text:
— Main Menu —Home About Us	- Vision and Objectives - CIICA Arbitration Council/Court - Global Board of Advisors - CIICA Council - Founder & President Arbitration	- CIICA Arbitration Rules - CIICA Expedited Arbitration Rules - Code of Ethics for an Arbitrator - Schedule of Fees (Arbitration) - Online Arbitration Mediation	- CIICA Mediation Rules - Schedule of Fees (Mediation) - Online Mediation Other ADR Services Model Clauses	- Model Arbitration Clause - Med-Arb Model Clause - Expedited Arbitration Model Clause - Mediation Model Clause Arbitrators	- Admission to CIICA Panel - CIICA Panel Guidelines/Notes	- Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration (2014) - Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration (2013) - Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (2010) - Guidelines for Drafting International Arbitration Clauses (2010) Forms Young Arbitration Group	- YAG Membership - YAG Global Advisory Board - YAG Steering Committee - Publications - Events/Webinars News & Events	- News & Events - Inaugural Event - Inaugural Event Videos - CIICA YAG Inaugural Event Contact Us
CIICA Arbitration Council/Court
Global Board of Advisors
CIICA Council
CIICA Arbitration Rules
CIICA Expedited Arbitration Rules
Code of Ethics for an Arbitrator
Schedule of Fees (Arbitration)
Online Arbitration
CIICA Mediation Rules
Schedule of Fees (Mediation)
Other ADR Services
Model Clauses
Model Arbitration Clause
Med-Arb Model Clause
Expedited Arbitration Model Clause
Mediation Model Clause
Admission to CIICA Panel
CIICA Panel
Guidelines/Notes
Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration (2014)
Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration (2013)
Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (2010)
Guidelines for Drafting International Arbitration Clauses (2010)
Young Arbitration Group
YAG Membership
YAG Global Advisory Board
YAG Steering Committee
Inaugural Event
Inaugural Event Videos
CIICA YAG Inaugural Event
1. Scope of Application and Interpretation
2. Notice, Calculation of Periods of Time
3. Notice of Arbitration
4. Response to the Notice of Arbitration
5. Number and Appointment of Arbitrators
6. Sole Arbitrator
7. Three Arbitrators
8. Multi-party Appointment of Arbitrator(s)
9. Qualifications of Arbitrators
10. Challenge of Arbitrators
11. Notice of Challenge
12. Decision on Challenge
13. Replacement of an Arbitrator
14. Repetition of Hearings in the Event of Replacement of an Arbitrator
15. Conduct of the Proceedings
16. Submissions by the Parties
17. Seat of Arbitration
18. Language of Arbitration
19. Party Representatives
20. Hearings
21. Witnesses
22. Tribunal-Appointed Experts
23. Additional Powers of the Tribunal
24. Jurisdiction of the Tribunal
25. Interim and Emergency Award
26. Applicable Law, Amiable Compositeur
27. The Award
28. Correction of Awards and Additional Awards
29. Fees and Deposits
30. Costs of the Arbitration
31. Tribunal's Fees and Expenses
32. Party's Legal and Other Costs
35. Decisions of the Chairman, the Arbitration Council and the Secretariat
SCHEDULE 1 : Emergency Arbitrator
Scope of Application and Interpretation
1.1 If parties have agreed to refer their dispute to CIICA for arbitration, they shall be deemed to have agreed that the arbitration shall be conducted and administered in accordance with these Rules. If any of these Rules is in conflict with a mandatory provision of the applicable law, that provision shall prevail.
1.2 These Rules shall come into force on April 5, 2016. These Rules shall apply, unless the parties have agreed otherwise, to any arbitration which is commenced on or after that date.
Unless they indicate otherwise, the parties will be deemed to have selected the CIICA Rules in force at the time of initiation of arbitration, even if an earlier version of the rules was in effect at the time of the agreement to arbitrate.
1.3 In these Rules –
"Award" means a partial, interim or final award and an award of an Emergency Arbitrator;
"Arbitration Council" means the CIICAArbitration Counciland includes a Committee of the Arbitration Council;
"Committee of the Arbitration Council" means a committee consisting of at least two members of the Arbitration Council appointed by the Chairman of the Arbitration Council, which may include the Chairman;
""Chairman" means the Chairman of the Arbitration Council;
"Secretariat" means the Secretariat of CIICA
"CIICA" means the Center for International Investment and Commercial Arbitration;
"Tribunal" includes a sole arbitrator or all the arbitrators if more than one is appointed;
Any pronoun shall be understood to be gender-neutral; and
Any singular noun shall be understood to refer to the plural where applicable.
Notice, Calculation of Periods of Time
2.1 For the purposes of these Rules, all notices, communications or proposals shall be in writing. Any such written communication may be delivered or sent by registered postal, courier service, fax or email or delivered by any other means that provides a record/proof of its delivery. It is deemed to have been received if it is delivered:
to the addressee personally; or
to his habitual residence, place of business or designated address; or
to any address agreed on by the parties; or
in accordance with the standard practice, if any, of the parties in prior communications/dealings, or
if none of these addresses are available, at the addressee's last-known residence or place of business.
2.2 The notice, communication, or proposal is deemed to have been received on the day it is delivered to the addressee.
2.3 Any period of time under these Rules, shall begin to run on the day following the day on which the notice, communication or proposal is received. If the last day of such period is not a business day at the place of receipt pursuant to Rule 2.1, the period shall be extended until the first business day that follows. Non-business days including official holidays during the running of the period of time are included in calculating the period.
2.4 The parties shall file with the Secretariat a copy of any notice, communication or proposal related to the arbitral proceedings.
2.5 The Secretariat may at any time, subject to reasons recorded in writing, extend or shorten any time limits prescribed under these Rules.
Notice of Arbitration
3.1 In order to commence an arbitration, the "Claimant" shall file with the Secretariat a Notice of Arbitration which shall include, but may not be limited to:
a request that the dispute be referred to arbitration;
the names, address(es), telephone number(s), facsimile number(s) and email address(es), of the parties to the arbitration and their representatives, if any;
a reference to the arbitration clause/agreement that is invoked and its copy;
a reference to the contract or other instrument out of or in relation to which the dispute arises and its copy;
a brief statement describing the nature and circumstances of the dispute, specifying the relief claimed and, if possible, an initial quantification of the claim amount;
a statement of any matters which the parties have previously agreed regarding the conduct of the arbitration or with respect to which the Claimant would like to make a proposal;
a proposal for the number of arbitrator(s) in case it is not specified in the arbitration agreement;
unless the parties have agreed otherwise, a proposal for a sole arbitrator if the arbitration agreement provides for a sole arbitrator, or the nomination of an arbitrator if the arbitration agreement provides for three arbitrators;
any comments regarding the applicable rules of law;
any comments regarding the language of the arbitration; and
payment of the applicable filing fee.
3.2 The Notice of Arbitration may also include the "Statement of Claim" referred to in Rule 16.1.
3.3 The date of receipt of the complete Notice of Arbitration by the Secretariat shall be deemed the date of commencement of the arbitration. The Notice of Arbitration is deemed to be complete after all the requirements of Rule 3.1 are fulfilled or when the Secretariat determines that there has been substantial compliance with such requirements. CIICA shall notify the parties on the commencement of arbitration.
3.4 The Claimant shall at the same time send a copy of the Notice of Arbitration to the "Respondent", and notify the Secretariat that it has done so, specifying the mode and date of service and providing evidence thereof.
Response to the Notice of Arbitration
4.1 The Respondent shall send to the Secretariat (for transmission to Claimant) a Response within 14 days of receipt of the Notice of Arbitration that contains the following:
a confirmation or denial of all or part of the claim(s);
a brief statement describing the nature and circumstances of any counterclaim, specifying the relief claimed and, if possible, an initial quantification of the counterclaim amount;
any comment in response to any statements in the Notice of Arbitration under Rules 3.1(f), (g), (h), (i) and (j) or any comment in connection with matters covered in such Rules; and
the nomination of an arbitrator if the arbitration agreement provides for three arbitrators or, if the arbitration agreement provides for a sole arbitrator, agreement with Claimant's proposal for a sole arbitrator or a counter-proposal unless parties have agreed on a different procedure.
4.2 The Response may also include the Statement of Defence and a Statement of Counterclaim, as referred to in Rules 16.2 and 16.3.
4.3 The Respondent shall at the same time send a copy of the Response to the Secretariat, together with the payment of the requisite filing fee for any counterclaim, and shall notify the Secretariat of the mode and date of service.
Number and Appointment of Arbitrators
5.1 A sole arbitrator shall be appointed unless the parties have agreed otherwise or unless it appears to the Secretariat, based on relevant factors including the nature of the case that the dispute warrants the appointment of three arbitrators.
5.2 Parties may agree that an arbitrator is to be appointed by one or more of the parties, or by any third person including the arbitrators already appointed.
5.3 The Chairman shall confirm appointment of the arbitrators nominated by the parties, or by any third person including the arbitrators already appointed.
5.4 The Secretariat shall set the terms of appointment of each arbitrator in accordance with these Rules or in accordance with the agreement of the parties.
6.1 If a sole arbitrator is to be appointed, either party may propose to the other the names of one or more persons. Rule 5.3 shall apply once the parties have reached an agreement on the nomination of a sole arbitrator.
6.2 The Chairman shall appoint the arbitrator if, within 28 days after receipt by the Secretariat of the Notice of Arbitration, the parties have not agreed on the nomination of a sole arbitrator, or if at any time either party so requests.
Three Arbitrators
7.1 In case three arbitrators are to be appointed, each party shall nominate one arbitrator.
7.2 If a party fails to make a nomination within 14 days after receipt of a party's nomination of an arbitrator, the Chairman shall appoint the arbitrator on its behalf.
7.3 In case of a 3-member tribunal, the third/presiding arbitrator may be appointed by (a) the parties jointly; or (b) the party-appointed arbitrators jointly; or (c) Chairman
7.4 The Chairman shall appoint the third/presiding arbitrator if the parties do not agree on a nomination within the time limit set by the parties or by the Secretariat.
7.5 The Chairman shall appoint an arbitrator as soon as practicable. The Chairman's decision to appoint an arbitrator shall be final and cannot be challenged/appealed.
Multi-party Appointment of Arbitrator(s)
8.1 If there are more than two parties and three arbitrators are to be appointed, the Claimant(s) shall jointly nominate one arbitrator and the Respondent(s) shall jointly nominate one arbitrator. In case both the joint nominations are not made within 28 days of receipt by the Secretariat of the Notice of Arbitration or within the period agreed by the parties or set by the Secretariat, the Chairman shall appoint all three arbitrators and designate one of them to act as the presiding arbitrator.
8.2 If there are more than two parties and one arbitrator is to be appointed, all parties must agree on an arbitrator within 28 days of receipt by the Secretariat of the Notice of Arbitration or within the period agreed by the parties or set by the Secretariat. In case all parties do not agree on a nomination, the Chairman shall appoint the arbitrator.
Qualifications of Arbitrators
9.1 Any arbitrator, whether or not nominated by the parties, conducting an arbitration under these Rules shall be independent and impartial, and not act as an advocate for any party.
9.2 In making an appointment under these Rules, the Chairman shall give due consideration to any qualifications required of the arbitrator by the agreement of the parties and to considerations important for the appointment of an independent and impartial arbitrator.
9.3 The Chairman shall also take into consideration the arbitrator's availability for conducting the arbitral proceedings in a prompt and efficient manner.
9.4 An arbitrator shall disclose to the parties and to the Secretariat any circumstance that may give rise to justifiable doubts regarding his impartiality or independence as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event before his appointment by the Chairman.
9.5 An arbitrator shall immediately disclose to the parties, the other arbitrators and the Secretariat any circumstance of a similar nature that may arise after his appointment at any stage during the arbitration.
9.6 If the parties have agreed on any arbitrator qualifications, the arbitrator shall be deemed to meet such qualifications unless a party states otherwise within 14 days after receipt by that party of the notification of the nomination of the arbitrator. In the event of such a challenge, the procedure for challenge and replacement of an arbitrator in Rules 10 to 13 shall apply.
9.7 No party or anyone acting on its behalf shall have any ex parte communication relating to the case with any arbitrator or with any candidate for appointment as party-nominated arbitrator, except communications related to the following:
the general nature of the controversy and of the anticipated proceedings;
the candidate's qualifications, availability or independence in relation to the parties; and
the suitability of candidates for selection as a third arbitrator where the parties or party-designated arbitrators are to participate in that selection.
No party or its representative shall have any ex parte communication with any candidate for presiding arbitrator.
Challenge of Arbitrators
10.1 Any arbitrator may be challenged if any circumstances give rise to justifiable doubts regarding the arbitrator's impartiality or independence or if the arbitrator does not possess the requisite qualification on which the parties have agreed.
10.2 A party may challenge the arbitrator nominated by it on the basis of any information/facts that it became aware of after the arbitrator's appointment.
Notice of Challenge
11.1 Subject to Rule 9.6, a party that intends to challenge an arbitrator shall send a notice of challenge within 14 days after the receipt of the notice of appointment of that arbitrator or within 14 days after the party becomes aware of any information/circumstances mentioned in Rule 10.1 or 10.2.
11.2 The notice of challenge shall be filed with the Secretariat and sent simultaneously to the other party, the arbitrator who is being challenged and the other members of the Tribunal. The notice of challenge shall be in writing and shall state the grounds for the challenge. The Secretariat may suspend the arbitration proceedings until the challenge is decided.
11.3 If an arbitrator is challenged by one party, the other party may choose not to contest it. The challenged arbitrator may also withdraw from his office without contesting it. In both cases, it would not constitute acceptance of the validity of the grounds for the challenge.
