text:
Tag Archives: multiculturalism
Posted on May 15, 2013 by Anti-Fascist Archive Standard	Reply
I haven't done an update since October. So here is a round up of what's changed since!
Three new academic articles have been uploaded
1. Contesting the 'authentic' community: Far-right spatial strategy and everyday responses in an era of crisis (Ince, 2011)
This article discusses AFA and the IWCA's strategy in displacing and replacing the far-right as the radical alternative.
The idea that voting alone will eliminate far-right and fascist politics is fundamentally flawed. Politics takes place in the hearts and minds of people; in their streets, communities and homes. The struggle against the far right is in part a struggle over the spatial articulation of and claims to authenticity in differing understandings of working class values. Authenticity, I argue, is primarily a politico discursive tool to which competing politics lay claim, perching on the ill-defined border between reality and artifice.
2. The Politics and Culture of FC St. Pauli: from leftism, through antiestablishment, to commercialization (Petra Daniel & Christos Kassimeris, 2013)
Transforming football stadia to political arenas is an old phenomenon, particularly, when clubs boasting a glorious past are involved. FC St. Pauli has certainly been instrumental to developments in its immediate environment though not so much for its success on the pitch, as for the socio-political views that its fans have been projecting ever since the mid-1980s. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to contextualize the same fan (and club) ideological background that has attracted worldwide attention in the light of the game's contemporary transformation.
3. 'The birthplace of Italian communism': political identity and action amongst livorno fans (Doidge, 2013)
Since the 1980s, there has been a shift to the right on the curve of Italian stadiums. Livorno stands apart as one of the few Italian clubs to maintain a resolute Communist identity. They draw on a variety of Communist images and this helps define their actions. Through political protest, charity and matchday choreographies, Livorno fans reflect and resist specific aspects of football in a globalized world.
Visit the La Zineteca: Punk and Ska Fanzine Library, issues of Leeds United anti-fascist fanzines are now available here, The Big Issue revealed evidence of police infiltration of AFA, read what Class War had to say on Red Action and the IWCA and visit the fantastic anti-fascist resource blog called Lewisham '77.
I have also posted two Red Action articles: Time to Dump Multi-Culturalism and Red Action on Multiculturalism.
Liverpool based Cairde na hEireann have published a report on anti-Irish racism in 2012. I found a great article on Celtic Fans Against Fascism read it here and, lastly, I found an interesting article on Red Action and it's support of the militant Irish Republican movement.
In the time since the last update an invaluable new resource for those wishing to learn about militant anti-fascism has been published. Largely an oral account, Physical Resistance by Dave Hann is now available. My thoughts on the book are also viewable here.
Lastly, since October we have received 35,000 more views taking the archives total page views to 85,000; from New Zealand to Mozambique to Chile to Kazakhstan to Ireland and Canada.
The Archive has also received generous donations and with these funds I am looking to move to a much better, custom website in the near future.
The Archivist.
Time 'to dump' Multiculturalism
Posted on March 4, 2013 by Anti-Fascist Archive Standard	1
by Joe Reilly
Reproduced from RA Bulletin Volume 4, Issue 12, July/Aug '01
Lightly edited by libcom
Currently there is much discussion on how the rise of the far right can be halted. The truthful answer, says Joe Reilly, is that an anti-fascism joined at the hip with multiculturalism cannot do so.
Britain 'has the highest number of interracial relationships in the world' according to the Institute for Social and Economic Research. This supremely natural and healthy state of affairs, is however, not due to multiculturalism but in spite of it. For multiculturalist ideology, which believes that 'culture makes man' rather than the other way round, sets its face firmly against miscegenation, integration and assimilation – on principle.
"Multiculturalism actually promotes racism. It engenders confusion, resentment and bullying and prevents people developing a shared British identity. This idea should have been dumped long since", claimed Minette Marrin in a Guardian article on May 29.
Though evidence to support her claim is legion, in the same paper on the same day, Vivek Chaudry a Guardian journalist rather underlined her point, by inverting the Norman Tebbitt 'cricket test'. He castigated England captain Nasser Hussain for bemoaning the fact that people with origins in the Indian subcontinent continue to support teams from that part of the world rather than England. "My message to Hussain is this. You need to get in touch with your brown side" Chaudrey advised.
Though small, a not insignificant number of journalists are now beginning to publicly ask questions of multiculturalism. Marrin's though is not a typical liberal view, nor is she a typical Guardian journalist. She is in fact a columnist for The Daily Telegraph, which explains why her article was entitled 'A view from the right'. But is it? Might it not as easily, or more accurately have been entitled 'A view from the Left'?
Mainly, what prevents the conservative left assessing the multicultural impact honestly, residual dullness aside, is the fear of being denounced. So instead of properly mocking the Robin Cook 'chicken tikka' statement, the conservative left feel under obligation to denounce any misgivings as 'right wing', and from that same standpoint feel under obligation to push the agenda toward what it sees as the opposite fundamentalist conclusions, when, and where ever, the opportunity presents itself.
Thus in Oldham, while the British National Party canvass the white working class neighbourhoods, the Socialist Alliance (SA), whose analysis sees the white working class as the sole culprits, nevertheless distributes its propaganda, only in the exclusively non-white areas.
