text:
thejudge13
F1: Daily International News roundup, inside whispers and insight together with thoughts and opinion
Daily F1 News and Comment
F1 Breaking News
F1 Comment
F1 Features
F1 History
F1 Polls
F1 Race Reviews
Voice of the F1 Fans
TJ13 Competition Terms & Conditions
Subscribe to TJ13
Advertise with TJ13
Voice of the #F1 Fans: Alonso the Home Wrecker
December 2, 2014 · by · in Voice of the Fans.	·
TJ13 is committed to social media and giving the fans a voice. "The voice of the fans" articles meet this goal and so this post is brought to you by TJ13 contributor landroni
Edited by Andrew Huntley-Jacobs
With the impending announcement of 'Fred' Fernando Alonso being re-united with his long lost… love/hate… McLaren, one has to wonder why anyone in their right mind would want to hire Alonso given his incredible home wrecking skills. Let's take a look at what the self-confessed "I am a team player" Asturian has been up to in his past 10 years or so in F1.
Having been with Renault since 2003, Alonso became a newly crowned WDC in October 2005. With his trophy still warm, he unapologetically signed for McLaren in December 2005 for a drive in… 2007. After winning one more title with Renault in 2006, Fernando, 'for the good of the team', Alonso discarded his beloved Renault team and switched to Big Ron's McLaren.
Sebastian by comparison must be considered a devotee to Red Bull having stuck with the Austrian team throughout the disastrous 2014 season – which by the way saw them romp home 2nd in the F1 constructors' title behind the über-dominating Mercedes team; along with scoring the only race wins other than Mercedes AMG F1.
However, back in 2007, Fred the shining new 2x WDC team-player quickly found himself matched by a diapered punk, also known as Lewis Hamilton, who couldn't even clean up his nose without the help of Big Ron. So in despair and anger he decided in Hungary 2007 to throw all the toys out of the pram, and upturn the applecart, attempting to blackmail Dennis his boss – presumably, 'for the good of the team'.
Alonso, in his mind had a clear #1 status within McLaren. "Who is that guy? I am a 2x WDC! Tell the damn kid from the other side of the garage that he is to respect his superiors, i.e. me the team-player, and make damn sure that he always finish behind my gearbox in races, as was originally promised to me when I signed the contract in 2005!" This is in actuality a paraphrase of mine 😉
So we all know what happened at the end of 2007: Fred slammed the door loud and clear at the MTC — shattering a few windows —, left Big Ron with a hefty $100m cheque to honour while McLaren found themselves disqualified from that year's Constructor's Championship. Ultimately, a year later following years in the sport, Dennis appeared to be 'removed' from F1.
The way was paved for the Martin Whitmarsh revolution which itself began inauspiciously with the recruitment of Heikki Kovalainen
Moreover, it has been suggested that the unwelcome $100m (reduced on appeal to $50m) write-off was one of the triggers for Mercedes withdrawing from their long-term partnership with McLaren, ultimately ending in an acrimonious, public split in 2014.
No happy ending here as Fernando 'for the good of the team' Alonso leaves, heads roll and the team is in tatters. Take 1.
Depending on your choice of analogy, the dog returned to his vomit OR the prodigal son returned home to Pappa Briatore and his Enstone home once again.
The team's lack of competitiveness and a frustrated Briatore (or maybe even Fred) decided to put Nelson Piquet Jr on the line in Singapore. This paved the way for a contrived first win for Renault in 2008 as at the time Fred marched victorious to Victory under the lights in Asia.
Briatore, Symonds and possibly Fred, necessary pressure on a less than ballsey Nelsinho, and the theatrics were set in motion. Piquet Jr duly spun out on lap 14 of the 2008 Singapore GP triggering the Safety Car, which was co-incidentally immediately following the decision to pit Alonso in what was an abnormal tyre strategy.
Felipe Massa, had been leading the race and was in the thick of the championship fight, complained that the spin appeared somewhat fishy. As time would tell this was in fact the case.
Following Briatore's unceremonious ditching of Piquet Jr mid 2009 season, Nelsinho discovered his balls, and revealed the Singapore crash—and by extension Alonso's win—was indeed stage managed.
Massa later astutely observed, "It was the team and Nelson – but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it [but] of course he knew. [It's an] absolute certainty."
What happened next? Following these revelations, sponsors ING and Mutua Madrileña removed their hats from the hat stand and headed for the hills removing their stickers from the Renault cars by the 2009 Singapore GP.
The CEO of Renualt dismissed both Briatore and Symonds despite their obvious abilities to manufacture underserved results. He then offloaded the Enstone team to a pair of somewhat… unproven investors… who acquired some paint and a couple of Lotus stickers – placing them atop the Renault badge.
Surprisingly, or not, Alonso decided it was once again time to jump from the sinking ship and head for pastures new, thoughthis time they were to be red.
Fernando 'for the good of the team' Alonso again exits stage left, a team boss' head rolls, and the team finds itself in tatters, Take 2.
Having left behind two devastated lovers, Fred's womanizing was in no way in decline.
This time the prize was the red-haired beauty going by the name of Ferrari. She was forced to jilt her current partner – Kimi Raikkonen – as Fred marched into the house in time for the start of 2010.
Yet Fernando could in no way have envisioned the fate about to befall him as over the next five years Ferrari gradually slumped from championship contender to race win contender to merely a podium contender.
Yet Fernando's star was still in the ascendancy as despite the 'trucks' being built in Maranello, he almost managed to clinch two WDC titles, each time being just beaten to the tape by the clinical German upstart that was Sebastian Vettel.
With each passing year of failure, it was inevitable; the letting of the Maranello coloured blood began.
Interestingly, the designer of the all-conquering 2014 Mercedes AMG F1 car – Aldo Costa – was dismissed for failing to deliver a trusty steed for Fernando to ride.
The promise of the new 2014 engine era gave hope to the tifosi, that Ferrari could spend their way to glory. Yet so catastrophic were their efforts that following a couple of races, Stefano Domenicali could take no more – and was off.
Most incredibly, Luca Cordero di Montezemolo, was ousted later in the year and swiftly followed by his nomination to replace Domenicalli – Marco Mattiacci. This is most unfortunate for the writers of TJ13 – as the M&M pairing is no more.
Yet despite requesting to leave, Fernando walks on water – fails to breach his contract with Ferrari – and in all likelihood departed the fields of Tuscany with a big fat cheque.
Most incredible of all, Ferrari is now to be sold in all probability to non-Italian owners. Could this be the end of the Scuderia – once and for all?
That would appear an appropriate epitaph for Fernando the Home wrecker.
Fernando 'for the good of the team' Alonso leaves, multiple bosses heads roll, and the team finds itself in tatters, Take 3.
In the meantime, Fred is talking double-dutch and once again pondering pastures new. Once he salivated at the thought of being inside the curves of a Newey creation, but his dreams of that outcome appear to have been shattered – once and for all.
Fred also eyeballed the grey but feisty and muscular Mercedes, but no room at the inn was the cry from behind the shuttered windows.
Now it appears, Fernando is out of choices. What is left is the unproven and possibly unstable creation from the nuptial bed of McLaren and Honda.
Yet should any team boss in their right mind entertain inviting the Asturian – Don Juan – anywhere near their lovely daughters?
Doesn't his track record demonstrate he will court them, abuse them and their family, casue mayhem amongst the blood relatives and then head for the highway when the going gets tough?
For many, it is most puzzling to observe Honda's unbridled passion for Fernando. Isn't the pretender's history worth considering prior to committing to the marital bed?
Of course, as every introductory statistics class teaches you, correlation doesn't imply causation. It may be hard to argue that Alonso was the cause of this trail of destruction. But it is just as difficult to ignore the ship wrecks bestowed upon the teams unfortunate enough to fall for Fernando's charms… And since Fred loves to get his hands dirty in the inner machinations within the bowels of a team, it's even more difficult to dismiss the Alonso influence.
So if I were Ron Dennis or Yasuhisa Arai, I'd be having sleepless nights for some time to come. Or is this a secret plan by Big Ron to exact revenge on Fred – and teach him a lesson, once and for all?
On the bright side, Mercedes fans looking to how Toto Wolff may one day be removed from their team – rest assured; Fred will be sniffing around your daughter too, just as soon as the terms for his future divorce are agreed at the shrine of the MTC.
Tags: Fernando Alonso, Ferrari, landroni's corner, McLaren, Renault F1, Singapore GP 2008
Watch F1 TV LIVE (Click below)
← #F1 Daily News and Comment: Tuesday 2nd December 2014
#F1 Daily News and Comment: Wednesday 3rd December 2014 →
85 responses to "Voice of the #F1 Fans: Alonso the Home Wrecker"
Jamie Norman December 2, 2014 at 18:44 · · Reply →
Yet both mclaren and Renault were both happy to hire him more than once. Seems more a case of putting 2 and 2 together and coming up with 5 in an effort to diminish someone who in undoubtedly the best driver of his generation, possibly in top three ever.
Peter Scandlyn December 2, 2014 at 19:05 · · Reply →
McLaren, only allegedly Jamie, we don't know for certain yet.
Renault, with Flabio still in control – no surprises there…..
anijs December 3, 2014 at 09:09 · · Reply →
McLaren is desperate, Renault had dropped from first to third (in fact fourth if it hadn't been for McLarens exclusion), was employing two journeyman at the time and no other top driver was going to sign for them. In addition they were managed by Alonsos mentor and manager.
If you look at the facts, Alonsos politicking doesn't bring any positive energy to the team he drives for. Yes, Schumacher demanded a similar undisputed No.1 status, but when did you hear him bitch and moan about his team in public? He might have kicked asses here and there if things weren't going well, but he did it behind closed doors and in a constructive way. I was never a Schumacher fan, but I have to admit that he was very good at building a team around him that served his needs. He was very effective at getting what he thought he needed. Alonso on the other hand, seems primarily driven by the fear of not getting what he thinks he deserves. Instead of convincing people that it is best for them to do the best for him and giving them the feeling that he very much appreciates everything that is done for him, he is quick to backstab, distance himself from the team and throw his toys out of the pram.
Of course it might be all a coincidence, but if you look at his career, a very destructive pattern emerges. I think the troubles at McLaren and Renault can be directly attributed to him. Ferrari is not as clear, it seems their problems had a lot to do with ineffective leadership. But then again, Alonso was part of that leadership. He used it for short term advantages, like the "Fernando is faster than you" incident, but long term, he was not able to establish a structure that allowed him to win a WDC with the team. Yes he came close twice, but he never came close to building up the effective winning machine everybody expected the Ferrari-Alonso combination to be.
titanracer69 December 2, 2014 at 18:49 · · Reply →
brilliant piece!
Miha Bevc December 2, 2014 at 19:18 · · Reply →
Great read. It's a bit exaggerated, but the pattern is obvious. Hardly a coincidence …
Auq December 2, 2014 at 19:28 · · Reply →
Indeed it is not a coincidence. However, it's not the one that is implied either.
Alonso does not cause the mayhem, but he recognises the writing on the wall early enough to leave the burning wreck before it explodes. That's the causality.
McLaren78 December 2, 2014 at 21:03 · · Reply →
Maybe Alonso doesn't cause the mayhem single-handedly, but believe you me, he's got his fingers in the mayhem pies. When he walks in and demands that the team bow to his every need, that causes the teams to lose focus.
Nigel December 2, 2014 at 22:15 · · Reply →
Alonso does not cause the mayhem
That's a pretty definitive statement given his McLaren history…
Perhaps I should have inserted the word "systematically" 😉
thejudge13 December 3, 2014 at 00:43 · · Reply →
…Fair comment – though sometimes it is necessary to exaggerate the point – to make the point
Karbry December 2, 2014 at 20:05 · · Reply →
A very enjoyable article…..
There is a reason a certain broadcaster has on occasion referred to him as "Teflonso"…….
Fat Hippo December 2, 2014 at 20:55 · · Reply →
Landroni, you are a brave man. Unbelievably stupid, but brave. I wouldn't have dared posting that. The mob will eat you alive…
No mob will touch him. Hamfosi won't. Sebfosi won't. Tifosi even won't anymore. And definitely Mcfosi won't. Alonso, just like Mourinho to use a football analogy, leaves a trail of destruction behind him irrespective of how brilliant he is. If Ron-da manage to get the best out of him and at the same time not lose focus by trying to satisfy his every need, I'll take my hat off them. Then again, maybe McLaren-Honda want to make a big entry with a big name and once they have a strong car in 2-3 years dispatch with him and go for Lewis, Seb, Ric, Bottas, whoever.
I don't think there's a vast mob out there.
Alonso is an extraordinary, perhaps peerless driver – this analysis is excellent:
https://f1metrics.wordpress.com/2014/11/26/2014-model-based-driver-rankings/
– but a strangely unappealing personality.
This "analysis" is not excellent, it's rubbish, but I think I already said that last time you tried to pitch it. Alonso is a poisoned cookie – great driver but rotten character and completely useless at developing a car. I nearly laughed my arse off when Ferrari mechanics waxed lyrical about how Seb told them things about the 2012 car that Alonso never noticed. Seb had driven that car for exactly 20 minutes. That's why I think Seb will achieve the title with Fezza.
See what you want to see, it's all equal to me.
