text:
<mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:exslt="http://exslt.org/common" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" version="3.3" ID="P0b002ee1895b9442">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Printing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator">printer</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm type="code" authority="marcrelator">prt</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm type="code" authority="marcrelator">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>United States District Court Eastern District of California</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm type="code" authority="marcrelator">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>USCOURTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Judicial Publications</category>
 <branch>judicial</branch>
 <dateIngested>2014-06-19</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>Administrative Office of the United States Courts</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2014-06-18</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">JU 4.15</classification>
<identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1895b9442</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-06-19</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-06-19</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>USCOURTS</docClass>
 <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410</accessId>
 <courtType>District</courtType>
 <courtCode>caed</courtCode>
 <courtCircuit>9th</courtCircuit>
 <courtState>California</courtState>
 <courtSortOrder>2061</courtSortOrder>
 <caseNumber>1:12-cv-01410</caseNumber>
 <caseOffice>Fresno</caseOffice>
 <caseType>civil</caseType>
 <natureSuitCode>790</natureSuitCode>
 <natureSuit>Other Labor Litigation</natureSuit>
 <cause>05:704 Labor Litigation</cause>
 <party fullName="Memorial Hospital Foundation" lastName="Memorial Hospital Foundation" role="Defendant"></party>
 <party fullName="Memorial Medical Center" lastName="Memorial Medical Center" role="Defendant"></party>
 <party fullName="Sutter Central Valley Hospitals dba Memorial Medical Center" lastName="Sutter Central Valley Hospitals dba Memorial Medical Center" role="Defendant"></party>
 <party fullName="Sutter Health" lastName="Sutter Health" role="Defendant"></party>
 <party firstName="Diane" fullName="Diane Thomas-Young" lastName="Thomas-Young" role="Plaintiff"></party>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
 <partNumber>1:12-cv-01410</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
<location>
 <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/content-detail.html</url>
</location>
<classification authority="sudocs">JU 4.15</classification>
<identifier type="preferred citation">1:12-cv-01410;12-1410</identifier>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States District Court Eastern District of California</namePart>
 <namePart>9th Circuit</namePart>
 <namePart>Fresno</namePart>
 <affiliation>U.S. Courts</affiliation>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
 <displayForm>Memorial Hospital Foundation</displayForm>
 <namePart type="family">Memorial Hospital Foundation</namePart>
 <namePart type="given"></namePart>
 <namePart type="termsOfAddress"></namePart>
 <description>Defendant</description>
</name>
<name type="personal">
 <displayForm>Memorial Medical Center</displayForm>
 <namePart type="family">Memorial Medical Center</namePart>
 <namePart type="given"></namePart>
 <namePart type="termsOfAddress"></namePart>
 <description>Defendant</description>
</name>
<name type="personal">
 <displayForm>Sutter Central Valley Hospitals dba Memorial Medical Center</displayForm>
 <namePart type="family">Sutter Central Valley Hospitals dba Memorial Medical Center</namePart>
 <namePart type="given"></namePart>
 <namePart type="termsOfAddress"></namePart>
 <description>Defendant</description>
</name>
<name type="personal">
 <displayForm>Sutter Health</displayForm>
 <namePart type="family">Sutter Health</namePart>
 <namePart type="given"></namePart>
 <namePart type="termsOfAddress"></namePart>
 <description>Defendant</description>
</name>
<name type="personal">
 <displayForm>Diane Thomas-Young</displayForm>
 <namePart type="family">Thomas-Young</namePart>
 <namePart type="given">Diane</namePart>
 <namePart type="termsOfAddress"></namePart>
 <description>Plaintiff</description>
</name>
<extension>
 <docClass>USCOURTS</docClass>
 <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410</accessId>
 <courtType>District</courtType>
 <courtCode>caed</courtCode>
 <courtCircuit>9th</courtCircuit>
 <courtState>California</courtState>
 <courtSortOrder>2061</courtSortOrder>
 <caseNumber>1:12-cv-01410</caseNumber>
 <caseOffice>Fresno</caseOffice>
 <caseType>civil</caseType>
 <natureSuitCode>790</natureSuitCode>
 <natureSuit>Other Labor Litigation</natureSuit>
 <cause>05:704 Labor Litigation</cause>
 <party fullName="Memorial Hospital Foundation" lastName="Memorial Hospital Foundation" role="Defendant"></party>
 <party fullName="Memorial Medical Center" lastName="Memorial Medical Center" role="Defendant"></party>
 <party fullName="Sutter Central Valley Hospitals dba Memorial Medical Center" lastName="Sutter Central Valley Hospitals dba Memorial Medical Center" role="Defendant"></party>
 <party fullName="Sutter Health" lastName="Sutter Health" role="Defendant"></party>
 <party firstName="Diane" fullName="Diane Thomas-Young" lastName="Thomas-Young" role="Plaintiff"></party>
 <state>California</state>
</extension>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-0" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-0/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed.R.Civ.P 16), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/4/2012. (Initial Disclosures: 12/3/2012, Non Expert Discovery ddl 9/20/2013, Expert Discovery ddl 10/30/2013, Non Dispositive Motion Filing ddl 10/30/2013, Dispositive Motion Filing ddl 12/16/2013, Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 6/12/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, Settlement Conference set for 8/29/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, Pretrial Conference set for 3/19/2014 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii, and Jury Trial set for 5/13/2014 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii.) (Gaumnitz, R)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>0</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2012-12-04</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-0.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2ce9</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-0</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_0.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-0/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-0.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-0</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>0</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2012-12-04</dateIssued>
