text:
OA JF
Open Access Journal Article Feeds
Springer Open
Migrants' Social Integration and Its Relevance for National Identification: An Empirical Comparison Across Three Social Spheres
Charlotte Clara Becker, et al.
ByCharlotte Clara Becker
Jan 3, 2022 alh5, Becker, brh5Charlotte, Clara, comparison, Empirical, Identification, Integration, migrants, national, relevance, social, Spheres
In recent decades the integration of migrants has become a prominent challenge for many Western and non-Western societies. And with this development more and more sociological research has focused on migrants' integration as well. Many researchers in the past have focused on cultural, social, and structural integration, by asking which determinants lead to the assimilation of migrants' concerning their knowledge and skills, their social networks, and their positions in society (e.g., Bevelander and Veenman, 2006; Martinovic et al., 2009a; Hochman, 2011; Fokkema and Haas, 2015; Kalmijn and Kraaykamp, 2018). Besides that, there is a line of research focusing on migrants' emotional integration, namely their sense of belonging and identification with the new society they are a part of. However, within this line of research there are still many uncertainties. This is specifically true with regard to explaining migrants' emotional integration with quantitative research using adult samples.
This is unfortunate because emotional integration is a key element for migrants' well-being. In addition, emotional integration is not only of great relevance for the individual migrant; rather, the whole society benefits from migrants having high levels of emotional integration. This is because high levels of emotional integration, specifically national identification, can be considered the basis for national solidarity and an overall effective democracy (Barry, 2002; Putnam, 2007; Verkuyten and Martinovic, 2012). Existing studies on emotional integration have looked for key determinants. Social integration, that is, the contact to society members without a migration background, appears to be one of them. Within this area of contact to natives there have been, among others, studies on the contact to native neighbors (e.g. de Vroome et al., 2014), specific school settings (e.g. Agirdag et al., 2011), and the composition of friendship networks (e.g. Walters et al., 2007).
However, previous research focused on individual aspects of social integration rather than analyzing the influence of different aspects simultaneously and comparing their relevance for national identification. It is therefore unclear, which aspects of social integration are most relevant. Yet, to increase migrants' national identification and, therefore, their well-being and to develop integration policies and programs, it is vital to understand which aspects of social integration are most relevant. Only when this knowledge is acquired can effective integration policies, programs, and interventions based on contact to natives be designed. My aim it to fill this gap by inspecting the influence of various kinds of contacts to natives on national identification simultaneously and comparing the respective effects empirically. Specifically, I will describe and compare the relationships between family, friendship, and workplace settings and national identification.
In a first step, I will present some theoretical considerations on the concept of emotional integration. Further, I will discuss previous studies on the relation of social and emotional integration. Based on this theoretical background and additional theories, concrete expectations for the results will be stipulated in form of testable hypotheses. Subsequently, after presenting the dataset used as well as the methods applied, I will analyze and compare the relationship between different forms of social integration and national identification. The article will conclude with a discussion of the results as well as potential limitations of the study.
Emotional Integration and Integration Theory
Emotional integration has been described as the emotional relationship between a migrant and the social system (Esser, 2001). This emotional relationship can also be understood as the degree to which migrants hold a collective sense of togetherness or national pride (Esser, 2001; Hochman, 2010). Overall, emotional integration aims to capture migrants' sense of belonging to the society of the country they are residing in.
In the last decades, different approaches to measure emotional integration have been developed. These include the widely accepted Collective Self-Esteem Scale (CSES) (Luhtanen and Crocker, 1992), which is based on Tajfel and Turner's (1986) concept of social identity (see also Crocker et al., 1994; Kim and Omizo, 2005; Gangadharbatla, 2008; Agirdag et al., 2011). Another, less theory-driven, approach investigated migrants' behavior to gather information on their emotional integration (Becker, 2009). Both approaches, however, can be difficult to implement because they require very specific data structures, which almost exclusively are obtained by data gathered for specific research projects. Another common and, in many cases, more feasible way to measure emotional integration is by means of national identification (Walters et al., 2007; Hochman, 2010; Maliepaard et al., 2010; Hochman and Davidov, 2014). Variables indicating respondent's levels of national identification can often be found in large surveys, such as the European Social Survey (European Social Survey, 2018) or the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), which asks respondents "To what extent do you feel German?" (TNS Infratest Sozialforschung, 2014). Throughout the rest of the article, national identification will be used to describe emotional integration unless otherwise specified.
Integration theories suggest a strong relation between other forms of integration and national identification (Esser, 2001; Nauck, 2001). These forms include: 1) structural integration—the migrants position in society and its core institutions (Heckmann, 2005), 2) cultural integration—the acquisition of knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviors specific to a certain country or region (Heckmann, 2003) and 3) social integration—(regular) contact to and interactions with natives (Haug, 2003; Martinovic et al., 2009b). These relations are suggested to be causal, with national identification being seen at the end of the overall integration process (Esser, 2001; Nauck, 2001). This is because it is assumed that structural and cultural assimilation as well as general contact to natives increase migrants' possibilities for participating in society and therefore help increase their sense of belonging and national identification (Esser, 2001).
Previous Research on the Link Between Social Integration and National Identification
In the recent past, many studies investigating these relations supported the assumption of a close relationship between different forms of integration and national identification. Concerning structural integration, factors like naturalization, and entitlement to vote were identified as being relevant for migrants' national identification (Ono, 2002; Walters et al., 2007; Fick, 2016), and with regard to cultural integration, language acquisition was found to be highly influential (Jasinskaja-Lahti and Liebkind, 1998; Remennick, 2004; de Vroome et al., 2014; Hochman and Davidov, 2014).
However, only few researchers were specifically interested in the effect of contact to natives on national identification in adults. Many researchers focused on children or when using adult samples merely included aspects of social integration as control variables into their models when analyzing the influence of other characteristics on national identification. Nonetheless, their work can be used to study the effect. Therefore, in the following, both studies explicitly focusing on the relation between social integration and national identification as well as studies indirectly contributing will be discussed.
Research including variables indicating the occurrence of contact to natives generally were able to show that migrants' national identification was strongly linked to increased contact to natives in everyday life (Hochman, 2010; de Vroome et al., 2011; Tolsma et al., 2012; Hochman and Davidov, 2014). While these studies provide a first indication of the relevance of social integration, more information on the effect of contact in various settings is necessary to learn about the potential differences in the effects.
One setting that has been explored further with respect to the relation between social integration and national identification is the neighborhood. For instance, in a sample of Caribbean and South Asian migrants in Britain, Maxwell (2009) indicated that those living in ethnically diverse neighborhoods in two out of three measurement time points (2003, 2005) exhibited the same level of national identification as those living in neighborhoods comprised of only members of their own ethnicity. In 2007, those living in diverse neighborhoods were less likely to report high levels of national identification. However, due to the strict definition of diversity, this variable had little variance. In both ethnic groups as well as over the three time points, more than 91% of respondents reported living in diverse neighborhoods. Instead of looking at the general composition on the neighborhood, de Vroome and colleagues (2014) analyzed the relation between national identification and contact to native neighbors specifically. Whereas migrants indicating more contact to native neighbors showed significantly higher levels of national identification, this relation was not very strong and could only be observed in first-generation migrants (de Vroome et al., 2014). Second-generation migrants' identification was not associated with the amount of contact to native neighbors, which was generally reported to be quite high across members of this group (de Vroome et al., 2014).
A more personal sphere, and the sphere most frequently applied, are migrants' friends and friendship networks. Specifically, many studies utilized information on the ethnic composition of the migrants' friendship networks (Lubbers et al., 2007; Walters et al., 2007; Maxwell, 2009; Hochman, 2010; Hochman and Davidov, 2014). In a sample of Puerto Ricans living in New York who reported the majority of their friends to be non-Hispanics, Oropesa et al. (2008) reported an increase in pan-ethnic over ethnic self-labeling. Similarly, Lubbers et al. (2007) found that with increasing percentages of native friends, the likelihood for immigrants in Spain to report generic rather than ethnic identification increased substantially. While these two studies focused on ethnic and pan-ethnic rather than national identification in the sense of identifying with the migrants' (new) place of residency, Maxwell (2009) explicitly investigated the relation between migrants having friends outside their own ethnic group and their sense of belonging to Britain. As expected, migrants with interethnic friendship networks reported a considerably stronger sense of belonging to Britain than those whose friendship networks were exclusively intraethnic (Maxwell, 2009). Comparable results were also found for Canada and Germany, with respondents with higher shares of native friends also reporting higher levels of national identification (Walters et al., 2007; Hochman, 2010; Hochman and Davidov, 2014).
In addition to these studies on adult migrants, there is also a line of research focusing on national identification in migrant children and adolescents. While some studies in this field confirm the results found in studies with adults (Phinney et al., 2006; Sabatier, 2008; Agirdag et al., 2011; Munniksma et al., 2015; Fleischmann and Phalet, 2018), others did not find this relation in their samples (Leszczensky, 2013; Leszczensky et al., 2016; Leszczensky, 2018). Therefore, in children the relation between having native friends and national identification appears to be more disputed, especially since the studies indicating no relation tended to use longitudinal analyses strategies, which are more suitable for analyzing causation1. Another interesting result from studies focusing on children is that the significance and strength of the relation between friendship network composition and national identification might differ between ethnic groups (Leszczensky, 2013; Schulz and Leszczensky, 2016). While for young migrants with southern European and former Yugoslavian roots the relations were in line with those commonly found in adults, the effect was not statistically significant for those of Polish and Turkish descent (Schulz and Leszczensky, 2016). This indicates that different migration backgrounds should be accounted for when researching the link between having native friends and national identification.
