text:
Q: Parsing Metadata API XML I am looking to leverage the Metadata API to help audit the security of a system on a single splash page (primarily to see Profile based permissions on different configurations). As I poke around the documentation and the client stubs, it seems like after I make a retrieve call based on a list of metadata, I receive a ZIP file back. My question is whether anyone has had any experience with parsing the XML via any built in tools, or if manually parsing each Profile XML is the only way to get at the data (was hoping that I'd be able to leverage some stub from the WSDL to pass in the file content and have it parse into objects, but it doesn't seem that is the case).

A: Metadata API Route. You can likely reuse the Java types generated by the WSDL and call utility methods provided by your Web Service stack your using to de-serialise the XML contents of the .profile into the generated Profile Java type.
I've done this the Salesforce WSC stack (using the static method 'load' on the generated types). The following is an example using the Retrieve for a Custom Object, but you should be able to adapt it easily for Profile. However read on to another thought I have about your requirement below...
// Retrieve Custom Object Meta data for Source Object
RetrieveRequest retrieveRequest = new RetrieveRequest();
retrieveRequest.setSinglePackage(true);
com.sforce.soap.metadata.Package packageManifest = new com.sforce.soap.metadata.Package();
ArrayList<PackageTypeMembers> types = new ArrayList<PackageTypeMembers>();
PackageTypeMembers packageTypeMember = new PackageTypeMembers();
packageTypeMember.setName("CustomObject");
packageTypeMember.setMembers(new String[] { sourceObject });
types.add(packageTypeMember);
packageManifest.setTypes((PackageTypeMembers[]) types.toArray(new PackageTypeMembers[] {}));
retrieveRequest.setUnpackaged(packageManifest);
AsyncResult response = metadataConnection.retrieve(retrieveRequest);
while(!response.isDone())
{
    Thread.sleep(1000);
    response = metadataConnection.checkStatus(new String[] { response.getId()} )[0];
}
RetrieveResult retrieveResult = metadataConnection.checkRetrieveStatus(response.getId());

// Parse Custom Object Meta Data for Source Object
CustomObject customObject = new CustomObject();
byte[] zipBytes = retrieveResult.getZipFile();
ZipInputStream zipis = new ZipInputStream(new ByteArrayInputStream(zipBytes, 0, zipBytes.length));
ZipEntry zipEntry = null;
while((zipEntry = zipis.getNextEntry()) != null)
{
    if(zipEntry.getName().endsWith(sourceObject + ".object"))
    {
        TypeMapper typeMapper = new TypeMapper();
        XmlInputStream xmlis = new XmlInputStream();
        xmlis.setInput(zipis, "UTF-8");
        customObject.load(xmlis, typeMapper);
        zipis.closeEntry();
        break;
    }
}

Reading Profiles Data via SOQL
One of the biggest problems with the Metadata API and Profiles, is that in order to get the complete information about your profiles you need to include in the manifest / request a list of all the classes, objects and pages you want to be included in the Profile returned. Fortunately what you can do instead is leverage the fact that Profile information is actually stored in the Permission Set tables, which you can query using the Salesforce Partner or REST API's.
For me this is the easier route to achieve what you want, what do you think?


Virginia's agricultural heritage roots run deep, including long-standing animal breeds and heirloom produce. Both of these are not only an important part of Virginia's agricultural history, but also, as many experts would argue, essential to the industry's future. Most of the state's heritage breeds and heirloom seeds are resistant to many diseases impacting modern agriculture. Preserving them will help strengthen the industry.
"We work to preserve heritage breeds for their genetics," says Chuck Neely, who owns Riven Rock Farm in Manchester with his wife, Lou Ann. Their 700-acre farm in Highland County specializes in gourmet, grass-fed beef, pork and grass-fed lamb. "A lot of these genetics will be lost if we don't use them. We use heritage breeds to preserve Old World artisan flavors and meat profiles that modern agriculture left behind," he says. The two have been raising heritage Gloucestershire Old Spot pigs for about five years. The Gloucestershire Old Spot breed dates back to the late 1800s when it was developed in the Berkeley Vale of Gloucestershire, England. They were sometimes called cottage and orchard pigs for their ability to forage for food in pastures or orchards.
According to Neely, farm customers encouraged the couple to raise the heritage pigs.
Riven Rock is one of several Virginia farms specializing in heritage and heirloom products. Blue Bee Cider in Richmond, for example, manufactures cider from the Hewes Crab apple, an heirloom variety that first appeared in northern Virginia in the 18th century. Southerners originally planted the Hewes Crab for home production of cider. Today, Blue Bee Cider – Virginia's first urban cidery – produces more than 3,000 cases of craft cider each year.
Another operation working to preserve heritage breeds is Leaping Waters Farm in Allegheny Springs. Alec and Sarah Bradford raise heritage breed hogs, including Red Wattles and American Saddlebacks, and heritage breed turkeys. Also on the 1,000-acre farm is the rare Ancient White Park breed of cattle, which dates back more than 2,500 years. Today, fewer than 1,000 of these animals in the nation are registered.
Both Riven Rock and Leaping Waters have found an eager customer base among high-end restaurants in Virginia and along the East Coast.
A champion of sustainability and agriculture, Thomas Jefferson grew more than 330 vegetable and 170 fruit varieties in his gardens at his Monticello estate. Today, the gardens thrive with many of the heirloom varieties planted by the avid gardener during the early 19th century. The Heritage Harvest Festival at Monticello celebrates Jefferson's legacy as a scientist and revolutionary gardener, showcasing the strength of Virginia agriculture.


The other day I sat down with my son to read a book before bed. I reached to grab Brown Bear Brown Bear, and as I pulled it out I looked at its sad state. The binding was missing, the thick pages dented in several places, and it was about to fall apart. I sighed as I wondered if our third child would have any books left to read!
As I thought about all of my children's books with the covers falling off, the pages hanging on by half a staple, and the accidental rips- I wondered if I should feel guilty for my failings or lack of stricter rules about books.
But when I thought about most of the damage, I decided I could not feel guilty. These were not the consequences of a destructive baby- they were the result of books well loved. Books that were excitedly carried from room to room by a 13 month old beaming. Books whose pages were turned again and again as the pictures came alive and put a smile on my kids' faces. Books that were read over and over again so much so that my 3 1/2 year can recite the entire thing to her brother. Books that were treasured. Books that were loved. Books that were used. Most importantly, through their heavy, beaten, and worn use- they serve an even greater purpose of fostering a love of reading for my children- something I don't and won't regret.
My heart poured over these tattered books, and I could not help but notice a little differently the giant stretched belly before me; the arms full of scars and cuts from 28 years of life; the aching calves in compression stockings that are necessary after three pregnancies; and the tired eyes with bags and wrinkles underneath them. Maybe you feel this way too- but sometimes I can feel like one of those tattered old books. My body feels worn- dented, ripped, and taped back together again. There are times I find myself feeling guilty- wondering what I need to do differently- thinking of all the ways I can regain what once was.
Oh, but dear friends- take heart, God lovingly leads us back to his truth. Our bodies? They are being treasured. They are being loved. They are being used. Our stomachs may be stretched and scarred- but it is because it has given of itself for the growth of another life. Our faces may be wrinkled, but they are so from years filled with laughter and tears with the people God has placed around us. Our eyes may be baggy, but they are so because they have given up countless hours of sleep in order to care for another person. Our hands may be calloused- but they have gotten that way through years of working, helping, cleaning, washing, baking, driving, and giving.
Our bodies? They are being treasured. They are being loved. They are being used.
And most importantly- just like those books- through their blemished, imperfect, and beat up use- they are serving an even greater purpose- a purpose we can never or will never feel guilty about. They are cultivating in our children, in our friends, our family- a deeper love and awe for God.
Not only does our service give glory to God- but we get to model the attitude and actions of our Savior to the people around us through these tired, worn bodies!
Next time we find ourselves feeling down about our worn out body- let's stand back up- thankful– thankful and humbled that God has given us the chance to have our bodies be broken for others. Let's remind ourselves of the mission, and rejoice to use these tattered, worn out bodies to accomplish it.
I don't know about you, but I don't want to be that neat and pristine book on the nightstand that nobody ever reads. Our time here is far too short to waste it like that. I want to love, I want to serve, and I want to be used.
PreviousHow Long Will We Go On Limping?
NextAre We Wasting the Beauty Around Us?