11.4 In instances referred to in Rule 11.3, the procedure provided in Rules 5, 5, 7 or 8, as the case may be, shall be used for the appointment of the substitute arbitrator, even if during the process of appointing the challenged arbitrator, a party had failed to exercise his right to nominate. The time-limits provided in those Rules shall start to run from the date of receipt of the other party's agreement with the challenge or the challenged arbitrator's withdrawal.
Decision on Challenge
12.1 If, within 7 days of receipt of the notice of challenge, the other party does not confirm its agreement with the challenge and the arbitrator who is being challenged does not withdraw voluntarily, the Arbitration Council shall decide the challenge.
12.2 If the Arbitration Council decides that the challenge is valid, a substitute arbitrator shall be appointed in accordance with the procedure provided in Rules 5, 6, 7 or 8, as the case may be, even if during the process of appointing the challenged arbitrator, a party had failed to exercise his right to nominate. The time-limits provided in those Rules shall start to run from the date of the Secretariat's notification to the parties of the decision by the Arbitration Council
12.3 If the Arbitration Council dismisses the challenge, the arbitrator shall continue with the arbitration.
12.4 The Arbitration Council may fix the costs related to proceedings for determining the challenge and specify whether one or more parties will bear the costs and the proportion in which such costs should be borne.
12.5 The Arbitration Council's decision made under this Rule shall be final and cannot be challenged/appealed.
Replacement of an Arbitrator
13.1 In the event of the death, resignation or removal of an arbitrator during the course of the arbitral proceedings, a substitute arbitrator shall be appointed in accordance with the same procedure that was adopted for nomination and appointment of the arbitrator being replaced.
13.2 If an arbitrator refuses or fails to act or in the event of a de jure or de facto impossibility of him performing his functions or that he is not fulfilling his functions in accordance with the Rules the procedure for challenge and replacement of an arbitrator provided in Rules 10 to 12 and 13.1 shall apply.
13.3 The Chairman after consulting with the parties, may remove an arbitrator who refuses or fails to act, or in case of a de jure or de facto impossibility of him performing his functions, or if he is not fulfilling his functions in accordance with the Rules.
Repetition of Hearings in the Event of Replacement of an Arbitrator
Upon replacement of a sole or presiding arbitrator any hearings held previously shall be repeated unless otherwise agreed by the parties. If any other arbitrator is replaced, such prior hearings may be repeated if the Tribunal decides to do so after consulting with the parties. If the Tribunal has issued an interim or partial award, any hearings related solely to that award shall not be repeated, and the award shall remain in effect.
Conduct of the Proceedings
15.1 The Tribunal shall conduct the arbitration in accordance with the procedure agreed to by the parties to ensure the fair and expeditious determination of the dispute. To the extent the parties have not agreed on procedural aspects of the proceeding, the Tribunal is empowered to determine in its discretion the procedures to be followed for the arbitral proceedings.
15.2 The Tribunal shall determine the relevance, form and admissibility of all evidence.
15.3 As soon as practicable after the appointment of all arbitrators, the Tribunal shall conduct a preliminary meeting with the parties, in person or by any other means, to discuss the most appropriate and efficient procedures to be adopted for the arbitration.
15.4 The Tribunal may direct the order of proceedings, exclude any testimony not considered relevant or other evidence and direct the parties to focus their submissions on issues the decision of which could dispose of all or part of the case.
15.5 Parties may authorize the presiding arbitrator to make procedural rulings on behalf of the tribunal.
15.6 All statements, documents or other information submitted to the Tribunal and the Secretariat by one party shall simultaneously be communicated to the other party.
Submissions by the Parties
16.1 Unless already submitted pursuant to Rule 3.2, the Claimant shall, within a period of time to be determined by the Tribunal, send to the Respondent and the Tribunal a Statement of Claim setting out the following:
a statement of facts that support the claim;
the legal grounds or arguments in connection with the claim; and
the relief claimed and the amount of all quantifiable claims.
16.2 Unless already submitted pursuant to Rule 4.2, the Respondent shall, within a period of time to be determined by the Tribunal, send to the Claimant a Statement of Defence that includes the facts and contentions of law on which it relies. The Statement of Defence shall also state any counterclaim, which shall comply with the requirements of Rule 16.1.
16.3 If the Respondent makes a counterclaim the Claimant shall, within 14 days, send to the Respondent a Statement of Defence to the Counterclaim stating:
the facts and legal arguments in the Statement of Counterclaim it admits or denies;
the grounds on which it denies the claims;
other facts and legal arguments on which it relies.
16.4 A party may amend its claim, counterclaim or other submissions subject to the permission of the Tribunal. The Tribunal may deny permission if it would cause unnecessary delay or prejudice the other party or if the amended claim or counterclaim would fall outside the scope of the arbitration agreement.
16.5 The Tribunal shall decide whether or not any further submissions are required from the parties. The Tribunal shall set the deadlines for communicating such submissions.
16.6 All submissions referred to in this Rule shall be accompanied by copies of all supporting documents that have not been submitted earlier by the party.
16.7 If the Claimant fails to submit its Statement of Claim within the specified time period, the Tribunal may issue an order for termination of the arbitral proceedings or give such other directions it deems appropriate.
16.8 If the Respondent fails to submit a Statement of Defence within the specified time period, or if at any point any party fails to make any submissions in the manner directed by the Tribunal, the Tribunal may proceed with the arbitration.
Seat of Arbitration
17.1 The parties may agree on the seat of arbitration. If there is no such agreement, the seat of arbitration shall be Lahore, Pakistan, unless the Tribunal determines that another seat is more appropriate after considering all relevant factors and circumstances of the case.
17.2 The Tribunal may hold hearings and meetings in a manner it considers appropriate and at any location it considers convenient or appropriate.
Language of Arbitration
18.1 The Tribunal shall determine the language to be used in the proceedings unless parties have agreed on a language.
18.2 If a document is written in a language other than the language of the arbitration, the Tribunal, or the Secretariat if the Tribunal has not been constituted, may order that party to submit a translation in a form to be determined by the Tribunal or the Secretariat.
Party Representatives
A party may be represented by lawyers/legal practitioners or any other representatives.
20.1 Unless the parties have agreed on documents-only arbitration, the Tribunal shall, if either party so requests or the Tribunal so decides, hold a hearing for the presentation of evidence and/or for oral submissions on the merits of the dispute, including any submissions related to jurisdiction of the Tribunal.
20.2 The Tribunal shall set the date, time and place of any meeting or hearing and shall give the parties sufficient notice.
20.3 If any party fails to attend a hearing without showing sufficient cause for such failure, the Tribunal may proceed with the arbitration and may make the award based on the submissions and evidence before it.
20.4 All meetings and hearings shall be in private, and any recordings, transcripts, or documents used shall remain confidential except to the extent parties expressly agree otherwise.
21.1 Before any hearing, the Tribunal may direct a party to give notice of the identity of witnesses, including expert witnesses, whom it intends to produce, the subject matter of their testimony and its relevance to the issues.
21.2 The Tribunal may allow, refuse or limit the appearance of witnesses.
21.3 Any witness who gives oral evidence may be questioned by each of the parties, their representatives and the Tribunal in a manner determined by the Tribunal.
21.4 The Tribunal may direct the testimony of witnesses to be presented in written form, either as signed statements or sworn affidavits or any other form of recording. Subject to Rule 21.2, any party may request that such a witness should attend for oral examination. If the witness fails to attend, the Tribunal may accord such weight to the written testimony as it deems appropriate and may even disregard or exclude it completely.
21.5 A party or its representatives may interview any of its witnesses or potential witnesses prior to his appearance at any hearing.
21.6 A witness's testimony will be struck from the record if he or she is not made available for cross-examination.
Tribunal-Appointed Experts
22.1 Unless the parties have agreed otherwise, the Tribunal:
may appoint an expert, after consulting with the parties, to report on specific issues; and
may require a party to provide such expert any relevant information/documents, or provide access to any relevant documents, goods or property for the expert's inspection.
22.2 An expert so appointed shall submit a report in writing to the Tribunal. Upon receipt of the report, the Tribunal shall forward a copy of the report to the parties and invite the parties to submit their written comments on the report.
22.3 Unless the parties have agreed otherwise, if the Tribunal considers it necessary, the expert shall, after delivery of his written report, participate in a hearing at which the parties shall have the opportunity to question him on the report.
Additional Powers of the Tribunal
In addition to the powers specified in these Rules, and assuming there is no conflict with the applicable mandatory law, the Tribunal shall have the power to:
order the correction of any contract, but only to the extent required to rectify any mistake which it determines to have been made by all the parties to that contract. This is subject to the condition that the proper law of the contract allows such correction;
upon a party's application, allow one or more third parties to be joined in the arbitration, provided that such person is a party to the arbitration agreement, with the written consent of such third party, and subsequently make one final award or separate awards in respect of all parties;
except as provided in Rules 27.2 and 28.5, extend or shorten any time limits provided by these Rules;
conduct any enquiries that the Tribunal deems necessary;
order the parties to allow access to any property or item for inspection;
order the preservation, storage, sale or disposal of any property or item which is fully or partly the subject-matter of the dispute;
order any party to submit copies of any relevant/material documents in their possession or control for inspection by the Tribunal and the other parties;
render an award for unpaid arbitration costs;
direct any party to give evidence by affidavit or in any other form;
direct any party to ensure that arbitral award including any interim or partial award is not rendered ineffective by the dissipation of party's assets;
order any party to provide security for legal or other costs in any manner the Tribunal deems fit;
order any party to provide security for all or part of any amount in connection with the dispute in the arbitration;
proceed with the arbitration notwithstanding the failure or refusal of any party to comply with these Rules or with the Tribunal's orders or directions or any partial award and to impose such sanctions deemed appropriate by the Tribunal;
decide any issue not expressly or impliedly raised in the submissions filed under Rule 17 provided all parties are given adequate opportunity to make their submissions, oral or written;
determine the law applicable to the arbitral proceedings; and
determine any claim of legal or other privilege.
Jurisdiction of the Tribunal
24.1 If a party objects to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement or to the competence of CIICA to administer an arbitration before the Tribunal is appointed, the Secretariat shall determine if reference of such an objection is to be made to the Council. If the Secretariat refers it to the Arbitration Council, the Arbitration Council shall determine if the arbitration agreement is prima facie valid. If the Arbitration Council determines otherwise, the proceedings shall be terminated. Any decision by the Secretariat or the Arbitration Council is without prejudice to the power of the Tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction.
24.2 The Tribunal shall have the power to rule on its own jurisdiction, including any objections regarding the existence, termination or validity of the arbitration agreement. A decision by the Tribunal that the contract is null and void shall not invalidate the arbitration agreement as it shall be considered a separate/independent agreement.
24.3 A plea that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction shall be raised in the Statement of Defence or in a Statement of Defence to a Counterclaim. A plea that the Tribunal is exceeding the scope of its jurisdiction shall be raised promptly after the Tribunal has indicated its intention to decide on the matter alleged to be beyond the scope of its jurisdiction. In either case the Tribunal may admit a late plea under this Rule if it considers the delay justified. A party is not barred from raising this plea by the fact that he has nominated, or participated in the nomination of, an arbitrator. A party that does not raise an objection is deemed to have waived its right to raise procedural objections also.
24.4 The Tribunal may rule on a plea regarding its jurisdiction either as a preliminary question or in an award on the merits. In case the Tribunal rules in favour of jurisdiction, it will issue a partial award to that effect.
24.5 For purposes of a set-off, a party may rely on a claim or defence to the extent permitted by the applicable law.
Interim and Emergency Award
25.1 At the request of a party, the Tribunal may issue an award granting an injunction or any other interim relief it deems appropriate. The party requesting the interim award may be required by the Tribunal to provide appropriate security in connection with the relief sought.
25.2 Prior to the constitution of the Tribunal, a party may apply for an emergency award pursuant to the procedures set forth in Schedule 1.
25.3 A party may apply to a judicial authority for interim relief prior to the constitution of the Tribunal, or in exceptional circumstances after constitution of the Tribunal. A party is not required to take the tribunal's permission before seeking such interim relief.
Applicable Law, Amiable Compositeur
26.1 The Tribunal shall apply the law chosen by the parties to the substance of the dispute. Failing such designation by the parties, the Tribunal shall apply the law which it deems appropriate.
26.2 The Tribunal shall decide as amiable compositeur or ex aequoet bono only if it has been expressly authorised by the parties to do so.
26.3 In all cases, the Tribunal shall decide in accordance with the terms of the contract, if any, and shall take into account any applicable trade usages.
27.1 The Tribunal shall declare the proceedings closed once if it is satisfied, after consulting with the parties, that the parties have no further submission to make. The Tribunal may reopen the proceedings, on its own motion or upon application of a party, before any award is made.
