text:
Judge to Kate: Pay up.
Pay your bills, Kate, like everyone else.
The judge also ordered Kate to pay court fees.
http://m.standardspeaker.com/news/district-judge-rules-against-reality-tv-star-1.1148766
Sediments by Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator at 3:08 PM
Justice, finally. This is historic ;) The first day Kate's grifting was not only stopped, but punished.
God bless our courts.
Sheeple are Delusional said...
I'm doing a victory dance. :)
See, Kate? The tide has turned against you, you can't wiggle your way out of anything anymore!
Tucker's Mom said...
Bringing this comment to the new post.....I'm not at all surprised she appealed. Talk about pissing your money away. Just pay the lady what you owe her!
What cracks me up is that apparently, Kate testified that she had conversations about Jon and did NOT want to discuss her or her childhood (me thinks something is waaaay hidden there). So what, Kate?
Kate was receiving LaFair's services. It was she speaking and who cares if it was about Jon or the Pope? Kate used the Dr.'s services, allegedly told LaFair to come to LA and now she offers that she's not responsible because this was all for Jon?
Doesn't work that way, hon.
Sorry kids, your mom is wasting more of that money you've all made ;-(
Admin--any chance Kate would win this appeal? Over under?
A very small number of appeals prevail. You usually have to show the judge abused their discretion. The appellate court will give great deference to the judge. She's cooked. Pay up! You're not in family court anymore!
Good for Lafair. Except now they're gonna need the jaws of life to open Kate's purse.
Red letter day...haha!!
Falling like a brick said...
I wonder if any of her sheeple will pass along a bandaid to Kate because it looks like reality has bitten her right in her backside.
Ohh.ohh. wait. Maybe she can go on another talk show and whine and moan about this bill that she's stuck herself with.
Pay Your Bills Kate!
Ding Ding Ding!!! We have a winner!!
Yes, between Twittergate and this horrendously horrendous travesty having to pay LaFair's bill when SHE HAS BILLS IN HER PURSE THAT SHE CAN'T PAY!!, I see a sit down with Merideth Vierra very, very soon.
In fact, I bet Kate's packing her bags and calling car service to NYC right this very moment!
stupid is said...
Not only are AA and PP "jelus haters" who can't get roles, they've also faked the NAMBLA member to bring more attention to THEMSELVES.
This is another accusation and I hope PP sees it and sues their asses off.
A Minor Consideration and Protect.org PROTECT CHILDREN. Are the Kate fans finally admitting that they really don't care about children?
Stewmama said...
Finally! Thank you God! Not so smug now are you Kate?
It's not at all surprising that Kate doesn't pay her bills. All narcissists try and get out of paying for any and everything. My mother-in-law has NPD and has always tried to get out of paying for anything. She has also been evicted at least 1-2 times a year for the past 20 years for failure to pay rent. Her utilities are also regularly turned off for failure to pay. She of course blames everyone else (the landlord, the utility company, etc.).
It's also not surprising that she refused to discuss her childhood or anything pertaining to her in counseling. My mother-in-law has also refused to discuss anything about her or her past when family counseling was recommended in my husband's childhood. She got up and left the room and refuse to come back when the subject would come up in the sessions.
Tweet your heart out Katie said...
@Kateplusmy8 Kate Gosselin
@rusmokincrack @happylady58 You are correct. Never fun to have to clean up others messes, is it? Or pay their bills...
Was so hoping throwing Jon under the bus this time would come back and bite her in the butt. Snap!! Or, if you prefer, BAM!!
Someone pass Kate a mop. It's official. It's her mess. Just hers.
Kate's tweeting about bananagrams right now trying to pretend everything is just fine nothing to see here.
But...but...didn't the Judge know who she IS????
(I'm loving it.)
Kate Gosselin of Sinking Springs has to pay Creative Energy Options, White Haven, $10,476 – a figure that includes $151 in court costs, District Judge Gerald Feissner has ruled.
It is Sinking Spring, not Sinking Springs, and Kate is not "of Sinking Spring," she is "of Wernersville." Close, but no cigar. Don't these writers ever check their facts? She uses the UPS in Sinking Spring, but as far as I know, she doesn't live in a post office box.
Just pay the darn bill, Kate. You'll have more attorney's fees and court costs up the gazoo. The stick is already there, so I imagine it's going get crowded in there. What is she trying to prove?
You called it, admin. You were correct. With PA's screwed up court system, I had my doubts. How do you figure the appeal will go?
Stupid Sheep said...
and yet YOU are reading here daily.
Posted on the last thread that Kart just wants the publicity. Another day in court with boobyguard Steve. She's just desperate to stay in the news and is probably hoping for more than 15 people to show up for the appeal. She's probably deciding on her next court outfit and hoping someone will take her picture.
Yes, Adm, she's tweeting about Bananagrams and "competitive spellers unite"...uh, Kate, that knocks you outta the running.
Didn't she make the comment that the judge will see the truth (paraphrased - something like that?) I guess he did just that!
Sorry, admin, I asked your opinion about the appeal before I read your comment upthread. I guess I should read the posts before my fingers go into action!
Just one more thing and it is my opinion entirely and only an opinion, but I bet anything the Judge contacted Dr. Phil and found out that he despises Kate...it's been obvious to me for quite a long time. Maybe the Judge should have also contacted Emeril.
Very simple... PAY WHAT YOU OWE.
F*ck her, and her entitled a*s.
Permanent Name said...
Oops - an error there Pat -
Should read:
But...but... didn't the judge know who she WAS???
Past tense is more appropriate, wouldn't you agree?
Sorry, Pat, for the grammar police comment, but kart no longer 'is', she is now 'WAS', in capital letters...
Bwwaaaa hhhaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaa
Anyone think she'll become all Christian again and go around to churches (or set up a website)
to ask for donations to help her pay the bill the Judge who doesn't know how to help her is making her pay? And anybody think some of her fans would actually contribute?
YAAAAAAY!! PAY UP YOU GRIFTING WITCH. GOD, I CAN'T $TAND HER.
Linda G. said...
If her appeal loses (and I agree, she doesn't stand a chance) will she be charged with more legal/court fees?
By refusing to pay it, she's just cutting off her nose to spite her face, something NPDs often do. (Because they're NEVER wrong! Except in reality, sometimes they are, just like everyone else.)
Oh well, Kate, pay up! How many gymnastics lessons would $10K have bought?
Are civil cases like this taken on the "If you lose you don't pay" policy? If Kate does not have that protection, and if her lawyer is not already on retainer, she'll have a fairly good sized lawyer bill by the time she goes through an appeal. The last lawyer I used was several hundred dollars an hour, and that included charging me for phone time (which I fully understood)
Gimme Gimme said...
I think she is trying to cut a deal with bananagrams. She doesn't name drop for nothing.
Sherill said...
Angrim is a class act! I really enjoyed her chapter in WG's book. Just excellent.
No regrets said...
We all know what is going to happen. Kate will, as usual, blame all this on Jon, as will the fans. The Judge will be vilified. Blah blah
I guess LaFair proved her case. Kate testified SHE called LaFair, testified SHE talked to LaFair, LaFair even testified that Jon REFUSED to talk to her. Funny, if Jon insisted LaFair be there. WHY would he refuse.
Oh well, the judge ruled. LaFair proved her case.
Oh well. The judge has spoken.
(underwalt)
Jenna Does said...
Why appeal? So she just can't lose?? What is the point? Just pay the damn fee & move the eff on. She just HAS to be in the papers, on the internet & in the news somehow huh? So ridiculous. She can keep paying & paying & taking up tax payers time & money. She will just keep appealing until she says; "Duh, this cost me more in legal fees than the original fee for the therapy"...when will she learn & just back down? Ya can't win them all, but I guess Kate the narcissist does not realize that, does she?
~Hippie Chick~
No regrets: Kate's fans on twitter are already very plainly blaming Jon. It's pathetic. Nothing is ever Kate's fault to them. Or to her.
fidosmommy: I know here if you don't pay a civil judgment, it can be put on your credit report. Girlfriend doesn't want that.
I think Kate should have to pay EVERYBODY who was in court that day who had to look at her ugly hot pink dress and fried bleached hair, and who had to hear that nails-across-a-chalkboard- voice.
I'm sure Kate knew about this suit ages before the public ever did. Had she simply tried to settle with this gal, she probably could have gotten out of this mess paying only 7,000 or 8,000 of the actual bill, an agreement to keep it confidential, and none of us never would have known this narcissist was refusing to pay an excellent therapist for her services, services she told Kate she didn't even want to give in the first place but Kate insisted!
But nooooo, KATE NEVER GIVES IN.
Well, Kate, got news for ya. A court has ordered you to give in.
I wonder if anyone in sheepleland has ever had to bill hours. Or if they ever had a business where they ever had to bill anyone. How would THEY feel if someone didn't pay their bill?
Don't the sheeple think if this were Jon's bill she would have, oh I don't know, sued JON. But attorneys are not permitted to file frivilous lawsuits in court against people who don't owe their clients anything! This wasn't Jon's bill, Jon never even talked to her according to the actual testimony. Kate was the one with all the contacts. I as well as many others said this looked very cut and dry to us, and we were right.
If I were this therapists' attorney and I had a choice to sue Kate or Jon, I would absolutely pick Jon, hands down. His reputation to many has been a deadbeat dad who doesn't pay his bills. Kate's reputation is the victim. I would much prefer to sue the deadbeat dad. Just speaks to how obvious it is it was Kate's bill, not Jon's.
Sheeple? In the court of law, you sue the person who wronged you. Not the people you hate.
Oh and by the way, if this is Jon's bill Kate can sue Jon! The dispute was between Kate and the therapist. The judge now says Kate owes it. If Kate thinks Jon owes it, Kate should sue Jon.
Crickets, don't see any suit from Kate on this point. Kate didn't even mention this might be Jon's bill in her testimony. Wouldn't you want to raise that issue???
It's not Jon's bill, people, accept it.
Actually, I was surprised that the therapist didn't name both Jon and Kate in the original suit being that they were both married at the time. My thought was she would sue with a shotgun approach and not a targeted approach like she did with Kate.
On the other hand, she seemed more credible in her suit against Kate as she could have gone against both but had her facts and obviously her proof that Kate was the party she had the meeting of the minds with.
Sheeple can spin it like they want but the fat lady sang today and YES, this is the original Kelly aka underwalt.
HA-HA!
Absolutely. She will have to pay to file the appeal, and on top of that, she will have additional attorney's fees and court costs.
Appeals to her said...
To file an appeal and for it to be accepted, doesn't the person have to have a legitimate reason such as new evidence or that there was a mistake in procedure, etc (or have I watched too many legal shows and not paid close enough attention)? What grounds could Kate have to appeal this ruling other than she just doesn't agree with the verdict (and is that enough for a good appeal)?
Wait, so the guy supposedly from NAMBLA on Twitter was a hoax? I read on a couple other sites that it was supposed to be publicity for Kate, but would Kate really stoop that low? Even for her?
