the three claims which the Knights alleged based on the mortgage clause.
Please Read The Disclaimer. Copyright 2014 by Dennis J. Wall. All rights reserved. No claim to original U.S. Government works.
No Documents, No Complete EUOs? No Bad Faith Tort.
An Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment was granted in Download Foster v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. (N.D. Ind. Case No. 1.10CV20, Order and Opinion Filed August 17, 2011) PUBLIC ACCESS, also published as 2011 WL 3610425 (N.D. Ind. August 17, 2011)(authorized password required to access Westlaw). In considering a Claim for alleged First-Party Bad Faith and Punitive Damages in connection with Claims under a Homeowners Policy, the Federal Court in that case very usefully and concisely summarized the applicable law.
Foster v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., 2011 WL 3610425 at *17.
Further, "[t]o prove that an insurance company committed the tort of bad faith in Indiana, a plaintiff must establish that his claim was underpaid or wrongfully denied in the first place." Id. at *18.
However, the Insurance Company in that case had not denied the Policyholders' Claim. Id. The Defendant contended that the Policyholders filed their lawsuit first, before the Insurance Company completed its investigation. Id. at *2.
Further, the fire at the base of the Policyholders' Claims was unexplained. Ignition took place when no-one was present, or at least no-one who was available to testify about it. Even if the Insurance Company is determined to Breach its Insurance Contract by not paying a First-Party Claim, the Insurance Company may in Good Faith dispute that Claim under the prevailing substantive law, the Court held. "A good faith dispute about the amount of a valid claim or about whether the insured has a valid claim does not supply the grounds for a bad faith cause of action." Id. at *18.
Accordingly, the Defendant Insurance Company in that case was held entitled to Judgment as a matter of law, there being no genuine issues of material fact. Since the standard of Bad Faith liability is even higher than the standard for assessing Punitive Damages in Indiana, the Federal Court also granted Summary Judgment with respect to the Policyholders' Claim for Punitive Damages in this case. Id. at *19.
The decision in this case is also noteworthy for other holdings. Besides pursuing a First-Party Bad Faith Claim, the Plaintiffs-Policyholders alleged a Claim for Breach of Contract. Their alleged basis for this Claim was that the Defendant failed to "pay the Plaintiffs' $2,888,432 claim for the loss of their dwelling and personal property caused by a fire." Id. at *1. The Defendant Insurance Company countered that the Plaintiffs-Policyholders failed to provide requested documentation to the Defendant and further that they failed to complete Mrs. Foster's Examination Under Oath as required by their Policy. Although the Federal Court mentioned Mrs. Foster's incomplete EUO several times, the Court actually concentrated on the Fosters' contention that they had produced all the documents they had.
The Plaintiffs-Policyholders thus replied to State Farm's requests for documentation, that they had no more documents to give and that they told the Defendant that they were prepared to complete the uncompleted EUO anyway. Then the Plaintiffs filed their lawsuit against the Defendant, in fairly short order. Id. at *2. Over nearly half-a-dozen full pages, the Federal Judge set out a "timeline" of the events concerning investigation of the Plaintiffs' Claim in the year following the fire, id. at *4-*10.
The Federal Judge in this case also summarized the applicable Policy Conditions concerning production of documents and sitting for EUOs. The provisions are standard Conditions setting forth what the Insured must do after loss. They are in use in many Policies across the country. "The duties at issue in this case are, 'as often as [the insurer] reasonably require[s]' that the insured provide records and documents the insurer requests, and submit to statements and examinations under oath." Id. a *11.
In this case, the issue raised by the Defendant Insurance Company concerning the Policyholders' compliance with these provisions was whether they substantially complied with, or materially breached these provisions. As noted above, the Policyholders maintained that there came a point when they had no more documents to give. The Federal Court examined this contention in the course of reviewing the "timeline" summarized in some 6 pages of the Court's Opinion as published on Westlaw. "However, this Court's review of the designated evidence, even when viewed most favorably to the Plaintiffs, does not support their claim that they fully complied with the Defendant's document requests." Id. at *13.
On first blush, this judicial statement almost seems like the Court is saying that it weighed credibility issues. It apparently did no such thing. The Policyholders did not apparently submit much beyond their assertion that they had no more to produce: "The evidence in support of the Plaintiffs' claims that they produced all documents are their own sworn statements and a letter their attorney sent to the Defendant." Id. at *13. The Court contrasted these items with the materials of record and concluded differently from what the Plaintiffs asserted to be the case here. "The Court does not doubt that in some cases an insured will have substantially complied with document requests despite a failure to meet every demand. This is not such a case.... The Plaintiffs' unsupported claim that they fully complied with all document requests could not convince a reasonable jury that the Defendant was the first to breach its contractual obligations." Id. at *17.
