For anyone who is acquainted with me and my ideas, then you certainly may well previously be aware which i have been striving to aid adjust many of the psychic reading views that numerous individuals have about psychics and what they do. Given that I have coated a few of all those features in other content articles I want to concentrate a lot more on what a psychic really should be and everything you can fairly anticipate to understand from a psychic looking through.
One of the most profound thought that arrived into my consciousness for the starting of the journey for me to be a "psychic" advisor was the reasoning that we have been all right here to know anything; to expand and evolve in the direction of perfection in the soul. Any time a true psychic is performing their position, they are helping you within an consciousness of particular areas of your lifetime any time you look for psychic suggestions. The main reason psychic information is often so effective is simply because it could possibly give substantially essential insight into your daily life that you would normally not remember of due to the fact you could possibly be so embroiled in the day-to-day actions and occasions within your existence that you choose to shut out your very own instinct and also your very own means to access your Better Self. Psychics are accessing unseen things in mother nature; even so within just all of us exists a concealed, decipherable code that individuals with highly produced psychic instinct and/or with all the use of specified divination instruments, can extra commonly accessibility. These people had been both born using a normal reward and/or has produced it.
The moment I discovered my genuine path, I made a decision to create it my mission to assist people that seek out it to seek out the ability in their internal globe and to access Higher Consciousness through non secular observe. A psychic (a term which really isn't to me accurately descriptive of what we do) is meant to aid you to assistance yourself. Not take the place of your respective have inner powers, insights or judgment by showing you that you choose to can perform this on your own. A real intuitive psychic must be applied for advice and to provide you with probable results according to the strength you are channeling in the time of the looking through. You see, a prediction can adjust since you've the power to vary it, specifically soon after someone tells you they see a matter that should occur but which you have the facility to alter. This is often especially useful once your advisor sees a achievable detrimental result to a situation. This is in truth an opportunity to transform that possibility by switching your thinking, motion, reaction or beliefs a few predicament. Each and every conflict is just an opportunity to harmonize power depending on your feelings and steps. Every single result is not necessarily pre-ordained and fixed.
Many people will need help to discover their way and when you find yourself speaking by using a talented, authentic psychic, you happen to be opening up additional alternatives in working out your absolutely free will for being at trigger with your everyday living rather than being effected by uncontrollable conditions. Deep profound insights into your lifetime may have a robust effect on your consciousness and produce concerning the very factor you'd like, empowerment. It's a much touted phrase today, but it's for authentic. It is the quest that each one souls (whether they understand it or not) are transferring toward as we journey the spiral upwards to perfection.
Acquiring mentioned all of that, what a psychic can inform is diverse. 1st, you should build what sort of facts you happen to be looking for. 2nd, you need to discover the ideal psychic who can provide you using this type of information. Now, not all psychics are made equal which posting assumes that you've got completed your homework and also have recognized that you are working with knowledgeable and moral practitioner.
There are several psychics to choose from who assert being 100% precise, can explain to all, understands all, which they are a psychic, a medium, an astrologer, crystal reader, reiki master, and so on. I notice that psychics that assert to be every thing to every person, most certainly are almost certainly neither professional nor ethical. Find out specifically what your psychic does very best! Numerous qualified psychics will show you what they can and cannot do. For example, a medium may be a psychic but all psychics are not mediums. Therefore if you might be wishing to get in touch with a liked a single who has crossed above, then you definitely should really search for an authentic psychic medium. All psychics are usually not mediums. Some psychics are clairvoyant (which means clear seeing) and also have visions. In my experience, I have talked with several clairvoyant psychics who will be certainly capable to "see" visions during the past, present or long run. Exactly the same goes for somebody that is empathic who will "feel" another's feelings. Some psychics can do both equally, but some can do only one or two apply regions really properly.
Regardless of whether your psychic is clairvoyant, clairaudient, empathic, telepathic, a medium, takes advantage of divination instruments this kind of as Tarot, Runes, I Ching, or maybe numerology and astrology, the extent to which they could let you know sure info will likely be determined by their encounter within their craft, their ability, know-how and pure presents. Every one of these elements play a component in obtaining you accurate psychic facts all through your reading through therefore you in particular want someone who is proficient should they will be capable of make it easier to based upon channeling from a better realm. Some psychics use tools, some do not. Relying on how a psychic worker uncovered their present and the way they have practiced it, will establish their skill level. I remember observing a method on television the place this psychic basically browse peoples' butts (of course, their behinds). There have been truly folks displaying her their butts and she or he would read them. Go figure. Not one person need to ever decide what it truly is that connects somebody with increased consciousness. For some it might be the Tarot for some others might be butts, but spiritual items are available all shapes and sizes, no pun intended. It's mastery that should worry us. Psychic mastery is actually a discipline like everything else and any person looking for psychic tips must want someone that has mastered their present into a certain diploma so that you can support some others with it.
I've identified through quite a few several years of applying psychics, clairvoyants, and so on. that some can see specified styles of factors but may not be ready to assist you in the slightest degree with what it's that worries you. For example, you get in touch with someone that statements for being clairvoyant and you simply want to know no matter whether or not you might have a reconciliation with the lover and she sees that you've got a completely new puppy and that you are donning a yellow scarf and you also are blown absent by this info. Wow, extraordinary. That may be a present for sure–to have the ability to try this and find out that without the need of viewing or figuring out the individual. Lots of every day folks have psychic items but that doesn't necessarily make them able to aiding you having a serious problem in the lifetime that requires specialised assist or somebody that is knowledgeable and experienced and competent of their craft at receiving you serious psychic answers channeled from Higher Consciousness.
Now regardless that that individual clairvoyant was capable to find out that which you were wearing which you had a new puppy won't indicate that they can see evidently and profoundly the answers you seek. Their potential may not be a match for your considerations. I've observed that men and women who're stunned by just little, little issues like that have a tendency to believe that everything that clairvoyant says when in point of fact their gift is a gift of seeing "You" bodily and what is in the actual physical environment, and that is an outstanding expertise referred to as distant viewing BUT will not be a ability match in your reconciliation dilemma or your career dilemma. It can be value acquiring as being a methodology for specific kinds of readings. Although the tendency to "believe" almost everything from that time on is incredibly robust due to the fact to an inexperienced seeker of psychic advice, this really is astounding adequate to bring about you to definitely make the erroneous willpower that this particular person can see "everything". And that isn't the case several occasions around. So all of this will be to say, inquire the psychic chances are you'll be contacting or making contact with to spell out exactly what their skills is and you simply make the willpower this psychic could be the 1 for you personally.
If a psychic is empathic, they're able to "feel" another's feelings/emotions. If a psychic is telepathic, they can know another's thoughts. If a psychic is clairvoyant they're able to begin to see the earlier, the present along with the foreseeable future as a result of visions. If a psychic is clairaudient, they receive/hear facts even appears in their intellect. If a psychic is clairsentient, they will truly seize info by physical sensations involved along with you or perhaps a individual you happen to be inquiring about. Bear in mind which the ability volume of each individual practitioner will fluctuate which is another bit of data you would like to inquire about. Exactly how much encounter have they got?


text:
Hankey Marks & Crider > Blog > Personal Injury > Potentially flawed Tesla vehicle charging adapters recalled in the US
Airplane Accidents
Drugs and Medical Devices
Hankey Law Office
Written by Charles D. Hankey
Written by James DuBach
Written by Kirsten Wold
Written by Melissa A. Davidson
Written by Sondra Burger
Written by Stacy J. Crider
Potentially flawed Tesla vehicle charging adapters recalled in the US
Approximately 7,000 Tesla adapters used for charging electric vehicles are being recalled in the U.S. due to a flaw that could result in injuries or property damage, a December 6 article of Bloomberg Technology reported.
Tesla Motors Inc. reportedly issued the voluntary recall after receiving two complaints that the adapters melted after emitting excessive heat. The recall affects the charging adapters that were sold in the U.S. that could be purchased on Tesla's online store. After receiving the overheating complaint, Tesla also recalled three other types of charging adapters with a similar design. Affected owners were advised not to use the faulty adapters and to expect a replacement after approximately three months.
Hankey Marks & Crider in Indiana represents people who have been injured as a result of using potentially dangerous vehicles. If you think were the victim of a dangerous product, we could help you file a legal claim against negligent parties. Call us today at (317) 634-8565 to find out how we may help you recover your loss.
Last Updated : November 5, 2021

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Bob's Red Mill has three new coupons out now. These deals are all PDF printable coupons. Do not miss out on your chance to save today on these items at a store near you.
Bob's Red Mill Coupon There is a new Bob's Red Mill Coupon available to print today. The coupon is for $1 off any (1) single Bob's Red Mill Product with no size restrictions.
Find current Bobs Red Mill coupons and Bobs Red Mill deals here! Listed below are all the current Bobs Red Mill printable coupons and other Bobs Red Mill coupons!
Get (4) rare Bob's Red Mill Coupons when you sign up for the October Unprocessed Challenge.
Wow, here are some really HOT, rare coupons up for grabs for Bob's Red Mill products! I'm really excited about these as Bob's Red Mill coupons are very hard to come by.
Use any of the great Bob's Red Mill coupons offered on ShopAtHome.com to maximize your savings and your Bob's Red Mill shopping experience! Bobs Red Mill.
save 35% Off at Bob's red mill with Bob's red mill coupons, vouchers and deals for a limited time. Today's top Bob's red mill coupon codes, Up to 35% Off!
Discounts average $1 off with a Bob's Red Mill promo code or coupon. 13 Bob's Red Mill coupons now on RetailMeNot.
Bob's red mill coupons are tested in May 2018.☆ PromosDaddy only shows you valid Bob's red mill discount codes.
Get Extra Percentage off with bobsredmill.com Coupon Codes June 2018. Check out all the latest Bob's red mill Coupons and Apply them for instantly Savings.
Bob's Red Mill has a new deal out now. Hopster has a new coupon for $1 off your purchase of one item. This deal is found at the link below. Grab it now for use at your favorite store.
There's a great new printable coupon from Bob's Red Mill this evening. Grab some prints of this nice coupon while you can. Some of their products aren't that expensive.


