text:
Home » Breaking News » Defections: Can Ayade Survive The Broom Revolution? BY INYALI PETER
Defections: Can Ayade Survive The Broom Revolution? BY INYALI PETER
In Breaking News, Columnists, National News, Opinion, Politics
Peter Inyali
Since the dawn of uninterrupted democracy in Nigeria in 1999, Cross River has arguably been a strong hold of the People's Democratic Party, (PDP).
The first democratically elected governor of the state in the current dispensation, Mr. Donald Duke ensured that all the political heavyweights in the state at the time and a few officials who were elected through other platform defected to PDP.
Some who had divergent views to Duke's philosophy were either made to resign or go into political oblivion.
During this time, the defunct All Nigeria People's Party (APP) which was the major opposition party in the country had a formidable force in the state to the point of producing the speaker, Rt. Hon Gabriel Adah who unfortunately became the first casualty of Duke's hatred for opposition.
Adah who was elected under the platform of the APP to represent Obudu state constituency was very resistant in dumping his party for the then ruling party which was waxing strong to take over the entire political structure of the state.
For those who know him, Duke will go any length to get what he wants. This was the case with Adah who was impeached as Speaker few months into his reign.
The impeachment practically laid the foundation for the sixteen years reign of the PDP in the state as a few members of the State House of Assembly who came under the platform all dumped the party for PDP for fear of being tagged enemy to the then most powerful governor in the country.
Senator Owan Enoh who was elected under the APP to represent Etung state constituency but has now gone to have a more successful political career with the PDP is a good example.
It was even rumoured that the impeached Speaker, later joined the PDP.
This development however built a solid foundation for Duke's successor and the immediate past governor, Senator Liyel Imoke who graciously led the state to become the leader and front burner of the PDP agenda in the South South geopolitical zone of the country.
Perhaps, Imoke didn't have much to do than to consolidate on the structures left by his successor to make sure the state delivers hundred percent to the party in every election; a task he maintained throughout his eight years tenure.
Besides, Imoke at some point was not regarded as just the leader of the PDP but the de-facto leader of all the political parties that existed in the state.
This is because all the major political decisions made by him were made to bind other alternative parties in the state. For instance, the zoning formula of PDP was always going to bind other parties like the case of the governorship election in the last elections.
Because of the dominance and might of the PDP in the state during his regime, the party primaries were largely regarded as the real elections as anybody who coast home to victory was as sure as winning the general election which in most cases was a confirmation to the decision of the party.
But despite this, Imoke was widely criticized for undermining the decision of senior party stalwarts especially if it was contrary to what he personally wanted.
In different occasions, he was accused of being too rigid and dictatorial in the way party flag bearers were elected during primaries.
This became obvious in the last elections as so many PDP fatefuls left the party for Labour party to test their popularity but as usual Imoke ensured all PDP candidates returned elected in the State.
Now Imoke and Duke are no more in the saddle but a new kid in the block in Senator (Prof.) Ben Ayade. Contrary to what the former governors had, the new dispensation of Ayade has witnessed a gale of defections that have prompted political watchers in the state to question the long term future of the PDP in the state.
Within his seven months governorship, more political juggernauts in the state have crossed from the PDP to the All Progressive Congress (APC) than the sixteen years of Duke and Imoke joined together. Maybe this is because the state has never be known as playing opposition to the government at the centre.
While many people have blamed the former governor for the PDP melee, insinuating that the party is having a hangover of the process that produced the party's flag bearers in the last elections, some have said that the leadership style of the incumbent governor was behind the nightmare.
Ayade has been accused of running the state as a personal business thereby disregarding advice and opinions of senior party members.
Amongst other defections, what has really thrown the state in total acrimony is the recent defection of the governor's kinsmen and major financiers in the last election to the APC.
A former two time member representing Obudu/Bekwarra/Obanliku federal constituency, Rt. Hon Paul Adah, led a team of who is who in Obudu, the local government of the governor to defect and subsequently register with the APC.
What was more shocking during their official defection on Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at Begiading Ward1 in Obudu local government area of the state was the mammoth crowd that came out to celebrate the decision of the former lawmaker and other political bigwigs who have crossed to the APC.
This development has since caused discontent in the camp of the governor as it was rumoured that all his efforts to truncate the event hit the rocks.
One of the defectors whom I contacted said that leaving the PDP was a big burden which he has taken off his neck even as he explained that his decision was hinged on the insensitivity of the state government to address urgent issues of public interest.
This outburst is however not strange because as role model to so many young people, it was best for him to embrace the change mantra of President Muhammadu Buhari which has favoured the state in terms of appointments than any other government.
However, some of these people who are from the same local government with the governor should be commended for their bold steps and decision to go to the APC.
They should also brace themselves for attacks and abuses but as true Cross Riverians, we have seen clearly that we are not in the best of times because of the direction less ness and clueless ness of the governor.
Before we crucify them, we must appreciate the fact that as leaders and politicians, there is nothing as bad as not satisfying what the people you represent, the people who believe in you would want.
So it is better for people to know that they are not part of this government in the state than to appear very big as people who can add to the development of the state yet cannot do anything.
Before I'm condemned by the social media punks of the governor, I'm not completely happy with the development especially as it's coming from his immediate constituency (His LGA).
However, it has become crystal clear to the blind and audible to the deaf that the government of Ayade clearly lacks direction and the governor has so far displayed ignorance in government through what a political activist called "aluta style" governance.
As a professor with a very successful business history, it's unfortunate to imagine that a systematic marginalization of party members associated with his perceived enemies has been adopted as the best approach to transforming the political instability in the state.
The people living now clearly have the choice between going extinct politically or joining forces with the opposition political party to save the state from the sinking ship of Ayade's leadership.
My interaction with his kinsmen especially his major financier during the elections shows that his inability to listen to advise has brought unprecedented embarrassment to the people.