Uncommon table lamp by Laurel, c1960's-70's. Hand blown, single piece of glass, with infused multi-color detail. The opaque glass provides for a soft, ambient light. Original label remains to underside.
Likely by a European designer for the Laurel Lamp Co. Working condition, appears to be original wiring.
Overall wear consistent with age and use. The item "Vintage Mid Century Modern Laurel Glass Mushroom Table Lamp Murano Italian" is in sale since Sunday, July 8, 2018. This item is in the category "Antiques\Periods & Styles\Mid-Century Modernism". The seller is "20cmodern" and is located in Royal Oak, Michigan.


text:
Q: Data step inside macro function I have a series of similar files from which I need to create SAS datasets.  I'd like to make a macro that, given the file name as a parameter, can output a data step.  Is this theoretically possible?
I'm fairly new to SAS and I made this simple example:
%macro computeFormAndDomain(formName, domainName);
   data thing;
      input Name $;
      datalines;
      Bob
      Jill
      ;
   run;
%mend;

%computeFormAndDomain("test", "test2");
proc print data=thing;
run;

However this gives back errors "ERROR: The macro COMPUTEFORMANDDOMAIN generated CARDS (data lines) for the DATA step, which could cause incorrect results.  The
        DATA step and the macro will stop executing."  What corrections need to be made, or is there a better way to achieve what I want?

A: You cannot use CARDS/DATALINES in a macro, by rule.  You need to supply the information to the macro as an already constructed dataset (or, some other way).  See for example this thread discussing the issue.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
WILDLIFE STUDY
TOBIN CAPP
ARTIST. HUNTER. EXPLORER.
Tobin Capp's sculptures are a unique reflection of his western lifestyle. He is a third generation Montanan, descended from an adventurous great-grandfather who pioneered the West. Tobin, like his great-grandfather, was called to adventure. With no frontiers left to tame, the rodeo arena stole his heart at an early age. While rodeoing for the University of Montana and attending their fine arts school, Tobin met rodeo judge, sculptor, and foundry owner, Bob Burkhart. It was a pivotal point in Tobin's art career.
"After spending three days at a bronze sculpting school with Bob and artist Jeff Wolff, I discovered a new medium that I really enjoyed. I switched to the College of Business, and pursued my art education from people who were outstanding at representational figures, particularly the sculpture of anatomy."
Tobin Capp has been involved in every phase of his pieces from the creating of the clay originals to the molding, casting, and marketing; and he is often at the foundry to better his understanding of the entire bronze art business.
Tobin's western art is also heavily influenced by his passion for nature and the wilderness. He spends an average of 100 days per year in the outdoors and says, "Woodsmanship is a tradition of my family and is the obligation of each generation to pass down to the next. I draw the majority of my inspiration from my time in the field." Tobin's quest to produce works that depict the natural movement of wildlife.
As Tobin has built his collection of works, he has felt an obligation to help others fulfill their dreams through his talent of sculpting. He has donated works to organizations such as the University of Montana Rodeo Team; the Miss Rodeo Montana organization; Ducks Unlimited; Montana Matters; Montana Wildlife Federation; and Healthy Mothers, Healthy Babies of Montana. Tobin has been selected to the juried show at the Mountain Oyster Club in Tucson, AZ and has also been invited to show at the Western Masters in Great Falls, MT; the Phippen Museum Western Art Show in Prescott, AZ; and the Western Design Conference in Jackson Hole, WY. Tobin was also honored to have three sculptures selected in 2007 for the Calgary Stampede Trophy Bronze Awards, 2 sculptures selected for the 2012 Calgary Stampede Bronze Awards and in 2008, was commissioned by the Montana Ag Credit Union to complete a bronze relief to dedicate the new Ag BioScience Building on the MSU campus in Bozeman. His works reside in private residences in Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, and througout the Southwest.
© 2016 by Tobin Capp. Proudly created with Wix.com

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Locally conceived and conducted research.
A lot of research in osteoporosis is done elsewhere by pharmaceutical companies. This can be valuable and important but may not reflect the needs and desires of our patients. We have a desire to research new approaches to osteoporosis care that are not paid for by drug companies. Many of our research ideas actually come from patients themselves!
In order to continue to provide the most up-to-date care that reflects the latest treatment options, it is important that our staff remain actively involved with continuing education and research meetings. These costs are also not covered by AHS funding.
Teaching other health care providers about osteoporosis.
Part of our work involves passing along new information about osteoporosis to primary care providers around the province. High quality education programs that are independent of drug company input still require funding to cover accreditation fees, etc.
Osteoporosis does not just affect people living in central Calgary. Many older women and men across southern Alberta (and even interior BC) can have osteoporosis but lack the ability come to Calgary for consultations and treatment. We desire to serve such patients with innovative care delivery services such as this website, long-distance phone consultation with rural physicians and even rural community visits where we may bring our services to other locations. In order to provide these services, we will require an ability to transform our clinic into a portable module.
How to make your charitable donation?
There is a link provided below *link that will permit you to immediately make a charitable, tax-deductible donation by credit card to the Osteoporosis Centre through the Calgary Health Trust. We are grateful to all donors; for those who would like to support the centre with donations of $10, 000 or more, we would like to return the honour with official recognition on our clinic Wall of Strength.
Please feel free to contact us if interested in further discussions about your generous gift.


EXIT 117 NORTHBOUND 0R SOUTHBOUND FOR HAZLET - KEYPORT EXIT. AFTER THE TOLL BOOTH, TAKE RIGHT FORK FOLLOWING SIGNS TO HIGHWAY 35 SOUTH [ NOT RT. 36] . PASS HOME DEPOT TO FIRST LIGHT AND TURN RIGHT ONTO HOLMDEL ROAD [ EXXON GAS STATION AT CORNER ], CONTINUE FOR APPROXIMATELY TWO MILES. AFTER YOU CROSS-OVER THE PARKWAY, MAKE THE VERY NEXT IMMEDIATE RIGHT ONTO HILLCREST ROAD. THE CHURCH IS APPROXIMATELY 300 YARDS ON THE RIGHT AT 20 HILLCREST ROAD.
TURN ONTO HILLCREST ROAD ( BY ST. BENEDICT ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH ) AND CONTINUE TO KIMISIS CHURCH ON YOUR LEFT JUST PAST SOUTH BEERS STREET.
ROUTE 79 NORTH TO LLOYD ROAD IN MATAWAN ( STREET BEFORE LLOYD ROAD IS TENNANT ROAD ON YOUR LEFT WITH EXXON GAS STATION ON YOUR LEFT ) AT LLOYD ROAD MAKE A RIGHT, IN ABOUT TWO MILES YOU WILL CROSS ROUTE 34. IN ABOUT 1 1/2 MILES YOU WILL COME TO CHURCH ROAD ( ALSO CALLED BETHANY ROAD ) MAKE A RIGHT AT LIGHT ONTO CHURCH STREET. ( AT THE NEXT LIGHT CHURCH STREET TURNS INTO BETHANY ROAD.) STAY ON BETHANY RD. TO HILLCREST RD.TURN RIGHT ONTO HILLCREST ROAD ( BY ST. BENEDICT ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH ) AND CONTINUE TO KIMISIS CHURCH ON YOUR LEFT JUST PAST SOUTH BEERS STREET.
ROUTE 34 NORTH TO LLOYD ROAD IN ABERDEEN. (JUST PAST FREINDLY'S ON YOUR LEFT) MAKE A RIGHT ON TO LLOYD ROAD (BANK & GAS STATIONS ON CORNERS) IN ABOUT 1 1/2 MILES YOU WILL COME TO CHURCH ROAD (ALSO CALLED BETHANY ROAD) MAKE A RIGHT AT LIGHT ONTO CHURCH STREET. ( AT THE NEXT LIGHT CHURCH STREET TURNS INTO BETHANY ROAD.) STAY ON BETHANY RD. TO HILLCREST RD.TURN RIGHT ONTO HILLCREST ROAD ( BY ST. BENEDICT ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH ) AND CONTINUE TO KIMISIS CHURCH ON YOUR LEFT JUST PAST SOUTH BEERS STREET.


text:
Friedrich III. der Strenge, auch Friedrich der Freundholdige, (* 14. Dezember 1332 in Dresden; † 21. Mai 1381 in Altenburg) war Landgraf von Thüringen und Markgraf von Meißen.

Er war der Sohn Friedrichs des Ernsthaften und der Kaisertochter Mathilde von Bayern und übernahm 1349 nach dem Tod des Vaters die Länder Meißen und Thüringen seines Vaters, die er gemeinsam mit seinen Brüdern Balthasar und Wilhelm I. regierte.

Seine Gemahlin Katharina von Henneberg brachte ihm als Mitgift einen großen Teil der Grafschaft Henneberg (Pflege Coburg) ein. Durch Kauf erwarb er Elgersburg, Zörbig, Teile der Markgrafschaft Landsberg und die Stadt Sangerhausen.