What political purpose, one asks, is served by such tokenism, when if it took its responsibilities at all seriously the SA would have put up candidates against the BNP in the area to begin with? As it is, while the SA 'intervention' allowed impeccably white liberals to wear their multicultural heart on their sleeve for a few hours, the BNP went about its business establishing a bridgehead for the local elections in 2002 unhindered. None of this is not to suggest that the SA is politically equipped to win white working class minds. It is merely to point out that it has no ambition to do so. Instead it is perfectly happy to strike a pose, and pronounce on events from a thoroughly partisan, that is to say dishonest, perspective.
Other factors detected within the debris of multiculturalism that is Oldham, are also worth mentioning. First of all, there is the carefully cultivated myth that anti-racism is the preserve of social groups A, and B. Only with 'education can there be enlightenment' The Guardian's Polly Toynbee announced recently. This is so often said, that it is now widely believed among all sections of society, to such an extent that for many, to be properly anti-racist it is necessary to be anti-working class.
Indeed to be properly anti-racist, it may for some, be necessary to instinctively feel 'anti-white'. "What we now have is a new version of the deserving and undeserving poor – the noble new British working class, who are ethnic, and the thoroughly swinish old working class, who are white". (Julie Burchill, The Guardian, 5.5.01)
Yet, even a casual glance at the make up of any inner-city community, reveals the conceit of an 'inherently racist' white working class to be a lie. It is among the working classes, and statistically, only among the working classes, that interracial relationships thrive. Elsewhere, apart from genially nodding to the man behind the counter in the corner shop, classes A and B contribute nothing to the project they loudly proclaim loyalty to.
On top of that there is the self-serving multicultural pretense that all ethnic communities are homogeneous, and in an ideal world, all would be treated as such.
Not only that, but while some such as 'Operation Black Vote' for instance, insist Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Sikhs and Hindus, as well as African and those of West Indian and even Chinese descent, must for general electoral convenience you understand, be treated as 'black', along side this form of forced integration, other multiculturalists are working just as hard to see the term 'black' further sub-divided on the grounds of ethnicity and religion.
The aim? To have strict segregation in schools and housing (to begin with), not only for Blacks and Asians but, for Muslims, Hindus, Bangladeshis and so on, ad infinitum, finally ending in racial, cultural and political balkanisation.
Of course, in the midst of this racial engineering, one word is carefully avoided. That is the word 'class'. For the very good reason that the promotion of cultural diversity is intended to kill off, and replace the idea of social diversity.Yet despite such sleight of hand, that 'class' is as big a factor in the sense of alienation experienced by 'Pakistani' youth in Glodwick, as it is in the predominately white Fitton Hill is undeniable. For what is striking about their situation, is that unlike many Indians, the Pakistani and Bangladeshi inhabitants of Oldham show little sign of the fabled enterprising spirit, all of Asian origin, are we are told possess.
They came here with nothing, to work in the mills as labourers, and labourers whether in work or not, they largely remain. They have not broken out – or up. Some pious humbugs like Ken Livingstone, will insist that this is entirely due to endemic racism in British society. But if true, how to explain the equally downtrodden white counterparts with whom they are at war? If racism is the root cause, how to explain the inability of 'Fittonhillites' to rise out of the ghetto? 'Oh them, they are you know, just so much white trash', many a multiculturalist will explain without blushing.
Recently describing for the New Statesman, a visit to Oldham a couple of years ago when he more or less predicted the 'backlash,' Darcus Howe uses that very expression, unashamedly, and apparently in ignorance of its American Deep South origins. No matter, his observations make a nonsense of the working assumptions of the ANL/SA, that there is 'a uniform access to power for all whites, denied to all blacks'.
"For the first time in this country, I had seen people who fitted the American description 'white trash'. Their homes had a stench of decay: of damp, sweat, and stale food cooked days before. The little picket fences were collapsing. The roofs were leaking and pallid faces staring." These are the labour aristocracy, benefitting from imperialism and eager to protect their privileges and ill-gotten gains by voting BNP are they?
For a further insight into how skewed mainstream multiculturalism thinking really is, it is necessary only to take stock of the racially loaded invective of the 'anti-fascist' visitors to the National Front 'guest-book'. These startlingly ugly contributions are, bear in mind, should you be tempted to look, all products of a multicultural education of thirty years standing.
In a further tribute to the influence of such teaching, one Asian group, allegedly set up to fight the NF and Combat 18 has chosen for itself the title; 'Combat 786′. Like Combat '18' which represents the A and H in the alphabet, 'numbers 786' are The Observer reports, 'a numerical representation of Allah'. The similarities do not, I suspect, end there.
Meanwhile that the segregationist 'peace line' solutions proposed by the BNP, are these days impeccably multiculturalist in tone and delivery is the final irony. 'In one area' an Observer article mentions 'where an alleyway leads from Fitton Hill into an Asian street, the council plans to erect a metal gate to separate the communities'. Remarkably, the metal gate has since been erected in line with the Griffin edict.
How effortlessly euro-nationalism has appropriated the language of multiculturalism to meet its own objectives, also demonstrates just how far the anti-racism of the 1970's has drifted. Furthermore, the ease and comfort of the euro-nationalist fit, unmasks the lie that multiculturalism is naturally progressive.
