Oh, the places you'll go to in the amazing 2020 DRV Suites Mobile Suites 43 MANHATTAN! You can find this reliable 5th Wheel at All Seasons RV, located at 4701 Airline Rd Muskegon Michigan 49444! Not only are we one of the largest RV dealers in the Midwest, but we're also #1 in customer satisfaction! The proof is in the pudding, so give us a call today at 231-739-5269!
With the master bedroom's cozy King bed, you and your camping partner will be able to drift off to sleep with ease each and every night! You won't be the only one sleeping well, as this comfy camper sleeps up to 5 people!
Sure campfire snacks and trail mix are great, but you'll soon want a hearty, nutritious meal! Thankfully, the kitchen is jam packed with wonderful amenities! The modern appliances include a 20.00 cu. ft. refrigerator, 3 burner range cooktop, and more! The sink won't run out of refreshing water, thanks to the massive 100 gallon freshwater tank!
Make sure that your kids get a full night's rest every night! They'll drift off to sleep in comfort and privacy in the bunkhouse!


Our Wonderful Hair Extensions cold fusion system is light weight, compact and utilises a hand held applicator that is designed to apply and mould the small shave V-Shaped keratin bond to the hair.
The WH cold fusion system excels in its versatility, speed and precision. Our 100% high quality hair extensions are designed to be applied as single bonds, meaning partial as well as full placements can be maid easily, efficiently and accurately.
A single bond can be applied in undertow seconds and a fully trained technician can complete a full head of extensions in less than 90 minutes. This places the WH cold fusion system at the fore front of the UK hair industry.
Works with flat bonds to guarantee clients comfort, and undetectable placements.
Note: Wonderful Hair cold fusion system can be purchased without the need to participate in WH training courses. All that we request is a recent copy of certification confirming you have previously been trained in cold fusion.


Once a Lithium-Ion battery is included, this is most probably the best value for money conversion kit you can find on the market.
The kit is a front motor-wheel design, making it incredibly simple to install. It usually takes less than an hour to complete the installation. But if you are not the DIY type, you can always seek assistance of a bike service shop. A full installation guide is included.
While this kit is powered through the use of a throttle, you can add a Pedal Assistance System to upgrade your kit with further functions.
The front forks on your bike need to have 100mm clearance between the drop-outs (which is the case with the vast majority of bikes).
The fork drop-outs themselves need to be the standard 10mm size (this is also the most common size for fork drop-outs). If you happen to have the slightly smaller 9mm drop-out, you could file them down by 0.5mm on either side for the motor to fit. Please seek professional assistance for this part as doing it wrongly will be entirely at your own risk.
The front motor is compatible with the majority of disc brakes. However, certain disc brake calipers are wider than usual which means they may block the hub motor from fitting inside the forks. Please refer to the motor dimensions on the motor tab and measure the clearance inside your forks.
The electric brake levers supplied with the kits are mechanical. I.e. they are not compatible with hydraulic brakes or brakes that are combined with gear levers. However, installing the brake levers are not a necessity and the kit will work fine without them. Moreover, the throttle is spring-loaded, i.e. it will cut the power whenever the thumb is released from it for safety.


St Barts is also known as Saint Barthelemy and St. Barts, which is renowned tourist destination attracting thousands of the travelers from across the globe. The major specialty here is the exclusive luxury yacht charter services, offering unlimited fun and sea sporting excitements to the travelers.
You can enjoy the terrific influence of cosmopolitan Mediterranean alongside the natural charm of the soft sanded beaches at this place. The turquoise waters and secluded coves will surely ensure you a perfect Caribbean escape at St Barts.
St Barts is a wonderful destination which plays host to many special yachting events too, one among which is the St Barts Bucket. It is a perfect opportunity for the sailors to gather a lot of colorful memories about your yachting endeavors. The wonderful sight of the sailing yacht racing across the sea in the most glorious atmosphere is a lifetime memory to keep.
