text:
manual on borderline and classification in the community
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR MEDICAL DEVICES
Version 1.17 (09-2015)
PLEASE NOTE: THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THIS MANUAL ARE NOT LEGALLY
BINDING; ONLY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE ("COURT") CAN GIVE
AN AUTHORITATIVE INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY LAW.
MOREOVER, THIS MANUAL SHALL ONLY SERVE AS "TOOL" FOR THE CASEBY-CASE APPLICATION OF COMMUNITY-LEGISLATION BY THE MEMBERSTATES. IT IS FOR THE NATIONAL COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND
NATIONAL COURTS TO ASSESS ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS.
THE CONTENT OF THIS MANUAL AND ALL UPDATES ARE PRESENTED TO THE
WORKING GROUP ON BORDERLINE AND CLASSIFICATION FOR
CONSULTATION. THIS GROUP IS CHAIRED BY THE COMMISSION AND IS
COMPOSED OF REPRESENTATIVES OF ALL MEMBER STATES OF EU, EFTA
AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 6
MEDICAL DEVICE/IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL DEVICE –
MEDICAL INTENDED PURPOSE ........................................................................... 8
Introduction ................................................................................................................. 8
1.1. Light box indicated to treat seasonal affective disorder (S.A.D) ...................... 8
1.2. AB0 and Rhesus (D) blood grouping intended for diet purposes ..................... 9
1.3. Pharmacy compounders................................................................................... 10
1.4. Dental disclosing products .............................................................................. 10
1.5. Mixer ............................................................................................................... 11
1.6. Non-corrective contact lenses with a medical purpose ................................... 11
1.7. Biofunctional clothes....................................................................................... 12
1.8. System for the determination of bacterial contamination in blood
products ........................................................................................................... 13
1.9. Independent in-vivo dosimeters....................................................................... 14
1.10. Gallipots .......................................................................................................... 14
1.11. Shoe covers...................................................................................................... 14
1.12. Urine Diverter / Funnel Element for Mid-Stream Urine Collection ............... 15
1.13. Air purifiers / Air decontamination units / Mobile air decontamination
units ................................................................................................................. 16
1.14. Wigs and head scarves..................................................................................... 17
1.15. Blood irradiation indicators............................................................................. 18
1.16. Odour neutralizers ........................................................................................... 18
1.17. Bedwetting alarm............................................................................................. 19
1.18. Sweat generation and diagnostic system – status of sweat card
............... 19
BORDERLINE IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL DEVICE........................... 20
Introduction ............................................................................................................... 20
2.1. Sample receptacles and sampling devices which are intended to be
used for the collection by the lay user of samples, which are
subsequently examined by third persons......................................................... 21
2.2. CE labelled microscope slides......................................................................... 22
2.3. Single or multiple channel pipettes ................................................................. 22
2.4. Qualification of fluid collection bowl
.................................................... 23
BORDERLINE ACTIVE IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE –
MEDICAL DEVICE ................................................................................................. 23
3.1. Bone anchored hearing aids............................................................................. 23
BORDERLINE MEDICAL DEVICE – MEDICINAL PRODUCT......................... 24
4.1. Product for testing patient reflex cough .......................................................... 25
4.2. Elastoviscous fluids ......................................................................................... 26
4.3. In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) and Assisted Reproductive Technologies
(ART) products................................................................................................ 27
4.4. Peritoneal dialysis solutions ............................................................................ 28
4.5. Agents for transport, nutrition and storage of organs intended for
transplantation ................................................................................................. 29
4.6. Zinc oxide containing creams.......................................................................... 30
4.7. Eye drops intended for related to the alleviation of 'soreness' ,
'discomfort' or 'irritation' caused by environmental factors (such as
dust, heat, smoke etc) ...................................................................................... 31
4.8. Product for use in acute sore throat ................................................................. 32
4.9. Plaster with capsaicin ...................................................................................... 33
4.10. Gold implants for treatment of osteoarthrosis ................................................. 33
4.11. Substances for chemical peeling ..................................................................... 34
4.12. Mustard packs.................................................................................................. 35
4.13. Washing solutions used for pathogenic microorganisms ................................ 35
4.14. Mousse for rapid relief from irritation, itching, burning and sensitivity
associated with chickenpox ............................................................................. 36
4.15. Injectable substance for treatment of localized adiposity................................ 37
4.16. Riboflavin solution for treatment of keratoconus............................................ 38
4.17. Dentistry products with aluminum chloride used in haemostasia ................... 38
4.18. Qualification and classification of a wound gel containing soluble beta
glucan
...................................................................................................... 39
4.19. Glycerin suppositories
............................................................................. 40
BORDERLINE MEDICAL DEVICE – BIOCIDES ................................................ 41
5.1. Hand disinfectants ........................................................................................... 41
5.2. Insect repellent................................................................................................. 41
5.3. Multipurpose disinfectants .............................................................................. 42
5.4. Brushes and sponges for washing/cleaning nails, hands and/or harms
in hospitals (prior to surgery) .......................................................................... 42
BORDERLINE MEDICAL DEVICE –COSMETIC PRODUCTS.......................... 43
6.1. Tooth whitening or bleaching products – amended
................................ 43
ACCESSORY TO A MEDICAL DEVICE OR A IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC
7.1. Haemodialysis water test strips ....................................................................... 44
7.2. Surgical instrument decontamination products ............................................... 45
7.3. Dental Water Line Disinfectants ..................................................................... 45
7.4. Sterilization indicators..................................................................................... 46
CLASSIFICATION................................................................................................... 46
8.1. Light box indicated to treat seasonal affective disorder (S.A.D) .................... 46
8.2. Oxygen delivery .............................................................................................. 47
8.3. Examination gloves coated with polyhexamethylene biguanide
(PHMB) ........................................................................................................... 47
8.4. Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) ............................... 48
8.5. Blood refrigerators, freezers and defrosters .................................................... 49
8.6. Warming blankets............................................................................................ 49
8.7. Products evaluating the condition of respiratory muscles............................... 50
8.8. Neutral electrodes for high frequency surgery ................................................ 51
8.10. Dental water line disinfectants ........................................................................ 51
8.11. Dental curing lights ......................................................................................... 52
8.12. Bacterial/viral filter for use on patient undergoing pulmonary function
testing .............................................................................................................. 52
8.13. Hydrocolloid plaster for blisters...................................................................... 53
8.14. Movement monitor for babies ......................................................................... 53
8.15. Medical devices containing silver ................................................................... 54
8.16. Ethyl chloride spray for local refrigeration anaesthesia .................................. 55
8.17. Pathogen inactivation system for platelets ...................................................... 55
8.18. Pre-transfusion confirmatory tests................................................................... 56
8.19. Eye drops regulated as medical devices .......................................................... 57
8.20. Wound irrigation solutions containing antimicrobial agents........................... 57
8.21. Contact lenses.................................................................................................. 58
8.22. Paraffin oil for IVF/ART procedure................................................................ 59
8.23. Dental abutments ............................................................................................. 59
8.24. Autologous Platelet Preparation System ......................................................... 60
8.25. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (APDT) systems ................................ 62
SOFTWARE AND MOBILE APPLICATIONS ...................................................... 63
9.1. A mobile application for processing ECGs ..................................................... 63
9.2. A mobile application for the communication between patient and
caregivers while giving birth ........................................................................... 64
9.3. A mobile medical application for viewing the anatomy of the human
body ................................................................................................................. 64
9.4. Qualification of software for interpretation of a guideline
..................... 64
9.5. Qualification and classification of software for delivery and
management of cognitive remediation and rehabilitation programs
................................................................................................................. 65
9.6. Classification of software for information management and patient
.............................................................................................. 65
10. APPENDIX ............................................................................................................... 67
10.1. Products currently qualified as medical devices according to
MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev 2...................................................................................... 67
10.2. Products qualified as accessory to medical devices according to
10.3. Products currently qualified as medicinal products according to
10.4. Products qualified as medical devices incorporating a medicinal
substance with ancillary action according to MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev 2 .............. 67
11. INDEX....................................................................................................................... 68
1. Borderline cases are considered to be those cases where it is not clear from the
outset whether a given product is a medical device, an in vitro diagnostic
medical device, an active implantable medical device or not. Or alternatively,
borderline cases are those cases where the product falls within the definition of a
medical device but is excluded from the Directives by their scope. Where a given
product does not fall within the definition of medical device or is excluded by the
scope of the Directives, other Community and/or national legislation may be
applicable.
2. Classification cases can be described as those cases where there exists a difficulty
in the uniform application of the classification rules as laid down in the MDD (or
where for a given device, depending on interpretation of the rules, different
classifications can occur).
3. There may be cases where 'claims' of a medical nature are made for certain
products, where those claims cannot be substantiated by technical, clinical and
scientific data. If there is insufficient clinical, technical and scientific data to
support the claims made, the product would not meet the requirements of the
medical device directives and therefore may not be CE marked as a medical
device. For such products no medical claim can be made.
4. Defining a given product as a medical device and interpretation of the
application of the classification rules fall within the competence of the competent
authorities of the Member States where the product is on the market.
5. Different interpretations of Community legislation occur, and, can put public
health at risk and distort the internal market. Both issues are of great concern to
Member States and the Commission. Therefore, the Commission finds it
important to facilitate a dialogue among regulators and industry where diverse
interpretations exist.
6. To this end, the working party on borderline and classification comprised of
Commission services, experts of Member States and other stakeholders meet on
a regular basis to discuss borderline and classification cases in order to ensure a
uniform approach. The borderline and classification meeting's primary aim is to
provide for a forum to exchange opinions, and, possibly reach consensus.
7. This manual represents the views agreed in this group on products, or categories
of products, which have raised doubts. The Commission, Member States and
other stakeholders concluded that guidance is needed which goes beyond
abstract rules and addresses their actual application.
8. However, please note that the views expressed in this manual are not legally
binding, since only the European Court of Justice ("the Court") can give an
authoritative interpretation of Community law.
9. This manual does not relieve national competent authorities from their
obligation to render decisions in these areas for any individual product, on a
case-by-case basis. National authorities, acting under the supervision of the
courts, must proceed on a case-by-case basis, taking account of all the
characteristics of the product.
10. Therefore, this manual shall not "prescribe" which regulatory framework
applies or how the classification rules must be applied by national authorities.
Rather, it shall serve as one out of many elements supporting the national
competent authorities in their case-by-case decision on individual products.
11. In particular, this manual does not deprive a national authority to consult with
colleagues from other regulated sectors concerned in order to reach a complete
view on all aspects related to a given product.
12. This manual will be updated in the light of the outcomes of the discussions of the
working party on borderline and classification issues.
MEDICAL DEVICE/IN
VITRO DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL DEVICE
MEDICAL INTENDED
According to article 1 (2)a MDD "'medical device' means any instrument, apparatus,
appliance, material or other article, whether used alone or in combination, including the
software necessary for its proper application intended by the manufacturer to be used for
human beings for the purpose of:
— diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease,
— diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of or compensation for an injury or handicap,
— investigation, replacement or modification of the anatomy or of a physiological process,
— control of conception,
and which does not achieve its principal intended action in or on the human body by
pharmacological, immunological or metabolic means, but which may be assisted in its
function by such means;"
According to article 1 (2)b IVDD "'in vitro diagnostic medical device' means any medical
device which is a reagent, reagent product, calibrator, control material, kit, instrument,
apparatus, equipment, or system, whether used alone or in combination, intended by the
manufacturer to be used in vitro for the examination of specimens, including blood and tissue
donations, derived from the human body, solely or principally for the purpose of providing
— concerning a physiological or pathological state, or
— concerning a congenital abnormality, or
— to determine the safety and compatibility with potential recipients,
— to monitor therapeutic measures."
From this definition it follows that in order to fall within the definition of an in vitro
diagnostic medical device, the product must also meet the definition of a medical device.
It is suggested to consult MEDDEV 2.1/1 for more detailed guidance on the interpretation of
the definition of "medical device" and MEDDEV 2.14/1 for more detailed guidance on the
interpretation of the definition of "in vitro diagnostic medical device".
Light box indicated to treat seasonal affective disorder (S.A.D)
- Background
The product in question is a light box that emits bright light and the manufacturer states that
light therapy is 'a convenient and effective way of compensating for the lack of light without
resorting to medication'. The manufacturer also states: 'in autumn and winter, the seasons
with the least sunlight because the days are shorter, increased symptoms resulting from light
depravation may be experienced. Even standard artificial lighting in buildings cannot
compensate for a shortage of natural light. The consequences of this may be depression, lack
of drive, interrupted sleep and melancholia – the typical autumn winter blues'.
- Outcome
These statements are effectively claims for treatment of seasonal affective disorder (S.A.D.),
which is a generally recognised medical condition, and therefore this product is considered a
medical device.
For the classification of this product see paragraph 8.1.
AB0 and Rhesus (D) blood grouping intended for diet purposes
These products are tests for AB0 and Rhesus (D) Blood Grouping, which is sold through the
internet and which is used by lay persons in the home environment.
The manufacturer states the following: HOME-KIT, For in Vitro Diagnostic Use, Not for
Bed-Side Testing; and currently in the text, which describes interpretation of the result, the
manufacturer states NOT FOR CLINICAL USE. The manufacturer has stated that the main
reason and purpose of the tests is educational. It is indicated that the product enables the user
to ascertain their blood group in order to determine whether a specific (food) diet should be
followed. This decision was not related to following a specific diet for medical purposes.
According to the information given by the manufacturer, it is concluded that even though it
can be argued that this product fits some parts of the definition of an in vitro diagnostic
medical device, it does not meet the definition of a medical device. As the definition on in
vitro diagnostic medical device (Article 1 (2) b IVDD) reads "'in vitro diagnostic medical
device' means any medical device, the product must also meet the definition of medical
device.
It can be concluded that as the intended purpose of this product cannot be qualified as a
medical purpose as described in definition of a medical device (Article 1 (2) a MDD), this
product is not an in vitro diagnostic medical device. The product in question is not a blood
typing test for a medical purpose.
This conclusion is reached in the light of the information provided by the manufacturer. It
would be necessary to check if these statements are correct, and, consequently do not contain
a deceptive and misleading labelling. Therefore, no reference to in vitro diagnostic medical
device (e.g. 'for in vitro diagnostic use') can be made. Also, as the product is intended to be
used by lay persons, there is a need for a strong and clear disclaimer which is understandable
for lay users; i.e. a statement that the test results cannot be used for transfusion purposes or for
blood group determination for medical purposes. It has to be noted that only a statement that
the product is not a medical device can not constitute a reason to escape from the Directive
and to avoid the CE marking if the criteria of the definition of a medical device are satisfied.
Pharmacy compounders
Pharmacy compounders may be used in a hospital pharmacy or in an industrial environment.
They are products that are intended for the production of fluids for administration to a patient,
usually as intravenous fluids (IV fluids) for administration parentally. They are intended to be
used by clinical nutritionist specialists and pharmacists. They mix a number of ingredients
that are subsequently administered to the patient. These fluids may be nutritional solutions or
pharmaceuticals. They may also be used for compounding formulas for cardioplegia,
hydration, fluid drugs and renal replacement therapy.
The issue is whether pharmacy compounders are medical devices, particularly if the
compounder is specifically intended to be used by clinical nutritionist specialists and
pharmacists to correctly prescribe nutritional solutions for Total Parenteral Nutrition.
Pharmacy compounders are regarded as processing equipment and should not be qualified as
medical devices. The compounder is only used for mixing the solution to be administered to
patients, but it does not administer itself anything to a patient. It should therefore not be
qualified as a medical device.
Dental disclosing products
Dental disclosing products are intended to 'disclose' plaque, i.e. to highlight the areas
around the teeth where the plaque is in order to aid its removal. There may be claims to 'aid
oral hygiene', to 'aid correct brushing regimes' or simply to identify the plaque for its
removal.
