text:
Mount Pleasant, SC (Chandler / Philip)
Chandler / Philip
About Mount Pleasant, SC (Chandler / Philip)
Real Estate Prices and Overview
Chandler / Philip median real estate price is $496,358, which is more expensive than 96.0% of the neighborhoods in South Carolina and 84.2% of the neighborhoods in the U.S.
The average rental price in Chandler / Philip is currently $2,259, based on NeighborhoodScout's exclusive analysis. The average rental cost in this neighborhood is higher than 98.5% of the neighborhoods in South Carolina.
Chandler / Philip is a suburban neighborhood (based on population density) located in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina.
Chandler / Philip real estate is primarily made up of medium sized (three or four bedroom) to large (four, five or more bedroom) single-family homes and townhomes. Most of the residential real estate is owner occupied. Many of the residences in the Chandler / Philip neighborhood are newer, built in 2000 or more recently. A number of residences were also built between 1970 and 1999.
Home and apartment vacancy rates are 8.5% in Chandler / Philip. NeighborhoodScout analysis shows that this rate is lower than 52.3% of the neighborhoods in the nation, approximately near the middle range for vacancies.
Notable & Unique Neighborhood Characteristics
When you see a neighborhood for the first time, the most important thing is often the way it looks, like its homes and its setting. Some places look the same, but they only reveal their true character after living in them for a while because they contain a unique mix of occupational or cultural groups. This neighborhood is very unique in some important ways, according to NeighborhoodScout's exclusive exploration and analysis.
Notable & Unique: Real Estate
Homes built from 2000 through today make up a higher proportion of the Chandler / Philip neighborhood's real estate landscape than 98.4% of the neighborhoods in America. When you are driving around this neighborhood, you'll notice right away that it is one of the newest built of any, with the smell of fresh paint, and the look of young landscaping nearly everywhere you look. In fact, 73.4% of the residential real estate here is classified as newer.
Notable & Unique: People
According to NeighborhoodScout's exclusive analysis, Chandler / Philip is among the best neighborhoods for families in South Carolina. In fact, this neighborhood is more family-friendly than 98.4% of neighborhoods in the entire state of South Carolina. Its combination of top public schools, low crime rates, and owner-occupied single family homes gives this area the look and feel of a "Leave It to Beaver" episode. Many other families also live here, making it easy to socialize and develop a strong sense of community. In addition, the high number of college-educated parents influences the academic success of the local schools. Overall, you will find all of the amenities a family needs to thrive in the Chandler / Philip neighborhood. In addition to being an excellent choice for families with school-aged children, this neighborhood is also a very good choice for highly educated executives and urban sophisticates.
Notable & Unique: Modes of Transportation
A unique way of commuting is simply not to. And in the Chandler / Philip neighborhood, analysis shows that 15.0% of the residents work from home, avoiding a commute altogether. This may not seem like a large number, but it is a higher proportion of people working from home than is found in 98.1% of the neighborhoods in the United States. One thing NeighborhoodScout's research reveals is that the wealthier and/or more isolated the neighborhood, the greater the proportion of residents who choose to work from home.
Also, our research reveals that 94.0% of commuters who live in the Chandler / Philip neighborhood get to work each day by driving alone in their automobiles, which is a higher proportion than 95.8% of U.S. neighborhoods.
Notable & Unique: Diversity
Did you know that the Chandler / Philip neighborhood has more Scottish ancestry people living in it than nearly any neighborhood in America? It's true! In fact, 5.8% of this neighborhood's residents have Scottish ancestry.
The Neighbors: Income
How wealthy a neighborhood is, from very wealthy, to middle income, to low income is very formative with regard to the personality and character of a neighborhood. Equally important is the rate of people, particularly children, who live below the federal poverty line. In some wealthy gated communities, the areas immediately surrounding can have high rates of childhood poverty, which indicates other social issues. NeighborhoodScout's analysis reveals both aspects of income and poverty for this neighborhood.
The neighbors in the Chandler / Philip neighborhood in Mount Pleasant are wealthy, making it among the 15% highest income neighborhoods in America. NeighborhoodScout's exclusive analysis reveals that this neighborhood has a higher income than 90.6% of the neighborhoods in America. In addition, 1.9% of the children seventeen and under living in this neighborhood are living below the federal poverty line, which is a lower rate of childhood poverty than is found in 82.4% of America's neighborhoods.
The Neighbors: Occupations
The old saying "you are what you eat" is true. But it is also true that you are what you do for a living. The types of occupations your neighbors have shape their character, and together as a group, their collective occupations shape the culture of a place.
In the Chandler / Philip neighborhood, 54.8% of the working population is employed in executive, management, and professional occupations. The second most important occupational group in this neighborhood is sales and service jobs, from major sales accounts, to working in fast food restaurants, with 26.6% of the residents employed. Other residents here are employed in clerical, assistant, and tech support occupations (9.5%), and 9.0% in manufacturing and laborer occupations.
The Neighbors: Languages
The most common language spoken in the Chandler / Philip neighborhood is English, spoken by 94.0% of households. Some people also speak Spanish (2.7%).
The Neighbors: Ethnicity / Ancestry
Culture is shared learned behavior. We learn it from our parents, their parents, our houses of worship, and much of our culture – our learned behavior – comes from our ancestors. That is why ancestry and ethnicity can be so interesting and important to understand: places with concentrations of people of one or more ancestries often express those shared learned behaviors and this gives each neighborhood its own culture. Even different neighborhoods in the same city can have drastically different cultures.
In the Chandler / Philip neighborhood in Mount Pleasant, SC, residents most commonly identify their ethnicity or ancestry as Irish (21.2%). There are also a number of people of German ancestry (14.4%), and residents who report English roots (12.1%), and some of the residents are also of Polish ancestry (6.0%), along with some Italian ancestry residents (5.9%), among others.
Even if your neighborhood is walkable, you may still have to drive to your place of work. Some neighborhoods are located where many can get to work in just a few minutes, while others are located such that most residents have a long and arduous commute. The greatest number of commuters in Chandler / Philip neighborhood spend between 15 and 30 minutes commuting one-way to work (43.8% of working residents), which is shorter than the time spent commuting to work for most Americans.
Here most residents (94.0%) drive alone in a private automobile to get to work. In a neighborhood like this, as in most of the nation, many residents find owning a car useful for getting to work.
AGE OF Mount Pleasant, SC (Chandler / Philip) HOMES
TYPE OF Mount Pleasant, SC (Chandler / Philip) HOMES
SIZE OF Mount Pleasant, SC (Chandler / Philip) HOMES
Employment Industries in Chandler / Philip
in Chandler / Philip
in Mount Pleasant
in South Carolina
Mount Pleasant VIOLENT CRIMES
Mount Pleasant Property CRIMES
65 Vital Statistics. 11 Condition Alerts found.
District Quality Compared to South Carolina
Better than of SC school districts.
FREE LUNCH ELIGIBLE
REDUCED LUNCH ELIGIBLE
Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metro Area regional investment potential
Housing Affordability Trends: Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metro Area
Popular real estate near Chandler / Philip
Charleston, SC (Daniel Island Dr / Seven Farms Dr)
Isle of Palms, SC (City Center)
Isle of Palms, SC (Palm Blvd / Carolina Blvd)
Mount Pleasant, SC (Hobcaw Point / Scanlonville)
Mount Pleasant, SC (Isle of Palms)
Mount Pleasant, SC (Snowden)
Mount Pleasant, SC (State Hwy S / Hobcaw Bluff Dr)
Mount Pleasant, SC (Town Center)
Mount Pleasant, SC (Ventura Ville / Farm Quarter Rd)
Sullivan's Island, SC
68% Match ‐ Charleston, SC (Drayton / Runnymede)
63% Match ‐ Mount Pleasant, SC (Snowden)
58% Match ‐ North Charleston, SC (Old Fort Dr / Gray Goose Ln)
58% Match ‐ Mount Pleasant, SC (Porcher Bluff / Whitehall Terrace)
57% Match ‐ Mount Pleasant, SC (Isle of Palms)


text:
<?php

namespace b1t\svg;

use b1t\svgf\font\SVGFFont;

/**
 * SVGTextContentElement.php
 *
 * This class implements the interface SVGTextContentElement as described in Document Object Model (DOM) Level 3 Core Specification.
 *
 * Note: it is assumed that the class using this trait extends SVGObject which in turn extends \DOMElement
 *
 * @author	J. Xavier Atero
 * @link	https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/text.html#InterfaceSVGTextContentElement
 */

trait SVGTextContentElement {

	use SVGElement;
	use SVGTests;
	use SVGLangSpace;
	use SVGExternalResourcesRequired;
	use SVGStylable;

	// lengthAdjust Types (Traits cannot have constants)
	static $const_LENGTHADJUST_UNKNOWN = 0;
	static $const_LENGTHADJUST_SPACING = 1;
	static $const_LENGTHADJUST_SPACINGANDGLYPHS = 2;