There are many destinations to explore at St Barts through charter trips. Gustavia Port is one must-seen place at St Barts, which is lined with many designer boutiques, world-class restaurants, and chic cafés. This is a wonderful yachting destination too which can port about 60 yachts at a time plus another 100 at the outer waters.
You can also explore activities like diving at the coral reefs and enjoying a first-hand sight of the marine life from here. There are also many varieties of water sports to be enjoyed through daily St Barts yacht charter services. The major stop-offs around Gustavia Port include the Leeward Islands, Antigua, St. Martin, St. Kitts, Barbuda, and the Nevis Island etc.
Departures to this wonderful destination are available from St Martin and Anguilla. Grand Case is a beautiful destination, which is also the gourmet capital of Caribbean. What you have to enjoy here are many culinary delights from the local street vendor cuisine to the most spectacular varieties from across the globe.
Boasting of a typical Caribbean feel in its culture and ambience, Grand Case is also home to the major artists who can be often seen at the quiet streets of the town. Adding to all these, you can also enjoy some of the best cocktails at this place, and sipping on the signature cocktails by dipping your feet into the shallow waters will be an enthralling experience.
Serenity and elegance can be best experienced at this place, and you can have charter sails to this destination from St Barts and other nearby islands. Anguilla is considered to be one of the most romantic resorts in the world now. The notable attributes at this resort include the Moroccan Architecture being displayed here. The 5-star dining offers some of the best cuisine and the white-sanded long beaches with crystal clear water can soothe you up. A charter yacht sail to this destination is an absolute must if you are in search of tranquility and peace in luxury.
Choosing the best service provider is the key if you are planning for yacht charter booking at St. Barts. There are many providers, so it is not so easy to identify who can offer you the best services in a budget-friendly manner. The best way out is to do a baseline research to identify the service specifics of all the providers and do a thorough comparison.


PETRONAS has been made aware of unauthorised individuals or organisations falsely using the PETRONAS name in emails in an attempt to recruit on behalf of PETRONAS and solicit up-front fees obtaining immigration documents including for visa or work permit for expatriate posting within a PETRONAS Groupwide from interested job-seekers or members of the public.
PETRONAS wishes to stress that it has not authorised such e-mail based recruitment. However, periodically, PETRONAS engages recruiting and/or placement agencies to help us attract potential candidates for specific positions. PETRONAS appeals to the public not to respond to the e-mail or any such emails.
1. PETRONAS official website pages always include http://www.petronas.com.my. Any other format is not genuine.
2. On-line recruitment portal is http://www.discoverpetronas.com and those who wish to seek employment with PETRONAS are advised to visit only this portal.
3. Email communication on recruitment from PETRONAS, if any, would be sent by PETRONAS' officials using only e-mail domains of @petronas.com.my.
4. No money transfers or payments of any kind will EVER be requested from applicants nor by PETRONAS or any of the agencies that recruit on our behalf, at any point in the recruitment process; or for immigration documents, insurance, or any other purpose.
Should you experience any of the foregoing, please treat the communication as fraudulent and forward it to: ghrmic@petronas.com.my.
PETRONAS wishes to alert members of the public that the e-mail communications on "PETRONAS Secured Online Promotion" currently circulating on the Internet is a scam devised by unscrupulous individual or parties.
The scam e-mail also contains details of a claims agent to be contacted for assistance and disbursement of the alleged prize.
PETRONAS wishes to inform that neither PETRONAS nor any subsidiary within its Group of Companies in any of the countries we operate in has conducted or authorised such prize redemption schemes and appeals to the public not to respond to the email.
Only trust emails by official PETRONAS personnel using e-mail domains of @petronas.com.my.
This advice also extends to all e-mail or short message service (SMS) communications using PETRONAS' name in other prize redemption schemes, lucky draws or contests.
PETRONAS has communicated with the authorities on this matter.
It has been brought to PETRONAS' attention that certain parties have been sending text messages to mobile phone users informing them that their SIM cards have won a lucky draw prize from PETRONAS.
