text:
How to Make Smart Tradeoffs When Developing Software Products
Poornima Vijayashanker • Wednesday, March 18, 2015 • BuildTV
As technologists, we want to build software that is friendly, fast, beautiful, reliable, secure, and scalable. And we expect ourselves to deliver it on time and under budget, because our ultimate goal is to have lots of happy customers who can do what they want (cue Daft Punk's "Technologic").
But time and energy are finite, and we simply cannot deliver it all at once. We need to choose our priorities, and this choice is one we should make consciously.
Evaluating our software development priorities while dealing with constraints is known as the tradeoff space.
How can you make wise tradeoffs for your product?
The choice is based on a balance between your technology stack and business model type.
"Move fast and break things!"
While this has become a popular motto, it doesn't apply to every company.
For example, enterprise software companies that are building system-level software prioritize reliability because customers need to use them. Each change needs to be rigorously tested, and often approved before it can be released.
Meanwhile, consumer internet companies spend time and money on making their UX delightful so that people want to use them. Reliability is something they're willing to sacrifice. Since many are web-based applications, they can iterate quickly and release changes frequently.
So yes, they can move fast and break things.
The tradeoff space may seem insurmountable, but you too can become confident about your decisions by learning from a true pro!
In the second episode of FemgineerTV, I've invited Jocelyn Goldfein, the Former Director of Engineering at Facebook, to talk about:
What the tradeoff space is;
How to not get overwhelmed by the tradeoff space; and
How to make decisions that will help you ship product that your customers will love and help you meet business goals.
Jocelyn has led engineering teams at early to growth-stage startups like VMWare and enterprise companies like Trilogy, so she's definitely had her fair share of dealing with constraints and having to make tradeoffs to ship product and meet business goals.
We also dig into the cost of a mistake, how to take risks, the biggest mistake Jocelyn sees technical folks making over and over again, and how to avoid making it!
Watch the episode to learn how you can make smart tradeoffs when developing software products.
Viewers Challenge!
After you've watched the episode, take our challenge. Let us know in the blog comments below:
What was the last tradeoff you had to make?
What was the cost of the mistake?
How did you or your company feel about taking the risk?
The three best responses will receive a special giveaway from our sponsor Pivotal Tracker and be showcased in Femgineer's weekly newsletter!
Submit your responses in the blog comments below by March 19th at 11:59pm PST.
The next episode of FemgineerTV airs in April. I've invited Ryan Hoover and Erik Torenberg, the founders of Product Hunt, to talk about: How to Build a Community of Evangelists for Your Software Product. Subscribe to our YouTube channel to know when it's out!
How to Make Smart Tradeoffs When Developing Software Products Transcript
Poornima Vijayshanker: Welcome to the second episode of FemgineerTV, brought to you by Pivotal Tracker. I'm your host, Poornima Vijayashanker, and the founder of Femgineer. For those of you who aren't familiar, Femgineer is an education company, and our goal is to help innovators build software products to give them more freedom in their careers, to enrich other people's lives, and to make the tech community a lot more inclusive. When it comes to building software, we're fundamentally just solving problems, and there's always more than one approach to solving a problem, but too often, we have a lot of constraints, like time, money, and talent.
And when we're dealing with all those constraints, we want to make sure that we're taking the right approach, so in today's episode, we're going to be talking about how to make smart tradeoffs when it comes to developing software products, and to help us out, I've invited Jocelyn Goldfein, the former Director of Engineering at Facebook, to talk to us about how to make these tradeoffs. Jocelyn has helped companies from early-stage startups all the way to growth-stage startups and enterprise companies build software products and manage engineering teams, so she's had quite a lot on her plate, and has been able to help these companies meet their business goals and ship products on time. So thank you, Jocelyn, for joining us today.
Jocelyn Goldfein: Oh, thank you for having me.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Yeah. It's great to have you on the show and to be talking about tradeoffs. And we met a few years ago at a dinner, and you were just getting started at Facebook, so it's wonderful to see that, after all these years, you've made such a positive impact on the company, and I also want to thank you for all your encouragement in helping young women pursue degrees in computer science and careers in engineering.
Jocelyn Goldfein: Thanks.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Yeah, thank you so much.
Jocelyn Goldfein: It's definitely a cause that I care about a lot.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Awesome. Now, before we dig in today's topic, I want to take a couple steps back and just ask you, what got you interested in building software, and what led you to then join Facebook?
Jocelyn Goldfein: Sure. I didn't actually start out knowing that I was going to be interested in computer science. I was a nerd in high school, but I was a really well-rounded one, and I just got to college, and I took a computer science class fall quarter of my freshman year, and I thought, "Wow, this is really fun, and I'm actually pretty good at it." And I just sort of went from there, but even by the time I graduated, I had no conviction about what I wanted to be when I grew up, and so I just kind of thought, "Well, I'd better get a job as a software engineer and find out," and I had a chance to work for a lot of really interesting companies, including my own startup, and I was at VMware for…I joined when it was a pretty small, medium small company of just a couple hundred people, and I grew up from an engineering manager. I stayed seven years. The company was 10,000 people when I left.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Nice.
Jocelyn Goldfein: And I was the vice president of engineering by the end, and so really grew up at that company, and then wanted to keep growing and keep learning new things, and so it just seemed like a obvious choice to me to walk away from everything I knew about making enterprise software and operating systems and go work for a consumer web app, and so I joined Facebook about four years ago and had an absolutely great time.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Yeah. So now, given your extensive background, both at early-stage to growth-stage startups, and building enterprise products, you've had to deal with a lot of tradeoffs, and in a very recent talk that you gave, I remember you talking about this thing called the tradeoff space, so let's start by digging into, what exactly is the tradeoff space?
Jocelyn Goldfein: Sure. Like maybe you've worked with an engineering manager who said, "Oh, features, quality, schedule. Pick 2." You have kind of a bad rap for saying things like that. I'm guilty of saying things like that.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Sure.
Jocelyn Goldfein: But it's actually a lot more complicated than that. First of all, I mean, it's not "yes" or "no." You're going to have some features, and you're going to have some quality, and you're going to have some schedule, but there's also a lot of other things we care about, too. We want our product to be beautiful and easy to use, and we want it to be speedy and responsive, and we want it to be reliable and never have downtime, and we want it to have exactly the features that are going to make customers buy it. And I could go on and on, and all those things are good things, but the one thing that is finite is time and energy.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Right.
Jocelyn Goldfein: And so no matter what you do, no matter what release process you follow, no matter what culture you have, there's no silver bullet. You can't have everything all the time, and so getting some of each of the things we care about is a choice, and one I believe that we should make consciously, and so how much of each of those things you do is what I call the tradeoff space.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Got it. Now, when we look at the space, you've listed probably like 10 things that we need to think about, right? It's really easy to get overwhelmed by it, whether we're a manager, or whether we're the individual contributor. How can we alleviate some of those feelings? How can we maybe reduce the problem space a little bit so that we can ship product and meet our goals?
Jocelyn Goldfein: Yeah. Well, one interesting side effect, for me, of working at such different companies, and on such different kinds of products, was I found that different environments, different technology stacks, really lend themselves to different solutions. For example—I think this will be pretty familiar to most engineers—the technology stack you're using really makes some things easy and some things hard. If you're on the web at the top of the stack, if you will, you get a lot of reuse. You get to sort of build a lot of functionality very quickly, because you're relying on frameworks that other people have built. You get to deploy your code on your own servers, so you don't have to worry about testing it in a wide environment, and if you want to make a change, you just update your own hardware, because you have control of updates.
You start working your way down the stack to middleware, to native, mobile, and desktop apps, even to operating systems or, God help you, hardware, and you get more and more control as you move down. The reason a lot of people make native apps for phones is because on the phone, you can send push notifications. You can get access to the camera with a native app. You can't do that with a web app, but you also give something up when you go down the stack. You might be able to…you won't get as much reuse, and as soon as you deal with installing software on somebody else's device, you're going through a third party to certify your application, or you're sending a CD to someone that they have to install…
