text:
What is the law of cross cutting
What is the law of crosscutting?
The principle of cross-cutting relationships states that an igneous intrusion is always younger than the rock it cuts across. … Examine the igneous intrusion and the surrounding rock.
What is the cross cutting?
Cross-cutting is an editing technique most often used in films to establish action occurring at the same time, and usually in the same place. In a cross-cut, the camera will cut away from one action to another action, which can suggest the simultaneity of these two actions but this is not always the case.
What is inclusion law?
The law of included fragments is a method of relative dating in geology. Essentially, this law states that clasts in a rock are older than the rock itself. One example of this is a xenolith, which is a fragment of country rock that fell into passing magma as a result of stoping.
How do scientists use cross cutting relationships?
By using superposition and cross cutting relationships, geologists can determine relative ages of rocks. This means they can determine which rocks are older and which are younger, but not the exact ages of the rocks. … The rocks at the bottom had to have been there before the rocks on top of them could be deposited.
Which is older a fault or dike?
Cross-cutting relationships may be compound in nature. For example, if a fault were truncated by an unconformity, and that unconformity cut by a dike. Based upon such compound cross-cutting relationships it can be seen that the fault is older than the unconformity which in turn is older than the dike.
You might be interested: What is the law of the conservation of mass
What is the law of horizontality?
The Principle of Original Horizontality states that layers of sediment are originally deposited horizontally under the action of gravity.
What is the difference between a cross cut and a rip cut?
In woodworking, a rip-cut is a type of cut that severs or divides a piece of wood parallel to the grain. The other typical type of cut is a cross-cut, a cut perpendicular to the grain. Unlike cross-cutting, which shears the wood fibers, a rip saw works more like a series of chisels, lifting off small splinters of wood.
Why is cross cutting important?
Cross-cutting is an excellent way to explore the contrast between situations by making differences clear for the audience. It can also be used to give them additional information. It enables performers to move quickly between locations and scenes without interrupting the flow of the drama they're creating.
What are the 7 cross cutting concepts?
The seven crosscutting concepts presented in Chapter 4 of the Framework are as follows:
Patterns. …
Cause and effect: Mechanism and explanation. …
Scale, proportion, and quantity. …
Systems and system models. …
Energy and matter: Flows, cycles, and conservation. …
Structure and function. …
Stability and change.
What is inclusion example?
Inclusion is defined as the state of being included or being made a part of something. When a book covers many different ideas and subjects, it is an example of the inclusion of many ideas. When multiple people are all invited to be part of a group, this is an example of the inclusion of many different people.
You might be interested: What theory explains the underlying reasons for the periodic law
Where are inclusions found?
They are found mostly in the cytoplasm and, to a lesser extent, the nucleus of oligodendrocytes. Inclusions are also observed in the cytoplasm and nucleus of some nerve cells and in neuropil threads.
What is inclusion Rock?
In mineralogy, an inclusion is any material that is trapped inside a mineral during its formation. … According to Hutton's law of inclusions, fragments included in a host rock are older than the host rock itself.
How do scientists use absolute dating?
Absolute dating is used to determine a precise age of a rock or fossil through radiometric dating methods. This uses radioactive minerals that occur in rocks and fossils almost like a geological clock. It's often much easier to date volcanic rocks than the fossils themselves or the sedimentary rocks they are found in.
What are the 3 types of unconformities?
There are three kinds of unconformities: disconformities, nonconformities, and angular unconformities.
Disconformities. Disconformities (Figure 1 ) are usually erosional contacts that are parallel to the bedding planes of the upper and lower rock units. …
Nonconformities. …
Angular unconformities.
Previous Post:How a bill becomes a law 5 steps
Next Post:How to get paid to go to law school


At least since the 1930s and until 2000 undergraduate entrepreneurs were prohibited from campus; yet they nevertheless existed, daring and alienated—call it the renegade era. In 2000 the Technology and Entrepreneurship Center at Harvard (TECH) was founded in the now Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences to embrace entrepreneurial culture and support it broadly across campus. That same year, the student handbook was amended to lift the blanket prohibition and a committee was constituted to oversee new student ventures, beginning a period of regulation. Six years later, in 2006, following a review requested by the dean of Harvard College, the committee disbanded, calling for a more supportive relationship with student entrepreneurs and allowing the possibility that greater resources for them might be appropriate. All the while, TECH, since 2000, had been supporting students' innovation and entrepreneurship needs. In 2008, TECH began to provide the programs that remain at the heart of the College entrepreneurship experience: i3, the Harvard College Innovation Challenge, TECH Startup Square, an undergraduate founder space in Harvard Square, then in 2012, Startup R&D, a multi-semester elective course specifically designed to foster founders and their ideas.