27.2 The Tribunal shall submit the draft award to the Secretariat within 30 days from the date on which the Tribunal declares the proceedings closed. The presumption is that the draft award is a reasoned award. The Secretariat may, as soon as practicable, suggest modifications, if any, to the form of the award. No award shall be made by the Tribunal until its form has been approved by the Secretariat.
27.3 The Tribunal may make separate awards on different issues at different times.
27.4 If any arbitrator does not participate in the making of the award despite being given a reasonable opportunity to do so, the remaining arbitrators shall proceed in his or her absence.
27.5 In case of more than one arbitrator, the Tribunal shall decide by a majority. If there is no majority decision, the presiding arbitrator alone shall make the award for the Tribunal.
27.6 The award shall be delivered to the Secretariat, which shall forward certified copies to the parties upon the full settlement of the costs of arbitration.
27.7 The Tribunal may award simple or compound interest on any sum which is the subject of the arbitration at such rates as the parties may have agreed. In the absence of such an agreement, the Tribunal may award it at such rates and for such time period that it deems appropriate.
27.8 In case of a settlement, the Tribunal may render a consent award recording the settlement on the request of a party. If the parties do not require a consent award, the parties shall confirm to the Secretariat that a settlement has been reached. The Tribunal shall be discharged and the arbitration concluded upon payment of any outstanding costs of arbitration including CIICA's fee and arbitrators' fees.
27.9 Subject to Rule 28 and Schedule 1, by agreeing to arbitration under these Rules, the parties undertake to enforce the award without delay, and they also irrevocably waive their rights subject to any exceptions under applicable law to any form of appeal, review or recourse to any competent court or other judicial authority. The parties further agree that an award shall be final and binding on the parties from the date it is made.
27.10 CIICA may publish any award subject to mutual consent of the parties and to any specific conditions mutually agreed upon by the parties.
Correction of Awards and Additional Awards
28.1 A party may, within 30 days of receipt of an award, request the Tribunal, by written notice to the Secretariat and to any other party, to correct in the award any error in computation, any clerical or typographical error or any error of a similar nature. Any other party may provide its comments on such request within 15 days of its receipt. If the Tribunal considers the request to be justified, it shall make the correction within 30 days of receipt of the request. Any correction, made in the original award or in a separate memorandum, shall be considered part of the award.
28.2 The Tribunal may, on its own initiative, correct any error of the type referred to in Rule 28.1 within 30 days of the date of the award.
28.3 A party may, within 30 days of receipt of an award, request the Tribunal, by written notice to the Secretariat and to any other party, to make an additional award in connection with the claims presented in the arbitral proceedings but not dealt with in the award. Any other party may provide its comments on such request within 15 days of its receipt. If the Tribunal considers the request to be justified, it shall make the additional award within 45 days of receipt of the request.
28.4 A party may, within 30 days of receipt of an award, request the Tribunal, by written notice to the Secretariat and to any other party, to give an interpretation of the award. Any other party may provide its comments on such request within 15 days of its receipt. If the Tribunal considers the request to be justified, it shall give the interpretation in writing within 45 days of receipt of the request. The interpretation shall form part of the award.
28.5 The Secretariat may extend the time limits in this Rule.
28.6 In case of a correction of an award and any additional award, Rule 27 shall apply in the same manner with the appropriate changes.
29.1 The Tribunal's fees and CIICA's fees shall be ascertained in accordance with the Schedule of Fees in force at the time of commencement of the arbitration. Parties may agree on a different method for determining the Tribunal's fees prior to the constitution of the Tribunal.
29.2 The Secretariat shall determine the advance payment on costs of the arbitration. Unless the Secretariat directs otherwise, 50% of such advances shall be payable by the Claimant and the remaining 50% of such advances shall be payable by the Respondent. The Secretariat may fix separate advance payments on costs for claims and counterclaims.
29.3 If the amount of the claim or the counterclaim is not quantifiable at the time payment is due, the Secretariat shall make a provisional estimate of the costs of the arbitration. This estimate may be based on the nature of the controversy and the circumstances of the case. This may be revised in light of any information that subsequently becomes available.
29.4 The Secretariat may from time to time direct parties to make further payments in connection with the arbitration costs that have either been incurred or to be incurred.
29.5 If a party fails to make the payments the Secretariat may, after consultation with the Tribunal and the parties, direct the Tribunal to suspend work and set a deadline on the expiry of which the claims or counterclaims shall be considered as withdrawn without prejudice to the party resubmitting the same claims or counterclaims in another proceeding that is not before the same tribunal.
29.6 Parties are jointly and severally liable for the costs of the arbitration. Any party may pay the whole of the advances or deposits on costs of the arbitration in respect of the claim or the counterclaim if the other party fail to pay its share. The Tribunal or the Secretariat may suspend its work, in whole or in part, if the advances or deposits remain either wholly or in part unpaid. The Tribunal may also issue an award for unpaid costs pursuant to Rule 23(h) on the application of a party.
29.7 If the arbitration is settled or disposed of without a hearing, the costs of arbitration shall be finally determined by the Secretariat. The Secretariat shall consider all the circumstances of the case, including the stage of proceedings at which the arbitration is settled or disposed of. If the costs of arbitration determined are less than the deposits made, there shall be a refund in such proportions as the parties may agree, or failing an agreement, in the same proportions as the deposits were made.
29.8 All advance payments shall be made to and held by CIICA. Any interest which may accrue on such deposits shall be retained by CIICA.
Costs of the Arbitration
30.1 The Tribunal shall specify the total amount of the arbitration costs in the award. The Tribunal shall also specify the apportionment of the arbitration costs of the arbitration among the parties if the parties have not agreed otherwise.
30.2 The term "costs of the arbitration" includes:
the Tribunal's fees and expenses;
CIICA's administrative fees and expenses; and
the costs of expert advice/opinion and of any other assistance required by the Tribunal.
Tribunal's Fees and Expenses
31.1 The fees of the Tribunal shall be fixed by the Secretariat in accordance with the Schedule of Fees and the stage of the proceedings at which the arbitration ended. The Secretariat may allow an additional fee above the amount prescribed in the Schedule of Fees if there are any exceptional circumstances.
31.2 The Tribunal's reasonable disbursements, out-of-pocket expenses necessarily incurred and other allowances shall be determined by the Secretariat and reimbursed accordingly.
Party's Legal and Other Costs
In its award, the Tribunal shall have the authority to order that all or a part of the legal or other costs of a party be paid by another party.
33.1 CIICA, including the Chairman, members of its Arbitration Council, directors, officers, employees or any arbitrator, shall not be liable to any person for any negligence, act or omission in connection with any arbitration proceedings conducted pursuant to these Rules.
33.2 CIICA, including the Chairman, members of its Arbitration Council, directors, officers, employees or any arbitrator, shall not be under any obligation to make any oral or written statement in connection with any arbitration proceedings conducted pursuant to these Rules. No party shall seek to make the Chairman, any member of the Arbitration Council, director, officer, employee or arbitrator act as a witness in any legal proceedings related to any arbitration governed by these Rules.
34.1 At all times, the parties and the Tribunal shall treat all matters in connection with the proceedings and the award as confidential unless parties agree otherwise.
34.2 A party or any arbitrator shall not, without the prior written consent of all the parties, disclose any confidential matter/information to a third party except:
for purposes of an application to a competent court to enforce or challenge the award;
pursuant to the order of or a subpoena issued by a court of competent jurisdiction;
for purposes of pursuing or enforcing a legal right or claim;
in compliance with the provisions of the applicable laws which are binding on the party making the disclosure;
in compliance with a specific requirement or request/directions of any regulatory body or other authority; or
pursuant to the Tribunal's order on application by a party with proper notice to the other parties.
34.3 The matters referred to in this Rule, include the pleadings, evidence and other materials in the arbitration proceedings and all other documents submitted by another party in the proceedings or the award arising from the proceedings, but excludes any matter that is otherwise in the public domain.
34.4 In case a party breaches this Rule's provisions, the Tribunal has the power to take appropriate measures, including issuing an order or award for sanctions or costs.
Decisions of the Chairman, the Arbitration Council and the Secretariat
35.1 Subject to Rule 24.1, the decisions of the Chairman the Arbitration Council and the Secretariat regarding all matters involved in the arbitration shall be conclusive and binding upon the parties and the Tribunal. The Chairman of the Arbitration Council and the Secretariat are not obligated to provide reasons for such decisions.
35.2 Subject to Rule 24.1, the parties shall be deemed to have waived any right of appeal or review in connection with any decisions of the Chairman the Arbitration Council and the Secretariat to any court or other judicial authority.
36.1 A party that is aware of non-compliance with any provision or requirement under these Rules and proceeds with the arbitration without promptly stating its objection shall be deemed to have waived its right to object.
36.2 In all matters not expressly provided for in these Rules, the Chairman, the Arbitration Council, the Secretariat and the Tribunal shall act in the spirit of these Rules and shall make every reasonable effort to ensure the fair and expeditious completion of the arbitration.
36.3 CIICA may from time to time issue Practice Notes to supplement, regulate and implement these Rules to facilitate the administration of arbitrations governed by these Rules.
36.4 CIICA has the authority to amend, modify these Rules but the changes will not apply to arbitration proceedings that have already commenced unless specifically agreed to by the parties.
Emergency Arbitrator
A party in need of emergency relief may, concurrent with or following the filing of a Notice of Arbitration but prior to the constitution of the Tribunal, make an application for emergency interim award. The party shall notify the Secretariat and all other parties in writing of the nature of the relief sought and the reasons why such relief is required on an emergency basis. The application shall also state the grounds on which the party is entitled to such relief. Such notice should include a statement certifying that all other parties have been notified or an explanation of the steps taken in good faith to notify other parties. The application shall also be accompanied by payment of any fees set by the Secretariat for such proceedings.
In case the Chairman determines that the application should be accepted, he shall appoint an Emergency Arbitrator within one business day of receipt of such application by the Secretariat and payment of any required fee.
The Emergency Arbitrator so appointed shall, before accepting appointment, disclose to the Secretariat any circumstance that may raise justifiable doubts regarding his impartiality or independence. Any challenge to the appointment of the Emergency Arbitrator must be made within one business day of the Secretariat's notification to the parties of the Emergency Arbitrator's appointment and the circumstances/grounds for the challenge disclosed.
Unless the parties agree otherwise, an Emergency Arbitrator may not act as an arbitrator in any future arbitration related to the dispute.
The Emergency Arbitrator shall, as soon as possible but in any event no later than three business days of appointment, establish a schedule for consideration of the application for an emergency award. The schedule shall provide a fair and reasonable opportunity to all parties to be heard. In the alternative, the schedule may provide for proceedings by telephone conference or on written submissions. The Emergency Arbitrator shall have the powers vested in the Tribunal under these Rules, including the authority to rule on his own jurisdiction, and shall resolve any disputes in connection with the application of this Schedule 1.
The Emergency Arbitrator shall have the power to award any interim relief that he deems proper and necessary. The Emergency Arbitrator shall give reasons for his award in writing. The Emergency Arbitrator may modify or vacate the interim award by providing valid grounds/reasons.
Once the Tribunal is constituted, the Emergency Arbitrator shall have no further power to act. The Tribunal may reconsider, modify or vacate the interim award of emergency relief issued by the Emergency Arbitrator and is not bound by the reasons given by the Emergency Arbitrator. Any award issued by the Emergency Arbitrator shall, in any event, cease to be binding:
if the Tribunal is not constituted within 90 days of such order or award; or
when the Tribunal makes a final award; or
if the claim is withdrawn.
Any interim award of emergency relief may be subject to the condition that the party seeking such relief provide appropriate security.
An award rendered under Schedule 1 shall be binding on the parties. Parties' agreement on arbitration under these Rules constitutes an undertaking to comply with such an order or award without delay.
The costs associated with any application pursuant to this Schedule 1 shall initially be apportioned by the Emergency Arbitrator. The final determination of apportionment of these costs shall be made by the Tribunal.
These Rules shall apply, as deemed appropriate by the Emergency Arbitrator, to proceedings under Schedule 1, in view of the urgency of such proceedings. The Emergency Arbitrator's decision regarding application of these Rules shall be final and not subject to appeal.
For general inquiries: inf[email protected]
For inquiries related to arbitration: [email protected]
For arbitration case filing/management: [email protected]
For inquiries related to mediation: [email protected]
For inquiries related to other ADR services: [email protected]
3rd Floor, 7-A Turner Road, Lahore, Pakistan
Copyright © 2014-2020 Center for International Investment and Commercial Arbitration (CIICA). All Rights Reserved.
Developed byThe Right Software
covid popup
CIICA - Covid-19 update
Amidst the Covid-19 pandemic, we would like to inform you of CIICA's online mediation and arbitration services. For more information, please send us an email at [email protected]