Poornima Vijayshanker: Yeah.
Jocelyn Goldfein: …now you have a lot less control over your update cycle, and so you have to think really differently about how frequently you can update.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Yeah. I know for myself, when I was getting started, my first job was actually designing electronic design automation software, so it was software for chip designers like Intel and AMD, and this was probably millions and millions of lines of code and was definitely a native app, and the sort of technology tradeoffs that we had to make were very different from my second company, which was Mint.com, right?
Jocelyn Goldfein: Mm-hmm.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Consumer internet app, web applications, so we had different ways of thinking, given our two technology stacks, so it became very, very apparent that difference of enterprise versus consumer, and most importantly, like where you are in terms of the stack.
Jocelyn Goldfein: Yeah, and I definitely think, Facebook's well known for the phrase, "Move fast and break things," and I think that makes total sense when, if you break something, you can update the software on your own web server. It's not quite that simple if you're shipping an operating system to somebody's data center that may get updated months or years later.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Yeah. So I know that, as engineers, it's really easy for us to think about the technology stack and develop an intuition and be able to make tradeoffs and decisions quickly, but a lot of times, we aren't aware of the business model we're operating under and we either get really frustrated with the way management's making decisions, or we don't have an understanding. What are some ways in which, as engineers or technical folks, we can develop that intuition or some understanding so that when we do have to make tradeoffs, we keep that in mind?
Jocelyn Goldfein: Yeah, I mean, I think there are sort of two sides to any decision you're making about investing your time and effort in doing something, whether it's a performance speed up or a test suite, and it's, "What does it cost me, and how am I going to benefit?" Like, does the benefits outweigh the costs, right?
Jocelyn Goldfein: It's kind of simple.
Jocelyn Goldfein: And I think the technology stack tells us a lot about what things cost, and I think you're right. Engineers have great intuition for what things cost, but I think to make good decisions, you've got to not just understand the costs, you've also got to understand the benefits. And I think mostly, those are driven by your business model, so if you're building a product for enterprises that are spending a lot of money on your software, and rely on it every day to do their jobs, then reliability is really important to them, and that's really important to your company having a good reputation and meeting your users' needs. At the other end of the spectrum, if you're doing a consumer app, maybe a free app, people's expectations are a lot lower when they aren't paying you a lot of money for something, but because it's not a need-to-use, it's a want-to-use, actually, the UX, the sort of delight and enjoyment of using your app needs to be much, much higher for people to sort of opt in to wanting to use it. And so I think that's one reason why even though consumer apps are free or very inexpensive compared to enterprise software, they're generally much more beautiful and much more fun to use, although we have a new breed of startups that are sort of challenging that received wisdom and seeing what happens when we take consumer design philosophy and bring it to enterprise software, and is that able to make a real compelling difference? And I think it will, if we find that it's able to meet employee needs better, and able to achieve business goals better, but knowing if that's a good tradeoff or not, to spend a lot of time on the design of your enterprise software, means understanding it, because that's what matters the most to your users.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Yeah, so that's a kind of new, novel experiment people are doing, huh, where they're actually bringing some of that rich UI back to…
Jocelyn Goldfein: The enterprise.
Poornima Vijayshanker: The enterprise. That's interesting. It's really interesting, because, like I said, when I was working building EDA software, it certainly was not, by any means, beautiful.
Jocelyn Goldfein: Yes.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Like not even the codebase was beautiful.
Poornima Vijayshanker: But it worked really well, and like you said, very, very reliable, because at the end of the day, this is going to go and design 90, 40-nanometer technology, so it needs to be precise, right?
Poornima Vijayshanker: There are so many things downstream that are impacted by it but didn't have a beautiful user experience, and was still functional, and made millions of dollars for the company, or actually billions of dollars.
Jocelyn Goldfein: Yeah.
Poornima Vijayshanker: And then contrast that to Mint, which was consumer internet, and free application, had a very, very beautiful user experience and user interface. So there was obviously a difference here, and part of that difference also came down to the customer and what their needs were.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Right? So can you elaborate a little bit more on like, how can we take back some of the customer needs and apply that to the way that we think about tradeoffs as we're building?
Jocelyn Goldfein: Yeah. I mean, I think that in some ways, to an engineer, it's counterintuitive that the web app has the more beautiful UI than the native app. If you think about it, the further down the stack you go, the more control you have over pixels. I mean, if you want to create the richest, most immersive user experiences, you try to bypass the operating system, even, and that's where we see video games, or, in this day and age, I'm really excited about what Oculus Rift is doing, and to deliver those incredible user experiences, you actually have to go very low in the stack. But at the same time, it's not a technology-driven choice alone. Even though your EDA app was native software, it was lower in the stack. It had the capability to deliver a more beautiful UI than an off-the-shelf kind of web app. Nonetheless, that wasn't what mattered to your customers. What mattered to your customers was that hardware design, actually have to go very low in the stack, but at the same time, it's not a technology-driven choice alone. Even though your EDA app was native software, it was lower in the stack. It had the capability to deliver a more beautiful UI than an off-the-shelf, kind of, web app. Nonetheless, that wasn't what mattered to your customers. What mattered to your customers was that hardware designers made a design that got to manufacturing and produced actual, workable components they could sell to their customers, and if the EDA software did not produce…
Jocelyn Goldfein: …created tremendous manufacturing waste, then they were out of business.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Totally.
Jocelyn Goldfein: And in that case, your EDA software would also be out of business. Whereas with Mint, if it's free, if it's not a must-have, then people have to find it easy to use or they just won't use it.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Right. They want it to be beautiful when they log into their account and see their money, or don't see their money, but yeah, yeah.
Jocelyn Goldfein: Yes, yes.
Poornima Vijayshanker: That's true.
Jocelyn Goldfein: And so I think a lot of times, we imagine that it's just about philosophy, or personality, or this set of founders care about design and that set of founders don't, but I really think, at the end of the day, as engineers and product people, we have to be motivated by the person using our software, and we have to remember that we cannot do everything in the world that we'd like to do, so we should focus our efforts on the things that matter most to that person.
Poornima Vijayshanker: That's so true.
Jocelyn Goldfein: And I think that when we design for the person, we do our best work.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Nice. So we've talked about tradeoffs in the context of the technology stack, as well as the business model, and now, taking into consideration customers, but one, I think, real concern that people have is the cost of a mistake, right? You make a mistake, you could be out of business, or the product gets end-of-lifed, and so you've got to have a real appetite for risk, and I know, having worked at various companies and startups as well, you've probably come across this appetite for risk. How should people be thinking about that and relating it back to the cost of a mistake?
Jocelyn Goldfein: Yeah. We talk about risk and failure all the time in the Valley. It's like, "Oh, in order to innovate, you've got to be willing to fail," and I'm guilty of that, too.
Jocelyn Goldfein: You know? I really I do think that you've got to be willing to take risks to do something great, but it's sort of easy, again, to think of appetite for risk as a character trait or a moral quality, and Mark Zuckerberg's got more of it, so Facebook's able to innovate, and maybe the CEO of VMware is very cautious or conservative. And again, I don't think it's a personality trait. If you think about what is the cost of a mistake, I think it comes in two parts. One is, what does it cost you? If you make a mistake, what does it cost you to fix it? And let's assume you're a going concern now, like you've got software, you're established, but…so you're going to have a chance to fix it. The cost of a mistake isn't you're out of business.
