text:
Wind Turbine With Rotor Blades Equipped With Winglets And Blades For Such Rotor
A wind turbine includes a rotor with wind turbine blades each having a root end connected to a hub of the wind turbine and a tip end, the tip end of each of which being equipped with a winglet extending a distance in a direction perpendicularly to a longitudinal direction of the blade. A new and much more slim design of the outer part of the wind turbine blade is disclosed, i.e. with a shorter chord length designed within a narrow band of values defined with respect to the length of the winglet, i.e. the extension in the direction transverse to the longitudinal direction of the blade.
Godsk, Kristian Balschmidt (Kobenhavn O, DK)
Nielsen, Thomas Steiniche Bjertrup (Randers, DK)
416/244R
F03D11/00
20070110583 Vane assembly May, 2007 Mcmillan
20090257873 Method and apparatus for prediction-based wind turbine control October, 2009 Egedal et al.
20080206060 Forming firtree profiles August, 2008 Roberts
20080226460 COMPRESSOR ROTOR September, 2008 Ochiai et al.
20100068057 METHOD FOR STOPPING A WIND TURBINE IN TWO STAGES March, 2010 Friedrich et al.
20080232964 Daisy fan September, 2008 Thomasson
20090074575 COOLING CIRCUIT FLOW PATH FOR A TURBINE SECTION AIRFOIL March, 2009 Propheter-hinckley et al.
20090178259 APPARATUS FOR PLUGGING TURBINE WHEEL HOLES July, 2009 Tisenchek et al.
20090134624 EMERGENCY PITCH DRIVE UNIT FOR A WIND TURBINE May, 2009 Kerber
20060093481 Combination type fan leaves structure May, 2006 Lai
20080145225 Shock Absorber for Adjustable Pitch Propeller with Feathering Blades, Particularly for Sailers June, 2008 Berghella et al.
EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT
Wood, Herron & Evans, LLP (Vestas Wind Systems) (Cincinnati, OH, US)
1. A wind turbine comprising a rotor with wind turbine blades each having a root end connected to a hub of the wind turbine and a tip end, the tip end of each of which being equipped with a winglet extending a distance in a direction perpendicularly to a longitudinal direction of the blade, wherein a combined radius specific solidity of the rotor at the tip end of the blades immediately adjacent the winglet is 0.085 times an extension of the winglet divided by a radius of the rotor plus a value within the range of 0.0012 and 0.0048, plus, the combined radius specific solidity of the rotor being defined as Solr=n·cr2πR n being a number of blades in the rotor, Cr a chord length at a distance r from the hub and R the radius of the rotor.
2. The wind turbine according to claim 1, wherein said combined radius specific solidity of the rotor at the tip end of the blade is within the range of 0.0016 and 0.0042, plus 0.085 times the extension of the winglet divided by the radius of the rotor.
3. The wind turbine according to claim 1, wherein the combined radius specific solidity of the rotor increases continuously from the tip end of the blade and to a value in the range of 0.0065 to 0.013 at a position 5% of the rotor radius from the tip in the direction of the hub.
4. The wind turbine according to claim 3, wherein the combined radius specific solidity of the rotor increases substantially linearly from the tip end of the blade and to a position 5% of the rotor radius from the tip in the direction of the hub.
5. A wind turbine comprising a rotor with wind turbine blades each having a root end connected to a hub of the wind turbine and a tip end, the tip end of each of which being equipped with a winglet extending a distance in a direction perpendicularly to a longitudinal direction of the blade, wherein a combined radius specific solidity of the rotor at the tip end part of the blades substantially is designed in accordance with the formula Solr=-0.34087·(rR)2+0.6004·(rR)-1.236·(XheightR)2+0.12548·(XheightR)-0.25276+C r being a distance to the hub and R a radius of the rotor, wherein C is defined as a constant for the whole rotor design and is chosen within the range of −0.006 and 0.006, the combined radius specific solidity the rotor being defined as Solr=n·cr2πR n being a number of blades in the rotor, cr a chord length at a distance r from the hub.
6. The wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein C is chosen within the range of −0.004 and 0.004.
7. The wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein said tip part being designed according to said formula constitutes at least an outer 5% of the blade length of each of the blades of the rotor.