In reality it is more trouble than it's worth. Not to say that people from the Indian subcontinent or anywhere else ought to be compelled to meet the 'Tebbit cricket test'. But neither should it be demanded of them out of some sense of racial fidelity that they meet the Chaudrey test either. Multiculturalism however, more or less insists they must. And it is largely when the the left promotes or defends multiculturalism's right to do so, that it becomes a politically dangerous liability, Oldham has exposed it to be.
Like many of the second generation Irish, whose support for the Republic at football is not entirely separate from an antipathy to England, similarly, as the unprovoked attacks of as many as 30 pubs in the Oldham area have illustrated, being pro-Muslim is not always entirely divorced from being anti-white. Clearly, such an ideology does not enhance authentic anti-racism – it subverts it.
Some commentators on the 'SPIKEONLINE' website (ex-Living Marxism magazine) have arrived at precisely such conclusions. "There was a time when the left was accused of stirring up race riots. Now it is the the far right that is accused of starting the violence. Where politicians once denounced violent blacks, today they are more likely to denounce violent racists. The establishment no longer relies on traditional British nationalism, but is more likely to talk in the language of anti- racism."
Continuing in a similar vein another adds: "When every issue and incident is racialised and seen through the prism of race, it is not surprising that people start to see their problems in racial terms. The end result can only be more division and conflict."
Professor Frank Furedi, one time mentor to the now defunct RCP is sure-footed on this subject at least: "today it is the race relations lobby and particularly New Labour that finds it difficult to avoid the temptation of playing the race card. By treating every routine conflict as racially motivated they are racialising everyday life. This process is as destructive as the old-fashioned racism."
It is a process he warns that can only end in "Everyday human contact" becoming "recast in racial terms, with the consequence that racism becomes normalised. This confuses and disorients people, breeding a climate of suspicion and mistrust." A by-product of this racialistion is that "it also trivalises the real experience of racism and distracts from confronting real cases of injustice" he concludes.
Currently there is much discussion on how the rise of the far right can be halted. The truthful answer is that an anti-fascism joined at the hip with multiculturalism cannot do so. Indeed the higher the activity of the likes of the ANL, and now, and even more ridiculously the SA, the more entrenched the respective working class communities will become. Put bluntly, 'racialising social problems' is the motive force of both euro-nationalism and multiculturalism alike. For purposes of anti-fascist strategy, if for no more principled reasons, multiculturalism is 'an idea that should have been dumped long since'.
Race Attack – Red Action on Multiculturalism
Race Attack: Red Action on Multiculturalism
Reproduced from RA Vol 3, issue 5, February/March 1999
Edited slightly by Libcom for spelling and to shorten paragraphs
G. O'Halloran argues that by its betrayal of principle, multiculturalism is a major propaganda gift to the far right, as well as laying the foundations for the political extermination of the working class itself.
Born of the desire to combat communism, multiculturalism was conceived out of cynicism and embraced by the left out of defeatism.
While we do not agree with the article in its entirety, we feel that it contains a number of useful points and arguments, and reproduce it here for reference.
As the recently released 'Nixon tapes' demonstrate, Nixon was both an equal opportunities advocate – and – a convinced racist. Blacks according to Nixon were simply incompetent. But as he explained "you can usually settle for an incompetent, because there are just not enough competent ones, and so you put incompetents in and get along with them, because the symbolism is vitally important" (Independent on Sunday 28.12.98). The symbolism was important mainly for international rather than domestic considerations. A primary Cold War concern being that 'racism over here helps Communism everywhere.' Which is why the 1948 "master plan" of Field Marshall Montgomery, "to turn Africa into a 'white supremacist bulwark against communism' was rejected in favour of black self government." (Guardian 7.1.99)
"The deference liberals in the West have shown towards the various nationalisms of the Third World could be understood," according to Oxford academic John Casey "not as the application of high minded principle but as part of the Western and especially American strategy of wooing those who might otherwise succumb to communist blandishments. But, along with the collapse of Soviet communism the old colonial powers, along with America can now do what they like." With the communist spectre a distant nightmare, the impetus for post war race relations legislation is also redundant. Now that they 'can do what they like' the theories on race that led to the Holocaust which had common currency in establishment circles pre-war and were merely set aside, rather than intellectually demolished, are being dusted down.
Racial science could not be totally repudiated, because the perception of difference within, rather than between races is still the rationalisation for our existing social, economic and political hierarchies. Which is why, as has been argued previously, the strategy of multiculturalism designed to combat communist propaganda is both conservative in origin and reactionary in practice (See 'Branded' Red Action Aug/Sept 1998). Conservative, because it is based on the notion that existing society is almost perfect; the finished article, the occasional tweaking of the equal opportunities strategy apart. Reactionary, because it sees race as society's dynamic. That the fundamentals were sold and embraced by the entire liberal Left under the title 'progressive,' only underscores the schism between intellectual middle class priorities and working class reality. That it is from these same intellectual circles, that racism today is regarded, as essentially the preserve of the 'lower orders' is apt. Subsequently if police are racist it is because of the 'brutish class' from which they are recruited and so on. It is no secret that for many of the media covering the Lawrence inquiry, the term 'white working class' and racist thug are synonymous. Reflecting the climate, an anarchist magazine (once associated with AFA [Anti-Fascist Action]) felt the need in a recent editorial to rationalise 'inherent working class racism.' [libcom – no source is given for this allegation] Not only an English disease either, this is a concept with international dimensions.