Further, researchers considered the contact to natives within the migrants' immediate families. This sphere is most likely the most personal one, as it considers migrants' choice in relationship partners. Results from Germany as well as the Netherlands indicated that migrants having a native partner display substantially higher levels of national identification than those who have partners sharing the same ethnicity (Rother, 2008; de Vroome et al., 2011). With similar results, but a different approach focusing on emotional integration rather than national identification, Becker (2009) and Gerhards and Hans (2009) also came to the conclusion that those with native partners were more likely to be emotionally integrated. Besides having a native partner, living together with a native in general appeared to have a positive effect on national identification (Fick, 2016).
As can be deduced from the presented studies, most research focused on spheres in which migrants are able to choose whether to have contact to specific others or not to engage in such contacts. Having a native partner and having native friends are choices made by the individual. Similarly, having contact to natives within the neighborhood can also be seen as a voluntary act, however, perhaps to a lesser extent than that of friendship and partner formation. To compare the relevance of different spheres, it would also be interesting to discuss settings in which migrants have no or relatively little influence on the composition of their network. One example for such a setting would be their place of work and the ethnic composition of their colleagues. Unfortunately, this context has been neglected to date. What exists, however, is research on the relation between schools' ethnic compositions and the national identification of adolescent migrants (Sabatier, 2008; Agirdag et al., 2011). Similar to situations where employees have little influence on the ethnic composition of the workforce they are a part of, pupils have little influence on the school and class composition. Therefore, results from studies conducted in schools could give first insights into the relevance of contact to natives in settings in which no or little individual choice concerning the contact is possible. Two studies conducted in Belgium and France used the percentage of native students at school as explanatory variables (Sabatier, 2008; Agirdag et al., 2011). Both came to the conclusion that while the composition initially appeared to be relevant for the national identification of students with a migration background, after controlling for aspects such as interethnic friendships and ethnicity, the relation lost its statistical significance (Sabatier, 2008; Agirdag et al., 2011). This would suggest that when controlling for other factors, the ethnic composition of networks in which individuals do not choose their counterparts might exhibit no or only a weak effect when compared to contact in other settings.
However, while the composition of the school did not exert statistically significant correlations with national identification, both studies highlight the relevance of friendships formed between migrant and native adolescents (Sabatier, 2008; Agirdag et al., 2011). This emphasizes the importance of including multiple aspects of social integration into analyses. Besides Sabatier (2008) and Agirdag et al. (2011) other researchers also opted for the inclusion of multiple aspects. De Vroome et al. (2011), for example, included three different aspects into their analyses on refugees national identification—whether they had at least one Dutch friend, whether half or more of their general social contacts were Dutch, and whether they had a Dutch partner. All three aspects correlated with national identification to a noteworthy degree and on a statistically significant level. Similarly, Gerhards and Hans (2009) included general contact (being visited by or having received visits from native Germans) as well as friendship aspects (at least one of the closest three friends is native German) and inter-marriage into their models. Again, all three aspects were substantial and statistically significant; however, intermarriage lost its statistical significance upon controlling for German citizenship. In neither of the two studies were simple comparisons of the coefficients possible, as no standardized effect sizes were provided and the authors did not discuss the differences in the coefficients size. Hochman and Davidov (2014), however, did include standardized effects in their work on the relation of language proficiency and national identification. As control variables they included the general visitation and friendship measures already used by Gerhards and Hans (2009). While both effects were substantially and statistically significant, the effect for general contact appeared to be slightly larger. However, it was not possible to determine whether this difference was statistically significant.
Overall, previous research has shown the importance of contact for migrants' national identification across several different settings. From research including multiple factors, first indications for potential differences in the effects of various spheres can be drawn. However, due to the variations in the scale of the included variables, these comparisons suffer from limited comparability. In the next paragraphs I will discuss these differences from a theoretical perspective and frame concrete hypotheses.
Three Theories of Social Integration
First assumptions on the relation between social integration and national identification can be drawn from the concept of social distance. Social distance is seen as a subjective measure describing the perceived void toward another person or social group (Ouellette-Kuntz et al., 2010). One example for this distance could be the affiliation to different social classes or, as relevant here, to being a member of the perceived category migrant versus the category native. Within groups, defined by sharing the same differentiator, there is little social distance between the individuals and the members feel a sense of belonging (Hill, 1984). It can be expected that migrants who have social networks similar to that of natives, that is, networks including large shares of natives, perceive a smaller social distance toward natives and the host society and, therefore, exhibit a greater sense of belonging.
The self-categorization theory (Turner et al., 1987), an advancement of the social identity theory (Tajfel and Turner, 1986), supports these assumptions. The theory assumes that individuals assign themselves to groups with whom they perceive to have similarities while at the same time they try to distance and demarcate themselves from groups with whom they perceive to have less in common (Turner et al., 1987). The knowledge of being a member of a group sharing certain characteristics not only increases the individual's sense of belonging to said group (social distance) but also the individual's identification with it (Turner et al., 1987). Applying this to the cases of migrants and their national identification, this means that increased similarity between a migrant and the native population should lead to an increased awareness of shared group membership and, hence, increased levels of national identification. Specifically, regarding the effect of social integration: With increased similarity of a migrant's social network to social networks observed in natives (everyday contact to natives in various settings), the migrant's national identification is expected to increase as well.
The contact theory further endorses these expectations, specifically with respect to the effect of social integration. The main idea of the contact theory is that interactions between groups or between individuals from different groups are necessary to dissolve group barriers that exist between them (Allport, 1954). The contact helps individuals to see each other as individuals rather than simple members of another, in itself uniform, group (Brewer and Miller, 1984). This process of individualization further leads to more positive attitudes toward the individuals as well as the individuals' groups (Brewer and Miller, 1984). Concerning migrants' national identification, this would indicate that migrants who have contact to natives develop a more positive attitude toward the host society. This might then influence their national identification since, with respect to the social identity theory, a positive attitude is considered a prerequisite for identification with a specific group (Tajfel and Turner, 1986). Considering all presented theories, a positive association between the amount of contact migrants have with natives and their levels of national identification can be expected (H1).
While all three theories indicate that increased contact to natives should lead to a higher sense of belonging as well as a higher level of national identification, further aspects need to be considered in order to evaluate the potential effects of contact in various settings. This is due to the fact that contact alone is not considered to be sufficient to provoke a lasting attitude change (Amir, 1969). To achieve the desired change in attitude and herewith identification, the contact needs to occur under specific conditions (Amir, 1969; Brewer and Miller, 1984). Advantageous characteristics for the contact setting are direct personal contact and the possibility to contest existing stereotypes, a similar social status of all individuals involved in the situation, the presence of egalitarian norms, and a collective goal that creates a cooperative interdependence between the individuals involved (Allport, 1954; Cook, 1978; Brewer and Miller, 1984). Further, the salience of the group membership in the contact situation affects the impact on the individuals attitudes (Hewstone et al., 1986; Brown et al., 1999; Voci and Hewstone, 2003; Kenworthy et al., 2005). Not all contact situations fulfill these requirements, but it can be assumed that contacts to natives that occur in settings which fulfill the requirements have a greater effect on migrants' national identification than contacts occurring in settings in which the requirements are not fulfilled.
One contact setting that can be assumed to fulfill multiple of the mentioned characteristics is contact to natives within the family setting, for example, migrants who are married to a native partner. Within families, direct personal contact on a regular basis is given, and it can be assumed that the possibility to contest stereotypes is given as well. Family members are often named as individuals' closest contacts and as the people with whom individuals discuss important issues (McPherson et al., 2006; Klofstad et al., 2009). Further, a similar social status between partners can be assumed because relationships tend to happen between individuals who are from similar social backgrounds (Kalmijn, 1998; McPherson et al., 2001; Blackwell and Lichter, 2004) and also because within-couple resources are commonly shared to a certain degree (Dew, 2008; Lyngstad et al., 2011). Interdependence is also given—on the one hand due to the shared resources and on the other hand because decisions made by individuals strongly influence the other members of the family (Kelley and Thibaut, 1978). While interdependence and intimate contact can hardly be disputed, the existence of egalitarian norms in contact settings within families is harder to describe. While gender norms and attitudes have changed toward egalitarianism across many Western societies, gender differences in housework and care work are only slowly reducing and, therefore, largely prevail until today (Hook, 2006; Scott, 2006; England, 2010; Altintas and Sullivan, 2017). Whether these differences are present across all contact situation within the family setting is questionable, however.
Similar to contact within the family, contact among friends usually fulfills the criterion of direct contact as well. Further, it probably provides a sphere which allows the contestation of stereotypes since research has shown that discussions among friends include very personal as well as intimate, but also political topics (Aries and Johnson, 1983; Diiorio et al., 1999). There are indications that political discussions taking place in settings that encourage small talk and provide room for general social interactions and bonding are more likely to change participants opinions and to foster an understanding for others (Kligler-Vilenchik, 2021). Additionally, a similar social status between friends is likely, given there is a general tendency toward homophily in friendships networks (Verbrugge, 1977; McPherson et al., 2001; Burgess et al., 2011). The similar status seems to be accompanied by egalitarian norms, friendships tend to be horizontally organized and based on equality (Laursen and Bukowski, 1997; Berenskoetter, 2014), with friendships exhibiting power differences being perceived as of lesser quality (Veniegas and Peplau, 1997). Another argument for egalitarian norms in friendship settings is the possibility for all involved to dissolve the friendship and build new ones if the relationship is perceived to be unequally beneficial. Lastly, a greater collective goal as well as interdependence are difficult to judge in the friendship context, and research on the issue is sparse. It can be assumed that interdependence is not as great as in the family setting, since friends' decisions potentially have less influence on the lives of other friends than on (close) family members.
