Home / Helpful Advice for Surviving a Breakup / Separation: What is a legal separation in divorce?
Sometimes married couples don't get along well and find that they need legal separation.
The biggest difference between divorce and legal separation is that divorce ends a marriage, while separation is not. Divorce is a legal action between married people to break their marriage relationship. This is a difficult time for all involved.
In the past, people who started separation had to prove a certain reason for separation. Some of these reasons include constant fights or abuse. Nowadays it is often difficult for couples and even a little embarrassing. The questions what the parties have done are personal and these topics come out in the courtroom.
Now the law is different and allows one party to separate if he states in court that the marriage is full of disagreement and quarrels. Usually, judges will not ask other questions about marriage and allow separation to continue.
However, in some separation, they can fall apart and there are many emotions that appear in court. This is a difficult time to deal with and many people go through very sad times. In some cases, one party does not want a separation and they will fight it with everything they have. This will make the situation more difficult for both parties.
Some court systems want to ensure that the couple does the right thing. In some cases, they will order couples to seek counseling. This is usually only for couples who have hope. This is not for everyone and it is important to do it only if one or both parties think that there is an opportunity for reconciliation.
People often give up on their marriage too quickly. In some cases, they have never really given other people the opportunity or marriage. There are difficult times in all marriages and some people decide to try and solve them, while others tend to just want to give up everything as quickly as possible.
It's always best to do what makes both parties happy and can continue and go back to living the rest of their lives. Going through a divorce will be one of the hardest things a person can live.
After you and your partner begin the process, do not sign any letters for your partner without the knowledge of your divorce lawyer. Litigation and negotiation are a little subjective so ask your lawyer about his policies in this matter.
A good divorce lawyer is very valuable for your case, so you have to choose it carefully. Also, once your case starts, don't change attorneys unless it's absolutely necessary because this can also endanger your case.
If you are looking to replace a divorce lawyer, make sure you get all the information from a previous divorce lawyer such as who is the judge, the required papers etc., so that a smooth transition is possible. After you trust a lawyer, do it fully and help him. After all, this is your own life.
Can one partner prevent the parting from happening?
If one person does not want to separate, but one party in the relationship does it and it is a separation that is not wrong, then the partner cannot stop the separation. This refers to as a conflicting difference and is validation for separation.
Sometimes, the relationship between a couple may get worse from the separation agreement to divorce if their differences cannot be settled either by their relatives or by a court. This will typically call for divorce between the said couple.
The couple can prevent the wrong divorce by convincing the court that he is innocent. This is something they must prove and it's up to the judge to decide. There are other additional ways to keep divorce from happening and can also be an option for some situations.
If someone who forgives that their partner has an affair for divorce, the couple can fight the divorce mistake by stating that their partner knows the affair and forgives the action. This is one way for someone to defend themselves in court.
Connivance is setting the situation so that other people do something that endangers marriage. One type of situation to explain is if a woman traps her husband in a situation where he is alone with his girlfriend. This is known as the arrangement and this is an argument that can be made by someone in the court to defend their actions.
Provocation is inciting a partner to take certain actions. If the couple demands divorce and claims that the other couple left them, another couple may defend their claim because they are provoked by the neglect. Collusion is if the spouse lives in a situation where divorce is not wrong demanding the couple separate for a while and the couple does not want to extend the situation.
This can cause the couple to mislead the court and pretend that one of them is just out of marriage. The above defense is usually not used for several different reasons. Proving a defense may require a witness and involves a lot of time and money. The possibility is that the court will eventually give a divorce.
Someone doesn't have to be married if they don't want it too. The law is designed to give people the chance to get out of marriage if that's what they really want to do. If you are involved in a marriage that you no longer want, the process can be difficult to pass, but you can make divorce really happen, and end the marriage.
When couples get a legal separation, it is very like divorce. This will involve the same filing process with the court to initiate legal action. Courts must then make decisions about where children will live, debts, and assets in a divorce. At the end of the process, the parties are separated legally rather than completely divorced. This means that they are still married but are not responsible for each other and what others do.
Separation of the law is the best thing to do in the last stage of a couple who is not harmonious. This can be a way to rest and find out what each party wants. There is no reason to get divorced in a hurry for some people; that is a decision that should be well thought out as the wedding should be.
Sometimes when people are on the separation agreement, they will try and solve the problem. However, there are a number of cases, where it will not work and the parties involved want to divorce. One year after separation agreement or legal separation is granted, one party can petition to change the separation into a divorce.
They can do this without further hearings and others cannot prevent that from happening. Sometimes people prefer separation rather than divorce because of their religious beliefs or for insurance purposes.
If the party then decides to divorce, it will end their marriage. To do that, the parties involved will go to court and decide how to handle children's questions and how to divide their marital property. Each party will be responsible for half of the marriage debt.
Marriage property is anything that couples buy when they are married. It doesn't matter who the name of the property is or who actually bought it. Bank accounts, pensions, and shares are marital properties even if they are only owned by one name.
The property brought into the marriage is still marital depending on the length of the marriage and what type of property it is. Courts will as fair as possible and sometimes the parties will make the right choice about being fair in divorce.