Welcome to my first ever Buy it or Boo it!
The newest palette from Coastal Scents is the Revealed 2 palette. I've heard this was a dupe for Urban Decay Naked 3, but I don't own one to compare it to. However, I can still give you my opinion.
First off let me say it was very hard to swatch these! The pigment isn't that great, they kept flaking off and there was terrible fall out! Below are pictures the best I could do. I thought they looked truest to color in natural lighting so that is what I used - no photoshop, no artificial light - just the REAL SWATCHES!
As you can see, these are very light. The matte shades barely show up! The satin/shimmer ones did show up a bit better and they are buildable. Like I said, I had a very hard time swatching these to show up!
I did these separately because they are my favorite 4 colors in this entire palette - although they do crumble and have fall out. I am partial to shimmery shades so I might be a bit biased, however the last 2 are dupes to several Urban Decay shadows.
Here is the bottom row and the majority are the shimmery type with one being more glitter (the dark purple, although appears more black when actually swatched, 2nd before last one). They showed up better than most of the ones on top. Again the matte shadows had to be built up several times to appear as they do. A ton of fall out especially from the glittery one which was awful!
The verdict - buy it or boo it? BOO IT!
There are so many affordable neutral palettes out there where you get more bang for your buck! This is normally priced for $19.95. I purchased it on the release day so only spent $9.95. If you did want this palette (why, oh why?) then I'd wait until it was on sale again which happens all the time!
Disclosure: I purchased this item with my own money. All opinions are 100% my own. I am not sponsored nor am I being paid for this review.
Wow, what great shades! I would love to own this!
Thank you for posting swatches. Your review is very helpful to me.
Ooo...very pretty! Great review; helpful!
You did a great job showing us their true colors. I love most of the shades!
I absolutely love the gorgeous earthly tons, really a beautiful pallet!
Pretty colors! My daughter loves eyeshadow pallets, I've never heard of this brand.
All the/colors are pretty, but I would not buy it . they need to do better with their pducts before I would buy it.


Aaron Adams is one of the leading authorities on bonefish science. He works for the Bonefish and Tarpon Trust, one of the organizations out there at the forefront of research on bonefish. Even better, Aaron's an angler himself, and that means he's written some great science pieces that can also help you catch fish!


Synthetic biology has been referred to as "extreme genetic engineering." A collection of emerging techniques, it includes programing and writing DNA in new ways to create novel, self-replicating organisms.
Stretches of human-made DNA may be ordered through the internet from genetic "foundries" and a "Registry of Standard Biological Parts." Upon arrival, they may be mixed and matched. In this manner, forms of life are created from genetic segments not previously in existence. The new living entitles are referred to as biological "devices," "systems," or "machines."
The International Genetically Engineered Machine (IGEM) Competition sponsors "jamborees" where teams of students who have genetically designed and created biological entities ("machines") may compete for prizes.
Synthetic biology is inadequately regulated.
How do you feel about teenagers genetically engineering biological organisms?
Do you think that synthetic biology requires greater public awareness and control?
"Genetic engineering is passé. Today, scientists aren't just mapping genomes and manipulating genes, they're building life from scratch - and they're doing it in the absence of societal debate and regulatory oversight. Dubbed "genetic engineering on steroids,"the social, environmental and bio-weapons threats of synthetic biology surpass the possible dangers and abuses of biotech. Synbio is inspired by the convergence of nanoscale biology, computing and engineering. Using a laptop computer, published gene sequence information and mail-order synthetic DNA, just about anyone has the potential to construct genes or entire genomes from scratch (including those of lethal pathogens)."
Friends of the Earth, "Synthetic Biology 101"
Thomas offers an eloquent, incisive account of important social aspects of synthetic biology. A "must see"
AHB QUERY: Do you think that the Precautionary Principle should be a part of the framing of discussions concerning synthetic biology? Why/why not?
AHB QUERY: What role do you think biotech patenting plays in driving the search for synthetic biology applications?
AHB QUERY: Presently, there is little public discussion of human applications of synthetic biology. Should it be discussed?
Princeton University biologist Lee Silver's views on human genetic engineering more generally, below, may be relevant to such consideration. How would the Precautionary Principle apply to what Professor Silver seems to be advocating?


BLUE ISLAND, Ill. (CBS) — A person was struck and killed by a Metra train in south suburban Blue Island early Monday.
The pedestrian was struck near the overpass over Interstate 57, on the border between Calumet Park and Blue Island, CBS 2's Kris Habermehl reports.
Train No. 202 on the Metra Electric District Blue Island service line was stopped about 5:45 a.m., near 124th Street and Ashland Avenue, according to Metra spokesman Tom Miller. The train was on the move again about 6:35 a.m. following a 53-minute delay.
The Cook County Medical Examiner's office confirmed a person was killed near the 124th Street address, but did not release any information about the person's age or gender.


home > products > crushing and grinding in cement industry crushing and grinding in cement industry. 100 tonne per hour iron ore mobile crushing plant for iron .
crushing stone crusher used in cement industry view all cement and crusher coal briquette in cement plant stone crusher quarry raw mill in cement .
cement plant equipment cement process cement production line. cement equipment manufacturer scm supplies cement plant machines:stone crusher, cement mill, ball mill for cement processing in cement grinding plant. get price; crushers process in cement. cement production process,cement manufacturing process . cement production process.
cement plant services. 2 index cement industry . the crusher installation has therefore become an important part of the cement production line .
details of cement industry,newest crusher, details of cement industry. crusher harga cement crusher plant, cement crushers, cement rock quarry .
cement crusher used for crushing limestone, bauxite, gypsum, coal cement crusher is the important cement manufacturing machine used in cement production line. types of cement crushers are used in cement grinding plant.


text:
'use strict';

/* global bootstrapModeler, inject */

var find = require('lodash/collection/find');

var modelingModule = require('../../../../lib/features/modeling'),
    coreModule = require('../../../../lib/core');

describe('features/modeling - append shape', function() {

  var diagramXML = require('../../../fixtures/bpmn/simple.bpmn');

  var testModules = [ coreModule, modelingModule ];
  beforeEach(bootstrapModeler(diagramXML, { modules: testModules }));

  describe('shape handling', function() {

    it('should execute', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling) {
      // given
      var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1');

      // when
      var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:Task' }),
          target = targetShape.businessObject;

      // then
      expect(targetShape).to.exist;
      expect(target.$instanceOf('bpmn:Task')).to.be.true;
    }));

    it('should create DI', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling) {

      // given
      var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1');

      var startEvent = startEventShape.businessObject;

      // when
      var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:Task' }),
          target = targetShape.businessObject;

      // then
      expect(target.di).to.exist;
      expect(target.di.$parent).to.eql(startEvent.di.$parent);

      expect(target.di).to.have.bounds(targetShape);
    }));

    it('should add to parent (sub process)', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling) {

      // given
      var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1');
      var subProcessShape = elementRegistry.get('SubProcess_1');

      var subProcess = subProcessShape.businessObject;

      // when
      var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:Task' }),
          target = targetShape.businessObject;

      // then
      expect(subProcess.get('flowElements')).to.include(target);
    }));

    it('should add connection', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling) {

      // given
      var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1');
      var subProcessShape = elementRegistry.get('SubProcess_1');

      var startEvent = startEventShape.businessObject,
          subProcess = subProcessShape.businessObject;

      // when
      var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:Task' }),
          target = targetShape.businessObject;

      var connection = find(subProcess.get('flowElements'), function(e) {
        return e.sourceRef === startEvent && e.targetRef === target;
      });

      // then
      expect(connection).to.exist;
      expect(connection.$instanceOf('bpmn:SequenceFlow')).to.be.true;
    }));

  });

  describe('undo support', function() {

    it('should undo add to parent', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling, commandStack) {

      // given
      var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1'),
          subProcessShape = elementRegistry.get('SubProcess_1');

      var subProcess = subProcessShape.businessObject;

      var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:Task' }),
          target = targetShape.businessObject;

      // when
      commandStack.undo();

      // then
      expect(subProcess.get('flowElements')).not.to.include(target);
      expect(subProcess.di.$parent.get('planeElement')).not.to.include(target.di);
    }));

    it('should undo add shape label', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling, commandStack) {

      // given
      var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1'),
          subProcessShape = elementRegistry.get('SubProcess_1');

      var startEvent = startEventShape.businessObject,
          subProcess = subProcessShape.businessObject;

      var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:EndEvent' }),
          target = targetShape.businessObject;

      var connection = find(subProcess.get('flowElements'), function(e) {
        return e.sourceRef === startEvent && e.targetRef === target;
      });

      // when
      commandStack.undo();

      // then
      expect(connection.sourceRef).to.be.null;
      expect(connection.targetRef).to.be.null;
      expect(connection.$parent).to.be.null;
      expect(subProcess.di.$parent.get('planeElement')).not.to.include(connection.di);

      expect(targetShape.label).not.to.exist;
      expect(elementRegistry.get(target.id + '_label')).not.to.exist;
    }));

    it('should undo add connection', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling, commandStack) {

      // given
      var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1');
      var subProcessShape = elementRegistry.get('SubProcess_1');

      var startEvent = startEventShape.businessObject,
          subProcess = subProcessShape.businessObject;

      var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:Task' }),
          target = targetShape.businessObject;

      var connection = find(subProcess.get('flowElements'), function(e) {
        return e.sourceRef === startEvent && e.targetRef === target;
      });