  <docketText>SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed.R.Civ.P 16), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/4/2012. (Initial Disclosures: 12/3/2012, Non Expert Discovery ddl 9/20/2013, Expert Discovery ddl 10/30/2013, Non Dispositive Motion Filing ddl 10/30/2013, Dispositive Motion Filing ddl 12/16/2013, Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 6/12/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, Settlement Conference set for 8/29/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, Pretrial Conference set for 3/19/2014 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii, and Jury Trial set for 5/13/2014 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii.) (Gaumnitz, R)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-1" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-1/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>ORDER on Request for Stipulated Protective Order. The parties' stipulated request for a protective order (Doc. 12) is DENIED without prejudice to renewing the request. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/17/2013. (Timken, A)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>1</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2013-05-20</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-1.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2c3b</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-1</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_1.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-1/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-1.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-1</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>1</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2013-05-20</dateIssued>
  <docketText>ORDER on Request for Stipulated Protective Order. The parties' stipulated request for a protective order (Doc. 12) is DENIED without prejudice to renewing the request. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/17/2013. (Timken, A)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-2" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-2/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding confidential proprietary, private information. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/29/2013. (Timken, A)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>2</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2013-05-30</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-2.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2cea</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-2</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_2.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-2/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-2.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-2</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>2</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2013-05-30</dateIssued>
  <docketText>STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding confidential proprietary, private information. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/29/2013. (Timken, A)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-3" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-3/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>ORDER requiring supplemental briefing re: Informal Discovery Dispute Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/17/2013. (Kusamura, W)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>3</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2013-06-17</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-3.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2cee</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-3</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_3.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-3/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-3.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-3</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>3</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2013-06-17</dateIssued>
  <docketText>ORDER requiring supplemental briefing re: Informal Discovery Dispute Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/17/2013. (Kusamura, W)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-4" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-4/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>ORDER Re: Informal Discovery Dispute Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/27/2013. (Defendant may file a supplemental brief re plaintiff's emotional distress damages no later than July 1, 2013, at 12:00 p.m. (noon). Plaintiff shall file an opposition brief by no later than July 3, 2013, at 12:00 p.m. (noon). The motion shall be deemed submitted at that time; no further argument or briefing will be permitted unless requested by the Court. The discovery deadline is not continued at this time.)(Gaumnitz, R)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>4</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2013-06-27</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-4.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2ce8</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-4</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_4.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-4/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-4.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-4</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>4</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2013-06-27</dateIssued>
  <docketText>ORDER Re: Informal Discovery Dispute Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/27/2013. (Defendant may file a supplemental brief re plaintiff's emotional distress damages no later than July 1, 2013, at 12:00 p.m. (noon). Plaintiff shall file an opposition brief by no later than July 3, 2013, at 12:00 p.m. (noon). The motion shall be deemed submitted at that time; no further argument or briefing will be permitted unless requested by the Court. The discovery deadline is not continued at this time.)(Gaumnitz, R)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-5" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-5/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>ORDER DENYING Defendant's request for production of Plaintiff's medical and psychotherapy records. Defendant's request that Plaintiff produce her medical and psychotherapy records is DENIED; Plaintiff need not respond to Defendant's Special Interrogatory No. 21, which requires Plaintiff to identify all medical providers she has sought treatment with over the last eight (8) years; and pursuant to Plaintiff's representations, Plaintiff shall not introduce evidence of medical records or expert testimony at trial regarding her claim for emotional distress. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/10/2013. (Timken, A)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>5</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2013-07-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-5.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2c39</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-5</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_5.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-5/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-5.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-5</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>5</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2013-07-10</dateIssued>