This is where we are now. Where are we going? Further into the age of requirement. The economy and many other schools and institutions are already there. So are many of our students—they come to campus wanting to change the world and they know that requires them to be creative, inventive, innovative and entrepreneurial in whatever fields they may enter. They aren't waiting for an authority to give them permission, or for the time to be right, or for opportunity to knock. They are responding to the incredible amount of change, uncertainty and need all around them and they are brainstorming ideas, applying their knowledge, defining problems, teaming up, designing experiments, prototyping solutions, testing markets and creating value in both social and economic terms. It isn't easy—it is daunting and exhilarating, confusing and life changing, challenging and rewarding. There is no algorithm, no certain road map. There is learning by doing and it is an exciting, meaningful, enduring and evermore required part of the college experience. We cannot and would not want to try to do it for them, but we can help. Our collective years and networks of experience help make it a positive, connected endeavor; and our financial support and services help provide the infrastructure and resources that foster the most effective learning environment.
Our ongoing efforts are promising, but like good entrepreneurs, our job is to keep it going and build it sustainably so that the time comes when an entrepreneurial college experience—and the life skills it provides—is as expected and supported on campus as sportsmanship on the playing fields, musicianship in the concert halls and scholarship in the classroom.


text:
Official Bio
Roscoe Bartlett
On the C-SPAN Networks:
Roscoe Bartlett has 578 videos in the C-SPAN Video Library; the first appearance was a 1992 Roundtable. The year with the most videos was 1995 with 53 videos. The year with the highest average number of views per program was 2010 with an average of 3,076 views per program. Most appearances with Chris Smith (12), Nellie Gray (10), Todd Tiahrt (10). Most common tags: Roe v. Wade, Reproductive Health, Abortion.
Appearances by Title:
U.S. Representative, R-MD 6th January 3, 1993 - January 3, 2013 Videos: 578
Recent Appearances
House Session, Part 1
At about 12:30 p.m., the House began debate on the rule for the defense authorization conference report. At about 1:30 p.m,…
House Session
The U.S. House of Representatives convened for a legislative session.
Maryland 6th Congressional District Debate
Candidates for Maryland's 6th Congressional District Representative Roscoe Bartlett (R), and challengers John Delaney (D)…
Defense Plans for Sequestration
Officials testified about automatic budget cuts scheduled for January 2013, known as sequestration. They focused on planning…
F-22 Raptor Oxygen Problems
Witnesses testified on the problem of pilots becoming dizzy from oxygen deprivation while flying the Air Force supersonic F-22…
Possible Defense Spending Cuts
Jeffrey Zients and Ashton Carter testified on the effects of automatic budget cuts on Defense Department and other…
See all appearances
Appearance Stats
All Event Types House Proceeding - 439 House Committee - 86 Congressional News Conference - 14 Rally - 10 Forum - 7 House Highlight - 6 Call-In - 4 Senate Committee - 3 Ceremony - 2 Speech - 2 Public Hearing - 1 Roundtable - 1 Joint Committee - 1 Debate - 1 Meeting - 1
Search Appearances
2012 Videos: 25 See all videos
1992 Videos: 1 See all videos
Historical Member of Congress Record
112th Congress (2011 - 2012) 111th Congress (2009 - 2010) 110th Congress (2007 - 2008) 109th Congress (2005 - 2006) 108th Congress (2003 - 2004) 107th Congress (2001 - 2002) 106th Congress (1999 - 2000) 105th Congress (1997 - 1998) 104th Congress (1995 - 1996) 103rd Congress (1993 - 1994)
Former District Map
Former Ideology Rankings
112th Congress 111th Congress 110th Congress 109th Congress 108th Congress 107th Congress 106th Congress 105th Congress 104th Congress 103rd Congress
Ideology data is based on DW-NOMINATE statistics developed by Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal. More information can be found at Voteview .
2012: House 2010: House 2008: House 2006: House 2004: House 2002: House 2000: House
Primary General
Historic election results compiled from data found on FEC.gov
No Committees
Voting Record: NAN%
Votes Against Party Majority: 0
Floor Activity
Days on Floor: 0
Common Floor Remark Topics:

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Bush made the UN irrelevant
"Judicially speaking, the United States has a clear obligation" to bring proceedings against Bush and Rumsfeld, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture Manfred Nowak said, in remarks to be broadcast on Germany's ZDF television Tuesday evening.
He noted Washington had ratified the UN convention on torture which required "all means, particularly penal law" to be used to bring proceedings against those violating it.
"We have all these documents that are now publicly available that prove that these methods of interrogation were intentionally ordered by Rumsfeld," against detainees at the US prison facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Nowak said.
"But obviously the highest authorities in the United States were aware of this," added Nowak, who authored a UN investigation report on the Guantanamo prison.
The irony in this is it's being exposed on German television, the very same country whose leaders we expunged with public show trials and executions for their war crimes, who are now asking, begging, suggesting, we do the same. Not a word of these allegations on American media, however, and that is as chilling for us as it was for Germany in the 30s and 40s. Bush ushered in the era of American fascism; Obama's biggest challenge will be in undoing it.
