text:
A15 and M1 Chips Could Stick Around for Longer Than Expected as Apple Chip Upgrades Slow Down
Friday April 1, 2022 3:28 am PDT by Hartley Charlton
Apple's custom silicon chip upgrades may be slowing down, with the company reportedly planning to stick with existing chips in multiple new devices, according to recent reports.
In a tweet posted after Apple's spring "Peek Performance" event, insightful Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said that the 2022 MacBook Air will feature the M1 chip, rather than the next-generation M2 chip.
Everything we have heard about the new MacBook Air until now has said that it will feature the M2 chip with an 8-core CPU and 10-core GPU, and there have even been signs of this chip spotted in macOS Monterey. Despite this, Kuo has since confirmed to MacRumors that he believes the next MacBook Air will still contain an M1 chip, although he said it could be a modified version of the existing M1, presumably to help differentiate it from the current MacBook Air.
Apple launched the current MacBook Air in November 2020, featuring the M1 chip in the same design as the previous model. It seems plausible that Apple could be planning to entice customers to buy the new model with its complete redesign, MagSafe charging, new display, and more, rather than with a new chip.
The M1 was introduced with the MacBook Air, 13-inch MacBook Pro, and Mac mini in November 2020, but Apple put the chip in a new device as recently as March this year, with the fifth-generation iPad Air. With the M1 chip now being present in four Macs and two iPads, it seems plausible that Apple could be committed to maintaining the same chip across its devices for longer, rather than fragment its product lineups with different chips in similar devices.
Another rumor suggests that the M1 chip is not the only Apple silicon chip to be eked out in successive devices. It now looks like the iPhone 14 and "iPhone 14 Max" may contain the same A15 Bionic chip from the iPhone 13 lineup, with the next-generation A16 chip being exclusively reserved for the high-end iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max models. According to these recent rumors, it may be the case that Apple is moving to retain the same chips on its devices for multiple generations, at least for consumer-level devices.
Reserving the A16 chip for the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max could provide further differentiation between the standard and "Pro" iPhone lineups, enabling the high-end devices to offer next-level performance compared to the lower-cost models. Different chips would add to the current differences in terms of materials, memory, ProMotion, battery life, and camera capabilities between the Pro and non-Pro iPhone models.
While the move to seemingly slow down chip upgrades could be intentional, the global chip shortage and delays with TSMC's next-generation fabrication processes may also be to blame. In addition, there may be other factors like development costs and economies of scale that make retaining the same chip for longer more lucrative, as well as a desire to offer a bigger performance and efficiency jump with the innovation that can be achieved over a longer period of time.


text:
<project>
    <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
    <artifactId>part_004</artifactId>
    <version>2.0</version>
    <packaging>jar</packaging>
    <parent>
        <groupId>ru.skorikov</groupId>
        <artifactId>chapter_003</artifactId>
        <version>2.0</version>
    </parent>
</project>