text:
telehealth Archives
Horst takes on new roles in advancing digital health
Oct. 13, 2022—Sara Horst, MD, MPH, has been named associate vice chair for Digital Health Operations for Vanderbilt's Department of Medicine and assistant chief for Clinical Informatics for the Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition.
Video vital for telehealth visits
Jul. 28, 2022—Vanderbilt study of 18,130 telehealth visits at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic defines risk factors associated with telehealth access and suggests how health systems can improve access.
Scale measures confidence with telehealth technology
Jun. 2, 2022—Vanderbilt's Digital Health Care Literacy Scale uses responses to three brief items to assess whether patients or caregivers are apt to have the confidence and basic know-how required to use digital health care services such as telehealth.
Program lets patients receive medical treatment at home
Jun. 1, 2022—by Matt Batcheldor When Denis Brock needed to be hospitalized for an infection last fall, she was treated in an unlikely place: her home. Brock was one of the first patients to participate in Vanderbilt's Hospital at Home program, which allows patients to remain in the comfort of their own home while receiving treatment for...
Horst named medical director for telehealth at VUMC
Mar. 30, 2022—Sara Horst, MD, MPH, has been named the new medical director for Telehealth Ambulatory Services for Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Digital growth, improvements, vaccinations: Leadership Assembly takeaways
Aug. 5, 2021—Vanderbilt University Medical Center completed its first full fiscal year of the COVID-19 era having achieved remarkable outcomes in digital health, growth and quality because of consistently strong performance from its workforce.
Children's Hospital adds online scheduling option
Jul. 22, 2021—Self-checkout and online ordering have become ways for consumers to gain both control and convenience in today's marketplace. And health care is no exception.
Neurology survey reveals high satisfaction for telehealth
Jan. 14, 2021—A post-visit outpatient survey from VUMC's Department of Neurology, conducted under an ongoing departmental quality improvement initiative, has turned up additional evidence of high satisfaction with telehealth among both patients and clinicians.
ACM gift aims to improve lives of children with autism spectrum disorder
Aug. 13, 2020—ACM Lifting Lives, the charitable arm of the Academy of Country Music, has made a generous gift to Vanderbilt University Medical Center for programs and research demonstrating the healing power of music to improve the lives of children with autism spectrum disorder.
Original podcast series explores ideas, issues shaping health and health care
Aug. 11, 2020—Listen to Episode 1 and subscribe on your favorite platform. Vanderbilt University Medical Center is launching Vanderbilt Health DNA: Discoveries in Action, an original podcast series exploring the issues and scientific advancements shaping health, medicine and society. The series takes the listener deep into the world of health care through conversations with more than 30...
Study finds patients defer routine health care during pandemic
Jul. 29, 2020—During February and March at two large academic medical centers in Nashville and Boston, screening for high cholesterol and high blood sugar dropped 81-90% and initiation of drug therapy for these conditions dropped 52-60%.
Use of VUMC's patient portal is surging
Jun. 24, 2020—Enrollment in the Vanderbilt Health patient portal, My Health at Vanderbilt (MHAV), has surged in recent months.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Natalie and Greg said their wedding vows last month in our beautiful Magnolia Ballroom. It's not every day that our Magnolia Ballroom hosts both ceremony and reception, so we wanted to share this beautiful duo with you. Everything sparkled and gave room to their large wedding party. Thank you Natalie and Greg for sharing your special wedding memories with us!


