text:
Home Gambling 5 Reasons Why Classic Games Hit the Comeback Trail in 2021
5 Reasons Why Classic Games Hit the Comeback Trail in 2021
Sandra Stephanell
2020 was a year in which online gaming reached new heights. More new players than ever before packed online gaming lobbies either just to enjoy competing against others from around the globe or to try and become the next big thing in Esports or streaming.
This charge was also led by a number of big title releases, rounding out the year with Cyberpunk 2077, which even boasted an appearance from Hollywood A-lister Keanu Reeves.
However, not everything has been hunky-dory in the world of online gaming, with the aforementioned Cyberpunk release flopping badly and some updates to popular battle royale games also receiving underwhelming reviews and player feedback.
All this has given rise to a surprising trend, whereby ancient and classic games, which were once seen as being too old hat to stay the course online, are now making major inroads into the player bases of more graphically superior games.
Some such classics include chess, poker, and even backgammon, all of which have seen a huge uptick in player registrations on PC and mobile throughout 2020.
In this article, we delve into exactly why that is, as well as looking at if this is a trend that is here to stay for 2021, rather than a fleeting flash in the pan.
Here are all the reasons that classic games hit the comeback trail in style throughout the twelve months of 2020.
Board games like chess that challenge players to the max and surging in popularity, thanks to gaming companies reinventing them for online audiences
1. Cost-Effective Versions Bring New Customers Into Play
There is no doubt that one of the main aspects behind more people moving into online gaming in 2020 has been the fact that the overall cost of playing has dropped, with everything from top strategy games to raging battle royales now being available to players partly free of charge.
Purveyors of classic games have keenly followed this trend, which prompted many to either make their games completely free to users or partially free, dangling the carrot as they found out if people wanted to continue playing or not.
Some good examples of this include Chess.com, which gives almost completely free access to everything from live chess tournaments to video tutorials. Approaching things slightly differently are PokerStars, who enable new players of Texas Hold'em and other poker variants to try them out using what is known as 'Play Money'. Last but not least there is 247backgammon.org, where games of backgammon can be played at any hour of the day or night at a minimal cost.
As many online gamers get used to free-to-play payment structures, these classic games and their free versions will continue to bring more and more players into their midst.
Many online gaming streamers are turning to games like poker and chess because the breaks in play allow them to interact more with their followers and build compelling storylines
2. Classic Games Offer Longevity
Image source: pexels.com
One of the major upsides of games like chess or poker is that they are easy to pick up for new players but are equally impossible to master for experienced players.
This means that players are constantly being challenged to improve as quickly as their peers, developing healthy levels of competition while maintaining interest in the game as a result.
This is in stark contrast to other more modern gaming titles, where the interest can wain quickly once a game is completed or a certain skill set is fully grasped by a player.
3. Classics are Conducive to Online Streaming
Image source: reddit.com
These days the boundaries between someone being a gamer, a broadcaster, and a content creator themselves are being blurred, thanks in large part to streaming platforms like Twitch and Facebook Gaming, where gamers are encouraged to market themselves as entertainers in return for donations from their followers.
When it comes to games that do well on platforms like these, they tend to fall into two categories.
The first of these is one based around all-out action. Streamers who fit into this category include huge names like Dr. Disrespect and Nick Mercs, who consistently stream high-quality content of them playing Call of Duty, Valiant, and other battle royale titles.
The second variety of gaming streamers tends to be one that focuses more on building a rapport with their followers, as they play games like poker or chess, games which often allow ample time in between moves or hands for the streamer in question to engage with their stream's chat.
Of course, the more people there are watching top-level players on Twitch and other streaming platforms means that many will become players themselves, as they look to emulate their streaming heroes. This is undoubtedly helping to drive the increased numbers seen on classic gaming sites and apps.
Many top pros who specialize in classic games act as additional media outlets and advertising avenues for companies that run classic games online
4. Young Successful Players Act as Ambassadors for the Games
While streamers have played a huge part in driving the online success of classic games, such individuals are often so caught up in the broadcasting ventures that they never manage to reach the elite levels of their chosen Esport.
However, that does not mean there are not highly engaging individuals leading the way at the pinnacle of these games.
A perfect example of this is the chess grandmaster Magnus Carlsen, who's smart and youthful approach to the game has brought untold amounts of new interest to chequered boards online and offline.
5. History Shows that Playability Endures Above All Else
At the end of the day, games like chess, poker, and dominoes have been around for centuries, and some even date back thousands of years.
What this shows is that what ultimately makes a game successful is its adaptability and the sheer number of possibilities and experiences it can offer to players.
By continuing to home in on exactly these qualities, classic games will undoubtedly continue to thrive in the online sphere and beyond, as developers of other games get too distracted by flashy graphics and overblown dynamics.
#! classic
Previous article5 Reasons Why Cricket Is the Most Popular Sport for Betting in India
Next article10 Warning Signs You May have Seasonal Depression
5 Reasons to Learn About Online Betting Laws In Your Country Before Gambling
4 Things All Beginners Should Know About Casino House Edge
3 Tips for Understanding How Does Online Gambling Work


It's time to uncover the captivating mystery that is Lithuania. These low-cost hotels guarantee a holiday that's both memorable and affordable.
Stay in Ambassador Hotel, Vilnius, just a short distance from the Old Town and the 13th century Cathedral. The rooms offer basics like direct-dial telephones, minibars, satellite TVs, and desks. Prone to sneezing and getting a runny nose? Patrons can request for hypoallergenic bedding. There are connecting bathrooms, as well as balconies to enjoy the fresh air. Smoking rooms are available, and nearby are facilities for aerobics, swimming, tennis, and more.
A low-cost hotel that's near the beach and the airport at the same time is Kungis Inn, Palanga. Hidden from the rest of the world by a stretch of forest, its bold red rooms have balconies looking out into the sea. Families can have their own private barbecues here. Visitors recommend this lodging for its proximity to the entertainment area and the grocery stores, and the fact that it remains secluded and peaceful at the same time.
Also in the town is Hotel Gamanta, which earns raves for its sumptuous meals. It is as lavishly decorated, and there are a number of amenities like a sauna, gift shop, and swimming pool. Currency exchange, banking, and laundry facilities are available as well. There are massage and beauty services too.
Guests also heap praises on Nemunas Tour, Kaunas. Its owners know how to take customer service to a higher level, not only providing information for newcomers, but also arranging excursions and providing healthy and delicious meals. The pale blue-green exterior hints at the serenity inside; Nemunas Tour is a cosy place in which to spend a relaxing holiday.


The assistants for the devices we use daily are no news. They can help us in many ways and are mostly controlled over voice commands. The importance of Siri in the Apple universe is crucial to understand why Apple is one of the friendliest brands for those who have vision imparities. Read on and find out everything you need to know about Siri.
The year was 2010 and the iPhone 4s was to be released and Siri was an app developed by SRI International with a speech recognition technology and engine provided by Nuance Communications (remember Ray Kurzweil? Nuance Communications bought the technology he originally invented). The voice assistance app was released to the iOS market in February of 2010 and two months later it was purchased by Apple. They featured in their iPhone 4S as a standard feature in October 2011 and has been a standard feature in every iDevice ever since. The voice of the actors (American, Australian and British) were recorded many years before (2005) that without them knowing what they will be used on. Today, they are probably some of the most-heard voices in the planet.
There were mixed reviews once Siri hit the market with iPhone 4s. Some media like The New York Times stated that the software was amazing in its capabilities and voice recognition. Also, specialized media like TechCrunch praised the voice recognition and the potential that it had to be further expanded in the future. Although that was the case with most media, some users reported that they had a hard time trying to make Siri understand complex indications or compound orders from the users. Also, some British users and others with a strong accent, had lots of problems to have Siri sort out what they were trying to say and follow their commands.
Besides these mixed reviews, some users claimed that the information about places nearby for some topics were deliberately shortened or misdirected. For example, some pro-choice abortion organizations criticized Apple because Siri wouldn´t show information about abortion providers and birth control facilities nearby but would instead take them to pro-life institutions like crisis pregnancy centers. This was a major accusation, because it didn´t mean that Siri was inaccurate because it was a faulty software but meant that it was programmed to act that way.
Although Apple has also the VoiceOver help feature that allows the use of the iDevices by people with visual imparity, the Siri feature goes way beyond allowing people to command their phones without any kind of. Siri is another step towards visual imparity autonomy and hence, a very welcome step by a major corporation into a future with enhanced equity.
VoiceOver is Apple Software for the visually impaired and comes built-in every iDevice you own. It takes the concept a little further than what Microsoft did with Ease of Access and the Microsoft Narrator. But of course it does, it´s Apple, they always take it one step further and we love them for it. Read on and find out everything you need to know about the VoiceOver App.
As everything that Apple has ever done, the VoiceOver App is dedicated to creative people above anything else. The company indicates that the software is prepared to tell the user absolutely everything that is going on in the screen of their iDevice. Also, it provides what Apple calls "helpful hints" while you´re using it to enhance the end-user experience. It allows you to plug a refreshable braille display, keyboard or the built-in gesture recognition technology. The more than 35 available languages make it very useful for Mac users around the world.
One important fact about the VoiceOver App is that it is not just a screen reader but is an integral part of the Operating System. This means that it was not added afterwards like is the case with Microsoft Narrator, but the Operating System was designed with it. It works awesome with Safari and if you happen to be able to read in multiple languages and visit different websites, the VoiceOver App recognizes it and automatically changes its language to match the content in the screen. There are many options in the refinements menu that can be tailored to make the software perfect for your everyday experience.
If you are not a person with visual imparities and have been to iTunes, you will recognize some movies have an AD icon in them. This stands for Audio Description and means that this software will describe you what is going on in the movie. You can, thanks to this technology, watch a movie without actually watching, but having someone tell you what is going on while you´re listening to the dialogs.
The app also has what the company calls a Dark Mode which resembles a lot to the High Contrast Mode in Windows. This allows users to do two things: one is to concentrate only on their work while all the menus fade to the dark and the other to increase contrast and allow those with a lighter visual disparity to perform better in all of the built-in apps.
Although, just like Microsoft, there is a tutorial published in Apple´s page on how to create apps that are VoiceOver-friendly, the percentage of companies that go the extra mile is still small compared to the giants that spent the big bucks in making it happen. Therefore, Apple doesn´t assure users that third-party apps on their iDevices will work with VoiceOver.