Just one more thing and it is my opinion entirely and only an opinion, but I bet anything the Judge contacted Dr. Phil and found out that he despises Kate..
If Dr. Phil despises Kate, why did he want to save their "brand" and not their "family", as Jon claimed?
To file an appeal and for it to be accepted, doesn't the person have to have a legitimate reason such as new evidence or that there was a mistake in procedure, etc (or have I watched too many legal shows and not paid close enough attention)?
I'm not admin, but in PA, anyone who doesn't agree with the decision can file an appeal in district court if the judgment was entered against him/her. It is not necessary to have new evidence or a "legitimate" reason. In fact, it is not even necessary to be represented by an attorney.
Appeals to her, Yea something I have experience with! I've written several appellate briefs, won a few. It's well understood you are lucky to win 2% of your appeals. It's one of the few professions you can be in where you suck all the time and still keep your job, ha.
Anyone can file a NOTICE of appeal for any reason or no reason, which is what this is. All that tells the appellate court is that you want the record (transcripts and reports) and will either file a brief or a no merits letter. Then typically you get a certain amount of time to review the whole record and decide whether there are any MERITORIOUS issues to appeal. That's right, yes, an appeal HAS to have some kind of merits. If you got nothing, you are obligated to let the court know. In fact, you can be disiplined, even disbarred for filing frivilous appeal briefs and wasting the court's time.
If after review you decide there are no issues, you simply send a short brief/letter to the court letting them no there are no issues. The end, appeal over. If you think in good faith there are any appealable issues, then you file a brief and the court gives you a schedule for the other party to reply, and a hearing for oral arguments. It's not typically another trial, it's usually a panel of appellate judges. Kate likely wouldn't even be there.
I a case like this where it was just a judge, like I said usually they're going to have to find the judge abused his/her discretion somehow. Typically that means a decision so wild and out there and outrageous it defies reason. Does this happen? Absolutely. Often? Absolutely not.
This was a he said she said case. The contract law is clear. All a judge has to say in their record is they found LaFair credible and Kate not credible. Appellate court doesn't touch that kind of thing. Credibility is the trial judge's call.
I think Jon paid his part of the bill or is making payments - at least it sounds as if that's the way things stand with Lafair. This is from an interview she gave:
"I did this because I believe people need to be held accountable," Dr. Lafair tells us. "We all need to be held accountable for agreements that we make and that's why this was filed … it's for services rendered that were never handled. Jon is handling his part." Dr. Lafair wouldn't comment on any of the specifics.
http://hollywoodcelebritygossipnews.com/list/Dr.%20Sylvia%20Lafair
She's not going to appellate court. She's going from district court to the Circuit Court in Luzerne County. Doesn't she get to retry her case as would happen here in Maryland. Once the decision is rendered in Circuit Court here, the appeal then goes to appellate court where they have a decorum, have to argue on mistakes made by the lower court or case law that supports the appeal and it is either affirmed and sent back to the lower court for review on points or a new trial? You know better than I do but this case was tried at such a low level, wouldn't she be able to try all over again at the circuit level?
Seem fairly simple to me. Kate called and requested her services, not Jon. Per her own statement in court. When she left the court house and I quote. "I told the truth".
Kelly, I didn't realize there was another court higher than this one before the appellate courts.
If that's the case yes she'd have to go to that court too. I would have to research it, but I find it hard to believe she is entitled to an automatic re-hearing in the higher court. I think she would still have to show some kind of error. Otherwise, it would render this lower court a kangaroo court with no final judgments. A court whose judgments are worth nothing if you can just get another bite at the apple someplace higher.
Actually first, not too.
A friend of mine is currently going through the appeals process as the result of a case she lost in district court. She didn't agree with the decision and her attorney filed the notice of appeal. It's been seven months since the reply brief was filed, and still nothing. I imagine if Kate does go through with this, it may be a long and expensive process. Why doesn't she just pay this darn thing and move on?
This won't be another trail for Kate. It's all paperwork, and my friend was told that although there was a document missing when her case was presented, and a key witness didn't show up on the court date, there's nothing she can do about it because the appellate court isn't a trial court.
I had an appeal take TWO YEARS. Kate will spend way more than $10,000 paying for this stupid bill.
PAY UP.
Admin, I don't doubt what you say. In Maryland there is the District Court where civil and misdemeanors and traffic offenses are heard. They can be tried before a judge or opt for a jury trial. If they opt for the jury trial, it is bumped up to the circuit level.
If it's a civil case on a district level, and heard by a judge, they can appeal it to the circuit court and the trial starts over again. They have to post an appeal bond with the clerk and a date is set. Once it goes to the Circuit Court, the judges decision can be appealed to a higher court but only on merits and mistakes on the judges part i.e. instructions to a jury or case law.
When it goes to the appellate level, the case is either affirmed or sent back to the Circuit with instructions or an order for retrial.
In Kates case, I think she can retry the case on the circuit level but once there and a decision rendered, it will be highly unlikely that she could win on appeal at a higher level if the circuit court affirms the lower courts decision. Again, I defer to your experience,education and knowledge. This is Maryland, where the men are men and the women are too.
Kelly, I am assuming three courts in the following order, and mind you states may have different names for them. CA actually calls its LOWEST courts superior--confusing!
1. Trial court 2. appellate court 3. state supreme court
If there is some court between Kate's trial court and the appellate court I don't know, she'd have to follow their procedures.
Again we say, pay up and LET IT GO.
Agreed, At this point Dr. Lafair can now collect on her judgement, appeal or not and then the burden on Kate is to either vacate the judgement or attempt to stop the garnishment. Good luck with either.
I'm sure the legal fees exceeded $3,500 to defend this canard.
If legal fees haven't already surpassed 10 grand, they sure will now. What a waste of the children's money.
I have this disturbing flash of the future of the kids grown and taking Kate to court to get their money back. Naturally Kate will lose, but WON'T PAY UP. Ugh.
Yes, she will, and she should have been advised of this. Is this just plain stubbornness on her part?
Interesting that Kelly said she will go from the district court to the Circuit Court. I think that the next level up in PA is the Court of Common Pleas. As far as I know, my friend, who lives in another state, didn't present her case in another court. Everything was handled by her attorney.
If a case is lost in district court in PA, the first step is to file the notice of appeal. It's possible that in PA if the dj decides against you, you do have the right for your case to go to Common Pleas. I'm curious now - will do some investigating (unless admin has the time to do it!)...
Hey! I found Kate and the sheeple's philosophy on the back of a truck:
http://9gag.com/gag/122485/
But I'm a reality t.v. star... said...
This is simply unbelievable...oh but wait we are discussing Kate Gosselin and her narcissistic, entitled way of living so maybe it's not.
Kate contacts LaFair because she is desperate to save the brand and "fix" Jon. And then she doesn't want to pay the bill. Like I said it's unbelievable.
PJ's momma said...
I suspect this may be the card that gets pulled that will cause the whole house of cards to eventually crash down. I'm sure she wasn't expecting this ruling; she has gotten away with everything for so long and nobody has called her on her BS and she just keeps getting paid and grifting and trying to be relevant in the public eye. The end is near. Hope she has a Plan B because she is going to need one.
Kate is going to drag this out as long as possible, no matter what or if she was advised to do the opposite. It's all about HER. That SHE has to be right, she's in charge--that's NEVER going to change, SHE'S KATE GOSSELIN! Oh, please! Even if she chosen to drag this out she's only actually digging deeper and deeper into her pockets. It's actually sad. But this is the life SHE chose, she chose to put kids on tv, herself on tv, in the public eye. She has noboyd now to blame but HERSELF!
Batterednotbroken said...
Do you think that perhaps Khate will get TLC to pay this? She can whine to them saying she hired Dr Lafair to "protect the brand"
On another note....^5 to all :))
That was/is Khate personified. Thanks for sharing.
Oh my goodness, I just saw her latest tweet. No is never no to her. She is really delusional. The collapse is coming and she still refuses to acknowledge anything. She should just shut the hell up and say nothing, but she's not that smart. She manages to make herself look even more dumb, if that's possible. Face palm........
At this point, I think TLC is just letting her hang herself on twitter - another reason to cut her loose.
Kate has tweeted just now that there is nothing to worry about, she will not be defeated, and that "no is never no to me!" (paraphrasing her tweet)
I think Kate needs to learn the phrase "enough is enough."
silimom said...
Admin, if Kate loses on appeal and is required to pay LaFaire, then what? What are the consequences if she doesn't pay? Isn't it up to LaFaire to enforce the ruling? I suppose she can sick a collection agency on Kate, but I guess what I'm asking is whether there would be any legal consequence once she's required to pay and doesn't.
I guess I'm just a little cynical. At best, this is a victory on paper only. Kate could still go for years and refuse to pay the bill.
Oh my God she is certifiable. She truly is.
That tweet deserves its own post coming now.
Oh, I truly believe Kate is doing this just to
find the judge who will prove her right. I believe she will spend any amount of money to show Jon she didn't owe that $10,000 bill. It's all a matter of pride by now. She will not be defeated even if she has to lose her
phone, her house and one session with Ted Gibson. SHE WILL NOT BE WRONG.
This could very well go on for a very long time.
And the kids' college accounts remain unfunded.
Amen. If no is never no to her, does that only apply to Kate? What if she says "no" to her children? Is no never no to them? Does she even say "no" to them, and if so, what happens when they defy her? If they see their mother never taking no for an answer, wouldn't they think that they can do the same thing? What kind of screwed up parenting is this?
Fidosmommy:
"no is never no to me!" (paraphrasing her tweet)
isn't that what she said to Jon when he inially said NO to more babies after the twins were born.
TLC ship is sinking said...
Oh my goodness, I just saw her latest tweet. No is never no to her. She is really delusional.
So, is she really going to keep fighting this thing just to prove she's right, no matter what the cost? Good luck with that, Kate!
It was her truth, straight from the horse's mouth, that done her in. She couldn't lie on the stand this time.
