text:
Find cheap flights from Quebec to Birmingham
Search hundreds of travel sites at once for deals on flights to Birmingham. Bundle your flight + hotel and save!
— BHX
Flight from Montreal Pierre Elliott Trudeau Intl to Birmingham
FAQs for booking flights from Quebec to Birmingham
How does KAYAK find such low prices on flights from Quebec to Birmingham?
KAYAK is a travel search engine. That means we look across the web to find the best prices we can find for our users. With over 2 billion flight queries processed yearly, we are able to display a variety of prices and options on flights from Quebec to Birmingham.
How does KAYAK's flight Price Forecast tool help me choose the right time to buy my flight ticket from Quebec to Birmingham?
KAYAK's flight Price Forecast tool uses historical data to determine whether the price for a flight to Birmingham from Quebec is likely to change within 7 days, so travelers know whether to wait or book now.
What is the Hacker Fare option on flights from Quebec to Birmingham?
Hacker Fares allow you to combine one-way tickets in order to save you money over a traditional round-trip ticket. You could then fly to Birmingham with an airline and back to Quebec with another airline.
What is KAYAK's "flexible dates" feature and why should I care when looking for a flight from Quebec to Birmingham?
Sometimes travel dates aren't set in stone. If your preferred travel dates have some wiggle room, flexible dates will show you all the options when flying to Birmingham from Quebec up to 3 days before/after your preferred dates. You can then pick the flights that suit you best.
Top 5 airlines serving Quebec to Birmingham
SWISSOverall score based on 9120 reviews
One of my bags didnt arrived. It was a priority bag. And the flight was a really bad experience. There were two kids (2-3 years old) from two families in business class that cried during literally 10 hours! Was a really long flight
Read more about SWISS
Cons: "A solution to the seat problem. If the seat only reclined 1/2 the distance they do now, the flight would be enjoyable."
Pros: "The service and food were good."
Cons: "As a petite person I find the seats in economy class small and cramped. When passengers in front of you recline their seat backs, there is very little room to move, making it difficult to get up and out of your seat."
Pros: "Great service in 1st class"
Cons: "All good"
Pros: "Crew was really nice can't complain"
Cons: "Other airlines offer free beer or even hard liquor here u have to pay"
Pros: "fresh baked bread!"
Cons: "fight was delayed almost 4 hours. we were stuck on the plane for over 2 hours before liftoff while technical difficulties were worked out. no compensation offered."
Pros: "the CREW WAS FRIENDLY AND CELEBRATING EASTER WITH THE GUESTS"
Cons: "THE FOOD WAS ADEQUATE, GIVEN THAT WE WERE ON AN AIRPLANE"
Pros: "crew"
Cons: "comfort, leg room, very crowded, overhead space jammed"
Pros: "Amazing crew/ food/seats very comfortable! Very relaxing ride !"
Cons: "It was perfect !"
Pros: "Exelent Crew, great food and service I really like Swiss airlines. The best so far!!! Thanks"
Pros: "full aircraft"
Pros: "I liked how nice the crew was."
Cons: "I didn't like how check in took a very long time. And they made me check in my carry on when it fit the restrictions and the overhead bins on board were not full."
Cons: "12 hours flight just one hot meal."
Pros: "Food was tasty. Crew was very good."
Cons: "Legroom was horrible, and I'm 5'-7"! Ancient entertainment units."
Pros: "Fast boarding and deplaning."
Cons: "Not clear seat bookings cost $35. I was assigned the last row. Extra short width, pitch, couldn't fully recline (A340-300) Terrible food. Super old, tired plane. Crappy in-flight entertainment with non-intuitive controls. Poor air conditioning. I felt like I was stuffed in a cage for 7 hours. Way worse than United domestic."
Cons: "They canceled the flight and took me to another company with a stop in Turkey,it was a really bad and uncomfortable flight And I'm really disappointed!!!!!"
Pros: "crew great smooth flight"
Cons: "no problem and happy crew."
Pros: "Food.confort.pillows."
Cons: "Excelent"
Pros: "Nothing remarkable"
Cons: "I got up to use the bathroom and I was seated in the 10th row. When I was trying to make my way back to my seat, the beverage service had started. They were at the 12th row and after bumping into me, the flight attendant asked me to back up and wait until the beverage service was over to go back to my seat. This was a flight from Frankfurt to Zurich, only about an hour long, and I would have easily spent half of it standing up had I complied with their request. I had to be pushy and ask them to just back up the cart 2 feet so I could get to my seat, which only took them 5 seconds. This was a very rude, illogical, and unreasonable request from the Swiss Air crew."
Pros: "The hospitality & staff were impeccable."
Pros: "The crew was very efficient and very helpful. They were constantly attending to passenger's needs."
Cons: "The landing was a little rough, but my friend said that it was windy here in NY. Otherwise excellent all around."
Pros: "Food and movies"
Cons: "Staff was not attentative. We were very misinformed on the seat upgrade we paid $100 for. And our liggsge was damaged and they had us walking all over ohare airport for no reason at all instead of addressing the issue at Swiss air."
Pros: "Chocolate was good, a bigger piece, or 2 of them would be better"
Cons: "I liked everything except the airplane itself, which I hated. I was fortunate enough to get an exit row on my long flight going over; I did not get lucky on my way home. The flights between Zurich and Brindisi were more comfortable than the long haul flights. The long haul flights are abominable and should be outlawed by governments as they are currently configured. The boy next to me literally could not fit his legs/thigh bones in the space provided by his seat. I did okay as I am not tall, until the woman in front of me decided to lean back. It is not her fault, however, though I thought nasty things about her and periodically tried to dig my knees into her back to get her to lift up her seat. The fault belongs entirely to Swiss Air, which chooses to treat human customers as steerage. The only thing that made the experience worse was the impossibility of choosing my seat online for my return because I had only a smart phone with not-great wifi available. Choosing one's seat should not be dependent on having good wifi and a computer, however. It is bad practice to "sell" seat choices. The families around me were not able to sit together because of this shoddy, greedy practice on the part of the airline. It is also not fair, subsequently, that other passengers are faced with giving up the seats they've chosen, or been given, to assist families in sitting together. Honestly, the extent of the greed on the part of airlines nowadays is astonishing. What used to be a thoroughly enjoyable way of traveling has become an ordeal at best."
Cons: "Business class service The hostess forgot my request twice. ..."
Pros: "The punctuality."
Cons: "The food was not up to the mark."
Pros: "Thank you for the sandwich!"
Cons: "Nothing!"
Pros: "Food was excellent and staff was friendy."
Cons: "Wifi was expensive."
Pros: "The crew was very attentive and friendly"
Cons: "The legroom was good but the seats were very narrow causing larger people to overlap the armrests"
Pros: "Nothing because the airplane seats were terribly uncomfortable!"
Cons: "The bar between the seats is not going up all the way"
Pros: "the entertainment selection was above an beyond."
Cons: "The food was really not great. The meals were tiny and low quality. I understand there are restrictions when on an aircraft, but the meals were the size of snacks and not understanding of allergies at all. (Ie, cheese was on everything.)"
Pros: "Services"
Pros: "Like to have the gluten free option for food. I know i chose it when i got the ticket but i did not get it."
Pros: "The flight was very good what I didnt like in that when i booked the flight it never said that my ticket wouldnt be able to add lifemiles for star alliance. That was only the reason i chose this airline. When i ask about my lifemiles the answer was that my class of ticket didnt get any lifemile. I felt cheated. You should put it somewhere visibly so the person knows before booking. If i knew it before i never chose this airline."
Pros: "Super nice and skilled staff, everyone was great to interact with."
Cons: "Not a thing."
Pros: "Best flight in years. Attentive crew, very good food and wine, on time. Strongly recommended."
Cons: "No me gusto . porque quando compre las pasajes con ustedes por la pagina me decia q estaba incluydo 1 maleta de 23 kg y otra de mano 8 kg. por el precio total pagado y cuando llegue ñas mañetas no estavam incluydas y tuve que pagalas. Yo ley las condiciones de mi pasaje y me daba exactamente esto que tenia derecho a las maletas. Grande falla de ustedes. ya no comprare mas con su compania K"
Pros: "Friendly crew. Good food and entertainment. Comfortable seats."
Pros: "The crew was terrific, the pilot provided us with lots of good information, and though the plane left late, it arrived on time."
Cons: "The seats are configured exactly opposite the human back. Clean, new, but very uncomfortable."
Pros: "food, staff."
Cons: "We left late so I missed my connecting flight in Zurich, to barcelona. Had to wait around 5 hours. My friends were waiting for me in BCN and had no way to contact them!!! I enjoyed the flights with SWISS but i dont know if ill fly with them again."
Cons: "Good overall"
Pros: "Nothjng"
Cons: "Made me check in my carry on bag and changed my reserved window seat to middle seat amidst 2 children I don't know. Whe I got on the plane there was plenty of room for my carry on despite the boarding staff saying there wasn't. I offered to upgrade my ticket to business class the attendant at the desk laughed at me. Older woman was very rude, condescending and not accommodating."
Pros: "Excellent service ans quality flight"
Pros: "At Montreal I was made to go through the customs, exit the airport, get the boarding pass, go through security check again. I was subjected to unnecessary hassle as Air Canada did not issue me boarding pass for the section of Motreal to Zurich at Los Angeles airport. Had I known that I have to come out of the airport, I would not have bought this ticket. Hopefully same ordeal is not repeated while returning from Zurich to Los Angeles via Montreal on June 30, 2016. There was a long queque at Montreal to board the place as it was not organized in zone wise."
Pros: "Crew great"
Cons: "Seats cramped"
Cons: "We didn't had entertainment"
Pros: "Good people."
Cons: "Bad food."
Lounge in Heathrow is great. Staff aim to please and very courteous. The upper class seat is very narrow with no storage area. Strange seating position, no options to recline the seat while sitting up. Who thought that this was a good idea? IFE minimal. On borard Lavs shared with premium economy class.
Pros: "This is the way to fly long haul."
Cons: "Frustration is it is impossible to sleep during the breakfast service, but this is a problem for all airlines and Virgin is better than most."
Pros: "Crew were super friendly and helpful. Food was delicious, comfortable seats, great selection of entertainment."
Cons: "Cheaper baggage rates"
Cons: "Staff were unhelpful and ran out of many food items by the time we were served - meaning that there wasn't anything available for us to eat as we don't eat eggs. The check-in was stressful and staff were keen to help - unprofessional and unsatisfactory."
Pros: "Very friendly crew. We boarded about an hour before so we were ready to go well before time."
Cons: "The economy seats are not that comfortable and the screen for entertainment is sometimes difficult to use."
Pros: "It was empty so we were told we could move around in the empty seats"
Cons: "Food was basically carbs, carbs and more carbs (especially if vegetarian). Some diversity, please. Staff forgot requests on a couple of occasions (Economy Delight cabin)."
Pros: "The crew was maybe average, that was still the best point."
Cons: "Extremely tight space. The food was almost inedible. Awful."
Pros: "Limited numbers in the top deck, silence, service and deplaning first."
Cons: "Food has to much of an asian slant."
Pros: "Food was delicious, consistent timely service and excellent entertainment options onboard. The flight was an hour early!"
Pros: "food was great!"
Pros: "Staff. Very couteous.polite. friendly."
Cons: "Good.entertainment choices."
Pros: "The flight crew was phenomenal, especially Daniella. Somehow we wound up with seats right next to the bathroom door, which would have been a pretty uncomfortable situation for a variety of reasons, but the flight wasn't full, and she helped us find a suitable place to sit. Also, my wife and I usually take our tea with honey vs. milk and sugar. Even though honey is usually one of the options for tea, she found a way to accommodate our request. The lunch meals were the best I can remember in a long time on an airline flight. They might have been the best I've ever had. The chicken curry was authentic, flavorful and spicy. Frankly my outbound flight had problems. My luggage got damaged. The transfer experience in Manchester left a LOT to be desired. I wasn't planning to use Virgin Atlantic again, but this flight crew (Daniella especially) redeemed Virgin Atlantic. They were attentive, pleasant, diligent."
Cons: "Only thing I didn't like about this flight was the boarding area. Once you get into that the area, you don't really have access to appetizing food (only vending machines) or even restrooms. That's one thing that could be improved."
Pros: "Great movie selection"
Cons: "They need softer seats...had to stand half the time"
Pros: "Service, meals, friendly and attentive FAs"
Cons: "Seatback TV is of the worst quality among airlines. They really need to upgrade those. They don't nearly give enough beverage and water. The gate wasn't announced till last minute. There was no group priorities when boarding. Process was chaotic. Food was meh. No internet."
Pros: "The cabin crew were excellent!"
Cons: "I paid extra for Economy Delight seats for me and my wife. Shortly after take-off, our calm and comfortable more or less empty section of the aircraft was colonised by an extended family of Orthodox Jews in a kind of airborne West Bank situation. They weren't in our section of the cabin at all to start with, and I don't know why they were apparently able to get a free upgrade that I had to pay £100 for. We went from being in an almost empty cabin to being basically sat in the middle of an Orthodox Jewish kindergarten. It was awful! They were noisy, messy, were constantly getting in and out of their seats, the back of my seat kept getting kicked, and there was even a baby crawling around the aisle. We were surrounded. I have no idea whether this is characteristic of Orthodox Jewish family life, or just a completely inconsiderate family. They didn't exactly ruin my flight, but they didn't make it enjoyable either. I asked to be moved. The cabin crew were great and acknowledged the difficulty of the situation. My wife lost her window seat but at least we still had the legroom and peace and quiet."
Pros: "Flight was close to being on time. I was able to get a lot of sleep on the flight."
Pros: "The selection of entertainment"
Cons: "My seats headphone connection did not work. I had to hold it and wiggle it around if I wanted to listen to anything."
Pros: "Great crew, easy boarding, comfortable enough flight"
Cons: "Could have used a charger for electronics, especially because we were expected to use our own device for entertainment. Didn't order food, but didn't look digestible"
Pros: "Nothing really!"
Cons: "I was coming from Sydney and I have to hurry up to take the other fly to Newark and didn't have time to buy for nothing to eat but I was very surprised they didn't offer me anything on the plane and when I ask they I have buy it online and didn't have many choices anyway, I very disappointed with this fly."
Pros: "Quality of service was good in the plane"
Cons: "Not many good recent movies / shows on in flight entertainment. Food was okay. But, the quantity was too little. It took a really long time for a second boarding pass check at London airport. Other airlines don't usually ask for a second check in"
Cons: "These seats are small"
Pros: "The flight crew from the mel to lax route were excellent. One was especially attentive to my 2 toddlers and gave me a bit of a break, something that has NEVER happened in over 40 flights traveling with children."
Cons: "I think something was broken in our section (mel to lax) as it was uncomfortably hot and the flight crew tried to get it cooler but could not. I've never experienced a flight that was too hot, usually the opposite. It was stifling."