I'll grant that the stats might be skewed by Raikkonen's miserable performance this season, but stats they remain, as opposed to Hippopinion.
ramanan1987 December 3, 2014 at 05:10 · · Reply →
Stefano Domenicalli told the same about Alonso when he was hired by Ferrari that they need a development driver. Its a new marriage hippo. Every event would be adjusted and issues amicably settled for some time. If Seb endures two seasons like Alonso's five he would be looking for pastures new and every driver for that matters since they exist to win.
As to linking the ousting of LDM and Alonso, i disagree. LDM was ousted because his and Marchionne's ideas contradicted concerning the future of Ferrari as a whole and not only the racing team. Everyone was calling for Domenicallis' head after the 2010 season itself. So even Domenicalli's ousting cannot be linked with Alonso. It just happened that Alonso was also employed by the Scuderia at the same time.
@ Landroni
Agreed that he was matched by a rookie Hamilton. But don't you think Ron was only in favour of lewis and not him. Wasn't he pushed into a corner and hence din't have anything to defend himself apart from threatening Ron? I still do not understand how the FIA investigated the incident in Hungary that happened between two team-mates with no insistence from the team itself but only from Hamilton's father?
landroni December 3, 2014 at 06:16 · ·
Re: Alonso vs Hamilton
At the end of the day, the talking is being done on track. These top teams, and McLaren above all others, are religious about providing identical kit to their drivers (well, unless Fernando comes in a requests special priority to new bits, as he did when returning to Renault, to make a point).
And this is what I suspect happened in 2007: Alonso got spanked hard, on the track, by a rookie, in identical kit. For example, as proof in point that there wasn't necessarily a Fred-shafting atmosphere in MTC, in Monaco 2007 Big Ron asked Hamilton to stay put in 2nd and not threaten Fred for 1st place; ultimately neither brat listened Big Ron, but this is hardly proof that McLaren were clumsily favoring Hamilton at all costs… And that Alonso lost hearts and minds within the team as a result of his intransigent posturing is one thing; that he got beaten on track by a rookie in identical kit is quite another.
The thing is that if the rookie cannot drive fast enough, he would never be in a position to look at Alonso in his mirrors. Take Magnussen this year: Big Ron may favor KMan all he wants, but at the end of the day Button was looking in his mirrors at KMan weekend-in weekend-out. And if things reversed, do you really think that Button would have started blackmailing his way into priority-man? Very unlikely, and Jense must have all the dirt in the world on McLaren after his number of seasons in the team, because all top F1 teams have unauthorized technical information on other teams all the time…..
[WP seems to enjoy eating my comments, so admins if there is duplicate please delete
Eli December 3, 2014 at 16:40 · · Reply →
"I nearly laughed my arse off when Ferrari mechanics waxed lyrical about how Seb told them things about the 2012 car that Alonso never noticed"
Alonso never noticed some of the flaws of the car because those were not flaws for him. Vettel is more sensitive, so he was more vocal about the car. What was a problem for Vettel while driving, wasn't a problem for Alonso.
thejudge13 December 3, 2014 at 16:46 · ·
… You should be a politician 😉 – seeing every angle – good point though
Joe December 5, 2014 at 17:31 · · Reply →
Raikkonen has probably given more feedback to the Ferrari mechanics than both Alonso and Vettel combined.
Teams dont hire Alonso because of being a miss congeniality or for his cool drunk skills. They hire him because he is one of the most capable drivers to put their car at the top.
@ Landroni,
Its the same Hamilton who refused to yield to Alonso in the practice run in the fuel burning phase which was the starting point for the entire episode. He went unpunished for that. I think Ron mentioned in the radio to Hamilton his exact feelings for Hamilton after the qualifying incident. I think this fact and it was Hamilton who started all this (sorry to Hamfosi's) is missed by many media outlets and you also did not recollect this in the above article.
Further the situation of Jense and K-mag cannot be compared to Alonso and Hamilton coz. Mclaren today are not fighting for WDC and WCC but they were in 2007. Thats the difference.
landroni December 3, 2014 at 07:23 · · Reply →
Again, we'd all love a sober account from Carlo or the Judge of the events in McLaren that year…..
I'm not sure that "he started it!" is a sufficient excuse for Alonso, the employee, for indulging himself into blackmailing his employer and making good on that blackmail threat. There is a difference between brushing with what's barely acceptable (refused to yield to the other driver in the practice run in the fuel burning phase; would Raikkonen have been as chastised for a similar episode, or lauded instead?) and outright blackmail. Spoiled children rarely understand the difference between the two.
For instance I never saw Mark Webber divulging all of RB's secrets, and there is little doubt now that cheating did occur and that drivers were in the know, either before or after leaving RB, even though he found himself for years in a corner within that Vettel-centric team……
ramanan1987 December 3, 2014 at 07:52 · ·
I was wrong about that free practice thing. It happened earlier in the qualifying session. Had Hamilton let him through Alonso would have had the chance to set the final flying lap and consequently a likely pole position. This would not have opened a can of worms i suppose.
Sing December 3, 2014 at 01:56 · · Reply →
Are there Alonso fans so rabid as to suss out an internet identity and cause a threat?
Nasty comments may ensue but after all landroni
is anonymous…unless all of you know something I don't.
salmon December 2, 2014 at 22:02 · · Reply →
So Fred was responsible for the 100m Mclarent bill? What about Nigel Stepney and Mike Coughlan and the fact that Ron and the whole team knew they were cheating.
But of course, it's all Fernando's fault. Ignore the fact that it was Mclaren to cheated in the first place.
And Fred moving to Mclaren after his 2 WDCs… well he was managed by Briatore who was also manager of the Renault team then…. I'm sure Briatore would have been involved with Alonso's negotiations with Mclaren. So how is that home wrecking?
At Ferrari, it was Mattiaci who acted in haste to sign Seb. Why would they sign up their enemy, such a stupid move? As a result Ferrari had signed 3 WDCs. A mistake which would prove fatal to his career.
So yes some team bosses heads rolled, but it was caused by their own unethical behaviour. Fred's timing was poor and was unlucky he happened to be in teams who's ambition was greater than their talent.
Let me phrase things slightly differently.
Since winning his WDC, Alonso witnessed some rather incredible events that surrounded all the 3 teams that he set foot in: a $100m penalty and WCC disqualification (McLaren), a win-for-crash operation accompanied by the withdrawal of a manufacturer (Renault), and the demise of a powerful dictator in Maranello (Ferrari). Given the rollercoaster bloodshed of this year, this last story isn't over by far.
In each of those instances the boss' head rolled on the floor more or less in sync with Alonso's leaving. In each of those cases long-term financial and strategical damage occurred in the affected teams:
– the $100m penalty which was one of the triggers for Merc's withdrawal from their long-term partnership with McLaren, including the acrimonious, public split in 2014. As well as the forced Martin Whitmarsh revolution, which itself ended in tears two failed drivers later, Heikki Kovalainen and Checo Perez (both Whitmarsh hopefuls), crowned with the disastrous 2013 and 2014 years, and an ostentatious lack of sponsor stickers. And all signs are there that even this story is far from over, too.
– the withdrawal of Renault from its works team, offloading Enstone to uncertain investors. The instantaneous loss of main sponsors ING and Mutua Madrileña. Loss of headline personnel—Kimi Räikkönen, James Allison, Eric Boullier, and countless others—over a single winter at the end of 2013, and a glorious finish in 2014 ahead of Marussia, Sauber and Caterham, with lack of investment funds being one of the core reasons for the slump. And all signs are there that this story is far from over, either.
– killing after killing after killing: a lot of thick, red blood was spilled, certainly enough to write this very article. Among others, Aldo Costa, Stefano Domenicali, and shockingly Luca Cordero di Montezemolo, as well as Marco Mattiacci (sadly depriving us of M&M's). And if history is any guide, Fiat shall withdraw from its long-term association with Ferrari, dumping it before Christmas or so.
Spin it as you will, but the trail of destruction invariably revolves around one brilliant driver, incredibly adept at pushing any junk to a race-winning position, our very own Andalusian Fernando Alonso…
So tell me, why would Honda dream of working with Fernando? If you look coldly at the events, team ruin—as in the deep abyss of despair—occurs about 5-6 years after Fernando sets foot in said team. I'm willing to bet a dollar that Honda will look rather queasy in 5 years time…
Come on. Alonso caused the $100 million penalty just like the teeth of the dog who ate my homework caused its destruction.
You can do better than that…
Clear View December 2, 2014 at 22:19 · · Reply →
Nice round up on Alonso's, maybe the heads role because the big bosses know they have the best driver possible and it then highlights the car's deficiencies, so when that driver says "I'm off, your cars a rubbish" then change must happen, as what is the point of hiring another stellar driver if the team that was left still carry on building less than stellar cars. That is the only explanation I can offer.
mattpt55 December 2, 2014 at 22:33 · · Reply →
Nice one, landroni. Your point about causality is well taken, but I would be wary of the Alonso effect if I were McLaren to be sure. Very wary
"Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times, it's enemy action…" ?
He didn't "span" out in Singapore. He SPUN out. Plus a number of other typos. Fun read though. Great driver, disastrous employee.
And you gotta wonder why Massa stills regards him highly.
Martin December 3, 2014 at 05:01 · · Reply →
Gary Anderson:
Do you get the sense that Alonso is like poison to the dynamics of a team, as some are saying?
Richard Durishin, via Twitter
Fernando Alonso is not poison to any team – he is a very talented driver with two world championships under his belt and he simply wants results.
When he is in an F1 car he works as hard as, if not harder than, most other drivers and he expects the team to do the same.
We have seen heroic drives from him on many occasions, and the team he has been driving for has appreciated it – because it has known that the equipment at his disposal was not capable of what he had just done with it.
Just go back to 2012 – the car was a real dog yet he brought Ferrari results that it could only dream about.
I rather take the opinion of an expert than [mod]
Joe Papp December 3, 2014 at 06:37 · · Reply →
Rants are more interesting and compelling when they marshal more logic and fact than just bile…
Well, said sycophantic Autosport expert(s) rarely trouble to be genuinely critical to any one F1 player of importance…. And they rarely trouble to stick their neck above the party line….
Same expert has recently uncritically endorsed our dear old Bernard: "I have to say, Bernie, that F1 needs you in control. No one else can do what Bernie has done for F1 and we are now at a critical point. If the teams have any sense they will get behind him." Conveniently overlooking that it was dear old Bernard himself, as CEO at FOG and master manipulator, who has himself engineered over the years the current financial disaster for the teams.
Same Autosport experts have recently written sickeningly sycophantic adulation to one Dr Collin Kolles, "F1's tail-end troubleshooter", conveniently overlooking how the Kolles management team was at the same time drawing blood and shafting one unfortunate Caterham into the ground, in a scam that has been relentlessly reported by the TJ13 amateurs (and haters, I gather).
As one team boss recently and memorably put it (from memory): "Thinking hurts. It's dangerous to think by yourself and make your own opinion." So pick your poison…
Wasn't McLaren fined $100m by FIA for committing the sporting form of corporate espionage, and bringing the sport of Formula 1 into disrepute?
How is that Alonso's fault that McLaren illegally and criminally obtained and utilized Ferrari's IP?
My understanding of the McLaren 2007 espionage incident is as follows.
McLaren was on trial with Ferrari in the civil courts, while the FIA didn't get involved, no more as it did more recently in the Force India and Caterham debacle. Then cometh Alonso in Hungary 2007, blackmails Ron Dennis into giving himself unchallenged #1 status within the team, and gets spurned by Big Ron. Alonso then makes good on his blackmail and murmurs to Briatore something that the Renault F1 boss passed onto the governing body (aka Max the Spanky), prompting a letter to all three McLaren drivers. Then Alonso was "very happy to help the FIA discover everything."
From what I see, Alonso was the trigger for the FIA nosing around the McLaren/Ferrari debacle, and Alonso provided Spanky with means and justification for a serious episode of regulatory overreach. Of course it was McLaren's guilt to possess confidential information from another team, but let's not forget that a disgruntled former Ferrari employee, Nigel Stepney, has provided them with that info. What happened when a disgruntled former employee provided "confidential information from another team" to Renault, months after the McLaren public shamming? Exactly that, nothing, not even a footnote.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_in_Formula_One#2007_season
"On 8 November 2007 the FIA accused Renault F1 of having McLaren F1 technical information in their possession.[9] According to the charge, the information in hand "included the layout and critical dimensions of the McLaren car as well as details of McLaren's fuelling system, gear assembly, hydraulic control system and suspension". The hearing on this matter took place in Monaco on 6 December 2007. The charge faced by Renault F1 – breaching of article 151c of the Sporting Regulations – was the same as that faced by McLaren earlier on in 2007 in the espionage controversy involving Ferrari & McLaren. The FIA found Renault F1 in breach of article 151c but did not penalise the team."