text:
The Future of the Arctic: A New Global Playing Field
Video Pause
Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson
President, Republic of Iceland
Presider
Scott G. Borgerson
Cofounder and Managing Director, CargoMetrics
SCOTT BORGERSON: Well, good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for coming to this afternoon's meeting with the president of Iceland on the Arctic. It's near and dear to my heart as a former CFR fellow who worked on this issue for several years, so I'm thrilled to see that the council is still sort of involved in this sort of critically important and increasingly important part of the world. It's dynamic and it's changing. As you'll hear from the president, quite a bit is going on.
So before we begin our conversation, I'd like to remind everyone that this meeting is on the record. And I also like to specifically acknowledge the former premier of Greenland, Kuupik Kleist, who is with us today until just two weeks ago. So we not only have one but two heads of state here. And the president has a packed agenda in Washington, which he'll tell you about, but he's going immediately from lunch with us to a meeting with both the Senate majority and minority leaders at the same time on the Hill. So he's quite busy. And we're very pleased that he made time in his schedule to join us at the Council on Foreign Relations.
So his full bio is in the program that you have, so I won't go through it, but I'd like to maybe highlight just sort of a few really interesting sort of facts from there. President Grimsson is serving his fifth term as president of Iceland, and he is the longest-tenured democratically elected head of state in the world, actually, which is quite a distinction. He is also the only European leader to still have his job since the financial crisis -- (laughter) -- which makes him unique. And given sort of that prestigious and long tenure, he is probably the world leader who has met more leaders of India and China than any other head of state in the world, which is sort of really quite extraordinary and will make more sense, perhaps, as we sort of talk about the Arctic.
So thank you, Mr. President, for joining us today. And with that introduction, maybe I'll place the first question as why is the president of Iceland in Washington, D.C.? What are -- what are you doing on your trip? And sort of why are you here?
PRESIDENT OLAFUR RAGNAR GRIMMSON: Well, first of all, let me thank you for inviting me to come here and have this opportunity to talk about the Arctic.
Why am I here? Well, the core of my mission is to try to wake this town to the fact that the Arctic should be among the top priorities for the United States' foreign policy in the first half of the 21st century. In two years' time the United States will take on the chairmanship of the Arctic Council, the formal organization where Russia, the U.S., Canada and the five Nordic countries sit together in an area where China, India, South Korea, Singapore, France, Germany are all knocking on the door and want to be a part of the action.
This has historically been America's backyard. During the second half of the 20th century, you made it the core of your military territory in terms of your extensive military buildup, ranging from Alaska over to Greenland and also my country, Iceland, and elsewhere. And given the important resources in the Arctic, perhaps the biggest reservoir of untapped resources in the world for the 21st century economy, and the unfortunate -- and I say unfortunate because it's due to the melting of the Arctic Sea ice -- opening up of new sea routes linking Asia to America and Europe in a revolutionary way like the Suez Canal did in its time, it is of primary importance, not just for the United States, to become a very engaged partner in this future. But it's also important for my country and for Greenland and others that in addition to having Russia and China and India involved in Arctic issues, we have the U.S. engaged in a formidable way in the coming years.
BORGERSON: When you speak about the Arctic, you often talk about an ice-dependent world which, in some ways, is sort of the impetus for the change that's happening there. Why do you mean by that when you say sort of an ice-dependent world?
GRIMSSON: What I mean by that is that if we take the ice sheet in Greenland and the Arctic Sea ice and we take the glaciers in the Himalayas and Antarctica, these three ice-covered areas in the world and what is happening there in terms of the melting of the ice in all of three territories is already having fundamental consequences for extreme weather patterns like storm Sandy here in the United States, like the extremely cold winter weather in China this year, which was more destructive in terms of economic damage in China than probably storm Sandy was here in the United States, and also due to the rising sea levels; if you go to Greenland, you will see new lakes and rivers being former due to the melting of the ice. The glaciers in my country -- Iceland has the largest glaciers in Europe -- indicate very clearly that climate change is not a theory; it's happening at a very aggressive rate. With the rising sea levels, this will become a great problem for our cities and our economies everywhere in the world.
It was quite remarkable last summer when the Chinese icebreaker Snow Dragon sailed from Shanghai to Iceland across the northern route, the first time in history a Chinese vessel goes across the North pole to visit an Arctic country, a ship organized and run by the Chinese polar institute with 60 scientists onboard.
And they demonstrated to us in an open public forum at the university in Iceland how the melting of the Arctic sea ice is the primary cause of extreme weather patterns in recent years in China. But they also demonstrated how the melting of the ice in Greenland and Antarctica would sink a great number of Chinese cities, starting with Shanghai, in not the worst-case scenario but in a bad-case scenario.
So if China is already so preoccupied by our ice-dependent world and what's happening to our ice-dependent world, it is of paramount importance for us in Europe and the United States to be also engaged in this. And whether we like it or not, the ice is melting. Ask the premier of Greenland; ask me. There's another reason both of us are here in this town is because the ice is aggressively melting in our countries and in our neighborhood. This will have a greater impact on the United States than any other single development in the coming decades.
BORGERSON: Speaking of China, some interesting news this week that Iceland and China have agreed to a free trade arrangement, which was surprising to me, but maybe it shouldn't have been given China's interest in the region. How might you explain sort of why China would want a free trade agreement with Iceland?
GRIMSSON: Because we are not an economic power -- (inaudible). (Laughter.) No, you're right, it's an interesting question. It's an interesting question.
If -- I have had the privilege to observe the Chinese (up front ?) throughout my presidency in the last 17 years. And it has been a very interesting journey, and also to see how they operate, because they usually start in a small way. Whether it's building a geothermal urban heating system, they start with a district in one town and see how it operates, and then they scale it up if it is successful.
So maybe making a free trade agreement with a small, highly advanced European country which is also recovering pretty effectively from a financial crisis could serve as an interesting model for China with respect to other countries. This is not the end of the story of Chinese free trade agreements with European countries.
But we have been fortunate -- and I say "fortunate" very deliberately -- by enjoying such a cooperation with China on geothermal clean energy in terms of urban heating systems, in terms of exploring a number of IT and high-tech technologies.
And I believe the free trade agreement is one way for China to demonstrate that they want a positive engagement with Europe and the rest of the world and they want to play by the rules. I know this is a strong statement. But by making a free trade agreement with as transparent and open country as Iceland is -- it would be difficult for you to find a more transparent and open country than Iceland due to the smallness and our democratic traditions. It'll be a test case for China how they follow the rules. And as an appendix to this agreement, we had a document on human rights and a dialogue on some social issues. So it will be interesting not just for us but for everybody else to watch how China will perform on the basis of this agreement.
BORGERSON: Great answer. The United States, of course, has made many strategic investments in the Arctic, especially during the Cold War, when it was the central point between U.S. and Soviet Union from an intercontinental ballistic missile perspective. But lately it seems our strategic priorities have been elsewhere, for a number of reasons. China, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, Russia and Canada, of course, and others are taking notice of the Arctic, but the U.S. seems slow so far. But we will assume chairmanship of the Arctic Council in just a few years. Canada has just assumed the chair, and in two years from now the United States will assume the chair. From your perspective as the president of Iceland, what does that mean? What's the sort of relevance and significance of that for an American audience?
GRIMSSON: Well, it will be an extraordinary testing time for the United States because while the Arctic Council was, in the beginning, a rather weak organization, it has grown in strength and effectiveness due to the leadership of a number of the Nordic countries within the Arctic Council but also due to the influence of Russia and the direction that Russia has given.
So when Canada becomes the chair of the Arctic Council, and then the U.S. in 2015, it will be the first time in the history of this extraordinary Arctic cooperation that North America takes on the leadership. And what will be the priorities of the U.S. during that leadership period? How will they conduct the operations of the council, and how will they deal with many of the issues, like the interest of South Korea, Singapore, China and India and the others to be part of the Arctic dialogue, as well as France and Germany?
How will they deal with the terms of investments by companies and corporations in terms of the utilization of the resources? What will they do in terms of emphasis on the research on the disappearing ice? And all these issues will be watched by all of us, and not just by small countries like mine but by the leading economic powers of Asia, by the leading economic powers of Europe, as well as a host of other political communities all over the world.
And the U.S. comes to that chairmanship from a period where your interest on engagement has been elsewhere -- you know that better than I. Whereas this territory, my country, Greenland, the Arctic, is the U.S.' backyard. And while you put billions and billions and hundreds of billions or even thousands of billions of dollars into military investment in the second half of 20th century in to this backyard, you basically left it 10 years ago.
You closed down the military base in Iceland. When George Bush and Dick Chaney and Donald Rumsfeld were telling all of you the world was now such a dangerous place there was need to go to war in Iraq and Afghanistan, they told us it was now such a safe place that they could close down the base in Iceland, which they did. But this lack of military interest, which basically is a good thing in my opinion, in the Arctic, has also meant that other interests have also given away.
And in the meantime, as my friend the former premiere of Greenland knows very well from his period of four years of running Greenland in the first period of self-government, there's a long queue of other players -- starting with China, India, South Korea, Singapore, Germany and France and others -- who want a -- who want a piece of the action and want to sit at the table, and are coming with a basket of investment finance as well as -- as well as other agenda.
When you throw into that how the melting of the Arctic sea ice is having an impact on climate and oceans and extreme weather patterns in the U.S. and elsewhere, I tell you as a great friend of this country, I don't know of any other international position in the second term of the Obama administration which will be of such consequences in terms of a formal chair position, as the U.S. chairmanship of the Arctic Council from 2015 to 2017.
And part of my mission here -- part of why we are establishing this new venue, an assembly, The Arctic Circle, together with Scott and Alice Rogoff and many others -- Lisa Mikulski (sp) and others here in the United states, is to an international coalition, with Kuupik Kleist and me and some people from Europe as well as Russia, in order to engage the U.S. policymaking establishment into a needed dialogue on what are the priorities, what are the tasks and what will be the decisions that we need all of us to take in the next four years?
BORGERSON: I was hoping you'd mention The Arctic Circle.
GRIMSSON: Oh yeah, of course.
BORGERSON: When and where will we meet?
GRIMSSON: Well, this is an attempt to create a much broader assembly of players on Arctic issues than has ever been attempted before. Experts, scientists, activists, the corporations, political leaders -- not just from the Arctic countries but also from those countries in Asia and Europe that I have mentioned.
It will, for example, be a testing ground where South Korea can justify, why is it so interested in the Arctic? Why does the leadership of South Korea visit Greenland? Why does the prime minister of China talk about the Arctic when he comes to Iceland? What is the agenda? I was in India a few weeks ago. The first item on the meeting with the foreign minister of India was India's desire to be a member of the Arctic Council. It's kind of crazy, paradoxical, that now I have to discuss in Delhi their membership in the Arctic Council.
So in order to take the pressure off the Arctic Council membership, so to speak, this gathering -- which we call The Arctic Circle, is partly a play of words of geographical location and having everybody sitting around the table, irrespective of protocol of power position -- to broaden this dialogue and make it more inclusive and more effective. And we have been preparing this now for about a year. And the first meeting will be in Reykjavik in our new Concert and Conference call from the 12th to the 14th of October.
And we are not only expecting, but encouraging and inviting broadly based U.S. participation in this dialogue because I think it will be a uniquely helpful forum for the decision making that has to take place in this country if your chairmanship of the Arctic Council is going to meet the expectations that all of us have with respect to that -- (inaudible).
BORGERSON: Arcticcircle.org, if you'd like to learn more. And may I say that everyone here is invited to come?
GRIMSSON: Sure, absolutely.
BORGERSON: Come on. (Laughter.) So you've talked about sort of the climate change, which I think sometimes in the lower 48 we forget just how rapid it's happening. The ice is melting sort of radically, and that's a fact. And you've talked about sort of -- maybe not so much on the part of the United States, but on the rest of the world, growing interest in the region to include sort of a growing queue of other nations interested in joining the Arctic Council.
And when you read about -- and including some of the things, sort of, I've written about this region, sometimes there's a debate set up: Is it a rush to resources, is it sort of a wild West or do we need a new treaty or sort of what will be sort of the "great game" outcome of this new region? From where you sit in Iceland and your travels around the world, sort of, on this, talking about this issue, what's your perspective on sort of how the Arctic will unfold and develop as a new geostrategic region?
GRIMSSON: Well, the positive story is that it's not the wild West. The positive story is that this is not a new Cold War. The positive story is that we already have a structure for cooperation in the region. We have the Arctic Council, which has quite a remarkable track record of evolving from being a talking shop into becoming a treaty-making organization in a very effective way. I would even go so far as to say that in the last 15 years, there's no other example of such a positive international cooperation in a formal way.
And then we have the Law of the Sea, which, although the U.S.has not signed it, still governs the relationship, the territorial disputes between these countries. So we already have this double framework of the Law of the Sea, which hopefully you will sign one day and you will continue to follow. It is fundamentally in the U.S. interest that you do it. You're just killing your own interest by not being a formal part of it. While the rest of us treat the U.S. almost as if you are the part of it, but it doesn't give you the legal certainty that you would get if you actually signed it.