PETRONAS wishes to inform that none of its companies has organised any such mobile phone SIM card lucky draws or contests and would like to advise members of the public not to respond to such text messages.
PETRONAS has also communicated with the authorities on this matter.
DISCLAIMER: PETRONAS shall not be responsible for the content of any information nor shall it be liable for any conclusion, loss or damage of any nature whatsoever suffered or may be suffered by any part or members of the public arising from or as a result of reliance on or usage of any information relating to prize redemption schemes, lucky draws or contests, and recruitment in PETRONAS from portals, websites or e-mail domains which are not authorised by PETRONAS.


text:
Pilot of Kobe Bryant's helicopter said he was climbing to avoid CLOUDS in final message before he plunged into mountain - as it's revealed aircraft had no black box and cops patrol for LOOTERS
Anti-virus company Avast sells web history, location and porn searches of its 435 million users to Google, Microsoft, Home Depot and Pepsi
Meghan's wedding week war with her father: Court papers reveal bitter messages that destroyed their relationship
Breakdown in Meghan's relationship with Thomas Markle was laid bare yesterday
A series of messages between the pair were detailed in court papers
Mr Markle made desperate attempts to mend their relationship after ill health
In one he accused Prince Harry of treating his heart attack as an 'inconvenience'
By Vanessa Allen for the Daily Mail
The devastating breakdown in Meghan Markle's relationship with her father was laid bare yesterday in a series of messages between the pair detailed by court papers.
He has handed over previously unseen messages and letters which set out how he made desperate attempts to mend their relationship after heart surgery forced him to miss her wedding.
In one message he accused Prince Harry of treating his heart attack as an 'inconvenience', adding: 'I've done nothing to hurt you, Meghan or anyone else.'
In another, he said that Meghan had effectively 'written me off'. The exchanges between Mr Markle and his daughter were detailed in documents filed to the High Court in London yesterday.
Thomas Markle has handed over previously unseen messages and letters which set out how he made desperate attempts to mend their relationship after heart surgery forced him to miss her wedding. (pictured: a young Meghan Markle with her father Thomas)
The Duchess of Sussex has launched legal action against the Mail on Sunday, the Daily Mail's sister paper, accusing the newspaper of breaching her privacy and her copyright by publishing extracts of a five-page letter she wrote to her father in August 2018. In the letter, Meghan, 38, chastised her father for ignoring her calls and said he had 'broken her heart into a million pieces'.
Meghan's legal team has claimed she was 'shocked and deeply upset' when her 'private letter' to her father was published.
The documents lodged at the court yesterday detail the newspaper's defence to her allegations. They say Mr Markle, 75, has never met his eight-month-old grandson Archie, nor been introduced to Prince Harry, although they have spoken on the phone.
His only contact with his daughter since her wedding day was the August 2018 letter, in which she accused him of lying about her and inflicting 'unnecessary and unwarranted pain' on her and her new husband.
As part of the legal action, Mr Markle has agreed to appear as the newspaper's key witness, should the case go before a judge later this year.
He has handed over his own medical records and his correspondence with Meghan, which reveals how their relationship broke down in the final fortnight before her wedding.
His only contact with his daughter since her wedding day was the August 2018 letter, in which she accused him of lying about her and inflicting 'unnecessary and unwarranted pain' on her and her new husband (pictured: Meghan and Prince Harry on their wedding day at St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle on May 19, 2018)
Thomas Markle 'gave Meghan's letter to the Mail on Sunday... Smiling Meghan Markle breaks cover for the first time since... Meghan Markle's closest confidante Jessica Mulroney 'tried... How Meghan Markle 'enlisted her friend Jessica Mulroney to...
Harry and Meghan wave as they leave Windsor Castle by car to attend their reception in Frogmore House
According to the messages detailed in the defence papers yesterday, Thomas Markle initially sent touching messages to his daughter, which spoke of his excitement about her upcoming wedding – before he told of his devastation when a heart attack forced him to abandon plans to walk her down the aisle. In the messages, he repeatedly told Meghan that he loved her.
