Our Broadstone joiners are skilled Uran Build qualified craftsmen right on top of their profession. Using the very best tradespersons in the sector our reputation has actually been established as the ' most likely to' company when quality and service matters. Their craftsmanship can be seen in a few of city 's most special addresses yet costs are constantly tailored to fit the project whether it be floors, staircases cupboards or complete repairs. We could even supply a ' group' of multi experienced tradespersons for very large projects with each member being a expert within their very own profession.
Available 24 hours our joiners also give emergency situation services for such things as doors, home windows, and break-in or accidental damages. Our tradesmen will certainly constantly make certain minimal disturbance and that they leave your properties clean and tidy following their go to.
joiners construct, erect or repair frameworks that are made of timber, steel or wood replacements. They can construct the framework of the house, wall surfaces and roof covering; set up doors, windows, floorings, kitchen cabinetry, ceiling floor tiles; set up scaffolding; complete various other architectural work such as sub-floor framing; and might also repair broken furnishings. Carpenters could specialise in a specific area of the profession, so be sure your selected expert is able to finish your certain job.
Layout/design: joiners should select the products for the job and step and mark them to guarantee that they are the right measurements needed.
Cutting and joining products: Cutting could be done with power or hand devices. The reducing stage also includes any kind of shaping that has to be done. Products are signed up with making use of nails, adhesive, screws or bolts and leaders. Levels and various other framework devices are employed to make sure accuracy in signing up with.
Interpretation: joiners translate and review blueprints and other strategies to figure out what will be required for a task.
Comply with building guidelines: joiners are needed to adhere to local and national building ordinance and standards when dealing with any kind of project.
Doors: joiners mount, repair service and replace all types of doors from standard bed room doors to challenging ornate doors. If the old door structure is no more ample, they could mount a totally new frame depending on your demands. See joiners – doors to learn more.
Windows: As well as doors, joiners can install new home windows and repair or replace old home windows. They could likewise mount home window devices such as joints and openers. To find out more see joiners – home windows.
Formwork: This is required when concrete is layed on your property. A carpenter is the optimal expert for creating, building and taking apart formwork and ensuring it is durable and able to sustain the framework.
Handrails: These are required to guarantee stairs, balconies, patio areas and decks are risk-free and safe and secure. joiners are skilled at the workplace with timber, so could construct a basic or luxuriant handrail to match your house style and preferences. For additional information see joiners – hand rails.
Structure outdoor decking: A carpenter could create and build a lovely deck, so you could appreciate your exterior area year-round. They can additionally set up necessary accessories such as stairs, ramps and handrails. See structure outdoor decking for even more.
Architraves: These are an attractive function in any type of residence, as they go around home windows or doors to conceal spaces between the window or door framework and the wall surface (see architraves). joiners can help select the perfect architrave and the ideal type of fixing to match.
Residence frames: As the house structure is the skeleton of the home, it is necessary to guarantee it is erected properly. Carpenters could erect residence structures for brand-new homes and expansions or enhancements, be it level roofs, saddleback roofs or other sorts of residence frameworks. For more informatoin see carpenters – house frames.
Ramps: joiners are able to build any type of sort of ramp you need, consisting of wheelchair and accessibility ramps, skate ramps, watercraft ramps and so forth. They can additionally help you acquire the called for authorizations for the ramp, and make a ramp that is risk-free and suitable. See carpenters – ramps for more details.
Remodellings: Whether you are undertaking little or big restorations in your house, carpenters could assist throughout the procedure. They can aid install kitchen cabinets, add an expansion or deck, mount brand-new floorings, closets and more. They can also help you acquire preparing permissions and allows where needed and help with the design of your improvement. For more details see joiners – renovations.
Skirtings: Skirtings are a decorative attribute that can assist round off the look of a room. Carpenters could set up brand-new skirtings or change old skirtings with ease using wood, MDF or plaster. See joiners – skirting for more options.
joiners will usually bill anywhere from EUR30 to EUR50 each hour, relying on your area and their experience. This will certainly include their time and you ought to verify if products are part of any quote. Much more expensive wood timbers, as an example, will certainly bring a rate costs over soft woods such as ache. joiners could suggest you which sort of hardwood is best suited to your project. If you are constructing a large structure such as a timber deck, any quote needs to include itemised work and products costings.
In some cities joiners are needed to be certified to do function above a specific worth. This is a legal need and guarantees your job is done by a certified tradesperson. There is more info on licensing of carpenters on www.nationalguild.ie.
UrbanBuild is a Broadstone based carpentry, joinery & fitting firm with years of experience. Get your furniture solutions designed by reliable joiners joiners.


I'm hoping I will have a free day soon to do that!
Our master bath- like the rest of the house- is drowning in brown.
our light fixtures are not my fave.
they are already breaking!!!!!! On a three year old house!!!
so they definitely need replacing.
Here are some bathroom pics I found that I really like.
I just love the light and bright feel of this bathroom. Just the right amount of sparkle to have the modern vintage appeal, and a hint of bohemian glamour.
L-O-V-E the tile on the floor.
I'm wanting to replace our huge mirror for something very similar to these.
And I already have the metal tray & orchid!
love the soaking tub, pedestal sink and vintage accessories.
and I spotted some locally at a great price!
I really like all the interesting combinations of tile that you can come up with.
This one has so many different things going on, but it again has a modern vintage feel to it with the checkered floor, the mini subway tile layed out in a fun pattern. The color combo keeps it looking updated and warm.
And having furniture pieces in the functional rooms of the house always makes things feel more inviting.
this wall color is pretty close to what I will be putting on our bathroom.
I love the beadboard and wood floors!
I love the last bathroom! We have similar color in our bathroom and I love it! I am really liking the wood floors too and my dream is to have a tub like that!!! Have fun!!


People with a combined sight and hearing loss have the right to live as independently as possible and to have choice and control in their lives.
Since 95% of our understanding of the world comes through what we see and hear, people who have a combined sight and hearing loss face enormous challenges. It is a distinct disability with unique needs and individual service requirements.
Sight for Surrey is one of the largest providers of specialist services, including communicator guides, for people with combined sight and hearing Impairment in the UK.
The specialist knowledge and experience that the team have in understanding the impact of this uniquely recognised disability (sometimes referred to as dual sensory loss or deafblindness) can assist to reduce the isolation, confusion, challenges with communication and mobility a person may experience. Additionally, they can provide advice and information to family and carers.
The aim of the service is to enable people with a combined sight and hearing impairment to have choice and control over their lives and, if desired, to live as independently as possible.
Anyone with a sight and hearing impairment can access this service. People do not need to be registered as having a visual impairment or hearing impairment.