Filed under Government, Guantanamo Bay, Torture Tagged with Bush, Government, Rumsfeld, UN, war crimes
War on Terror=War on Islam? II
The brutality and torture many prisoners at Guantanamo faced was both physical and psychological. It was aimed to hurt them as well as humiliate them and in most cases it was aimed at their religion, Islam. US authorities seized on the animosity generated by 911 and perceptions that Muslims were either responsible to that atrocity or indifferent about it to allow a floodgate of abuse to be directed towards inmates as Muslims and their faith. This was done through the abuse of Islamic symbols, sexual abuse and intimidation, as well as physical distraction and torture. Overt attempts at proselytizing of Muslim inmates that had nothing at all to do with their incarceration and or military personnel, were even employed to intimidate and stir religious passions. There should be no doubt such tactics were at the very least approved at the highest levels of the command structure in the military if not designed and implemented by them. It is another dark strain on the American conscience left by the Bush administration.
….desecration of the Qur'an is alleged to have taken many other forms in U.S. detention facilities. Former detainees say it has been handled with disrespect by guards and interrogators—written in, ripped or cut with scissors, squatted over, trampled, kicked, urinated and defecated on, picked up by a dog, tossed around like a ball, used to clean soldiers' boots, and thrown in a bucket of excrement. A Russian ex-detainee, Timur Ishmuratov, remembers how it would be laid on the back of a handcuffed, bent-over prisoner, so that it would fall to the ground if he stood up. With just a Qur'an and a pair of handcuffs, a Muslim detainee could in this way be made to torture himself.
In A Question of Torture, historian Alfred McCoy has chronicled how such "no-touch torture" techniques have been rigorously developed by U.S. interrogators, especially in the CIA. The power to torment Muslims by abusing the Qur'an was not discovered accidentally by Gen. Miller or a clumsy guard at Guantánamo. Bill Dedman of MSNBC has reported how the Qur'an has been used by the U.S. Army as a tool for intelligence gathering. When asked about an "interrogation scenario" called "Fear Up," one intelligence officer offered Dedman this example of the technique: "Disrespect for the Qur'an."
At Gen. Miller's Guantánamo, expressions of disrespect for religious practices grew into a kind of regimen. To interrupt prayers, guards made noise by striking things against the holding cages or playing loud rock music. Every morning and evening, just as the detainees were being called to pray, "The Star-Spangled Banner" blared over the loud speaker.
In addition to mockery and systematic distraction, professional interrogators used grotesque methods of sexual harassment to impede religious observances. For Muslims, impurity prevents prayer. In Inside the Wire, former Army translator Erik Saar recounts a shocking exploitation of Islamic rules about ritual impurity. Saar was translating for a female Army interrogator who was having trouble getting information out of a young Saudi detainee named Fareek. She told Saar that she wanted to break the strength of Fareek's relationship with God: "I think we should make him feel so fucking dirty that he can't go back to his cell and spend the night praying. We have to put up a barrier between him and his God." So she did a striptease. When Fareek wouldn't look at her, she walked behind him and "began rubbing her breasts against his back." According to Saar, she told Fareek that his sexual arousal offended God. Then she told him that she was having her period, and showed him her hand covered in what he thought was menstrual blood (it was red ink). She cursed him and wiped it on his face. As she and Saar left the room, she informed Fareek that the water to his cell would be shut off that night. Even if he managed to calm himself down, he would be too defiled to pray. As for Saar himself, he writes that "there wasn't enough hot water in all of Cuba to make me feel clean."
That episode is not the only documented example of such torture. The Bahraini detainee Jumah al-Dossari suffered a darker, more explicitly religious adaptation of the method in late 2002, according to a legal motion filed in U.S. District Court (District of Columbia) by Joshua Colangelo-Bryan and others on his behalf. During al-Dossari's torture, a female interrogator had his clothing cut off, then removed her own and stood over him. Just before wiping what she said was menstrual blood on his face, she kissed the crucifix on her necklace and said, "This is a gift from Christ for you Muslims."
Many detainees perceived their incarceration as a general attack on Islam….During the trial of Abu Ghraib's Specialist Charles Graner, ex-detainee Amin al-Sheikh reported that he had been compelled to eat pork and curse Allah. A Guantánamo detainee informed Capt. Yee that a group of prisoners had been forced to "bow down and prostrate" themselves inside a makeshift "satanic" shrine, where interrogators made them repeat that Satan, not Allah, was their God. Others told of being draped in Israeli flags during interrogation, a claim corroborated by the FBI, while one interrogator explicitly told al-Dossari that "a holy war was occurring, between the Cross and the Star of David on the one hand, and the Crescent on the other."
Filed under Guantanamo Bay, Islam, The War Party, Torture, War on terror Tagged with Guantanamo Bay, Islam, terrorism, Torture, war crimes, War on terror
WOT=War on Islam?
There's no mistake that America had every reason to be angry at what happened on September 11, 2001, but that tragedy was used by some to take out centuries old grudges against people in the Middle East and steer America on a course which has led it to become a violator of international treaties and agreements unparalleled in our nation's history. Nowhere is that exemplified more than with Guantanamo Bay where scores of Muslim men were snatched up from all over the world and placed in an isolated military camp where they were tortured for no apparent reason.
