text:
Physicists create synthetic magnetic monopole predicted more than 80 years ago
by Amherst College
Artistic illustration of the synthetic magnetic monopole. Credit: Heikka Valja.
(Phys.org) —Nearly 85 years after pioneering theoretical physicist Paul Dirac predicted the possibility of their existence, an international collaboration led by Amherst College Physics Professor David S. Hall '91 and Aalto University (Finland) Academy Research Fellow Mikko Möttönen has created, identified and photographed synthetic magnetic monopoles in Hall's laboratory on the Amherst campus. The groundbreaking accomplishment paves the way for the detection of the particles in nature, which would be a revolutionary development comparable to the discovery of the electron.
A paper about this work co-authored by Hall, Möttönen, Amherst postdoctoral research associate Michael Ray, Saugat Kandel '12 and Finnish graduate student Emmi Ruokokski was published today in the journal Nature.
"The creation of a synthetic magnetic monopole should provide us with unprecedented insight into aspects of the natural magnetic monopole—if indeed it exists," said Hall, explaining the implications of his work.
Ray, the paper's lead author and first to sight the monopoles in the laboratory, agreed, noting: "This is an incredible discovery. To be able to confirm the work of one of the most famous physicists is probably a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. I am proud and honored to have been part of this great collaborative effort."
Ordinarily, magnetic poles come in pairs: they have both a north pole and a south pole. As the name suggests, however, a magnetic monopole is a magnetic particle possessing only a single, isolated pole—a north pole without a south pole, or vice versa. In 1931, Dirac published a paper that explored the nature of these monopoles in the context of quantum mechanics. Despite extensive experimental searches since then, in everything from lunar samples—moon rock—to ancient fossilized minerals, no observation of a naturally-occurring magnetic monopole has yet been confirmed.
Hall's team adopted an innovative approach to investigating Dirac's theory, creating and identifying synthetic magnetic monopoles in an artificial magnetic field generated by a Bose-Einstein condensate, an extremely cold atomic gas tens of billionths of a degree warmer than absolute zero. The team relied upon theoretical work published by Möttönen and his student Ville Pietilä that suggested a particular sequence of changing external magnetic fields could lead to the creation of the synthetic monopole. Their experiments subsequently took place in the atomic refrigerator built by Hall and his students in his basement laboratory in the Merrill Science Center.
After resolving many technical challenges, the team was rewarded with photographs that confirmed the monopoles' presence at the ends of tiny quantum whirlpools within the ultracold gas. The result proves experimentally that Dirac's envisioned structures do exist in nature, explained Hall, even if the naturally occurring magnetic monopoles remain at large.
Finally seeing the synthetic monopole, said Hall, was one of the most exciting moments in his career. "It's not every day that you get to poke and prod the analog of an elusive fundamental particle under highly controlled conditions in the lab." He added that creation of synthetic electric and magnetic fields is a new and rapidly expanding branch of physics that may lead to the development and understanding of entirely new materials, such as higher-temperature superconductors for the lossless transmission of electricity. He also said that the team's discovery of the synthetic monopole provides a stronger foundation for current searches for magnetic monopoles that have even involved the famous Large Hadron Collider at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research. (Older theoretical models that described the post-Big Bang period predicted that they should be quite common, but a special model for the expansion of the universe that was later developed explained the extreme rarity of these particles.)
Added Aalto's Möttönen: "Our achievement opens up amazing avenues for quantum research. In the future, we want to get even a more complete correspondence with the natural magnetic monopole."
Hall, who was recently named a Fellow of the American Physical Society, said his team's experimental work arose out of interest from Amherst summer student researchers at a group meeting in 2011, well after Pietilä and Möttönen's 2009 paper had appeared in Physical Review Letters. "It felt as though Pietilä and Möttönen had written their letter with our apparatus in mind," he said, "so it was natural to write them with our questions. Were it not for the initial curiosity on the part of the students we would never have embarked on this project."
Artificial magnetic monopoles discovered
More information: Observation of Dirac Monopoles in a Synthetic Magnetic Field, M. W. Ray, E. Ruokokoski, S. Kandel, M. Möttönen, and D. S. Hall, Nature, 2014: dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12954
The method used in the monopole creation has been developed in: Creation of Dirac Monopoles in Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensates, V. Pietilä ja M. Möttönen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 030401 (2009): link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v103/e030401
Provided by Amherst College
Citation: Physicists create synthetic magnetic monopole predicted more than 80 years ago (2014, January 29) retrieved 18 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2014-01-physicists-synthetic-magnetic-monopole-years.html
Physicists Propose a Method to Observe Dirac Monopoles
Point-like defects in a quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles
Magnetic monopole experiment at CERN could rewrite laws of physics
Large-scale cousin of elusive 'magnetic monopoles' found
Freezing magnetic monopoles: How dipoles become monopoles and vice versa
Scientists piece together the largest U.S.-based dark matter experiment
Bottomonium particles don't go with the flow
Artificial intelligence designs metamaterials used in the invisibility cloak
Chaos theory provides a way for determining how pollutants travel
Weyl fermions discovered in another class of materials
Coupling qubits to sound in a multimode cavity
qquax
These kind of articles always fails to properly stress that we are dealing with monopole quasiparticles. They are not naked monopoles, and I'd wager there may not be any in nature and Maxwell's div B = 0 equation (i.e. Gauss' law) won't have to be modified.
MrVibrating
Rubbish - it's no more a 'monopole' than a bunch of disc magnets all glued same-side-up to a tennis ball...
Tell, you what, i've got something here even more amazing - it's a piece of string, with only one end, and doesn't even have a middle bit! It's just one end of a piece of string, but completely disembodied from any actual string. Yes it's a tricky beast to isolate, but i've nonetheless managed it - and it's just the left end. The right end and middle bit are completely absent!
A magnetic field is a vector quantity. It has magnitude and direction. There is no such objective entity as a 'pole' - they're merely subjective frames of reference between flux vectors - head-on = 'north' and end-on = 'south'.
For this reason it simply makes no sense to speak of monopoles - it's oxymoronic, a contradiction in terms!
Why are we so regularly condescended with these "yet another first (virtual) monopole"/s without so much as a nod to their classical incongruity?
Precisely - divergence of B is zero (for static fields) - Gauss's law for magnetism. I can only conclude that elementary monopoles must be a fallacious solution to the Dirac equation. I'd love to be proven wrong - but can anyone here, contributors or readers, explain away this basic conceptual paradox? If so i'm sure many here would love to read it..
it's no more a 'monopole' than a bunch of disc magnets all glued same-side-up to a tennis ball...
Maybe you missed the word 'synthetic' in the heading?
PPihkala
"Finnish graduate student Emmi Ruokokski was published today in the journal Nature."
I bet that last name should be Ruokokoski, because without o it would not be any Finnish name, but with o it is common one.
it's no more a 'monopole' than a bunch of disc magnets all glued same-side-up to a tennis ball
Inside of magnetic motors the same type of monopoles generates the mechanical work. The theory needn't to be violated globally for still being violated locally. In addition, these monopoles are all created within material phase, which is much more dense, than the vacuum, so that their entropy violating effects are much more intensive.
The same thing applies to the electric field, yet we have negative and positive electric charges in isolation. The existence of a magnetic monopole would mean the existence of a negative and positive magnet particle or equivalent, which we are simply calling a "monopole" for a lack of better name.
billpress11
We already have them, they are called the north and south poles.
He probably means something like the magnetic charge, i.e. the object with magnetic lines of force coming from single point. The magnetic particles always have a two poles at same moment, not just single one. IMO when we attach two magnets with the same poles each other, the magnetic domains inside of it will get the monopole state partially. It's analogy of Dirac fermions within superconductors and another materials with mutually squeezed fermions in it. These monopoles are still dipoles at the global level, but not withing local context of ferromagnetic material itself. The EM wave propagates more slowly inside of material than across vacuum around it, so if you're switching the monopole state on and off fast enough, you can get a sufficient level of radiative time arrow violation within material, i.e. the violation of entropic arrow. Inside of magnetic motors the mutually repulsing magnets change their distance fast, so that during brief time intervals you can violate thermodynamic
Maybe you missed the whole point of my reply: that such 'virtual' monopoles (which are a total triviality) are the only kind possible - because magnetic flux is a vector; it has direction.
Can't you see the contradiction? To put it another way, if only one end of this flux vector is here in this reality, then where's the other end - what dimensions does it occupy? Ie. a conventional magnetic field occupies a volume in 3-space, hence a true monopole in 3-space couldn't be a vector (it'd be scalar). And again - there's no such things as 'poles' anyway - they're not an intrinsic component of the field; a flux loop has no poles... and once you get your head around that, you realise that two and zero are the only rational quantities of magnetic poles we can meaningfully speak of...
Well no, motors work using conventional (ie. real) magnetic fields - they're vectors, one and all. They leverage time-dependent I/O asymmetries, (ie. powering a coil when aligned to a given stator pole) - otherwise they wouldn't be able to do any work (cos the curl of B = 0). But all the fields being applied are still bipolar - they're virtual-photon polarisations, lowering the local vacuum entropy. And all EM's and PM's use 'material phase' domains!
You can't have a monopole magnet precisely because you can't have a monopolar magnetic field
Charge is a scalar - no direction implied. Magnetism has that extra dimension, which is intrinsic to its identity. Inextricably so, from here i'm afraid..
Well, probably not macroscopically/statically. But locally and temporarily we can prepare the monopoles - and this is just the moment, when we could utilize them for negentropic thermodynamics. But magnetic monopoles already exist in stable form of CP violation. For example the asymmetric jets of black holes can be explained just with monopole concept - these objects are creating magnetic field stronger at one pole due to their intrinsic asymmetry. Such a black hole behaves like the vortex ring rotating at place - it sucks the space-time from one pole and throws it out at another. The resulting space-time drag leads into violation of magnetic field symmetry around it, i.e. into monopole. I presume, the CP violation observed for some atom nuclei is of the same origin: they do emit particles in preferential direction in similar way like the tiny black holes with asymmetric jets.
suggested a particular sequence of changing external magnetic fields could lead to the creation of the synthetic monopole. Their experiments subsequently took place in the atomic refrigerator
The spontaneous cooling bellow temperature of environment is prohibited in entropic thermodynamics.
@Nestle - the most well-thought out answer so far, but i still have issues with it - yes you can make pseudo-monopoles in a lattice, but each domain remains a dipole. Magnetism according to SR is an effect between charges in relative motion, and according to QED an exchange of ambient angular momentum - in either case the sign of the momentum imparted is a function of the flux vector orientations relative to the charges' acceleration vector... hence how, and in what dimensions, would you move charges to generate a scalar magnetic field between them?
Again, magnetism without moving charges is meaningless, yet moving them in 3-space yields a dipole field. True monopoles just don't make sense on any level..
Rutherord's first paper (1886) dealt with time-dependent non-dissipative losses (violating classical symmetry), so i'm with you there, and propagation rate IS a function of field density, but if either end of a magnetic field held different magnitudes, that'd break Maxwell..!
MrVibrating, the motivation for a magnetic monopoles is almost as old as the Maxwell equations, as magnetic monopoles would make them look perfectly symmetric in the way they are commonly written.
Curiously, if you write them using Clifford geometric algebra it makes much more sense to treat the magnetic field as bi-vector while the electric one remains a vector field, i.e. this symmetry then appears more as a mirage of an inferior notation.
@Nestle, sorry, not seeing the relevance of CP violation / chiralty, but negentropic thermodynamics is a fascinating and neglected area (2LoT is a real glass-half-full persepctive IMHO - we wouldn't even be here without negentropic gradients!)
