Home > News > Blog > Can Software-Defined Radio Become Open Radio?
Software-defined radio (SDR) is by now a grizzled veteran in the dusty waiting room of next big things. Apart from some deployments in battlefield radios, electronic countermeasures, and small-cell cellular base stations, it remains a great idea awaiting its chance at the big time.
But advances in radio-frequency (RF) semiconductors and in computational accelerators are poised to dramatically lower the cost of SDR hardware, simplify the software part of the equation, and consequently open new applications at lower price points. These opportunities range from the current next big thing—the Internet of Things (IoT)—to low-cost reconfigurable radios for developing countries, to open platforms for hobbyists.
The advances are targeting key cost points in SDR architectures. One way to organize their discussion is to examine the elements most SDR implementations have in common, and to see how technology change is impacting them.
Starting from the end-user's point of view, the first major block in an SDR system is the programmable baseband processor. This block was actually the point of inception for the entire concept. In it, computational circuits perform the necessary functions to transform outgoing data into a modulated waveform in the baseband frequency range, and to transform an incoming digitized baseband waveform into received data.
The SDR concept is simple: if you are just processing digital data, do the work on a programmable processor such as a digital signal processor (DSP) instead of in fixed hardware. Then you can change the filters, modulation schemes, error-correction algorithms, and packet or stream protocols by just changing the software executing on the processor.
This is a powerful concept, but it proved a bit optimistic. Programmable engines that could meet the demands of increasing algorithm complexities, data rates and baseband frequencies needed to be very powerful: banks of the fastest DSP chips, for example, or high-end FPGAs. This reality put high minimums on the cost of the baseband processor, its mobility, and its ease of programming.
The baseband processor turned out to be not the only challenge in the SDR concept. The next step in the signal chain is data conversion: digital-to-analog for the transmitter, and analog-to-digital for the receiver, with accompanying analog filters. Then there must be up- and down-converters to shift the signal between baseband and RF, more filters, and amplifiers: perhaps a pre-driver on the transmit side, and certainly a low-noise amplifier (LNA) on the receiver. Finally, there are components that are usually on separate dice, implemented in different process technologies: power amplifiers (PA), antenna filters, and antenna switches.
The problem with these RF analog and mixed-signal components is that they are not inherently programmable—they are traditionally implemented with fixed-function RF-analog components. So while you could change the baseband function of the SDR by changing the software, changing the carrier frequency or the bandwidth of the radio meant changing out or duplicating hardware components.
Clever designers devised solutions—tunable oscillators, adjustable filters, and variable-gain amplifiers—that you could alter by loading registers that in turn manipulated the analog paths. But these techniques generally worked over only a limited range—the bandwidth and linearity necessary to make a broadly-adjustable analog component were really expensive in cost and power. So a multiband, continuously-tunable SDR was likely to need multiple sets of RF signal paths, all the way from the local oscillator to the antenna.
This limitation presented cost, space, and power problems in many potentially high-volume applications. For some specific applications like cognitive radio, in which signals can occur anywhere across a broad spectrum, the need for multiple RF chains could be disabling.
Despite the challenges of huge baseband computing loads and multiple RF transceivers, SDR clearly worked. It worked in high-value military and first-responder applications in the developed world, where the alternative was a suitcase—or a rack—full of different single-function radios. It worked in commercial applications where the number of protocol, modulation, and band combinations was limited and known in advance. But a universe of other opportunities waited.
Clearly there are potentially large markets that could open in response to a low-cost SDR platform. Recognizing this, the industry has launched a two-pronged attack on the cost problem. One prong has sought more cost-effective implementations of the programmable baseband processor. The other prong has pursued a unified, wide-band configurable RF transceiver.
The baseband problem has proved the more tractable of the two. Early work by venture companies such as PicoChip—later acquired by Mindspeed Technologies and passed to Intel—demonstrated that a moderately-large array of simple DSP engines could very efficiently support baseband processing for a small-cell base station.
More recently, two other architectural approaches have shown good results, both based on the notion of general-purpose CPU cores augmented by computational accelerators. When the SDR is to span a relatively restricted range of modulation schemes and protocols, high-end microcontrollers with communications-oriented accelerators have shown surprising capabilities. For example it is possible to implement an LTE baseband using a Freescale QorIQ MCU.
Without a-priori restrictions on baseband requirements, design teams have used the same underlying architecture, but with the accelerators implemented in an FPGA. The big news is that process and integration advances have brought these designs within the range of reasonably-priced small-system FPGAs, with or without integrated CPU cores.