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
Theonomic Find Surprises Historians
Boston Courthouse Clerk Recovers 300-year-old Court Minutes
BOSTON, Massachusetts – A Suffolk County courthouse worker made an astonishing find on a July day in 1996. While cleaning out a file cabinet, Supreme Judicial Court clerk Richard Rouse stumbled on one-of-a-kind hand written manuscripts. The two leather bound volumes contain proceedings detailing Puritan prosecutions of witches, adulterers, and slaves. The decayed, fraying records provide students of the Puritan theocracy an astonishing look at Massachusetts' civil law proceedings spanning the years 1673 to 1695.
One of the volumes was first discovered in 1901 and the proceedings were hand copied for use by historians and scholars. No one knows how the volume was lost again, but the second volume, which details dozens of more cases, is of more interest because state archivists believe that it is the first time that it has ever been discovered. These court proceedings of civil trials from the years 1673 to 1695 were unavailable for study until now.
Modern theonomists, those who study biblical law's application to modern society, are interested in Puritan New England as an example of a working theonomic government. Theonomists would like to find in Puritan America a model of liberty under the law of God applied to the civil and religious spheres. The Massachusetts Puritans saw themselves as a theocracy: literally, "a government under God." The language describing the proceedings is brimming with biblical allusions. However, the judgments often stray from strict applications of biblical law, nor is there frequent reference to Scripture as the basis for the judgments rendered.
The following are samples of cases, including witchcraft and adultery, found in the Record of the Court of Assistants, Colony of the Massachusetts Bay, 1673 to 1692, which were published in the Boston Herald on July 9, 1996.1 These cases have never before been available for study. The 17th century spelling of words and punctuation, which was not yet standardized, has been preserved in order to maintain absolute accuracy of transcription from the handwritten manuscripts.
Elisabeth Johnson wickedly, feloniously and maliciously a covenant with the Devill did make by which diabolical covenant she gave herself both soule and body to the Devill and signed the Devill's book and by him was baptized and under him renounced her Christian baptism and God and Christ and owned the Devill to be her God and promised to serve and obey him forever, by which wicked covenant thee the said Elisabeth Johnson is become a detestable witch. [Note: This charge was later dropped. Johnson and others accused of witchcraft were acquitted.]
Ruth Reed being Committed to prison & brought to the barr to Answer for that having binn about fowe yeares in England absent from hir husband and bringing wth hir a child of About two yeares old affirming that she received it at Brandford in England that August in Lyndon who changing his name to John Rogers & hirselfe by the name of Robekah Rogers as she also Affirmed betweene whom seuerall letters wickedly (as if man & wife had passed between them which are on file, and that John Rogers told hir the childs name was John Rogers and most impudently there parts imposing the sajd child on hir husband Wm Read The Court sentenct the sajd Ruth Reed that named hirself Rebeckah Rogers if found in this Colony two month after this date that shee stands in the markett place on a stoole for one hower wth a paper on hir breast wth y inscription THUS I STAND FOR MY ADVLTEROUS AND WHORISH CARRIAGE and that on a lecture day nex after the lecture and then be seuerely whipt wth thirty stripes.
Samuel Guile of Hauerill being Committed to Prison in order to his tryall for Committing a Rape was presented & Indicted by the Grand Jury was brought from the prison to the barr where holding vp his hand was Indicted by the name of Samuel Guile for not having the fear of God before his eyes & being Instigated by the divill did on or about the 25th day of December last in the woods violently & forcibly seize on & Comitt a rape on the body of Mary Ash the wife of John Ash of Amesbury Contrary to the peace of our Soueraigne Lord the King his Croune & dignity of the lawes of God & of this jurisdiction = to which he pleaded not Guilty and put himself on God & the Country = After the indictment & euidences were Read Comitted to the jury & are on file with the Reccords of this Court the Jury brought in yir verdict they found the prisone at the barr Guilty & he accordingly had a sentenc pronounct ag him yow Sam Guile are to Goe from hence to y place from whence yo came & thence to y place of execution & there be hang till yow be dead wch was accordingly donn 16 October 1675. = Six pounds eighteen shillings allowed for y Tresurer to pay newberry men as witnesses out of the state of sajd Guile in his power as also out of the estate to pay unto Mary Ash fiue pounds.
Amy Wellen the indictment being found ag hir by the Grand jury was brought to y barr Refusing to object ag any of y jury trialls holding vp hir hand at y barr was Indicted by y name of Amy Wellen wife to Richard Wellen for not having the feare of god before hir eyes did sometime(s) the last spring being whin a twelve moneth being instigated by the divill comitt Adultery wth Glandfeild of black point in the house of willjam Buttyn of black point Contary to y peace of our Soueraigne Lord his Croune & dignity the lawes of God & of this jurisdiction to wch Indictment she pleaded not guilty & put hirself on tryall by God & the Country After y Indictment & euidences in the Case produced ag the prisoner at the barr were read Comitted to the jury & are on file wth the Reccords of this Cour The Grand Jury found hir not Guilty = & so she was dismist = The Grand Jury finding the like bill ag Jn Glandfeild of black point he was alike tried for Comitting adultery wth Amy Wellen mutatis mutan(dis) & on hearing of all y ev idences he jury found him not Guilty as above & he was (also) dismist.
Modern theonomists will immediately notice that the Massachusetts Puritan's approach to civil law was mixed. It remains for some ambitious student or historian to cull from the complete trial proceedings the genuine cases of theonomy and to compile a critique of when and how they missed the mark. For the sake of brevity here, I simply conclude that although the Puritans aimed at a theocratic and theonomic ideal, they did not achieve it. An honest historical view must take note of their failure as well as their success.
Theocracy of Ancient Israel: Pattern for Colonial New England
Theonomy is a term for the belief that the moral law of God is to be applied as a standard of righteousness for governing individuals and society. The term comes from the Greek for "God's law" and is the concept that all of the moral laws (those excluding the non-ceremonial and dietary laws) given to Moses and recorded in the Pentateuch are binding on people of all nations forever. Theonomy posits God's law as the only just standard for regulations in every human institution: family, church, and state.
Theocracy is the term for a nation ruled by God and God's law. Theocracy does not imply rule of the state by the church. The proper term here would be an ecclesiocracy. Although the church and the state are separate spheres of government, both are to be ruled by God's law.
Detractors of theonomy and theocracy like to argue that the civil law and its sanctions were limited to Old Covenant Israel because there was no separation of church and state in Israel's theocracy. Even a casual survey of the law of Moses disproves this conjecture. The Old Covenant commands that "alien and sojourners" in Israel, even those who were uncircumcised heathen, were bound to the civil law (Lev. 24:22).
Yet these foreigners were not required to keep most of the ceremonial aspects of the Mosaic law (Ex. 12:43,44,48; 9:33; Deut. 14:21). Only the circumcised were allowed to participate in the Passover, the old covenant communion meal. The two "marks of the covenant" separated members of the "church" from members of the "state." There was also a separation between the priests of the ceremonial law, the Levites, and the magistrates of the civil law, the elders and judges (Lev. 14:35; 27:11; Deut. 1:16; 16:18; 19:12; 21:2; 25:1).
In the New Covenant, the primary purpose of the church is to minister God's grace in the world. Christ's commission to the church was to preach salvation to the nations (Matt. 28:18-20). The Apostles were given the keys of the kingdom and the sword of the Spirit, the Word of God, in order to carry out the Great Commission. The state is to be a minister of justice (Rom. 13:1-7). It alone is given the sword of power to execute vengeance on those who would violate the law of God as expressed in the laws of the civil sphere. The church is never to control civil government, but may instruct state proceedings with biblical counsel (Deut. 17:8-13). The church is also expected to train godly men for civil leadership.
