text:
All Cases page 166
You are here: BAILII >> Browse A-Z title lists >> All Cases page 166
Dudeney v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Penalty) [2016] UKFTT 680 (TC) (12 October 2016)
Dudfield, R (On the Application Of) v Forest of Dean District Council [2016] EWHC 291 (Admin) (19 February 2016)
Dudgeon and Martin v. Thomson and Patrick [1854] UKHL 1_Macqueen_714 (1 August 1854)
Dudgeon v. Elliot [1881] SLR 19_154 (30 November 1881)
Dudgeon Offshore Wind Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Ors [2012] EWHC 861 (Admin) (Hearing 23 March 2012)
DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 7525/76 [1981] ECHR 5 (22 October 1981)
DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (ARTICLE 50) - 7525/76 [1983] ECHR 2 (24 February 1983)
Dudgeon v. Thomson & Co [1876] SLR 13_384_1 (17 March 1876)
Dudgeon v. Thomson and Donaldson [1876] SLR 13_629 (5 July 1876)
Dudgeon v. Thomson &Co [1876] SLR 14_175 (22 December 1876)
DUDICOVA v. SLOVAKIA - 15592/03 [2009] ECHR 27 (8 January 2009)
DUDIN v. RUSSIA - 9673/09 (Judgment : Article 5 - Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee) [2018] ECHR 274 (03 April 2018)
DUDKA v. UKRAINE - 55912/09 (Judgment : Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee) [2018] ECHR 984 (04 December 2018)
Dudko v The Government of the Russian Federation [2010] EWHC 1125 (Admin) (19 May 2010)
Dudley & Anor & Ors, R (on the application of) v East Sussex County Council [2003] EWHC 1093 (Admin) (16 April 2003)
Dudley and West Midlands Zoological Society Limited (Other ) [2017] UKICO FS50671480 (27 April 2017)
Dudley Bower Building Services Ltd v. Lowe & Ors [2003] UKEAT 856_01_1802 (18 February 2003)
Dudley College of Technology (Education) [2019] UKICO fs50848755 (17 December 2019)
Dudley Ernest Lyncoln Wager Felix v The General Dental Council (The Disciplinary Committee of the General Dental Council) [1960] UKPC 17 (11 May 1960)
Dudley v. Her Majesty's Advocate [2003] ScotHC 5 (7 February 2003)
Dudley Holder (Reasons) v The Queen (Barbados) [1978] UKPC 17 (11 July 1978)
Dudley House Westmoreland Street - Westminster : London (No Fault Right to Manage) [2014] EWLVT LON_LV_NFR_00BK_0007 (25 July 2014)
Dudley Joiner & Anor v George & Ors [2001] EWCA Civ 749 (11 May 2001)
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (Decision Notice) [2013] UKICO FS50470517 (11 March 2013)
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (Decision Notice) [2014] UKICO FS50523870 (14 April 2014)
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v Hill [2018] EWCOP 35 (16 July 2018)
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v JS [2011] UKUT 67 (AAC) (11 February 2011)
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (Local government (Borough council)) [2016] UKICO FS50622046 (23 June 2016)
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2012] EWHC 1729 (Admin) (25 June 2012)
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v Shurvinton & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 346 (21 March 2012)
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (Undertakings ) [2014] UKICO 2014-54 (25 April 2014)
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (Undertakings) [2014] UKICO 2014-13 (25 April 2014)
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (Undertakings) [2014] UKICO 2014-67 (01 December 2014)
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v Willetts & Ors (Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKEAT 0334_16_3107 (31 July 2017)
Dudley Muslim Association v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 1123 (05 November 2015)
Dudley v Peterborough City Council [1996] UKEAT 732_94_0507 (5 July 1996)
Dudman Group Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKFTT 52 (TC) (17 April 2009)
Dudman Group Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 77 (TC) (06 February 2013)
Dudman Group Ltd v Revenue & Customs (Rev 1) [2011] UKFTT 771 (TC) (30 November 2011)
DUDNICHENKO AND WAES v. RUSSIA - 49507/10 (Judgment : Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review)) [2017] ECHR 325 (06 April 2017)
DUDNIKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 63928/13 (Judgment : Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect)) [2017] ECHR 428 (04 May 2017)
DUDNIKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - 24686/07 (Judgment : Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Art...) [2017] ECHR 340 (06 April 2017)
DUDNYK v. UKRAINE - 17985/04 [2009] ECHR 2052 (10 December 2009)
Dudson v Deepdene School [1997] UKEAT 674_97_0610 (6 October 1997)
Dudson, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2003] EWHC 2797 (Admin) (21 November 2003)
Dudson, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 52 (28 July 2005)
DUDU CALKAN v. TURKEY - 19660/92 [2002] ECHR 358 (28 March 2002)
DUDYK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - 10288/07 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Fifth Section Committee)) [2017] ECHR 26 (12 January 2017)
Dudzik v Fisher Metal (NI) Ltd [2013] NIIT 00341_13IT (03 July 2013)
Duell v Customs and Excise [2005] UKVAT(Excise) E00850 (17 February 2005)
Duferco Long Products v Commission (Judgment) French Text [2018] EUECJ T-93/17 (18 September 2018)
Dufey, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2342 (Admin) (27 April 2017)
Duff v - . [1745] 5 Brn 741 (11 January 1745)
Duff & Anor v. Kiel & Anor [2006] ScotSC 89 (29 November 2006)
Duff & Co. v. The Iron and Steel Fencing and Buildings Co., Ltd [1891] SLR 29_186 (1 December 1891)
Duff v Alves. [1631] Mor 2188 (12 March 1631)
Duff v Alves. [1631] Mor 3869 (8 March 1631)
Duff and Brown v Forbes of Culloden. [1671] Mor 12428 (14 December 1671)
Duff and Dalgardno v Taylors of Edinbugh. [1684] Mor 3507 (27 February 1684)
Duff and Others v. The S.S. "Overdale" Co., Ltd [1915] UKHL 849 (02 July 1915)
Duff v Boyd and Wilson. [1629] Mor 12547 (26 March 1629)
Duff v Brodie. [1769] Mor 9644 (29 June 1769)
Duff v Chapman. [1755] Mor 10046 (19 February 1755)
Duff v Dumfries And Galloway [2012] ScotCS CSIH_45 (18 May 2012)
Duff v Dunne [2004] IEHC 151 (6 July 2004)
Duff v. Earl of Seafield [1883] SLR 21_66 (9 November 1883)
Duff v East Dunbartonshire Council & Ors [1999] ScotCS 132 (1 June 1999)
Duff v Egerton [2002] NICh 4 (23 January 2002)
Duff v. Fleming [1870] SLR 7_480 (18 May 1870)
Duff v Forbes. [1671] Mor 12558 (5 December 1671)
Duff v Fowler. [1672] Mor 10282 (16 July 1672)
Duff v Gordon. [1807] Mor 21_37 (27 June 1807)
Duff v Kellie. [1624] 1 Brn 15 (23 March 1624)
Duff v. Merrick Homes Ltd [2003] ScotCS 76 (18 March 2003)
Duff v. Minister for Agriculture and Food [1999] IEHC 140 (25th March, 1999)
Duff v. Minister for Agriculture and Food [1999] IEHC 170 (3rd June, 1999)
Duff v. Minister for Agriculture and Food [1999] IEHC 190 (11th August, 1999)
Duff of Bracco v Innes of Auchluncart. [1686] Mor 10342 (00 March 1686)
Duff of Braco v Abstracters. [1682] Mor 15986 (00 March 1682)
Duff of Braco v Arthur Forbes. [1687] 3 Brn 621 (25 June 1687)
Duff of Braco v Duke of Gordon. [1735] 1 Elchies 367 (11 February 1735)
Duff of Cubbin v His Creditors. [1736] 1 Elchies 350 (25 June 1736)
Duff of Drummoir v Gordon of Achintoul. [1707] Mor 3775 (12 June 1707)
Duff of Drummuire v Innes of Coxtoun. [1683] 2 Brn 37 (00 March 1683)
Duff of Kilmuir v the Representatives of Bell. [1742] Mor 1059 (22 July 1742)
Duff v Ogilvie. [1734] Mor 198 (19 July 1734)
Duff v. Pirie [1893] SLR 31_118 (14 November 1893)
Duff, R. v [2002] EWCA Crim 2117 (30 July 2002)
Duff, R (on the application of) v The Master, Fellows and Scholars of the College of the Holy and Undivided Trinity Within the Town and University of Cambridge of King Henry VIII's Foundation & Ors [2015] EWHC 1605 (Admin) (12 June 2015)
Duff, Re Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1913 [2013] ScotCS CSIH_112 (18 December 2013)
Duff, Re Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1913 [2013] ScotCS CSOH_101 (25 June 2013)
Duff, Ross & Co. v. Kippen [1871] SLR 8_299 (14 January 1871)
Duff, Ross, and Co., and Another v. Kippen and Another [1866] SLR 2_3_1 (15 May 1866)
Duff v Sir George Abercrombie. [1807] Mor 21_29 (10 February 1807)
Duff v. Strang [2008] ScotHC HCJAC_04 (23 January 2008)
Duff v. Strang [2008] ScotHC HCJAC_4 (23 January 2008)
Duff v The Director of Public Prosecutions [2009] EWHC 675 (Admin) (05 March 2009)
Duff v. The National Telephone Co. (Ltd) [1889] SLR 26_512 (14 May 1889)
Duff v The Taylors. [1684] Mor 11386 (00 February 1684)
Duff-Dunbar's Trustees v. Wares [1919] SLR 1 (15 October 1919)
DUFFER (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2011] UKIntelP o24111 (8 July 2011)
Duffett v McEvoy (Victoria) [1885] UKPC 1 (5 February 1885)
Duffield & Anor v Gandy [2008] EWCA Civ 379 (17 April 2008)
Duffield v Constructa-Stor Installation Services Ltd [1993] UKEAT 1026_93_0405 (4 May 1993)
Duffield v Cumbria & Lancashire Strategic Health Authority [2005] EWHC 1986 (QB) (14 November 2005)
Duffield v Customs & Excise [2003] UKVAT(Excise) E00454 (05 August 2003)
Duffield v Duffield [2007] EWLands LP_36_2006 (10 July 2007)
Duffield Morgan Ltd v. Historic Scotland [2004] ScotCS 32 (13 February 2004)
Duffield Parish Council (Decision Notice) [2006] UKICO FS50083794 (10 April 2006)
Duffield, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 1004 (30 April 2009)
Duffield v The Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2009] UKFTT 170 (HESC) (27 July 2009)
Duffill and another v Duffill (Natal) [1903] UKPC 47 (7 July 1903)
Duffin v. Deloitte and Touche Wealth Management Ltd [2003] UKEAT 0453_03_2409 (24 September 2003)
Duffin (Elizabeth), James Crawford and Mary Agnes Dempsey [2016] NICh 5 (04 Feb 2016)
Duffin v. Minister for Justice [1997] IEHC 43 (28th February, 1997)
Duffin Transport v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 561 (TC) (7 October 2013)
Duffs v Duff. [1745] Mor 5429 (5 June 1745)
Duff's Trustees and Others v. Leighton's Executor [1908] SLR 349 (23 January 1908)
Duffus v Forrester. [1628] Mor 3166 (2 February 1628)
Duffus v. National Water Commission (Jamaica) [2007] UKPC 35 (19 April 2007)
Duffy & Anor v. Deery & Ors [2003] IEHC 618 (15 April 2003)
Duffy & anor v Kavanagh & anor [2019] IEHC 798 (14 November 2019)
Duffy & Anor, R v [2012] NICC 1 (20 January 2012)
Duffy & Anor v Sunday Newspapers Ltd & Ors [2017] NIQB 71 (19 July 2017)
Duffy & Ors, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1436 (13 June 2008)
Duffy & Ors, R v [2015] NICC 13 (22 October 2015)
Duffy & Ors, R v [2019] NICC 10 (4 April 2019)
Duffy v AG [1994] JCA 029 (11 February 1994)
Duffy (AP) v Lanarkshire Health Board [2001] ScotCS 52 (7 March 2001)
Duffy (AP) v Secretary Of State For Scotland [1999] ScotCS 40 (3 February 1999)
Duffy v Brown [2007] NIIT 715_06 (13 March 2007)
Duffy v Chief Constable of Cleveland Police [2007] EWHC 3169 (Admin) (06 December 2007)
Duffy (Colin) & Ors, Re Judicial Review (No 2) [2011] NIQB 16 (24 February 2011)
Duffy v Cosgrave (Redundancy Pay) [2002] NIIT 126_02 (14 June 2002)
Duffy v Council for Catholic Maintaine...The Board of Governors of St A... [2018] NIIT 02952_17IT (08 February 2018)
Duffy v. Electricity Supply Board [1999] IEHC 218 (18th February, 1999)
Duffy v Enterprise Engineering Services Ltd [2008] ScotCS CSOH_141 (03 October 2008)
Duffy v Firstsource Solutions Ltd [2015] NIIT 02256_14IT (06 August 2015)
Duffy v. Garda Commissioner [1998] IEHC 114; [1999] 2 IR 81 (10th July, 1998)
Duffy v George [2013] EWCA Civ 908 (23 July 2013)
Duffy v George (Unfair Dismissal) [2012] UKEAT 0517_11_1910 (19 October 2012)
Duffy v HM Advocate [2015] ScotHC HCJAC_29 (18 March 2015)
Duffy v Kennedy [2007] NIIT 823_05 (10 May 2007)
Duffy v Lamb (t/a Vic Lamb Developments) [1997] EWCA Civ 1373 (10 April 1997)
Duffy v. Mungle [1871] SLR 8_535 (6 June 1871)
Duffy v Nortel Networks UK Ltd (in adm... [2015] NIIT 6455_09IT (23 March 2015)
Duffy v Northumbria Police Authority [1996] UKEAT 1114_95_2904 (29 April 1996)
Duffy v Omagh District Council [2010] NIIT 01631_10IT (21 February 2011)
Duffy v Pat Devine Homes Ltd [2009] NIIT 6798_09IT (18 December 2009)
DUFFY v PF GLASGOW [2014] ScotHC HCJAC_81 (24 July 2014)
Duffy v POA [2008] NIIT 1065_06IT (23 September 2008)
Duffy v POA [2009] NIIT 1065_06IT (09 January 2009)
Duffy v Port Ramsgate Ltd. [2004] EWHC 9008 (Costs) (25 February 2004)
Duffy v PPS [2012] NIIT 01834_11IT (05 April 2012)
Duffy v Property Management Services [2002] NIIT 2587_01 (18 November 2002)
Duffy, R (on the application of) v HM Deputy Coroner for the County of Worcestershire & Anor [2013] EWHC 1654 (Admin) (19 June 2013)
Duffy, RE [2008] UKHL 4 (30 January 2008)
Duffy, Re Application for Judicial Review [2006] NICA 28_1 (09 June 2006)
Duffy, Re Application for Judicial Review [2006] NIQB 29 (11 May 2006)
Duffy, Re Judicial Review (Rev 1) [2016] NIQB 77 (22 September 2016)
Duffy v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKSPC SPC00596 (05 March 2007)
Duffy v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 405 (TC) (22 June 2011)
Duffy v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 399 (TC) (23 July 2013)
Duffy v. Ridley Properties Ltd. & Anor [2005] IEHC 314 (7 July 2005)
Duffy v. Ridley Properties Ltd. & Anor [2005] IEHC 315 (7 October 2005)
Duffy v. Ritchie, Menzies & Co [1871] SLR 8_662 (18 July 1871)
Duffy v. Rooney [1997] IEHC 102 (23rd June, 1997)
Duffy v Rubbertec International Limite... [2010] NIIT 1799_10IT (23 November 2010)
Duffy v Secretary of State for Health [2015] EWHC 867 (QB) (27 March 2015)
Duffy v Stripes Solicitors (a firm) [2011] EWHC B17 (QB) (10 May 2011)
Duffy v Stripes Solicitors (a firm) No. 2 [2011] EWHC B18 (QB) (10 June 2011)
DUFFY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM and one other application - 29062/12 - HECOM [2012] ECHR 1803 (24 September 2012)
Duffy v Ulsterbus Ltd [2007] NIFET 84_01 (30 March 2007)
Duffy -v- Clare County Council & anor [2016] IEHC 618 (08 November 2016)
Duffy -v- Clare County Council & Ors [2013] IEHC 51 (08 February 2013)
Duffy -v- Enviromental Protection Agency [2014] IEHC 405 (11 July 2014)
Duffy -v- Irish Progressive Life Assurance Company Ltd & Ors [2010] IEHC 27 (29 January 2010)
Duffy -v- Laois County Council [2014] IEHC 469 (29 October 2014)
Duffy -v- Liffey Meats (Cavan) [2017] IEHC 103 (22 February 2017)
Duffy -v- Lyons [2017] IEHC 390 (31 May 2017)
Duffy -v- Ridley Properties & anor [2008] IESC 23 (30 April 2008)
Duffy -v- Road Safety Authority & ors [2015] IEHC 579 (21 September 2015)
Duffy v. Waterford Corporation [1999] IEHC 241 (21st July, 1999)
Duffy v Yeomans & Partners Ltd [1993] UKEAT 530_91_0704 (7 April 1993)
Duffy v. Young [1904] SLR 42_40 (03 November 1904)
Dufoo v Tolaini & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 1536 (27 November 2014)
DUFOORT v. BELGIUM - 43653/09 - HEJUD (French text) [2013] ECHR 35 (10 January 2013)
Dufosse v Melbry Events [2011] EWCA Civ 1711 (14 December 2011)
Dufour v ECB French Text [2011] EUECJ T-436/09 (26 October 2011)
Dugald Campbell v Neil Macgibbon and Colin Campbell. [1780] Mor 1139 (10 August 1780)
Dugan & Anor v Porter Property Ltd [2018] NICh 21 (26 October 2018)
Dugan v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Employment income) [2016] UKFTT 618 (TC) (26 August 2016)
Dugdale v Kraft Foods Ltd [1976] UKEAT 277_76_1076 (28 October 1976)
Dugdale Plc v. G Cartlidge [2007] UKEAT 0508_06_2004 (20 April 2007)
Dugdale v Woolworths Plc [1999] UKEAT 1498_98_1003 (10 March 1999)
Duggal v Connex South Eastern Ltd [1997] UKEAT 265_97_2511 (25 November 1997)
Duggal v. Connex South Eastern Ltd [2000] UKEAT 639_99_1412 (14 December 2000)
Duggan & Anor v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT(Excise) E00796 (08 October 2004)
Duggan v. Bank of Ireland [1998] IEHC 124 (29th July, 1998)
Duggan v. Bourke & Ors [1986] IEHC 32 (30 May 1986)
Duggan v Coroner for Northern District of Greater London [2010] EWHC 1263 (Admin) (20 May 2010)
Duggan v Crossgar Poultry Ltd (Unfair Dismissal) [2002] NIIT 1879_01 (14 June 2002)
Duggan v HM Prison Full Sutton & Anor [2004] EWCA Civ 78 (10 February 2004)
Duggan v. Irish Auditing and Accounting Supervisory Authority [2019] IEHC 748 (08 November 2019)
Duggan v McDonald & ors [2016] IEHC 413 (19 July 2016)
Duggan v McGaffin (Breach of Contract - Unfair Dismissa) [2019] NIIT 07719_19IT (27 September 2019)
Duggan, R (on the application of) v HM Assistant Deputy Coroner for the Northern District of Greater London & Ors [2014] EWHC 3343 (Admin) (14 October 2014)
Duggan, R (on the application of) v HM Assistant Deputy Coroner for the Northern District of Greater London & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 142 (29 March 2017)
Duggan, Re Judicial Review [2012] NIQB 78 (26 October 2012)
Duggan v Revenue & Customs [2015] UKFTT 125 (TC) (18 March 2015)
Duggan v Roulston & McLaughlin Ltd & Ors [2005] NIIT 302_04 (22 July 2005)
Duggan v. Stoneworth Investment Ltd. [2001] IEHC 174 (7th December, 2001)
Duggan -v- Commissioner of an Garda Siochana, Ireland and the Attorney General [2017] IEHC 565 (06 October 2017)
Duggan -v- O'Leary & anor [2015] IEHC 223 (11 March 2015)
Duggan v Wood [2001] EWCA Civ 1942 (22 November 2001)
Dugmore v Swansea National Health Trust & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1755 (21 November 2002)
Dugmore v Swansea NHS Trust & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1689 (21 November 2002)
Duguid v Farquharson. [1748] Mor 14536 (16 June 1748)
Duguid v Fraser [1941] ScotHC HCJAC_2 (17 September 1941)
Duguid v Macombie. [1749] 1 Elchies 329 (7 December 1749)
Duguid, Re Fatal Accidents Sudden Deaths Inquiry [2003] ScotSC 39 (08 July 2003)
Duguid v Secretary Of State For Environment, Transport & Regions & Anor [2000] EWCA Civ 241 (28 July 2000)
DUHAMEL v. FRANCE - 15110/02 [2006] ECHR 369 (11 April 2006)
Duhan -v- Radius Television Production Ltd & Ors [2007] IEHC 292 (18 July 2007)
Duhaney & Anor, R v [1997] EWCA Crim 2826 (5th November, 1997)
Duhoe v Support Services Group Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction/Reasons/Burns-Barke) [2015] UKEAT 0102_15_1308 (13 August 2015)
Duhra & Ors (as partners) v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 322 (TC) (13 May 2011)
Duignan v. Carway [2000] IEHC 195 (27th July, 2000)
Duignan v. Carway [2001] IESC 74 (31 July 2001)
Duignan v. Carway [2002] IEHC 1 (23rd January, 2002)
Duignan v. Dudgeon & Ors [2005] IEHC 348 (14 October 2005)
DUINHOF AND DUIJF v. THE NETHERLANDS - 9626/81;9736/82 [1984] ECHR 6 (22 May 1984)
DUJAK AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - 17303/15 (Judgment : Article 6 - Right to a fair trial : Fourth Section Committee) [2019] ECHR 119 (07 February 2019)
Duka v Duka [2003] EWHC 1262 (Admin) (16 May 2003)
Dukali v Colin Morrow [2015] NIIT 1315_14IT (04 March 2015)
Dukali v Lamrani [2012] EWHC 1748 (Fam) (15 March 2012)
Duke and Duchess of Hamilton v Scotts. [1664] Mor 14766 (24 June 1664)
Duke and Duchess of Monmouth v the Earl of Tweedale. [1677] Mor 349 (14 February 1677)
Duke and Dutchess of Buccleugh v The Earl of Tweeddale. [1677] Mor 2369 (14 February 1677)
Duke and Dutchess of Monmouth v Earl of Tweeddale. [1677] Mor 5625 (14 February 1677)
Duke and Dutchess of Monmouth v Scot of Clerkington. [1667] Mor 12266 (12 November 1667)
Duke v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT(Excise) E00741 (04 June 2004)
Duke v GEC Reliance Ltd [1987] UKHL 10 (11 February 1987)
Duke Hamilton v Countess of Callendar [1687] Mor 10444 (12 January 1687)
Duke Hamilton v Lady Callander. [1686] Mor 2211 (15 December 1686)
Duke Hamilton v Lady Callender. [1687] Mor 9323 (00 July 1687)
Duke Hamilton v Maxwell of Monreith. [1668] Mor 13067 (29 February 1668)
Duke Hamilton v The Laird of Allardine. [1667] Mor 13064 (6 December 1667)
Duke v. Jackson [1921] SLR 299 (29 January 1921)
Duke v Martin Retail Group Plc [1993] UKEAT 647_92_1712 (17 December 1993)
Duke v North Eastern Education & Libr... [2012] NIIT 00399_12IT (11 June 2012)
Duke of Abercorn and Sir W. H. Dick Cunyngham, Bart. v. Rev. Henry Duff, Clerk of Presbytery of Edinburgh [1870] SLR 7_419 (17 March 1870)
Duke of Abercorn and Sir. W. H. Dick. Cunynghame v. Rev. Henry Doff [1869] SLR 6_563 (11 June 1869)
Duke of Abercorn v. Merry & Cuninghame, Ltd [1909] SLR 574 (12 March 1909)
Duke of Argyill v Campbell. [1736] 2 Elchies 235 (27 July 1736)
Duke of Argyle v. Campbell. [1819] ScotJCR 2_Murray_103 (12 March 1819)
Duke of Argyle v Feuers of Sheardale. [1788] Mor 6573 (21 November 1788)
Duke of Argyle v M'Quorquadale. [1722] Mor 12017 (20 December 1723)
Duke of Argyle v Representatives of the Lord Halcraig. [1723] Mor 2929 (24 July 1723)
Duke of Argyle v Sir Alexander Murray. [1739] Mor 13526 (7 December 1739)
Duke of Argyle v Sir Alexander Murray. [1740] 5 Brn 692 (5 February 1740)
Duke of Argyle v Sir Alexander Murray, &c. [1739] 5 Brn 680 (8 December 1739)
Duke of Argyle, v Sir Allan M'Lean. [1781] Mor 15828 (29 June 1781)
Duke of Argyle v The Creditors of Tarbert. [1762] Mor 14495 (5 February 1762)
Duke of Argyll and Others, Petitioners [1896] SLR 33_731 (9 July 1896)
Duke of Argyll and Trustee - Dr. Lushingto - Tinney v. Alexander Macalister Esq. of Loup, and Factor loco tutoris - Lord Advocate (Jeffrey - Follett [1832] UKHL 6_WS_98 (12 July 1832)
Duke of Argyll v. Bullough [1904] SLR 41_737 (07 July 1904)
Duke of Argyll v. Campbell and Another [1912] SLR 487 (06 February 1912)
Duke of Argyll v Campbell, (Douglas.) [1736] 1 Elchies 176 (27 July 1736)
Duke of Argyll v. Campbeltown Coal Co., Ltd [1924] SLR 555 (27 June 1924)
Duke of Argyll v. Dalgleish's Trustees [1873] SLR 10_403 (16 May 1873)
Duke of Argyll v. Graham's Trustees [1912] SLR 442 (10 February 1912)
Duke of Argyll v. Riddell [1911] SLR 342 (11 March 1911)
Duke of Athole v Duchess Dowager. [1756] Mor 7766 (20 July 1756)
Duke of Athole v. Menzies [1890] SLR 27_595 (20 March 1890)
Duke of Athole v. M'Inroy and Others (M'Inroy's Trustees) [1890] SLR 27_341 (24 January 1890)
Duke of Athole v. Robertson [1878] SLR 15_585 (4 June 1878)
Duke of Athole v. Stewart [1890] SLR 27_590 (20 March 1890)
Duke of Athole v The Duchess. [1756] Mor 15680 (24 July 1756)
Duke of Athole v. The Lord Advocate and Another [1880] SLR 17_804 (20 July 1880)
Duke of Atholl and Others v. Glover Incorporation of Perth and Others [1899] SLR 36_481 (3 March 1899)
Duke of Atholl and Others v. Wedderburn and Others [1899] SLR 36_477 (3 March 1899)
Duke of Atholl v. Glover Incorporation of Perth [1900] SLR 38_58 (13 November 1900)
Duke of Atholl v. Glover Incorporation of Perth [1900] UKHL 686 (28 May 1900)
Duke of Atholl v. Torrie and Others [1852] UKHL 1_Macqueen_65 (4 June 1852)
Duke of Bedford v. Earl of Galloway's Executor [1904] SLR 41_804 (08 July 1904)
Duke of Buccleuch and Another v. Smith and Others [1911] SLR 300 (18 January 1911)
Duke of Buccleuch and Others v. Cowan and Others [1866] SLR 1_141_1 (6 February 1866)
Duke of Buccleuch and Others v. Cowan and Others [1866] SLR 2_253 (30 July 1866)
Duke of Buccleuch and Others v. Cowan and Others [1873] SLR 10_494 (3 June 1873)
Duke of Buccleuch and Others v. Cowan and Others [1873] SLR 10_513 (13 June 1873)
Duke of Buccleuch and Others v. Cowan and Others (ante, p. 141) [1866] SLR 1_163 (15 February 1866)
Duke of Buccleuch and Others v. James Brown & Co. - (Esk Pollution) [1874] SLR 11_642 (27 June 1874)
Duke of Buccleuch and Others v. Kean [1890] SLR 27_695 (30 May 1890)
Duke of Buccleuch and Queens-Berry and Another (Trustees of Rosyth Royal Naval Depot Canadian Fund) v. The Admiralty, Petitioners [1924] SLR 176 (26 January 1924)
Duke of Buccleuch v. Boyd [1890] SLR 28_19 (21 October 1890)
Duke of Buccleuch v. Cowan & Others [1866] SLR 3_61_1 (28 November 1866)
Duke of Buccleuch v. Cowan and Others [1867] SLR 3_138 (21 December 1867)
Duke of Buccleuch v. Cowan and Others (ante, pp. 141, 163) [1866] SLR 1_180 (23 February 1866)
Duke of Buccleuch v Earl of Tweeddale. [1677] Mor 11460 (14 February 1677)
Duke of Buccleuch v. Gilmerton Gas Coal Co., Ltd [1894] SLR 31_528 (8 March 1894)
Duke of Buccleuch v Laird of Thirlston. [1672] Mor 13469 (29 November 1672)
Duke of Buccleuch v. Montgomery and others, &c. [1817] UKHL 5_Dow_293 (9 July 1817)
Duke of Buccleuch v. The Magistrates and Town Council of Sanquhar [1865] SLR 1_72 (13 December 1865)
Duke of Buccleuch v The Officers of State. [1768] Mor 10711 (5 August 1768)
Duke of Buccleuch v The Officers of State. [1770] Mor 10751 (1 February 1770)
Duke of Buccleuch v. Tod's Trustees [1871] SLR 8_662_1 (18 July 1871)
Duke of Buccleugh and Queensberry v. John Hyslop, Tenant in Halscar [1817] UKHL 6_Paton_350a (10 July 1817)
Duke of Buccleugh v Feuars of Dalkeith. [1744] 1 Elchies 470 (1 February 1744)
Duke of Buccleugh v Parishioners of Hassendein. [1671] Mor 12401 (22 June 1671)
Duke of Buccleugh v The Officers of State. [1768] Hailes 237 (5 August 1768)