Couples can make the right decisions about how things should separate before actually going to court. Both parties must have a lawyer and this will help things develop together without having to worry about any legality. This is the best way to protect the assets of each party and ensure that the process is fair.
In a legal separation, the general question is, "what is the benefit formula". Yes, indeed there is no formula for divorce benefits. This is in stark contrast to child support, which bases on specific formulas in each country. Benefits are based on factors and these factors will decide through divorce negotiations or by divorce judges. However, there is no benefit formula available for your divorce lawyer or you to determine in advance what benefits will be paid for your case.
What does a divorce court see to determine benefits? These problems differ in each country. But, there are also many general benefits from state to state. So, even though there is no specific benefit formula for you to rely on, there are benefits factors that you can see to help you determine what allowance benefits you might have in your case.
In divorce, some of the benefits factors that the judge might see include the following. First is the length of your marriage. If the parties have been married for one year, the court's attitude towards the request for benefits will be very different from if the parties have been married for twenty years. Because the length of marriage varies greatly in all divorces, it is not possible to incorporate this factor into the benefit formula to determine the number of benefits.
Another factor that influences the provision of benefits is employment status. Obviously, if a couple seeking benefits has been unemployed or unemployed for several years to care for small children, homes, or partners, that is a factor that will hamper the couple's kindness if he seeks benefits.
On the other hand, if the couple has the ability to get a job that will more than adequately meet their needs, the court may think a little differently about providing benefits to that party. Other factors that are considering closely with this factor include the level of education, work experience, the age of the child in the household, and work history.
The main factor that can affect the provision of benefits is the property that the parties will maintain or share. If a partner seeking benefits stays in the parent's house, but will have significant assets after the divorce or has separate assets, such as a trust fund, the court's attitude towards the provision of benefits will be affected.
The court will certainly see the demand for benefits in these circumstances far different from the requests made by individuals who did not receive assets in a divorce or who did not have separate property.
The health of those seeking benefits is a major factor that can influence court decisions in providing benefits. If couples seeking benefits have a debilitating physical condition that has an impact on whether or how much they can work, the court will not want to impoverish the party after divorce and the court will be more likely to use benefits to meet at least basic living needs.
One other factor that needs to consider by a divorce court and by the parties is the tax for payment of benefits. In most cases, if there are no special provisions that are contradictory, the payment of a husband and wife's allowance will tax to the recipient and can deduct from tax to the payer. The tax benefits obtained by spreading the economic wealth in this way can be significant and must be discussed in depth with your divorce lawyer.
One problem that courts do not always consider, but should be discussed with your divorce lawyer, is that payment of benefits, in general, cannot be canceled in bankruptcy. If there is a possibility that the party who will pay the benefits will file for bankruptcy, the divorce lawyer will negotiate very hard on both sides to maximize the ultimate benefit for their clients in divorce.
Thus in a divorce, there cannot be an easy formula for benefits, no matter which country you live in. It is impossible to include all these factors into the mathematical equation to arrive at the "correct" formula for benefits.
It requires that divorce courts or divorce lawyers review how different and different factors affect both parties in divorce; and then arrive at a solution that covers all divorce issues, including property settlement and benefits. They cannot just make a benefit formula that will work for all parties.
Although it's good to have a happy marriage, when you face a difficult situation such as a separation agreement, you must have the courage to overcome it. Usually, the state of separation agreement occurs little by little and not suddenly.
If you enter the divorce market, you may consider the following about divorce to deal with the process smoothly. Relying solely on friends and family for advice will not help you much.
1. In the US, the law on divorce differs from one country to another. Even though they differ mainly in asset distribution, divorce can only be submitted in the country where you live. You cannot go to another country that offers more in the distribution of assets.
2. At present, undisputed divorce has become more popular and common among couples who choose to divorce. Under this divorce, they must agree and understand that divorce is the only choice for both partners; after reaching a basic agreement on the separation of assets held together. The process is easiest when there is no involvement of children outside of marriage. For separation agreement, lawyers only need to either minimal or not need at all.
3. Some countries demand a divorce, where a separation agreement will require during the probationary period before the granting divorce. During periods of the separation agreement, couples who choose to divorce must live separately without interaction between them.
In a state of separation, the couple will know each other and will try to live without a partner. Often, people suddenly find that they no longer need divorce during the separation period; and become willing and ready to make adjustments to past differences.
4. In a wrong divorce, one partner violates the marriage contract and has committed neglect, infidelity or cruelty to another partner. There are various types of cruelty such as verbal or emotional cruelty or physical cruelty. Some countries do not require the separation agreement of the initial trial for the wrong divorce.
When both partners are guilty of violating a marriage contract, a comparison principle of honesty will use. This method compares the guilty parties and determines which party is more guilty. It is very difficult to prove the level of guilt only by word of mouth that can drastically change. The direction of the case will decide on the distribution of assets and property.
5. If you are facing divorce now, you must know the specific divorce law relating to your country where this case is submitted, even if you are in a pressing situation. The right homework will allow you to deal with situations with great courage; you will know and understand what will expect of this case.