  <docketText>ORDER DENYING Defendant's request for production of Plaintiff's medical and psychotherapy records. Defendant's request that Plaintiff produce her medical and psychotherapy records is DENIED; Plaintiff need not respond to Defendant's Special Interrogatory No. 21, which requires Plaintiff to identify all medical providers she has sought treatment with over the last eight (8) years; and pursuant to Plaintiff's representations, Plaintiff shall not introduce evidence of medical records or expert testimony at trial regarding her claim for emotional distress. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/10/2013. (Timken, A)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-6" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-6/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/22/2013. (Timken, A)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>6</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2013-07-22</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-6.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2c3c</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-6</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_6.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-6/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-6.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-6</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>6</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2013-07-22</dateIssued>
  <docketText>ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/22/2013. (Timken, A)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-7" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-7/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>STIPULATION and ORDER to CONTINUE the Settlement Conference. The Settlement Conference currently set for 8/29/2013, is CONTINUED to 12/10/2013, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/30/2013. (Timken, A)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>7</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2013-07-30</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-7.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2ce6</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-7</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_7.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-7/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-7.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-7</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>7</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2013-07-30</dateIssued>
  <docketText>STIPULATION and ORDER to CONTINUE the Settlement Conference. The Settlement Conference currently set for 8/29/2013, is CONTINUED to 12/10/2013, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/30/2013. (Timken, A)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-8" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-8/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/13/2013. (Timken, A)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>8</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2013-11-13</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-8.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2cf1</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-8</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_8.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-8/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-8.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-8</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>8</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2013-11-13</dateIssued>
  <docketText>ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/13/2013. (Timken, A)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-9" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-9/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>STIPULATION and ORDER Regarding new dates for filing and responding to motion for summary judgment. Defendant will file a motion for summary judgment and/or dispositive motion by December 18, 2013; Plaintiff will file her opposition brief to the motion for summary judgment and/or dispositive motion by January 8, 2014; Defendant will file its reply brief by January 20, 2014; and the hearing for the motion for summary judgment shall be set for January 27, 2014. To the extent that Plaintiff elects to file a dispositive motion on January 8, 2014, Defendants opposition shall be filed by January 21, 2014, any reply shall be filed by January 27, 2014, and the hearing on both motions shall be set for February 3, 2014. If Plaintiff elects not to file a dispositive motion, the dates stipulated to by the parties stand. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/12/2013. (Timken, A)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>9</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2013-12-12</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-9.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2cec</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-9</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_9.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-9/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-9.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-9</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>9</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2013-12-12</dateIssued>
  <docketText>STIPULATION and ORDER Regarding new dates for filing and responding to motion for summary judgment. Defendant will file a motion for summary judgment and/or dispositive motion by December 18, 2013; Plaintiff will file her opposition brief to the motion for summary judgment and/or dispositive motion by January 8, 2014; Defendant will file its reply brief by January 20, 2014; and the hearing for the motion for summary judgment shall be set for January 27, 2014. To the extent that Plaintiff elects to file a dispositive motion on January 8, 2014, Defendants opposition shall be filed by January 21, 2014, any reply shall be filed by January 27, 2014, and the hearing on both motions shall be set for February 3, 2014. If Plaintiff elects not to file a dispositive motion, the dates stipulated to by the parties stand. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/12/2013. (Timken, A)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-10" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-10/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/2/2014. (Timken, A)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>10</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2014-01-02</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-10.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2c3a</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-10</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_10.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-10/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-10.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-10</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>10</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2014-01-02</dateIssued>
  <docketText>ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/2/2014. (Timken, A)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-11" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-11/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>ORDER vacating hearing date of January 27, 2014 and taking matter under submission. signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/23/14. (Nazaroff, H)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>11</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2014-01-23</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-11.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2ceb</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-11</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_11.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-11/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-11.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-11</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>11</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2014-01-23</dateIssued>