Duke of Buccleugh v The Officers of State. [1770] Hailes 333 (31 January 1770)
Duke of Buccleugh v Vint and Others. [1766] Mor 16053 (25 June 1766)
Duke of Douglas and Mr James Baillie v Baillie of Littlegill. [1740] 2 Elchies 128 (2 February 1740)
Duke of Douglas v Ballie of Littlegill. [1740] Mor 2474 (2 February 1740)
Duke of Douglas, &c. v Baillie. [1740] 1 Elchies 97 (2 February 1740)
Duke of Douglas v Creditors of Littlegill. [1746] 5 Brn 744 (7 November 1746)
Duke of Douglas v Elliot of Woolie [1738] Mor 15656 (1 February 1738)
Duke of Douglas v Elliot of Woolie. [1738] Mor 15739 (1 February 1738)
Duke of Douglas v Lockhart of Lee. [1717] Mor 4343 (18 February 1717)
Duke of Douglas v Lockhart of Lee. [1753] Mor 7638 (6 February 1753)
Duke of Douglas v Lord Torphichen. [1735] 1 Elchies 290 (5 December 1735)
Duke of Douglas v Officers of State. [1740] 1 Elchies 468 (16 July 1740)
Duke of Douglas v the Other Creditors of Littleoil. [1742] Mor 17033 (23 November 1742)
Duke of Douglass v Creditors of Lady Jean Douglass. [1752] 5 Brn 803 (28 December 1752)
Duke of Fife v. George (Clerk to Deveron Fishery Board) [1897] SLR 34_440 (23 February 1897)
Duke of Fife v. Great North of Scotland Railway Co. [1897] SLR 35_78 (23 November 1897)
Duke of Gordon and . Ada - Abercrombie v. Reverend James Gillan and . Kea - Wilson [1825] UKHL 1_WS_295 (7 June 1825)
Duke of Gordon and his Curators v his Majesty's Advocate. [1760] Mor 517 (2 January 1760)
Duke of Gordon v Catharine Gordon. [1685] Mor 16694 (20 March 1685)
Duke of Gordon v Duff of Bracco. [1735] Mor 12778 (12 February 1735)
Duke of Gordon v. John Gordon [1759] UKHL 2_Paton_26 (21 March 1759)
Duke of Gordon v Lady Gordon. [1748] 1 Elchies 365 (2 November 1748)
Duke of Gordon v Lady Henrietta Gordon. [1748] Mor 14045 (2 November 1748)
Duke of Gordon v Lauchlan M'Intosh of that Ilk. [1714] Mor 10975 (8 July 1714)
Duke of Gordon v Lochiel. [1687] Mor 4665 (00 July 1687)
Duke of Gordon v M'Pherson [1756] 5 Brn 382 (2 March 1756)
Duke of Gordon v M'Pherson of Clunie. [1714] Mor 16108 (27 January 1714)
Duke of Gordon v Sir James Grant. [1776] Mor 18_7 (10 August 1776)
Duke of Gordon v Sir James Grant. [1776] Mor 7384 (10 August 1776)
Duke of Gordon v The Crown. [1750] Mor 9597 (15 February 1750)
Duke Of Gordon v The officers Of State. [1750] 1 Elchies 439 (15 February 1750)
Duke of Hamilton and Brandon - Lord Advocate (Jeffrey - Follett v. George Robertson Aikman Esq. - Dr. Lushingto - Merewether [1832] UKHL 6_WS_64 (5 July 1832)
Duke of Hamilton and Earl of Selkirk v Archibald Douglas of Douglas. [1761] Mor 14442 (28 November 1761)
Duke of Hamilton and Others v. Common Agent in Locality of Linlithgow [1874] SLR 12_99 (19 November 1874)
Duke of Hamilton and Others v. Rev. J. Scott, D. D. [1813] UKHL 1_Dow_393 (13 July 1813)
Duke of Hamilton, and The Bailie of the Town and Regality of Borrowstownness, v The Trades. [1694] Mor 13072 (19 January 1694)
Duke of Hamilton and Turors, and Earl of Selkirk v Archibald Douglas. [1762] Mor 12350 (9 December 1762)
Duke of Hamilton and Tutors v Archibald Douglas of Douglas. [1762] Mor 10962 (9 December 1762)
Duke of Hamilton v Archibald Douglas. [1765] 5 Brn 913 (9 August 1765)
Duke of Hamilton v. Buchanan [1877] SLR 14_253 (26 January 1877)
Duke of Hamilton v. Buchanan [1877] SLR 14_545 (8 June 1877)
Duke of Hamilton v. Buchanan [1878] UKHL 513 (8 March 1878)
Duke of Hamilton, &c. v Mr Douglas. [1764] 5 Brn 900 (8 August 1764)
Duke of Hamilton v Castlemilk. [1682] Mor 3727 (27 January 1682)
Duke of Hamilton v Countess of Callendar. [1687] Mor 13257 (16 July 1687)
Duke of Hamilton v Douglas of Douglas. [1762] Mor 16956 (9 December 1762)
Duke of Hamilton v. Dunlop and another [1885] UKHL 737 (13 May 1885)
Duke of Hamilton v Earl of Selkirk. [1740] 5 Brn 684 (8 January 1740)
Duke of Hamilton v Earl of Selkirk. [1740] Mor 14935 (8 January 1740)
Duke of Hamilton v Earl of Selkirk and Ruglen. [1740] Mor 5615 (8 January 1740)
Duke of Hamilton v. Graham [1872] SLR 10_61 (21 November 1872)
Duke of Hamilton v. Guild (Potter's Trustee) [1883] SLR 20_735 (6 July 1883)
Duke of Hamilton v. Hamilton and others [1868] SLR 6_111_1 (20 November 1868)
Duke of Hamilton v Hamilton of Wishaw. [1693] 4 Brn 38 (3 January 1693)
Duke of Hamilton v. Johnston [1877] SLR 14_298 (31 January 1877)
Duke of Hamilton v Laird of Clackmannan. [1665] Mor 13092 (14 December 1665)
Duke of Hamilton v Laird of Strichen. [1666] Mor 13093 (00 February 1666)
Duke of Hamilton v Mr John Elies of Elieston. [1684] Mor 9293 (00 March 1684)
Duke of Hamilton, Petitioner v. Buchanan [1878] SLR 15_333 (2 February 1878)
Duke of Hamilton, Petitioner. v. John Graham Barnes Graham, Respondent [1872] SLR 9_304 (2 March 1872)
Duke of Hamilton v The Duke of Buccleugh. [1666] Mor 13063 (28 June 1666)
Duke of Hamilton v The Earl of Selkirk. [1740] Mor 5554 (8 January 1740)
Duke of Hamilton v The Laird of Blackwood. [1669] Mor 7976 (14 July 1669)
Duke of Hamilton v. The Lord Advocate [1892] UKHL 138 (10 November 1892)
Duke of Hamilton v The Tenants of Lesmahago. [1670] 2 Brn 491 (13 July 1670)
Duke of Hamilton's Trustees v. Caledonian Railway Co. [1905] SLR 42_747 (27 June 1905)
Duke of Hamilton's Trustees v. Fullarton and Others [1918] SLR 371 (20 February 1918)
Duke of Hamilton's Trustees v. Hamilton [1918] SLR 364 (20 February 1918)
Duke of Hamilton's Trustees v. Mackinnon and Another [1918] SLR 359 (20 February 1918)
Duke of Hamilton's Trustees v. M'Kelvie [1918] SLR 374 (20 February 1918)
Duke of Hamilton's Trustees v. M'Neill [1918] SLR 329 (20 February 1918)
Duke of Lauderdale v Earl of Tweedals. [1678] Mor 11293 (25 January 1678)
Duke of Lauderdale v Lord and Lady Yester. [1676] 2 Brn 194 (26 January 1676)
Duke of Lauderdale v The E. of Tweedale. [1678] Mor 11193 (25 January 1678)
Duke of Lauderdale v The Earl of Tweddale. [1678] Mor 6427 (23 January 1678)
Duke of Lauderdale v The Lord and Lady Yester. [1676] Mor 9220 (2 February 1676)
Duke of Lennox v His Chamberlains. [1629] Mor 12426 (6 March 1629)
Duke of Lennox v Sir James Cleland. [1627] Mor 16149 (00 January 1627)
Duke of Lenox v Cleland. [1627] Mor 3879 (20 February 1627)
Duke of Lenox v Houston. [1628] Mor 15184 (29 January 1628)
Duke of Lenox v Inhabitants of St Andrews. [1614] Mor 6683 (16 December 1614)
Duke of Lenox v Sir James Kneiland. [1629] Mor 12450 (25 March 1629)
Duke of Lenox v The Inhabitants of Sr Andrews. [1614] Mor 7182 (16 December 1614)
Duke of Monmouth v Earl of Tweeddale. [1675] 1 Brn 551 (5 February 1675)
Duke of Monmouth v Parishioners of Halsenden. [1671] Mor 10999 (23 June 1671)
Duke of Montrose, and Others, v Sir James Colquhoun. [1781] Mor 8822 (31 January 1781)
Duke of Montrose and Others, Supplicants. [1710] Mor 12040 (22 November 1710)
Duke of Montrose v Graham. [1728] Mor 16979 (00 February 1728)
Duke of Montrose v M'Aulay. [1713] Mor 10919 (9 July 1713)
Duke of Montrose Petitioner [1881] SLR 18_712 (20 July 1881)
Duke of Montrose v Sir James Colquhoun. [1781] Mor 15017 (31 January 1781)
Duke of Montrose v The Heritors of Strathblairn. [1747] 2 Elchies 429 (4 June 1747)
Duke of Montrose v The Heritors of Strathbxain. [1747] 1 Elchies 322 (4 June 1747)
Duke of Norfolk and Others, Creditors of the York-Buildings Company, Petitioners. [1752] Mor 13325 (26 February 1752)
Duke of Norfolk and Partners v Trustees for the Annuitants of the York Buildings Company. [1752] Mor 7062 (14 February 1752)
Duke of Norfolk, &c. Supplicants. [1752] 1 Elchies 359 (26 February 1752)
Duke Of Norfolk v The Creditors Of Mr Murray. [1746] 1 Elchies 444 (13 June 1746)
Duke of Norfolk v Trustees of The York Buildings Company. [1752] Mor 15131 (14 February 1752)
Duke of Norfolk's Settlement Trusts, Re [1981] EWCA Civ 5 (13 April 1981)
Duke of Northumberland v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue [1920] UKHL 630 (30 April 1920)
Duke of Queensberry and Lord Hopeton, v The Officers of State. [1807] Mor 18_33 (15 December 1807)
Duke of Queensberry and Others v Marquis of Annandale. [1771] Hailes 442 (14 November 1771)
Duke of Queensberry v Carruthers of Dormont, and Others, Heritors of the Parish of Middleby. [1749] Mor 15662 (19 July 1749)
Duke of Queensberry v Gordon of Spadoch. [1687] Mor 6497 (00 January 1687)
Duke of Queensberry v. John M'Murdo, Esq., late Chamberlain to the said Duke (Et e contra.) [1804] UKHL 4_Paton_565 (14 June 1804)
Duke of Queensberry v. Sir William Douglas, Bart. [1783] UKHL 2_Paton_603 (30 April 1783)
Duke of Queensberry v Telfer. [1756] Mor 13843 (11 March 1756)
Duke of Queensberry v Viscount of Stormont. [1773] Hailes 543 (4 August 1773)
Duke of Queensberry v Viscount of Stormont, and James Rome, in Torduff, and John Rome in Hills. [1773] Mor 14251 (00 August 1773)
Duke of Queensberry v Wilson of Spango. [1686] Mor 3517 (00 March 1686)
Duke of Queensberry's Trustees - Murra - Abercrombie v. Marquis of Queensberry - Brougha - Kea - Sandford [1826] UKHL 2_WS_265 (22 March 1826)
Duke of Richmond v. Earl of Seafield [1870] SLR 7_359 (16 February 1870)
Duke of Richmond v. Wharton Duff [1867] SLR 3_176_1 (25 January 1867)
Duke of Roxburgh v - . [1749] 5 Brn 769 (13 June 1749)
Duke of Roxburgh and His Majesty's Advocate, v William Chatto, Feuar in Kelso. [1753] Mor 3444 (6 February 1753)
Duke of Roxburgh and Others v. Marquis of Lothian [1875] SLR 12_472 (26 May 1875)
Duke of Roxburgh v Dice. [1750] Mor 15665 (27 June 1750)
Duke of Roxburgh v Earl of Home [1767] Hailes 249 (21 July 1767)
Duke of Roxburgh, v Earls of Home and Tankerville. [1768] Mor 14272 (29 June 1768)
Duke of Roxburgh v. Griffith and Others (Waldiic's Trustees) [1879] SLR 16_364 (18 February 1879)
Duke of Roxburgh v. Jeffray and Others [1757] UKHL 2_Paton_4 (18 March 1757)
Duke of Roxburgh v. Jeffrey and Others, (Kelso case) [1757] UKHL 1_Paton_632 (18 March 1757)
Duke of Roxburgh v Ker. [1729] Mor 7202 (23 January 1729)
Duke of Roxburgh v Mr W. Dice. [1750] 1 Elchies 385 (27 June 1750)
Duke of Roxburgh v Oliphant. [1738] Mor 14345 (28 June 1738)
Duke of Roxburgh v Robert Mein. [1785] Hailes 977 (21 July 1785)
Duke of Roxburgh v Robert Mein. [1785] Mor 16070 (21 July 1785)
Duke of Roxburgh v Rutherford. [1729] Mor 11549 (00 February 1729)
Duke of Roxburgh. v Scott of Horslie Hill. [1744] Mor 15741 (12 December 1744)
Duke of Roxburgh v Town of Kelso. [1753] 1 Elchies 100 (16 November 1753)
Duke of Roxburghe - Brougha - Denman v. George Waldie, Esq. - Abercromby [1825] UKHL 1_WS_1 (10 February 1825)
Duke of Roxburghe v. John Wauchope, W.S., and Others, Trustees and the Legatees of the late John, Duke of Roxburghe [1820] UKHL 6_Paton_548 (25 July 1820)
Duke of Roxburghe v Marquis of Lothian [1838] CS 16_341 (23 January 1838)
Duke of Roxburghe Petitioner [1881] SLR 18_614 (28 June 1881)
Duke of Roxburghe v Scot of Gala. [1749] Mor 10764 (3 November 1749)
Duke of Roxburghe's Trustees v Young [1835] CA 13_476 (17 February 1835)
Duke of Somerset v Fitzgerald & Ors [2019] EWHC 726 (Ch) (25 March 2019)
Duke of Sutherland v. Marquess of Stafford [1892] SLR 29_422 (23 February 1892)
Duke of Sutherland Petitioner [1901] SLR 38_462 (20 March 1901)
Duke of Sutherland v. Reed and Others [1890] SLR 28_217 (18 December 1890)
Duke of Sutherland v. Ross [1878] UKHL 532 (15 April 1878)
Duke of Sutherland v. Sir Charles Ross [1877] SLR 14_552 (26 May 1877)
Duke of Westminster v Inland Revenue [1935] UKHL TC_19_490 (7 May 1935)
Duke or Roxburghe v William Chatto. [1753] Mor 29_1 (00 February 1753)
Duke Petitioner [1903] SLR 41_156 (08 December 1903)
Duke Street -with- Cardpoint -with- Alphyra -with- Payzone (Electronic transaction _ payment services in the State (including, for example, in respect of electronic mobile phone top-up, utility top-up and bill payment and EFT processing)) [2010] IECompA M10005 (09 February 2010)
Duke Street -with- Hutton Collins -with- Lion _ Katsu -with- JV (Restaurant sector) [2011] IECompA M11011 (24 March 2011)
Duke v The University of Salford [2013] EWHC 196 (QB) (06 February 2013)
Dukedom Group Ltd v. Willett [2005] UKEAT 0336_05_2608 (26 August 2005)
Dukeminster Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Exeter City Council [2014] EWHC 664 (Admin) (13 March 2014)
Dukes Contracts v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18587 (04 May 2004)
Dukes Court 50 Part Street - Sefton : Northern : Manchester (No Fault Right to Manage) [2015] EWLVT MAN_LV_NFR_00CA_0007 (22 December 2015)
Dukes Court 250 Croydon Road - Bromley : London (Service Charges) [2013] EWLVT LON_LV_SVC_00AF_0124 (09 December 2013)
Dukes Rise Development including: Pennard House, Marlborough House, Dulcott House, - Mendip : Midland : Birmingham (Service Charges) [2013] EWLVT CHI_LV_SVC_40UB_0180 (09 October 2013)
DUKES (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2018] UKIntelP o29018 (15 May 2018)
DUKHANIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 2349/06 (Judgment : Violation of Right to a fair trial ( Civil proceedings Access to court) Violation of Art...) [2017] ECHR 865 (12 October 2017)
DUKIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - 4543/09 [2012] ECHR 1052 (19 June 2012)
DUKMEDJIAN v. FRANCE - 60495/00 [2006] ECHR 81 (31 January 2006)
Ã-�dukövízig and Hochtief Solutions (anciennement Hochtief Construction) [2012] EUECJ C-218/11 (18 October 2012)
Dul v The Director Of Border Revenue (EXCISE DUTY RESTORATION OF VEHICLE (see also EXCISE APPEAL) : Own use) [2018] UKFTT 514 (TC) (24 August 2018)
Dula v Director of Public Prosecutions of Zwolle Lelystad Holland [2010] EWHC 469 (Admin) (04 February 2010)
Dulagan, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (IJR) [2016] UKUT 136 (IAC) (2 March 2016)
Dulahin Jadunath Kuar v Raja Bisheshar Bakhsh Singh and others (Consolidated Appeals) (Lucknow) [1930] UKPC 98 (4 December 1930)
Dulahin Jadunath Kuar v Raja Bisheshar Bakhsh Singh, since deceased, and others (Consolidated Appeals) (Lucknow) [1932] UKPC 21 (8 March 1932)
Dulai & Ors, R (on the application of) v Chelmsford Magistrates' Court & Anor [2012] EWHC 1055 (Admin) (26 April 2012)
Dulas v HM Advocate [2016] ScotHC HCJAC_91 (12 October 2016)
DULAS v. TURKEY - 25801/94 [2001] ECHR 60 (30 January 2001)
DULAURANS v. FRANCE - 34553/97 [2000] ECHR 109 (21 March 2000)
DULBASTRU v. ROMANIA - 47040/11 - Chamber Judgment (French Text) [2014] ECHR 726 (08 July 2014)
Dulciora SpA v Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato. [1979] EUECJ R-95/78 (5 April 1979)
Dulger [2012] EUECJ C-451/11_O (07 June 2012)
Dulgheriu & Anor v London Borough Of Ealing [2018] EWHC 1302 (Admin) (24 May 2018)
Dulgheriu & Anor v The London Borough Of Ealing [2018] EWHC 1667 (Admin) (02 July 2018)
Dulgheriu & Anor v The London Borough of Ealing [2019] EWCA Civ 1490 (21 August 2019)
Dulhin Genda Kunwar v Harnandan Prashad Singh and others (Fort William (Bengal)) [1916] UKPC 8 (21 February 1916)
Dulhin lachhanbati Kumri and others v Bodhnath Tiwari since deceased and others (Patna) [1921] UKPC 76 (1 July 1921)
Dulieu v White & Sons [1901] EWHC KB 1 (05 June 1901)
Dullatur Feuing and Building Co. v. Ritchie and Sturrock [1881] SLR 19_247 (16 December 1881)
Dully v Athlone Town Stadium [2019] IEHC 734 (15 November 2019)
Dully v Athlone Town Stadium Ltd &ors No.7 [2019] IEHC 783 (04 November 2019)
DULSKIY v. UKRAINE - 61679/00 [2006] ECHR 569 (1 June 2006)
Dulwich Estate v Baptiste [2007] EWHC 410 (Ch) (15 February 2007)
DUMA v. UKRAINE - 39422/04 [2006] ECHR 1017 (30 November 2006)
Duman & Ors -v- Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform [2007] IESC 64 (20 December 2007)
Duman, Re Application for Judicial Review [2005] ScotCS CSOH_149 (11 November 2005)
Dumanovski, Docevski & Blage Ilievski against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia - 13898/02 [2011] ECHR 1275 (8 June 2011)
DUMANOVSKI v. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA - 13898/02 [2005] ECHR 826 (8 December 2005)
DUMAS v. FRANCE - 53425/99 [2003] ECHR 444 (23 September 2003)
Dumbar v Hamilton. [1671] 2 Brn 583 (17 November 1671)
Dumbar v Hay. [1650] 1 Brn 476 (24 January 1650)
Dumbar. v Lord Duffus. [1666] Mor 13813 (14 June 1666)
Dumbar v Mr. Murdoch M'Keinzie, Bisop of Murray [1670] 2 Brn 482 (2 July 1670)
Dumbar of Hemprigs v Lady Frazer. [1663] Mor 2367 (18 February 1663)
Dumbar of Hemprigs v Lord Arbuthnot [1680] 3 Brn 381 (14 December 1680)
Dumbar v Provost of Elgin. [1634] Mor 11701 (26 March 1634)
Dumbar v Williamson. [1627] Mor 570 (23 November 1627)
Dumbars v Agnew. [1694] 4 Brn 119 (10 January 1694)
Dumbarton County Council Eastern District Committee and Others v. Young and Others [1893] SLR 31_22 (19 October 1893)
Dumbarton Harbour Board v. Cox [1918] SLR 122 (05 December 1918)
Dumbarton Town Council v. Caledonian Railway Co. and Another [1915] SLR 443 (11 March 1915)
Dumbarton Waterworks Commissioners v. Lord Blantyre [1884] SLR 22_80 (12 November 1884)
Dumbartonshire Road Trustees v. Orr Ewing and Others [1886] SLR 23_328 (22 January 1886)
Dumble v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2009] EWHC 351 (Admin) (06 February 2009)
Dumbleton v Frances Clark Ltd [1996] UKEAT 313_96_0910 (9 October 1996)
DUMBRAVA v. ROMANIA - 25234/03 [2009] ECHR 288 (17 February 2009)
DUMBRAVEANU v. MOLDOVA - 20940/03 [2005] ECHR 318 (24 May 2005)
Dumbreck v. Stevenson, et al. [1861] UKHL 4_Macqueen_86 (11 February 1861)
Dumbrell v The Governor of St Patricks Institution [2006] IEHC 9 (31 January 2006)
Dumbuya, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lewisham [2008] EWHC 1852 (Admin) (16 July 2008)
Dumez v Commission of the European Communities. (Refusal by the Commission to initiate Treaty infringement proceedings) [1995] EUECJ T-126/95 (13 November 1995)
Dumez France SA and Tracoba SARL v Hessische Landesbank and others. [1990] EUECJ R-220/88 (11 January 1990)
Dumford Trading AG v OAO Atlantrybflot [2004] EWCA Civ 1265 (17 September 2004)
Dumford Trading Ag v Oao Atlantrybflot [2005] EWCA Civ 24 (26 January 2005)
Dumford Trading AG v OAO Atlantrybflot [2005] EWCA Civ 113 (26 January 2005)
Dumfries & Galloway Council v Carroll [2019] UKEAT 19_0001_0708 (07 August 2019)
Dumfries & Galloway Council v Dunion, Scottish Information Commissioner [2008] ScotCS CSIH_12 (08 February 2008)
Dumfries & Galloway Council, Re An Application For Judicial Review [2006] ScotCS CSOH_119 (02 August 2006)
Dumfries & Galloway Council, Re Application For Judicial Review [2000] ScotCS 217 (2 August 2000)
Dumfries & Galloway Housing Partnership v. Johnson [2005] UKEAT 0054_05_2212 (22 December 2005)
DUMFRIES AND GALLOWAY COUNCIL v. JAMES DUFF [2012] ScotSC 19 (04 October 2012)
Dumfries and Galloway Council v. North & Ors [2009] UKEAT 0047_08_2404 (24 April 2009)
DUMFRIES AND GALLOWAY COUNCIL v. P.D. & I.D. [2011] ScotSC 153 (04 October 2011)
Dumfries Assessor v. Kirk's Trustees [1911] SLR 168 (15 December 1911)
Dumfries County Council v. Langholm Magistrates [1912] SLR 209 (05 December 1912)
Dumfries Galloway Council, Re An Order Freeing Adoption [2003] ScotCS 139 (6 May 2003)
Dumfries Harbour Commissioners v. Steamship "Fulwood," Ltd [1907] SLR 44_320 (23 January 1907)
Dumigan v Whiteabbey Royal British Legio... [2012] NIIT 01743_11IT (18 January 2012)
DUMIKYAN v. RUSSIA - 2961/09 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Third Section)) [2016] ECHR 1101 (13 December 2016)
Dumitrascu v Revenue & Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Profits) [2018] UKFTT 553 (TC) (25 September 2018)
DUMITRESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - 23365/15 (Judgment : Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee) [2019] ECHR 432 (06 June 2019)
DUMITRESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - 66551/14 (Judgment : Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee) [2018] ECHR 660 (26 July 2018)
DUMITRU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - 57162/09 (Judgment : Article 6 - Right to a fair trial : Fourth Section Committee) [2019] ECHR 482 (25 June 2019)
Dumitru CONSTANTIN v Romania - 30842/05 [2011] ECHR 1711 (27 September 2011)
Dumitru CROITORU v Moldova - 29755/07 [2010] ECHR 757 (18 May 2010)
Dumitru DAVID & Ors v Romania - 54577/07 [2012] ECHR 556 (6 March 2012)
DUMITRU GHEORGHE v. ROMANIA - 33883/06 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Fourth Section)) [2016] ECHR 356 (12 April 2016)
DUMITRU v. ROMANIA - 4710/04 - Chamber Judgment (French text) [2014] ECHR 568 (03 June 2014)
DUMITRU v. ROMANIA - 71851/13 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Fourth Section Committee)) French Text [2016] ECHR 906 (18 October 2016)
Dumitru TATARU v Moldova - 38421/05 [2009] ECHR 283 (27 January 2009)
Dummett v. American Express Services Europe Ltd [2001] UKEAT 160_00_0806 (8 June 2001)
Dummigan and others v McCrory Scaffolding Contractor... [2013] NIIT 00360_13IT (16 October 2013)
DUMONT v. BELGIUM - 49525/99 [2005] ECHR 269 (28 April 2005)
DUMONT-MALIVERG v. FRANCE - 57547/00 ; 68591/01 [2005] ECHR 339 (31 May 2005)
Dumoulin v Langtry and others (Canada) [1887] UKPC 24 (18 June 1887)
Dumphy v Customs and Excise [2003] UKVAT(Excise) E00404 (22 April 2003)
Dumphy v The Montreal Light Heat and Power Company (Quebec) [1907] UKPC 49 (31 July 1907)
Dumpleton v. Lincolnshire County Council [2001] UKEAT 1145_00_2401 (24 January 2001)
Dumrul v Standard Chartered Bank [2010] EWHC 2625 (Comm) (20 October 2010)
Dumville & Anor v Rich [2019] EWHC 2086 (Ch) (30 July 2019)
Dun v Adam. [1735] 1 Elchies 54 (5 February 1735)
Dun v. Bain [1877] SLR 14_248 (24 January 1877)
Dun v IC & The National Audit Office (Freedom of Information Act 2000 & Data Protection Act) [2011] UKFTT EA_2010_0060 (GRC) (18 January 2011)
Dun Laoghaire Rathdown Co Co v Westwood Club Ltd [2019] IESC 43 (29 May 2019)
Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council -v- West Wood Club Ltd [2015] IEHC 800 (17 December 2015)
Dun Laoighre Rathdown County Council v. Shackleton [2002] IEHC 2 (23rd January, 2002)
Dun v Lord Galloway. [1766] 5 Brn 918 (17 January 1766)
Dunai (Judgment) French Text [2019] EUECJ C-118/17 (14 March 2019)
Dunai (Opinion) French Text [2018] EUECJ C-118/17_O (15 November 2018)
Dunalastair Investments Ltd for Recall of Inhibition [2002] ScotCS 25 (25th January, 2002)
DUNAN v. FRANCE - 49342/99 [2001] ECHR 731 (30 October 2001)
Dunauskas & Anor, R v [2010] NICC 17 (7 May 2010)
Dunavant Enterprises Incorporated v Olympia Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd [2011] EWHC 2028 (Comm) (29 July 2011)
DUNAYEV v. RUSSIA - 70142/01 [2007] ECHR 404 (24 May 2007)
Dunbaith v Balnagoun. [1687] Mor 16611 (00 June 1687)
Dunbar & Ors, R (on the application of) v Hampshire Fire & Rescue Service [2004] EWHC 431 (Admin) (24 February 2004)
DUNBAR AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [2015] ScotHC HCJAC_22 (13 March 2015)
Dunbar and the other Creditors of Dunbar, competing. [1745] Mor 3699 (27 July 1745)
Dunbar v Annesborough Engineering Ltd [2013] NIIT 00646_13IT (30 May 2013)
Dunbar Assets Plc v BCP Premier Ltd [2015] EWHC 10 (Ch) (12 January 2015)
Dunbar Assets Plc v Dorcas Holdings Ltd & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 864 (12 July 2013)
Dunbar Bank Plc v Nadeem & Anor [1998] EWCA Civ 1027 (18 June 1998)
Dunbar v Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council [2011] UKUT 169 (LC) (20 April 2011)
Dunbar v Caithness. [1744] 1 Elchies 190 (20 June 1744)
Dunbar v. Chiene (Wilson & Dunlop's Trustee) [1887] SLR 25_176 (21 December 1887)
Dunbar v Crawfurd. [1575] Mor 14741 (21 April 1575)
Dunbar v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT(Excise) E00792 (08 September 2004)
Dunbar v Department of Agriculture and ... [2012] NIFET 00029_10FET (17 January 2012)
Dunbar v Dunbar. [1638] Mor 7416 (14 July 1638)
Dunbar v. Dunbar [1872] SLR 10_109 (7 December 1872)
Dunbar v. Dunbar [1911] SLR 16 (25 October 1911)
Dunbar v Enterkin. [1582] Mor 11610 (00 June 1582)
Dunbar v. Gill [1908] SLR 870 (04 July 1908)
Dunbar v Hay. [1621] Mor 786 (13 June 1621)
Dunbar v Hay of - . [1621] Mor 3559 (22 June 1621)
Dunbar v Innes. [1759] Mor 16818 (9 February 1759)
Dunbar v Lady Fraser. [1663] Mor 5876 (18 February 1663)
Dunbar v Leslie. [1628] Mor 5392 (23 February 1628)
Dunbar v Leslie. [1628] Mor 9668 (8 July 1628)
Dunbar v Leslie. [1628] Mor 12397 (8 July 1628)
Dunbar v Lesly. [1628] Mor 8919 (26 June 1628)
Dunbar v Lesly. [1628] Mor 10419 (23 February 1628)
Dunbar v Lesly. [1628] Mor 11657 (8 July 1628)
Dunbar v. Macadam [1884] SLR 21_458 (5 March 1884)
Dunbar v Maxwell. [1671] Mor 6643 (14 July 1671)
Dunbar v Melville. [1566] Mor 6001 (12 February 1566)
Dunbar v M'Kenzie. [1681] Mor 5568 (8 February 1681)
Dunbar v M'Kie. [1628] Mor 5733 (11 July 1628)
Dunbar v Mudie. [1628] Mor 12014 (11 July 1628)
Dunbar v Muirhead. [1709] Mor 2149 (30 November 1709)
Dunbar v Murdoch. [1730] Mor 16742 (00 February 1730)
Dunbar of Burghie v Tenants. [1627] Mor 12073 (20 January 1627)