The problem, of course, with the colonial Massachusetts "theocracy" was that it was not a true theocracy with separation of powers, but an ecclesiocracy. Cotton Mather wrote: "Yet, after all…in this world a Church-State was impossible, whereinto there enters nothing which defiles."
On the other hand, it was this experiment with self-government which finally led to the emancipation of the colonies from the tyranny of the British crown in later years. In all fairness to the Massachusetts Puritans, we must realize that they came to the New World at a time when the Protestant Reformation was still very much in progress in England. A unifying and comprehensive church confession describing the relationship between church and state had not been adopted. Connecticut, Plymouth, and Rhode Island experimented with alternate forms of theocracy.
According to 19th century Harvard historian John Fiske: "The spirit in which the Hebrew prophet rebuked and humbled an idolatrous king was a spirit they could comprehend. Such a spirit was sure to manifest itself in cramping measures and in ugly acts of persecution; but it is none the less the fortunate alliance of that fervid religious enthusiasm with the Englishman's love of self government that our modern freedom owes its existence." 2
Modern theonomists can neither completely defend the rigidity of the Massachusetts Bay Colony nor completely disparage the attempts towards a godly separation of powers by Roger Williams and the Rhode Island colony. A more honest approach would be to settle on the example of civil liberty found in the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut.
The United States Constitution owes allegiance to Thomas Hooker, more than any other man, for providing a working model of decentralized government, one which had not appeared on the face of the earth since the time of the ancient Hebrews.
The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut was the first biblical covenant in modern times which founded a federal government. The Mayflower Compact was not a constitution, in that it did not define and limit the functions of government. The Magna Charta had the nature of a written constitution because it described the rights of the people, but it did not create a civil government.
This constitution states that Connecticut is submitted to the "Savior and Lord." There are none of the patronizing references to a "dread sovereign" or a "gracious king" nor the slightest allusion to the authority of British government or any other government over the colony. It presumes Connecticut to be self-governing. It does not describe church membership as a condition for suffrage. In this federation, all powers not granted to the General Court remained in the towns. Each township had equal representation in the General Court. The governor and the council were chosen by a majority vote of the people with almost universal suffrage.
In his sermon to the General Court, May 31, 1638, Hooker said, "The foundation of authority is laid in the free consent of the people…the choice of public magistrates belongs unto the people by God's own allowance…they who have power to appoint officers and magistrates have the right also to set the bounds and limitations of the power and place unto which they call them."
John Fiske writes: "It was the first written constitution known to history, that created a government, and it marked the beginnings of the American republic, of which Thomas Hooker deserves more than any other man to be called the father. The government of the United States today is in lineal descent more nearly related to that of Connecticut than to that of any of the other thirteen colonies." 3
The Hebrew Commonwealth: A Model for Separation of Powers
Christian leaders at the time of the drafting of the U.S. Constitution supported the division of church and state, with no sphere of government impinging upon another sphere. There is a reason why America's Christian leaders did not seek a return to a government administered by a king.
It was prophesied to the people of Israel by Samuel that this form of government would soon become intrusive (1 Sam. 8). There was to be no monarch but King Jesus. God commanded the model of government instituted by Moses, with tribal elders moderating civil disputes and the Levitical priests enforcing the covenant within the confines of the Tabernacle.
Some have called this model the "Hebrew Commonwealth" and have seen our present constitutional model of government as based on this ideal. In fact, a sermon preached in 1788 had the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in mind: The Republic of the Israelites An Example to the American States by Samuel Langdon. Langdon was prominent in securing the adoption of the Constitution as a delegate to the New Hampshire state convention in 1788.
The New Hampshire Congregationalist minister argues that Deuteronomy 4:5 is a model for our American republic. Thus, in the words of Langdon, we have proof that some representatives who ratified our Constitution were men who believed that: "the Israelites may be considered as a pattern to the world in all ages; …. Let us therefore look over their constitution and laws, enquire into their practice, and observe how their prosperity and fame depended on their strict observance of the divine commands both as to their government and religion." 4
The Old Covenant basis for the representative congress, the senate, the judicial system, the order of military, the religious and ceremonial observances, the different and weaker forms of government which succeeded that commanded by Moses, and the complete revelation supplied by Jesus Christ, are all expounded on by Langdon and then applied to the newly birthed American Republic. There are comparisons between Moses as Israelite general and Washington as our military leader, the twelve tribes and our thirteen colonies. Soon after this sermon was published the U.S. Constitution was ratified by New Hampshire.
Contribution of the First Great Awakening
Puritanism was carried into our form of civil government through the First Great Awakening by the waking up of the minds of all classes. The Awakening produced a general discussion of the principles of freedom and human rights, the habit of contending for rights with religious zeal, and the preparation of the mind for all questions pertaining to civil government in the American colonies. The very word "constitution" was carried into America's political discussion by the Puritans. To the Puritan mind, "constitution" is synonymous with "covenant" or "compact."
We can view the First Great Awakening of 1740 as the impetus for issuing the Declaration of Independence to King George III in 1776. While it would be stretching the truth to say that the Declaration of Independence was a civil covenant, it is obvious that the structure of the document had Puritan covenantalism in mind.
Although it is true that there was a strong deistic influence at the time of the signing of the Declaration, there is no question that there were the residual effects of strong Puritan influence. The American Revolution could not have occurred without the 150-year-old Puritan foundation in America.
Thomas Jefferson, a man described by his contemporaries as "a French infidel in respect to religion," was indebted to the Puritans for his model of civil government. The evangelical explosion of the Great Awakening in Puritan New England provided the seeds for the first Baptist churches to be planted in Episcopal Virginia, which held to a Calvinistic theology and a congregational form of church government. Jefferson gained his first clear idea of a republican government from seeing the congregationalism of a Baptist church in his vicinity. It was good politics, too, since he strengthened his state party's stance among the people through an alliance with the Baptists and all friends of religious freedom. 5
The Jeffersonian distinction between church and state is very different from the idea promoted in our day. The very phrase "separation of church and state" is very misleading. It is not a constitutional phrase but it came afterward in the writings of Jefferson. It originated as a Calvinist/Puritan distinction between the spheres of authority of church and civil government.
The church and the state are separate spheres of governmental authority. Separation of church and state does not mean separation of the civil sphere from God and God's law.
The issue is not whether the church should intrude on the state's affairs. The church should not. Neither should the state intrude on the church's affairs. But Jesus Christ intercedes in the affairs of both. Civil government is not secular, it still stands under the moral Law of God. This was the understanding of many American legislators until the 20th century.
1. Maggie Mulvihill, "Bewitching Find Shocks Historians," The Boston Herald , July 9, 1996, pp.1, 6, 7.
2. John Fiske, The Beginnings of New England or The Puritan Theocracy in its Relations to Civil Law and Religious Liberty , illustrated edition (Houghton, Mifflin and Company, Boston and New York, 1889), p. 274.
3. Ibid , pp. 137, 140.
4. Ellis Sandoz, ed., Political Sermons of the American Founding Era (Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, 1990), p. 946.
5 Joseph Tracy, The Great Awakening (Tappan and Dennet, Boston, 1842),