Jocelyn Goldfein: So there's, what does it take to fix it, and that's like some cost we can reason about. Like there's a bug that makes it to production, we debug it, we code up a solution, we test our solution, we deploy the solution, right? Whatever that cost is, let's call it X, OK? And then there's another dimension to the cost, which is not what's my cost to my business, but what's the pain to my customer?
Jocelyn Goldfein: To my user of my outage, and that's some pain because my software is not working the way they expect it to. And so I think that if you look at, again, these two dimensions of technology stack and business model, if your code runs on hardware you control, then that cost to fix X, is whatever X is, and then as soon as you introduce, as soon as you start going down the stack, as soon as you have to run on multiple other kinds of hardware, all of a sudden, you have to have a test matrix.
Jocelyn Goldfein: All of a sudden, you have to get Apple to approve your App Store update. All of a sudden, you have to get users to be willing to deploy your software, maybe just on their phone with an over-the-air update, or maybe it's a hardware OEM that needs to get a CD to their factory and reimage a bunch of components as they come off the assembly line, OK? And so, I want to say is, as you move down the stack and you go from the code running on your servers to depending on other people, the cost of fixing it goes up by an order of magnitude, let's just say 10x. We're making broad, ballpark, sweeping assumptions. And then, let's look at the pain to your users on the business model axis. We can joke about Twitter's Fail Whale, but the truth is, if Twitter has a little outage, we can come back later. It's not the end of the world.
Jocelyn Goldfein: And so that pain is X, but as you sort of move down to software that people are relying on, like email, they can't communicate without it, or my revenue booking software, I can't book sales, I can't operate my manufacturing plant while your software is down, that cost, I would say, also goes up by an order of magnitude. The more people have spent on your software, the more they're relying on it to do their job. And then I think if you kind of combine the two axes and you're building, and you're in VMware's situation…
Poornima Vijayshanker: Oh, totally.
Jocelyn Goldfein: …and you are building system software that people have paid a lot of money for, I'd love to say it's 10x plus 10x, but it's actually geometric expansion, right? It's 10x times 10x, so it's two orders of magnitude more cost. It's 100 times more, and so I think it is perfectly reasonable for free consumer web software to make a lot of mistakes and quickly fix them and to choose, even, a path to designing a product, which is to rapidly experiment. Whereas I think at the other end of the spectrum, if you are down in this other sort of quadrant where the cost of a mistake is two orders of magnitude higher, then it makes sense to have a much, much more careful process where you are really sure you have something exactly right before you let it out the door.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Yeah, so there's a lot going on here, right? There's a number of ripple effects. There's the fact that your process also needs to be bulletproof or somewhat bulletproof. Where do you see the biggest mistakes that people make, then, when it comes to these tradeoffs?
Jocelyn Goldfein: I think we arrive at an intuitive understanding. I think whether people sort of are consciously thinking about their technology stack, and their business model, and, "Let me pick a software development process that optimizes for quality or that optimizes for UX," I think we just kind of naturally, sort of, form follows function in a very Darwinian way, like whatever experiences we have, we find our way to what optimizes for that. The trouble is, as software engineers, we tend to get really religious.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Yes.
Jocelyn Goldfein: We think can have religious wars over like tab widths and text editors…
Jocelyn Goldfein: …and so when we find a way to deliver software that really works for the product we're working on, we get dogmatic, and we think we found the one right way to do it. And I think that that's fine, as long as you're applying it to the same product, but what if your company needs to pivot from web to mobile like Facebook did? Or what if your free consumer game, your freemium consumer game, turns into an enterprise messaging app, like Slack? You may sort of pivot your way right out of what you were optimizing for, and if you have, sort of, religious or moral conviction that you were shipping software the right way, now you're going to end up with something that's really ill-suited for what you're trying to do, where you're going to spend a lot of time and energy on things that are expensive and maybe you don't need to do. I think of Microsoft doing Bing, which is free consumer web software, and I think they could have moved faster and taken more advantage of iteration, but it was hard to shake off the roots, the culture, the values of a software company that was making operating systems and needed really predictable schedules. And at the same time, I know from firsthand experience it was really hard for Facebook to move from web to native apps, and that is not because Objective-C is a more difficult programming language than PHP, it's because of the culture that surrounded the way we released software, and that move-fast-and-break-things culture was dangerous when you—
Poornima Vijayshanker: When doing mobile.
Jocelyn Goldfein: —took it to a native app, which you cannot update twice a day. Which is, by the way, the rate at which Facebook updates its web app is twice a day.
Jocelyn Goldfein: And so I think that everybody's going to try to make these tradeoffs, and I would encourage you to be self-conscious, and reflective, and do it, and sort of write down what you think is important to you and what is easy to you and figure out if you're doing stuff that's expensive and not important and stop doing it, because that's an opportunity for a big win. I'd encourage you to figure out if things are really important to you and you could optimize for them more, but at the end of the day, the most important thing, realize that your release process is not a matter of ethical or moral right and wrong, that it's just a pragmatic choice shaped by what works well for the product you're doing now, and be prepared to pivot. Be prepared to adapt when your technology stack changes, when your business model changes.
Poornima Vijayshanker: So any final parting words for our viewers?
Jocelyn Goldfein: Well, I would say, most of all, software is really a team effort.
Jocelyn Goldfein: And so even if you've watched this video and kind of absorbed the tradeoffs, and you're inspired to be adaptable, or to apply the right process, or the right values, you've got a whole team to think about, not just yourself. And so if you're bringing in leaders who are going to set the tone and set the engineering culture at your company, I think being really conscious that they either come from a background that emphasizes the same priorities as your company, or that if they come from a different background, they know how to adapt, that you're onboarding them really thoughtfully, and that you're teaching people your engineering values so that you're all, kind of, optimizing for the same stuff, and not making tradeoffs that cancel each other out.
Poornima Vijayshanker: Yeah, that's a good point, and so part of that is having those engineering values, and sitting down, and writing them out if you don't yet have those.
Jocelyn Goldfein: Yeah. Yeah, absolutely, just get everybody rowing the same direction.
Poornima Vijayshanker: All right, so just to recap, we've covered the topic today of how to make smart tradeoffs when you're developing software products, and we talked about the tradeoff space, and while that can be really big and filled with many, many different dimensions, you've got to narrow it down to, ultimately, what's a priority for you and your business, and so part of that is considering your technology stack. And it's really easy, as technical folks, to develop an intuition, but we've also got to think about the business model that we're operating under and factor that into the decisions we make. And then, finally, we talked about the cost of a mistake and how we want to think about that in terms of the level of risk that we can absorb as a company. Finally, we have a challenge for you. We want to know when was the last time you had to make a decision when it came to tradeoffs? What did you have to consider? What was the cost of the mistake, and what was your appetite for risk or your company's?
Let us know your response in the comments below, and the winner of the best response will get a special giveaway from Tracker and be hosted on Femgineer's weekly newsletter. So I'm really looking forward to hearing what everyone has to say and reading through their responses to get an understanding of the tradeoffs and the decisions you've had to make when building products. So I'd like to thank our special guest, again, Jocelyn Goldfein for joining us today. Jocelyn, how can people get in touch with you, or how can people learn more from you?
Jocelyn Goldfein: Well, I keep a blog which you can find at jocelyngoldfein.com, or you can always follow me on Twitter @jgoldfein.
Poornima Vijayshanker: And thanks to all of you for tuning in today. I'm really looking forward to your challenge responses, and of course, to our wonderful sponsor, Pivotal Tracker, for helping to produce this episode, and if you've enjoyed this episode, then please share it with your friends, your teammates, and your boss, and subscribe to the YouTube channel to know when the next episode will be out. We'll have special guests, the founders of ProductHunt. Thanks.
Femgineer's Confident Communicator Course will be opening up soon. This course is only taught once a year, so you won't want to miss out. For more information and resources, visit femgineer.com/confident-communicator-course.
This pilot episode of FemgineerTV is brought to you by Pivotal Tracker—build better software faster.
FemgineerTV is produced as a partnership between Femgineer and Pivotal Tracker. San Francisco video production by StartMotionMEDIA.
Category: BuildTV