	/** @var SVGAnimatedLengthList $textLength Corresponds to attribute 'textLength' on the given element. */
	private $textLength;

	/** @var SVGAnimatedEnumeration $lengthAdjust corresponds to attribute 'lengthAdjust' on the given element. The value must be one of the length adjust constants defined on this interface. */
	private $lengthAdjust;

	/**
	 * Returns the total number of characters available for rendering within the current element, which includes referenced characters from 'tref' reference, regardless of whether they will be rendered.
	 * Effectively, this is equivalent to the length of the Node::textContent attribute from DOM Level 3 Core ([DOM3], section 1.4), if that attribute also expanded 'tref' elements.
	 *
	 * @return long Total number of characters.
	 */
	public function getNumberOfChars()
	{
		$this->textLength = strlen($this->textContent); // the value is updated only when this function is called
		return $this->textLength;
	}

	/**
	 * The total sum of all of the advance values from rendering all of the characters within this element, including the advance value on the glyphs (horizontal or vertical),
	 * the effect of properties 'kerning', 'letter-spacing' and 'word-spacing' and adjustments due to attributes 'dx' and 'dy' on 'tspan' elements.
	 * For non-rendering environments, the user agent shall make reasonable assumptions about glyph metrics.
	 *
	 * @return float The text advance distance.
	 */
	public function getComputedTextLength()
	{
		// to-do: Untested function.
		// to-do: the effect of properties 'kerning', 'letter-spacing' and 'word-spacing' and adjustments due to attributes 'dx' and 'dy' on 'tspan' elements.
		$style_font_family = $this->style->getProperty('font-family'); // defined in SVGStylable
		$style_font_size =  $this->style->getProperty('font-size'); // defined in SVGStylable
		$bbox = imagettfbbox($style_font_size, 0, $style_font_family, $svg_text->nodeValue);

		$this->textLength = strlen($this->textContent); // the value is updated only when this function is called
		return $this->textLength;
	}