I'm also aware that many people are scrambling to join those who have left PDP for Ayade to build a new platform for the future wellbeing of Cross Riverians.
There's also strong rumour that the most popular senator from the state in the 8th National Assembly who meritoriously, is the Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance is undergoing sustained consultation to dump PDP for APC.
If this happens, it will be the biggest blow to Ayade because a good politician would not temper with a man who defeated the then sitting Senate Leader. Let me leave that sensitive reports for now till I gather more facts.
Before I end this piece, let me also remind us that within just seven months of Ayade's governorship, the former Senate Leader, Senator Victor Ndoma Egba, former governor, Mr. Clement Ebri, former Reps., Earnest Irek, the immediate past Chairman of the State Board of Internal Revenue, a governorship aspirant in the last elections who was until his defection, the Caucus chief of PDP, Obudu chapter, Dr. Peter Oti, Chief Bullem as well as the most popular governorship aspirant and the son of the Paramount Ruler of Obudu LGA, Prince Goddy Jedy Agba and a host of other prominent politicians in the state have all joined the APC.
Now that we are counting months to the local government elections in the state and considering the calibre of people who have left the once most popular party in the state, Cross Riverians are waiting patiently to see if the governor has the political structure and wherewithal to survive the broom revolution in the state.
Inyali peter writes from Calabar Inyalipeter@gmail.com
Topics: ayade calabar cross river state news peter inyali politics
Previous Post Governor Ayade: Standing For God And For The Youths BY SOLOMON ASHA/EMMANUEL ULAYI
Next Post Partners For Peace, Cross River Chapter Elects New Excos
By Ushang Ewa The family of Mrs Mary Ugbome have petitioned the Inspector General of the Nigerian Police Force,
One commentOn Defections: Can Ayade Survive The Broom Revolution? BY INYALI PETER
Danboy
The governor has 4 years of mandate. It is too early to judge his performance at this time! What evidence do you have to support your biased opinion? Your writing is a very good example of whining!
Be patient, old boy; you are too judgmental.
It is the governor's prerogative to appoint the people he is comfortable working with!


text:
@import Foundation;

@interface FPSource : NSObject

@property (nonatomic, strong) NSString *name;
@property (nonatomic, strong) NSString *identifier;
@property (nonatomic, strong) NSString *icon;
@property (nonatomic, strong) NSString *rootPath;
@property (nonatomic, strong) NSArray *openMimetypes;
@property (nonatomic, strong) NSArray *saveMimetypes;
@property (nonatomic, strong) NSArray *mimetypes;
@property (nonatomic, strong) NSArray *externalDomains;
@property (nonatomic, assign) BOOL overwritePossible;
@property (nonatomic, assign) BOOL requiresAuth;

@end

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


Metal Roof Systems Our roof systems are the smart choice for your business or home's protection. They can withstand hail, rain, snow, fire and wind, while saving you money and providing you peace of mind. Our products will enhance your business or home's appearance and are durable, fast to install and are virtually maintenance free.
Insurance Specialist Perhaps you are thinking about replacing your siding or roof. If this is the case, why not see if you qualify for an insurance replacement by calling us first.
Hail Damage Inspection PROSTAR Roofing is the place to call to inspect your property for storm damage you may, or may not know exists. By taking advantage of PROSTAR Roofing, you will eliminate all the headaches involved with getting your project completed. We work with our customers to ensure expert and speedy repair of your home or property.
Commercial PROSTAR Roofing is a licensed, bonded and insured roofing contractor. We design, install and service a wide spectrum of Commercial Roofing Systems using the latest products and techniques for all types of commercial buildings. We serve our commercial customers with the latest advances in roofing technology.
Repairs Specialist From small repairs to complete re-roofs, plus, we specialize in construction defect repairs. We have rapid response crews for Roofing Emergencies. Call us now for FREE INSPECTIONS and ESTIMATES!
Tear-Off Whether it is new construction, re-roofing, periodic inspection and maintenance, or emergency services, PROSTAR Roofing maintains an excellent reputation for providing prompt, reliable service.
Leaking Roof Trust us to find that leak and asses any type of repair big or small. We'll fix only whats necessary, and let you know what areas may need some TLC in the future.
Dumpster Rental Service for Construction Sites We provide same day service in San Antonio area and one flat rate charge for all our dumpsters. We carry 30yd and 40yd dumpsters. Visit www.psrolloffdumpster.com for more information.
Pro Star Roofing has no reviews yet.


text:
Home › Discover Nature › Field Guide ›
Deer Mouse
Peromyscus maniculatus
More Mammals
Deer_Mouse_P_maniculatus_7-16-18.jpg
The deer mouse is found statewide, usually in open habitats like fields and grasslands. It, and our other three species of Peromyscus mice, look a lot alike.
MDC Staff
Cricetidae (New World rats, mice, voles) in the order Rodentia
The deer mouse is a small rodent with large, protruding, black eyes; large, scantily furred ears; long, coarse whiskers; and a moderately to well-furred tail from one-third to less than one-half of the animal's total length with a slight tuft at the tip. There are 4 clawed toes and an inconspicuous nailed thumb on each front foot, and 5 clawed toes on each hind foot. The soles of the hind feet are thinly furred from the heel to the 6 pads, or tubercles. Small internal cheek pouches are present. The body fur is long and soft.
There is considerable color variation in individual deer mice, but in general the back and sides of the adults vary from grayish to reddish brown with or without a darker area in the middle of the back. This color is sharply marked off from the lower face and underparts, which are white or sometimes grayish. The base of the hairs on both back and belly is dark gray. The feet are white. The tail is dark like the back above and sharply contrasted to light like the belly below. The ears are dark brown for approximately the outer half with a very slight grayish to whitish margin but are whitish to pinkish for the inner half.