But the messages made clear how their relationship began to break down after it was revealed that he had secretly agreed to stage a series of paparazzi-style pictures of himself preparing for the wedding.
In documents lodged at the High Court, defence lawyers said Meghan had shown a disregard for her father's wellbeing. They said that even after he explained his cardiac condition and that doctors said he couldn't fly, he was on the receiving end of an admonishment from Harry.
She did not make it clear that he was forced to abandon plans to attend her wedding because of his poor health, and she then ignored his repeated attempts to contact her after the wedding, they alleged.
Lawyers for the Mail on Sunday told the court: 'If the Claimant [the Duchess of Sussex] had been or was concerned about her father and his welfare, she would not have cut her father, a sick 75-year-old man, out of her life for the perceived sin of speaking to the Press about his daughter who had become a famous royal duchess.'
A smiling Meghan was seen for the first time since leaving the country today boarding a sea plane in Vancouver Island, Canada
According to the defence papers, Mr Markle texted his daughter to say he had dropped off some flowers at her mother's house for Mother's Day. In a touching message, he told Meghan he was excited about trying on some shoes she had bought for him to wear to her wedding. She had also bought him a new suit.
He ended the text with a poignant message that it was 'past her bedtime' because of the time difference, adding: 'I love you.' He wrote: 'I look forward to trying on my shoes and see how we look thank you for getting it ready for me its [sic] probably past your bedtime so have a good night I love you Dad.'
May 11 or 12
The news is about to break that Mr Markle had secretly agreed with a photographer to stage a series of paparazzi-style pictures – despite pleas from Prince Harry for the media to leave his future father-in-law alone. At the time, it was reported that CCTV had caught him posing in an internet café for photographs which showed him looking at a news story about his daughter's romance with the prince.
Kensington Palace had previously issued a warning to publishers to respect his privacy, saying he had been 'harassed' by paparazzi. A letter by Prince Harry's communications secretary Jason Knauf said he had been followed and urged editors not to publish pictures of him. But the Mail on Sunday revealed a series of photographs had been taken with his co-operation in March. Mr Markle, Meghan and Harry spoke on the phone before the story broke.
Queen Elizabeth II, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex watch a flypast to mark the centenary of the Royal Air Force from the balcony of Buckingham Palace on July 10, 2018
Kensington Palace issued a statement in which it confirmed that Mr Markle would not attend the wedding. It said: 'This is a deeply personal moment for Ms Markle in the days before her wedding. She and Prince Harry ask again for understanding and respect to be extended to Mr Markle in this difficult situation.'
The defence papers say that on that day, Mr Markle wrote to his daughter to apologise for the furore over the posed photographs, and offered to make a public apology to both Meghan and Prince Harry. He said he loved her but would not go to her wedding as he wanted to spare her from any further embarrassment.
Prince Harry sent him a message in response, saying he did not need to apologise, and that he should call them. Later that day, Mr Markle suffered chest pains and shortness of breath and was taken to hospital and diagnosed with suspected congestive heart failure.
The following day, the defence papers say that Mr Markle texted Meghan to say he was back in hospital, and she responded, asking him to call her.
Mr Markle had an emergency operation – an angioplasty to unblock two arteries to his heart.
The defence papers say that on that day, he texted Meghan to tell her about the surgery and said he could not attend the wedding because his doctors would not allow him to fly. He apologised for missing the wedding and said he loved her, and wished her the best, saying he had had surgery.
According to the defence papers, he sent a later message, asking who would walk her down the aisle to give her away, and said he would come if she really needed him. He apologised again for not being there. He told Meghan he loved her and wishes her the best.
In response, he received a text message which he believed was from Prince Harry, which he described as hurtful.
Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex leave after visiting Canada House in London, after their recent stay in Canada last week
According to the legal documents lodged at the High Court yesterday, it was signed 'Love M and H' but did not ask about his emergency heart surgery, or even ask him how he felt. Instead, it accused him of ignoring some 20 phone calls from Meghan.
The court papers said of Thomas Markle: 'He received a text response signed 'Love M and H', but which read as if it was from Prince Harry, (amongst other things) admonishing Mr Markle for talking to the Press and telling him to stop and accusing Mr Markle of causing hurt to his daughter.
'The text did not ask how the surgical procedure had gone or how Mr Markle was or send him good wishes.' Mr Markle was said to be 'deeply hurt' by the tone of the message, and replied curtly.
According to the defence papers, he said: 'I've done nothing to hurt you Meghan or anyone else I know nothing about 20 phone calls. I'm sorry my heart attack is … any inconvenience for you.' The court papers allege he received no reply and that his daughter did not speak to him again in the final days before her wedding.
In the letter that Meghan later wrote to her father in August 2018, which was published in the Mail on Sunday last year, she wrote: 'You've told the Press that you called me to say you weren't coming to the wedding – that didn't happen because you never called.'
She accused him of ignoring her attempts to contact him in the days before the marriage, saying: 'From my phone alone, I called you over 20 times and you ignored my calls... leaving me in the days before our wedding worried, confused, shocked and absolutely blindsided.'
Harry and Meghan arrive at the public walkabout at the Rotorua Government Gardens on October 31, 2018 in Rotorua, New Zealand
Kensington Palace issued a statement from Meghan, saying: 'Sadly, my father will not be attending our wedding.
'I have always cared for my father and I hope he can be given the space he needs to focus on his health. I would like to thank everyone who has offered generous messages of support. Please know how much Harry and I look forward to sharing our special day with you on Saturday.'
In a statement the following day, Kensington Palace said Meghan had asked Prince Charles to walk her down the aisle at her wedding. It made no reference to her father or his hospital treatment.
May 19 – day of the wedding
Meghan Markle married Prince Harry and formally became part of the Royal Family.
Her mother Doria was at her side and Prince Charles walked her down the aisle.
The defence papers lodged yesterday, said that Mr Markle had insisted he made multiple attempts to contact his daughter by phone call and by text message, but received no response.
When he tried to call, he said his calls were blocked and that he believed she had changed her number without telling him.
Mr Markle said he had no communication from Meghan at all until her letter in August, three months later. Apart from that single letter, the defence papers said he had not heard from his daughter since he told her he was too ill to attend her wedding. He had never been introduced to her husband Prince Harry, nor met his eight-month-old grandson Archie.
He continued to try to make contact, and texted her in November 2018, according to the defence papers. The message read: 'I want to reach out to you or try to reach out to you one more time.
'You apparently have just written me off and now it's telling me I guess for the rest of my life?' He has received no response, the legal papers said.
Meghan's wedding week war with her father: Court papers reveal messages that destroyed relationship

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Into the Pit: 131: Sulpher – Live at Purple Turtle – 04-May 2012
Posted on May 7, 2012 June 16, 2017 By adam
It isn't often that it takes a band nearly ten years to reappear after a first album, without completely disappearing from view and/or being forgotten. But somehow, that is what has happened with Sulpher. Well, I say disappear, but what actually happened was that Rob and Monti in particular ended up working with other bands. And seriously high profile ones, too – The Prodigy, Marilyn Manson, Curve, Gary Numan…indeed the latter day Gary Numan sound, much-more guitar-industrial heavy than before, clearly owes a lot to the influence of Sulpher in the writing and production process.
Sulpher
AlterRed
Purple Turtle, London NW1
All of that other work has meant that the long-promised second album has still not yet materialised. But with this gig, the first in god-knows how long (five, six years, maybe?), the return has finally begun, and judging on the large number of people that turned up (including members of the Prodigy and Gary Numan himself!), I wasn't the only one with an interest in how this was going to work out.