Environmental Health & Safety (EHS) supports an environmentally responsible, safe and healthy work, research and study environment at Concordia University.
We accomplish this by proactively identifying risks and emerging issues and by developing and implementing innovative, practical and sustainable processes to manage them, including inspections and training.
Through close collaboration with all members of the Concordia community, we establish and maintain health and safety systems that ensure a high level of safety, while not limiting or impeding academic freedom or freedom of research.


text:
RAY v. TATTNALL BANK; and vice versa.
Foreclosure, etc. Tattnall Superior Court. Before Judge Cavender.
This is a dispute between two creditors with reference to their respective rights to an alleged overage from the sale of a debtor's property by The Tattnall Bank in the foreclosure of a deed to secure debt held by it.
The plaintiff Howard O. Ray brought this action against The Tattnall Bank alleging that it had foreclosed and sold certain real property under the power of sale contained in the deed from their debtor (Bobby Ray) for the sum of $31,000 of which the defendant was entitled to recover under its note and deed to secure debt only the sum of $22,000 leaving an overage, and it has failed and refused to account to the plaintiff, a judgment creditor, for said excess. Plaintiff contends he has "a judgment lien against said property" in the principal sum of $5,330.34, plus interest and costs. Plaintiff also alleged defendant had acted in bad faith, had been stubbornly litigious and put the plaintiff to unnecessary trouble and expense by failing and refusing to honor his judgment liens and in addition to the principal amount of the indebtedness and interest he sought punitive damages of $10,000 and attorney fees of $5,000.
The defendant answered the complaint admitting only that defendant is a banking corporation but otherwise denying the claim or at least neither admitting nor denying the averments therein with reference to its actions in foreclosing upon the property of the debtor and having any excess from same or as to any information with reference to plaintiff's claim of a judgment lien. Defendant also filed separate defenses that the judgment liens obtained by the plaintiff against the debtor were procured by fraud and misrepresentation upon the small claims court by knowingly representing to the court that the sums claimed had arisen out of separate causes of action in order to bring each of the actions within the jurisdictional limits of the small claims court and the judgments were therefore null and void having been rendered by a court which did not have jurisdiction.
By deposition the plaintiff disclosed that he was in the fertilizer, chemical and seed business as a self-employed farmer supplying said products to others and during the course of business he had certain dealings on open account with the debtor "Bobby Carl Ray." He maintained four separate accounts as to Ray two of which were individual (personal) accounts for separate years, the first being for 1978 as to goods sold although service charges were thereafter charged from April 30, 1978, through February 1980, and for 1979 for goods sold from March 13, 1979, to May 1979 with service charges thereafter through "2/30" (?), 1980. He also maintained two partnership accounts as to Ray and his partners during 1979 (March 9, 1979, to "2/31" (?), 1980, and another from March 12, 1979, to "2/30" (?), 1980). These accounts were maintained in this manner because the plaintiff contends in the deposition that he had to pledge the accounts as collateral to his fertilizer supplier.
In February 1980 he sought judgments by filing five separate claims in the Small Claims Court of Tattnall County against the defendant Bobby Ray, said court having jurisdiction of claims of $1,500 or less. He obtained judgments as follows: Case No. 80-230 in the amount of $1,305.25 (1978 account of Bobby Ray) plus court costs, dated "3-26-80"; Case No. 80-231 (for the sum due on a partnership account) in the amount of $906.27, plus court costs, dated "3-26-80"; Case No. 80-232 (another partnership account) for the sum of $1,401.12, plus court costs, dated "3-26-80"; Case No. 80-233 (for part balance on the account of the debtor) in the amount of $1,500 (the claim showing a total balance of $1,645.70), dated "3-26-80"; Case No. 80-234 for $145.70, plus court costs (remaining balance of the $1,645.70 account), dated "3-26-80."
The plaintiff moved for summary judgment attaching his affidavit thereto, contending he is the holder of a superior judgment lien. He further contended that the defendant had sold the debtor's property at public outcry on October 6, 1981, at the price of $31,000 and "the indebtedness to defendant under said note and deed to secure debt" was only $22,000, hence defendant failed and refused to account to the affiant (plaintiff) for the excess funds for the satisfaction of his judgment lien as provided by law, and he was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
The defendant responded by moving for summary judgment in its favor contending it was entitled to judgment as there were no genuine issues of material fact.
In opposition to defendant's motion plaintiff responded that the defendant had no standing to challenge the judgments and that there are questions of fact with reference to the amounts of each separate account and the separation of accounts. He also attached another affidavit wherein he set forth that the debtor (Bobby Carl Ray) had filed a petition for bankruptcy and all issues between the parties were fully litigated or could have been fully litigated in "the many adversary proceedings arising therefrom," and the judgments he had obtained in the small claims court were not stricken "nor was the validity of said judgment nor the jurisdiction of the Court challenged therein [and the issue] as to jurisdiction of the Court would have been res judicata between plaintiff and [the debtor] and his successors and assigns."
The motions for summary judgment came on for a hearing and the trial court made findings of fact with reference to the five judgments against the debtor by the plaintiff. The defendant had purchased the deed to secure debt held by another as to the real property and had foreclosed same, and the sales price at the public sale was $31,000. However, the defendant had loaned other money subsequent to the liens and had another deed to secure debt on the aforementioned property of the debtor and had applied the remainder of the proceeds after the foreclosure to that deed to secure debt and no sums were applied to the debt evidenced by the judgment liens of the plaintiff. The trial court also determined the jurisdictional limits of the small claims court "at the time of the filing of the liens" was $1,500. The debtor had previously filed for bankruptcy and had obtained relief "under Chapter 7." The court then determined that the issues were whether the judgment liens were valid liens and enforceable against the defendant and did the defendant have standing to attack the judgment liens held by the plaintiff and further had the defendant acted in bad faith and been stubbornly litigious so as to authorize an award of punitive damages and attorney fees. The trial court then concluded as a matter of law that the judgments shown above in Case Numbers 80-230 ($1,305.25), 80-233 ($1,500), and 80-234 ($145.70) resulted solely from the indebtedness of the debtor and were void and unenforceable in that the aggregate sum exceeded the jurisdictional limits of the Small Claims Court of Tattnall County. The court further held that a judgment rendered by a court without jurisdiction is a mere nullity, citing former Code Ann. 81A-160 (f) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 622; 1967, pp. 226, 239, 240; 1974, p. 1138) (now OCGA 9-11-60 (f)); Edwards v. Lampkin, 112 Ga. App. 128 (144 SE2d 119); The Central Bank of Georgia v. Gibson, 11 Ga. 453; and Ricks v. Liberty Loan Corp., 146 Ga. App. 594 (247 SE2d 133). The court held that the small claims court having rendered judgment beyond its jurisdiction, the judgment was void as to third persons and could be impeached whenever and wherever it is sought to be used as a valid judgment, citing in support thereof The Central Bank of Georgia v. Gibson, 11 Ga. 453, supra; Canal Ins. Co. v. Cambron, 240 Ga. 708 (242 SE2d 32); Lewis v. Lewis, 228 Ga. 703 (187 SE2d 872); and Simpson v. Bradley, 189 Ga. 316 (5 SE2d 893). Therefore, the defendant had standing to attack same. The court concluded that the remaining judgments arose out of farming partnerships holding same were valid and enforceable, the same being Case Numbers 80-232 ($401.12) and 80-231 ($906.27).
In Case No. 66698 plaintiff appeals the granting of partial summary judgment to the defendant declaring the small claims court judgments in Case Numbers 80-230, 80-233 and 80-234 as void and unenforceable. In Case No. 66701 the defendant appeals the grant of partial summary judgment to the plaintiff declaring the small claims court judgments in Case Numbers 80-231 and 80-232 as valid and enforceable and granting judgment against the defendant in the principal amount of said judgments together with interest thereon. Held:
1. The judgment here under review was dated 10 February 1983. At that particular time the jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court of Tattnall County was $2,500 as established by Georgia Laws 1981, Volume II, p. 4587. However, the Small Claims Court of Tattnall County was created by Georgia Laws 1975, pp. 3684, 3685 in which the jurisdiction of the court was set forth as "cases at law in which the demand or value of the property involved does not exceed $1,500.00." The 1981 amendment was not remedial legislation requiring the trial court to accept the amendment as the law in considering the attack upon the judgments. We, therefore, apply the law in effect at the time (1980) of the judgments, that is, the $1,500 limitation as to the demand.
First of all, the judgments are not void on their face and must be attacked by a direct proceeding. This would be the case here, after process and service, as an affirmative defense by the defendant to this action. See OCGA 9-11-60 (a) (formerly Code Ann. 81A-160 (a) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 608, 662; 1967, pp. 226, 239, 240; 1974, p. 1138)). Under OCGA 9-11-60 (f) (Code Ann. 81A-160), supra, such an attack upon the judgment by a third party may be made at any time, whether at law or equity. See The Central Bank of Georgia v. Gibson, 11 Ga. 453 (1), 455, supra; Mobley v. Mobley, 9 Ga. 247 (2) (6), 250, 252; Griffin v. Sketoe, 30 Ga. 300 (4), 305 (3) (4); Simpson v. Bradley, 189 Ga. 316, 318, supra. Compare Lewis v. Lewis, 228 Ga. 703 (2), 704 (5), supra, (an equity case); Canal Ins. Co. v. Cambron, 240 Ga. 708, 710, supra, (an equity case); First Fid. Ins. Corp. v. Busbia, 128 Ga. App. 485, 486 (197 SE2d 396) (void judgment on its face); Ricks v. Liberty Loan Corp., 146 Ga. App. 594, 595 (1), supra, (an action at law, the judgment being void on its face); Edwards v. Lampkin, 112 Ga. App. 128, supra, (lack of probate jurisdiction); Trapnell v. Smith, 131 Ga. App. 254, 256 (205 SE2d 875) (probate proceeding void on its face). Accordingly, we have for decision the issue as to whether or not the various small claims court judgments exceed the legal limit and are void based upon the alleged fraud to establish jurisdiction of the subject matter. See Berry v. Consumer Credit of Valdosta, 131 Ga. App. 147 (205 SE2d 533); Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine, 208 Ga. 261 (2), 262 (66 SE2d 234). The defendant here, a third party, was not a party to the judgment in the small claims court, but it may attack the judgment for fraud under OCGA 9-11-60 (f) (Code Ann. 81A-160), supra, in this action at law. We proceed to a determination of whether or not the small claims court judgments are void under the evidence submitted in this summary judgment proceeding.
2. In the findings of fact set forth in the judgment of the trial court it was stated that the defendant had subsequently loaned money to the debtor and secured said loan with a deed to secure debt on the aforementioned property of the debtor. It then purchased a deed to secure debt given by the debtor which was superior to the five small claims court judgments and foreclosed same in which the sale price at the public sale was $31,000. This was a pleading by the plaintiff which was denied by the defendant. However, an affidavit by the plaintiff was that the property was sold at public outcry for this price and the defendant had an indebtedness under said note and deed to secure debt of only $22,000. Under the evidence here this is uncontroverted. The trial court then contended that the defendant applied the proceeds to this debt "and the remainder of the proceeds were then applied to the debt" (the subsequently loaned money to the debtor by the defendant), and that no sums were applied to the debt evidenced by the judgment liens of the plaintiff. We find no evidence in the record here with reference to this additional indebtedness. The trial court then refers to the fact that the debtor "had previously filed for bankruptcy and had obtained relief under Chapter 7." The only evidence in the record with reference to the bankruptcy of the debtor is the affidavit of the plaintiff that the debtor had filed a petition for bankruptcy in which the plaintiff contends that all issues between the parties (plaintiff and debtor) were fully litigated and the issue as to jurisdiction of the court (the bankruptcy court) would have been res judicata between the plaintiff and the debtor and his successors and assigns. No evidence as to the bankruptcy judgment is before the court other than the above, and we have no evidence as to the relief under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy statute or any evidence as to same as to whether or not it would be res judicata. We do not presume the pleading before the trial court to be one to vacate and set aside the judgment in equity since the debtor is not named as a party to this proceeding. In order to make this an equity proceeding it would be necessary that he should have been made a party and served. See in this connection Mobley v. Mobley, 9 Ga. 247, supra; Rodgers v. Evans, 8 Ga. 143; Towns v. Springer, 9 Ga. 130; Cowart v. Williams, 34 Ga. 167, 172 (2). The defendant herein in its affirmative defense merely seeks to have the judgment set aside with reference to its defense in the case sub judice. We proceed further to consideration of the attack upon the judgments by a third party, the proceeding being merely one at law.
3. Our examination of the two small claims court judgments on the partnership accounts fails to show any evidence that same are void for lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter both being partnership accounts being less than $1,500 and within the jurisdiction of the small claims court. There is no evidence here that any jurisdiction was lacking as to the person or subject matter. The trial court did not err in holding that these two small claims judgments (No. 80-232, 80-231) are valid and enforceable and in granting judgment against defendant in the principal amount of said judgments together with interest not determined.
4. As to the small claims court judgment (Case No. 80-233) it shows on its face that the total balance of the account was $1,645.70, plaintiff seeking a $1,500 judgment within the jurisdiction of that court ($1,500). It then appears that Case No. 80-234 could be one as to the remaining balance due on the same 1979 account over and above the $1,500 sought in Case No. 80-233. See in this connection Berry v. Consumer Credit of Valdosta, 124 Ga. App. 586, 587 (184 SE2d 694). Without further evidence we would not hold that this 1979 account (if, in fact the two judgments result from the same account) was an attempt to exceed the jurisdiction of the small claims court although a jury might so find. Plaintiff produced the written accounting for same in which it appears to be one and the same account reduced by chemicals of $117.60, plus $28.10 for "11 months s.c." (which we logically presume to be service charges), or $145.70.
The remaining judgment claim is based upon the personal account with the data for the 1978 year (Case No. 80-230), and it is less than the jurisdictional amount of the small claims court of $1,500. Nevertheless, these three judgments added together would exceed the $1,500 jurisdictional amount unless these accounts had been maintained in this manner due to the pledging of same as collateral as testified by the plaintiff in his deposition. The defendant at the deposition hearing had an opportunity for a thorough and sifting cross-examination with reference to same and failed to obtain admissions so as to demand judgment as granted by the trial court in which it determined these judgments to be void and unenforceable. See Berry v. Consumer Credit of Valdosta, 124 Ga. App. 586, 587, supra. Under the pleadings and the evidence here genuine issues of material fact remain for jury determination inasmuch as the evidence must be construed most strongly against the movant for summary judgment in the consideration of same. See Holland v. Sanfax Corporation, 106 Ga. App. 1 (1), 4-5 (126 SE2d 442); Burnette Ford, Inc. v. Hayes, 227 Ga. 551 (181 SE2d 866); McCarty v. National Life &c. Ins. Co., 107 Ga. App. 178 (129 SE2d 408). It was the duty of the moving party for summary judgment to present its case in full in order to pierce the pleadings and same has not been accomplished here. Dunbar v. Green, 229 Ga. 829, 830-831 (194 SE2d 435); Summer-Minter & Assoc. v. Giordano, 231 Ga. 601, 604 (203 SE2d 173).
Accordingly, the trial court erred in holding these particular small claims court judgments were void and unenforceable but did not err in failing to hold as a matter of law that said judgments were valid. The evidence does not demand a finding as a matter of law that the plaintiff's treatment of the personal accounts of the debtor were in any wise an attempt to procure judgments by fraud and misrepresentation upon the small claims court by filing these claims as separate causes of action to bring each action within the jurisdictional limits of the small claims court although a jury might so find from the evidence.
As to the two partnership claims, under the uncontroverted evidence, the trial court did not err in ordering them to be held valid and enforceable and rendering judgment against defendant. The judgment in the main appeal is reversed and as to the cross appeal affirmed.
Glen A. Cheney, for appellee.
Richard D. Phillips, for appellant.
DECIDED SEPTEMBER 9, 1983.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