      // when
      commandStack.undo();

      // then
      expect(connection.sourceRef).to.be.null;
      expect(connection.targetRef).to.be.null;

      expect(startEvent.get('outgoing')).not.to.include(connection);
      expect(target.get('incoming')).not.to.include(connection);

      expect(connection.$parent).to.be.null;
      expect(subProcess.di.$parent.get('planeElement')).not.to.include(connection.di);

      expect(elementRegistry.get(targetShape.id)).not.to.exist;
    }));

    it('should undo add connection label', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling, commandStack) {

      // given
      var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1');
      var subProcessShape = elementRegistry.get('SubProcess_1');

      var startEvent = startEventShape.businessObject,
          subProcess = subProcessShape.businessObject;

      var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:Task' }),
          target = targetShape.businessObject;

      var connection = find(subProcess.get('flowElements'), function(e) {
        return e.sourceRef === startEvent && e.targetRef === target;
      });

      // when
      commandStack.undo();

      // then
      expect(connection.sourceRef).to.be.null;
      expect(connection.targetRef).to.be.null;
      expect(connection.$parent).to.be.null;
      expect(subProcess.di.$parent.get('planeElement')).not.to.include(connection.di);

      expect(elementRegistry.get(connection.id + '_label')).not.to.exist;
    }));

    it('should redo appending multiple shapes', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling, commandStack) {

      // given
      var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1');
      var subProcessShape = elementRegistry.get('SubProcess_1');

      var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:Task' });

      var targetShape2 = modeling.appendShape(targetShape, { type: 'bpmn:UserTask' });

      // when
      commandStack.undo();
      commandStack.undo();
      commandStack.redo();
      commandStack.redo();

      // then
      // expect redo to work on original target object
      expect(targetShape.parent).to.eql(subProcessShape);

      // when
      commandStack.undo();
      commandStack.undo();

      // then
      expect(targetShape2.parent).to.be.null;
      expect(elementRegistry.get(targetShape2.id)).not.to.exist;
    }));

    it('should redo add connection', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling, commandStack) {

      // given
      var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1');
      var subProcessShape = elementRegistry.get('SubProcess_1');

      var startEvent = startEventShape.businessObject,
          subProcess = subProcessShape.businessObject;

      var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:Task' }),
          target = targetShape.businessObject;

      var connection = find(subProcess.get('flowElements'), function(e) {
        return e.sourceRef === startEvent && e.targetRef === target;
      });

      // when
      commandStack.undo();
      commandStack.redo();
      commandStack.undo();

      // then
      expect(connection.sourceRef).to.be.null;
      expect(connection.targetRef).to.be.null;
      expect(connection.$parent).to.be.null;

      expect(subProcess.di.$parent.get('planeElement')).not.to.include(connection.di);
    }));

  });

  describe('bpmn element support', function() {

    describe('ExclusiveGateway', function() {

      it('should append', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling) {

        // given
        var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1');

        // when
        var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:ExclusiveGateway' }),
            target = targetShape.businessObject;

        // then
        expect(targetShape).to.exist;
        expect(target.$instanceOf('bpmn:ExclusiveGateway')).to.be.true;
      }));

      it('should add to parent (sub process)', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling) {

        // given
        var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1');
        var subProcessShape = elementRegistry.get('SubProcess_1');

        var subProcess = subProcessShape.businessObject;

        // when
        var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:ExclusiveGateway' }),
            target = targetShape.businessObject;

        // then
        expect(subProcess.get('flowElements')).to.include(target);
      }));

      it('should undo append', inject(function(elementRegistry, modeling, commandStack) {

        // given
        var startEventShape = elementRegistry.get('StartEvent_1');
        var subProcessShape = elementRegistry.get('SubProcess_1');

        var subProcess = subProcessShape.businessObject;

        var targetShape = modeling.appendShape(startEventShape, { type: 'bpmn:ExclusiveGateway' }),
            target = targetShape.businessObject;

        // when
        commandStack.undo();

        // then
        expect(subProcess.get('flowElements')).not.to.include(target);
        expect(subProcess.di.$parent.get('planeElement')).not.to.include(target.di);
      }));

    });

  });

});

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


Heavenly Care is actively hiring caregivers in your area, to provide concierge services to residents of a upscale independent living facility in Cedar Park.
You will be assisting residents with companionship and personal assistance services.
Three shifts available 7 to 3, 3 to 11 and 11 to 7.


解析対象期間: 2002年11月23日(土) 08時03分 〜 2002年11月23日(土) 23時32分 (0.65 日).
Copyright (C) 2002 Tc-x communications. All rights reserved.
368 名前:nobodyさん sage 03/08/05 (火) 22:28 ID:???
your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.


text:
Warren, Sanders, O'Rourke and Castro set for Milwaukee forum
MILWAUKEECopyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
MILWAUKEE (AP) — Democratic presidential candidates Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Beto O'Rourke and Julian Castro are participating in a town hall in Milwaukee sponsored by the Hispanic civil rights organization LULAC.
Each candidate will be onstage for 20 minutes Thursday evening. Immigration is expected to be a prominent topic.
The candidates' appearance early in the campaign cycle highlights Wisconsin as a key toss-up state that Democrats want to reclaim. President Donald Trump's victory in Wisconsin in 2016 marked the first time since 1984 that Republicans won the state in a presidential election. Hillary Clinton did not visit Wisconsin once as a general election candidate.
LULAC spokesman David Cruz says every candidate was invited months ago. Cruz says of those who responded, the field was narrowed down to candidates who resonated most with LULAC members.
General news, Donald Trump, Government and politics, United States Presidential Election, Presidential elections, 2016 United States Presidential Election, Campaigns, National elections, Elections, Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Human rights and civil liberties, Social issues, Social affairs, Hispanics, United States General Election, General elections, Political conventions, Julian Castro, Municipal elections, Local elections, Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Beto O'Rourke, 2020 United States presidential election


text:
Q: What are the best practises for using character references in a HTML document? It may seem like a subjective question but all I'm looking for is some hard and fast rules for when to use and when not to use HTML character references, particularly given the charset:
<meta http-equiv="content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />

I'm picking up development on a company website from where someone else left off, and it seems like the previous developer encoded everything other than A-Z and 0-9 as HTML character references. For example every comma has been encoded as , and I'm not sure if this is a good thing.
Specifically is the following bad in terms of SEO?
<meta name='keywords' content='eriks industrial services, industrial products, industrial services, eriks, uk, european, leader, european leader, eriks, power transmission, power, bearings'/>

And specifically what characters must always be encoded as character references?
And for the sake of consistency is it better to avoid &name; and use &#DD; wherever possible?

A: Character references should be used when document creating/editing software, the data storage or a transport channel cannot store Unicode data or preserve the byte stream it is encoded to.
Practically this could mean that work needs to be done with legacy applications or with legacy configuration or with legacy transport protocols. In such cases it is possible that some part of the toolchain supports only 8-bit encodings or even ASCII only. Storing Unicode characters as such is not possible in such cases so reverting to character references on all but ASCII characters could be useful then, because that way you can avoid nasty encoding conversion problems that might appear when switching from 8-bit encodings to Unicode. Using named entities instead of character references is marginally more readable, but it unnecessarily complicates XML compatibility or migrating to XML, because using entities requires the presence of a DOCTYPE declaration or embedded DTD. This does not apply to <, &, ", &apos' and > which are pre-defined in XML.
If you are working with a modern environment, using Unicode characters as such is generally preferred because often (the textual) data can be used without parsing/interpretation (e.g. direct searches from the text), it is easier and it will probably lead to more readable and thus more easily maintainable code.
The characters you must encode are < and & and also " and ' when they appear in an attribute value and the same character is used as an attribute value delimiter. In theory you should also escape > when it appears as a part of a ]]> string that is not meant to end a CDATA section, but this is only for SGML compatibility and therefore not generally needed. These characters should be escaped using entities instead of character references. The need of escaping & applies also to URL values in <a href="..."> which unfortunately is commonly forgotten.

A: As for me encoding characters means that the page will be more accessible e.i. more browsers will display it correctly ext…
I'm lazy and usually enter the unicode chars (like √, ∞, æ) as they are if I need it, and mostly it works ok.
You can encounter problems if
1) this data can't be stored
2) can't be transferred
3) can't be displayed

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
My Love, Don't Cross that River
Directed by Jin Moyoung
Documentary, Asian, Romance
$19.95 $14.98 Members
$29.95 $14.98 Non-Members
A blockbuster in its native Korea, where it would go on to become the country's most successful film of all time, MY LOVE, DON'T CROSS THAT RIVER presents an unforgettable story of true love that transcends both generations and cultures. "100-year old lovebirds," Jo Byeong-man and Kang Kye-yeol, have been inseparable companions for 76 years. Observing this fragile couple for 15 months, director Moyoung Jin acts as a fly-on-the-wall, capturing the tender moments of their twilight days - as the two face the inevitable reality that their time together will soon be approaching an end.
Jo Byeong-man
Kang Kye-yeol
Deleted Scenes\n\nBonus short: Ed & Pauline, directed by Christian Bruno and Natalija Vekic
Sound: Stereo 2.0 and 5.1 Surround Sound
"...gentle, elegant and genuinely moving...MY LOVE, DON'T CROSS THAT RIVER is a wonderful documentary that tells a story of [undying] love."
Hugo Ozman, Twitch Film Sydney
"Go and see MY LOVE, DON'T CROSS THAT RIVER: if, by its ending, it hasn't moved you to your core, you have an invulnerable heart."
Andrew Blackie, Film Ink Australia
"CRITIC'S PICK. Many of the passages in this gentle film may be universal, but the love here is extraordinary."
Andy Webster, The New York Times
"Serving as a gentle reminder that enduring love is still possible, My Love, Don't Cross That River is practically the cinematic equivalent of marriage counseling."
Frank Scheck , The Hollywood Reporter
"The potent mix of joy and sorrow presented simply in the documentary "My Love, Don't Cross That River" is enormously affecting, devastating in fact."
Katie Walsh, Los Angeles Times
Best Documentary
Los Angeles Film Festival
Audience Award
Visions du Réel, Nyon
Special Jury Award
Millenium Int'l Documentary Film Festival
Baek Sang Art Awards
DocAviv Film Festival
Hotel Salvation
Faced with his father's bizarre demand to go and die in the holy city of Varanasi and attain Salvati...
They Say Nothing Stays the Same
A poor ferryman's life takes a turn when he unexpectedly meets a girl.
Frau Stern
With a wonderful performance from the late Ahuva Sommerfeld, Frau Stern is a sad yet funny meditatio...
Leaps of Faiths
Love tests faith. Faith tests love. Interfaith marriage - how does that work?