A enterprise is both your career, your career or your small business, or a industrial exercise consisting in offering a great or a service in alternate for income.
Earnings in enterprise will not be essentially cash. There could be a bonus, in any type in anyway, acknowledged by the corporate (the entity) concerned within the exercise (exercise).
To make clear issues, divide the definition of the corporate right into a definition of the corporate and a definition of the exercise. .
An enterprise (an entity) is a company or some other entity engaged in industrial, skilled, charitable or industrial actions. It might be a for-profit entity or a non-profit entity and should have a separate existence from that of the individuals / individuals who management it.
A enterprise (exercise) is a enterprise exercise that entails offering items or companies the first function of which is to generate income.
The enterprise idea is the fundamental thought behind the enterprise. The enterprise mannequin, the plan, the imaginative and prescient and the mission are developed on the idea of this idea. Uber, for instance, was launched on the idea of grouping taxi drivers and offering their companies on demand underneath one model. All different enterprise methods have been developed primarily based on this idea.
The industrial function is the explanation that makes the corporate evolve and conducts its enterprise in the long term. That is the explanation why the corporate exists. Whereas most individuals argue that profitability is the first aim of each enterprise. Few have outlined the brand new underlying aim.
In keeping with the normal idea, companies exist solely to earn cash by offering items and companies to prospects.
In keeping with the trendy idea, the underlying aim of each enterprise is buyer satisfaction as a result of it's it that generates probably the most income. If the client is glad, the corporate excels.
Manufacturing companies are the producers who develop the product and promote it on to the client or intermediaries to make gross sales. Iron factories, plastic factories, and so on.
One of these enterprise entails promoting intangibles to customers. Not like bodily property, companies cannot be saved or separated from the supplier.
Service corporations present skilled companies, experience, fee promotions, and so on. Examples embrace commerce reveals, colleges, consulting companies, and so on.
Merchandising is an intermediate enterprise technique through which the enterprise buys merchandise from a producer, wholesaler or retailer. Different companions and sells them on the retail value. It's normally referred to as shopping for and promoting as a result of they make income by promoting the merchandise at a value greater than their price value.
Examples of a merchandising enterprise are grocery shops, supermarkets, distributors, and so on.
Hybrid corporations have the traits of a minimum of two sorts of companies defined above. For instance, a restaurant develops its personal dishes (manufacture), sells merchandise equivalent to chilly drinks made by different corporations (merchandising) and gives a service to prospects (service).
The only real proprietorship is a enterprise owned and operated by a single particular person. It's straightforward to configure, use and save. All of the income of the corporate belong to the proprietor and he's additionally chargeable for all of the commitments contracted.
The key drawback of this exercise is that the proprietor should face limitless legal responsibility. Which means that the collectors of the corporate can sue the non-public property of the proprietor if the corporate is unable to pay them.
When two or extra folks be part of forces to run a enterprise, they normally are available in partnership. Partnerships take two varieties: basic and restricted. A partnership is sort of a sole proprietorship, however with multiple proprietor the place all homeowners face limitless legal responsibility. In restricted partnerships, some or all the companions have restricted legal responsibility.
An organization is a company that has a authorized id distinct from that of the individuals who personal or handle it. The property is normally represented within the type of actions of the motion.
House owners take pleasure in restricted legal responsibility however don't essentially take part within the administration of the enterprise. The corporate is managed by a gaggle (board of administrators) elected by the shareholders.
A restricted legal responsibility firm is a hybrid type of enterprise that has the traits of each a company and a partnership. A partnership as a result of it's not included and a company as a result of all companions / homeowners have restricted legal responsibility.
The cooperative is a personal industrial group owned and managed by its workers. mutual advantages. These persons are referred to as members and profit from the products and companies provided by the cooperative. It's anticipated that each one members will take part within the administration of the corporate, as a result of the principle function of the cooperative is to supply a service to all members fairly than a return on funding.
Proceed, inform us what you assume!
Have we forgotten one thing? Come on! Inform us what you concentrate on our article on enterprise within the feedback part.