}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
Sins of The Last Jedi
March 31, 2018 October 19, 2018 / Outpost Dire
Love makes you blind to flaws, doesn't allow you to see past your passion, at least at the start of any relationship. Only when we have become disillusioned over time, do we see people for what they are. This is called the infatuation stage. Love makes you blind, but time allows for clarity. This is said of humans, but also can be said of movies and franchises. We should step back and reevaluate. This isn't the Star Wars of the 70's and 80's, nor is it the prequel era. This isn't George Lucas's Star Wars, this is Disney Star Wars, and despite what many believe, not everything Disney touches turns to gold. Many people will say, "But it's still Star Wars." Yes and no. When United Airlines bought PetSafe–a company who had an insane approval rating on transporting pets around the globe and considered the best in the business–they plummeted as the go-to service. Pets were dying left and right and still are. In 2017, eighteen of the twenty-four pet deaths were because of United. Now, PetSafe is synonymous with–and brings a whole new meaning to–chance. Another quick example would be Apple. If Google bought the company–or some other conglomerate–would it still be Apple? Or Marvel? What if Lionsgate purchased the mega comic-movie business like when Disney bought it? Would it still be the same as when Marvel was only Marvel-owned?
Someone who was very dear to me told me that if I loved Star Wars, I had to love all aspects of it, and couldn't pick and choose which I wanted. She said I had to love all the flaws and go with "the spirit of intent and understand what they were trying to do." I understand they are trying to destroy a franchise with the NF given attitude. She also equated I wasn't a real fan because I didn't bow to the all-encompassing, unconditional love for the movie(s). To me, being ignorant of the flaws sounds more like infatuation. Unconditional love is like blind obedience, and look how well that turned out for everyone at the Nuremberg trials. Their plea of 'just following orders' did not save them, nor should it. Then again, I've had to follow orders I didn't agree with either; same can be said of laws. Unconditional love is absolute, and there is nothing absolute–except for death and taxes. You do not profess unconditional love at the alter–if so, you'd still be married after your wife or husband is caught for being a serial killer. I mean, maybe you would if you liked that kind of crazy. At best, marriage is conditional love, as is being a parent. Think of how many men and women walk away from their children when they are just kids. How many more so if they are found to be thieves, rapists, pedophiles, and murderers?
The point I am making is this blind adherence to something or someone. People attack others for having a different perspective, opinion, or belief. If everyone thought the same, how boring would this world be? Imagine the movies? They would be carbon copies … and I mean, they are rehashes of other movies. And the books?
Before Disney bought Star Wars and discarded the whole expanded universe, I borderlined on fanatic. I purchased and read over one hundred and twenty of the paperback books, collected hundreds of comics and toys. I could recite to you Luke Skywalker's life. When my friend told me I couldn't be critical of Star Wars (SW) and be a true fan, I reminded her of this significant portion of my life. How many hundreds or thousands of dollars did I spend–and continuously spent after they killed off Chewbacca and Anakin and Jacen Solo–on something I didn't love? She said, "None of that matters anymore, only what Disney is doing." Really? Sounds exact opposite of what she is preaching, loving all aspects of SW.
When Disney announced they were going to do a sequel trilogy with the original cast, I knew Disney would kill off the original three because 'what better way to propel the story?' Plus, they were getting up there in age. The fact that Han and Luke died does not bother me. Han's death doesn't bother me, it served a purpose, making Ben fall deeper into the dark side. Luke's? In some ways, the compulsion to be moved came on strong as he stared off into the distance, seeing Tatooine's twin suns, and John Williams's new rendition of Binary Sunset. Moved, but hollow, serving a meaningless purpose in the grand scheme. More on that later. To be honest, the only thing bothering me about The Force Awakens (TFA) is taking Han Solo, the coolest SW character without a mask, and turned him into a deadbeat dad. I don't want to read a book or view a movie that plops me back into a real situation. I peruse and watch Sci-Fi and fantasy to escape, to go somewhere else.
Sorry to say, this rambling happens to be a precursor to the actual blog. From here, I will be talking about the film. The rest is the background to what finally fueled this rant/ blog. Actually, you can thank my cousin. I hadn't written about this before because I didn't want to scramble for the bandwagon with everyone else, but I may repeat some things from others. I am a huge fan, and I will be approaching this not only as a fan but as a writer, too. I will be critical, maybe nitpicky to some of you, but I want to make my points. Further, what may be a small detail to you is a glaring one for me. As they say, the devil is in the details. Agree or disagree, I would love your comments at the end and will happily debate/talk about it. I will pull from all the movies and the now-deleted Expanded Universe of SW.
A long time ago, before they tried to destroy a great, great franchise … but Lucas took a stab at it, but sorta redeemed himself with Revenge of the Sith (ROTS)…
Star Wars is not dead, but it is a withered husk. How Disney treats Episode IX (and Solo) will determine if this hiccup we call The Last Jedi (TLJ) is the deathknell. I would like to point out something very, very simple in the SW universe. The movies–and most books–are about family. That is the purest, most authentic form of SW. Father and son, mother and daughter, siblings, aunts and uncles, the family drives SW. Sure, you can say, "not-ugh, it's about good vs. evil." True, but to me, that is secondary because all stories on some level are about good vs. evil or some variant thereof.
Let's start with TFA (by the way, I will be using initializations like the previous one to talk about the movies, so if you don't know them, brush up real quick). TFA is a rehash of ANH. No problem! I get it! You're looking for a familiar way back into a franchise once considered dead after the dreaded prequels. The Resistance destroyed Starkiller (SK) base, a freaking planet! After ANH, there is a three-year gap between it and ESB. During that time, they built Vader's command ship, the Executor, and it nearly bankrupted the Empire, or so the expanded universe (EU) had said. It took three years for the Empire to hunt down the rebellion after the first Death Star's destruction. But here is TLJ, and the First Order (FO) is stronger than ever. Did the Resistance just blow up their superweapon? "Nah, it's okay. Didn't hurt. We got Snoke's ship, a damn super, duper Star Destroyer (I think they call it mega SD), a super weapon in and of itself." But the FO has gathered and is hunting the Resistance who attacked SK base. Really? Didn't they fight a big battle or something and a lot of ships were destroyed? I mean, if the Resistance is hurting, how much more so is the FO? Plus, wouldn't the FO be stretched across the galaxy to engage on multiple war fronts to harass and destroy their enemy?
So, sin number one, not addressing the devastating setback the FO had from TFA. And if you say, "well, it wasn't a setback, obviously," then I would say the New Republic (NR) is the biggest moron in the galaxy. If the FO possess the means in which to attack en mass after SK base is destroyed, then they are a much more significant threat than the Empire at the height of power and nulls any argument about why the NR ignored the FO.
Forced banter. The opening with Poe and General Hux is cringe-worthy. I knew I was in for a terrible movie with the opening tirade. And the acting on Hux's part is too over the top. The guy, Domhnall Gleeson, can act. I've seen him do it, but the character Hux is too much. So, a bash on the character, not Gleeson. Still, it wasn't funny, and the titters I heard from the crowd were nervous and forced. So, sin two: approaching SW as a comic, campy, popcorn flick. As a writer, I would have cut–no, I wouldn't have written it in the first place. So, that's a few sins rolled into one.
While we are talking about the opening scene of TLJ, let's talk science. There is no gravity in space, ergo the bombs wouldn't have dropped! In the atmosphere of the ship? Maybe. But once out of the artificial gravity, they would have floated. Now, a simple CGI fix with little rocket propellers would save you there. Or better yet, a simple line saying. "Drop those magnetic bombs and get the hell out of there. They seek out the largest source, but you won't be safe from the blast!" Cool, I get it. You covered your ass. Sin three: ignoring science. And yes, even in fantasy–because SW is fantasy more than anything else–you cannot bend those rules because it will look cool. The crowd isn't stupid. Granted, lightspeed at this point is theoretical other than light itself, as in we cannot achieve it, but that's the "Fi" of the "Sci."
Luke Skywalker: the unsentimental, hermit Jedi. Okay, dude, you could be more graceful than tossing the relic away. Poor Rey held out her arm for two years for you to take the lightsaber, and then you chuck it over your shoulder? Seriously though, this scene makes no sense. Here, a stranger who managed to track you down and hands you your first lightsaber. If I'm Luke, here's my reaction. "Who are you? How did you find me? Was it with the map I left? Is that my father's lightsaber? Where did you get it? I lost it long ago in a duel above a gas planet called Bespin. How did you get it? Did you happen to see a hand with it, too?" Another note is Luke's hand. It's mechanical, and it's opened to the elements. Where's the skin, dude? Why didn't you get it covered back up? How is it still working after being on this humid-as-hell planet? Rust much?
Does no one remember this scene from ANH? Ben pulling the lightsaber out of a chest. "This was your father's lightsaber. He wanted you to have it when you were old enough, but your uncle wouldn't allow it." First, holy shit, it's his dad's lightsaber! Two, Ben, his friend and mentor gave it to him. Three, he based his lightsaber design off his father's as stated in ROTJ by Emperor Palpatine. Yes, it doesn't look like it, but it's canon. So, yeah, I'm going to toss this thing over my shoulder and storm off. Sin four: no sentimentality. Sin five: ignoring more science, water, salt, humidity, and the metal in his mechanical hand.
And before I forget… we never got the answer to how or why Maz had it in TFA, so, sin six.
I got a crap-ton more to say about Luke, but I'll come back to him.
Kylo Ren. You had a cool helmet, though you playacted like the new Darth Vader. Why did you destroy it, your personification in the first film? Snoke made fun of you, so you got rid of it? Way to give into bullying. I think your subordinates were more terrified of you with the mask. And the unnecessary shirtless scene? We knew Rey could see him because, in the first Force-connection, she shot at him. So, the whole explanation, "it showed she could see him," doesn't hold water. But since we are going for shirtless scenes, I expect Rey's in the next film … can't wait! Yes, that's sarcasm. Sin … what are we on now? Seven for getting rid of the helmet, because now it means nothing to you? Eight for giving into Snoke's bullying (yes, that's sarcasm). And nine, for the unnecessary shirtless scene (not sarcasm). The latter is nitpicky, sure, but I am set on the helmet-identity thing. He wishes to emulate his grandfather.
But Kylo Ren is a very conflicted character, and you can almost see his anguish and the war within him, the light and the dark. I am unsure if he killed Han or if Han did the self-sacrifice. Still, at times, Ben does act like a petulant child. If you are the next big badass, at least act like it instead of throwing temper tantrums like smashing that cool helmet and screaming to subordinates who happen to be standing there, "Ready my ship!" They were probably like, "Who the hell is this guy?"