The deer mouse is a widely distributed North American species with great variation in form, behavior, and habitat preferences. The subspecies that occurs in Missouri is Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii.
Similar species: Missouri's four species of Peromyscus mice are similar in appearance and habits. The best way to distinguish between them is by differences in size and characters of the tail. Our other Peromyscus species are
the white-footed mouse (P. leucopus), which usually is larger and usually has a slightly longer tail that lacks the sharp color contrast between upper and lower surfaces; it lives mostly in wooded areas.
the cotton mouse (P. gossypinus), which is similar to but slightly larger than the white-footed mouse; it lives in moist, timbered areas, and in Missouri it is restricted to the Mississippi lowlands of the Bootheel.
the Texas mouse (P. attwateri), which closely resembles the deer mouse but is slightly larger with a longer, strongly two-colored tail that has a fur tuft at the tip; the flanks are paler than those of the deer mouse. In Missouri, it occurs in the southwestern part of the Ozark Highlands, where it is confined to particular habitats in the White and Elk River drainages.
In areas where these species occur together, their sizes can be intermediate, so they can be very difficult to identify to species. For accurate species identification, specimens should be examined by a person familiar with these species.
Also, keep in mind that Missouri has — in addition to members of the genus Peromyscus — about 20 other species of small mice, rats, and voles. Missouri mice that look most similar to the deer mouse are the golden mouse, two species of harvest mice, the house mouse, the meadow jumping mouse, and the plains pocket mouse.
Key Identifiers:
Color of upperparts is sharply marked off from underparts.
Total length less than 9 inches.
Upper incisors not grooved.
Tail considerably more than twice the length of hind foot; ears projecting beyond fur.
Tail not bushy.
Total length: 4 3/8–8 inches (usually 6 inches or less); tail length: 1 5/8–3 7/8 inches (usually 2 1/2 inches or less); weight: 1/3–1 ounce.
Deer_Mouse_P_maniculatus_in_grassland_7-16-18.jpg
The back and sides of deer mice are generally grayish to reddish brown with or without a darker area in the middle of the back. This color is sharply marked off from the lower face and underparts, which are white or sometimes grayish.
Deer_Mouse_P_maniculatus_face_7-16-18.jpg
In Missouri, the deer mouse is usually found in an open habitat such as pastures, meadows, prairie, cultivated fields, and along field borders and fencerows. Thus habitat is an important clue for identification.
Deer_Mouse_P_maniculatus_scratching_7-16-18.jpg
The deer mouse lives throughout Missouri and is one of the most abundant mammals on open lands.
greater_roadrunner_with_deer_mouse_11-16-13.jpg
Greater Roadrunner Capturing Deer Mouse
Deer mice are a very important prey species for flesh-eating animals, including the greater roadrunner.
Share your photo
Habitat and conservation:
In Missouri, the deer mouse is usually found in open habitats such as pastures, meadows, prairie, cultivated fields, and along field borders and fencerows. It may also live in and around human habitations, but it generally does not occur in heavy brush or wooded places.
A deer mouse's several nests are generally located underground in cavities among the roots of trees or shrubs, beneath a log or board, or in a tunnel built either by another animal, but no longer used by it, or by the mouse itself. Less often, the nests may be aboveground in a hollow fence post, stump, log, or an old bird's or squirrel's nest.
In Missouri, the deer mouse seldom occupies the same range as its close relative, the forest-dwelling white-footed mouse.
In Missouri, the highest populations of deer mice occur from March through June. Local populations fluctuate greatly from year to year, with peaks occurring about every 3–5 years.
Foods:
The important foods of deer mice are insects (beetles and larvae of butterflies and moths), nuts, wild seeds, domestic grain (corn and soybeans), fruits and fruit pits, and some leafy vegetation. Occasionally they eat fungi, snails, slugs, worms, spiders, centipedes, millipedes, eggs and young of birds, and dead mice. In the fall, seeds and nuts are stored in holes in the ground, in old bird nests, or in trees. These caches may contain as much as 1 pint of food. Deer mice do much of their feeding at these storehouses. The food is carried in the small cheek pouches, which together hold about 1 teaspoon of seeds. Although deer mice are active outside their nests mostly at night, they shun the hours of brightest moonlight. The customary feeding periods are during early evening and just before dawn.
Distribution in Missouri:
The deer mouse lives throughout Missouri and is one of the most abundant mammals on open lands. The species is widespread across North America, ranging throughout central and southern Canada, the United States, and into southern Mexico.
The principal mating periods of the deer mouse are in spring and fall, but limited breeding takes place in summer and, if there are remarkably mild temperatures and abundant food, even in winter. The gestation period is generally from 21 to 23 days but may be extended up to 37 days in nursing females. From 1 to 9 young are born per litter with 3 and 4 the most common. Mated mice usually stay together during the breeding season, if both survive; otherwise, new mates are acquired. In the wild, deer mice may live as long as 1½ or 2 years. However, fewer than one-fifth of those born usually reach sexual maturity. The record of longevity in captivity is 8 years.
Human connections:
Deer and other mice damage some crops and stores of grain. In western states, they dig up seeds planted for reforestation. In the fall, they commonly enter buildings, where they leave their droppings and become a nuisance.
Although not yet identified in Missouri, hantaviruses that cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome have been identified in the deer mouse, white-footed mouse, hispid cotton rat, and marsh rice rat within the United States. As of 2018, nearly every state surrounding Missouri has reported at least one case of hantavirus. Because this disease is fatal in about 36 percent of the cases, people should be careful about handling rodents, their urine, droppings, and nesting materials. Since it is hard to tell if a mouse or a rat carries hantavirus, it is best to avoid all wild mice and rats and to safely clean up any rodent urine, droppings, or nesting materials with a disinfectant or a mixture of bleach and water. The deer mouse and other mammals have also been associated with the spread of plague and Lyme disease.