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Nov 18, 2020, 11:36am Caroline Reilly
On #ThxBirthControl Day, we're thanking birth control for letting people have the sex they want, the family they want, and the quality of life they want.
Did you know that the rules governing single people's access to birth control used to be different than the rules for married couples?
Today is "Thanks, Birth Control" Day. It's like Thanksgiving, but instead of celebrating genocide and forced assimilation, we celebrate the medical marvel that is birth control: a life-changing and lifesaving drug that lets people control when and whether to become parents, while helping many manage the symptoms of painful conditions like polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
Finding and choosing a birth control that works for your body is a personal and often difficult process: Maybe you swear by the pill, or maybe you're a Mirena evangelist. Maybe added hormones aren't your thing and you're into the copper IUD. And while there are other ways to prevent pregnancy—like condoms and other barrier methods—statistics show that if you are sexually active, chances are you have at one point used birth control.
There are a lot of people to thank for birth control: the scientists and researchers who created it; the advocates and lawmakers who continue to fight for access; the providers who walk patients through the process of finding the right option for them. But what would be the point of birth control if it were illegal to use it? That's where the landmark court cases that cemented birth control as a fundamental right come in.
Griswold v. Connecticut is widely understood as the landmark birth control case that legalized birth control. And it did—but only for some people.
In 1965, the Supreme Court ruled in Griswold v. Connecticut that the constitutional right to marital privacy meant doctors could not be criminalized for providing contraception to married couples. You might be thinking: wait—just married couples? Yup! Just married couples. For single people, the right to birth control did not become a reality until seven years later, in 1972.
Enter Eisenstadt v. Baird. After a Boston pro-choice activist was arrested and convicted of a felony for handing out foam spermicide to an unmarried woman, he challenged the Massachusetts law prohibiting distributing birth control to single people. The case reached the Supreme Court, which ruled that the law violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment because it treated single people differently from married couples.
When it comes to birth control, the Court ruled that the distinction between married and single people didn't pass the "rational basis test"—one of the standards of review that courts apply to determine whether a law is constitutional. The test asks whether the law in question is reasonably tied to a government interest. In Eisenstadt, the Court determined it was not. (For a deep dive into the levels of judicial scrutiny, you can check out this Boom! Lawyered explainer by my colleague, Imani Gandy.)
Essentially the Court said: Hey, if we're letting married people get it on without us inserting ourselves—pun intended—into what they do in the bedroom (or the kitchen or the living room or the car), we don't really have a good reason to keep single people from doing the same thing. And thus access to birth control for single people was born. (Again, pun intended.)
In the decades since Griswold and Eisenstadt, we've seen birth control access expanded and attacked. We've seen the Affordable Care Act cover contraception for millions, and we've seen conservatives lose their collective minds over this basic and fundamental part of health care being accessible for all.
But one thing has never changed: the importance of birth control for all who want and need it—to have the sex they want, the family they want, and the quality of life they want. And for that we say: Thanks, birth control!
Access to contraception, Birth Control, birth control access, Eisenstadt v. Baird, griswold v. connecticut, Law and Policy, Supreme Court
Analysis Law and Policy
Dec 28, 8:30am Lisa Needham
News Law and Policy
Justice Samuel Alito Went Off the Rails Over Your Birth Control
Nov 14, 9:00am Rewire News Group Staff
Two Very Different Abortion Access Stories Emerge After the Election
Nov 5, 1:19pm Danielle Campoamor
This 'Religious Liberty' Case Could Take Away Your Right to Adopt
Nov 2, 9:06am Lisa Needham