Fundamentally though i can't accept that B can have alternate values depending on the direction it's measured from - sure, it can change over time (ie. between measurements) but the instantaneous value for a field's poles can only ever be equal. Basically you're suggesting a temporal rather than spatial virtual monopole - which may even be possible, however not via a Maxwellian or Lorentzian type asymmetry, IMHO. Frame-dragged distortions wouldn't qualify either (10/10 for imaginative effort tho!)..
Cross-sectional flux density could vary between poles, but that's not quite the same thing, simply trading distance for force - the curl's still zero..
Monopoles would make perpetual motion machines possible.. that's gotta be a big clue!
not seeing the relevance of CP violation / chiralty
Why not to check it before replying blindly?
frame-dragged distortions wouldn't qualify either
Why not? It's a well known effect predicted with GR.
The problem is, the mainstream physics is willing to study the phenomena just after when they have theory developed. It fits the contemporary religion, in which the formal math and theory is everything in science, but if Tesla or Faraday would delay their research in similar way, we would never have the electricity installed in out kitchens. The only solution is to fire the theorists and to give their money to experimenters.
Eeks a mathematician! (runs away)
Seriously though - you're suggesting monopoles would just be aesthetically pleasing? I was under the impression their existence was a specific prediction / solution - of the Dirac equation... which i'm presuming must be a red herring..
I had to Google Clifford algebra but if it obviates monopoles then i approve.. i'll have to keep an eye out for an idiot's guide..
The magnetic monopole can apply for so-called scalar waves generation in Tesla experiments too. It's actually quite easy to imagine it: the magnetic field is created by current impulse around toroidal coil - but just during brief period of time, which is so short, that the magnetic field has not enough of time to revolve it. As the result, during the brief impulse the electromagnetic field is generated just with one side of coil preferentially.
The scalar waves and dark matter are all closely related to magnetic monopole concept (so called the anapoles). The anapoles are behaving like tiny gravitational lenses, so that the light waves tend to refract and revolve them - but because they're so temporary, that the EM wave has not enough of time to complete its motion around it in symmetrical way at the opposite end of gravity lens - and the resulting magnetic field will remain unsymmetrical, i.e. monopole.
Why not to http://arxiv.org/.../9206263 before replying blindly?
Well sure IF they existed (if they could) then they'd be a candidate explanation. That tentative 'IF' is my whole reservation tho..
It'd count the same way as my mono-ended string (hint, the other end is really just hidden in my fist - it's sleight of hand!)..
It'd be virtual, not physical.
OU could cause a local variation in fundamental constants precipitating the mother of all fallouts.. careful what you wish for!
Inside of vacuum its not easy to prepare monopoles in this way, because the light is spreading pretty fast through it and the vacuum density is affected with electrostatic field intensity in small extent only (Tesla did use the megavolt generators and magnetic extinguisher of discharge for faster interruption of current). But inside of solid phase or boson condensates the effective speed of EM propagation is much lower (actually just a few meters per second inside of boson condensates), so that the fooling of Maxwell's theory in this way is much simpler. Also, the temporal formation of anapoles, i.e. temporal lenses for EM waves is much easier, because the effective refractive index of boson condensates can be modulated in much wider extent. The same applies for propagation of magnetons within ferromagnetics. The monopoles do exist only inside of solid phase, but they're slow enough for introduction of negentropic effect even for slow switching speed of magnetic field.
The field's a product of the current - its magnitude may be time dependent, but not its symmetry. You're thinking of Sv - entropy viscosity (per Rutherford) - but it doesn't work the way you're thinking - at every instant in the evolution of the field curl and div = 0.
Sv is interesting in that it's a potentially non-thermodynamic loss mechanism (calorimetry would imply energy destruction), and i'm open to persuasion as to its reversibility, however not via a Maxwellian violation. To accept anything else would be a religious leap.
Porgie
So, does it repel everything or attract everything? After all, they are saying magnetic.
It'd repel like-poles and attract complimentary ones, just as its ambidextrous counterpart..
It'd be virtual, not physical
The Rayleigh scattering and blue color of sky is caused with virtual density fluctuations too (the atmosphere density are getting averaged, so for slowly changing EM waves the atmosphere appears homogeneous and transparent - but not for waves of higher frequency). Even the virtual particles can have permanent effects, when they emerge at sufficiently high density. Therefore the devices like the MEG cannot amplify the EM signal for sufficiently fast changing AC current, but they still fulfill the Maxwell laws perfectly for DC current.
You're thinking of Sv - entropy viscosity (per Rutherford) - but it doesn't work the way you're thinking
Just read about magnetic viscosity first. When the coercivity of material is changing slowly, then the spreading of field around magnetic domains becomes non-Maxwellian.
For example the overunity effects of Orbo device depends on magnetic viscosity of ferromagnetic materials in the following way: when you magnetize the ferromagnetic material inside of toroidal coil with sufficiently high electric current, then the material will get saturated and it will not attract the magnet anymore. When you interrupt the current, the magnetic domains will get restored with vacuum fluctuations gradually (you could detect the Barkhausen effect during it) - and the material will start to attract magnet again. The mechanical work done during this is assisted with vacuum fluctuations, after then - not with current, which has been already switched off.
Captain Stumpy
@zephyr / Nestle
Orbo device
you mean the one built by Steorn?
The one that never worked? That one?
https://en.wikipe...i/Steorn
they have YET to build one that works per its claims
surely you are not pushing the Stoern Orbo free energy device that never worked????
it violates the law of conservation of energy
there cant be perpetual motion machines, says science
@zephyr
there was a panel of scientists headed by Ian MacDonald, emeritus professor of electrical engineering at the University of Alberta which started in Feb 2007...
In June 2009 the jury announced its unanimous verdict that "Steorn's attempts to demonstrate the claim have not shown the production of energy. The jury is therefore ceasing work".
[Dick Ahlstrom (24 June 2009). "Irish "energy for nothing" gizmo fails jury vetting". Irish Times]
Steorn then claimed because of difficulties in implementing the technology the focus of the process had been on providing the jury with test data on magnetic effects for study. Steorn also said that these difficulties had been resolved and disputed its jury's findings
references of claims and reference list provided here:
The science allows the violation of thermodynamics with quantum mechanics (I mean all these Maxwell daemon stuffs). Now we can just talk about scope, at which the quantum mechanics may apply. My point is, the boson condensates are fancy and all, but they don't actually represent the most intensive quantum system in the nature. They cannot survive the heating above few Kelvin temperatures due to low energy density of forces involved. But the magnetic domains within ferromagnetics are different stuff - they can survive Curie temperatures over 1000 °C because of much stronger spin-spin interactions and they do represent the most stable and energetically intensive quantum system opened to violation of thermodynamics in real life.
the jury announced its unanimous verdict
Yes, the similar conference decided, that the cold fusion effects are BS. Did such decision change something with experiments done so far?
last little bit
Steorn had a device powered by a rechargeable battery. Steorn said that the device produced more energy than it consumed and recharged the battery.
HOWEVER No substantive details of the technology were revealed and no independent evidence of Steorn's claim was provided
On 1 April 2010 Steorn opened an online development community, called the Steorn Knowledge Development Base (SKDB), which they said would explain their technology.[33] Access is available only under licence on payment of a fee.
from the link:
no working model has ever publicly been verified to produce the free energy
no references/public verification
paywalled and licensed fee site for verification
i would consider that proof that it doesnt work!
Verified? If you consider the peer-review only as a verification, then I can tell safely, no peer-reviwed attempt for replication of Orbo has been done so far. And this is whole the problem - until no such attempt will be done and published (both with positive or negative result, it doesn't matter) - then the factual reliability of your stance is equivalent to mine one. I'm just providing the explanation, in which this device could work, because I do know, that the interest and acceptation of modern physicists depends of transparent theory very much. These guys essentially want to understand every phenomena before starting its serious research (which is just poorly masked search for safe job and long-term professional carrier). They don't want to risk their job & grants not a bit.
Verified? If you consider the peer-review only as a verification, then I can tell safely, no peer-reviwed attempt for replication of Orbo has been done so far
@zeph
peer review is not the ONLY way
it was Steorn that requested a jury of scientists
those scientists were picked by Steorn
it was THAT JURY that conclusively proved that the results claimed by Stoern were invalid.
On top of that, there has NEVER been a working model that has been verified from an outside impartial source to do what Steorn claimed
then the factual reliability of your stance is equivalent to mine
in my stance is SCIENCE
your stance states that your model/hypothesis is essentially nothing more than an attempt to make a perpetual motion machine, whereas REAL SCIENCE says that you cannot do it
you provide NO PROOF other than the Stoern claims
Steorn failed
there is NO MACHINE
SCIENCE WINS!
@zephyr says
I'm just providing the explanation, in which this device could work, because I do know, that the interest and acceptation of modern physicists depends of transparent theory very much
but thats just it... it CANNOT work as it violates the fundamental principles of physics
no perpetual motion machines
principle of conservation of energy and all that
Rejecting conservation of energy would undermine all science and technology
These guys essentially want to understand every phenomena before starting its serious research (which is just poorly masked search for safe job and long-term professional carrier). They don't want to risk their job & grants not a bit.
most likely this is true
but that still doesnt make their physics correct
it was THAT JURY that conclusively proved that the results claimed by Stoern were invalid
You cannot prove anything, if you even don't bother to publish an article about it in peer-reviewed journal. Sorry, but the criterion of falsifiability in science are valid for everyone - both for proponents of ideas, both for their deniers. The conclusion of some anonymous jury is not a science - but a theological discourse.
principle of conservation of energy
These devices don't violate the conservation of energy. This energy is provided with quantum fluctuations of vacuum. I.e. by the same fluctuations, which do allow the formation of magnetic monopoles, btw. The formation of monopoles violates the "principles of physics" as well.
but that still doesn't make their physics correct
If you think so... But I just talked about mainstream physicists..;-) It's evident, you even don't need to read my posts here for to oppose them. Your stance is motivated with pure negativism - you're arguing the groups of words, not the actual content.
Zephyr says
You cannot prove anything....
not just some anonymous jury, a jury of scientists picked specifically validate the science and outcome and to make sure the claim made by Steorn was legitimate
the scientists picked could not validate the claims
one can reasonably assume at this point that they will never publish their hypothesis because it will show without doubt that they attempted to violate basic physics
the demonstration was essentially their experiment and it failed
this is proof even without the publication for peer review as experimentation is used for the validation of hypothesis
the only thing a peer reviewed paper would do is show HOW it failed and why they could not violate the principle of conservation of energy
but as you have seen even YOUR explanations dont shed light on it as you are also violating the basic principles in your statements
as you have seen even YOUR explanations don't shed light on it as you are also violating the basic principles in your statements
Lets the readers decide it, OK? The plain saying I'm violating something doesn't mean, I'm really doing it.
This is just the problem - it wasn't independent replication, published in peer-reviewed journal the less. The findings cannot be disproved in this way and I'm not even talking about lack of scientific approach, interest the less in this particular case.
It's evident, you even don't need to read my posts here for to oppose them. Your stance is motivated with pure negativism
I am motivated by reality
you said here
For example the overunity effects of Orbo device depends on magnetic viscosity of ferromagnetic materials in the following way: when you magnetize the ferromagnetic material inside of toroidal coil with sufficiently high electric current, then the material will get saturated and it will not attract the magnet anymore. When you interrupt the current, the magnetic domains will get restored with vacuum fluctuations gradually (you could detect the Barkhausen effect during it) - and the material will start to attract magnet again. The mechanical work done during this is assisted with vacuum fluctuations, after then - not with current, which has been already switched off