text:
The Interface of IHL and IHR: A Taxonomy
IHR, International Humanitarian Law (IHL), International Law Commission, Lex Specialis
As the excellent Jinks/Corn/Rona series on IHL/IHR notes, there are a number of theories surrounding the interface between international humanitarian law (or the law of armed conflict) and international human rights law. Indeed, I attended a conference last week at Duke Law School and hosted by the International Committee of the Red Cross that brought together United States and Canadian government officials, military representatives, and academics to discuss issues of interoperability in contemporary armed conflicts. This IHL/IHR conflict of laws conundrum featured prominently across a range of topics, including the use of force and detention operations. From these conversations, the jurisprudence emerging from international tribunals, and the academic literature, it is possible to draw together a taxonomy of approaches for resolving the normative tensions that exist at the intersection of these two bodies of law.
The first theory is one of lex specialis, which comes in a strong and a weak form. The strong form envisions a total displacement of IHR upon the commencement of armed conflict. By this view, humanitarian law and human rights law are self-contained, mutually exclusive regimes. Where IHL applies but does not speak to a situation, actors are free to choose a course of action, unfettered by legal rules drawn from elsewhere. Gaps in the law are deemed purposeful in a sense such that they should not be filled from other sources.
The weak form of the lex specialis theory does not envision the total displacement of international human rights norms in armed conflict situations except where the rules of IHL and IHR are in direct contradiction. Where the applicable rules are not directly opposed to each other, or where there are gaps in IHL as the lex specialis, this approach would dictate that the two bodies of law should be harmonized through interpretive techniques and formal declarations of derogation. IHR may be particularly relevant in regulating the conduct of states engaged in NIACs, where IHL rules are less developed as compared to the corpus of rules applied to IACs. This is the approach largely adopted by the Human Rights Committee, charged with interpreting the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in its General Comment 31 and by the International Law Commission (ILC)'s Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law. As such, where there are gaps in IHL, there may be other rules—including human rights norms and domestic law—that are applicable. Human rights law can also be employed as an interpretive aid to add content to undefined terms in IHL, such as "judicial guarantees" and "humane treatment," or to expound upon treaty obligations, as in situations of occupation when the occupying state exercises plenary power over territory.
While many adherents to a lex specialis approach consider human rights to be an invasive species vis-à-vis IHL, it cannot be gainsaid that positive IHL invites in these very norms. Thus, many IHL treaties create space for a consideration of, or even interlineations with, human rights norms and concerns. The Martens Clause is the precursor to this phenomenon, and Article 72 and Article 75 of Additional Protocol I are more modern and fulsome manifestations of this tendency. These textual portals go far toward debunking the lex specialis maximus approach to the humanitarian law/human rights interface. By the same measure, there are IHR treaties that specifically make allowances for situations governed by IHL. The European Convention on Human Rights, for example, specifically exempts from censure "deaths resulting from lawful acts of war." This formulation necessarily imports elements of IHL into the human rights analysis such that in a situation of armed conflict, IHL defines what constitutes an "extrajudicial" killing.