She and her fans are delusional, especially blaming this on Jon. They blindly believe whatever Kate says instead of reading the facts i.e. Kate's testimony for themselves.
No wonder it was a gloomy day for Kate and she lacked the motivation to get things done. She was probably in bed all day suffering from another meltdown.
Is she selling the McMansion? This from GWoP blog:
...as of 5/13/2011
Rev Trust aggreement with William Blumer..
Home and land (23.88 acres) was purchased 10/23/2008 for $1,120,00
As of 5/13/2011 assessed value of the home was $482,000. The mortage is probably more than the assessed value.
LaFair's quote from today isn't getting a lot of attention. JON PAID HIS HALF.
Likely, since this was marriage counseling, which you know implies two people since it's usually two people in a marriage, if you get divorced with an unpaid bill you SPLIT IT. Down the line.
Jon paid his share, Kate didn't pay hers. Simple as that. It has nothing to do with how much Kate's twisted little head felt that Jon needed it more.
New post ya'll. You can stay in this one for general discussion of the court case, or jump to the other for specific discussion of Kate's narcissistic tweet.
Question for Admin - if and when Khate loses the appeal, can the court "garnish" her pay check to collect the fee? Thanks
You know, no matter what she does, she is not generating any interest anywhere. Lilo in a tight white mini garnered mass media coverage, Kate Kreider in a fugly pink smock, small town locals. I hope you learned something from your TLC paid scuba lesson, you will need it soon while you are swirling down that toilet.
Maryanne said...
Oh yeah, waaayyy too familiar with billing hours for services. If you don't get paid for services rendered you cannot even write it off as a bad debt. Architects only relatively recently were permitted to file a lien against a property if there is a failure to pay. Really, fat lot of good that does as you have to wait until the property is sold...even then chances are there are other liens filed by others, so you'e SOL.
Geez, deadbeats are despicable (I mean those able to pay but don't, like KG)
Court appeals process from district court is to the PA Court of Common Pleas
(Under B: 1)
http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/246/chapter300/s324.html
Midnight Madness said...
Maryanne said, "If you don't get paid for services rendered you cannot even write it off as a bad debt."
Are you sure about that? My accountant told me differently? Oops...
http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc453.html
Ingrid said...
In Wis. I believe we have a 50/50 law so any outstanding bills incurred during a marriage can be split between the couple when divorcing. (Unless they both agree to do it differently) It doesn't matter who made the bill- they both can be held responsible. (which it sounds like Jon paid his half) I work with a girl who almost got stuck with her (ex)husband's $50,000 business loan that he never told her about before the divorce. Luckily they worked it out and he got it all.
I don't know what PA laws in divorce are but if similar that should make it obviously her responsibility.
Lorrie said...
What happened to Kate being a "contract honorer"? So glad someone finally took her down a peg or two!
so sick of her said...
I really think that, this whole thing about the Ped was a plant, to get everyone to ignore the law suit. Kate should pay her bills. According to 2 article now, Jon paid his half. I watched the View this morning, and Kate was not invited to Sherri Shepards, Shower. I also noticed that Kate has not been tweeting much. What TLC muzzle her.
She claims there was no contract. If there was no contract (in her mind) then you can't honor one!
New Show for Kate? said...
http://www.deadline.com/2011/05/cw-to-pickup-new-reality-series-h8r-which-pairs-celebrities-with-their-haters/
She'll be on every week!
Just a Philly lawyer said...
Am also an atty. I definitely would have advised Katie Kreider Gosselin to keep her mouth shut. When she said that the doctor "was trying to make money off of riding Jon's celebrity" in that courtroom, after the Judge heard that Kate wanted the doc to talk Jon into working on their Brand, well that was the nail in the coffin for Kate. She should have had an atty go with her, had the atty speak for her, unless directed by her atty to speak and never, ever tried to discredit the doctor.
Facts: Dr. was called by Kate, flew to LA, spoke with kate for many hrs and all about getting Jon to "stay with the Brand".
If this goes to appeal, I would advise the doc to have Jon issued a subpoena along with the right reverend Dr. Phil who advised this counseling service. Then Katie Kreider Gosselin would be paying fees, court fees and interest plus the Judge could tack on a Punitive charge on Katie for lying (punishment amount of money and it could be as much as the amt owed the doctor)
Love this, wearing that trampy pink dress with that overblown, whiteish blonde hair with the flat iron marks in it. Wow, she is one hell of a piece of low class garbage.
TLC did not bail her out of this one. So, I say to Jon, go to court and get your co custody rights back NOW. Don't look like TLC is running around with their law dept for katie, huh?
WOW!!!PA ATTORNEY, Great stuff there. Glad to see your response. Hoping that Jon read it and it actually goes to appeal however as of the close of business today, still no filing.
Would love to read more of your insight into this and the flaws you see with this totally lopsided custody arrangement that has seemed to only benefit Kate.
Just A Philly Lawyer said: Love this, wearing that trampy pink dress with that overblown, whiteish blonde hair with the flat iron marks in it. Wow, she is one hell of a piece of low class garbage
Pants On Fire: What do you think? :)
Then Katie Kreider Gosselin would be paying fees, court fees and interest plus the Judge could tack on a Punitive charge on Katie for lying (punishment amount of money and it could be as much as the amt owed the doctor
#############
Punitive damages for perjury? Wouldn't the attorney for the plaintiff have to prove malicious misconduct? Is there a cap in PA on punitive damages?
Are punitive damages awarded in contract disputes? I didn't think they were. Moreover, this was held in district court where no punitive damages are awarded. If it goes to appeal, can punitive damages be levied if the suit originated in magisterial court?
"If this goes to appeal, I would advise the doc to have Jon issued a subpoena along with the right reverend Dr. Phil who advised this counseling service."
I wasn't aware that Dr. Phil advised Dr. Lafair. Kate said that she had her own counselor, Dr. Phil, but where was it reported that Dr. Phil advised LaFair's counseling service? I didn't know that Dr. Phil was Dr. Lafair's adviser.
"When she said that the doctor "was trying to make money off of riding Jon's celebrity" in that courtroom, after the Judge heard that Kate wanted the doc to talk Jon into working on their Brand, well that was the nail in the coffin for Kate"
Where did this direct quote come from? Was this in a transcript of the hearing? If so, is this online, or is this "insider" information? The judge made the statement that he wouldn't give the reason for his decision in Lafair's favor.
"She should have had an atty go with her,"
She was represented at the hearing by her attorney, Kimberly Borland.
Oh yeah, that quote of Katie about the doc, was something that was on the TV. The doc was asked by the TV crews, local, about that comment and I'm sure I paraphrased it, but it was right on the money with content. The interviewer asked her how she felt about that comment and the doc said, "it hurt to hear her say that" (Remember that doc waited almost 2 yrs to file for the money, she understood the family was in turmoil with the divorce and she said that in the courtroom, she said somewhere, perhaps in the complaint how long she has sent bills to Kate and not acknowedged and on the news) Again, we have Kate with her meanness just coming out NATURALLY.
Anyhow, not perjury, as she just described her feelings not evidence. She blurted that out because the doctor had her evidence. She should have kept her mouth shut. Not because she would have won, but she cheapened herself even more and insulted that woman who did everything for an enormous amount of time, 2 yrs, before filing.
Doesn't look like Kate has the TLC law dept or PR dept fighting for her any longer, huh?
What is happening, no new contract? Maybe.
Jon should file now because he has been stable worked, etc,, good chances plus no TLC law dept to fight for use of her and kids, huh?
Now direct those questions to the Admin, wow I spent so much time on her, makes me angry at me for giving her my Saturday time.
She is ruining her own reputation even more.
That pink dress still bothers me, I wonder why the pink dress and he with the red tie. Did she want to look good for her neighbors? The press? But no professional hair and makeup.
Isn't TLC taking care of her anymore?
"Anyhow, not perjury, as she just described her feelings not evidence."
In your previous post, you said, "Then Katie Kreider Gosselin would be paying fees, court fees and interest plus the Judge could tack on a Punitive charge on Katie for lying (punishment amount of money and it could be as much as the amt owed the doctor"
Lying under oath is perjury. Yet, in your last post, you said, "not lying." If lying is not perjury, then what is it, and how would punitive damages be assessed for "lying," the amount to be as great as the judgment itself?
You didn't address my question on whether punitive damages can be awarded in magisterial district court, and if an appeal is made, can punitive damages be awarded if the original suit was initiated in district court?
"Oh yeah, that quote of Katie about the doc, was something that was on the TV. The doc was asked by the TV crews, local, about that comment and I'm sure I paraphrased it, but it was right on the money with content. The interviewer asked her how she felt about that comment and the doc said, "it hurt to hear her say that"
What is "THAT" comment, and you said "local" station? What station was that? I watch the Philadelphia stations and I didn't see any television interview. Is the interview online?
"Now direct those questions to the Admin, wow I spent so much time on her, makes me angry at me for giving her my Saturday time."
Admin isn't the one who brought up the issue of perjury, which is why I addressed my question to you.
The SOL in Pennsylvania in district court for written and oral contracts is four years. Perhaps Kate was hoping that Dr. Lafair would just let it slide and the SOL would run out.
Sorry, but I'm not buying any of this.
E-Town, I'm with you on this. Something about all this info sounds odd to me. I apologize if I am wrong, but I just can't help it.
The word card is crossing my mind.....credit card? Birthday card? Ace of Spades? Gift card? Calling card? Why is that?
LoriT said...
Mareeam said...
A Pink Straight Jacket For Kat said...
Want to see your comment published? Follow a few simple rules:
1. Do not use Anonymous. Pick a name (click Name/URL to type in a name) and stick to the same name.
2. Anonymous insider stories should be emailed to us directly (in confidence). They will not be posted here unless we can verify the validity, such as with photos. This is not to discourage legitimate insiders from speaking out, but to guard against all the fake stories out there.
3. No insulting other posters or picking fights, refusing to let things go and move on. Stop with the snotty comments--they will be rejected. Treat people here like how you would talk to the person you most respect in your life, it's just pleasant that way.
4. No trash talking other blogs/bloggers here.
Kate describes class field trip with the kids as '...
Could Kate play with the big celebrity boys and gi...
Kate: "No is never no to me!"
Grocery store filming
Jon: I want to 'build a normal life for them when ...
Two bits to get y'alls purdy picture taken, partners!
Recap: Philly Fun! See how educational-ish Philly ...
Falling faster than a Skyjumper: Ratings hit anoth...
Kate Plus 8 Philly Fun! Discussion Thread


