text:
14 Best football Quotes Images
Need an original and unique football quotes? Check this collection of 14 the best football quotes. Some of them has a beautiful quotes picture already, but you can redesign it at you will, because a catchy quotes with good looking typography will be more memorable for the reader. Here are the list:
1. College football would
"College football would be more interesting if the faculty played instead of the students - there would be a great increase in broken arms, legs and necks. "
2. Football is a
"Football is a mistake. It combines the two worst elements of American life. Violence and committee meetings. "
by George Will
3. Anybody who watches
Quotes by Erma Bombeck : "Anybody who watches three games of football in a row should be declared brain dead. "
4. Who called Genius according to Joe Theismann
Quotes by Joe Theismann : "Nobody in the game of football should be called a genius. A genius is somebody like Norman Einstein. "
5. Chris Butler quote about confidence.
Quotes by Chris Butler : "The question Who am I? is not a philosophical football meant to be kicked around coffeehouses by pseudo-intellectuals. It's a real-life question. Nothing is more important and more relevant than to know who you are."
6. Dwight D. Eisenhower quote about leadership.
Quotes by Dwight D. Eisenhower : "The supreme quality for leadership is unquestionably integrity. Without it, no real success is possible, no matter whether it is on a section gang, a football field, in an army, or in an office."
7. Pressure? This is
Quotes by Goal keeper for Paraguay Jose Luis Chilavert : "Pressure? This is just a football match. When you do not know how to feed your children, that is pressure. "
8. Frank Gifford quote about sports.
Quotes by Frank Gifford : "Pro football is like nuclear warfare: There are no winners, only survivors."
9. Vince Lombardi quote about work.
Quotes by Vince Lombardi : "People who work together will win, whether it be against complex football defenses, or the problems of modern society."
10. Dancing is a
"Dancing is a contact sport. Football is a hitting sport. "
by Lombardi Winning is the only thing Jerry Kramer Vince Lombardi
11. Sharks are as
"Sharks are as tough as those football fans who take their shirts off during games in Chicago in January, only more intelligent. "
12. SURE-FIRE SINGLES AD:
"SURE-FIRE SINGLES AD: Famous Writer needs woman to organize his life and spend his money. Loves to turn off Sunday football and go to the Botanical Gardens with that special someone. Will obtain plastic surgery if necessary. "
by Joe Bob Briggs
13. Being a woman
"Being a woman is of special interest to aspiring male transexuals. To actual women it is simply a good excuse not to play football. "
by Fran Lebowitz
14. Gerry Ford is
"Gerry Ford is a nice guy, but he played too much football with his helmet off. "
by Lyndon Baines Johnson