Die Vögte von Plauen und die Grafen von Schwarzburg zwang er gewaltsam zu einer Reihe von Abtretungen. Gemeinsam mit Heinrich II. von Hessen vernichtete er den Sternerbund.

Friedrich starb am 21. Mai 1381 in Altenburg. Seine Grabstätte befindet sich im Kloster Altzella, wo 1676 für die Gräber aus dem Chor der zerfallenen Klosterkirche eine neue Fürstenkapelle errichtet wurde, in welche die Gebeine aber erst 1804 umgebettet wurden.

Nachkommen
Friedrich der Strenge war seit 1346 mit Katharina von Henneberg (* 1334; † 15. Juli 1397 in Meißen) verheiratet, die ihm folgende vier Söhne gebar:
 Friedrich († jung, um 1350)
 Friedrich der Streitbare (1370–1428)
 Wilhelm der Reiche (1371–1425)
 Georg (* 1380; † 9. Dezember 1401 in Coburg)

Literatur

Weblinks

Markgraf (Meißen)
Landgraf (Thüringen)
Wettiner
Geboren 1332
Gestorben 1381
Mann

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Ghana face Burkina Faso, Niger in Pan-African Schools Championship qualifiers
By Vincent Ashitey
Ghana has been paired with Burkina Faso and Niger in the Group stage of the WAFU Zone B qualifiers for the CAF Pan-African U-16 Inter schools' championship.
The tournament which will take place from Friday, November 11 to Sunday, November 13, in Cote D'Ivoire will serve as qualifiers for the first ever CAF Inter schools Championship.
Ghana will be represented by two teams, namely, Offinso College of Education JHS and Maakro M/A JHS in the maiden edition after winning the schools competition in Kumasi in July this year.
Host Cote D'Ivoire are housed in Group A alongside Benin and Togo.
The intercontinental school soccer tournament, according to CAF, is part of efforts being made to use the lessons of football to guide growth and development to shape our future leaders.
Got something to say about this story? Or have a story to share? Reach out to us: editor@primenewsghana


text:
Tresemmé is proud to be approved by peta (people of the ethical treatment of animals)!
Our TRESemmé policy prohibits all animal tests for our products and the ingredients used in them, anywhere in the world. Over 40 years ago our parent company, Unilever started developing and using non animal methods to assess product safety. Unilever's ongoing work on alternatives to animal testing, and its commitment to advocate for their acceptance globally, has also been recognised by PETA, which lists Unilever as a company working for regulatory change.
Don't miss the new addition to our TRESemmé packaging!
To spread the word that TRESemmé is approved by PETA, we're adding its bunny logo to our TRESemmé packaging.
WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT PETA?
PETA is the biggest animal rights organisation in the world, with more than 6.5 million members and supporters. Since 1980, PETA has campaigned against animal abuse and exploitation, and influenced organisations and lawmakers to stop using animals whenever and wherever possible.
Its Beauty Without Bunnies listing of PETA-Approved brands is the gold standard for consumers to rely on when making compassionate purchases. When you see the PETA-Approved logo on a product, it's a sign that you can thrust that the brand you've chosen does not test on animals.


text:
Why "Free Ukraine"?
Ukraine is facing a major conflict and its people needs help now more than ever.
"Free Ukraine" is an international non-profit organization based in Nyon, Switzerland, with volunteers involved in several activities in order to contribute to the development of Ukraine.
Thanks to the solidarity and investment from all of us, we hope to make an impact on its path to the democracy, liberty and prosperity.
"Free Ukraine" is mobilizing its forces in Ukraine in the following directions:
Families in Need
Aid to families and victims evacuated because of the conflict in the East of Ukraine
Hospitals & Medicine
Aid to hospitals in Ukraine
Orphanage & Education
Aid to orphanages and schools in Ukraine
Various events in Switzerland in order to help discovering Ukraine and its culture
Discover below some of on-going projects sponsored by "Free Ukraine"
"Free Ukraine" aid already to 12 families of victims perished in the conflict
"Free Ukraine" facilitated 6 surgeries & provided drugs for 200 persons
"Free Ukraine" supported 400 orphaned children in one orphanage within the Mariupol' region
Various cultural events in Switzerland to help discovering Ukraine
Independence Day in Lausanne
Gala of Hope in Zurich for the benefit of children traumatized by hostilities in Eastern Ukraine
Wounded soldiers received an Easter gifts from Switzerland
Dear Friends, The Association "Free Ukraine" together with ACRU and Geneva' Branch of Ukrainian Society are pleased to...
The Music and Ballet Soloists from the Zurich Opera House, together with Vesselina Kasarova Mezzo soprano among...
Next events of "Free Ukraine"
Get United and help UKRAINE


text:
Royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse
NSW government solicitor admits flaw in handling of compensation cases
Women abused at a children's home in Brewarrina in 70s and 80s had to prove abuse even though perpetrator had already been jailed
The royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse hearing sitting in Sydney. Photograph: Royal Commission
Last modified on Fri 3 Aug 2018 10.45 EDT
A senior NSW government solicitor admits state lawyers should not have asked women to prove they were sexually abused as children when the man who terrorised them was already in jail for his crimes.
Helen Allison, senior solicitor at the NSW Crown Solicitor's Office, supervised the defence of a civil claim brought by 15 plaintiffs who were physically and sexually abused at Bethcar Children's Home in Brewarrina, in the 1970s and 80s.
On the second day of a royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse hearing into Bethcar, Allison was answering questions about the state's legal strategy when 14 women and one man sought redress and an apology.
In defending the claim, lodged in 2008, the state legal team took a tough stance – denying liability and drawing out proceedings, the commission heard.
They wanted each case tested separately and plaintiffs were asked to prove the abuse although one perpetrator, Colin Gibson, was jailed in 2007 on two sentences of 12 years and 18 years.
Allison was asked if it was hypocritical to ask the plaintiffs to prove their case when the perpetrator had been convicted and jailed.
"I believe it should not have been done but I don't believe it's hypocritical," Allison said.
Allison conceded that forcing some of the plaintiffs to prove allegations when they had been established was not the right thing to do.
In a long list of NSW model litigant responsibilities is one that requires that the other party not have to prove a matter which the state or an agency knows to be true.
A second alleged abuser, Burt Gordon, died before the case against him reached court.
It has also been revealed the department had documents from 1980 showing Terry Madden, a Brewarrina-based officer for the NSW Department of Community Services, was concerned about Bethcar.
Madden had taken girls to police, but they were returned to the home after that interview and were beaten. They changed their story on the second police interview.
The commission heard at one stage the state sought a permanent stay on the case without disclosing in an affidavit to the court all it knew, including that Madden was prepared to give evidence.
Earlier on Thursday, Janet Loughman, principal solicitor for the Women's Legal Service who represented 13 of the Bethcar plaintiffs, said the state approach to the civil litigation launched in 2008 was to "avoid liability at all costs, no matter how egregious the matters raised".
She also said that at times it appeared "they were trying to wear the plaintiffs down or make it so difficult that we would give up".
At the end of his cross-examination of Loughman, Paul Menzies QC for the state of NSW announced the government would introduce more flexibility in its model litigant responsibilities and on limitation periods.
The case continues on Friday.
Law (Australia)