Based on their individual interests, Wallenberg Fellows will be matched to internships at premier institutions and organizations related to business, finance, economics, policy, and government.
The internship is designed as an authentic international business experience, centered on a specific project, paper, or other corporate initiative. Given the background and distinction of the Wallenberg Fellows, the international companies that participate will benefit greatly as well, gaining access to some of the most talented students in the world.
Olivia Lamb's summer internship was with the Merger and Acquisition Group of Electrolux, where she worked on acquisition projects in different stages of the process, spanning various business sectors and geographies.
Anastasia Nedayvoda was an intern at Ericsson, where she helped in strategy development and supported the execution of forward-looking technologies.
Marta Khomyn's summer internship was at the World Bank Group, where she worked on designing Rapid Technology Skills Training Programs to improve job creation in the developing world.
Alec Albright interned at Investor AB. Mr. Albright conducted analyses on existing investments as well as new potential investments while learning about corporate financial matters, commercial and strategic analysis and valuation.
Piotr Rozwałka was an intern at the World Resources Institute in the Land Resources Rights Initiative, where he co-authored an economic working paper on the cost/benefit analysis of secure community forest tenure.
Hannes Tordengren's summer internship was at the Peterson Institute for International Economics where his work involved research on pension reform, energy efficiency, business regulation and innovation.