But I don't see anyone dragging Renault through the mud for having cheated. And what happens when former employees, wink wink Peter Podromou (and countless others!), jump ships and bring with them "confidential information from another team", conveniently stored in files within their brains, all up for easy access and exploitation? Exactly that, nothing, this is actually the rule of the game… I don't see anyone dragging Ferrari through the mud for "cheating" by poaching Merc engine specialists and thus acquiring "confidential information from another team"….
But as was requested several times in the comments on TJ13, we'd all love a sober account from Carlo or the Judge of the events in McLaren that year…..
thanks for replying. I'll read over what you've written later today. just wanted to send you a brief thanks now tho. cheers.
nik December 3, 2014 at 07:10 · · Reply →
Interesting piece to get the conversation going, but Alonso is the guy who beat the all conquering Schumacher and Ferrari in 2005-2006, something no other driver/ team combination could do for many years previously.
Also, it was Ron who made the biggest mistake of his career with his poor management of the team and drivers in 2007. I have a feeling he wants to correct that mistake through his re-hiring of Alonso.
As for Ferrari…………..they have been going steadily down hill since the "Italians" took control back from Todt. Without Alonso they wouldn't of challenged for the Championship during those 5 years.
Alonso will be champion within 3 years with Mclaren and Vandoorne will be his faithful disciple until Alonso retires. Mclaren/Alonso dominance is on its way.
"Alonso is the guy who beat the all conquering Schumacher and Ferrari in 2005-2006, something no other driver/ team combination could do for many years previously."
Indeed so. It is for this very reason that I hold Alonso, the driver, in highest esteem. Probably higher than Hamilton, who is much more yo-yo like when it comes to maintaining top-notch performance. And it is extremely gratifying to see Alonso's driving skills critically acclaimed, placing him squarely into the sports greatest ever:
https://f1metrics.wordpress.com/2014/07/18/who-was-the-greatest-f1-driver/
And currently (!) on his peak 3 year performance, mind you. This guy is peerless when it comes to driving an F1 car consistently fast!
So as much as I have qualms with Fernando's "team player" self-aggrandizing myths, Fernando the driver is simply sublime.
Indeed so, again. But it is nevertheless striking how after winning his WDC, Fernando is like a scourge to any team that he touches, with 5 years on the said team staring into the deep abyss of despair… McLaren, Renault nay Lotus nay Enstone, and now Ferrari…..
neepwurty December 3, 2014 at 09:15 · · Reply →
I thought Kimi also been Shumacher/Ferrari in 2005? MSC came 3rd if I recall.
McMaster December 3, 2014 at 11:53 · · Reply →
Pretty sad piece of writing Judge. Doesn't do any good for reputation to publish such lop-sided drivel.
It's called "THE VOICE OF THE FANS" – a section of our site dedicated to allowing fans an opportunity to express themselves.
The point is TJ13 promotes fans access to an audience via social media – what they write is their call – given certain criteria based on readability
Fans are often polemic – by definition – and they may write from a bias.
However, it may be better to either
– engage with their articles critically, rather than merely snipe in a cheap and easy fashion
– or alternatively, say nothing at all.
Aberracus December 3, 2014 at 12:17 · · Reply →
Not really Judge, the other 2 instances of Voice of the Fan where Fat Hippo rants, it's me or this site has an Anita Alonso Bias?
….It is the voice of a fan… not the site
Eli December 3, 2014 at 16:45 · ·
It's voice of the fan on the site. So it's the site.
….Rubbish – it's a billboard as part of the site for fans to write their views in an extended form
So can I write something for this site?
….. Yes – That's the point 😉
"Merely snipe in a cheap and easy fashion", like the article. I'll take into account the low threshold of the criteria for publication in the future and refrain from commenting.
"the low criteria for publishing"…. as I suggested, avoid the "Voice of the Fans" articles if they are not of the nature you require.
"cheap and easy fashion – like the article"…. ….In fact, someone spent considerable time and effort penning their ideas…. whether they are valid or not.
In contrast, your comment was a throwaway 5 second dismissive opinion without any explanation behind it… as stated, it was cheap and easy – and not in keeping with other worthy contributions you have brought regularly.
McMaster December 3, 2014 at 13:21 · ·
I gave the effort worthy of the article. I was dismissive because it should be dismissed. I couldn't be bothered to take the time to point out all the short comings of his statements and then have to respond to all the long winded defenses he would post. Like those he has. I read all his subsequent posts before commenting, which only served to reinforce my belief.
I apologize for having posted such a brief assessment. In the future I will take into consideration that the Voice of the Fans articles need no basis in reality and will keep my thoughts to myself.
And should you wish to pen some thoughts in the future – TJ13 will be happy to publish them – they appear to be regularly well considered and enlightening
The main thrust of the article is based on surprisingly many facts, which I did my best to keep accurate. Please address those arguments, instead of leaving such drivel as a comment.
Life is to short.
McMaster, Voice of the Fans is a fan-written piece. Like a newspaper op-ed, if you disagree with the content, you don't have to read it. The difference is you have to pay for a newspaper and last I looked, this is free.
I value TJ13 and the effort he puts into the blog. Do you know how much time goes into maintaining this sort of effort?
If TheJudge can find a fan who'll spend a great deal of time and effort to write an entertaining and cogent piece, I applaud him for sharing the space. That the FatHippo and Grumpy Jackal help out is commendable.
If you have a differing view, supply a substantive article to TheJudge and I'll bet you here and now he'll post it.
Really and obvious piece of scientific and measured analysis, facts and evidence, this is the type of "articles" that made me start reading Judge13.
-Sarcasm
….The avoid the "Voice of the Fans" section….
The thing here it's you're condoning this kind of misinformation in your Blog, with that you are devaluating it (your blog), I can not recommend into my friends anymore as I often did as very good mix of rumors and intelligent opinion.
…then if that is your blinkered view – feel free to do as you wish.
It is my right to publish a controversial opinion written by a fan and clearly mark it so – with the obvious disclaimer this is not necessarily my view.
Also – in my opinion – it is no one's right to be blaze and dismissive of others without proper engagement – and for those who behave in such a manner, I suggest they are better served slugging it out in out in a forum somewhere else.
I tend to disagree, Judge. Just because it was published in the "Voice of the Fans" section, it doesn't necessarily mean that it was written from a strong bias, or that it passed only a very low readability threshold for publication….. Sure, the style was kinky (and even more so in its original version), but the substance was as fact-based as possible.
As I say above, the main thrust of the article is based on many facts, which I did my best to keep accurate. I encourage posters to address what was written, not what they thought they read. And clearly state what facts are plain wrong, and what facts were erroneously interpreted. THEN we can have a meaningful discussion.
… I said "may" – not that this was the case
So what "misinformation" exactly do you think is present in the article?
Look the problem is everywhere, but your conclusions are jumps of faith, like this example: " And since Fred loves to get his hands dirty in the inner machinations within the bowels of a team, it's even more difficult to dismiss the Alonso influence " how do you know that ? The other day Rob Smedley said working with FA was a great experience and he was not difficult to work with. So how do you KNOW that he meddles in the bowels of the teams? This is just one of your conclusions. Your… How can we call it, article, is full of premises that aren't proved, and from them you get your biased conclusions.
I will follow Judge opinion and go elsewhere,,,
Fernando Alonso has a known, well-publicized history of meddling in the politics of teams.
In McLaren, he famously blackmailed Ron Dennis into giving him undisputed #1 status over Lewis Hamilton, as was implied when he had signed for the team in 2005.
On his return to Renault, he had it enshrined in his contract that he would receive special treatment from the team, in the form of priority access to upgraded parts, etc. (Can't recall any other driver insisting on such contractual clauses.) And as was implied in the article (and by Felipe Massa), it is inconceivable that Alonso had no part to play in the Singapore cheating episode, but he certainly got off lightly from the fallout. He was also one of the few drivers on the grid to be "chumming up" with the team principal, Flavio Briatore, even if he was his manager.
In Ferrari, he was very close to both Domenicali and Luca di Montezemolo. Very often it wasn't perfectly clear who had the power behind the throne. When Marco Mattiacci arrived, he immediately started a power struggle with him, dismissing him as a good-for-nothing neophyte, that would have no immediate impact on the team. When Mattiacci started showing his fangs, and the power behind the throne shifted, Fernando's public position softened visibly, starting to praise the new team principal. And so on, and so forth. For all intents and purposes, Fernando had sufficient political clout (either via the media or in backrooms) to influence decisions at Maranello.
And for what it's worth, this assumption of Fernando's being a political animal is oft times implied and sometimes stated outright in TJ13 analyses. But hey, feel free to go elsewhere…
…Alonso is indeed a most political animal… and with considerable clout too… this is founded in his remarkable driving abilities – and I would suggests he is second to none on this score in his generation..
How do you know when Dennis, in 2005, approached and signed Alonso that it wasn't on the basis that he was number one? Is there any doubt he was, with Renault, when Dennis signed him? Would it not make sense that it would be part of the agreement in moving to McLaren? Could it be Dennis that went back on his word?
…Baby – bathwater – Oh well (sigh)
Austin_F1 December 3, 2014 at 16:25 · · Reply →
Anyone who's seen the emotional farewell videos showing Alonso's Ferrari departure would never come away thinking he wrecked that home in any fashion. What a load of bs.
Indeed, he was a major force keeping it all from falling apart before the eyes of the world. Think Ferrari's had poor results the last few years with Alonso? Imagine where they'd have been without him.
Maybe in a position to effect the necessary changes much earlier, much thorougher, and without the need for the current bloodbath…. LdM must be ruing the day he decided to center the team around Fernando. And let's see how the rumors of Marchionne selling Ferrari away pan out… If that happens, THEN it shall be very hard to argue that Alonso was Ferrari's savior in any way, shape or form.
Landroni: I would like you to cite all these quotes you are attributing to Alonso and others. You can start with the second paragraph of your article. Show us where he dismisses Mattiacci as " a good-for-nothing neophyte". Show us evidence that Alonso had anything to do with the poor performance of the engineering departments at Ferrari. Those that actually develop the car. Tell us how Massa's statements regarding Singapore have any bearing or are even provable. Gives us a quote from Montzemolo indicating his disappointment with hiring Alonso, or Domenicali or anyone at Ferrari. Give us a quotation from any team principle from any team that Alonso is a destructive force.
"The main thrust of the article is based on surprisingly many facts…". BULL. It is opinion mixed with fairy tales backed up by hot air.
Austin_F1 December 3, 2014 at 17:37 · ·
Indeed. Well said, my friend. I would also like to see some evidence of the team being built around Fernando, or that he was in any way a divisive force in the garage. Any of you who may have seen the documentary of Alonso's final race for Ferrari know how well-loved he is at Ferrari and how much he loves that team. It's obvious to anyone with eyes.
As you justly pointed out, life is too short. In any case, nihilism will only get you thus far. We're all trying to make sense from the little facts that we have on other people's lives; I sure do hope that you apply the exact same demanding principles on each and every piece of TJ13 that is being published, and then categorize those as BULL, because the regular TJ13 writers use just as much conjecture, rumors, logical deductions spiced up by speculations as this particular piece, if not more at times.
As for the main thrust of the article it was quite very simple. After winning his 2 WDC: Alonso enters a team, 5 years later the team finds itself in exquisitely perilous financial and leadership position, with main manufacturer backers withdrawn (or on the brink of withdrawal, in Ferrari's case), and with the original team boss unceremoniously ousted. 3 times, with 3 different top teams. Now that's one good riddle! Care to disprove this BULL pattern?
It's fine to employ speculation and conjecture, so long as you don;t frame them as fact. You should expect that to draw criticism every time.
"Show us where he dismisses Mattiacci as " a good-for-nothing neophyte"."
Of course someone politically astute like Alonso will never say exactly this outright in public. But if you read between the lines, this was the message coming from Alonso when Mattiacci was ferried in.
http://thejudge13.com/2014/04/18/daily-f1-news-and-comment-thursday-17th-april-2014-2/
"Earlier, Alonso's first statements about his new boss were far from glowing. On Thursday, he said he wasn't even sure Mattiacci was making the trip to China, while revealing he has been talking with the departed Domenicali "all the week long". And when asked about Mattiacci's inexperience, Alonso answered: "It's too early to say if it will be a very good thing or very bad. "I don't really have much to say. I drive the car," he later added."