text:
Q: mostrar contenido que esta por debajo del nivel acceso al document root server Primero les comentare sobre mi entorno ya que puede haber limitaciones o adecuaciones para resolver el problema segun el S.O
Estoy desarrollando un Script php7.4 y como servidor uso un proxy nginx que apunta a un servidor apache, en mi local uso Windows 11 Home.
pero planeo desplegarlo en Linux, windows y mac cual sea el entorno debe de funcionar.
El escenario es que en el desarrollo que estoy, estoy tratando de recrear algunas característica similares a synfony, pero no logro copiar/simular/desarrollar una característica que este tiene en especial.
Al navegar uso un sistema de ruteado similar a este:
DirectoryIndex index.php

<IfModule mod_rewrite.c>
    RewriteEngine on
    RewriteBase /
    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-l
    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php [QSA,L]
</IfModule>

Para poder usar una URL como esta:
http://localhost/D_00001
mi estructura es la siguiente:
directorio-proyecto
├───public (document-root)
│   └───index.php
└───repository
    └───Master
        └───D_00001 (Mantenimiento de Product)
            ├───Back (Logica del Backend, php)
            ├───dic (Diccionarios de Traduccion Multilenguaje)
            ├───front (Logica del Front, Javascript)
            │   └───d_00001.js (El Archivo del problema)
            └───html (Template)