There are solutions for a software-defined baseband—enough of them to allow system architects flexibility in trading-off design effort versus range of capabilities. But the transceiver problem remains a key issue: you can't reach low cost if you need a separate RF signal chain for each band you need to cover.
Ideally the entire signal path in both directions between the antenna and the baseband interface would be so wide-band and linear over its entire range that designers could select any window they wished across the relevant RF spectrum merely by setting the local-oscillator driving the mixer and tuning a few filter parameters at RF to achieve the required selectivity. We are not there yet, but we are getting closer.
Bushehri enumerated the critical signal-path components that must be considered (Figure 2). On the transmit side, there is a baseband digital-to-analog converter (DAC), a variable-gain amplifier (VGA), an adjustable low-pass filter, a wide-band mixed with attendant phase-locked loops (PLL) and local oscillator, and a second VGA, a PA, and an antenna switch. For most modulation schemes everything up to the mixer must be duplicated: one path for the in-phase (I), and one path for the quadrature (Q) signal. On the receive path, coming off the antenna switch you have an RF filter, an LNA, a mixer assembly, and then I and Q paths comprising VGAs, low-pass filters, and the ADCs.
In a fixed-purpose design, every element in these paths would be optimized around its design center. And you can do the same optimizations for an SDR that is intended to operate on a small set of closely-related frequencies and modulation schemes. But an open-ended SDR design, able to adapt to whatever the environment throws at it, must be far more demanding of its RF hardware.
Fortunately, CMOS RF process improvements and increasing sophistication in digitally-assisted analog and RF design have gone a long way toward meeting these needs, Bushehri says. He points, for example, to a recently-announced Lime device, the LMS7002M field-programmable RF transceiver IC. A 65 nm RF CMOS chip, the device provides most of a 50 MHz to 3.8 GHz signal path for a 2 x 2 multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) software-defined transceiver (Figure 1).
Demands on the individual blocks are sobering. The PLLs, mixers, RF VGAs, and LNAs must be essentially flat and low-noise over the full 3.75 GHz bandwidth, and linear enough to support demanding use models including multi-carrier operation. "The RF circuit design is quite aggressive," Bushehri allows. In one place, advanced process technology and strong design skills still can't achieve a single wide-band component. The chip uses multiple voltage-controlled oscillators to cover the frequency range, but with only a single PLL each for transmit and receive.
The portions of the transceiver design that operate at baseband frequency are in their own way equally demanding. In order to support the range of applications Lime envisions, the on-chip baseband blocks—the converters, VGAs, and programmable filters—must support bandwidths from 100 kHz to 108 MHz. This is no trivial specification for, especially, the programmable low-pass filters and the 12 bit data converters, especially when you add in the requirement for low power consumption.
A number of other provisions extend the range of the chip. Most of the functional blocks can be bypassed, allowing designers to substitute a more specialized external component into the signal path if necessary. Lime also integrates multiply-accumulator blocks into digital ends of the baseband paths to offload high-performance digital filters from the baseband digital hardware. And the chip includes an integrated 8051 MCU core to provide a level of abstraction between the control software and the internal registers.
The wideband programmable transceiver solves a lot of the design challenge. But there are still the RF antenna filter, switch, and PA to be dealt with. Of these, the most obvious issue is the PA. But Bushehri says there are commercial wide-band PAs available that can match the transceiver's bandwidth, or for more specific applications the chip provides multiple driver outputs, so the user can connect multiple PAs tuned to different bands.
There are antenna switches that can approach 3.8 GHz with reasonable insertion loss and isolation figures. So perhaps the main challenge left to the user is to work out a tunable RF filter to achieve the required receiver selectivity.
Taken together, programmable baseband processors with DSP acceleration, programmable RF signal paths, and careful selection of external components can pack a highly flexible SDR onto a small board at an attractive cost. This opens a range of interesting possibilities for system developers.
At the least, the technology makes it possible for manufacturers to serve a number of wireless markets—say, in various kinds of IoT hubs—from a single hardware design, perhaps with a few parts variations. More interestingly, a system developer could produce a single box—say, a femtocells or white-space transceiver—that could be quickly initialized to fit into any of a wide range of known field environments.
At the extreme, the technology brings fully cognitive radio—able to scan, interpret, and respond to signals from across a broad spectrum and range of uses—within the price of emergency responders and service-providers in the developing world, where capital is dear and locations needing service may be remote and utterly without infrastructure. Such capabilities could be entirely game-changing in the developing world.