On November 9 The Guardian reported that in Germany 'the leader' of the Jewish community Ignatz Bubis, warned of a "new tide of right wing extremism, nationalism and anti-Semitism in Germany, saying that the new nationalism was now fashionable among the intellectual elite and not just in 'primitive circles.'"
Apart from the interesting observation that the new nationalism is as AFA has long argued, bottom up rather than top down, imagine for a moment the term 'primitive' applied to an ethnic minority and see how anti-racism seems to make it alright to hate 'the poor.' Ironic then, that it is the hatred and fear of the 'the dangerous classes' that has been the foundation both for racial science in the first place, and post-war, the Western powers vigorous sponsorship of equal opportunities and anti-racism.
Practically from the beginning racial science agreed on a commonality between the 'lower orders' in European society and non-European peoples, and justified the inferiority of both. "The lowest strata of European societies" wrote French psychologist Gustav Le Bon" is homologous with primitive men." He added "that given sufficient time the superior grades of the population would be separated from the inferior grades by as great a distance as that which separates the white man from the negro or even the negro from the monkey." Of course in Victorian Britain when it was perfectly acceptable to hate, and, fear the poor, society's primary relationships were considered equivalent: primitives to Europeans; women to men; children to adults; the working class to the elite. The sense of racial superiority that European elite classes felt over non European society can best be understood by studying the social hierarchy at home.
"The English governing classes" in the 1860's Bernard Siemel observed "regarded the Irish and the non-European native just as they had, quite openly regarded their own labouring classes for many centuries: as thoroughly undisciplined, with a tendency to revert to bestial behaviour; consequently requiring to be kept in order by force, and by, occasional but severe flashes of violence; vicious sly, incapable of telling the truth, naturally lazy and unwilling to work unless under compulsion."
In 1865 a local uprising by peasantry in Jamaica was put down with the utmost ferocity by the island's governor. many of those who defended him did so by comparing the negro to the English worker. "The negro" observed Edwin Hood, "is in Jamaica as the costermonger is in Whitechapel; he is very likely often nearly savage, with the mind of a child." The Saturday Review suggested that the "negro is neither ferociously cruel nor habitually malignant. He often does cruel and barbarous things; but then so do our dray men and hackney-coachmen and grooms and farm servants, through want of either thought or power of thinking." For the Victorians then, race was very much a description of social distinctions not of colour.
Mid Victorian perceptions of colour and class are further illustrated by the debate on the relationship between American slavery and the English factory system. when it was published in 1852 the anti-slavery novel Uncle Tom's Cabin caused considerable furore because of the comparison it drew between American slaves and English workers. An article in the British Mothers Magazine argued that though both American slaves and English paupers lived in a state of degradation, the slave's condition was an enforced one whereas the condition of the English poor was "to a large extent their own fault." Another writer just for good measure added, that if American slaves truly lived in the same conditions as English workers then slavery would be defensible.
In his book The Making of Race, Keenan Malik argues that: "the idea of race emerged not so much with reference to populations which were external to Western society, populations which were exotic or distant or physically distinct but rather in relation to social gradations within European society. The racial categories developed in relation to differences within European societies were subsequently transposed to the non-European world." The debate around race arose out of perceived differences within European society and only later was it systematically applied to difference of skin colour. What we now consider class or social distinctions were then seen as racial ones – and possibly will be again.
That current American and British social policy is already based on the idea that the poor are locked into a 'dependency culture,' which while not of their creation, is still to a large extent 'their own fault' is an obvious echo.
In January Blair finally revealed that the key to Labour's 'Third Way' is to "make more people middle class." In the same way that at the beginning of the century it was suggested 'the solution to racism was the gradual lightening-up of a socially inferior black population through an influx of white blood;' so Labour's solution to social exclusion at the end of the century is to acculturate the poor into middle-class values. This is simply the equal opportunities strategy, extended to the white working class to emasculate it directly.
To fight racism it was necessary that a black middle class was created, and the 'white trash' be impregnated with middle class anti-racism. Expanded to fight crime, social injustice and future political disorder, the strategy requirement now demands that the working class is politically, socially and culturally exterminated (Incidentally, one of the key popularisers of the underclass theme was Charles Murray who some years later in The Bell Curve went a step further, when in returning to the pre-war ground of eugenics less than sensitively concluded that "the differences between blacks and whites was biological." This saw him denounced as 'a neo-Nazi.' Even conservatives, prefer their racism less crudely put).
Nevertheless the political acceptance of the idea of the 'underclass as a race apart', has allowed the political establishment on both sides of the Atlantic to explain the growing inequality in a society formally committed to equality. And with as consequence society itself 'proved' nigh on perfect, the logical next step was to racialise the poor. With the 'dangerous classes' categorised, it then became apparent that in order for middle class society to feel at ease with itself, the 'threat' would in the mean time have to be substantially diminished i.e. the working class itself would need be politically presented as just another minority.