9. The wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein the combined radius specific solidity of said tip part deviates less than 12% from the combined radius specific solidity defined by said formula.
10. The wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein the extension of the winglet constitutes in the range of 0.5% to 5% of the radius of the rotor.
11. The wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein a maximum lift coefficient Cl,max of the blades where Cl,max is valid for a two-dimensional flow passing a smooth profile surface, at the outer 10% of the radius R of the rotor is within the range of 0.9 and 2.0.
12. The wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein a maximum lift coefficient Cl,R at the tip end of blades is within the range of 0.2 and 1.4.
13. The wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein the combined radius specific solidity of the winglet tip chord is within the range of 0.0 and 0.02 for blade radius r taken as the rotor radius R, and the maximum lift coefficient for the winglet tip chord is within the range of 0.0 and 0.4.
14. The wind turbine according to claim 13, wherein the combined radius specific solidity of the rotor at the tip end of the blades immediately adjacent the winglet is substantially equal to the combined radius specific solidity at the winglet root chord, and the combined radius specific solidity decreases substantially continuously from the winglet root chord to the winglet tip chord.
15. The wind turbine according to claim 14, wherein the combined radius specific solidity decreases substantially linearly between the winglet root chord and the winglet tip chord.
16. The wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein the winglets extend said distance to a suction side of the blades of the rotor.
17. The wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein a winglet inflow angle of attack αAoA is in the range of −5 to 10°.
18. The wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein a winglet inclination angle of attack to blade is within the range of 70 to 150°.
19. The wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein a winglet leading edge displacement XLED is less than the winglet root chord.
20. The wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein a winglet trailing edge displacement XTED is less than plus or minus 30% of the winglet root chord.
22. The wind turbine blade having a root end with means for coupling said root end to a hub of a wind turbine and a tip end having a winglet, the blade being suitable for use in a wind turbine according to claim 5, wherein the number of wind turbine blades is n=2 or n=3.
The present application is a continuation of pending International patent application PCT/DK2007/000559 filed on Dec. 20, 2007 which designates the United States and claims priority from Danish patent application PA 2007 01142 filed Aug. 10, 2007 and Danish patent application PA 2006 01705 filed Dec. 22, 2006, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a wind turbine having a rotor with wind turbine blades equipped with winglets and having a particular airfoil design to improve the performance of the wind turbine
It has for a number of years been common practice in air craft wing design to arrange different types of winglets or other means at the wing tip for reducing or preventing the spanwise flow of air from the pressure (lower) side of the wing profile to the suction (upper) side of the profile around the tip, which results in the creation of the tip vortex and a decreased lift coefficient at the tip section of the wing, mainly due to the reduced suction at the suction side. Wind turbine rotors having blades equipped with winglets are also known in the art, mainly for the purpose of reducing noise emission from the wind turbine due to the presence of the tip vortices but also to improve the overall performance of the wind turbine.
WO 2004/061298 A2 discloses such blade for a wind turbine, where a particular design of the winglet itself is disclosed.
EP 1 500 814 A1 shows a wind turbine blade with an end projection having an aerodynamic cross-sectional profile, which lies in a plane extending at an angle to the rotor blade plane. The end projection is asymmetric to the central longitudinal axis of the rotor blade, with a progressive or stepped reduction in the blade thickness at the transition between the end projection and the remainder of the rotor blade.
WO 2005/078277 A2 relates to a rotor blade for a wind turbine with a drag ratio, in particular in the central or main board region of said rotor, whose value exceeds 80% and preferably 90% of the maximum value of said ratio in the range of +/−20 of the optimum pitch of said rotor.
One of the consequences of producing lift on a finite wing is the generation of spanwise flow around the tip which influences the flow pattern in the whole tip region. In particular, the pressure gradients caused by the lower pressures on the upper surface relative to the higher pressures on the lower surface lead to inward spanwise flow (toward the hub) on the upper surface and outward spanwise flow (toward the tip) on the lower surface. At the trailing edge, the merging of these two flows having different directions generates the vorticity that is shed from a finite wing and is the origin of induced drag as well as aerodynamic noise.