An Algerian man who spent nearly seven years in Guantanamo Bay says his U.S. interrogators never questioned him on the main terrorism allegation against him.
Mustafa Ait Idir, who was freed this week and returned to his adopted homeland of Bosnia, was accused of planning to go to Afghanistan to fight against U.S. forces.
"They've never asked anything about charges which were brought against us. They've never asked about Afghanistan," he told Reuters in an interview.
Ait wasn't captured on some battlefield endangering the lives of US servicemen and women, rather he was taken from his country, Bosnia and imprisoned in Gitmo Bay after his own country's court had determined he was innocent of the charges for which the US government picked him up. It seems however that US authorities were interested in Islamic relief organizations working in Bosnia, which appears to be even the focus of officials even here in America. (The Holy Land Foundation trial recently concluded in Texas is an example where relief efforts particularly for Palestinians suffering under the worse case of state sponsored terrorism were shut down under flimsily constructed charges.)
The charge for which the US picked up Ait, conspiring to attack the US embassy in Sarajevo, was dropped by authorities while he was in Gitmo and a US federal judge ordered and government officials acceded to the order that he be released from his unlawful imprisonment, but why was he picked up in the first place?
From this observer's perspective it appears America has given into its dark side, filled with sadism and masochistic fantacies played out in our artistic and entertainment culture which could be acted out in reality against an enemy we were told only responded to such brutality. The Bush administration was/is not the least bit interested in fighting its true enemies it merely wanted bodies, the 21st century version of the body count notion that came out of the Vietnam war, to fill up Guantanamo and justify its existence.
At a Pentagon briefing in the spring of 2002, a senior Army intelligence officer expressed doubt about the entire intelligence-gathering process.
"He said that we're not getting anything, and his thought was that we're not getting anything because there might not be anything to get," said Donald J. Guter, a retired rear admiral who was the head of the Navy's Judge Advocate General's Corps at the time.
In 2002, a CIA analyst interviewed several dozen detainees at Guantanamo and reported to senior National Security Council officials that many of them didn't belong there, a former White House official said.
Despite the analyst's findings, the administration made no further review of the Guantanamo detainees. The White House had determined that all of them were enemy combatants, the former official said.
Rather than taking a closer look at whom they were holding, a group of five White House, Justice Department and Pentagon lawyers who called themselves the "War Council" devised a legal framework that enabled the administration to detain suspected "enemy combatants" indefinitely with few legal rights.
The threat of new terrorist attacks, the War Council argued, allowed President Bush to disregard or rewrite American law, international treaties and the Uniform Code of Military Justice to permit unlimited detentions and harsh interrogations.
The group further argued that detainees had no legal right to defend themselves, and that American soldiers — along with the War Council members, their bosses and Bush — should be shielded from prosecution for actions that many experts argue are war crimes.
This attitude that the executive could unilaterally re-write or even ignore existing law is a theme that has been consistently explored during the Bush administration and found expression in a doctrine known as "unilateral executive". With this gloves off approach, people in the field were allowed to do whatever they wanted; there were no limits to the power or the abuse they could reap on people under their control and consequentially torture and physical abuse were more normal than not.
(Ait) said he was kept for four months, lightly dressed, in a very cold refrigerated container. For short periods of the day he was taken outside, where it was very hot. Other prisoners were subjected to long periods in total darkness or very bright light, he said.
"There was torture every minute," Ait Idir said. "It did not matter to them if we were terrorists or not."
Filed under Al-Qaida, fascism, George W. Bush, Government, Guantanamo Bay, Islam, Muslim, Taliban, terror, terrorism, The War Party, Torture, U.S. Tagged with Al-Qaeda, George W. Bush, Guantanamo Bay, Islam, Muslim, terrorism, Torture, war crimes, War on terror
Cheney admits to war crimes
So why isn't he in jail? Perhaps it's the mood of the country, overwhelmed by all that has gone wrong during the Bush administration finally being exposed by the main stream media. Trillions, not billions as we were originally told, of tax payers' money needed for a bail out of an economy that some say has been in a recession for over a year, and that's the best thing that can be said about that, jobs eliminated or on the verge of being wiped out and fraud exposed at every level of the financial markets, people are unsure which shoe will drop next, so Cheney's admission to something that doesn't directly affect the everyday person most likely was met with a sigh of relief it didn't involve them directly.
Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba, who led the investigation of abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, has said "there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account."
Most likely the answer is they will not be held accountable because the blame for a government intent on torturing people it didn't like should fall on the shoulders of people of all political persuasions and the people who elected them. For the moment the ball rests in the Bush court. Will he issue pardons to the members of his administration guilty of such crimes, or will he let them go? There will be hearings about this in both houses of Congress, but that will probably be the extent of any accountability, so it's up to the "people" to make their voices heard on this issue. What has muted our response before is our realization we are responsible for Bush/Cheney serving 8 years in the White House. I hope we can get past that and let these criminals know where we stand today! I don't think Cheney will find an sympathetic ear with them/us. Time will tell.