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/114045/
"Speaking to reporters ahead of the Monaco GP, Alonso said Mattiacci still needed more time to gain experience of F1 before he could enact change at Ferrari.
"Not much to be honest – I don't think it's going to happen soon," said Alonso, when asked by AUTOSPORT what Mattiacci had altered inside the team.
"He's still learning about the team situation, the Formula 1 environment, the F1 weekends.
"There are a lot of things to learn and [he needs to] get some experience before making any decisions that at the moment he will not take.
"On our side – the drivers, the engineers, the mechanics trackside – we come to the GP and still have the same meetings at the same times; we don't see any big difference.
"When I go to Maranello to work, to have some meetings and preparations and run in the simulator, these areas are still not any change in this last month.
"But probably it was expected not to have any change in the first month, because he still does not have the experience."
http://thejudge13.com/2014/04/21/daily-f1-news-and-comment-monday-21st-april-2014/
"Before the confirmation of Domenicali's resignation, rumours began circulating that Ross Brawn and Briatore had been mentioned to replace Stefano yet with the announcement of Marco Mattiacci one could understand Alonso's reluctance to welcome him to the team.
Alonso responded with what could seem to be an inflammatory statement to test the mettle of the new man – "In Bahrain, we were one minute behind the leaders, ninth and tenth and today we are on the podium, seven seconds behind Nico (Rosberg). I think this podium should be dedicated to Stefano, as everything we do up to July will also be the result of his efforts."
Alonso is not a reactionary man, every move and utterance is designed for particular motives. It may yet be proved that his disapproval of the new arrival is linked to a wish to move teams – as many neutral observers have suggested in recent weeks. A move that Ferrari will not countenance having seen the performance of Raikkonen this season.
Despite his faith in his own abilities, Alonso needs to tread carefully, LdM is a consummate political player. His intentions are without doubt to be winning titles but he would be wise to learn;
you catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar.."
"Show us evidence that Alonso had anything to do with the poor performance of the engineering departments at Ferrari."
This is a topic in itself, and a matter of debate. You say, I presume, that drivers drive the car while engineers develop them. I say drivers are instrumental in giving feedback to engineers on what works and what doesn't, and what needs to be fixed. As examples are Schumacher who built Ferrari around his needs, and Vettel who geared Newey around his needs (and to the detriment of Webber).
Alonso can almost always adapt his driving to work around car issues, which means that he is less sensitive to car issues than other drivers (i.e. Massa or Alonso). And given that he was an uncontested number at Ferrari during 5 years, his feedback was taken into account above all else. If he cannot point out car issues, then car development and setup optimization cannot happen straightforwardly…
"Tell us how Massa's statements regarding Singapore have any bearing or are even provable."
They're not provable, of course. But take a moment to reflect on what he says. Briatore and Symonds put pressure on Piquet Jr, and Nelsinho duly spun out. Alonso was the main beneficiary from this operation, as he inherited the lead as he pitted abnormally early. He pitted abnormally early, so he knew what was going to happen. It stands to logic that Alonso was in on the whole plan, from the moment he stepped in his car. This has bearing. Other drivers may have dismissed such a cheating plan from the outset, but obviously not Alonso. Alonso was right in the thick of the most damaging event in Enstone from the past 5 years or so, the event that has triggered the exodus of sponsors, manufacturer Renault, team bosses, arrival of shaky investors, lack of funds and sponsors, and today's financial despair at Lotus.
"Gives us a quote from Montzemolo indicating his disappointment with hiring Alonso, or Domenicali or anyone at Ferrari."
I haven't affirmed anything like that in the article. I speculated on this, tongue in cheek, in the comments.
"Give us a quotation from any team principle from any team that Alonso is a destructive force."
You really don't want to submit Ron Dennis to a lie-detector test on this subject… And I don't need quotes from team principles on this matter. I simply point out the trail of destruction that seems to be following one very specific driver, which as it happens has a habit of getting involved in very peculiar political incidents. Make of this what you will………
I'm not the one making the slanderous claims Landroni you are. You're attributing statements to people that were never made. Your presenting arguments as fact with nothing to support the them. I find the writers of TJ13 generally don't present opinion as fact. Speculation and rumour are just that. But be sure that if I read something I consider rubbish there will be a comment from me.
Maybe in your thinking you should include McLaren losing Newey. Or how about Dennis, being the boss of the team when they convicted of cheating to the tune of millions lost for investors. Maybe you should note the Santander logos that remain at McLaren and now grace the Ferrari. Maybe Alonso wasn't in on the Singapore affair. He didn't need to be. Maybe Massa was pissed because the fueling rig sticking in Singapore cost him the championship. Maybe Ferrari's decline started with the loss of Brawn and Byrne. Maybe Costa moved because he had been demoted and was offered a big cheque and a better position at Mercedes.
Your "main thrust', as outlined in the first paragraph is "…why anyone in their right mind would hire Alonso with his incredible home wrecking skills".
Look up nihilism.
BTW, *I* don't think Ferrari's had poor results the last few years. No way! Ferrari has had very decent seasons, twice being in the thick of the WDC battle, regularly scoring wins and podiums, and regularly being at the sharp end, even if not in front of all others. Not unlike McLaren in the past decade or so: always there or in the whereabouts, but rarely stringing it all together.
I think the perception that Ferrari has been doing so badly these last 5 years is more to do with the media and fans trying to satisfy stratospheric expectations reminiscent of the Schumacher era, which as pointed out on TJ13 in the past, was a distinct aberration in the recent 50 year history or so of Ferrari in F1. Before the Schumacher domination era, for the past 50 years very few Ferrari drivers managed to win a WDC, only Niki Lauda and Jody Scheckter. Overall Ferrari isn't such a happy hunting ground, notwithstanding the Schumacher era, for world titles… So I'm not quite sure why we have so many grumpy jackals nowadays…
Landroni, that was certainly a much better effort at backing up your argument although none of it did.
He said he didn't know if Mattiacci was going to be good or bad and would need time to learn what he needed to know about F1 before doing anything and this was not going to happen immediately. Later he said that the changes Domenicalli had made, before his departure, were why Ferrari had closed the gap to Mercedes and that those plans were going to affect the way Ferrari were working until July. What he said was true and I don't think that his belief that the podium should be dedicated to Domenicalli was so much a jab at Mattiacci as recognition of reality.
Drivers give feedback on the parts the engineers have already developed or in the simulator on parts they believe might work. They don't give input on how to develop them. The reason Alonso can drive around problems is because he is so good at identifying them. He has to know where the weakness is in the cars abilities to be able to adjust his driving and he does it better than anyone in F1. Vettel did not give Newey direction on development. It is exactly the opposite. Newey got Vettel to change his driving style to take advantage of the blown diffuser. He had to get him to believe that the car was going to break the understeer by applying throttle which is completely against driver instinct. Webber could not adapt, Vettel did. Schumacher, although a great driver, had the backing of, by far, the biggest testing budget in the history of F1. Ferrari ran full track testing more than 60 days a year as well as developing the Bridgestone tires they ran. During their peak spending It equated to more than $300,000 per lap of racing.
Alonso pitted when the safety car came out. Could have been a call from the wall. He may have known but he was cleared by the FIA and they had more information than you, I or Massa. So I'll take it as ruled.
Montezemola was a great supporter of Alonso. Lot's of quotes out there to prove that. He knows the worth of Alonso.
During the lie detector test make sure you ask Dennis if he promised Alonso that he would be the focus of McLaren's efforts. Remember when he was asked about racing Raikkonen for the championship his response was "WE are racing Alonso". And of course rumour has it Dennis has hired Alonso again. It's unlikely he would rehire a man he thought was a "home wrecker" although he would probably rehire a man he wasn't fond of that he new could help him win.
Dennis was moved out because he cost McLaren shareholders money and embarrassment by endorsing his teams cheating. Briatore and Symonds were thrown out by the FIA. Their cheating causing embarrassment for Renault shareholders. Domenicalli fell on his sword for the crappy car this year (and was probably tired of the politics of the organization). Montezemolo fired the engine designer (can't think of his name) because he was under pressure for Ferrari's poor performance. Montezemolo was moved out because he didn't agree with the direction Marchionne wants to take Ferrari (road cars).
The pattern I see is Alonso giving 100% to whatever team he's driving for and those teams not giving what he needs to win.
Érico Calixto December 3, 2014 at 16:40 · · Reply →
I agree with the sentiment that Alonso is a terrific pilot that comes with great and unusual risk, but I think the text could have been more eloquently written.
Anyhow, I wonder how much of this is due to Briatore's influence on him. Why would anyone in his right mind want to hang around FB at all? It's not like Alonso depends on him to establish his credentials as pilot and make contact with teams. If anything, it seems as if Alonso's contract decisions are more often a miss than a hit (as far as getting WDC cars, not as far as being well paid).
As a McLaren fan, part of me would welcome Alonso back and trust his skills and opportunism to help achieve far better results. But part of me also fancies Alonso simply having no ride at all in 2015 and watching F1 from home while Hamilton and Vettel add to their trophies and possible legacies.
"Anyhow, I wonder how much of this is due to Briatore's influence on him. Why would anyone in his right mind want to hang around FB at all? "
My feeling is that it's a question of compatibility. Some people simply get along marvelously, for no obvious reasons. Fernando and Flavio have a feel for each other, just like Bernard and Putin…
Right car at the right time is always a crap shoot.
I would love to see Hamilton, Vettel, Ricciardo and Alonso in comparable equipment. That would be a season to remember.
tamburello December 3, 2014 at 18:52 · · Reply →
[mod]
Sebastian dumped Red Bull pretty damn quick. Sticking with them? What a joke.
[Note from Editor in Chief – AHJ If you insist on posting abusive and pathetic personal insults your comments will be placed into permanent moderation]
elf December 4, 2014 at 06:45 · · Reply →
Thid is by far tge most absurd article i have ever read. What js so great bout it? This man has simply charted ougbthe liff of Alonso in f1. Bravo but i vould read that on autosport mate.
To understand why Alonso is what he is, is that you need to understanf the mentality if f1driver. Tgey want ti win, uou wanna blame him for that?
And this talk about sebastian sticking with his team in 2014. LMAO wat other option did he have. Your articlrs premise is absurd. I will bd writting adetailed reply to this absurdity, after i finish somf studying. So watch this space over the next 24 hours.
And tj13, seruously yiu chose to post ths article? [Mod – personal attacks on individuals will not be tolerated]
Your blatant disrespect towarsds alonso is perpetual and pathetic. Instead of a tribute fir him leaving ferrari you post this. I hate this from a source who rrspects and propagates a sport. The onf man whos the only possible strand of perfection and ths is how you treat him. Shame on you!
He is complete, he took the ferrari where its never deserved to be. Hes still in great touch with tge team. Apparrnyly Arrivebene has even voiced his concern over letting Alonso go. You premise is defunkt and hopeless. More detailed whooping coming soon.
[Note from the editor AHJ: As has been said many times, TJ13 is committed to giving the fans a voice – the voice of the fans articles are written by fans – and they are their opinion. The articles are edited for possibly a clearer structure, grammar and spelling only. TJ13 does not edit the fans opinions.
If you wish to read more 'news style' stories and reports – I suggests you avoid reading the voice of the fans articles
Alternatively – should you wish to pen a counter position to the one you read – we will publish it in the interests of the debate
All fan articles bringing tribute to Fernando and his time at Ferrari are welcome]
Spotted: Hamilton driving a McLaren yesterday January 23, 2020
Photo's of Schumacher after accident, sold on the black market January 22, 2020
Bottas comments: the dutiful no.2 driver to Hamilton January 21, 2020
Horner's opinion on coming Hamilton, Leclerc & Verstappen battle January 20, 2020
Stroll & Wolff takeover: Mercedes becomes Aston Martin? January 19, 2020
Further information: Italians reporting Hamilton Mercedes 2yr deal January 17, 2020
Team boss surprising admission on Stroll January 16, 2020
Red Bull boss critical of team: "no more excuses" January 16, 2020
Alonso reveals 'discussions' with several F1 teams 2020 January 15, 2020
Breaking: Watch Alonso big accident at Dakar rally (video) January 15, 2020