An endplate at the tip of a finite wing can reduce the spanwise flow and thereby reduce the induced drag. Unfortunately, to be effective, the endplate must be so large that the increase in wetted area drag far outweighs any drag reduction. A winglet, rather than being a simple fence which limits the spanwise flow, carries an aerodynamic load that produces a flow field i.e. an inward side force that allows its own induced velocity field to partially cancel that of the main wing, thereby reducing the amount of spanwise flow. In essence, the winglet diffuses or spreads out the influence of the tip vortex such that the downwash and, in turn the induced drag, are reduced. In this way, the winglet acts like an endplate in reducing the spanwise flow but, by carrying the proper aerodynamic loading, it accomplishes this with much less wetted area.
The displacement of the wing tip out and away from the main wing planform reduces the effect of the shed vorticity on the wing by displacing the concentrated vorticity away from the wing. In this manner, the winglet emulates the effect of a planar span extension and an increase in the length of the load perimeter.
The diffusion process is also realized as an expansion of the wake in the far field due to induced velocities from the non-planar components of the winglet. The out of plane bound vortex on an upward winglet induces horizontal velocities on the free wake that cause a spanwise spreading of the wake field. This also emulates the effect of a span increase.
Another benefit of winglets, which is not achieved by a simple span extension, is the effect on the spanwise lift distribution, particularly in the region of the wing tip. The influence of the winglet effectively loads the planform in the tip region, increasing the local lift coefficients and filling out the spanwise lift distribution. Planform efficiencies greater than those of an elliptical wing are possible. This occurs because, as evidenced by the extension of the roughly constant lift coefficients to beyond the actual tip location, the tip loaded spanwise lift distribution is, in fact, behaving like that of a nearly elliptically loaded planform of a greater span. When referenced to the actual span, the resulting efficiency is greater than that of an elliptical loading.
Summering up the overall benefits of winglet vs. tip extension is:
1. Installation of winglets is found to cause a larger increase in the power coefficient and a smaller increase in the flap bending moment than radially extended rotor blades
2. The smaller turbine diameter for the same tip velocity results in smaller gear ratio.
3. On some sites the local regulations dictates maximum wind turbine height (tower+blade tip in highest position).
4. Decrease noise from tip vortices.
The advantages discussed above of the application of winglets on wind turbine blades have lead to design trend where the blade part extending from the hub and to the tip end of the blades immediately adjacent the winglet, i.e. at the winglet root, is designed as the inner part of a longer wind turbine blade because the presence of the winglet reduces the adverse tip effects on the lift coefficient at the outer part of the blade near the tip and a higher performance of that part of the blade may be achieved, which is particularly interesting because this part sweeps a large section of the total area swept by the rotor. This design leads to relatively large chord lengths at the outer part of the blade, i.e. the outer about 5% of the complete rotor radius.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved design of a wind turbine blade with a winglet that results in an improved performance of the wind turbine with respect to yearly production and preferably also reduced noise emission.
It has been found by the present invention that an optimisation of the performance of the wind turbine may be achieved by designing the outer part of the blade much more slim, i.e. with a shorter chord length designed within a narrow band of values defined with respect to the length of the winglet, i.e. the extension in the direction transverse to the longitudinal direction of the blade. The reduction in chord length has shown to reduce the actual drag more than the reduction in lift and results in an improved performance. Thus, the present invention relates to a wind turbine comprising a rotor with wind turbine blades each having a root end connected to a hub of the wind turbine and a tip end, the tip end of each of which being equipped with a winglet extending a distance in a direction perpendicularly to a longitudinal direction of the blade, wherein the combined radius specific solidity (Solr) of the rotor at the tip end of the blades immediately adjacent the winglet is 0.085 times the extension of the winglet divided by the radius of the rotor, plus a value within the range of 0.0012 and 0.0048. However, for an optimum effect of the winglet, the inventor's studies indicates that said value preferably is within the range of 0.0016 and 0.0042, and most preferred within the range of 0.0024 and 0.0040. The extension of the winglet and the radius of the rotor are taken in absolute values, so that their ratio, i.e. the extension of the winglet divided by the radius of the rotor, will be a fraction, typically in the order of 0.01 to 0.04. Thus, an example of a typical calculation of the combined radius specific solidity (Solr) of the rotor at the tip end of the blades immediately adjacent the winglet is for a blade where the ratio of the winglet extension and the rotor radius is 0.025 and said value is selected as a medial value of the last mentioned range: (0.085 times 0.025)+0.0032=0.0053.