text:
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-dzvvk Total loading time: 2.09 Render date: 2022-01-19T04:30:38.622Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }
>The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
>Incentives
The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
Introduction: Compliance as the Interaction between Rules and Behavior
Compliance Concepts and Approaches
Deterrence and Incapacitation
Legitimacy and Social Norms
Capacity and Opportunity
Compliance and Cognition
Management and Organizational Processes
Measuring and Evaluating Compliance
Analysis of Particular Fields
Part III - Incentives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 May 2021
Benjamin van Rooij and
D. Daniel Sokol
Benjamin van Rooij
School of Law, University of Amsterdam
The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance , pp. 309 - 382
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108759458[Opens in a new window]
Agarwal, R., Gupta, A. and Gupta, S., 2019. "The Impact of Tort Reform on Defensive Medicine, Quality of Care, and Physician Supply: A Systematic Review." Health Services Research 54(4): 851–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J. M., Heaton, P. and Carroll, S. J.. 2010. The US Experience with No-Fault Automobile Insurance: A Retrospective. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Apel, Robert. 2013. "Sanctions, Perceptions, and Crime: Implications for Criminal Deterrence." Journal of Quantitative Criminology 29(1): 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avraham, Ronen, and Schanzenbach, Max. 2015. "The Impact of Tort Reform on Intensity of Treatment: Evidence from Heart Patients." Journal of Health Economics 39: 273–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, Tom, and Griffith, Sean J.. 2007. "Predicting Corporate Governance Risk: Evidence from the Directors'& (and) Officers' Liability Insurance Market." University of Chicago Law Review 74: 865.Google Scholar
Baker, Tom, and Griffith, Sean J.. 2010. Ensuring Corporate Misconduct: How Liability Insurance Undermines Shareholder Litigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Tom, and Swedloff, Rick. 2012. "Regulation by Liability Insurance: From Auto to Lawyers Professional Liability." UCLA Law Review 60: 1412.Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare. 1764 (reprinted in 1985). On Crime and Punishment. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1968. "Crime and Punishment, An Economic Approach." Journal of Political Economy 76: 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1789 (reprinted in 1973). "An Introduction to the Principles and Morals of Legislation." In The Utilitarians. Report.Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Bilimoria, Karl Y., Chung, Jeanette W., Minami, Christina A., Sohn, Min-Woong, Pavey, Emily S., Holl, Jane L. and Mello, Michelle M.. 2017. "Relationship between State Malpractice Environment and Quality of Health Care in the United States." Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 43(5): 241–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, M. M., and Hanon, Amandine. 2009. "Protecting Directors and Officers from Liability Arising from Aggressive Earnings Management." CIRANO-Scientific Publications 2009s-35. https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2009s-35.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, M. Martin, and Stern, Léa H.. 2012. "Is Corporate Governance Risk Valued? Evidence from Directors' and Officers' Insurance." Journal of Corporate Finance 18(2): 349–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, M. Martin, and Tennyson, Sharon. 2015. "Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance, Corporate Risk and Risk Taking: New Panel Data Evidence on the Role of Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance." Journal of Risk and Insurance 82(4): 753–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Don W. 1978. "Arrest Rates and Crime Rates: When Does a Tipping Effect Occur?" Social Forces 57(2): 671–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Zhiyan, and Narayanamoorthy, Ganapathi S. 2011. "The Effect of Litigation Risk on Management Earnings Forecasts." Contemporary Accounting Research 28(1): 125–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelletti, M., and Garth, B., eds. 1978. Access to Justice, Vol. I: A World Survey. Alphen a/d Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Cardi, W. Jonathan, Penfield, Randall D. and Yoon, Albert H.. 2012. "Does Tort Law Deter Individuals? A Behavioral Science Study." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 9(3): 567–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, John M. R., Dann, Larry Y. and Harford, Jarrad. 2002. "Managerial Opportunism? Evidence from Directors' and Officers' Insurance Purchases." Journal of Finance 57(2): 609–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamlin, Mitchell B. 1991. "A Longitudinal Analysis of the Arrest–Crime Relationship: A Further Examination of the Tipping Effect." Justice Quarterly 8(2): 187–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alma, and Dehejia, Rajeev. 2004. "The Effect of Automobile Insurance and Accident Liability Laws on Traffic Fatalities." Journal of Law and Economics 47(2): 357–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Core, John E. 2000. "The Directors' and Officers' Insurance Premium: An Outside Assessment of the Quality of Corporate Governance." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 16(2): 449–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. David, Phillips, Richard D. and Weiss, Mary A.. 2001. "The Incentive Effects of No-Fault Automobile Insurance." Journal of Law and Economics 44(2): 427–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, Barbara A. 1978. "Survey of the Public's Legal Needs." American Bar Association Journal 64: 848–52.Google Scholar
Currie, Janet, and MacLeod, W. Bentley. 2008. "First Do No Harm? Tort Reform and Birth Outcomes." Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(2): 795–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, Scott H., Wright, Richard and Logie, Robert. 1993. "Perceptual Deterrence among Active Residential Burglars: A Research Note." Criminology 31: 135–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrig, Richard A., Segui-Gomez, Maria, Abtahi, Ali, and Liu, Ling-Ling. 2002. "The Effect of Population Safety Belt Usage Rates on Motor Vehicle-Related Fatalities." Accident Analysis & Prevention 34(1): 101–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devlin, Rose Anne. 1992. "Liability Versus No-Fault Automobile Insurance Regimes: An Analysis of the Experience in Quebec." In Contributions to Insurance Economics, edited by Dionne, Georges, 499–520. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewees, Don, and Trebilcock, Michael. 1992. "The Efficacy of the Tort System and Its Alternatives: A Review of Empirical Evidence." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 30: 57.Google Scholar
DuCharme, Larry L, Malatesta, Paul H and Sefcik, Stephan E. 2004. "Earnings Management, Stock Issues, and Shareholder Lawsuits." Journal of Financial Economics 71(1): 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore, and Engel, Christoph. 2014. "Assuring Civil Damages Adequately Deter: A Public Good Experiment." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 11(2): 301–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Nora Freeman. 2011. "An Alternative Explanation for No-Fault's Demise." DePaul Law Review 61: 303.Google Scholar
Felstiner, W., Abel, R. and Sarat, A.. 1980–1. "The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming." Law and Society Review 15: 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frakes, Michael. 2012. "Defensive Medicine and Obstetric Practices." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 9(3): 457–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frakes, Michael, and Jena, Anupam B.. 2016. "Does Medical Malpractice Law Improve Health Care Quality?" Journal of Public Economics 143: 142–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galanter, M. 1974. "Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change." Law and Society 9(1): 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genn, H., and Beinart, S.. 1999. Paths to Justice: What People Do and Think about Going to the Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Gillan, Stuart L., and Panasian, Christine A.. 2015. "On Lawsuits, Corporate Governance, and Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance." Journal of Risk and Insurance 82(4): 793–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, John C. P. 2010. "Tort in Three Dimensions." Pepperdine Law Review 38:321.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, Thornton, Dorothy and Kagan, Robert A.. 2005. "Motivating Management: Corporate Compliance in Environmental Protection." Law & Policy 27(2): 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havinga, Tetty. 2012. "The Influence of Liability Law on Food Safety on Preventive Effects of Liability Claims and Liability Insurance." Nijmegen Sociology of Law Working Paper (2010/02).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, P., and Helland, E. 2008. No-Fault Insurance and Automobile Accidents. Rand Institute for Justice Working Paper, WR-551-ICJ, 1–35.Google Scholar
Iizuka, Toshiaki. 2013. "Does Higher Malpractice Pressure Deter Medical Errors?" Journal of Law and Economics 56(1): 161–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachalia, A., and Mello, M. M.. 2011. "New Directions in Medical Liability Reform." New England Journal of Medicine 364(16): 1564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, Daniel, and McClellan, Mark. 1996. "Do Doctors Practice Defensive Medicine?" Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(2): 353–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Daniel, and McClellan, Mark. 2002. "Malpractice Law and Health Care Reform: Optimal Liability Policy in an Era of Managed Care." Journal of Public Economics 84(2): 175–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Irene. 2015. "Directors' and Officers' Insurance and Opportunism in Accounting Choice." Accounting & Taxation 7(1): 51–65.Google Scholar