text:
Prayer for Monday 17th March
Today from our church family we pray for Sylvia Boss.
Collect for St Patrick:
Almighty God, who in your providence chose your servant Patrick to be the apostle of the Irish people: keep alive in us the fire of the faith he kindled, and strengthen us in our pilgrimage towards the light of everlasting life; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
We celebrate today the feast of St Patrick, the apostle of Ireland. As a boy growing up in the western Britain, Patrick was captured by Irish pirates and taken into slavery. During his years of servitude, Patrick began to pray, and gradually came to know and love God. He eventually escaped slavery, and after many hardships made it back to his home. After receiving the basic Bible training needed for the priesthood, he chose to return to the land where he had suffered so much to preach the Gospel. Even at the height of his success as Bishop of Armagh, he never forgot his former status as unlearned exile, slave and fugitive, and emphasized the need for complete reliance on the God who can bring good out of the darkest of situations. Lord, help us to trust in you today, and to know that you are always in control. Lord in your mercy, hear our prayer.
Labels: Bishop of Armagh, Daily Prayer, Ireland, Monday 17th March 2014, St Patrick, St Patrick's Day
The Woman At The Well
Prayer for Monday 31st March 2014
Prayer for Sunday 30th March
Mothering Sunday All Age Talk
Prayer for Saturday 29th March
Prayer for Friday 28th March 2014
Prayer for Thursday 27th March
Prayer for Wednesday 26th March
Suffer little children to come unto me..... Matt 1...
You are the Light of the World
The Discipline of Prayer
Prayer for Tuesday 25th March
Prayer for Sunday 23rd March
Prayer for Saturday 22nd March 2014
Prayer for Friday 21st March
Would The World Be Better Without Religion?
Prayer for Friday 14th March
Our Culture Has Accepted Two Huge Lies
Jesus Quote
Prayer for Wednesday 12th March 2014
Inclusive Church
Prayer for Sunday 9th March 2014
Prayer for Saturday 8th March
Prayer for Friday 7th March
Teaching Eucharist
Prayer for Thursday 6 March 2014
Prayer for Ash Wednesday 5 March
Ideas for Lent
Prayer for Tuesday 4th March
Prayer for Monday 3rd March
Prayer for Sunday 2nd March