The solidity of a wind turbine rotor is the ratio between the area of the blades projected into the rotor plane and the total area covered by the rotating blades, Ablade. The combined solidity, i.e. the sum of solidifies of the blades, is hence:
Sol=n·AbladeπR2
Where n is the number of wind turbine blades, e.g. 2, 3 or 4.
Solidity may also be established for a specific radius, r, from the centre of the rotor plane. The radius specific solidity of the wind turbine blade decreases as a function of the specific radius, r, and the combined radius specific solidity Solr. The combined radius specific solidity (Solr) of the rotor is defined as
Solr=n·cr2πR
where n is the number of blades in the rotor, normally 2 or 3, cr the chord length at the distance r from the hub and R the radius of the rotor.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the outer end of the blades are designed so that the combined radius specific solidity (Solr) of the rotor increases continuously from the tip end of the blade and to a value in the range of 0.0065 to 0.013 at a position 5% of the rotor radius R from the tip in the direction of the hub, preferably in the range of 0.008 to 0.011 and most preferred within a range of 0.0085 to 0.01. It is particularly preferred that the combined radius specific solidity of the rotor increases substantially linearly, i.e. within a deviation of +/−5-8% from a linear increase as a function of distance from the tip.
According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the whole outer part of the blades of the rotor is designed in a particular manner to improve the overall performance of the rotor. Is has been found that the optimal design depends strongly on the height of the winglet, and the invention further relates to a wind turbine comprising a rotor with wind turbine blades each having a root end connected to a hub of the wind turbine and a tip end, the tip end of each of which being equipped with a winglet extending a distance Xheight in a direction perpendicularly to a longitudinal direction of the blade, wherein the combined radius specific solidity (Solr) of the rotor at the tip end part of the blades substantially is designed in accordance with the formula
Solr=-0.34087·(rR)2+0.6004·(rR)-1.236·(XheightR)2+0.12548·(XheightR)-0.25276+C
r being the distance to the hub and R the radius of the rotor, wherein C is defined as a constant for the whole rotor design and is chosen within the range of −0.006 and 0.006, the combined radius specific solidity (Solr) of the rotor being defined as
n being the number of blades in the rotor, cr the chord length at the distance r from the hub.
The wide range of the design reflects the fact that wind turbine rotors are designed for the type of wind the individual wind turbine will be subjected to, i.e. the expected distribution of wind velocities.
This blade tip design may advantageously be combined with the aforementioned design according to the present invention.
It is preferred that C is chosen within the range of −0.004 and 0.004, preferably within the range of −0.003 and 0.003.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, said tip part being designed according to said formula constitutes at least the outer 5% of the blade length of each of the blades of the rotor, preferably at least the outer 8% of the blade length of each of the blades of the rotor, and most preferred at least the outer 10% of the blade length.
The combined radius specific solidity (Solr) of said tip part is designed substantially in accordance with the formula, which in a preferred embodiment means that it deviates less than 12% from the combined radius specific solidity (Solr) defined by said formula, preferably less than 8% and most preferred less than 6%.
The extension of the winglet may with the present invention exceed the commonly applied 1.2% to 1.5% of the rotor radius with improved performance of the wind turbine. Thus, the winglet extends preferably in the range of 0.5% to 5% of the radius R of the rotor, and most preferred in the range of 2% to 4% of the radius.
It is preferred that the maximum lift coefficient Cl,max of the blades, where Cl,max is valid for a two-dimensional flow passing a smooth profile surface, at the outer 10% of the radius R of the rotor is within the range of 0.9 and 2.0, and it is furthermore preferred that the maximum lift coefficient Cl,R at the tip end of blades is within the range of 0.2 and 1.4. For a further discussion of the maximum lift coefficient, please refer to WO 2006/090215.
With respect to the design of the winglet, it is preferred that the combined radius specific solidity of the winglet tip chord is within the range of 0.0 and 0.02 for blade radius r taken as the rotor radius R, and the maximum lift coefficient (Cl,max) for the winglet tip chord is within the range of 0.0 and 0.4. It is furthermore preferred that the combined radius specific solidity (Solr) of the rotor at the tip end of the blades immediately adjacent the winglet is substantially equal to the combined radius specific solidity at the winglet root chord, and that the combined radius specific solidity decreases substantially continuously, more preferably linearly with the distance to the tip, from the winglet root chord to the winglet tip chord.