A third approach to managing this interface rejects the idea of lex specialis and of a hierarchy of rules altogether. Instead, it presumes that the most appropriate rule or body of law should be applied in any particular scenario to promote what the ILC calls "systemic integration." This approach may dictate application of a sliding scale between the two bodies of law depending on the circumstances. So, activities on the battlefield or in an active theater of hostilities may be governed almost exclusively by IHL, but human rights law may have more to say vis-à-vis law-of-war detention practices in light of its detailed rules on conditions of confinement and judicial protections. Thus, the applicability of IHL is not necessarily binary, in the sense that the corpus of IHL either applies in its entirety to an incident, territory, or individual, or not at all.
Finally, one can envision a reverse lex specialis prioritization, whereby international human rights norms apply to temper elements of classic IHL. This may be due to the fact that many human rights norms constitute later in time legal pronouncements. Or, this approach may be justified with reference to human rights rules' strong normative force or jus cogens nature. As such, the additive application of pertinent rules to ensure maximum protection to the individual.
Most courts and commentators have adopted a harmonizing approach to this question. The ICJ, for example, in the Nuclear Weapons opinion stated that IHL as the lex specialis would determine whether a particular killing was "arbitrary":
The test of what is arbitrary deprivation of life, however, … falls to be determined by the applicable lex specialis, namely, the law applicable in armed conflict is which designed to regulate the conduct of hostilities. Thus whether a particular loss of life … is to be considered an arbitrary deprivation of life contrary to Article 6 of the Covenant [on Civil and Political Rights], can only be decided by reference to the law applicable in armed conflict and not deduced from the terms of the Covenant itself.
Even Philip Alston, the former Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Killing, Summary or Arbitrary Executions and fellow contributor here at Just Security, noted that targeted killings can be lawful in the context of IHL:
[A]though in most circumstances targeted killings violate the right to life, in the exceptional circumstances of armed conflict, they may be legal.
Given that there are multiple theories for how the law governing the use of force and human rights law interact, there will be situations—most notably in counterterrorism operations—when the jus in bello and international human rights norms simply cannot be perfectly harmonized because the two bodies of law permit forms of action or impose obligations and restraints that are inherently incompatible. In such situations, it comes down to a pragmatic policy choice by the state as to which body of rules to follow. This choice is, of course, subject to the recognition that the state will have to accept any consequences—reputational, reciprocal, retaliatory—for having breached an equally applicable legal obligation.
Beth Van Schaack
Beth Van Schaack (@BethVanSchaack) served as Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor of Human Rights, Stanford Law School; Former Deputy to the U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues in the U.S. State Department. Served as Executive Editor of Just Security (until March 2022).
Coming Debates to Advance New Treaty on Crimes Against Humanity Will Require Skillful Leadership
by Leila Nadya Sadat and Akila Radhakrishnan
New Suit Against Liberia at ECOWAS Court of Justice Seeks Accountability for Civil War-Era Massacre
by Catherine Amirfar, Ela Matthews and Taylor Booth
The Ethiopia-Tigray Permanent Cessation of Hostilities Agreement and the Question of Accountability for International Crimes
by Owiso Owiso
Gender Norms as a Tool for Wartime Torturers – A Look at Sexual and Gender-Based Violence under International Humanitarian Law
by Grant Shubin
Over 80 Countries Committed to Curb Use of Explosive Weapons, Now Comes the Hard Part
by Bonnie Docherty