Finn. This could've been a cool character with an astonishing story arc … until Johnson screwed him. That we know of, he is the first stormtrooper to defect. Stellar starting point! In TFA, he ran away from his problems. He lied and pleaded and pretended to be someone he wasn't to get away. When he could have gone to the Resistance, he went to board a ship headed for the Outer Rim (Maz's cantina scene right before the FO shows up). He was going to leave superfly Rey, bouncing ball BB-8, and the legendary, leather-clad Han Solo to flee. Then, to save Rey, he does something heroic, he leads Han to SK base, and they blow it up. In TLJ, as soon as he wakes up and sees that Rey is gone and safe, he tries to flee again. This is superb and in line with the established character. Then, he gets roped into a pointless side quest (will discuss later). But, his character comes full circle, and he finds a cause worthy of fighting for (the Resistance) and decides to sacrifice himself to save everyone, even if it is a stall tactic. He commits to dying. I rooted for him to succeed, not because I hated him and wanted him to die, but because it would be such a fantastic arc and more resonance than anything in the new trilogy to date. He speeds up, passes everyone who pulls back. He closes on the death ray (I forgot the name), and despite the pain, he endures. He's closing. This is going to be amazing! Epic! And then fucking Rose, out of nowhere, slams into him, stopping him from saving everyone. Way to go Disney and Rian Johnson!
How did this happen? Finn passed her a long time ago. He lurched forward at full throttle! How did she loop around to the side, pass him up, and then turn toward him and save the day when they are using old, rusty speeders? Was hers faster? Was he driving a go-cart and she had the one with the NASCAR engine? This is scientifically inaccurate. If both cars can travel the same speed, and car 1 is traveling in a straight line, car 2 cannot pass car 1 by driving in an arc. Hasn't Rose or anyone in SW watched Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan? "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one." Rose, your lovey-dovey feelings don't matter next to the annihilation of the Resistance. Where the hell did those feelings come from? I mean, you spent two days with Finn on an opulent planet, and now you love him? Damn, Finn got skills. Either that or Rose is the shallowest person in existence. Didn't Rose tase him at the beginning of the movie for desertion? Didn't she find the act repulsive? Alright, whatever… Let's count the sins: ten, for not killing Finn when his storyline/ sacrifice may have been the best in the entire franchise. Right now, I am giving it to Jyn Erso in RO. God, I loved Felicity Jones in the movie! Eleven: for giving him a Disney ending with Rose. Twelve: for making Rose adore him in two days (Disney Princess much?) when she stood in awe of him at the beginning of the film. Thirteen: for the lame-ass kiss we endured and one-liner she gave. I mean the kiss was so terrible she passed out.
Rose. You are by far one of the most useless characters in the SW franchise. This is not an attack on the actor but the character. Johnson conjured her up for what purpose? For Finn to travel with and make a forced-poignancy moment for social justice on the casino planet? The galaxy is a vast, dirty place. I mean, Anakin was a slave for the Force's sake! We don't need a preaching moment to shove the point home. We got it way back in the day (1999), and even then, there wasn't a point to drive home. It wasn't about making points, it was the story, nothing more. I mean, the irony of Anakin being born into slavery but becoming a tyrant that helped enslave the galaxy is epic. Another character with a more significant role than Rose is Jar Jar Binks. He turned the galaxy over to Palpatine. He, one of the most hated characters in the SW franchise, has been supplanted by Rose (well, to be fair, it's a toss-up between the two). Still, he had a purpose. Rose, the travel buddy, stopped the most significant moment of TLJ from happening. So, Rose, I fine you another sin (fourteen), do not pass Go, do not collect two hundred dollars, and may God grant mercy on your soul, but I'd be fine if he didn't.
This next point, the casino planet storyline ties in with Rose as it shouldn't have happened. The fact it did is another sin: fifteen. They accomplished nothing, and in the book-writing world, your publisher is going to make you cut it. Further, it was only in the story because Laura Dern's character, Vice Admiral Holdo, is the most incompetent Resistance commander ever (we'll get to that). They park on a beach, go to a casino, get arrested before reaching the slicer they needed, escape, and destroy the city because…?–you don't like how the other side lives or agree with their choices? Destroying property and lives because you think you're right and they're wrong is a stellar message! Not. So, they escape the planet not with the slicer they needed, but with a street urchin, hobo-looking Benicio Del Toro. And the whole thing ends terribly and without accomplishing what they set out to do. Sure, the ship gets destroyed, but not because of them. Plus, Poe said, "Let's destroy the ship," and Rose and Finn were like, "Nah, even if you did, that wouldn't work," which set off the whole stupid quest. So, for the storyline: sin fifteen. Epic fail in the storyline and not accomplishing anything that added gravity or substance to the tale: sixteen.
Captain Phasma's lame death is another sin: seventeen. They killed her off in TFA, but Rian brings her back. How did she escape the garbage compactor and get off the planet before it blew up? It's not like she had a droid on the comm to help her. So, you bring her back just to die after seven minutes of screen time? Talk about lame. The way the female characters have been portrayed thus far (by the writing itself) is terrible and almost criminal. Phasma is a neat character that falls flat despite being a female stormtrooper in charge with chrome-plated armor. You have such potential here, and you plan to give her a quick death? "Yep, sure am. Kill her in a five-minute window of the second movie while not explaining how she got there, and she'll be remembered forever!" And yes, that's sarcasm. By the way, not explaining how she survived, sin eighteen. Phasma served no purpose. Also, Finn killed her, and he wasn't the best of stormtroopers and needed reconditioning. You take the strongest and make her succumb to the 'weakest' … the janitor. In a deleted scene, Phasma gunned down four other troopers but still couldn't take out Finn? Are you kidding? How are we supposed to respect her as a relevant character when you treat her like that? It starts with the writers…
Vice Admiral Holdo. A terrible leader who cared more about cutting the balls off her pilots than keeping them informed. Granted, she doesn't answer to Poe, but an average leader will see or intuit when there is dissension among the ranks. If she is so fantastic of a leader, why did she not see the kind of atmosphere she was creating? When I write characters like this, they usually get killed for their stupidity. Instead, she's hailed as a sacrificing hero. So, for being a terrible character, that's sin nineteen. When she uses the terrible line to Leia about why she can't come with her. "Someone needs to fly the ship." Are you kidding me? Never heard of freaking autopilot? I mean, our jets have the feature. Granted, it's limited in function, but it can fly straight… in a futuristic setting, the autopilot can do almost everything! So, her lame excuse is the twentieth sin.
Dues Ex Machina. Pronounced (Day-oos eks MAH-kee-nah) is a trope seen in movies, tv shows, novels, and comics, and in this case, it is the twenty-first sin. Dues Ex Machina is when an event, character, ability, or any iteration thereof solves an unsolvable problem in a sudden and unexpected way. This is done numerous times in TLJ, but a major one is when the old Rebel base (the planet they were running to) magically appears, and everything clicks into place for the Resistance. In other words, had Holdo informed Poe, we'd save ourselves from a terrible side quest, and she wouldn't go down as the worst commander in the SW franchise, right behind Admiral Ozzel. Dues ex is often used when an author writes themselves into a corner, and there was plenty of pulling the rabbit out of the hat with TLJ.
Snoke. You don't build up a character as the next emperor and then unceremoniously kill him off (sin twenty-two) at a random time. I realize you're going to scream, "Well, they did the same with Darth Maul!" No, they didn't. Maul was never the big baddie in the flick, but a tool for Palpatine to use, like Dooku/ Tyrannus. And, he didn't die. Watch the Clone Wars TV series and Rebels. Sin twenty-three comes from not explaining anything about Snoke before killing him. Who is he? Where is he from? How did he come into power? Where did he learn about the Force? Did he hide from Palpatine? Did the emperor know of him? Was Snoke, at one point, ever considered as a viable replacement for Vader? What species is Snoke? Also, if Snoke was powerful enough to connect Rey and Kylo's mind in a Force FaceTime, wouldn't he sense Kylo's imminent betrayal? The fact he didn't makes him weak and lame. He could pull Ben Solo under his sway and seduce him to the dark side. Not only that, he had the power to keep the young pup in check despite Luke being afraid of Ben's abilities. When put in that context, his death and lack of being able to discern it doesn't make sense.
Leia. I love Carrie, and I am sad she passed. I am never bothered when celebrities pass, but I paused for a moment of silence for Robin Williams, and I wept when I found out about Carrie. She is, was, will always be, my princess. All said, her Force ability in outer space, while cool, flies in the face of science. Now, Luke did something similar in the EU, but he also had help from his wife, Mara Jade. He shut down his body, and the Force sustained him. Plus, if my memory serves correctly, he held a sphere of air around him with the Force. Had they done the same with Leia, no one would say anything. Instead, she survives in the vacuum of space for who knows how long. Sin twenty-four: defying science again by having Leia survive in space without a Force bubble holding oxygen around her body or space suit.
Sin twenty-five: lightspeed as a weapon. In the EU, lightspeed (LS) cannot be used as a weapon because when someone is traveling at LS and comes too close to a large enough gravity well, it will pull said ship from LS. So, in TFA, when Han approached SK base at LS, he wouldn't need to disengage the hyperdrive as the planet would jerk him from hyperspace. Now, Snoke's mega SD would be large enough for its own gravity shadow and pull any ship from LS. And if you think not, fine, but the entire fleet around his ship would add to the gravity well. Using LS as a weapon negates every SW movie up till now. First off, I doubt Vice Admiral Holdo is the first person to think of LS as a weapon. Second, if you can use it as a weapon, then why didn't the rebel alliance back in ANH send one X-wing up into space with a droid and LS into the first Death Star, or the second one for that matter, or SK base in TFA? In fact, why not pull the trick out every time an enemy comes at you with superior numbers? You can defeat an entire enemy force with one ship and one droid, so cost is low. Why didn't they do the maneuver at the beginning of TLJ with the massive dreadnaught instead of sending all those bombers in to blow up and die with all those pilots? Granted, a stunning visual effect, but in the grand scheme, something that looks cool but kills the logic of all the movies is a no-win situation.
Yoda. While I am hesitant to claim Yoda's appearance is a sin–for he is quite a loveable character–his final teaching moment is not acted upon by Yoda's greatest and failed student. Yoda delivers a pep talk to kick Luke in the pants and he … gets involved by staying home in his pajamas? When you come to a moment like this, when someone essential breaks through to the hero, this is the turning point in the novel/ movie. Yoda's appearance is more of an appeasement to fans, a subtle… "I screwed up this motion-picture so here's something you love." This cinematic feature is very much a bait and switch, and Yoda's appearance feels random as hell. In the EU, Yoda never appeared to Luke other than at the end of ROTJ. It was Obi-Wan who appeared to him, and after five years, he never came again. This passage can be found in the novel Heir to the Empire by Timothy Zahn, the godfather of SW EU. He kicked it off and did a fantastic job. I'm paraphrasing here, but Ben says, "The distance has become too great for me to come to you anymore. You are to go forth alone. Your path is yours." Luke then has a deep sentiment of being "The Last Jedi," to which Obi-Wan says, "Not the last of the old Jedi, the first of the new." So, take this however you will. I am not saying Yoda is a sin, but the inaction taken by his appearance is a sin, so that's twenty-six.