The winglet may extend to the pressure side, which is the most common in order to avoid interference with the wind turbine tower, or the winglet may extend to the pressure side as well as to the suction side of the blade. However, it is preferred that the winglets extend said distance (Xheight) to the suction side of the blades of the rotor as it in combination with the present invention has shown to provide an improved performance of the wind turbine.
It is furthermore preferred that the winglet inflow angle of attack αAoA is in the range of −5 to 10°, preferably in the range of −2 to 8° and most preferred in the range of 0 to 5°.
It is also a preferred embodiment of the present invention that the winglet inclination angle of attack to blade is within the range of 70 to 150°, preferably in the range of 80 to 120° and most preferred in the range of 90 to 100°.
It is a further preferred embodiment of the present invention that the winglet leading edge displacement XLED is less than the winglet root chord, preferably within the range of 5% to 75% thereof and most preferred with the range of 10% to 50% thereof.
It is a yet further preferred embodiment of the present invention that the winglet trailing edge displacement XTED is less than plus or minus 30% of winglet root chord, i.e. that the trailing edge of the winglet at very tip of the winglet may be displaced in front of or behind the trailing edge of the main wing, preferably in the range of plus or minus 2% to plus or minus 20% thereof and most preferred within the range of plus or minus 5% to plus or minus 10% thereof.
The present invention also relates to wind turbine blades having a root end with means for coupling said root end to a hub of a wind turbine and a tip end having a winglet, the blade being suitable for use in a wind turbine having the characteristics as described above, wherein the number of wind turbine blades is n=2 or n=3.
The enclosed figures illustrates terms and effects related to the present invention:
FIG. 1 illustrates the inclination of the winglet to the blade,
FIG. 2 illustrates the winglet height, the winglet root chord, the winglet tip chord, the leading edge displacement and the trailing edge displacement,
FIG. 3 illustrates the winglet angle of attack,
FIG. 4 shows a preferred combined radius specific solidity of the outer 10% of a wing turbine rotor having a 1% winglet height,
FIG. 5 shows a preferred combined radius specific solidity of the outer 10% of a wing turbine rotor having a 2% winglet height, and
FIG. 6 shows a preferred combined radius specific solidity of the outer 10% of a wing turbine rotor having a 4% winglet height.
In FIG. 1, the tip end of a blade is shown as seen in perspective with the winglet pointing upwards, and the inclination of the winglet to the blade is shown as the winglet inclination angle to blade, αinclination, defined as the angle between the main wing centre line and the winglet centre line.
In FIG. 2 the tip end of a blade is shown as seen from the end thereof, i.e. the blade itself extends away from the viewer of FIG. 3. The winglet height, Xheight, is defined as the distance from the main wing chord line at the very tip to the chord line of the very tip of the winglet. The winglet root chord, Xrootchord, is defined as the distance from the leading edge to the trailing edge of the main wing at the very tip where the winglet is attached. The winglet tip chord, Xtipchord, is defined as the distance from the leading edge to the trailing edge of the winglet at the very tip of the winglet. The winglet leading edge displacement, XLED, is defined as the distance from the leading edge of the main wing at the very tip to the leading edge of the winglet at very tip of the winglet. The winglet trailing edge displacement, XTED, is defined as the distance from the trailing edge of the main wing at the very tip to the trailing edge of the winglet at very tip of the winglet.
In FIG. 3 the tip end of a blade is shown as seen from the side to which the winglet tip points, i.e. the tip of the winglet of FIG. 3 points towards the viewer. The winglet angle of attack, αAoA, is defined as the angle between the line parallel to the main wing chord plane at the tip and the winglet root chord plane
Modifying the blade with different winglets has shown to increase the efficiency of the rotor i.e. the amount of energy that the rotor extracts from the wind.