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Celebrities from Bollywood attended the premiere of Aamir Khan's much-awaited film Secret Superstar in Mumbai on October 17, 2017. The grand premiere event saw the presence of veteran actress Rekha along with Aamir Khan, Akshaye Khanna, Salim Merchant, Sharman Joshi with his wife and others.
The upcoming film is ready to be released on October 19, 2017 which marks the Indian festival of Diwali. Reviews have already started pouring in and the audience cannot wait to catch the film in theatres. The upcoming film has Zaira Wasim and Aamir Khan playing the lead roles with Meher Vij playing the role of Zaira's character Insia's mother.
The story of Secret Superstar is about a 14-year-old girl who is passionate about singing and wishes to reach out to the world with her voice. However, due to lack of support from her father, Insia decides to create her own YouTube channel. Insia then posts videos of her, but keeps her identity anonymous. The film is directed by Advait Chandan and produced by Aamir Khan and Kiran Rao.
Exclusive photos of Bollywood celebs at Secret Superstar premiere event!


In the 70 years since the IMF's founding, the global economy and the IMF's role have evolved markedly. So too has the IMF's need for data, but what has not changed is the fundamental role that data play in supporting the IMF in its efforts to foster global economic and financial stability. This evaluation examines whether the IMF has effectively leveraged this important asset.
In general, the IMF has been able to rely on a large amount of data of acceptable quality. Data provision from member countries has improved markedly over time, allowing the institution, to a large extent, to keep abreast of the growing complexity and interconnectedness of the world economy. Nonetheless, problems with data or data practices have, at times, adversely affected the IMF's surveillance and lending activities. In the aftermath of crises, data have often been put at the forefront, prompting important changes in global initiatives and in the Fund's approach to data. Yet, once these crises subside, data issues are usually viewed as mere support activities to the Fund's strategic operations.
The roots of data problems are diverse, ranging from problems due to member countries' capacity constraints or reluctance to share sensitive data to internal issues such as lack of appropriate staff incentives, institutional rigidities, and long-standing work practices. While most of these problems have been recognized for decades, they have recently been cast in a different light by the proliferation of data sources and rapid technological change and, in particular, by the surge in demand for multilateral and financial surveillance and cross-country analysis. These latter activities require data with greater comparability and granularity.
Tackling these data problems would better enable the Fund to deliver on this evolving and more challenging role. Efforts are under way in this regard (e.g., a new data management governance structure, initiatives to fill data gaps revealed by the global crisis), but these efforts are, as previous attempts, piecemeal without a clear comprehensive strategy which recognizes data as an institutional strategic asset, not just a consumption good for economists. The current conjuncture may provide an opportunity for greater progress.