text:
Barrie Craig was a different kind of detective show and Craig as played by Gargan was a different type of detective: a big gentle easy going guy who always believed his clients until evidence proved otherwise.
In some ways, it poked fun at the private detective genre by giving Craig police-type powers and duties such as filling out making arrests and filling out paperwork. This played off the wide variety of functions and investigations that other PIs took on that were really police functions. Another time, Craig began his voice over narration by saying, "Manhattan's my beat," a clear reference to CBS' Broadway's My Beat.
Other episodes took a serious turn such as Craig's poignant caper with a mentally ill young woman.
Gargan's light and easy going style make each episode of Barrie Craig is like a visit with an old friend talking about his detective adventures. Listeners were more than happy to visit for four years.
William Gargan (1905-79): The Brooklyn-born Gargan was actually a detective and store investigator in real life for about a year, and that carried over to his roles on the big screen, television, and radio, often being called on to play cops and detectives. His acting career began on the stage in the 1920s with a one line role, "Mr. Bob, heap big coconuts." In 1932, he made his first major motion picture appearance with Leslie Howard in, "The Animal Kingdom" in which he played the role of Red Regan which he had performed on Broadway. Gargan was nominated for the best supporting actor in 1941 for his role in They Knew What They Wanted. During World War II, he worked with a group of actors entertaining the troop. After the war, as movie work dried up, Gargan took a radio and later television, starring in the Mystery Gameshow, Murder Will Out, as well as the detective shows, I Deal in Crime, Martin Kane, and Barrie Craig, Confidential Investigator.
Gargan eased to retirement after Barrie Craig ended in 1955 and he completed a new Martin Kane series filmed in Europe. In 1960, while playing a dying ex-President in The Best Man, Gargan was diagnosed with cancer of the larynx. He had to make a quick decision to save his life and had his larynx removed, forever silencing his signature voice.
Gargan's acting career effectively ended with the exception of one non-speaking appearance in the syndicated TV show, The King of Diamonds as a mute clown. However, Gargan found new purpose in life by learning how to practice esophageal speech. He spent the rest of his days as a volunteer spokesman for the American Cancer Society: raising funds, encouraging and challenging cancer patients, and raising awareness about the causes of cancer: including smoking. Gargan also remained active in the work of the Bohemians and the Knights of the Holy Sepulcher. In 1967, he was honored with a lifetime achievement award from the Screen Actor's Guild.
Episode Log:
The Judge and the Champ (Original Air Date: October 17, 1951)
Microfilm in the Fish Tank (Original Air Date: October 24, 1951)
Corpse on Delivery (Original Air Date: October 31, 1951)
The Case of the Borrowed Knife (Original Air Date: November 7, 1951)
Dead on Arrival (Original Air Date: November 14, 1951)
Murder in Max (Original Air Date: November 21, 1951)
The Case of the Naughty Necklace (Original Air Date: November 28, 1951)
The Paper Bullets (Original Air Date: December 5,1951)
Death and the Purple Cow (Original Air Date: December 12, 1951)
Ghost of a Chance (Original Air Date: December 19, 1951)
Song of Death (Original Air Date: December 26, 1951)
Death of a Private Eye (Original Air Date: January 2, 1952)
Murder Island (Original Air Date: January 9, 1952)
Fatal Appointment (Original Air Date: January 16, 1952)
The Deadly Fight (Original Air Date: January 23, 1952)
A Very Odd Job (Original Air Date: January 30, 1952)
The Diary of Death (Original Air Date: February 6, 1952)
A Time to Kill (Original Air Date: February 13, 1952)
Motive for Murder (Original Air Date: February 20, 1952)
The Long Way Home (Original Air Date: July 8, 1952)
Murder by Threes (Original Air Date: October 8, 1952)
Dead Loss (Original Air Date: October 15, 1952)
The Crimson Queen (Original Air Date: January 4, 1953)
The Girl on the Doorstep (Original Air Date: February 15, 1953)
Behold a Corpse (Original Air Date: March 1, 1953)
Beware the Walking Dog (Original Air Date: May 3, 1953)
The Lost Lady (Original Air Date: June 14, 1953)
Scream for Murder (Original Air Date: July 19, 1953)
The Thirteenth Guest (Original Air Date: August 9, 1953)
Kitchens Come with Knives (Original Air Date: September 22, 1953)
Fog Over Murder (Original Air Date: October 13, 1953)
The Lonely Corner (Original Air Date: November 3, 1953)
Strange Vision (Original Air Date: January 19, 1954)
Zero Hour (Original Air Date: February 2, 1954)
The Embezzler (Original Air Date: March 30, 1954)
The Schemers (Original Air Date: April 6, 1954)
The Corpse Who Was Wrong (Original Air Date: May 25, 1954)
The Tough Guy (Original Air Date: July 6, 1954)
Murder by Error (Original Air Date: July 13, 1954)
Death By a Bedroom (Original Air Date: July 27, 1954)
For Love of Murder (Original Air Date: August 3, 1954)
Death's Bargain Basement (Original Air Date: August 10, 1954)
Mid-Summer Lunacy (Original Air Date: August 17, 1954)
Blood Money (Original Air Date: August 24, 1954)
Hay is for Homicide (Original Air Date: August 31, 1954)
Ghost Don't Die in Bed (Original Air Date: September 7, 1954)
Life Line (Original Air Date: November 7, 1954)
The Sneak Assassin (Original Air Date: November 21, 1954)
Dead Bull in a China Shop (Original Air Date: December 19, 1954)
Angel of Death (Original Air Date: January 4, 1955)
Nobody Lives There Anymore (Original Air Date: February 9, 1955)
The Moving Target (Original Air Date: February 16, 1955)
Sweet Larceny (Original Air Date: March 2, 1955)
Corpse on the Town (Original Air Date: March 9, 1955)
Never Murder a Mummy (Original Air Date: March 30, 1955)
Confession to Murder (Original Air Date: May 5, 1955)
Visitor at Midnight (Original Air Date: May 12, 1955)
Sucker Bait (Original Air Date: June 9, 1955)
Two Dead Men (Original Air Date: June 23, 1955)
End of Log.
Log information courtesy of the Old Time Radio Researchers.
Welcome to the Great Detectives of Old Time Radio. We will feature six of Old Time Radio's great detectives from the beginning of the career to the very last episode in existence with a new episode posted Monday-Saturday.
In addition, twice a month, we'll post a public domain movie or TV mystery or detective show as a bonus.
Along the way, I'll provide you my commentary and offer you opportunities to interact. This is going to be fun and exciting. I hope you'll join me for the trip.
If you'd like to join the adventure with all the great shows that are featured as part of our line up, click here to add this podcast to your Itunes, click here to subscribe to this feed using any other feed reader.
If you'd like an even more in-depth experience, get our Iphones App from the Itunes store from or our Android App from the Amazon App. store and get bonus episodes featuring the stars of our shows in non-Detective roles.
You can follow me on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook
2 comments for "Barrie Craig"
Pingback: The Five Best Syndicated Old Time Radio Detective Shows « The Great Detectives of Old Time Radio
Pingback: Radio's Most Essential People Countdown: #85-#81 « The Great Detectives of Old Time Radio