Mechanics of the activation plate on a lightsaber. The little nob at the top of the lightsaber is not the activation plate, but the lens adjuster for the crystals within, a subject thoroughly covered in the EU. Anakin had a multi-crystal saber, and the focus lens allows him to adjust the length of his blade. The activation plate is about halfway down the hilt of the saber, where Luke and Anakin activated it countless times in the movies? So why do Finn and Rey always turn it on at the top? It's irritating. That's at least a half sin … but we'll round up: twenty-seven.
Where is Luke's lightsaber? This is something else that bothered me. I doubt he'd destroy it. I mean, he did keep his X-wing tucked away under the swells of the ocean. Why would he do that he if never planned to leave? Even in his Force projection, he had his father's lightsaber, not his own–which, if you want to get serious, reinforces why he wouldn't have chucked it over his shoulder. If the purpose is to make Kylo more unstable, the green blade would put a crap-ton more fear into him. I mean, didn't he see it hovering above him when Luke went to kill Ben? Luke, unless the galaxy's biggest idiot, would keep some form of defense for himself, either a blast or saber, especially if he "closed" himself off from the Force. Sin twenty-eight.
Now, I am going to shift focus and talk about Luke and Rey. I saved these two-story points for last.
Rey. I love Rey as much as Jyn Erso, and Daisy does an absolute, fantastic job. Sure, the first few scenes in TFA were rough, but whatever. I don't hold it against her. I also don't hold the way she is written against Daisy. Anyone who takes this as a knock against her, well, then the fault and problem lies with you. I am critical of the character because it is written poorly, not because I'm misogynistic. I realize many of you have heard the term Mary Sue, and while it can be a derogatory term, there is a reason there is a term for it. If it wasn't an issue, there would never be a term. Mary Sue is, for the most part, directed at females, but it can be a male, too (I think it's called Marty Stu or Gary Stu–Superman anyone?). I didn't coin the phrase, I am not defending or condemning it, but I am using it for this context. There are many different definitions of the term, but for this example, we will state it: "Mary Sue is beautiful but unique, as is her cool, exotic name. She's exceptionally talented in a wide variety of ways, seemingly a master of multiple crafts with little to no training and possesses skills that are rare or nonexistent to other characters in the story. She also lacks any realistic, or at least story-relevant, character flaws. What flaws are possessed are considered endearing more than actual flaws. More often than not, these types of characters are used for author inserts or wish fulfillment. There are both male and female versions of this trope. Mary Sue is derogatory because she's so perfect that it makes for lame storytelling."
Okay, so now that we established the definition, we can continue. From above, Rey fits. I understand many of you–including Daisy herself–don't like the term, but just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist or isn't true. I'm not fond of mentally and emotionally weak people who blame their actions on inanimate objects, but they still exist. Rey fits because she can fly a ship (her first time btw), sabotage the vessel, fix said ship while taking off or flying through hyperspace; speaks the Wookie language; is an excellent shot with a pistol and can wield a lightsaber. She held her own against Kylo Ren–a trained Jedi or Sith acolyte–and Snoke's bodyguards. She can also use the Force to mind control others, snatch objects, overpower other Force wielders, or clear out a hundred boulders with ease. In gamer terms, she's OP AF. Now, I don't remember Luke being able to do that in ANH or ESB. In fact, had he not tapped into his anger in ROTJ, I doubt he'd beat Vader. Luke struggled to lift rocks and a droid on Dagobah and trained with one of the greatest Jedi Masters to ever live: Yoda. Please explain how Rey can do all this. In most stories, there is a valid reason the hero/protagonist is fantastical. Batman is not a superb fighter because he's rich or because of his suit, but because he spent countless hours honing his body into a lethal fighting weapon. If we started watching a movie (having no idea who Batman is) and watched him kick the crap out of twenty people with firearms, I would say he's OP and a Gary Stu. However, if you showed me how he became phenomenal, the years spent training in his craft (think Batman Begins), then I wouldn't believe that. After he returned to Gotham and dressed like a bat, he still wasn't perfect and got hit often enough.
Imagine if the roles were reversed, and Adam Driver played Ray, a badass dude from nowhere who kicked the shit out of Kyla Ren (Daisy) with no training. How much criticism would he receive? In books, we need to discover why your protagonist is incredible. We need to understand why they can call upon powers no one else possesses, or travel through time, or live in exile for fear of wiping out humanity… There has to be a reason; otherwise, your character is not memorable and is written poorly. Take Alice, Milla Jovovich's character in the Resident Evil movies. She is a prime example of a Mary Sue, but there are reasons as to why she is so overpowering and are explained (for the most part). Did she start out that way in the first film? No. It began as a journey to gather her powers. This type is not frowned upon because there are explanations and reasons why she became what she did. To make her character more relatable, they took away her powers.
Another example of an OP Rey is at the end of TLJ where she moves dozens, if not hundreds, of boulders out of the way. Compare her to Luke in ESB. Many people say, "Oh, well, Rey is the prodigy archetype." Okay, then Rey is the prodigy archetype, but a prodigy must learn their gifts despite their raw potential or born innate abilities. They cannot miraculously be able to stand toe to toe with others without some phase of guidance and education. They do not wake up one day and pluck the theory of time travel out of thin air, or in this case, Force powers and lightsaber training. More to the point, while some people say that Luke is the everyday man, others also argue that he, too, is a prodigy.
Take Luke's first appearance and compare it to Rey's. Luke got beat up by Tusken Raiders. Han yells at him every chance he gets, and Leia disregards him. Luke can't deflect a blaster bolt to save his life and scarcely felt a glimmer while learning about the Force for the first time aboard the Millenium Falcon. But he can fly his T-16 and shoot womp rats no bigger than two meters, so that's a plus. Still, he cannot understand Artoo without Threepio and has no clue what Chewie is saying. Rey can fly the Falcon, fix the Falcon, outmaneuver trained TIE pilots, can talk to droids and Chewie, acquired Force abilities such as telekinesis, mind probe resistance, Jedi Mind Trick, and unparalleled skill in combat against Kylo. That would be like Luke defeating Vader in ANH. The long and short of it, if I tallied a sin for each of those infractions for Rey and TLJ, we'd jump a dozen at the minimum, but I'll count one for sin twenty-nine.
Now, here is some speculation filled with hopeful wishes. Maybe Rey is a Skywalker, which would make more sense in the overall context. As a child, kids pick up multiple languages easier than adults, which is why she can speak the Wookie language if she grew up around Chewbacca. She's abnormally strong in the Force. Anakin had more *cough* midichlorians than any other Jedi to include Yoda. Luke is arguably more impressive, given his exploits in the now-deleted EU. How much more so if Rey is his daughter?
Some of you are saying, she can't be because Luke would have recognized her. No, not true. Look how young she looks when dropped off on Jakku. What if Luke hadn't seen her for years before, and she went into protective custody for her safety? Would renegade Imperial Warlords want to kill the offspring of Skywalker in retaliation for defeating the Empire? Rey said she had seen the tree that held the Jedi text. True, she said it was in a dream, but how do we know she didn't visit before, and the dream is a repressed memory? If she is a Skywalker, that means she most likely had training prior to her being sent off. What is more, if we are using the Force for massive things like astral projection across the galaxy, who's to say it cannot be used to block or suppress memories? Perhaps the block is wearing off at suppressing her latent Force abilities. Plus, let us not forget: Han seemed to recognize her, and Ben Solo did, too. And … after Han's death, Leia hugged Rey instead of Chewbacca–I'm still scratching my head at that one. But why didn't Luke recognize her through the Force? Well, Rey said it in the movie, he cut himself off from the Force. That I can recall off the top of my head, Luke only used the Force around four times, to reach out to Leia, to snatch up something to fight Rey with, to stop himself from falling, and using it for astral projection.
Without dragging into everything about Rey, we will sum it up with the above, but the last point I want to make is her backstory which is the thirtieth sin. You taunt fans with who she is in TFA and in TLJ you ignore it until Ben says, "They were nobodies, drunks who sold you for drink money." I understand what Rian Johnson did. He told her (and fans) the most devastating thing she could hear at the moment, much like Vader did to Luke. Don't forget, many folks thought Vader lied in the crucial moment. If Rey was a nobody, sold by her parents for drink money, why did they fly off in a beautiful ship in TFA? Why didn't they sell the ship? Crazy things do happen, but it's a stretch for parents to sell a child and keep their vessel… Seems to me she was put on Jakku for her protection, kinda like Luke on Tatooine. If the Force can make lightning and astral project across the entire galaxy, I think it could block out the identity of her parents and obscure her early years Force training, say with her dad, Luke.
Luke. Mark Hamill has been critical of what Rian Johnson did to Luke. He was very outspoken about it until Disney shut him up. Now, Hamill apologized and back-pedaled, but we discern the truth. He's on record for stating this is not Lucas's Luke but someone else's. Moreover, Hamill fundamentally disagreed with everything Johnson did. I am not attacking Mark Hamill, the actor–I idolized him for years (Luke Skywalker), and he is my favorite character from the original trilogy other than Vader–but the portrayal of Luke to fulfill Johnson's vision. As the biggest draw for TLJ, he could have stuck to his guns and told Johnson, "Fix this garbage you call a story."
Luke wants to kill Ben: Luke's main story in the original trilogy–at least to me–is about coming to a point in his life where he can either defeat or redeem his father. In my mind, Yoda and Obi-Wan had written Anakin off as irredeemable and molded Luke into a weapon to destroy the Sith. Perhaps because of Luke's optimism, he sensed good in his father. When Luke defeats Vader, it is a hollow victory and not the climax of the film. It is the redemption of Vader and saving Luke from the emperor that is the actual climax. Luke sought to liberate his father from the dark side, a man who murdered children in the Jedi Temple, who attacked fellow Jedi and Jedi Masters alike, engaged in domestic abuse (Force choked Padme when it wasn't kinky-time), killed countless rebels, and was party to decimating an entire planet and genocide. And these are the things we know about. What did he do those eighteen years while Luke grew up hating sand because it's coarse, rough, irritating, and gets everywhere? This makes no sense when Luke wants to kill Ben Solo because of bad dreams and what he perceived to see in his heart. Didn't Luke watch Terminator 2? "There's no fate but what we make for ourselves!" If Luke could say his father is redeemable, how can he want to kill his nephew? I am sorry die-hard fans with blind loyalty, this is terrible, terrible writing with little to no planning. Luke is a Jedi, he doesn't kill out of anger or emotion as portrayed in the film. Sin thirty-one.