We list Courses across the UK. If there is not one near you, do get in touch to be notified or to book a Private Course.
Dealing with an unconscious, but breathing casualty (Recovery Position) Adult, child and baby.
Topics covered will be agreed by consensus based on individuals' requirements. All topics (including those not covered) are described in the accompanying First Aid manual.
The price includes a free coffee, tea or squash. Top-ups, bottled drinks and snacks are available to purchase, as are First Aid items such as manuals and First Aid kits, however there is no obligation to purchase anything.
Why not come along with a friend or two? Children and babies are welcome, but they are your responsibility – see our FAQ for guidance. If you are breastfeeding, this will not be a problem. Note that the room is on the first floor at the top of a staircase and there is no lift. It is, therefore not wheelchair friendly, but we can give you a hand with pushchairs.
Fill in our request form and we will arrange one! We will even let you know when we have so you can book on to it.


Who is Angelina Jolie's father?
In the original meaning of "decimate", who is killed?
Who starred with Bette Davis in the 1962 film "Whatever Happened To Baby Jane"?
The Australian city of Hobart is on which river?


text:
You are here: Home > Recent articles > On politics, education and business Wednesday 17 July 2019
Theresa May on politics, education and business
interview with The Rt Hon Theresa May MP
The Right Honourable Theresa May MP, Shadow Leader of the House of Commons and Shadow Minister for Women talks to Roger Prentis about politics and the challenges facing the UK and discusses some new approaches to tackle the issues.
q: Why did you go into politics and what aspect of it is important to you?
a: I have been interested in politics for a long time - the "bug" started fairly early in my life. I was a Councillor for a number of years at the local level before coming into Parliament.
I suppose that the reason I went into politics, and what is closest to my heart about it, is making a difference for people's lives. You can do that in politics in a range of ways although, in Opposition, your options are less wide than they are when you are in Government. Obviously when in Government you can make changes that affect people's lives through legislation, but as a Constituency MP you can also make a real difference to people and your local community as well.
q: There must be quite a difference between the local and national levels of politics?
a: There is a tremendous range of things to get to grips with. The danger of politics is that it is very easy to reach a position where you know a little about a lot of subjects as opposed to knowing a lot about a small number of subjects. You can specialise of course like some people who have been Select Committee Chairman. Gwyneth Dunwoody was a very good example - she took a great deal of interest in transport for a number of years and was known as an expert in the field.
My current roles in the Shadow Cabinet mean that I have a wide range of issues to deal with at any point in time. But my Constituency is my base - I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for the fact that the majority of my local constituents voted for me. I believe that one must pay attention to the local constituency and work on issues there. It helps you keep your feet on the ground and enables you to be able to talk to people and find out what the issues are that really matter to them and to hear from people what the implications of legislation actually are. One of the things I feel we are not so good at in this place is really thinking through how pieces of legislation are actually going to work in practice.
q: Do you think that there is too much "point scoring" in Parliament rather than serious debating?
a: I don't think that there has ever been a "golden age" for Parliament at any time where the quality of debate was necessarily significantly different. I think that the problem we have today is that the bits of Parliament that are picked up by the media and seen by most people tend to be the more rumbustious exchanges. Prime Minister's questions (PMQs) is the classic example - that is the one that most people see if they are going to see anything. The bit from PMQs that is mostly shown appears to be two people having a good argument with each other over current issues.
We have made a very conscious effort under David Cameron as Leader to change the way we approach politics here more generally. We won't just oppose things because the Labour Government has proposed them. For example, just last weekend when David was interviewed on the Government's proposals on welfare reform - apart from pointing out that they appear to have taken some of our ideas - he offered our support. It doesn't matter that they have taken our ideas, so long as they have done it in the right way. Notwithstanding the fact that Labour Back Benchers may rebel against it and therefore the political opportunist way of doing it would be to say, "Ahh, we can join them and have a go at the Government." Actually, if we think that the Government is doing the right thing we will support them. We did it with the Education Act under Tony Blair, so I think that is taking a different tone and approach.
q: How do you think business people regard the machinations of Parliament?
a: I think that there are some problems around the general view of Parliament.
Some of the particular debates of the past few weeks highlight this - for example, the discussions about MPs' expenses and allowances - we on the Conservative side have been pushing for the need for radical reform. We need to adopt the same sort of practical approaches that are used in business and elsewhere. There are quite a few of my colleagues who joined Parliament after the last election who find it difficult to believe that they don't have to provide a receipt for every single expenses claim.
In the old days, being an Honourable Member who said that they had spent a certain amount might have been acceptable without supporting proof, but, frankly, those times are long gone. We have to show that we are adopting the same rigorous approach to our accountability that people would expect in other walks of life. We should follow best practice in the public sector and the private sector in our Audit arrangements and I am pushing for this.
Debates like that on expenses and allowances can often get in the way of people's image of Parliament because they damage its reputation.
There are other issues too that people have about the way Parliament does its business. The length of time it takes to get change, for example, can be quite frustrating sometimes. The over-reliance of Government in the last few years on legislation and that can cause problems for people. Also, I think that there are a lot of people that feel we don't spend enough time examining proposed legislation from Europe when we have a series of proposals. We have a series of proposals to change this and improve Parliament's scrutiny of European legislation. We need to make sure that Ministers cannot go to Brussels and sign up to something without Parliament having discussed it. At the moment, there is an image that they just go and sign up.
q: It seems that a Government with sufficient majority can "force" things through Parliament - even resorting to the Parliament Act - if they wish. Do you think this is a problem?
a: I think that it presents some difficulties and it affects people's attitude to what Parliament should be doing. It is part of a general change in attitudes - people no longer have a hierarchical view - that there are people "up there" that take decisions about what happens to "us". The same is true in business: there is a concept about wanting to be part of the decision-making process - it isn't about a lack of respect for authority, it is that people now expect to be treated on a more equal basis. Bringing that into politics, it is important that politicians and parliament should recognise that people don't necessarily want us to make decisions that they want - they recognise that there are differing views out there - but they need to know that all the views have been properly taken into account. Also, sometimes people just want an explanation of why parliament has gone down a particular route rather than another.
They also don't want to see government wasting money. There is a classic example recently where the Department for Transport spent nearly £650,000 on two surveys asking people about their views on road user charges - at the same time that a million people signed a petition on the Downing Street web site saying that they did not want it. It makes people wonder why Ministers don't know what people think when the message is so clear already.
q: Various politicians or parties have been in power for several terms recently. It would seem that their downfall is in appearing to push things through almost regardless of public opinion?
a: We have had two governments that have been in for a significant period of time � the Conservatives from 1979 to 1997 and the current government since. This is different from the 1960s and 70s when there were constant changes. It does mean that it is easy for government to get out of touch and become complacent in what it is doing. Failing to listen to people and appreciate public opinion, along with the relentless pressure from the 24-hour media always to be saying something, leads to a situation where Ministers are sitting back and thinking they should come up with a new idea each day to be seen to be doing something. Often they haven't thought it through and that leads to all sorts of problems.
One thing we need to do is restore the power of parliament. Parliament has been increasingly sidelined over the years with government just doing things regardless. Ken Clarke Chaired the Democracy Task Force for us and there is some work being done here in my office about how we can improve the process of creating legislation and how we can restore the power of parliament so that it holds the Executive to account properly.
q: What are the big challenges facing us today in the UK?