If you are experiencing problems with larger numbers of mice, contact a wildlife professional for advice, assistance, regulations, or special conditions for handling these animals. This is especially important in areas with large amounts of mouse droppings, where protective clothing and equipment are recommended.
Ecosystem connections:
Deer mice are very important as a prey species for carnivorous animals. In fact, when they are abundant and form a ready supply of food, their predators likewise become abundant.
These mice consume large quantities of weed seeds and insects.
Their waste products return nutrients to the soil. In the case of such a common animal, the value of this fertilization is considerable.
The high reproductive capacity of deer mice and most other small rodents is balanced by a host of adverse factors. They are preyed upon by opossums, short-tailed shrews, foxes, coyotes, weasels, skunks, minks, badgers, bobcats, domestic cats, hawks, owls, and snakes.
Also, mites, ticks, lice, fleas, botfly larvae, roundworms, and tapeworms take a toll as well.
A large number of mice die because of cold weather and associated food shortages, and their bodies feed animals that scavenge.
US CDC: Hantavirus Information
Similar Species
Voles (Meadow Mice)
Microtus ochrogaster, M. pinetorum, and M. pennsylvanicus
Sorex, Blarina, and Cryptotis spp.
Thirteen-Lined Ground Squirrel
Ictidomys tridecemlineatus
Eastern Chipmunk
Tamias striatus
Southern Flying Squirrel
Glaucomys volans
Eastern Mole
Scalopus aquaticus
Eastern Gray Squirrel and Eastern Fox Squirrel
Sciurus carolinensis and Sciurus niger
About Mammals in Missouri
More than 70 species of wild mammals live in Missouri: opossums; shrews and moles; bats; rabbits; woodchuck, squirrels, beaver, mice, voles, and other rodents; coyote, foxes, bear, raccoon, weasels, otter, mink, skunks, bobcat, and other carnivores; deer and elk; and more. Most of us recognize mammals easily — they have fur, are warm-blooded, nurse their young, and breathe air.
Why Important
Avoiding
Don't Adopt Wildlife
How to Identify
The Wild Mammals of Missouri, Third Revised Edition
Aquatic Invertebrates
Trees, Shrubs and Woody Vines
Wildflowers, Grasses and Other Nonwoody Plants

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Sid & Marty Krofft Pictures x Funko Pop Phygital Drop
Drop's mint website was verified by its submitter in our Discord community
Twitter Discord Marketplace URL
The trendsetting toymaker Funko Pop! starts the new year with another big NFT-based collaboration, bringing nostalgia to web3. This time, the Digital Pop! series is devoted to the characters of the 1980's legendary morning television show by Sid & Marty Krofft Pictures.
Traditionally, the animated trading cards in the series dubbed Sid & Marty Krofft Pictures x Funko Pop will be placed in blind packs of two formats: Standard pack with five cards at $9.99 and Premium pack with 15 cards inside at $29.99.
The whole supply will be scattered through 12.5K standard and 12.5 premium packs with one of five rare Digital Pops! in each pack. These rarities will become available both in digital and physical formats for those who accomplish certain conditions.
Thus, being split into different rarity tiers, the collection gives minters an opportunity to pull a Legendary or Grail Digital Pop NFT and become eligible to redeem for a rare, exclusive physical collectible, matching a digital card. The animated characters available for redemption into a physical vinyl figurine include the following:
Horatio J. Hoodoo
Seymour Spider
Freddy Funko as Sleestak
Additionally, holders of the Royalty Collection, composed of a Common, Uncommon, Rare, and Epic NFT, can redeem it for one of the above-mentioned vinyl figures designed exclusively for this release.
The drop will start on January 17th, exclusively on the Dropp NFT marketplace, while the redemption tokens will start arriving to the minters' wallets on May 17th up to June 16th. As for the physical Funkos, they will be delivered to their owners in Q3 2023.
Join the nostalgic drop and immerse yourself in the happy days of childhood, recalling the live-action Sunday morning fantasy shows by Sid and Marty Krofft.
Tags: #collectible
Ikons 70's Collection
Superlotls
A martian in space


Powerful, lightweight, portable hand-operated crimper, ideal for field service operations. Comes with separate box, designed to contain complete set of dies. Crimps no-skive GlobalSpiral™ couplings up to 1" and no-skive MegaCrimp® couplings for wire-braid hose up to 1.1/4".


text:
T 0575/05 () of 24.4.2007
A61F 13/15
Decision text in EN (PDF, 41 KB)
Absorbent article
KAO CORPORATION
The Procter & Gamble Company
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 100(b)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 123(2)
Main and third to fifth auxiliary requests not allowable, Article 100(b) EPC
First auxiliary request - not admitted
Second auxiliary request - (request for referral of question to Enlarged Board rejected)
G 0001/93
I. The opponent (appellant) filed an appeal against the opposition division's decision of 18 April 2005 rejecting the opposition against European patent EP-B-0 910 321 and requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.
The appellant based its appeal inter alia on Article 100(b) EPC.
II. With its summons to oral proceedings, the Board informed the parties of its provisional opinion. In the matter of Article 100(b) EPC, the Board noted that the patent did not disclose a test method for measuring thickness of the absorbent sheet, which thickness was defined in claim 1 as being in the range of "0.3 mm to 5 mm", thus leaving the pressure used for measuring the thickness seemingly unspecified. The Board also noted that at least claim 1 covered absorbent sheets of compressible material.
III. In further support of its arguments under Article 100(b) EPC, the appellant filed the following document:
D11: "Standard Test Method for Thickness of Nonwoven Fabrics, ASTM Designation D 5729-97".