The Court in this case granted the Defendant's Summary Judgment on the Breach of Contract Claim as well.
California Fire Coverage Exclusion, Summary Judgment on Good Faith.
In Download Bishara v. Century Surety Co. (C.D. Cal. Case No. EDCV 09.01745, Order Filed April 6, 2011) PUBLIC ACCESS, also published as 2011 WL 1334406 (C.D. Cal. April 6, 2011)(authorized password required to access Westlaw), three rulings in particular deserve to be highlighted. This is a case in which the Insurance Company issued a Policy which provided Coverage for loss by Fire, but in which the Insurance Company denied all Coverage under an Exclusion for loss or damage caused by or resulting from a dishonest or criminal act by or on behalf of the Insured, among other provisIons.
The Court held that the Exclusion was properly applied by the Insurance Company to deny all Coverage, carefully pointing out that in doing so, "the Court does not opine or make any findings as to whether Swidan actually set fire to the Restaurant. Rather, the Court finds only that the uncontroverted evidence satisfies Defendant's burden of demonstrating there is an absence of evidence establishing Defendant breached the Policy" by denying Plaintiff's Coverage Claim. Bishara v. Century Surety Co., 2011 WL 1334406 at *9.
As there was no Coverage, there could be no Bad Faith in this case under California Law, the Federal Court concluded. Id. at *10.
Even if there could be a legally cognizable Bad Faith Claim in this case, said the Federal Court, California law would still impel the grant of Summary Judgment to the Insurance Company because of the California "genuine dispute" rule. In this case, the Insurance Company relied on the Report of an Expert as to the cause of the Fire Loss in question before the Insurance Company denied all Coverage for the Fire Loss. Under the California "genuine dispute" rule, Coverage may be genuinely disputed on the basis of "'a single, thorough report by an independent expert'". Id. at *11. So it was in this case.


text:
Home | Networks | EE Deals | Huawei P20 Pro
The Huawei P20 Pro with an AI-powered triple camera. A renaissance in photography is here.
Thanks to light fusion technology, hybrid zoom and a stunning low-light performance, you can be sure you will capture perfect photo's every time. The Leica Triple Camera is an all new AI-assisted camera system that allows you to transform the photographs you take. It's 40MP lens helps to deliver stunning photos in extreme low light conditions.
Performance wise, this smartphone is smarter and faster, for longer thanks to the Kirin 970 Neural Network Processing Unit, giving greater battery life and huge speeds.
This handset is also very stylish, with it's strong metal frame and hardened glass body. It has an impressive 6.1" screen which lets you see more on your screen without scrolling and more importantly, you ca
Thanks to light fusion technology, hybrid zoom and a stunning low-light performance, ...
£252.00 cashback provided by Mobile Phones Direct reducing the monthly line rental from £31.00 to £20.50
View Value Deal
View Bestseller
£ 9 .99 Upfront £38.58 Inc. VAT per month / 24 months
Includes £10.00 automatic cashback provided by Mobile Phones Direct reducing the monthly line rental from £39.00 to £38.58
SIM Free Price In Stock
Including VAT and Delivery
SIM Free Price: £649.00
Huawei P20 Pro Deals
Upfront phone cost:Up to £0
Data per month:4GB+
Huawei P20 Pro Price Plans
About the Huawei P20 Pro
Thanks to light fusion technology, hybrid zoom and a stunning low-light performance, you can be sure you will capture perfect photo's every time. The Leica Triple Camera is an all new AI-assisted camera system that allows you to transform the photographs you take. It's 40MP lens helps to deliver stunning photos in extreme low light conditions. Performance wise, this smartphone is smarter and faster, for longer thanks to the Kirin 970 Neural Network Processing Unit, giving greater battery life and huge speeds. This handset is also very stylish, with it's strong metal frame and hardened glass body. It has an impressive 6.1" screen which lets you see more on your screen without scrolling and more importantly, you can do more.