The Hidden Valley tailings storage facility (TSF) has set a new precedent in environmental management of tailings in Papua New Guinea (PNG). Modern mining in PNG arguably began with the development of Bougainville Copper in the late 1960s, and continued through to Ok Tedi, Porgera, Lihir, Misima (and others). These mines have proceeded with deep sea or riverine tailings deposition, rather than construction of a tailings dam to retain the mine waste within an impoundment; as is the practice throughout the majority of the mining industry.
The Hidden Valley TSF is comprised of two large earth and rock fill dams, raised by the downstream method. Starter dam construction was completed in 2009. At final height the Main Dam will be one of the highest tailings dams in the world. The dams are constructed of pit waste and therefore have the dual function of storing tailings and waste rock.
Construction of the starter dams and subsequent raises is complicated by conditions at the site. Water management was, and remains, the dominant issue. High rainfall, weak erosive soils, material availability, dense vegetation and remoteness of the site provide constant challenges to construction. The Observational Approach to construction was recommended by the designers and adopted by the mine operator. This involves a knowledgeable pre-assessment of what is likely to change and having contingency plans to deal with possible major issues. This approach allows changes to the design during construction so the "as-built" product is suited for the site, fit for purpose, and remains consistent with the overall intent of the design.
The TSF has been in operation since August 2009 and monitoring data of the structures has been collected during construction and operation. This data is reviewed to confirm design assumptions and assess dam performance.
Personnel involved with this project combined their experiences working in the PNG environment and dam building from other locations. This process led to close interaction between the mine operators, designers and construction teams. Team work and diligent construction practices were and will continue to be necessary to construct and operate the pioneering TSF in PNG.
Murray, L., R. Friedel, G. Suter, J. Penman, J. Watt and H. Jitno. 2010. "Hidden Valley – Design and Construction of Highland Papua New Guinea," in: ANCOLD 2010, Dam Decisions, Past Experiences, Future Challenges, Hobart, Tasmania, November 3-5, 2010. Hobart: Australian National Committee on Large Dams.
If you are interested in obtaining this publication, please email marketing@klohn.com. We may be able to provide you with a copy, depending on copyright restrictions. For more papers visit the technical publications page.