  <docketText>ORDER vacating hearing date of January 27, 2014 and taking matter under submission. signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/23/14. (Nazaroff, H)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-12" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-12/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/27/2014. (Gaumnitz, R)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>12</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2014-01-27</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-12.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2cf2</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-12</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_12.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-12/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-12.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-12</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>12</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2014-01-27</dateIssued>
  <docketText>ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/27/2014. (Gaumnitz, R)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-13" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-13/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>STIPULATION and ORDER to Vacate Trial Date, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/21/14. (Gonzalez, R)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>13</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2014-02-24</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-13.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2ce7</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-13</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_13.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-13/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-13.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-13</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>13</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2014-02-24</dateIssued>
  <docketText>STIPULATION and ORDER to Vacate Trial Date, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/21/14. (Gonzalez, R)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-14" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-14/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>ORDER ; granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Summary Judgment ; resolved 29 Motion for Reconsideration signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/19/14. (Nazaroff, H)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>14</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2014-03-19</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-14.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2cef</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-14</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_14.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-14/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-14.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-14</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>14</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2014-03-19</dateIssued>
  <docketText>ORDER ; granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Summary Judgment ; resolved 29 Motion for Reconsideration signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/19/14. (Nazaroff, H)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-15" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-15/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>ORDER Directing Briefing on 80 Issue of Merit Pay Increases, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/4/2014. (Defendant to file supplemental motion not later than twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Defendant shall file an opposition not later than fourteen (14) days from the date of service of Defendant's motion. Defendants may file and serve any reply brief within seven (7) days of the filing of Plaintiff's opposition.)(Gaumnitz, R)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>15</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2014-04-04</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-15.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2ced</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-15</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_15.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-15/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-15.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-15</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>15</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2014-04-04</dateIssued>
  <docketText>ORDER Directing Briefing on 80 Issue of Merit Pay Increases, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/4/2014. (Defendant to file supplemental motion not later than twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Defendant shall file an opposition not later than fourteen (14) days from the date of service of Defendant's motion. Defendants may file and serve any reply brief within seven (7) days of the filing of Plaintiff's opposition.)(Gaumnitz, R)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-16" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-16/mods.xml">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al</title>
  <subTitle>MEMORANDUM, OPINION and ORDER; ORDERED Judgment In Favor of Defendant, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 06/17/2014. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)</subTitle>
  <partNumber>16</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <originInfo>
  <dateIssued>2014-06-18</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
 <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-16.pdf">
  <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1895c2cf0</identifier>
</relatedItem>
 <identifier type="uri">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-16</identifier>
 <identifier type="former granule identifier">caed-1_12-cv-01410_16.pdf</identifier>
 <location>
  <url access="object in context" displayLabel="Content Detail">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-16/content-detail.html</url>
  <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-16.pdf</url>
</location>
 <extension>
  <searchTitle>USCOURTS 1:12-cv-01410; Thomas-Young v. Memorial Hospital Foundation et al; </searchTitle>
  <courtName>United States District Court Eastern District of California</courtName>
  <state>California</state>
  <accessId>USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01410-16</accessId>
  <sequenceNumber>16</sequenceNumber>
  <dateIssued>2014-06-18</dateIssued>
  <docketText>MEMORANDUM, OPINION and ORDER; ORDERED Judgment In Favor of Defendant, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 06/17/2014. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)</docketText>
</extension>
</relatedItem>
</mods>

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
Culinary Content Network
Baking 101
Chefs & Cookbooks
Kitchen & Tools
Say Hello to Summer
Grilling & Barbecue
Ice Cream Time
Eat/Dine
Chefs & Personalities
Weddings & Wedding Cakes
The Ultimate Tailgate
Celebrity Bites
Culinary Vacations
Global Cuisine
10 Things You Didn't Know About Paddy's Day
Randi Roberts
Learn these great fun facts and impress everyone on St. Patrick's Day
There is so much to learn about this holiday and its evolving traditions.