that you can build a perpetual motion machine
this is patently false
I challenge you to do it!
The plain saying I'm violating something doesn't mean, I'm really doing it.
now you are back-pedalling...
your statements violate the conservation of energy
anyone familiar with the basics of physics will see that
tell you what
I will give you 90 days to build your perpetual motion machine as stated above
using your physics as you stated
then you can get it independently verified and write a paper on it
your success will net you amazing amounts of money, however, I am willing to give you 100% of my taxable income for the year 2015 if you are successful in building a perpetual motion machine in the next 90 days using the profound physics that you claim above
It's both theoretically, both experimentally both experimentally proven, we can build the overunity device - this violates your "conservation of energy" already. The only question is, if we can push it harder with smarter approach. We're paying the scientists for it, so we should already see some results...
to give you 100% of my taxable income for the year 2015
An income of anonymous Internet troll, who is spending whole day at PO forum...? Try to impress me with hard numbers, please....
about your link
http://phys.org/n...ncy.html
here is ONE explanation for it
So, how does this not totally and completely invalidate the conservation of energy? We have to look at how energy flows through the entire system, not just at the electricity in and light out. When the LED gets more than 100% electrically efficient, it starts to cool itself down, which is another way of saying that it's stealing energy (in the form of heat) from its environment and converting that heat into those over-unity photons.
This cooling effect has some interesting implications for low-power electronics, but most importantly, we can all rest just a little bit easier knowing that the basic physical rules that frame our perception of the universe have survived for one more day.
http://www.dvice....nt-l.php
An income of...,please
send me an e-mail addy
i will mail you back
you wont because of fear
you CANT build it
at least you are funny... you dont know about physics, but you are funny!
especially given your hyperbole! oh, the irony!
i will stand by my words. send me an e-mail
send me a contract when i contact you back!
we can get it legal if you want! i dont mind that at all!
the reason that you will not is simple.
it is impossible to build
you cannot build a perpetual motion machine
you cannot violate the basic principles of physics like that
not even YOU Zephyr!
maybe your aether crackpot stuff can explain your world, but it doesnt work in REALITY...which is where we live
your machine above will never work
and there is no way for you to ever prove it
i am still giving you the chance though!
Bye, Z!
Whydening Gyre
Charge/potential differential. A difference between 2 adjacent charges, creates interaction. Zero is a place marker. The boundary marker between 2 charges. It's the VERB that counts, not the nouns.
There can be NO other way for THIS Universe to exist..
Mimath224
Have enjoyed the comments. I have nothing to add except questions concerning MM's which posters above may be able to answer.
I seem to remember that the last decade at least a couple of similar claims were made. One from Dublin College (2010) apparently used nano scale mags and involved 'spin ice'.
Weren't merging skymions also claimed to produce MM sometime last year? The difference being then it was NOT claimed as a solution to the Dirac problem.
What is the difference between this article and that of the MM similarity in 'flux tube' experiements?
Can't you see the contradiction?
Since there exists such a thing as electric flux, which is also a vector (and since we do have electric 'monopoles' - i.e. separate charge carrying particles)...not really.
Tachyon8491
It's all a question of perspective - I am delighted to inform that I have invented a push, without a pull - conversely, also a pull without a push. If I focus on one of these for an infinitesimal moment of its entanglement with its non-self environment, I can transiently neglect the existence of its opposite. Oops... that does not mean that its opposite is non-existent though, does it? I believe this whole polemical debate is fundamentally a philosophical/metaphysical one that cannot ever base itself on empirical physics and its experimental observations...
Osteta
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
You're confusing the field for its source.
If a magnetic monopole should exist, it too would have to be scalar.
I am more interested in hearing, "Hey we have invented iron oxide monopole magnets and here is a set of them running in a kitchen blender motor - with a 99% efficiency at $25 a kilo."
Magnetic monopoles don't allow you to break any efficiency limits, because any motor built using them would be analogous to electrostatic motors and generators.
Any suggestion that they do is analogous to claiming that you can squeeze a steel spring and get more energy out by releasing it.
Zephyr,
I've personally validated different versions of Orbo (i was in the SKDB) - it's true that the excess work is performed by virtual photons (all magnetic work is) however you're confused with respect to e-Orbo - saturation damps the core's ability to produce back-EMF, decoupling input from output. Barkhausen jumps accompany all changes in B and not just passive changes. In e-Orbo the work becomes free as the platter speed increases because the only losses are resistive, ie. a function of time (following Joule's 2nd law for heat, Q=(I^2) x (r) x (t), whereas the magnetic work is temporally invariant (at least up to Sv speeds). IOW the Orbo you're referring to depends on materials having high mu, low coercivity and negligible Sv.
For an Sv-type gain , check out the old k-toy - it's an interaction with two different MPE's depending on the dimension its measured in (ie. X vs Y/Z) - the asymmetry occurs because B rises slower than it falls. Still no signs of any monopoles tho..
demonstrating the "aether drift"
from your link
Since the current experiment demonstrates that the absolute motion of the earth can be magnetically detected, why do experiments with light not detect it?
how did the experiment rule out movement/effects from known magnetic sources already present (earth/ etc)?
How did it rule out movements that might have been made by other forces?
How do we know that there was no external noise/forces affecting the setup?
where are the references/additional information and the peer review?
The values recorded in the data tables have an uncertainty of only plus or minus 0.02 mm in most cases, and 0.04 mm in a very few cases
I would still go with results at 10^(-17) level that PROVE aether WRONG
http://www.exphy....2009.pdf
Ah i see - because current is a vector composed of scalar elements, all vectors are likewise reducible? Is that what you're thinking? Current's a vector because it has magnitude and direction - so it behaves as a dipole, with positive and negative terminals. But magnetism isn't a current, rather, it's an epiphenomenon of currents. A kind of vacuum wake. Magnetism is a force between moving charges - that's why it's a vector. Again, how and where would you move your charges to generate a monopolar magnetic field?
The source is motion between charges, ie. current.
Yes that's exactly what i've said.
At least, it'd be scalar in our familiar space... notwithstanding that it could be a vector in some higher dimensional manifold - with one end protruding here, and the other elsewhere, or something. I'm trying to stay open minded here...
The researchers created a monopole effect, not a monopole as you stated in your first post
And if you read the article you will notice that it says exactly that. Nowhere do they say they have created a monopole. All the fuzz is because you (and MrVibrating) don't know how to read scientific articles.
Reading such articles is NOT like reading a newspaper. You have to pay attention. Especially you have to pay attention not to assume stuff that isn't expressly stated. That way you can save yourself a lot of confusion/grief about imagined shortcomings.
...sometimes the shortcomings are just in the reader.
Why? You have a clear understanding of the forces/fields. The people who are debating you range from mildly informed to not. The researchers created a monopole effect, not a monopole as you stated in your first post...rubbish indeed.
LOL i said no such thing - i used the term 'virtual' monopole, and derided its triviality on that basis.
What i really object to is that the researchers, as quoted in the article, and the tone of the article itself, vaunts this 'virtual' monopole (NOT 'synthetic') as being some kind of noteworthy breakthrough, that could be valuable in establishing attributes of a REAL monopole. Articles - and research, generally, of this ilk - predicate their interest upon the propagation of an extremely spurious (if not downright false) scientific premise, when it should be treated as near-pseudoscience, with all due qualifications and caveats.
Unicorns aren't merely 'elusive' - describing a toy one won't help you bag the real beasty.
The result proves experimentally that Dirac's envisioned structures do exist in nature, explained Hall, even if the naturally occurring magnetic monopoles remain at large.
"It's not every day that you get to poke and prod the analog of an elusive fundamental particle under highly controlled conditions in the lab."
^This^ is the problem - it tacitly overstates the research value by conspicuously understating its highly controversial context, and entertaining, unquestioningly, the over-exited and laughably hubristic conclusions of the researchers.
"Our achievement opens up amazing avenues for quantum research. In the future, we want to get even a more complete correspondence with the natural magnetic monopole."
LMFAO :)
For my reply just read your own back at yourself - i'm explicitly criticizing the worth of 'synthetic' unicorns, and the farcical pretense of "advancing our understanding" of 'real' ones, without so much as a blink at the elephant scratching its arse in the corner.
And FWIW, i put 'synthetic' oil in my bike, and it's REAL lubricant, not an abstract representation..
I was being coy when i said monopoles would make PM possible - i should've said "easier" or simpler. But by exploiting Sv we could attract in and repulse out from a monopole at super-Sv speeds and gain KE.
Classical conservation of energy simply doesn't apply to time-dependent magnetic interactions. This is, understandably, often quite a bombshell for many folks so give me a second and i'll write up a few paragraphs qualifying this point...
Firstly, any electrodynamics textbook will begin by explaining that classical CoE cannot be applied to time-dependent passive changes in B - such interactions are, by definition, non-conservative.
This is not conjecture but a basic fact. For example two magnets attract together over a distance D, and we harness this conversion of MPE to KE - maybe storing it in a flywheel. This is the interaction's output work.
Next, we perform our input work, separating them back to their initial D.
The force/distance integrals will only sum to zero if there's no change in B between output and input.
If however there's significant Sv, then B will continue to rise after the output stroke - in attraction, magnets pull each other up their B/H curves, to 'Bmax'. If Bmax is thus higher when we come to input our work, then we must input more energy separating them, than they output initially.
In the 1st case (no Sv), the flywheel coasts to a halt as D is restored. In the 2nd, it hasn't enough go..
These passive mid-interaction changes in B are what you might listen for via Barkhausen steps, as Zephyr alluded.
The form of input work and output work, classically, is FxD - hence this is likewise the form of the loss. We've input more work to the field, than it has output. Hence this is not a conventional thermal loss - rather, this type of loss mechanism is thermodynamically categorised as "non-dissipative" - the excess work has gone to FxD, not heat loss.
So long story short, monopoles would make this a lot easier to reverse, and closed-loop gains would've been discovered by the Victorians - at the very least, Rutherford would've found it. Instead, it took another two centuries and the luck of the Irish...
Fundamentally though, if we only had a PARTIAL monopole - one pole weaker, the other stronger - then a closed-loop gain would be trivial, so it's a slippery slope...
Incidentally, i'm not affiliated with Steorn in any way, i think my NDA's have expired although i still honour their spirit - anything i've mentioned in relation to their IP is, i believe, already public domain. I research classical symmetry breaks as a hobby, and i'm currently working on the single most compelling case i've come across thus far, that of Johann Elias Bessler. This was, i'm convinced, another genuine claim, now three centuries unresolved. But as much as i could bang on about it, this is getting way OT...
S_Bilderback
For the appearance of a PM machine, it would require a mechanism for "stealing or converting" energy from other dimensions that don't normally interact with our universe (making dimensions 6-8 our entropic dumping grounds). Could it be possible? Never say never, good luck with that proof set.
I read too much sy-fy
if we only had a PARTIAL monopole - one pole weaker, the other stronger - then a closed-loop gain would be trivial, so it's a slippery slope
Well exactly. In classical electromagnetic based on strictly transverse waves the monopoles shouldn't exist, but when time symmetric quantum mechanics is involved, the negentropic phenomena may arise. In this way the mainstream physics could be connected with aetheric physics, which is symmetric with respect to longitudinal and transverse wave.
it would require a mechanism for "stealing or converting" energy from other dimensions
Or simply from vacuum noise, which represents such a dimension in similar way, like the Brownian noise represents the (third dimension of) underwater at the (two-dimensional) water surface. But so far it seems, that these negentropic phenomena are limited with low energy density of vacuum fluctuations (CMBR noise) and impractical to use.