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Wash the rice and keep it aside for 15-20 mins.
Heat oil in a pan and put cinammon and bay leaves,then put the coriander/chilli paste and saute it till it turns greenish black.
Now put the washed rice and again saute for 2-3 mins.


Cooma Florist, Jindabyne Florist, Snowy Mountains. Cooma NSW Florist.
Hand tied bouquet, using fresh mixed seasonal flowers from the markets.
Specify in notes at checkout, if you would like a particular flower in season or colour/theme.
Delivery to local area for $5.00 or pickup at 86 Vale Street Cooma.


text:
Author Erin Kelly
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., left, and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., have both received contributions from ACRE, the political arm of NRECA. (Photo By: Chip Somodevilla, Getty Images)
NRECA's political action committee has raised more than $1.2 million in the first five months of this year for federal candidates who support electric cooperatives.
That's about $60,000 more than the Action Committee for Rural Electrification, better known as ACRE®, received from January through May of last year, said Gabe Snow, ACRE's director. The committee took in a record $4.2 million during the 2017-2018 election cycle.
ACRE has already begun contributing to federal candidates, who face primaries in the first half of next year followed by a general election in November 2020. The PAC has contributed nearly $458,000 so far to 217 candidates consisting mostly of incumbents seeking re-election, Snow said. ACRE expects to contribute to about 110 to 135 more candidates, for a total of 350 to 375 this cycle.
The contributions have been split almost evenly between Republicans and Democrats so far, Snow said. Contributions to House candidates were split 50-50 between candidates of both parties, but more Republican Senate candidates got contributions because more of them are up for re-election this cycle, said Amy Lewis, ACRE's deputy director.
ACRE also gives to both the Democratic and Republican House and Senate campaign committees, and it contributes to the leadership PACs run by House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
ACRE does not contribute to presidential candidates.
"We consider ourselves nonpartisan," Lewis said. "We don't take party into account. We just look at whether they support electric cooperatives."
Last year, 91% of congressional candidates supported by ACRE were elected to Congress. Those lawmakers are currently considering legislation that could have a big impact on co-ops, including bills to protect co-ops' tax-exempt status and lower the pension insurance premiums they must pay to the federal government. Congress also is considering how much money to invest in expanding broadband service to rural communities.
The decisions about which candidates to support are made by ACRE's steering committee, which is composed of Snow and select employees of the NRECA government relations staff. The steering committee consults with the corresponding statewide organizations prior to all contributions.
ACRE receives voluntary grassroots contributions—which average about $65 a year—from more than 35,000 eligible co-op employees, directors and consumer-members in 47 states, Snow said. In general, hourly employees are not eligible to contribute because of laws designed to prevent workers from feeling coerced by their bosses to give. However, those employees are allowed to contribute as consumer-members, Snow said.
About half of the money collected is returned to state PACs managed by the statewide associations to support candidates for state legislatures. The states with the highest number of consumer-members contributing to ACRE in the 2018 election cycle were Ohio, North Carolina and Florida. Ohio had by far the most, with nearly 6,000 co-op members giving a total of about $152,000. They made up more than half of the 11,000 co-op members who contributed to ACRE.
For electric co-ops, every election is important and everyone should exercise the right to vote and get involved in the political process, Snow said.
"It's all part of our mission to provide safe, affordable, reliable electricity to our 42 million co-op members," he said.
Erin Kelly is a staff writer at NRECA.
ACRE raises personal, voluntary contributions from NRECA's eligible membership. Federal law prohibits soliciting contributions from individuals other than NRECA and member-systems' eligible employees, boards of directors, consumer-members and the families of such individuals. Contributions from ineligible individuals will be returned. For more information on the ACRE program or eligibility to participate, please contact Gabe Snow, ACRE Director, at gabe.snow@nreca.coop or 703-907-5799.
Contributions to the NRECA Action Committee for Rural Electrification® (ACRE®) are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. Contributions to ACRE are voluntary and will be used for political purposes. You have the right to refuse to contribute without reprisal. Federal law prohibits contributions from foreign nationals who lack permanent resident status. Any contribution guidelines presented are merely suggestions. You are free to contribute more or less than the suggested amounts, or not at all. NRECA will not favor or disadvantage anyone by reason of the amount contributed or a decision not to contribute.
Up Next NRECA Names Finkel to Lead Advocacy Strategy→