Klick, Jonathan, and Stratmann, Thomas. 2007. "Medical Malpractice Reform and Physicians in High-Risk Specialties." Journal of Legal Studies 36(S2): S121–S142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanowski, Paul S., and Young, Madelyn V.. 1985. "Deterrent Aspects of No-Fault Automobile Insurance: Some Empirical Findings." Journal of Risk and Insurance 52(2): 269–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konety, Badrinath R, Dhawan, Vibhu, Allareddy, Veersathpurush and Joslyn, Sue A.. 2005. "Impact of Malpractice Caps on Use and Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Data from the surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program." Journal of Urology 173(6): 2085–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landes, Elisabeth M. 1982. "Insurance, Liability, and Accidents: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of the Effect of No-Fault Accidents." Journal of Law and Economics 25(1): 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, William M., and Posner, Richard A.. 1987. The Economic Structure of Tort Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Chen, Officer, Micah S. and Zou, Hong. 2011. "Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance and Acquisition Outcomes." Journal of Financial Economics 102(3): 507–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughran, D. S. 2001. The Effect of No-Fault Automobile Insurance on Driver Behavior and Automobile Accidents in the United States. Rand Institute for Justice Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwin, R. Ian. 1989. "No-Fault and Road Accidents: Some Australasian Evidence." International Review of Law and Economics 9(1): 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mello, M. M. (2006). Medical Malpractice: Impact of the Crisis and Effect of State Tort Reforms. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Research Synthesis Report No. 10.Google Scholar
Mello, Michelle M., and Brennan, Troyen A.. 2001. "Deterrence of Medical Errors: Theory and Evidence for Malpractice Reform." Texas Law Review 80: 1595.Google Scholar
Mello, Michelle M., and Kachalia, Allen. 2010. "Evaluation of Options for Medical Malpractice System Reform." A Report to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) No. 10–2.Google Scholar
Minami, Christina A., Sheils, Catherine R., Pavey, Emily, Chung, Jeanette W., Stulberg, Jonah J., Odell, David D., Yang, Anthony D., Bentrem, David J. and Bilimoria, Karl Y.. 2017. "Association between State Medical Malpractice Environment and Postoperative Outcomes in the United States." Journal of the American College of Surgeons 224(3): 310–18. e2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagin, Daniel S. 2012. "Imprisonment and Crime Control: Building Evidence-Based Policy." In Contemporary Issues in Criminological Theory and Research: The Role of Social Institutions, edited by Rosenfeld, R., Quinet, K., and Garcia, C. A., 309–17. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S. 2013. "Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century." Crime and Justice 42(1): 199–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S., and Pepper, John V., eds. 2012. Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Andrew F. 2011. "In Defense of Deterrence." Albany Law Review 75: 181.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1972. "A Theory of Negligence." Journal of Legal Studies 1(1): 29–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roisman, Anthony Z., Judy, Martha L. and Stein, Daniel. 2004. "Preserving Justice: Defending Toxic Tort Litigation." Fordham Environmental Law Review 15: 191.Google Scholar
Saks, Michael J. 1992. "Do We Really Know Anything about the Behavior of the Tort Litigation System. And Why Not?" University of Pennsylvania Law Review 140(4): 1147–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schell‐Busey, Natalie, Simpson, Sally S., Rorie, Melissa and Alper, Mariel. 2016. "What Works? A Systematic Review of Corporate Crime Deterrence." Criminology & Public Policy 15(2): 387–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Sally, Rorie, Melissa, Alper, Mariel Elise, Schell-Busey, Natalie, Laufer, William and Smith, N. Craig. 2014. "Corporate Crime Deterrence: A Systematic Review." Campbell Systematic Reviews 10(4): 5–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, Frank A., Reilly, Bridget A. and Schenzler, Christoph M.. 1994. "Tort Liability versus Other Approaches for Deterring Careless Driving." International Review of Law and Economics 14(1): 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, Frank A., and Shadle, John H.. 2009. "Is There Empirical Evidence for 'Defensive Medicine'? A Reassessment." Journal of Health Economics 28(2): 481–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin. 2012. "How the Haves Come out Ahead in the Twenty-First Century." DePaul Law Review 62: 519.Google Scholar
Van McCrary, S., and Swanson, Jeffrey W.. 1999. "Physicians' Legal Defensiveness and Knowledge of Medical Law: Comparing Denmark and the USA." Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 27(1): 18–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rooij, Benjamin. 2016. "Weak Enforcement, Strong Deterrence: Dialogues with Chinese Lawyers about Tax Evasion and Compliance." Law and Social Inquiry 41(2): 288–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. Tony, Studdert, David M., Subramanian, S. V. and Mello, Michelle M.. 2012. "Does Tort Law Improve the Health of Newborns, or Miscarry? A Longitudinal Analysis of the Effect of Liability Pressure on Birth Outcomes." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 9(2): 217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zador, Paul, and Lund, Adrian. 1986. "Re-analyses of the Effects of No-Fault Auto Insurance on Fatal Crashes." Journal of Risk and Insurance (1986–1998) 53(2): 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James, Sanchez, Isabel and De Juan, Ana. 1995. 'Economic and Noneconomic Factors in Tax Compliance.' Kyklos 48: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, James. 1990. 'Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving'. Economic Journal 100: 464–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, Sebastian, Kasper, Matthias, Kirchler, Erich and Erard, Brian. 2019. 'Do Audits Deter or Provoke Future Tax Noncompliance? Evidence on Self-Employed Taxpayers'. IMF Working Paper WP/19/223. www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Publications/WP/2019/wpiea2019223-print-pdf.ashx.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénabou, Roland, and Tirole, Jean. 2006. 'Incentives and Prosocial Behavior'. American Economic Review 96: 1652–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beretti, Antoine, Figuières, Charles and Grolleau, Gilles. 2019. 'How to Turn Crowding-Out into Crowding-In? An Innovative Instrument and Some Law-Related Examples'. European Journal of Law and Economics 48: 417–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohnet, Iris, Frey, Bruno S. and Huck, Steffen. 2001. 'More Order with Less Law: On Contract Enforcement, Trust, and Crowding'. American Political Science Review 95: 131–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, and Polanía-Reyes, Sandra. 2012. 'Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements?' Journal of Economic Literature 50: 368–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerasoli, Christopher P., Nicklin, Jessica M. and Ford, Michael T.. 2014. 'Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Incentives Jointly Predict Performance: A 40-Year Meta-analysis'. Psychological Bulletin 140: 980–1008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, Emilee Booth. 2019. 'The Distinctive Value of Elections and the Case for Compulsory Voting'. American Journal of Political Science 63: 101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosno, Jody L., and Brown, James R.. 2015. 'A Meta-analytic Review of the Effects of Organizational Control in Marketing Exchange Relationships'. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43: 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, Edward L., Koestner, Richard and Ryan, Richard M.. 1999. 'A Meta-analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation'. Psychological Bulletin 125: 627–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, Ernst, and Rockenbach, Bettina. 2003. 'Detrimental Effects of Sanctions on Human Altruism'. Nature 422: 137–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feld, Lars P., and Frey, Bruno S.. 2007. 'Tax Compliance as the Result of a Psychological Tax Contract: The Role of Incentives and Responsive Regulation'. Law and Policy 29: 102–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Yuval. 2011. 'The Complexity of Disentangling Intrinsic and Extrinsic Compliance Motivations: Theoretical and Empirical Insights From the Behavioral Analysis of Law.' Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 35: 11–51.Google Scholar
Feldman, Yuval, and Lobel, Orly. 2010. 'The Incentives Matrix: The Comparative Effectiveness of Rewards, Liabilities, Duties, and Protections for Reporting Illegality'. Texas Law Review 88: 1151–1211.Google Scholar