Munich flights from AU$1525 to AU$1599*. Enter your departure and dates for Munich flights and air fare deals.
Click on a departure city / airport below for more cheap flights to Munich , Germany.
Compare one way and return cheap flights to Munich, Germany on all major airlines - Qantas, Emirates, Jetstar.
We compare flights on a range of travel agents, airlines and websites. Book cheap Munich flights from Australia - oneway, return, economy class, business class and first class flights.
Germany's Munich is a popular city getaway, known for its interesting culture, stunning architecture, and the annual lively beer festival of Oktoberfest.
It is a top German city for the arts, with many splendid galleries across the city where you can see ancient, classical, and contemporary works. There are also numerous museums. Some of the best include the City Museum of Munich, Lenbach Haus, Glyptothek, and Pinakotheken.
There are several attractions dedicated to great classical musicians and composers. The National Theatre is home to the Bavarian State Opera and the Bavarian State Orchestra. Another top spot is the Residenz Theatre. The Bavarian Theatre Academy is based at the Prinzregententheater. The Gartnerplatz Theatre shows many ballets and musicals.
The famous Bayern Munich FC hails from the city.
There are four grand royal streets, lined with incredible buildings, in the heart of the city. They are Briennerstrasse, Ludwigstrasse, Maximilianstrasse, and Prinzregentenstrasse.
Palaces and castles feature highly on sightseeing itineraries, with the Baroque Schloss Nymphenburgand Residenz being particular favourites. There are numerous beautiful churches in Munich; Frauenkirche is a major city sight, with two enormous towers, the curious Devil's Footstep, and a gorgeous interior.
Some other top sights include the old and new Town Halls, Maximilianeum, the world famous Hofbrauhaus beer hall, the Siegestor arch, and the fine Statue of Bavaria.
The city offers fine dining, an eclectic night scene, a beer hall atmosphere, and more. There are numerous eating and drinking establishments all across Munich.
Munich International Airport is a major airport in the country. It serves various domestic and international destinations. Munich Central Station is located in the heart of the city and trains connect Munich to the rest of Germany, with high speed services available to Paris and Strasbourg. There are also night services to other European destinations. The German autobahn provides excellent road links; buses are widely available and driving is possible. Within Munich there is an excellent public transport system.
Browse our Munich Holidays or the Munich Airport guides for further details and hot travel tips. Country travel information is available at our Germany Holidays guide.