Filed under Guantanamo Bay, Torture, war on terrorism Tagged with Cheney, Torture, war crimes
No excuse now!
Guantanamo Bay can be closed, and America's allies are willing to help in that effort.
European Union countries should offer to take in any detainees released from the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo, Portugal's foreign minister said in a letter published Thursday.
Portugal is willing to grant asylum to Guantanamo detainees who cannot return to their home countries, Foreign Minister Luis Amado said in the letter sent to his EU counterparts.
Let's see how long it takes for impediments to get in the way of seeing this travesty of justice shut down.
Filed under Al-Qaida, Barak Obama, Guantanamo Bay, Torture, War on terror, war on terrorism Tagged with European Union, Guantanamo Bay, Portugal, War on terror
I thought George Bush took the cake with his many dumb platitudes, but along comes former Attorney General John Ashcroft who tops even his former boss, Bush. In Ashcroft's mind a person is guilty regardless of guilt or innocence; the mere accusation is enough to sentence someone to indefinite detention, torture and no recourse to the criminal justice system. Countless numbers of people presently locked up in Guantanamo Bay are there because financial bounties were offered up by the US military for the capture of "al-Qaida" members, and no regard was made whether a person turned over to authorities was really a member or not. It was accepted at face value that he was, and off he was wisked to Cuba never to be seen or heard from again. Ashcroft thinks that's ok and the presumption of innocence should have nothing to do with this process. It's a good thing he's no longer Attorney General. You can hear his ramblings below.
This comes on the heels of the announcement that Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and other high-ranking Bush administration officials were responsible for the harsh interrogations against captured terrorist suspects that took place at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib, according to a bipartisan report issued Thursday by the Senate Armed Services Committee. The report concludes:
"Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's… authorization of aggressive interrogation techniques and subsequent interrogation policies and plans approved by senior military and civilian officials conveyed the message that physical pressures and degradation were appropriate treatment for detainees in U.S. military custody………What followed was an erosion in standards dictating that detainees be treated humanely.
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's authorization of aggressive interrogation techniques for use at Guantanamo Bay was a direct cause of detainee abuse there."
Read what a former detainee at Gitmo Bay, Moazzam Begg , said about his imprisonment here. Look for more historical revisionism to take place in the days before the end of the Bush presidency.
Filed under Afghanistan, Al-Qaida, Torture Tagged with Afghanistan, Guantanamo Bay, John Ashcroft, Torture, war crimes
Torture and abuse are against my moral fabric
I wish it was George W. Bush saying that statement in the title above, but it isn't. Instead it's a US military officer who served on an intelligence team responsible for interrogating Iraqi insurgents and al-Qaida operatives and who says quite succinctly in a Washington Post editorial that torture cost American lives in the Iraqi campaign. Even though Bush didn't utter those words he surely knew of the successes those teams had in Iraq where torture wasn't employed while still achieving very good results
The methods my team used are not classified (they're listed in the unclassified Field Manual), but the way we used them was, I like to think, unique. We got to know our enemies, we learned to negotiate with them, and we adapted criminal investigative techniques to our work (something that the Field Manual permits, under the concept of "ruses and trickery"). It worked. Our efforts started a chain of successes that ultimately led to Zarqawi.
Our new interrogation methods led to one of the war's biggest breakthroughs: We convinced one of Zarqawi's associates to give up the al-Qaeda in Iraq leader's location. On June 8, 2006, U.S. warplanes dropped two 500-pound bombs on a house where Zarqawi was meeting with other insurgent leaders.
I know the counter-argument well — that we need the rough stuff for the truly hard cases, such as battle-hardened core leaders of al-Qaeda, not just run-of-the-mill Iraqi insurgents. But that's not always true: We turned several hard cases, including some foreign fighters, by using our new techniques. A few of them never abandoned the jihadist cause but still gave up critical information. One actually told me, "I thought you would torture me, and when you didn't, I decided that everything I was told about Americans was wrong. That's why I decided to cooperate."
Why didn't Bush lead the way and instruct his military on the best way to conduct interrogation? Nothing is as it seemed with this Administration; they knew before waging the war that the reasons they gave for it were lies; likewise they knew this war wasn't being waged to benefit the Iraqis, rather it was to cause their utter humiliation and destruction as a powerful society. Torture became a means to that end. Bush surely read and or heard the cries of many within his Administration that torture was not consistent with American military policy yet it continued under his watch. Is it any wonder why there are some who think Bush should be tried for war crimes? Count me among them!