PHYSICAL 154.2 mm x 74.5 mm x 7.9 mm mm
PROCESSOR Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
EXTERNAL MEMORY No
CAMERA 40 mega pixel (Triple: 40 MP (f/1.8, 1/1.7", OIS) + 20 MP (f/1.6))
FRONT CAMERA 24 mega pixel (24 MP, autofocus, f/2.0, 1080p)
Huawei P20 Pro Features
Email on your phone
In-built email functionality allows you to send and receive emails wherever you are. Certain email clients allow for multiple email accounts to be synced to one phone.
Triple 40MP + 20MP + 8MP
Huawei Freebuds
FREE Huawei Freebuds
Offering a truly wireless Experience. After a simple Bluetooth® pairing, they will connect automatically allowing you to listen to music or make phone calls when wearing them. Infrared sensors can sense when the earbuds are in your ears or when you take them out. The built-in G-Sensor simplifies every operation into an elegant & efficient double-tap.
How To Claim Your Earphones
Participants must visit https://www.huaweipromo.co.uk/p20summerpromo on or between 1st August and 14th September 2018
Complete the claim form (providing the IMEI of your handset and postal address), upload a copy of your proof of pre-order and proof of purchase before 23:59 BST 14th September 2018.
The earphones will be posted within 30 days of successful claim validation, to the UK address provided by you in the claim form. (Subject to availability).
Promotion Terms and Conditions:
Participants agree to these terms and conditions (the 'Terms and Conditions'). Any information or instructions published by Huawei Technologies (UK) Co., LTD., with its registered offices at 300 South Oak Way, Green Park, Reading, Berkshire, RG2 6UF, or its fully owned subsidiaries about the Promotion at www.huaweipromo.co.uk/p20summerpromo form part of the Terms and Conditions.
Participants who purchase a new Huawei P20 Pro or Huawei P20 whether SIM free or with a monthly contract or on 'pay as you go' basis ('Qualifying Product') in-store, online or call centre sales, from a qualifying retailer in the table below (each a 'Qualifying Retailer') on or between 00:01 BST 18th July 2018 until 23:59 BST 16th August, 2018, will be eligible to claim a Promotional Item in accordance with the table below, to be delivered directly to Participant at a UK address.
The Promotional Item you will be eligible to receive will depend on the Qualifying Product you purchase, as follows:
Qualifying Product Promotional Item
Huawei P20 Pro Huawei "Free buds" Headphone
Huawei P20 Huawei "Active noise cancellation 3rd Gen" Headphone
To be eligible to participate in the Promotion you must be aged 18 or over and residing in the United Kingdom ('Participant'). Businesses are excluded from participating in this Promotion except for business customers purchasing the Qualifying Product(s) through Carphone Warehouse, EE,O2, Three or Vodafone business customer accounts ("Business Customer")
A claim must be made by the end user Participant, and must not be submitted through agents, retailers, resellers, third parties or in bulk.
Only two claims per Participant is permitted. Only one claim per purchase of a Qualifying Product is permitted, unless you are a Business Customer whereby you can make up to 10 Claims. Only one claim per Qualifying Product is permitted. This Promotion cannot be used in conjunction with any other Huawei promotion.
Participants who cancel their order will not be eligible to receive the Promotional Item.
Participants must purchase the Qualifying Product from a Qualifying Retailer by 23:59 16th August, 2018.
Participants who return the Qualifying Product to the Qualifying Retailer within 14 calendar days of the date of purchase will not be eligible to receive the Promotional Item. The date of purchase counts as day one (1).
Participants must visit https://www.huaweipromo.co.uk/p20summerpromo on or between 1st August and 14th September 2018, complete and submit the claim form (including providing the IMEI of the Qualifying Product, Participant's postal address in the UK where the Promotional Item shall be delivered) and upload a copy of their proof of purchase of the Qualifying Product from a Qualifying Retailer. Claim form information and supporting documents for purchase must be received on or before 23:59 BST 14th September 2018 to be eligible to claim for a Promotional Item free of charge. See FAQs at www.huaweipromo.co.uk/p20summerpromo for details of the form of supporting documents required as evidence of purchases for each of the Qualifying Retailers and, the information to be provided as part of the claim form process. If you are a Business Customer you will need to provide information about your company including business name, registered company number (if applicable) and proof of purchase of the qualifying items under Carphone Warehouse, EE,O2, Three or Vodafone's business customer account – see FAQ's on web-site.
The Promotional Item are subject to availability, while stocks last and shall be allocated on a first-come-first-served basis. Huawei reserves the right to replace the Promotional Item with an alternative promotional offer of equal or higher value if circumstances beyond Huawei's control make it necessary to do so.