Concerning the workplace, a collective goal and a certain level of interdependence can be assumed. Co-workers work on projects together and the success of the project or company depends on the whole workforce and not just the individual worker. Besides that, employees might also depend on fellow co-workers to fulfill their duties and obligations so that one's own responsibilities can be fulfilled. However, even though there is interdependence and contact at the workplace tends to be personal contact, it is questionable whether the possibility to challenge stereotypes exists. When asked about the individuals with whom one discusses matters that are important, people rarely named their co-workers (Klofstad et al., 2009). Likewise, the presence of a similar social status is debatable since workplace environments are often based on hierarchical structures and power asymmetries. This might also impact the existence of egalitarian norms. Their existence is further questioned with respect to migrants in the workforce given that workplace racism and discrimination are common phenomena (Deitch et al., 2003; Rospenda et al., 2009; Kahanec et al., 2012; Rosette et al., 2018).
Overall, it appears that most of the conditions would be fulfilled within the family setting. Similarly, contact to friends is likely to occur under conditions advantageous for positive attitude and identification change. The workplace environment, on the other hand, seems to fulfill only some of the conditions mentioned above. This leads to the following hypotheses:
The association between having native family members and national identification is stronger than the link between having native friends and national identification (H2).
The association between having native family members and national identification is stronger than the link between working together with natives and national identification (H3).
The association between having native friends and national identification is stronger than the link between working together with natives and national identification (H4).
The analyses presented in this article use data from the IAB-SOEP Migration Sample collected in 2013 (Brücker et al., 2014). The dataset stems from a collaboration between the IAB (Institute for Employment Research) in Nuremberg and the SOEP at the German Institute for Economic Research in Berlin. It includes migrants who immigrated to Germany after 1994 as well as individuals with a migration background who were born in Germany as anchors. Additionally, interviews were conducted with the anchors' household members who were over the age of 16. In total, the dataset includes 4,964 respondents, mostly first- and second-generation migrants. Since it was not possible to differentiate later migrant generations from respondents without a migration background, both groups had to be excluded from the analyses. Further, students, those who were completing an apprenticeship trainee or a voluntary social year and those who were unemployed (including most retirees) as well as part-time retirees working zero hours were excluded from the analyses. For most of these excluded individuals, no information on the contact to natives within the workplace environment was available2. Appendix A1 provides detailed information on the number of respondents excluded from the final sample for each of the above-described categories. The final sample included in the analyses is N = 2,780.
Respondents from the 2013 IAB-SOEP Migration Sample were invited to become members of the SOEP panel in the following year (Liebig et al., 2019). While later waves of the SOEP do not include large numbers of migration-specific variables, aspects of national identification are regularly included in the questionnaire. I merged the 2014 wave of the SOEP to the generated dataset, and 1,943 participants could be matched. Generally, many respondents from the IAB-SOEP Migration Sample chose not to participate in later waves of the SOEP.
At both time points, the dependent variable national identification was measured by the item "To what degree do you think of yourself as German?" with response categories ranging from 1 (completely) to 5 (not at all). The variable was recoded, so that higher values indicate greater national identification. In the following sections, national identification 2013 refers to the data collected with the IAB-SOEP Migration Sample in 2013 and national identification 2014 refers to the information gathered from those individuals who also participated in the 2014 wave of the SOEP. Besides national identification, information for all other variables was taken from the IAB-SOEP Migration Sample (2013).
Contact to natives within the family setting was operationalized as having a native family member, that is, a household member who is not a first- or second-generation migrant. Respondents who had a native family member were assigned the value 1, and respondents who had no native household members or only household members with a migration background were assigned the value 0.
Contact to natives within the friendship setting was measured by the variable mostly native friends. Respondents were assigned the value 1 if about one-quarter, less than one-quarter, or none of their friends were foreigners, and they were coded 0 if about half, most, or all of their friends were foreigners.
A similar operationalization was used for contact to natives in the workplace setting (mostly native work). Respondents were assigned the value 1 if about one-quarter, less than one-quarter or none of the staff at their workplace were foreigners, and they were coded 0 if about half, most, or all of their fellow staff members were foreigners.3
As control variables I included various aspects, including sociodemographic as well as migration specific characteristics. Besides age, calculated by subtracting the respondents birth year from the time point of data collection, and gender (male = 1, female = 0), level of education was included into the analyses. Because no information on the years of schooling was available for most migrants, two dummy variables using the available ISCED-2011 (International Standard Classification of Education) coding scheme were created. Secondary education was designated as 1 for respondents whose highest degree came from an institution of secondary education and 0 for everyone else. Higher education was designated as 1 for respondents who reported having an educational qualification that exceeded the secondary level and 0 for everyone else. Participants who only received a primary education formed the reference category. In addition to aspects of education, I also considered aspects of the employment situation by including variables controlling for part-time (1 if part-time employee, 0 otherwise) and marginal employment (1 if marginally employed, 0 otherwise). The reference category was comprised of individuals working full-time.
Concerning the migrant-specific variables, I included language skills as an index of the reversed self-reported writing, reading, and speaking skills (each 0–5). The overall scale varied between 0 and 15, with higher values indicating a better understanding of the German language. In addition, I included second-generation, a variable indicating whether a respondent was a first- or second-generation migrant (1 if respondent was born in Germany, 0 if respondent was born abroad), German citizenship (1 if respondent had the German citizenship, 0 otherwise) as well as the migrants' region of origin. The latter was operationalized as dummy variables following an allocation scheme by Seibert (2011), which first considers the respondents' citizenship, prior citizenship, second citizenship (where applicable), and if necessary the parent's citizenship. If this information did not support the regional allocation, the respondent's and his or her parent's birthplace were used. The following regions of origin were differentiated: Turkey, member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), countries from the Arab League, and Other origins. Migrants from the European Union (EU) built the reference category. Details on the specific countries belonging to each category can be found in Supplementary Appendix S2.
To test the hypotheses, I ran ordered logit regressions. As a starting point I used cross-sectional models only including information from the IAB-SOEP Migration Sample. Model 1.1 uses national identification 2013 as the dependent variable and only includes the three contact variables as independent variables. Model 1.2 also includes the general control variables, and Model 1.3 includes all three contact variables as well as general and migrant-specific control variables. For better comparisons between the three models, all three used the same sample, meaning that only those respondents for whom information on all variables was available (those included in Model 1.3) contributed. Also, to increase comparability between the three contact variables, they were standardized in all models.
In a second step, I ran the same regressions now using national identification 2014 as the dependent variable. All other variables (contact and control) stem from the IAB-SOEP Migration Sample from 2013. Again, I ran three models following the above-described scheme (Model 2: Model 2.1, Model 2.2, and Model 2.3) also using the standardized contact variables and the sample retrieved from the model including all variables as discussed above. However, as indicated earlier, the available sample for regressions including information from the SOEP 2014 wave is much smaller than the original IAB-SOEP Migration Sample, therefore, the sample sizes vary strongly between Model 1 and Model 2. To address these differences and increase comparability, I reran the former regressions with the sample used for the latter, following the same variable scheme (Model 3: Model 3.1, Model 3.2, Model 3.3). Model 3, therefore, includes the same sample as Model 2 which allows comparisons between the cross-sectional model and the lagged model.4
I used Wald-Chi-tests to compare the associations of national identification and the three standardized contact variables with each other. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were used to assess the overall fit of the models.
Of the 2,780 respondents from the IAB-SOEP subsample, 53% were male. The average age was almost 39 years, and the majority of respondents had completed secondary education (55%) and worked full-time (67%). With a mean of 12.2, the overall language skills were quite high. Overall, only 17% of respondents were second-generation immigrants, and almost half were German citizens (46%). Concerning origin, the largest group was composed by respondents originating from a member state of the European Union (39%) followed by respondents originating from member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States (28%). More detailed information on the sample can be found in Supplementary Appendix S4.
With regard to feeling German, 10% reported not feeling German at all, 12% reported feeling barely German, 31% felt German in some respects, 29% felt mostly German, and 19% felt completely German. As indicated by Figure 1, a similar distribution was found for the 2014 version of this variable. The most notable differences can be seen in the decreased percentages of respondents who indicated "not at all" and the increase in the "in some respects" category.
FIGURE 1. National identification in the years 2013 and 2014.
The three contact variables vary strongly in their distribution. While only 9% of respondents lived with a native family member, 28% reported that less than half of their friends are foreigners, and 51% of respondents reported that less than half of their co-workers are foreigners.
The starting point for the discussion of the link between national identification and the three contact variables is a multivariate cross-sectional analysis using all available cases. As discussed above, three models were run: a model without control variables, a model with general control variables, and a model including both general and migrant-specific control variables. The results, summarized in Table 1, indicate that the model including both general and migrant-specific control variables exhibited the best fit according to both the AIC and BIC. This was not only the case in the cross-sectional model with the larger sample, but across the three overall approaches (Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3). Therefore, in the following discussion of the results, I will focus on these models and only include information on the other models when noteworthy changes were observed following the inclusion of the control variables. Detailed information on all models can be retrieved from the respective tables.