On cue, the British National Statistics Office has just unveiled eight tiers of social classifications based on occupation, the overwhelming majority presented as middle class. However, an ICM poll commissioned by Radio's 4's Today programme around the same time found that over half the respondents asked, saw themselves as 'traditional working class.' Shook, the Daily Telegraph dismissed the Today poll as " nonsense" : "Can't everybody see, that there is nothing in the least bit admirable about idle remnants of the proletariat, that dwindling few with their hideous clothes, revolting food, trashy newspapers, filthy children, disgusting manners, vile wallpaper, and violent and dishonest dispositions?" it pleaded.
It might have added, had it not conflicted with its own inner beliefs "their ignorant racism." Any decent liberal would have. The point being that liberals view the world from much the same vantage point as conservatives. Both are agreed that the 'poor are different' and have always done so. Generally liberals would like a little more democracy conservatives a little less. The latter a little less taxation the former slightly greater wealth distribution. Longer sentences versus shorter sentences, carrot versus stick, nice cop nasty cop and so on. An adversarial arrangement that only works as long both parties agree on a shared objective. Invariably that objective is the strengthening and enhancement of the existing economic, social and political structures – by any means necessary.
Which is how, in less than a couple of decades, conservatives and liberals of the parliamentary democracies who had with different degrees of relish, in practically every country in Europe looked, on fascism as their 'insurance' against communism, just as quickly discovered the anti-racist within themselves, Encouraged, they then embraced multi-culturalism, even anti-colonialism for the same pragmatic reason, tactical prudence. It was in a Cold War scenario, clearly the lesser evil. But, and here's the rub, an evil none the less. If they support anti-racism now, it is only because it is perceived to work in their interests. If not, well, they can 'do what they like these days.' All bets are covered.
In a roughly similar timespan the revolutionary Left, emasculated by the realities of Soviet Russia, the failure of the student revolts in 1968, the collapse of both Stalinist and social democratic parties in the eighties, and the demise of the Third World Liberation movements, led to the belief that any progressive social transformation was an illusion.
For many their greatest disappointment was in the working class itself 'who had not behaved as expected.' So the intelligentsia swallowed their pride and accommodated themselves to reality. Or putting it more simply, they switched en masse, to the winning side. Proving as Marx more than once observed " that intellectuals do not lead they follow."
Consider then that in the sixties and seventies the struggle for equal rights offered a clear cut crusade without caveat. This meant campaigns against segregation, immigration controls, or any forms of institutional control in which different races were treated differently. Today, without noticeable pause for breath, it means campaigns for segregation; separate schools, youth clubs, demands to use different languages, and an insistence on the maintenance and celebration of particular cultural practices.
This 'celebration of diversity' [race, gender and sexuality] has become for many former radicals the principle dynamic in society today." The emergence of new subjects, new genders, new ethnicities, new regions, new communities," claims Marxism Today's Stuart Hall, who exemplifies the renegade trend "has given hitherto invisible groups the means to speak for themselves for the first time." Translated, this hogwash means that 'we have tried and failed to change society so we must accommodate ourselves to it as it is.'
Completing the circle some influential academics now go so far as to argue that 'discourses [which] state their opposition to racism, to totalitarianism, to Nazis, to fascism…do this is in the name of an axiomatic.' Meaning that to take a stand against racism or fascism is to adopt the totalitarian outlook of the racist or the fascist. Consequently, if being white working class is in itself considered the equivalent of being racist; it follows that being a white working class anti-fascist, leads automatically to the familiar anti-AFA charges 'of sinking to their level; of being anti-fascist fascists, of actually being worse than the fascists' and so on.
Of course "it's not uncommon in middle class circles" as Andrew Anthony points out (Observer 13.12.98) "to hear attacks on the racism of their little Englanders. It's true that the working class makes less effort than the middle classes to hide its racism, but its also true that no other social group has dealt with any genuine form of racial integration – if you want to see mixed marriages and kids of different races hanging out together, go to the inner cities".
However this mutual assimilation owes nothing to, and has nothing in common with multiculturalism. It is despite, rather than because of it. Recent evidence, saw Birmingham Council condemned by its own race equality officer for "bad practice" for awarding apprenticeships to "Pakistanis only" (Evening Mail 20.11.98). Unsurprisingly, a study conducted in Birmingham by the Commission for Racial Equality around the same time found "racist views were widespread."
Still in November a London Evening Standard editorial, in reference to an independent inquiry into the running of Tower Hamlets, commented "Amongst the welter of serious allegations, racism is the most disturbing. It takes some doing to be suspected of being anti-Bengali by the Bengali residents and anti-white by the whites, but the council seems to have managed it. No, doubt it will claim that it is the councillors attempts to be even handed that have led to the criticisms from both sides, but the form of the complaints suggests that it is more a matter of bias-or-worse in one direction or the other." (7.11.98)
Additional allegations, by a former CRE commissioner who claimed the Commission for Racial Equality was "itself both self serving and riven with ethnic tensions and rivalry, with a corrosive hostility between Asian and West Indian staff", surfaced in December. In calling for the CRE to be wound up academic Paul Barker argued "that with this being England race has become entangled with class. If, for example, young black men in south London are angry, unemployed and disenfranchised how exactly do their feelings and their position differ from those of a young miserably workless young white man in a collapsed mining village in County Durham?"