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


If God Knows Our Need, What's OUR Part?
Romans 7:22-25a: For in my inner being I delight in God's law; but I see another law at work in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within my members. What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? Thanks be to God– through Jesus Christ our Lord!
We have to remember that our flesh wants to go its own way; we can WANT to be Godly in our hearts, but our lives are stuck in a sinful world. God knows this; the Lord knows we want to be better than we are, and has provided a way to make that happen: Jesus Christ our Lord! As we submit to His Lordship and let Him lead us, His righteousness is placed on us, like a exoskeleton, enabling us to do with Him what we couldn't do alone.
Long-time actress and comedienne Gracie Allen once received a small, live alligator as a gag. Not knowing what to do with it, Gracie placed it in the bathtub and then left for an appointment. When she returned home, she found this note from her maid: "Dear Miss Allen: Sorry, but I have quit. I don't work in houses where there is an alligator. I'd a told you this when I took on, but I never thought it would come up.
What Happens When God Shows Up On Your Doorstep?
Romans 5:1-2 ~ Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand. And we rejoice in the hope of the glory of God.
To start this new series based on Covenant Concepts, we need to realizes that Covenants are agreements between stronger and weaker parties. Just like when a person borrows money to purchase a home, they go to the bank (the stronger party in this instance because they have the money) and agree to pay them more money over a long period of time because they do not currently have sufficient cash to purchase the house. The relationship between the strong party (the bank) and the weak party (the home-buyer) are defined by the terms of the covenant. God does this with us; He provides ways for us to understand Him through the use of covenant. Why does God use this format?
Remember: God Is Faithful; He Does NOT forget us. God is Able; He Does Not abandon us.