Luke as a failure: My heart went out to Luke here. He failed his masters and Yoda's last edict. Well, no, not in its entirety. He did pass on what he learned, but the Jedi Order was destroyed by a young boy. So, still failed because he went into hiding and cut himself off from the Force instead of trying again. The fact he went into hiding/exile doesn't bother me, but staying there does. Luke wouldn't mope for years on end. This is sin thirty-two. He'd analyze where he went wrong, pep-talked himself to death, and went back out there. Luke faced down Palpatine and Vader, two of the most formidable Sith ever, what is Snoke and a boy to him? Remember, Palpatine is the culmination of over a thousand years of Sith following the Rule of Two, and each new master had to beat the last to take the mantle.
Sin thirty-three, Luke's Astral Projection: In the context of how much power it would take to do this, okay, that's cool. In the EU, some Jedi could do this, and some more than others. Luke could but wasn't the best, not like Corran Horn. But one thing is for sure, those projections don't work on droids. Threepio shouldn't have seen Luke. Wouldn't it have been more epic for Luke to be there and survive the Super AT-AT barrage? If you say he couldn't, let me direct your attention to Anakin, who on more than one occasion, absorbed blaster bolts without damage. Yes, it is an actual power in the EU and in games and comics. And as noted before, Corran Horn could absorb energy, too. If Luke can project himself across the galaxy, I'm confident he can survive a few blaster bolts. Plus, what would it have said about his actual prowess as a master? Beating Kylo in a lightsaber battle is flimsy and inadequate since Rey had already done so. Plus, he wasn't there. He just dodged a few times. If an initiate in training can beat Kylo, what chance does boy Solo hold against Luke Skywalker? The moment Luke died, the dice should have faded immediately, not hang around for another five to ten minutes to be found by Kylo.
Luke's Death: I am not upset Luke died, I'm irritated in the manner in which it happened. He wasn't laying down his life for his friends or trying to protect them. The stall tactic with no relevant payoff brings us to sin thirty-four. The hermit wasn't there and in no danger, which cheapens the effect. Luke dying is okay, as stated at the very beginning of the blog, the manner though…
Luke hiding: Luke said he came to the most unfindable place in the galaxy to die. That's not true! He left a map so people could find him. Why else would there be a map? Sin thirty-five.
Random entry: Ben Solo. This is a random entry and more of a sin for TFA, but I never understood why Han and Leia called their son Ben. Without strong connections to Obi-Wan, why name their son after him? In the EU, Luke and Mara Jade name their son Ben after the Jedi Master, which makes sense.
Summing it all up:
The most prominent sin of all: Ego, the thirty-sixth sin. Ego ruined TLJ. Rian Johnson came in and scraped the planned works of Abrams and Kasdan. The outline, the focal points, the staples were set in place. When you disregard everything, you end up with a divisive feature full of holes in the storyline, like changing why Luke left a map to find him. You also don't go around altering what is already established like Kylo Ren's scar. Don't like it? Tough. It's canon already. Did Johnson fancy himself a better writer than the screenwriter for ESB? Abrams himself can tell some great stories. The disconnect between the final product and the fans should tell you something. One, develop a better plan when making a trilogy. Two, when you possess a template, don't toss it out because you "are in charge now." Fans shouldn't have to suffer because a director wants to put "their" touch on the galaxy far, far away.
The woman from the beginning once said the story wasn't everything, which despite my disbelief, came from an aspiring writer. Yes, the plot does matter, as does character, and their development. She also told me the reason I and so many others hated TLJ was because, "Everyone goes in with their assumptions and with their own story cooked up in their head, and that's why you cannot accept it." Funny, because that's what Johnson did when he threw out the foundations of Episodes VIII & IX to suit him. "Nah, screw fans, screw the franchise, screw Abrams who revived a dying franchise … I'm going to do what I want." Kathleen Kennedy needed a much tighter rein on Johnson (sin thirty-seven), kinda like she had on those directors she fired for the Solo movie. When you have confines, you make a much better flick. Look to Rogue One. They had a specific story with set rules. They didn't change how the ending of RO happened because they wanted it. No, they tailored their story to how ANH began, and the cinematic experience is much better for it. Plus, the rebels gave their lives for their mission.
Disney, you own a gold mine. Don't blow it by defecating on the fans. As for me, how the final episode of this trilogy turns out will determine whether I continue to invest in the franchise. If they kill off all the Skywalkers (as in Rey isn't one, and Ben Solo isn't redeemable), then I'll be done. I understand wanting to go to different stories, but you don't have to wipe out a family to do it. Whether you like or hate my assessment, I will be happy to discuss. What is your opinion? Where did the story excel or fail? As always, may the Force be with you.
If you enjoyed this content or you're an avid, epic fantasy reader, check out my book, The Bearer of Secrets, on Amazon. It's available on Kindle Unlimited, eBook, and print.
Opinion Pieces, Reviews: Movies, Books, TV Shows
#Critique, #MayTheForceBeWithYou, #MovieReview, #Outline, #StarWars, #TheLastJedi, #Writing
← Plans and Future Blogs
Sex in Writing: Part 1 →
13 thoughts on "Sins of The Last Jedi"
Great title and a very well done review. It touched on pretty much everything I felt for the movie. I was most saddened by Luke's death but how you put it makes sense. Really the worst part about it is how meaningless it was and I really have no idea how he died. Sure the force projection could have used a lot of energy but not enough to just kill him. Only thing I can think of was it was kind of like a suicide or something. Which is even worse. Only thing I might object on is why Kylo Ren destroyed his mask. Because Snoke gave him so much shit he decided he would try to make his own path and stop trying to emulate his grandfather. Though the mask was awesome and it made him intimidating and was a great part of his character. So I would be sad if he doesn't have it next movie but he probably won't. I actually came to like Kylo Ren a lot more in this one for some reason. He is still a whiny child at times but I feel towards the end he kind of realized what he has to do. I thought it was awesome he killed Snoke and took the mantle but it was lame he died without any kind of build up on his character. Like I don't know who he is so his death is kinda meaningless. Same thing with the new republic senate being destroyed by starkiller base. I had no emotional connection to them so it was really just cool special effects. I'm still hoping Rey has some lineage to the Skywalker bloodline. Otherwise her being a mary sue has no explanation and just detracts from the story arc that is episode 1-6. I think Kylo was just trying to piss her off or something so she would join him. When episode 7 ended I was really excited to see where it was going despite some flaws with the story. But after episode 8 I'm not too concerned about episode 9. I'll watch it. But I'm not as hopeful as at the end of episode 7.
Xenomene
Never thought about Kylo being fed up and wanting to forge his own path free of Vader, but honestly, his identity is so strongly linked to it, I dismissed the notion. It is a very valid and probable reason as anything I said. Great point.
It seems he tried so hard to be like Vader and was given so much shit by Snoke that he was just like whatever I'll do things my way. Though it is hard to see him completely take a different path. Vader has to be his greatest influence but him destroying his mask was really more of a symbol of him destroying that part of him. One thing I am excited for in episode 9 is to see how Kylo Ren handles things. It's cool that he is in command of the First Order. Before I read your review I saw something saying how it didn't make sense that Luke wanted to kill Ben. It is really a stretch for that character. I mean you turned one of the most evil people in the galaxy and your nephew hasn't turned yet and you want to kill him. Just not like Luke at all.
Well said. I didn't buy that whole crap of a storyline with Luke wanting to kill him
The biggest concern for me was just how they have handled all of the original characters. It's just sad. I didn't read into much of how it was made but something you wrote makes me want to look into it. How you said Johnson just scrapped everything that was prepared. To me if I was writing a trilogy I would want atleast some idea of how it will play out. Not just write each one from scratch. And if they had an idea and he just scrapped it that's just ridiculous. And now he is being given his own trilogy which is retarded. Though I think it could be good just because it won't be tied to things we have long cherished. Like rogue one was Awesome, a bit cheesy at times, but it was so great because it had nothing to do with characters we already knew for the most part.
Rogue One is in my top 3
Besides the whole rebellions built on hope thing being said like 3 times it was outstanding. I remember at the end I was like man I just saw a star wars movie with no lightsabers or force powers. And then Vader comes out and just wrecks shop. That moment alone was worth a movie ticket lol.
Pingback: Sins of The Last Jedi – Okinawa Military Community Writers
What is insulting to me is that this franchise has become nothing more than a giant cash grab that was conceived, planned, and executed with one goal in mind – to make an insane amount of money. Which is not surprising given the mindset of corporate America… Greed will imprison us all.
Bottom line is it's not about the story anymore. It's not. The role of gatekeeper to the SW franchise was entrusted to Kathleen Kennedy. This means that she herself signed off on this bullshit – somewhere down the line she said "Yes, this is good stuff." This is Disney for Christs sake they knew EXACTLY what they were doing (selling out story, depth, and anything remotely intellectual for $$$$, ratings, and box office records). The garbage of a product that is TLJ was what THEY wanted, and that, in and of itself, gives me no hope – None – for what will come ahead.
Anyway, I could keep rambling but am currently not in the mood to transpose thoughts and feelings into coherent and articulated sentences… so I'll stop there for now. Great write up and summary of how TLJ, KK, and Disney failed us. I am no where near your level of understanding of the SW universe, but I know enough to say that loyalist fans of your nature (and there are thousands if not millions) are some of the most educated followers of a story/universe as there ever was in the history of cinematic/novel story telling…. And to me, TLJ is nothing but a giant insulting falcon punch to the cunt of every SW bastard fan out there! The lack of any intellectual depth or substance to the characters, plot, script etc etc (and I'm not asking for No Country For Old Men or Daniel Day Lewis level depth – but come on what the fuck is this amateur hour? this shit is just soo Di….. oops, wait 🙄) can only insinuate that Disney has a very low opinion of the intelligence level and lack of respect for SW fans across the globe. Or more disturbing yet, they do realize this, but just didn't give a shit about anything else than making $ by dumbing everything down to Pre-K level. They succeeded in making a classic American summer action flick w/awesome effects and what not, but not a SW movie worthy of the title and franchise. Ok I'm really done this time – rant over and am now stepping off the soap box…
So… where were we? Ah yes, to end where I began. Insulting, this movie was!
What's odd to me with that statement is that they wouldn't even have to dumb it down. I mean they don't have to make something incredibly deep. I think they could have made just enough money if not more if it was somewhere in between. How Rian Johnson was given the reins to turn this trilogy into what he wants is just amazing.
You're definitely right how SW fans are really educated in its more and to think they could have gotten by with making something half assed is just dumb on the part of its writers. I'm glad TLJ made less than TEA. I mean they're gonna make sequels no matter what so atleast the decline in revenue shows them they shouldn't do that shit to a story that so many people have cherished for decades.
Pingback: Star Wars: A Franchise Fatigue Story part 1 | Outpost Dire
Pingback: Luke Skywalker: The Inhuman Hero | Outpost Dire