text:
Q: Bash/Shell: Why am I getting the wrong output for if-else statements? So here's a simple script to evaluate a string length and print whether it is greater than or less than a value.
#!/bin/sh

FILENAME="thisislongerthantencharacters"
echo $FILENAME
echo "$FILENAME" | wc -c
if [ $( "$FILENAME" | wc -c ) -gt 10 ]
    then echo "FILENAME is longer than 10 characters for: $FILENAME."

elif [ $( "$FILENAME" | wc -c ) -lt 10 ]
    then echo "FILENAME is less than 10 characters for: $FILENAME."
else
    echo "None of the above"
fi

For some reason, I only get the output that it is less than, regardless of the string length.
Output:
thisislongerthantencharacters
30
FILENAME is less than 10 characters for: thisislongerthantencharacters.

May I know what I am doing wrong exactly? And why is the character count a bit off?

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Feral Love documentary celebrates community cats.
Community cat program in Georgia's Cobb County saves cats by the hundreds.
Former community cat who once needed help lends a helping paw to other cats like him.
Working cat program saves Los Angeles cats reluctant to make friends with people.
Many hands pitch in to help a homeless stray cat with FIV.
Take a walk on the wild side with animal pictures featuring stray cats.


CS:GO BLOOD Doppler Karambit Hawkbill Full Tang Tactical Neck Knife w/ABS Sheath – (Limited Edition) + FREE CSGO Dog Tag Necklace – Great price appears to be well built.
What are the Pros and Cons of the CS:GO BLOOD Doppler Karambit Hawkbill Full Tang Tactical Neck Knife w/ABS Sheath – (Limited Edition) + FREE CSGO Dog Tag Necklace?
I have found most affordable price of CS:GO BLOOD Doppler Karambit Hawkbill Full Tang Tactical Neck Knife w/ABS Sheath – (Limited Edition) + FREE CSGO Dog Tag Necklace from Amazon store. It offers fast and free shipping. Best combat knife for sale will be limited stock of certain product and discount only for limited time, so do order now to get the best deals. Before you buy, check to see if a product is available online at store, read and compare experiences customers have had with combat knife below.
All the latest best combat knife reviews consumer reports are written by real customers on websites. You should read more consumer reviews and answered questions about CS:GO BLOOD Doppler Karambit Hawkbill Full Tang Tactical Neck Knife w/ABS Sheath – (Limited Edition) + FREE CSGO Dog Tag Necklace below.


text:
Dieser Artikel beschreibt den Verlauf und die Ergebnisse der Etappen des Giro d'Italia 2019.

1. Etappe
Bologna – Santuario della Madonna di San Luca, Einzelzeitfahren, 8 km

Der im Vorfeld als Mitfavorit auf den Tages- und Gesamtsieg gehandelte Roglič setzte sich, früh gestartet, mit 19 Sekunden Vorsprung auf Simon Yates und derer 23 auf Vincenzo Nibali durch und erzielte damit seinen zweiten Giro-Etappensieg nach 2016, als er ebenfalls ein Zeitfahren gewann. Zudem wurde er am Ende der Etappe erster slowenischer Träger der Maglia Rosa.

2. Etappe
Bologna – Fucecchio, Hügelige Etappe, 205 km

Grand-Tour-Debütant Ackermann siegte im ersten Massensprint des Giro d'Italia 2019 vor Elia Viviani und Caleb Ewan. Es war gleichzeitig sein vierter Saisonsieg.

3. Etappe
Vinci – Orbetello, Flachetappe, 220 km

Dem ursprünglichen Erstplatzierten im Massensprint, Elia Viviani, wurde sein Sieg nach Entscheidung der Jury wegen regelwidrigen Verhaltens im Zielsprint aberkannt und der Zweitplatzierte Gaviria nachträglich zum Sieger der dritten Etappe erklärt. Viviani wurde an das Ende der ersten Gruppe im Ziel auf Platz 73 zurückgesetzt.

4. Etappe
Orbetello – Frascati, Flachetappe, 235 km

Durch einen Massensturz sechs Kilometer vor dem Ziel der bis dahin unauffällig verlaufenden Etappe wurde das Peloton geteilt und es verblieb eine etwa zehnköpfige Gruppe um den Gesamtführenden Roglič an der Spitze. Der Tagessieger Carapaz attackierte in der Schlusssteigung nach Vorarbeit des Teams UAE Emirates um Ulissi 400 Meter vor dem Ziel und erreichte seinen zweiten Giro-Tageserfolg nach 2018. Da sich außer Roglič keine anderen Gesamtklassements-Favoriten in der ersten Gruppe befanden, konnte der Slowene seinen Vorsprung gegenüber Simon Yates auf 35 Sekunden ausbauen. Tom Dumoulin, der Gesamtsieger von 2017 und vor der Etappe in der Gesamtwertung aussichtsreich auf Platz fünf gelegen, verletzte sich während des Massensturzes am Knie und erreichte das Ziel mit etwa vier Minuten Rückstand gegenüber Carapaz.

5. Etappe
Frascati – Terracina, Flachetappe, 140 km

Pascal Ackermann gewann im Massensprint der verregneten 5. Etappe seinen zweiten Tagesabschnitt, obwohl er, um eine Kollision mit dem ausscherenden Jacopo Guarnieri, dem Anfahrer des Tagesdritten Arnaud Démare, zu vermeiden, neu antreten musste. Der Sieger von 2017 und Vorjahreszweite Tom Dumoulin musste das Rennen nach seinem Sturz auf der 4. Etappe aufgeben.

6. Etappe
Cassino – San Giovanni Rotondo, Hügelige Etappe, 238 km

Die beiden Tagesersten Fausto Masnada und Valerio Conti setzten sich 29 Kilometer vor dem Ziel aus einer dreizehnköpfigen Fahrergruppe ab, die durch die Mannschaft des Gesamtführenden Primož Roglič nicht ernsthaft verfolgt wurde. Nachdem zunächst der Angriff aufgrund einer Uneinigkeit der Fahrer zu scheitern drohte, einigten sich die Fahrer, vermittelt durch die Sportlichen Leiter, auf eine Zusammenarbeit und dem Aufteilen der Erfolge dahingehend, dass Masnada die Etappe gewinnt und Conti dank der seiner Mitarbeit das Maglia Rosa übernimmt.

7. Etappe
Vasto – L'Aquila, Hügelige Etappe, 185 km

Nach belebtem Beginn formiere sich erst rund 100 Kilometer vor dem Ziel die dreizehnköpfige Spitzengruppe des Tages, aus der sich heraus Pello Bilbao durch eine Attacke am Schlussanstieg den Tagessieg sicherte. Zwischenzeitlich übernahm José Joaquín Rojas die virtuelle Gesamtführung. Der Vorsprung der Spitzengruppe sank aber, nachdem das Team des Gesamtführenden Contis, UAE Team Emirates, durch Trek-Segafredo Unterstützung bei der Verfolgung erhielt, sodass Conti seine Maglia Rosa verteidigte.

8. Etappe
Tortoreto Lido – Pesaro, Hügelige Etappe, 239 km

An der letzten Bergwertung 24 Kilometer vor dem Ziel setzte sich der Bergwertungsführende Giulio Ciccone nach einem Angriff von Louis Vervaeke ab, dem auch François Bidard folgte. Das Trio wurde durch die Zusammenarbeit der Sprinterteams sechs Kilometer vor dem Ziel eingeholt. Der von seinem Bora-hansgrohe-Team pilotierte Pascal Ackermann lancierte den Sprint nach der letzten Kurve, wurde aber von Caleb Ewan und Elia Viviani übersprintet.

9. Etappe
Riccione – San Marino, Einzelzeitfahren, 34,8 km

Etappensieger des verregneten Zeitfahrens mit einem Anstieg nach San Marino wurde Primož Roglič, der hinter dem weiter Gesamtführenden Valerio Conti (3:34 Minuten Rückstand im Etappenziel) den zweiten Rang der Gesamtwertung übernahm. Etappenzweiter wurde der noch im Trockenen gestartete Stundenweltrekordler Victor Campenaerts mit elf Sekunden Rückstand, der zu Beginn des Schlußanstiegs einen Defekt hatte. Von den Mitfavoriten verloren Bauke Mollema als Dritter eine Minute, Vincenzo Nibali als Vierter 1:05 Minuten Mikel Landa 3:03 Minuten, Simon Yates 3:11 Minuten und Miguel Angel Lopez 3:45 Minuten.

10. Etappe
Ravenna – Modena, Flachetappe, 145 km

Arnaud Démare gewann den Massensprint des Peletons vor Elia Viviani und Rüdiger Selig, dessen Sprintkapitän Pascal Ackermann mit anderen Fahrern an der 1000-Meter-Marke schwer stürzte, aber keine Brüche erlitt. Matteo Moschetti konnte aufgrund der Folgen dieses Sturzes zur 11. Etappe nicht mehr antreten.

11. Etappe
Carpi – Novi Ligure, Flachetappe, 221 km

Der am Vortag gestürzte Pascal Ackermann eröffnete früh den Sprint um den Etappensieg und wurde durch Caleb Ewan überspurtet. Zweiter vor Ackermann wurde der Vortagessieger Arnaud Démare und übernahm die Maglia ciclamino.

12. Etappe
Cuneo – Pinerolo, Mittelschwere Etappe, 158 km

Zu Beginn der Etappe bildete sich eine 24-köpfige Spitzengruppe, deren Bestplatzierter Jan Polanc (Tagessechster auf 25 Sekunden) die Gesamtführung von seinem UAE Team Emirates-Kollegen Valerio Conti (10:37 Minuten Rückstand) übernahm. Die Spitzengruppe zerfiel an der Bergwertung der 1. Kategorie 33 Kilometer vor dem Ziel. Nach einem weiteren unkategorisierten steilen Anstieg 2,5 Kilometer vor dem Ziel und der folgenden Abfahrt verblieb eine Fünferspitze übrig, deren Sprint Cesare Benedetti gewann. Aus der Favoritengruppe setzten sich an der letzten Bergwertung Mikel Landa und Miguel Ángel López ab und erreichten das Ziel mit 7:35 Minuten Rückstand auf den Sieger und 28 Sekunden Vorsprung auf die meisten der übrigen Favoriten um Primož Roglič.

13. Etappe
Pinerolo – Ceresole Reale, Hochgebirgsetappe, 196 km

Die erste Hochgebirgsetappe mit Bergankunft des Giro d'Italia 2019 wurde durch eine 27-köpfige Ausreißergruppe bestimmt, der unter anderem der Gesamtfünfte Bauke Mollema angehörten. Aus der Spitzengruppe heraus gewann Ilnur Zakarin heraus mit 35 Sekunden Vorsprung vor Mikel Nieve, den er auf den letzten beiden Kilometern abschütteln konnte. Die Verfolgung wurde insbesondere durch das Team Jumbo-Visma von Primož Roglič kontrolliert. Im auf eine Favoritengruppe verkleinerten Hauptfeld attackierte Mikel Landa 15 Kilometer vor dem Ziel mit Unterstützung seiner aus der Fluchtgruppe zurückgefallenen Mannschaftskollegen und wurde Tagesdritter mit 1:20 Minuten Rückstand. Jan Polanc verteidigte als 15. sein Rosa Trikot, büßte aber fast die Hälfte seines Vorsprungs gegenüber Roglič ein. Giulio Ciccone, der sich in der Spitzengruppe befand und die ersten beiden Bergwertungen des Tages gewann, übernahm die Maglia azzurra nach einem Tag wieder von seinem Teamkollegen Gianluca Brambilla. Pawel Siwakow, der als Tagesneunter ins Ziel kam, wurde neuer Führender in der Nachwuchswertung.