Dental disclosing products may be in the form of solutions, tablets or an applicator
containing the solution and may be intended for use by dentists or by individuals at home.
The question is to whether these products should be qualified as medical devices, or
whether they are simply intended for oral hygiene and therefore shall not be considered as
medical devices.
Although in severe cases, in addition with other contributory factors, plaque may lead to
dental decay or gum disease, plaque is not considered to be a disease in its own right.
Therefore dental disclosing products, intended to disclose plaque in order to help its
removal, cannot be qualified as medical devices.
The product is a Thermomixer (mixer) intended to control the temperature of (and mix)
liquids in closed micro test tubes and micro test plates. The manufacturer claims that this
mixer is specifically intended for the preparation and processing of samples from the human
body within the scope of in-vitro diagnostic applications, in order to allow the in-vitro
diagnostic medical device to be used as intended. Therefore the manufacturer considers this
Thermomixer, being an in-vitro diagnostic accessory, to fall within the scope of Directive
98/79/EC.
MEDDEV 2.14/1 rev.1, states that "if, however, the product does not in fact possess specific
characteristics that make it suitable for one or more identified in vitro diagnostic
examination procedures, then the manufacturer is not free to bring it within the scope of the
IVDD merely by affixing the CE marking to it. In other words, a manufacturer is not able to
bring within the scope of the IVDD a product that, in reality, is a piece of general laboratory
equipment simply by affixing the CE mark to it".
For example, the point 4 of MEDDEV 2.14/rev.1 mentions that laboratory centrifuges are not
usually considered to fall within the scope of the IVD directive.
According MEDDEV 2.14/1 rev.1, the fact that this mixer is intended by the manufacturer to
be used especially for in vitro diagnostic procedures is not sufficient to qualify it as an IVD
medical device, if this mixer does not possess specific characteristics that make it suitable for
one or more identified in vitro examination procedures.
If this mixer possesses such specific characteristics, the manufacturer will have to
demonstrate these specific characteristics and the link with one or more identified in vitro
examination procedures.
This case is similar to the cases of pipettes or glass slides, considered as products for general
laboratory use, already published in the manual.
On the basis of the above this mixer could not be considered as an in vitro diagnostic medical
Non-corrective contact lenses with a medical purpose
In general, non-corrective contact lenses (commonly known as 'plano' lenses) are not
considered to be medical devices as they have no corrective function.
Some non-corrective contact lenses, coloured or not, however may have a medical purpose.
They serve to treat a number of congenital or traumatic conditions. They are often used in
clinical practice or post-surgical setting as a medical prosthesis.
Examples of non-corrective contact lenses with medical purpose are:
UV blocking contact lenses that help protect against transmission of harmful UV
radiation to the cornea and into the eye so as to alleviate photophobia as seen in
albinism.
Contact lenses for therapeutic use as a bandage lens for the following acute and
chronic ocular conditions:
For corneal protection in lid and corneal abnormalities such as entropion,
trichiasis, tarsal scars and recurrent corneal erosion. In addition they are indicated
for protection where sutures or ocular structure malformation, degeneration or
paralysis may result in the need to protect the cornea from exposure or repeated
irritation;
For corneal pain relief in conditions such as bullous keratopathy, epithelial
erosion and abrasion, filamentary keratitis, and postkeratoplasty,
For use as a barrier during the healing process of epithelial defects such as
chronic epithelial defects, corneal ulcer, neurotrophic and neuroparalytic keratitis,
and chemical burns;
For post-surgical conditions where bandage lens use is indicated such as post
refractive surgery, lamellar grafts, corneal flaps, and additional ocular surgical
conditions;
For structural stability and protection in piggy back lens fitting where the cornea
and associated surfaces are too irregular to allow for corneal rigid gas permeable
(RGP) lenses to be fitted. In addition the use of the lens can prevent irritation and
abrasions in conditions where there are elevation differences in the host/graph
junction or scar tissue.
All of the above are recognised medical conditions and therefore non-corrective lenses,
coloured or not, which have the above mentioned functions are considered to be medical
devices on the basis that they prevent, monitor, treat or alleviate disease.
Manufacturers of such products must, however, clearly indicate the specific intended medical
purposes for these non-corrective contact lenses both on the packaging / labelling and in the
instructions for use. Non corrective contact lenses without specific claims (such as those
listed above) would be regarded as having no medical purpose and therefore not medical
devices.
Biofunctional clothes
Bio functional clothes or "therapeutic clothes" consist of clothes (e.g. socks, leggings, pyjamas,
undershirts…) impregnated with silver and brown algae extract. These clothes are presented as
having anti-bacterial, anti-microbial, breathable, thermal regulating and anti-odour properties.
According to the manufacturer, the silver ions (positively charged) integrated into the fiber
reduce the microbial growth in the fabric and inhibit microbial growth on the skin, and the
brown algae extract protects against rash act by neutralization of neuromediators and
vasodilator agents responsible for flushing. The intended use of these clothes is to prevent
inflammatory crisis of atopic dermatitis.
The main mode of action described by the manufacturer is the creation of a physical barrier
that prevents the contact of sensitive skin with the outside and other tissues potentially
sensitizing, creating an environment helping to the attenuation of skin conditions. The actions
of silver and algae extract were presented as an ancillary action. The product was presented as
a Class I medical device.
The clothing in itself cannot be considered as a medical device unless it achieves a specific
medical purpose. Silver is a medicinal substance, presented as having anti-microbial properties.
The combination of clothes with a medicinal substance might not be qualified as a medical
In addition, the intended use described by the manufacturer, prevention of inflammatory crisis
of atopic dermatitis, is likely to be achieved by pharmacological or immunologic means and
linked to the presence of silver and algae extract. Therefore the clothes would not be
considered as a medical device, based on the determination of the principal mode of action.
In case the clothes would have in themselves a medical purpose and the principal mode of
action would not be achieved by metabolic, pharmacologic or immunologic means, the product
might be seen as a medical device. However in that case, the medical device would fall in
Class III under rule 13, due to the combination with a medicinal substance.
System for the determination of bacterial contamination in blood products
The bacterial contamination of blood components represents a high infectious risk in blood
transfusion, particularly for platelets concentrate. In order to estimate the bacterial
contamination, manufacturers have developed some bacterial detection systems near the time
of blood collection. A new system has been developed based on the detection and
identification of a wide spectrum of common pathogenic bacteria. Following the
identification, a direct count is obtained by cytometry.
These devices are intended to reduce the risk of transfusion reaction due to the bacterial
contamination. The system is providing information regarding the safety of blood donation
and therefore should be qualified as an in vitro diagnostic medical device.
Independent in-vivo dosimeters
In vivo dosimetry systems are used in radiotherapy to monitor the radiation dose received by
the patient during a radiotherapy treatment. The device consists in a semi-conductor detector
placed on the patient's skin and an electrometer placed in the control room where the
physicians control the radiotherapy equipment. When performed early in treatment as an
additional measure, the in vivo measurements of the radiation dose are an additional
safeguard against setup, calculation or transcription errors. If the dose delivered to the patient
is higher than the calculated dose, the system, independently of the radiotherapy equipment,
can alert the physician, allowing him to act on the treatment.
Even if the in-vivo dosimeter is independent of the radiotherapy equipment, it can be
considered that it is used to control the performance of the radiotherapy device. Therefore the
in-vivo dosimeter should be qualified as a medical device. The in vivo dosimeter controls the
performance of an active device intended to emit ionizing radiation and therefore should be
classified as Class IIb, according to rule 10.
1.10. Gallipots
Gallipots are containers usually made from metal or plastic. They may be sterile or non-sterile
and may be disposable. They are intended to be used to contain various items including
medicinal products or disinfectants for antiseptic fluids to scrub the incision area prior to
surgery. They are defined variously as "a small glazed pot used by apothecaries for medicines,
confections, or the like1", as "a small glazed earthenware jar formerly used by druggists for
medicaments2", and as "a small usually ceramic vessel with a small mouth; especially: one
used by apothecaries to hold medicines3".
Gallipots do not meet the definition of a medical device: They do not diagnose, prevent,
monitor, treat or alleviate disease, diagnose, monitor, treat or alleviate or compensate for
injury or handicap or investigate, replace or modify the anatomy or physiological process. Nor
do they fit the definition of an accessory to a medical device. Therefore Gallipots are not
considered to be medical devices or accessories to medical devices.
1.11. Shoe covers
On the EU market there are shoe covers sold at hospitals used for different purposes :
Source: Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Source: Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary
• Shoe covers which are intended by their manufacturer to be worn by the nursing staff to
limit cross contamination in operating theatre and care units.
• Shoe covers for visitors which are intended to be worn by visitors to prevent patient's
contamination when they visit a patient.
According to the section 3.3 of Meddev 2.1/4, the labelling of the product is crucial for its
classification under the directive 93/42/EEC. "As a general rule, the principal intended
purpose can be established as being the one of a medical device if the product is intended to
be used in a medical context with the aim to provide protection of health and safety for the
patient, regardless of whether the product aims simultaneously to protect also the user. Where
a product is mainly intended to protect the person using it, irrespectively whether in a medical
environment or not, it falls under Directive 89/686/EEC."
Consequently, shoe covers which are specifically intended by their manufacturer to be used in
operating rooms, intensive care units or immunodepressed patients to protect the patient from
potential contamination are medical devices. In application of rule 1, they are in class I.
In this case, shoe covers are considered as being similar to surgeons' gowns and hats.
On the other hand, shoe covers for visitors even in a hospital are products of control of
1.12. Urine Diverter / Funnel Element for Mid-Stream Urine Collection
There are a number of mid-stream urine collection kits on the EU market. In general,
these products consist of a specimen receptacle and a urine diverter / funnel element. They
are usually packaged together in a 'kit' and in general the funnel part is not attached to the
specimen receptacle in the kit. The user puts the two parts together, produces the sample,
then removes the 'funnel' and closes the specimen receptacle.
The specimen receptacle is an IVD medical device as it is intended for the primary
containment and transport of the urine sample.
The question arose as to the qualification of the urine diverter or 'funnel' and whether it is
a general medical device (Class I) or an IVD medical device.
Some of these 'funnels' are intended to be held away from the body, whilst others are
intended to be applied to the body. Some of these have been specifically designed for
female use and this can be seen in their shape and form. In the majority of these cases the
intention is for the 'funnel' to be held against the body whilst the urine specimen is
collected.
The funnel / diverter itself does not fit the definition of an IVD medical device: it does not
directly diagnose or provide information. It has no diagnostic function in itself. It
therefore cannot be an IVD medical device in its own right, but is regarded as an
accessory to the specimen receptacle.
Directive 98/79/EC states in Article 1.2 (c) that for the purposes of the definition of an
accessory, invasive devices or those which are 'directly applied to the human body' are
not considered to be accessories to IVD devices, therefore the 'funnel' / diverter cannot be
considered to be an accessory to the specimen receptacle.
MEDDEV 2.14/1 states that specimen receptacles which come into contact with the
patient fall within the MDD and not the IVDD. It also reiterates Article 1.2 (c) of the
Directive and states that devices which are made available with IVD devices and which
are directly applied to the human body for the purpose of obtaining a specimen within the
meaning of Directive 93/42/EEC are not considered to be accessories to IVDs and come
within the scope of Directive 93/42/EEC.
Therefore, where the funnel / urine diverter is intended to be directly applied to the human
body for the purpose of obtaining a specimen (within the meaning of Directive
93/42/EEC) it shall not be an accessory to an in vitro diagnostic medical device but it will
be a Class I medical device. The intended direct application to the female/male body for
obtaining the specimen is demonstrated by the instructions for use, the labelling and/or
other information provided by the manufacturer.
1.13. Air purifiers / Air decontamination units / Mobile air decontamination units
There are various types of air purifiers and air decontamination products on the market. There
are two main types:
- 'Stand alone' / mobile units which are intended to purify or decontaminate the air in
individual rooms or areas, which may be moved from room to room in accordance with the
perceived need to purify or decontaminate the air in the room. They stand in the room and
function independently. They are not connected to individual patients directly (e.g. via the
use of a mask). These may or may not include filters.
- Units which are installed into the fabric of the healthcare institution, supplying purified
/ decontaminated air through pipe works that are part of the fabric of the building, into
specific rooms /areas. Filters may also be used within the systems.
The claims for these products vary from 'purifying' the air to 'decontaminating' the air;
however in general they are intended to remove allergens (dust, pollen etc.) and / or to remove
bacteria from the air in a specific room or area.
Some of these systems contain filters in order to remove particulates in the air whilst others
claim to destroy airborne micro-organisms.
In both cases the purified air is supplied into rooms and not directly connected to individual
patients (e.g. via a mask) nor to breathing machines (which are directly connected to a
patient).
In hospitals, these systems for air decontamination are used to reduce infection risks in
intensive care units and operating theatres. They include Burnt units or systems comprising a
mobile air decontamination unit and a mobile deployable room put directly above the patient
with the intent to protect burnt patients or immuno-compromised patients from air
contamination.
The question has arisen as to whether such products are considered to be medical devices,
since it is claimed that they reduce infection risks to patients or protect patients from airborne
contaminants.
These products are intended to 'control the environment' by removing allergens or
microbial contamination from the air. They do not act directly on an individual patient and
there is no direct contact with an individual patient. In order for a product to be a medical
device, the device must have a direct association with the individual patient.
Although maintaining clean air may contribute to keeping a patient in an appropriate
environment, this is not considered to be a 'medical purpose'. Air is part of the
environment of the patient and its cleanness is necessary in a similar way as for surfaces,
walls, floors and other objects which also need to be cleaned and disinfected.
Since these products do not fulfil the definition of a medical device, they are not
considered to be medical devices, but are rather products for the general environment.
1.14. Wigs and head scarves
Both wigs and head scarves are routinely used by people for aesthetic reasons. They may also
be used by patients undergoing chemotherapy or suffering from alopecia (hair-loss) from
other causes.
The question arose whether wigs and head scarves intended for such patients would be
regarded as medical devices on the basis that they may protect the head, reduce physical or
emotional effects of hair loss and so on.
Wigs and head scarves are primarily intended for a cosmetic purpose, i.e. to improve or
change the appearance of the wearer.
They do not treat or alleviate any specific medical conditions and do not fit the definition of a
medical device. They are therefore not qualified as medical devices.
1.15. Blood irradiation indicators
Lymphocytes contained in the blood components can bring to Transfusion Associated Graftversus-Host Disease (TA-GvHD) in specific cases. Lymphocytes may be deprived of the
possibility of multiplication through the use of irradiation. Therefore, for example red cells for
intrauterine transfusion and whole blood for exchange transfusion in neonates should be
irradiated prior transfusion.
Blood irradiation indicators provide information as to whether the blood products have been
irradiated and protect from repeated irradiation of those products.
According to instruction for use, indicators only indicate that irradiation has occurred, while
they do not measure the dose from an irradiator.
The manufacturer of the above mentioned indicators has placed these products on the market
as class I medical devices.
The blood irradiation indicators simply show that blood product has been irradiated. They do
not affect the irradiation process and only provide additional information to the user.
In this connection, blood irradiation indicators do not fulfil the definition of a medical device
laid down in Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 93/42/EEC; therefore they are not considered to be
Blood irradiation indicators cannot be considered to be accessory to a medical device because
they are not intended specifically by its manufacturer to be used together with a device to
enable it to be used in accordance with the use of the device intended by the manufacturer of
the device.
1.16. Odour neutralizers
Odour neutralizers, which may be presented in a spray form or as oil, are products used for
the control of odours generated by the ostomy devices. The spray is intended to neutralize
odours in room where in use ostomy equipment is present, while the oil is intended to be
instilled in ostomy pouches.