And then we have the track record of the Arctic Council, where, for example, Russia has been very constructive, very constructive. Ten years ago -- if I had come here 10 yeas ago, I probably would have gotten a lot of questions about the suspicions about Russia, what were the Russians' ulterior motives and so on. Similar kinds of questions we now get about China. But funnily enough, nobody in this town is suspicious of South Korea being in the Arctic, which to us is even stranger than China being there.
So we already have a legal framework, but that's not enough because time is running out. Time is really running out. The Chinese are already building ships to transport cargo across the northern sea route, probably the center route close to the North Pole, and they will start aggressively in this decade. When I go to Shanghai in June, they want to take me to the shipyards and to the headquarters of the shipping companies to demonstrate how serious they are.
But then you need to build harbors in order to deal with this new traffic. The premier of Greenland has been preoccupied during his period of office in the last four years with dealing with companies from Asia, from Europe or elsewhere, except, perhaps, the United States, who all want to be a part of this investment structure within his country and elsewhere in the Arctic.
So, hopefully we will be able to do this in a constructive way, but in order to do that, we need a body like the Arctic Circle (sic), where everybody who wants a stake in the Arctic, everybody who is interested, whether it's Greenpeace or the World Wildlife Fund or whether it's Exxon or whoever, or whether it's China or Iceland, could come to this round table and present their case and their interest and be tested -- that's the thing -- be tested by the others of their seriousness and their intentions in an open and transparent way. Because we cannot afford in the Arctic to make mistakes. That will be of such great consequences, not just for our future but for everybody's future, so we have to be very careful.
BORGERSON: You talked a lot about Asian interests and others, but not much about Russia so far, which, of course, has some prime real estate in the Arctic. What's your view on Russia and the Arctic?
GRIMSSON: Russia, of course, has more than primary estate in the Arctic. I mean, Russia is the predominant Arctic player, whether you like it or not. I mean, just look at the map. The only country that comes close to it is Greenland. And 10 years ago a lot of people were suspicious about what were the Russians' intentions in the Arctic. Would they play by the rules? Would it become a new imperial power in the Arctic? Would there be a military race in the Arctic?
When I made my first state visit to Russia more than 10 years ago and I put the Arctic issues on the table with Putin, he wasn't really interested. He said, you talk to the governors about that. You go up to (Yamalo-Nenets ?) and you to go Chukotka and you go up to Murmansk and you talk to the local governors about the Arctic. It was not on Moscow's agenda.
This has changed -- this has changed. Three years ago, the Russian Geographical Society, which is somewhat like the Council on Foreign Relations with respect to the Arctic within Russia -- a very distinguished body of scientists and experts -- was asked to host the first Arctic conference under the auspices of Putin. And it took place in Moscow.
And he came and made a very interesting speech -- very positive, very constructive speech. Then the second conference was a year and a half ago in Arkhangelsk. And he came again, which I found quite remarkable. They invited me to the first one, they invited me to the second one, but I said to the ambassador, sorry. I mean, I went to the first one; why should come to the -- why should I come to the second one? But then he sent Shili Kano (ph) as a special emissary. He flew to Iceland for 24 hours to induce me to come. So I did.
And it was quite remarkable that now it's moved so high on Putin's agenda that he came to the second conference as well -- back to Arkhangelsk, and gave a very constructive speech about the importance of the ice and the importance of securing the environment, of how risky and dangerous these northern territories can be for the rest of the world.
And in order to utilize the resources on the new sea routes, there was a need for a very broad cooperation. And when you look at the two agreements that have been negotiated within the Arctic Council -- the search and rescue agreement, which was signed in Nuuk two years ago, and Hillary came there and signed it on behalf of the United States -- and the oil spills agreement, which has been negotiated, but I don't think it has been signed yet. But it has been negotiated.
Both of these agreements were successful because of very positive engagement on behalf of the Russian negotiators together with their American and other Arctic partners. So my view of the Russian role in this -- of course they have their interests, of course they have their -- they have their national agenda, but so far, they have turned out to be a more constructive partner than I think most people expected.
BORGERSON: Thank you for those comments, Mr. President. Before opening the conversation to our members, I'd like to actually invite Premier Kleist, if you could, either -- maybe you'd like to ask the president or vice versa, or maybe even just comment on what your premiership was like. How have things changed in Greenland while you were the leader?
PREMIER KUUPIK KLEIST: First of all, thank you for having me by the invitation of the -- of the president. I'd like to comment on the climate change issue. And it's not only that -- I mean, attracting the world's interest in the Arctic in general, and especially focusing on Greenland and the mineral resources and so on. What I'd like to point out is that we are engaged in and very busy with adapting to the new situation which is created by the climate change.
And to me, in a setting -- in a prominent setting like this, it's always important to talk about the peoples of the Arctic. Not that the other issues are not relevant, but it is my role to point out that approximately 4 million people are living in the Arctic area, and 350,000 of those are indigenous peoples. And they're all engaged in adapting to the new situation, including how to handle this new and very rapidly growing interest from the outside.
Often, we have to tell representatives of governments and companies that you have to deal with parliaments and governments as well in the Arctic area. It's not the wild west. Actually, the Arctic is regulated by laws and agreement -- international agreements. So it's perfectly right when the president says that the cooperation in the Arctic area is a very good example of international cooperation within the last two decades.
Actually, I think that the cooperation within the Arctic Council also have inspired, for instance, the U.N. in the ways that the U.N. have included the indigenous peoples of the world in its work, and that the Arctic peoples have to be taken seriously when you discuss the Arctic issues.
Like the president, I think that the interest of the rest of the world is legitimate, because what's happening in the Arctic area today is affecting everyone on the rest of the globe. So with this, I think the creation of the Arctic circle is both timely and I would say a (genius strike ?) in terms of maybe taking a little bit of the pressure away from the Arctic Council, which is facing a very difficult task in handling the growing interests of the superpowers of the world to get involved with the Arctic agenda.
We see conflicts between Canada, European Union, Russia, China, U.S., Russia and the Swedish presidency, who got the task forming a common ground for decisions, whether to include those applicants, had a very difficult task. And I believe that, likewise, Canada and the U.S. will have the same kind of challenges to overcome during the presidency.
That will be my comments.
BORGERSON: OK, thank you, Premier.
So now is the opportunity where we can open up the conversation to the floor, see a few hands already. Before the microphone finds you, just a reminder, please stand and state your name and your affiliation. You may pose a question either to the president or to the premier. And a reminder, this meeting's on the record.
So I saw a first hand here for a microphone, please.
QUESTIONER: President, Steven Schwabel (sp). It's reassuring to --
BORGERSON: Your affiliation, sir, where are you from?
QUESTIONER: I am unaffiliated. (Laughter.)
BORGERSON: OK.
QUESTIONER: It's reassuring to hear that you will meet with members of Congress and that you regard your mission as one of awakening your interlocutors. What can you do to awaken them to the puzzlement of the world at the failure of the United States to become party to the U.N. convention on the Law of the Sea?
PRESIDENT GRIMSONN: Well, I think there is an awareness among many that this is in the U.S. interest. I was in Boston exactly a year ago, attending a conference on the Arctic where John Kerry, then Senator, made a very informed intellectually rigorous speech about why the United States should become party to the Law of the Sea. So I don't think he needs any education from me on that issue.
The question is the politics of it. Alice Rogoff who, together with us, is launching this Arctic Circle, hosted the conference up in Alaska last year, where Ronald Reagan's secretary of state gave a very interesting speech where he described that while they had opposed the Law of the Sea, it -- the treaty had now been amended to such an extent that it falls highly in the U.S. interest. And there was a broad Republican establishment and Democratic establishment position that it served the interests of the United States.
So you now have a very broad bipartisan, intellectual and high- level political support for the U.S. becoming formally a part of the Law of the Sea. And let's hope that John Kerry will stick to his statement in Boston a year ago or two, give it a priority in the Senate to push for such a ratification, because it would be kind of an embarrassment for the U.S. to take on the presidency of the Arctic council and not being a formal member of the Law of the Sea.
BORGERSON: CFR published a few years ago a special report on the national interest in joining the Law of the Sea, if you'd like to learn more. I know the author.
Sherri in the back, I saw your hand there.
QUESTIONER: Thank you very much, Scott. Sherri Goodman, CNA, former deputy undersecretary of defense.
Thank you, Mr. President, for your very eloquent and very compelling statement why it is in the American national interest to be more engaged in the Arctic.
Those of us who follow this area closely, like yourself, have been for the last several years, talking about whether there is going to be more cooperation or competition in the Arctic in coming years. And you've clearly painted a future that you hope will be fulfilled of cooperation, continuing now and hopefully into the future.
But what are the real risks about which you are concerned when you think about it? Is it an accident of some type? Or is it potential for competition among the various players in the Arctic of a different type?
PRESIDENT GRIMSONN: Well, the Arctic is already a territory which many people visit every year. They come on cruises. I remember when I was in Nuuk a year and a half ago attending a conference on Arctic law, there was this huge cruise ship outside the harbor.
And they're all over. They're in Alaska, they are in northern part of Iceland, they are around Greenland and so on. These are ships with thousands of people on board. And if there was an accident on some of these ships, it would be very difficult. That's why the search-and-rescue agreement was the first agreement that the Arctic Council made. And that's very indicative that the first agreement it makes, it's a search-and-rescue agreement, dividing the entire Arctic up into areas where each country is responsible for the search and rescue.
Fortunately, in terms of the oil companies, I think in the last 12 to 18 months, they have started to be more careful, more hesitant, more aware of the risks. That's why the second agreement is the oil spills agreement. Some people, like Greenpeace, say it doesn't go -- doesn't go far enough. But at least it's a -- it's an effort to indicate the priorities, the priorities. And in the Putin speech that he made last year, that was one of the key items that he actually talked about. So I think all of us are now pretty aware of the risk, but the cruise ship companies have an open sea. I mean, they have the freedom to travel up there with their passengers and hope that nothing happens.
With respect, however, to the melting of the Arctic sea ice, we could see cargo ships coming in great numbers. The Chinese are already planning 50 ships a year, or something, within this decade, I think, every year, bringing containers and cargo. And when you look at the statistics of what could go through the North Sea route in terms of European and Asia, European and American trade with China, even if it was just 20 or 25 percent of the annual trade, it's a formidable number.
So, there are all kinds of risk involved in this -- what we would call normal traffic, normal activity in this region. But I don't see any signs of sort of major conflict creating risk of the kind that our thinking in the Cold War period made us, sort of, used to. We will see.
BORGERSON: Yeah, this -- in the back, please.
QUESTIONER: Hi, Claire Casey, Garten Rothkopf. I'd be very interested to hear your views on the prospects for international cooperation around black carbon within the Arctic Council or perhaps this broader Arctic Circle. Thank you.
GRIMSSON: Well, this is a very good question because, as I said to the leadership of India last month when they were pushing the case for India being accepted as a member of the Arctic Council, I said, what's your scientific contribution? What will you contribute in terms of research and science on the environment on the ice?
And, fortunately, that is really the first question we ask these potential membership countries: What are you going to contribute in terms of our understanding of the environment, of the ice, of the risks, of the carbon or whatever within the Arctic? That's why the Chinese very cleverly have started with these scientific expeditions. There were 60 Chinese scientists on board the -- (inaudible) -- in this four months' journey -- most of them young. Highly impressive crowd. And now they have invited me to come in June to the Arctic conference hosted by the Chinese Polar Institute in Shanghai.
So, I think it indicates how aware we are of this problem that the first test we will make of countries that want to be formally engaged is their scientific contribution. And when the French and the Germans are explaining why they should be accepted as -- (inaudible) -- partners or when the European Union is arguing why they should be accepted as partners, they usually -- the first thing they highlight is their scientific funding, the scientific manpower involved in doing research on what's happening in the ice.
But since you mentioned black carbon, let me also say that the Arctic cooperation, and what's happening to the Arctic ice, is increasingly becoming a model for countries in the Himalayan region to look at. There, the black carbon question is even more acute than it is in our parts of the world. So, the success of our Arctic cooperation will, in my opinion, have implications of how far India, China, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan and the others go forward in a similar constructive cooperation in the Himalaya region, because like the Arctic was 20 years ago a highly militarized, conflict-ridden area, the Himalayas still are. And in addition, the water system the rivers which originate from the places in the Himalaya region, feed over a billion people in India, China, Bangladesh and elsewhere.
And I think it's very important for the United States, taking on the chairmanship of the Arctic Council, and for all of us in the Arctic cooperation to realize that there are people in other parts of the world seeing how we go forward in this and seeing if they can take that as a model in helping them. I was in India mainly to attend the so-called Third Pole Environmental Conference. The Third Pole is a very clever name given four years ago to a cooperation among Chinese, Indian, Pakistani, Nepalese, American and European scientists led, among others, by Lonnie Thompson of Ohio State University to get away from the political connotations of Tibet and all this. It's the North Pole, the South Pole and the Third Pole. And it's only beginning, and it's been so difficult that the first meeting was in China, the second meeting was in Nepal.
But then there was a problem, where should the third meeting be? It should have been in India. That would have been a logical place. India was not yet ready to host it. So I hosted it in Iceland a year and a half ago, although we are not a Himalayan country, as everybody knows. (Laughter.)