14. Etappe
Saint-Vincent  – Courmayeur, Hochgebirgsetappe, 131 km

Nachdem der letzte Ausreißer des Tages, der Führende in der Bergwertung Giulio Ciccone, eingeholt wurde, attackierte Richard Carapaz 28 Kilometer vor dem Ziel am Colle San Carlo, einem Anstieg der 1. Kategorie. Er hatte im Ziel 1:32 Minuten Vorsprung auf Simon Yates. Die Favoriten Vincenzo Nibali und Primoz Roglic belauerten sich und verloren 1:54 Minuten auf den Tagessieger, der damit die Maglia Rosa übernahm.

15. Etappe
Ivrea – Como, Mittelschwere Etappe, 232 km

Die beiden Tagesersten der durch drei kategorisierte Anstiege mit gefährlichen Abfahrten geprägten Etappe, Cataldo und Cattaneo setzten sich bereits nach 23 Kilometern ab und hatten einen Maximalvorsprung von ca. 16 Minuten. Im Ziel hatten sie nur noch 11 Sekunden Vorsprung auf die Verfolge um Nibali und Carapaz, während der Mitfavorit Roglič behindert durch einen Defekt mit Radwechsel und einen Sturz auf einer Abfahrt weitere 40 Sekunden verlor.

16. Etappe
Lovere – Ponte di Legno, Hochgebirgsetappe, 194 km

Die Tagesersten Ciccone und Hirt waren die letzten Verbliebenen aus einer ursprünglich 21-köpfigen Spitzengruppe, die sich kurz nach dem Start bildete. Im Favoritenfeld dahinter attackierte Nibali 34 Kilometer vor dem Ziel im Anstieg zum 1.854 Meter hohen Mortirolopass. Seiner Attacke konnte zwar die Maglia Rosa Carapaz folgen, nicht aber Roglic, der 1:23 auf die Gruppe um Nibali verlor und seinen zweiten Gesamtwertungsplatz an Nibali abgeben musste,

17. Etappe
Commezzadura – Antholz, Mittelschwere Etappe, 181 km

Am ersten größeren Anstieg des Tages löste sich eine 18-köpfige Spitzengruppe mit dem Gesamtzwölften Davide Formolo, aus der sich 15 Kilometer vor dem Ziel Nans Peters lösen konnte. An der Spitze der Favoriten konnten Landa (19. auf 4:27 Minuten) und Carapaz (20. auf 4:39 Minuten) durch Angriffe kurz vor der Bergankunft in Antholz einige Sekunden auf die anderen Gesamtwertungsfahrer gut machen.

18. Etappe
Olang – Santa Maria di Sala, Flachetappe, 222 km

Die letzte Flachetappe wurde durch eine dreiköpfige Spitzengruppe mit dem späteren Tagessieger Damiano Cima, Mirco Maestri (10.) und Nico Denz (11.) bestimmt, die sich nach ca. 50 absetzen konnte. Die Nachführarbeit wurde in erster Linie von Ackermanns Bora-hansgrohe-Team geleistet, die das Ziel verfolgten Ackermann die zu vergebendenen Punkte für die Maglia ciclamino zu sichern. Das Spitzentrio wurde auf der Zielgeraden gestellt; Cima rettete sich jedoch vor Ackermann als Erster in Ziel, der so die Führung in der Punktewertung übernahm.

19. Etappe
Treviso – San Martino di Castrozza, Mittelschwere Etappe, 151 km

Esteban Chavez konnte sich nach mehreren Attacken 2,5 Kilometer vor der Bergankunft aus der Spitzengruppe des Tages absetzen, die sich kurz nach Etappenstart gebildet hatte. Es war sein erster Sieg nach einem Jahr ohne Erfolge aufgrund einer Erkrankung mit dem Pfeiferschen Drüsenfieber. Miguel Ángel López konnte durch einen Angriff auf den letzten Kilometern 44 Sekunden auf die anderen Favoriten herausfahren und wurde 13. mit 5:45 Minuten Rückstand.

20. Etappe
Feltre – Croce d'Aune, Hochgebirgsetappe, 194 km

Die Bergankunft wurde durch Pelio Bilbao im Sprint einer kleineren Gruppe aus Ausreißern und aufgefahrenen Favoriten Landa, Carapaz und Nibali entschieden. Primož Roglič verlor in der letzten Abfahrt zuvor den Anschluss, kam als 14. mit 54 Sekunden Rückstand ins Ziel und verlor damit seinen dritten Gesamtrang. Miguel Angel Lopez wurde im Schlussanstieg von einem Zuschauer zu Fall gebracht und verlor 1:49 Minuten. Nach seinem Unfall schlug Lopez den Zuschauer.

21. Etappe
Verona – Verona, Einzelzeitfahren, 17 km

Sieger des abschließenden Einzelzeitfahrens wurde Chad Haga mit vier Sekunden Vorsprung vor dem Stundenweltrekordler und Zeitfahreuropameister Victor Camperaerts. Carapaz sicherte sich als 36. des Tages mit 1:12 Minuten Rückstand die Maglia Rosa vor Nibali (9. auf 23 Sekunden), während Roglič als Tageszehnter auf 26 Sekunden den dritten Gesamtplatz von Landa (21. auf 57 Sekunden) übernahm.

Einzelnachweise

Weblinks

Etappen

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
About: The Fabulous Beekman Boys
An Entity of Type : television show, from Named Graph : http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space : dbpedia-live.openlinksw.com
The Fabulous Beekman Boys was a reality television show produced in the United States by World of Wonder Productions. The series followed Josh Kilmer-Purcell and his husband Brent Ridge as they learned how to become farmers and launch their lifestyle brand, Beekman 1802. Brent, a physician who previously worked for Martha Stewart Omnimedia, lives at the farm full-time, while Josh, a New York Times bestselling author, commutes from their apartment in New York City on the weekends. The show originally aired on Planet Green, one of the Discovery Networks, but was acquired by Cooking Channel, a network owned by Scripps Network Interactive in 2012.
dbo:Work/runtime
The Fabulous Beekman Boys was a reality television show produced in the United States by World of Wonder Productions. The series followed Josh Kilmer-Purcell and his husband Brent Ridge as they learned how to become farmers and launch their lifestyle brand, Beekman 1802. Brent, a physician who previously worked for Martha Stewart Omnimedia, lives at the farm full-time, while Josh, a New York Times bestselling author, commutes from their apartment in New York City on the weekends. The show originally aired on Planet Green, one of the Discovery Networks, but was acquired by Cooking Channel, a network owned by Scripps Network Interactive in 2012. Touted as a "gay Green Acres", the series chronicled the couple's trials and tribulations as novice farmers, aided by their caretaker and resident farmer John Hall, or "Farmer John." Hall brought his goats to the Beekman Farm shortly after Ridge and Kilmer-Purcell purchased it in 2007. Also featured is Polka Spot, the farm's llama. Other residents of Sharon Springs, New York are also included in the cast, including Doug Plummer and Garth Roberts, owners of the American Hotel. On August 9, 2010, Planet Green announced that The Fabulous Beekman Boys had been renewed for a second season of ten episodes. In announcing the renewal, Laura Michalchyshyn, President and General Manager of Planet Green, noted that the series "has quickly established itself as a cornerstone franchise for Planet Green". The second season began on March 22, 2011. Planet Green declined to renew The Fabulous Beekman Boys for a third season based on low ratings. However, Cooking Channel announced in April 2012 that it had picked up the series for a third season. The channel plans to repeat the first two seasons with additional footage as well. The pair also participated in the 21st season of The Amazing Race, ultimately becoming the season's grand prize winners. (en)
dbo:channel
dbr:Cooking_Channel
dbr:Planet_Green
dbo:genre
dbr:Reality_television
dbr:Sharon_Springs,_New_York
dbo:numberOfEpisodes
dbo:numberOfSeasons
dbo:releaseDate
dbo:runtime
1380.000000 (xsd:double)
dbo:starring
dbr:Brent_Ridge
dbr:Josh_Kilmer-Purcell
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Fabulous_Beekman_Boys&action=edit
http://www.beekman1802.com/
http://atlantaboy.com/the-fabulous-beekman-boys-atlanta-interview-exclusive-appearance-54268/
http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/the-fabulous-beekman-boys/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Fabulous_Beekman_Boys&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Fabulous_Beekman_Boys&oldid=936192127
dbt:Infobox_television
dbc:2010_American_television_series_debuts
dbc:2011_American_television_series_endings
dbc:Destination_America_original_programs
dbc:Cooking_Channel_series
dbc:2010s_American_reality_television_series
dbc:2010s_American_LGBT-related_television_series
dbc:American_television_series_revived_after_cancellation
dbc:American_LGBT-related_reality_television_series
dbc:2010s_LGBT-related_reality_television_series
schema:CreativeWork
dbo:TelevisionShow
dbo:Work
yago:PlanetGreenOriginalPrograms
yago:LanguageUnit106284225
yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
yago:2010AmericanTelevisionSeriesDebuts
yago:2011AmericanTelevisionSeriesEndings
yago:Abstraction100002137
yago:Act100030358
yago:Action100037396
yago:AmericanLGBT-relatedTelevisionPrograms
yago:Beginning100235435
yago:Broadcast106619428
yago:Change100191142
yago:ChangeOfState100199130
yago:Cognition100023271
yago:Content105809192
yago:Ending106308765
yago:Event100029378
yago:Idea105833840
yago:Introduction100238022
yago:Morpheme106306233
yago:Part113809207
yago:Plan105898568
yago:Relation100031921
yago:Show106619065
yago:SocialEvent107288639
yago:TelevisionProgram106620579
The Fabulous Beekman Boys was a reality television show produced in the United States by World of Wonder Productions. The series followed Josh Kilmer-Purcell and his husband Brent Ridge as they learned how to become farmers and launch their lifestyle brand, Beekman 1802. Brent, a physician who previously worked for Martha Stewart Omnimedia, lives at the farm full-time, while Josh, a New York Times bestselling author, commutes from their apartment in New York City on the weekends. The show originally aired on Planet Green, one of the Discovery Networks, but was acquired by Cooking Channel, a network owned by Scripps Network Interactive in 2012. (en)
The Fabulous Beekman Boys (en)
freebase:The Fabulous Beekman Boys
yago-res:The Fabulous Beekman Boys
dbpedia-wikidata:The Fabulous Beekman Boys
dbr:The Fabulous Beekman Boys
wikipedia-en:The_Fabulous_Beekman_Boys
dbr:Fabulous_Beekman_Boys
dbr:Beekman_Boys
dbr:Beekman_Brothers


Our Top trends in 2019: Infrastructure Outlook paper and complementary video focuses on the three key themes to be aware of in Europe and North America to help infrastructure investors navigate portfolio allocation decisions. Merchant power risk is not new to US investors, but, increasingly it is an investment prerequisite to participate in the wave of energy investment opportunities in Europe. We expect the flurry of data infrastructure investments seen in 2018 to continue but we highlight some concerns.