These products are intended to improve the quality of life of people holding ostomy pouches
by controlling the odours.
It is considered that these products have no medical purpose and therefore cannot be qualified
as medical devices.
The sprays are not considered to be medical devices – they are intended to be used in a room
and do not fit the definition of a medical device.
The oils meet the definition of an accessory to a medical device only when these articles are
intended specifically by their manufacturer to enable the pouches to be used in accordance
with their intended purpose, as specified by their manufacturer, according to the definition of
accessory in Article 1 par. 2(b) of Directive 93/42/EEC.
1.17. Bedwetting alarm
A bedwetting alarm is a device intended to be used as a treatment of nocturnal enuresis. Each
device has a moisture sensor component and an alarm component. A moisture sensor snaps
onto underwear. The alarm sounds at the first sign of moisture, and interrupts the wetting
process. The bedwetting alarm conditions the user to timely recognize bladder fullness, and
awaken before wetting occurs.
When such devices are intended for treatment of nocturnal enuresis, which is generally
recognized as medical condition, they should be qualified as a medical device. Such
bedwetting alarm devices should be classified as Class I under rule 12 of Annex IX of the
Directive 93/42/EEC.
The product is a sweat card which is part of a system intended to measure chloride ions in
sweat for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. The system runs the sweat test in two stages:
iontophoresis sweat stimulation done by delivering pilocarpine through the skin to stimulate
sweating (by exciting the sweat glands) and measurement of the chloride concentration in
sweat sample. It includes three components namely:
a) sweat cards: contains pilocarpine for delivery via iontophoresis and a gel component
that collects the resultant sweat;
b) remote module: sweat card is inserted into a unit, which is placed in direct contact
with skin and is held in place via a strap; this battery powered module stimulates
delivery of pilocarpine and resultant production of sweat is collected, analysed and
sent to a receiver base;
c) terminal or receiver base: this contains a unit for calculation and display of results.
The manufacturer considered that the sweat card element of the system would be either a class
IIa medical device or an IVD medical device. He did not consider the sweat card to be a class
III rule 13 medical device on the basis that the main purpose of the sweat sensor card is not to
elicit a response via a pharmacological action but to diagnose cystic fibrosis by measuring
sweat chloride. They considered that the pilocarpine iontophoresis is used for stimulation of
sweat as a first step and hence the pilocarpine iontophoresis is an ancillary process to collect
sweat.
The primary purpose of the sweat card is sweat collection; the pilocarpine is acting in an
ancillary manner by stimulating glands to ensure collection of sweat is more effective.
The sweat card is directly applied to the human body for the purposes of obtaining a sample
and therefore is not considered to be an IVD Medical Device as per MEDDEV Guideline
2.14/1 but rather a medical device according to Directive 93/42/EEC.
This device incorporates, as an integral part, pilocarpine which, if used separately, can be
considered to be a medicinal product, as defined in Article 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC, and
that is liable to act on the human body with action ancillary to that of the device. Therefore,
the sweat cards should be qualified as medical devices and regarded as class III medical
devices in accordance to Rule 13 in Annex IX of the Medical Devices Directive 93/42/EEC.
BORDERLINE IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL DEVICE
The definition of in vitro diagnostic medical devices reads as follows:
Article 1 (2) b IVDD "'in vitro diagnostic medical device' means any medical device which is
a reagent, reagent product, calibrator, control material, kit, instrument, apparatus,
equipment, or system, whether used alone or in combination, intended by the manufacturer to
be used in vitro for the examination of specimens, including blood and tissue donations,
derived from the human body, solely or principally for the purpose of providing information:
Article 1 (2)a MDD "'medical device' means any instrument, apparatus, appliance, material
or other article, whether used alone or in combination, including the software necessary for
its proper application intended by the manufacturer to be used for human beings for the
purpose of:
Other relevant provisions are:
Article 1 (2) b IVDD "Specimen receptacles are considered to be in vitro diagnostic medical
devices. 'Specimen receptacles' are those devices, whether vacuum-type or not, specifically
intended by their manufacturers for the primary containment and preservation of specimens
derived from the human body for the purpose of in vitro diagnostic examination."
Article 1 (2)b IVDD "Products for general laboratory use are not in vitro diagnostic medical
devices unless such products, in view of their characteristics, are specifically intended by
their manufacturer to be used for in vitro diagnostic examination;"
It is suggested to consult MEDDEV 2.14/1 for more detailed guidance concerning in vitro
diagnostic medical devices.
Sample receptacles and sampling devices which are intended to be used for the
collection by the lay user of samples, which are subsequently examined by third
persons.
The products in question are IVD kits which are being supplied to the public for a variety of
medical conditions including tests for food allergies and infections such as Chlamydia. These
tests are being supplied by post to members of the public in the following manner:
The patient orders the kit from the company concerned and the kit is despatched to him. The
kit contains the required equipment to take a sample. The patient is instructed to take the
sample (for example, usually a urine sample or blood sample – either via a lancet, or they are
advised to take their kit to their doctor for a blood sample to be taken). The sample is then
placed in some type of storage container. Once the sample is obtained, the patient is instructed
to send it back to the company supplying the kit. The patient is then supplied with the result of
the test, indicating whether or not they have a positive result. None of these activities involve
These kits are in vitro diagnostic medical devices by means of applying article 1 (2) b IVDD
which states that: "Specimen receptacles are considered to be in vitro diagnostic medical
The question arises whether these specimen receptacles could be considered as a 'device for
self-testing' in accordance with article 1 (2)d IVDD according to which 'device for selftesting' means any device intended by the manufacturer to be able to be used by lay persons
in a home environment;
In this determination, the notion 'used' is essential. Firstly, it is necessary to examine the
instructions for use. Where the instructions for use require an action to be taken by the enduser of the device in question, the notion 'used' is fulfilled. In addition, the definition of 'selftesting' provides guidance on the action to be taken i.e. "testing".
Thus where a specimen receptacle is simply used by the patient to contain a specimen it
remains a specimen receptacle. To become a 'device for self-testing', either the filling of the
receptacle with a specimen should result directly in a result being given or the patient should
need to do something directly to the specimen prior to its despatch in order to fulfil the
concept of 'used'.
CE labelled microscope slides
This product is a microscope slide which is made of a thin sheet of glass used to hold objects
for examination under a microscope. Unless the manufacturer's intended purpose falls within
the definition of an in vitro diagnostic medical device, it must be regarded as a general
laboratory product. The latter are excluded from the IVDD by article 1 (2) b IVDD.
In addition, MEDDEV 2.14/1 rev.1 states in this context:
"if, however, the product does not in fact possess specific characteristics that make it suitable
for one or more identified in vitro diagnostic examination procedures, then the manufacturer
is not free to bring it within the scope of the IVDD merely by affixing the CE marking to it. In
other words, a manufacturer is not able to bring within the scope of the IVDD a product that,
in reality, is a piece of general laboratory equipment simply by affixing the CE mark to it".
Single or multiple channel pipettes
The single or multiple channel pipettes are used for aspirating and dispensing specific
volumes in the microlitre scale. The volume is set by rotating the thumbwheel or the pushbutton. These pipettes have various laboratory purposes.
Unless the manufacturer's intended purpose falls within the definition of an in vitro diagnostic
medical device, these pipettes must be regarded as a general laboratory product. The latter is
excluded from the IVDD by article 1 (2) b IVDD.
Moreover, the MEDDEV 2.14/1 rev. 1 specifically refers to pipette. Under point 4 "Products
for general laboratory use", it is mentioned that pipettes are laboratory products that are not
Qualification of fluid collection bowl
The product is a single-use plastic device consisting of a round container, a cover, a drainer and a
liquid-absorbent inner layer. The absorbent material would receive the waste fluid from syringes,
therefore avoiding spillage.
This product is intended to facilitate the safe disposal of fluids during a medical procedure (e.g. in
operating theatres), avoiding any spills or splashes.
The product's intended purpose is the safe disposal of body fluids collected during a medical
procedure and therefore this product is not intended to be used so as to achieve a medical purpose.
This bowl is similar to containers for used syringes, needles and other bio-hazardous materials or
waste, which are not qualified as medical devices. They could also be compared to gallipots, which,
as stated in the entry 1.10. of the Manual on Borderline and Classification, should not be qualified
Therefore, this product should not be qualified as a medical device.
BORDERLINE ACTIVE IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE – MEDICAL DEVICE
Bone anchored hearing aids consist of a titanium implant (that is screwed into the patients
cranium), an abutment to transfer vibrations and a sound processor (hearing aid). The sound
processor collects sound, amplified the vibrations and passes them on to the implant (via the
abutment). The vibrations find their way to the inner ear without the help from any other
devices and make it possible for the patients to hear. The sound processor relies on an
electrical power source, while both the abutment and the implantable titanium piece are
passive.
It must be noted that bone anchored hearing aids are different from cochlear implants which
are intended to stimulate the hearing nerve directly via an electrode array inserted into the
cochlea (inner ear). According to MEDDEV 2. 1/2 rev 2, cochlear implants activated by an
external power transmitter are regarded as active implantable medical devices as the
implanted component clearly depends on a power source for its function and its purpose is to
convert the power it receives into electrical signals which trigger appropriate sensory channels
in the brain.
The question is whether bone anchored hearing aids fall under the Directive 93/42/EEC on
medical devices or under the Directive 90/385/EEC on active implantable medical devices.
Guidance MEDDEV 2. 1/2 rev 2 states that a product falls under the definition of an active
implantable medical device if it is at the same time both active and implantable. Under its
point 2.1.2 the MEDDEV 2.1/2 rev.2 excludes that a device is active if the function of the
device is only a mere transmission of vibration. With the bone anchored hearing aid the
implantable component is not an active medical device – it is a titanium 'rod'. The sound
processor, which is the active component, is not implanted.
On the basis of the above, bone anchored hearing aids fall under Directive 93/42/EEC on
medical devices. The sound processor shall be classified as class IIa medical device according
to classification rule 9 while the implant is regarded as class IIb medical device according to
classification rule 8 of Annex IX of Directive 93/42/EEC. Where the two elements are
supplied as one system, the higher classification applies to the overall product and the system
is therefore classified as class IIb medical device.
BORDERLINE MEDICAL DEVICE – MEDICINAL PRODUCT
It is suggested to consult MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev 3 for more detailed guidance on the borderline
issues concerning medical devices and pharmaceuticals.
The definitions of medical device and medicinal product, as well as the Article 2(2) of
Directive 2001/83/EC are reproduced here for reference.
• Medical device definition (Article 1(2)a of Directive 93/42/EEC, as amended):
(a) 'medical device' means any instrument, apparatus, appliance, material or other article,
whether used alone or in combination, including the software necessary for its proper
application intended by the manufacturer to be used for human beings for the purpose of:
- diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease,
- diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of or compensation for an injury or handicap,
- investigation, replacement or modification of the anatomy or of a physiological
- control of conception,
function by such means
• Medicinal product definition (Article 1(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC, as amended):
(a) Any substance or combination of substances presented as having properties for treating or
preventing disease in human beings;
(b) Any substance or combination of substances which may be used in or administered to
human beings either with a view to restoring, correcting or modifying physiological functions
by exerting a pharmacological, immunological or metabolic action, or to making a medical
diagnosis.
• Article 2(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC, as amended:
In cases of doubt, where, taking into account all its characteristics, a product may fall within
the definition of a "medicinal product" and within the definition of a product covered by
other Community legislation the provisions of this Directive shall apply.
Note: It must be noted that for the purposes of determining whether a product falls within the
definition of a medicinal product by function, the national authorities must decide on a caseby- case basis, taking account of all the characteristics of the product, in particular its
composition, its pharmacological properties to the extent to which they can be established in
the present state of scientific knowledge, the manner in which it is used, the extent of its
distribution, its familiarity to consumers and the risks which its use may entail.
Product for testing patient reflex cough
The product may be used, following initial diagnosis, by health care professionals as a part of
a neurological evaluation to assess the patient's laryngeal cough reflex (LCR), neurological
airway protection and the vagal (cranial nerve X) component of reflex cough. The test uses 13 inhalations of a nebulized 20% solution of L-(+)-tartaric acid in a medicinal non-ventilatory
nebulizer. Tartaric acid acts as a mild irritant to the mucosa of the larynx.
The resultant involuntary reflex response, i.e., cough, is indicative of whether the upper
airway is neurologically protected. The expected result of a normal test is an immediate series
of a forceful coughs, which are primarily expiratory "airway cleaning" in character. The
expected result of an abnormal test is represented by an absence of coughing, or a diminished
(weak) coughing, or coughing not immediately after administration of the test stimulus. The
testing is terminated when the subject either elicited a cough or failed to cough after three
valid inhalations.
According to the manufacturer's statements the test functions like many other devices which
assess neurological pathways, including the reflex hammer, nerve conduction stimulators, and
the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of the swallowing with sensory testing, where a physical
stimulus (either electrical or physical) challenges a neurological pathway to elicit a response.
The manufacturer regards 20% tartaric acid (TA) solution used to induce cough as a physical
stimulus, although it cannot be denied that it induces chemical changes to the sensory nerves
and that there may be "pharmacological" agents involved. Another consideration given by the
manufacturer is that TA in the dose used will have no measurable effect on general body
metabolism, and it should therefore not be considered to have a "metabolic" action. Finally
the manufacturer stresses that the purpose of the TA test is not diagnostic. As with the use of
other physical stimuli, the patient's diagnosis will already have been established (e.g. stroke)
and the test will be used to determine appropriate treatment for the individual patient.
The manufacturer will market 20% L-(+)-tartaric acid in normal saline as a sterile, pure
solution. The item will be used with a commercially available disposable jet nebulizer for
single-patient use (the nebulizer is not pre-filled with the solution). Continuous flow will
deliver the agent through the inspiratory cycle, and will allow re-charge of the agent during
the exhalation phase. According to the manufacturer's statements the use of the solution is
deemed ancillary to the nebulizer, as the solution cannot be administered without
nebulization.
The tartaric acid is intended to be used for neurologically impaired patients to test the
functioning of their laryngeal cough reflex in order to determine appropriate treatment. A
pharmacological action on the patient cannot be excluded.The tartaric acid is used as an
irritant to produce a cough reflex and is a substance administered for in-vivo diagnostic
purposes. The administration of this substance could be considered as a component of the
general medical diagnosis since it consents to improve definition of the extent of neurological
On the basis of the above, the product does not meet the definition of a medical device.
Elastoviscous fluids
This product is a sterile, non-pyrogenic, elastoviscous fluid containing hylans (derivatives of
hyaluronan-sodium salt of hyaluronic acid that consists of repeating disaccharide units of Nacetylglucosamine and sodium glucoronate). It is biologically similar to hyaluronan which is a
component of synovial fluid which is responsible for its viscoelasticity. The product achieves
its therapeutic effect through viscosupplementation, a process whereby the physiological and
rheological states of the arthritic joint tissues are restored. Viscosupplementation is a
treatment to decrease pain and discomfort, allowing more extensive movement of the joint.
The product has to be injected in the affected joint to achieve its effect. Hylans are degraded
in the body by the same pathway as hyaluronan.
The data presented does not allow issuing a general statement for the qualification of the
elastoviscous fluids.
Viscoelastic materials with intended use for mechanical/physical purposes such as protection
of tissues during and after surgery and separation of tissues are considered to be medical
devices. Such materials are also used as synovial fluid replacements where
viscosupplementation provides support and lubrication. Additional pharmacological benefits
claimed which are ancillary to the mechanical action do not alter the medical device status.
However, certain of these materials such as some hyaluranon based products, where the
predominant claims are of a pharmacological nature and not primarily related to any
viscoelastic characteristics, are classed as medicinal products.