text:
Q: Fast datastructure for doing geohash lookups I have two sets of data, A and B, that I am trying to create matches between.  Values in set A correspond to locations of people, and values in set B correspond to locations of cities.  Location here is represented by a 10-digit geohash string.
I want to make a fast loop that, for every person in set A, associates a city from set B.  I found this fairly easy to do by having A and B as lists and using for loops.  However, the O(n) efficiency of the for loops is undesirable.  My second attempt at this problem was to use dictionaries to get O(1) time.  I want to do something like this:
for z in A.keys():
    for x in range(0,10):
        try:
            match_list.append([z,B[z[:-x]])  --this partial string lookup is not supported with dictionaries.
        except blahblahblah:
        .....

For those without geohash background: truncating a geohash string is like "zooming out" or trimming the decimals off a lat,long pair.
I've looked at this stackoverflow post for implementations that involve itertools, but I am too inexperienced to make sense of how to use them in this context.
Also, I have thought about making multiple dictionaries for each hash lengther, but this is problematic because there is a large up-front computational cost for making these dictionaries.
If anybody has a way to implement my idea, or an idea for a fast datastructure that could acheive my goals, please let me know!    Thanks for the help.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
package server

import (
	"fmt"
	"net/http"
	"time"

	"github.com/Sirupsen/logrus"
	"github.com/adolphlwq/webim/entity"
	"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)

// ContactAdd add contact relationship handler
func ContactAdd(c *gin.Context, appService *ServiceProvider) {
	var contact entity.Contact
	err := c.BindJSON(&contact)
	if err != nil {
		logrus.Warnln("parse contact info from request error: ", err.Error())
		c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, CommonResponse{
			Message: ErrMoreContactInfo,
		})
		return
	}

	if contact.FriendMax == "" || contact.FriendMin == "" {
		logrus.Warnln("need friendmax or friendmin of contact.")
		c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, CommonResponse{
			Message: ErrMoreContactInfo,
		})
		return
	}

	// check friend name existed
	contact.Standerize()
	isExisted1 := appService.MysqlClient.ChekcUserExistedByUsername(contact.FriendMax)
	if !isExisted1 {
		c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, CommonResponse{
			Message: fmt.Sprintf(ErrUsernameNotExistedTmpl, contact.FriendMax),
		})
		return
	}
	isExisted2 := appService.MysqlClient.ChekcUserExistedByUsername(contact.FriendMin)
	if !isExisted2 {
		c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, CommonResponse{
			Message: fmt.Sprintf(ErrUsernameNotExistedTmpl, contact.FriendMin),
		})
		return
	}

	// check if contact relationship existed
	var tmpContact entity.Contact
	appService.MysqlClient.DB.Where("friend_min = ? and friend_max = ?", contact.FriendMin, contact.FriendMax).First(&tmpContact)
	if tmpContact.FriendMax != "" {
		// relationship exists, check if active
		if tmpContact.State == "active" {
			c.JSON(http.StatusUnprocessableEntity, CommonResponse{
				Message: ErrContactRealitionshipExisted,
			})
			return
		}
		// relationship inactive, make it active
		appService.MysqlClient.DB.Model(&tmpContact).Update("state", "active")
		c.JSON(http.StatusOK, CommonResponse{
			Message: ContactAddSuccess,
		})
		return
	}

	// contact relationship does not exist, save to db
	contact.AddedTime = time.Now().UTC()
	contact.State = "active"
	appService.MysqlClient.DB.Create(&contact)
	c.JSON(http.StatusOK, CommonResponse{
		Message: ContactAddSuccess,
	})
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


Do You Want To Quit Sugar With Me? | The Free From Fairy.
So I am biting the bullet! I am starting the successful I Quit Sugar 8 Week Programme on Tuesday and I am wondering if you want to join me on the journey?
We all know how bad sugar is for us. I have blogged about it a lot, but if you are in doubt just look at the evidence around you….more obesity and type 2 diabetes and the highest rate of child obesity in Europe; we are sleepwalking into a health disaster that our wonderful NHS has no chance of coping with.
Those of you who know me will know that I have been trying to give up sugar for the last year. I've done it for a few months and then slipped slowly back into eating too much again. I have been suffering the consequences even in the small amounts that I have been eating. Headaches and a more unhappy tummy are signs that I have been eating too much of the white stuff along with too many high carbohydrate foods.
So when I was approached by the I Quit Sugar team run by Sarah Wilson, I decided to give the 8 week programme a go! I've nothing to loose, and the results she claims to get are impressive!
8 weeks of winter Meal Plans and Shopping Lists.
94% of previous 8 week programme Graduates would recommend the Program.
Sounds good eh? And in terms of the meal plans, in case you are wondering, you can choose from omnivore or vegetarian plans and then each meal has a gluten-free, dairy-free and paleo option! No low FODMAP option for me, but I think I will be able to adapt the recipes to suit, or just use my own! You never know Sarah might work with me to develop some low FODMAP options too!
One of the meals as part of the plan.
I shall also be trying to get the kids avoiding a bit more sugar. They don't do badly for kids, but with the help of Sarah's kids cookbook I am hoping to get some more ideas of how to encourage them to eat less. In addition to that book, Sarah seems to have written a multitude of books since my sister bought me her first one a few years ago! They range from family meals to chocolate (!) and can all be purchased on her website.
I will be blogging about my experiences over the next 8 weeks…so you'll get that extra element of support with one extra blog post from me per week.
Oh, and did I mention that if you join the programme with me I will get £10 for each referral, and 20% of every book purchase you make that originates from my site…which will help with raising the money to get my multipurpose, wholegrain, rice-free, gluten-free flour blend on the market?
So all in in it will be a win win for everyone! You get to be more healthy and you get to feel good about the fact that you are helping get a new product on the market that currently doesn't exist!
So what are you waiting for! Click on the link below and join me to a healthier, (hopefully) happier you, and we'll share the journey together!
« Maple & Pecan Seedy-Nut Clusters: A Glutenfree, Dairyfree, Eggfree, Soyafree, Refined Sugarfree Recipe!
Thanks Renee! It will be hard but I hope it will help!
Tempted…… but I don't generally do well on 'programmes'….. I am better self-motivated and currently hormones are seriously against me!
Good luck though……. I am sure you will do really well!!
Ah thanks Kate! I'm not sure I do well on programmes either, but I haven't stuck to it on my own so perhaps this will work instead! I'm hoping so! I'm also looking forward to not having to do too much meal planning. It will be like a holiday for me!!