a: Obviously the economic down-turn is the thing that is on everybody's mind at the moment. Beyond that, there is the issue of energy security - this is a significant challenge. That ties in, of course, with climate change and environmental issues and how we adjust to those to the extent that they require changes in behaviour for both businesses and individuals.
Issues like energy security seem to have crept up on us - people have been discussing them in the background for a while, but government doesn't seem to have really grasped their importance.
q: As a nation, we have a variety of energy options available to us - we are an island and have tidal power available, wind power etc. as well as our oil reserves. What should we be doing to address the problems?
a: If I can couple this with climate change issues, we have to look at a future where there is a different balance in energy. Yes, we do have to encourage renewables, but I think it has to be a wide range. Government seems to have grasped at wind farms as the solution, but omitted things like tidal and wave power - a lot of work has been done in Spain on this - and photovoltaic power. It is important for us to have a spread of renewables available to us.
There also has to be an increase in local micro- and macro-generation and we believe that it is important to establish a fair price for carbon. But we also feel that we should be helping people who are putting into place generating ability and to give them proper tariffs when they feed into the national grid so they get a benefit from any excess they produce.
q: Do you think that the current carbon tariffs are appropriate?
« it is very easy to fit something in as a "green tax" when it isn't »
a: It is very easy to fit something in under the heading of a "green tax" when it isn't. We would classify the government's current retrospective excise duty increases for cars under that heading. You may have made a perfectly sensible decision on purchasing a vehicle six years ago, then suddenly you get hit by a tax increase - this is portrayed as a green tax and it isn't one. There is a place for green taxes of course, but the government must be absolutely clear what are genuine ones. We would use the money generated from such taxes to feed back to people through our family fund. This would give a real incentive for people to change their behaviour.
q: How much of the economic downturn is due to the global situation and how much is due to our local actions?
a: There are clearly aspects that relate to the global situation. We feel strongly that the government failed to do the prudent thing - to take appropriate actions in the good times in case there were not such good times ahead. They therefore failed to put anything aside - as they say "to repair the roof while the sun was shining" - so their room for manoeuvre now is very, very limited just at the time when people need the government to have exactly that flexibility to help and give them support. We feel that part of it is very much about how the government has failed to prepare properly.
q: We also seem to be somewhat ill prepared for the demographic changes - the ageing population. What impact do you think that will have on society?
« we had some of the strongest pension provision in Europe, now we have some of the weakest »
a: It is staggering how we have moved away from a situation where we had public and private pension schemes that was very well regarded around the world. To quote Labour MP Frank Field, "In 1997, we had some of the strongest pension provision in Europe, now we have some of the weakest." With Gordon Brown taking £5 billion a year out of pensions it means that they have been hit hard. We used to have groups of people who could take early retirement if they wished and often they would then put a lot back into the community when they did retire. Now people have to work longer and that has implications on how we structure the work place and its flexibility. Added flexibility will be even more critical to allow people to continue to work if they have to for financial reasons. It does raise some real challenges - the government is bringing in the Single Equalities Bill later in the year and one of the issues it will be putting into place properly is the whole approach to age discrimination. It also raises issues for the Health Service - complex issues - and these have to be thought through very carefully.
q: The UK has become very much a service culture - do you think that we will have to move back into a production economy more in the future?
a: I think that market forces will control the outcomes. I don't think that government can artificially create a situation and I don't think it would be right to do so. Other countries have developed the ability to manufacture and we have been through waves where manufacturing in the UK survived because of quality, if not price. Now we find that quality is being produced in other economies as well as price so it does become a real challenge. However, as the economies of other countries grow, their cost structure will change and that will cause a re-balancing.
q: How do you feel the development of the "tiger economies" will impact on this?
a: China and India have massively growing economies and these will have a significant impact. We have heard the government talk about the "knowledge economy" and what we have to offer, but if you look at the quality of graduates from India, for example, our edge is fundamentally challenged. Our advantages have always been our flexibility and our ability to innovate. These are important, but even there things are changing.
q: Our education system has always been held in respect by the world. Do you think we are approaching education in the UK in the right way?
a: I think we need to take a long hard look at the education scene. There are aspects that do seriously concern me.
The government has pushed strongly in the school sector towards diplomas as opposed to A Levels. I totally agree that we should consider vocational education here in the UK, but not at the expense of the academic education. Maintaining high standards of academic education is going to be important to enable our universities to be able to continue to take their place on the world stage. That way, we will continue to have a lot of, for example, Chinese students coming to study. Maintaining our academic edge is very important - take chemistry - there are a number of chemistry departments in universities that have already closed and this is a real area for concern.
« ... not such a clear-cut decison for business to stay in the UK ... »
This also ties in with government's responsibility to create an environment where business feels it is a good place to be. What has happened is that this has been eroding - with the legislation, the regulation, the taxation and so forth. Now it is not such a clear-cut decision for business to stay in the UK as a result. In addition, graduates are being recruited from around the world already, but if government does not look after the corporate environment then it will be even easier for them to move elsewhere.
In the Thames Valley, for example, there are a number of very large and significant companies that are doing business around the world to the great benefit of the UK - jobs and revenue - but the decision of where to site the company is becoming more flexible. The government has therefore to be very conscious of the issues that matter to business and remember that issues such as education and transport infrastructure are critical, along with others that the BERR (the Department for Business, Education and Regulatory Reform) considers.
q: One of your roles is as Shadow Minister for Women - why do we need a Minister with special responsibility for Women?
a: There are a number of issues that particularly affect women that are cross-departmental. There needs to be someone to bring a focus to and highlight the relevant issues. Some are difficult issues that might affect men too, but the overwhelming majority of those affected are women. For example, domestic violence. This is a real issue that cuts across a number of government departments and it needs to have a focus to ensure that it is on the political agenda and being addressed. In the past, it is the sort of thing that has tended to have been overlooked. It is the things like this that predominantly affect women that government needs to address and you need a Minister to provide the focus. The position of Minister for Women was introduced by the Conservative government and it is a position that has been maintained since.
Flexible working and some of the workplace issues are amongst the challenges about which I have to try to change people's perception. A lot of people are concerned about flexible working because it is something that the government says people have the right to request in certain circumstances. In fact, however, flexible working is not necessarily about working less hours - it may be about working part time or job sharing, but it might also just be the tailoring of your working time. It might equally be for a man or for someone with a particular medical condition such as arthritis or MS or for an older person. Whoever it is for, the flexibility enables them to remain in the work place and contribute to the economy. People should think of flexible working as something not only for women and something that can be of benefit in a wide variety of contexts - and, importantly, it is not just about someone working less time.
q: Women are strong in the political arena in the UK - what do women bring to politics that is special?
« women "do" politics in a different way »
a: Women "do" politics in a different way. They are more likely to approach it in terms of what we can deliver for people, not just what can we talk about. They challenge the stereotypes of women and their focus tends to be much more on the delivery and the provision of solutions.
We discussed earlier the "ya-boo" politics - women tend not to get so involved in that - they have a more practical approach looking for solutions. They also bring different experiences and therefore a different perspective. In the family it is still very often the woman who has most contact with the school, the Doctor's Surgery and so forth so they bring an experience of what is actually happening out there.