IV. The respondent (patent proprietor) requested dismissal of the appeal as a main request. As a first auxiliary request filed during the oral proceedings of 24 April 2007, the respondent requested maintenance of the patent in amended form. Alternatively, as a second auxiliary request, the respondent requested that the question set out in its statement, also filed during the oral proceedings, be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal, or alternatively that the patent be maintained in an amended form based on one of the third to fifth auxiliary requests filed with its written submissions before the oral proceedings.
V. Claim 1 of the main request reads as follows:
"An absorbent article comprising a liquid-permeable outermost, skin-contacting top layer (10, 110), a liquid-impermeable back layer (20, 120) and a liquid-retentive absorbent member (30, 130), said absorbent member is folded to form an opposing pair of absorbent barrier cuffs (40, 140) which extend along longitudinal edge portions of the absorbent article, said liquid-retentive absorbent member (30, 130) is interposed between said top layer and said back layer, characterised in that said top layer (10, 110) is secured to said liquid-impermeable back layer (20, 120) and said absorbent member (30, 130) includes an absorbent sheet (31, 131) having a thickness of 0.3 mm to 5 mm, an entire surface of said absorbent sheet (31, 131) is overlaid with said top layer (10, 110), and said cuffs (40, 140) are formed by integrally folding said absorbent sheet (30, 130) and only said top layer (10, 110), with said back layer (20, 120) being oriented in an unfolded state."
VI. Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request is the same as that of the main request with the exception that the following addition has been inserted after the wording "thickness of 0.3 mm to 5 mm":
"measured according to EN ISO 5084 of 1996 by applying a pressure of (1 ± 0,01) kPa,".
VII. The question formulated by the respondent, as its second auxiliary request, for referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal, reads as follows:
"Are the principles of G1/93 only applicable to amendments made during the Examination Procedure or are they likewise applicable to amendments made during the Opposition or Appeal Procedures".
VIII. Claim 1 of the third auxiliary request adds the following features (from granted claim 4) to the end of claim 1 as granted, namely:
"wherein the top layer (10, 110) is extended beyond a perimeter of the absorbent sheet (31, 131) of the barrier cuffs (40, 140), and is secured to the back layer (20, 120) at the perimeter of the absorbent sheet (31, 131)."
IX. Claim 1 of the fourth auxiliary request adds the following features (from granted claim 10) to the end of claim 1 as granted, namely:
"wherein said barrier cuffs (40, 140) have a height of 1 to 30 mm, and elastic members (50, 150) are provided inside side edges of said barrier cuffs (40, 140) located along the longitudinal direction of said barrier cuffs such that said barrier cuffs are shrunk along the longitudinal direction of said barrier cuffs over a prescribed length."
X. Claim 1 of the fifth auxiliary request was identical to claim 1 of the main request.
XI. Regarding matters relevant to the decision, the appellant argued essentially as follows:
The parameter used in claim 1 of the main, first and third to fifth requests defined the thickness of the absorbent sheet simply as "0.3 mm to 5 mm". The requirements of Article 100(b) EPC were not met, since no test method was described in the patent indicating how to measure the sheet thickness. This was essential in this case for carrying out the invention, because the materials of the absorbent sheets exemplified in paragraph [0025] of the patent included highly compressible materials such as fluff pulp. Depending on the pressure applied, vastly differing thickness results would occur. There was no single method or commonly accepted method used in the technical field; instead there were many known methods including those in
D9: "DIN EN ISO 5084 Bestimmung der Dicke von Textilien und textilen Erzeugnissen, Oktober 1996",
D10: "ISO 9073-2, Textiles - Test methods for nonwovens - Part 2: Determination of thickness, Second edition 1995-03-15",
and in D11.
The patent did not indicate which test method was to be used and the test pressure applied varied greatly between the test methods; D11 used a pressure of 4.14 kPa while D9 was unspecific, quoting a value merely of 1kPa or less ("1kPa oder weniger"). There were also many other test pressures commonly used in the technical field, each of which would give different results.
As regards the first auxiliary request, there was no basis in the filed application for the introduction of a particular test method. In fact, no test method was disclosed at all. The amendment was not immediately allowable under at least Article 123 EPC, and the request was late-filed. The request should therefore not be admitted.
As regards the second auxiliary request, the findings of G1/93 were not relevant to the present case. Also, even if the question were answered in the positive, this was not relevant to the outcome of the appeal as technically meaningful information was being added to the claim.
XII. The respondent's arguments relevant to the decision can be summarised essentially as follows:
EPO Case Law does not require a method of measuring a parameter to be defined in the claims or the description. The Guidelines C-III, 4.10a notes that one such case is where a particular method is commonly used. In the present case, no method is disclosed in the patent but in such a case the skilled person would know that the commonly used ISO standard in D9 should be applied. The ISO standard would indeed be the standard to be used, and not another standard such as in D11, because the present case concerned a European patent and the appropriate European standard must therefore be used. The pressure in D9 was not unspecific, since although D9 stated a value of 1kPa or less, D9 at the same time recommended that the value 1 kPa be used (D9, Section 8.1); the test should be carried out simply as specified. This was all the skilled person needed. Also, the exact value of pressure to be used in D9 was not of great importance, since the pressure of 1 kPa was itself very low. The appellant had not shown that different pressures would provide results differing to any appreciable degree.
The thickness range was furthermore not only limited by a parameter, but was also described in terms of its intended function as explained in column 6, lines 17 to 29 of the published patent.
The appellant's objection related to clarity of the claim and to the alleged difficulty of judging whether or not a third party product would fall within the claim scope or not; this was simply a risk for the proprietor and not an Article 100(b) EPC matter.
The same arguments in this regard also applied equally to the third to fifth auxiliary requests.