text:
Home Nick Cannon Mornings Byron Allen Issues Official Statement On Comcast's Recently-Filed Opposition Petition To The...
Nick Cannon Mornings
Byron Allen Issues Official Statement On Comcast's Recently-Filed Opposition Petition To The FCC
The following is Byron Allen's official statement in response to Comcast's recently-filed opposition to the Entertainment Studios/NAAAOM petition to the FCC:Our lawsuits are not frivolous, which is why they are still pending in federal court, over one year after we have filed them.Everybody talks about diversity, and everybody complains about the lack of diversity. These lawsuits were filed to provide distribution and real economic inclusion for 100% African American-owned media.Comcast says our cable networks are not getting support. That is not true. Entertainment Studios has seven 24-hour HD networks, the largest privately-held portfolio of cable networks in the world, with approximately 80 million subscribers.The real issue here is these white executives are not used to an African American man holding them accountable. Charter Communications has an all-white male board, consisting of 16 members. No women. No Asians. No Hispanics. No African-Americans. How shameful in 2016.The cable industry spends $70 billion a year licensing cable networks and 100% African American-owned media receives ZERO. This is completely unacceptable.I challenge both Comcast and Charter Communications not to say that I am wrong, but to PROVE that I am wrong. Comcast and Charter should open up ALL their contracts and show the world what is on their platforms that is 100% African American-owned and participating in the billions of dollars they spend on programming every year.The deceitful arrogance of Comcast has been pervasive since seeking regulatory approval for the largest media merger in history. In order to gain regulatory approval for their acquisition of NBCUniversal, Comcast made commitments to the FCC. To date, Comcast has not executed on the commitments, nor have the FCC enforced the provisions. The same malpractice of a major regulatory agency refusing to do its job lead to the crash of the global economy. Just as the SEC trusted the major political caign donors of the banking world to write their own rules, the FCC is now allowing Comcast to skate on their commitments, and dictate when the regulators are allowed to do their job. The latest exle is Comcast stating categorically that the FCC does not have jurisdiction to hold Comcast accountable in the wake of the NBCUniversal merger. The ongoing behavior of Comcast, and the dereliction of duty by the FCC, makes the current FCC commissioners look like a bunch of buffoons.This is the very same thing Comcast told the FCC when Comcast got caught deploying software to slow down competitors' video on the web — the biggest threat to their business.Comcast's response is absolute proof that the FCC must stand up and prove to the world that they are doing what is in the public's best interest by making Comcast 100% transparent by opening up ALL of the contracts, and being held 100% accountable for their empty promises.Simply put, the contracts and the numbers do not lie, thus the reason for our lawsuits. Comcast and Charter: please prove me wrong. And President Obama: please deliver the hope and change you promised us!!!Byron AllenFounder, Chairman and CEOEntertainment StudiosAbout Entertainment StudiosEntertainment Studios, Inc. owns seven 24-hour HD cable networks serving nearly 80 million subscribers: PETS.TV, COMEDY.TV, RECIPE.TV, CARS.TV, ES.TV, MYDESTINATION.TV, and JUSTICE CENTRAL.TV. The company also produces, distributes, and sells advertising for 40 television programs, making it one of the largest independent producers/distributors of first-run syndicated television programming for broadcast television stations. With a library of over 5,000 hours of owned content across multiple genres, Entertainment Studios provides video content to broadcast television stations, cable television networks, mobile devices, multimedia platforms, and the World Wide Web. Our mission is to provide excellent programming to our viewers, online users, and Fortune 500 advertising partners. Chairman and CEO Byron Allen founded the company in 1993. Headquartered in Los Angeles, it has offices in New York, Chicago, Denver, and Raleigh. For more information, visit: www.es.tvAbout NAAAOMNAAAOM's mission is to eliminate racial discrimination and secure the economic inclusion of truly 100% African American-owned media through fair contracting and equal treatment practices. www.naaaom.comSOURCE Entertainment Studios

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Hewitt-Messenger Well Drilling & Pump Service is announcing the launching of Aqua Systems of SW Missouri a division of our current company. This is going to be providing a new line of product we are very excited about. It supplies the latest equipment for water softening, water treatment and purification. You can now get notifications on your smart phone when your softener needs salt or there is a problem that needs to be dealt with. See us for your water solutions!


A good friend I have known since I was 12 had her third baby last week and I had to make her a softie! She is crafty herself and I knew she would appreciate it.
I made this sweet bear from a woolen skirt given to me by my sister. The pattern is adorable and is by the very talented soft toy maker and pattern designer, Fiona Dalton of HopSkipJump. Fiona is Australian too and I just LOVE all the toys she makes. I have her HopSkipJump book and I have used it heaps already. I have made the mouse, cat, monkey, fox, bunny and now bear! If you are into making soft toys, this is such a good book to have. Fiona promotes sustainable sewing using lots of recycled fabrics and organics.
This pattern is called "Louis". I planned on making this bear if Emily was born a boy as we planned on naming her/him Louis!
So I finally made a Louis for gorgeous baby Gia Scarlett - what a lovely name! And she is so sweet!! The photo below was taken with my phone so is not super clear but you get an idea of how cute Gia is and how she stacks up against her new bear!!
I highly recommend Fiona's book - it has so many adorable patterns in it. You can see all the other toys I have made using Fiona's patterns by clicking here. Have a lovely weekend!
It's adorable, Suz! What a sweet gift (and darling baby!).
What a heartfelt present Suz :) I am sure your friend absolutely loves it! When I was a kid I was sewing soft toys by hand and loved it. Haven't made any since markets... must have burnt out!
Great gift, I love these type of photos of a baby with his/her plush animal. I have one with my son and his favorite bear when my son is 2 days old, it looks so huge in his baby pictures!
Such a lovely teddy bear!
Its always nice with handmade gifts. Im sure little one will love this bear.
Thank you Fiona! I love your patterns and am so glad you stopped by my blog!!
You've made a very cute softy! I love the detail of the 'G' you embroidered on the bear.
Cute bear, but woah super cute baby girl.
2. I was visiting when Suz and her beautiful girls gifted this sweet bear to Gia!


Those of you who want to have a refresh on their economics, please find a lovely 5 minute youtube video on 10 principles of economics. 10 principles of economics is a common textbook undergrad theme in US put up by leading economist Gregory Mankiw.
On another note, some of you are aware that I have moved out of executive responsibilities in ControlCase. I am going to survive on my shareholding returns henceforth..Reasons: I got bored, and I just felt what is the need to work?
Both of us being NITIE alumni, we thought that it would be just appropriate to offer the fruits to NITIE community first..One can make money by either selling, or creating the site the techical details we will give to persons selected.
Position B) As we have to ensure quality, we will do a selection pre-entry and performance assessment post-entry on this. Poor performers will get dropped out, and good performers will get more than proportional work.
So if you have wives, husbands, relatives, friends, or you yourselves who are idling all the time away in facebook/orkut, and Saas Bahu, you can approach us for any of the money making opportunities. We will give the first choice to NITIE community(alumni and current students), and reserve a 30 day period from today (Till January 14th 2010) in which we are not going to offer position (B) to anyone after which we will offer the positions to college kids other than those from NITIE.
Please note that the business model and pricing will keep on getting refined as we learn more and more. We are not accepting investors asthis is a low cost startup model, and the founders (Nikhil and me) don't need any startup capital for this one. Kindly don't approach us with any shareholding request. Suggestions to improve will be welcome, and good ones will be acknowledged.


The apartment house "Parco Nocc" in Gentilino, was built in 2017 and comprises 12 apartments and 4 villa, only 5 km to Lugano city and 1 km to the American/international school TASIS. The luxury duplex develop on 3 floors, it offers modern refined interiors and a private garden. From the large terraces and the own garden you enjoy magnificent view onto the lake and the surrounding nature.


Rent a Dumpster in Hummels Wharf Now!
Simply give us a call and we will answer any questions you may have about the Hummels Wharf dumpster rental procedure, allowed materials, size you may need, etc.
Our roll off containers can usually be delivered in Hummels Wharf the day after you place your order. Make sure to call us early to ensure timely delivery.
When you rent a temporary dumpster, your goal is to fill it up and have the waste hauled away. But if you want your waste recycled, you may have to really go about it in a slightly different fashion. Waste in most temporary dumpsters isn't recycled because the containers are so big and carry so much material.
If you are interested in recycling any waste from your project, check into getting smaller containers. Many firms in Hummels Wharf have a wide range of containers available, including those for recycling. All these are generally smaller than temporary dumpsters; they're the size of routine trash bins and smaller.
If you'd like to recycle, find out if the company you are working with uses single stream recycling (you don't need to sort the material) or if you'll need to organize the recyclable material into different containers (aluminum cans, cardboard, plastics, etc.) This can really make a difference in the total number of containers you have to rent.
One of the greatest concerns you probably have when renting a dumpster in Hummels Wharf is how much it'll cost. Among the finest methods to negate this fear is to have accurate info. When you phone to get a price quote, have recommended of just how much waste you will need to remove so you may get the top recommendation on dumpster size. If you're unsure on the quantity of waste, renting a size bigger will save you the extra expense of renting a second dumpster if the first proves overly little.
Supply any information you believe is relevant to make sure you don't end up paying for services that you don't really need. More than a few companies charge by the container size, while others charge by weight. Make sure you know which is which so you've a clear quote. Likewise, ensure that you ask whether the quote you get includes landfill charges; this will keep you from being surprised by an additional fee after.
Most cities or municipalities don't have many regulations regarding in Hummels Wharf as long as you keep the dumpster entirely on your own property during the rental period. Should you need to place your container on the road in any way, you'll likely need to get a permit from the correct building permit office in your town.
Most firms in Hummels Wharf will take care of securing this permit for you if you rent from them. Be sure that in case you're planning to set the dumpster on the road, the organization has made the proper arrangements. You should also ensure that you get the permit in a timely manner and at the correct cost. If you thought the dumpster company was getting a permit and they didn't, you'll be the person who will have to pay the fine that's issued by the authorities.
2. Give you and also the rental business plenty of time. It is best to phone ahead at least a week or two before you need the dumpster. If you attempt to schedule an appointment sooner than that, you could have a small selection.
3. Keep in touch with all the rental business. If anything changes in your schedule, contact the firm when possible to permit them to know. This way you can adjust the appointment as needed without limiting your choices.
All major credit cards accepted for dumpster rentals in Hummels Wharf.