Dusted off your giant green leprechaun hat or that "Kiss Me I'm Irish" tee yet? Have you dug out your recipes for green confections and corned beef and cabbage? Well, it's about that time again. St. Patrick's Day is just around the corner.
Click here for the 10 Things You Didn't Know About St. Patrick's Day (Slideshow).
Gangs of rowdy revelers 'crawling' from pub to pub, masses of green-clad people marching to bagpipes in city streets, and assortments of green shamrock decorated treats are now some things equated with St. Patrick's Day across the globe. But that's not how it always was.
It started out as a religious feast day in the ninth or tenth century to commemorate Saint Patrick, the patron saint of Ireland. Born in the fourth century, he was enslaved as a teenager and brought to Ireland from his native Britain, but eventually escaped after hearing the voice of God. Years later, the voice urged him to return to Ireland as a missionary and bring Christianity to the people. There, he used clovers to explain the Holy Trinity and converted pagan Druids. Irish Catholics venerate the saint on the anniversary of his death, March 17, by going to mass, praying for missionaries and celebrating with a large meal.
The St. Patrick's Day that we know — and local bars love — is more about national pride than a celebration of the religious figure. This custom started on American soil with banquets held by Irish charities in Boston. The first St. Patrick's Day parade was in New York City in 1762, when Irish soldiers marched through the city as a way to reconnect with their roots. St. Patrick's Day is now associated with everything "Irish"— green beer, shamrocks, luck, and traditional dishes.
3 Irish Inspired St. Patrick's Day Aprons9 Green Drinks for St. Patrick's Day How to Make Wine Cork ShamrocksHow to Make a Lucky Charms Wreath6 Beer Alternatives to Guinness on St. Patrick's Day
Most of us don't know all the facts about Saint Patrick or the holiday celebrated in his name. Bet you didn't know that Saint Patrick wasn't all about green, or that St. Patrick's Day is only a public holiday in three places, or that "Saint Patty's Day" is not on March 17th. To find out the answers to these trivia facts and to learn a few more, click through our slideshow.
How to Make a Spicy Tuna Roll Like a Sushi Chef
Drink Recipe of the Day
St. Paddy's Day
st. patrick's day facts
About Navigation
Check your inbox for an email from us so you can confirm your subscription and begin receiving the newsletter!
COPYRIGHT © 2020 Tribune Publishing. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE DAILY MEAL ® IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF TRIBUNE PUBLISHING.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


HP Sales – Henny Penny, Smokaroma, Instaburger, Cozoc, Doregrill, Jaccard, Liebherr, and more. Bars & Taverns - HP Sales - Henny Penny, Smokaroma, Instaburger, Cozoc, Doregrill, Jaccard, Liebherr, and more.
Fry More Food, Use Less Oil, Thank Us Later.
Because consumers have such a wide variety of choices, you know just how important outstanding food quality is when it comes to differentiating your bar or tavern in the flooded marketplace. Today's Henny Penny fryers have been proven to turn out delicious and consistent food with no recovery time at all. On top of that, Henny Penny uses 40% less oil while the automatic filtering system actually works to extend the oil's life.
Ready for a fryer that slashes oil costs, uses less energy, and practically filters itself? Welcome to the evolution.
The advantages of pressure frying are clear: controlled low pressure allows faster cooking at lower temperatures. This not only saves energy and shortening, but helps seal in the food's moisture & flavor.
HP Sales of NJ & NY is a food service equipment distributor providing customized value added food service solutions for the preparation and merchandising of hot foods to both the food service and retail markets.


text:
Bernie Sanders Throws His Support To Iron Worker Randy Bryce—Which Could Be Very Bad News For Paul Ryan
Posted By: Mark Taylor November 23, 2017
By Marc Daalder
In These Times (11/20/17)
Randy Bryce took the political world by storm this June when he released a stunning television ad announcing his campaign to unseat House Speaker Paul Ryan. Bryce is running for Ryan's seat in Wisconsin's southeastern 1st congressional district, which straddles Milwaukee's metropolitan border.