text:
Constitutional Law Group September 30, 2019 Judicial review, UK government, UK Parliament
Aris Georgopoulos: The Melting of Constitutional "Glaciers": Miller 2 and the Prerogative Powers of Government
The purpose of this piece is to examine the legal and constitutional implications of the Miller 2 Judgment.
I will focus on two aspects of the Judgment. First, the reasoning of the Court in setting and applying the standard for examining the five-week prorogation's impact. Second, the Court's approach concerning the examination of the reasons of justification of the Government's decision.
1. Setting and applying the standard of examination
The Court contextualised temporally its examination by referring explicitly to the foreseen exit day of 31st October (paras 56 and 57). In other words, the examination did not concern the prorogation during any five weeks but the five out of the eight weeks before exit day. The exit day is what makes the examination noteworthy; the exit day is the reason why the challenge was brought in the first place. This logically means that the standard of examination employed by the Court would use this day as its point of reference. To be more precise, after this temporal contextualisation, the Court would be logically expected to examine if the five week prorogation deprived the Parliament from performing its dual constitutional role namely to legislate or to hold the Government to account concerning its decisions or omissions in the context of the UK's imminent departure from the EU on 31st October. Such a construction would be anticipated especially in the context of the exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction which acknowledges the wide political discretion that the Government enjoys in this area of prerogative powers.
The standard set by the Court was (para 50):
For the purposes of the present case, therefore, the relevant limit upon the power to prorogue can be expressed in this way: that a decision to prorogue Parliament … will be unlawful if the prorogation has the effect of frustrating or preventing, without reasonable justification, the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions as a legislature and as the body responsible for the supervision of the executive. In such a situation, the court will intervene if the effect is sufficiently serious to justify such an exceptional course. [Emphasis added]
Based on the temporal contextualisation of the examination (paras 56-57) the "effect" should logically have been examined by reference to whether Parliament was able to perform its dual constitutional role in the context of the UK's imminent departure from the EU on 31st October notwithstanding the five weeks prorogation. If the answer was negative then clearly the five weeks prorogation would manifestly violate Parliamentary Sovereignty and Parliamentary Accountability.
Instead, the Court applied the standard by asking whether Parliament could perform its dual Constitutional role during these five weeks. In doing so the Court engaged in a circular if not tautological argument (the impact of the five weeks prorogation is that Parliament is prorogued for five weeks).
Furthermore, by putting the focus on the length of the period the Court diluted the emphasis on the effect, thus leaving a back door for problematic interpretations of the Miller 2 judgment. This is especially the case if paras 56-57 are read in conjunction with para 45 where the Court pronounced that "There can be no question of such a prorogation [for only a short time, according to modern practice] being incompatible with Parliamentary sovereignty: its effect on Parliament's ability to exercise its legislative powers is relatively minor and uncontroversial."
However, it is perfectly conceivable to have a situation where even a very short prorogation may have the most dramatic of an impact on Parliamentary Sovereignty and Parliamentary Accountability. Let us imagine a hypothetical three days prorogation from 29th to 31st October 2019. Let us now submit this prorogation decision to the two alternative tests mentioned above, the one that focuses on the impact of prorogation by reference to the exit of the UK from the EU and the one employed by the Court in paras 56-57.
On the one hand, the first test would be: Is Parliament able to perform its dual constitutional role namely to legislate or to hold the Government to account concerning its decisions or omissions in the context of the UK's imminent departure from the EU on 31st October notwithstanding the three days prorogation? The answer is manifestly negative.
On the other hand, the Court's test would be: Is Parliament able perform its dual Constitutional role during these three days? The answer would be prima facie negative, but para 45 seems to allow it ("there can be no question of such a prorogation… [for only a short time, according to modern practice] being incompatible with Parliamentary sovereignty: its effect on Parliament's ability to exercise its legislative powers is relatively minor and uncontroversial.")
Such a reading is indeed possible and provides a maverick party with an arguable veneer of lawfulness at a point where there would be very little time for judicial intervention. At that stage the defence of the obvious would rest mainly in the hands of the Monarch (a truly unenviable situation). This would not have been possible – neither the maverick interpretation of the judgment nor the opportunity for action – if the Court had employed the first test and had not ruled the Government's decision unlawful.
Nevertheless, even within this stricter construction of the framework of legal examination by the Court there was still scope for the latter to act more deferentially acknowledging the wide scope discretion that the Government enjoys in this field. This observation is linked with the second point of my analysis.
2. The Court's approach concerning the examination of reasons of justification
Although the Court seems to acknowledge the latitude of the PM's power to prorogue Parliament (para 60) and that the latter may involve a range of considerations, "including matters of political judgment" (para 51), eventually the Court fails to recognise this fact in the examination of the reasons that could justify the Government's decision, as I will explain below.
The position of the Court regarding the examination of the reasons of the Government's decision is based on the premise that all the reasons are sharable in the context of this kind of judicial scrutiny just like in any other judicial review proceedings (para 51 "[the examination of the effect of prorogation]…presents no greater difficulty than many other questions of fact which are routinely decided by the courts." See also para 58 "It will be apparent from the documents quoted earlier that no reason was given for closing down Parliament for five weeks.")
I discussed elsewhere a reason that could in fact explain the Government's decision to prorogue Parliament for such a lengthy period. I called it the "gadfly effect" which on the one hand was aimed at stiring the "Parliamentary Steed" into action and on the other at infusing a sense of urgency into the negotiations with the EU hoping for some last-minute concessions by the latter. Leaving aside the motive behind such a move – I hypothesised about what that motive might be here and here – the "gadfly effect" seems a plausible reason behind this prorogation decision. What's more there is tangible evidence that it has worked to an extent at least: It should be remembered that in the summer of 2019 a Parliamentary motion to effectively block no-deal exit had been defeated (309-298). It was obviously the sense of urgency created by the Government's decision to prorogue – to such a length – that led Parliament to react by passing the EUW (No2) Act 2019 immediately after its return from the summer recess in September.
Following the Court's reasoning such a motive should have been explicitly articulated in order to be considered by the Court in the examination of the decision's lawfulness. And here lies the problem with the UKSC's reasoning: had the aforementioned reason been explicitly articulated and shared publicly before the Court it would have risked minimising its intended effect.
What follows logically as a direct consequence of the UKSC's reasoning is that such reason/aim (gadfly effect) practically cannot be pursued by the Government – because its public acknowledgement takes away all its practical effectiveness. Should the Court be able to limit to such an extent the ability of the Government to use prorogation to achieve this clearly political aim? The answer of the UKSC is affirmative (this is the logical implication of the ruling). I respectfully disagree; not in the context of the present uncodified Constitution, I would argue.
From a legal, constitutional and practical perspective, if the Court was aiming to re-emphasise and protect the cornerstones of the UK Constitution namely the Principles of Parliamentary Sovereignty and Parliamentary Accountability from unwarranted inroads by the executive, it could have achieved its objective by ruling affirmatively on the point of justiciability but refraining from ruling on unlawfulness on the basis of lack of manifest evidence.
From a legal perspective the standard enabling the judiciary to examine in the future similar cases would have been established. In addition, it would have limited the ability of the Government to proceed with a second prorogation instalment after October 14, because that would manifestly violate the principles of Parliamentary Sovereignty and Accountability.
From a practical perspective the window for the Parliament to act would remain by and large the same. The critical period to hold the Government accountable by reference to the UK's exit from the EU is after the October EU Council (17th-18th October) when it will become obvious whether a revised deal is forthcoming.
Instead, the Court decided to go the extra mile. In that sense, I hope I would be allowed the mischievous observation, the ruling of the Court was not proportionate.
Finally, the judgment can also be regarded as an attempt by the Court to solidify its role as a traditional Constitutional Court akin to those encountered in other legal orders. With the only important difference, however, that in the other legal orders Constitutional Courts perform their role within the confines of a legally binding codified constitutional framework that was established after a political and constitutional process involving various parties.
3. Concluding thoughts
In recent years we have witnessed the gradual sublimation of the prerogative powers of the Government into greater roles for Parliament and for the Courts. As rightly pointed by Lord Sumption (here), Miller 2 ultimately reinstates Parliament at the heart of the political process. However, although the strengthening of key constitutional principles (including, by implication, the principle of the rule of law even though the latter was not mentioned explicitly in the Judgment) is in principle welcome, we should acknowledge that as the glaciers and polar ice – cold, majestic, unhospitable remnants of the past – play a role in the earth's ecosystem so do the 'constitutional glaciers' of prerogative powers in the context of the constitution (and they are present in different forms in all democratic legal orders). Their uncontrollable thawing should be embraced neither enthusiastically nor uncritically but with caution.
In the current constitutional ecosystem of the UK's political constitution the "glaciers" of prerogative power have a role to play (this is also true for constitutional conventions of course). Their radical and quick melting may render the calls for a change of the UK's constitutional ecosystem unescapable.
The author would like to thank Professor Alison Young for her useful comments. The usual disclaimer applies.
Dr Aris Georgopoulos, Assistant Professor in European and Public Law – Advocate, University of Nottingham, School of Law
(Suggested citation: A. Georgopoulos, 'The Melting of Constitutional "Glaciers": Miller 2 and the Prerogative Powers of Government', U.K. Const. L. Blog (30th Sept. 2019) (available at https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/))
Posted in Judicial review, UK government, UK Parliament and tagged Brexit, European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019, Miller II/Cherry, parliamentary accountability, Parliamentary sovereignty, prerogative powers, prorogation, R (Miller) and Others v The Prime Minister (Miller 2), UK Prime Minister, UK Supreme Court. Bookmark the permalink.
C D Vanderweele	 on October 1, 2019 at 11:02 am
This piece interestingly draws out the strands of length, impact and reason/motive. They are, inevitably intertwined. But impact surely trumps all. The gadfly motive, disclosure of which would undermine its effect, is only effective if it has impact, otherwise it has no political traction. Similarly, length. If impact is the critical question, it is a political judgement. Or is it? Can it not be seen as a question of fact? In the case of a five week break, there is clearly much that can be done by a government without scrutiny by Parliament. But that is just to say impact is the principal consideration.
On going the extra mile : to rule on justiciability but not to rule on the issue of lawfulness in the instance before it would have made the SC look toothless in a palpably egregious case of abuse. To have analysed in detail what parliamentary business was lost and what else might have been achieved in those days would have politicised the court. Absent a good reason (does that beg many questions) the court was able to rule the prorogation unlawful.
Brexit Highlights 30 September – 6 October 2019 – Middle Temple Library Blog	 on October 7, 2019 at 3:40 pm
[…] Instruments (Part 3); Anurag Deb: A Constitution of Principles: From Miller to Minerva Mills; Aris Georgopoulos: The Melting of Constitutional "Glaciers": Miller 2 and the Prerogative Powers…; Mike Gordon: The Prorogation Case and the Political […]
David Dennis: Llewellyn, Hart and Miller 2 – UK Constitutional Law Association	 on October 29, 2019 at 3:30 pm
[…] what Aris Georgopoulis has described as the "melting of constitutional glaciers" in relation to the prerogative powers […]
Mike Gordon: The Prorogation Case and the Political Constitution
Anurag Deb: A Constitution of Principles: From Miller to Minerva Mills