November 23, 2016 Basketball, Jodie Wagner.
Five area teams and one from Satellite are scheduled to participate in the Palm Beach Central Thanksgiving Classic boys basketball event this weekend.
The host Broncos, Jupiter, John I. Leonard, Santaluces, Village Academy and Satellite will play games Friday and Saturday as part of the competition.
Admission is $5 per day.
John I. Leonard vs. Village Academy, 3 p.m.
Jupiter vs. Santaluces, 4:30 p.m.
Palm Beach Central vs. Satellite, 6 p.m.
John I. Leonard vs. Satellite, 3 p.m.
Jupiter vs. Village Academy, 4:30 p.m.
Palm Beach Central vs. Santaluces, 6 p.m.


22mm - 2 point adjustable. Engineered to'Activate More Grip', sway bars are principally designed to reduce body roll or sway. By reducing body roll, lateral loads are spread more evenly across the tires thereby increasing cornering grip and improving outright performance. The item "Ford Focus RS MK3 Whiteline BFR78Z Rear Anti-Roll Bar Kit 22mm" is in sale since Thursday, March 1, 2018.
This item is in the category "Vehicle Parts & Accessories\Car Parts\Suspension & Steering\Anti-Roll/Sway Bars". The seller is "monster_motorsport" and is located in Loughborough. This item can be shipped to United Kingdom, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Australia, United States, Canada, Brazil, Japan, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Norway, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Chile.


text:
By Hetty Musfirah Abdul Khamid, Channel NewsAsia, 18 Nov 2014
Former Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng said there is no immunity to the threat of radicalisation for any society, including Singapore.
Speaking at a seminar by the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) on Tuesday (Nov 18), Mr Wong said that the "vigilance of the security services must ultimately be augmented by the vigilance of the society itself."
He said groups like Islamic State (IS) are savvy in their use of social media to propagate radical rhetoric and recruit fighters to their cause. He also urged governments in the region to step up efforts in the sharing of information and intelligence.
Mr Wong said: "13 years on from 9/11 and Singapore's discovery of the regional JI (Jemaah Islamiyah) network, we are none the safer from the terrorism threat. The terrorism threat has not diminished, but has evolved and adapted to a more hostile security environment. It has also become more diffused with the rise of the phenomenon of self-radicalised or 'lone wolf' terrorists."
He felt that the conflict in Syria and and the IS have given new impetus to existing regional jihadist groups like JI and the Jemaah Anshorut Tauhid (JAT), which have sent their members to Syria to fight.
Mr Wong said the manner in which foreign fighters flock to Syria reminds him of how Muslims around the world had similarly been drawn to fight in the Soviet-Afghan war in the 1980s.
He added: "The Soviet-Afghan war not only led to the creation of the Al-Qaeda terrorist organisation, but also a global fraternity of terrorist brotherhood. Many governments anticipate that the Syrian conflict will likewise lead to the emergence of a new generation of mujahidin and the perpetuation of the terrorism menace for many years to come."
Mr Wong, who was also Minister for Home Affairs, recounted how Singapore had taken a multi-pronged approach to counter the threat of jihadist terrorism.
"Apart from investigations and exchange of intelligence with foreign security services, the Government held closed-door national dialogues with religious and community leaders to share our concerns on the terrorism threat and how we must not let it destroy our Singapore's social cohesion," he stated.
Mr Wong said there was also the awareness to go beyond the detention of JI members to counter the deviant religious teachings. A core group of religious teachers formed the Religious Rehabilitation Group (RRG) to provide religious counselling for the JI detainees and their families.
To this end, Mr Wong said that for some "hardcore" detainees, results so far have not been positive, and that they will only be released once they are rehabilitated.
Overall, he said that while Singapore has been successful in keeping the terrorism threat at bay, the general public must continue to remain vigilant and stay united in the event of an incident.
"The irony is, the more successful we are in our counter-terrorism efforts, the more the urgency and cogency of the terrorism threat will diminish in the public's consciousness," said Mr Wong. "We need every resident to be vigilant against this threat. Should we one day be unable to stop a bomb from exploding or a murderous act by an ISIL supporter in Singapore, I hope Singaporeans will have the resilience to overcome the attack, cope with the crisis and maintain our social cohesion."
No Indonesian laws to force terrorists to attend rehabilitation
By Walter Sim, The Straits Times, 19 Nov 2014
INDONESIA has no laws to compel detained terrorists to undergo rehabilitation programmes, and those who do so attend voluntarily, the former commander of the country's elite counter- terrorism task force, Detachment 88, said in Singapore yesterday.
Dr Muhammad Tito Karnavian, who now supervises counter-terrorism efforts, described this as "another challenge for us". But he said there have been promising results from among those who went through the programme and returned to society.
"Of course, we have some who are still quite radical. We're not giving up, of course. We're still approaching them," he said at a seminar on The New Threat Landscape, organised by the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) and Singapore Press Holdings.
Dr Tito was asked about Indonesia's rehabilitation programme, in the light of reports about the release of jailed militants over the next two years in Indonesia, and the adequacy of efforts to deradicalise and rehabilitate them.
He said the programme was voluntary as "we don't have a law to push them to join this kind of programme". "This is because of the democratic society we have today - people demand more democracy, more freedom, less intervention from government and so on."
He added that the National Counter-Terrorism Agency undertakes programmes which include community engagement to counter ideology, including what is accessible via social media and the Internet.
Earlier, he told about 150 participants, including diplomats and students, that at least 985 suspects have been dealt with since the 2002 Bali bombings.
There are 26 detained and under investigation; 32 on trial; 281 in prison; 97 killed during operations and raids; 12 who died in suicide bombings; three executed under capital punishment; 451 released after serving jail terms; and 83 acquitted due to the lack of evidence.
Responding to a question, Dr Tito said that while there have been improvements to monitoring the movement of illegals and others, the task has not been easy, given Indonesia's size and long border. This is why the authorities work with counterparts in neighbouring countries and use intelligence operations to monitor networks, he added.
Speaking earlier, former deputy prime minister and home affairs minister Wong Kan Seng said threats from groups such as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) extend far beyond the areas they currently operate, and Singapore is not immune.
Hence, the vigilance of security services against threats "must ultimately be augmented by the vigilance of the society itself".
Singapore has been fortunate to have the support of Muslim religious leaders and scholars, volunteers and others to build trust and resilience in society. This ensured a strong foundation of communal trust and social cohesion which will help Singapore, and Singaporeans, stay alert.
But Mr Wong worries the public might think the Syrian conflict and ISIS threat are far away and will not affect Singapore.
"The irony is, the more successful we are in our counter-terrorism efforts, the more the urgency and cogency of the terrorism threat will diminish in the public's consciousness."
The measures that speakers suggested to deal with the terrorism threat included cooperation and information sharing among intelligence agencies, border controls, and strong legislation on social media. Speakers included terrorism expert Rohan Gunaratna of RSIS.
The seminar ended with the launch of a book, Old Wars, New Methods, by former Straits Times senior writer M. Nirmala.
The book, which details new developments of the terror threat, is published by The Straits Times Press. It costs $15 (including GST), and will be available at major bookstores from today.
Fears over ex-inmates returning to terror acts
By Wahyudi Soeriaatmadja Indonesia Correspondent In Jakarta, The Straits Times, 19 Nov 2014
INDONESIA'S release of convicted Jemaah Islamiah (JI) member Taufik Abdul Halim last week has drawn attention to the imminent release of a number of terror detainees from Indonesian jails over the next few years and sparked questions over whether they might return to their old ways.
But analysts say the Indonesian authorities are keeping close watch on former militants who have served their prison terms, as they try to stop those who might otherwise return to terror acts, especially with the growing appeal of extremist group Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in radical circles.
Over 800 people have been convicted of terror offences over the past decade, and about 270 are still serving their prison terms.
One of those behind bars in Indonesia is Abu Dujana, 44, a former JI military commander who was sentenced to a 15-year jail term in 2008. Another is Abdullah Sunata, 36, who helped set up an Aceh paramilitary camp. He was sentenced to a 10-year jail term in April 2011.
Taufik, a 39-year-old Malaysian bomb expert for JI, was released last week after spending 12 years in an Indonesian prison. He was convicted of trying to bomb a mall in Jakarta in 2001.
"Most are not going to be a threat. Most are going to return to their families and friends and won't cause trouble - although there will certainly be a few who will," Ms Sidney Jones, director of the Jakarta-based Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict, told The Straits Times.
"What we have seen in the last two to three months is the stepped-up efforts of Indonesian correctional institutions to do a better job of monitoring prisoner activity and getting a better sense of who will constitute a risk when they are released," she said.
A deputy at Indonesia's National Counter-Terrorism Agency (BNPT), Major-General Agus Surya Bakti, said recently that around 30 of those released over the years have returned to their terrorist past. A number have been recaptured as they had been monitored by the authorities.
But analysts say the bigger task is to ensure that the number of recidivists remains low. For this to happen, they must be given help to find jobs and rejoin society.
Mr Adhe Bhakti, a researcher at the Jakarta-based Centre for the Study of Radicalism and Deradicalisation, argued that these former terrorists could be saved if they believed that Indonesia is not a legitimate battleground.
The government could then give them vocational training or capital to start a business, he told The Straits Times.
There are several ongoing efforts to engage the former radicals. Among them is one started by terrorism analyst Noor Huda Ismail of the Institute for International Peacebuilding, who helps former militants get vocational skills and capital to start small businesses, like restaurants and car repair workshops.
Mr Nasir Abas, a former JI leader who now works with the authorities to campaign against terrorism and counsel detained militants, said former terrorist inmates need to have more support to go back to a normal life.
"If we lose confidence, we will lose hope and we could fall back to the people who once 'helped' us," he said, referring to how radical groups try to win back former inmates.
Why KL can't arrest returning ISIS fighters
The Straits Times, 19 Nov 2014
KUALA LUMPUR - Proof, or rather, the lack of it, is holding back police from arresting Malaysians who return after fighting for the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) militant group, a senior intelligence source said.
"These Malaysians have not been picked up immediately because the burden of proof lies with the police, not the suspects," news website The Malaysian Insider reported the source as saying yesterday, pointing out that this evidence-gathering process requires time.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, the official said that although some Malaysians had posted pictures of themselves on social media, these had to be proven as genuine.
"If the Malaysian militant had posted an image of himself wielding an automatic rifle in the Middle East on Instagram or Facebook, police have to verify the image.
"First, was the image really taken in the Middle East? Is the image authentic and genuine? Witnesses are also required to verify if the suspect was really in the Middle East."
The official said that under the new Security Offences (Special Measures) Act passed in 2012, there were a number of boxes which police needed to tick.
"Getting statements from sources in the Middle East to confirm that a Malaysian citizen was there fighting alongside ISIS forces is insufficient," the official said.
"Police must build a strong case before a Malaysian suspect who fought alongside ISIS forces in the Middle East can be charged in court here."
Recent reports say that at least five ISIS militants had returned to Malaysia and that police had arrested three of them. The official said that of the three arrested, two were charged last week.
Labels: Outside World, Politics, Religion, Terrorism