@antialias_physorg, what the articles states
'...Fellow Mikko Möttönen has created, identified and photographed synthetic magnetic monopoles in Hall's laboratory on the Amherst campus. ..and first to sight the monopoles in the laboratory...'
I don't think that 'synthetic' = 'effect'
MrVibrating does seem to have '1st hand knowledge' here and certainly to me a MM would be a scalar. What I find difficult is that if MM would attract/repel unlike/like then doesn't that imply a force? Unless MM is doing this in a GR way and warping surroundings. If MM is a scalar it's not an inert one and therefore, just like temperature, would have a gradient from point to point, which is a vector.
On a very simplistic level my initial reaction to this article (and others like it elsewhere) is that if the researches have found anything invalidating Mawell's equations then perhaps they have found a 'new (quasi)particle'. Or did the experiment just 'damp' one pole?
This is precisely my concern - there's no magic step in a time-dependent interaction; every detail's dependent on CoE, including the lag. Hence it'd be a real leap to presume that energy isn't ultimately conserved - as you say, most fundamentally, the entropy of some field (ie. some component of the vacuum) must change in relation to the disunity.
By all accounts the vacuum energy derived from QED remains one of the biggest uncorrected mistakes in physics, yet various fundamental constants may be products of its activity. Saving the world would be a hollow victory if it risks destroying the universe..
http://phys.org/n...ser.html
Synthetic means: not natural. How hard is that to understand? The article also states quite plainly what they did and didn't do - all you need to do is be able to read.
I understand that many people would misunderstand, because they are not used to reading scientific articles (more precisely: they are not aware that reading scientific articles requires a different skillset than reading newspaper articles). And this lack of skill is quite evident in many here (especially MrVibrating, but also Nestle and others).
That's fine. Lack of such skill is nothing to be ashamed of. How could they have the skill if they have never worked/been exposed to real scientific work?
But making pronunciations based ON such lack of skill - that is something to be ashamed of.
@Mimath224 - 'damping' one pole is the first thing would-be PM mobilists try. Eventually - if they persist long enough - they learn that this is prohibited, per Maxwell, and that the only shielding possible is by concentrating the field into a higher-mu material (this is how RF shielding works).
You're right that virtual monopoles could constitute quasiparticles, i think - tho not sure how mobile they'd be, unless they could form magnons? All of these virtual monopoles however are using the same underlying principle of folding the 'hidden' poles inwards - the outward uniform polarity is a charade, and nothing here violates Maxwell.
LOL same troll post 3 times in a row, how very dull.
Your nomenclature is also inadequate, as i've already pointed out - synthetic is a synonym for something artificial, manufactured. Virtual would be a more honest description - something that behaves as if it were real, but isn't.
A real monopole wouldn't be dependent upon myriad dipoles, and neither would a synthetic one.
Synthetic means: not natural. How hard is that to understand?
What in modern physics is not "natural"? The physicists just created a set of conditions and the monopoles resulted naturally from it. In the same way, like they identified many obscure subatomical particles already. Are these particles less natural (i.e. nonexisting in nature) just because of it? I already explained above, why these monopoles aren't fully fledged one: it's because they were not prepared in vacuum, but in environment of boson condensates, which is surprisingly dense with respect to speed of light spreading. It corresponds the interior of neutron stars in this respect.
ab3a
@MrVibrating: Monopoles would make perpetual motion machines possible.. that's gotta be a big clue!
Perhaps this is why we won't find them naturally. In other words, it may well be that it takes energy to sustain a magnetic monopole, thus conservation of energy is preserved.
it takes energy to sustain a magnetic monopole, thus conservation of energy is preserved
Yep, this is a good insight. In general, all artifacts, which can be observed with boson condensates will need an energy from outside for their survival, because the temperature of Universe is 3 Kelvins or so - and the boson condensates all need lower temperature for their existence. Currently the only experiment, which indicates that the monopoles could exist at room temperature without introduction of energy from outside is this one. If I'm correct, than the drag of magnets could be explained with the interaction of monopoles formed with their magnetic domains with anapoles of dark matter in the vacuum. Another indirect indicia can be, that some black holes do appear like monopoles (with single jet) and they do appear stable too - but I admit, that such observation may not apply to terrestrial conditions. We simply need more experiments to judge it.
@Mimath224 - 'damping' one pole is the first thing would-be PM mobilists try...
@MrVibrating, yes, understand, but your comment really says what I didn't have the confidence (or knowledge) to say, that is perhaps 'charade' aplies to some teams in order to get recognition!?
@antialias_physorg oh come on, you can do better than that...or maybe you can't. Gravitational lensing does not produce a synthetic object it produces an effect that more than object exists. After amputation the brain can send signals that give the effect that the part still exist but synthetic limbs perform functions...how many more examples do you need.
Nope. That doesn't explain permanent magnets, which are magnetized due to electrons being basic dipole magnets without the need to move as a collective current. The external field arises from the alignment of electrons which are not paired with other electrons of opposing spin state (which would contain the magnetic field).
The existence of magnetic monopoles simply predicts that electrons have an inner structure with two opposing magnetic charges. In other words, split the electron, find the magnetic monopole.
EWH
Regarding Clifford Algebras in physics, all the more comprehensible stuff is listed under "geometric algebra". (The GA that has nothing to do with Artin, but rather David Hestenes.) Most of the GA papers explain things from first principles and are quite easy to understand compared with most physics papers. The better papers usually have Chris Doran or Leo Dorst among the authors. The latter's "Geometric Algebra for Computer Science" is a good textbook, and his free GAViewer visualization software is a great help, particularly with conformal GA. (Which has circles and spheres as primitives along with lines, points, planes). Doran and the other Cambridge group researchers have the best physics papers. Jaap Suter's Geometric Algebra Primer is the best medium-length introduction.
Some motivation: in 4D GA all 4 of Maxwell's equations and special relativity reduce in usable form to 4 characters saying that the gradient of the current is the field. (4-current and Faraday bivector field.)
@Eikka
There's two forms of electron motion to consider, axial and orbital, and a corresponding magnetic moment for each, hence the motion requirement is satisfied - there couldn't be a magnetic field otherwise.
Electrons are supposed to be fundamental, and besides, magnetism is not a property of charges or currents - moving charges do not exchange energy directly, but via the intermediary of the vacuum. The magnetic interaction is a menage á trois, an inter-reaction, and the force is manifested via vacuum-generated virtual-photons exchanging momentum between the charges in signed units of h-bar... so magnetism doesn't come 'from' the charges, and isn't strictly a property of them - it's a vacuum interaction.
A monopole would thus require a way of moving charges that only elicits virtual-photon exchanges of a preferred sign, regardless of the translation or polarisation directions, which in turn would seem to transcend or defy the limits of the 3-space the charges are confined to..
MrVibrating, can you enlighten me on your '...via vacuum-generated virtual-photons exchanging momentum between the charges...'
If we are using M's eqs then B field is generated by moving charges...hope I said that right? Aren't virtual-photons more theoretical than say moving e? Are you implying that magnetism is part of the vitual theory or that a moving charge invokes virtual (particle) theory to explain how the B field moves?
@antialias_physorg oh come on, you can do better than that...or maybe you can't.
Point is: I was a scientist for over 10 years. I know how to read scientific articles and it is obvious that some others here don't. If you can't accept that then I urge you to enter a scientific field and find out for yourself.
@antialias_physorg Oh that explains it! I spent years correcting the English in 'scientific' reports, in industry that is.
The standard model of particle physics assigns so-called elementary bosons as mediators of the fundamental forces, and virtual photons are responsible for the EM force. These aren't emitted by electrons, but simply co-opted from the vacuum around them. Interactions are described at this level by quantum electrodynamics, and this is currently the closest we can get to dealing with what the field actually is, rather than just what it does.
Well if the fruits of all your haughty achievements have culminated in the belief that monopoles could exist because, after all, electrons do, then fewer posters could better illustrate the chasmic gulf between reading and UNDERSTANDING that your self-esteemed self, sir..
Besides, if you think the existence of electrons is evidence in favour of monopoles (!) then you should be even less impressed by fake ones than i am...
So what, then, in your rapier-like scrutiny of the article, do you see of value in this achievement - do you agree with the conclusion that it could advance our understanding of real monopoles? Any more pearls besides "electrons exist"? Don't hold back on us now, eh..? ;)
@EWH cheers for the heads up, i've now got Suter's primer on the Kindle...
Edit: lol, just checked me library and i've already got GA and its application to Mathematical Physics, and also Gravity Gauge Theories and GA, both by Doran. Will stick 'em on the holiday list...
@Osteta - that's a fascinating line of thought... so would that mean it was intrinsically impossible to manifest a monopole, or might there be some way to force it to collapse out?
My overriding impression remains that they're a solution without a problem tho.. with too much baggage (too classically controversial) for mere aesthetic appeal...
@MrVibrating, thanks, yes I understand your comment. Hadn't thought of it that way. Would the dipole then come about as being the 'ball thrower' and 'ball catcher', to use a common place analogy. But if that were so then a monopole could only exist via the former with the latter being 'extracted' or 'cancelled' while the 'ball' was still on route. H'mmm, that wouldn't work either because it would exclude a 'replacement' to fill the gap via, perhaps, the virtual 'soup'. Would seem that I'm becoming more entrenched with 'no monopoles' idea!
I spent years correcting the English in 'scientific' reports, in industry that is.
So? What has correctiong spelling mistakes got to do with being able to understand the content? You have to realize that science is different. It's done by people who are very mathematically minded - and hence very precise in what they write (and more importantly: what they DON'T write). Science reports are reports on facts. Not essays of prose.
If something is not explicitly mentioned in the article then it wasn't done. If it's not an explicit conclusion stated by the authors then it's not a supportable conclusion with the data they have. Anything you interpret beyond what the article states is therefore -with a on certainty bordering likelyhood- false. If you think you, as a layman, can glean some info on the fly that the authors didn't with years of study on the subject and 20-30 more IQ points then you're just kidding yourself.
antialias_physorg there's a big difference in correcting English and just spelling mistakes. Obviously you don't even understand that!
I do. I also worked as a project manager for translation/validation services for technical manuals for almost 2 years. And no: The people translating, validating, editing such articles don't know about technical articles at all. There's a HUGE difference between editing/checking and writing/understadning scientific articles.
@Mimath224 - yes, you've got the drift.. with the minor addition that the momentum of the balls can be positive or negative. Normally, catcher and pitcher in zero-G would propel themselves backwards whether throwing or catching, whereas here, catching a ball having negative momentum would propel you towards the thrower. A monopole would only exchange + or - momentum, depending on the polarity of another pole it interacts with, rather than both, per normal dipoles..
MrVibrating, thanks for addition. Enjoyed the 'chat'...which is why I come here and to learn more about what's going on.
Chemist90
I've seen a lot of comments speaking in classical terms. You must step out of the classical and step into the quantum world for this to make sense. A magnetic monopole follows from the quantization of electric charge in quantum mechanics. "Quantization" meaning, almost, restriction to certain energy levels. In classical mechanics magnetism is continuous, with no restrictions. A magnetic monopole confirms the existence of a charged particle that carries each magnetic pole with it without the opposite pole. The existence of this singular particle would confirm the quantization of the electron, and be a huge boon to a unified theory being more like quantum theory. This also means huge philosophical implications. You can not explain magnetic monopoles with current college level electromagnetic theory. It forces the treatment of electromagnetism with quantum mechanics. I want to say that none of you are wrong technically, just treating it with the wrong equations and frame of ref.
Rimino