Therefore it is appropriate to follow a case by case approach, taking into account all product
characteristics and in particular:
- The intended purpose of the product and the claims of the manufacturer, taking into account
the way the product is presented;
- The nature of the principal intended action. For example, is there any pharmacological or
metabolic action (e.g. anti-inflammatory effect, stimulation of in vivo hyaluronic acid
synthesis etc.) not ancillary to the mechanical/physical action of the product?
In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) and Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART)
The In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) and Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) products
cover a large spectrum of products.
For some of these products the principle intended action is clearly a pure physical or
mechanical action. On the other hand, a number of products that fall within this category
contain substances that act by pharmacological, immunological or metabolic action. In the
latter cases, it is of utmost importance to assess whether such a pharmacological,
immunological or metabolic action represents an ancillary or primary action. It is concluded
that this analysis should be done on a case by case basis.
IVF/ART products may be qualified and regulated as medical devices provided that they meet
the definition of a medical device as laid out in Directive 93/42/EEC, taking into
consideration the principal intended action and intended purpose of the product. The concept
of 'used for human beings' is interpreted in the broadest sense. The whole IVF/ART
procedure and related products would be seen as (indirectly) "(…) used for human beings for
the purpose of (…) replacement or modification of (…) a physiological process" by
promulgating pregnancy. Therefore, the definition of medical devices can include IVF/ART
Examples of products which could be qualified as medical devices (classification is only
indicative and must be assessed on a case by case basis taking into account all product
characteristics):
- Devices that act in a physical or mechanical way intended to be used for IVF/ART (such as
pipettes or syringes) should be classified according to the rules set out in Annex IX of
Directive 93/42/EEC, depending mainly on their intended use;
- Devices, such as washing, separating, sperm immobilizing, cryoprotecting solutions, which
are liable to act with close contact on the inner or outer cells during the IVF/ART are likely to
be considered as Class IIb medical devices, in particular by analogy of Rule 3.4
- Devices manufactured utilizing animal tissues or derivatives rendered non-viable are
considered as Class III medical devices according to rule 17;
- Devices incorporating, as an integral part,
(i) a human blood derivative or
(ii) a substance which, if used separately, can be considered to be a medicinal product,
as defined in Article 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC, and which is liable to act on the
human body with action ancillary to that of the devices,
are considered as Class III medical devices according to rule 13. The assessment of the
ancillary nature of the pharmacological, immunological or metabolic action of any medicinal
product contained in IVF/ART products should be done on a case by case basis, taking also
into account the purpose of the inclusion of this substance into the product. Although case by
case analysis should always be performed, media intended for use in the IVF process to
support the growth / storage of the embryo may generally be considered to be Class III
In case of doubt where taking into account all product characteristics, and provided that the
concerned product meets both definitions of a medicinal product and of a medical device,
Article 2(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC could apply.
Peritoneal dialysis solutions
4 These products are considered to present the same level of risk as non-invasive devices intended for modifying the
biological or chemical composition of blood, other body liquids or other liquids intended for infusion into the body
Solutions for peritoneal dialysis are preparations for intraperitoneal use which contain
electrolytes in a similar concentration to that in plasma, and also contain glucose or another
suitable osmotic agent.
Peritoneal dialysis solutions always contain sodium, chloride, and hydrogen carbonate or a
precursor. They may also contain calcium, magnesium, and potassium.
In peritoneal dialysis, the solution is infused into the peritoneal cavity, where exchange of
electrolytes takes place by diffusion and convection, and excess fluid is removed by osmosis,
using the peritoneal membrane as an osmotic membrane. Such exchange of electrolytes
induces a metabolic effect.
Peritoneal dialysis solutions are used for specific and restricted medical conditions to be
administered parenterally to patients with an identified medically diagnosed condition and
have a metabolic mode of action. Therefore such solutions cannot be qualified as medical
Agents for transport, nutrition and storage of organs intended for
transplantation5
Historically, solutions for the transport and storage / preservation / nutrition of organs for
transplant have been regarded as medicinal products.
However these products are not currently regulated in all Member States as medicinal
products since some authorities do not consider that they fit the definition of a medicinal
There is a direct parallel between IVF media and these solutions for the preservation, storage,
nutrition and transport of organs, cells or body parts. The solutions are intended to store and /
or maintain the viability of the organs / cells until such time as they are reintroduced to the
Some agents for transport, nutrition and storage of organs intended for transplantation may be
qualified and regulated as medical devices provided that they meet the definition of a medical
device as laid out in Directive 93/42/EEC, taking into consideration the principal intended
action and intended purpose of the product. In this case, the transplantation procedure would
be seen as used (indirectly) for human beings for the purpose of replacement or modification
of the anatomy.
1) The physical containers for the transport of organs are regulated as medical devices and are
given as an example in MEDDEV 2.4/1 under classification rule 2, second indent 'devices
intended for temporary storage and transport of organs for transplantation' and 'devices
Corresponding section in MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev.2 is currently under revision
intended for the long term storage of biological substances and tissues such as corneas, sperm,
human embryos, etc.'
2) Agents for transport, nutrition and storage of organs intended for transplantation usually act
through pharmacologic, immunologic or metabolic means. Therefore the assessment of the
ancillary nature or not of the pharmacological, immunological or metabolic action of the
product is a crucial element for the qualification of the product.
According to Article 1 (2)a of Directive 93/42/EEC, medical devices do not achieve their
principal intended action in or on the human body by pharmacological, immunological or
metabolic means but may be assisted in its function by such means.
Provided that they meet the definition of a medical device as laid out in Directive 93/42/EEC:
are considered as Class III medical devices according to rule 13.
The assessment of the ancillary nature of the pharmacological, immunological or metabolic
action of any medicinal product contained in agents for transport, nutrition and storage of
organs intended for transplantation should be done on a case by case basis, taking also into
account the purpose of the inclusion of this substance into the product.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC, in case of doubt where taking into
account all product characteristics, and provided that the concerned product meets both
definitions of a medicinal product and of a medical device, the provisions of Directive
2001/83/EC shall apply.
Zinc oxide containing creams
Products containing zinc oxide are available as creams for local administration.
Some zinc oxide containing products, depending on their claims and intended use, might be
covered by Directive 76/768/EEC on cosmetic products.
The discussion below only concerns zinc oxide containing products used to treat or prevent
minor skin irritations (e.g. burns, cuts, nappy rash, eczema etc.).
A medical device should not achieve its principal intended action in or on the human body by
pharmacological, immunological or metabolic means, but may be assisted in its function by
such means.
For zinc oxide containing products, according to the literature, a pharmacological and
metabolic action is demonstrated, e.g. may play a role in enzymatic processes, support of
wound granulation.
The pharmacological action may, however, be ancillary when the product concerned is
primarily a barrier cream.
In such cases the qualification of zinc-oxide containing products is defined taking into
account the claims, the intended purpose and the relevant primary mode of action. Some
products that act primarily as a barrier may therefore be acceptable as Class III medical
devices in accordance with rule 13 of Annex IX of Directive 93/42/EEC.
Eye drops intended for related to the alleviation of 'soreness' , 'discomfort' or
'irritation' caused by environmental factors (such as dust, heat, smoke, etc.)
On the EU market there are many different types of eye drops used for different purposes.
1) Eye drops regulated as medicinal products:
Eye drops used in or administered to human beings with a view to making a medical
diagnosis are regulated as medicinal products in accordance with article 1(2) of Directive
2001/83/EC.
Eye drops with pharmacological, immunological or metabolic principal mode of action will
fall under the definition of a medicinal product if they may be used in or administered to
human beings either with a view to restoring, correcting or modifying physiological functions.
2) Eye drops regulated as medical devices:
Products specifically intended to be used for disinfecting, cleaning, rinsing or, when
appropriate, hydrating contact lenses are medical devices.
Eye drops with a physical mode of action that are clearly indicated for a medical purpose are
acceptable as medical devices (e.g. for the treatment of hay fever).
Therefore, the discussion below only concerns products for which no 'medical' claims are
made, nor any claims associated with the use of contact lenses. Commonly the only claims
made relate to the alleviation of 'soreness' , 'discomfort' or 'irritation' caused by
environmental factors (such as dust, heat, smoke, etc.) or simply 'for tired eyes'.
The qualification of a particular eye drop products shall depend upon the intended purpose
and mode of action of the product, and must be assessed on a case by case basis.
Some products may claim indications such as 'treatment' of a physiological response to
external factors (i.e. dust, smoke, dry heat, air conditioning) and are used to create a
humidification of the eyes or to treat minor irritations of the eyes. As such, they are designed
to complement physiological functions provided by normal tears to help meet an increased
demand for humidification / lubrication of the eyes.
These products do not need to stimulate physiological functions of the natural tears. The
intended effect may be achieved by physical means only, i.e. by washing the eye surface
(effect of dust, smoke), or supplement the aqueous layer of natural tear film with additional
water under conditions of significantly increased evaporation (dry heat, air conditioning). By
decreasing the exposure to irritants they may be helpful in treatment of 'minor irritations' of
the eye.
Therefore products which claim to treat damage caused by environmental factors may be
acceptable as medical devices (or medicinal products, dependant on their mode of action)
provided that they clearly claim to treat or alleviate damage to or irritation of the eye (e.g. via
repairing damage to the tear film caused by environmental conditions).
These products must not claim to be artificial tears, or any kind of replacement of natural
tears. Products called 'artificial tears' are usually those that replace or complement natural
tear functions when natural tear function has been compromised. The term 'artificial tears'
should therefore only be used for products that replace the function of natural tears. Such
products may be regulated as either medical devices or medicinal products, depending upon
their mode of action.
For the classification of these products see paragraph 8.19.
4.8. Product for use in acute sore throat
The product is intended to be used, according to the instruction for use, in acute sore throat
with irritated mucosa. This product contains Icelandic Moss and benzocaine.
The mechanism of action of Icelandic Moss is a mucilaginous drug which spreads on the oral
and pharyngeal mucosa, forming an internal coating on the mucosa, acts by covering the
mucosa with a protective layer. The benzocaine helps reducing further sensitivity.
The European Pharmacopoeia contains monographs for "Iceland Moss" and "Benzocaine
(benzocainum)".
Icelandic moss may be considered as a medicinal substance and is described as having
pharmacological properties including anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and antiviral activities.
Benzocaine is a known medicinal substance with pharmacological action as local anaesthetic
and is found in several medicinal products intended for temporary local relief of pain
associated with sore throat.
A pharmacological action of Icelandic moss cannot be excluded, as it is described to have
pharmacological properties including anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and antiviral activity.
Furthermore, even if the Icelandic moss may be considered as providing a physical barrier,
the benzocaine contained in this product could not be considered having an ancillary action.
On the basis of the above, it is concluded that this product achieves its principal intended
action by pharmacological means and therefore do not meet the definition of a medical
Plaster with capsaicin
The products in question are warming plasters (adhesive) containing capsaicin (capsicum
oleoresin or capsicum extract). These plasters are intended for heat-treatment, local analgesia
and are indicated to treat muscular, rheumatic and neuralgic pains.
The European Pharmacopoeia contains monographs for "Capsici fructus" and "Capsicum
Oleoresin". The European Scientific Cooperation on Phytotherapy (ESCOP) has classified
"Capsici fructus" as an herbal medicinal product.
According to classification rule 13, devices incorporating, as an integral part, a substance
which, if used separately, can be considered to be a medicinal product, and which is liable to
act on the human body with action ancillary to that of the device, are in Class III.
The adhesive plaster described appears to be acting as a carrier for the substance (Capsaicin)
in order for the substance to be delivered to the body to produce the analgesic effect. It
therefore cannot be excluded that this product achieves its principal intended action by
pharmacological means. Therefore warming plasters with capsaicin may not be qualified as a
4.10. Gold implants for treatment of osteoarthrosis
Various gold salts are available for systemic treatment of painful joint diseases, mainly
arthritis and arthrosis. There is increasing evidence that the gold salts exert their effect by a
direct intervention with the cellular immune response. It is generally assumed that the active
part of the gold salts is the gold ions.
Solid gold implants for local treatment of painful joint diseases in animals have been used by
veterinarians in a number of years. Several studies have documented a therapeutic effect of
solid gold implants in animals. Research has provided evidence that gold ions are released
from the implanted gold and diffuse into the surrounding tissue, where they can be detected in
connection with inflammatory cells from the immune system. The researchers concluded that
solid gold implants as a local treatment, mimics systemic treatment with a gold-containing
drug.
The question is whether gold implants should be qualified as medical devices or not.
In the view of the above mentioned mode of action which mimics systemic treatment with a
gold-containing drug, gold implants for treatment of osteoarthrosis exert their effect by a
direct intervention with the cellular immune response and therefore cannot be qualified as
4.11. Substances for chemical peeling
Skin exfoliation is widely used to reduce the signs of aging in the skin since it diminishes
imperfections by peeling away the skin's top layers (solution to sun-damaged, unevenly
pigmented, and finely wrinkled facial areas). It is also used on acneic skin and on acne scars.
Skin exfoliation could be obtained by different means such as mechanical peeling (also called
dermabrasion which consists of a sand blasting technique with particles), physical peeling
(carbon dioxide ultrapulsed laser, erbium:YAG laser) and chemical substances. In this case,
the depth of peeling depends of many factors such as the substance used (e.g. alpha hydroxy
acids (AHA), beta hydroxyl acids as salicylic acid, trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and phenol), its
concentration, the pH of the solution, and the length of the application.
Considering their intended use on acneic skin some manufacturers requested an opinion about
placing chemical peeling containing salicylic acid (and glycolic acid) as class I medical
device. The question is whether these chemical peeling must have a specific action on
treatment of acnea to be considered as a medical device or whether the claim that they are
indicated in case of acneic skin could be sufficient to qualified them as medical device.
It is concluded that, depending on their principal mode of action and in the case they have a
specific medical purpose (for example treatment of acne), these products might be qualified as
medical devices. However the claim that they may be used on acneic skin is not considered
sufficient to indicate a medical purpose.
When these products could be qualified as medical devices they shall be classified as class III
medical devices according rule 13 if they contain a medicinal substance with ancillary action.
4.12. Mustard packs
Mustard packs, consisting of mustard seed powder, are usually applied on the chest, abdomen
or articulations and the intended use is to alleviate the symptoms of common colds and other
respiratory system ailments, and rheumatism. The mechanism of action of the mustard pack
remains unclear and the properties which could prove their suitability for the treatment of
disease and prophylaxis are still unknown.
The mustard packs work in a manner analogous with Capsaicin plasters (see section 4.9.).
It is considered that the mustard seed powder produce a heating effect by causing capillaries
to expand and an analgesic effect by interacting with skin receptors to reduce sensitivity due
to the release of allyl isothiocyanate compounds that follows the hydrolyzation of the
glucosinolates contained in the seeds.
Therefore, mustards packs principal intended action is achieved by pharmacological means
and cannot be qualified as medical devices.
4.13. Washing solutions used for pathogenic microorganisms
There are washing solutions with antimicrobial properties, destined for the disinfection of
healthy skin, being placed on the market as class III medical devices, even though, according
to European guidance, topical disinfectants (antiseptics) for use on patients are given as
examples of medicinal products.
According to manufacturer information, these washing solutions (which are presented as
concentrate solutions, gel, foam and impregnated wipes) are intended for multi-drug resistant
organisms decolonization by physical cleansing (inhibiting their spreading and transmission
with sustained antimicrobial barrier effect), and may also be used for pre-operative cleansing.
General treatment indications include washing of hair, face, ears, nose, upper body, lower
body, perineum, urethra and catheter entry sites, legs, and others such as spectacles, jewellery
and prosthesis.
These washing solutions are also presented as oral solutions/mouthwashes for: the
disinfection of the oral cavity and pharynx; prevention of plaque formation, caries,
periodontitis, gingivitis, and are applicable on impaired mucous membranes, according to
manufacturer claims.