TABLE 1. Cross-sectional ordered logit models.
Regarding the link between contact and national identification, not all of the three contact variables had the expected positive and significant association. The link between having native family members and national identification was negative across all three models, however it was very small and statistically insignificant. This finding indicates that having native family members is, unlike expected, not associated with individual's level of national identification. The association between having mostly native friends and national identification on the other hand was as expected, with respondents who have higher shares of native friends being more likely to report high levels of national identification. This relation was independent of the inclusion of control variables. The association with working in a predominantly native work setting, however, strongly depended on the inclusion of the migrant-specific control variables. When migrant-specific aspects were not controlled for, the association was positive, substantial, and statistically significant; upon the inclusion of these variables, the association was no longer significant and became quite small.
The comparison of the associations revealed that the association between national identification and having mostly native friends was significantly stronger than the relations between national identification and having native family members or large shares of native co-workers. The latter two associations, both statistically insignificant, did not differ in strength upon the inclusion of the migrant-specific control variables. Prior to the inclusion, having predominantly native co-workers appeared to be more strongly linked to national identification than having native family members.
As expected, most of the control variables—general and migrant-specific—had a statistically significant association with national identification. While the coefficient for age was positive and significant, it was quite small. The variables covering education and employment situation on the other hand all had strong negative associations with national identification. Concerning the migrant-specific variables, increased language skills, and being a second-generation migrant, as well as having the German citizenship were associated with higher levels of national identification. Out of the five regions of origin, respondents coded as originating from a CIS member state or a region belonging to the category "other origin" were more likely to report high levels of national identification than those originating from an EU member state.
The results obtained from Model 3, the models using the sample from the lagged analyses but the cross-sectional approach, were very close to the results from Model 1. The main associations, the directions, sizes of the coefficients, and significances only changed slightly between the models. Similarly, the conclusions about the overall fit were practically unchanged. Concerning the differences in the strength of the associations, the general results from Model 1 hold, with the exception that prior to the inclusion of migrant-specific control variables there was no statistically significant difference in the strength of the associations of having mostly native friends and having mostly native co-workers with national identification. Further, for some of the control variables noteworthy changes concerning the size and significance of the association with national identification were observed. While in the full model with the larger sample (Model 1.3) secondary education, part-time employment and being of Turkish origin were all negatively associated with national identification, this significant link could no longer be found in the smaller sample. Overall, the associations between national identification and the control variables appeared to be smaller in Model 3. However, because of the overall similarities, the results obtained from Model 3 will not be discussed further. Details on the models and results can be found in Appendix A2.
Like the change towards the smaller sample, changing the analyses strategy to the lagged variable approach (Model 2) yielded few changes in the results. In comparison to Model 3, the association between having native family members and national identification was positive, however it was still very small and stayed statistically insignificant (Model 2, Table 2). This was found independent of the inclusion of various control variables. Concerning the association between national identification and having a larger share of native friends, no substantial change was observed. The coefficients had the same size (in fact they were identical to the cross-sectional Model 1), meaning the relation was substantial. Respondents reporting lower shares of foreign friends in 2013 were significantly more likely to report high levels of national identification in 2014. Lastly, working in a predominantly native work setting once again had no significant association with national identification when migrant-specific control variables were included. Across the three models (Model 2.1, Model 2.2, and Model 2.3) the associations appeared to be very similar in size and significance to their equivalences in the cross-sectional models (Model 3.1, Model 3.2, and Model 3.3 in Appendix A2).
TABLE 2. Lagged ordered logit models.
The comparison of the associations again drew a very clear picture in favor of the contact situation including native friends. The association between having predominately native friends and national identification was significantly larger than the respective associations regarding having native family members and having larger shares of native co-workers. The difference between the latter two was again insignificant upon the inclusion of the migrant-specific control variables. Prior to the inclusion, working in a predominantly native work setting appeared to be more strongly linked to national identification than having native family members.
The associations between the general and migrant-specific control variables and national identification mostly stayed the same upon applying the lagged approach. The only noteworthy change was that while coming from a CIS member state was significantly and substantially linked to national identification in the reduced cross-sectional model (Model 3.3.), this link could no longer be found in the lagged model (Model 2.3). For all other control variables, the significance structure stayed generally the same, with only small changes in the strength of the associations.
While previous research discussed the relevance of contact to natives for migrants' national identification and tested this assumption in specific settings, little is known about the differences in effects of various kinds of contact. It is therefore unclear which kinds of contact are most strongly linked to national identification. Or assuming causality, which kinds of contact are most influential for migrants' national identification. I gathered first indications concerning this relation by looking at the existing studies that have examined the link between national identification and various contact settings individually and by discussing the results of studies that included multiple contact settings as control variables.
Aspects of the concept of social distance in combination with the self-categorization theory, the social identity theory, and the contact theory suggested that, in general, migrants' national identification should be positively associated with the amount of contact they have to natives (H1). However, extensions of the contact theory suggest that for attitudinal changes to occur, the contact situation needs to meet specific requirements (Amir, 1969; Cook, 1978; Brewer and Miller, 1984). I argued that these requirements were more likely to be met in certain contact situations. Specifically, I discussed three kinds of contacts: contact within the family setting, contact with friends, and contact within the workplace. For each of these settings, the fulfillment of the requirements was discussed. Overall, theoretical considerations suggested that the requirements for attitudinal change were most often met within the family setting followed by migrants' contact with friends. In contrast, for work-related contacts, the number of requirements met was presumably lower. Therefore, I expected the association between having native family members and national identification to be greater than the association between having native friends (H2) or native coworkers (H3) and national identification. Similarly, having native friends was expected to be more strongly linked to national identification than having native coworkers (H4).
Contrary to expectations, the results indicated that the link between national identification and contact to natives was not generally positive. Rather, the existence of the association was highly dependent on the specific contact situation. Therefore, H1 could not be corroborated.
Concerning the link between having native family members and national identification, neither the cross-sectional models nor the lagged models' results supported the generally expected positive association. Migrants with native family members were not more likely to report high levels of national identification than migrants without native family members. Therefore, it seems as if there is no link between having native family members and national identification. Unlike the family aspect, having mostly native friends was positively associated with national identification in all models, that is, cross-sectional and lagged. Further, this association was significantly larger than the insignificant association between having native family members and national identification. Therefore, H2 had to be rejected. H4, in contrast, could be corroborated since the association between having predominantly native coworkers and national identification was significantly smaller than the association between having predominantly native friends and national identification. However, it should be mentioned that the link between having a larger share of native co-workers and national identification was insignificant in both the full cross-sectional and the full lagged model. Upon closer inspection, it became clear that the link between the two variables depended highly on the inclusion of the control variable related to the respondents' language skills. Lastly, H3 suggested that the association with having native family members would be larger than the association with working in a predominantly native work setting. Contrary to the expectations, the associations, both being insignificant, did not differ significantly from each other in the full model. In the models without the migrant-specific control variables the associations differed significantly, however, the association between working with larger shares of native co-workers and national identification consequently appeared to be larger.
Drawing from these results, it can be concluded that contact to native friends is the most relevant form of contact to natives with regard to migrants' national identification. Programs aiming to increase national identification or, more generally, emotional integration among migrants should therefore focus on settings in which friendships between migrant and native participants can be formed.
This study, however, is not without limitations. One issue concerns the measure for national identification. The concept was measured by a single question: "To what degree do you think of yourself as German?". No further indicators for national identification were available in the data set. Therefore, no indices covering multiple aspects of national identification or similar approaches could be applied and the possibilities to validate the instrument were severely restricted. Future research should aim towards creating a measure which includes multiple aspects of national identification and apply this measure in the replication of studies analyzing the relation between aspect of social integration and national identification.
Besides that, the variable measuring the contact to natives within the family setting should be discussed. The sample is very unbalanced regarding the family setting, less than 10% of the sample were coded as living with a native family member. Since the family setting variable was constructed from information on the migration status of migrants' participating family members, it is possible that migrants who were coded as living without a native family member actually had native family members who simply chose not to participate in the study. An equal participation rate across non-migrant and migrant family members needs to be assumed for a valid interpretation of the results. However, there is no information backing the assumption.
Further, while lagged models were used, no full longitudinal analyses were possible since the contact and migrant-specific variables were only collected in the IAB-SOEP Migration Sample and not in later waves of the SOEP. This also meant that no analyses regarding the reversed causation was possible. It is therefore unclear whether the link between having native friends and national identification is solely based on the effect of contact on national identification or if the migrants' level of national identification might also influence their choice of friends.
In conclusion, there are still a few issues that require further attention, such as the small sample of migrants with native family members and the topic of (reversed) causation. Nonetheless, the presented study provides valuable insights into the field: first, by presenting an overview of the existing literature on the influence of social integration on national identification; second, by offering a theoretical approach linking the two aspects; and finally, by simultaneously analyzing the associations between national identification and contact to natives across multiple settings. Overall, for migrants in Germany, the formation of national identification was strongly linked to their friendships with natives, but not so much to their contact to natives within the family or workplace setting.
Data Availability Statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://www.diw.de/en/diw_01.c.678568.en/research_data_center_soep.html.
CCB came up with the idea and conception of the study, performed the statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. CCB revised and approved the submitted version.