The Antwerp tram system after the reintroduction of trams to Brusselstraat (line 4) on 6 Dec. 2014 and the opening of new track between Deurne and Wommelgem, part of new route No.8, on 7 Sept. 2015.
Urban trams: (horse-drawn) 1 May 1873 - ?; (electric) 2 Sept. 1902 - today.
Pre-metro (underground tramline): 25 March 1975 - today.
Interurban trams: (horse-drawn) 20 July 1879 – 9 Sept. 1908; (steam) 15 Aug. 1885 – 6 March 1932; (electric) 21 June 1908 – 25 May 1968.
Interurban trams (NMBV): 1000 mm.
Brosteaux, M. "Antwerpen - A new era", Modern Tramway & Rapid Transit Review, Sept.-Oct. 1975 (38:453-454), p.308-314 and 339-341.
Davies, W.J.K. The Vicinal story - Light railways in Belgium, 1885-1991.Scarborough [England]: Light Rail Transit Association, 2nd ed., 2006.
Floyd, J.D.A. "Tramways in Antwerp", The Modern Tramway, March 1949 (12: 135), p.56-61.
Pulling, N. "Systems Factfile No.112 - Antwerp, Belgium", Tramways & Urban Transit, Feb. 2017 (80: 950), p.63-68.
Russell, M. "Groenenhoek glory", Tramways & Urban Transit, Apr. 2007 (70: 832), p.152-153.
"Systems Factfile No.32 - Antwerp, Belgium", Tramways & Urban Transit, May 2010 (73: 869), p.179-182.
Wansbeek, C.J. "Antwerpen: 100 years of electric trams", Tramways & Urban Transit, Sept. 2002 (65: 777), p.334-337.
Thanks to Peter Zondag (from Utrecht, The Netherlands), Guy Cools (from Brussels, Belgium) and Ken Van Oproy (from Antwerp, Belgium) for information obtained through personal communication.