pero no logro crear un link symbolico programatico en php que publique el archivo d_00001.js
<?php

$objetivo = dirname(__DIR__) .'/../repository/Master/D_00001/front/d_00001.js';
$enlace = 'd_00001';
symlink($objetivo, $enlace);

?>

<!DOCTYPE html>

    <meta charset="UTF-8">

My Website

Some text...

el otro camino es copiar en un temporal cada vez que hago un request dentro de directorio-proyecto/public/cache-js pero esto es completamente contra producente y poco escalable...
como logro esto con los link simbólicos o algo que se paresca?
Update 1:
Encontre que se puede hacer emdiante un proxy file:
<?php
  header('Content-Type: image/png');
  readfile("../img/" . $_GET['img']);
?>

y luego en el html:

pero no quiero que esto se vean en el html: image.php?img=myimage.png
¿que regla tendria que aplicar a mi .htaccess para rutear los request a este proxy file? ...

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Women and Peace in Iraq: opportunities, challenges, and prospects for a better future (EN+AR)
We are proud to present this long-awaited study, the result of one year of extensive research and joint efforts between Dr. Zeynep Kaya and Dr. Ilham Makki, with support from a local team of researchers. The study was conducted within the framework of the "Women Talking Peace" project, funded by The German Corporation for International Cooperation (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit – GIZ) on behalf of the German Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (Das Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung – BMZ) and implemented by elbarlament.
This groundbreaking study puts the focus on the voices of women in Iraq; it looks at what they think about the peacebuilding processes happening in their country and why they are not part of it. This valuable women's perspective is usually neglected in favor of a more top-down approach looking only at the political processes, negotiations etc.
Dr. Zeynep Kaya and Dr. Ilham Makki have painstakingly drawn on their extensive knowledge and expertise in the field to provide a thorough analysis of women's participation in peacebuilding processes in Iraq, highlighting opportunities, challenges and recommendations to different stakeholders for a better future of Iraq. The study is contributing not only to the existing literature on Women, Peace and Security (WPS) in Iraq, but also articulating guidelines for the different interventions needed to enhance women's engagement and effective participation in formal and informal peacebuilding processes.
Women and girls have suffered from the long-term conflicts in Iraq, with detrimental impacts on their social, economic and political conditions. Important strides, including drafting an Iraqi National Action Plan (INAP) for the monitoring and implementation of United Nations Security Resolution 1325 of 2000, have been made, which acknowledge that women must participate on an equal footing with men in peacebuilding processes, and that gender equality is crucial in establishing sustainable peace and building democratic functioning Iraqi state organs. However, women's effective participation in formal and informal peace processes in Iraq still lags behind.
On the other hand, Iraqi women and girls continue to defy the challenges to participation in peacebuilding processes. As a pillar of the protest movement, young women have established/founded the "Their Homeland" movement, through which they seek to affect fundamental change in the Iraqi system. They also continue to play a role that is integral to the quest for change and gendering peace and justice processes. That too comes at a cost, as women's presence in Iraqi public life puts them at a risk of harassment and assassination in some cases, among others. But as feminists scholars argued that "the fate
of women is indicative of the fate of societies" (Nadje Al-Ali and Nicola Pratt 2009), sustainable peace and justice in Iraq can only be achieved when Iraqi women's opinions and efforts are recognised on local, national and international levels.
We hope the study informs and inspires all those writing and working in the field, with the aim of supporting Iraqi women and girls to have power and peace. We would like to thank Dr. Zeynep Kaya and Dr. Ilham Makki for this excellent study and, of course, all the women who were interviewed and who contributed important information to the success of this study.
Download the study in English here and in Arabic here..
Study authors Zeynep N. Kaya and Ilham Makki had given an interview explaining the reasoning and research method at the beginning of the year. Watch it in this video.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Innovative and ground breaking technology has made it possible for Unilever to transform the way it does business by transforming multi-layered waste into useful items – such as school desks – that can be used towards various community development projects.
recyclable or compostable by 2025. "We hope that our commitment will encourage others in the industry to make collective progress towards ensuring that all plastic packaging is fully recyclable and recycled." Unilever's partnership with Wildlands dates back to 2004 with various waste-preneur projects since supported with the objectives of increasing awareness and encouraging recycling.
The partnership with Wildlands is indicative of Unilever's commitment to sustainability and its ambition to double its business while reducing its environmental impact.
ended up on landfill sites, placing an enormous strain on the environment. "Wildlands, together with Rural Waste Poverty Alleviation (RWPA), has developed a ground-breaking solution which, through a combination of grinding and extrusion, upcycles these post-consumer multi-layered multi-film materials into planks which are then assembled into school desks.
better chance for their future. An elated Skeen Primary School principal, Phillemon Mashishi, said: "The school has 1558 learners and 38 teachers. I was most relieved when Unilever approached us about the initiative as we have been struggling to obtain school desks from 2010. Some parents have tried to assist by providing chairs for their children from their homes.
Unilever, and The Wildlands Conservation Trust. Skeen Primary School in Alexandra, east of Johannesburg and Saphinda Primary School in Umlazi, south of Durban are the latest recipients of 250 desks each to beef up their under-resourced facilities.