Vanity Hall is a high quality bathroom furniture manufacturer with over 20 years of experience within the industry. Production is made to order in the UK.
They offer a wide choice of over 50 door styles with matching carcases, along with bespoke painted finishes and Corian solid surface worktops.
HKS are proud to display a range of VH furniture in our showrooms.
Alternatively our staff would be happy to discuss Vanity Hall products in further detail.


No woman desires to have a guy who cheats on her. The man you call your boyfriend should have features of faithfulness, which will make him deserve to be called your boyfriend. You should not go out with a guy who will just make your life miserable by being unfaithful. Do you want to stop your boyfriend from cheating on you such that he loves whole-heartedly? Then you should cast this powerful anti-cheating love spell right now and get all the love, which your boyfriend can offer because that is what you deserve.
You need a boyfriend who has authentic love for you and who will not give any room to any other woman to come close to him. That is the law of faithfulness and I am going to ensure that he obeys that law. I am going to give you an effective cheaters love spell, which will stop your boyfriend from cheating on you, and he will love wholly and sincerely without any reservation.
I want to help you make your boyfriend love you sincerely even unto marriage. When you cast this anti-cheating love spell over your boyfriend, he will be able to commit to you and he will be yours alone for as long as you want. This is your chance to take your relationship to another level and I want to you to take this love spell right now and cast it. You do not deserve to have a boyfriend who cheats on you most especially when you love him so much. I am going to make your boyfriend your ultimate pride because he will love you honestly once you cast this love spell over him.


We share everything we know about AMD'S Ryzen Threadripper— possibly the most powerful consumer CPU ever introduced. Plus, Build 2017's biggest reveals and our full Samsung Galaxy 8+ review.
Watch: Meet Windows Defender Security Center and learn about other Windows 10 privacy settings in the new Creators Update. See our full Samsung Galaxy 8+ review and the Galaxy 8+ in action with DeX dock and as a desktop PC. Plus, hands-on with ShapeScale 3D body scanner.


text:
Rhea Ripley on the reasons why she does not perform often
Rhea Ripley spoke to The New York Post about her return from injury. Many are surprised that Ripley did not perform much. She revealed the reasons. "A lot of it was the injury. I hadn't been cleared for the longest time," Ripley responded.
"I think I got cleared properly and fully the week before my NXT match [on October 18]. Apart from that, I pretty much wasn't cleared that whole time [four months]. After that there pretty much hasn't been an opportunity for me to wrestle because I have been there with The Judgement Day and sort of their muscle.
I help them out if they need me. I'm 'the problem' as The O.C. would say". - Ripley said, as quoted by pwmania.com Rhea Ripley is still an optimist and expects that her matches will get better and better, and her full glory is yet to be seen.
"I feel like my wrestling career is just starting up again," she said.
Rhea Ripley and Bianca Belair
Her relationship with Bianca Belair is always an interesting topic. There has always been a strong rivalry that makes fans love to watch their matches.
"Bianca and I, it's something that shouldn't be rushed and we don't want to rush it. Where that sort of felt like it's gonna happen and that would be the end of it. We want our names to be etched in history.
We want to leave our legacy where we can be in the ring together and make magic. Bianca and I are perfect rivals pretty much. We've talked about it in NXT before. We've talked about it here at Raw before. We pretty much want to be the next Stone Cold and The Rock. We want to have the storylines. We want to go out there and we want to steal the show".