Sometimes AV software shows false detections over crack downloads. That`s all because cracks files and keygens sometimes make system modifications. In 99% of cases cracks files and keygens are safe. However you must look through antivirus report below and decide for yourself whether to proceed to download or not.
Discussion for Advanced Music Recovery v1.0-CRD crack.
As an alternative you can try to look for Advanced Music Recovery v1.0-CRD torrent file. You may need a little bit more time to download it but in fact bittorrents usually offer a full pack (software+crack) so you will not need to bother about product version match.


text:
July's sweltering heat wave blanketed Pennsylvania cities such as Pittsburgh, Harrisburg and Philadelphia, where 90-degree days were the norm.
"In places like Harrisburg and Philadelphia, there are between five and 10 more 'hot days' (now) compared to what was seen back in the late 1800s and early 1900s," Imhoff said.
Pennsylvania wasn't the only place breaking records last month.
Baltimore recorded 25 days of 90-degree temperatures in July, breaking a 148-year record. And Washington set a record with 28 days reaching 90 or more in July. The previous mark was 25 days in 2011, according to the weather service.
On Thursday, the temperature reached 118 degrees in Phoenix, Arizona, shattering the record of 115 set in 1934. It also set a record for hottest July, with an average temperature of 99 degrees.
For now, relief appears on the way for York County.
Cooler temperatures in the low-to-mid 80s are projected starting Monday, with a chance of occasional rain and thunderstorms created by Hurricane Isaias through midweek before clearing up, according to the weather service.
"It doesn't look like we are going to have another 90-degree day until at least mid-August," Banghoff said.
— Ron Musselman can be reached at rmusselman@yorkdispatch.com or via Twitter at @ronmusselman8.