The "National Team" will be led by Pro Football Hall of Famer Darrell Green. He will have Anthony Philyaw from Howard and Justin Evans from South Carolina State at his disposal.
Finished first practice at Rose Bowl.
⚜Mark Your Calendars ⚜@SitBakN_WatchME ,Aaron Tiller (DE) will hit the field for the 2018 @NFLPABowl.
Each coaching staff will have 18 assistants, many of them household names for fans of the NFL. Darrell Green's staff will feature a couple of HBCU connections as well. Current Clark Atlanta University assistant coach Dexter Jackson will coach the defensive backs this week. While Pro Football Hall of Fame finalist and former Grambling star Everson Walls will coach the cornerbacks.
The game is another opportunity for scouts to see players up close and determine what type of pro they might ultimately be. Former HBCU stars Tarik Cohen and Chad Williams were drafted into the NFL after playing in last years game. Cohen was actually the MVP of the 2017 game. For players like Carter, there is a similar buzz floating around.
The seventh annual NFLPA Collegiate Bowl kicks off on Saturday at 4 pm live on FS1. The experience is more than just football. The week is filled with off the field sessions where participants will learn about the business of football.


To quote the Eurovision Song Contest's greatest success story, Abba: 'breaking up is never easy, I know.' But we have to go. Yet Liberal Democrats can't seem to accept the reality of the European divorce proceedings, any more than some pop lovers in the UK can accept the impossibility of winning Eurovision anytime soon.
The Lib Dem strategy on all this all went horribly wrong under Nick Clegg, who captained the party to the most disastrous election results in the movement's history. Included in his portfolio of errors was Mr Clegg's unflinching worship of the European Union.
Nick's a nice man. But let's be honest: he's not a natural born leader is he? Coupled to this was his abandonment of fundamental tenets of liberalism. Specifically, giving up on 'relativism' was nuts. It was also a necessary precursor to his unalloyed belief in a grand European alliance dictating policy to nation states.
This was a way wrong answer. Gone was the caution surrounding global intervention. The historically sacred liberal tenet of relativism was nowhere to be seen. In its place was an absolutist willingness to meddle in state affairs to deliver the collective interest, such as protecting the environment, or preventing extremism. The European Union could intervene on domestic British policy to, for example, reduce presumed environmental harm.
History records he didn't achieve 126 MPs. He got eight. That's a trifle short – by 118 seats. Clegg resigned immediately from the leadership – two years too late to prevent the collapse of the Lib Dem Parliamentary presence.
Unfortunately, Clegg and his team had generated sufficient momentum for his authoritarian, insanely pro-European position to contaminate the party's ongoing campaign strategy. Even after his abrupt exit, the Lib Dem high command remained focused on a virtually single issue pro-EU stance, including the claim that the public hadn't grasped what it was voting for in the EU referendum – and demanding another one.
The Lib Dems omitted to explain one thing. If citizens had failed to understand the Remain arguments first time round, why did the Lib Dems think they could do any better at explaining the Remain arguments in a second referendum? This reveals a patronising assumption: the public were too stupid to get the Remain case in the first referendum, despite the best efforts of the Lib Dems to present it. The alternative view, and a more realistic one, is that either the Lib Dems were too stupid to put the Remain case credibly: or the Leave case was stronger.
Either way it didn't matter. There was very good news for the Lib Dems. A 'second referendum' turned up after all. It was called the '2017 General Election.' This was the golden opportunity for the Lib Dems to clarify to the 52% who voted Leave why they should have voted Remain. But even if Liberal Democrats only secured the support of the 48% who voted Remain in the referendum, no problem. 48% would still sweep them into government.
The result proved a trifle short of that goal. They got a little over 7% – an actual decline in the polls versus 2015. In total, they gained eight seats from targeted local campaigning, but lost five of the nine seats they previously held. Amongst the losses was arch Europhile Clegg himself – poetic evidence that staying in Europe was not top of Sheffield's 'bucket list.' Even factoring in Clegg's political weakness as a campaigner, how big does the writing on the wall have to be for the Lib Dems to be able to read it?
In fairness, Vince Cable, now Lib Dem leader, expressed his doubts about a second referendum position, noting a second vote would be 'seriously disrespectful and utterly counterproductive.' He urged the party to focus on the specifics of Brexit negotiations. Unlike Clegg, he won his seat in 2017, suggesting that accepting Brexit was not a vote loser. But still the party steadfastly refused to entertain any post-Brexit scenarios, preferring instead to fixate on the possibility of a second referendum.
There was a time when Liberals saw the greatest good as co-existence with other countries on the basis of relativistic mutual respect, rather than conformity on a multinational scale. As long as the Liberal Democrat movement is determined to oppose the now-settled decision to leave the EU, they will remain outside the political mainstream, just as UKIP are perceived by many has having had their glorious day for precisely the opposite reason.
The Lib Dems and UKIP are united in the sense that in both cases the ship appears to have sailed, with UKIP winning and Lib Dems losing. They're both stranded on the same island, and some distance from the political mainland. The only difference seems to be that the Lib Dems want to be there. Right now, nothing could be less central to the Brexit debate than the Lib Dems.