Also, a low price point could open a serious hobbyist market for cognitive radio. Not only would this increase designers' familiarity with the concepts, but it could ignite the kind of open-system innovation that has boosted previous technologies, from amateur radio to embedded computing and robotics. The implications of an open community for cognitive radio are not obvious, but they could be vast.


text:
The governors act as a "critical friend" to the school, monitoring and overseeing the smooth running of the school and supporting and listening to staff and parents. The governing body is responsible for the overall management of the school and for determining its aims, objectives and policies in accordance with all the relevant legislation. The head manages the school from day to day and is the governing body's principal professional adviser who assists it with the formulation and implementation of its aims, objectives, policies and plans.
Governor minutes are in the public domain. You can request to see them in the school office. Alternatively email the Clerk, Mrs J Marchione by clicking This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..
Governor Statutory Information / Register of Interests
Mrs S. Smith (Chair) - Diocesan Board of Education, appointed by the Diocesan Board. 3/10/13 - 2/10/20
I have been a Foundation Governor for just over thirty years. It is a privilege to be part of such a wonderful school. I have four grown up children all of whom had an excellent primary education at West Pennard. My passion for each and every child to have the best possible start to their journey into the world of education is still with me today and I very much enjoy being part of a team who share this passion.
I sit on the Finance and Buildings and Curriculum committees and I am responsible for RE, Colleective Worship and Leadership and Management.
Register of Interests - Brother DJ at school discos
Attendance at FGB 2017-18 100%
Mrs M. Colman (Vice Chair) - Local Authority, appointed by LA. 1/9/13 - 31/8/20
I have been a Governor for 13 years, but my involvement with the school goes back 25 years when we moved to West Pennard and my daughter began school. I am Vice Chair and Chair the Personnel Committee. Our responsibilities in the Personnel Committee relate to monitoring the welfare of pupils and staff. We are also responsible for approving a wide range of policies.
I chair the Personnel committee. I am a training mentor and I am also responsible for Leadership and Management.
Register of Interests - Garden maintenance at school.
Miss J. Hale (Headteacher) - Headteacher Governor. 1/9/17 -
I feel extremely privileged to have been appointed by the Governing Body as Headteacher of West Pennard Church of England Primary School for the start of the academic year 2017 – 2018. I was initially attracted to apply for the position due to the school's excellent reputation in the local community, its rural setting and the welcoming and friendly nature of the staff and the children. Previously, I have taught in 3 very different primary schools and bring a wealth of ideas and experience. I also bring 7 years leadership experience, having been SENCo and then Deputy Headteacher in two different rural primary schools. My passion and core belief as an educational professional is to ensure that every child, whatever their starting point, develops a love of learning and achieves their academic and personal potential.
I sit on the Personnel, Finance and Buildings and Curriculum committees.
Register of Interests - nil
Mrs H. Austin - Diocesan Board of Education, Diocesan Board of Education. 01/09/2013 - 31/08/2017 - awaiting re-appointment
I have had connections with West Pennard School for 42 years, as a parent, a teacher and now a grandparent and governor. My teaching career was mainly with the younger children and I am delighted to be the Foundation Stage Governor and also the Special Needs Governor. Through all the changes in education over the years West Pennard has always been an outstanding school not only in striving to provide its pupils with an excellent education but more importantly in imparting a sense of self-worth and consideration for others.
I chair the Curriculum and sit on the Personnel committee. I am responsible for Additional Educational Needs and the EYFS.
Attendance at FGB 2017-18 66%
Mrs G. Holley - Co-Opted Governor 01/10/2014 - 30/09/2018
I was born and brought up in West Pennard and I now live in Sticklynch. My son, Thomas, and I are both ex-pupils of the school. My interests revolve around our beautiful countryside surroundings, children and good food. I'm currently keen to encourage enjoyment of school meals and the maintaining of our in-house school meals service.
I sit on the Curriculum committee. I am responsible for Equalities, Health and Wellbeing and Physical Development.
Rev'd Chris Hopkins - Ex Officio Governor 1/9/18
Attendance at FGB
Mr L. Green - Co-opted Governor
Mrs E. Padamadan- Elected Parent Governor
I live in Glastonbury, Somerset. I have a relationship with the school, having had an elder son attend West Pennard School from reception to Year 4, and I currently have a son in Year 3. My background is within specific learning differences. I have worked within the training, FE and HE sector as a specialist assessor and teacher for nearly 23 years. I currently work for Target Consultancy and Assessments Limited as lead educational consultant and director. I feel privileged to have been accepted as a parent governor of the school, and look forward to contributing my experience to the continued betterment of the school and its pupils.