NEW YORK--U.S. oil futures rallied to a one-month high Tuesday after government forecasters lowered their estimate for domestic crude-oil production this year and next.
Light, sweet crude for May delivery settled up $2.12, or 2.1%, at $102.56 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, the highest settlement since March 7. Brent crude on the ICE futures exchange rose $1.85, or 1.8%, to $107.67 a barrel.
The U.S. is likely to produce 8.37 million barrels a day of crude oil this year, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said Tuesday. The projection is down from 8.39 million barrels a day in the EIA's previous forecast but still up from 7.44 million barrels a day in 2013. In 2015, the EIA forecasts production of 9.13 million barrels a day of oil, down from 9.16 million barrels a day previously.
U.S. oil production has been robust because of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques that have enabled energy producers to tap into supplies trapped in shale-oil fields. However, frigid weather this winter halted some production.
On the consumption side, the agency raised its 2014 forecast slightly from 18.89 million to 18.9 million barrels a day.
The EIA also increased its projection for prices this year. The U.S. oil benchmark will average $95.60 a barrel this year, 27 cents more than what was predicted in the EIA's March report and $2.31 less than last year's average.
The report, which was released at noon EDT, was "certainly a supportive element" for prices, said Tim Evans, analyst at Citi Futures Perspective.
Traders are also looking ahead to weekly EIA data on domestic oil and petroleum-product supplies, set to be released Wednesday at 10:30 a.m. EDT.
Analysts expect the report to show that U.S. crude-oil inventories rose by one million barrels, on average, in the week ended April 4, according to a Wall Street Journal survey.
Demand for crude oil is typically lower at this time of year as refineries shut down units to perform seasonal maintenance.
Gasoline stockpiles are expected to fall by 700,000 barrels, while stocks of distillates, which include heating oil and diesel, are expected to decline by 100,000 barrels.
Refinery use is seen rising 0.1 percentage point to 87.8% of capacity, based on EIA data.
The American Petroleum Institute, an industry group, said late Tuesday that its own data for the week showed a 7.1-million-barrel build in crude stocks, according to industry sources. The group also said gasoline supplies fell by 3.7 million barrels in the week and distillate stocks rose by 293,000 barrels, according to the sources.
Front-month May reformulated gasoline blendstock, or RBOB, settled up 5.41 cents, or 1.9%, at $2.9801 a gallon, the highest settlement price since March 4. May diesel rose 4.37 cents, or 1.5%, to $2.9344 a gallon.