"I decided to run for office because not everybody's seated at the table—and it's time to make a bigger table," Bryce says in the ad. "If somebody falls behind, we're so much stronger if we carry them with us. That's the way I was raised. We look out for each other."
The ad helped raise almost half a million dollars for Bryce's campaign in just twelve days.
An Army veteran and an ironworker by trade, Bryce mixes an everyman's appeal with genuine progressive politics—a stark contrast with Ryan's straight-laced conservatism. And Bryce received a boost to his progressive credentials last week when he was officially endorsed by Bernie Sanders.
"We have enough lawyers in Congress, There aren't a lot of garbage men, ironworkers, building tradespeople. We need more people that actually know what it's like to struggle so that we have a government that's receptive to our needs." – Randy Bryce
"We've got to protect Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid from people like Paul Ryan," Sanders said in a statement announcing the endorsement. "I think Randy Bryce has an agenda that is going to make sense to working families. We need Randy in Congress."
Sanders and Bryce line up on a range of issues, from unwavering support for workers and union rights to a $15 minimum wage.
Explaining why he stands with workers fighting for a higher wage, Bryce tells In These Times, "I've always been supportive of a $15 minimum wage. Otherwise what we're doing is just giving welfare to corporations. We shouldn't be subsidizing corporations so that they can profit more on the people's backs."
Bryce also shares Sanders' belief in a universal healthcare system, backs the Vermont senator's Medicare for All bill and supports a massive investment in infrastructure spending to revitalize deindustrialized communities like those in his Wisconsin district. Joe Dinkin, spokesperson for the Working Families Party—of which Bryce is a member and endorsed candidate—says that what connects Sanders and Bryce is a commitment to progressive values.
"What Bernie sees in Randy Bryce is a working class progressive that draws a perfect contrast to 'Wall Street' Paul [Ryan]," Dinkin says. "Randy wants to guarantee healthcare for all, to rebuild America's roads and bridges and to make the billionaires pay for it. Paul Ryan wants to give billionaires a massive tax cut and make the middle class pay. This endorsement, coming from America's most popular political leader, is a huge deal and proves that this is a top tier race."
Bryce says it's not only his policy positions that that set him apart from Ryan, but also his commitment to representing the needs of his constituents rather than outside interests.
"It's about getting trust," Bryce says. "It's not just showing up a few weeks before election day and trying to get people to vote. It's about actually being involved in the community—to listen and then to come up with ways to implement the needs of the community."
Bryce may still appear to be a longshot candidate. A recent Public Policy (PP) Pollshows him trailing Ryan by seven points. But Bryce's campaign says that these numbers will change as more voters get to know who the candidate is and what he stands for (the PP poll shows 69 percent of respondents still aren't familiar with Bryce).
Ryan beat his Democratic opponent in 2016 by 35 points, so the race currently sitting at single digits represents a significant change in the political winds. …
Randy Bryce for Congress | Bernie Sanders Endorsement
"We've got to protect Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid from people like Paul Ryan. I think Randy Bryce has an agenda that is going to make sense to working families. We need Randy in Congress." — Senator Bernie Sanders.


text:
"The Chinese have been here a very long time," says Trini national on Chinatown
Caribbean region is an area that is ripe for exploration.
This paper will outline the rationale behind Chinese immigration, the indentureship scheme itself and then attempt to succinctly explore select areas of the daily lives of the Chinese in the Caribbean.
According to The Caribbean Atlas, there were two main waves of Chinese migration to the Caribbean region.
The first wave of Chinese consisted of indentured labourers who were brought to the Caribbean predominantly Trinidad, British Guiana and Cuba, to work on sugar plantations during the post-Emancipation period.
The second wave was comprised of free voluntary migrants, consisting of either small groups (usually relatives) to British Guiana, Jamaica and Trinidad from the 1890's to the 1940's. In fact the most modern Caribbean Chinese are descended from this second group. (Look Lai, Origins of the Caribbean Chinese 26).
And in 2019 the Capital City of Port-of-Spain presents to the nation 'Chinatown'.