Regarding the first auxiliary request, the introduced terminology defined the test method to be used and in so doing merely limited the technical parameter of the thickness range defined in the claim. The test method however did not itself provide any technical contribution to the claim. Decision G1/93 made clear that a feature which merely limited a claim but did not provide a technical contribution thereto was allowable without contravening Article 123(2) EPC. It was irrelevant that G1/93 related to the text of a granted patent following an amendment made during examination, because no reason existed for treating the present limitation differently merely because appeal proceedings were involved. This was the only meaningful interpretation which could be given to the decision, because the decision did not exclude amendments made in opposition or appeal proceedings. The amendment introduced by way of the first auxiliary request was anyway within the content of the application as filed, by virtue of it relating to a European application to which European measurement standards must apply. Document D11 related to a non-European standard. The request should therefore be admitted into proceedings.
Regarding the question for the Enlarged Board as made in the second auxiliary request, this question met the requirements of Article 112 EPC because an important point of law had arisen which affected the outcome of the present case. If decided in the respondent's favour, this would show that the first auxiliary request should be admitted into proceedings.
1. Main request
Article 100(b) EPC
Claim 1 defines a thickness range of "0.3 mm to 5 mm", without any test method being stated regarding the way in which the thickness parameter is measured. The lack of a disclosed method in the patent itself is undisputed.
Materials which may be used to form the absorbent sheet in claim 1, as specified for example in paragraph [0025] of the patent, include compressible materials. Fluff pulp sheets or certain other fibrous sheets, particularly those including high loft material, are well known to be highly compressible. The pressure used in any test method for measuring thickness of easily compressible products is thus of the utmost importance, because the thickness varies inversely with the pressure applied. Confirmation of this well known fact can for example be found in D11, item 5.3, which notes that "the thickness values of most nonwoven fabrics will vary considerably depending on the pressure applied to the specimen" and that "it is essential that the pressure be specified when discussing or listing any thickness value".
Furthermore, the invention as defined in claim 1 has a lower end point of thickness of 0.3 mm. Thus the lower limit of the thickness range concerns a very small thickness dimension, the measurement of which requires substantial measurement accuracy. If the pressure used in the measurement method is unknown, the skilled person is unable to determine whether an article is within the scope of claim 1 or not(see also e.g. T 387/01, item 2.2.1; T 611/02, item 3). Particularly at the lower end of the claimed range, this determination would be particularly problematic. Thus, while the Board acknowledges that some degree of measurement value variation will occur in all measurement methods and is to be included within the measurement value, the complete lack of information as to what load is to be applied when measuring a compressible sheet leads to a degree of uncertainty which is entirely unacceptable for a skilled person trying to establish which sheets might fall within the claims.
The respondent has argued that the disclosure of a specific method is not needed, and has referred to the Guidelines for Examination C-III, 4.10a(ii). This section states that, "(t)he method of and means for measurement of the parameter values need not however be in the claims when: (ii) a person skilled in the art would know which method to employ, e.g. because there is only one method, or because a particular method is commonly used;". However, it should be noted first that the Guidelines in this section relate to what is required in the claims, and not to what is required in the specification as a whole to meet the requirements of Article 83 EPC. Even if it were accepted arguendo that the same requirements would apply equally to the description, the skilled person is still unable to know, due to the lack of guidance from the description, which method he should employ amongst the many commonly used methods available. D9 and D11, relating to standardised test procedures, are merely two examples of several recognised standard methods. Even between these two methods, a considerably different pressure is used, D9 using an undefined pressure of some value below 1kPa and D11 using approximately 4.14 kPa. Still further methods exist in this technical field, such as those using optical measurement in an uncompressed state or methods involving applying a pressure corresponding to that expected during use of the product (such as adult or infant users of absorbent articles).
The respondent asserts that the ISO standard as stated in D9 would be used because the present case concerns a European patent and the ISO standard is a European standard. The Board however does not concur with the respondent. Firstly, the mere fact that a European patent is involved does not mean that a European standard was ever intended to be read into the disclosure, in particular because the industry, also the absorbent article industry in Europe, recognises a variety of different methods for such testing. Albeit of secondary importance, the fact that the applicant was a Japanese company and that it filed the application as a PCT application covering not only the designation "EP" but also "US", does not support the respondent's conclusion regarding the implicit disclosure of a European standard. Additionally, even if the ISO standard according to D9 were to be applied, this ISO standard itself states in item 3.1 that the thickness is to be measured with a pressure of 1kPa or less ("ein Druck von 1 kPa oder weniger"). This latter statement in D9 leaves the skilled person with a choice to make as to which pressure is to be used. Without guidance in the patent, the skilled person is unable to make such a determination.
In section 8.1 of D9, a recommended pressure of 1±0.01 kPa is mentioned, but this is not a definitive value for the test method, as the standard states that any value below 1 kPa can be used and the test report ("Prüfbericht") in item 10d) specifically requires the applied pressure to be stated. Thus, the Board's findings in this matter remain unchanged by the respondent's arguments. The Board also cannot agree with the respondent's further argument that no appreciable difference would result when applying pressures anywhere up to 1 kPa, since this is contrary to the common general knowledge that highly compressible materials in this technical field are compressed to a very high degree even at low pressures.
Additionally, it may be added that the materials to which the test of D9 applies are textiles and textile products, yet examples of the materials intended to be covered in the patent (see e.g. paragraph [0025]) include inter alia "absorbent paper" and "a sheet obtained by interposing superabsorbent polymer between paper or nonwoven fabric in an overlaid configuration", not falling within such a category. The ISO standard test of D9 was thus not intended for such materials.
Summarising, a skilled person cannot know, from the disclosure in the patent, which measurement method should be employed to establish the claimed thickness parameter, nor which measurement conditions might be used for any chosen method.