The Volkswagen ID. ROOMZZ can go up to 450 kilometres in a single charge.
NIO restricts top eight banks including JP Morgan by tying them up in rare year-long non-compete clauses.
As of now, Japan's Panasonic is the exclusive battery cell supplier for Tesla cars.
Tesla is cutting down on jobs by 7 percent, while its shares are now down by 4.1 percent.
Tesla said it continues to push to increase Model 3 production to about 10,000 units per week.
Early signs suggest electric-car prices may fall sooner and faster than production costs.
Tesla shares sank last week after the US SEC accused Musk of securities fraud.
Tesla's Model X and Model S have both received the top rating in the past.
The company routinely loses money and is burning through cash as it develops its Model 3 sedan.


Then there may be some challenges to over come if it regards studies. This is comprised of a few paragraphs. You'll find just three cause of tension that may obviously be observed within our society daily lifestyle today that is household issues, atmosphere that is working and studentsa lifestyles. If you think experiments reflect a superb, describe, and extend fun evidence. Try to remember that you're writing an academic article so your title should possess the correct tone.
It makes it possible for you to provide architecture on your thoughts. Remember that you just must be quite careful with expressing your own personal views about the movie. Deeper analysis for a researcher is essential. Additionally, your teacher might possibly need a thesis statement to your own document. Slimming down whatever you know about the particular issue in a http://uvc.laurenimages.com/onlineessaywriters-com/ fast checklist. The reader ought to be impressed by how you defend your ideas.
The most vital words ought to be all used in the introduction. You have reached the spot if you need aid writing an informative article on a book. Paper is one of one of the tasks all men and women want to handle. PaperCoach can support you with your entire documents, therefore look at the moment! An assignment published in MLA doesn't require a title web page that is different. It is much superior to find the investigation and organized before you begin to write. You also ought https://awc.ashford.edu/essay-dev-good-paragraph.html to run an alternate investigation, in case you detect that there's any deficiency in your study paper.
You might recommend upcoming instructions, for example the way the test could possibly be modified to accomplish another goal.
The creation of students' capacity to think, analyze, outline, and also generalize different opinions along with the capacity to characterize particular content and also formulate a conclusion.
Get in touch anytime to get chemistry and biology techniques virtually all aggravating issues.
The process of producing of your investigation papers on one's personal is surely an rationally tough venture. Difficulties arise through staying with the medical fashion to earning sure that your projects stays exclusive and it has absolutely no plagiarism. It is vital that you follow a new technological style and use third man or woman narration within plural type or even unaggressive voice.
You will find the full picture when you understand what the following thing would be and it's simpler that you write. You can start out with the options that are ready-made with time, you can switch to the ones that might be accomplished with the guidance of the set of information scientists. In the event you tactic report producing at the most acceptable manner, you will learn to effectively manage your advice and make a mailing list report. In case your essay will not flow effortlessly, it's likely perhaps not very likely to secure you that the grade that you're on the lookout for.


text:
Q: Does the trick of replacing "who/whom" with "he/him" always work? In many grammar books, whenever Who vs Whom comes up, you get the rule (who is used for to refer to the subject, whom is for the object or preposition) and then you get this supposedly handy tip:

If you are confused about using who/whom, try substituting he/him or they/them to see which makes sense.
  If he/they makes sense, use who.
  If him/them makes sense, use whom.
e.g. [Who/whom] do you serve? You serve him.
  Therefore: 'Whom do you serve' = CORRECT

Aren't there examples where this trick fails to work? Can you think of any?
I ran into this problem applying the trick to the question 'Who are you?'. I know, instinctively, that Who is correct, but if I were to use the trick, I would get it wrong:
[Who/whom] are you? You are him.
Therefore:  'Whom are you' = CORRECT
But this is obviously INCORRECT, so what gives? What am I doing wrong? What's the best way to remember how to correctly use Who/Whom

A: The trick does work substituting the objective pronoun or the subjective pronoun in place of "who/whom".