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
An earlier version of this article is part of the author's doctoral dissertation on Migrant's integration: Analyzing attitudes towards immigrants and national identification (Becker, 2021). The dissertation was published by the University and City Library of Cologne in October 2021.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2021.700580/full#supplementary-material
1The issue of causation is a general problem in many studies analyzing the relation between contact to natives and national identification. Most research so far, especially with regard to adults, used cross-sectional data and can therefore only report on the general link between the two concepts. Cross-sectional analyses are unable to identify whether it is having native friends that influences national identification or national identification that influences having native friends. An article by Leszczensky et al. (2019) provides an overview over this issue by highlighting theoretical considerations concerning the link between the two concepts as well as discussing studies using different methodological approaches. The latter with a special focus on studies with school children rather than adult samples.
2With 1,109 individuals, the unemployed respondents with a migration background represent a group of significant size. As a robustness check I ran additional models including these respondents and only the relations between national identification and the two social spheres for which information was available for this group (family and friends). Overall, the coefficients were similar in direction, size, and significance. Further, the comparison between the coefficients yielded the same results as the overall analyses below. More information can be found in Supplementary Appendix S1.
3Different operationalizations were applied in robustness checks. Concerning the results, coding those who reported "about half" their friends/co-workers to be foreigners as 1, rather than 0, did not lead to substantial differences in the overall conclusion. Similarly, assuming an underlying interval scale and using the full information provided by the original measure led to coefficients comparable to those reported below. Further information on the robustness checks can be found in Supplementary Appendix S1.
4Additionally, as a robustness check, I ran separate models for the three spheres. These models indicate the main relation between each kind of contact and national identification. Supplementary Appendix S3 shows the results for the three lagged models with control variables.
Agirdag, O., Van Houtte, M., and Van Avermaet, P. (2011). Ethnic School Context and the National and Sub-national Identifications of Pupils. Ethnic Racial Stud. 34 (2), 357–378. doi:10.1080/01419870.2010.510198
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Altintas, E., and Sullivan, O. (2017). Trends in Fathers' Contribution to Housework and Childcare under Different Welfare Policy Regimes. Soc. Polit. Int. Stud. Gend. State. Soc. 24 (1), 81–108. doi:10.1093/sp/jxw007
Aries, E. J., and Johnson, F. L. (1983). Close friendship in Adulthood: Conversational Content between Same-Sex Friends. Sex Roles 9 (12), 1183–1196. doi:10.1007/BF00303101
Barry, B. (2002). Culture and equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Becker, B. (2009). Immigrants' Emotional Identification with the Host Society. Ethnicities 9 (2), 200–225. doi:10.1177/1468796809103460
Becker, C. C. (2021). Migrant's Integration: Analyzing Attitudes Towards Immigrants and National Identification. MS dissertation. Cologne (Germany). University of Cologne.
Berenskoetter, F. (2014). "Friendship, Security, and Power," in Friendship and International Relations. Editors S. Koschut, and A. Oelsner (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK), 51–71. doi:10.1057/9781137396341_3
Bevelander, P., and Veenman, J. (2006). Naturalization and Employment Integration of Turkish and Moroccan Immigrants in the Netherlands. Int. Migration Integration 7 (3), 327–349. doi:10.1007/s12134-006-1016-y
Blackwell, D. L., and Lichter, D. T. (2004). Homogamy Among Dating, Cohabiting, and Married Couples. Sociological Q. 45 (4), 719–737. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2004.tb02311.x
Brewer, M. B., and Miller, N. (1984). "Beyond the Contact Hypothesis: Theoretical Perspectives on Desegregation," in Groups in Contact. Editors N. Miller, and M. B. Brewer (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 281–302. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-497780-8.50019-x
Brown, R., Vivian, J., and Hewstone, M. (1999). Changing Attitudes through Intergroup Contact: The Effects of Group Membership Salience. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 29 (5–6), 741–764. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<741::AID-EJSP972>3.0.CO;2-8
Brücker, H., Kroh, M., Bartsch, S., Goebel, J., Kühne, S., Liebau, E., et al. (2014). The New IAB-SOEP Migration Sample: An Introduction into the Methodology and the Contents (Research Report No. 216) SOEP Survey Papers. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/103964.
Burgess, S., Sanderson, E., and Umaña-Aponte, M. (2011). School Ties: An Analysis of Homophily in an Adolescent friendship Network. Working Paper No. 11/267). Bristol, England: Centre for Market and Public Organisation.
Cook, S. W. (1978). Interpersonal and Attitudinal Outcomes in Cooperating Interracial Groups. J. Res. Development Education 12, 97–113.
Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Blaine, B., and Broadnax, S. (1994). Collective Self-Esteem and Psychological Well-Being Among White, Black, and Asian College Students. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20 (5), 503–513. doi:10.1177/0146167294205007
de Vroome, T., Coenders, M., van Tubergen, F., and Verkuyten, M. (2011). Economic Participation and National Self-Identification of Refugees in the Netherlands. Int. Migr. Rev. 45 (3), 615–638. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2011.00860.x
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
de Vroome, T., Verkuyten, M., and Martinovic, B. (2014). Host National Identification of Immigrants in the Netherlands. Int. Migration Rev. 48 (1), 1–27. doi:10.1111/imre.12063
Deitch, E. A., Barsky, A., Butz, R. M., Chan, S., Brief, A. P., and Bradley, J. C. (2003). Subtle yet Significant: The Existence and Impact of Everyday Racial Discrimination in the Workplace. Hum. Relations 56 (11), 1299–1324. doi:10.1177/00187267035611002
Dew, J. (2008). "Marriage and Finance," in Handbook of Consumer Finance Research. Editor J. J. Xiao (Springer), 337–350. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-75734-6_20
Diiorio, C., Kelley, M., and Hockenberry-Eaton, M. (1999). Communication about Sexual Issues: Mothers, Fathers, and Friends. J. Adolesc. Health 24 (3), 181–189. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00115-3
Esser, H. (2001). Integration und ethnische Schichtung [Integration and ethnic stratification]. Arbeitspapiere No. 40. Mannheim, Germany: Mannheimer Zentrum Für Europäische Sozialforschung.
European Social Survey (2018). ESS-CUMULATIVE. Bergen, Norway: NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data for ESS ERIC. doi:10.21338/NSD-ESS 1-8, European Social Survey Cumulative File, Study Description.
Fick, P. (2016). Does Naturalization Facilitate Integration? Z. Für Soziologie 45 (2), 107–121. doi:10.1515/zfsoz-2015-1006
Fleischmann, F., and Phalet, K. (2018). Religion and National Identification in Europe: Comparing Muslim Youth in Belgium, England, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 49 (1), 44–61. doi:10.1177/0022022117741988
Fokkema, T., and de Haas, H. (2015). Pre- and post-migration Determinants of Socio-Cultural Integration of African Immigrants in Italy and Spain. Int. Migr. 53 (6), 3–26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00687.x
Gerhards, J., and Hans, S. (2009). From Hasan to Herbert: Name-Giving Patterns of Immigrant Parents between Acculturation and Ethnic Maintenance. AJS 114 (4), 1102–1128. doi:10.1086/595944
Haug, S. (2003). Interethnische Freundschaftsbeziehungen und soziale Integration. Koelner Z.Soziol.u.Soz.Psychol. 55 (4), 716–736. doi:10.1007/s11577-003-0118-1
Heckmann, F. (2003). "From Ethnic Nation to Universalistic Immigrant Integration: Germany,". The Integration of Immigrants in European Societies: National Differences and Trends of Convergence. Editors F. Heckmann, and D. Schnapper (Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius), 7, 45–78. doi:10.1515/9783110507324-004
Heckmann, F. (2005). Integration and Integration Policies: IMISCOE Network Feasibility Study. Bamberg: Europäisches Forum für Migrationsstudien efms.
Hewstone, M., Brown, R., Hewstone, M., and Brown, R. (1986). "Contact Is Not Enough: An Intergroup Perspective on the "Contact hypothesis," in Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters. Editors M. Hewstone, and R. Brown (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 1–44.
Hill, P. B. (1984). Forschungsnotizen. Räumliche Nähe und soziale Distanz zu ethnischen Minderheiten. Z. Für Soziologie 13 (4), 363–370. doi:10.1515/zfsoz-1984-0406
Hochman, O., and Davidov, E. (2014). Relations between Second-Language Proficiency and National Identification: The Case of Immigrants in Germany. Eur. Sociological Rev. 30 (3), 344–359. doi:10.1093/esr/jcu043
Hochman, O. (2011). Determinants of Positive Naturalisation Intentions Among Germany's Labour Migrants. J. Ethnic Migration Stud. 37 (9), 1403–1421. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2011.623615
Hochman, O. (2010). Ethnic Identification Preferences Among Germany's Immigrants and Their Descendents: A Comprehensive Perspective. Mannheim: University of Mannheim.
Hook, J. L. (2006). Care in Context: Men's Unpaid Work in 20 Countries, 1965-2003. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71 (4), 639–660. doi:10.1177/000312240607100406
Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., and Liebkind, K. (1998). Content and Predictors of the Ethnic Identity of Russian-speaking Immigrant Adolescents in Finland. Scand. J. Psychol. 39 (4), 209–219. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00081
Kalmijn, M., and Kraaykamp, G. (2018). Determinants of Cultural Assimilation in the Second Generation. A Longitudinal Analysis of Values about Marriage and Sexuality Among Moroccan and Turkish Migrants. J. Ethnic Migration Stud. 44 (5), 697–717. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1363644
Kelley, H. H., and Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. New York City, NY: Wiley.