Pros: "Very polite and helpful staff."
Pros: "The crew was excellent. Flight was quite comfortable. Nice attention to service"
Cons: "I would have appreciated another round of hot drinks."
Pros: "Seat is very comfortable"
Pros: "No one would update that the flight was delayed. They would not even communicate as to why delayed and would not put us in a different flight. Absolutely no customer service. Disappointed and would not fly jet airways again . I missed my conference lecture today as I was late."
Cons: "No communication, nor will they tell you why it's late . Nor will they move you to another flight even wen requested"
Pros: "Good entertainment, food and in-flight crew"
Cons: "Because this flight was delayed it was a miracle (involving running til my throat literally bled) that I made my connection. Ground crew could not have been less helpful - even to my friend who they knew was trying to get home to attend a family funeral."
Pros: "Amazing food and drinks, and to top it off we were served a frozen ice cream treat during our flight."
Pros: "The Business - was The Business! Loved it."
Pros: "Choice of movies was good, but told the flight over was better. I flew another airline. Had no issue checking one bag in for free, but I think that is standard on an international flight."
Cons: "Entertainment systems take up foot/bag space underneath the seats. Was not able to get more than one glass of wine, even though I missed the first beverage service, that is my fault though, but I don't recall it being an issue getting a drink between services. Entertainment systems had contrast issues and it seemed like a lot of people 8 - 10 had issues since they were using iPads instead of the built in monitors. A lot of wear showing on the entertainment systems remotes."
Pros: "first time I flew VirginAtlantic. Heard so many good things about it. It fact even our Uber driver was praising the airline on our way to the airport. But once onboard: - poor food (I mean 'survival kit' style) - entertainment station was not working - games feel like 20 years old - design (heavy red) now looks dated and suffocating - hostesses are more focused on their hairstyle than their customers"
Cons: "Back to Air France next time!"
Pros: "Getting to Barbados from Manchester airport is convenient"
Cons: "The light weight on a long haul flight do not work anything over four hours you need some form of comfortability and virgin got it wrong with the seats .. yes I know the industry is all about making and saving money but you also need to Remember that most of this flight you will be sat down for"
Pros: "Purchased an extra 3" of leg room, which helped tremendously being that my husband & I are both tall. Flight attendants were friendly, helpful & attentative. There were plenty of beverages offered. The food service was adequate. So many options on the media screens on the back of the seats. USB ports were provided on the back of every seat as well."
Pros: "Having a not full flight and room to spread out. The Dreamliner is awesome. On time departure."
Cons: "The wifi did not work at all, and I think I was charged 3 times Landed 30 mins early and then waited an hour for the gate, I get that things happen but we have been on the plane for 11.5 hrs. Figure it out!"
Pros: "Food was great, plenty of it also"
Cons: "I'm 6'4" and there was no acknowledgement by the crew that I was squashed into a tight seat."
Pros: "comfort, entertainment, food"
Pros: "The food was surprisingly ok and the seats in PE were comfortable, plus there were two USB ports, perfect!"
Cons: "Being woken up to be asked if I wanted to eat, twice! If I wanted to eat, I wouldn't have a sleeping mask on my face, or be asleep! Plus, upper class and premium economy didn't board first."
Cons: "You lost our luggage. We were able to pick up our luggage after the Sydney flight, but they never made it to Minneapolis. What I don't understand is why we were not able to get boarding passes and seat assignments when we did our check-in in Sydney? Why is that so hard? Also, when we were getting our boarding pass in LAX it was so confusing when it asked for checked bags. Our bags were already on a belt going to who knows where - were we supposed to check "yes"? If we had a boarding pass this would not have been an issue."
Pros: "The crew of the flight were very sweet and helpful"
Cons: "When I bought my ticket I wasent informed that I needed a return ticket out of New Zealand before entering so I had to buy one super last minute and almost missed my flight"
Pros: "very incompetent crew carrying out orders for a very cheap airline."
Cons: "There was nothing to like, attendants were rude, seating was horrible, No room, no snacks, counter persons were even worse, tried to contact virgin australia over 12 times for booking confirm and itinerary, no replies ever, none from HQ in Brisbane. Virgin has NO customer service whatsoever, all they want is to take your money online and do nothing for paying customers. "Paying Customer", remember who we are??? The ones that pay for the worst service in the world. Well done Richard Branson!!"
Cons: "Crew had poor communication, didn't seem friendly or helpful, no food given for free and no warnings fhat this was the case. Flight was delayed at takeoff And they did not accurately tell us how long the delay was"
Cons: "Crew"
Cons: "I did not get the requested meal. I had requested Asian Veg meal. I had reconfirmed that Virgin Atlantic Kiosk at Heathrow airport as well. In flight when I asked cabin crew they said they didn't get any request. I was hungry whole flight. Very bad experience."
Pros: "Non stop"
Cons: "Food was not good, they served snacks and did not serve drinks with snacks. Seats were tight"
Pros: "Not much not to like about this experience except for cramped seating in coach."
Pros: "Virgin gave everyone meal vouchers to use at the airport during the 5 hr. delay. Also, they still offered a meal on the plane."
Cons: "I couldn't get the inflight entertainment to work. I wish they would offer devices to borrow on the plane."
Pros: "As expected, great customer service from Virgin. Great Vera system. Friendly and welcoming experience."
Cons: "The seats!!!! Omg I got bed sores. Not really but they have got to be the most uncomfortable things I have ever sat in. For a European flight from Uk they'd be fine. But for 9 hours...not good. The short hop down from ATL to MCO after was a blessed relief. Virgin, you have got to think a little more about your passengers asses. Also, having flown with just about every major transatlantic operator, including previous trips with Virgin, the knee room was not good. If you stretched out under the seat in front you were ok but draw your knees up... I wore short trousers for comfort and have sore points on my knees where they rubbed against the material of the chair in front."
Pros: "Very friendly and helpful staff! Food was very good too."
Cons: "More leg room always desirable"
My husband and I LOVE DELTA SERVICE… the crew, everybody are so nice…
TsA was fast and efficient. Boarding was effortless, fast. Having a new and clean plane only amplified the experience
Pros: "Professional crew, no fanfare, standard was excellence."
Cons: "Faster flight time in air..."
Cons: "Movies were outdated flying to Amsterdam, coming back was great"
Pros: "The chargers and movies on the flight. The seat was comfortable. The flight attendants where awesome. I loved the flight!"
Cons: "No changes!"
Pros: "The crew's positive energy and great service were truly amazing. Kudos Delta!"
Cons: "Delta flies a lot of the CRJ planes, even on relatively longer trips. Traveling first class, the seats are a little wider than in coach and have a little more leg room, but calling it "first class" is a bit of an exaggeration. It's more like what coach used to be before the days of the flying sardine cans."
Pros: "Great service"
Cons: "Messed up my luggage in Atlanta. Gate said baggage was going to domestic. Ended up in international terminal. Added almost an hour of back and forth between terminals."
Pros: "WARDA at the Miami Gate H07 was awesome. She went above and beyond. Everyone else was very helpful but you can get tell she does more than the norm. LOVE LOVE LOVE the free entertainment in the individual seats. Perfect for families!"
Cons: "No complaints"
Pros: "Good experience"
Cons: "Better snacks"
Cons: "I'm skinny and 5'2" and I felt squashed. Like I was in a dollhouse. The space is too small, it's too uncomfortable. I couldn't take my zip front sweater off. The seats and space are not proportional to humans."
Pros: "Not much"
Cons: "Being on time. Trapped in plane for 2 hours"
Pros: "Crew was great as usual these days with delta. Boarding was easy and efficient. Madrid staff booked us on a later flight in Atlanta as a precaution and it turned out we needed it. Really helpful!"
Cons: "Plane had crumbs on the seat and floor when we got on."
Cons: "Bring back the Narita to Minneapolis."
Cons: "We sat for an hour on the tarmac with the plane at about 80-85 degrees and everyone sweating. Once we took off the flight attendants kept turning the cabin lights on and off and serving dinner (on an overnight flight is that really necessary?!) and waking us up. Also plane was old and uncomfortable."
Cons: "The flight was 2.5 hours late. Then it was freezing in the flight. I let the crew know and it warmed up at the front and back of the plane but it was unbearable in the middle. It took me two hours to warm back up!"
Pros: "On flight entertainment was very good. Flight was smooth and ran ahead of schedule."
Cons: "They were out of vegetarian meal options. Really poor for a six hour flight. Also, the family behind us was atrocious, but that's not Delta's fault."
Pros: "Good service"
Cons: "Video system locked up at my seat"
Pros: "We eventually got to Atlanta."
Cons: "Delta is flying a lot of commuter planes, which are pretty cramped. We usually fly first class, and the seating is essentially the same as what coach used to be. There's nothing "first class" about it. And of course, the flight was hours late."
Cons: "My flight from Chicago was two hours late and that's why I missed the flight from Atlanta to Buenos Aires. No one helped and did not know that the flight was delayed and I had to find a place to sleep. I'm not satisfied with the experience and I have not yet arrived in Argentina because of the whole"
Pros: "Crew was amazing."
Cons: "Delayed departure due to late crew arrival. Not a huge deal."
Pros: "Zee was our flight attendant and she was absolutely wonderful. Personable, attentive, and she made sure each and every person on the plane was comfortable and happy, going so far as to move solo passengers to empty rows so they could have more space. I wish she could be on every flight I take."
Pros: "I was rerouted through Detroit after it was apparent I would miss my connecting flight. The flight was good and I have no complaints."
Cons: "There was a mechanical delay and I ended up missing my flight. Even though I arrived 10 minutes prior to departure."
Pros: "Equipment felt a bit dated. No entertainment system, which was fine with me. Skipped the offered snack. Just had water. Flight was onntime."
Pros: "Take off on time, arrived early, pleasant flight attendant"
Cons: "Had to sit on tarmac after arriving early"
Pros: "Direct flight from Indy to CDG is great."
Pros: "On time, pleasant and friendly flight attendant, no unexpected issues or problems."
Cons: "Grumpy gate attendants at YUL! Could not hear the captain's comments over the PA system. Shouldn't the volume be checked every so often? We were offered only water or coffee, bad enough, then there was no milk or cream on board, so water or black coffee... not very impressive! And there was no entertainment so I'd rate that zero but the scale only goes as low as one star."
Pros: "It's a fast flight and boarding was quick."
Cons: "The terminal at LGA airlines is terrible."
Cons: "Customs never to hire more agents to work in the early mornings."
Pros: "On time, and pleasant flight. Flight attendants were first class: very competent."
Cons: "I slept all the way, so can't say whether anything went wrong with the flight."
Pros: "Friendly and courteous attendants."
Cons: "Had a seat that did not recline...not broken just one of those seats."
Pros: "Good food, excellent service"
Cons: "Seats did not have enough storage."
Cons: "Not much to read"
Pros: "Great to have movies on a domestic flight. Friendly crew."
Cons: "Boarding was a shambles resulting in late departure. Seems to be common in the US, but the zone system of boarding with back of the plane going on last seems counterintuitive and I can't recall it taking so long to board a flight. Also took a long time disembarking."
Pros: "Newer plane"
Cons: "Not comfortable at all, doesn't feel like any upgrade from regular economy seat."
Pros: "Not applied"
Cons: "Not applied"
Pros: "We got on the plane and it went to where it was supposed to go."
Pros: "Over all everything specially we got in earlier than expected"
Pros: "Crew member Lori was exceptional. Great detail to safety and customer service!"
Pros: "I got upgraded to comfort + which was great. quick flight, was even early"
Pros: "Fligth were on time"
Cons: "My flight from Montreal to Atlanta was 2:30 min Left at 6:10 arrive at 8:30 roughly Tried twice to get to my connection earlier and get 9:30 instead of 12:09 fligth to Daytona Delta was not flexible to allow me to book saying i did not have 55 min in between fligth which i had than lear n it will cost $75.00 to change the fligth - What? Very disappointed of Delta - lost 3 hrs at the airport today"
Pros: "Same as above."
Pros: "Couldn't find a thing."
Cons: "My husband booked West Jet by phone. They spelled my name wrong on the ticket which caused hours of delays tryng to check in...ultimately leading to our missing the flight. The time spent was around 6 hours....4 of them the were on one continuous phone call where we were bumped back and forth between West Jet and Delta. The problem was never fixed and we haven't flown home yet. We have new flights booked on Delta but only because Delta took pity....West Jet does no refunds or reticketing. If flights are missed you're out on of luck!"
Pros: "Nice regional jet!"
Cons: "It was a regional jet..."
Pros: "Flight was delayed by 2+ hours, Delta (running the flight for westjet) sent 1 email about the flight being delayed to 4:45 which was inconsistent with the gate signage and agent who said 3:45, flight ended up leaving at 5:45PM. No reasons were provided beyond the incoming flight from LGA hadn't come in. Why hadn't it come in? When could we expect to leave YUL? No answers."
Pros: "Delta automatically rebooked our flight due to delays. We were rebooked on Air Canada"
Cons: "Plane kinda of old. Just cookies and coffee"
Pros: "Thomas our steward was excellent."
Cons: "No Wi-Fi"
Pros: "Crew, food, and business class pods were super. In fact Lufthansa itself was great BUT read next..."
Cons: "...debarkation at SFO was dismal. The nearest bathroom upon debarking was closed for cleaning. The passport control signs were misleading and confusing (the term "residents" was misused). And there was no one at baggage claim to prevent bags from piling up atop each other on the conveyor. I received a bone bruise trying to get my bag off another one. Avoid SFO as an international destination if you can...horrible airport."
Pros: "Comfortable and Clean"
Pros: "One of the flight attendants was very rude and seemed bothered when I inquired about a meal since I was sleep when they originally handed them out and said that I would have to wait u til the next meal period."
Cons: "She could have informed me they where no longer available."
Pros: "The crew were very professional. There was a very difficult passenger who was very rude to the stewards and I thought they coped really well. I was sorry to see them treated in this way."
Cons: "More support"
Pros: "The crew were nice and the service very good. The layover was short."
Cons: "Our luggage was lost so we had to go back to the airport the day after. In economy class the Last 3 central rows or even more, have no carryon storage. We were stuck with our carryons for over 7 hours during the flight Montreal Munich. This is the case if you fly their new A350-390."
Pros: "The seats were comfortable"
Cons: "The food could be better"
Cons: "The flight was delayed as we were waiting for documents required for our entry to the UK - surely these should have been ready in advance? Perhaps a taste of things to come if (when) we sadly leave the EU. Same poor sandwiches."
Cons: "Impossible to do beter."
Cons: "-"
Pros: "Smooth flight"
Cons: "Stop overcharge people for 1 luggage :( very disappointed"
Pros: "Comfort and space"
Pros: "Service and hospitality. On dot service with no major delays."
Pros: "Can not fault anything"
Cons: "Legroom"
Cons: "The whole experience"
Cons: "There was hardly any communication about the delay."