Did you speak to him?
Whom did you speak to?
Did you go to see her?
Whom did you see?
Who is it?

the problem you are running into is the "I/me" switch.
Properly, one should answer the phone

It is I

not

It is me

but the latter gets used very often and is understandable.
A way to remember "who" is subjective is that it's the name of the band

The Who - Who Are You?

imagine if they were named "The Whom"...?

A: You're right that this trick doesn't work all the time. Since whom is a formal pronoun whose use doesn't come naturally to speakers, it sounds wrong to use it with colloquial case rules. So this "trick" would fail to work in cases where prescriptive rules for case don't correspond to English speakers' intuitions.  As you've said, one example of this is case after the copula. I can't think of any other common examples, but I did think of an uncommon one.
Consider the topic of the foliowing question:
Tom is taller than I? Many people would say "Tom is taller than me." However, it would be wrong to use "whom" in a sentence like "Who is Tom taller than?" I don't think this is very useful information though because such sentences seem to be very rare. I only found one example so far, and it is from a translation of scripture, with a different word order and an archaic feel to it:

Stronger than who is he?

-The Two Targums of Esther, translated by Bernard Grossfeld
A more contemporary-sounding example I found uses "who" in a non-question context:

And when you have that many kids, there's always going to be a lot of
  competition - who's better than who, who's bigger than who, who's
  stronger than who and the way people usually figure that out is by
  proving it.

-Everyday Violence: How Women and Men Experience Sexual and Physical Danger, by Elizabeth Anne Stanko
Actually, this kind of construction—"who's [adj]er than who"—is probably the most common circumstance where "who" shows up as the complement/object of "than".
Another example I could think of is case in coordinate noun phrases (such as "Emily and I/me") but I don't think this is relevant to your question as "who/whom" seems unlikely to be used in coordinate phrases like this.

A: Put in mind that linking verbs or copular   verbs do not require an object. Are/is/am, the verb to be is a linking verb. Unlike action verbs, linking verbs show a relationship between the subject of the sentence and a noun or adjective being linked to it. What comes after to be is a compliment and describes the subject. In other words to be does not make an action on the compliment, so a compliment is never an object.
Who are you? I am a student. I am I. A student and I are compliments that describe the subject and not objects that receive the action. Therefore, you can' t say I am him.
You are him is logically impossible. You are yourself not him. You are you. Who are you? Not whom are you?
 For more information, you can read about linking verbs and action verbs.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Vehicles/Equipment
Auto Rental News
Beverly Hills Adopts Renewable Diesel
February 8, 2017 • by Staff
Photo courtesy of City of Beverly Hills
The City of Beverly Hills, Calif., is the latest public fleet to adopt renewable diesel.
Fleet Manager Craig Crowder said the city uses about 50,000 gallons of diesel per year, with police and fire vehicles accounting for the majority of its diesel use. Currently, the city is using renewable diesel in its central fuels station, which fuels all public works vehicles.
"The research that we've done indicated that it's a drop-in fuel, a drop-in replacement for ultra-low-sulfur diesel (ULSD). Not only does it have emission benefits, it has the green bio benefit because it is a green bio-based product as well, but the way that they make that product is exactly the same way they make regular diesel fuel," Crowder said. "It functions exactly like ULSD so there are no issues; you can drop it right in your diesel tank and you can just start using it from day one."
Crowder hopes to run renewable diesel for a year to make sure there are no issues with storage, usage, and dispensing before expanding use to its police and fire fleet. The city ran B-20 biodiesel in the past, but had issues with the fuel. In one case, a fire rescue vehicle stalled on the way to the hospital.
Calif.-based IPC USA supplies the city's renewable diesel. Crowder said he met the company at a Municipal Equipment Maintenance Association (MEMA) meeting.
Several fleets have made the switch to renewable diesel across the West Coast, including the cities of San Diego, Carlsbad, and Long Beach in California; Contra Costa County in California, and the City of Corvallis, Ore. New York City is also testing renewable diesel.
Related: What You Need to Know About Renewable Diesel
Originally posted on Government Fleet
Read more about City of Beverly Hills Renewable Diesel Alternative Fuels
Geotab Launches EV Solution to Help Utilities Address Charging Challenges
Lordstown Motors Establishes Nationwide EV Service Network
Electrify America Launches B2B Charging Solutions
The Number 1 Resource for Vocational Truck Fleets
Mobility Solutions for Fleets
© 2021 Green Fleet Magazine, Bobit Business Media. All Rights Reserved.


text:
William Perley Annis  (May 24, 1857– June 10, 1923) was a 19th-century Major League Baseball outfielder. He played for the 1884 Boston Beaneaters. He continued to play baseball in the minor leagues through 1892.

Career
Annis made his professional baseball debut in 1883, playing for the Pottsville Antharcites of the Interstate Association.

In 1884, he played for both the Boston Reserves of the Massachusetts State Association and the Boston Beaneaters of the National League. He played in 27 games as an outfielder for the Beaneaters, collecting 17 hits in 96 at bats. Annis finished with a .177 batting average.

Annis played for several minor league teams from 1885 to 1892.