While 'race and class were always entangled' an ideological construct like multiculturalism which owes its existence these days to its association with good manners rather than political need, is in the long run unsustainable, and may, one way or the other be nearing crisis point. Recent controversies regarding adoption, in particular the case of the adoption of a 'black child' being rejected on the grounds of 'incompatibility' because the prospective parents were merely 'light skinned' is not only perverse, but provides a pervading sense of an ideology devouring itself. Having only ever been challenged by the right, the most likely political beneficiaries are all too easily identifiable.
Since the '80's the far-right throughout Europe, a) have successfully attacked the multi cultural concept on traditional grounds b) appropriated the arguments of cultural diversity and separatist logic to suit its own agenda and c) used this 'common sense' approach to devastating effect in a host of countries across Europe to appeal to working class communities abandoned by both the mainstream politicians and the Left.
As we have seen the 'celebration of diversity' was born not of high principle, but conceived in cynicism and embraced out of defeatism; it is theoretically wrong headed, has misread its own origins, is both politically divisive and strategically counter productive.
As a major propaganda gift for the far-right it works against its own principle, and through this process is laying the foundation for an even more fundamental defeat. In short 'multiculturalism over here helps fascism everywhere'.
That many will shrink from such a conclusion, finding it heretical if not treasonable, is precisely why militant anti-fascism must not. For the simple reason that at the moment this is where the buck rests. And while there is an opportunity to seize the initiative, failure to deal positively with it, means deliberately passing the buck, knowing full well the identity and malign intentions of the lurking recipient.
Either we accept the political risks of addressing it now, or risk the consequences of the far-right capitalising at their leisure later. There is of course no guarantee that we can beat them to the punch, but it is absolutely essential that we try.


text:
Skip to main content link
Thank you for accessing Secure Ballot.
This site does not collect any personal information about you when you visit this site.
Secure Ballot is using the information provided by its customers - that is the electoral roll - for running the ballot delivery process. There is not any additional personal information gathered, requested, or managed by this website.
There is not any tracking of the user activities; only ballot related tracking information is managed at this site.
No voter selections are recorded by or stored within the Secure Ballot system.
This site does not store personal information in cookies; cookies are used only to manage user sessions. The sole purpose of the session cookies is to allow the user authentication process across the different pages from this website, in a transparent manner for the user. Scytl does not retain any information collected by these session cookies. Session cookies are automatically deleted at the end of a session, that is, when you close your browser.
Scytl do not use persistent cookies or any other persistent tracking technology.
No electronic voting taking place and no ballots are transmitted electronically.
DATA LOCATION
The information of this site is stored at servers hosted in a datacenter located at the United States. The location of this datacenter may change but always within the United States.
ADVANCED INFORMATION PROTECTION
Scytl provides elections systems with the highest levels of security, voter privacy, voter verifiability, election integrity, system availability, and access control.
Secure Ballot is fully compliance with the document NISTIR 7711 Security Best Practices. See: http://www.nist.gov/itl/vote/draft-nistir7711.cfm
Secure Ballot platform requires the voter and election official's web browsers to access the application using an HTTPS connection. This is done seamlessly for the user and establishes an encrypted channel using the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol for the transmission of all data. The use of HTTPS also allows for the Secure Ballot domain to be authenticated to the user such that the voter and official can be sure of the site's legitimacy.
Access control information such as passwords and privileges are stored cryptographically protected from disclosure to unauthorized entities.
Scytl secures each of its applications through the use of a physically secure data center, complete redundancy of critical resources, and the application of cryptography at multiple levels that ensure authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality.
The Secure Ballot application is hosted in a secure Tier III datacenter behind a layer of redundant firewalls and where it is under 24/7 physical and application monitoring to ensure the security and health of the system around the clock.
Furthermore, Secure Ballot runs on hardened operating systems updated with the latest security patches. At the application level, each connection over the Internet is required to utilize the HTTPS protocol to establish a separate authentic and encrypted communication channel with each user. This also allows the voter's web browser to verify the authenticity of the Scytl web domain.
UPDATE OF PRIVACY POLICY
We will update this privacy policy as soon as any of the terms expressed in this policy changes. If in some moment we decide to implement important changes affecting the privacy policy, we will update this policy and we will clearly describe the changes at the beginning of the policy.
For further information about our privacy policy or security mechanisms, do not hesitate to write an e-mail message for the attention of the Privacy officer to the e-mail address product.support@scytl.com, or write a letter to Scytl offices at 5426 Bay Center Drive, Suite 525 | Tampa, FL 33609 | USA.
We will respond to your request within the shortest time period.
Privacy policy updated on July 2013.
About Site Accessibility

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
News From The News
Town Affairs
The Grange
Town & About
Food & Farm
Outdoors & Environment
State police talk policing, racism with students
By Amelie Fairweather
Photo by Trooper Luke Rodzel
Vermont State Police officers participated in a Zoom call with members of the Junior Reporters Club last week and shared their opinions and observations about becoming a police officer, George Floyd, use of force, and racism in Vermont.
It was a slightly breezy day when Vermont State Police Captain Julie Scribner, the staff operations commander since 2001, and Sergeant Erin Hodges, previously undercover in a drug task force, and from the Albany area in New York, joined a Zoom call that would give us the info on how they feel about police violence, and add another perspective to the table.