IzzSo Media ventured to the 'University of the People' Woodford Square where we spoke with the elderly about their thoughts on the city's new development and what they witnessed during their younger days in Trinidad.
https://izzso.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/chinatown-vox-pop.mp4
The second phase of the is archway is being constructed at the bottom half of Charlotte Street; where Chinese nationals can be seen working steadfast on completing the project.
https://izzso.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/B38FA9A9-E9FB-4436-8BDF-617CF522BC35.mp4
*Cover Story* 14897 Business 1741 Economy 1339 Government 4254 News 13562 Charlotte Street 4 Chinatown 3
67 Year Old Becomes China's Oldest New Mother
UK Elections December 12th
Search continues for man connected to Las Cuevas double murder
Showers expected as 2 tropical waves approach
Search continues for man connected to Las Cuevas double murder 0
Showers expected as 2 tropical waves approach 0
DaBaby's Nudes Allegedly Leaked Online 0
Police find another body in Aripo 0
TT whipped 7-0 by USA in international friendly 0
"I think there needs to be jail time for him," says John Legend's wife on Donald Trump 0
TTPS Respects All Religious Groups, Says Acting CoP Jacob 0


text:
Christian Book Reviews, Author Interviews, Excerpts
A Distant Melody Does Credit to First-Time Novelist
Author: Sarah Sundin
Title: A Distant Melody
It's 1942, and Walter Novak can't seem to put two coherent words together when faced with a pretty, available woman. But he can command a crew and pilot a B-17 through enemy fire. When Walt meets Allie Miller, he mistakenly believes she is married, and while disappointed—she's friendly and attractive—he finds that he can converse with her easily. Soon afterwards, he discovers that she is single after all, and their newly established camaraderie gives him hope for the future.
Allie Miller has been told by her mother for years that someone as plain-looking as she is should be grateful for the attention of her long-time beau, Baxter. Besides, her father wouldn't bequeath his thriving company to any other man. When Allie meets Walter on her way to a mutual friend's wedding, sparks fly, much to her delight and dismay. During their week at the wedding location, she assumes Walt is just being friendly, for surely her friends have told him about Baxter. But her feelings aren't so platonic.
When Walt is called into action over Europe, he and Allie begin corresponding regularly by letter. By the time Walt figures out that Allie can't be his "girl," it's too late—he's in love. Allie finds herself resisting her parents' expectations but is limited in how she far she can rebel. Each of them must rely on God in new and challenging ways as they fight their individual battles.
Allie and Walter are two very likeable characters. Each of them experiences not just a love story, but a coming of age transformation. They live in two different worlds—breezy, affluent California and harsh, dangerous England during World War II. Sarah Sundin successfully weaves the narrative into a tri-cord braid—their developing relationship, Walt's leadership and wartime challenges, and Allie's struggle to reject family expectations. Their letters bridge the gaps and help bring the story strands together.
The author is most successful in painting the scene. Sundin describes each setting in vivid prose. Readers fly with Walt's B-17 bomber making a run across the English Channel to drop bombs on Germany. We smell the smoke and blood, see the flak on the windshield, hear the screams of pain and whine of engines, feel the faint nausea brought on by fear. Life in the barracks, military uniforms, 1940s customs, manners, and fashion—Sundin fills the story with anecdotal riches.
Sundin also describes the hardships of war surprisingly well, not backing away from the debilitating effects of death, suffering, and depression. Characters are not allowed to stagnate—even those we dislike grow and change. By the end of the book, Walt and Allie are not the same people who met on the way to a wedding. Well-paced, with a solid Christian theme and message, A Distant Melody does credit to first-time novelist Sundin. Readers should be delighted that it is only book one in the "Wings of Glory" series.
**This review first published on May 17, 2010.
Recently On Books
How to Be the Bridge : Practical Steps to Racial Reconciliation
How Does The Emotionally Intelligent Pastor Help with Burnout?


Little Bo-Peep Knits: I've got some dyeing to do!!!
I've got some dyeing to do!!!
The big brown truck just dropped off a box of yummy superfine cestari merino!!!! yay! I'll be dyeing over the weekend so stay tuned for some new colorways!