But the glaciers in Iceland are in many ways similar to the glaciers in the Himalayan region. So with respect to the carbon question, the black carbon question, what we do in the Arctic can also serve as an inducement and a model for the same kind of problem that is perhaps more acute in some areas of the Himalayan region.
BORGERSON: Yes, in the middle here, please. And I -- and we'll go next over here.
QUESTIONER: My name is James Turner from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. One of the other important components for the Arctic is the current negotiations for a polar code under the International Maritime Organization to govern maritime operations in the polar regions. I was wondering if you could comment on that and where you see it going.
GRIMSSON: That is absolutely correct. And I found it interesting that when Michel Rocard, the former prime minister of France who was appointed by Sarkozy as the French president's special envoy on the polar regions, came at my invitation to Iceland two years ago, his main statement was that the first area of conflict and problems that would hit us in the Arctic would be the fisheries and the marine resources would be opened up to various fleets from other parts of the world. And we need to get agreements to cover the -- not only the fishing but the shipping and the cruise ships that I mentioned before is a part of that as well.
We are in an urgent need to establish code of conduct and a legal framework, which very vessel that comes into the Arctic observes. That is why I find what Google is doing, if I may say so here, in trying to bring the technology from Google Earth up to the northern oceans and the Arctic region, so all of us can sit in a taxi in Washington, D.C. and monitor on our cellphone what these vessels are doing up there and trace very vessel.
It's a combination of the information technology available or made possible by a great company and our hopes to get at a regime and a code of contact and then reinforce it because I believe the best reinforcement is the transparency that comes with everybody anywhere in the world with a cell -- with a -- with a phone of that nature can actually go online and check. But while we negotiate the code, we also need to use the information technology to be able to enforce it without too much difficulty.
But the problem for this country, if I may say so, is that in terms of infrastructure and ice breakers and airplanes and boats, given the vastness of Alaska and the U.S. Arctic territories, you don't have the machinery or the infrastructure to be able to monitor the code that would be agreed on. So while the code is good, you also have to examine how are we going to enforce it? And there, I think, what Google is doing could be the most important contribution.
BORGERSON: So, a contextual point for audience members who maybe struggle on your Alaskan geography, this was sort of new to me until I actually sailed it a few years ago. The distance from Dutch Harbor to Barrow is the same distance as Key West to Maine. Alaska is two and a half times the size of Texas. It's massive. And if you add up all the coastline of Alaska, it's as much as the lower 48 states combined in their aggregate. It's just -- it's a nation in some ways.
I saw a hand at this table here, if we could next.
QUESTIONER: Elmer Romanoff (sp) for the secretary of defense. Mr. President, from your perspective, as the U.S. continues engaging in this area, where did -- do the U.S. should put its priority or emphasis? I mean, would it be on trade? Would it be on infrastructure, commercial security? What would be that first starting point in our engagement in the Arctic?
GRIMSSON: Well, the first starting point should be to talk about the Arctic issues at all the high levels of the administration, of Congress, the media and the policymaking establishment, to realize that, like Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, North Korea -- but for different reasons, thank God -- the Arctic should be up there among the long-term high priorities of the United States.
That is why I -- during this visit I'm talking to members of Congress, because I believe, from analyzing this political system and operating with it for a long time, that's where you should go before you talk to the administration -- because presidents come and go, but people stay up on the Hill.
(Laughter.)
And therefore, I think the first priority is to realize that then, everything else will follow. And then, the second priority, I think, would be to have an honest analysis by the Coast Guard, by the Defense Department, by the business community, by the information and high-tech community where you're actually lacking. And then start engaging.
I mean, it is crazy, given the fact that this is America's back yard, that I've had many times more meetings with Chinese leaders and Indian leaders and South Korean leaders on Arctic issues in the last five years than with any American leader. Same for my friend from Greenland, I am sure. I mean, there is something wrong with the priorities when those of us in Iceland or Greenland are talking more with South Korea about the Arctic than we are talking about with the United States.
BORGERSON: I saw a question here at that table, and we'll go back there next.
QUESTIONER: Thank you. Barbara Matthews with BCM International and Regulatory Analytics. Thank you very much for a tour de force presentation. I'd like to focus on an issue you haven't touched quite a lot on yet, and that would be the economic situation.
GRIMSSON: The economic -- yeah --
QUESTIONER: The economic situation in Iceland, and how the prospects for scientific and commercial development can help the country. You mentioned that you are coming out of the financial crisis, which is true. But there are a number of contingent liabilities that remain subject to judicial decision. And depending on how the courts go, it will either create significant liabilities for the country still or could erase them from the books. How do you view your economic prospects going forward in light of all the interest in the Arctic? Do you see this as an opportunity to develop sources of strength, make it possible to engage in different ways?
GRIMSSON: Well, I think it is the proof of how we have succeeded in dealing with the financial crisis, that I can come into this town and talk about the Arctic in one meeting after another, and it's only towards the end that people want to talk about the financial situation in Iceland. (Scattered laughter.) I certainly could not have done that four years ago, that's for sure.
Well, it was, of course, the most difficult part of my entire public career. We saw the democratic structures of our country being threatened because of the failure of the banks. We had riots and protests, and the police had to defend the parliament and the central bank and various other public institutions. It was a very dramatic demonstration that the failure of the financial system can pose a fundamental political and democratic threat to one of the most secure and open democracies in the world. So I imagine what it can do to countries -- other parts of Europe that experience military dictatorships during our lifetime.
So I think the first lesson of the Icelandic case is that the financial markets have to realize the extraordinary democratic and political responsibility they carry, because their failure is probably the greatest threat to our democracy, in my opinion. That's the lesson of Iceland and Europe in recent years.
But now, four years later, we are, perhaps, exhibit number one in Europe of a country which has succeeded in dealing with the financial crisis. And how did we do it? It's a -- somewhat a long story, but also a short one, because there are two dimensions to it. One was that we did not follow the traditional orthodoxies of the so-called Washington consensus led by the IMF and all Western administrations in the last 30 years. We did not follow the kind of orthodoxies that were recommended to the Asian countries in the Asian financial crisis a few decades ago. We let the banks fail. They were private banks; we allowed them to go bankrupt.
I have often asked the question, why are banks so holy that they can't go bankrupt? If we allow all other kinds of companies to go bankrupt, what's so special about those banks? We did not introduce austerity measures on the same scale as has been demanded in many other countries. We protected elements of our welfare system -- the health care and the education system. We introduced currency controls, which was an absolute taboo in the orthodox world until now; the European Union acknowledges it's perhaps necessary as well.
And we let the currency devalue. And I have to hand it to the IMF, that when the Icelandic program was finished -- it only took two years, and we held our so-called farewell to the IMF -- I think we are the only country to have a special celebratory farewell conference for the IMF -- (laughter) -- they were honest enough to recognize that maybe they had learned more from dealing with a highly-developed Western democratic country like Iceland.
But the other dimension was that we realized early on that this was not just a normal financial crisis. This was a profound political, democratic and even a judicial crisis. And in order to engage the people in a recovery and help them to recover from the shock and the hardship and the difficulties, you had to introduce broader democratic, political and even judicial reforms because an economy is not just a set of Wall Streets and corporations and banking networks. An economy is fundamentally a community of people. And unless you empower the people and give them vision and courage to go ahead despite the difficulties and the challenges, you are never going to recover the economy. So, it was, for us, absolutely necessary to have this very comprehensive approach.
So, while there are still problems, of course, while there are still difficulties for many people in my country, we are still -- we are already on the way to economic growth. We have about 5 percent unemployment, which many people would -- I won't say "kill for," but would be very happy to have -- and we have had many sectors of our economy, including the tourism sector, the high-tech sector, the IT sector, the fishing sector much more prosperous in the last three years than they were prior to it. So, while we still have to deal with the problems, as you indicated, on the whole we are now in a situation where we can be positively engaged in the long-term buildup of the Icelandic economy.
And I always found it very interesting as an indication of our long-term health that when Rio Tinto terminated all their global investment decisions after the fall of Lehman Brothers -- when Lehman Brothers fell, Rio Tinto decided they're not going to invest anywhere in the world for awhile. The first investment decision globally that Rio Tinto took after this pause was to modernize their aluminum smelter in Iceland for half a billion U.S. dollars. Why? Because they judged the country to have a long-term health partly due to our clean-energy economy and the fact that our aluminum produced by electricity in Iceland -- hydro and geothermal -- left less carbon footprint on aluminum produced by other resources -- and so has been the story of many others. And so if you trust the judgment of the big corporations with respect to our economy, I think Rio Tinto is a -- is a good example. But it also indicates that the transformation from a fossil fuel-based economy over to a clean-energy economy is also a very good insurance policy against future financial crisis.
BORGERSON: Thank you. We're about to run out of time. We only have five minutes left, and we pride ourselves here at CFR in ending our meetings on time. So, we have time for just one last question, but before we take it, let me just remind you that this meeting's been on the record.
The middle table here, please.
QUESTIONER: Thank you. Hi, Danny Freifeld (ph). I want to circle back to a comment you made about envisioning a world in which we could in a taxi cab in D.C. sort of understand geospatially and from a (monitoring ?) standpoint the Arctic better. What are some of the specific social, commercial or political dividends of greater mapping, greater understanding, greater monitoring ability in the Arctic? And I say this because it seems like the argument in favor of greater engagement for the United States in the Arctic is a mix of fear and greed. Fear of, you know, the Russians, the Chinese and others are ahead of us; and greed, well, there are all these natural resources and other opportunities (that are open ?) there. And both of those have negative externalities when you motivate the United States, at least, in my short experience in politics in this town.
So, in something more sustainable, like, that it comes with better technological understanding of the Arctic, what do you think are some of the bigger social, political and commercial opportunities that would come with that? Thank you.
GRIMSSON: Well, my first response would be that the United States is heavily engaged in far-away places in the world in terms of finance, manpower, political investment, military presence, and also business presence.
The northwest part of the Arctic is, as I have said, America's backyard. It is your geographical homeland. So, for all kinds of reasons, it makes sense for leading country to be engaged in its own homeland for all kinds of reasons -- democratic, political, scientific, commercial -- because if you don't care about your own homeland, your long-term presence in other parts of the world will look a bit strange. Why are you so concerned about far-away places if you're not fully engaged in your own homeland? I don't have to give this town lessons in homeland security, but Alice Rogoff can tell you that last summer, up in Alaska, you had an open border.
And anybody could come from anywhere in the world because the ice had disappeared. And ships came into towns and people went ashore. There was no passport control, no custom official. The next homeland official was maybe over 1,000 miles away.
So the melting of the ice in the Arctic is creating an open border for the United States in a territory, as Scott described, as a coastline, which is bigger than the East and the West Coasts combined.
If you are putting all this investment and political power into your homeland security, the Arctic and what's happening up in Alaska and the melting of the Arctic sea ice should be a top priority. You know, talk to your coast guards up there and let them tell you their story. They know it better than I, what's happening there.
So if it was only in terms of the fundamental elemental primary security of the United States, you should be fully engaged, not because of the Chinese or the Russians or the South Koreans, but because you care about your homeland. And then everything else follows. If you want to be a part of the 21st century economy, as Greenland is entering that world with its huge resources, you should perhaps help Greenland to break the monopoly that China has on precious metals in the world. That is also an economic security issue that the United States should have access to these fundamental elements in a high-tech, modern economy. And Greenland can tell you that so you don't have to go to China and ask for access to their resource.
So as I understand the politics of this town, security is the primary issue for a number of reasons, which I don't have to explain to this audience. So let's leave all this commercial stuff away and just simply concentrate on the fundamental, classical, long-term security interest of the United States. And it's only for that reason you should be fully engaged in Arctic -- not in the Cold War way, but in the way that the 21st century requires.
BORGERSON: What a poignant note to end on, Mr. President. Thank you for coming to lunch today. (Applause.)
PRESIDENT GRIMSONN: Thank you.
BORGERSON: Premier Kleist, thanks for dropping in and this concludes today's meeting. Have a very nice week, everyone. Thank you.
KLEIST: Thank you.
(C) COPYRIGHT 2013, FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC., 1120 G STREET NW; SUITE 990; WASHINGTON, DC - 20005, USA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ANY REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.
UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES A MISAPPROPRIATION UNDER APPLICABLE UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW, AND FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO PURSUE ALL REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO IT IN RESPECT TO SUCH MISAPPROPRIATION.
FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. IS A PRIVATE FIRM AND IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. NO COPYRIGHT IS CLAIMED AS TO ANY PART OF THE ORIGINAL WORK PREPARED BY A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE AS PART OF THAT PERSON'S OFFICIAL DUTIES.
FOR INFORMATION ON SUBSCRIBING TO FNS, PLEASE CALL 202-347-1400 OR EMAIL [email protected].
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT.
Top Stories on CFR
The United States and Japan Should Prepare for Chinese Aggression Against Taiwan
Argentina: A South American Power Struggles for Stability
Diplomacy Reset: Ten Global Summits to Watch in 2022 Link