text:
QUOCS and Part 36
The post below is the text of a lecture delivered to the Association of Costs Lawyers Conference on 9th May 2014.
1.The introduction of the Jackson reforms on 1st April 2013, saw as one of the "big ticket" changes, the abolition of the recovery of After the Event (ATE) insurance premiums, and the introduction of a new procedure to provide, meritorious but wrong claimants in personal injury claims with protection from adverse costs, a scheme called Qualified One Way Costs Shifting (QUOCS).
2.It should be noted, that it is still possible, indeed still the norm, for claimants to incept ATE insurance policies as part of the funding package, but the utility of such a policy is greatly reduced. It acts now, to insure against part 36 risks, as we shall see, and to insure against the non-recovery of disbursements. As most solicitors in this context, will be funding a client's disbursements on credit, as a case progresses, in practical terms it functions as re-insurance for a solicitor against the credit risks posed by a client.
3.Indeed, one of the issues, that might arise, in the not too distant future, is a surge in professional indemnity claims against solicitors, arising from two mis-selling scandals waiting to happen: solicitor-own client success fees, and advice to incept unnecessary insurance ATE insurance policies.
4.Both could easily occur, in context where there is pre-existing BTE, and the latter in circumstances, where there is a failure to weigh up the risks of proceeding with/without ATE insurance.
5. The purpose of this paper is to consider how the QUOCS scheme works, is working and how it is going to continue to develop over the next year.
The Jackson Report
6. The starting point then is to consider what Jackson LJ had to say about Qualified One Way Costs Shifting in his Final Report:
1.2 Important features of personal injuries litigation. There are two important features of personal injuries litigation. First and self-evidently, the claimant is an individual. For the vast majority of individuals it would be prohibitively expensive to meet an adverse costs order in fully-contested litigation. The most recent Social Trends report shows that 73% of all households have savings (made up of securities, shares, currency and deposits) of less than £10,000. Defence costs can easily be many times higher than £10,000 in fully-contested litigation. This would mean that for three quarters of households their other financial assets (their own home in most cases) would be at risk from an adverse costs order. Secondly, the defendant is almost invariably either insured or self-insured. By "self-insured", I mean that the defendant is a large organisation which has adopted the policy of paying out on personal injury claims as and when they arise, rather than paying substantial liability insurance premiums every year.
1.3 Factors pointing towards one way costs shifting. The factors which make one way costs shifting a serious candidate for consideration in relation to personal injuries litigation are the following:
(i) Claimants are successful in the majority of personal injury claims. Defendants seldom recover costs, so they derive little benefit from two way costs shifting.
(ii) Personal injuries litigation is the paradigm instance of litigation in which the parties are in an asymmetric relationship, as discussed in chapter 9 above.
(iii) The principal objective of recoverable ATE insurance premiums is to protect claimants against adverse costs orders. One way costs shifting would be a less expensive method of achieving the same objective.
(iv) One way costs shifting is not a novel concept in personal injuries litigation. Between 1949 and 2000, the vast majority of personal injury claims proceeded under a one way costs shifting regime, namely the legal aid shield.
4.1 In my view, the regime of recoverable ATE insurance premiums is indefensible for the reasons set out in chapters 9 and 10 above. On the other hand, most claimants in personal injury cases have for many years enjoyed qualified protection against liability for adverse costs and there are sound policy reasons to continue such protection. The only practicable way that I can see to achieve this result is by qualified one way costs shifting.
4.2 Despite the arguments of the MDU, the ABI and others, I do not regard it as practicable to introduce one way costs shifting for limited categories of personal injury cases, such as low value cases or CFA cases. Either one way costs shifting is introduced across the board for personal injury cases or, alternatively, two way costs shifting remains the rule, except for those protected by the legal aid "shield". Given that stark choice, I favour introducing qualified one way costs shifting for all personal injury cases.
7. Thus the stated justification for the introduction of QUOCS in the Jackson report, is that claimants need to be protected from adverse costs, and in a way that is less expensive, than the scheme established by the Access to Justice Act 1999, with its provision for ATE premiums, which by and large, do not benefit liability insurers, when considered across the industry as a whole.
8. It is also important to note the reference to asymmetric litigation: because personal injury litigation is only one area, of legal practice, where such asymmetry applies: judicial review, environmental claims falling within the scope of the Aarhus Convention, defamation, privacy, are all other areas where such asymmetry is likely to be present.
9.It should also be noted, that Jackson LJ is focusing on the mean, the average, and making no allowance for what might be termed the Naomi Campbell factor: the courts, like the Savoy Hotel, are open to all, but an accident or clinical negligence might happen to anyone, rich or poor. This is significant, because, the scheme of costs shifting which applied under the legal aid legislation, did so distinguish: by definition, only those practically devoid of assets or income, would qualify to obtain legal aid, as it was means tested, thus by default only providing costs protection to the very poor, who it could be said, might need it least, given the practical limitations on enforcing any costs award.
11.These factors were apparent, as part of the backdrop, from the discussion in the Final Report, on the operation of the legal aid provisions in practice.
4.3 The legal aid shield. Section 11(1) of the Access to Justice Act 1999 (the "1999 Act") provides:
"Except in prescribed circumstances, costs ordered against an individual in relation to any proceedings or part of proceedings funded for him shall not exceed the amount (if any) which is a reasonable one for him to pay having regard to all the circumstances including:
(a) the financial resources of all the parties to the proceedings, and
(b) their conduct in connection with the dispute to which the proceedings relate…"
It can be seen that this protection against costs liability is qualified protection, rather than total protection.
4.4 How the legal aid shield works in practice. Section 11 of the 1999 Act is supplemented by the Costs Regulations, the Cost Protection Regulations and sections 21 to 23 of the Costs Practice Direction. The effect of these provisions is that the judge making a costs order against a legally aided party may specify the amount to be paid or may direct that the amount be determined at a separate assessment. Before that separate assessment, the legally aided party files and serves a statement of resources. Whilst on its face section 11 of the 1999 Act appears to give the court a wide discretion to order costs to be paid, in practice the section operates as something very close to complete immunity from costs liability. It is not hard to see why this is the case. Pursuing an order will involve the receiving party in significant costs and the prospects of making any significant recovery, when the paying party is by definition of very limited means, are low. Although no official figures exist my understanding, confirmed by discussion with my assessors, is that it is rare indeed for a successful opponent even to attempt recovery against a legally aided party.
4.5 The necessary elements of a one way costs shifting regime. A one way costs shifting regime for personal injuries litigation (including clinical negligence) needs to have the following elements:
(i) Deterrence against bringing frivolous claims or applications.
(ii) Incentives for claimants to accept reasonable offers.
4.6 Deterrence against frivolous claims or applications. The claimant must be at risk of some adverse costs, in order to deter (a) frivolous claims and (b) frivolous applications in the course of otherwise reasonable litigation. In my view, the best formula is that contained in section 11(1) of the 1999 Act. This provides a proper degree of protection against adverse costs without eliminating all personal risk. It is a formula which is tried and tested, having been included in all legal aid legislation since the original Legal Aid and Advice Act 1949.23
4.7 Proposed rule. I therefore propose that all claimants in personal injury cases, whether or not legally aided, be given a broadly similar degree of protection against adverse costs. In order to achieve this result I propose that a provision along the following lines be added to the CPR:
"Costs ordered against the claimant in any claim for personal injuries or clinical negligence shall not exceed the amount (if any) which is a reasonable one for him to pay having regard to all the circumstances including:
(b) their conduct in connection with the dispute to which the proceedings relate."
If this proposal is adopted, there will have to be consequential provisions of the kind that currently exist to enable section 11(1) of the 1999 Act to be operated. The details of these consequential provisions will be a matter for the Civil Procedure Rule Committee.
12. The key point to note is that this is not in fact, the rule that has been formulated! Instead of the more nuanced approach, advocated by Jackson LJ, a far broader, some may say cruder, rule has been formulated. In particular, the Naomi Campbell factor has survived into the scope of qualified one way costs shifting: it is available to anyone, be they ever so wealthy, or the defendant ever so poor.
13. One can see the benefits to such an inclusionary provision: it removes the transactional costs of asking a judge to form a view in individual cases, as to how much if anything, an unsuccessful claimant should pay. It should cut down the scope of satellite litigation, by its very inflexibility.
14. Equally, however, one can see little basis, for including very wealthy litigants within its scope, or more prosaically, those who have the benefit of BTE insurance and thus have already prudently insured against the risk of adverse costs in litigation, should they be unfortunate enough to become embroiled in it.
4.8 I do not think it should be necessary in most cases to require a detailed enforcement procedure to determine liability under this provision. In the great majority of cases it should be determined at the conclusion of the case whether an order should be made and, if so, the amount should be determined summarily. Furthermore the making of a costs order will be the exception, rather than the rule. Nevertheless, the formula suggested above will enable the court to make a costs order in three specific situations where such an order would be appropriate: (a) where the claimant has behaved unreasonably (e.g. bringing a frivolous or fraudulent claim); (b) where the defendant is neither insured nor a large organisation which is self- insured; or (c) where the claimant is conspicuously wealthy.
4.9 Consistency with overriding objective. The new rule suggested above would be consistent with the overriding objective. CPR rule 1.1(2) provides:
"Dealing with a case justly includes, so far as is practicable – (a) ensuring that the parties are on an equal footing…
(c) dealing with the case in ways which are proportionate…
(iv) to the financial position of each party…"
Parr v Smith
15. In order to complete the picture of how the Legal Aid costs shifting shield operated, it is important to note that it was never a complete shield, and indeed led to the common practice of the making of a "Pools" order: what would doubtless be termed a "Lottery" Order today. The case of Parr.v.Smith [1995] 2 All ER 1031 illustrated how this worked:
The judge in this case ordered that the unsuccessful defendants, who were legally aided for part of the time, should pay the plaintiffs' costs,
"such costs not to be enforced without leave of the court."
An order in those terms is very frequently made, both at first instance and in the civil division of the Court of Appeal. I cannot speak for other courts, but in this court there is in the ordinary way little if any enquiry into the means of the unsuccessful party before such an order is made. Perhaps it is thought that the successful party would press for an enquiry if there was any prospect of discovering assets. The problem is whether such an order is within either or both of Regulations 129 and 130 . Regulation 129(b) provides that the court may direct, where the court thinks it reasonable that no payment should be made immediately or that the assisted person should have no liability for payment, that payment under the order for costs be suspended either until such date as the court may determine or indefinitely.
Like the Master of the Rolls, I consider that the court is exercising (or purporting to exercise) this power when it makes an order for costs which is not to be enforced without leave of the court.
However, I also consider that Regulation 130 applies to such an order. It follows that leave to enforce the order cannot be given (i) after 6 years have elapsed, or (ii) unless there is either new information which could not have been obtained by reasonable diligence at the time when the order was made, or a change in the assisted person's circumstances since that date.
There are thus significant limitations on the usual form of order, that the assisted person shall pay the costs not to be enforced without leave of the court. Those limitations may not be fully appreciated by those who apply for such orders or those who make them. As I have said, little or no diligence is commonly used to assess the assisted person's financial situation when the order is made. It is assumed that his means are negligible, or small.
There may be a method of avoiding that result. Regulation 127 provides that the court may postpone the determination of the amount of an assisted person's liability for costs, for such time as the court thinks fit. There would not then have been a "determination", which Regulation 130 treats as final after six years or unless one of the conditions for review is satisfied.
If that be right, successful litigants may prefer an order for costs in their favour with the determination of the assisted person's liability postponed, to an order for costs not to be enforced without leave of the court.
16. So the "shield" provided by Legal Aid, was not complete: it could be pierced and frequently was, with amounts equivalent to the Legal Aid contributions that a person would have to pay during the currency of the case, being ordered to be paid to the successful defendant. And if the financial circumstances of the claimant changed (it could be you etc), then that too, could prompt a payment of the defendant's costs. The point that I would make is that the Legal Aid shield, was far more nuanced and dependent on the financial circumstances of the parties.
Lockley v National Blood Transfusion Service
17. The final case, that I would note is that of Lockley.v.National Blood Transfusion Service [1992] 1 WLR 492 which dealt with the ability of a defendant, to set off costs awarded in its favour in interlocutory matters against costs or damages it was ordered to pay the ultimately successful claimant at the conclusion of the case. Scott LJ suggested that the applicable principles are as follows:
In my judgment, the following propositions can be stated.
(1) A direction for the set-off of costs against damages or costs to which a legally aided person has become or becomes entitled in the action may be permissible.
(2) The set-off is no different from and no more extensive than the set-off available to or against parties who are not legally aided.
(3) The broad criterion for the application of set-off is that the plaintiff's claim and the defendant's claim are so closely connected that it would be inequitable to allow the plaintiff's claim without taking into account the defendant's claim. As it has sometimes been put, the defendant's claim must, in equity, impeach the plaintiff's claim. *497
(4) Set-off of costs or damages to which one party is entitled against costs or damages to which another party is entitled depends upon the application of the equitable criterion I have endeavoured to express. It was treated by May J. in Currie & Co. v. The Law Society [1977] Q.B. 990 , 1000, as a "question for the court's discretion." It is possible to regard all questions regarding costs as being subject to the statutory discretion conferred on the court by section 51 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 . But I would not have thought that a set-off of damages against damages could properly be described as a discretionary matter, nor that a set-off of costs against damages could be so described.
(5) If and to the extent that a set-off of costs awarded against a legally aided party against costs or damages to which the legally aided party is entitled, cannot be justified as a set off (i) the liability of the legally aided party to pay the costs awarded against him will be subject to section 17(1) of the Act of 1988 and regulation 124(1) of the Regulations of 1989; and (ii) the section 16(6) charge will apply to the costs or damages to which the legally aided party is entitled.
Applying these principles to the respective orders made by the district registrar and by Mars-Jones J., I conclude that neither can be criticised. In general, in my opinion, interlocutory costs incurred in the progress of an action to trial and ordered to be paid by a plaintiff to a defendant would in equity impeach the right of the plaintiff to recover from the defendant costs of the action ordered to be paid by the defendant. A set-off of costs against costs, when all are incurred in the prosecution or defence of the same action, seems so natural and equitable as not to need any special justification. I would expect a party objecting to the set-off to give some special reason for the objection. It is, in my opinion, less obvious that a set-off of costs against damages would always be justified.
18. The decision is interesting, not only because as we shall see, the QUOCS scheme anticipates that costs in a defendant's favour will be capable of set off against damages, but that it is silent as to whether a defendant's costs can be set off against a claimant's costs. The further point that this raises, is whether the statutory scheme is exclusive in terms of its purview, or whether other rights of set off, such as equitable set off can be deployed in favour of a defendant's position. On this latter point, the case of Vava.v.Anglo American South Africa Limited [2013] EWHC 2326 had this to say about a contractual form of costs shifting agreed between the parties:
V contended that there should be no order for costs because of a contract made in correspondence between the parties on "one way costs shifting" whereby X had agreed not to seek any costs or any costs order against them, as a result of which V had cancelled after the event insurance cover. V argued that that was implicit from the expression "one way costs shifting" according to the Review of Civil Litigation costs: Final Report (the Jackson reforms), which had been published before the parties' exchanges, the glossary of which included the description of "one way costs shifting" as "A regime under which the defendant pays the claimant's costs if its claim is successful, but the claimant does not pay the defendant's costs if the claim is unsuccessful". X submitted that it was appropriate to make an order for costs limited to the amount of costs that it had previously been ordered to pay to V, namely 60 per cent of V's costs occasioned by applications for disclosure and information. Those costs had not been assessed and X had paid nothing on account of them.
HELD: (1) The Jackson reforms did not present "A regime under which the defendant pays the claimant's costs if its claim is successful, but the claimant does not pay the defendant's costs if the claim is unsuccessful" as a definition of the expression "one way costs shifting" but as its "Meaning or description". Even if it was an exact definition, the earlier costs order would not be in accordance with the agreement since it was made before the claim or even the jurisdictional challenge had been decided, and it was made for only 60 per cent of V's costs. The parties' agreement on costs had been concluded only when V cancelled the ATE cover: before then, they had not contractually agreed to anything (see paras 9, 11 of judgment).
(2) X was effectively seeking an order for costs to neutralise the earlier costs order, limited to the amount that it was then ordered to pay. It recognised that an order for any greater amount should not be made because it had agreed not to enforce it. The purpose of the agreement had been to provide V with protection equivalent to that which they would have obtained from ATE insurance. If the issue had to be determined as a matter of contractual construction, it would be concluded that by seeking to deploy an order for costs against the earlier costs order, X would be attempting to "enforce" a costs order against V within the meaning of the agreement. However, there was another route to the conclusion that no order for costs should be made since a judgment or order for payment of a sum could be set-off against another: that principle extended to orders for costs, Reid v Cupper [1915] 2 K.B. 147 followed. It was also reflected in CPR r.44.12. The court could order a set-off under its inherent jurisdiction to do what was fair. It would be unfair for X to set-off liability under an order that it had agreed should not be enforced against an enforceable order. Moreover, had V proceeded to an immediate assessment of their earlier costs, X's liability would probably have accrued and been paid before any decision about jurisdiction. In those circumstances, X could not properly have sought a costs order. It was not fair that V should be worse off because they sensibly did not rush to have their costs assessed with the risk of a series of separate costs assessments between the parties. It was, accordingly, appropriate to make no order for costs (paras 12-13, 15-18).
The amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules 1998
commencement funding arrangement as defined by rule 48.2: for our purposes, then inception prior to the 1st April 2013, of a CFA with a success fee or ATE funding or being in receipt of trade union funding.
20. This raises a very interesting question: if a claimant enters into a CFA with a success fee with one firm of solicitors, then parts company with them after 1st April 2013, instructing new solicitors, he may not qualify for QUOCS protection. He may not be able to incept ATE. If he does, he will not recover any premium he agrees to pay. I use the word "may" guardedly as there is an ambiguity in the transitional provision in rule 44.17: does "has entered" mean "has entered and is subsisting" or "has entered at any time".
CPR Part 44
21. I turn therefore to consider the wording of the rules:
(1) This Section applies to proceedings which include a claim for damages –
(a) for personal injuries;
(b) under the Fatal Accidents Act 19767; or
(c) which arises out of death or personal injury and survives for the benefit of an estate by virtue of section 1(1) of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 19348, but does not apply to applications pursuant to section 33 of the Senior Courts Act 19819 or section 52 of the County Courts Act 198410 (applications for pre-action disclosure), or where rule 44.17 applies.
(2) In this Section, 'claimant' means a person bringing a claim to which this Section applies or an estate on behalf of which such a claim is brought, and includes a person making a counterclaim or an additional claim.
22. There is a teasing possibility arising from the definition of "personal injuries" in rule 2.3 it "includes any disease and any impairment of a person's physical or mental condition". Is this latter phrase, wide enough to include other species of claim, than what we might term personal injury claims properly so called? Could it include claims such as those for discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 where awards for injury to feelings may be pursued? Probably not, though the position is not wholly free from doubt.
Effect of qualified one-way costs shifting
23. The effect of qualified one way costs shifting must be considered carefully. Note the specific limitation on enforcement, without permission; except against awards of damages or interest. But what would be the position, if the Claimant recovers damages, interest and costs, but the defendant refuses to pay citing an equitable right of set off against not only damages and interest but costs too? Is a defence to any enforcement action possible on the basis of equitable set-off, that being said not to be "an enforcement"?
24. If this is not the case, then the curious situation may apply whereby the claimant recovers a modest damages award with interest, and a partial order for costs, the defendant reduces the damages/interest to "nil" through rule 44.14 but still has to hand over the costs due to the claimant under the partial award in the claimant's favour. It also raises the possibility that it can still be advantageous for a claimant's solicitors to press on to trial, even if they know full well that their client's damages have been expunged, by for example, costs orders in the defendant's favour at an interlocutory stage.
25. Because any question of enforcement, only arises at the end of the case, there is the intriguing prospect, that a defendant may get a costs order in its favour at an early stage, and the claimant a costs order in his favour, a little later in the proceedings, but the defendant cannot enforce its costs order, or rely on a set off, so must pay out to the claimant summarily assessed costs.
26. One also notes, that because a costs Order against a claimant does not count as an unsatisfied court judgment, if not paid, there is a temptation for a firm which has acquired a CFA caseload, to run every single case, where there client effectively has no possibility of an adverse outcome, and the mere existence of a QUOCS scheme acts as an incentive to defendants to settle cases, even bad cases, quickly to avoid incurring their own irrecoverable legal costs.
(1) Subject to rules 44.15 and 44.16, orders for costs made against a claimant may be enforced without the permission of the court but only to the extent that the aggregate amount in money terms of such orders does not exceed the aggregate amount in money terms of any orders for damages and interest made in favour of the claimant.
(2) Orders for costs made against a claimant may only be enforced after the proceedings have been concluded and the costs have been assessed or agreed.
(3) An order for costs which is enforced only to the extent permitted by paragraph (1) shall not be treated as an unsatisfied or outstanding judgment for the purposes of any court record.
Exceptions to qualified one-way costs shifting where permission not required
27. There are some exceptions to the process: of the ones set out in rule 44.15, the interesting one is 44.15(a): there are many cases in the Law Reports, where what we would now regard as well settled duties of care in negligence, started their legal history as applications to strike out proceedings alleging that there was no applicable duty of care. Such cases are often ground breaking, but it seems that if a claimant makes or asserts a novel claim, perhaps arguing for an incremental development of the law of negligence, they do so at their peril, and may lose their costs protection, without the need for the defendant to ask the court to exercise its discretion. That seems a curiously indiscriminate consequence.
Orders for costs made against the claimant may be enforced to the full extent of such orders without the permission of the court where the proceedings have been struck out on the grounds that –
(a) the claimant has disclosed no reasonable grounds for bringing the proceedings;
(b) the proceedings are an abuse of the court's process; or
(c) the conduct of –
(i) the claimant; or
(ii) a person acting on the claimant's behalf and with the claimant's knowledge of such conduct,
is likely to obstruct the just disposal of the proceedings.
Exceptions to qualified one-way costs shifting where permission required
28. There remains scope to make some further inroads into QUOCS, as in certain circumstances the court may exercise a discretion: the first of these is the "fraud" exception, although curiously the word fraud is not used, instead the synonymous phrase "fundamentally dishonest" is used. This may or may not mean that the scope of the exception is not limited to fraudulent claims: it may also mean that people who exaggerate the extent of their disability and their claims might be at risk too."
29. The wider exceptions will arguably encompass credit hire claims, subrogated claims or the inclusion of non-personal injury claims in the same action: this could lead to some intriguing scenarios, where there may well be disputes over what a claim is fundamentally about. The provision is 44.16(3) directing the court's attention to its powers under the SCA 1981 to make a non-party costs Order, may point to more applications being made directly against insurance companies, credit hire companies or others in similar standing to litigation conducted ostensibly by private individuals.
(1) Orders for costs made against the claimant may be enforced to the full extent of such orders with the permission of the court where the claim is found on the balance of probabilities to be fundamentally dishonest.
(2) Orders for costs made against the claimant may be enforced up to the full extent of such orders with the permission of the court, and to the extent that it considers just, where –
(a) the proceedings include a claim which is made for the financial benefit of a person other than the claimant or a dependant within the meaning of section 1(3) of the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (other than a claim in respect of the gratuitous provision of care, earnings paid by an employer or medical expenses); or
(b) a claim is made for the benefit of the claimant other than a claim to which this Section applies.
(3) Where paragraph (2)(a) applies, the court may, subject to rule 46.2, make an order for costs against a person, other than the claimant, for whose financial benefit the whole or part of the claim was made.
The Practice Direction
30. The Practice Direction adds a little more meat on the bones, with some assistance with definitions, guidance on when the exceptions might be exercised, and a warning that if a paying party settles a claim, they will be in considerable difficulty, in seeking to argue fundamental dishonesty at some later stage.
This subsection applies to proceedings to which Section II of Part 44 applies.
Examples of claims made for the financial benefit of a person other than the claimant or a dependant within the meaning of section 1(3) of the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 within the meaning of rule 44.16(2) are subrogated claims and claims for credit hire.
'Gratuitous provision of care' within the meaning of rule 44.16(2)(a) includes the provision of personal services rendered gratuitously by persons such as relatives and friends for things such as personal care, domestic assistance, child-minding, home maintenance and decorating, gardening and chauffeuring.
In a case to which rule 44.16(1) applies (fundamentally dishonest claims) –
(a) the court will normally direct that issues arising out of an allegation that the claim is fundamentally dishonest be determined at the trial;
(b) where the proceedings have been settled, the court will not, save in exceptional circumstances, order that issues arising out of an allegation that the claim was fundamentally dishonest be determined in those proceedings;
(c) where the claimant has served a notice of discontinuance, the court may direct that issues arising out of an allegation that the claim was fundamentally dishonest be determined notwithstanding that the notice has not been set aside pursuant to rule 38.4;
(d) the court may, as it thinks fair and just, determine the costs attributable to the claim having been found to be fundamentally dishonest.
The court has power to make an order for costs against a person other than the claimant under section 51(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 and rule 46.2. In a case to which rule 44.16(2)(a) applies (claims for the benefit of others) –
(a) the court will usually order any person other than the claimant for whose financial benefit such a claim was made to pay all the costs of the proceedings or the costs attributable to the issues to which rule 44.16(2)(a) applies, or may exceptionally make such an order permitting the enforcement of such an order for costs against the claimant.
(b) the court may, as it thinks fair and just, determine the costs attributable to claims for the financial benefit of persons other than the claimant.
In proceedings to which rule 44.16 applies, the court will normally order the claimant or, as the case may be, the person for whose benefit a claim was made to pay costs notwithstanding that the aggregate amount in money terms of such orders exceeds the aggregate amount in money terms of any orders for damages, interest and costs made in favour of the claimant.
Assessments of costs may be on a standard or indemnity basis and may be subject to a summary or detailed assessment.
How it works in practice
31. As noted above, personal experience of how these provisions will work in practice is still comparatively limited. This may well be, because the vast majority of personal injury claims do indeed settle, with a favourable result for the claimant.
32. In one case, I was asked to advise upon, the claimant discontinued proceedings for a tripping claim on a public highway, having seen the defendant's evidence. The claimant was a doctor. He had the benefit of a BTE policy. But as he had not entered into a pre-commencement funding arrangement, he was entitled to do so, with the benefit of QUOCS protection. It was not possible, to circumvent the clear wording of the rule. The defendant sought to have its costs assessed: but what was the point, in circumstances where the doctor was unlikely to make a habit of pursuing tripping claims?
33. In short, the defendant had to take on the chin, the fact that QUOCS was working exactly as had been intended, without discrimination, amongst those able to pay the defendant's costs and those who would never be able to, and the costs incurred could not sensibly be pursued.
How Part 36 applies
34. Part 36 is key to understanding, how QUOCS can be used to extract some benefit for defendants, who although losing on liability, go on to succeed on their part 36 offer. Well that happens all the time doesn't it? In my experience, that scenario happens in perhaps 1 of 200 cases.
35. But when it does, and it is important to note, that it is the deterrent effect of the system which is the wider point, then the costs awarded to the defendant can be deducted, pound for pound, from the claimant's damages or interest.
36. An interesting point to contemplate, is the situation where the defendant, as so many do, has retained its panel solicitors to act on the basis of a CCFA, where if the defence win the case, the solicitors are entitled to guideline rates, or court rates, on their costs, and not the panel rate which applies across the majority of their caseload.
37. In those circumstances, are the claimant's damages reduced by the enhanced rates, or the panel rates? And does it matter where, conceivably, the insurers, might take advantage of the chance to plead guideline rates, but actually pay only panel rates, because they are not recovering monies from an ATE insurer? It seems to me that any deductions must be based on what the defence actually pay their solicitors: otherwise, the scope for an accusation of misleading or improper behaviour surely arises.
A continuing need for ATE?
38. It remains interesting to note, that although some ATE companies have experienced in the year since Jackson, a decline in the volume of business underwritten of perhaps one third, the ATE insurance industry remains very much in business.
39. ATE insurance now functions as re-insurance for the disbursement liabilities of a solicitor's firm, and so it doesn't catch a cold, on non-recovery of disbursements. It can be a requirement of some practice funders, that the disbursement carry is underwritten by ATE insurance.
40. Whether this will continue to be so, is going to be interesting: one can anticipate that in high value cases, where disbursements might easily run into six figures, for expensive expert evidence, that the need for ATE insurance will be real.
The problems
41. So in PI, what do I perceive to be the problems that lie ahead? I think in summary they can be noted to be the following:
(1) The Naomi Campbell factor. As things stand, the one size fits all model is based on a desire for simplicity. But some anomalous results will undoubtedly arise in the years to come, which might cause reasonable people to wonder about the blanket nature of the protection.
(2) The BTE factor. Related to the above, one now wonders whether the real benefit of BTE, might prove to be in relation to own client costs, though noting the reluctance of BTE companies to pay own client costs, or pay them at a commercial rate. But why should a client who has insured against a liability not be required to draw on the insurance pot?
(3) The failure to include a specific right of set off against costs, as opposed to simply damages and interests. Probably the factor which has the greatest potential to create anomalies, and perverse litigation behaviour.
Ongoing reform
42. QUOCS is not however, limited in its application to PI cases.
43. In fact, the plan is to roll out its application to other, disparate areas of law.
44. The proposals which are most advanced, at the current time, relate to media and defamation, cases, but it is interesting to note, that the principles now up and running in part 44, are not simply to be applied across the board. Instead, a different system will apply to these cases.
Defamation and media cases
45. A recent email exchange with the Ministry of Justice has confirmed that the reforms in this field will take place later in the year, but with no date fixed at the time of writing this paper. The document which is of principal interests is Costs protection in defamation proceedings: the government's s proposals published by the Ministry of Justice in September 2013.
46. The differences are telling.
23. A party seeking costs protection would apply for it and notify the other side.
24. The Government recognises that in defamation cases there can be a disparity in the relative means of each party. The typical public perception of a defamation case might be of a wealthy celebrity claimant against a well-resourced national newspaper. However, the reality is more nuanced, with a variety of scenarios of differing resources of both claimant and defendant, and their disparity. For example, such cases can also involve a claimant of modest means – or a wealthy claimant against a small publisher or an individual.
25. Unlike in relation to personal injury,14 the Government does not believe that it is right to provide full costs protection regardless of means to all claimants in defamation cases: rather it considers that it is right that those who can afford to pay all or some of the costs in these cases should do so. The Government therefore proposes to consider three groups (of both claimant and defendant, individual and non-individual) as set out in more detail below:
(i) those of modest means, who should be entitled to costs protection in full ('nil net liability'); (ii) the 'mid' group of those of some means – who could pay something, but not the costs in full – who should be entitled to costs protection in part ('capped liability');
(iii) those of substantial means, who should not get any costs protection because they would not face 'severe financial hardship' if they were ordered to pay the other side's costs.
26. It would be open to the parties to agree the costs protection position – for example, a national newspaper could agree at an early stage that a claimant of modest means should have full costs protection. If the position cannot be agreed between the parties, it would be for the judge to decide, based on a statement of assets provided by the applicant. The statement of assets must be verified with a statement of truth, and must be sufficiently detailed (rule 44.26(2)).
27. Individual claimants who are not of substantial means would be entitled to costs protection unless the court was satisfied that they would not suffer severe financial hardship; however, they would have to apply formally to confirm this.
28. Claimants who are not individuals (such as businesses or charities), and all defendants, could also apply for costs protection. Again, this could be agreed between the parties, or the matter would be determined by the judge, based on the applicant's statement of assets. If the judge were satisfied that it was in the interests of justice for costs protection to be granted, then it could be granted on a full or partial basis (on the same basis of the consideration of means as for individual claimants).
47. The summary of the proposals states:
42. In summary, the rules would apply to protect the costs that a party might have to pay to the other side at the end of a case:
Those of substantial means (whether individuals or organisations) would be excluded from the costs protection regime – on the basis that they would not face 'severe financial hardship' if ordered to pay the other side's costs.
Those of lesser means – whether claimant or defendant – could get costs protection, either in full (i.e. those of modest means – 'nil net liability' – would not have to pay anything), or in part (i.e. those of less modest means – the 'mid' group – might have to pay a reasonable sum, capped at a maximum amount). Importantly, it would be clear from the first judicial hearing what the maximum liability would be.
A claimant individual of modest means would be able to get costs protection as of right (unless the court is satisfied that they would not suffer severe financial hardship); others (non-individual claimants and all defendants) would have to satisfy the judge that it was in the interests of justice to do so.
It would be open to parties to agree the position; otherwise a judge would decide, based on (i) an applicant's means – as evidenced by a statement of assets, and (ii) the costs that s/he might be ordered to pay (which would be indicated by the costs budget which now needs to be agreed in practice in all defamation cases).
As with personal injury, costs protection would be lost if there were fundamental dishonesty, or the case were struck out.
A winning claimant with costs protection might still have to pay costs out of damages recovered (but for a claimant with 'nil net liability' this would be no more than damages recovered).
48. A real question must arise, as to whether two quite distinct approaches to costs protection can survive. It raises the intriguing possibility, of whether reforms a few years down the line, might seek to achieve uniformity in costs shifting by applying this system or the PI system across the board.
49. A notable exception from the scheme, or indeed by its absence from the legal horizon, would be the extension of QUOCS to judicial review cases. This is particularly hard to understand as a matter of legal logic, given that Legal Aid with its statutory shield, already survives for judicial review claims, albeit in truncated form. In political terms, it is very easy to understand as the principal defendant in such claims is the government.
50. In the recent reforms to part 45 to deal with Aarhus Convention claims, the requirements of the Convention have been met, by placing a limit on the amount of costs that can be recovered from unsuccessful claimants, rather than to introduce a form of QUOCS proper for planning and environmental judicial reviews. Is the reason "full fat" QUOCS has not be introduced, is that this rule has been formulated for the government's benefit, with its emphasis on deterrence, of claims, rather than facilitating claims being brought.
Suing your solicitor?
Wasted costs revisited