text:
namespace MoreLinq
{
    using System;
    using System.Collections.Generic;

    static partial class MoreEnumerable
    {
        ///
        /// Prepends a single value to a sequence.
        ///
        /// <typeparam name="TSource">The type of the elements of <paramref name="source"/>.</typeparam>
        /// <param name="source">The sequence to prepend to.</param>
        /// <param name="value">The value to prepend.</param>
        /// <returns>
        /// Returns a sequence where a value is prepended to it.
        /// </returns>
        /// <remarks>
        /// This operator uses deferred execution and streams its results.
        /// </remarks>
        /// <![CDATA[
        /// int[] numbers = { 1, 2, 3 };
        /// var result = numbers.Prepend(0);
        /// ]]>
        /// The <c>result</c> variable, when iterated over, will yield
        /// 0, 1, 2 and 3, in turn.

        public static IEnumerable<TSource> Prepend<TSource>(this IEnumerable<TSource> source, TSource value)
        {
            if (source == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(source));
            return source is PendNode<TSource> node
                 ? node.Prepend(value)
                 : PendNode<TSource>.WithSource(source).Prepend(value);
        }
    }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


Kylie and Kendall Jenner in collaboration with high-street label Topshop will be releasing a bikini line for Summer 2016.
Kylie took to social media Instagram and Snapchat, and revealed some pieces from the collection, adding to the hype for the release.
In one image the Reality TV star wears a neon yellow and black two-piece with the Kylie and Kendall branding, and puts her assets on show.
For another Instagram snap, the brunette is seen in a vivid orange neoprene look with a heavy duty black zipper, showing off a hint of cleavage.
There is also a bold metallic piece in the collection, and all the designs remain close to Kylie's personal style more instead of Kendall's.


text:
2017 / Bible / Christian living / Church / Encouragement / God / Growth / Judging / Leadership / Life / Opinion / Pet Peeves / Politics / Uncategorized
We Should All Be a Little More Like Lady Gaga (Seriously)
February 13, 2017 Lisa M. PriceLeave a comment
Fools find no pleasure in understanding, but delight in airing their own opinions~ Proverbs 18:2 NIV
Like most families in America we tuned into the Super bowl last Sunday night. We are not diehard football fans and unless the Seahawks are playing we rarely have all that much invested in who wins. This year we watched mostly for the camaraderie, the snacks, and the weirdly hedonistic pleasure we derive from critiquing the commercials.
We had a houseful of junior high boys during the 2004 Janet Jackson/Justin Timberlake "nipple gate" fiasco. As a result my husband and I are more than a bit skittish about exposing (no pun intended) our family and guests to the halftime entertainment provided by the NFL during the Super bowl.
Our new "tradition" is to record any halftime performer who we believe might be questionable. After the game we consult Google to get the lowdown. Then if it turns out that it's not all kinds of inappropriate, we watch it after the game.
Life in the modern world is weird sometimes.
We were particularly uneasy about this years show. Mostly, because the headliner was Lady Gaga and- well- Lady Gaga is Lady Gaga. She's best known for controversy, meat dresses, near nudity and at least a zillion other dubious choices.
Magnifying our concern was a statement she made during an interview with Rolling Stone magazine a few days prior to the Super bowl:
"I believe in a passion for inclusion, I believe in the spirit of equality, and the spirit of this country is one of love and compassion and kindness so my performance will uphold those philosophies"
Please understand. I do not typically assume the worst in people.
However, her statement was so ambiguous that it left me completely clueless as to what she was attempting to communicate. Besides, I have been conditioned by the culture to believe that when people use words like "equality" and "inclusion" those words are almost always code for some sort of crude and gratuitous sexual display. On top of all that, Lady Gaga is a well-known liberal and most liberals totally lost their minds on November 8th, 2016 and have yet to come to their senses.
The combination of above factors logically led me to assume that her statement to Rolling Stone was political in nature and that she intended to do something we wouldn't be able to un-see.
I couldn't have been more wrong.
Lady Gaga's halftime show was a fun, patriotic and wonderfully sparkly performance lacking in even a smidgen of controversy.
I was left feeling more than a bit shameful for jumping to conclusions and assuming the worst of another human being. As I was repenting of my ugly inclination to judge, it struck me that I need to rethink nearly everything I believe about life and the universe now that I have come to the conclusion that all of us should try and be a little bit more like Lady Gaga.
Minus the meat dresses and nudity of course.
I never thought I would live to hear myself say this but I am proud of the stand Lady Gaga took by choosing not to take a stand. She had the opportunity (and the platform) to jump to the political and rant endlessly about what she believes about all sorts of social and political issues. Instead she chose the path of unity, not by kowtowing (that would be dishonest), but by keeping a fun and light-hearted event (the Super Bowl) a fun and light-hearted event.
Over the course of the last few years it has become nauseatingly trendy for individuals from every walk of life and both sides of the political aisle to turn EVERYTHING into a political statement. Americans are force-fed a steady stream of political commentary through bumper stickers, television commercials, award shows, music, movies and their Facebook feeds. Even many popular fiction authors have taken to proselytizing for their pet causes through the stories they tell.
I believe that everyone should speak-up for what they believe in. I also believe that every voice (well, most voices) should be heard. Healthy debate is a good thing. I also believe there is a time and a place for political discourse and even political disagreement. That said, football games are not the time or the place for political discourse or debate. Football games are a time for celebration, friends, food and unity and I for one am grateful that at least one Hollywood liberal finally figured that out.
It's about stinking time.
Christian living, Christianity, Common Sense, encouragement, faith, Grace, humor, life, Opinion, Pet Peeves, Politics
Please Stop Telling me To Breathe
The two most Abused and Misused Words in the World-