The burden on the skilled person in trying to carry out the invention as claimed based on the content of the patent as granted is therefore undue, since the skilled person is unable, with any reasonable degree of certainty, to know when an article would lie within the scope of the claim, since without the disclosure of a test method for its measurement, the defined parameter has no sufficiently defined technical meaning within the technical field concerned.
The respondent's further argument that Article 100(b) EPC was not at issue here, but instead that the appellant's arguments related merely to whether third party products could be shown to fall within the claim or not, does not convince the Board. Whilst it may be correct that the burden of proof is on a proprietor in certain circumstances to show that a product falls within the claims in an infringement proceedings and thus fulfils the thickness parameter feature of claim 1, this does not release the proprietor from its burden of providing sufficient disclosure in the patent itself to allow the skilled person to carry out the invention at least with reasonable certainty.
Lastly, the respondent's argument that the patent at column 6, lines 17 to 29 (paragraph [0022]) gives additional information for arriving at a material sheet within the claims by means of the intended function and which does not rely on parameters, does not assist the respondent's case further. This portion of the description merely explains that if the thickness is less than 0.3 mm, it is difficult to provide improved fitting and increased absorption capacity, and if it is greater than 5 mm the rigidity of the sheet would be increased such that the fitting is spoiled. This consequently does not add anything but entirely subjective and vague requirements for the sheet, which would be fulfilled both by more of less highly compressed sheets. There is also no indication of the way in which these subjective criteria could guide the skilled person in deciding which particular thickness test should be applied in order that the products would or would not correspond to the thickness parameter requirements in claim 1.
The main request is thus not allowable with respect to Article 100(b) EPC.
2. First auxiliary request
This request was filed during the oral proceedings. The request is thus late-filed, in particular because the objection which the amendment serves to overcome was already made in the appellant's appeal grounds and was also mentioned in the Board of Appeal's annex to the summons. Thus, when deciding on whether or not to admit the request into proceedings, the Board must first decide whether such a late-filed request, in accordance with established case law of the Boards of Appeal, would appear to be immediately allowable. If such is not the case, the request should not be admitted.
In the present case, the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC are not met by the subject matter of claim 1 of this request.
The terminology concerning the test method which is introduced into claim 1 by way of this request, limits the thickness parameter to that measured by a specific method. The terminology thus appears to provide the thickness parameter with sufficient technical meaning for a skilled person to carry out the invention as claimed. The introduced terminology however has no explicit basis in the application as filed; neither the method nor the stated pressure are explicitly disclosed. The respondent has not disputed the lack of an explicit disclosure but instead argued that the method to be used is, necessarily and implicitly, the European standard (as in D9) due to the fact that a "European" patent is under consideration. In the respondent's view, a disclosure of the introduced terminology is consequently to be understood as being implicitly within the content of the filed application. As already explained above in item 1 however, the mere fact that a European patent is being dealt with does not automatically provide a presumption that a European standardised measurement method should apply. Indeed, the Board concludes that a skilled person has no means of identifying, from the disclosure within the content of the filed application, which measurement method of those known is to be applied, nor which pressure should be used in any such method, as no method and no method conditions at all are disclosed and several different methods using different pressures (e.g. the methods of D10 and D11) are available. Thus, there is no unambiguous explicit or implicit basis in the application as filed for introduction of the specific method according to EN ISO 5084 of 1996.
Additionally, as also mentioned in item 1 above, the pressure to be used in the EN ISO 5084 test (D9) is stated as being 1kPa or less ("1kPa oder weniger"), thus allowing a range of pressures below 1kPa from which to select. The selection of the pressure 1±0.01 kPa thus relates to a selection from the quoted method, for which selection there is also no unambiguous basis. The fact that a pressure of 1±0.01 kPa is mentioned as being recommended does not mean that this pressure must be used, nor that it would even be implicitly suitable for all material sheets (covered by claim 1) which are to be measured.
The respondent further argues that the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC are met because the amendment introduced is merely limiting for the scope of claim 1, but in itself provides no technical contribution to the claim and thus should be allowed in accordance with the findings as stated in G1/93 (see e.g. headnote, item 2).
Firstly, regarding the lack of technical contribution provided by the amendment, the Board is not convinced by the respondent's argument. The introduced terminology is the only terminology which gives sufficient technical meaning to the thickness parameter for a skilled person to carry out the invention as claimed. Thus it makes a technical contribution to the claimed subject matter. For this reason alone, G1/93 would not be applicable to the present case.
Secondly, nothing in decision G1/93 indicates that its findings should relate generally to cases where an introduced feature lacks a technical contribution and merely limits claim scope. Instead, G1/93 is specifically related to cases where a granted claim contains a feature which was not within the content of the filed application. This does not correspond to the facts of the present case which is instead concerned with amendments being made to a granted patent by the introduction of a feature that was not disclosed in the filed application.
Thus, the findings made in G1/93 cannot change the Board's conclusions on the matter of Article 123(2) EPC.
Since the subject matter of proposed claim 1 would therefore fail to meet at least the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC, the request is not admitted into proceedings for the reasons that it is late-filed and is not immediately allowable.
3. Second auxiliary request
The Board concludes that the conditions in Article 112(1) EPC for referring the question, posed in the respondent's second auxiliary request, to the Enlarged Board of Appeal, are not met for the following reasons:
One of two conditions must exist to justify the referral of a question to the Enlarged Board, these being stated in the opening paragraph of Article 112(1) EPC, namely "in order to ensure a uniform application of the law" or "if an important point of law arises".
As regards the first of these conditions, the respondent's formulated question itself does not need to be answered to ensure uniform application of the law. No contradictory decisions or the like have been cited which would support such an argument, nor can the Board see that any exist.