text:
News > Reuters Health Information
Ranibizumab Biosimilar Shows Equivalent Efficacy to Branded Drug for Neovascular AMD
By Marilynn Larkin
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - In a phase 3 study, the ranibizumab biosimilar SB11 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and similar safety and immunogenicity profiles compared with ranibizumab for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
Specifically, said study coauthor Dr. Neil Bressler of Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore and Editor-in-Chief of JAMA Ophthalmology, "The results showed equivalent efficacy for visual acuity outcomes at eight weeks and anatomic outcomes at four weeks, which were the endpoints required by the U.S. FDA (visual acuity) and the EMA (OCT central subfield thickness), respectively, to show equivalent efficacy for biosimilars to anti-VEGF agents used to treat nAMD."
"Also, the safety and immunogenicity profiles of SB11 appeared similar to that of ranibizumab," he said. "The regulatory agencies likely would conclude that these results support that physicians should have confidence to prescribe these biosimilar agents for nAMD in situations in which they consider using ranibizumab."
"Physicians may have a reluctance to consider a biosimilar because of a lack of experience of using biosimilars," he noted. "However, there is no scientific evidence at this time to support such a reluctance."
As reported in JAMA Ophthalmology, Dr. Bressler and colleagues did a preplanned interim analysis of the equivalence study after the 705 randomized participants (mean age, 74; 57% women) completed the week 24 assessments.
The study was conducted in 75 centers in nine countries from 2018-2019, and the interim analysis was performed in May 2019. Participants received an intravitreous injection of SB11 or ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, every four weeks through week 48 (total of 13 doses for those who completed the study).
Least-squares mean changes in central subfield thickness from baseline at week four were −108 micrometers for SB11 versus −100 micrometers for ranibizumab, with an adjusted difference of −8 micrometers.
Least-squares mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline at week eight were 6.2 letters in the SB11 group versus 7.0 letters in the ranibizumab group, for an adjusted treatment difference of −0.8 letter.
Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar for SB11 and ranibizumab (66% vs. 66.9%), including serious treatment-emergent adverse events (12.6% vs. 12.4%) and treatment-emergent adverse events leading to drug discontinuation (2.3% vs. 1.4%).
Immunogenicity was low, with a cumulative incidence of anti-drug antibodies up to week 24 of 3% in the SB11 group and 3.1% in the ranibizumab group.
Dr. Bressler said, "There may be greater confidence to overcome (prescribing) reluctance if physicians have longer term safety and efficacy results comparing this biosimilar to ranibizumab. Such results were presented as a poster at American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting in November." (https://bit.ly/37muWDl ).
"Hopefully," he added, "these results will appear in the peer-reviewed literature within the next six months to provide this confidence, and hopefully these results, in general, will be looked upon by ophthalmologists and others in the scientific community and the public that a biosimilar, appropriately approved by regulatory agencies, will provide more choices for healthcare providers to consider when managing...major public health problems such as AMD and diabetic retinopathy, in the U.S. and elsewhere around the world."
Dr. Shiji Patel, Associate Fellowship Director, Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery at Vanderbilt Eye Institute in Nashville, commented by email to Reuters Health, "Given the large number of patients enrolled over multiple sites and the methodologic rigor with which the study was conducted, the results are very encouraging."
"Anti-VEGF agents account for a significant portion of the CMS Medicare Budget and have been a target for cost-savings," he said. "It will be interesting to see what the cost of this product will be."
Like Dr. Bressler, he noted that results affirming the current study results were recently presented. "However," he said, "we don't have long-term data or durability data for extension past Q4 injections."
The study was funded by Samsung Bioepis, Incheon, Republic of Korea. One coauthor is an employee and seven coauthors have received fees from the company. Dr. Bressler received grants from the company to Johns Hopkins University during the conduct of the study.
SOURCE: https://bit.ly/39ByaFA JAMA Ophthalmology, online November 19, 2020.
Reuters Health Information © 2020
Cite this: Ranibizumab Biosimilar Shows Equivalent Efficacy to Branded Drug for Neovascular AMD - Medscape - Nov 30, 2020.
US Claims Regeneron Paid Kickbacks Via Charity to Boost Expensive Drug
NHS Wins High Court Case Over Avastin for Wet AMD
High Levels of Serum Cystatin C and Chronic Kidney Disease Linked to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
News Ranibizumab Biosimilar Shows Equivalent Efficacy to Branded Drug for Neovascular AMD
Fewer New Cases of Intraocular Inflammation After First Year of Abicipar in AMD Patients
2010http://reference.medscape.com/edads-32
Patient Simulation: A 66-Year-Old Man With Vision Problems
Patient Simulation: A 68-Year Old Woman With Blurred Central Vision
Intravitreal Injection for Wet (Exudative) Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV)
Nonexudative (Dry) Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Pseudophakic (Irvine-Gass) Macular Edema
Top News From AAO 2013: Slideshow
The Future of Retinal Imaging
According to OPHTHALMOLOGISTS
Keeping Eyes Safe From COVID-19: What Works?
Drug-Induced Maculopathy
Neuro-Ophthalmic Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 19
Endophthalmitis After Cataract Surgery: An Update on Recent Advances
Pilocarpine Promising as Presbyopia Treatment
The Future of Retinal Imaging Journal Article
Age-Related Macular Degeneration Journal Article
Advances in the Treatment of AMD 0.75 CME Credits Conference Coverage
0.75 CME
Advances in the Treatment of AMD
2001http://www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/aao2013
Top News From AAO 2013: Slideshow Slideshow