Feldman, Yuval, and Perez, Oren. 2009. 'How Law Changes the Environmental Mind: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Legal Norms on Moral Perceptions and Civic Enforcement'. Journal of Law and Society 36: 501–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Yuval, and Perez, Oren. 2012. 'Motivating Environmental Action in a Pluralistic Regulatory Environment: An Experimental Study of Framing, Crowding Out, and Institutional Effects in the Context of Recycling Policies'. Law and Society Review 46: 405–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Betsch, C., Böhm, R. and Chapman, G. B.. 2015. 'Using Behavioral Insights to Increase Vaccination Policy Effectiveness'. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2: 61–73.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. 1993. 'Does Monitoring Increase Work Effort? The Rivalry with Trust and Loyalty'. Economic Inquiry 31: 663–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. 1997a. Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. 1997b. 'A Constitution for Knaves Crowds Out Civic Virtues'. Economic Journal 107: 1043–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. 1999. 'Morality and Rationality in Environmental Policy'. Journal of Consumer Policy 22: 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., and Jegen, Reto. 2001. 'Motivation Crowding Theory'. Journal of Economic Surveys 15: 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, Patricia. 2007. 'Is There an Expressive Function of Law? An Empirical Analysis of Voting Laws with Symbolic Fines'. American Law and Economics Review 9: 135–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangl, Katharina, Torgler, Benno, Kirchler, Erich and Hofmann, Eva. 2014. 'Effects of Supervision on Tax Compliance: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Austria'. Economics Letters 123: 378–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gneezy, Uri, Meier, Stephan and Rey-Biel, Pedro. 2011. 'When and Why Incentives (Don't) Work to Modify Behavior'. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25: 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, Uri, and Rustichini, Aldo. 2000. 'A Fine Is a Price'. Journal of Legal Studies 29: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, Romy, and Gregg, Daniel. 2011. 'Farmers' Intrinsic Motivations, Barriers to the Adoption of Conservation Practices and Effectiveness of Policy Instruments: Empirical Evidence from Northern Australia'. Land Use Policy 28: 257–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Jared, and Bromiley, Philip. 2007. 'Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation'. Organization Science 18: 350–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, Camerer, Colin, Fehr, Ernst, Gintis, Herbert and McElreath, Richard. 2001. 'Cooperation, Reciprocity and Punishment in Fifteen Small-Scale Societies'. American Economic Review 91: 73–8.Google Scholar
Heyman, James, and Ariely, Dan. 2004. 'Effort for Payment: A Tale of Two Markets'. Psychological Science 15: 787–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, Eva B., Gangl, Katharina, Kirchler, Erich and Stark, Jennifer. 2014. 'Enhancing Tax Compliance through Coercive and Legitimate Power of Tax Authorities by Concurrently Diminishing or Facilitating Trust in Tax Authorities'. Law and Policy 36: 290–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jack, B. Kelsey. 2009. 'Upstream–Downstream Transactions and Watershed Externalities: Experimental Evidence from Kenya'. Ecological Economics 68: 1813–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Maarten C., and Mendys-Kamphorst, Ewa. 2004. 'The Price of a Price: On the Crowding Out and In of Social Norms'. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 55: 377–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. 2001. 'Trust, Collective Action, and Law'. Boston University Law Review 81: 333–45.Google Scholar
Kraak, Sarah B. M., and Hart, Paul J. B.. 2019. 'Creating a Breeding Ground for Compliance and Honest Reporting under the Landing Obligation: Insights from Behavioural Science'. In The European Landing Obligation, edited by Uhlmann, Sven Sebastian, Ulrich, Clara and Kennelly, Steven J., 219–36. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Lepper, Mark R., Greene, David and Nisbett, Richard E.. 1973. 'Undermining Children's Intrinsic Interest with Extrinsic Reward: A Test of the "Overjustification" Hypothesis'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28: 129–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Listokin, Yair, and Schizer, David M.. 2012. 'I Like to Pay Taxes: Taxpayer Support for Government Spending and the Efficiency of the Tax System'. Tax Law Review 66: 179–215.Google Scholar
Lobel, Orly. 2012. 'Linking Prevention, Detection, and Whistleblowing: Principles for Designing Effective Reporting Systems'. South Texas Law Review 54: 37–52.Google Scholar
Lubell, Mark, and Scholz, John T.. 2001. 'Cooperation, Reciprocity, and the Collective-Action Heuristic'. American Journal of Political Science 45: 160–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, Richard H., and Nadler, Janice. 2005. 'Testing the Focal Point Theory of Legal Compliance: The Effect of Third‐Party Expression in an Experimental Hawk/Dove Game'. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 2: 87–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, Richard, and Tullock, Gordon. 1985. The New World of Economics (4th revised edition). Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
Murayama, Kou, Kitagami, Shinji, Tanaka, Ayumi and Raw, Jasmine A.. 2016. 'People's Naiveté about How Extrinsic Rewards Influence Intrinsic Motivation'. Motivation Science 2: 138–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Promberger, Marianne, and Marteau, Theresa M.. 2013. 'When Do Financial Incentives Reduce Intrinsic Motivation? Comparing Behaviors Studied in Psychological and Economic Literatures'. Health Psychology 32: 950–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramaswami, Sridhar N. 1996. 'Marketing Controls and Dysfunctional Employee Behaviors: A Test of Traditional and Contingency Theory Postulates'. Journal of Marketing 60: 105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rode, Julian, Gómez-Baggethun, Erik, and Krause, Torsten. 2015. 'Motivation Crowding by Economic Incentives in Conservation Policy: A Review of the Empirical Evidence'. Ecological Economics 117: 270–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, Günther G., and Frank, Björn. 2003. 'Deterrence versus Intrinsic Motivation: Experimental Evidence on the Determinants of Corruptibility'. Economics of Governance 4: 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seamone, Evan R. 2002. 'A Refreshing Jury Cola: Fulfilling the Duty to Compensate Jurors Adequately'. New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 5: 289–417.Google Scholar
Serra, Danila. 2011. 'Combining Top-Down and Bottom-Up Accountability: Evidence from a Bribery Experiment'. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 28: 569–87.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Matthew, Jones, Julia P. G., Rahajaharison, Michael and Milner-Gulland, E. J.. 2010. 'The Role of Fairness and Benefit Distribution in Community-Based Payment for Environmental Services Interventions: A Case Study from Menabe, Madagascar'. Ecological Economics 69: 1262–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Erin G., Morton, Sally C., Hulscher, Marlies E., Maglione, Margaret A., Roth, Elizabeth A., Grimshaw, Jeremy M., Mittman, Brian S., Rubenstein, Lisa V., Rubenstein, Laurence Z. and Shekelle, Paul G.. 2002. 'Interventions that Increase Use of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening Services: A Meta-analysis'. Annals of Internal Medicine 136: 641–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stout, Lynn A. 2014. 'Killing Conscience: The Unintended Behavioral Consequences of Pay for Performance.' Journal of Corporation Law 39: 525–61.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996. 'On the Expressive Function of Law'. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144: 2021–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Shu‐Hua, and Hall, Vernon C.. 1995. 'The Overjustification Effect: A Meta‐analysis'. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9: 365–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thøgersen, John. 1994. 'Monetary Incentives and Environmental Concern: Effects of a Differentiated Garbage Fee'. Journal of Consumer Policy 17: 407–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titmuss, Richard M. 1970. The Gift Relationship. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Underhill, Kristen. 2016. 'When Extrinsic Incentives Displace Intrinsic Motivation: Designing Legal Carrots and Sticks to Confront the Challenge of Motivational Crowding-Out.' Yale Journal on Regulation 33: 213–79.Google Scholar
Velez, Maria Alejandra, Murphy, James J. and Stranlund, John K.. 2010. 'Centralized and Decentralized Management of Local Common Pool Resources in the Developing World: Experimental Evidence from Fishing Communities in Colombia'. Economic Inquiry 48: 254–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Erte, and Houser, Daniel. 2011. 'Punish in Public'. Journal of Public Economics 95: 1006–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbink, K., and Wu, K. 2017. 'Reward Self-Reporting to Deter Corruption: An Experiment on Mitigating Collusive Bribery'. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 133: 256–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amir, E., Lazar, A., and Levi, S. 2018. 'The Deterrent Effect of Whistleblowing on Tax Collections'. European Accounting Review 27, no. 5: 939–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apesteguia, J., Dufwenberg, M., and Selten, R. 2007. 'Blowing the Whistle'. Economic Theory 31: 143–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert, C., Rey, P., and Kovacic, W. 2006. 'The Impact of Leniency and Whistle-Blowing Programs on Cartels'. International Journal of Industrial Organization 24: 1241–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bank of England. 2014. 'Financial Incentives for Whistleblowers'. Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority, www.fca.org.uk/publication/financial-incentives-for-whistleblowers.pdf.Google Scholar
Berger, P., and Lee, H. 2019. 'Do Corporate Whistleblower Laws Deter Accounting Fraud?' Unpublished manuscript, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3059231.Google Scholar
Bigoni, M., Le Coq, C., Fridolfsson, S., and Spagnolo, G. 2012. 'Fines, Leniency and Rewards in Antitrust'. RAND Journal of Economics 43, no. 2: 368–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, L. 2013. 'Tax Compliance and Whistleblowing: The Role of Incentives'. Bonn Journal of Economics 2, no. 2: 7–44.Google Scholar
Buccirossi, P., and Spagnolo, G. 2006. 'Leniency Programs and Illegal Transactions'. Journal of Public Economics 90, no. 6–7: 1281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J., Serra, D., and Spagnolo, G. in press. 'Motivating Whistleblowers'. Management Science, https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/pdf/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3240.Google Scholar