text:
Feel free to call us +353 (0)91 528325 info@communityworkireland.ie
Commissioning Human Social & Community Services
March 21, 2016 /in Commissioning, CWI Submissions, Featured, News /by Ann Irwin
The Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, Mr. Brendan Howlin T.D., established a public consultation on commissioning human, social and community services.
Community Work Ireland (CWI) has been working on the area of commissioning, public procurement and competitive tendering, particularly as it affects work to address poverty, social exclusion and inequality, for a number of years. That work culminated in the recently published, In Whose Interests? Exploring the impact of public procurement and competitive tendering on social inclusion and community work (attached here). The CWI submission is based on the learning from this process. he submission makes the argument that there should be a derogation for social inclusion and community work on the basis that this work is not a service that can be delivered.
To download a copy of the Community Work Ireland submission please click here
Copies of the consultation paper, details of the consultation process, background information and further supporting documents are available on the Department's website at www.per.gov.ie/commissioning
https://www.communityworkireland.ie/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/tendering.jpg 582 1920 Ann Irwin https://www.communityworkireland.ie/wp-content/themes/Master/images/cwi-logo-540.png Ann Irwin2016-03-21 13:52:242019-03-03 21:57:41Commissioning Human Social & Community Services
CWI Submission to the Community Services Programme ReviewJune 24, 2019 - 11:56 am
Community Work Ireland
Westside Resource Centre Ltd.
Seamus Quirke Road, Galway
Email: info@communityworkireland.ie
Work: +353 (0)91 528325
EUCDN
Working for Change
AIEB
The CWI work is supported by the Support Scheme for National Organisations.
© Community Work Ireland
CWI response to Our Communities: A Framework Policy for Local and Community... In Whose Interests?


text:
package cn.xxywithpq;

import java.io.*;
import java.util.Objects;
import java.util.logging.Logger;

/**
 * 序列化对象工具类
 * V1.0
 * Created by panqian on 2017/4/1.
 */
public class SerializationUtil {
    private static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(SerializationUtil.class.getName());

    /**
     * 序列化对象 对象应实现Serializable接口
     *
     * @param obj 要序列化的对象
     * @param <T> 对象类型
     * @return byte数组
     */
    public static <T extends Serializable> byte[] serialize(T obj) {
        if (Objects.isNull(obj)) {
            throw new NullPointerException("传入对象不能为空");
        }
        try (ByteArrayOutputStream arrayOutputStream = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
             ObjectOutputStream objectOutputStream = new ObjectOutputStream(arrayOutputStream)
        ) {

            objectOutputStream.writeObject(obj);

            return arrayOutputStream.toByteArray();
        } catch (IOException e) {
            logger.severe(e.getMessage());
        }
        return null;
    }

    /**
     * 反序列化对象
     *
     * @param bytes byte数组
     * @param t     要反序列化的对象
     * @param <T>   对象的类型
     * @return 对象
     */
    public static <T> T deserialize(byte[] bytes, Class<T> t) {
        if (Objects.isNull(bytes)) {
            throw new NullPointerException("传入数组不能为空");
        }
        try (ByteArrayInputStream byteArrayInputStream = new ByteArrayInputStream(bytes);
             ObjectInputStream objectInputStream = new ObjectInputStream(byteArrayInputStream)
        ) {

            return (T) objectInputStream.readObject();