Cons: "I didn't like selection on movies"
Pros: "Tout était impeccable."
Cons: "The first flight for this trio was cancelled .. stop with automated cron jobs"
Pros: "Good staff and food."
Cons: "Flight was late and boarding was unorganized. When the person sitting in front of me moved their chair it hit my head and moved all my stuff, this should not happen. We should not feel our area moved because the person moved their seat in front of us."
Pros: "Arriving on time."
Cons: "Can't think of anything."
Pros: "Great crew!"
Cons: "The sound quality of the loud speakers for the announcement was awful. The sound for the movies was also not great."
Pros: "Service, food, and entertainment was great!"
Pros: "Great staff, quick boarding and vegetarian options were avaliable. This was the most pleasant experience I've had with a flight service. I commend Lufthansa and the crew of this aircraft."
Cons: "Minimal entertainment but understandable for a short flight."
Pros: "The flight itself was on time, the food was basic, just like drink."
Cons: "Staff didn't ask a lady next to me to sit properly whilst she was almost laying with her shoes very near to my seat. I had to be careful not to clean her shoe soles with my clothes. Also, after arrival to Birmingham there was an unnecessary crowd created by releasing people from busses from 2 different flights simultanously."
Cons: "Rubbish boarding staff"
Pros: "Usual good service for economy class on this airline"
Pros: "Crew were efficient and pleasant"
Cons: "Uncomfortable seats and could not recline seats"
Pros: "The entertainment options were great, The plane was very clean and the bathrooms was HUGE!"
Cons: "uncomfortable seat, off set from the seat in front of me so my entertainment screen was at an odd angle to watch. Food was ok but they had a sauce on the chicken that was not very appetizing. It actually made my wife sick and lets just say she did not keep her dinner. Also, I asked for a scotch after take off and it was a small shot and after dinner I asked for another and it was just a whisper. It did not even cover one ice cube. It would have been nice to get at least a full shot."
Pros: "Everything went according as planned. No problem at all."
Cons: "There is nothing I didn't like."
Cons: "The passenger behaind, was a tall guy. All the 7 hours flight i had to fight him to allow me puting my back sest dowm on his hearting legs. Why didnt hay extra and seat where it fits his size?"
Pros: "The crew were excellent and plane was comfortable"
Cons: "The plane was way out of the terminal and I had asked for assistance which I had going and most of coming back until the last part getting on to the plane at Lufthansa no-one came at Birmingham either. I struggled to collect my case and walk through to the exit."
Pros: "Flight was on time."
Cons: "I was sitting at the tale end. Seat was extremely uncomfortable. I was trying to rest yet flight attendants and several passengers were talking loud. Crews kept forgetting passengers orders/requests. A lady sitting besides me pushed a call bottom 3 times to get noticed. Flight attendants were too busy chatting with passengers to help other passengers. I have never seen that type of services before."
Pros: "Great staff"
Cons: "small seat despite being in business class"
Pros: "Premium economy gives you extra confort, more space to sleep better."
Cons: "The flight was delayed 40 minutes."
Pros: "The polite stewards The food and drinks given for free."
Pros: "The food and service"
Cons: "I don't have my luggage yet!"
Cons: "The staff was very unfriendly and they had inconsistent rules with carry on baggage."
Pros: "Ample leg space. Friendly, efficient crew. Restroom area provided space for exercise."
Cons: "Food was fair."
Pros: "Even though we were a little late boarding and taking off, we still arrived 15 minutes early. The on board snack was pretty good (cheese sandwich) and the coffee was lovely - good quality and just what I needed."
Pros: "The people, the service, the seats, the timeliness... (I did not fly from Washington to Munich on Lufthansa; I flew back on Lufthansa.)"
Cons: "Nothing. They were great."
Cons: "Na"
Pros: "Everything I like with LH"
Pros: "Promptness, profesional and nice service. Everything overall."
Pros: "The plane was clean. Some of the attendants were very kind and helpful about our situation (the plane left 35 minutes late from Athens and we were in danger of missing our next flight to the US). Food was pretty good. Small portions as usual."
Cons: "Pretty big delay before departure, ended up in very stressful conditions for the rest of the trip. It became pretty obvious that we were cutting very close to the boarding time for our next flight (arrival scheduled for 4:05 pm and our flight to Chicago barding on 4:20 pm). One of the flight attendants kindly offered us to move up to the front seats of the plane on the last 15 minutes of the flight (with our luggage) so that we can exit as soon as possible. We moved (per his suggestions) and we were treated rudely by the young lady attendant of the Business Class. We explained that we moved after the suggestion of their other flying attendant. She called her supervisor on us, who in return, rudely, arrogantly and loudly started to berate us on how we "dared" to move ourselves to the Business class. After explaining the whole story again and showing her the tickets, she allowed us to stay to those seats for the last 10 minutes of the flight. We asked if an airport cart could be called to transfer us to the next gate, and they said no. We asked for information on the gate for Chicago and they did not provide one. Unfortunately, the plane landed very far from the gates. We had to enter the airport bus, which traveled for about 15 minutes before we got on a gate. There, we faced about 35 minutes of passport procedures and waiting lines. At that point, 5 minutes before our plane for Chicago was supposed to take off, we asked the passport pre-check officer what we should do (we assumed we would be missing the plane at that point) and he told us very rudely "When you REALLY miss your plane, then come back and ask me"!!!!!!!!! Then we passed through passport check and we were told to run to our gate (which by that time was no longer showing on the computer screen, and we knew about the changed number, ONLY because KAYAK sent the update to us-THANK YOU!!!). We ran for about 12 minutes. We arrived at our gate late by about 25 minutes after our flight was supposed to leave. There we were asked why we were running and when we told the guy who screened our boarding passes he responded "Well, running is good for your health..."!!!!! At that point I would have liked to give him a piece of my mind...We were told by the same guy that due to airport security issues, Frankfurt airport had so many delays in the last couple of weeks that planes know to wait for the late passengers. Couldn't someone have told us that before? We have NEVER been treated so poorly by an airline and we will NOT fly with them again. The LUFTHANSA customer service was terrible. We have not encountered such arrogance and lack of information for many years...Shame on them! AND we were not the only Americans running. There were families with little children and older people, etc etc, just because the Lufthansa attendants and ground crew did not feel like giving us the information we needed!!!"
Pros: "direct flight"
Cons: "only one type of food offered. presented in a rude way."
Cons: "The gate printed on my ticket was not the gate the plane departed from. Not only was it not, but there was no announcement or warning this would happen. I only realized because 15 mins after the scheduled boarding time I went to find out what was going on. There should have been an announcement."
Pros: "quiet on-time flight"
Cons: "Overnight flights are usually a pain in the neck, which is obviously not the airline's fault"
Cons: "The connections for audio wasn'y working, false contact..."
I love KLM, its very spacious and clean and the landing is always very soft. Great Airline!
Pros: "The plane condition."
Cons: "The flight attendants could have served some drinks in between the meals. They actually refused to serve something additionally when asked."
Pros: "Staff were polite"
Cons: "The seating space is horrendous, I am 5 ft 8 and felt like I was sitting with my knees at my chest, horrible horrible seating"
Pros: "Yes"
Cons: "Nothing. Flight was amazing"
Pros: "Perfect"
Pros: "The crew was professional & friendly"
Cons: "Food was terrible honestly, entertainment system didn't work on 1st flight."
Pros: "15 years ago I told myself not to fly Delta anymore. But these 2 flights Detroit to Amsterdam and back changed my mind. I enjoyed the flight very much and I'm looking forward to the next one."
Pros: "the crew was wonderful, we got a nice Wrap and water, wine or coffee for free, not all airlines serve it anymore, we were on time and I got whatsapp message with updates of the flight"
Cons: "Don't be late"
Cons: "1. In Flight Entertainment 2. Controlled In Flight Temperature"
Pros: "Friendly crew"
Cons: "KLM lost one piece of my luggage"
Pros: "Pleasant flight"
Cons: "We were delayed & missed our connection"
Pros: "The entertainment was amazing"
Cons: "The seats were a bit hard"
Pros: "the drinks"
Cons: "seat reservation. having to pay for luggage...."
Pros: "Checkin 1a at Schiphol had long lines, and no seperate counters for just bag drop. My family and I had to wait for 50 mins, to do a bag drop which in,y lasted 1 min! Flight was delayed, without proper announcements."
Cons: "Seat pitch could've been more. At least let us know via Whatsapp that the plane is delayed, or at which belt the bags would come out. This basic info was lacking."
Cons: "Flight on time would have been good when you have a late evening arrival. Long wait for luggage at Birmingham airport."
Cons: "Long haul flight made pleasant by KLM"
Pros: "great crew and comfortable flight."
Cons: "sceens in the plane to show map and direction of travel"
Pros: "Everything OK"
Pros: "Very attentive crew. Attended to needs immediately. Took a lot of time with each person when someone had something to say."
Cons: "The seat I had with no seats in front of me was very small. Much smaller than the other economy seats because the tray table and video screen were in the armrests. Paid extra for the legroom by ended up losing it side to side. Really had to squeeze into the seat."
Pros: "Excellent service. A meal , drink and a coffee included which we were not expecting."
Pros: "The crew was efficient. Flight left on time. Food and wine served."
Cons: "No entertainment."
Pros: "Easy flight; loved the crew and their friendly customer service. Great food, kept everyone hydrated and fed."
Cons: "The movie options, as well as music and TV options were limited. There were no electrical outlets."
Pros: "More than adequate room, And very good service from a very professional staff. Head and shoulders abovevany American carrier, and several European lines I have flown."
Pros: "The crew was fantastic! Our needs were constantly being met and just about the time you thought you might want a snack or a meal, the attendants were already heading down the aisle. Because of an allergic reaction, I asked for ice a number of times and the attendants were more than happy to meet my needs."
Cons: "The seats were very close together. The trip from New York to Amsterdam seemed a lot more comfortable than the return flight. The food from NYC JFK was better than the food from Amsterdam. The movie selection on both flights was a little disappointing."
Cons: "Flight was cancelled."
Cons: "Nothing good to say about this flight. The plane was old with no entertainment. The sits where very compact and not comfortable at all. The food was a sweet bread and water. The flight attendants were rushing and will take a while if you needed anything. I felt like I was taking a bus with graffiti all over the place."
Cons: "Our two hour connection in Paris became 30 minutes because Air France was late in leaving Washington. So our luggage didn't make to to KLM to Amsterdam. My poor rating was because the luggage handling was really poor. Lots of flights from Paris to Amsterdam (almost hourly), but my bag showed up 12 hours later. My wife's bag took 36 hours. And yes, we checked in together. There were lots of confusing messages"
Pros: "Boarding was as expected, crew & food were ok. Nothing else positive to extract out of this flight."
Cons: "Delayed flight, horrible baggae policy when the flight is actually operated by a partner of the company you bought the ticket from and not the actual company. Dirty seats, no in-flight entertainment whatsoever (not even a magazine)."
Cons: "Actually the Welcome on board announcement. The part where they special welcome loyalty program members. I do not get that... I am an explorer holder my self, but really?? so other paying customers are not as welcome. This is leftovers from the older days.."
Cons: "Nothing much"
Pros: "Short flight with good communication."
Cons: "Nil to complain."
Cons: "Please Endeavour to put the expiration date on the food served in the flight."
Pros: "Crew were friendly. Flight was comforyable smooth and on time. Nice snack."
Pros: "On time"
Pros: "Very friendly service!"
Cons: "Crowded seating, 20-year old video system, headphones that did not match the two-jack system, lackluster service in flight. Generally my experience with KLM has been good, but this was well below average."
Pros: "Flight was lovely, crew were friendly and very helpful and food was delicious!! We travelled with assistance for mum and it was excellent and we were kept updated all through the flight."
Cons: "Per usual, KLM can't seem to figure out the order of boarding the plane. Should be business - priority - everyone else. Instead they do priority first, and that's usually two-thirds of the passengers. Strange choice of in-flight movies; no accounting for taste, I guess."
Pros: "Loved the service...everything was excellent"
Cons: "The bus class seat was a bit narrow at the feet"
Pros: "Everything. Staff incredible."
Cons: "Why do the crew have to slam the overhead and catering compartments to get them to shut?"
Pros: "Staff at Schipol airport were lovely and very helpful. Cabin crew were friendly and efficient. On board snack was nice."
Cons: "Elbow room is a little bit awkward and I didn't get to sit next to my fiance WE will still definitely recommend KLM though!"
Cons: "One of the senior stewardesses we're very rude. Whether it's her personal opinion or KLM's policy, it's unreasonable to think that a 3 years old child could or should hold her pipi over 20 minutes, while they slowly and inefficiently trying to give out food. Several parents were there with the request to let us through to the toilet with small children and she smiled in our face and said "no, we will finish first and than you can go". She might be not fit for the job anymore, but KLM can't afford this kind of treatment."
Pros: "The crew were lovely and welcoming. We was given snacks and drinks on the flight which was great. Take off was a bit delayed but boarding was smooth. Couldn't complain about the comfort as was only just over an hours flight."
Pros: "Crew was friendly, and the food was better than the usual KLM fare."
Cons: "The "new" seats were hard and uncomfortable. Avoid any kinds of seats near the bathroom in a configuration with 3 abreast next to the windows. The "aisle" seat is essentially a "waiting area" for the rest room."
Pros: "Same as above"
Pros: "Excellent service, excellent food."
SWISS8.0
Virgin Atlantic8.0
Delta7.9
Lufthansa7.9
KLM7.7
Safety measures for airlines flying from Quebec to Birmingham
Airlines flying from Quebec to Birmingham have enacted additional safety measures and adjusted policies to better accommodate travellers. Policies vary by airline.
Daily cleaning, installation of cabin HEPA filters on flights from Quebec to Birmingham
Masks required on board, masks provided on flights from Quebec to Birmingham
Middle seats unavailable to book on flights from Quebec to Birmingham
Testing for antibodies, testing for symptoms for flights from Quebec to Birmingham
Waiving of change fees. Search flexible flights from Quebec to Birmingham
Book cheap flights from Quebec to Birmingham
16h 30mYUL-BHX
17h 00mBHX-YUL
1 stopLufthansa
2 stopsLufthansa
2 stopsUnited Airlines
2 stopsKLM
3 stopsSWISS
C$ 770 or less
1 stopDelta
1 stopVirgin Atlantic
2 stopsDelta
1 stopAir Canada
2 stopsAir Canada
Flights to Birmingham
Birmingham (BHX)United Kingdom
Birmingham - Quebec
United Kingdom »
Flights to La Vernière
Search Birmingham flights on KAYAK. Find cheap tickets to Birmingham from anywhere in Quebec. KAYAK searches hundreds of travel sites to help you find cheap airfare and book the flight that suits you best. With KAYAK you can also compare prices of plane tickets for last-minute flights to Birmingham from anywhere in Quebec.