Personal life
He was the son of Perley Mason Annis, a shoe maker, and Rozilla E. Coburn. He was married twice, and had no children.

He died on June 10, 1923, and was buried at Lindenwood Cemetery in Stoneham, Massachusetts.

References

External links

1857 births
1923 deaths
19th-century baseball players
Major League Baseball outfielders
Boston Beaneaters players
Pottsville Antarcites players
Newark Little Giants players
Omaha Omahogs players
Omaha Lambs players
Worcester Grays players
New Haven Nutmegs players
Providence Clamdiggers (baseball) players
Baseball players from Massachusetts

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Come fly with Melbourne Star
Having been the city's icon for a number of years, the Melbourne Star Observation Wheel is offering experiences beyond just flights with views.
Melbourne Star is now offering a range of unique "in-flight" packages in its fully-enclosed, air-conditioned glass cabins 120 metres above ground.
Available from 1pm daily, Sparkling Flights allows guests to enjoy a glass of bubbles on their flights or upgrade to their own private cabin that can accommodate up to 15 guests.
Catering can be added to the Sparkling Private Cabin for an even more exclusive experience on the southern hemisphere's only giant observation wheel.
This Valentine's Day, take your loved one to a romantic date in your private cabin with wine, canapés, roses and music.
The newly-opened Star Departure Lounge offers snacks and beverages to be enjoyed at the lounge or taken on board the cabins as they rotate above Melbourne's skyline.
The sky really is the limit for what programs are on offer at Melbourne Star.
Try Yoga in the Sky to find inner peace and reclaim clarity while meditating above the world and perfecting your star pose.
The 60-minute Vinyasa Yoga Flow sessions are suitable for both beginner and intermediate-level yogis and emphases on breathing, alignment and postures.
And if you are after a wedding like no other, say "I do" on board the Star!
Wedding ceremonies can be held in the cabin with 360-degree city views as the backdrop and fully catered functions are available at the event space.
Melbourne Star's director Toshiya Kawasaki said his team had worked diligently to bring the best service and most memorable ride experience to visitors.
"Just like an airline, we now offer economy, business and first-class flights," he said.
"The team has been busy working on programs that give our visitors new experiences and this is something new for us too."
The past New Year's Eve saw Melbourne Star's cabins booked out by guests wanting to take in the spectacular fireworks in the air.
Mr Kawasaki said the new programs had really diversified what Melbourne Star had to offer and boosted visitor numbers significantly.
"Over the past three years, we've had more than one million visitors fly with us. I think the new packages will get people keep coming back."
"We now provide packages other than just for people to take a flight and enjoy the view. Having that private, exclusive access to a cabin and some canapé while sipping on a glass of wine is a really unique experience," he said.
For more information and to book, visit www.melbournestar.com


text:
Justin McKee, Meteorologist
Published: June 1, 2020, 5:35 pm
Tags: weather, tropics, hurricane season, tropical depression, Cristobal, NOAA, National
Tropical Depression 3 forms on the first day of Atlantic hurricane season
We're tracking a disturbance that could become our third named storm of the young season
Satellite image showing Tropical Depression 3 in the Bay of Campeche (WSLS)
BAY OF CAMPECHE – Despite two preseason tropical storms (Arthur and Bertha), Atlantic hurricane season did not officially begin until Monday.
It's a busy first day of the season for forecasters at the National Hurricane Center in Miami as they have begun issuing advisories on Tropical Depression 3.
Tropical Depression 3 information (WSLS)
The disturbance was once known as Tropical Storm Amanda and was being tracked as part of the Eastern Pacific hurricane basin. Amanda moved over land and dissipated, but its remnants have reorganized into a tropical depression. If the disturbance can strengthen into a tropical storm or hurricane, it will be known as "Cristobal."
2020 Atlantic basin hurricane names (WSLS)
Model data does not have a good handle on where this disturbance may go, but areas along the Gulf Coast like Texas and Louisiana will be watching closely.
Tropical Depression 3 forecast track (WSLS)
This hurricane season is likely to be an active one. Forecasters at Colorado State University, NC State University and NOAA are all predicting "above-normal" numbers of named storms, hurricanes and major hurricanes.
NOAA hurricane season forecast (WSLS)
Copyright 2020 by WSLS 10 - All rights reserved.
Justin McKee presents the weather forecast on 10 News Saturday and Sunday mornings from 6 to 8 a.m. He also fills in for other meteorologists during the week.