Call, A., Martin, G., Nathan, S., and Wilde, J. 2018. 'Whistleblowers and Outcomes of Financial Misrepresentation Enforcement Actions'. Unpublished Manuscript, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2506418.Google Scholar
Carson, T., Verdu, M., and Wokutch, R. 2008. 'Whistle-Blowing for Profit: An Ethical Analysis of the Federal False Claims Act'. Journal of Business Ethics 77, no. 3: 361–76.Google Scholar
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). 2014. 'Informant Rewards Policy'. www.gov.uk/government/publications/cartels-informant-rewards-policy.Google Scholar
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). 2018. 'Reference Request Number: IAT/FOIA/509'. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/774831/Cartel_Reward_FOIA_Request.pdf.Google Scholar
Dyck, A., Morse, A., and Zingales, L. 2010. 'Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud?' Journal of Finance 65, no. 6: 2213–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebersole, D. 2011. 'Blowing the Whistle on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provisions'. Ohio State Entrepreneurial Business Law Journal 6, no.1: 123–74.Google Scholar
Engstrom, D. 2016. 'Bounty Regimes'. In Arlen, J. (ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Criminal Enforcement and Financial Misdealing, 334–63. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Filler, R., and Markham, J. 2018. 'Whistleblowers – A Case Study in the Regulatory Cycle for Financial Services'. Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law 12, no. 2: 311–40.Google Scholar
Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2011. 'Criminal Cartel Enforcement: Stakeholder Views on Impact of 2004 Antitrust Reform Are Mixed, but Support Whistleblower Protection'. www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=682276.Google Scholar
Hamaguchi, Y., Kawagoe, T., and Shibata, A. 2009. 'Group Size Effects on Cartel Formation and the Enforcement Power of Leniency Programs'. International Journal of Industrial Organization 27: 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 2017. 'Annual Report to Congress'. www.irs.gov/compliance/whistleblower-office-annual-reports.Google Scholar
Johannesen, N., and Stolper, T. 2017. 'The Deterrence Effect of Whistleblowing – An Event Study of Leaked Customer Information from Banks in Tax Havens'. Working paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2017–4, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2976321.Google Scholar
Kovacic, W. 1996. 'Whistleblower Bounty Lawsuits as Monitoring Devices in Government Contracting.' Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 29: 1799–1858.Google Scholar
Marvão, C., and Spagnolo, G. 2016. 'Cartels and Leniency: Taking Stock of What We Learnt'. Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics, working paper No.39, https://swopec.hhs.se/hasite/papers/hasite0039.pdf?_ga=2.195741548.1523066161.1567577039–350847113.1567577039.Google Scholar
Moberly, R. 2007. 'Unfulfilled Expectations: An Empirical Analysis of Why Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers Rarely Win'. William & Mary Law Review 49, no. 1: 65–155.Google Scholar
Modesitt, N. 2013. 'Why Whistleblowers Lose: An Empirical and Qualitative Analysis'. Sociological Inquiry 64: 322–47.Google Scholar
Nyreröd, T., and Spagnolo, G. 2019. 'Myths and Numbers on Whistleblower Rewards'. Regulation and Governance, early view available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rego.12267.Google Scholar
Pacella, J. 2015. 'Bounties for Bad Behavior: Rewarding Culpable Whistleblowers under the Dodd-Frank Act and Internal Revenue Code'. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law 17, no.2: 345–92.Google Scholar
Rothschild, J., and Miethe, T. 1999. 'Whistle-Blower Disclosures and Management Retaliation'. Work and Occupation 26, no.1: 107–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spagnolo, G. 2004. 'Divide et Impera: Optimal Leniency Programs'. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4840, Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2017. 'Congressional Budget Justification'. www.sec.gov/about/reports/secfy17congbudgjust.pdf.Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2018. 'Annual Report to Congress 2018'. www.sec.gov/sec-2018-annual-report-whistleblower-program.pdf.Google Scholar
Wiedman, C., and Zhu, C. 2018. 'Do the SEC Whistleblower Provisions of Dodd-Frank Deter Aggressive Financial Reporting?' 2018 Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA) Annual Conference (September). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3081174 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3081174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, J. 2017. 'The Deterrent Effect of Employee Whistleblowing on Firms' Financial Misreporting and Tax Aggressiveness'. Accounting Review 92, no. 5: 247–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, George. 1970. "The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism." Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Cindy A., and Arlen, Jennifer. 2018. "Does Conviction Matter? The Reputational and Collateral Consequences of Corporate Crime." In Arlen, Jennifer (ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Crime and Financial Misdealing. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 87–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Cindy A., and Cohen, Mark. 2015. "The Evolution of Corporate Criminal Settlements: An Empirical Perspective on Deferred Prosecution, Non-Prosecution and Plea Agreements." American Criminal Law Review 52: 537–91.Google Scholar
Arffa, Leslie B. 2019. "Separation of Prosecutors." Yale Law Journal 128: 1078–1129.Google Scholar
Arlen, Jennifer. 2016. "Prosecuting Beyond the Rule of Law: Corporate Mandates Imposed through Deferred Prosecution Agreements." Journal of Legal Analysis 8: 191–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arlen, Jennifer. 1994. "The Potentially Perverse Effects of Corporate Criminal Liability." Journal of Legal Studies 23: 833–67.Google Scholar
Arlen, Jennifer, and Buell, Samuel W.. 2020. "The Law of Corporate Investigations and the Global Expansion of Corporate Criminal Enforcement." Southern California Law Review 93: 697–761.Google Scholar
Arlen, Jennifer, and Carney, William. 1992. "Vicarious Liability for Fraud on the Market: Theory and Evidence." Illinois Law Review 1992: 691–734.Google Scholar
Arlen, Jennifer, and Kahan, Marcel. 2017. "Corporate Governance Regulation through Non-prosecution." University of Chicago Law Review 84: 323–87.Google Scholar
Arlen, Jennifer, and Kraakman, Reinier. 1997. "Controlling Corporate Misconduct: An Analysis of Corporate Liability Regimes." New York University Law Review 72: 687–779.Google Scholar
Armour, John, Gordon, Jeffrey and Min, Geeyoung. 2020a. "Taking Compliance Seriously." Yale Journal on Regulation 37: 1–66.Google Scholar
Armour, John, Garrett, Brandon L., Gordon, Jeffrey N. and Min, Geeyoung. 2020b. "Board Compliance." Minnesota Law Review 104: 1191–1273.Google Scholar
Baer, Miriam H. 2018. "When the Corporation Investigates Itself." In Arlen, Jennifer (ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Crime and Financial Misdealing. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 308–33.Google Scholar
Baer, Miriam H. 2016. "The Stick That Never Was: Parsing the Yates Memo and the Revised Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations." NYU Corporate Enforcement and Compliance Blog.Google Scholar
Baer, Miriam H. 2009. "Governing Corporate Compliance." Boston College Law Review 52: 949–1019.Google Scholar
Baer, Miriam H. 2008. "Linkage and the Deterrence of Corporate Fraud." Virginia Law Review 94: 1295–1365.Google Scholar
Balleisen, Edward J. 2017. Fraud: An American History from Barnum to Madoff. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barkow, Rachel. 2014. "The New Policing of Business Crime." Seattle University Law Review 37: 435–73.Google Scholar
Bird, Robert C., and Park, Stephen Kim. 2017. "Turning Compliance into Competitive Advantage." University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law 19: 285–338.Google Scholar
Buell, Samuel W., 2018. "Why Do Prosecutors Say Anything? The Case of Corporate Crime." North Carolina Law Review 96: 823–58.Google Scholar
Buell, Samuel W., 2007. "Criminal Procedure Within the Firm." Stanford Law Review 59: 1613–70.Google Scholar
Casey, Anthony J., and Niblett, Anthony. 2014. "Noise Reduction: The Screening Value of Qui Tam." Washington University Law Review 91: 1169–1217.Google Scholar
Cressey, Donald Ray. 1953. Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Diamantis, Mihailis E. 2018. "Clockwork Corporations: A Character Theory of Corporate Punishment." Iowa Law Review: 507–69.Google Scholar
Eisinger, Jesse. 2015. The Chickenshit Club: Why the Justice Department Fails to Prosecute Executives. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Fanto, James A. 2014. "Surveillant and Counselor: A Reorientation in Compliance for Broker-Dealers." Brigham Young University Law Review 2014: 1121–83.Google Scholar
Feldman, Yuval. 2018. The Law of Good People: Challenging States' Ability to Regulate Human Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
First, Harry. 2010. "Branch Office of the Prosecutor: The New Role of Corporations in Business Crime Prosecutions." North Carolina Law Review 89: 23.Google Scholar
Ford, Cristie, and Hess, David. 2011. "Corporate Monitorships and New Governance Regulation: In Theory, In Practice and In Context." Law and Policy 33: 509–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L. 2020. "Declining Corporate Prosecutions." American Criminal Law Review 57: 109–55.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L. 2014. Too Big to Jail. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L., and Mitchell, Gregory. 2020. "Testing Compliance." Law and Contemporary Problems, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3535913.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, Gregory M. 2014. "The Special Problem of Banks and Crime." University of Colorado Law Review 85: 1–52.Google Scholar
Golumbic, Court E., and Lichy, Albert D.. 2014. "The 'Too Big to Jail' Effect and the Impact on the Justice's Department's Corporate Charging Policy." Hastings Law Journal 65: 1293–1344.Google Scholar