The annual increase in production for a turbine with an average wind speed of 8.5 m/s for a standard wind turbine rotor has been calculated theoretically for various extensions of the winglet:
1% 2% 4%
original Winglet Winglet Winglet
Percent increase in annual 0.0 0.9 1.5 2.4
production for an average
wind speed of 8.5 m/s
It is observed that the main effect of the blade design according to the invention arise for wind speeds between 5-11 m/s. This is highly advantageous, as for higher wind speed, the maximum production is already reached and for smaller wind speeds, radial movement of the wind has limited effect. It appears that the increase tends to be larger for larger heights of the winglets, but a practical limit with respect to mechanical construction and forces on the tip part of the blades due to the presence of the winglet is about 5% of the radius of the wind turbine.
The combined radius specific solidity of the outer 10% of wind turbine blades has been calculated for three different examples of blade designs according to the present invention and are shown in FIGS. 4-6.
In FIG. 4, a design with a winglet height of 1% of the rotor radius is shown. The combined radius specific solidity (Solr) of the rotor at the tip end of the blades immediately adjacent the winglet is chosen to be 0.00435 which results in a constant C=−0.00355 for the above formula. For a 3-bladed wind turbine with a rotor diameter of 90 meter this equals a winglet height of 45 cm, a tip chord length of about 41 cm and a chord length at radius r=90% of the rotor radius of 45 meter of about 92 cm.
In FIG. 5, a design with a winglet height of 2% of the rotor radius is shown. The combined radius specific solidity (Solr) of the rotor at the tip end of the blades immediately adjacent the winglet is chosen to be 0.0057 which results in a constant C=−0.003085 for the above formula. For a 3-bladed wind turbine with a rotor diameter of 90 meter this equals a winglet height of 90 cm, a tip chord length of about 54 cm and a chord length at radius r=90% of the rotor radius of 45 meter of about 98 cm.
In FIG. 6, a design with a winglet height of 4% of the rotor radius is shown. The combined radius specific solidity (Solr) of the rotor at the tip end of the blades immediately adjacent the winglet is chosen to be 0.0057 which results in a constant C=−0.003212 for the above formula. For a 3-bladed wind turbine with a rotor diameter of 90 meter this equals a winglet height of 180 cm, a tip chord length of about 62 cm and a chord length at radius r=90% of the rotor radius of 45 meter of about 107 cm.
Previous Patent: WIND TURBINE BLADE AND ASSEMBLY
Next Patent: Method And Apparatus For Controlling Microfluidic Flow


I think the Maserati Ghibli is a terrible value -- and I think it absolutely isn't worth $80,000 or more. I rented this 2015 Maserati Ghibli from Turo to explain why.
Is that the toothpaste you use Doug... Just Curious?
2019 Kia K900, way more reliable, more luxury features, better quality, $20k less than this Maserati.
WORST CAR EVER MADE BY MASERATI?
Great review. This is a *classic* example of where a great brand with great historical bones (and yes, some quirks too) meets large US corporate bean counters (well, the Chrysler 'gift' to Fiat) and the result is - well - watch the video. This is *exactly* the result Jaguar experienced when Ford bought them, took over, and nearly killed J off entirely. Fortunately, Ford had to sell J during financial crisis and it survived and is reborn. *Bean-counterosis* is _never_ a practicable nor successful pathway to high end performance/luxury automaking. Ever.
But is the 550 i a Maserati, no!!!
+Francis why don't you fk off instead of making some reasonable points, give me one reason this car is worth buying over bmw except "it's special"
+Francis maseratis are special because it has less power, less features and more expensive to the competitors?
Fun fact: the oil changes on this car are $500 , Fiat Chrysler is a joke.
Finding out Fiat owned Maserati was all I needed to hear to know this car would be a piece of crap.
i think Maserati needs to get lot of technology for their new models that will arrive in 2021 in the future. not just that Maserati also need to have a small engine so the price will be more cheaper like their rivals Mercedes benz e class bmw 5 series and audi a6. well i still don't understand until right now why does Maserati doesn't want to make a small engine for their cars so the price will be cheap.
Theres a Ghibli at a local dealer in my town thats priced at 29 grand rn.
My 2012 Chrysler 200 has better build quality than that giant overpriced pig.
It looks like a Nissan to me.
I'm not getting one after watching this video. I'm here bc I was researching reviews.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MaseratiGhibli/ Come join a proper Ghibli information center!