text:
Q: Using TSQL to transfer data from one table to another that have different field names Have an issue. I have a database called DATA. Within it are multiple tables. One called MASTER and others called temp1 .
MASTER has columns called first, middle, last, dob, address, city, state, zip, phone, cell
Temp1 has essentially the same columns more or less, but in different orders, different column names, more columns than exist in MASTER, etc...
I'd like to be able to write a TSQL script that I can execute to move data from temp1 to MASTER, but map which column gets what data.
Using something like:
INSERT INTO MASTER
SELECT * from temp1
just blows up and name is in wrong field and its a mess due to the columns within temp1 which are, and in a jumbled order:
dateofbirth, lastname, firstname, middlename, telephone, cell, address, city, state, zip
What'd I'd like to do is be able to map the columns while they are transferred... like if I was using the import GUI.
so firstname to first, lastname to last, cell to cell, address to address, dateofbirth to DOB... etc. and some columns totally skipped.. but you see where its going :-)
Is this possible?? Or am I stuck using the GUI??

A: All the GUI does is generate SQL for you, so rest assured, this is possible.
Here's what you want:
INSERT INTO [MASTER] (
     first, middle, last, dob, address, city, state, zip, phone, cell, ...
)
SELECT
    firstname, middlename, lastname, dateofbirth, address, city, state, zip, telephone, cell,  ...
FROM
    [temp1]

SQL Server will use the indexes of the named columns to map data, disregarding names and types. If there is a type mismatch it will try to perform an implicit conversion or fail with a runtime error.

A: You can use a select statement with an insert statement which allows you to order which columns go where.
i.e.
INSERT INTO [MASTER] (FIRSTNAME,LASTNAME)
SELECT FIRST,LAST FROM TEMP1

You can have each column list (in both the insert and the select statements) in any order - regardless of the column structure of the table.

A: In my view, we need to map columns programatically or manually to insert data accurately.
I have one simple options, not sure if its best practices:
Can we generate insert statement for each row of data with proper column mappings?
For Example:

*

*Export all the rows from TEMP1 table to Excel

*Write an Insert Statement for all values of Row1 on Excel using CONCATENATE.
=CONCATENATE("INSERT INTO MASTER(Lname,Fname,Address)  Values('",A1,"','",B1,"','",C1,"')

*Use Drag options to Generate Insert Statement for all the rows.

*Copy all the Insert Statements with values and Prepare for Inserting into Master table.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


The Brunswick design from Regent Homes Two Storey Range is an articulated two storey plan designed for areas where council regulation require the upper storey set in from the lower. A truly cosmopolitan look is a feature of this stunning home.
The Brunswick offers a plentiful entertaining space, with a fabulous open plan family, kitchen and meals area along with a separate lounge/home theatre plus a quiet study room away from the hustle and bustle.
The Brunswick has four spacious bedrooms upstairs , with built – in robes, and a large WIR and luxurious ensuite to the Master bedroom. A separate bathroom and toilet services the secondary bedrooms, whilst a powder room caters for downstairs as well as a large laundry. The complete home for a compact allotment.
Enquire today about how to get into your Brunswick dream home!


Investing in AI now puts you ahead of the competition in many ways. You won't have to wait very long before you start to see a positive return.
The sooner that you implement AI in your recruitment strategy, the sooner that you'll save time and be able to allocate it towards company branding and candidate engagement to stay competitive.
In both the short and long-term, investing in AI pays off in more ways than one.
The average fill time for a new position without AI is about 44 days and the average cost of each hire is $4,129.
We give on average 35% of a recruiter's time back which is equivalent to about 3 hours/day. This is time that would otherwise be spent on resume screening and phone calls.
If a recruiter's average salary is 70k, in a 5-day work week Avrio AI can give back $510 a week, or $26,520 per year.
That money was once spent on resume screening and can now be allocated to other initiatives such as improving candidate engagement, brand development and better in-person interviews.
Therefore, from a purely financial standpoint, it's an obvious decision for many companies to invest in an AI Talent Platform for recruiting as soon as possible.
However, you still may be concerned about exactly how well AI can perform at the top-of-the-funnel tasks that it automates compared to humans.
It eliminates human biases when it comes to irrelevant factors like name, gender, age etc. that can result in high qualified candidates being overlooked.
It eliminates the errors that can occur when recruiters only have 6 seconds to screen each resume on average (when there are often hundreds of resumes per position).
It engages every candidate in a two-way dynamic conversation through our chatbot, Rio (available 24/7).
It makes recruiting "more human" by allowing recruiters to allocate more of their work week to face-to-face interviews, company tours, selling their unique brand, etc.
Adding to this, AI talent platform gets better and better at these tasks as they receive more and more data specific to your organization.
AI is driven primarily by machine learning. It learns how to do its tasks better through identifying patterns in resume data, the inputs it receives from humans, and other information.
The more company-specific data that is fed into Avrio AI, the better it becomes at proactively matching top candidates for a job, asking qualifying questions through our chatbot, and ultimately shortlisting the most qualified candidates for you to focus on.
These capabilities are already highly advanced with the current build of Avrio AI's talent platform, and will only become more in tune with your company's job needs over time.
So, not only are you going to immediately save time for your recruiters by adopting AI now, but you are also going to see significantly improved job matching accuracy and increasingly shorter job vacancies as time progresses.
When you hire a new person, you don't expect them to perform like a superstar right from the very beginning.
They require a ramp up period before they become productive, so they can learn the job and the nuances of the company.
Well AI is very similar. Although it will be productive for you right out of the gate through automation, it takes time to gather the data it needs to learn the specifics of your company to get better at what it does.
Once it does, it will help you fill your job requirements with an incredible speed and reduce the high cost of to hire. So, the sooner you start getting that data into an AI talent platform, the better!
Your competitors already are – AI has been adopted by an estimated 61% of businesses and that number is constantly growing.
So, if you're thinking about using AI next year, or after your competitors start, you might want to rethink that and adopt it in the near future.
AI fits right into your organization's main goal to be as competitive as possible. The traditional recruiting model is not made for scale and speed in this fast moving digital era, but AI most certainly is.
Along with helping you scale up, it will help your recruiting department perform their most important roles better – selling your firm, creating a unique brand and culture, building relationships and keeping your most talented candidates engaged!
Don't miss out and be left behind, request a demo of Avrio AI to see just how cost-effective and impactful it can be right now!