Filed under Government, Iraq, military, Torture, War, War on terror Tagged with George W. Bush, Torture, war crimes


text:
Q: How can I sort this list by column which I need to print to a .csv [1167234, 'Apple ', 'phone', 534, datetime.datetime(2022, 2, 1, 0, 0), '']
[2390112, 'Dell', 'laptop', 799, datetime.datetime(2022, 7, 2, 0, 0), '']
[9034210, 'Dell', 'tower', 345, datetime.datetime(2022, 5, 27, 0, 0), '']
[7346234, 'Lenovo', 'laptop', 239, datetime.datetime(2022, 9, 1, 0, 0), 'damaged']
[3001265, 'Samsung', 'phone', 1200, datetime.datetime(2023, 12, 1, 0, 0), '']
[2347800, 'Apple ', 'laptop', 999, datetime.datetime(2022, 7, 3, 0, 0), '']
[1009453, 'Lenovo', 'tower', 599, datetime.datetime(2023, 10, 1, 0, 0), '']

This is my code
for ids in ID:
    x = str(list((ids,ManDict.get(ids),typeDict.get(ids),PriceDict.get(ids),ServiceDatesDict.get(ids),DamagedDict.get(ids))))
    sortedX = sorted(x,key=lambda a:a[1])
    print(sortedX)
    yikes.write(x)
    yikes.write('\n')

I need to sort by column 2.
I have been stuck at this for hours and tried using multiple methods such as lambda. However, I don't think I have the correct syntax for it.

A: *

*Put your arrays in another array

*Sort the list once you're done adding all arrays
arrayToSort = []
for ids in ID:
    x = list((ids,ManDict.get(ids),typeDict.get(ids),PriceDict.get(ids),ServiceDatesDict.get(ids),DamagedDict.get(ids)))
    arrayToSort.push(x)
arrayToSort.sort(key=lambda a:a[1])

print(arrayToSort)

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Mahmoud El-Yousseph
Mahmoud El-Yousseph is a Palestinian freelance writer and retired USAF veteran.
Adelson in Israel regrets to have worn uniform of the US armed forces and how he wisheed his son will join the IOF to be a sniper. Why put the interest of ISISrael ahead of your own country?
On A foreign leader — Netanyahu — set Trump's agenda in Middle East, Michael Wolff book says,
Outstanding article by Philip Weiss. Adelson is a nothing more than a "kapo" and ungrateful American citizen. In a talk to an Israeli group in July, 2010, Adelson said he wished he had served in the Israeli Army rather the U.S. military–and that he hoped his young son will come back to Israel and "be a sniper for the IDF," a reference to the Israel Defense Forces. (YouTube video of speech)
"I am not Israeli. The uniform that I wore in the military, unfortunately, was not an Israeli uniform. It was an American uniform, although my wife was in the IDF and one of my daughters was in the IDF … our two little boys, one of whom will be bar mitzvahed tomorrow, hopefully he'll come back– his hobby is shooting – and he'll come back and be a sniper for the IDF," Adelson said at the event.
"All we care about is being good Zionists, being good citizens of Israel, because even though I am not Israeli born, Israel is in my heart," he said toward the end of his talk. Talking about disloyalty!
Thank you Jonathan Ofir ! You truly represent the Jewish conscious with your writing. This is by no means the first peace of your I read in defense of the Palestinians. I wish to nominate for Israeli Man of the Year – 2017. Once again, thanks for standing up for peace, freedom and justice for Palestinians.
On Israeli prosecutors try to make Ahed Tamimi a terrorist,
Jon66 asked a the naive question to give him a proof where the term 'martyrdom operation is used when referring to someone killed NOT as part of sucide bombing or other attack?
The Marh 11, 1978 martyrdom operation of Dalal Mughrabi and her other 10 Palestinian and Lebanese freedom fighters comes to mind.
Their goal was to attack the ISISraeli Ministry of Defense in Tel Aviv or the Knesset and to demand the freedom of Palestinian prisoners (like 4 of the Tamimi women) held in israHell.
Like Ahed Tamimi, Dalal Mughrabi have a choice to be assigned and work at the PLO office in Italy. She turned that luxurious offer down . Asked her mom to fix her her favorite food, gave her pistol as gift to her father and left on the that day without telling them where she was going.
She and her comrades-in -arm did not have suicide west. 8 of them fell as martyrs in a shootout with the IOF, Two survived. As Dalal laid down motionless due to a severe injury, the leader of IOF unit in-charged of the operation on the day was no other than Former ISISraeli prime minister Ehud Barak. He told his subordinates, leave her for me. He then empty his magazine into her body, lift her up by her hair and have his picture with her body as trophy.
I share Annie Robins views. the IOF and the illegal Jewish settlers are illegal and nothing more. They are criminal trespassers. So, the are a fair targets. They are lucky they are not in the US. Under US law, you have the right to shoot them dead. It is called Make my day Law.
A better question for jonn 66 to pose would be, " who is responsible for luring Jews from all over the world into Palestine, put them on a stolen lands and in the middle of war zone? Blaming Palestinians for the violence is like blaming a woman for kicking her rapist in the stomach.
Nikki Haley acts as the second ISISraeli ambassador to the UN. She can add me to her nutty list too, then she can shove it where the sun do not shine!