Hodges formerly worked on a road in Rutland with a marked car, before she went undercover and eventually joined the police force. Captain Scribner grew up near Boston before moving to Vermont. After asking about initiations into the police force, Scribner talked about a physical and slightly mental trial, for example: a written exam, pushups, sit ups, a mile and a half run, interviews with other state troopers, a polygraph exam, and interviews with her relatives, friends, even former employees to make sure she was the kind of person they wanted to hire. She also mentioned how she had wanted to be a police officer since she was six years old.
"What's the hardest part of the job?" I asked. "The hardest part is never know what to expect. I never do the same thing day after day. As a road trooper, you may pull someone over for speeding or help someone change a tire, or go to a call in which someone needs help with their family, or training and learning new things, and while that is fun, it is hard because I like to plan things out. You just never know what will happen," Captain Scribner said.
"What is your proudest moment of being a police officer," Marianna Fairweather, 8, asked. "When I see a good person with good values and they do the right thing all the time, get the job, and then make it through the training, which is hard, and progress in their career, and to see Erin come all this way…she's training new officers and that's a proud moment," says Scribner.
"What, if you had to choose, would be the coolest moment for you so far?" I asked. "The coolest part is the animal escaping in Rutland County. Some cows had gotten off a truck and I had to figure out how to wrangle the cows back in at 11:30 and I had no clue how to do it. Cows are really big when you're next to them," Hodges joked.
"What was training like?" Lily Mae Siedlecki, 11, asked. "It was pretty hard," said Hodges, "There were a lot of academics, we spent a lot of time in the classroom, but it's also physical work, and then bringing the class together as a unit."
"What is the most common crime?" Marianna asked. "It's probably robberies, you know, store thefts, drunk driving, no license," responded Hodges.
"On a more serious note, what is your opinion on the George Floyd tragedy," I asked.
"When I first saw that video …I try to keep an open mind… like, that's only one angle or that's only one side of it, you're not getting the story, but when I first saw that I was just horrified and heartbroken. I don't even have the words to say how I felt about that particular incident and the things that have happened as a result of that," Scribner said.
"There are millions of Americans, and people actually across the whole world, that are finally seeing that this is the time for change, and it has been a long, long, long time coming and I think that we're going to come out of this and we are all going to be better officers, we're going to hire better officers, and it's going to be better. It's going to take a while, but I think we are moving forward to be better police officers and be more inclusive of people of color and other groups in this country," said Scribner.
"What is your ideal solution to racism?" Amelie asked. "We need to stop talking and listen and learn from people who have been affected. I'm a white girl in a white state and I need to listen and learn. It's a poor excuse for me to say, 'Oh I learned that in high school or college from the textbooks,' but I have so much to learn and so I think the answer is listening and learning," answered Scribner.
"Do you think hiring more women will help?" I asked. "Yes, on hiring women: we bring something different to the table," Hodges said. "I've been in a number of situations where I was able to talk to someone, there's a lot of paperwork with the use of force reports, and so I would much rather talk my way out of that situation… maybe they just need to be heard, and maybe we don't always see everyone on their best days. I've talked people into my cruiser that needed mental health help and it started out serious, but we got them to the hospital. Females, not all, but many do a better job in that, although some men are very good at it, too," answered Hodges.
"What is your opinion on defunding the police?" asks Katie Fraser, a fifth-grade teacher at Charlotte Central School.
"I see anger. There's anger that police officers can't do the social work and community service that the communities deserve. I don't think it makes sense to do away with police officers, because there are always bad people in the world, and good people need protection, but can we move some funding and change training and make it so better mental health and restorative justice for after a crime occurs than going to jail, than police coming in and arresting someone because they're having mental health breakdown…There's different ways to do it," said Hodges.
"We are not in a society where we can get rid of the police," answered Captain Scribner.
"Do you see white supremacy in Vermont?" asked Christina Asquith. "There is definitely racism in Vermont and not just those extremes–those are the examples you hear about in the news, but what you don't hear about in the news are the little things every day, where a person of color is riding their bike through a small town in Vermont and you'll have a white person look at them think, 'Oh, who's that? What are they doing here?' And when you have people do that and start a conversation at their general store, then that's racism. There is racism here," replied Hodges.
Amelie Fairweather is a member of the Junior Reporters Club at The Charlotte News. Students interested in reporting over the summer are welcome to send an email to participate.
Amelie Fairweather
Selectboard approves Vermont Commons highway access permit
Early birds catch worms: College application trends
The often-murky meaning of idioms
Support Community Journalism
Read our Latest Issue (pdf)
© Copyright 2021. The Charlotte News. All rights reserved. Member of the New England Newspaper & Press Association, Vermont Press Association and LION (Local Independent Online News). The Charlotte News is Printed by Denton Publications Inc. , Technical Advisor: Melissa Mendelsohn, Orchard Road Computers. Site design by Deep Dish Creative.
Already subscribed? Hit the X
Subscribe to our newsletter – for fast breaking Charlotte news!


VK4RGC now P25 enabled! - The Gold Coast Amateur Radio Society, Inc.
The club's main UHF repeater system, VK4RGC 438.600Mhz, located at Springbrook on the southern Gold Coast, is a Motorola Quantar running mixed mode analogue/P25.
The analogue side of things runs a 123Hz encode/decode tone and P25 is the default NAC of 293.


An article published Sunday reveals that Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith and licensing chief Horacio Gutierrez told Roger Parloff of Fortune Magazine that Free and Open Source Software infringes on no fewer than 235 Microsoft patents.