text:
EXCEPT WHERE INDICATED, THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF THE MADISON TIMES
Systems That Divide Us
Reflections on the Loss of Skylar Lee, the Need for Solidarity and the Complexity of Oppressions
by Karma R. Chávez
Last February I attended the Creating Change conference in Denver. Creating Change is put on by the National LGBTQ Taskforce and it is one of the largest meetings of LGBTQ non-profit service providers, activists, and organizers in North America. The Taskforce has had a lot of growing pains over the years as it has worked to distinguish itself from the more mainstream (read: white, middle-class) Human Rights Campaign. It has also contended with poor-people-of-color's grassroots critiques of the Taskforce as part of the problem of the "non-profit industrial complex"–a term used to critique the nonprofit system for squelching genuine grassroots efforts of the most impacted people by professionalizing and career-tracking activism. The system has also ensured that white people with advanced degrees become leaders of movements.
These tensions were present at last spring's conference, which was a slick and shiny affair at a nice hotel. During the opening awards ceremony, a group of trans activists disrupted with horns and whistles and charged the stage while chanting "trans lives matter!" It was a chaotic moment, and I was pretty far back in the crowd. It seemed that about 30-40 trans people, many people of color, took the stage and encouraged the crowd to chant with them: "trans lives matter!" I felt quite conflicted.
Without a doubt, trans lives matter. But last February, I had been working to support the efforts of the Young Gifted and Black Coalition here in Madison, and I was keenly aware of the risks of co-opting "Black lives matter" for other identities. The importance of this movement is to center Black lives. Even though many of those who took the stage were people of color, few of them were, as far as I could see, Black. What did this take over say about Black trans lives? (It is important to note that Black activists attempted to address this question by disrupting the mainstage the following day. They emphasized the need to center Black lives, especially Black trans lives in the LGBT movement).
It is too simplistic to simply say that the trans activists from the first night were participating in anti-Blackness; all trans women of color, not just Black trans women, die at horribly disproportionate rates, often in violent murders that go uninvestigated. Yet, I couldn't help but feel that there had to be other chants that could have centered trans lives without displacing Black lives, including Black trans lives.
I was reminded of this uncomfortable dilemma last week when our Korean-American transman comrade, Skylar Lee, took his own life. I didn't know Skylar well, but he was one of the smartest and sassiest youths I ever encountered. His life's work was, as far as I can tell, showing how we cannot separate systems of oppression, and that when we do, we erase queer people of color, including those suffering from mental wellness struggles. When we separate or isolate systems of oppression, we use the master's tool of 'divide and conquer' lamented by the great Black lesbian feminist, Audre Lorde. Urging us against 'divide and conquer' strategies is precisely what she meant when Lorde famously said, "The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house."
Skylar seemed to understand this better than most. He insisted on the importance of creating spaces for queer Asians within people of color spaces, but he was also an avid supporter of the Black Lives Matter movement–he was a lead organizer for the West High walkout after MPD Officer Matt Kenny killed Tony Robinson, and he regularly showed up at YGB protests with a sign reading "Yellow Peril Supports Black Power." The sign of course is an historical allusion to similar signs from the 1960s Black Power struggles that showed solidarity and the interconnectedness of struggles. I think the reason that Skylar's death reminded me of the Creating Change incident was because when we lose vibrant leaders like Skylar who see the complexity of how power works, we lose more than just a beautiful young man. We lose part of our capacity to fight deadly oppressions–from white supremacy, to transphobia, to mental illness and more. And we desperately need people with drive and analysis like Skylar's so that our work can be toward solidarity and liberation, without inadvertently reinforcing systems that divide us.
Popular Interests In This Article: Karma R. Chavez
Read More - Related Articles
Juneteenth: No Place for Police
'Now is the Time for Big Ideas'
#TheRealUW: 'Too Many Racist Stories, Not Enough Space For Them'
Potentially Devastating: Why the Attack on Tenure at UW Matters
Open Letter Addressing Racist Incidents at UW