The Qualifying Products are subject to availability while stocks last.
The Administrator will post the Promotional Item within 30 days of successful claim validation, to the UK address provided by the Participant in the claim form and, the Promotional Item will require a signature on delivery.
The Promotional Item comes with the Huawei consumer limited warranty of 3 month, where details can be found at: https://consumer.huawei.com/uk/support/warranty-policy/
Compensation for the Promotional Item in cash, its exchange, or its transfer to other persons are excluded.
If the claim is deemed to have not been submitted correctly, the Participant will be notified via email and offered the opportunity to provide the required information within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the email. If no response is received within seven (7) calendar days of the email being sent, then the claim shall be marked as invalid and the Participant will no longer be eligible to receive the Promotional Item. It is the Participant's responsibility to contact us if you have not received an update on the status of your claim within seven (7) calendar days.
Subject to condition 10 above, claims that are incomplete will be deemed invalid. Huawei or the Administrator are not responsible for lost, delayed or damaged data which occurs during any communication or transmission of claims.
Huawei reserves the right to withdraw or amend the Promotion or these Terms and Conditions and to disqualify claims which it considers do not comply with these Terms and Conditions at any time at its own discretion. Huawei's decisions regarding all promotional matters will be final, and no correspondence will be entered into.
Huawei and the Administrator shall have the right, where necessary, to undertake all such action as is reasonable to protect themselves against fraudulent or invalid claims including, without limitation, to generate or require further verification as proof of purchase, as well as the identity, age, and other relevant details of a Participant, deny issuing Promotional Item, or terminate the Promotion due to excessive fraud. This process may involve Huawei sharing information with third parties.
Huawei excludes liability, to the fullest extent permitted by law, for any loss or damage caused to a Participant arising out of or in connection with the Promotional Item or this Promotion. Without prejudice to the preceding restriction, and to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, in no event will the Huawei liability to you exceed £50.00.
Data Protection. Participant's personal data provided by the Participant when making a claim under this Promotion shall be processed in accordance with Huaweipromo.co.uk's Privacy Notice at https://huaweipromo.co.uk/gb/en/pages/p20summerpromo/privacy
Administrator: Opia Limited, company number 06021170 with its registered offices at Priory House Pilgrims Court, Sydenham Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 3RX
The Promotion is governed by English Law and is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts.
Support ID: 3EAJPV

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Applications are invited for a 3.5-year fully funded, AXA Ocean Risk Scholarship, PhD studentship at the University of Exeter to study the potential for microplastics to act as a vector of disease within marine ecosystems. Plastics have become a ubiquitous feature of modern life with global production figures currently in excess of 300 million tonnes per year, the equivalent to the biomass of the entire human population (Plastics Europe 2016). Microscopic plastic litter (<5 mm, 'microplastic') is increasing in abundance in the marine environment, originating from the fragmentation of plastic items, and directly from industry and personal-care products. Microplastics are a concern because their small size is within the optimal prey range for many aquatic animals, including species intended for human consumption or occupying critical ecological roles. Microplastic particles have now been found in every part of the ocean from the deep sea to the Polar Regions, and within the guts of over 300 marine taxa worldwide, particularly in filter feeding and benthic species. A new and so far relatively unstudied area of concern regarding the impacts of microplastic pollution is their potential to transport diseases and drive increased disease prevalence in vulnerable marine species.
This exciting project will investigate the potential for microplastics to act as a vector for pathogen delivery to economically shellfish species, namely mussels and oysters. Working in collaboration with the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), we will focus on Vibrio spp. as a model pathogen due to its prevalence and relevance for human health. This project will use a combination of laboratory based ecotoxicology and microbiology together with field sampling for plastics in the marine environment and oceanographic modelling to determine the role that microplastics play in disease transport and infection. Experiments will be run at the University of Exeter's state-of-the-art aquarium facilities and at the Cefas laboratories in Weymouth.
You will be trained and supported by an enthusiastic team of Bioscience researchers who have been at the forefront of global efforts to determine the potential health impacts of microplastic to marine organisms. This studentship will provide you with a highly employable portfolio of research skills in an area of current global importance. Applicants are required to have a good degree in a biological science and a strong interest in the marine environment. For further details contact Dr Ceri Lewis at [email protected].