Kenworthy, J. B., Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., and Voci, A. (2005). "Intergroup Contact: When Does it Work, and Why," in On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years after Allport. Editors J. F. Dovidio, Peter. Glick, and Laurie. A. Rudman (New York City, NY: John Wiley & Sons), 278–292.
Kim, B. S. K., and Omizo, M. M. (2005). Asian and European American Cultural Values, Collective Self-Esteem, Acculturative Stress, Cognitive Flexibility, and General Self-Efficacy Among Asian American College Students. J. Couns. Psychol. 52 (3), 412–419. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.412
Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Friendship and Politics Don't Mix? the Role of Sociability for Online Political Talk. Inf. Commun. Soc. 24 (1), 118–133. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1635185
Klofstad, C. A., McClurg, S. D., and Rolfe, M. (2009). Measurement of Political Discussion Networks: A Comparison of Two "Name Generator" Procedures. Public Opin. Q. 73 (3), 462–483. doi:10.1093/poq/nfp032
Leszczensky, L. (2013). Do national Identification and Interethnic Friendships Affect One Another? A Longitudinal Test with Adolescents of Turkish Origin in Germany. Soc. Sci. Res. 42 (3), 775–788. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.019
Leszczensky, L. (2018). Young Immigrants' Host Country Identification and Their Friendships with Natives: Does Relative Group Size Matter? Soc. Sci. Res. 70, 163–175. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.10.012
Leszczensky, L., Jugert, P., and Pink, S. (2019). The Interplay of Group Identifications and Friendships: Evidence from Longitudinal Social Network Studies. J. Soc. Issues 75 (2), 460–485. doi:10.1111/josi.12321
Leszczensky, L., Stark, T. H., Flache, A., and Munniksma, A. (2016). Disentangling the Relation between Young Immigrants' Host Country Identification and Their Friendships with Natives. Social Networks 44, 179–189. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.08.001
Liebig, S., Schupp, J., Goebel, J., Richter, D., Schröder, C., Bartels, C., et al. (2019). Deutsches Institut Für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin). Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), Data from 1984-2017 Sozio-Oekonomisches Panel (SOEP), (Version V34). SOEP Socio-Economic Panel Study. doi:10.5684/SOEP.V34
Lubbers, M. J., Molina, J. L., and McCarty, C. (2007). Personal Networks and Ethnic Identifications. Int. Sociol. 22 (6), 721–741. doi:10.1177/0268580907082255
Luhtanen, R., and Crocker, J. (1992). A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One's Social Identity. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18 (3), 302–318. doi:10.1177/0146167292183006
Lyngstad, T. H., Noack, T., and Tufte, P. A. (2011). Pooling of Economic Resources: A Comparison of Norwegian Married and Cohabiting Couples. Eur. Sociological Rev. 27 (5), 624–635. doi:10.1093/esr/jcq028
Maliepaard, M., Lubbers, M., and Gijsberts, M. (2010). Generational Differences in Ethnic and Religious Attachment and Their Interrelation. A Study Among Muslim Minorities in the Netherlands. Ethnic Racial Stud. 33 (3), 451–472. doi:10.1080/01419870903318169
Martinovic, B., Tubergen, F. v., and Maas, I. (2009b). Changes in Immigrants' Social Integration during the Stay in the Host Country: The Case of Non-western Immigrants in the Netherlands. Soc. Sci. Res. 38 (4), 870–882. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.06.001
Martinovic, B., van Tubergen, F., and Maas, I. (2009a). Dynamics of Interethnic Contact: A Panel Study of Immigrants in the Netherlands. Eur. Sociological Rev. 25 (3), 303–318. doi:10.1093/esr/jcn049
Maxwell, R. (2009). Caribbean and South Asian Identification with British Society: The Importance of Perceived Discrimination. Ethnic Racial Stud. 32 (8), 1449–1469. doi:10.1080/01419870802604024
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71 (3), 353–375. doi:10.1177/000312240607100301
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27 (1), 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Munniksma, A., Verkuyten, M., Flache, A., Stark, T. H., and Veenstra, R. (2015). Friendships and Outgroup Attitudes Among Ethnic Minority Youth: The Mediating Role of Ethnic and Host Society Identification. Int. J. Intercultural Relations 44, 88–99. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.12.002
Nauck, B. (2001). Intercultural Contact and Intergenerational Transmission in Immigrant Families. J. Cross-Cultural Psychol. 32 (2), 159–173. doi:10.1177/0022022101032002004
Ono, H. (2002). Assimilation, Ethnic Competition, and Ethnic Identities of U.S.-born Persons of Mexican Origin. Int. Migration Rev. 36 (3), 726–745. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2002.tb00102.x
Oropesa, R. S., Landale, N. S., and Greif, M. J. (2008). From Puerto Rican to Pan-Ethnic in New York City. Ethnic Racial Stud. 31 (7), 1315–1339. doi:10.1080/01419870701722521
Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Burge, P., Brown, H. K., and Arsenault, E. (2010). Public Attitudes towards Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities as Measured by the Concept of Social Distance. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabilities 23 (2), 132–142. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00514.x
Phinney, J. S., Berry, J. W., Vedder, P., and Liebkind, K. (2006). "The Acculturation Experience: Attitudes, Identities, and Behaviors of Immigrant Youth," in Immigrant Youth in Cultural Transition. Editors J. W. Berry, J. S. Phinney, D. L. Sam, and P. Vedder (Erlbaum). doi:10.4324/9780415963619-4
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scand. Pol. Studs 30 (2), 137–174. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
Remennick, L. (2004). Language Acquisition, Ethnicity and Social Integration Among Former Soviet Immigrants of the 1990s in Israel. Ethnic Racial Stud. 27 (3), 431–454. doi:10.1080/01491987042000189213
Rosette, A. S., Akinola, M., and Ma, A. (2016). "Subtle Discrimination in the Workplace," in The Oxford Handbook of Workplace Discrimination. Editors A. J. Colella, and E. B. King. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199363643.013.2
Rospenda, K. M., Richman, J. A., and Shannon, C. A. (2009). Prevalence and Mental Health Correlates of Harassment and Discrimination in the Workplace: Results from a National Study. J. Interpers Violence 24 (5), 819–843. doi:10.1177/0886260508317182
Rother, N. (2008). Better Integrated Due to a German Partner? an Analysis of Differences in the Integration of Foreigners in Intra- and Inter-ethnic Partnerships in Germany. Revista OBETS 1, 21. doi:10.14198/OBETS2008.1.02
Sabatier, C. (2008). Ethnic and National Identity Among Second-Generation Immigrant Adolescents in France: The Role of Social Context and Family. J. Adolesc. 31 (2), 185–205. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.08.001
Schulz, B., and Leszczensky, L. (2016). Native Friends and Host Country Identification Among Adolescent Immigrants in Germany: The Role of Ethnic Boundaries. Int. Migration Rev. 50 (1), 163–196. doi:10.1111/imre.12163
Scott, J. (2006). Family And Gender Roles: How Attitudes Are Changing. GeNet Working Paper No. 21. Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge.
Seibert, H. (2011). "Berufserfolg von jungen Erwachsenen mit Migrationshintergrund. Wie Ausbildungsabschlüsse, ethnische Herkunft und ein deutscher Pass die Arbeitsmarktchancen beeinflussen," in Integration durch Bildung. Editor R. Becker (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften), 197–226. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-93232-3_9
Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1986). "The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior," in Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Editors W. G. Austin, and S. Worchel. 2nd ed (Nelson-Hall Publishers), 7–24.
TNS Infratest Sozialforschung (2014). Erhebungsinstrumente des IAB-SOEP -Migrationssamples 2013: Integrierter Personen-Biografiefragebogen, Haushaltsfragebogen [Survey instruments of the IAB-SOEP Migration Sample 2013: Integrated individual- and biography questionnaire, household questionnaire] (SOEP Survey Papers, A218). Berlin, Germany: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
Tolsma, J., Lubbers, M., and Gijsberts, M. (2012). Education and Cultural Integration Among Ethnic Minorities and Natives in the Netherlands: A Test of the Integration Paradox. J. Ethnic Migration Stud. 38 (5), 793–813. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2012.667994
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., and Reicher, S. D. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: Self-Categorization Theory. New York City, NY: B. Blackwell.
Veniegas, R. C., and Peplau, L. A. (1997). Power and the Quality of Same-Sex Friendships. Psychol. Women Q. 21 (2), 279–297. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00113.x
Verbrugge, L. M. (1977). The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices. Social Forces 56 (2), 576–597. doi:10.1093/sf/56.2.57610.2307/2577741
Verkuyten, M., and Martinovic, B. (2012). Immigrants' National Identification: Meanings, Determinants, and Consequences. Soc. Issues Pol. Rev. 6 (1), 82–112. doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01036.x
Voci, A., and Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup Contact and Prejudice toward Immigrants in Italy: The Mediational Role of Anxiety and the Moderational Role of Group Salience. Group Process. Intergroup Relations 6 (1), 37–54. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001011
Walters, D., Phythian, K., and Anisef, P. (2007). The Acculturation of Canadian Immigrants: Determinants of Ethnic Identification with the Host Society*. Can. Rev. Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 44 (1), 37–64. doi:10.1111/j.1755-618X.2007.tb01147.x
TABLE A1. Sample development.
TABLE A2. Cross-sectional ordered logit models with sample from lagged models.
This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.
Click here for Source link (https://www.frontiersin.org/)
Charlotte Clara Becker
Amazon Music: Six Months of Disney+
Assessing Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity in Older Adults: Validity of a Commercial Activity Tracker
Brandon C. Briggs, et al.