Hacienda del Álamo Golf Resort is a Golf resort located near the Costa Calida, in the province of Murcia. The resort is designed for a full life and recreation. In the closed area there are recreation areas, restaurants, sports complex, supermarket, Sheraton hotel, Spa, and 18-hole Golf course, which includes the Golf Academy and club.
In Hacienda del Álamo, there are several residential areas that perfectly integrate with the natural environment. This spacious and bright apartment has 1, 2 and 3 bedrooms. High quality construction materials: marble floors, furnished kitchen and equipped with appliances, bathrooms with Underfloor heating and a Spa bath, air conditioning, etc. This gated and well-kept town has lots of greenery and 8 swimming pools. All apartments have a Parking space. If you are looking for a cozy home near the best Golf courses and at a good price, please contact us!


to find out about Jerry's background, how he got his start as an artist, the materials he uses, and what inspires his work. Also, get a seek peak into what his plans are for this Fall and 2014.
Although, my creations are ultimately my strongest vehicle of change, I find it undoubtedly necessary to have a hand in helping to change the world by impacting young people's lives.For the past few years I have assisted in instructing art class for the Mill Creek Community Partnership in addition to mentoring young men who have found their creative niche in the world but are still combating life growing up in the urban Philadelphia.
My studies at the Corcoran School of Art in Washington, D.C. and later at Saint Joseph's University (Bachelor of Arts in Fine Arts) have solidified what I have know throughout my life: that my artistic purpose--my destiny--is to use my God-given talent to help better humankind. If I can move or inspire others through my art, by enhancing and deepening their vision of other, I have done what I am here to do as an artist. Currently, most of my work is acrylic on canvas. However, to put my artistic vision into form, I use whatever medium is available to me at the moment in time when I am enlightened, including, but not limited to, wood planks, paper, vinyl, Plexiglas, or dry-wall. Artists like Basquiat and Pollack influence my erratic and primitive style. My work has even been described as aggressive.
Wine Down Wednesday at Hotel Monaco.


Неколку провокациски извадоци од еден пост кој задолжително мора да го прочитате!!
There is a saying about Einstein's Theory of Relativity: that what makes it difficult for some people to comprehend is its simplicity. That you don't need to acquire more information to understand it, but that you must instead discard preconceived notions that block your understand. Understanding the New Medium is like that, too.
Technorati Tags: Rebuilding Media, New Media, Media, Medium, Mass Media, MSM, Interpersonal Medium, Mass Medium, New Medium, .
Добар дел од постот си издвоил. Јас брзајќи да го постирам, првото што ми падна во очи го ставив.


The map below shows all 0 stadiums in Medellin held on World Stadium Database. Hover over a marker to see the name of the stadium and click on a marker to go to the page for that stadium.
If you know of a stadium that should appear here then please add the stadium yourself!