Mr T. Wheat - Elected by staff 7/9/2012 - 6/9/2020
I have a long association with West Pennard School, having attended the school as a child and having taught here for the last 11 years. I am Deputy Head, teach Year 2 and coordinate Maths, Computing, History and Geography. I have been a governor for the last 11 years as teacher governor and sit on the Finance and Buildings and Curriculum Sub Committees.
I sit on the Curriculum and Finance and Buildings committees.
Mrs S Middleton - Elected Parent 15/12/2014 - 14/12/2018
I live in Shepton Mallet and have a son in Yr 5 and a daughter in Yr 3. I speak fluent French and come from a language teaching background, as well as having taught exercise classes locally for many years. I am link governor for Modern Languages and Humanities and sit on the Personnel and Curriculum committees. I was elected as a governor in December 2014 and feel very privileged to be able contribute to this wonderful school. I believe the children here are nurtured and cared for by outstanding staff and encouraged to reach their full potential, not only academically but as happy, creative and confident members of the community.
I sit on the Personnel and Curriculum committees.I have a responsibility for the Humanities and French.
Mrs L. Thompson - Elected Parent
Mrs J. Marchione - Clerk - 1/10/2010 -
I have worked at West Pennard School for 9 years. I have been clerk to Governors for 5 years and clerk to the committees for 7 years. I work in the office as finance officer.
Register of Interests - Married to auditor

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


When buying a car from an auction, many people are focused on how to get the best deal. People research multiple car dealerships, speak to private sellers and make the most of incentives and discounts, all so that they can buy a great car with the least amount of money.
However, do you know that you can save money if you know when to buy a car?
Like everything else, there is also a season for buying a used car. Although taking advantage of online car auctions is a great way to make a good deal any time of the year, there are some times when you are more likely to succeed even further. Take a look at when it is best to buy a car from an auction — and when it isn't.
Saturdays and Sundays are the days when many car auctions and dealerships hold special sales events. Auto dealership personnel know their potential customers are not at work and are ready to shop. On Mondays, dealers tend to follow up on business from the weekend. However, the middle of the week, that is Tuesdays and Wednesdays, are the slowest days of the week for most auto dealers. Their customers are at work and there are hardly any walk-ins. Sometimes a salesperson will make you a great deal on these days just to make a car sale.
The best days to shop for a used car is at the end of the month and the very best day is the last day the dealership is open for the month. That's because salespeople put in extra efforts in these last few days to meet their sales goals and sell enough cars. To that end, they might be open to more negotiation than they would at any other time of the month. If you go at this time, chances are you can buy a used car for a steal and at the same time do your good deed for the day by making a person reach his sales goal.
The pre-Christmas season is one of the best times for buying a car at an auction. During this time, people are thinking of ways to get a little extra cash to do their Christmas shopping. Those who have an unwanted car or truck are most likely to sell them off to an auction. As a result, many used car auctions are flushed with inventory in late November and early-to-mid December. For potential car customers, this is a great time to buy a vehicle as they can expect more variety in terms of car make, model and even money. This is an ideal time to buy a used car and a smart buyer should do some research to find the car that best fits their need.
Some people believe that if they want to get a car at a cheap price, they should go at the time when the dealership is about to close down for the day. The reason behind it is that the salesperson will be in a hurry to go home and will be more amenable to negotiations so that they could quickly wrap up the deal. In fact the opposite is true. When you go to a car auction or a dealership at this time, the salesperson is likely to think that you desperately need that particular car and will not be open to much bargaining.
Another myth is that a salesperson will be desperate to make a quick deal if it is raining. This myth is also not true and most times salespersons will think that you really want that car, since you approached the dealership during such terrible weather. As a result, you may not get the car for the money you expected.
Between the months of February and June, when people receive their federal tax refunds, there are a lot of potential customers whose pockets are swollen with money. Many of them are on the lookout for a good deal on a used car. In tandem with the rising demand, car prices generally increase during this season. However, when people have more money, they are likely to throw caution to the winds and bid higher. As a result, they can end up paying much more for a car than they initially expected.
Always, keep a budget in mind when buying a used car and be aware of the true worth of the car. That way, you can avoid being swept up in the bidding excitement.
When looking for a used car with a good price tag, as always, knowledge is paramount. Research the kind of make and model you have in mind and don't be afraid of negotiating with the salesperson. Some people, including car salespersons believe that time can affect car prices. However, it is not written in stone and mostly depends on where you have decided to buy a car from.
Don't let that faze you. If you have done your research right, you will come out holding the better part of the deal.