text:
Q: Can travis-artifacts be used to upload to S3 from a pull request? I have an org repo at github.com/numenta/experiments, and a forked version at github.com/rhyolight/experiments. When trying to get artifact uploads to S3 working as described in this blog post, I used the travis encrypt command to do this with the -r rhyolight/experiments option, and it worked, as you can see on line 60 in the travis output.
I created a pull request against the original repo, and the build failed there with the error:
Missing required arguments: aws_access_key_id, aws_secret_access_key (ArgumentError)

That tells me that travis was unable to decrypt the secure environment variables, probably because this is being executed in a different repository than where the hashes were created. Ok, that makes sense. So I recreated the secure variables with the -r numenta/experiments slug instead of using my own github username. So, I get a familiar upload error when the build runs on rhyolight/experiments, which I expected, but I also get the same upload error when it runs against the numenta/experiments from within a pull request.
To experiment, I merged the pull request to see if the secure values would be extracted properly once they were merged into master and no longer running from a pull request... and it worked!
Is there any way to publish artifacts with the travis-artifacts project from within a pull request to another repository?
Thanks in advance!

A: After chatting with support at Travis, the answer is no.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Q: How to fix error: package 'tzdb' is not available for this version of R I'm new at R and trying to usetidyverse. The installation seems to go fine, but when I want to load the package, I get this error: there is no package called 'tzdb'. When I try to install 'tzdb' I get a warning that package 'tzdb' is not available for this version of R. I'm using version 4.0.5, which I believe should work.
Any suggestions on how I can get this package to work (so I can start using tidyverse)?
Edit: I've added an image of the code I ran + the outputs of sessionInfo() , options("repos") and  .libPaths() below.  (I'm sorry I can't copy paste code nor use the browser of the virtual machine that I work from).
https://i.stack.imgur.com/hra1r.png
It does give a warning stating that the CRAN mirror is set to an insecure URL. Could that be the problem? It didnt't seem matter for the other packages.