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Home ANTHILL TV Myths busted! The next six minutes may change a lot of what...
Anty-Climax
Myths busted! The next six minutes may change a lot of what you think you know [VIDEO]
You know iron maidens? Not the fourth best heavy metal band of all time (not to be confused with the almost award-winning fourth-most-popular folk duo in New Zealand), but those medieval, metal torture chambers? They never existed.
This, and 49 other things that you may think you know are about to be debunked in this six minute video from Mental Floss. And, let's face it, six minutes is a lot shorter than the 30 minutes it takes to watch a single episode of QI. And, it only focuses on one letter year! QI is an ambitious 26 year programming feast for sure, but a six minute crash course may be just what you need.
There's a long weekend coming up. If you're managing to fit in some socialising rather than working through, arm yourself with some new found knowledge.
Remember. It's Anthill. We're here to almost help you every situation.
(Image supplied by Bigstock)
50 common misconceptions
Previous articleSocial media site for old people? Tapestry launches with the goal, 'No senior left behind'
Next articleIt's so hard to find good technical talent these days. [VIDEO]
How ESG initiatives impact business value
8 factors that influence the cost of residential and commercial painting
"If you're pressed for time, I'm here to help." In this report, David Hobson will show you three quick wins - things you can do to pimp out your LinkedIn profile in 15 minutes or less.
Earth from 70,000 feet in a U2 spy plane
Paul Ryan - Aug 14, 2009
Unusual business card designs
Paul Ryan - Apr 8, 2008
The world's favourite… pro bono workplace
Caimes - Jun 17, 2009
The weekend just got owned. By a newspaper, and it's better than you can possibly imagine [VIDEO]
Jen Storey - Jan 14, 2013
How to create and edit videos for the web [ACADEMY COURSE]
Anthill Magazine - Sep 2, 2013
LinkedIn is a professional and commercial platform. What you do on LinkedIn matters: it really matters, and if you're not careful, your actions can backfire and tarnish your brand and your integrity. We're going to throw out a wild guess and say that you don't want to get burned by your mistakes. Fair enough. This FREE REPORT from David Hobson has the five most common LinkedIn mistakes and what you can do to avoid them.
The Ultimate Social Media Almanac with James Tuckerman [Cheat Sheet]


What Motivates You to Work?
Brook is a multi-purpose WordPress theme for big and small-sized businesses. Enjoy the theme's original design, functional features & responsive layouts.
Sign up to our newsletter for regular updates and more.
© 2018 Brook. All Rights Reserved.


text:
Q: How to get Body raw JSON data from Postman to Python I have the variable colors and a value in the raw data in JSON format. I want to get the value from postman to python. How can I get the body raw data in python? That postman body raw data image ->
colors raw data image

A: You can request the data straight from the server with HTTP requests:
https://requests.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
r = requests.get('192.168.1.6:8069/web/raw?default=red')
r.json()

Or export the data from postman in to a .json file and read the file using open()
with open('example.json', 'r') as myfile:
    data = myfile.read()

A: I use the odoo tool developed by python. That odoo get raw data method little change the method. Maybe this way works in python
@http.route('/cams/biometrics 3.0/',method=["POST"], csrf=False, auth='public', type = "http")
def generate_attendance(self, **params):
    data = json.loads(request.httprequest.data)
    json_object = json.dumps(data)

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


In this most recent case won by Schelstraete Equine Lawyers (SEL) before the Court of Appeal in The Hague, a horse, which was sold to be a dressage horse, turned out to have sweet itch (also known as: SSRD or summer itch). Sweet itch is a chronic, season-related skin allergy which often shows as rash-looking sores on the horses body.
The sweet itch was severe and made the horse very sensitive and difficult to ride. Veterinarians affirmed that horses with sweet itch are less suitable to be performing physical work as sweating may cause severe itching. Some horses might even not be able to have a saddle on.
SEL were able to prove that the horse had sweet itch already before it was sold and it appeared that the seller was aware of this but did not communicate it to the buyer. The Court of Appeal agreed with SEL´s argumentation and ruled that the horse was non-conform, as it is not fit as a sport horse. On the basis of this, SEL´s client could dissolve the contract and receive the money she paid for the horse back.
SEL´s client was also awarded damages for stabling costs, transport and treatment of the horse.
The horse Justice, an unusual plaintiff, is suing his previous owner for neglect.


Unsubscribe from Corvette: Sales, News & Lifestyle?
Corvette Design Team Members Kirk Bennion and Ryan Vaughn hosted the C7 Corvette Z06 Design Seminar at the Corvette Museum's annual Bash. There was also a discussion and slides showing the evoltion of the Corvette Racing's identity from C6.R to C7.R as well.


text:
EFTTEX praised by exhibitors for creating business leads
Category: Press Release,News,EFTTEX
YOU ARE HERE: EFTTA Media Centre EFTTEX praised by exhibitors for creating business leads
As the curtain came down on the 38th EFTTEX trade show in Brussels, exhibitors paid tribute to the success of the show and the valuable business leads it brought to their companies.
Mark Spain, of Flambeau Outdoors Europe, was quick to praise the latest event in the Belgian capital. "The show was a great success. We were looking to communicate our new lines, discuss the next year of business and meet potential partners. I feel that these were met effectively and the company went away having exceeded what we expected – certainly in new business."
EFTTEX debutant, Knotter, travelled down from Finland to debut its Uni-Knot and was pleased with the response it received from visitors to its booth. Founder, Kalle Saarinen, said: "We were happy that so many people found our product exciting. "As a result, we were able to make very good contact with distributors and wholesalers, which was our main goal in attending the exhibition."
Another company making its first appearance at EFTTEX was Chinese lure manufacturer, Recertop, and the company has already re-booked to attend the event in Prague next year. Leon Zhu told Newslines: "Our first EFTTEX was a success as we met many potential customers who expressed an interest in taking our OEM baits. It certainly exceeded all our expectations and we look forward to a repeat in the Czech Republic."
Well established Indian fishing tackle manufacturer, Bhagwati – a long-time EFTTEX exhibitor – was happy with the result of its latest appearance at the show. Director Kailash Tibrewal, said: "It was once again a useful venture for us as we achieved our aim of finding new wholesalers across Europe, including Russia and France. "We are looking forward to visiting Prague so that we can show of our products and make contact with potential customers from across Eastern Europe."


Beautiful Destination Beach Wedding on The Gulf For Less Than $9,200 for 50 guests!!
Paradise awaits on this secluded island with million dollar beach homes for less than other beach locations in Southwest Florida!
Music DJ included for cocktail hour, dinner and reception PLUS UPGRADED Music DJ on the beach. Microphone for officiant and your vows.
SMALL BUDGET? Our lowest priced beach setup is only $350!!! We will customize to your specifications. Budget Wedding for 50 guests less than $6,400 !
Watch the video of a recent wedding to see more.


To develop Media Literacy Seminars within a media education and research strategy in order to disseminate its main perspectives and to propose new research lines along the Mediterranean area.
To identify and map the most important trends in the main media production achievements made by the young Europeans, their small differences and major disruptions, with the help and point of view of several European experts in the Media Literacy field.
To clarify what are the links that can be established between the youngsters' media production and their media education, as well as to identify what are the main skills that should be observed and achieved in a broad European context, from the Mediterranean media cultural environments to the Nordic media landscapes, all of them having the internet as their main dissemination vehicle and support network.
These steps will be systematized within a wide research process, sequenced in 3 different international seminars, Paris, Brussels and Faro, and a final assembled congress in Bellaria, between January 2008 and December 2009.


Champion Lawn Mower Parts Manual - Cub Cadet. It's one thing to talk innovation it's another to back it up.Cub Cadet Lawn Mower Parts have been backing it up for decades by building riding mowers, utility vehicles, commercial mowers, and compact tractors that work harder and perform better than other products in the industry.Cub Cadet is committed to moving outdoor power equipment forward.. Lawn Mower Parts from Amazon.com. A freshly mown lawn creates a welcoming environment for your family, and creates a great space for activities like playing fetch with your dog and having a. Genuine Cox, Kingcat Blade Kit Including Fasteners, 40 Inch Rear Discharge Kit154: Kingcat Lawn Mower 28 Inch Inch Swing Back Blade Set 750556: V-Belt Premium Quality A Section (68 Series) 27 Inch O.D. Kevlar Belt 6827.
Welcome to All Mower Spares. Australia's Largest & Most Efficient online Spare Parts Store for Lawn Mowers & Outdoor Power Equipment.. EZ-GO Golf Cart Parts Look-up Manual Diagram!EZ-Go Product Finder. Not sure what your model is? Your Model Isn't on this List? – Call 800-753-4943. Briggs & Stratton powers 8/10 US lawn mower brands. Learn more about small engines and shop for Briggs engine parts, generators & outdoor power products..
Online shopping for mower parts, mower accessories, mower replacement parts, John Deere parts, and Toro mower parts from Amazon.com. Back To Craftsman Walk-Behind-Mowers Model: 917.378381 or 917378381 Craftsman Rotary Lawn Mower 6.5 HP Power Propelled 21 in. Rear Discharge. Other Items that are in the Same Category. 917.273041 Craftsman 20 HP 46 in. Mower Garden Tractor Man 917.273320 Craftsman 50 in. Mower Garden Tractor Manual.
Back to Small Engine Repair FAQ Table of Contents. Lawn Mower Basics and General Maintenance. Gas, electric, or manual? Many people who have never used a gasoline engine powered piece of yard equipment are intimidated by all the warnings with respect to the explosive nature of gasoline.. Farmall Parts sells International Harvester Farmall tractor parts including Cub and Super A & C. View and Download Stiga Garden scoop instructions for use manual online. Garden scoop Lawn Mower pdf manual download..