But first, we had to get through the support acts. I missed Global Citizen – I might have at least seen the end of their set if it hadn't been so ludicrously slow to get in, always an issue at the Purtle – but I did see AlterRed, who were apparently launching their new album.
I saw them a few years back, and while they are clearly a considerably more polished live band than they were then, I'm afraid they still do little for me. More than anything they sound an awful lot like IAMX, in other words aiming for preening, bombastic synthpop with a dark edge. And while the ideas are clearly there, it all seems a bit half-baked, with few if any songs sticking in my head whatsoever. In fact, the two moments they really grabbed me was when the sound got that bit harder and heavier, but sadly those moments were all too brief. Still, kudos to the band for doing something different, and not being yet another band relying on tired 4/4 beats and processed vocals.
And so onto Sulpher. We were made to wait for new stuff, which was peppered through the set, and instead treated to a few old favourites to get us started. These quickly proved that the band haven't lost their fire and intensity – You Ruined Everything in particular was brutal, an industrial rock anthem that never quite was.
The new stuff was of great interest, too, as only the odd snippet has been released so far from the band. Two of them in particular stood out: the chugging intro, soaring chorus and piano interlude of No One Will Ever Know marked it as a potential album highlight, and better still was Threw It All Away, a pitch-black, brooding track that bursts into life for an epic chorus. Otherwise, I'll likely need to hear the other new songs a few more times before I can appreciate them properly – as the one thing I did think was that so far, the new material doesn't have a truly killer song like You Ruined Everything just yet. But then, the band haven't aired anything close to the full album yet, so there is still time for that.
Sulpher setlist
You Ruined Everything
No One Will Ever Know (new song)
Disintegrate (new song)
Throw It All Away (new song)
(Unknown) (new song)
Nothing (new song)
Take A Look (new song)
Scarred
Or maybe the band aren't interested in that any more? Sulpher were always about dynamics in their sound, being masters of switching from quiet to LOUD in a heartbeat, and this was something that a (somewhat overworked!) PA did a relatively good job of showing off. Unknown built to a staggering explosion of fury, and a later Problem did similarly. But for me it was the closing Scarred that was the highlight of the entire evening.
The first real moment of calm all evening as it began, but it was one of foreboding, as we all knew what was coming…and as "What am I supposed to do?" is whispered into the mic, the break is drawn out…before /that/ monstrous riff rips in, and the whole crowd rocks back on it's heels. Oh yes. Worth the entry fee alone, finishing with this monster made it pretty much fine that the band either decided against an encore or were denied one – it was difficult to tell. Either way, it meant that one or two old favourites were missed out, but what this show did demonstrate was that Sulpher are back, fighting fit, and a new momentum that should see them gain new fans along the way, especially when the new material finally gets released.
Posted in /Into the Pit, /ReviewsTagged AlterRed, Global Citizen, live, reviews, sulpher
But Listen: 123: Saltillo – Monocyte
Into the Pit: 132: Primordial + Hell Live at Islington 05-May 2012


text:
Giving Someone the Power of Attorney
Power of attorney is a legal term in fact. This is a form or a document that is basically legal because it will be notarize by someone in the right position like the lawyers. Power of attorney allows some to have the authority to handle some other person's business affairs. There are two individuals involve in the process. The first is the principal which will authorize someone to act on his or her behalf. The second person is the agent or the attorney in fact who is appointed to carry out the task of its principal. In the United States, attorney in fact is the common term used; this person must be loyal and most importantly honest in carrying out his or her tasks. The attorney in fact may or may not be paid but for the record most principal would choose someone close to them to act as his or her agent. Usually the principal chooses individuals close to them as the agent because this individual acts as a confidant to the principal.
When making a power of attorney form, you should decide on what type you will use. This form may be limited or special and general. The effectiveness of its power ends when the principal becomes incapacitated or incapable or even before she or he dies. In this case, the principal will be unable to grant the power needed unless the grantor or principal will state and specify that the power of attorney still have its effectiveness even if he or she becomes debilitated. In case when the principal dies, so the effectiveness of the power of attorney ends as well.