Griffith, Sean J. 2016. "Corporate Governance in an Era of Compliance." William and Mary Law Review 57: 2075–2140.Google Scholar
Gruner, Richard S. 2004. Corporate Criminal Liability and Prevention. New York: Law Journal Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Todd. 2015. "The Most Senior Wall Street Official: Evaluating the State of Financial Crises Prosecutions." Virginia Business Law Review 9: 153–99.Google Scholar
Henning, Peter. 2017. "Why Is It Getting Harder to Prosecute Executives for Corporate Misconduct?" Vermont Law Review 41: 503–21.Google Scholar
Henning, Peter. 2016. "The New Corporate Gatekeeper." Wayne Law Review 62: 29–52.Google Scholar
Hess, David. 2016. "Ethical Infrastructures and Evidence-Based Corporate Compliance and Ethics Programs: Policy Implications from the Empirical Evidence." New York University Journal of Law and Business 12: 317–68.Google Scholar
Innes, Robert. 2001. "Violator Avoidance Activities and Self-Reporting in Optimal Law Enforcement." Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 17: 239–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, Robert. 1999. "Remediation and Self-Reporting in Optimal Law Enforcement." Journal of Public Economics 72: 379–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joh, Elizabeth E., and Joo, Thomas W.. 2015a. "The Corporation as Snitch: The New DOJ Guidelines on Prosecuting White Collar Crime." Virginia Law Review Online 101: 51–9.Google Scholar
Joh, Elizabeth E., and Joo, Thomas W.. 2015b. "Third Party Harms in Undercover Police Operations." Southern California Law Review 88: 1309–55.Google Scholar
Kaal, Wolf A., and Lacine, Timothy. 2014. "The Effect of Deferred and Non-prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance: Evidence from 1993–2003." Business Lawyer 70: 61–119.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. 1996. "Is Chevron Relevant to Federal Criminal Law?" Harvard Law Review 110: 469–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Michael P., and Mandelbaum, Ruth E.. 2016. "Are the Yates Memorandum and the Federal Judiciary's Concerns about Over-Criminalization Destined to Collide?" American Criminal Law Review 53: 899–937.Google Scholar
Koehler, Mike. 2018. "The FCPA's Record-Breaking Year." Connecticut Law Review 50: 91–160.Google Scholar
Krawiec, Kimberley D. 2005. "Organizational Misconduct: Beyond the Principal–Agent Model." Florida State Law Review 32: 571–615.Google Scholar
Langevoort, Donald C. 2018. "Behavioral Ethics, Behavioral Compliance." In Arlen, Jennifer (ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Crime and Financial Misdealing. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 263–81.Google Scholar
Laufer, William S. 2017. "A Very Special Regulatory Milestone." Journal of Business Law 20: 392–428.Google Scholar
Laufer, William S. 1999. "Corporate Liability, Risk Shifting and the Paradox of Compliance." Vanderbilt Law Review 52: 1343–1420.Google Scholar
Lemos, Margaret H., and Stein, Alex. 2011. "Strategic Enforcement." Minnesota Law Review 95: 9–58.Google Scholar
Low, Lucinda A., and Prelogar, Brittany. 2020. "Incentives for Self-Reporting and Cooperation." In Soreide, Tina and Makinwa, Abiola (eds.), Negotiated Settlements in Bribery Cases: A Principled Approach. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 200–27.Google Scholar
Martinez, Veronica Root. 2019. "The Outsize Influence of the FCPA?" University of Illinois Law Review 2019: 1205–25.Google Scholar
McGrath, Joe. 2020. "Why Do Good People Do Bad Things? A Multi-Level Analysis of Individual, Organizational, and Structural Causes of White-Collar Crime." Seattle Law Review 43: 525–53.Google Scholar
Michaels, Jon D. 2020. "We the Shareholders: Government Market Participation in the Postliberal U.S. Political Economy." Columbia Law Review 120: 465.Google Scholar
Miller, Geoffrey. 2018a. "An Economic Analysis of Effective Compliance Programs." In Arlen, Jennifer (ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Crime and Financial Misdealing. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 247–62.Google Scholar
Miller, Geoffrey. 2018b. "The Compliance Function: An Overview." In Gordon, Jeffrey N. and Ringe, Wolf-Georg (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 981–1002.Google Scholar
Oded, Sharon. 2018. "Trumping Recidivism: Assessing the FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy." Columbia Law Review Online 118: 135–52.Google Scholar
Rakoff, Jed S. 2014. "The Financial Crisis: Why Have No High-Level Executives Been Prosecuted?" New York Review of Books Jan. 9. www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/01/09/financial-crisis-why-no-executive-prosecutions/.Google Scholar
Richman, Daniel C. 1999. "Federal Criminal Law, Congressional Delegation and Enforcement Discretion." UCLA Law Review 46: 757–814.Google Scholar
Sanchirico, Chris William. 2006. "Detection Avoidance." New York University Law Review 81: 1331–99.Google Scholar
Soltes, Eugene. 2018. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Corporate Compliance Programs: Establishing a Model for Prosecutors, Courts and Firms." NYU Journal of Law and Business 14: 965–1011.Google Scholar
Spalding, Andrew. 2015. "Restorative Justice for Multinational Corporations." Ohio State Law Journal 76: 357–408.Google Scholar
Tenbrunsel, Ann, and Messick, David. 2004. "Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior." Social Justice Research 17: 223–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, David M. 2013. "Deferred Prosecution and Non-prosecution Agreements and the Erosion of Corporate Criminal Liability." Maryland Law Review 72: 1295–1344.Google Scholar
Weisselberg, Charles D., and Li, Su. 2011."Big Law's Sixth Amendment: The Rise of Corporate White-Collar Practices in Large U.S. Law Firms." Arizona Law Review 53: 1221–98.Google Scholar
Werle, Nick. 2019. "Prosecuting Corporate Crime When Firms Are Too Big to Jail: Investigation, Deterrence, and Judicial Review." Yale Law Journal 128: 1366–1427.Google Scholar
Woody, Karen. 2018. "'Declinations with Disgorgement' in FCPA Enforcement." University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 51: 269–311.Google Scholar
Yockey, Joseph W. 2016. "Beyond Yates: From Engagement to Accountability in Corporate Crime." New York University Journal of Law and Business 12: 409–23.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1968. "Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach." Journal of Political Economy 76: 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas, and Whinston, Michael. 1999. "Incomplete Contracts and Strategic Ambiguity." American Economic Review 88: 902–32.Google Scholar
Bolton, Patrick, and Dewatripont, Mathias. 2005. Contract Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Jesse. 2008a. "Mechanism Design with Moderate Evidence Cost." B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 8(1): article 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Jesse. 2008b. "Costly Evidence Production and the Limits of Verifiability." B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 8(1): article 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Jesse. 2009. "Costly Evidence and Systems of Fact-Finding." Bulletin of Economic Research 61: 103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Jesse, and Watson, Joel. 2004. "Evidence Disclosure and Verifiability." Journal of Economic Theory 118: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Jesse, and Watson, Joel. 2007. "Hard Evidence and Mechanism Design." Games and Economic Behavior 58: 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Jesse, and Watson, Joel. 2019. "Statistical Evidence and the Problem of Robust Litigation." RAND Journal of Economics 50(4): 974–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cater, Bruce, Lew, Byron, and Pivato, Marcus. 2009. "Why Tenure?" Working paper.Google Scholar
Chakravarty, Surajeet, and MacLeod, W. Bentley. 2009. "Contracting in the Shadow of the Law." RAND Journal of Economics 40(3): 533–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deneckere, Raymond, and Severinov, Sergei. 2008. "Mechanism Design with Partial State Verifiability." Games and Economic Behavior 64: 487–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fluet, Claude, and Lanzi, Thomas. 2018. "Adversarial Persuasion with Cross-Examination." Working paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Oliver. 1995. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmstrom, Bengt. 1982. "Moral Hazard in Teams." Bell Journal of Economics 13(2): 324–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Martimort, David. 2009. The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legros, Patrick, and Matthews, Steven. 1993. "Efficient and Nearly-Efficient Partnerships." Review of Economic Studies 68: 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipman, Barton, and Seppi, Duane. 1995. "Robust Inference in Communication Games with Partial Provability." Journal of Economic Theory 66: 370–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelson, David. 2001. "Did Van Halen's Concert Contract Require the Removal of Brown M&Ms?" Snopes, www.snopes.com/fact-check/brown-out/.Google Scholar
Miller, Nolan. 1997. "Efficiency in Partnerships with Joint Monitoring." Journal of Economic Theory 77: 285–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moszoro, Marian, Spiller, Pablo T., and Stolorz, Sebastian. 2016. "Rigidity of Public Contracts." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 13(3): 396–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, David Lee. 2012. "Brown M&Ms." Vimeo, https://vimeo.com/36615187.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Alan, and Watson, Joel. 2013. "Conceptualizing Contractual Interpretation." Journal of Legal Studies 42: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Hyun Song. 1994. "The Burden of Proof in a Game of Persuasion." Journal of Economic Theory 64: 253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeveloff, Julie. 2016, "There's a Brilliant Reason Why Van Halen Asked for a Bowl of M&Ms with All the Brown Candies Removed before Every Show." Business Insider, September 7.Google Scholar