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Berlin based Kiwi artist Noah Slee has given us another taste of his forthcoming debut album this week with this gorgeous sounds of 'Lips', featuring the voice of fellow New Zealander Melodownz.
This track has so much going for it. From the smooth soulful rhythms and electro-RnB grooves, to its singer/rap blended vocals – if you weren't already getting a bit excited for Noah Slee's debut album then I'm pretty sure this track is going to get you there and a little bit beyond.
'Told ' is available everywhere now via Majestic Casual Records, and stay tuned for the release of 'Otherland' around August 4th.


We offer FREE shipping within Australia (Australian capital cities and major metro areas.) on all treadmills, cross trainers, exercise bikes, rowing machines, weight machines, and ifit products listed on this website. If you have any concerns your delivery address is outside of our free network please call 1800 993 770 to check before ordering.
We do not deliver to islands.
Please note that products are shipped directly from our Sydney and Brisbane Logistics Providers and are not available for collection.
Orders are normally shipped 1-2 business days from receiving payment.
Once your order has been dispatched from our Logistics centre, we will send an email to you with your order tracking number.
Our delivery company will be in contact with you by phone to organise a convenient time to deliver your product to your door. If you are unable to answer the phone when our delivery driver calls you, they will leave a message with their return phone number and they will keep trying to contact you periodically to organise a suitable time for delivery.
The delivery company will only deliver the product to your door, unless special arrangements have been made e.g. technician install.