I have about 7000 karaoke songs in my hard-disk.It's very joyful play my favourite songs and learn !!!I have ever know it.
Hi! Thank you for your comment and good job! Karaoke can be real fun and it is great that you can see how to use it for language study.


Surgery at Brockville General Hospital mmn (BGH) covered new ground November 24th with the first laparoscopic colon resection performed in the hospital's history. Laparoscopic surgery is done with small incisions and special, minimally-invasive equipment. This type of surgery has been done at BGH for gall bladder removal, but laparoscopic colon surgery for cancer is something new.
The minimally-invasive technique offers secondary benefits to patients—less post-operative pain, faster return of bowel function, and consequently shorter hospital stays. Fiscal benefits are gained with these decreases in healing time as hospital resources can be distributed elsewhere more quickly.


text:
Matt Thrash
Owner / Tattoo Artist
Contact Matt
Request an Appointment with Matt
Matt Thrash is a lifetime resident of the Black Hills. He is owner and operator of Thrash's Tattoo and Piercing, and Wild Idea Tattoo and Piercing, alongside his wife, Cathy Thrash. Since 1997, Matt's primary artistic focus has been the serious pursuit of properly applying pigment graphically to the human body, constantly pressing its limits and promoting the cultural acceptance of tattoos. He has worked as an artist in several different mediums (paint, airbrush, jewelry, tie-dye, you name it!) but tattoo is where his heart is.
Matts says, "I live for the perfect tattoo and enjoy sessions with my clients… visiting, laughing, and listing to great music. People are naturally excited to be getting tattooed and I feed off of that. I believe this is why the tattto art medium has moved me the most over the years."
Doing great tatttoos is one thing, but Matt also gets satisfaction working around other experienced tattoo artists and developing the skills of up-and-coming artists. "I simply want to see and enjoy a tattoo I wouldn't natually draw myself. It's just more fun working around a group of diverse artistry," he says. "And operating a busy tattoo studio takes a crew where everybody takes a part of the preparation, maintenance, and customer service. Everybody gets to create more when we are all in the picture."
For inspiration and reference, Matt studies nature's colors and textures in plants—like the fine textures in bark or an exposed root system in a tree—and of course the sky and other landscapes. He pays attention to the features of people's faces, which lends well to creating portrait tattoos. He tries to memorize and reproduce what he sees. "I dream of a world full of colorful, textured surfaces where none existed before. I feel almost obligated to create something. Our tattoo shops and our great clientele provide a place to do this kind of work. I'm really challenging myself with advanced tattoo work."
You can bet that right now Matt is thinking about his next tattoo, shop project, or out reference-gathering.
Matt's Work:


text:
Consumer science winners: Two students earned top honors in regional Family, Career and Community Leaders of America competition.
Abigail Bidwell, a junior, received a gold medal for her Focus on Children entry and will advance to the state tournament in March. She also was nominated for regional historian.
Lauren McBride, a senior, earned a silver medal in fashion construction.
Family Career and Community Leaders of America recognizes proficiency and achievement in projects, leadership skills and career preparation.
Kearney School District
State recognition: Dogwood Elementary School has been named an Exemplary Professional Learning Communities School for the 2017-2018 academic year.
Statewide, 21 schools earned the distinction for their focus on collaborative learning and commitment to improving student achievement. The winners were announced at the Powerful Learning Conference in January at Osage Beach.
Liberty North High School
Aspiring artists: Artwork by Lily Brown and Ashleigh Erickson won regional Gold Key awards and will advance to national competition.
They were among more than 1,700 students who entered the 2018 Kansas City Metro Area and Greater Missouri Art Region scholastic contest. Their entries will be displayed and the students will be honored during a ceremony in March at the Kansas City Art Institute Crossroads Gallery Center for Contemporary Practice, 1819 Grand Blvd. in Kansas City, Mo.
Compiled by Su Bacon, Special to the Star
Please e-mail your school news to PigSuBacon@aol.com, fax it to 816-453-7823 or mail it to 816 North, The Kansas City Star, 1729 Grand Blvd., Kansas City, MO 64108. No e-mail attachments, please. Include a telephone number for verification. Items must be received at least two weeks before publication.
Abigail Bidwell earned a gold medal in the regional Family, Career and Community Leaders of America competition. Photo provided
Lauren McBride won a silver medal in the regional Family, Career and Community Leaders of America competition. Photo provided
What are people saying they want to see in the new KCI airport?
Little kids from both soccer teams join dogpile after a goal
Clay County treasurer, former school teacher dies after battling cancer
By Steve Vockrodt
Ted Graves, who reached office as treasurer after retiring as a teacher, died Monday after a short battle against what was described as an aggressive form of cancer. Graves, 57, was also an assistant track coach.
MORE 816 NORTH
Teen suspects in Northland homicide set up a fake drug deal for robbery, records say
Zona Rosa garage in default after Platte Co. refuses to pay debt by crucial deadline
With Zona Rosa $1 million in the red, Platte County sues to find out who must pay
Pair of Kmart stores in Kansas City area to close as part of Sears bankruptcy
Smithville fire district bonuses may have broken law, new fire station empty: audit
Platte County has to pick its poison for Zona Rosa: Financial pain now, or later