There is also the durable power of attorney which encompasses an advance directive that sanctions the attorney in fact. In this position, the agent makes decisions regarding health care of the principal which now happens to be the patient. The decisions would include terminating care; consent to give or not to give any medication or procedure or treatment. An advance directive is very much different with a living will. A living will is a written document stating the patient's wishes regarding the health condition but this does not allow the agent to make any medical decisions.
In the end, it is really very important to understand power of attorney because giving or assigning this to another individual requires a lot of understanding. Yes, it is very easy to acquire such but then it will all end up when the agent would act upon the power of attorney.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=James_Kahn
Business Laws : Forming an LLC
The Importance of a Healthcare Proxy and Living Will
Living Wills Review: Five Reasons Why You Must Hav...
If I Give My Agent Immediate Powers, Do I Forfeit ...
Advance Directives and Why You Need One
What Is a Deed of Trust and What Is It Used For?
Probate Process - What Is Probate? The Steps to Ad...
Which Business Entity Is Right for You?
Advance Medical Directive: The Basics
Why Forming an LLC is a Good Idea
Advance Directives - "The Living Will" and Other I...
What is a Living Will, and Why You Should Inquire ...
What Is A Limited Power of Attorney?
Making a Will - What You Should Know About Creatin...
What If Someone Objects to the Will?
How Do I Set Up an LLC Without a Lawyer?
Can Someone Challenge My Will After I Die?
The Tax Benefits of a Limited Liability Company
Understanding Probate in California
Limited Liability Company (LLC) - Definition and E...
Can I Name Alternate Beneficiaries in My Will?
Uncontested Divorce Made Affordable - By the People


text:
HomeOp-ed
The UK government's new Covid rules are authoritarian and arbitrary. How much longer will people put up with this?
Guy Birchall
Guy Birchall, British journalist covering current affairs, politics and free speech issues. Recently published in The Sun and Spiked Online. Follow him on Twitter @guybirchall
9 Sep, 2020 17:42
© AFP / DANIEL LEAL-OLIVAS
The latest crazy edict from Boris Johnson's government is that only six people can meet up in private homes. There is no logic to this whatsoever, and it perfectly sums up their shambolic handling of the entire coronavirus crisis.
From September 14, it will be illegal for more than six people to gather in a variety of places, including private homes, in England. This ban also extends to restaurants, cafes, bars, pubs and even outdoor spaces, and applies across the board to all ages. However, the rule won't apply in an array of other scenarios, for no other apparent reason than Matt Hancock says so.
The health secretary, who also seems to have appointed himself commissioner of the fun police, explained to the adoring inmates of Airstrip One that: "one of the pieces of feedback we had, including from the police, was that we needed the rules to be super simple so that everybody knows what they are, and now this will be rigorously enforced by the police. This is really simple. Gatherings are OK, they should be socially distanced of course, but groups only of up to six."
Also on rt.com XR's stupid stunts are masking the fact that the establishment agrees with its ridiculous aims
They may be really simple, Mr Hancock, but far more striking than their simplicity is their earth-shattering stupidity. The new restrictions are being introduced in response to a steep rise in coronavirus cases. Not deaths, not hospitalisations, but cases. This rise in cases has, astonishingly, coincided with an increase in testing, but the fact that if you go looking for something you might find more of it doesn't seem to have crossed the minds of the geniuses at the Department of Health.
Despite that little nugget of information passing them by, they have identified some situations where it is apparently fine for more than six people to congregate. These include schools and workplaces, 'Covid-secure' weddings, funerals and organised team sports.
Quite how Covid-19 is supposed to tell the difference between having seven or more people round for a few drinks just for the hell of it and having seven or more people round for a few drinks because it's a wedding is not immediately clear. But I guess we'll just have to take Matt's word for it.