Considering that:
- These washing solutions for inhibition of pathogen microorganisms present medical claims
such as: multi-drug resistant organisms' decolonization, prevention of plaque formation,
caries, periodontitis, and gingivitis;
- Only products intended for disinfecting medical devices or cleaning contact lenses (rule 15
of annex IX of the MMD) are medical devices;
- As indicated on point 5.1 of the Manual on Borderline and Classification: "Hand
disinfectants do not appear to be qualified as an accessory to a medical device. These products
are for disinfecting the hands and not devices.";
- According to MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev 3, section A.2.2.2.: "Topical disinfectants (antiseptics) for
use on patients" are given as examples of medicinal products;
- Mouthwashes are medicinal products when the intended purpose is to treat or prevent
oropharynx diseases;
- The solutions presented
antiseptics/disinfectants.
pharmacological
Therefore, washing solutions used for pathogenic microorganisms cannot be considered to be
associated with chickenpox
A product, available as a mousse (foam), designed to relieve the symptoms of chickenpox on
large surfaces of the skin and used for rapid relief from irritation, itching, burning and
sensitivity associated with chickenpox, was placed on the market as a class I medical device,
according to rule 4 of Annex IX of the Directive 93/42/EEC.
According to information provided by the manufacturer, the product is based on a patented
complex (that results from the filtration process of the Aloe barbadensis gel) which helps to
protect and soothe the irritated skin, this ingredient supports the skin's own natural immune
system. Its polysaccharide chains have the unique characteristic of binding to harmful
bacteria. This blocks the bacteria, thus protecting the skin cells from being attacked. This
patented complex creates a barrier for pathogenic bacteria avoiding the invasion of the hosts'
tissue.
- According to expert opinion, this complex acts in a manner similar to that of the body's
immunological response;
E.g. There are several receptors for the recognition of pathogenic organisms, some of them
are present in the bloodstream, and in tissue fluids as soluble blood serum proteins, and others
can be found in cell membranes of macrophages, neutrophils and dendritic cells.
An example of soluble forms that bind to the microbial surface and promote their
opsonization is mannose binding lectin and C-reactive protein. These receptors, when
connected to the microbial surface, also have the ability of triggering the complement system,
turning the invader into a sort of target for the complement-mediated lysis.
- There is an antimicrobial action through the blockage of pathogenic bacteria's receptors;
- There is insufficient data to demonstrate a mere physical action;
- In case of doubt where taking into account all product characteristics, and provided that the
On the basis of the above, it is concluded that this product does not meet the definition of a
4.15. Injectable substance for treatment of localized adiposity
The product is described by the manufacturer as an injectable aqueous solution with a microgelatinous base, which helps to modulate and favour the action of external ultrasound waves
(generated by the use of a medical ultrasound generator) for the non-surgical treatment of
localized adiposity by means of intralipotherapy. It is placed on the market as a class III
According to manufacturer information the product is a totally resorbable solution, composed
of an aqueous gelatinous micro-containing polymer. The solution is injected into the adipose
tissue, during intralipotherapy technique, and produces a swelling in the tissue, and, when
followed by the external application of ultrasound to the skin, leads to the generation of
micro-cavitation in the area where the solution was injected, increasing the drainage of the
fluid present in the treated area.
Also, according to the labelling and instructions for use, this product has as the intended use
simply the treatment of localized adiposity, without any relation to a specific pathology,
although it bears the instructions that it is intended to be used only by physicians.
The IFU mention the use on the "culotte de cheval" as well as in medicine and aesthetic
surgery / dermatology, as the manufacturer intends the product to be used for the treatment
and improvement of body imperfections due to small accumulations of adiposity. The
indication is limited only to healthy patients.
Considering that the treatment of localized adiposity on healthy patients is not a medical
purpose, and that the product does not have any medical claim, it is concluded that the
product does not meet the definition of a medical device and cannot be qualified as such.
4.16. Riboflavin solution for treatment of keratoconus
- Background:
The product is a solution containing riboflavin supplied in the form of eye drops and is
intended for the treatment of keratoconus (a degenerative disorder of the eye which causes
structural changes within the cornea).
The riboflavin solution is administered into the eye and is activated via illumination with UVA light for approximately 30 minutes. The riboflavin causes new bonds to form across
adjacent collagen strands in the stromal layer of the cornea which increases the tensile
strength of the cornea.
The intended purpose of the product is to increase the collagen cross linking by using
riboflavin in treatment of keratoconus by causing the collagen fibrils to thicken, stiffen and
cross link and reattach to each other making the cornea stronger, more stable and in turn
halting the disease progression.
The question is if the mode of action of the riboflavin in this clinical indication is a chemical
reaction or a pharmacological, immunological or metabolic action.
- Outcome:
The available information indicates that the riboflavin has a dual function, firstly on the
production of oxygen free radicals, and secondly by absorbing the UV-A radiation and
preventing damage to deeper ocular structures, such as corneal endothelium, the lens and the
retina.
The application of riboflavin results in an alteration of the normal chemical process of crosslinking of collagen. Considering this, as well as the definition of medical device and
metabolic action included in MEDDEV 2. 1/3 rev 36 (an action which involves an alteration,
including stopping, starting or changing the speed of the normal chemical processes
participating in, and available for, normal body function), it can be concluded that this product
should not be qualified as a medical device.
4.17. Dentistry products with aluminium chloride used in haemostasia
http://ec.europa.eu/health/medical-devices/files/meddev/2_1_3_rev_3-12_2009_en.pdf
Dentistry products with aluminium chloride are used in haemostasia. These products contain
aluminium chloride in various concentrations. Liquids and gels contain from 20% to 25%
aluminium chloride, while impregnated retraction cords contain from 5% to 10%
The products formulated as liquid and gel are intended to staunching perigingival bleeding
that results from decay cavities preparation. The aluminium chloride provides a local
astringent effect. The action of these products is based on precipitation of albumins which in
turn block the vessels (capillaries). These products are used on the mucous membranes or
injured skin creating a protective layer and contracting gums. It is claimed that bleeding stops
after several minutes enabling single day treatment without need for temporary dressing.
The impregnated retraction cord is used for retraction of the gingival tissues around the teeth
for improving the results of dental impressions and haemostasis of the gingival margin. The
aluminium chloride reduces the liquid in gingival pocket and closes the smaller blood vessels.
The effective retraction when the cord is correctly placed would take few minutes. Some
product types additionally contain lidocainum.
As that the mode of action of aluminium chloride is other than pharmacological,
immunological or metabolic, these products should be qualified as medical devices.
4.18. Qualification and classification of a wound gel containing soluble beta glucan
The product is a sterile, non-preserved, amorphous and thixotropic wound filling gel
containing water, glycerol, carboxymethylcellulose and soluble beta-glucan (SBG) 2%. It is to
be administered to the wound surface as a primary wound dressing, which then would be
covered with a conventional secondary dressing.
The question is whether such a product would be qualified as a medical device and classified
as a class III medical device with ancillary medicinal action under classification rule 13.
The soluble beta-glucan utilised is an aqueous soluble 1,3/1,6-glucan produced from baker's
yeast; it is a polymer containing glucose as the only monomer. A 2% formulation in water
presents as an adhesive gel-like solution. SBG has been found to be an inducer of innate
immune responses through its action on phagocytic cells at the beta-glucan receptor Dectin-1,
which stimulates macrophage migration into wounds. The gel product also contains
carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and glycerol, which are both established components of
wound healing dressings presented as gels.
The manufacturer claims that the product has as its primary function, as a hydrogel wound
dressing, the moistening and an assisting debriding effect in the wound bed. This is achieved
by the functionality of glycerol and CMC being able to bind excessive amounts of water (i.e.
having a high viscosity event at 1 to 2% concentration), but also by the soluble beta-glucan
polysaccharide component which forms a weak gel at a 2% concentration in water.
The soluble beta-glucan is claimed to have a dual action. The ancillary, or medicinal
substance effect, is claimed to stimulate the wound healing process by modulating phagocytic
cells in the wound bed, especially macrophage functions. Soluble beta-glucan may also
contribute to reducing the risk for secondary wound infection by modulating the functions of
cells belonging to the innate immunological system and by recruiting phagocytic cells into the
wound area.
For this specific product, the data provided sufficient evidence to indicate that while the
principal action is exerted by the moist wound healing effect, the soluble beta-glucan which,
if used separately, can be considered to be a medicinal product, as defined in Article 1 of
Directive 2001/83/EC, is liable to act on the human body with action ancillary to that of the
wound healing process. Therefore this product should be qualified as medical device and
regarded as a class III medical device under rule 13. This should not be taken to mean,
however, that other products containing soluble beta-glucans or other dual action products
should be always qualified as medical devices.
This product is used to relieve occasional constipation. Glycerin suppositories act as a
hyperosmotic laxative by drawing water into the intestine. This effect usually results in a
bowel movement. Glycerin suppositories act by increasing the transportation of electrolytes
through the bowel membrane (osmotic effect) and by stimulating nerve endings of rectum
triggering defecation reflex (stimulant effect).
In this case an osmotic process leads to a metabolic effect while the stimulant effect is
considered as a pharmacological mode of action.
Glycerin suppositories are a product intended to treat and prevent constipation that act via a
metabolic and pharmacological mode of action and should not be qualified as a medical
BORDERLINE MEDICAL DEVICE – BIOCIDES
General disinfectants fall under the Biocides Directive7. Article 1 (2) of this Directive
excludes products that are defined or within the scope of Directive 93/42/EEC on medical
devices (MDD) and Directive 90/385/EEC on active implantable medical devices (AIMDD).
A guidance document exists for borderline cases between the Biocides Directive and the
Cosmetics Regulation as well as a manual of decisions for implementation of the Biocides
Hand disinfectants
A manufacturer directed a request to the Commission services on the qualification of a range
of products. These products are hand disinfectants.
Hand disinfectants do not appear to be qualified as an accessory to a medical device. These
products are for disinfecting the hands and not devices. Such products are likely to be covered
by other Community legislation, for example the Biocides Directive.
The product is an insect repellent packaging in a spray and consisting of lactic acid.
According to the manufacturer's claims the product is intended to be applied on the human
skin and is intended to prevent diseases by preventing human exposure to diseases transferred
by mosquitoes. The manufacturer also claims that the product alleviates injuries on the skin
since the product reduces the amount of skin penetration caused by the bites of mosquitoes.
According the manufacturer, the mode of action is that the product acts as a barrier on the
skin against mosquitoes and other blood sucking insects, with an effect during four hours.
Therefore, the manufacturer intends to put its product on the market as a medical device.
This product is primary intended to repel insects in order to prevent mosquitoes and insects
bites. This product is not intended to be used principally for a medical use. According to
Annex V of Directive 98/8/EC, repellents and attractants products including those that are
used for human or veterinary hygiene either directly or indirectly are considered biocides
Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing
of biocidal products on the market, OJ L 123, 24.4.1998, p. 1–63.
products. In addition, insect repellents are considered to have a primary effect on the insects
and not on the human body.
On the basis of the above this insect repellent cannot be consider as a medical device.
Multipurpose disinfectants
Disinfectants cover a wide area of uses and, while some are specifically intended for the
disinfection of medical devices, others are of a multipurpose use covering the disinfection of
various surfaces including floors, walls, sanitary facilities and sometimes also medical
While usually disinfectant products are regulated within the biocides legal framework, those
that are specifically intended for disinfecting medical devices fall within the scope of the
"Products with a multiple purpose which may be used occasionally in a medical environment
are normally not medical devices" (MEDDEV 2. 1/1 paragraph 1.1).
" Examples of accessories of medical devices
- Disinfectants specifically intended for use with medical devices (e.g. endoscopes),
Note: Multipurpose disinfectants or sterilisation agents are not covered by MDD; they are
covered by the directive on biocides." ( MEDDEV 2. 1/3 rev 3, paragraph A.2.1.4)
General disinfectants fall under the Directive 98/8/EC on the placing of Biocidal products on
the market. This directive will be repealed and replaced by the Regulation (EU) No 528/2012
applicable 1 September 2013.
Brushes and sponges for washing/cleaning nails, hands and/or harms in hospitals
(prior to surgery)
Single use sterile brushes and sponges with or without disinfectants are used by healthcare
professionals for washing and cleaning the nails, hands and/or arms before surgical
Manufacturers claim that, as these products act to prevent infections in patients undergoing
surgical procedures, they are medical devices.
Brushes and sponges, with or without disinfectants, for washing and cleaning the nails, hands
and/or arms, used by healthcare professionals, do not qualify as medical devices as they do
not meet the definition of a medical device according to Directive 93/42/EEC.
Additionally, it should be noted that only products intended specifically to be used for
disinfecting medical devices come into the scope of the MDD.
BORDERLINE MEDICAL DEVICE –COSMETIC PRODUCTS
Article 1(5) d MDD states that the MDD does not apply to cosmetic products covered by
Directive 76/768/EEC on cosmetic products.8
It is suggested to consult MEDDEV 2.1/1 section 1.1. (d) for more detailed guidance on the
borderline issues concerning cosmetics.
Tooth whitening or bleaching products – amended
Dental cosmetic products are intended to clean the teeth and/or to whiten/bleach discoloured
teeth in order to remove the plaque and other residues and/or remove discoloration of the
teeth. There may be various claims, such as prevention of odour from the oral cavity or even
of some kind of dental caries.
Dental cosmetic products may be in the form of solutions, pastes or other forms and are
typically intended for use by individuals at home, but also for use in a professional medical
environment e.g. by dentists.
The question is whether tooth whitening/bleaching products may be qualified as medical
devices, or whether they are simply intended for aesthetic purposes / toiletry purpose and
therefore cannot be considered as medical devices.
In some cases, in addition to other contributory factors, discoloration of teeth may be caused
by a disease. Nevertheless discoloration of teeth is not considered to be a disease in itself.
Besides, application of tooth-whitening/bleaching products is not intended to treat the
underlying disease; it only may mask a sign of an underlying disease.
Art. 1 of the Directive 93/42/EEC defines that a medical device is intended to be "used for
human beings for the purpose of: - diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation
of disease [..]". This definition clearly establishes a link between prevention or treatment and
disease.
Council Directive of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic
products, OJ L 262, 27.9.1976, p. 169, as last amended.
Describing the colour of the teeth after treatment does not give an indication about the
effectiveness to treat an underlying disease or to prevent a disease.
It should be mentioned that, according to the definition of a cosmetic product as laid down in
article 2 of Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 on cosmetics products ('Cosmetics Regulation')
tooth whitening or bleaching products qualify as cosmetic products. This has been confirmed
in Annex III of this Regulation (entry 12 (d) and (e)), which sets maximum concentrations of
hydrogen peroxide, present or released, use conditions and labelling warnings9.
Therefore, tooth whitening/bleaching products whether placed within the tooth cavity or
placed on the surface of the teeth should not be qualified as medical devices.
ACCESSORY TO A MEDICAL DEVICE OR AN IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL DEVICE
The definitions of accessory read as follows:
Article 1 MDD (b) 'accessory' means an article which whilst not being a device is intended
specifically by its manufacturer to be used together with a device to enable it to be used in
accordance with the use of the device intended by the manufacturer of the device;
Article 1 (2)c IVDD "'accessory' means an article which, whilst not being an in vitro
diagnostic medical device, is intended specifically by its manufacturer to be used together
with a device to enable that device to be used in accordance with its intended purpose. For
the purposes of this definition, invasive sampling devices or those which are directly applied
to the human body for the purpose of obtaining a specimen within the meaning of Directive
93/42/ EEC shall not be considered to be accessories to in vitro diagnostic medical devices;"
diagnostic medical devices, and MEDDEV 2.1/1 on the definition of accessory for medical
Haemodialysis water test strips
The matter at hand concerned the question whether the following two products can be
considered as an accessory to a haemodialysis machine which is a medical device. Both
products are used together with the haemodialysis machine, one is a residual peroxide reagent
strip, which confirms, when used, that the residue of disinfection agents used in the
OJ l 283, 29.10.2011, p. 36. At the time, the rules were incorporated into Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27
July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products, OJ L 262,
27.9.1976, which is now replaced by the Cosmetics Regulation.
haemodialysis machine have been reduced to safe levels. The other is a reagent strip used to
test the water in the haemodialysis machine to ensure that the level of water hardness has been
reduced to a level where it is safe to proceed with haemodialysis.