Does your commercial building or home have issues retaining heat or cool air? It may be time to install some new insulation into your walls. At ABLE INSULATION, you'll receive guaranteed residential and commercial insulation services. Contact our experienced team today to set up your insulation service.
When our team installs your insulation, a mesh fabric will be stapled over the wall cavity. Loose fill insulation will then be blown behind the fabric and packed tightly to prevent any future settling.
Call 405-260-1160 today to schedule your net and blow insulation service and to receive your FREE estimate.
Enjoy guaranteed service every time you call the team with over 40 years of insulation experience.


aluminum decking price deck pricing per sq ft aluminum decking aluminum decking price per deck cost per sq ft lockdry aluminum decking cost.
prepac platform beds platform bed with storage king king size platform bed with storage platform storage bed king prepac sonoma black bookcase platform storage bed with headboard.
vinyl loveseats slipcovers furniture protector glass clear vinyl seamed edges sofa cover for pet home design ideas app.
how to clean quartz countertop fish foam and soft scrub with bleach how to clean white quartz in case i go with quartz clean quartz countertops silestone.
denton furniture stores rustic furniture rustic furniture outlet rustic furniture outlet rustic furniture stores in denton tx furniture stores.
how to clean cork floors image titled clean cork floors step 8 how do i clean cork floors.
loft jacksonville fl fully furnished loft apartment short long term rental leases available aloft hotel jax fl.
bird houses for sale cheap bird houses for sale for the garden gifts bird houses bird houses for sale.
crosley keepsake review cruiser portable rntable crosley keepsake deluxe portable usb turntable reviews.
tv media chests youth media chest w mount tv media chest drawers.


Stainless steel, side stand extension for BMW R 1200 GS motorcycle. There are two types of side stands for BMW R 1200 GS, so the set includes two upper brackets to match extensions to both versions.
Thanks to the extensions, you can leave a motorcycle supported on the side stand on any ground.


text:
Q: Should a library function be suspend or return deferred Let's assume I'm writing a library that returns a string which is a complex and long running task.
I can chose between offering this
interface StringGenerator {
   suspend fun generateString(): String
}

or
interface StringGenerator {
   fun generateString(): Deferred<String>
}

Are there any (dis-)advantages of either of the options and which are they? Which should I choose?

A: Kotlin coroutines are designed along the "sequential by default" guideline. That means that your API should always expose suspend funs and the user, if and when they really need it, can easily wrap them in async.
The advantage of that is analogous to the advantages of cold flows with respect to hot flows: a suspendable function is active only while control is inside it. When it returns, it has not left behind a task running in the background.
Whenever you return a Deferred, the user must start worrying what happens if they don't manage to await on the result. Some code paths may ignore it, the calling code may get an exception, and then their application has a leak.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Send healing vibes their way with a deliciously fudgy gift of all 12 enchanting brownie flavors, including beloved varieties like golden Toffee Crunch, silky Cream Cheese and more!
We've tucked a dozen snack-size Fairytale Sprites into our purple treasure box with a hinged lid, then wrapped it in a cheery Get Well Soon gift band. 100% natural & certified kosher.


Our first ever employee the gorgeous Emily Howe!
Check out the article on us in the July addition of The Local Answer Magazine….
We are getting ready to hire a new Consultant…..
Paul James, Leader of Gloucester City Council visits Anderson Recruitment!
Anderson Recruitment proud to be apart of the 2013 FSB winning bowling team!
I took part on Monday 18th March 2013 in the Federation of Small Businesses annual bowling event and was on the winning team! It was a great night and I met some lovely people. The winning team was Cath Anderson – Anderson Recruitment, Tony Bowden – Smart Communications, Martin & Sadie Green – Martin Green Traditional Decorating Limited & David Bassett & Tom - DMXpressions Limited. A big thank you to Mark Owen & Cindy from FSB committee for organising the event. Lets hope we can retain our title next year!


text:
Texas unveils temporary logo patch for Andrew Jones
Grant McGalliard
Jan 11, 2018 at 12:01 AM Sep 22, 2018 at 4:07 AM
The University of Texas is honoring sophomore guard Andrew Jones with a temporary uniform patch against TCU tonight.
was diagnosed with leukemia, the university announced earlier today. News of his condition had been circulating, but as HookEm.com's Brian Davis reported,
the university withheld the announcement due to privacy laws.
Texas will wear temporary AJ1 patches in support of teammate
@DrewdotCash for tonights' contest against TCU.
#TexasFamilypic.twitter.com/ljy1n5EQ9O
— Texas Basketball (@TexasMBB)
The patch reads "AJ1" in honor of Jones' jersey number. The 20-year-old from Irving MacArthur High School has been an integral
part of the Longhorns team this year, averaging 16.6 points in his last five games.
Obviously, the game tonight pales in importance to Jones' health. The team has offered its full support, and Texas head coach
Shaka Smart has spent an extensive amount of time with Jones' family over the weekend.
When the game does tip off at 8 p.m. on ESPNU, Texas will have to face a a tough TCU team. The Longhorns will host the Horned
Frogs, who are ranked No. 16. in the country.
Texas unveils temporary logo patch for Andrew Jones appeared first on
Hook 'Em.


Researchers have identified at least two viruses disguised as information for fans of the upcoming FIFA World Cup in Germany, a tactic that has scored goals for malware writers in the past.
The FIFA World Cup 2006 tournament wont get underway in Germany until early June, but computer virus writers are already attempting to cash in on the planets most popular sporting event with viruses aimed at deceiving eager soccer fans.
Researchers at UK-based Sophos released notification of a new attack that infects Microsoft Excel files and has been disguised as a spreadsheet charting the national teams participating in the World Cup.
Identified by the security company as XF97/Yagnuul-A, the virus lives in an Excel file that offers to help people set up fantasy sports competitions related to the international soccer championship, and also attempts to market itself specifically to fans of the English Premiership, one of the worlds top professional leagues.
Once the World Cup virus has infected a PC, it begins forwarding itself to other people using the corrupted machine and may also send itself to people listed in any e-mail client software on the device, Sophos said.
The Excel virus marks the second World Cup-oriented attack identified by the company in the last week. On May 4, Sophos detailed a Trojan virus dubbed Troj/Haxdoor-IN, which cloaked itself as a wall chart of the teams competing in the tourney that fans could print out and use to follow the action.
The threat was noticed as it was distributed via spam e-mail, and while it specifically targeted speakers of German, the virus could easily be adapted to other languages, researchers said.
As in the United States, where large amounts of office workers wager on the NCAAs Men Basketball Championship by joining related Web sites or filling out electronic forms, soccer fans abroad are increasingly creating their own leagues for following the World Cup, said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos.
"The hackers know that people are rabid for information to follow their favorite team in the tournament and that many will be at work, where they wont be able to watch live on TV and could fall prey to this sort of attack," said Cluley.
"People have become suspicious about opening a file that appears to be a revealing picture of a celebrity, but when it comes to something like sports, some people may still let their guard down out of curiosity."
/zimages/4/28571.gifClick here to read about how Oracle is keeping customers waiting for security patches.
Attempts by hackers to take advantage of the wide appeal of the World Cup, which is held once every four years, are nothing new, Cluley said.
Sophos has tracked threats tied to the event since as far back as 1998. And there is also reason for hackers to believe that they could succeed using such ploys, as the Sober.n worm virus—which misrepresented itself as an opportunity for people to buy tickets to the World Cup—was one of the most widespread computer attacks of 2005 worldwide.
In addition to the sheer number of soccer fans around the globe interested in World Cup-related information, Cluley said that the event is also likely to draw many new Internet users and people in developing nations where anti-malware programs are less widely used, both of which could help the threat lure in more victims.
/zimages/4/84833.gifZiff Davis Media eSeminars invite: Join us on May 11 at 2 p.m. ET to learn critical best practices for e-mail and instant messaging applications, including tips on "hygiene" from Gartner.
For enterprises, the key is making sure that employees are vigilant about security threats at all times, regardless of what they may be crafted to look like, according to Cluley, who said that some companies have even begun e-mailing fake attacks to their workers just to monitor who may be easily coerced into opening suspicious messages or attachments.
"Whether its a new TV series or some horrible natural disaster, the virus writers are quickly jumping on whatever hot news story is out there because they know a lot of people will be looking," Cluley said.
"Businesses dont need to send out a reminder to warn employees every time theres an earthquake or a big soccer match, but it should serve as an incentive to keep their systems protected and actively educate workers on what sorts of behavior to avoid."


CORNERSTONE's Christian Home Inspirational and Educational Family Schools, better known as CHIEFS.
CHIEFS is committed to developing our children with strong Godly character, sound mind and body, so they may share with others the love of God, while learning to serve our Lord and Savior, the Chief Cornerstone.
CHIEFS offers many fun-filled activities to enrich our student's education. Monthly field trips, student speaking days, a reading club, music, physical education, and holiday socials are events geared to enhance knowledge and fellowship for students and homeschool providers. We communicate primarily through emails, general meetings, and occasional phone trees. Parental involvement is strongly recommended and encouraged.
We look forward to seeing and hearing from each one of you. Your input is invaluable. Together, we can build strong families for Christ.