The Neighbourhood Watch of the skies.
Formed in 2004 to be the ears and eyes of the sky in support of the multi-agency law enforcement groups. The organisation has a network of members from companies to individuals who supply and receive information on suspicious, irregular movement of aircraft.
Using aircraft is one method of bringing people or illegal matter or both into the country. There are very few reasons why an aircraft should be flying low level over land after 02.00 hrs and before 05.00 hrs in the morning except perhaps the Military, Police helicopter and the Search and Rescue [SAR] helicopters. However, aircraft have been observed at relatively low levels over land. They can take the form of single or twin engine fixed wing aircraft or helicopters.


A casserole that has all the brunch essentials: Little potatoes, bacon, eggs, sour cream, cheese, peppers, and onions!
Preheat oven to 400°F and line a baking sheet with foil. Bake potatoes for 30 minutes or until tender. Cool completely and chop. (To save time, cook potatoes in the microwave for 5 to 8 minutes, checking every 3 to 4 minutes).
Reduce oven heat to 350°F and lightly grease a 9″x13″ casserole dish.
In a large bowl, stir together eggs, sour cream, salt and milk.
Stir in potatoes, cheese, pepper, onions and bacon until combined. Pour into prepared casserole dish and bake for 35 to 40 minutes, until center is set. If edges are browning too quickly, cover with a piece of tin foil and continue baking.
Serve with additional sour cream, bacon, green onions and cheese if desired.