So… Why are we parenting differently from a Galaxy far far away? | KATE PENWARN THOMPSON……..The Adoption Thing………..
So… Why are we parenting differently from a Galaxy far far away?
So, we are coming home from the beach today.
Need to set alarms early, like, 6a.m. cause I got five kids with me.
Sheets off all beds, towels in the wash, all bags packed as well as food.
Two get up. GREAT! Three are dragging. One has personal stuff.
Two (twins) who are the youngest think they are exempt.
Phones are really important. Like what are their friends doing?
Like in my grandkids, also coming home from the beach.
Finally out the door, made it in just over an hour. Record time.
Anyone with large families will get this. Two, one, easy peasy.
I get the over usage of data message. I try to say nicely, NO FACETIME!! Of course using my nice voice doesn't work, but on the second over usage of data, I guess I elevated my tone to make it work!
About that time I thought I should tell a small story, but one that was a wee bit telling about the age we live in.
I reminisced. You see when I was a kid, up until I was about ten or so, and I do know I am dating myself here. We didn't have a TV, there were no cell phones, no internet (90's I believe), and no I Tunes, FaceTime you got it etc.
When I was going and coming from holidays it was like this. We all got up around 3 a.m. Dad read the paper, delivered to our door, Mum started the packing. There were no fast food restaurants, and buying food in any form was pretty rare. She had to prepare for our holiday at a remote spot on the beach understanding we were going for three weeks.
Food for a family of five (sometimes six because our grandma would come), clothes for all of us, games we could play, fishing rods, hats, flip flops (we called them thongs, and yes I know), warm and cold extras because it was Fall, or Autumn as we called it.
And, my daddy loved to go out on the boat fishing, so extra stuff for him.
I wish I could remember if he took his banjo-mandolin with him.
Then the journey. Yup, what a trek. Gosh, well, we got up at 3.am. but Dad had to read the newspaper. Very frustrating for Mum, who made his cup of tea, toast and eggs, and had all of the other packing to do. Boy do I relate.
We had an old green van. A "Comma". It was almost like a seven seater these days, but wasn't. It had two benches which wasn't enough so we had a couple of extra back seats. No seatbelts at all. I'm not even sure that were not two front seats and a bench. I was really young, but did remember that old green van.
The roads were not that great in 1957 plus, and many bridges were not built at that time. To get to our holiday destination (which was also mine for some forty years plus after that) we drove 200 miles at around 45 miles an hour, crossed three rivers by driving on a ferry, and and it took us about 12 hours to get to our destination.
It was worth it. We played "I Spy", and all other sorts of games. We asked "how long until we get there" more often than my parents could have stood, but we did get there. And, we made lots of memories. Without phones, TV, FaceTime, Face Book, The Internet and constant communication.
Oh yes. You see I took my own kids there for multiple holidays before I moved here. They made memories they will never forget. I have taken this blended family to this very place, across the many miles, to Australia. They have not forgotten.
So, why are we giving in to phones, Face Time, Face Book, Snap Chat, Instagram and many of the apps out there that are affecting the innocence of our children. Why are we becoming subservient to our children's needs for what? Just putting this out there.
Maybe parenting has become old fashioned and if it has, then maybe that is why we have a lot of "Lost Children" in our foster systems, our adoption rolls, and our international issue of children without parents.
And I do know a lot of those children are not the products of electronics, they are the products of hunger, alcohol, drugs, war, neglect and ignorance.
I encourage you. TV, phones, electronic instruments are not the answer. Sometimes, a good old fashioned game, or just a family dinner around the table has the answer.
For the "Lost Children"? We are their answer. They do not have a voice. They feel invisible. Those children are on our streets, around the corner, in foster homes, in the "projects" and overseas in orphanages. Orphanages that do not love or hold these children, places in Africa where children roam the streets hungry, alone and uncared for. And the numbers are growing.
All I ask, is this. Pray as a family, eat as a family, laugh as a family and play as a family. Other than that, pray for those Lost Children who do not have a family or anyone who prays for them.
If you would like more of this, please join my email list. I am about to give out amazing interviews from Parents who thought they could not ever find a forever child and much more information for your journey into the foster/adoption world.
Also, I am about to record my new song "I Feel Invisible" which I am giving away to those on my email list.


Unique custom home on 2 very private acres in the Upper Jacoby Creek Valley. Secluded serene setting at the end of a private gated road, yet just minutes to downtown Arcata. Jacoby Creek School District. This tri-level home features oak floors, custom touches throughout, and a large sunny deck. Separate two story cabin for guests or rental. Large detached shop for all your storage or hobbies. Hotub with beautiful views across the valley. Large patio area with built in seating and firepit. This property even has it's own private trail that connects to the Jacoby Creek Forest for hiking and mtn biking. Driveway was recently re-rocked while Garden Lane and Jacoby Creek Rd were just repaved. Enjoy summers out of the fog and the sound of Jacoby Creek roaring in the winter. Tranquility awaits!
Propane. Wall Unit, Forced Air.
1 Garage Spaces. Street Parking, Detached Garage, Private.
Out Building, Satellite Dish. Gravel Road, Private Roads.
I am interested in 6139 Glory Lane, Bayside South, CA 95524.
Sign up for Inside AccessTM to view recent sales near 6139 Glory Lane.


LingvoSoft FlashCards is a collection of four absorbing games that will help you memorize thousands of foreign words quickly and easily. Now your handheld can be twice as functional: it lets you expand your vocabulary as you play and make use of free time, anywhere, anytime! Both English and Hungarian words can be studied using this handy application.
Now you can 'chill' with your phone the smart way – you can even learn English and Hungarian Medical, Business, Law and Computer terms!
Paragon Hungarian PiLoc creates an environment to operate with Palm OS in Hungarian. PiLoc is a common solution of Palm OS localization problem, chosen by a number of Palm OS device resellers.
This bidirectional Paragon SlovoEd English <-> Hungarian dictionary is dictionary software for Nokia 9300, Nokia 9500 Communicator.
SlovoEd is Hungarian-English and English-Hungarian translation dictionary for mobile phones with Windows Smartphone 2002/2003/2003 SE/2005 operating systems (smartphones). Hungarian-English-Hungarian smartphone dictionary (translator) is compatible with any Windows Smartphone mobile phone.
Hungarian-English and English-Hungarian bidirectional translation dictionary is based on SlovoEd multi-language dictionary engine. With easy to use interface, quality dictionary databases from well-known linguistic companies and powerful compression technology, SlovoEd Sony Ericsson software dictionary provides quick translation for many thousands of words and can be used everywhere. With SlovoEd software you can learn new foreign words with special methods, improve your pronunciation by listening to the words with English, French, Spanish and Italian sound modules and create your own word bases.
Hungarian-English and English-Hungarian bidirectional translation dictionary is based on SlovoEd multi-language dictionary engine. With easy to use interface, quality dictionary databases from well-known linguistic companies and powerful compression technology, SlovoEd Nokia software dictionary provides quick translation for many thousands of words and can be used everywhere. With SlovoEd software for Nokia you can learn new foreign words with special methods, improve your pronunciation by listening to the words with sound module and create your own word bases.


french , open or iced up?
Im going down to the shore after some loops tomorrow and wondering if I should bring my long poles or the short ones? What do you guys think?
just got back from there a min ago and the whole shore is unfishable. the only place you can fish is in mcquade.
thanks hound . Is there ice as far as you can see or what just wondering? Would it make a difference if I brought my wadders? Just hoping i guess?
nope no way you can fish, ice covering as far as you can see, and im guessing its 1 to 2 inches if that so i wouldnt go ice fish out there, and its all moving too.........it was cool to see with that east wind all the ice was moving in towards the harbor and huge sheets of ice would crash into eachother. it sounded like a construction zone. Im guessing all the ice out there was moving to the west about 2 mph. it will definately be unfishable for awhile now, until colder weather arrives.
No doubt, I hate this in-between stuff...either get it frozen good so we can ice fish or give us some open water. Right now you cant really do either.
before the ice blew in how was the fishing this week any loopers ? I was down there last week and picked up some coho but no loops.
I have thought about coming up from Buffalo. but would like to know if it is worth the drive.
Heres a pic from yesterday...kind of hard to tell but there was a lot of thick ice piles near shore and very thin ice with chunks floating beyond that. Pretty much impossible to fish. If you come up from buffalo it could be a bust the way things are changing day to day.
It seems like a lot of people have made the comment that there are less and less loopers every year . I wonder if that is a fact or is it just people voicing their frustrations on their success ? Last year was one of my best and I only went about 9 times. I landed 25 loopers 7 steelhead and about 5 or 6 coho.I think they stock around 135,000 each year. Just wondering I guess. we might get strong west winds tomorrow. maybe fishing by sunday?
I've had some good days...but I think you have to look at the overall picture, such as the actual returns and overall success. Just in general as far as talking to people and just seeing fish on the bank...its definitely been a bit slower the last few years. I can think of years when you talk to people/look on the bank and this guys got one here that guys got a couple...last few years I just havent seen as many fish landed overall. There will be good days and peak times when fish are caught in good numbers but as a whole by the total of anglers fishing over the whole season there arent as many fish caught as in years past.
is it just me or does there seem to be fewer anglers down there at any given time than there were say even 5 or 6 years ago ? fewer anglers fewer fish ? I try to go during the week so maybe im just there when most are not.
Yeah, definitely fewer people. When fishings hot they come out of the woodwork. Doesnt take long for word to get out. Also an indicator that there arent the fish around. A few years ago the run was over 2000 counted at the french. I think last year it was under 500.
An article in the outdoor news last week says loopers are down, and the DNR doesn't have a definite answer as to why.
There is no way they stock 135,000 a year. They have dropped their numbers dramatically in the past couple years, and even what they say they are stocking - truthfully it's still significantly less than that. A lot of crooked stuff going on with the MN DNR politics.
From the dnr stocking report from 2007 looks like about 90,000 total. If they arent going to stock more I wish they would grow them larger, put them in at about 13" or so to reduce predation and give them a better chance at survival in the lake. They could take the money from cutting the king program and put it into that, yeah right. On top of that I believe the steelhead association used to put 40,000 or so steelhead smolts into the knife and I think they cut that out too. Not looking good unless your a lake trout troller. Sure there are fish around but it could be better.
there is no king program, they haven't stocked kings for many years. The only place stocking kings anymore is wisconsin and canada. the steelhead association is definitely doing their part for the steelhead no thanks to the mn dnr. the 90,000 loopers is still a bogus number - truthfully it is still less than that. If you can find an honest person that works with stocking them, they can tell you that themselves. It's the dishonest ones down at the capital that make up the rest. And when they are dumping all of those 13" smolts in the lake, I imagined the lake trout go into a feeding frenzy. At least that's what I've heard.
It would cost too much money to raise the trout until they're 13 inches...and the numbers being stocked would still be low because of how many would die in the hatchery in the time it would take them to grow so big.
Today at 3 in the afternoon it looked like this.
This dude had a spud & did Not appear to be fishing. Otherwise no one there.
Well, just got back from checking things out this morning and it was pretty unfishable except for the usual harbor which already had half dozen or more guys out by 6:30. Was hoping the wind would have pushed it out more but I guess its just blowing it down along the shore.
As far as stocking 13" fish...I know some tailrace fisheries that stock tons of 13-14 inch fish and they dont have any big die offs. I think the slightly larger fish are actually hardier than the small ones. They have plenty of room at the hatchery. would cost more but the returns would be better. Kind of like stocking fry...they are cheaper but the return is much smaller. Not like its gonna happen anyway.
anyone go to the french this morning? is it fishable from shore?
Well, hows it looking now? Anyone been out that way?
Open water, plenty of people fishing since saturday.