Apart from being excellent in high quality, mattresses from Puffy are delivered complimentary to your door. The Puffy is an internet based store, as well as that is why their items come at a practical price. Purchasing a Puffy Mattress is as basic as sending out an email.
The Puffy Mattress is made to do its job no matter its host surface. Speaking you think about anything like level structures, box springs, adjustable frames, slats and even the flooring. Your bed mattress is mosting likely to create very same outcomes till and also unless you won't choose to come up with something out of routines like yards or open areas.
Puffy insurance claims that their mattress has some distinct features which maintain sleepers back straightened while dealing with the pressure points by removing them. It is an issue of that much better and also audio sleep could bring a very positive impact on your overall mental and also physical wellness as well as wellness.
Another fascinating point concerning Puffy, worthwhile to be pointed out right here is that life time warranty they are providing. It is not comparable to the other basic service warranties being offered these days. The bears ensure for their mattress as long as a consumer has it. Well, Puffy' s we could not consider it just as good as an orthopedic bed mattress however still, it often tends to aid you to handle pressure factor associated problems and also excessive discomforts.
Just like numerous various other businesses the Puffy is operating with a very well created CSR task. Therefore, favoring Puffy while looking for a spending plan cushion could make you sign up with a really honorable reason.
Puffy is a self-adjusting bed mattress, and it will certainly get accustomed to your requirements within an hour approximately – this includes it a superb selection for consumers from various histories and also age teams.
The Puffy have a strong group of experts active in study and also advancement tasks. Maybe this is the factor behind that steep discovering contour this mattress maker is complying with.


We offer several smart,�modern & technical textiles courses. Scroll down to see the ones currently available.
This is a fantastic opportunity to learn about modern and smart materials, including technical textiles, all set in the context of space technology.
Develop an exciting and hands-on curriculum that embraces the STEM elements of the Design and Technology GCSE curriculum. Content will focus on the smart and modern materials and technical textiles elements of the new Design and Technology GCSE specification (across all awarding bodes) and will also be relevant to teachers wanting to develop this area at key stage 3.
The course is held at the Airbus Foundation Discovery Space, the home of the Mars Yard where Airbus scientists and engineers are testing out the next UK effort on Mars, the ExoMars Rover, as part of the ExoMars Programme.
As well as being able to see the ExoMars Rover and the Mars Yard testing area, participants will be able to use the interactive displays at the Centre and find out more about the materials used in space technology from an Airbus STEM ambassador.


text:
Microweber brand new version (1.1.0) is live!
Tzveti Borisova created thread at May 30, 2018
Are you ready for the new version? Version 1.1.0 is better than you can possibly imagine.
After months of hard work, we are super excited to announce that Microweber's brand new version 1.1.0 is finally live! Our latest release comes with a complete overhaul of our design and a reshuffle of the features aimed at bringing even better experience to our users. And that's not all – we are now 100% mobile ready!
We also the code on the backend and the live editmade a lot of improvements of
We can talk for ages about what we've done, but deeds speak better than words. Just take a look at some of the upgrades we made for you:
Brand new Dashboard
Dashboard v. 1.0.7 vs Dashboard v. 1.1.0
Obviously, we played around with the dashboard design quite a bit, hoping it is now much more pleasant for the eye. But that's not all, we also did our best to improve its logic and usability, making some structural changes. The Dashboard now features an upgraded statistics functionality allowing users to trace how their website, online shop or blog performs in real time.
Easy-to-manage website
Website v. 1.0.7 vs Website v. 1.1.0
Creating new pages is so much fun
Create New Page v. 1.0.7 vs Create New Page v. 1.1.0
Shopping matters
Since the built-in online shop in every single one of our templates is something that our users find particularly attractive, we decided to give it a place of its own. Unlike the previous version 1.0.7, where you had to enter the website settings to reach your shop settings, the latter are now a separate section in the left panel directly on your screen.
Shop v. 1.0.7 vs Shop v. 1.1.0
Spotless order management
Orders v. 1.0.7 vs Orders v. 1.1.0
Shop Settings overhaul
Shop Settings v. 1.0.7 vs Shop Settings v. 1.1.0
Mobile-ready
No matter where you are, and what you're doing, your online space is now in the palm of your hand, so you are always on top of what is going on there. We are also planning on launching a mobile app in the near future to make things even easier. Stay tuned for that!
Modules that just wow
We hope you like what we did with the latest Microweber CMS & Website Builder. If so, do let us know in the Comments section below. If you don't or see further room for improvement, we can't wait to hear from you - after all, our great community has been guiding us in everything we do and we appreciate your ever word and line of code!
Stay tuned for the latest exciting news about Microweber CMS & Web Builder and don't forget to tell us what you need, like or dislike in our ForumSuggest a Feature, section or get in touch with us directly!
Microweber CMS the new generation website builder
Microweber is a website builder that helps you create responsive websites without having to write a single line of code.…
Migration to Laravel, Bootstrap and new design
Hi everyone, you can read about the new things that coming on the new release version 2.0We will probably release intermediate…
Excellence in Innovation 2018 Award
We are happy to share with you that Microweber was awarded for "Excellence in Innovation" for 2018 year! The highest honor…


50 smartbuyglasses coupons now on retailmenot discover and share thousands of kaspersky lab promo codes and kaspersky lab dollar car rental discount codes aaa coupon codes for amazing kaspersky lab discounts find the latest pizza hut coupon on cuponation singapore smartbuyglasses coupon code 2018 for 888 poker welcome bonus black friday 2017 9 active pizza hut promo code verified 5 minutes ago ⭐ today's coupon: choose from a wide variety of colours and styles. plus, how to calculate discounted payback period by hand save even more with free shipping when you. save sg$25 discount storewide with raya sale voucher – june 2018 use lazada promo code gdzie kupic e voucher today and get the latest smartbuyglasses coupon code 2018 coupon ⭐ verified 2 minutes ago ⏩. no coupon code required. choose from a wide variety of colours and styles.
Sign party & carnival discount up to receive emails from ac lens for expert jöhnk eckernförde angebote the latest promotions, special offers and news, and receive 15% off your first order! shop gutschein vorlagen word for karl lagerfeld kl 243 523 at smartbuyglasses uk. we offer free delivery & 2 year warranty! $64. get an extra $10 off your next $100 order of contact lenses with the latest 1-800 contacts promo code. no coupon code required. discounts average smartbuyglasses coupon code 2018 $93 off with a pearle vision promo code or coupon.


text:
Dayana Sabrina Mendoza Moncada (Caracas, Venezuela; 1 de junio de 1986) es una modelo, actriz, presentadora, empresaria, productora y directora de cine venezolana. Además es una, ex-reina de belleza, ganadora de los títulos de Miss Venezuela 2007 y Miss Universo 2008, asimismo es poseedora de un Récord Guiness tras la victoria en 2009 de la también venezolana, Stefanía Fernández siendo está la primera y única vez que un país ha ganado consecutivamente la competencia del Miss Universo.

En 2012, participó en el famoso reality show, The Celebrity Apprentice, del magnate Donald Trump (expresidente de los Estados Unidos).

En 2018, incursionó como productora y directora de películas.

Vida personal
Nació en la ciudad de Caracas, capital de Venezuela, criándose en la parroquia "La Urbina" en los alrededores de Petare, sus padres son Willy Mendoza y Laura Moncada oriundos de los estados del Táchira y Aragua.

Una vez fue secuestrada en Venezuela cuando era adolescente, y declaró que el trauma que experimentó, le enseñó a permanecer serena bajo presión.

En 2001, firmó un contrato con la agencia Elite y fue finalista en el Elite Model Management 2001 realizado en Francia.

Ha trabajado con empresas como Max Maraella y ha modelado en pasarelas de Nueva York, Italia, Alemania, Francia, Atenas y España para Versace, Roberto Cavalli, Carolina Herrera y otros diseñadores de moda, además de firmar un contrato con la "Trump Model Management". Mendoza habla fluidamente español, inglés e italiano, este último aprendiéndolo después de desempeñarse como modelo y animadora en ese país durante algunos años.

En 2012, negó los rumores, que tuviera un romance con el magnate Donald Trump.

Contrajo matrimonio el día 6 de diciembre de 2013, con el empresario; Michael Pagano, la boda fue celebrada en República Dominicana, específicamente en los Altos de Chavón; la celebración duró tres días. La ex Miss Universo lució un hermoso traje diseñado por el venezolano: Ángel Sánchez.

Posteriormente, el 7 de junio de 2015, Mendoza anunció a través de su cuenta personal de Instagram que estaba en la dulce espera de su primera hija.

El 5 de octubre de 2015; dio a luz a su primógenita Eva Pagano Mendoza en Nueva York, la noticia la dio a conocer en su cuenta de Instagram, donde adjuntó a la foto lo siguiente: "¡Bienvenida mi princesa amada! ¡Te amamos demasiado, te amaremos más cada día y te protegeremos por siempre!" En septiembre de 2016, Mendoza hace oficial su separación de Michael Pagano, al declarar en una entrevista que la separación se llevó a cabo en buenos términos.

En agosto de 2020, se bautizó bajo la religión Cristiana Evangélica.

Carrera de modelo
En 2001 Dayana firmó con la agencia de modelos, Elite Model y desfiló en España, Italia, Francia, Estados Unidos, Inglaterra, Grecia y Alemania para Versace, Roberto Cavalli y otros diseñadores importantes durante esta etapa de su vida.

Después de Elite, firmó con Trump Model Management desde 2009.

En marzo de 2015, aparece en un comercial para una bebida, junto a la Miss Universo 2012; Olivia Culpo de Estados Unidos y la Miss Universo 2014; Paulina Vega de Colombia, la filmación se llevó a cabo en la isla de Bali, en Indonesia.

Miss Venezuela

Fue la representante del Estado Amazonas en el concurso Miss Venezuela 2007 en el año 2007, donde obtuvo las banda de Miss Integral y fue coronada el 13 de septiembre de 2007 como la quincuagésimaquinta (55.ª) Miss Venezuela, siendo, por tanto, la segunda Miss Venezuela que gana representando al Estado Amazonas.