This award provides annual funding to cover UK/EU tuition fees and a tax-free stipend. For students who pay UK/EU tuition fees the award will cover the tuition fees in full, plus at least £14,777 per year tax-free stipend. Students who pay international tuition fees are eligible to apply, but should note that the award will only provide payment for part of the international tuition fee and no stipend.
How good is research at University of Exeter in Geography, Environmental Studies and Archaeology?


text:
You are here: Sports Betting Online > Free Football Betting Tips & Football Predictions Today >	Peterborough Too Posh for Barnsley's Tykes
Peterborough Too Posh for Barnsley's Tykes
The Champions League will take centre stage in midweek with the 5th round of group matches, as that particular competition really hots up. However, back in England on the domestic front there is a full fixture list in Leagues One and Two, and punters who prefer the to stick to the football league will be looking for value in the lower divisions.
We've assessed the options in League One and come up with some decent bets in what is one of the tightest leagues in English football. Coventry are top dogs at the moment after Saturday's 4-1 thrashing of previous leaders Gillingham saw them leapfrog that rival and rise to the summit. Early-season favourites for the title, Peterborough, have come back to form recently with three wins in four, but they remain three points outside the play-off zone; while Wigan are another side to hit their groove with five wins in six catapulting them into the top four.
However, it's Posh who are our headline tip this midweek, as they welcome relegation-threatened Barnsley to London Road on Tuesday evening.
Peterborough v Barnsley
Peterborough are an attractive 21/20 2.05 +105 1.05 1.05 -0.95 with BetVictor to take all three points, and that looks a generous price.
Posh have long been something of an unpredictable side, but manager Graham Westley has been getting the right tune out of his players recently, and they've won four of the last five in all competitions, scoring 16 goals in the process. Saturday's 5-1 win away at Crewe included a brace from young midfielder Jermaine Anderson. Westley has gone on record as saying that Anderson can follow in the footsteps of Under-18 England colleague Dele Alli, which is high praise indeed for the 19 year-old. Posh have risen to ninth in the table, but remain three points outside the play-offs and have plenty of work to do to achieve the dream of promotion.
In contrast, Barnsley have had a torrid season so far, and are under real threat of relegation from the division. They are 21st in the league just four points above bottom club Crewe. Saturday's 2-1 away win at fellow strugglers Oldham brought to an end a run of 8 straight defeat in the league, but that last-minute winner doesn't mean that the corner has been turned at Oakwell. The Tykes have lost on each of their last two visits here, and with Peterborough in such great goal-scoring form, it's hard to see Barnsley being able to live with them.
Gillingham v Rochdale
Next up it's Gillingham who are priced at 6/5 2.20 +120 1.20 1.20 -0.83 with BetVictor to bounce back from the disappointment of the Coventry defeat, when they take on Rochdale at home on Tuesday night.
The Gills remain second in the league after being deposed by Coventry, but manager Justin Edinburgh will want to put that result behind them as quickly as possible as they continue the push for promotion. They've been held to draws on home ground by Southend and Oldham this season, but have won all of the other seven home games they've played this year. They are traditionally very strong at home, and it's a long trip down to Kent for Rochdale.
The Angels are 13th in League One, with a nicely symmetrical record of won 6, drawn 6, lost 6. They've been on a fair run of late, with 3 wins, 4 draws, and 3 defeats in the last ten games, although Saturday's 2-0 victory over Doncaster was their first win on the road for nine games. More noticeably they've lost away games at sides in the higher reaches of the division – Millwall, Sheffield United and Burton have all beaten Rochdale – and Gillingham are right up there among the best in the league, particularly on home ground.
Bury v Scunthorpe
Our final tip is on the match between Bury and Scunthorpe which looks like it could be a high-scoring game as two attacking teams go toe-to-toe.
Over 2.5 goals is a decent price of 10/11 1.91 -110 0.91 -1.10 0.91 with BetVictor, BoyleSports and William Hill for two sides whose games tend to feature at least three goals on a regular basis.
Just looking at the bare facts shows that Bury's last ten games have included 28 goals at an average of 2.8 per game; while Scunthorpe's last ten fixtures have seen 27 goals at an average of 2.7 per game. Further analysis shows that Bury's last ten home games have also featured 28 goals at an average of 2.8 per game; but more interestingly Scunthorpe's last ten road games have included a whopping 34 goals at an average of 3.4 per game.
What this tells us is that Scunthorpe tend to go for broke away from home, and although they often end up on the losing side, they've scored in all but one of those last ten away trips. What it also tells us is that Bury tend to play an attacking and open style of football, which is bourne out by the fact that they've conceded by far the most goals (27) in the top half of the table.