text: ./kick.sh deploy ../../../../


text:
<?php
include('../clases/conexion.php');
//include('../clases/redireccion.php');
session_start();
$id= $_SESSION['id'];
$categoria= $_SESSION['categoria'];
$SelecionarNombre="SELECT * FROM PERSONAL WHERE idPERSONAL=$id";
$queryNombre=mysqli_query($conn,$SelecionarNombre);
$filanombre=mysqli_fetch_assoc($queryNombre);
$nombre=$filanombre['Nombre'];
?>

<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Vendedores</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../css/bootstrap.css" media="screen" title="no title" charset="utf-8">

Vendedor:<?php echo $nombre; ?>

				N° Pedido
				Estatus
				Prioridad

			<?php
			$selecionarpedido="SELECT * FROM PEDIDO WHERE PERSONAL_idPERSONAL=$id";
			$querypedido=mysqli_query($conn,$selecionarpedido);
			while ($filapedido=mysqli_fetch_array($querypedido))
			{
				echo '
';
				echo ''.$filapedido['NumPedido'].'	';
				echo ''.$filapedido['Estatus'].'	';
				echo ''.$filapedido['Prioridad'].'	';
				echo 'Seleccionar	';
				echo '
';
			}
			 ?>


Résumés – Are You Lost?
Wikipedia Definition – A résumé is a document that contains a summary or listing of relevant job experience and education. The résumé or CV is typically the first item that a potential employer encounters regarding the job seeker and is typically used to screen applicants, often followed by an interview, when seeking employment.
A Curriculum Vitae (loosely translated as course of life) provides an overview of a person's life and qualifications. It differs from a résumé in that it is appropriate for academic or medical careers and is far more comprehensive. A CV elaborates on education to a greater degree than a résumé. A résumé is tailor-made according to the post applied for. It is job-oriented and goal specific. One of the key characteristics of a proper résumé is conciseness.
Those of you that read my blog know that I have been out of work since September 2008. During this time I have met with or consulted with a variety of professionals: large scale recruiters, boutique recruiters, career coaches, life coaches, outplacement counselors, professional résumé writers, human resource professionals, etc. It is interesting to hear each professional's take on what the resume format should be.
See what I mean? It is confusing. I have revamped (totally overhauled) my resume several times based on the advice I was given. Honestly, while I have been around for sometime and have years of experience under my belt there are only so many ways to say something.
With millions of Americans out of work and the only thing to represent you is an 8-1/2 x 11 piece of papyrus, what should the resume format and message be? If the professionals cannot come to a consensus, how is the average Joe/Jane suppose to know?
Is the resume out-dated in these times?
So I have been attending various networking events around the tri-state area-events that specifically cater to senior IT executives.
I was a little apprehensive to attend functions like this because I really did not see the value for myself. Can a room full of other out-of-work IT executives provide any good leads? We are all looking for the same type of job. If anything, this is my competition. Why would anyone help the competition? But I digress….
People would come up to me and recite their resume – their elevator pitch. I have to be honest, I am not good with names and I am definitely not good remembering the intricacies of your last job. I am, however, good at remembering trivial details about a person. I think most people are good at that.
What are you trying to get out of the event? Is it knowledge transfer, critique of you resume, making contacts? Go in with a game plan.
Don't regurgitate your résumé to people. Honestly, the people I remembered the most were the ones that just talked about themselves, not the ones that spoke about managing a global ERP implementation. It makes it easier to remember you in a room full of other people that have also done ERP implementations. Know your audience.
Be yourself. Not your last job.
Be happy. You are in a room with other people out-of-work. It makes no sense to cry about your situation. Everyone is going through similar or worst ordeals in this economy.
Carry some business cards. Go to Kinkos (or FedEx Office – whatever they are calling themselves these days) and make 100 business cards for $30 and put your information on it and hand them out to people as you talk to them. A business card still goes a long way. Have fun with it be a little creative. And do not forget to add your LinkedIn profile address and blog.
I would like to hear stories from you about the networking events you attend and any tips you may have.
Yesterday I attend my first TENG meeting. The Technology Executives Networking Group. LLC (TENG) http://www.theteng.org. TENG is a great group with various chapters across the country.
Last night they had 3 speakers come to discuss recruiting and how best to market oneself.
Senior executives should not post their resumes on free sites like Dice, Monster. There are unscrupulous recruiters out there who will use your resume without you approving.
LinkedIn should be used wisely and discretionarily. Do not add contacts for the sake of adding contacts.
Keep your resume to one page (page and a half max). Senior executives by their very nature should be able to summarize information including their career history. This forces you to remove the fluff and keep your information current. Who cares if you interned at Company XYZ in your senior year of college. Other senior executives will be reviewing your resume. Their time is precious.
Your resume should be treated like a first date. Only provide enough information to get a second date. Anymore and you have the possibility of scaring of the other person.
If you have been working for sometime, it is not necessary to provide college information. Use this space for details about your current position. Again, who cares about your GPA 15+ years ago. You are a senior executive with proven experience.
Create an eye catching summary statement. You are selling yourself. SO SELL YOURSELF!
Be creative. In this market, you have to stand out from the pack.
Stay in contact with your network. Send periodic updates to them.
Be wary of recruiters that cold call you. They are just trolling for information or mining you.
Job postings on web sites usually mean the position has been filled. Very few senior executives get jobs via free websites. They get them through senior recruiters and networking.
Build relationships with some recruiters. Have a handful of recruiter names in your rolodex that you have met you and know your skill-set and experience.
Take chances. In a down economy, those that take risks get big rewards. You have nothing to loose.
I was born on March 31, 1972 in Brooklyn, New York. My father was an avionics engineer in the U.S. Army and my mother was a nurse. I grew up in a middle class family. Both parents were born in Trinidad. My grandparents were born in India. Where exactly has been lost. We were indentured servants brought to the Caribbean to harvest sugar cane and have been there since. We have no ties to India.
My father served in Vietnam; one of a handful of Hindus that served. He is American through and through. My mother was trained in England and is also an American. So I am first generation American along with my younger brother.
We moved from Brooklyn to upstate New York when I was 4. My father's unit was transferred, so the whole moved for a better life. I started school and was one of a few minorities in elementary school.
In high school I discovered industrial drafting and fell in love with it. From there I started taking architectural drafting classes. When my senior year rolled around and the time came to figure out where and what I was going to study I knew I wanted to study architecture.
Architecture like any other sophisticated practice has many sub disciplines i.e. medicine or law. I decided I wanted to be a designer and focused my efforts on understanding the concepts of solid and void and circulation-all concepts which are important to a successful building. Along with this understanding, any design student must learn how to present, project management, engineering, interior design, and history. I graduated and started working immediately as a draftsman/designer.
Like any graduate, I had big dreams to one day design the next famous building. However, I quickly learned that one has to pay bills. I learned that architects do not make huge salaries and work on smaller scale projects. When I graduated there were very projects where there was mass building. Most of the buildings being built were going up in Asia.
I joined a small firm that was specializing in network implementations in architectural, engineering, and construction firms. They needed someone with an architectural background to help transition these firms to CAD and computer networks. This is how I got involved in computers, networks, and data management. It was great. I learned how to repair computers and printers, how to set up networks, how to transition a firm from paper base processing to electronic processing. I was able to leverage my education and make money doing it.
Then in 1997 I joined a financial firm on Park Avenue. Not knowing anything about banking or financial services. This firm was a subsidiary that specialized in middle/large ticket leasing and offered specialized finance to corporate customers. They wanted someone to come onboard and help manage and grow their technology and help move from a paper base process to electronic. So I joined. I was a one man show. I did it all: building servers, racking them, backups, antivirus, email, etc. I was all hands on. I had designed and built a stable network with capacity to grow as business grew. Management loved it. They had a stable infrastructure that allowed them do conduct business. Twenty four hours a day, seven days a week I worked and I loved it.
Business started growing and there was a demand for more sophisticated systems: general ledger, accounting, market data, firewalls, disaster recovery sites. So I had to hire more staff to meet demand. Eleven plus years later, I had managed a successful IT operation that had weathered: Y2K, 9-11, blackouts, datacenter outages, upsizing and downsizing, a merger, branch office build out in London, increased regulatory process, and all the intricacies that come along with managing and IT department in a global organization.
So this is my story about how I went from building buildings to building networks.