text:
'Transformers' sequel leads Razzies awards nominations
Published Jan 14, 2015, 4:49 pm IST
Updated Mar 30, 2019, 12:52 am IST
The action sequel led with seven nominations, 'Legend of Hercules' bagged six
Los Angeles: "Transformers: Age of Extinction" is rolling out with the most nominations at this year's Golden Raspberry Awards.
The action sequel starring Mark Wahlberg alongside morphing robots led all films Tuesday with seven nominations, including worst picture, worst sequel, worst screenplay and worst screen combo.
"Transformers" is also up for worst director for Michael Bay, worst supporting actress for Nicola Peltz, and worst supporting actor for Kelsey Grammer, who was also recognized for his supporting parts in "The Expendables 3," ''Legends of Oz" and "Think Like a Man Too."
The nominations were released to The Associated Press on Tuesday ahead of an official announcement on Wednesday.
This year's other worst picture nominees are "Kirk Cameron's Saving Christmas," ''Left Behind," ''The Legend of Hercules" and "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles." The faith-based comedy "Saving Christmas" and the Kellan Lutz action flick "Legend of Hercules" both collected six nominations, including worst actor for Cameron and Lutz.
The nominees for worst screen combo are Cameron and his ego in "Saving Christmas"; Seth MacFarlane and Charlize Theron in "A Million Ways To Die in the West"; any two robots, actors (or robotic actors) in "Transformers"; Cameron Diaz and Jason Segel in "Sex Tape"; and Lutz and either his abs, pecs or glutes in "Legend of Hercules."
The Razzies, which launched in 1980 as a spoof of Hollywood's awards season, added a new category this year called the redeemer award that lauds past Razzie honorees.
The inaugural redeemer award nominees are: Ben Affleck for being praised for both "Argo" and "Gone Girl" after winning the worst actor trophy in 2004 for "Gigli," ''Daredevil" and "Paycheck"; Jennifer Aniston for her Screen Actors Guild Award nomination for "Cake" following four Razzie nods; Mike Myers for earning acclaim as the director of the documentary "Supermensch" after winning three Razzies for "Love Guru" in 2008; six time Razzie nominee Keanu Reeves for rebounding with "John Wick"; and "Twilight" star and former Razzie recipient Kristen Stewart for earning rave reviews for the indie film "Camp X-Ray."
The Razzies announcement came ahead of Thursday's Oscar nominations. The winners of the 35th annual Razzies are selected by online votes from the organization's 757 members. They will be announced at Hollywood's Montalban Theater on Feb. 21, the night before the 87th annual Academy Awards.
While far less star-studded than other award shows, past Razzie recipients such as Halle Berry and Sandra Bullock have shown up in person to jokingly accept their gold spray-painted prizes.
Tags: hollywood, kristen stewart, ben affleck, cameron diaz, entertainment, razzies award, transformers
Guys or gals: support gender fluidity
Actor Alec Baldwin fires prop gun on movie set, killing cinematographer


text:
Q: Get Value of Post before I have a normal loop in wordpress and in every post i need to check the value of the post before to compare it with the current post.
-- POST 1 --
** DO NOTHING **
-- POST 2 --
** GET VALUE FROM POST 1 **
-- POST 3 --
** GET VALUE FROM POST 2 **
<?php
    if ( have_posts() ) {
        while ( have_posts() ) {
            the_post();

                  $description = get_post_meta( get_the_ID( ), 'metabox_description', true );
                  echo $description;

                  // Add: echo $description_from_post_before;

        } // end while
    } // end if
?>

A: <?php
$previous_post=null;
    if ( have_posts() ) {
        while ( have_posts() ) {
            the_post();
             global $post;
            if($previous_post!=null)
            {
              /// Do what ever you want to do with previous post $previous_post.
            }

                  $description = get_post_meta( get_the_ID( ), 'metabox_description', true );
                  echo $description;

                  // Add: echo $description_from_post_before;
            $previous_post = $post;
        } // end while
    } // end if
?>

A: You can use the function get_previous_post() to get the previous post object.
$prev = get_previous_post();
if ( !empty( $prev ) ) {
   // Do some comparing
}

Hope this helps

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Ranajor Singh Thapa anglicised as Ranjore Thapa () was governor of Kumaun and Garhwal and commander of Jaithak Fort during Anglo-Nepalese war at Battle of Jaithak. He was born to General Bada Kaji Amar Singh Thapa. His brother Ranadhoj Thapa served as deputy to Prime Minister Bhimsen Thapa.

Ranajor Singh set up position at Jaithak overlooking Nahan. On the night of 25 December, British and Indian native sepoys climbed to get into better position to attack at Ranajor Singh's forces. Major Ludlow, who led the attack up the southern slope of the ridge, left the camp at midnight and came first upon the enemy. But the Nepalese thwarted British down the mountain side.  Ludlow fell in with Ranajor Singh's outer picquet at three in the morning, at about a mile's distance from the point to be occupied.

Major General Martindell ordered retreat and first war ended. When General Ochterlony came up with heavy forces and modern equipments, Nepalese were losing out. Badakaji Amar Singh Thapa was reluctant to surrender but then came the letter of fall of Almora by Governor of Kumaun, Bam Shah. Ranajor Singh lost connection completely from his father and from Central Nepal. He was hopelessly and rigidly defending the position. By the time Grand Old Man Bhakti Thapa and position of Almoda fell, his father had to surrender with no support from Capital Kathmandu. Ranajor  Singh on second campaign linked up at Sindhuli Gadhi in support of his father.

References

Bibliography

Year of birth missing
Year of death missing
Nepalese military personnel
Anglo-Nepalese War
Bagale Thapa

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Is Foundation Damage Covered By Your Florida Homeowners Insurance Policy?
Problems with the foundation are among the most unnerving issues for any homeowner. Not only is the foundation critically important for the structural integrity of a building, but foundation problems are typically well-hidden, difficult to diagnose and expense to repair. Encountering any type of problem can be highly frustrating and confusing for a homeowner. You need peace of mind. Here, our Fort Lauderdale property insurance attorneys discuss what you need to know about foundation damage and related insurance claims.
Movement of the earth: Earth movement is perhaps the most prevalent reason for why serious foundation damage occurs. While this is a bigger issue in earthquake prone regions, it does not take an actual earthquake to cause damage. Other earth movement issues, such as those related to sinkholes or major storms, can also cause severe foundation damage.
Poor construction: In some cases, foundation damage can be traced back to shoddy construction work. This is why it is extremely important to investigate the foundation before buying a home. These cases can be challenging, as construction defects are often only a partial cause.
Water leakage: Exposure to water will cause damage to even the hardiest of foundations. Whether it's because of poor drainage after a tropical storm, or because of a leak in your home's plumbing, water exposure can be a serious problem.
Trees: Many people do not realize just how expansive a tree's roots are. A large tree near your home will undoubtedly have wide ranging roots underground. Potentially, these roots could cause a crack in your home's foundation or in your pipes.
Ultimately, coverage will always depend on the specific terms of your individual Florida homeowner's insurance policy. You should always be sure to review your policy so that you understand precisely when you are covered. This is a particularly important issue in foundation damage cases, as certain common causes of damage are not covered by most standard insurance policies, whereas other common causes of damage are almost always covered.
For example, many, but certainly not all, Florida policies exclude coverage for earthquakes. Additionally, many policies exclude coverage for construction defects. Though, in that type of case, you may be able to hold the responsible party (the contractor) liable for your damage. On the other hand, damage caused by plumbing issues or storms (tornados, hurricanes) is often covered by policies Florida. Still, it will always depend on the terms of your policy.
If your property insurance claim was denied, and you feel that the decision was made in error, our team can help. All too often, insurance companies will try to deny or underpay valid foundation damage claims. At Geyer Fuxa Tyler, our Broward County property insurance dispute lawyers have helped homeowners recover fair compensation for their losses. To learn more about how we can help you, please call our Sunrise, Florida office today at (954) 990-5251 to set up a free review of your claim.