Use of Hyper-Spectral Visible and Near-Infrared Satellite Data for Timely Estimates of the Earth's Surface Reflectance in Cloudy and Aerosol Loaded Conditions: Part 1–Application to RGB Image Restoration Over Land With GOME-2
J. Joiner, et al.
By Charlotte Clara Becker
Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Livestock in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia and Associated Risk Factors for Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study
Tsegabirhan Kifleyohannes, et al.
Jan 16, 2022 Tsegabirhan Kifleyohannes
Baseline Low-Density-Lipoprotein Cholesterol Modifies the Risk of All-Cause Death Associated With Elevated Lipoprotein(a) in Coronary Artery Disease Patients
Younan Yao, et al.
Jan 16, 2022 Younan Yao
MALDI-TOF MS Based Bacterial Antibiotics Resistance Finger Print for Diabetic Pedopathy
Haojie Sun, et al.
Jan 16, 2022 Haojie Sun
Save 80% on select product(s) with promo code 80Y4DBHR on Amazon.com
The Occurrence of Bedding-Parallel Fibrous Calcite Veins in Permian Siliciclastic and Carbonate Rocks in Central Thailand
Piyaphong Chenrai, et al.
Preparation of Mn/Mg/Ce Ternary Ozone Catalyst and Its Mechanism for the Degradation of Printing and Dyeing Wastewater
Shuai Zhang, et al.
Archives Select Month January 2022 (3781) December 2021 (14279) November 2021 (623) October 2021 (233) September 2021 (1530) August 2021 (16389) July 2021 (3193) June 2021 (523) May 2021 (144) April 2021 (95) March 2021 (98) February 2021 (41) January 2021 (45) December 2020 (25) November 2020 (21) October 2020 (24) September 2020 (55) August 2020 (28) July 2020 (33) June 2020 (42) May 2020 (22) April 2020 (36) March 2020 (30) February 2020 (18) January 2020 (29) December 2019 (37) November 2019 (32) October 2019 (16) September 2019 (19) August 2019 (22) July 2019 (30) June 2019 (24) May 2019 (20) April 2019 (20) March 2019 (31) February 2019 (19) January 2019 (26) December 2018 (18) November 2018 (13) October 2018 (17) September 2018 (16) August 2018 (15) July 2018 (13) June 2018 (18) May 2018 (21) April 2018 (19) March 2018 (15) February 2018 (11) January 2018 (22) December 2017 (12) November 2017 (12) October 2017 (8) September 2017 (11) August 2017 (7) July 2017 (16) June 2017 (12) May 2017 (10) April 2017 (14) March 2017 (15) February 2017 (15) January 2017 (18) December 2016 (12) November 2016 (12) October 2016 (12) September 2016 (6) August 2016 (15) July 2016 (10) June 2016 (14) May 2016 (14) April 2016 (14) March 2016 (14) February 2016 (16) January 2016 (10) December 2015 (16) November 2015 (8) October 2015 (9) September 2015 (10) August 2015 (15) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (22) May 2015 (14) April 2015 (14) March 2015 (16) February 2015 (19) January 2015 (13) December 2014 (15) November 2014 (14) October 2014 (11) September 2014 (15) August 2014 (11) July 2014 (17) June 2014 (12) May 2014 (10) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (7) February 2014 (10) January 2014 (10) December 2013 (11) November 2013 (11) October 2013 (11) September 2013 (15) August 2013 (17) July 2013 (15) June 2013 (10) May 2013 (15) April 2013 (16) March 2013 (12) February 2013 (15) January 2013 (10) December 2012 (8) November 2012 (5) October 2012 (11) September 2012 (10) August 2012 (13) July 2012 (14) June 2012 (16) May 2012 (10) April 2012 (7) March 2012 (17) February 2012 (9) January 2012 (7) December 2011 (5) November 2011 (6) October 2011 (18) September 2011 (6) August 2011 (8) July 2011 (6) June 2011 (7) May 2011 (13) April 2011 (8) March 2011 (6) February 2011 (9) January 2011 (11) December 2010 (5) November 2010 (5) October 2010 (5) September 2010 (5) August 2010 (5) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (3) May 2010 (11) April 2010 (4) March 2010 (7) February 2010 (3) January 2010 (5) December 2009 (4) November 2009 (4) October 2009 (6) September 2009 (5) August 2009 (4) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (9) May 2009 (6) April 2009 (8) March 2009 (5) February 2009 (7) January 2009 (8) December 2008 (3) November 2008 (3) October 2008 (6) September 2008 (7) August 2008 (6) July 2008 (2) June 2008 (1) May 2008 (9) April 2008 (4) March 2008 (4) February 2008 (5) January 2008 (6) December 2007 (4) November 2007 (6) October 2007 (2) September 2007 (2) August 2007 (2) July 2007 (3) June 2007 (3) May 2007 (5) April 2007 (3) March 2007 (10) February 2007 (3) January 2007 (2) December 2006 (3) November 2006 (4) October 2006 (4) September 2006 (8) August 2006 (6) July 2006 (7) June 2006 (1) May 2006 (2) April 2006 (3) March 2006 (8) February 2006 (4) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (3) November 2005 (4) October 2005 (4) September 2005 (4) August 2005 (2) July 2005 (2) June 2005 (5) May 2005 (3) April 2005 (1) March 2005 (4) February 2005 (3) January 2005 (6) December 2004 (7) November 2004 (3) October 2004 (5) September 2004 (3) August 2004 (6) July 2004 (2) June 2004 (4) May 2004 (3) April 2004 (5) March 2004 (1) February 2004 (2) January 2004 (1) December 2003 (2) November 2003 (3) October 2003 (4) September 2003 (1) August 2003 (1) July 2003 (3) May 2003 (2) April 2003 (5) March 2003 (2) February 2003 (1) January 2003 (1) December 2002 (2) November 2002 (1) September 2002 (3) July 2002 (1) June 2002 (1) May 2002 (1) April 2002 (1) March 2002 (1) November 2001 (1) August 2001 (3) June 2001 (1) February 2000 (1) June 1998 (1) March 1980 (1) January 1970 (24)
EDP Open
EDP Open – Translated into Hindi
EDP Open – Translated into Tamil
EDP Open – Translated into Telugu
MDPI – Translated into Hindi
MDPI – Translated into Tamil
MDPI – Translated into Telugu
Jan 16, 2022 Piyaphong Chenrai
Proudly powered by WordPress	| Theme: News Click by Themeansar.


text:
Skinned Knees But Still Running
By	Susan Niswonger	/	last year
The Winter Olympics were held in Vancouver a few weeks ago. I held my breath as snowboarders performed on the half-pipe. I groaned when Lindsey Vonn wiped out on the Giant Slalom and cheered the United States team as they scored to send the gold medal hockey game into overtime. The grace and beauty of Women's Figure Skating is always a big draw and this year was no exception. I enjoyed watching the skating competition finals and was captured by the sparkling personality of gold-medalist Kim Yu-Na and the story of bronze-medalist Joannie Rochette, who skated despite losing her mother to cancer, the previous Monday. In my opinion, the most inspirational moment is the Medal Awards Ceremony. The top 3 finishers stand on platforms with the gold medal winner in the middle on the highest pedestal, the silver medalist stands on the right hand of the gold medalist and the bronze medal winner stands to the left. In turn, each winner bows his/her head as the medal is placed around their neck, then the gold medalist stands at attention as the national anthem of his/her country is played in their honor. With tear-filled eyes, the winner sings the words to his/her country's song and then proudly raises a bouquet of flowers to acknowledge the accolades of the crowd.
We are running a race in Life's Olympics. It isn't held just every four years but it is a lifelong pursuit. The motivating factor, as it is to the Olympians, is the promise of a prize. In 1 Corinthians 9:24, Paul reminds us, "Know you not that they which run in a race run all, but one receives the prize? So run, that you may obtain." Not only does Paul tell us there is a prize to claim but he instructs us that the prize cannot be obtained if you don't enter, run and finish the race. There are many young people who watch the Olympics and dream of winning the gold medal but they will never stand on the platform to receive the prize. The reasons may include a lack of talent but for the most part it is a lack of discipline. We watch the "glory" of the Olympic Games and forget about the years of training, pain, failure, tears and frustration that each Olympian brings to the competition. Paul continues in 1 Corinthians 9:25 & 27, "And every man that strives for the mastery is temperate in all things" and "But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection."
Most Christians agree on the prize but have varying opinions when it comes to running the race. For some it is a mental assent and a verbal declaration; I believe in my heart and accept Jesus' sacrifice on the cross. This is a wonderful start but PLEASE DON'T STOP, you haven't obtained the prize! An Olympic champion is not the person who watches the Olympics and states, "someday I want to win a gold medal!" Others declare that there must be true repentance (sacrificing the old life on the altar) and baptism to wash the old away and become a new creation in Christ. All biblical but PLEASE DON'T STOP, you are just entering the training facility! To win the prize, you have to continue the training as you continue your pursuit. Still others have embraced Peter's message to the early church. On the Day of Pentecost, when asked, "What must we do to be saved?" Peter declared that Repentance was necessary, each participant must be baptized in the Name of Jesus and go on to receive the Holy Spirit. But PLEASE DON'T STOP, you are at the starting line and the race is about to begin. Remember, Paul says that you have to "run to obtain."