Gentoo Forums :: View topic - Gentoo-alt with mingw ?
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:28 pm Post subject: Gentoo-alt with mingw ?
So far, Gentoo-alt can run on Unix, MacOS and Interix.
But has anybody tried to install Gentoo Alt with mingw (or cygwin) ?


text:
Homeland S4E7+8: "How Can This Possibly Happen?"
Two weeks ago, "Homeland" gave us its craziest episode this season, and this week, we got by far this season's best episode. I don't think that's a coincidence. It's kind of like the show finally sneezed and out of relief was able to relax into a tight, tense hour of very enjoyable television.
Photo courtesy of Collider
Tags Aasar Khan, Andrew Lockhart, Carrie Matheson, CIA, Dennis Boyd, Homeland, ISI, John Redmond, Martha Boyd, Nicholas Brody, Pakistan, Peter Quinn, Saul Berenson, Showtime
Homeland S4E5: "It's A Strange Game They're Playing"
It's not easy to sit down and complain about the same TV show every week. Or very fun. It stops being fun pretty quickly in fact. "Homeland" and a lot of TV shows out there are often disappointing, but fellow "Newsroom" fans know there's more to this medium than what is strictly speaking good or bad. And that almost nothing is 100 percent terrible, and even when it is, it's probably still a lot of fun to watch. "Homeland" has a lot of problems, yes, but it's definitely not all bad, so I want to start by highlighting something I really love about "Homeland" right now.
Tags Carrie Matheson, CIA, Dennis Boyd, Fara, Homeland, ISI, John Redmond, Mark Moses, Martha Boyd, Michael O'Keefe, Pakistan, Peter Quinn, Saul Berenson, Showtime


text:
Phyllis L Guerrero
Roxbury Township, Mrs. Phyllis Louise Guerrero died on October 8, 2021 at Saint Clares Hospital, Dover. She was born and raised in Totowa, and lived in Randolph and Succasunna before moving to Kenvil 47 years ago. She was a retired telephone operator for the Bell Telephone Company in Morristown, and a member of the Telephone Pioneers of America. She was a very active member of the Succasunna First Presbyterian Church- singing in the choir, and serving as an Elder, Deacon, Sunday School teacher, Cemetery Secretary, and Historian. She collected antiques and dolls,was a member of a local Doll Club and wrote several articles for magazines in those areas. She also wrote and published 4 books about historical figures in the church.
She was predeceased by her beloved husband John B Guerrero last year and is survived by her 3 sons; John L Guerrero of Sicklerville, NJ, Chris Guerrero of Kenvil, and Lee J (and Nadja) Guerrero of Austria. She also leaves her grandchildren; Nicholas and Jessica.
Friends and relatives may visit at the Davis & Hepplewhite Funeral Home, 96 Main Street, Succasunna, NJ 973-584-7264 (davishepplewhitefh.com) on Friday, October 15th, from 4 – 7 pm. The Funeral Service will be held on Saturday, 10 am, at the Presbyterian Church, with the interment to follow at the Church Cemetery.


text:
Bid to overturn Waitemata DHB smoking ban fails
11:30 am on 9 July 2013
The High Court has dismissed a bid to overturn a smoking ban at all Waitemata District Health Board premises.
Two former psychiatric patients and a retired nurse had challenged the board's 2009 ban, saying it is a breach of human rights.
But in a ruling released on Monday, Justice Asher says the board acted within its powers. He says there is no breach of human rights by not allowing psychiatric patients to smoke, as the restraint applies to all patients, visitors and workers.
Justice Asher says the smoke-free policy achieves its purpose of stopping smoking and protecting non-smokers from tobacco smoke.
Waitemata DHB's lawyer, Jonathan Coates, says the board is pleased with the result. "It certainly validates the efforts that the DHB has put in over a great number of years to do what it thinks is the right thing for patients and staff, in relation to minimising smoking and ensuring that patients and staff and others are not exposed to secondhand smoke on the DHB's property."


text:
Interviews, Saatchi & Saatchi APAC Spotlight, USA
Q&A: Daniel Lobatón, Creative Director, Saatchi & Saatchi New York
by Patricia Censoprano
A native of Lima, Peru, Daniel Lobatón, Creative Director at Saatchi & Saatchi New York, has worked on some of the most talked about campaigns in the ad world. Perhaps most readily recognizable is his work on Super Bowl 2018's "It's a Tide Ad" campaign that was, arguably, talked about more than the game itself.
Over the course of his career, Lobatón has seen his work recognized by the industry's top award shows including Cannes Lions, Clio and more.
The LIA Award's Patricia Censoprano caught up with Lobatón to talk about his award-winning Tide work and the creative path the team took to bring it to life. As he puts it on his homepage about creative pursuits: "The biggest lesson about ideas I probably took from Star Wars: 'Do or do not. There is no try.'"
Tide is the best selling detergent in the US. In your humorous ad winning commercials featuring David Harbour, was it difficult to convince the client to do a detergent ad without the usual mandatory "washing and whiter than white sequence"?
Getting to an idea like "It's a Tide Ad" required a number of very talented people and a brave client. I think everyone's first instinct was to try another "stain removal" story. But after many rounds, we realized it wasn't going to be surprising enough. The goal was to "be the most loved brand on the Super Bowl" and that meant taking a different perspective. When we landed on the idea of pointing out clean in all commercials and claiming them as "Tide ads" the clients were easily convinced. From then on it was all about close collaboration to make the best possible execution.
We approached it as a writers table, much like the way a TV show is run. We went into production with 20 possible scenarios we liked. Then our partners at Rattling Stick helped us streamline it for a 4-day shoot. We kept writing throughout the shoot and then we rewrote it again in the edit. It took a village, but we believe that "none of us is as smart as all of us."
Why was David Harbour cast as the omniscient spokesperson, breaking the 4th wall in the commercials? Was there a long casting process before you decided to use him instead of NFL commentator, Terry Bradshaw?
We needed someone with gravitas. We needed an internet darling and an unexpected face. We looked at several options, but when David Harbour came up we immediately knew he was the best man for the job. His approach was amazing, he wanted to play it like a voice of mischief, and it really comes through in his performance. He was playing an outsider completely aware of all the tricks of advertising and that's what makes him so resonant in today's landscape where everyone knows how ads get made.
Crossing over to other P&G commercials with memorable characters like Isaiah Mustafa of Old Spice and Mr.Clean was really smart. Was it easy to obtain approval from the other P&G brands to get on board with the idea?
As I said earlier, we are lucky to have very brave clients. P&G was fully on board to see this idea become a success and it got lots of momentum inside the organization. Everyone was very collaborative. On set it was an ad nerds dream to see Isaiah reprise the iconic scene that made him famous, we had the same crew from The Mill who made the original and we wanted to stay true to that character. It was a tribute that was also a Tide Ad.
You have been raising the bar with the real stain on Terry Bradshaw and making viewers wonder if it's a Tide ad whenever they see clean clothes in a commercial. So what's next?
Right after the Super Bowl, we started planning how to extend the "Tide Ad" idea and reignite the passion for it. When the 2018 NFL season kicked off in September, we pointed to clean clothes again, only this time we did it on the field.
We partnered with NFL and FOX Sports to integrate our branded content into the live broadcasts of Thursday Night Football all season long. When viewers tuned in and saw a highlight, a penalty call, a play review, or an interview, we made them question once again: "Is this an NFL game, or a Tide ad?".
Each piece of content was meticulously designed to match the individual teams, commentator outfits, and key plays, so viewers believed it was part of the live broadcast. As our audience took the bait, they turned to Twitter, making #TideAd part of the NFL conversation and 1 in 5 tweets during Thursday Night Football featured #TideAd.
It's been very fun to keep inserting the brand where viewers least expect it.
This version of this article originally ran here.
Patricia Censoprano
Q&A: Aditi Kohli on Shifting Workplace Expectations in the Asia-Pacific
Anthony Gregorio Stepping Down as CEO of Saatchi & Saatchi Australia – Patrick Rowe Takes the Reins
Q&A: Stephen de Wolf – National Chief Creative Officer, DDB Group Australia
NYC Ballet Releases Exquisitely Gorgeous Animated Film for 'The Sleeping Beauty'
Q&A: Helen Sac – 'The Hybrid World is Very Much Here to Stay'


The ultimate in Party Bags in 4 vibrant colours. This Tote Bag is made from woven fabric and will up-grade any party gift. The bag size is 22cm x 14cm. These are perfect for Easter Egg hunts.
Add the quantity you require to the quantity box below.
Click 'update' and check the quantity is correct.
Our office will then contact you when the product is available for delivery.
2014 © The Playwrite Group Plc.


Today, having a large the house is very difficult to realize. This is due to the limited land that can be used by to be built a house. Modern minimalist house becomes the only option which can be taken. Because it is minimalist, any room at home is also in small size. To make small home decorating is not easy, because not everyone has the expertise in decorating a room, especially the small one.
There are some small home decorating ideas to be applied in several rooms in your home. To get some ideas that inspire, you can look for some pictures and also a tutorial in decorating a room, especially in a minimalist home. Make the room decor that fits to your characteristics, it aims to make you feel comfortable when you're sitting at home.
Some things that must be avoid in applying small home decorating which are do not use large-sized furniture and do not buy furniture that is not needed. Meanwhile, to give the impression of the room, use bright paint and put a mirror at one side of the room. By applying certain thing above, your desire to have a beautifully decorated home will soon come true.