text:
Q: 4 deep level folder not working "../../../../config.js" in vue component I am trying to export config.js and import it from Allplayer.vue but when I call it, it's say it was not a function.
how to fix this? Is there problem when module is in 4 deep level of folder structure?
Because other component can reach the config.js file in 3 deep level of folder from config.js file.

A: did you use named export and import it properly?
// something.js
export default something;

//another.vue
import somthing from "./something"

or
// something.js
export {
    something,
}

//another.vue
import { something } from "./something";

or you can use commonJS
// somthing.js
module.exports = somthing;

//another.vue
const somthing = require("./somthing");


I don't really understand the "down from" part :\/ I'm guessing it's a typo.
"Windwalker Monk PvP 2-piece bonus now also increases the range of Keg Smash."
I have no idea if this is the case, just a wild guess.
Hmm I hope you're right. Thanks for the explanation.
FANTASTIC! Now what are justice points and what the hell do I do with them?
Also, up to +50% health, DPS and Heals if you keep wiping on LFR. That seems slightly excessive.
"Staves and polearms can be transmogrified to each other." As a druid that loves having gear that matches perfectly, I approve of this. No more having to find a weapon that doesn't match my gear just because I have a polearm.
But the really funny part is 5% or even 25% damage isn\u00b4t going to prevent wipes because normally wipes happen when a hunter autoattacks a boss by mistake. I think this has happened in LFR about 5 times for me, but only 2 resulted in wipes.
I'd hang back on making suicide jokes at the best of times, but especially when this is actually really not as bad as it looks. If you've not been scorch-weacing (it sounds like you aren't) then this should actually INCREASE your damage.
=O now this is interesting.
I wonder if we're gonna get disguises when doing these scenarios........ Like when we do the old Caverns of Time dungeons.
Not necessarily El. If a group is bad enough to wipe in LOOKING FOR RAID, OVER TEN TIMES (Since you get 5% extra damage per wipe, you'd need 10 to reach the max stacks to be doing 50%) they probably need all the help they can get.
I agree, I have the Потрескивающий кинжал Регейла but want to Xmog to a Тесак мстительного гладиатора, the best dagger i can find is Изумрудный потрошитель, but it doesn't match red Warlock Gear nearly as well.
up to +50% health, DPS and Heals if you keep wiping on LFR. That seems slightly excessive.
I just don't know... i'm on the fence about this. I kinda expect more from the playerbase than to need something like this... but Blizzard has the bigger picture and if their statistics show that people need an extra boost in their LFR, so be it I guess.
So long as people don't abuse it and start to intentionally fail fights - especially if they know beforehand that groups tend to wipe anyway - then i'm okay with it.


text:
Vesper Launches High Performance VM2000 Microphone for Smart Speakers
Newest piezoelectric MEMS microphone ensures long-term voice performance in harsh environmental conditions
BOSTON – (November 29, 2017) – Vesper, developer of the world's most advanced acoustic sensors, today introduced the VM2000, the only MEMS microphone that maintains high system performance over the life of a product. Targeting voice-activated systems such as smart speakers, smart home and Internet of Things (IoT) products — which use microphone arrays to enhance voice capture and clarity — the VM2000 solves a critical need for stable, reliable and accurate microphone arrays that do not degrade over time.
"The growth of voice-enabled smart speakers —which use up to seven microphones per device — as well as smart home automation systems and diverse IoT products is spurring demand for MEMS microphone arrays," said Matt Crowley, CEO, Vesper. "The problem with capacitive MEMS microphones, however, is that they degrade over time when exposed to contaminants. If one microphone in the array drifts or gets wet, dirty or dusty, the entire microphone array will fail, severely limiting acoustic system performance and far-field accuracy. Only piezoelectric MEMS microphones such as the VM2000 remain stable and reliable throughout a product's lifetime. This ensures long-term acoustic performance of voice-activated systems built with Vesper microphones."
The VM2000 is Vesper's highest-performance MEMS microphone to date. It achieves a typical 66 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and offers an acoustic overload point (AOP) of 133 dB sound pressure level (SPL), providing exceptional "barge-in" performance to support clear speech recognition in loud environments. Vesper's piezoelectric microphones also cut material costs up to 50 percent, enabling them to cost much less than capacitive microphones.
As with all Vesper microphones, the VM2000 is a piezoelectric MEMS device that is natively immune to environmental contaminants such as dust, water, humidity, oil, particulate matter and shock. This level of environmental robustness further contributes to the reliability of the company's microphones. In addition, only Vesper microphones are immune to stiction, which can cause catastrophic system failure.
The VM2000 has a small 3.76 mm X 2.95 mm X 1.3 mm package. It is reflow solder-compatible with no sensitivity degradation. The VM2000 is currently sampling and will be in volume production in Q1 2018. For more information on the VM2000, please email: info@vespermems.com.
About Vesper
Vesper is a privately held advanced sensor company based in Boston, MA. With origins at the University of Michigan, Vesper's award-winning microphones are driving a new era of pervasive voice interfaces and acoustic event-detection products via a proprietary piezoelectric MEMS technology. For more information, visit www.vespermems.com, Twitter, YouTube, and Vesper Blog.
Brooks Wallace, Hollywood Agency
Email: brooks@hollywoodagency.com