From the information provided by the manufacturer of the strips, they do not enable the
haemodialysis machine to be used. The strips are used for testing and are not necessary for the
functioning of the machine.
According to Article 1 (2) b of Directive 93/42/EEC and the developed guidance (MEDDEV
2.1/1) the decisive criterion to decide whether a product is an accessory to a medical device is
whether or not the product is specifically used together with a medical device to enable it to
be used in accordance with the use intended by its manufacturer.
The notion "enabled it to be used" implies that the accessory is necessary for the medical
device to function.
Therefore, such strips are not considered to be 'accessories' of a medical device within the
meaning of Article 1 (2) (b) MDD.
If a manufacturer can claim, substantiated with a solid reasoning that the strips are necessary
for the proper functioning of the machine, then these products might be qualified as
'accessories'.
Surgical instrument decontamination products
of products. The products in question are surgical instrument decontamination products.
Surgical instrument decontamination products are covered by the definition of accessories to
medical devices in Article 1 (2) b of Directive 93/42/EEC. The respective guidance
(MEDDEV 2. 1/1) expressively mentions disinfectants specifically intended for invasive
medical devices as one example for accessories.
For the classification of these products see paragraph 8.9
7.3. Dental Water Line Disinfectants
of products. The products in question are Dental Water Line Disinfectants.
Dental Water Line Disinfectants are covered by the definition of accessories to medical
devices in Article 1 (2) b of Directive 93/42/EEC.
For the classification of these products see paragraph 8.10
7.4. Sterilization indicators
The sterilization procedure is monitored routinely by using chemical and biological indicators
to evaluate the sterilizing conditions and indirectly the microbiologic status of the processed
Sterilization indicators monitor the performance of the sterilizer. They do not affect the
sterilization procedure and only provide additional information to the user.
Sterilization indicators do not fulfil either the definition of a medical device laid down in
Article 1(2)a of Directive 93/42/EEC or the definition of an accessory laid down in Article
1(2)b of Directive 93/42/EEC as they are not intended specifically to be used together with a
device to enable it to be used in accordance with its stated use.
It is suggested to consult MEDDEV 2.4/1 rev 9 for more detailed guidance concerning the
classification rules for medical devices.
compensate for a shortage of natural light. These statements are effectively claims for
treatment of seasonal affective disorder (S.A.D.), which is a recognised medical condition and
therefore this product is considered a medical device.
In the classification of this product, it must be decided whether it performs any active action
as defined in Annex IX I - Definition 1.5 'Active therapeutic device'.
That is, does it support, modify, replace, or restore biological functions or structures with a
view to treatment or alleviation of a disease? If the device performs an 'active' function, then
it is class IIa.
Oxygen delivery
These products are intended to deliver oxygen to the patient and are connected to active
devices such as ventilators, anesthetic machines etc. and / or to a pressure regulator.These
devices may be connected to the different kind of oxygen delivery systems with regulators;
via oxygen piping to the oxygen supply/oxygen delivery centre, to oxygen bottles/oxygen
cylinders or to oxygen concentrators.
In the classification of this product, Class IIa is appropriate based upon rule 2, 5 or 11 of
Annex IX.
Examination gloves coated with polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB)
The case relates to examination gloves with PHMB which is a broad spectrum bactericide.
This substance is also used as an ingredient in various products (contact lens solutions and
surgical scrubs and swimming pools). The intended use is to reduce bacterial transfer between
the healthcare professional and the patient. The gloves would be single use.
Examination gloves are usually considered to be Class I medical devices, however MEDDEV
2.1/3 in section A.5 states that 'wound dressings, surgical or barrier drapes (including tulle
dressings) with antimicrobial agent' are considered to be devices incorporating medicinal
substances and therefore Class III devices.
Antimicrobial agents on surgical or barrier drapes intended to come in to contact with the
patient have no 'ancillary' effect on the patient and neither would an antimicrobial coating on
an examination glove, however the MEDDEV implies that these examination gloves with a
PHMB coating should be considered as Class III medical devices.
Medical devices may incorporate substances as an integral part which, if used separately, may
be considered to be a medicinal product. This is specifically addressed in article 1(4) MDD
which makes it clear that such products are devices, provided that the action of the medicinal
substance is ancillary to that of the device, as reflected in the product claim and as supported
by the scientific data provided by the manufacturer of the devices. Rule 13 places these
devices in Class III.
In essence two issues need to be considered: a) is the substance (PHMB), if used separately a
medicinal product; b) is the substance liable to act on the human body with action ancillary to
that of the devices?
a) Taking into account the published literature, it can be concluded that the PHMB is a
substance which could be administered topically to human beings in view to restore or modify
physiological functions by mainly means of pharmacological action (e.g. treatment of
Acanthamoeba keratitis). As such it could be regarded as a medicinal product in accordance
with Article 1(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC as amended.
b) The risk that the PHMB acts on the patient highly depends on the intended use of these
gloves. For example, an examination of a wound or a mucous membrane will lead to a
considerably increased risk of action of PHMB on the patient.
On the basis of the above and taking into account the Rule 13, the classification of these
gloves as Class III would appear the most appropriate.
Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS)
Basically, a PACS workstation is specifically designed to be networked with a wide variety of
diagnostic imaging systems, e.g. x-ray, nuclear medicine, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
or ultrasound, as well as laboratory or hospital information systems. It does not contain
controls for the direct operation of a diagnostic imaging system and is designed to receive,
archive, and transmit data both on-line and off-line. It is typically located at a site remote
from imaging systems and is configured to provide limited or extensive capabilities to further
process, manipulate and/or view patient images and information collected from diagnostic
imaging systems. The manufacturer of the PACS states that the system does not influence the
radiation of the diagnostic x-ray machine.10
Generally speaking there are various types of PACS:
(a) PACS used for viewing, archiving and transmitting images.
(b) Where the post-processing of the image for diagnostic purposes is such as:
- image processing functions which alter the image data (e.g. filtering, multiplanar
reconstruction, 3D reconstruction)
- complex quantitative functions (e.g. arterial stenosis evaluation, ventricular volume
calculation, calcium scoring, automatic indication (detection) of potential lesions
(c) With image enhancing by controlling image acquisition
GMDN code 40943
In cases where the PACS falls under the definition of a medical device, i.e. is specifically
intended by the manufacturer to be used for one or more of the medical purposes set out in the
medical device definition, the following situations can be foreseen:
In relation to PACS (a) intended by its manufacturer to be used for viewing, archiving
and transmitting images, it is considered that applying rule 12 could be appropriate and
accordingly this type of PACS are generally classified as Class I medical devices. However,
PACS that are only intended for archiving or storage of data may not fall within the definition
of a medical device provided that data is not manipulated.
Those types of PACS (b) which drive a device or influence the use of a source device
fall automatically in the same class in accordance with implementing rule 2.3, which classifies
them as Class IIa or IIb. If this type of PACS does not drive or influence the use of the source
device, this type of PACS can be classified under rule 10 if such PACS are intended to allow
direct diagnosis, classifying them as Class IIa.
PACS with image enhancing by controlling image acquisition (c) should fall into the
same class as the source device. This is based upon, firstly, implementing rule 2.3"Software,
which drives a device or influences the use of a device, falls automatically in the same class."
and the last paragraph of MEDDEV 2.4/1 - rev. 8, Section 3.2 stating that: "Standalone
software, e.g. software which is used for image enhancement is regarded as driving or
influencing the use of a device and so falls automatically into the same class. Other
standalone software, which is not regarded as driving or influencing the use of a device, is
classified in its own right". Applying this classification rule and the interpretation of the
MEDDEV allows this type of PACS to be classified as Class IIa or IIb medical devices
according to the classification of the device itself.
Blood refrigerators, freezers and defrosters
The product in question concerns blood product cooling devices/blood bank refrigerators. A
blood storage refrigerator and a blood storage freezer are devices intended for medical
purposes that are used to preserve blood and blood products by storing them at cold or
freezing temperatures. Plasma defrosters are designed for defrosting of blood plasma.
Blood storage refrigerators, freezers and defrosters sold for the specific intended purpose of
dealing with blood should be medical devices in their own right.
The cooling device or refrigerator store substances that will be eventually delivered into the
body and are Class IIa (rule 2). The plasma defrosters are in Class I (rule 1).
Warming blankets
This matter relates to the classification of warming blankets. It concerns a manufacturer who
markets warming blankets on the basis of warm air, produced by an extra warming device.
The manufacturer considers the blanket to be an accessory to the active device and as such the
manufacturer considered it Class I.
1/ Medical device or not?
The medical purpose has to be clearly identified and substantiated to qualify these products as
2/ If the blanket and the generator are sold as a single medical device:
Classification rule 9 would classify these products as class IIa or class IIb medical devices
depending on the state of the patient (which is inherently linked to different levels of risks).
When the product is intended to be used on an unconscious patient (who therefore cannot
remove the blanket), e.g. in reanimation services, the device is to be classified as class IIb
medical device. If the device is intended to be used on a conscious patient (who therefore can
react), the device is to be classified as class IIa medical device.
3/ If the blanket and the generator are sold separately:
The blanket sold separately cannot be considered as an active medical device and is a Class I
medical device in accordance with rule 1.
The generator sold alone would be class IIa or class IIb in accordance with classification rule
9. The manufacturer will have to specify the use of such generator.
Products evaluating the condition of respiratory muscles
The product assists in evaluating the condition of the respiratory muscles. It is a small battery
operated device that performs two tests: the Pmax and the Sniff tests. Both tests measure
pressure.
The Pmax test operates through the mouth through a voluntary respiratory manoeuvre. This
test requires a maximal respiratory effort by the patient. The test starts by a deep breath filling
the full capacity of the lungs and then the patient tries to breathe out into a plastic tube which
is closed from all sides except the connection to the mouth. The device measures the
maximum pressure that is developed in the tube and sustained for at least one second. This
pressure is then compared to normal pressures. This is done for both expiratory and
inspiratory pressures. The Sniff test measures the pressure that develops in the nose during a
sniff manoeuvre. Both tests are supposed to give similar results.
It gives an indication whether the respiratory muscles are working properly. Bad readings do
not necessarily indicate a disease but an indication that further clinical investigation might be
appropriate. Neither does it monitor any physiological process since it does not allow air flow
through it, so it cannot monitor respiration.
The product measures how fast a person can exhale air. It is one of many tests that measure
the function of the airways, which are commonly affected by diseases such as asthma. This
product is intended to measure the condition of the respiratory muscles and as such is to be
classified as a Class IIa medical device in accordance with classification rule 10 third indent.
Neutral electrodes for high frequency surgery
The issue relates to the classification of neutral electrodes which are accessories for High
Frequency (HF) surgery. In general there are two types of electrodes used in high frequency
surgery: those which are 'active' concentrate the energy and convert it into heat and those
which are 'neutral' and simply transfer the energy between two points.
The MEDDEV does not make this distinction and places both electrodes active and neutral
under rule 9, consequently they are both considered to be in Class IIb. This is the result from
discussions a few years ago, and that is why the MEDDEV puts both electrodes in the same
Class IIb. However, manufacturers do make this distinction.
Current guidance (MEDDEV 2.4/1 under rule 9) indicates that all such electrodes should be
considered as Class IIb products, irrespective of their nature (active or neutral) as they may be
potentially hazardous. It is concluded that the neutral electrodes are medical devices which
involve potentially hazardous exchange of energy and should be Class IIb medical devices.
A manufacturer directed a request to the Commission services on the classification of a range
These products should be classified according to Rule 15 of Annex IX of Directive
93/42/EEC. This rule has been further developed in MEDDEV 2.4/1, according to which this
rule covers substances used principally in a medical environment to disinfect medical devices.
Examples listed in the MEDDEV 2.4/1 include disinfectants specifically intended for instance
for endoscopes or haemodialysis equipment, sterilizers specifically intended to sterilize
medical devices in a medical environment and washer disinfectors.
Dental water line disinfectants
8.11. Dental curing lights
The dental curing lights are intended for curing of dental filling substances in situ.
A number of dental filling materials need for hardening (a kind of polymerisation) after
application to the tooth to be treated with light. During this application of light, the energy
transmitted with this light is absorbed by the filling material as well by the surrounding parts
of the body (surface of the tooth, other neighboured fillings and crowns, internal part of the
tooth surrounding the filling which is warming up, gum if the filling is close to the gum). It is
not possible to avoid the surroundings of the filling to be treated together with the filling; this
is an undesired but unavoidable and accepted side effect.
Because of the considerable changes in the design of the lights, it is questioned whether a
reclassification would be needed.
It is confirmed that no reclassification is needed and that these products shall be considered as
Class I medical devices in accordance with classification rule 12. Also, the guidance
MEDDEV 2.4/1 on classification lists the example of "dental curing light" under
classification rule 12.
8.12. Bacterial/viral filter for use on patient undergoing pulmonary function testing
The product is a bacterial/viral filter indicated for single use on patients undergoing
pulmonary function testing and its main function is to avoid secretion and moisture deposition
in the equipment, reducing the need of frequent decontamination procedures. The equipment
is a spirometer, a class IIa active medical device, according Directive 93/42/EC.
The manufacturer states that the product should be classified as class I, because the product
does not interfere at all with the diagnostic function of the test machine, and because the
energy used by the active device (spirometer) is not exchanged with the patient. In
consequence the manufacturer applies the rule for devices not intended for connection to an
active medical device.
The product is an invasive device since it is partially inserted inside a natural body orifice
(patient's mouth).
The product is intended for transient use, as the duration of contact seems to be usually less
than 60 minutes and is intended for connection to a Class IIa active device (spirometer).
On the basis of the above and taking classification rule 5 into account, this device should be
classified as Class IIa medical device.
8.13. Hydrocolloid plaster for blisters
Blisters are resulting from frictional forces that mechanically separate epidermal cells and
dermal cells and the separation fills with a fluid. The epidermal cells will be weakened. The
blister management could be done by protecting the blister without puncture it or puncturing
the blister with a sterile needle and removing the skin on the blister area before placing the
plaster.
Hydrocolloids are more effective than ordinary first aid plasters and claim that they promote
rapid healing. Indeed, some of hydrocolloid dressing mentions the principle known as moist
wound healing to provide the ideal treatment for blisters. Moisture enhances wound reepithelization since occlusive dressings that maintain moisture and warmth were optimal for
healing.
A blister is injured skin.
Hydrocolloid acts by its proprieties on the microenvironment of the blister and is not placed
on a blister to act simply as a mechanical barrier for absorption of exudates.
On the basis of the above and taking classification rule 4 and guidance MEDDEV 2.4/1 – rev
8, part 2 into account, it is considered that hydrocolloid which claims promoting rapid
healing should be classified as class IIa medical devices.
8.14. Movement monitor for babies
The manufacturer claims that this product is recommended for all babies, especially during
their most vulnerable first 6 months, to help guard against life-threatening events such as
Apnoea and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS or Cot Death).