New director, Jonathan White, shakes hands with RRA Managing Director, Mark Powles, outside the new Elmbridge Court Business Park office.
Jonathan White, a well-known and well-respected face in the construction industry, has been appointed by award-winning practice, RRA Architects, as a director.
Actively involved in delivering BIM projects up to level 2 Jonathan has worked on a number of high profile projects in both the public and private sectors and brings a wealth of knowledge and experience, to reinforce RRA's skilled team of architects, technologists and construction specialists.
The expansion plan has included a bid to increase market share of commercial and educational sectors. This has already resulted in the recent completion of highly successful projects such as, The Growth Hub and Balcarras Music School. And includes completion of the first phase of the exciting Dowdeswell Park development on the outskirts of Cheltenham, marked by the opening of Dunkertons Cider.


3 Days in Southern California - Knott's Berry Farm by Day and So Much More!
Home > TOOLS > Blog > Trip Itineraries > 3 Days in Southern California - Knott's Berry Farm and So Much More!
3 Days in Southern California - Knott's Berry Farm and So Much More!
There's so much to do and see in and around Buena Park, it's hard to narrow down the choices. But often, time is limited. Need to get a real feel for the area – with just 3 days in Southern California? Follow this three-day itinerary for a great overview of the vicinity. Then plan to stay longer next time!
Sometimes we spend a week or more in an area, drinking in all the local culture, events and food. When our time is limited, we need to take a more focused approach to getting acquainted with the region. So, with just 3 days in Southern California, we created an itinerary that allowed us to visit some of the "must see" attractions, while taking in some of the local culture too.
With the help of the Visit Buena Park Travel Guide, we were able to please the beach lovers, the star seekers and, of course, the coaster lovers in our family. If you're planning a Southern California trip, no matter what the length, be sure to get your copy of the guide - it's free, but invaluable!
We did have to make some compromises, since we only had 3 days. The major one - this Disney family believes that, to truly experience Disneyland, you need a couple of days to dedicate solely to the Disney parks, so we're holding that for "next time." But if you have just 3 days in Southern California – and are willing to bypass Disney – we think these attractions are so compelling, "next time" will happen quickly!
Day One – Hurray for Hollywood!
Our first stop was actually a drive-by of the iconic Hollywood sign because, really, what trip to Tinsel Town would be complete without that? I learned later there are actual hikes to the Hollywood sign, but the "Easy Hollywood Hike" was a six-mile trek. With only 3 days in Southern California, we didn't have the time or the energy for that, so hiking to the Hollywood sign is another entry on the "next time" list.
Next, we headed to the famous Hollywood Walk of Fame. We had seen so many of our favorite actors, singers and comedians "get their star" through the years – on TV, of course. Now we had our chance to search out our favorites.
The stars are embedded in the sidewalk down Hollywood and Vine, and each star bears not only the name of the celebrity being honored, but a symbol designating which category the honoree was in (motion picture, broadcast television, theater/live performance, audio recording/music and broadcast radio).
We ran around locating our favorites, including the Beatles (both collectively and individually), Robin Williams, Kristin Chenoweth and, of course, Mickey Mouse.
Before heading out of Lalaland, we made a final stop at TCL Chinese Theatre, which is just down the block from the Walk of Fame. This iconic theatre plays host to over 50 events each year, many of them red carpet movie premieres. Here we compared our hands and feet to the prints in the cement, including favorites like Melissa McCarthy, Ron Howard and Johnny Depp.
Our "next time" list includes this, one of the new water slides at Knott's Soak City. Photo courtesy of Visit Buena Park.
After a quick stop for lunch, we headed back to Buena Park. It was time to cool off, so we enjoyed a couple of hours of water fun at Knott's Soak City, the only outdoor water park in the OC. This 15 acres of water fun boasts a plethora of tubes, slides and chutes – there were 15 in total when we visited, and I read that this year that number will boost to 22 with the addition of seven new attractions. Four even include Aqua-launch chambers, where you wait in a tube for the floor to drop, launching you on your ride. You know I have that on the list for "next time" too!
We headed out after a couple of hours because of dinner reservations, though the kids would have loved to stay longer.
My husband had made reservations for all of us to attend Medieval Times Dinner & Tournament in Buena Park. It was a eat-with-your-fingers dinner show set-up, this time centered on tales of knights and their steeds, princesses and Royal Courts. We enjoyed the roasted chicken and corn (though I did long for a fork!), and I was pleased to see that my daughter, a vegetarian, was offered hummus, pita bread, and carrots and celery. (A vegetarian bean stew is also available.) Our knight, alas, was not the victor, but we all agreed the show was a winner.
Go dark knight! Jousting is on the menu at Medieval Times Dinner & Tournament in Buena Park. Photo courtesy of Visit Buena Park.
We really could have covered our second day itinerary with one entry – everything Knott's! I was excited to explore the park that bills itself as "California's Best Theme Park." After all, it has some stiff competition!
But before we headed towards the thrill rides, my family visited at Knott's Independence Hall in Buena Park. Right across the street from the theme park, this is a brick-by-brick replica of the original Independence Hall in Philadelphia. Being Philly folk, we knew we wanted to check this out!
From the outside, Knott's Independence Hall is the spitting image of the real thing. However, it's a bit different inside. While the original is known for the rooms where the Declaration and the Constitution were hammered out, this replica is filled with artifacts and exhibits, including a replica Liberty Bell on the ground floor of the tower, where it originally was in Philadelphia (it's since moved to its own pavilion).
The Hall was Walter Knott's labor of love, designed to allow those on the west coast have a taste of the history they may never be able to visit across the country. In Knott's honor, admission is free. Now there's a reason to make room for this attraction in during 3 days in Southern California!
The wooden Ghost Rider was a favorite of my family of coaster fans. Photo courtesy of Visit Buena Park.
When it comes to theme parks, my family is all about the coasters. We all have our preferences – one loves wooden classics, another likes hoops and loops, yet another has a need for speed. But we all agree on one thing: coaster is king.
So, with that in mind, we approached Knott's Berry Farm in Buena Park and its coasters – and came away thrilled. Talk about speed! Montezooma's Revenge took us from zero to fifty in 3 seconds, then hurled us first forwards, then backwards through a gigantic hoop. But that was child's play compared to the Xcelerator, which goes from zero to 82 mphs in less than 3 seconds, then hurl back down a 90-degree angle towards earth – all with a 50's theme. Crazy!
Other family favorites included the Wild West Frontier Show, the Timber Mountain Log Ride, the Calico Saloon Show and the Ghost Rider, billed as the longest, tallest and fastest wooden coaster on the west coast.
We grabbed snacks throughout the day, then had a hearty chicken meal at Mrs. Knott's Chicken Dinner Restaurant, a staple at the park since 1934. We scheduled dinner a little on the early side, as we had one more surprise waiting before we headed back to the hotel for the night.
We were all about the nostalgic fun - and the ice cream - at Farrell's Ice Cream Parlor. Photo courtesy of Visit Buena Park.
When we first planned our 3 days in Southern California, we knew we wanted to stop at Farrell's Ice Cream Parlor in Buena Park. My husband and I have fond memories of going to Farrell's for shakes and sundaes after events during our high school years (many, many years ago). That Farrell's closed years ago, but we remembered the restaurant as family-friendly and fun – and the Buena Park Farrell's lived up to the reputation.
We dared our kids to share a Pig's Trough, which is a double-sized banana split. We tried tempting them with the blue ribbon you receive upon completion, but they stuck with conservative (and delicious) classic hot fudge sundaes.
I kept hoping someone would order a Zoo, the team-sized 30 scoop sundae that made Farrell's infamous back in NJ. When I was young, the waiters sang some sort of song and sirens rang when a Zoo was ordered, but unfortunately, I didn't have the opportunity to see if the same happens on the west coast.
After two busy days, we needed to kick back a little. And, being from the Jersey shore, I grew up on the Atlantic Ocean. I didn't want to leave the "left coast" without seeing the Pacific, so we planned a ride south down the coast (24 miles south) to Newport Beach and enjoyed a laid-back beach day for the last of our 3 days in Southern California.
Although we just wanted to soak in the rays and take a dip in the mighty Pacific, there was plenty to do if your family wants a more active beach experience. Surf lessons, shopping, fishing and standup paddle boarding were all popular choices. You could even rent a yacht – at $500!
But, as we were coming to the end of our vacation budget, our choice was a budget-friendly whale-watching excursion with Newport Landing Whale Watching. If there's anything more thrilling than a 0-80 mph coaster, it's the site of a pod of dolphins dancing over waves alongside your boat. We didn't get to see an orca (which are my favorite animals!), but that just gives me something more to look forward to. Next time!