For the first time, Stanford's Three Books program goes beyond the book: a documentary film, a suite of smartphone applications described on a website that includes articles and video documentation, as well as a book. It is hoped that the diversity of format encourages students to think about how ideas are expressed differently by the written word, in filmic presentation, through music, or by using contemporary social media.
In light of the opening of the $112 million Bing Concert Hall, Undergraduate Advising and Research (UAR) chose to focus Three Books 2012 on the arts and chose Professor Mark Applebaum to select the texts. Professor Applebaum believes the opening of the concert hall begs the questions: What is it for? Who gets to use it? The issue of access that surrounds the concert hall is deliberately paralleled in the Three Books selections: what ideas are worthy of our attention (a book about heavy metal); which people ought to make art (a film about a 4-year old); and who should have access to tools (a discussion about smartphone applications).
When the idea to examine smartphone applications initially surfaced, we were intrigued by the possibility and conscientious about the inclusion of a medium that, at first glance, may seem divisive. We understand the initial reaction the Three Books announcement has generated from some in our community because we share these concerns. Because equity and access are among our core values in UAR, we have gone to great lengths from the outset to make this an inclusive, deliberate and thought-provoking program for all of our incoming students this fall. In April, Professor Applebaum met with the Resident Fellows (who will lead the dorm discussions following the event) and shared an extensive study guide. Elements of this study guide are presented in a video that will be released to incoming students in July. Although these materials contextualize the program and selections, the short announcement sent to The Daily last month was instead a press release about the texts and described neither the plans for access nor the conceptual agenda of the program. Given that a news brief ("Three Books inspired by opening of Bing Concert Hall," May 25) and an editorial ("Choice for Three Books disappointing," June 1) reacted only to the press release, we'd like to elaborate on those issues here.
To be perfectly clear: there is no expectation that students own or buy a smartphone for this program. In a few weeks, students will receive a mailing that includes the book, DVD and a letter from Professor Applebaum introducing them to the program and a special Smule website set up by Professor Ge Wang exclusively for incoming students. The website provides video demonstrations of the applications, links to relevant articles about the culture and meaning of smartphone applications and ideas for expanding on uses for this technology. To fully engage in all of the content offered, students will need to dedicate several hours (not unlike reading a book). In some respects it is this website – not the apps themselves – that is the Three Books selection.
We want students to experience the applications first hand and have a plan for this. During New Student Orientation (NSO), residential staff will provide devices with the apps pre-loaded so students can explore them in person, make music with their dormmates and go on a campus sonic scavenger hunt together. This will be a scheduled activity during NSO – not unlike a field trip to a percussion studio in which everyone can use (but need not purchase) an instrument.
Part of that dialogue, we are certain, will address the Editorial Board's opinion that the apps don't offer an "opportunity for intellectual engagement." As an academic community, we actively encourage the expression of differing opinions, and the Board's questioning of the Three Books program aligns with our intent. However, we regret that the Board did not take the time to first learn about the logistical infrastructure and conceptual agenda supporting our selection. We believe, had the Board considered the goals and care that went into designing this year's program, it would share our excitement about what is sure to be a most thoughtful event. Even though the editorial failed to tell the full story, it has succeeded in sparking the very questions the selections are intended to provoke.