A little vibrating motor is used to stimulate babies in neonatal wards that suffer apnoea
episodes and can indicate if they are rhythmic or general movements. If the baby becomes
dangerously inactive, this product will provide a small tactile stimulation even before human
intervention. If breathing effort stops, slows down too much or becomes too shallow the
built-in stimulator will gently stir baby to breathe, failing which a loud alarm will alert the
nearest adult and consequently should be help by a doctor. The problem is to know whether
this product could be considered as a general product or as a medical device or as an active
This product is intended to help preventing life-threatening events such as apnoea and Sudden
Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS or Cot Death). Taking this medical purpose into account this
product fulfils the definition of a medical device.
This product is to be connected with a source of electrical energy and could then be
considered as an active medical device. According to classification rule 10, this product
should be classified as Class IIb medical device.
8.15. Medical devices containing silver
There are many medical devices being placed on the market containing silver (e.g. wound
dressing containing silver, coated catheters or secondary bandage to cover primary
dressings…). The claims for these products are usually that the silver is acting as an
antimicrobial agent in an ancillary manner.
Silver is well known as an antimicrobial agent and is active at low levels. It is considered to
be a medicinal substance in its own right when such claims are made.
The question is whether or not silver containing medical devices should be classified as
class III medical devices under classification rule 13 of Annex IX.
In general, medical devices containing or coated with silver, specifically those making
antimicrobial claims, should be considered as Class III medical devices under classification
rule 13 of Annex IX. This is because in order for the silver to act as an antimicrobial agent,
it has to be in an available form and therefore would be liable to act on the body.
The Directive 93/42/EEC states that if a device incorporates as an integral part a medicinal
substance and that this substance is liable to act on the body with ancillary action to that of
the device then the device should be classified as class III medical device. The Directive
does not state that the medicinal substance must be intended to act on the body. The fact
that the silver is not intended to reach the body or act on the body does not preclude the
silver from being liable to act on the body.
There may be some exceptions to this:
If a device does not come into direct contact with the body (for example a secondary
bandage intended to cover primary dressings) then a lower classification might be possible,
provided that the manufacturer has clear data to support the claims being made and the fact
that the silver is not liable to act upon the human body.
If it is claimed that the silver in the product will not act on the body or that it is intended to
maintain specific characteristics of the device and would therefore not have any ancillary
action, the manufacturer must demonstrate the claim via clinical and scientific data, using
suitably rigorous testing to prove that the silver does not leach out of the device. If there is
clear data to support such a claim then a product could potentially be classified in a lower
class. In the absence of valid data to support such a claim then the product would remain
Class III under rule 13.
8.16. Ethyl chloride spray for local refrigeration anaesthesia
A manufacturer of a spray for local anaesthesia containing ethyl chloride wants to place this
product on the market as a medical device. Several other products with a similar intended use
and mode of action are already placed on the market as medical devices but with some
discrepancies regarding their classification.
In some countries, ethyl chloride is regulated as a medicinal product because of its toxicity
and its narcotic properties.
Ethyl chloride is used as local anaesthetic in minor operative procedures and is used also to
alleviate pain associated with bruises, contusions, etc…
The rapid vaporization of ethyl chloride when applied as a spray to the skin produces freezing
of superficial tissues to -20°C, which results in insensitivity of peripheral nerve endings and a
local anesthesia.
In the present case the principal mode of action of ethyl chloride is not pharmacological,
immunological or metabolic and therefore this product could be qualified as a medical device.
As stated in MEDDEV 2.4/1 rev.9, medical devices using pre-stored gases and/or vacuum as
a power source are regarded as active devices. Consequently this product could be qualified as
an active medical device and, according to rule 9 of Annex IX of Directive 93/42/EEC, could
be classified as Class IIa medical device.
8.17. Pathogen inactivation system for platelets
These specific systems for storing platelets are used to protect patients against transfusiontransmitted disease by inactivating pathogens in platelets. The system is designed to inactivate
viruses, bacteria, other pathogens and white blood cells in platelets intended for transfusion.
This system is composed of a blood bag, a chemical compound and if necessary an
illumination device. The compounds have a high affinity for nucleic acids of viruses, bacteria
and others pathogens and prevent the replication of the pathogens by damaging the nucleic
acid. The chemical compounds could be psoralen-derivatives, riboflavin, ethylene imines and
methylene blue. Psoralen-derivatives and riboflavin require a photo-activation by an
illumination device to be active.
After the pathogen inactivation process, the chemical compounds could be removed and the
platelets are transferred to the final blood bag where they are stored until transfusion.
The question is on the classification of such devices, the blood bag with chemical compounds
and the illumination device,
According to MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev 3, "systems intended for the collection, storage and
preservation of blood or blood components and as an ancillary function, the treatment of
blood or blood components where this effect is achieved outside the human body, are
classified as devices provided that any residual material is not intended to achieve its intended
effect when the blood or cells are reintroduced into the body, e.g. systems incorporating
chemicals activated by light to reduce the viral load where the quantity of chemical remaining
has no intended effect when transfused".
According to MEDDEV 2.4/1 rev 9, blood bags are class IIb except if they " have a function
greater than for storing purposes and include systems for preservation other than anticoagulants the other rules (e.g. rule 13) may apply". Therefore, if the compound has an
ancillary pharmacological or metabolic action, the blood bag with the compound has to be
classified as Class III medical device under rule 13.
In the present case, the compound which inactivates pathogens is used to provide an
antimicrobial effect and not for the purpose of the preservation of the solution. This
antimicrobial effect is considered to be a pharmacological action and therefore the blood bag
with the compound should be classed class III under rule 13.
The illumination device is considered to be an accessory of the device as it enables the action
of the blood bag with the chemical compound and therefore could be classified as Class IIa
medical device under rule 3, as the illumination process modifies the biological composition
of blood and consists on exchange of energy.
8.18. Pre-transfusion confirmatory tests
Pre-transfusion devices are made of a support on which anti-A and anti-B reagents are applied.
Those devices are used by nurses and doctors for the pre-transfusion compatibility testing at
the patient's bedside. The purpose is to verify the ABO system compatibility between the
recipient and the red blood cell component to be transfused immediately before transfusion to
prevent any incidental incompatibility.
The simultaneous comparison of agglutination between the recipient's blood and the blood of
the donor's bag allows a last verification of the ABO system compatibility between recipient
and donor. These devices are considered as In vitro Diagnostic medical devices. The question
is whether these devices are falling under Annex II list A of Directive 98/79/EC, which
includes "Reagents and reagent products, including related calibrators and control materials,
for determining the following blood groups: ABO system…".
Although the Pre-transfusion devices are not specifically used for the determination of the
ABO system blood groups, those devices include anti-A and anti-B reagents used for the
determination of the ABO system blood groups, which are falling under Annex II list A.
Therefore, these devices are falling under Annex II list A of Directive 98/79/EC.
8.19. Eye drops regulated as medical devices
The ocular surface is a physiological complex fundamental in the maintenance of a good
visual function, so its integrity must be properly safeguarded irrespective of the use of contact
lenses. The use of substances that increase the retention time of the lubricants, tend to increase
the contact time between the lubricant and the ocular surface.
According to point 3.1.2.2 of MEDDEV 2.4/1 rev.9 on the Concept of continuous use, if it
cannot be demonstrated that components of the device are totally eliminated in the interval
between uses, this is also considered as an immediate replacement.
The continued use in situations where there is no lasting relief of symptoms as well as the
continuation of aggressive conditions (environmental or not / or due to a number of medical
conditions) can lead to the permanent and / or high frequency use (with products whose rate
of elimination is unknown), setting the conditions for the continued use of these lubricants.
Considering eye lubricants as examples of medical devices (in which there is no
demonstration of their total elimination between applications) destined for continuous use.
According to rule 15 of Annex IX of Directive 93/42/EEC, all devices intended specifically to
be used for disinfecting, cleaning, rinsing or, when appropriate, hydrating contact lenses are in
Class IIb, and in MEDDEV 2.4/1 rev.9, comfort solutions are given as an example to rule 15.
When qualified as medical devices, eye drops intended for the lubrication of the eyes, should
be classified on a case-by-case basis, and would be class IIa or class IIb, in accordance with
classification rule 5 of Annex IX of Directive 93/42/EEC, depending on if they are intended
for short or long-term use.
8.20. Wound irrigation solutions containing antimicrobial agents
Irrigation solutions intended for mechanical rinsing are regarded as being medical devices.
Topical disinfectants for use on humans are not considered to be medical devices but rather
medicinal products. A number of irrigation solutions intended for mechanical rinsing contain
ingredients such as chlorhexidine, cetrimide, iodine, hypochlorous acid (HOCl), free chlorine
(chlorine/chloride ion Cl2/Cl-), hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorous acid, hydrogen peroxide,
chlorine dioxide, sodium hydroxide, sodium chloride and sodium carbonate. Many of these
ingredients have an antimicrobial effect on the body. A question arose with regard to the
qualification of these products as medical devices and their classification.
MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev.3 states that irrigation solutions for mechanical rinsing are considered to
be medical devices unless the principle intended purpose is to provide a local antimicrobial
effect. The majority of wound irrigation solutions with antimicrobial action are intended
primarily as wound irrigation solutions to mechanically rinse the wound whilst also reducing
the bacterial load. The antimicrobial effect may be considered as an ancillary action.
Antimicrobial agents or substances are generally considered to be medicinal substances when
intended for a medical purpose. Therefore a wound irrigation solution containing an
antimicrobial agent, irrespective of the amount of the antimicrobial substance liable to act on
the body, will be considered to be Class III according to classification rule 13.
8.21. Contact lenses
There are three main types of contact lenses:
- Daily disposable (single use) contact lenses: these single use devices are worn only during
the waking period of one day and then disposed of;
- Contact lenses for daily wear (planned replacement): these contact lenses are reusable
devices. They are worn only during waking periods; taken out overnight for cleaning,
disinfected during the sleeping period, and put back in the eye the following day;
- Contact lenses for extended or continuous wear: these lenses are worn continuously during
successive waking and sleeping periods.
The overnight period when lenses are cleaned and disinfected is considered as a
discontinuation of the device use. For the determination of the duration of use, only the
specified time period of uninterrupted wear of the lens (e.g. 16 hours) needs to be taken into
On the basis of the above, contact lenses are classified as follows:
- Daily disposable (single use) contact lenses are classified as class IIa medical devices
according to classification rule 5, 2nd indent;
- Contact lenses for daily wear with discontinuation of use overnight are classified as class IIa
medical devices according to classification rule 5, 2nd indent;
- Contact lenses for overnight wear with discontinuation of use during the day are classified
as class IIa medical devices according to classification rule 5, 2nd indent;
- Contact lenses for continuous wear for up to 30 days are classified as class IIa medical
devices according to classification rule 5, 2nd indent;
- Contact lenses for continuous wear for more than 30 days as classified as class IIb medical
devices according to classification rule 5, 3rd indent.
8.22. Paraffin oil for IVF/ART procedure
Paraffin oil is placed over the culture media containing the human embryos during an ART or
IVF procedure. The paraffin oil overlay is intended to protect the culture medium from
evaporation in the incubator, to reduce gas, temperature and pH fluctuation in the medium
surrounding the embryos. Besides, the paraffin oil eases the examination of embryos during
culture under the microscope.
The paraffin oil protects the medium and embryo from environmental conditions by creating a
physical barrier like containers for organs or body tissues and is intended to be used for
IVF/ART procedure. When intended to be used for IVF/ART procedure, the paraffin oil
should be qualified as a medical device.
Besides, it has been established that the paraffin oil by its relative close contact between the
oil and the embryo could interfere on the embryo development.
Thus, by similarly with containers for organs or body tissues, the paraffin oil should be
classified as a Class IIa medical device in accordance with classification rule 2 second indent.
8.23. Dental abutments
Three parts make up an "artificial" tooth: the crown or cap, the dental abutment, and the
implant.
This entry refers to final dental abutments which are usually called dental implant abutments
or prosthetic abutments for dental implant and does not cover healing abutments which are
placed during a variable time before a final abutment.
Dental abutments are connecting elements between the dental implant and the crown. The
implant is inserted directly into the bone of the jaw. The abutment is fixed to the implant and
is in contact with the gum, in the surgical cavity. In the final stage of getting the
dental implant, the crown is built above the gum around the other part of the abutment.
The question arises as to whether dental abutments should be classified as Class IIa or IIb
MEDDEV 2.4/1 rev. 9 relating to the rule 8, first hyphen, of Annex IX to Directive
93/42/EEC states that examples of medical devices to be placed in the teeth such as bridges
and crowns, dental filling materials and pins and dental alloys ceramics and polymers are to
be classified as Class IIa medical devices.
Since they are directly placed in the gum, dental abutments should be considered as
implantable devices, as well as dental implants.
According to rule 8 of Annex IX to Directive 93/42/EEC, dental abutments should be
classified as Class IIb medical devices.
8.24. Autologous Platelet Preparation System
This product is a system which is used in the preparation of autologous platelet rich plasma
(PRP) for injection/application in/on the skin surface or wound and is claimed to promote
accelerated healing and rejuvenation. The system comprises several devices such as
preparation tubes and filters, syringes, hypodermic needles and blunt needles. Each of these
devices is CE marked.
The patient's blood is drawn into the preparation tube which contains a gel and an anticoagulant solution (ACD). The preparation tube is then centrifuged to separate the patient's
blood sample into two phases: red blood cells (erythrocytes) and plasma, which contains the
platelets. The gel, which has a specific gravity between that of the plasma and red blood cells,
acts as a barrier to prevent the two phases reconstituting.
The plasma phase consists of two 'layers': a top layer of Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) and a
bottom layer of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP). The PPP is removed by inserting a blunt needle
syringe into the plasma and then discarded. The remaining PRP is extracted through a filter
sleeve, which is placed within the preparation tube, using the blunt needle syringe. The blunt
needle is removed from the syringe and replaced with a hypodermic needle which is then used
to inject the PRP into the patient.
The manufacturer has classified and CE marked the preparation tube, containing the gel and
anti-coagulant solution (ACD), as a Class IIa medical device under Rule 3 as he means the
tube to be a non-invasive device modifying the composition of blood (with the aid of
centrifugation) and intended for infusion into the body.
Anti-coagulant solution (ACD) is considered to be a medicinal product as defined in Article 1
of Directive 2001/83/EC and according to Rule 13 of Annex IX of Directive 93/42/EEC 'all
devices incorporating, as an integral part, a substance which, if used separately, can be
considered to be a medicinal product as defined in Article 1 of the Directive 2001/83/EC, and
which is liable to act on the human body with action ancillary to that of the devices, are in
Class III'.
However, as per MEDDEV 2.4/1 Rev. 9, this rule does not cover those devices incorporating
substances which under other circumstances may be considered as medicinal substances, but
which are incorporated into the device exclusively for the purpose at maintaining certain
characteristics of the device and which are not liable to act on the body.
The appropriate classification of the preparation tube, containing the gel and anti-coagulant
solution (ACD) was queried, specifically the appropriateness of Rules 3 and 13. The
appropriate classification of the filter sleeve was also queried.
Anti-coagulant solutions (ACD) and preservative solutions for human blood have a European
Pharmacopeia monograph of 0209 and would be considered to be a medicinal product as
defined in Article 1 of the Directive 2001/83/EC.
Considering the anti-coagulant solution (ACD) is mixed with the blood during manipulation
of the patient sample, the anti-coagulant solution (ACD) is liable to act on the human body
when PRP is introduced in or used on the human body.
Therefore, the platelet preparation tubes, containing the anti-coagulant solution (ACD), may
be classified as a Class III medical device under Rule 13 in the case where either the PRP
infusion that the patient receives contains medicinal substances or in circumstances where the
manufacturer cannot appropriately demonstrate that such medicinal substances have been
completely removed from the PRP infusion. In the case where this can be demonstrated, the
second indent of Rule 3 of Annex IX to Directive 93/42/EEC may apply due to the treatment
process consisting of a centrifugation step.