← Are Lithium Ion Batteries Safe?
After much hard work, the Solar Batteries Comparison Table is now live.
We will also be adding more functionality to the database over time to make the pages more useful, so please keep coming back.
If you did find the pages useful, please remember to Like the pages for us!
White background media ready images of your battery.
Specific description of the warranty and any conditions.
This way we can ensure people are evaluating your batteries based on the most up to date information.
Newer: Are Lithium Ion Batteries Safe?


text:
COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY CLINICS REBRANDS AS HEALTH CENTER PARTNERS TO BETTER SERVE NEEDS OF LOW-INCOME AND UNINSURED CALIFORNIANS
March 2016 Articles
Council of Community Clinics
Health Center Partners
Health Quality Partners
Integrated Health Partners
By Janis Russell
Photos by Carol Sonstein and Janis Russell
March 9, 2016 (San Diego) - Many turned out to support Council of Community Clinics as they rebranded into Health Center Partners (HCP) and the subsidiary Health Quality Partners on March 2. HCP is an association of 17 community health care locations in San Diego, Imperial and Riverside Counties, including an Alpine location in East County.
The newest subsidiary to join is Integrated Health Partners. The event took place at their San Diego Family Care in Linda Vista set to open in a few weeks.
Sparkle Barnes, Chief Strategy Officer, welcomed guests and announced, "This has turned into the largest primary care system in the U.S…we champion the delivery of primary care."
Barnes also wanted to recognize CEOs from different companies, board members, funders, and elected officials in attendance. She then introduced Jason Weisz,Senior Field Representative, from Speaker Toni Atkins' office.
Weisz first gave an update from Sacramento. "We passed the MCO tax with a bi-partisan tax." He explained that this tax brings billions of dollars to support developmentally disabled and health care clinics. Weisz presented an award of congratulations to Health Center Partners' CEO Henry Tuttle.
Tuttle spoke next. "We're here to celebrate many things," he said, noting that next year, the Council turns 40 years old. Many of the clinics are "equal in size or larger than the Missouri or Florida counterparts," he added of the 17-member organization with 40 practice sites. "Going forward, as we forge ahead, we are focused on an ambitious strategic plan," Tuttle stated. That plan is to transform primary care. We will make a difference."
He recalled the bold vision of forbearers who met in San Diego's Midcity location basement and founded the Council 40 years ago.
Why the name change now to Health Center Partners?
Tuttle explained, "Our name celebrates more accurately who we are." He introduced several of the company's employees who will work under the new name Health Center Partners. A press release states, "The branding of the new name is tied to their vision to meet the "evolving health needs of nearly 800,000 low-income and uninsured Californians…"
(To see an article about the company's restructure of employees, read: http://www.bizjournals.com/prnewswire/press_releases/2016/02/22/LA27730).
Next, Sabra Matovsky, Executive Vice President of Integrated Health Partners, shared her thoughts. "We're now facing people with chronic issues who have trouble accessing healthcare," she said of conditions such as depression. She emphasized how important it was to reach these types of patients. There's also a big emphasis on combining data through each of Integrated Health Partners' 12 community care clinics in order to deliver high quality health care.
She introduced Jessica Savage, the Director of Performance Improvement, for Integrated Health Partners (IHP). Matovsky then asked Richard Chambers, President of Molina Healthcare, to come on up. Molina has been in full support of the clinics.
Chambers thought it was interesting that Molina had a similar background as Health Care Partners. "Today, with the launch of IHP, the Council of Community Clinics can continue that vision," he said.
He congratulated Tuttle and his vision over the last two years. He also gave special thanks to Matovsky, who used to work at Molina. "In 2015, Molina provided $20 million to the Council of Community Clinics," part of which helped launch IHP. "We're glad to be a partner." Chambers concluded. The CEO/President of San Ysidro Health Center and board chair of Health Center Partners, Kevin Mattson, presented Chambers with a plaque for the work done at Molina to improve health care.
Barnes wrapped up the event by encouraging those in support to follow them on social media.
Tuttle told ECM that the newest facility in Linda Vista will provide all kinds of health services.
When asked to explain why this event is called 'Better Together,' Tuttle replied, "We believe collectively we're 'Better Together' to help improve health care."
According to a press release provided by Emily Lynn Anderson from Havas Formula, HCP is a "fully integrated primary health network designed to advance standards of care, improve outcomes and reduce costs for member community health centers."
Tuttle also mentioned in the press release, "We firmly believe that everyone deserves access to high quality health care." With the launch of their new name, they will continue to serve their members by "championing the needs of the safety net population, enhancing the delivery of and access to high quality primary care, and acting as a trusted change agent and visionary by bringing forth innovative solutions and effective programs that positively impact health center outcomes."
The purpose of IHP is "to address the shift to value-based care by leveraging aggregated member date for up to 500,000 patients to better analyze and understand the status of community health and drive performance improvement that will result in better patient outcomes, operational enhancements, and treatment effectiveness." This helps IHP to "educate the care community and steward health resources for optimal use."
Matovsky stated, "Integrated Health Partners is the solution for primary care in Southern California. By compiling and analyzing key performance indicators from across the region, we're better able to understand the communities we serve, overcome cultural and linguistic barriers, solve the most challenging health care delivery problems and address existing and emerging critical needs. We are a united voice representing primary care providers, safeguarding the future of quality health care for the most vulnerable and ensuring a seat at the table for the important health care decisions on the horizon."
Mattson stated, "As a long time member, we've found that the collaboration that exists between Health Center Partners and health centers is invaluable- providing a unique opportunity to speak with a strong, unified voice in support of primary care, meeting the growing needs of low-income and uninsured patients, and ensuring California's health centers are well positioned for the future of health care. Health Center Partners is our region's preeminent health care authority and policy advocate- focused on improving lives by elevating the primary care profession and enhancing our ability to deliver quality health care."
HCP's Program of Work 2020 is a "comprehensive strategic framework designed to ensure members remain at the forefront in meeting the evolving health care needs of the most vulnerable in our communities [and] establishes broad-reaching and aggressive goals for organizational transformation."
A poster for HCP mentions that they are "working to make the health care safety net stronger." HCP is "the voice and advocate for its members, who serve the needs of the communities throughout Southern California." They have thought leadership and senior advocacy. "We are the thought leader and innovative influencer of change, inspiring our members to be on the forefront of primary health care. We have developed deep and effective relationships with local, state and federal policy health officials, other health care leaders and the community at large. Education and training programs help members implement best practices and improve operational efficiency."
A poster for IHP says "Integrated Health Partners of Southern California is working to deliver better health outcomes and healthier lives." They are "proof of the adage, 'power in numbers.' As a clinically integrated primary care network, IHP unites the voice of 12 HCP health centers to safeguard the future of quality healthcare for the safety net population and ensure them a seat at the table for the important healthcare decisions of the future."
Health Quality Partners "supports community health centers and other safety-net partners in taking the best possible care of their patients" as a "trusted partner with a successful track record in grant-funded program administration; implementing progressive, collaborative programs with health centers and other safety net partners, resulting in improved access to care, quality health outcomes and operational efficiencies."
For more information on Health Care Partners, visit: http://hcpsocal.org/.
Number game 12 hours 1 min ago

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


This is a part of the Death Railway that was constructed during the Second World War using POW labor to cut through the mountain. The site is located in a thick forest near Km. 66 of the Sai Yok-Thong Pha Phum Road (Highway No. 323). Along a 4-kilometer walking trail made by the Allied prisoners visitors can envision the difficulties faced in constructing the Death Railway using simple tools. The pass is approximately 500 meters long and 26 meters deep. In 1943 Australian POWs employing hand drills, picks and shovels, baskets and dynamite completed it within six weeks.
Pick-up from most hotels; Local Licensed Guide English Speaking; Transportation; Entrance Fee; Train Ticket; Lunch.


Stunning photos of Jasmine and Will's romantic English wedding. The feel of the day was understated, elegant, natural and romantic with a Boho edge. They celebrated with 60 of their friends and family.
Jasmine and Will have a stunning eye for detail and made many of their own decorations including the wooden signs, the log slice welcome sign, the menu and table plan which were made from wooden pallets, and the Bride and Groom signs on the backs of their chairs. Jasmine's family had also got involved in the DIY making the favours for their guests. The ladies were given little heart shaped soaps with dried Jasmine flowers inside. The men were given little hessian bags with sweet William seeds inside to sow in their own gardens and the name settings were sprigs of eucalyptus from her Nana's garden with printed cards. Jasmine even made and decorated her own wedding cake!!
The whole day had a real family feel about it from the help Jasmine and Will had in the lead up to the day, to her granddad chauffeuring Jasmine and Will in his Morgan, which had been lovingly decorated in handmade bunting by her Nana, Aunty and cousins to Jasmine's brothers giving her away and then providing the entertainment in the evening dj-ing.
The weather was decidedly English on the day and rain was threatening, luckily Jasmine and Will were able to marry outside at our oak arbour before the rain came and then went up to the moors for photos with their guests.


^ Ferrari confirm launch date for 2008 car. autosport.com. 2007-12-20 [2007-12-20].
^ Stuttgart launch for new McLaren. formula1.com. 2008-01-02 [2008-01-02].
^ January launch for new Toyota. formula1.com. 2007-11-20 [2007-11-20].
^ BMW Sauber to unveil F1.08 in Munich. formula1.com. 2007-11-21 [2007-11-21].
^ Jerez launch for new Red Bull challenger. formula1.com. 2007-12-21 [2007-12-21].
^ Honda targeting points at every race. formula1.com. 2008-01-29 [2008-01-29].
^ Revitalised Renault get ready to launch. formula1.com. 2008-01-31 [2008-02-22].
^ Force India Launch and Testing Dates. autosport.com. 2008-01-25 [2008-01-25].
^ New Williams to appear next week. formula1.com. 2008-01-14 [2008-02-04].
^ F1: 2008 Schedule Confirmed. SpeedTV.com. 2007年10月24日 [2007年10月24日]. (原始内容存档于2007年11月26日).
^ Official website of the Singapore F1 GP. [2007-09-30] (英语).
^ Ferrari to shakedown F2008 in January. gpupdate.net. 2007-11-22 [2007-11-22]. (原始内容存档于2007-11-23).
^ 13.0 13.1 Ferrari extend Massa's contract to 2010. formula1.com. 2007-10-16 [2007-11-24].
^ 14.0 14.1 Ferrari Team Profile. Formula 1.com.
^ BMW ahead of schedule with 08 chassis. ITV Sport/Motorsport. 2007-09-27 [2007-09-27]. (原始内容存档于2007-10-26).
^ 17.0 17.1 Heidfeld and Kubica stay at BMW. BBC Sport/Motorsport. 2007-08-21 [2007-08-21].
^ 18.0 18.1 Klien and Asmer join BMW Sauber as test drivers. formula1.com. 2008-02-04 [2008-02-04].
^ Flav: We will bounce back in '08. itv-f1.com (ITV Network). 2007-10-15 [2007-10-15]. (原始内容存档于2007-11-16).
^ 20.0 20.1 Alonso to partner Piquet at Renault for 2008. formula1.com. 2007-12-11 [2007-12-11].
^ Di Grassi named third driver at Renault. Yahoo Sport. 2008-02-08 [2008-02-20].
^ Romain Grosjean looks forward. Yahoo Sport. 2008-01-31 [2008-02-20].
^ Renault signs Yamamoto as test driver. formula1.com. 2008-02-04 [2008-02-04].
^ Williams plans early launch for 2008 car. F1Live. 2007年11月3日 [2007-11-03].
^ Toyota engines for Williams in 2007. formula1.com. 2006-07-27 [2006-10-20].
^ Rosberg will not get a transfer to another team in 2008. Race Freaks. 2007-09-02 [2007-08-02].
^ Hulkenberg confirmed as Williams tester for 2008. formula1.com. 2007-12-14 [2008-02-21].
^ Karthikeyan Williams tester for 2008. formula1.com. 2008-03-11 [2008-03-11].
^ Nakajima lands second Williams seat. ITV F1. 2007-11-07. (原始内容存档于2007-11-24).
^ Exclusive interview - Red Bull's Adrian Newey. formula1.com. 2007-11-19 [2007-11-24].
^ Coulthard. Updatef1.com. 2007-07-05 [2007-07-05]. (原始内容存档于2007-09-29).
^ Buemi confirmed as Red Bull test and reserve driver. formula1.com. 2008-01-16 [2008-01-16].
^ Webber. Updatef1.com. 2007-07-06 [2007-07-06]. (原始内容存档于2008-02-03).
^ Toyota's TF108 will be very different. f1.gpupdate.com. 2007-11-06 [2007-11-06]. (原始内容存档于2007-11-07).
^ Trulli. BBCsport. 2006-07-28 [2006-10-20].
^ Toyota announce Kobayashi as third driver. f1-live.com. 2007-11-16.
^ Glock to race for Toyota in 2008. formula1.com. 2007-11-19 [2007-11-19].
^ Toro Rosso to start 2008 with old car. f1-live.com. 2007-11-17 [2007-11-23].
^ Launch season. f1-live.com. [2007-12-06].
^ Button. timesonline.co.uk. 2005-09-25 [2006-10-24].
^ Wurz joins Honda as test & reserve driver. autosport.com. 2008-01-10.
^ 44.0 44.1 2008 Honda Testers. formula1.com. 2008-03-12 [2008-03-12].
^ Barrichello confirmed at Honda for 2008. GPUpdate. 2007-07-19 [2007-07-19]. (原始内容存档于2007-08-21).
^ 46.0 46.1 Super Aguri F1 team confirms new partner and drivers for 2008 season. Super Aguri F1 team official website. 2008-10-03 [2008-10-03]. (原始内容存档于2008-11-23).
^ Force India usher in a new era at Mumbai launch. formula1.com. 2008-02-07 [2008-02-11].
^ Exclusive interview - Spyker's Dr Vijay Mallya. formula1.com. 2007-10-10 [2007-10-10].
^ 49.0 49.1 49.2 Fisichella, Sutil, Liuzzi confirmed at Force India. formula1.com. 2007-01-10 [2007-02-11].
^ McLaren launch the MP4-23 in Stuttgart. formula1.com. 2008-07-02 [2008-02-20].
^ Lewis offered huge pay rise. planet-f1.com. 2007-10-02 [2007-10-02]. (原始内容存档于2013-01-04).
^ 52.0 52.1 Kovalainen confirmed at McLaren. autosport.com. 2007-12-14 [2008-02-22].
^ Kovalainen to partner Hamilton at McLaren for 2008. formula1.com. 2007-12-14 [2007-12-15].