Building Community through Cultural Exploration!
On Tuesday, December 12, students from Melrose and Malden Catholic High Schools met at the CHS office in Malden to help wrap over 100 gifts for the Individuals we serve at the Cooperative for Human Services Inc! Though this time of year can be especially busy for students, these student volunteers were more than happy to come out and lend us a hand. We are always trying to find new ways to make connections in our local community. This project was particularly successful in that it allowed us to connect with a younger demographic, one we don't normally get a chance to work with. We are very grateful for the student volunteers who came out to help us prepare for a fun filled holiday season!


Pearl's portable configuration presets: How do they work?
Learn how to use Pearl's portable configuration presets feature to manage a fleet of Pearls and simplify the setup process in your next live event.
Why we added two new Pearl models and which models are right for you.
Innovative products & features, compelling content, tradeshow presences & more. Here's how we made a powerful impression on the pro AV space during 2015.
Learn how the induction of UVC drivers helped to shape the future of the video capture market and what that means for consumers.
Interviews, presentations, spectators and more! Our experience at Streaming Media West 2015.
One manager's take on Infocomm Connections 2015 and how his experience fuels creative development at Epiphan.
Just a few interesting things we noticed on the conference floor while connecting with fellow higher education AV professionals.
Lecture capture insights and more! Read on to learn about our experience at this interesting conference.
Have you ever seen a live stream where the presenters don't know which camera to look at? Get better results with a single camera.
Epiphan and Panopto will be working together at the EDUCAUSE Annual Conference 2015. Learn how we'll be combining AV tech for use in education.


text:
Tag: Gianfranco Zola
Chelsea assistant says Alvaro Morata must improve on his goalscoring
SuperFan
Chelsea assistant manager Gianfranco Zola believes Alvaro Morata must show an improvement in the goalscoring department, if he is to succeed with the west London side for the long-term. The Spain international has produced a mixed performance during his 18 months with the Blues where there has been more criticism than praise over his efforts […]
Alvaro Morata brace Gianfranco Zola
Gianfranco Zola says Chelsea must produce their best to beat Tottenham Hotspur
Chelsea assistant Gianfranco Zola believes the club should produce their best performance if they are to overcome Tottenham Hotspur at the semi-final stage of the League Cup. The Blues reached the last four of the Cup competition on Wednesday night after they secured a slender 1-0 triumph over Eddie Howe's Bournemouth. Speaking in a news […]
Eden Hazard Gianfranco Zola Maurizio Sarri


text:
/*
This is the main entry point for node app. This file does:
- Set's up http/express server
- Uses object from routes/index.js to map all the paths to their root react components.
*/
var express = require('express');
var reactViews = require('express-react-views');
var compression = require('compression')

var app = express();
var port = process.env.PORT || 3000;
// compress all requests
app.use(compression());

var routes = require('./routes');

//setup our login APIs
require('./loginapi')(app, express);

//setup our APIs
require('./api')(app, express);

app.set('view engine', 'js');
app.engine('js', reactViews.createEngine());

app.use(express.static(__dirname + '/public'));

//configure routes to their handlers
for (var i in routes){

  (function(i){
    app.get(routes[i].path,function(req, res){

      //cloning can be improved. This works for now.
      var stateClone = cloneObject(routes[i].initialState);

      //add user session data (if any)
      stateClone.data.userData = (req.user)?cloneObject(req.user):false;

      //remove password info
      if (stateClone.data.userData)
        delete stateClone.data.userData.password;

      routes[i].handler(stateClone,req,res);
    });
    console.log("route %s configured",routes[i].path);
  })(i)

}

function cloneObject(obj){
  return JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj));
}

app.listen(port, function () {
  console.log('server listening on port ' + port);
});