On A Christmas letter to Nikki Haley,
@ Boris, no country around the world recognizes Israel sovereignty over Jerusalem. Not even the USA, Canada or any of the European nations. In other word, Israel should never have jurisdiction over Jerusalem. If a young Jewish American is treated that way, imagine what is like for a Palestinians who hold duel-nationality. Israel is acting as the bully of the Middle East.
On Banned from Jerusalem (for trying to pay respects to my grandmother),
Bravo Sheren Khalel for such insightful article. President Trump said so much without saying anything substantial at all in a joint press conference with the Prime Minister of Israel. President Trump blamed the Palestinians for hating the Israelis as the reason of lack of peace. My friend Hanan Chehata from London, England responded eloquently to Trump's bizarre claim in a Face Book post by stating:
"Can you imagine swapping the word Palestinian for any other native people in this context and saying that the native community has to get rid of the hate for their occupiers and complaining that the native community is taught to hate their occupier from a young age… without addressing the occupation itself.'
Additionally, President Trump failed to talk about the hate taught to Israelis from a young age as part of their school program. What about the Beitar soccer club that has never signed a player from Israel's Arab population who are actually Palestinians. Bietar club has a long history of racism among its supporters, with a favorite chant being "Death to Arabs". Israelis cleverly use the term Arabs when speaking of Palestinians as a way of not recognizing them.
Perhaps the president should have also eluded to how illegal Jewish settlers celebrate during weddings by jumping and dancing while carrying guns and knives and stabbing pictures of an 18-month-old Palestinian child, Ali Dawabsheh. Baby Ali was burned to death in a July 3, 2015 arson attack that also killed his parents in West Bank village. The only survivor was Ali's brother, 6 year old Ahmad who is still not fully recovered.
I wonder if President Trump is aware that the current Israeli justice minister, Ayelet Shaked published on Face Book while serving as an Israeli law maker, a call for genocide of the Palestinians. She declared that "the entire Palestinian people is the enemy" and justifies their destruction, "including its elderly and its women, its cities and its villages, its property and its infrastructure." It was a call for genocide because she called for the slaughter of Palestinian mothers who give birth to "little snakes."
That is the Israeli hate President Trump ignored. The continued Israeli military occupation of Palestine is the reason for absence of peace.
On Palestinians express mixed reactions to Trump's shift from two-state solution,
Israel is trying to create an image that does not fit her as a racist and apartheid state.
Using the photograph of Mukarram AbuAlouf for a propaganda purposes by Israel, Miss
AbuAlouf rihts were violated. Israel is trying to tell the rest of the world that Gazans and IDF are just a happy family. Who can dispute this genuine smile by young Palestinian woman along with one IOF who may have killed many Palestinians and Gaza during her military tour of duty. Plus, could you believe that one member of most immoral army in the world is helping a young Palestinian lady by dragging her heavy luggage? Israel was founded in 1948, was built on stolen Palestinian lands and is based ever since on lies, theft and deception. Thank you Mondoweiss for posting the story of Mukarram AbuAlouf and good luck to her in her study in the good ol' USA.
On Israeli gov't used my image for propaganda purposes without my consent,
Ever since this traitor was arrested, every major Jewish American organization, from ADL, to AIPAC has lobbied and pressured the White House for Pollard shameful release. I wrote several articles about this ungrateful American. I would like to share the last one. https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2014/04/03/jonathon-pollard-should-be-hung-not-freed/
On MSM avoids central Pollard question: Did Israel trade secrets to Soviets for emigres?,
I just wonder if Susan Abuelhawa told the Israeli interagators what she told U.S. National Security Advisor, Susan Rice; " You can kiss my 100% Palestinian a$$!".
On Leading American writer Abulhawa is denied entry to Palestine,


text:
Tatya Tope was hanged 150 years ago: Remembering the hero of 1857
The great guerilla warrior and freedom fighter Commander Tatya Tope was executed exactly 150 years ago. The anniversary of his death passed without any notable event or mention to this legendary figure of the War against imperialist forces.
It was on April 18, 1859 that this great figure who had traversed across Central and North India, fighting the British forces and uniting the rebel sepoys, died. He was sent to gallows by a Kangaroo court soon after he was arrested.
Tatya Tope was hanged to death in Shivpuri in Madhya Pradesh when he was just 45. Along with Nana Sahib, Azimullah Khan, Ahmadullah Shah, Kunwar Singh, General Bakht Khan, Azizan, Begun Hazrat Mahal and other heroes, he is among the tallest figures of grand Indian struggle to the Company rule.
After the spark of Meerut spread across the country, the soldiers of East India Company had joined the revolution and Tatya had become the Commander-in-Chief of the fores.
He had witnessed the entire war [termed as mutiny by British], wrested Kanpur and Kalpi, reached Jhansi where their [and Rani Laxmi Bai] joint armies had defeated British forces to proclaim independence.