How do I send my transcript to a college?
Fill out a Senior Transcript Request Form for each college you are applying to and turn them in to Ms. Simpson n in the Student Services Department (along with a counselor statement and brag sheets if applicable - see below) Do not submit this form if your school is on the common app.
If you are applying to a college using College Foundation of North Carolina, you do not need to request a paper transcript be sent through the mail. Your transcript will be sent by the Department of Instruction. *you must enter your student number* Your student number is the same as your computer password.
How do I get a recommendation letter from my teacher?
Ask teachers early if they will write you a recommendation letter. There is often a form that teachers need to fill out in addition to sending the letter - make sure you give them the form (it's found on the college's website). As a courtesy, give them an addressed and stamped envelope so they can send the letter off immediately without using their own postage. If you are applying using the common app, your teacher will write your recommendation directly on the common app. Be sure to include their email address under recommenders.
How do I get my counselor to write a letter of recommendation for me?
See your counselor in person to request that they write a letter for you. You will have to fill out a brag sheet before your counselor will write the letter.
Many colleges do not require a letter, so please check the colleges website to see what is required.
What schools require counselor statements or secondary school reports?
There are many schools that must have this form filled out by your counselor - make sure you are looking at the "Application Checklist/Requirements" for each college to find out if this form is needed. If you are applying using the common app, the school report is done by your counselor on the common app website.
What is a brag sheet and why do I need to fill it out?
In order for your counselor to write you a strong recommendation letter, we need to have additional information about you to make you stand apart from the crowd. Please fill out these forms completely and make sure you tell us all the great things about you - hence, brag about yourself and your accomplishments!
When is the last time I can take the SAT or ACT before college deadlines?
If you are applying for regular decision, the January test date is usually the last one you can register for to ensure your scores are submitted on time. Some colleges may accept scores after this date, especially if they want you to restest - check with the school before you register after the January test date.
How do I find scholarships to apply for?
Every week we post the scholarships we hear about in the student services department. Check our scholarships page often.
There are many scholarship websites available for students to search based on specific criteria - click here for our Links Page, where you will find numerous opportunities for scholarship searches.
Every college you are applying to has a Financial Aid and Scholarship Deppartment. Check the individual college websites for available scholarships from your school of your choice or contact someone directly from the school you wish to attend.


If you haven't noticed via my Instagram, I'm just a little bit of a coffee addict. When cold brew coffee was introduced to me almost 3 years ago, it was all over from there. I was hooked! BUTTTTTT cold brew is expensive EVERYWHERE…most cups will run at min $4. I do not have the dinero for that on a regular basis so I had to think of something fast to fuel my cold brew fire. I did some research, seeing there were tons of different ways you could make this delicious coffee. I decided to go with the Toddy Cold Brew Coffee System – you can find it here at Williams-Sonoma (I got mine here with a 20% off coupon code during a free shipping promo) or on Amazon and of course at the Toddy Website. I am sure there are other places to for it, but those were the two I looked at most. There are also other systems like Chemex and my sister has this Hario one (she loves it). I chose because the Toddy has been around for over 50 years now, and the price/size were what I was looking for.
So why cold brew? The Toddy Site goes into detail behind the chemistry of the process, but in the end, it's a better cup of coffee being 67% less acidic than regular hot-brewed coffee. In a nutshell, it tastes greater because it's a lot smoother than a regular cup of coffee, and it's easy on your stomach – a win/win!
I was pretty excited to try my Toddy out especially because I was using one of my FAVORITE Los Angeles coffee shop's roasted beans, Swörk!!! My husband is all about beer and when we travel anywhere trying local beer is his top priority. My main squeeze is finding damn good coffee. Now, I make it a point to bring back a bag of roasted beans from any local coffee shops i visit. In this case, I'm working with Swörk's signature roast, Truckdriver. It was developed between them and their main provider Intelligentsia. It's super tasty and made for some deliciously smooth cold brew.
I'm gonna show you some pics of the process and below them will be the instructions which are directly from the Toddy Instruction Manual. I'm doing it this way because cold brewing is precise, and I don't want to mess it up for you!
Fill – First, insert the stopper into the outside bottom of the brewing container; then, dampen the filter and insert it into the inside bottom of the brewing container. Next, add 1 cup of water into the bottom of the Toddy brewing container and 6 ounces of ground coffee. Slowly pour 3 more cups of water over the grounds, in a circular motion. Then, add the remaining 6 ounces of ground coffee. Finally, wait 5 minutes and slowly add the last 3 cups of water. DO NOT STIR (stirring the bed of grounds can result in a clogged filter). Lightly press down on the topmost grounds with the back of a spoon to ensure all grounds get wet.
Brew – Steep your coffee grounds for 12 to 24 hours to create a smooth, rich flavor.
Serve – Remove the stopper and let your coffee concentrate flow into the glass decanter – stays fresh for up to 2 weeks in your refrigerator. We recommend starting with a ratio of 1 part coffee concentrate to 2-3 parts water, milk or soy. Mix to taste, making your coffee as strong or as weak as you prefer.
When I did this, I let mine brew in the fridge for 24 hours. This yielded an amazing cup! This yields a concentrate; therefore, I recommend diluting it. I dilute mine with water and actually do about two thirds concentrate and a third water, but that's cuz I am nuts. My mother-in-law swears by half concentrate and half water, and she is also an avid coffee drinker. She did dilute it with hot water and said that it really watered it down so if you want a hot cup as opposed to a cold one, she recommends just reheating it in the microwave. She says it tastes just as good that way as opposed to heating up water and adding it in. I will have to give that a shot!
I hope you enjoy your cold brew coffee!
Previous Post Visiting the Berghoff's Oktoberfest in Downtown Chicago!
Next Post Experiencing NASCAR at the Chicagoland Speedway!


We totally love seeing how other professionals use the Ontraport WordPress integration in our AccessAlly plugin to transform their online presence and membership site. It's gratifying and exciting, knowing that our work in development continues to bear fruit in someone else's business.
Specifically developed to integrate with Ontraport and Infusionsoft, our membership site plugin AccessAlly has a multiplicity of benefits to bring to the table for businesses that are ready to rock it.
Today, we're looking at Danny Johnson's amazing WordPress membership site, Find the Money Project.
Initially, Danny wasn't entirely certain how she was going to present her course content to her clients.
She knew that she wanted both long-term access and dripped content that could be revealed over time. For the type of information that she wanted to teach, it became clear that the membership site model was the best fit.
The beauty of a membership site is that it really brings home a feeling of inclusion.
Sending out a series of emails or receiving a .zip file download might be a good way to deliver content, but there's something really special about having a unique login to a beautifully designed membership site. It makes you feel special and important!
To stay on top of the needs of her business, Danny had recently migrated to Ontraport for its robust CRM and email marketing abilities.
But at that point, it became clear that she'd need professional help to create the membership site with full Ontraport WordPress integration like she was envisioning.
There are many sites online that are able to connect business owners with freelancers … but it can be risky hiring someone new. In the end, you might not have the results you were looking for simply because you weren't familiar with the professional.
That's why we decided it was important for us to pre-screen qualified experts in the field to be able to give entrepreneurs a solid list of names to start from.
In this case, Danny Johnson already knew and trusted Nathalie, so heading for the AccessAlly Certified Partners was a no-brainer. There, she connected with Kimberly Gosney.
The process of finding an AccessAlly Certified Partner was easy … she simply looked through the list for who was certified with Ontraport and emailed a few of them. Kimberly just seemed like the best fit.
For Danny, this was by far the easiest project she'd ever done. She attributed the "built in trust factor" with AccessAlly made the initial contact with her web designer easy.
Thanks to her dedication and expertise, Kimberly was able to show Danny all of the unique functionality that was possible through the Ontraport WordPress integration of the AccessAlly plugin.
It became clear to Danny that her web designer not only loved what she did … she also knew how to build it out.
"It was the perfect storm of me with an idea, but NO idea how to implement it and finding the person who could make it happen," said Danny.
One of the main perks of the Ontraport WordPress integration with AccessAlly is that Ontraport's tagging system can be used to release the course lessons in sequence as needed to each user.
It also allows each person to get their own automated log-in and password (in every email) so they can easily access their course content.
Now that you've seen such an incredible example of our AccessAlly plugin in action, you might be wondering whether it might also be the solution you're looking for.
Currently, the plugin only offers Infusionsoft and Ontraport WordPress integration. If you're not using either of these two platforms, there are still a lot of great membership site plugins to choose from.
If you are using Infusionsoft or Ontraport, definitely take the time to learn more about our membership site plugin, AccessAlly. If you have any questions, free to send us an email or leave a comment below!