Miss Universo

El 14 de julio de 2008, Dayana obtuvo el título Miss Universo 2008, durante el certamen que se realizó en Nha Trang, Vietnam. Con este triunfo, Venezuela iguala en el segundo puesto a Puerto Rico en el número de coronas obtenidas como país en el Miss Universo. En el certamen Miss Universo 2008 explicó que sus gustos eran el diseño, fotografía, publicidad y surf. En la etapa de preguntas a las concursantes ella respondió que la diferencia entre hombres y mujeres era que "'los hombres piensan que la manera más rápida de ir a un punto es ir derecho, mientras que las mujeres saben que la manera más rápida de ir a un punto es siguiendo las curvas.

Finalmente fue coronada con una tiara exclusiva de ese año valorada en 120.000 dólares, tras una final con claro acento latinoamericano: los puestos segundo y tercero correspondieron a Miss Colombia, Taliana Vargas, y a Miss República Dominicana, Marianne Alexa Cruz González;. Además de obtener variados premios en efectivo y en género, Mendoza pasó su reinado recorriendo el mundo para dar conferencias sobre cuestiones humanitarias para recoger fondos para promover la educación para luchar contra la enfermedad del sida-VIH.

Como embajadora de la belleza universal, Mendoza tuvo la oportunidad, además de realizar numerosos viajes y atender diversos compromisos alrededor de los Estados Unidos, de visitar a los Guardacostas de los Estados Unidos (USCG), en Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, y luego viajar a Indonesia, donde hizo apariciones en la televisión local, estando presente en el "Puteri Indonesia 2008" certamen donde se le elige la candidata de dicho país al Miss Universo; además de visitar Yakarta, también estuvo en los templos de Borobudur y la isla de Bali. Seguidamente viajó a su país Venezuela, donde fue recibida por una multitud de 13,000 personas en el Poliedro de Caracas, en medio de festejos que se prolongan durante una semana. Después Mendoza visita Singapur, para asistir al Gran Premio de Singapur de la Fórmula 1 y también Puerto Rico donde participa como jurado en la elección de Miss Puerto Rico y visita el Hospital de Niños de San Jorge, en San Juan.

En noviembre regresa a Venezuela para participar de la Feria de La Chinita en Maracaibo y viaja a España e Italia, donde es entrevistada en distintos programas de televisión. En Cannes, Francia fue invitada a los premios Five Star Diamond. Como vocera de la prevención del VIH/sida viajó a Nicaragua y El Salvador en medio de la campaña "Hombres de verdad" de la Organización Panamericana de Mercadeo Social (PASMO), en la cual se pretende involucrar activamente a los hombres centroamericanos en la lucha contra la enfermedad.

Entre febrero y marzo de 2009, Mendoza realiza una gira por países de Europa Oriental, entre los que se encuentran Ucrania, República Checa y Rusia donde sostuvo un encuentro con la Miss Mundo reinante, Ksenia Sukhinova para coronar a Miss Rusia en Moscú. En las Bahamas participó en la Conferencia de Prensa en la que el archipiélago fue anunciado como la sede oficial del certamen Miss Universo 2009. Posteriormente viajó —por segunda ocasión— a Puerto Rico, donde realizó una visita oficial al Gobernador de la isla, Luis Fortuño, en el Palacio de Santa Catalina, además del Hospital Auxilio Mutuo y el torneo de Golf Puerto Rico Open.

A comienzos de mayo de 2009 viaja a Dubái, en los Emiratos Árabes Unidos y a São Paulo, Brasil, a la coronación de Miss Brasil 2009, al igual que asiste a la República Dominicana, Bolivia y Argentina a los concursos donde fueron elegidas las representantes de esos países.La mujer más linda de Argentina será consagrada en Mar del Plata El Retrato de Hoy, 12 de mayo de 2009. En junio de 2009 viaja de vacaciones con su familia al sur de Francia, luego regresa a las Bahamas como parte de un viaje promocional del certamen Miss Universo 2009 y finaliza el mes en Rumanía, al este de Europa, donde además de realizar una Conferencia de Prensa con los medios rumanos, participa en un baile junto a un Ballet Folclórico en un programa de Televisión de ese país. También corona a Miss Rumanía en Bucarest.

Dayana ha realizado entrevistas para CNN en español, NBC, ABC, Telemundo, Univision, Venevisión entre otras grandes cadenas de TV a nivel mundial. En el año 2008 fue nombrada entre las 50 más bellas de la revista People.

El 23 de agosto de 2009, Al finalizar la velada de la 58º edición del Miss Universo realizado en Bahamas Dayana Mendoza, Miss Universo 2008 de Venezuela entregó la corona a Stefanía Fernández también de Venezuela. Es la primera ocasión, en 58 años de historia del concurso que la corona queda en manos del mismo país.

Durante su reinado, Dayana visitó países como Argentina, Bahamas, Bolivia, Brasil, Cuba,  El Salvador, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, España, Francia en dos ocasiones, Indonesia, Nicaragua, Puerto Rico en dos ocasiones, República Checa, República Dominicana, Rumanía, Rusia, Singapur, Ucrania, Vietnam, además de sus viajes oficiales a país natal Venezuela y varias ciudades de Estados Unidos.

 Visita a la Bahía de Guantánamo

Entre el 20 y 25 de marzo de 2009 y acompañada de la Miss Estados Unidos, Crystle Stewart, visitó la Base Naval en la Bahía de Guantánamo, al sur de Cuba y a su regreso comentó lo siguiente:

Esto trajo como consecuencia la condenación masiva a través de Internet, especialmente a través de blogs de opinión, que ridiculizaron tales comentarios. En su país de origen, Venezuela, el comentario también género bastante de que hablar, con el presidente Hugo Chávez a la cabeza, afirmando que podría reconsiderar los elogios que le había brindado previamente.

La Organización Miss Universo salió en defensa de sus declaraciones alegando que la visita de Mendoza y Stewart formó parte, "del programa de entretenimiento de la USO, lo que aumenta la moral de las tropas de los EE.UU... Dayana Mendoza hizo referencia en su blog a la hospitalidad que recibió por parte de los miembros militares de los EE.UU. y sus familias que se encuentran estacionados en Guantánamo". Poco después, los comentarios fueron retirados del blog.

 Polémica

La ex soberana de belleza se vio envuelta en un escándalo al posar desnuda, para una marca de joyería. Se corrió el rumor de que le quitarían el título de belleza, chisme que fue desmentido por la organización Miss Universo.

En junio de 2022, emitió a través de las redes sociales unos comentarios basados en sus religión donde escribió que no apoyaba la homosexualidad, y la Comunidad LGBT, entre los cuales eran: «La homosexualidad es una abominación». Los mismos tuvieron respuestas de rechazo contra Mendoza, entre celebridades y el público colectivo. Miss España 2018
Ángela Ponce fue una de los quienes se opusieron a dicha opinión.

 Carrera Artística

Dayana Mendoza estudió actuación y cine en la New York Film Academy, uno de los institutos de cine más importantes de los Estados Unidos, gracias a una beca otorgada por la organización Miss Universo.

En el 2009, protagonizó su primer cortometraje titulado "Sweet Misery". Ese año formó parte del grupo de animadores del programa matutino de Venevision, Portadas.

En el 2010, fue presentadora, del show de entrevista "Relaxed" de E! Entertainment Television.Ese mismo año, apareció en el vídeo musical Bla Bla Bla, y acompañó a Donald Trump a la isla de Puerto Rico, donde grabó junto a él un programa de golf que tiene el multimillonario.

También en el 2010 Dayana, es parte del elenco de la comedia Lord of the Dreams (El señor de los sueños).

Dayana participó en el reconocido reality show "Celebrities Apprentice" del empresario Donald Trump donde interactuó con personalidades como Lisa Lampanelli, George Takei, Clay Aiken y Debbie Gibson. Su participación en ese programa, estuvo envuelta en controversia, luego de que la comediante Lisa Lampanelli, declarara comentarios en su contra.

En el 2013 interpretó a Jasmine en el cortometraje dramático, The Mermaid Complex (El complejo de sirenas).

En 2017, protagonizó  la película "Nothing's Fair in Love" (Nada es justo en el amor), en donde personifico a Jessica.

En el 2018, produce su primer filme titulado "Honey", por lo cual recibe buena críticas, siendo reconocida como película semifinalista, por el Hollywood International Moving Pictures Film Festival .

En el 2019, participó como presentadora del concurso de belleza, Queen Beauty Universe.

 Filmografía
2009:Sweet Misery (cortometraje.Natas Productions ).......Protagonista.
2009:Portada´s (Programa.Venevision)........Presentadora.
2010:Lord of the Dreams( Cortometraje).........Actriz de Reparto (Isabela).

2010:Relaxed (Show de entrevista.E! (Latinoamérica))......Presentadora.
2010:Bla Bla Bla (Vídeo Musical).........Protagonista.
2012:Celebrities Apprentice (Reality Show,NBC y Trump Productions )......Participante.
2013:The Mermaid Complex.........(Cortometraje)........Reparto (Jasmine).
2017:Nothing's Fair in Love (cortometraje,1 More Mile Productions)..........Protagonista (Jessica ).
2018: Honey'' (Cortometraje..Dayana Mendoza Productions, en asociación con Jane Chae).........Productora y directora.
2019: Queen Beauty Universe 2019..........Presentadora.

Apariciones especiales en la Televisión

Títulos de belleza

Referencias

Véase también
 Miss Venezuela
 Miss Venezuela 2007
 Anexo:Ganadoras y finalistas de Miss Venezuela
 Anexo:Venezuela en los concursos de belleza
 Miss Universo
 Miss Universo 2008

Enlaces externos

 Sitio Oficial del certamen Miss Venezuela
 Sitio Oficial Miss Universo

 Dayana Mendoza en Beevoz

Participantes de El Aprendiz: Celebridades
Ganadoras de Miss Universo
Ganadoras de Miss Venezuela
Delegadas de Miss Universo 2008
Caraqueñas
Participantes de Elite Model Look 2001
Secuestrados en Venezuela

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Watch Dragon Ball GT Episode 63 English Dubbed Online at dragonball360.com. Streaming in high quality and Download anime episodes for free. Watch Dragon Ball GT Episode 63 in High HD Quality online on www.dragonball360.com.
You Are watching Dragon Ball GT Episode 63. Episode 63 in the TV Anime Series Dragon Ball GT.