text:
https://mmajunkie.usatoday.com/2009/04/the-ultimate-fighter-10-tryouts-bring-jubilation-and-heartbreak
"The Ultimate Fighter 10" tryouts bring jubilation and heartbreak
April 8, 2009 12:40 am ET
SEATTLE – With his eyes welling ever so slightly, Ryan Chiappe (3-4) tried to keep a straight face while his dreams of quick fame were crushed.
"What did I do wrong?" the Prince George, British Columbia, native asked, echoing sentiments of the majority of 186 middleweight, light heavyweight and heavyweight hopefuls attending an open casting call for the 10th season of the "The Ultimate Fighter."
Like Chiappe, most were sent home after a two-minute grappling display. Like Chiappe, most were forced to confront the reality of reality television for the first time.
This was a showcase not a competition.
Typical macho bravado seemed cheap and silly. Flamboyance and charisma were the currencies of the day.
"This is like a lottery ticket," UFC matchmaker Joe Silva told MMAjunkie.com (www.mmajunkie.com). "These guys know that this can bring them fame and everything that goes with it."
The would-be reality stars came from all over the United States, Canada and England in hopes of emulating Amir Sadollah, who was discovered at a casting call and eventually become the "TUF7" champion. Among the fighters in the Marriott Hotel assembly hall: a smattering of UFC and IFL veterans like Rob Yundt (6-2), Scott Junk (6-2-1) and Aaron Stark (9-4) and former NFL players Marcus Jones (4-2), Rex Richards (6-1) and Herbert "Whisper" Goodman (9-6).
"This is unreal," Jones said.
A former All-American defensive tackle at North Carolina and first-round draft pick of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the 6-foot-6 heavyweight pumped his fist with excitement upon learning he had survived the first round of cuts.
"One day, I will tell my grandkids that I tried out for the UFC and I was a part of the greatest sport on the planet," Jones said.
Managing the masses
Cast members for the first two "TUF" seasons were selected from video tapes and recommendations. The first casting call was held before season three. Tryouts for the ninth season ("U.S. vs. U.K.") were held in Chicago and drew more than 600 applicants.
The numbers were more manageable Monday, and fighters were split into four groups. Every hopeful had their moment in front of Silva's watchful eye as well as the "TUF"/Spike TV brain trust: Craig Piligian, Brian Diamond, Chris Martello, Jamie Campione and Andrea Richter, who acted as emcee.
"Guys like (UFC veterans) Clay Guida, Roger Huerta and Jason Lambert did not make the cut," Silva told each group before they grappled. "This is not the end of your dreams."
If fighters survived the grappling phase, they participated in a mass striking exhibition – eight at a time, punching and kicking pads as Silva and Richter dodged their limbs. If they passed Silva's striking assessment, they were handed off to the "TUF"/Spike TV crew for the interview phase.
"This interview will [expletive] make or break you," Piligian, "TUF's" executive producer, said. "This is not like we are [expletive] hiring you for a [expletive] hourly wage job. Come in here and be [expletive] smart and show some [expletive] personality."
The interview phase was anti-climactic. First, due to privacy issues, Spike TV does not allow reporters into the interview chamber. Second, fighters will not know for at least a week whether they will be invited to the second interview stage in Las Vegas.
"They asked about the scar on my head and then I told them about my other scars," Eric Poling (1-2) said. "That took a good four minutes."
The 24-year-old from Andalusia, Ill., played football at Iowa Wesleyan.
"I had them laughing so I feel like I nailed it," Poling said. "I let them know who I was."
By the time they reached the interview stage, fighters were relaxed. The anxiety of the morning had faded into a sense of – at least temporary – victory. They had all survived the harsh moment at the end of each session when Richter read the names advancing to the next stage. Even apparent locks like Jones, Richards and Stark were tense as the pile grew smaller. Notably, Goodman did not make the first cut.
Chiappe, 30, jerked in place and grimaced as his group's pile dwindled.
"I was waiting to hear my name called and I could see my chances were getting smaller," Chiappe said. "They said 'Ryan' and paused, but it was a different last name.
"I thought I had made it through to the next round."
The long ride home
Like many of his disappointed peers, Chiappe got a moment with Silva after the grappling stage. Silva answered all their inquiries with respect and incredible patience.
"I felt you were a little too small for the weight class," the matchmaker told Chiappe.
Chiappe admitted Silva was right. He checked in as a middleweight Monday, but will fight as a welterweight Saturday at the King of the Cage in Calgary, Alberta.
"I know it's really tough for these guys," Silva said. "If you are a world-class judo guy, you might not be able to show much in two minutes of grappling off your knees. A lot of it depends on style too. Maybe you get two guys whose styles cancel out and they can't show what they can do.
"You see guys that come a long way for this and I feel bad for them."
Fighters took the rejection in different ways. Some sought solitude in the hotel bar or simply left. Surprisingly, most took the rejection in stride.
Roger Carroll (3-0) flew in from North Carolina. A brown belt in Brazilian jiu-jitsu, the 26-year-old looked good during his grappling session but did not make the first cut.
"I run a school full-time, so I'll get back on a plane tonight at 11:30 p.m. and be at work tomorrow," Carroll said. "It's an honor to be here and to see [fighters] I have competed against get selected. I'm not upset at all.
"The way I look at it, I'm doing what I love everyday, so it's OK if I didn't make [the show]."
Award-winning journalist Brad McCray is a contributor for MMAjunkie.com. He can be reached at zonesports [at] hotmail.com.


text:
#pragma once
#include <aws/es/ElasticsearchService_EXPORTS.h>
#include <aws/es/ElasticsearchServiceRequest.h>
#include <aws/core/utils/memory/stl/AWSString.h>
#include <utility>

namespace Aws
{
namespace Http
{
    class URI;
} //namespace Http
namespace ElasticsearchService
{
namespace Model
{

  /**
   *
Container for the parameters to the ListTags operation.
   * Specify the ARN for the Elasticsearch domain to which the tags are
   * attached that you want to view are attached.

See Also:
   AWS
   * API Reference

   */
  class AWS_ELASTICSEARCHSERVICE_API ListTagsRequest : public ElasticsearchServiceRequest
  {
  public:
    ListTagsRequest();
    Aws::String SerializePayload() const override;

    void AddQueryStringParameters(Aws::Http::URI& uri) const override;

    /**
     *
 Specify the ARN for the Elasticsearch domain to which the tags
     * are attached that you want to view.

     */
    inline const Aws::String& GetARN() const{ return m_aRN; }

    /**
     *
 Specify the ARN for the Elasticsearch domain to which the tags
     * are attached that you want to view.

     */
    inline void SetARN(const Aws::String& value) { m_aRNHasBeenSet = true; m_aRN = value; }

    /**
     *
 Specify the ARN for the Elasticsearch domain to which the tags
     * are attached that you want to view.

     */
    inline void SetARN(Aws::String&& value) { m_aRNHasBeenSet = true; m_aRN = std::move(value); }

    /**
     *
 Specify the ARN for the Elasticsearch domain to which the tags
     * are attached that you want to view.

     */
    inline void SetARN(const char* value) { m_aRNHasBeenSet = true; m_aRN.assign(value); }

    /**
     *
 Specify the ARN for the Elasticsearch domain to which the tags
     * are attached that you want to view.

     */
    inline ListTagsRequest& WithARN(const Aws::String& value) { SetARN(value); return *this;}

    /**
     *
 Specify the ARN for the Elasticsearch domain to which the tags
     * are attached that you want to view.

     */
    inline ListTagsRequest& WithARN(Aws::String&& value) { SetARN(std::move(value)); return *this;}

    /**
     *
 Specify the ARN for the Elasticsearch domain to which the tags
     * are attached that you want to view.

     */
    inline ListTagsRequest& WithARN(const char* value) { SetARN(value); return *this;}

  private:
    Aws::String m_aRN;
    bool m_aRNHasBeenSet;
  };

} // namespace Model
} // namespace ElasticsearchService
} // namespace Aws

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


What is speech therapy and how can it help?
Speech therapy (also referred to as speech pathology) aims to appraise, diagnose and provide interventions in people (both children and adults) who have a variety of speaking, swallowing or communication difficulties. It is commonly perceived that speech therapists help with lisps or stuttering. While therapy can certainly help improve these issues, it also assists people with a wide assortment of communication problems, such as using voice, speaking, listening, reading and writing, discerning and properly using language, social skills and dysphagia (swallowing problems).
An NDIS supported speech therapist is a qualified allied health professional who has completed a relevant degree in university (usually at the Bachelor or Master's grade) and can work in a wide range of settings such as hospitals, private practices, rehabilitation clinics, schools, community health centres, and nursing homes.
Problems with cognition that affects communication (cognitive-communication disorders) to advance skills such as planning, reasoning, memory, problem-solving, organisation.
Why is the NDIS important?
The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is the recently introduced way that people in Australia with a disability or permanent medical condition can become connected to additional supports and services in the community. The program was implemented in 2016 (although trial areas began earlier) and focuses on giving clients more freedom and control when deciding what therapy and supports they would like to engage in.
It aims to deliver supports and services to people whose long-term disability is seriously affecting their daily functioning, and the support must be essential to improving the person's quality of life. However, the NDIS only provides services that are separate of those already encompassed by other sectors, such as health care or education. For example, while the NDIS supports allied health services such as speech therapy or psychology, it cannot be used for tutoring services, as this not considered elemental to person's functional capacity.
How does someone become part of the NDIS?
The best information on how to apply to become a participant is found on the official website.
For an application to be successful, the person must not only satisfy the principles described above, but they also need to show written evidence of their condition(s) and its effect on their life. Most often, this comprises of garnering reports and letters from treating medical doctors (e.g. specialist or GP) and other health professionals (e.g. psychologist or occupational therapist). The process also usually involves an assessor meeting with the applicant to learn more about them, their goals and how NDIS funding may be able to help them.
What is an NDIS supported speech therapist in Sydney?
An NDIS supported speech therapist in Sydney is a certified therapist that also has obtained registration as a service provider. This may be an individual (a therapist working on their own) or a therapist part of a larger organisation. A government funded therapist has gone through the processes put forward by the scheme to ensure that a service has the pertinent qualifications and expertise to work with disabled clients. This ensures that the standard and quality of service is sufficient and does not compromise people's safety.
As the scheme is a relatively new program, there have been many new services in Sydney and other areas across the country that have become registered providers. An NDIS supported speech therapist in Sydney is able to directly claim from a client's funding via the portal website.
Where can I find an NDIS supported speech therapist in Sydney?
Perhaps the first avenue to direct yourself is to the official website, which has a comprehensive list of NDIS supported speech therapists in Sydney. Further, you may ask for guidance from your local area coordinator or community case worker, which often have developed good contacts with providers. Community health centres and GP clinics are also becoming more aware of the program and may have appropriate suggestions. Of course, you may also use an internet search to research nearby services.


Film is a visual medium, sure there's dialogue and it's crucial but fundamentally theater-going is a visual experience. So try to minimize any detail you include in descriptions that can't be shown on-screen - such details are often the sign of a non-pro screenwriter.
An exception is character descriptions - these are not technically shown on screen but help the reader get a quick overview of who the character is.
The SHOT blasts in. Rick does not know what to do. Should he run to his car or fight?
Non-pros screenwriters also often try to explain important plot details or complex aspects of their story (or its backstory) via dialogue - they typically employ long and expositional dialogue to do so.
Such things would be much better explained visually i.e. through a scene.
Again such writers should drum in to themselves the golden rule: Show, Don't tell.