text:
Araghchi reminds signatories to JCPOA to honor commitments
IRNA – Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in Beijing on Sunday that Iran nuclear deal is an achievement of international diplomacy and multilateralism, so all the signatories to JCPOA to honor their commitments.
He made the remarks in a joint press conference with his Chinese counterpart Ma Zhaoxu,
Araghchi said the two countries held consultations about the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
He said that since day one of the JCPOA, Iran has always held consultations with China over saving the international Agreement.
Araghchi said that the JCPOA is an agreement endorsed by the United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 and that the US pullout from the international deal is an outright violation of the UNSC Resolution.
He said that Iran has reduced commitments to the JCPOA and that no state should question Iran's remedial action for renegade on the nuclear deal by the US and the other states parties to the Agreement.
Araghchi said that the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear agency, has repeatedly verified that Iran abides by the JCPOA.
He said after the US quit the deal, Iran stayed fully committed to its JCPOA commitments for a year before starting to reduce them. Iran's reduction of its commitments doesn't mean it is quitting it and the Article 36 of the deal has envisaged remedial action for Iran when the other party does not abide by its commitments.
Article 36 of the deal says, "If Iran reach a point that any or all of the E3/EU+3 were not honoring their commitments to the JCPOA, Iran could refer the issue to the Joint Commission for settlement of the dispute. Similarly, if any of the E3/EU+3 believed that Iran was not meeting its commitments under this JCPOA, any of the E3/EU+3 could do the same ….. If the issue still has not been resolved to the satisfaction of the complaining participant, and if the complaining participant deems the issue to constitute significant nonperformance, then that participant could treat the unresolved issue as grounds to cease performing its commitments under this JCPOA in whole or in part and/or notify the UN Security Council that it believes the issue constitutes significant non-performance."
Araghchi added that Iran welcomes efforts made by all the JCPOA parties, especially China, to resolve the dispute.
Calling China a strategic partner and thanking the Chinese officials, he said that the two countries will continue with cooperation on regional and international issues, including the JCPOA.
On Saturday Araghchi, who is on a visit to China at the invitation of his Chinese counterpart to discuss Iran nuclear deal, told IRNA that the fact is that the Europeans are still serious about INSTEX and regard it as a trade mechanism to keep financial ties with Iran, despite the US sanctions, is per se of value.
Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, and the Netherlands issued a joint statement announcing that they are joining INSTEX to enter trade with Iran and to safeguard the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) signed by Iran and the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany, from which the US unilaterally withdrew in March 2018 and re-imposed its sanctions on Iran. The INSTEX was designed in the first place to make up for the US unilateral pullout of the deal.
The statement said that the deal was endorsed by the UNSC and is also an important element in the non-proliferation regime of nuclear weapons.
Saying that the INSTEX is in the final steps of operation, Araghchi said that the INSTEX, even during sanctions, can cover 20 percent of the economic relations of Iran.
He added that of course the economic ties between Iran and China don't need the INSTEX, the two countries have already designed their own mechanism. However, the Europeans said that after the INSTEX got underway and worked out, they will introduce the barter system to non-European countries as well.
Abbas Araqchi, Iran nuclear deal, JCPOA, Ma Zhaoxu	December 1, 2019
House of Rais Ali Delvari in Iran's Bushehr
IAEA's new head says watchdog to take up fair yet stern stance on Iran


text:
Change: All 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 All Carling Nations Cup European Cup Finals European Cup Play off European Cup Qualifier Four Nations Tournament Friendly Tournament US Nike Cup World Cup Finals World Cup Play Off World Cup Qualifier Move to: Players Matches Records Opponents This day Search engine Manual
16.06.1946 at 00:00 Stadium of Light, Lisbon Attendance: 50000
Portugal	 3 - 1	 Republic of Ireland
Referee: Wartburg (Switzerland) Friendly-match
Araujo 7,
Rogerio 17,
Peyroteo 20 None.
Opening squads
Azevedo,
Cardoso,
das Neves,
Amaro,
Feliciano,
F. Ferreira,
Lourenco,
Araujo,
Peyroteo,
Colado,
de Carvalho Ned Courtney
Billy Mc Millan
Tommy Aherne
Jackie Carey
Tommy Eglington
Davy Walsh
Joshua Sloan
Jack O'Reilly
Peter Farrell
Jimmy Mc Alinden
Bentes Con Martin
Bentes for de Carvalho Con Martin -> Ned Courtney (30)
None None.
Pictures from the match
Sunday, 16th June 1946
Con Martin plays in goal!
First game since 23rd May 1939:
Jackie Carey was the only player to have had played previously for Ireland at International level.
Portugal 3 (Peyroteo 2, Araujo)
Republic of Ireland 1 (O'Reilly)
Ireland: Ned Courtney (Cork Utd), Billy McMillan (Belfast Celtic), Tom Aherne (Belfast Celtic), Jackie Carey (Manchester Utd), Jackie Vernon (Belfast Celtic), Peter Farrell (Shamrock Rovers) capt, Jack O'Reilly (Cork Utd), Josiah Sloan (Arsenal), Davy Walsh (West Brom), Jimmy McAlinden (Portsmouth), Tommy Eglington (Shamrock Rovers)
Subs: Con Martin (Glentoran) for Courtney - 30 mins
Portugal: Azevedo, Cardoso, das Neves, Amaro, Feliciano, F. Ferreira, Lourenco, Araujo, Peyroteo, Colado, de Carvalho
Subs: Bentes for de Carvalho