Analogy to Rule 18 of the above mentioned Annex which classifies blood bags, including
those containing or coated with an anticoagulant, as Class IIb medical devices was made. This
rule, however, is a special derogation rule which is exclusively applied to blood bags and
cannot be extended to other product which may contain an anti-coagulant solution.
Sleeve filters should be classified as a Class IIa medical device under Rule 3 of Annex IX of
Directive 93/42/EEC according to which all non-invasive devices intended for modifying the
biological or chemical composition of blood, other body liquids or other liquids intended for
infusion into the body are in Class IIb, unless the treatment consists of filtration,
centrifugation or exchange of gas or heat, in which case they are in Class IIa.
In the scenario where the system is placed on the market containing one or more medical
devices not bearing valid CE marking the system shall be treated as a device in its own right.
In the same manner, where the manufacturer of the system changes or modifies the IFU for
the medical devices included in the system, or creates a new IFU in order to claim the
production of PRP, the system shall be treated as a device in its own right. The applicable
conformity assessment procedure shall be determined by the medical device component with
the highest classification i.e. the platelet preparation tubes containing the anti-coagulant
solution (ACD). Therefore, the entire system would be classified as a Class III medical device
under Rule 13 where either the PRP infusion that the patient receives contains medicinal
substances or in circumstances where the manufacturer cannot appropriately demonstrate that
such medicinal substances have been completely removed from the PRP infusion.
8.25. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (APDT) systems
Photodynamic laser-based disinfection systems, activated by a topical photosensitiser, are
intended for the decolonization of potentially-pathogenic bacteria, including methicillinresistant S. aureus (MRSA), from the oral cavity or anterior nasal passages.
The topically applied photosensitizer, such as methylene blue or toluidine blue, stains bacteria
by binding with microbial cell wall components. Light, at a specifically defined wavelength,
is absorbed by the topically applied photosensitiser molecules in the presence of oxygen. This
causes the photosensitizer molecules to undergo excitation and electronic state transitions,
converting the sensitizer to its photoactive triple state. The excited photosensitiser
immediately transfers energy to surrounding molecular oxygen, thereby producing reactive
oxygen species (ROS) which are responsible for lethally disrupting the microbial cell wall.
These ROS products are very short-lived, and the ROS-production process ceases
immediately upon deactivation of the laser.
Photosensitiser solutions used in APDT systems, such as those containing methylene blue or
toluidine blue, for disinfection for a medical purpose do not qualify as medical devices. This
decision is based on the following:
their primary action is not physical,
their activation to provide an anti-bacterial function is not achieved via physical
their composition,
they are typically sold separately from the laser.
Lasers used in APDT systems for disinfection for a medical purpose do qualify as medical
devices. Such lasers are classified as active therapeutic devices under Rule 9 and are Class IIa,
unless energy is transferred in a hazardous manner, in which case they are Class IIb.
The laser (i.e. laser generator) and photosensitiser system, when used for a medical purpose,
are not considered to be an integral product at the time of use and, therefore, cannot qualify as
a Class III medical device under Rule 13.
SOFTWARE AND MOBILE APPLICATIONS
Software and mobile applications that fall under the definition of a medical device or an invitro diagnostic medical device are regulated by the respective Directives 93/42/EEC11 or
98/79/EC12.
In the context borderline cases, the MEDDEV Guidance 2.1/6, entitled "Guidelines on the
qualification and classification of stand-alone software used in healthcare within the
Regulatory Framework of Medical Devices" and released by the Commission services in
January 2012, is the most relevant document which provides practical advice to
manufacturers, organisations and public authorities on how to determine when a software falls
under the definition of a medical device or of an in-vitro diagnostic medical device. Such
criteria apply also to mobile applications.
A mobile application for processing ECGs
This application -or app- (software program) allows clinicians to review a patient's ECG
history during routine check-ups and see a full presentation generated by the analysis
algorithms. ECG-related and supplementary data can be received wirelessly, for example
from the hospital ECG management system.
The app's intended use is to allow for more timely and accurate diagnosis and treatment of the
This app, which is not incorporated to a medical device, uses signal data from an external
source and processes it to an ECG waveform thereby performing an action on data other than
just storage, for the medical benefit of individual patients.
In accordance with the guidance document MEDDEV 2.1/6 rev. 113, such a mobile app for
viewing ECGs should be qualified as standalone class IIa medical device, according to Rule
10 of Annex IX to Directive 93/42/EEC.
OJ L 169, 12.7.1993, p.1.
OJ L 331, 7.12.1998, p.1.
http://ec.europa.eu/health/medical-devices/documents/guidelines/index_en.htm.
A mobile application for the communication between patient and caregivers
while giving birth
This app allows storing data on each moment of contraction during delivery, after a healthcare
professional established that a woman is in the process of giving birth. Users can make notes
and take pictures for the purpose of exporting them to an external website also providing
documentation for a later stage.
The app's intended use is to improve the quality of communication between the patient and
caregivers.
This app, which is not incorporated in a medical device, performs an action on data limited to
storage and simple search.
In accordance with the guidance document MEDDEV 2.1/6 rev.1, a mobile app for the
communication between patients and caregivers while giving birth should not be qualified as
a medical device.
A mobile medical application for viewing the anatomy of the human body
This app allows users to view illustrations of the anatomy of the human body. In addition, it
introduces the reader to anatomical terminology, positioning and medical imaging.
Although the app is not only performing simple data search it is not used directly for the
medical benefit of the individual patients. In light of this, this app should not be qualified as a
Qualification of software for interpretation of a guideline
The product in question consists of a software application which allows for faster
consulting/reading of an international guideline regarding the Classification of Malignant
Tumours (TNM) issued by the UICC (International Union Against Cancer), in the view of
classification of cancer by anatomic disease extent.
Three variables are introduced into the system:
• the size of the primary tumour and whether it has invaded nearby tissue (described as
T0, T1, T2, etc.);
• regional lymph nodes that are involved (indicated as N0, N1, N2, etc.);
• metastasis (M0 or M1).
According to the selection of these 3 categories/variables, the application indicates the
disease's stage of development (cancer extent), according to the above mentioned guideline.
According to the manufacturer this information software simply facilitates the search and use
of an international guideline which physicians usually consult via electronic file, or in paper
The software does not perform an action on data other than simple search function, as per in
MEDDEV Guidance 2.1/6.
The product does not therefore fulfil the definition of medical device, according to Directive
93/42/EEC, and should not be qualified as such.
Qualification and classification of software for delivery and management of
cognitive remediation and rehabilitation programs
This software is designed to deliver and manage cognitive remediation and rehabilitation
programs and is intended to be used for the treatment of a variety of neurotrauma,
neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric conditions.
The software contains different programs designed for targeted stimulation of cognitive
functions, by using interactive games and exercises. Such cognitive functions include
executive functions (reasoning and strategy), verbal memory, visual memory, spatial memory,
auditory memory, processing speed. This software also allows the clinician to plan, monitor
and assess the patient's progress throughout the treatment plan.
Based on the intended purposes, namely the treatment of disease, injury or handicap, this
software should be qualified as a medical device. When such software qualifies as a medical
device it shall be classified as class I medical device according to rule 12 of Directive
93/42/EEC.
Classification of software for information management and patient monitoring
The product in question is a software-based system that includes an informatics management
and patient monitoring platform. The informatics management component of the software is
intended to route and store medical device data and device diagnostic information from
supported bedside devices to the electronic medical record and clinical information system.
The patient monitoring platform is intended to allow health care professionals remotely
consult a patient's status and remotely review other standard or critical near real-time patient
data, waveforms and alarms in order to utilize this information to support clinical decisions
and deliver patient care in a timely manner.
The patient monitoring platform has the following functions:
1. view collated patient information and track changes in patient history;
2. generate audible alerts when an alarm is coming through the system;
3. generate trend graphs which include red-shading when an alarm is sounding;
4. set patient specific "filtering rules" based on alarm severity and alarm type. These alarm
rules support the ability to suppress specific alarms, delay specific alarms and separate
rules for visual, audio, and paging of alarms;
5. send SMS and e-mails and filter alarm forwarding to 3rd party annunciation systems.
This system is intended to be used in intensive care wards with ventilators, pulse oximeters
and other devices used for monitoring patients, although similar systems could be used with
devices for monitoring non-vital physiological processes. Per MEDDEV 2.12/6 clinical
information systems are not qualified as medical devices. The patient monitoring platform
contains a number of different functions, each of which must be assessed when determining
whether the software meets the definition of a medical device using the criteria described in
MEDDEV 2.1/6.
Per MEDDEV 2.1/6 "if the software does not perform an action on data, or performs an
action limited to storage, archival, communication, "simple search" or lossless compression
(i.e. using a compression procedure that allows the exact reconstruction of the original data) it
is not a medical device". This is applicable for the listed functions performed by the patient
monitoring platform with the exception of the alarm filtering function.
The software is not considered to be "generating" an alarm as it is the bedside device that
generates the alarm based on its analysis of patient physiological data. The bedside device
also assigns a severity to that alarm. While this software does not generate the original patient
alarm, it applies user-defined filtering rules to each alarm category (e.g. severity) received by
the software. This filter function is considered to be performing a search of the nearly "live"
data received from the bedside device that results in a specific action being taken on that
alarm i.e. alarm is delayed. The action of the filter function is not considered a "simple
search" of archived data. The delay to the alarm that results from the filter function is
considered to lead to the generation of new or additional information that contributes to the
monitoring and follow-up of the patient connected to the bedside device. If an alarm is noted
on the system the users are instructed to interact with the bedside device, which would be
considered to be influencing the use of the bedside device.
Therefore this software, having one of its functions qualified as medical device, complies with
the definition of a medical device and should be qualified as such. When classifying this
device implementing rule 2.3 of Annex IX applies.
Below are listed the examples mentioned in the MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev 2 that have not been
included in the MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev 3.
These examples will be subject to further discussion in the future and will be added to the
relevant sections of this Manual.
However at present these products are regulated as per MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev 2.
Therefore, in order to avoid any gap in the guidance for manufacturers and notified bodies,
information on their current qualification according to MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev 2 can be found
10.1. Products currently qualified as medical devices according to MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev 2
- Products containing collagen where adhesion of platelets to the surface triggers platelet
adhesion and aggregation
10.2. Products qualified as accessory to medical devices according to MEDDEV 2.1/3
- Challenge tests specifically intended to assess the tolerance to a given medical device, or its
constituents (e.g. injectable collagen).
10.3. Products currently qualified as medicinal products according to MEDDEV 2.1/3
- Haemofiltration substitution solutions,
10.4. Products qualified as medical devices incorporating a medicinal substance with
ancillary action according to MEDDEV 2.1/3 rev 2
- Blood bags containing anticoagulant or preservation agents
- Haemostatic devices enhanced by the incorporation of collagen, where the primary action of
the device is mechanical even though there may be ancillary action due to the presence of
collagen having demonstrable action with platelet receptors resulting in platelet adhesion
through a pharmacological process
11. INDEX
- A mobile application for processing ECGs ……………………………...…63
- A mobile application for the communication between patient and caregivers while
giving birth ………………………………………………………………....64
- A mobile medical application for viewing the anatomy of the human body
- AB0 and Rhesus (D) blood grouping intended for diet purposes .............................. 8
- Agents for transport, nutrition and storage of organs intended for transplantation . 16
- Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (APDT) systems ........................................ 56
- Autologous Platelet Preparation System systems .................................................... 60
- Bacterial/viral filter for use on patient undergoing pulmonary function testing...... 52
- Bedwetting alarm
..................................................................................... 19
- Biofunctional clothes ............................................................................................. 12
- Blood irradiation indicators ..................................................................................... 18
- Blood refrigerators, freezers and defrosters ............................................................. 49
- Bone anchored hearing aids ..................................................................................... 23
- Brushes and sponges for washing/cleaning nails, hands and/or harms in hospitals
(prior to surgery).
............................................................................................. 42
- CE labelled microscope slides.................................................................................... 9
- Contact lenses (classification) .................................................................................. 58
- Dental abutment
- Dental curing lights
- Dental Water Line Disinfectants (qualification) ...................................................... 45
- Dental water line disinfectants (classification) ........................................................ 51
- Dental disclosing products ...................................................................................... 10
- Dentistry products with aluminum chloride used in haemostasia ………………38
- Elastoviscous fluids
- Ethyl chloride spray for local refrigeration anaesthesia........................................... 55
- Examination gloves coated with polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) .............. 47
- Eye drops intended for related to the alleviation of 'soreness' , 'discomfort' or
'irritation' caused by environmental factors (such as dust, heat, smoke etc)........... 31
- Eye drops regulated as medical devices................................................................... 57
- Fluid collection bowl ............................................................................................. 23
- Gallipots
- Glycerin suppositories ............................................................................................. 40
- Gold implants for treatment of osteoarthrosis.......................................................... 33
- Haemodialysis water test strips ................................................................................ 44
- Hand disinfectants
- Hydrocolloid plaster for blisters............................................................................... 53
- In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) and Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART)
- Independent in-vivo dosimeters ............................................................................... 14
- Injectable substance for tretment of localized adiposity ......................................... 36
- Insect repellent
- Light box indicated to treat seasonal affective disorder (S.A.D) ............................... 9
- Medical devices containing silver ............................................................................ 54
- Mixer
- Mousse for rapid relief from irritation, itching, burning and sensitivity associated
with chickenpox
- Movement monitor for babies .................................................................................. 53
- Multipurpose disinfectants ....................................................................................... 42
- Mustard packs
- Neutral electrodes for high frequency surgery......................................................... 51
- Non corrective contact lenses with a medical purpose ............................................ 11
- Odour Neutralizers
- Oxygen delivery
- Paraffin oil for IVF/ART procedure......................................................................... 59
- Pathogen inactivation system for platelets ............................................................... 55
- Peritoneal dialysis solutions ..................................................................................... 28
- Pharmacy compounders ……………………………………………………………10
- Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS)........................................ 48
- Plaster with capsaicin 33
- Pre-transfusion confirmatory tests ........................................................................... 56
- Product for testing patient reflex cough ................................................................... 25
- Product for use in acute sore throat.......................................................................... 32
- Products evaluating the condition of respiratory muscles........................................ 50
- Riboflavin solution for treatment of keratoconus
- Sample receptacles and sampling devices which are intended to be used for the
- Shoe covers
- Single or multiple channel pipettes .......................................................................... 22
- Surgical instrument decontamination products (qualification) ................................ 45
- Software for delivery and management of cognitive remediation and rehabilitation
programs…….…………………………………………………………………...65
- Software for interpretation of a guideline ................................................................ 64
- Software for information management and patient monitoring ............................... 65
- Substances for chemical peeling ................................................................................ 6
- Surgical instrument decontamination products (classification) ............................... 45
- Sweat generation and diagnostic system – status of sweat card .............................. 19
- System for the determination of bacterial contamination in blood products ........... 13
- Tooth whitening or bleaching products.................................................................... 43
- Urine Diverter / Funnel Element for Mid-Stream Urine Collection ........................ 15
- Warming blankets
- Washing solutions used for pathogenic microorganisms ........................................ 35
- Wound gel containing soluble beta glucan ............................................................. 39
- Wound irrigation solutions containing antimicrobial agents ................................... 57
- Zinc oxide containing creams ................................................................................. 30
DSVG 00
Directive 2010/84/EU - Association of Pharmacy Technicians, UK
TEW-212APBO(CE)
PP-2007-01331-00-00-EN-TRA-00 (FR)
ANNEX 3 – IVD COMPLAINT REPORTING FORM USER
Memo Saint-Gobain
Q. I have missing or damaged parts.
MATERIAL CERTIFICATION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16 August 2013 EudraLex