"This is not a case of some accidental, unknowing infringement," Gutierrez asserts. "There is an overwhelming number of patents being infringed."
"Gutierrez refuses to identify specific patents or explain how they're being infringed, lest FOSS advocates start filing challenges to them."
Gutierrez and Microsoft aren't interested in intellectual property rights. They're not interested in allowing the Open Source world to defend itself. They're not interested in a fair fight. Like a bully, they refuse to face the Open Source world in a fair fight, instead hinting at willful infringement and making backhanded threats. Why? Like any bully they fear that when faced with a fair fight in the light of day they will be revealed for the bully they are. Like any bully they fear that which they threaten.
I work with many companies that have partnerships with Microsoft. For many years I've tried to give Microsoft the benefit of the doubt and watched them slowly move from anti-Open Source to an Open Source supporter, or at least a company that recognizes the importance of Open Source ISVs to the future of the Windows platform. But this bullying has to stop now.
If Microsoft believes that Free and Open Source Software violates any of their patents, let them put those patents forward now, in the light of day, where we can all evaluate them on their merits. If not, then stop trying to bully customers into paying royalties to use Open Source. It's time for Microsoft to put up or shut up.
It appears Microsoft is using the SCO playbook: claim infringement but withhold the evidence.
But then, wasn't Microsoft funding SCO? Now that the legal attack on Linux by SCO-as-proxy seems to be failing, Microsoft is switches tactics to a direct, albeit still nebulous, attack.
Larry has the right idea here: Let's get these allegations out in the open once and for all so they can be debunked. That will allow developers to turn their attention back to more important tasks -- like developing better applications.
Isn't there some legal recourse that can taken against MS for this? Is there anyone out there familiar enough with the law to know whether it's a violation of civil tort to make such allegations without providing details?
It's time for RedHat, IBM, Oracle, et. al to come together and lay this matter to rest.
But your main point about Microsoft is correct, and that's what counts!
Isn't it about time Congress worked on making such claims illegal, even punishable by money and time in jail?
It just bad for commerce as a whole to have a few companies make claims that are unprovable.
Perhaps if the courts considered this type of behavior 'advertising' they could be fined or jailed by the FTC.
ok but what about the companies using OSS who have under the pressure already paid up to M$? if it proves there's been no patent infringement, would M$ have to pay the money back?
I mean this has been going on now for a long time, and i've read several stories where companies have paid, but for what, i don't get it, M$ just says you infringe, and they pay without even asking what?
Eventually, they will either have to engage in real patent litigation and expose their claims to scrutiny or the market will discount the claims and they will lose any value. The failure to disclose discounted the value and impact of the claims at the outset. The market is no longer ignorant enough to take wild arm waving as significant. SCO (with Microsoft funding) did a lot to educate them.
Having worked with Xybernaut, a company convinced at the very top of the Executive Team that it had incredibly valuable patents, I have seen the arc. Xybernaut eventually, in bankrupcy, tried to auction off the patents and got bids that were, compared to the valuations they believed in, a pittance. It was quite a revelation and one that will be repeated frequently in this software patent world.
We all look forward to a day when this is all on the table and we can understand the situation on the facts. Until then, this is the kind of empty rhetoric powerless bullies use in moments of fear.
"Microsoft, put up or shut up". Precisely!
Microsoft have elevated the magic list of OSS-violated patents to the status of "Trade Secret"!
MS - Put up or shut up!!!
Microsoft's goal is not to protect patents, or protect intellectual properties. Microsoft's goal is to slow corporate adoption of Linux, and protect their cash-cow, windows.
Their tried and true methodology has been, aquire or steal technology, sewing FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt), and enbrace and smother. This is no different.
Microsoft us sewing FUD regarding patent litigation to make linux unattractive. Its 'open source' initiatives are attempts to embrace and smother competing technologies. The deal with novel is about 'legitimizing' the FUD claims. ("Obviously this is legitimate, see, this other company paid...") And the combination will lower stock prices of, say, Oracle and RedHat, and allow microsoft to aquire them for a song.
I have a theory that there's quite a bit that can be done, even in the absence of further details by MS. Their patents are publically searchable; with a bit of effort, the one's they're likely referring to can be identified rather reliably.
"There is an overwhelming number of patents being infringed."
Well, that's what you get when you file an even more overwhelming number of vague, obvious, and overly general patents, not to mention plenty of those with prior art.
I think the only mileage they can even remotely hope to get out of this is a short term PR FUD-point.
I am quite sure recent SCOTUS decisions like KSR Intl. v. Teleflex and the like will not work in favor of MS either.
Were it to actually hit the courts, it could entirely (I would say very much likely end up very disappointing for MS, much as what came of Honeywell v. Sperry-Rand.
I would like to know exactly what part of the Linux gui Microsoft thinks violated their patent. As far as I can tell gnome looks nothing like windows in its design. In fact the theme engine already existed before Microsoft put there's in. What are they suggesting the icons are a violation. I'd day thats a bit of a stretch if you ask me. Whats left if anything?
Lets not forget where MS got the idea for icons in the first place... Anyone remember the old Xerox display on its copiers? Bill Gates does!! Look, a tiny picture and if I push it the copier starts!! Cool!! MS windows got started by patent infringments.