text:
News|Human Rights
A rural view of Iran's politics
Countryside remains calm a world away from post-election tensions in big cities.
Published On 6 Feb 20106 Feb 2010
Iranians are still paying the price of violence that followed last year's disputed presidential election.
Many protesters remain in custody and some are facing execution.
Tensions still simmer throughout the big cities, but life is calmer in rural areas, where President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who was declared re-elected after the contentious vote, has traditionally enjoyed a lot of support.
Nazanine Moshiri has more.
Source: Al Jazeera

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
**Non-standard**
This feature is non-standard and is not on a standards track. Do not use it on production sites facing the Web: it will not work for every user. There may also be large incompatibilities between implementations and the behavior may change in the future.

### Summary

The `**uneval()**` method creates an string representation of the source code of an Object.

### Syntax

    uneval(_object_)

### Parameters

**`object`**

> A JavaScript expression or statement.

**Note:** You won't get a valid JSON representation of your Object.

### Description

`uneval()` is a top-level function and is not associated with any object.

### Examples

    var a = 1;
    uneval(a); // returns a String containing 1

    var b = "1";
    uneval(b) // returns a String containing "1"

    uneval(function foo(){}); // returns "(function foo(){})"

    var a = uneval(function foo(){return 'hi'});
    var foo = eval(a);
    foo(); // returns "hi"

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
The Ebbe Carlsson affair () was a major political scandal in Sweden occurring during mid-1988. The affair came to public knowledge on 1 June 1988, when the evening newspaper Expressen revealed that Ebbe Carlsson, a journalist and publisher and former secretary at the Swedish government, was carrying out an independent and illegal investigation into the assassination of prime minister Olof Palme, secretly supported by the minister for justice Anna-Greta Leijon.

The scandal forced Leijon to resign a week later, and was finally concluded with Carlsson, by then dying with AIDS, being fined for smuggling in 1992. Long before it landed in criminal court, however, an investigation of his role was launched by the constitutional committee of the parliament, its hearings broadcast live on Sveriges Television, the public television service. The matter became embarrassing to the government, appearing to expose an "old boys culture" encompassing people both in the senior ranks of the Social Democratic Party and in the police, and careless handling in highly sensitive police work.

Background
In late 1987, prime minister Ingvar Carlsson summoned Carl Lidbom, the Swedish ambassador to France, to Stockholm. He wanted Lidbom to lead an investigation into the procedures of SÄPO, the Swedish security police. This was prompted by the escape of convicted spy Stig Bergling as well as the failure to find the assassin of former prime minister Olof Palme.

Course of events
Lidbom consulted his old acquaintance Ebbe Carlsson. The two had known each other since the early 1970s when they had both worked at the Department of Justice. Ebbe Carlsson had both knowledge and connections relating to SÄPO, and started up his own investigation, backed by the National Police Commissioner Nils Erik Åhmansson who provided Carlsson with a bodyguard and additional collaborators within SÄPO.

Ebbe Carlsson concluded that Olof Palme had been assassinated by the Kurdish organisation PKK and claimed that:
 SÄPO could have prevented the murder through telephone tapping of Kurds, claiming that the SÄPO operational director had known that the PKK was planning a murder in Stockholm in February 1986 (Palme was shot dead on his way home from a cinema on the late evening of 28 February 1986).
 The PKK had been ordered to assassinate Palme by the Iranian government at a meeting in Damascus in 1985. The reason for this was supposedly that Palme had stopped the Iranians from acquiring the Swedish RBS 70 air defence missile system and that the Swedish government had listed the PKK as a terrorist organization.

Carlsson's theories were largely a rehash of the "PKK track" that had become the main path of the Palme inquiry under Hans Holmér in 1986, leading to a major police clampdown on suspected PKK people in early 1987. After prosecutors deemed the police work on the Kurds unsatisfactory and had denied further search warrants and phone tapping along those lines, Holmér stepped down as chief of the inquiry. Holmér, Lidbom, and Carlsson were long-time friends and Carlsson's theories are believed to have been inspired by Holmér.

On 17 March 1988, Anna-Greta Leijon was briefed by Lidbom about Carlsson's theories, and a few days later she also met with Carlsson himself. On 28 March, the prime minister was informed by Lidbom, who was given a deadline of 7 June to confirm Carlsson's theories.

On 2 May, Carlsson went to see Leijon to get a letter of recommendation. He intended to use this when traveling to England where his aim was to talk with a number of people whom he considered knowledgeable on the alleged meeting in Damascus. Leijon promptly wrote the letter, giving it to Carlsson two days later. A copy was placed in her safe without a registration, bypassing the correct procedure. All documents issued by or sent to a public authority in Sweden generally have to be noted, with date, in a roll of documents and by default become public, unless access has been specifically restricted. By treating the document as a private letter, Leijon was aiming to keep it hidden.

A week later Carlsson had a meeting with chief prosecutor Jörgen Almblad where he presented his theories about the PKK. Almblad was enraged as he had not been informed about Carlsson's part in the investigation prior to this meeting. He was highly critical, too, of the fact that Carlsson had been given access to various kinds of top-secret information.

Finally, on 30 May and 1 June 1988, Expressen reporter Per Wendel called Leijon and asked about Carlsson's involvement in the investigation. Leijon, among other things, denied that she had given Carlsson any letter of recommendation. Immediately after this, the letter was taken out of the safe, registered, and thereafter classified.