text:
In Front of the Camera »
grand theft sparrow · 14 · 3256
grand theft sparrow
NO SLEEP TIL BROKER!
In time for the holidays, Christmas letters to Christopher Walken.
Quote from: Cinephile on March 07, 2008, 01:51:29 PM
pubrick RIP
Myxo
Some very funny stuff here..
Walken Grabs the Remote
Christopher Walken is in negotiations to join the cast of Click, a comedy feature from helmer Juan Jose Campanella with Adam Sandler set to star. Columbia Pictures and Revolution Studios are releasing the film, which will begin production in early summer.
Written by Steve Koren and Mark O'Keefe, the story centers on an architect who spends all his time in the office. He soon meets a mysterious stranger (Walken) who gives him a remote control that allows him to rewind and fast forward to different parts of his life. He hits a snag, however, when the remote starts to take control of his life.
GoneSavage
Reply #3 on: August 15, 2005, 06:45:25 PM
Christopher Walken - Presidential candidate
Success is not a goal, it's a byproduct.
Thats really something... I wonder how far he will get with this...
Its a tie-in to Wedding Crashers.
Reply #6 on: August 16, 2005, 08:33:02 AM
It's bullshit.
And I had just started making a poster for him too...
The Ultimate Boon
RIP Antonioni, Bergman
I really refuse to believe that this is untrue.
Quote from: A Matter Of Chance
I wish more than anything that I could tell you it wasn't a hoax but...
http://washingtontimes.com/upi/20050815-094627-5892r.htm
Is Walken going to run?
Aug. 15, 2005 at 9:50PM
A Web site announcing Hollywood actor Christopher Walken plans to seek the U.S. presidency is a hoax, his publicist says.
The site, walken2008.com claims to quote the actor as saying, "It's time to get America back on track," and says he will run for the nation's top post in 2008.
But his rep told "Entertainment Tonight" Monday that the sit is "100 percent not true."
"(It) sounds like someone got a little too excited over his role as secretary of the Treasury in 'The Wedding Crashers' and now they want to make him president," the rep said.
Walken for President? Not!
He may have played his fair share of nut jobs on the big screen, but is Christopher Walken really crazy enough to try to become leader of the free world?
According to one Website currently sparking up a storm on the Internet, Walken2008.com, the Oscar winner has launched a campaign for the presidency in 2008.
A post on the Website announcing Walken's candidacy reads: "Our great country is in a terrible downward spiral. We're outsourcing jobs, bankrupting social security and losing lives at war. We need to focus on what's important--paying attention to our children, our citizens, our future. We need to think about improving our failing educational system, making better use of our resources and helping to promote a stable, safe and tolerant global society. It's time to be smart about our politics. It's time to get America back on track."
Considering the unlikely success of the Gipper and the Governator, the idea of the Oscar-winning Deer Hunter star running for office doesn't seem like much of a stretch.
After all, Walken, 62, does have some limited government experience--albeit fictional. He currently graces the big screen as the secretary of the Treasury in New Line Cinema's hit comedy Wedding Crashers, which has become one of the summer's biggest draws, grossing over $165 million domestically.
And with his documented obsession for gourmet cooking, his dancing prowess (as showcased in his MTV VMA-winning Fatboy Slim clip "Weapon of Choice") and inside tales of Hollywood, Walken would no doubt go over huge at state dinners.
But don't go carving out space for that Walken '08 bumper sticker just yet. News of his candidacy has been greatly exaggerated.
"The person who put this together was just trying it as a hoax, I presume," the thesp's publicist, Mara Buxbaum, told the Los Angeles Times. "My take on it is it sounds like the person who put this on the Web took his role...in Wedding Crashers too seriously and now wants him to run for the presidency."
Walken's agent, Toni Howard of International Creative Management, also shot down the idea of a Walken White House bid.
"I don't know where they got it," Howard told the Times. "That's like saying Tim Robbins is running on the Republican ticket. [Walken] is the least political guy I know."
The Website even includes a press release featuring a bogus quote from Howard and a statement from a nonexistent campaign manager, who says Walken hopes to devote time to his presidential bid once he's done shooting several upcoming films and plans to pattern his campaign after Howard Dean, by launching an online grassroots effort.
Walken2008.com doesn't mention Walken's party affiliation, arguing that "voters should vote based on the candidates' platforms, not their party affiliation." The site does feature its own tagline--"Get America Back on Track"--and outlines Walken's purportedly nonpartisan political views, dubbed the "Walken Platform."
The actor is quoted on everything from campaign-finance reform ("I feel that as a wealthy American I should have no more say than even the least fortunate American citizen") to stem-cell research ("I met Chris Reeves before he died...and I cannot support legislation to restrict this potentially life-saving research") to the military ("instead of sending billions to the Pentagon's pet projects, it should go to the troops").
The site is reminiscent of a John Cusack-for-President Web page that surfaced in 2001. While the actor didn't endorse the bid, his publicist said, "It is a funny idea, but we think humor in politics is a good thing."
As for the ersatz Walken campaign, it seems Netizens haven't caught on to the joke, at least according to some back and forth on political message boards. At Fazed.org, somebody called Spastichero says, "Who the hell wouldn't vote for Christopher Walken. He could announce plans for world domination, and I would still vote for him. Just because he's such a cool guy."
"I disagree on many of Chris' views on education, trade tariffs and appropriations. But, overall, I believe that Walken can get more cowbell in the White House," writes one Bashturn. "Walken for president, because America has a fever, and cowbell is the only cure."
Adds Mr. Mojo Risin: "We would kick butt in every corner of the world."
Reply #10 on: August 19, 2005, 09:46:53 PM
Still funny.
The Perineum Falcon
I was murdered by Christopher Walken in a dream last night.
We often went to the cinema, the screen would light up and we would tremble, but also, increasingly often, Madeleine and I were disappointed. The images had dated, they jittered, and Marilyn Monroe had gotten terribly old. We were sad, this wasn't the film we had dreamed of, this wasn't the total film that we all carried around inside us, this film that we would have wanted to make, or, more secretly, no doubt, that we would have wanted to live.
or maybe it was real and posting about it on xixax was the dream?
Reply #13 on: August 21, 2005, 02:36:23 AM
or my idea of heaven?