In Life's Race, unlike the Olympic Games, everyone who finishes the race receives the prize. In my mind I can visualize Heaven's Award Ceremony. What a day that will be when I stand on the pedestal of Heaven and bow my head as Jesus places, not a gold medal around my neck, but a "Crown of Righteousness" on my head. I'm sure tears of joy will spill over when I hear the angels begin to sing Heaven's anthem. Then as all of Heaven cheers, I will cast my crown at the feet of my Savior in awe and worship. "I Can Only Imagine!"
I began the race over 43 years ago. It hasn't been the sprint I imagined but it has turned into a marathon. There have been moments when I thought the grassy expanse might be an easier way then the straight and narrow path. Many times I trip and fall, but with bruised legs and skinned knees, I keep pressing on. Voices from the crowd try to distract me, I grow weary dealing with the "cares of life" and sometimes, it seems I don't have the strength to take another step, that's when my training takes over. A still, small voice whispers, "You can make it, I am with you." I get a "second wind," the end is in sight and the prize is waiting. Paul sums up life's race to Timothy in 2 Timothy 4:7-8 I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith: Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing.
Jan 12, 2022 / By	David Green
Trusting God in the Fire
Jan 11, 2022 / By	Phyllis Corbin

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Operating since 1899, the San Diego County Bar Association is the oldest and largest legal association in San Diego County. It considers itself the voice of the diverse legal community in San Diego County. In addition to supporting the legal professionals, the San Diego County Bar Association also works tirelessly to contribute to the community and to inform and assist the public.
Post your case online at LegalMatch.com to quickly connect with the right lawyer for your case. For over 10 years, LegalMatch has provided a superior attorney-client matching experience in California.
The San Diego County Bar Association provides a free lawyer referral service to members of the public who wish to find legal representation through this bar association. In addition, for those who become unhappy with their legal representation, the bar association also provides assistance through programs dealing with client relations, fee mediation, fee arbitration, and attorney assistance.
The members of the San Diego County Bar Association enjoy many benefits as well. In addition to having the support of a major organization, the attorney who are members of the bar association have access to over 300 hours of Continuing Legal Education each year. Lawyers who practice in California are required to complete a certain number of hours of Continuing Legal Education each year to stay active in their membership.


Drive the global governance process for all changes to Investment Banking (IB) posting rules from inception to implementation.
Work with specialists in Group Finance, Regulatory reporting and Product Control to understand the business background and proposed accounting of IB posting rules changes.
If required liaise with Accounting Policy group to identify US GAAP, Swiss GAAP, local IFRS and regulatory requirements that need to be applied in posting rules.
Drive the development of global posting rules by validating the design of all proposed solutions against posting rules design principles and finding of optimal design solutions with specialists from Finance Change, Group Finance, Regulatory Reporting and Product Control.
Work closely with Finance Change specialists to ensure that currently existing pain-points in Detailed Accounting Ledger (DAL) and Accounting Rules Engine (ARE) are not repeated.
Apply strong product knowhow of all Investment banking trading products in discussions with business line users and Finance Change.
Prepare or update standardized posting rules documentation as part of change reviews.
Organize the weekly global governance committee meeting by presenting the change requests in accounting terms so that the business line representatives from Group Finance, Regulatory Reporting and Product Control can understand and agree or disagree on the proposed changes.
Become the Group Finance specialist contact point for questions related to IB posting rules. Provide trainings to business line users in Group Finance, Regulatory Reporting and Product Control.
Ensure strong and dedicated communication with the business line users. Ensure coordination with business line users globally and ensure a region / entity neutral treatment.
You possess Degree in accounting or finance and internationally recognized accounting qualification (CA/CPA/CFA) or alternatively degree as business analyst.
You have total work experience of 5-7 years of which 5 years experience in financial accounting systems in a banking environment, preferably within Investment banking background.


text:
Cupcake & Dino: General Services reviews
by Captain Cats and the Nightrider | May 7, 2019 | Cartoons | 0 comments
Ahoy Captain Cats here and today I'm going to review a series on Netflix called Cupcake & Dino: General Services.
The series follows two brothers name Cupcake, who is a cupcake with a Napoleon complex and his T-Rex fun-loving brother Dino, yes I know sounds like the odd couple but for kids and your right but there is more to that. They both run a company that does nothing but general services aka odd jobs; a good example would be their grandmother told the boys to take her date home so she can go on another date with someone else, don't ask.
The series takes place in a town, in which the rest of the cast is made up of food, animals, objects, mythical creatures and of course humans. The series is a mix of live action and animation, and it's done very well here. The show look, feel, and the color is like one big colorfest to the eyes, which is not a bad thing at all. The writing is all around funny and at times very smart. The voice acting is on par with how the series is, one big mess of fun and enjoyment. Justin Collette and Mark Little who voice Cupcake and Dino do a great job bringing these two to life in such a way only they can.
With two seasons ready to watch, season one was by far the best.; it was amusing all around and very smart and witty at times. Season two, on the other hand, was a hit and miss, some episodes were good while others were head scratching and not worth watching.
Overall Cupcake & Dino is an excellent show with a few bumps in the road. Sit down and either watch it with friends, family or just for yourself and have a good time.
Golden Kamuy Season 3 Review
Netflix and Discovery Canada's Frontier After a Binge


2 Between Flexibility and Stability: Ad Hoc Procedures and/or Judicial Institutions?
4 Towards Reinforcing or Contesting the Vision of the Rule of Law?
9 Governance of Financial Crises: A Role for the International Protection of Economic and Social Rights?
12 'Return of Cultural Treasures to their Countries of Origin': Principle or Trend in Cultural Property Law?
29 Most-Favoured Nation and National Treatment in the EU and US Regional Trade Agreements-Tools for Equal or Discriminatory Treatment?
Photini Pazartzis is Professor of International Law at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
Maria Gavouneli is Assistant Professor of International Law at the University of Athens.


This is the very first "official" guest post by Leo Wurschmidt (Twitter), Co-Founder and Marketing Director for Triune Designs.
I've gotten to know Leo through this blog and another and have loved his passion and insight into marketing and the social media space. It is an honor to open up my blog to those that are passionate about using technology for the Kingdom, and so thanks Leo for being one of the first.
Charlotte finally put its name on the social media map – the Queen City hosted a bloggers' conference. It was a great conference full of "expert" panels and Q&A discussions that aimed to help local bloggers become better at their craft.
CLT WordCamp's how-to sessions provided information on utilizing current blog technology, creating better blog content, and ways to promote your blog. Mark Jaquith gave the final keynote address and discussed WordPress as a whole: its mission, how it operates and why the programmers leave it as an open source platform. Mark also gave us a preview of an awesome upgrade to WordPress 2.7.
While the conference served as a great learning experience, it accomplished something more important that should not be overlooked: CLT WordCamp took a small part of the Charlotte blogging community temporarily offline and enabled participants to have personal interaction with one another.
Do not get me wrong, I love technology and the Internet. The tools they provide are helpful in connecting people all around the world. They provide an extreme amount of value to our work, friendships and social lives.
We should not forget, though, that technology simply acts as a set of tools that provide us with a better opportunity to meet people (both locally and internationally) and reunite with distant friends. As we become more entrenched in technology and make it an increased part of our world we must not lose sight on the value of true, face-to-face interaction.
The WordCamp conference provided us the opportunity to get that human interaction every person needs. AT&T's old campaign: "reach out and touch someone" seemed very appropriate in my mind. Tweeting, blogging and even video chatting can not replicate what a bunch of handshakes and conversations over pizza gave us.
It is important for church leaders to keep this concept in mind. As churches become more reliant on technology to reach people and help them come to know Christ the person-to-person relationships can accidentally be overlooked.
Here is a good related article about our goals relationships (and investing in others) as opposed to falling back on simple marketing: Why Churches Should Stop Marketing.
There are 20 comments already... Come join us!
I think social media has many values that are all great. One of the greatest is using online connections to inspire offline action. Whether that action is meeting face to face or just serving in your passion. I don't know that the relationships need to exist in both "planes" of community, but I do think the scope of how you express yourself needs to be in both of those planes. Does that make sense?
And… it's the TONY! (the man speaks truth).
i agree that we are no infinitely extendable and that our online persona's do not necessarily have to match 1:1 in the offline.
thanks for the weigh in. always appreciate.
I thought about it and maybe it is more clear this way. The greatest value of social media is that it is socially driven and expressive. The danger is that we become socially obese from all the connections we've made, and we get satisfied with just connection, and never being socially healthy. What is very cool to see is the number of site, widgets and UIs that are encouraging healthy social behavior through a renewed sense of civic, religious and compassionate responsibility.
I have to admit that I have found myself connecting via social networking with people I interact with face-to-face. Often it is easier to send a message via twitter or facebook instead of just calling them. I've had times when I just want to retreat to my office and communicate from afar. This is a reminder that I can't fall into that trap and that others need interaction, even if I don't, and it's not about me. Thanks Tony!
Tony, would love for you to "guest" post about this… you got time?
Thanks for stopping by Dave. I actually have dropped a few of my real-life contacts… interesting, huh?
Tony brings the pain. He blogged about it too.
Yeah, regardless of where we are (e.g. in front of the computer, at the coffee shop, or at church) we need to be mindful of our connections with people in actual relationships. I like your thought: "Christ's grace doesn't save computers or social media." Too true.
I think it makes perfect sense. I believe you are right in that it is how we express ourselves (in either plane) that is important. I always hear social media consultants refer to it as authenticity. Through that authenticity with others we inspire some of the aforementioned offline actions.
Did I confuse your thoughts too much?