References

1988 in Sweden
Assassination of Olof Palme
Political scandals in Sweden
1988 in politics

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Sudan Gezira Project
Egypt Salam Canal Project
Ethiopia Beles Sugar Development Project
Ethiopia Erosion in Choke Mountains
Nile Basin Media and Water Diplomacy
Nile Basin Dam Tour
Sudan Waha Irrigation Project
About the Nile Water Lab
NILE WATER LAB
NILE WATER LAB > News & Events > Mapping Nile controversies. The role of media in water conflicts
Explore Projects >
Path 6 Copy 3 Created with Sketch.
Fill 1 Created with Sketch. News & Events
News - Published on January 24, 2017
Mapping Nile controversies. The role of media in water conflicts
By Fredrick Mugira from African Water Journalist
Do water wars mainly happen on media reports? What is the role that media play in fuelling water conflicts, particularly when they report on controversial technical issues such as dams or climate change? In order to address these issues a workshop on ''Mapping Nile controversies'' was held in Addis Ababa. The workshop was the kick-off of the project 'Open Water Diplomacy Lab: Media, Science and Water Cooperation in the Nile basin'. The project aims to bring diplomats, journalists and water scientists from different Nile basin countries together, in order to engage in a process of common learning and co-production of knowledge, and to share and discuss the issues and controversies concerning the Nile Basin.
Working on shared Nile narratives
Stories about water issues in the Nile Basin have mostly been miscommunicated and exaggerated by journalists to date. The project therefore wants to explore how ideologies, knowledge and culture could possibly shape narratives on transboundary water issues. The Open Water Diplomacy Lab explores how techno-scientific controversies on the Nile are debated in mainstream media and social networks in Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia, and how these narratives impact on international negotiations. The main goal is to contribute to the emergence of shared Nile narratives going beyond mainstream "national interest" perspectives.
The Open Water Diplomacy Lab addresses the needs and demands of water journalists in terms of facilitated access to potential sources of information – getting scientific research on water communicated in an accessible and ready to use way, meeting and working with water researchers and water diplomats – and opportunities to support and promote media coverage on water issues.
Overcoming the national interest perspective
''First of all, the communication on how the issues on the Nile in both mainstream and social media in Ethiopia, Sudan and Egypt will be studied. Based on the research findings, joint training activities will be developed for journalists and scientists coming from the Nile countries. Hereafter, they will be brought together to work and cooperate in order to promote the shared narratives about the Nile, overcoming the mainstream national interest perspective,'' explains Emanuele Fantini, Senior Researcher at IHE Delft and project coordinator.
The journalists who attended the workshop were very positive and optimistic about it and felt that they could engage better with water researchers through this initiative, which might lead to positive results and solutions.
Journalist views
Ishraga Abbas, a professional journalist form Sudan, who has been concerned and ambitious about water related issues, stated that she has never had the chance to work with water researchers, or to work on a water story based on the findings of water researchers. The journalist's main argument on the continuous and controversial issue of the Nile basin, is that researchers are used to being out of the spotlight and prefer to share their findings with fellow researchers rather than communicating and sharing their findings with journalists.
Ishraga Abbas argues that this might be due to the fact that journalists often neglected the coverage of multifaceted water issues, or that journalists are perhaps known for misrepresenting the research facts or showing lack of interest in the topics related to water. "This is an essential responsibility for the journalists in the Nile basin, which they cannot simply avoid. Journalists have a crucial role to play in ending the Nile wars between countries that share the longest river in the world. I therefore believe that the workshop is a great effort and initiative which will result in boosting the quality of water journalism in the Nile basin", says Ishraga.
Dagim Terefe, an Ethiopian journalist and documentary maker, was very positive about the project. "The Open Water Diplomacy Lab project will help give birth to a new generation of journalists that specifically concentrate on investigating River Nile issues''. He added that the project has changed his view and perspective, and that from now on he will no longer write a Nile water story with a nationalistic thought or feeling.
Water scientists and researchers: 'this workshop is important'
Water scientists and researchers were positive about the workshop as well, and agreed on its importance.
Dr. Wubalem Fekade, the head of the Social Development and Communication Unit at the Eastern Nile Technical Regional Office (ENTRO) of the Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) based in Addis Ababa contends, ''having the story of the Nile in the media, will be a key catalyst for decision and policy makers in making enlightened and bold decisions that contribute to sustainable management of the river''.
In addition, Atta el-Battahani, a Professor of Political Science at the University of Khartoum commented that it is of great importance to know and acknowledge that water is a strategic resource for livelihoods, in order to be able to manage it efficiently for the sake of people's wellbeing.
Wondwosen Seide, a doctoral student at Lund University in Sweden, who has been researching the River Nile issues for the past ten years, believes that Nile wars are found generally in the media more than in reality. He also believes that the project is crucial in bridging controversies and contradicting reporting among the riparian countries.
Prof. Dr. Yacob Arsano of Addis Ababa University in Ethiopia argued that the project can have a positive impact on bringing journalists and researchers together to identify the serious issues in the Nile discourse.
The Open Water diplomacy Lab is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs 'Global Partnership for water and development'


text:
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
	<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
	<groupId>com.my.babasport</groupId>
	<artifactId>babasport</artifactId>
	<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
	<packaging>pom</packaging>
	<modules>
		<module>babasport-portal</module>
		<module>babasport-console</module>
		<module>babasport-login</module>
		<module>babasport-pojo</module>
		<module>babasport-common</module>
		<module>babasport-interface</module>
		<module>babasport-dao</module>
		<module>babasport-service-product</module>
		<module>babasport-service-cms</module>
		<module>babasport-service-buyer</module>
		<module>babasport-service-solr</module>
	</modules>

	<!-- jdk1.7 -->
	<build>
		<plugins>
			<plugin>
				<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
				<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
				<version>3.2</version>
				<configuration>
					<source>1.7</source>
					<target>1.7</target>
					<encoding>UTF-8</encoding>
				</configuration>
			</plugin>
		</plugins>
	</build>

	<!-- 设置统一控制版本 -->
	<properties>
		<java-version>1.7</java-version>
		<junit-version>4.12</junit-version>
		<spring.version>4.1.3.RELEASE</spring.version>
		<jackson.version>2.4.2</jackson.version>
		<mysql-connector-java-version>5.1.8</mysql-connector-java-version>
		<org.mybatis-version>3.2.7</org.mybatis-version>
		<org.mybatis-spring-version>1.2.2</org.mybatis-spring-version>
		<opensymphony-version>2.4.2</opensymphony-version>
		<freemarker-version>2.3.18</freemarker-version>
		<druid.version>1.0.9</druid.version>
		<commons-collections-version>1.0</commons-collections-version>
		<commons-fileupload-version>1.2.2</commons-fileupload-version>
		<org.apache.commons-version>3.1</org.apache.commons-version>
		<commons-codec-version>1.6</commons-codec-version>
		<dom4j-version>1.6.1</dom4j-version>
		<javax.servlet-version>1.2</javax.servlet-version>
		<aspectjweaver-version>1.6.6</aspectjweaver-version>
		<slf4j-log4j12-version>1.6.6</slf4j-log4j12-version>
		<log4j-version>1.2.16</log4j-version>
		<javax.servlet-jsp-version>2.0</javax.servlet-jsp-version>
		<cglib-version>2.2.2</cglib-version>
		<slf4j-api-version>1.6.6</slf4j-api-version>
		<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
	</properties>

	<!-- 依赖管理 版本号 -->
	<!-- 设置统一依赖管理、不强行依赖 -->
	<dependencyManagement>
		<dependencies>
			<!-- with junit4.8.2 -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>junit</groupId>
				<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
				<version>${junit-version}</version>
				<type>jar</type>
			</dependency>
			<!-- Spring -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
				<artifactId>spring-context</artifactId>
				<version>${spring.version}</version>
			</dependency>
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
				<artifactId>spring-beans</artifactId>
				<version>${spring.version}</version>
			</dependency>
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
				<artifactId>spring-webmvc</artifactId>
				<version>${spring.version}</version>
			</dependency>
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
				<artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
				<version>${spring.version}</version>
			</dependency>
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
				<artifactId>spring-aspects</artifactId>
				<version>${spring.version}</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
				<artifactId>spring-test</artifactId>
				<version>${spring.version}</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
				<artifactId>spring-context-support</artifactId>
				<version>${spring.version}</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
				<artifactId>spring-jms</artifactId>
				<version>${spring.version}</version>
			</dependency>

			<!-- Jackson Json处理工具包 -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId>
				<artifactId>jackson-databind</artifactId>
				<version>${jackson.version}</version>
			</dependency>

			<!--freemarker -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.freemarker</groupId>
				<artifactId>freemarker</artifactId>
				<version>2.3.18</version>
			</dependency>
			<!-- with mybatis-spring -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.mybatis</groupId>
				<artifactId>mybatis</artifactId>
				<version>${org.mybatis-version}</version>
			</dependency>
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.mybatis</groupId>
				<artifactId>mybatis-spring</artifactId>
				<version>${org.mybatis-spring-version}</version>
			</dependency>
			<!-- jdbc driver -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>mysql</groupId>
				<artifactId>mysql-connector-java</artifactId>
				<version>${mysql-connector-java-version}</version>
			</dependency>
			<!-- 连接池 -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>com.alibaba</groupId>
				<artifactId>druid</artifactId>
				<version>${druid.version}</version>
			</dependency>
			<!-- apache commons jar -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>commons-collections</groupId>
				<artifactId>commons-collections</artifactId>
				<version>${commons-collections-version}</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>commons-fileupload</groupId>
				<artifactId>commons-fileupload</artifactId>
				<version>${commons-fileupload-version}</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId>
				<artifactId>commons-lang3</artifactId>
				<version>${org.apache.commons-version}</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>commons-codec</groupId>
				<artifactId>commons-codec</artifactId>
				<version>${commons-codec-version}</version>
			</dependency>
			<!-- analyze xml use dom4j -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>dom4j</groupId>
				<artifactId>dom4j</artifactId>
				<version>${dom4j-version}</version>
			</dependency>

			<!-- jstl标签 -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>jstl</groupId>
				<artifactId>jstl</artifactId>
				<version>1.2</version>
			</dependency>
			<dependency>
				<groupId>taglibs</groupId>
				<artifactId>standard</artifactId>
				<version>1.1.2</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
				<artifactId>slf4j-log4j12</artifactId>
				<version>1.6.6</version>
			</dependency>
			<dependency>
				<groupId>log4j</groupId>
				<artifactId>log4j</artifactId>
				<version>1.2.17</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
				<artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId>
				<version>1.6.6</version>
			</dependency>
			<dependency>
				<groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
				<artifactId>activation</artifactId>
				<version>1.1.1</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>cglib</groupId>
				<artifactId>cglib</artifactId>
				<version>${cglib-version}</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>net.fckeditor</groupId>
				<artifactId>java-core</artifactId>
				<version>2.6</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.json</groupId>
				<artifactId>json</artifactId>
				<version>20131018</version>
			</dependency>