The Drop Dead 24mm BF RDA (a collaboration between Hellvape and Heathen with The Vapor Chronicles) features a 24mm diameter, four post build deck with gold plated positive posts, 5mm deep juice well and redesigned airflow inspired by TVC.
The Drop Dead RDA allows for single or dual coils which can be secured with either the pre-installed flathead screws or the included Phillips screws. The downward sloping airflow can be adjusted for both single and dual coil options and a knurled grip allows for easy airflow adjustments.


text:
Q: iOS: OpenGL ES2 incorrect vertex rendering order I'm rendering a 3D object in OpenGL ES2 on iPhone, the model is loaded from a .obj file. Previously the render engine was implemented in ES1 and I was using the same structure, same element buffer, and everything was ok.
Now I want to migrate to ES2, but when I draw the model, it seems that the vertices are drawn in a different order, but the array buffer and element array buffer is the same.
Here is my vertex structure:
struct Vertex
{
    union { struct { float x, y, z; }; float position[3]; };
    union { struct { float nx, ny, nz; }; float normal[3]; };
    union { struct { float u, v; }; float uv0[2]; };
};

My vertex shader is correct, because I rendered a cube, and everything was fine.
Here is a screenshot of the result, rendered with ES2:

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Worst receivers in the league
HfxTC February 10, 2020, 4:20am #1
Really to bad this team has no professional receivers. the rest of the team is good enough to win half its games but these guys are killing this team. Get to work Marcel...
Chief February 10, 2020, 4:20am #2
That drop in the endzone was beyond ridiculous. That should've been a guaranteed 7.
And Matt Carter's fumble was the cherry. Whenever you see a receiver bobbing left to right like a rag doll you know this is going to happen.
geoffyguy February 10, 2020, 4:20am #4
It's pathetic that this is a professional football team's receiving corps. The RedBlacks lost, at the very least, 13 points because of drops (Carter's drop in the end zone, Henry's drop at the 20 with lots of running room, and Carter's fumble). The defense stepped up tonight in a big way. Four turnovers, including a forced fumble on the goal line and a third down stop. It seemed that almost everything clicked on defense, especially in our own end.
I had blamed Henry for the first few losses of the season, and he certainly didn't look great tonight either. That being said, the receiving corps is costing us games. This one hurt more than the rest. This one should've been ours.
On a more positive note, Brett Maher looked incredible tonight. Booming kicks, terrific angles, and even a tackle. Very well done, backed by a terrific defensive performance.
Qman February 10, 2020, 4:20am #5
They didn't invest a dime in receivers this year and it shows bigtime.
Most of these guys shouldn't be in the league.
We won't ever see these receivers in the CFL once the RedBlacks cut them all in the offseason....or sooner.
sheets_1 February 10, 2020, 4:20am #7
T.J Hill after the Riders game got cut after a bad game, Carter drops a easy pass that would of extended the drive and then fumbles so shouldnt he be released? oh he's cdn so he excused for playing like a high schooler
QQ_One-Nine February 10, 2020, 4:20am #8
"geoffyguy":
It's pathetic that this is a professional football team's receiving corps. The RedBlacks lost, at the very least, 13 points because of drops (Carter's drop in the end zone, Henry's drop at the 20 with lots of running room, and Carter's fumble).
So they bring in Onrea Jones to help... and he drops one on the goal line that hit him just under the numbers.
Marcus Henry is the most frustrating to me. The closer he gets to the goal line, the less reliable he becomes. He has dropped passes inside the opponent 10 against Winnipeg and Toronto and can't seem to go a whole game without leaving one on the ground. These guys are embarrassing.
"sheets#1":
T.J Hill after the Riders game got cut after a bad game, Carter drops a easy pass that would of extended the drive and then fumbles so shouldnt he be released? oh he's cdn so he excused for playing like a high schooler
I think there's more to it than that. Jerrell gavins had four penalties in his first game and was kept. Brandon Lang and Jerail McCuller have as well and are still around.
With Hill, at 34 years old, IIRC, you know what you have. They seem to want to be patient with young guys learning, but in their late 20's I don't know if that should apply to Carter and Henry anymore either.
HfxTC February 10, 2020, 4:20am #10
Its amazing that Burris is around 60 percent completion with this bunch ! Imagine if he had a couple receivers like Green and Dressler.
QQ_One-Nine February 10, 2020, 4:20am #11
OTTAWA - The Ottawa REDBLACKS of the Canadian Football League made the following transactions today:
•RELEASED national wide receiver Paris Jackson
•RELEASED international wide receiver Tim Maypray
•RELEASED international defensive back Seth Williams
What did Paris do wrong? Threaten to catch a ball? :roll:
SirChandos February 10, 2020, 4:20am #12
We need to point out the awesome job of Pruneau as Linebacker. He is really stepping up and TJ Hill is not missed.
Now, if we can have some guys that can catch the ball, we'll be alright :lol:
noback February 10, 2020, 4:20am #13
"SirChandos":
especially balls thrown at their number :?
maybe add a little stickum to the jersey??? :lol:
I got a little nervous when Pruneau was on the limp late in the game though. Don't know what the plan is if he goes down. I think I would have kept Hill around and rotated them like they did with Pruneau and Fraser for a while. Maybe Hill wasn't really open to that and that's why he got released instead.
ride80 February 10, 2020, 4:20am #15
Back on topic, this is the worst Ive seen of any WR group ever. And that includes the Renegades. These guys don't even know how to gain separation from the DB to force themselves to get open let alone catch when needed. Starting with Marcus Henry who is a useless monolith.
"ride80":
Did you see the Ottawa Sun article from yesterday (I think) in which the offensive coordinator explains that far too often, they're not following assignments? Gives the example of a receiver (unnamed of course) running 8 yards when the pattern called for 14 (on 2nd and 11), catching the ball (!!!) but, obviously, not getting the first down.
They just don't seem football smart. You and I have seen Burris give it to Marcus Henry for not going down to stop the clock just before halftime once near field goal range. Carter describes his fumble against Edmonton as something to learn from in what? His 5th or 6th year in the league?
What's bugging me is how celebrated they get. Carter's had one good catch against Edmonton (that he didn't fumble...but that may have hit the ground...) and the team is highlighting all week. They keep showing off that Wallace Miles catch from last week...that gained all of 15 yards. You hope they're not burying their heads in the sand about this bunch.
drummer_god February 10, 2020, 4:20am #17
these players should all be forced to give the RedBlacks their paycheques back.
slimjim February 10, 2020, 4:20am #18
"CRFadmin":
Miles does seem to be getting better, he made some good catches and over 100 yards receiving. His TD catch and run was a good effort.
cflsteve February 10, 2020, 4:20am #19
Receiver was the one position in which they were not able to address in the expansion draft, Redshirt Draft, 2014 Draft, or free agency.
They were able to grab the best two modern FB/TEs in Lavoi and Delahunt. It seemed like they were using them a lot more at the beginning of the season then they are now.
I thought they would be using them both a lot more in Single TE sets as the base offence as well as double TE sets more. Having them used more as receviers as well as establishing the run game. They also have a third TE they drafted that is playing Lacrosse for now.
Made think they would use the Montreal style offense with Lavoi in his rookie year
there are/were plenty of CFL receivers available via free agency before the season began;
arland bruce
brian bratton
prechea rodriguez
jamal richardson
mo mann ( argos got him first )
romby bryant ( winnipeg got him first )
that's just off the top of my head. if put to the main CFL forum, i'm sure this list would grow substantially.
could probably get N.Lewis from calgary for cheap. they haven't been using him this season anyway and he is familiar with Burris.


Washington Community Reinvestment Association is a non-profit organization that helps provide funding for affordable housing projects. We have worked with them for 5 years creating their annual reports. Each year we focus on a specific project the have completed that benefits the people in our state.