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Women's premium ultralight long sleeved functional base layer with superfast moisture wicking and excellent thermal insulation perfect climate regulation when the conditions demand it.
Ergonomically designed with 4 way stretch and completely seamless finish to support optimum freedom of movement. Features high neck line designed especially with skiers and golfers in mind.


text:
Biserica Votivă din Viena (în ) este o biserică neogotică din centrul Vienei, situată în imediata vecinătate a Universității din Viena. După arhitectura acestei biserici au fost realizate proiectele pentru Biserica Preasfânta Inimă a lui Isus din Elisabetin și pentru Biserica Preasfânta Inimă a lui Isus din Ditrău.

Biserica are lungimea de 85 de metri, lățimea de 55 de metri și lățimea navei de 30 de metri. Înălțimea edificiului este de 99 de metri.

Origine
Biserica este situată pe Ringstraße, în districtul Alsergrund lângă Universitatea din Viena. Originea bisericii provine de la atacul cu un cuțit asupra împăratului Franz Joseph săvârșit la 18 februarie 1853 de către naționalistul ungar János Libényi. Împăratul Franz Joseph al Austriei se plimba pe unul dintre bastioanele orașului cu unul dintre ofițerii săi, contele Maximilian Karl Lamoral O'Donnell, atunci când Libényi s-a apropiat pe la spate l-a înjunghiat în gât pe împărat. Franz Joseph purta aproape ca întotdeauna o uniformă cu un guler înalt, care era realizată dintr-un material foarte robust și era închisă aproape complet la gât. Chiar dacă Franz Joseph a fost rănit și sângera, acest guler i-a salvat viața. Contele O'Donnell l-a lovit pe Libényi cu sabia. O'Donnell, care era până atunci conte numai prin proveniența sa din nobilimea irlandeză, a fost făcut apoi conte al Imperiului Habsburgic și a primit Crucea de Comandor al Ordinul Regal Leopold. La blazonul lui O'Donnell au fost adăugate inițialele și stema Casei ducale din Austria și, de asemenea, vulturul bicefal al Imperiului. Acest blazon este reprezentat pe porticul casei din Mirabel Platz nr. 2 din Salzburg, unde O'Donnell și-a construit mai târziu reședința. Un alt martor, care s-a întâmplat să fie prin apropiere, măcelarul Joseph Ettenreich, l-a doborât rapid pe Libényi. Pentru fapta sa, el a fost ulterior înnobilat de Franz Joseph și a devenit Joseph von Ettenreich. Libényi a fost ulterior judecat și condamnat la moarte pentru tentativă de regicid. El a fost executat pe Simmeringer Heide.

După atacul nereușit de la 18 februarie 1853, fratele lui Franz Joseph, Ferdinand Maximilian Joseph, viitorul împărat al Mexicului, a invitat comunitatea locală să facă donații pentru o nouă biserică în apropierea locului atentatului. Biserica urma să fie o ofrandă votivă pentru salvarea lui Franz Joseph și "un monument al patriotismului și al devotamentului oamenilor față de Casa Imperială".

Istoric

Planurile bisericii au fost alese în urma unui concurs din aprilie 1854, la care au participat mai mulți arhitecți. Au fost trimise 75 de proiecte provenind din Imperiul Austriac, landurile germane, Anglia și Franța. Inițial, planurile urmăreau să includă Allgemeines Krankenhaus și să creeze un campus modelat după planurile universităților de la Oxford și Cambridge. Un alt plan a fost acela de a crea o catedrală națională pentru toți supușii imperiului. Cu toate acestea, din cauza costurilor în creștere și a schimbării situației politice, acest plan a trebuit să fie reanalizat. Juriul a ales proiectul lui Heinrich von Ferstel (1828-1883), care avea pe atunci doar 26 de ani. El a decis să construiască biserica în stil neogotic, împrumutând foarte multe elemente din arhitectura catedralelor gotice franceze. Din cauza acestui concept, multe persoane confundă această biserică cu o biserică gotică originală. Cu toate acestea, Biserica Votivă nu este o simplă imitație a unei catedrale gotice franceze, ci mai degrabă întruchipează un concept de design nou și individual. Biserica Votivă a fost construită cu un singur arhitect supraveghetor al lucrărilor și nu de mai multe generații, așa cum au fost construite catedralele din evul mediu.

Construcția bisericii a început în 1856, iar lăcașul de cult a fost sfințit 26 de ani mai târziu, în 24 aprilie 1879, cu ocazia jubileului de argint a cuplului imperial.

Biserica a fost una dintre primele clădiri care a fost construită pe Ringstraße. Din cauza faptului că zidurile orașului existau încă în acel moment, biserica nu a avut inițial enoriași. Ea era menită să fie o biserică de garnizoană, urmând să fie folosită de militarii care au venit la Viena, după Revoluția din 1848. Biserica nu este situată direct pe bulevard, ci are în fața sa o piață largă (Sigmund Freud Park). Biserica Votivă este confecționată din gresie albă, la fel cu Domul Sfântul Ștefan, și, prin urmare, trebuie să fie în mod constant renovată și protejată de poluarea aerului și de ploaia acidă care îi erodează piatra moale.

Biserica a suferit renovări extinse după ce a fost grav avariată în timpul celui de-al doilea război mondial.

Deoarece stilul arhitectural este similar cu cel al Domului Sfântului Ștefan, cele două biserici sunt confundate de multe ori de către turiști. În realitate, cele două biserici au o diferență de vârstă mai mare de 700 de ani.

Designul acestei biserici a fost strâns imitat de Gedächtniskirche din Speyer (Germania) și Sint-Petrus-en-Pauluskerk din Oostende (Belgia).

Note

Bibliografie
Farrugia, Joseph - The Votive Church in Vienna; Kunstverlag Hofstetter, Ried im Inkreis, 1990 (on sale in the church).

O'Domhnaill Abu - O'Donnell Clan Newsletter no.7, Spring 1987 (ISSN 0790-7389)