			<!--page -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>com.babasport</groupId>
				<artifactId>page</artifactId>
				<version>1.0</version>
			</dependency>
			<!-- solrJ -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.apache.solr</groupId>
				<artifactId>solr-solrj</artifactId>
				<version>4.10.3</version>
			</dependency>

			<!-- jedis Java接口 -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>redis.clients</groupId>
				<artifactId>jedis</artifactId>
				<version>2.6.2</version>
				<type>jar</type>
			</dependency>

			<!-- FastDFS client -->

			<dependency>
				<groupId>fastdfs_client</groupId>
				<artifactId>fastdfs_client</artifactId>
				<version>1.20</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.jboss.netty</groupId>
				<artifactId>netty</artifactId>
				<version>3.2.5.Final</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>com.alibaba</groupId>
				<artifactId>dubbo</artifactId>
				<version>2.5.3</version>
			</dependency>

			<dependency>
				<groupId>com.alibaba</groupId>
				<artifactId>fastjson</artifactId>
				<version>1.1.41</version>
			</dependency>

			<!-- Zookeeper 用于分布式服务管理 -->

			<dependency>
				<groupId>com.github.sgroschupf</groupId>
				<artifactId>zkclient</artifactId>
				<version>0.1</version>
			</dependency>
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.apache.zookeeper</groupId>
				<artifactId>zookeeper</artifactId>
				<version>3.4.6</version>
			</dependency>
			<!-- Zookeeper 用于分布式服务管理 end -->
			<!-- Active MQ 开始 -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
				<artifactId>activemq-all</artifactId>
				<version>5.8.0</version>
			</dependency>
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
				<artifactId>activemq-pool</artifactId>
				<version>5.8.0</version>
			</dependency>
			<!-- Active MQ 结束 -->
			<!-- Tomcat7 servlet-api -->
			<dependency>
				<groupId>org.apache.tomcat</groupId>
				<artifactId>tomcat-jsp-api</artifactId>
				<version>7.0.47</version>
				<scope>provided</scope>
			</dependency>
		</dependencies>
	</dependencyManagement>

</project>


text:
Héctor Walter Baldassi (ur. 5 stycznia 1966 w Río Ceballos) – argentyński sędzia piłkarski. Został międzynarodowym sędzią w 2000 roku. Zna język hiszpański i angielski. Został wybrany jako sędzia na mundial w 2010.

Urodzeni w 1966
Argentyńscy sędziowie piłkarscy


This cylindrical form porcelain mug was made in China during the third quarter of the eighteenth century. It is decorated in the Nanking pattern with trees, birds, pagodas and boats, using cobalt blue underglaze enamel. It measures 4.75 inches high with a 3.5 inch opening.
It appears that this mug has a story to tell, as its original strap handle has gone astray and is now fitted with a rusty iron replacement. Perhaps a bar room brawl resulted in the loss, or someone dropped the mug while clearing the table, or during a wash-up. We may never know for sure how the deed was done but I am thankful the owner had the good sense to have a tinker replace the handle, rather than throw out the broken mug. Isn't it remarkable that this chipped survivor from 250 years ago is still able to engaging us and stir our imaginations?
This mug with similar form and decoration shows what the original strap handle might have looked like.
This whimsical teapot in the form of a three-story Georgian mansion is made of saltglaze stoneware pottery. The molded decoration includes a coat of arms, guards, animals, vines, birds, a dancing couple, and a crane on a serpent's head spout. It measures 5.75 inches high, 8 inches wide from handle to spout and was made in the Staffordshire region of England, circa 1750-1760.
After the original lid broke or went missing, an intricate tin replacement in the form of a shingled roof with a chimney as knob was made by a clever tinker. This is one of just a few replacement lids I have come across where the repairer copied the form of the original, and I am so glad that he (or she) did!
This teapot of similar form suggests what the original lid on mine might have looked like.
This Dutch shape pearlware pottery jug was made in Sunderland, England, c.1860-1870. It has dark red transfer decoration of the sailing ship "Great Australia" on one side and verses on the other side and front, accented with washes of pink lustre, yellow, green, and blue. "Great Australia" was built for Messrs Baines & Co. in Liverpool and launched in Decemeber 1860. Jug measures 8 inches high and 9.5 inches from handle to spout.
The large metal replacement handle with finger grip, thumb support, and a wide horizontal band were done by a tinker in the 19th century. As these jugs were prone to constant wear and tear, it was not uncommon for handles to break off and be replaced. Larger towns and cities had local tinkers but if you lived in a smaller town or village, you would bring your broken household items to itinerant tinkers, who would travel from town to town and set up on the side of the road or in the town square.
I love finding make-do's in multiples and was thrilled to find this jug, which is one of a pair. Even better, they match a large jug I purchased many years ago with a similar metal replacement handle, making the set, graduating in size, a trio. Take a look at Large Sunderland jug, c.1855 the largest jug I previously posted.
This jug of similar form and decoration shows what the original handle on mine would have looked like.
This large porcelain bowl was made in China durning the Tongzhi period (1862–1874). It is decorated with warrior figures, a horse, an interior scene & flowers in the famille rose palette and measures 14.75 inches in diameter and is 4.75 inches high. Originally it would have been part of a set which most likely included a matching water jug.
But the true beauty for me lies on the underside. After the bowl broke into 2 pieces, a skilled and patient china mender used 136 metal staples, placed in pairs, to make this broken bowl whole again. The work is extraordinary and the repair is tight, making it usable. And as you can see in the last photo, Oscar demonstrates that it also makes for a comfortable cat bed.


text:
Ronald Anthony Bailey (30 July 1923 – 28 September 1990), born Anthony Ronald Bailey, was an English cricketer who served in the Royal Navy. He played in three first-class cricket matches for Kent County Cricket Club in 1948.

Bailey was born at Camberwell in London in 1923. He served in the Royal Navy and made all three of his first-class appearances for Kent during July 1948. Kent were searching for a replacement for Norman Harding, an established fast bowler who had died in the 1947 polio epidemic after the end of the previous season and Bailey, a right-arm bowler, was tried in the team. He opened the bowling in each of his three matches, but took only two wickets. In his five first-class innings he failed to score a run. He made a single appearance for the county's Second XI in August 1948, taking six wickets, and played several times for the Royal Navy cricket team between 1948 and 1953.

Bailey died in 1990 at Sissinghurst near Tunbridge Wells in Kent. He was aged 67.

References

External links

1923 births
1990 deaths
English cricketers
Kent cricketers
People from Camberwell
Cricketers from Greater London


I have used your audio program and read your book. I am trying very hard to implement your system. I am willing to accept adreneline when I present, as you recommend. However, I'm finding that my dry mouth is worse than ever when I present. I'm willing to accept the adreneline, but my mouth gets so dry it is literally difficult to form words. Also, from your advice, I have completely cut out caffeine, sugar, and sugar substitutes for the last 30 days, but I've still had several dry mouth episodes since then. Any tips or suggestions would really be appreciative. Thank you for your work.
External linksXerostomia can be caused by excessive clearance (such as by excessive breathing through the mouth), or it may be caused by insufficient production of saliva (called hyposalivation).
Hyposalivation, in turn, may be a sign of an underlying disease, such as Sjögren's syndrome, poorly controlled diabetes, or Lambert-Eaton syndrome, but this is not always the case. Other causes of insufficient saliva production include anxiety, medications, or the consumption of alcoholic beverages, smoking marijuana, physical trauma to the salivary glands or their ducts or nerves, dehydration caused by lack of sufficient fluids, previous radiation therapy, and also a natural result of aging. The vast majority of elderly individuals will suffer xerostomia to some degree, although the most common cause is the use of medications. Output from the major salivary glands does not undergo clinically significant decrements in healthy older people and clinicians should not attribute complaints of a dry mouth and findings of salivary hypofunction in an older person to his or her age. The results of one study suggested that, in general, objective and subjective measurements of major salivary gland flow rates are independent of age, gender, and race. Furthermore, signs and symptoms of dry mouth in the elderly regardless of race or gender should not be considered a normal sequela of aging. Playing or exercising a long time outside on a hot day can cause the salivary glands to become dry as the bodily fluids are concentrated elsewhere. Xerostomia is a common side-effect of various drugs such as cannabis, amphetamines, heroin, antihistamines, and some antidepressants. Treatment involves finding any correctable causes and fixing those if possible. In many cases it is not possible to correct the xerostomia itself, and treatment focuses on relieving the symptoms and preventing cavities. Patients who have endured chemotherapy usually suffer from this post- treatment. Patients with xerostomia should avoid the use of decongestants and antihistamines, and pay careful attention to oral hygiene. Sipping non-carbonated sugarless fluids frequently, chewing xylitol-containing gum, and using a carboxymethyl cellulose saliva substitute as a mouthwash may help. Pilocarpine may be prescribed to treat xerostomia. Non-systemic relief can be found using an oxidized glycerol triesters treatment used to coat the mouth. Drinking water when there is another cause of the xerostomia besides dehydration may bring little to no relief and can even make the dry mouth more uncomfortable. The use of an enzymatic product such as Biotene toothpaste, Biotene mouthwash, and Biotene dry mouth moisturizing liquid has been proven to reduce the rate of recurrence of dental plaque resulting from dry mouth. Of note is that Biotene does not significantly reduce the count of streptococcus mutans.