As regards the second of these conditions, no important point of law arises. Even if the respondent's proposed question were to be answered in the positive, this would not assist the respondent's case as regards e.g. the first auxiliary request, because the Board has already concluded that a technical contribution is indeed provided by the introduced terminology. Further, the Board in any event sees no reason which could lead to an interpretation that the Enlarged Board of Appeal's findings in G1/93 should apply to cases in opposition appeal proceedings where the proprietor is seeking to introduce wording for which there is no basis within the content of the application as filed. Merely because the Enlarged Board of Appeal decision did not exclude this possibility is irrelevant; the Enlarged Board dealt with an entirely different situation. In the matter dealt with in G1/93, the Enlarged Board of Appeal was faced with a different set of legal circumstances, namely a situation where a feature which had not been within the content of the application as filed had already been introduced into a claim before grant and could not, after grant, simply be removed, due to the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC. The respondent's interpretation of G1/93 that it should in some way extend to cases such as the present one is thus without basis.
The request for referral of a question to the Enlarged Board is thus rejected.
4. Third to fifth auxiliary requests:
In response to the objection under Article 100(b) EPC, the respondent relied on the same arguments as presented with regard to the main request. The conclusions reached in respect of the main request thus apply equally to the claims of the third, fourth and fifth auxiliary requests, since the thickness parameter "0.3 mm to 5 mm" is still present in all these requests.
It may be added that although further amendments to claim 1 have been introduced by way of the third and fourth auxiliary requests, those amendments do not serve to further define or limit the thickness parameter as defined in granted claim 1 and thus cannot affect the finding on Article 100(b) EPC.
The third to fifth auxiliary requests are therefore not allowable with respect to Article 100(b) EPC.
2. The request to refer a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is rejected.
3. The patent is revoked.


Designer Bedroom Furniture Interior | Lukeoverin.com designer bedroom furniture sets. designer bedroom furniture online. designer bedroom furniture sale.
Designer Bedroom Furniture Really Encourage Ideas Charming Design Cool Home Decor Intended For 2. Designer Bedroom Furniture Residence Luxury Houseology Intended For 3. Designer Bedroom Furniture Fantasy Modular Bed Manufacturer From Mumbai Intended For 4. Designer Bedroom Furniture Luxury Sets LuxDeco Com Intended For 5. Designer Bedroom Furniture Interesting Rosanna Bed Mattress Shop Newcastle Shops Divan Regarding 6. Designer Bedroom Furniture Inspire Bedrooms Design 7. Designer Bedroom Furniture Aspiration Beds Bedside Tables BoConcept Sydney Regarding 8. Designer Bedroom Furniture Dream Unique Leather Home For 9. Designer Bedroom Furniture Elegant Bed Lakkar Bazar Ludhiana Singla For 10. Designer Bedroom Furniture Gorgeous Images Home In Addition To 11. Designer Bedroom Furniture Elegant Sets Excellent With Photo Of And Also 12. Designer Bedroom Furniture Wish Design For Designs 13. Designer Bedroom Furniture Fantasy Home Designs Of Nifty And 14. Designer Bedroom Furniture Stunning DESIGNER BEDROOM FURNITURE In Ludhiana Punjab SEIKO INTERNATIONAL For 15. Designer Bedroom Furniture Comfy Regarding 16. Designer Bedroom Furniture Property Great For 17. Designer Bedroom Furniture Stunning Set Online Intended For 18. Designer Bedroom Furniture Awesome Design Beds Classic And Elegant Bed For 19.


The 'Fountain Sandstone' walls carved by South Boulder Creek, of Eldorado Canyon State Park, just 15 min from Downtown Boulder, CO are where some of America's most famous rock climbing stories were written and legends were made. In the 1970's Eldo Canyon, as it's affectionately known amongst the climbing community, was where iconic rock climbers like Layton Kor, Huntley Ingalls, David Breashears, Jeff Achey, and the late great Derek Hersey (to name a few) could be found amongst the unique lichen covered red walls and their famed tilted geologic formations. Both awe-inspiring and humbling, the climbing in Eldorado Canyon is unique and like no where else. Today, thanks to many decades of route development from the local, strong Boulder / Denver climbing community, Eldo now sports over 500 routes of which to enjoy this beautiful and unique climbing treasure and state park, just mere minutes from the growing metropolis of Boulder, Colorado.
Whether a seasoned climber looking to experience the best of what this place has to offer on a limited time schedule, a fledgling trad and multi-pitch climber looking for more mileage with the tutelage of an IFMGA licensed mountain guide, or the indoor climber looking to foray onto outdoor rock, and get way off the ground to experience the thrill of exposure and sweeping vistas, Eldorado Canyon's plethora of high quality and classic routes from 5.5 – 5.10 have something for everyone. And then of course, there is Colorado's (and arguably one of America's) most famous 5.11 rock climbs… The Naked Edge.
Although generally considered much easier climbing then the more sheer walls of nearby Eldorado Canyon, The Flatirons, of which is the namesake of the Boulder, CO skyline, offer much more moderate, long multi-pitch routes of up too 1000' (300M), just minutes from Downtown. With sweeping views of the higher Indian Peaks and famed Rocky Mountain National Park to the West, nestled in the Colorado front range foothills, The Flatirons, offer some of the highest quality, continuous long multi-pitch climbing adventures at accessible and enjoyable grades for climbers at all ability levels.
(970) 901-9763 or click here to make a trip inquiry.
Excellent couple of days getting to spend time climbing with you. I hope to be able to do it again sooner rather then later.


A fantastic assortment of fairy fun to set your heart in a flutter, containing no less than eight sparkly series from the bestselling Rainbow Magic books! Wave a wand and launch yourself into a treasure-trove of magical missions, tackling Jack Frost's pesky goblins time and time again. Through snow and sunshine, light and darkness, danger and enchantment, can Rachel and Kirsty help their fairy friends to restore the magic to Fairyland?
OMG!This is so awsome man its kinda cool!