Legături externe

 Votivkirche Homepage
 Votivkirche Webcam

Votivă
Biserici romano-catolice din Austria
Arhitectură neogotică

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Is your low credit score holding you back? Many people see that their credit scores are dropping in this economy. Luckily, there are ways to improve it, and you can start right now by having a look at these credit repair tips.
Creating a payment plan and sticking with it is just the first step to getting your credit on the road to repair. You have to be committed to making real changes to your spending habits. You should only purchase the necessities, and skip the impulse buying. Only buy something if you have to have it and you can afford it.
You can keep your interest rates lower by working to keep your credit score as high as possible. Monthly payments are easier this way, and you can pay off your unpaid debt. The way you can achieve an excellent credit score is by getting good offers and credit rates that are competitive in order to make paying off debt easier.
You can get a house mortgaged at the snap of a finger if you have a high credit score. Making mortgage payments in a timely manner helps raise your credit score even more. Owning your own home gives you a significant asset to use in securing your finances, and your credit score will reflect that asset. This will be beneficial when you apply for loans.
In order to start repairing your credit, you need to start paying your bills. More importantly, you need to start paying your bills in full and on time. This will improve your credit score. The score rises as soon as you start making some headway on your overdue bills.
When you are trying to clear up your credit contact your credit companies. By doing this, you will keep your credit from getting worse by making sure that your debt does not increase. It is perfectly appropriate to call and request an adjustment to your interest rate or to push back a payment date if needed.
The first step in repairing your credit involves a thorough and careful check to ensure your credit report doesn't contain erroneous information. Although a certain credit item may not have any error, finding a mistake corresponding to a date or an amount can have the same item taken out of your report.
If you are trying to improve your credit score but are having difficulty gaining access to new credit in order to do so, join a credit union. Credit unions sometimes have better rates and more options for your credit rather than a large bank. You can base this on how well the economy is in your area instead of the national situation.
If you notice credit reporting errors, always file a dispute. You should compose a letter to the agencies that have made the errors, and provide proof that you are correct. Sending your letter by certified mail provides you with proof that the letter was received.
Stop spending more money than you have available. You you need to rewire your thought process. In years past, many people relied on credit cards to make major purchases, but now those risky financial choices are catching up with them. Examine your finances and make wise decisions about how much you should be spending.
If you and a creditor agree on a payment plan, make sure the agreement is committed to paper. Having documentation is important for your records but also protects you in case a creditor changes their mind. Finally, when it is paid in full, get documentation thereof to submit to credit agencies.
Filing for bankruptcy is a bad idea. This negative mark will stay on your report for 10 years. It may seem like the right things to do, but your future will be affected. It may be hard to get a credit card or a loan if you declare bankruptcy.
When you pay your bills on time, you are keeping your credit score high. Late payments are reported to all credit report companies and will greatly decrease your chances of being eligible for a loan.
Make sure that the credit repair agency you choose to work with is reputable. Just like any other field, credit repair has plenty of companies that do not provide what they promise. Many people have fallen for scams involving credit repair. Be a smart consumer and educate yourself by researching user reviews online to find a good agency.
It is difficult to just forget about negative reports, but writing a statement is useless. The less you can do to attract attention to negative reports, the better.
Dealing with a debt collection agency is one of the most traumatic parts of a financial crisis. You can use a cease and desist letter to stop any harassment from collection agencies. These letters stop collection agencies that harassing debtors, but they don't erase liability for the debt itself.
Unfortunately, sometimes you have more debts than you have money to pay them off. Take the money you have for bills, and allocate a small amount to several creditors so you can make a little progress with each. Even if the payments you are making are the minimum ones, these small payments will still somewhat please your creditors, which will likely stop them from getting in touch with collection agencies.
When you create a new credit source, your score decreases. Resist the urge to sign up for credit cards even when they promise you instant savings at the checkout. As soon as you open a new credit account, your credit score drops immediately.
If you are struggling with payments as planned, talk to the creditors themselves. Often times they will work out a deal. Many times, a creditor will let you pay in installments and not report the debt to credit reporting agencies if you just ask. This can also make your financial situation easier by letting you pay more on those accounts where you have not been able to set up an alternate plan.
If your low credit score has been a source of frustration and discouragement, implement this advice to change all that. By applying these tips, you can improve your credit score.


text:
MyBizTips by 121
Decorate for the Holidays Safely
Are You Susceptible to Identity Theft?
Smart Risk Management Strategies for Domestic Workers
Do Not Overlook the Personal Umbrella Policy
Is Your Home Perilously Underinsured?
Smother Wildfire Loss Exposures
Sidestep Flooded Autos
Top 10 Tips for Filing Property Claims
Protect Your Identity
Choose Safety Features on New Cars Carefully
Recycling Business Insurance
Food & Beverage Business Insurance
Entertainment and Sports Insurance
Convenience Store and Gas Station Insurance
Insurance for Manufacturers
Vacation Rental Property Insurance
Commercial Trucking Insurance
Coverage for Contractors
Builder's Risk Insurance
Arborists and Tree Care Contractors
Landscape Contractors
Pool & Spa Contractors and Service Firms
All Quote Forms
Business - Workers' Compensation
3 Questions to Ask Before Buying Business Insurance
Special Liability Insurance Your Business Might Need
Summer Liabilities
Tax Season FAQs
Home > Automobile > Automobile & Car Quote
Fill out the following form as completely as possible. Once you have completed the form, click Submit to send your information to Insurance121 Insurance Solutions. We will handle your request shortly.
State/Province * CA
Phone Number, Ext.*
Alternate Number, Ext.
January February March April May June July August September October November December 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1916 1915 1914 1913 1912 1911 1910 1909 1908 1907 1906 1905 1904 1903 1902 1901 1900
Marital Status* Single Married Divorced Separated Widowed
Gender* Male Female
Own or Rent Home Own Rent
Currently Insured Yes No
If no, when did you last have insurance?
Current Carrier
How did you hear about us? None Current Customer Friend Direct Mail Email Internet Ad Radio Ad Television Ad Yellow Page Listing Online Blog Internet Search Engine Bing/Live Search Engine Google Search Engine Yahoo! Search Engine Driving By The Office Business Card Flyer Local Event
LIBERTY CENTER II BUILDING
9381 E Stockton Blvd, Ste 204


Pat's Scraps: A New Award!
Wow, I won a new award! Liza at Hoo's Crafty gave me this new award today! How cool is that! Thank you so much Liza. Go visit her blog and check out all her terrific creations.
Thank the blogger who gave this award to you and link back to them.
Give this award to 4 bloggers that you think rock!
Leave them comments to let them know.
Chloe at http://chloeandherclipons.blogspot.com/ from Australia!
Please make sure to visit these blogs, you won't be disappointed!
Thanks so much Pat! Haven't seen that award before. What a nice way to start the day.


text:
Forbes Releases Fourth Annual Midas List Europe Of The Region's Top Venture Capital Investors
NEW YORK – WEBWIRE – Wednesday, December 16, 2020
Forbes 2020 Midas Europe List
Forbes released the 2020 Midas List Europe, the definitive ranking of the top 25 venture capital investors in Europe and Israel. The list was produced for the fourth consecutive year in partnership with TrueBridge Capital Partners.
· Index Ventures investor Jan Hammer maintains his spot at the top for the third year in succession, largely due to the continued success of Adyen, the Netherlands-based payments company which has a market cap of €53 billion, and investments in unicorns Collibra, Robinhood and TransferWise.
· "Against the backdrop of a turbulent year for our global economy, Europe hasn't seen the big tech IPOs that the U.S. has in the past 12 months, but the region's venture capitalists are continuing to battle to identify and invest in the sector-redefining businesses of tomorrow and will be hopeful for a big 2021," said Forbes Senior Editor Alex Konrad. "Notably, women and people of color remain underrepresented on the list, reflecting the broader need for more equitable representation within the global VC ecosystem."
· Sonali De Rycker of Accel (No. 2), the highest ranked woman on the list, and Danny Rimer of Index Ventures (No. 3) round out the top three. Just two newcomers make the list: Gil Dibner of Angular Ventures at No. 21, and Johan Brenner of Creandum at No. 23.
· In addition to De Rycker three additional women appeared on this year's ranking including Luciana Lixandru (No. 12), Reshma Sohoni (No. 18) and Laurel Bowden (No. 20). Lixandru notably switched firms from Accel in March, helping to launch Sequoia's first European office in London.
· The leading firms on the list include: Index Ventures (3 investors on the list); Accel (3); Creandum (2); LocalGlobe (2); Seedcamp (2)
For the complete ranking and more, visit: The Midas List Europe 2020
Join the conversation on social, using: #ForbesMidas
Forbes' Midas List Europe receives submissions from dozens of Europe's and Israel's leading venture capital firms. Forbes and data partner TrueBridge Capital Partners run that data through a proprietary model that evaluates investors by their portfolio companies valued at $200 million or more or that exited at $100 million or more, factoring in the stage, size and returns of such deals. Spanning early and later stage investments, Forbes' Midas List Europe recognizes bolder and bigger bets.
About Forbes
Forbes champions success by celebrating those who have made it, and those who aspire to make it. Forbes convenes and curates the most influential leaders and entrepreneurs who are driving change, transforming business and making a significant impact on the world. The Forbes brand today reaches more than 140 million people worldwide through its trusted journalism, signature LIVE and Forbes Virtual events, custom marketing programs and 32 licensed local editions in 71 countries. Forbes Media's brand extensions include real estate, education and financial services license agreements. For more information, visit the Forbes News Hub or Forbes Connect.
Banking / Financial Services


Information on the 2015 plan options is available on OGB's annual enrollment website atwww.annualenrollment.groupbenefits.org<http://www.annualenrollment.groupbenefits.org>.(Or you can totally waste your time by calling Ansafone.) Members are receiving decision guides in the mail that outline each plan in detail. 43 meetings are being held across the state in addition to live webinars for employees and retirees. OGB has also developed a cost calculator tool that allows members to compare plans and out-of-pocket cost side-by-side as well as a one-sheet that compares last year's plans to the upcoming year's options. Additionally, customer service hours have been extended to 7 a.m. through 7 p.m. Monday through Saturday.