Burgers. How bloody good are burgers!?
Although we'll never be able to try a famous Krabby Patty made by Spongebob himself, these Sydney Burger Joints are giving us the next best thing. Whether you like your burgers super plain, vegan or packed with double meat and extra bacon, we've got you covered with our top 5 burger places that will put you in a food coma and take you to burger heaven.
Holey Moley. These burgers are literally huge! Packed with cheese and meaty goodness, Goodtime Burgers make some insane creations – including burgers with chicken nuggets and burger rings stacked on top of the bun.
There is absolutely no such thing as too much cheese or too much anything at this place!
Not convinced just yet? Then maybe the price will get you over the edge. On Wednesdays they have burgers for only $5! Not to mention their burger of the week is only $15.
As Goodtime Burger is also a bar, you'll be treated to cheap drinks and happy hour from 4pm- 6pm, hell yeah! If you're a crazed burger fanatic and love a cheap feed, then Goodtime Burger is here to serve you.
Burgerhood serves up some mean looking burgers. Juicy, cheesy and full of flavor, these burgers are American inspired and are sure to pack a punch!
The burgers aren't the only thing you're going to love about this place, it's child friendly and is great for parties and group dining. The team behind Burgerhood wanted to create a burger restaurant that was family friendly and we think they've hit the nail on the head.
Not only do they do burgers, but they also do shakes, fries and you get a free soft serve when you eat in – need we say more?
With affordable prices and menu options for kids, vegetarians, gluten free peeps and vegans – there is a burger option for everyone.
Move aside meat-eaters, Soul Burger is here to show you that plants are the new meat. Soul burger is completely vegan! That's right, you won't find any animals products here! With burgers that are full of flavor, creativity and good intentions – this place is perfect for you vegan peeps, or even for those of you wanting to make the transition. This place is proving that vegan food can be just as exciting and flavorsome, if not more!
Not only are these burgers saving our furry friends, they're also healthier for you – win win!
They don't only do vegan burgers though – their chips and milkshakes are also vegan. Soul Burger has an incredible menu, whether you're a vegan, vego or straight up carnivore – we promise you won't be leaving Soul Burger on an empty stomach.
These people are serious about their burgers! With 9 affordable burgers on their menu, your only issue will be having to choose one! But if like us, you're a bit indecisive, we recommend you try their 'Blame Canada' burger – it's a crowd fave!
Bar Luca isn't afraid to try new flavor combinations, with crunchy peanut butter being an add-on option for your burger! They also have a special burger of the week, so there's always something new and exciting to try out! Bar Luca is known for their killer burger game and their ability to make new flavor combinations, so why not indulge in a good burger that you won't be able to try anywhere else.
The saying goes quality over quantity, but at 4 Ounces Burger Co (4OBC) you get quality food, and a lot of it! These burgers are fresh, made in-house and over 80% of their produce comes within 400km radius of Sydney, so you're getting good quality food and supporting Australian farmers.
That's not the only thing cool about this place though! 4OBC is all about hip hop and rap! Not only in their interior but also in their menu. Take your pick from the The Yeezy burger which is packed with deep fried mac and cheese, or maybe the G Funk which comes with maple bacon – yum!
4OBC is working hard to become the world's most sustainable food company as they don't use single use plastic throughout their restaurant and are cooking up some mean burgers from good quality ingredients. So if you're after a juicy burger but want to do it the right way, then we highly suggested you check 4OBC out!


Takeaway: Clear communication over radio makes for a safer job site as long as people approach it with respect and don't clog the channel with unnecessary chatter.
Have you ever been in a meeting or a presentation and suddenly people start talking all at once? It can be very confusing, distracting, and difficult to interpret if you are trying to focus on a job or a conversation. Now, imagine the same thing happening over a closed loop radio. It makes interpreting the messages almost impossible.
The implications for safety are vast, especially if someone acts on a misinterpreted message. Many avoidable accidents have happened because of misinterpreted messages over handheld radios. With the right protocols, however, you can communicate through hand-held radios knowing that your messages are going through clearly and quickly.
Whether you're a first-time radio user or a seasoned veteran, the following information may help you in becoming a safer and more effective worker with a handheld radio.
In many parts of the United States and in Canada, radio certification is required for some jobs, especially if you'll be using the radio as part of an air-to-ground communications platform. These types of jobs may include situations in which you communicate with helicopter or airplane pilots engaged in fighting wildfires or in military field operations.
Of course, reading this article won't give you the certification, but it will help you get prepped to ace a course in radio communications (for more on safety training options, see Safety Training Eating Up Your Budget?).
First, you should get to know the various different types of radios you could be using at work. There are walkie-talkie radios, hand-held radios, and other types, so do a little research on the various models and find one that suits your style and needs the best.
All radios have various channel options, so you can talk on an alternate channel if one of the channels is in use by another party. This is a critical feature, but it can also make communication confusing. Many people will continue to talk without ever receiving a reply, and chances are good that a non-reply is due to being on the wrong channel. It is always important to identify your preferred channel with your co-workers so you are able to communicate. It may also be necessary to identify some back-up channels in case unrelated users happen on the same channel or there are too many crews on a single channel to effectively communicate.
Once you've figured our your preferred channel, you are ready to send and receive messages. Since many worksites often have more than one worker on a channel, it is important to exercise some restraint. Avoid long, drawn-out conversations. Save the coffee or water-cooler talk for when you see each other in person, rather than tying up the radio channels.
Do not talk over someone else. If you hear someone talking, wait until you hear them stop before chiming in.
Be aware that others could listen in. Since many radio channels are open to the public and monitored via scanners and other devices, it is important to never give out confidential or private information since this information can be easily received by third parties.
Always check your battery to ensure a good level of energy, and always carry a backup battery. If there is an emergency and your battery has died, it could make the difference between life and death for your co-worker, so always keep a good battery on hand.
Check in on a regular schedule. Check in with your co-workers every hour or couple of hours to make sure the work is being carried out safely and that the radios are in good working order.
Get to know the short language of radio communications. Clarity, simplicity, and brevity are the core rules for the language of radio communication. Though some sites have their own language that evolved either across their industry or at their particular company, most share a common base. You're probably aware of some of them, like saying "over" to tell the listener you are done speaking or saying "copy" to signal that you understood what was said. "Say again" is a simple way to get the speaker to repeat what they just said, and "break, break, break" is an important one to know – it is used to silence all conversation on the channel to communicate an emergency.
Radios can make communication within a large job site a breeze. It closes the physical gaps and can keep information flowing. On any job site, you want to familiarize yourself with the channel or channels your company uses, make sure your equipment is in working order with backup power, and put in a little extra effort to learn some of the radio language that helps with clarity, simplicity, and brevity.
If everyone follows the protocols, approaches it with respect, and avoids clogging up the channel with unnecessary chatter, radio communication can stay clear and make for a safer job (for related reading, check out Improving Communication and Response Time).


We invite the best trainers who use the latest techniques to insire our players to develop towards their maximum potential. This summer will be our seventh year of training soccer players to prepare and achieve in their fall seasons.
5 nights of soccer fun! Print out the waiver, fill it out, and send it in along with payment to ensure your place at camp. Our primary focus is to develop a love for the game of soccer while building individual skills.
The High School camp is the best way to prepare your team for the upcoming season. We work hard and play harder. This camp is for serious competitors who are looking for an edge to the upcoming season. We invite special guest trainers and coaches from college and professional teams.
Our past teams have reaped the benefits of our double session camp and thrived throughout the following season. Our previous camps have had special guests from SkyBlue FC, Ramapo College, and Parisi Speed School.
There is a place for everyone! We believe that sports and being a part of a team are a great way to develop lifetime competitors. We hope to help our players to achieve all of thier life's goals.


We deliver LiDAR to enable the autonomous vehicle revolution.
Baraja builds revolutionary LiDAR to support revolutionary thinkers.
Baraja is expanding globally, with offices in Australia, the U.S. and China. We are an international team coming from a broad range of industries that make us unusually good at solving LiDAR's challenges. Want to join the team? We're hiring! Send us an email at jobs@baraja.com.
Baraja has been operating in stealth since 2016, collaborating with juggernauts in OEM and ride sharing.
We've been able to rapidly iterate the technology thanks to close collaboration with customers and key partners.
Baraja founders Federico Collarte and Cibby Pulikkaseril bring a wealth of expertise in photonics and product development to the company.


We are enlisted as top company involved in manufacturing and supplying of sweet packaging box in Bangalore, India. Our product range includes a broad array of cardboard sweet packaging box, fancy sweet box, sweet corrugated packaging box, and sweet gift packaging box. In their making process, we use only top-notch quality material and use the latest tools and machinery. Besides this, we test these boxes on a variety of grounds before dispatching and shipping them at the destination of our clients. These are come up with modern design preferable for packing, storing, takeaway and gifting.


LAFC today announced that Partial Ticket Plans and single match tickets for the Club's second season at Banc of California Stadium in the Heart of Los Angeles will go on-sale to the general public this week.
Partial Ticket Plans go on sale Monday, Feb. 4 at 10 a.m. via Ticketmaster.
A Partial Ticket Plan allows fans to choose between five of 10 selected matches, and along with a Season Ticket Membership, is the only way to guarantee a seat for LAFC's Home Opener vs. Sporting Kansas City on March 3 or for the match-up against the Galaxy on Aug. 25 once single game tickets are sold out.
A limited amount of single-match tickets are available to the general public on Thursday, Feb, 7 at 1 p.m. PT via Ticketmaster.
LAFC Full Season Memberships are still available and interested fans can place a deposit.
Season Memberships start as low as $442 for all 17 home matches and include Member Benefits such as exclusive access to LAFC events, priority pricing and pre-sale ticketing. Members only pre-sale for 2019 single match tickets begins on Wednesday, Feb. 6.
Last season, LAFC sold out all 17 MLS games at Banc of California Stadium, averaging 22,042 fans at the new state-of-the-art venue. Over 450,000 fans enjoyed the most unique fan experience in Los Angeles sports in the 22 matches held at the stadium in 2018.


The freedom to travel with all the conveniences of home is a great adventure; however, it is safer if it is accompanied with a motor home insurance coverage policy. RV insurance includes all types of recreational vehicles like your motor home, travel trailer, fifth wheel or medium duty tow vehicle. The Great Outdoors offers so much to see and experience that you should not have to worry about the financial woes of insuring your motor home. Copeland Insurance Group can help ease your concern and assist you in obtaining a policy that fits your needs so you can sit back, relax and enjoy your next adventure in your R.V.
Don't be fooled in thinking that your auto insurance policy will cover your RV adequately. Not many cars can haul over 100 pounds of fuel and 300 gallons of water. Your RV requires specialized motor home insurance to cover all the different features it possesses vs. your typical automobile.
Copeland Insurance Group can assist you in obtaining policies with standard and optional coverage that isn't found in your standard auto policy. Some are listed below.
Total Loss Replacement Coverage that protects your motor home from the effects of depreciation. If your new-model motor home is destroyed within its first five years, most carriers will replace with a similar model at no cost to you– no matter what it costs.
Emergency Expenses Coverage that pays for lodging or travel home if your RV is damaged or destroyed by a covered loss more than 50 miles from home.
Replacement Cost Coverage on any personal items that may be stolen, damaged or destroyed.
Towing and Roadside Assistance – Towing, jump starts, roadside service, flat tire changes, fuel delivery, and locksmith services are available through this option.
Call today to learn about other coverages for your RV and talk to an experienced Copeland Insurance agent now to get you started on your next journey on the road!