Each of the last four meetings between these two has gone over 2.5 goals, and it looks a fair bet again this Tuesday night. Only seven points separates the two, but Bury are in 6th place just inside the play-off zone and looking upwards; while Scunthorpe are back in 13th, only seven points outside the play-offs but only six points above the drop zone. However, both sides are inconsistent in terms of form, with Bury losing three and winning two of the last five, and Scunthorpe having the same record of lost three and won two in their last five. In that sense the win-lose-draw market is best avoided, and goals looks a much better option.
Peterborough to beat Barnsley
Tuesday 24th November, 19:45 GMT
Odds: 21/20 2.05 +105 1.05 1.05 -0.95
Gillingham to beat Rochdale
Bury v Scunthorpe – Over 2.5 goals


text:
2022 MVMMS JUNIOR RAIDERS
The Program Starts Here
The MVMMS Junior Red Raiders has become the flagship program for Melrose Football. Established in March of 2010 by Friends of Melrose Football, the Melrose Recreation Department, and MVMMS, the Middle School program prepares players for a smooth and successful transition to the next level of play.
The program's success translated to the varsity level when the very first graduates of the Middle School program kicked off the start of the most successful decade in Melrose football history. Since 2013 Jr. Raiders have gone on to help the varsity program secure 4 appearances in the Super Bowl, winning 2 state championships and numerous sectional and league titles. Many of these players have also gone on to play football at the collegiate level (Amherst College, Becker College, Bentley College, Bridgewater State University, Brown University, Endicott College, Fitchburg College, Hamilton College, Annapolis-Navy, St. Anselms, Tufts University, Worcester State University, Worcester PolyTech, and more!)
Endorsed by Head Coach Morris the Junior Raiders work closely with the High School program. Players have the opportunity to learn and execute the Melrose Varsity offensive and defensive playbooks while playing competitive football in the Eastern Massachusetts Middle School Football League.
Players also can participate in our in-season Strength and Conditioning Program under close supervision by qualified coaches.
The program is open to all 7th-grade & 8th-grade students regardless of their weight. All home games are at Fred Green Field; locker room facilities are provided to players as well as bus transportation to away games.
Email Friends of Melrose Football with any questions or register below
Registration Closed for the 2022 Season
Glen Squatrito
MHS 1986
Adam Caffey
Jesse Gauvain
Cam Hickey
George Karelas
John Mercer
Jack Sasso
Chuck Whelan
MVMMS JR. RAIDERS FOOTBALL SCHEDULES
MVMMS VARSITY SCHEDULE
9/14/22 - at Concord- 7:30pm
9/21/22 - vs Arlington - 6:30pm
9/28/22 - at Winchester - 6:00pm
10/5/22 - vs Burlington - 6:30pm
10/12/22 - vs Woburn - 6:30pm
10/19/22 - at Reading - 7:00pm
10/26/22 - at Belmont - 4:00pm
11/2/22 - vs Wilmington 6:30pm
MVMMS JV SCHEDULE
9/14/22 - at Concord - 6:00pm
9/22/22 - vs Winchester - 6:30pm
9/29/22 - at Burlington - 7:00pm
10/06/22 - NO GAME
10/20/22 - vs Brockton - 6:30pm
11/3/22 - vs. Concord - 6:30pm
Action from Recent Games


icePAC for records and document management.
icePAC is a client-server application which has been in use since 1995 and efficiently manages millions of document records for one of our largest customers.
icePAC has been designed to satisfy the entire control and management requirements of large construction and manufacturing projects – including Power Station Design & Build, Civil, and large Manufacturing Projects.
icePAC is both powerful and flexible, designed to provide instantaneous access to the latest project information and yet still employ company specific reference codes and customisable reference data.
Starting with a user definable set of reference data, icePAC can begin at the pre-contract stage, and if a project results, it will evolve to control and manage the vast quantities of data generated through Drawing Registers, Communication Logs, Despatch Schedules, Shipping Lists and Site Systems.
icePAC is modular in design, its data is fully integrated, yet it is still possible to operate most of the modules in isolation. This approach means implementation can be gradual and digestible.
Integrated links can be provided to systems such as desktop products from Microsoft, CAD, DIP, Planning and Financial systems.
icePAC is the project administration and control software, which provides the 'missing glue' giving project engineers & managers complete control of large-scale engineering and construction projects.