It is also good to know that the virus apparently doesn't spread when you are doing things the government approves of, like going to work or school, but does spread if you just want to enjoy yourself. I didn't know that viruses were capable of telling the difference between a diversity training seminar and a dinner party, or a geography lesson and a barbecue, but you learn something new every day…
These new laws regarding socialising will be enforced through a £100 fine if people fail to comply, doubling on each offence up to a maximum of £3,200. This means that people could be given a criminal record for hanging around with more than six people in a park. This is complete insanity, and completely arbitrary. Why have they settled on six people as a limit? Has Matt Hancock been binge-watching 'Friends' on Netflix during lockdown? Is he making sure we're spared an S Club 7 reunion? Does he just not have many mates?
It is staggering that we Brits are continuing to put up with this nonsensical idiocy from our government, but what alternative do we have? Captain Hindsight Keir Starmer won't dare suggest that the government is overreaching itself with these totalitarian measures, lest he be accused of wanting to kill pensioners.
The devolved administrations in Wales and Scotland seem to be having a competition to be even more ridiculous than the absolute shower in Westminster, and the MSM continue to breathlessly report every case of coronavirus without ever providing the context of how ill any of the people who have it are.
For all the protestations of Hancock and Boris Johnson that they are making "tough" decisions, it seems to have passed them by that they are actually just making "bad" decisions.
Also on rt.com The 1% conundrum: How a simple but flawed math prediction by US Covid-19 experts caused the world to panic and order lockdowns
Quite how they can look at themselves in the mirror when they are criminalising socialising is frankly extraordinary, but the fact they are also reportedly considering a national 10pm curfew is proof that things could get worse before they get better.
In fact, at this stage, it appears that they simply like telling people what to do. The more worrying thing is that we, the people, are continuing to let them.
Trends:Boris Johnson newsCovid-19 coronavirus newsUK Parliament news UK news
Caitlin Johnstone: Tens of millions of people displaced by the 'War On Terror', the greatest scam ever invented
'Tenet': How does a bad movie trick you into believing it's good? By confusing the heck out of you!
We must not allow Caster Semenya's case to be hijacked by trans athletes who want to compete against women
Covid-19 has given a sense of meaning to those who never found it elsewhere… & they'd rather live under lockdown than give it up
The Kaepernick conundrum: The supposed social value of the former quarterback turned poster boy for BLM is a myth
France's bid to ban 'I Hate Men' book has given feminist with little to say a platform she doesn't deserve
Oscars' 'diversity' quotas could hamstring storytelling and fill movies with meaningless token characters
CNNgate? CNN chief Jeff Zucker offered Trump 'WEEKLY SHOW' & gave 'the boss' tips for presidential debate in leaked 2016 audio
Guardian touts op-ed on why AI takeover won't happen as 'written by robot,' but tech-heads smell a human behind the trick
AstraZeneca's Covid-19 vaccine trial ON HOLD after adverse reaction of UK participant – report


MY LIGHT ARE FLICKERING. THEY GO DIM AND GET VERY BRIGHT! WHAT CAUSES MY LIGHTS TO FLICKER GO DIM AND GET VERY BRIGHT?
This is usually a sign that you have lost a neutral connection in your electric service. The loss of a neutral can cause power surges in some parts of your home and low power in other parts causing damage to appliances. If you are experiencing lights flickering dimming and getting very bright then you should turn your main breaker off and call an electrician right way.
This is due to the loss of one of your hot conductors of your electric service have a bad connection. An electrical service into your home is made up of three wires two wires are 120v each and one is the neutral. The voltage from the neutral to each hot wire is 120v and the voltage between both hot wires is 240v. If you lose one hot wire half of your house will be without power and sometimes turning on a 240v appliance may make it seem like you everything is working again. This is caused because the power from that appliance feeds into the other hot wire and gives power to that half of your house. This is very dangerous and you should turn your main breaker off and call an electrician right way.
Another sign you may have a problem with your electric service is if you have voltage on your cable TV line or you had had a TV or cable box stop working recently. Cable TV ground is warm or even hot Or your cable coax line has melted or burned up.