Though the British re-captured it later, Tatya kept organising bands of fighters, criss-crossed the entire Bundelkhand, Central India and United Provinces from Bharatpur (in present day Rajasthan) to Bithur and beyond.
He fought up to Narmada, Betwa rivers and went as far as South towards Khandesh to keep flame of revolution alive. The marathon march of Tatya is extraordinary by any standards:
From Gwalior to Jora Alipore, crossing Chambal river, reaching Tonk and later Bundi, then passing Bhhilwara, Kankroli and Jahlrapatan to reah Rajgarh, Biaora, Sironj, Chanderi, Isagarh, Khurai, Bagrod, Rajpur, then crossing Narmada and through Banswara, reaching Zirapur, Indargarh, Sikar and dozens of other towns.
Gharib Parwar, Hatim-e-Dauraa.n, Aadil-e-Zamaa.n, Fayyaz-e-Ahad, Shujaat Shoaar, Shrimant Peshwa Bahadur Tatya Sahab Daam-e-Iqbaaluhu [That's how he was addressed in letters]
Quite similar to Tipu Sultan, this brave warriour also ran out of luck. It is believed that his own trusted friend Man Singh of Narwar had betrayed him. Man Singh was promised that if he helped the EIC, he would get his territory back as reward for this service.
Ultimately, Tatya Tope was captured. [No surprise. After all, Jiwaji Rao Scindia of Gwalior had already decided to support the British though majority of his troops had joined Tatya and Laxmi Bai. But Gwalior's support proved crucial and paved the way for British to capture the country.]
The rare pictures and portraits of the era including the photographs of the armies of Tatya Tope and Nana Sahib make an impressive sight. They look smart, well-armed sepoys ready to take on the might of the empire. They were mostly the East India Company soldiers who had joined him.
Tatya Tope spent long time in jungles. The Bitish generals were scared of his guerilla tactics. For a long time he dodged them and had skirmishes with forces. But after the betrayal, he was caught on April 7 and brought before the court. During the trial, he said that it was his duty to fight for reclaiming his motherland.
Within 11 days the Compnay executed him. He asked the hangman to stay away and himself put the noose around his neck. Though there were later speculations that someone else was hanged and Tatya had managed to escape.
However, it seems to be the optimism among the masses whose spirits had hit an all time low after the failure of the revolution, and wanted to believe that he was still alive and planning for a great battle.
Tatya Tope, whose real name was Ram Chandra Pandurung Yolekar, was born in 1814. His father had accompanied Peshwa Baji Rao from Pune to Bithur. Young Tatya was just a few inches over 5 feet but his valour made him one of the heroes of the war of 1857.
He was feared among British forces. Tatya had led the assault on General Havelock's army and defeated it near Ganges. He had battled the armies of Campbell, Major Rock, Homes, Roberts and kept playing hide and seek with British forces even when the Company forces had re-captured most of the areas in other parts of the country.
No mention in mainstream media, news channels
I couldn't find a single report on Tatya Tope on any of the channels on the 150th anniversary of his martyrdom. Isn't it a shame?
Twenty20 cricket, Elections and the Celebrity culture seems to have eclipsed every other thing. Remaining slots were occupied by the daily reports about Taliban.
Though a couple of years back there were a couple of reports about the plight of his descendants living in Bithur (Kanpur) and Railway Minister Lalu Yadav had given job with the railways to a family member.
However, it is sad to see that society remains almost apathetic and the newspapers rarely remind us of such occasions. It's not so unusual as the 150th anniversary of Ghadar had also passed two years back with barely a few seminars and functions to speak of.
Illustrations:
[1. Stamp on Tatya Tope
2. The other photograph shows the letter written by Tatya's armymen from Kalpi informing him about their victory over East India Company's forces
3. Pencil sketch of Tatya Tope that was drawn just before he was hanged in Shivpuri. ]
Labels: 1857, Indian freedom struggle
Now Azamgarh throws up a hero: Kamran Khan
Falsehoods about terrorism: 'Islamic' and 'un-Isla...
Tatya Tope was hanged 150 years ago: Remembering t...
Lok Sabha elections 2009: Will Opinion polls prove...
Muslim Shop, Hindu God: Communal Harmony Project-1...
Revival of Indian hockey: Victory in Azlan Shah to...
Whither West Bengal: Is Communist Citadel Crumblin...
Decades of Terror in Assam: ULFA turns 30
Elections 2009: Muslim politicians' visits to temp...
Beard ban in school okay, not Taliban comment: Mus...


text:
Q: How to implement default page of React Router when using :id? I suspect the answer is that it cannot be done unless using a really hacky method but just to be sure.
I want /1 or /2 to show me  but if I get /dsf or /-4 I want to go to the 404 page.
The below isn't working as path="/:id" is always hit first.
const App = () => {
  return (
    <Routes>
      <Route path="/" element={<Format />}>
        <Route index element={<Home />} />
        <Route path="/:id" element={<Home />} />
      </Route>
      <Route path="*" element={<Error404 />} />
    </Routes>
  );
};