        } catch (IOException e) {
            logger.severe(e.getMessage());
        } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
            logger.severe(e.getMessage());
        }
        return null;
    }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
NextWomen Crushing Wednesday & more Women's History Month Events
Social Media in college: the pros and cons
Campus Carrier	on April 5, 2019
Alana George, Campus Carrier Asst. Arts & Living Editor
Social media use is common, even expected, for any college student. At Berry, social media have become more prevalent in recent years, with new marketing campaigns and students becoming more involved with building their own brand online.
According to a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center in January 2018, the top-used apps by people ages 18-24 are YouTube (90 percent) Facebook (80 percent), Snapchat (78 percent), Instagram (71 percent), and Twitter (45 percent). Each of these sites serves a different purpose in a college student's life, some good, some bad. They can be used to keep up with what friends are doing, but this can lead to comparison, which is indeed the thief of joy. In this social media-ridden landscape, how can students maintain the balance?
Sam Nazione, associate professor in the communication department, believes that social media are a double-edged sword. Nazione herself does not use social media; the negative effects outweighed the positives for her. She said that the social media scene is much different in college because the even playing field in high school is now gone, with some students living in their mother's basements and others getting married and making money in large companies.
Nazione discussed some of the negative effects they can have on relationships between students and on students' self-esteem. To clinically explain the effects, Nazione cited the hyperpersonal model, put forth by Joseph Walther.
"When we go on our social media accounts, we very carefully craft an image of ourselves," Nazione said. "We only put the best pictures, the best things that we're doing with our lives, we create this image for ourselves and we're able to take away or add to it at will."
The model and Nazione said that this type of crafting does affect face-to-face communication.
"It dramatically alters expectations that we have for relationships, and that can have a negative impact when we can't meet those expectations because they're so unrealistic," Nazione said.
With all of its negative effects, it can be hard to see how social media can bring any good into the world. But Nazione does cite some positive effects she has noticed from social media.
"One of the positives about it, though, is that you can reach out for social support," Nazione said. "I definitely have had friends or family members that are going through a rough time and they'll post about it and they'll get lots of love and comments, and I do think that there are some positive things about it."
Nazione also discussed the effects, both positive and negative, that social media have in the current job market.
"Most employers now are going to look at your digital footprint when they're interested in hiring you," Nazione said. "That digital footprint can just as easily hurt your chances of getting a job as it can help your chances of getting a job. If you can portray yourself well on social media, they can extrapolate that to then believe that you can portray a company well on social media."
Social media really are all about portraying yourself exactly how you want the world to see you, and everyone wants a different image and personality for themselves on the Internet. There are some students at Berry who have done this in a unique way.
Tiana Arriaga is a sophomore at Berry. She has her own YouTube channel, TianaRenay, which has amassed 14,396 subscribers at this point. She has had her channel since she was in middle school, and it grew into a collection of college life videos and vlogs.
"I kind of just make videos just for fun, and people say pretty much everything I film can be entertaining, so I think just making more videos of my daily life or anything that happened in my life, because people seem to be interested in my life for some reason," Arriaga said.
Arriaga admitted to the struggle of maintaining a consistent presence, due to her busy college schedule.
"When I'm home I film a lot more, but in college I usually end up filming two videos a semester," Arriaga said. "I'm trying to do more since college is my thing now; I'll just try to film more."
Even with the effort her channel takes among the other things required of her, Arriaga loves being on YouTube and wants anyone who is considering it to just go for it.
"Starting YouTube was the best decision I ever made, because I've made so many friends and my whole career path has changed because of it," Arriaga said. "Definitely start one if you want to and don't be scared. In the long run, it's not going to matter what anyone thinks and if it makes you happy then you should totally do it."
With social media still in their infancy, their long-term effects are unclear. For college students in this current landscape, the lesson is to be ever cautious and aware of the implications social media activity can have on the future. It will have an influence on employment opportunities once they leave Berry, and it is up to them to determine whether that will be a positive influence or a negative one.
Women Crushing Wednesday & more Women's History Month Events
Movie adaptations offer an interesting alternative


text:
iLikeMe
J. Jamal
"Love is patient. Love is kind. Love is painful. But love is necessary. Love's just funny like that"
— J. Jamal
Harbor City, CA — Tuesday, March 19th, 2019 — Newcomer J. Jamal has released the Love Letter EP. This is his second project released under Exquisite Noise Records. Love Letter was released on Valentine's Day 2019 and has already begun to garner positive reviews and reactions. Fans of true R&B and Soul crooners definitely need to hear this project. It is a modern day take on a throwback to the 80s and 90s.
"Love Letter' contains a relatable storyline, lovely soul vocals, and groovy instrumentation flavored with '90s-inspired R&B, gospel, and reggae-soul elements." – Zangba Thomson, Bongmines Entertainment
"A glistening RnB single is taken from his new EP, J. Jamal's 'Good Guy' sparks of vibrancy and pop brilliance."- Broken 8 Records
"The song (Love Letter) is about a guy who's looking for love, even if he gotta do something unconventional and 'old school' to find it. He's looking for something strong, like in the love songs he grew up hearing." – J. Jamal
He stated that he plans to make a "Love Letter" an annual release, to ensure those he loves and who love and support him will never forget it. "Love Letter" by J. Jamal is available for download and streaming on all major streaming sites, and at his website, jjamalmusic.com. Sign up for his mailing list to stay current on future releases.
To order the Love Letter EP, visit jjamalmusic.com. But for now, enjoy a free download of the title track. As J. Jamal says, "enjoy my Love Letter to you."
http://jjamalmusic.com/track/1651828/love-letter
Driven by faith and a determination for change, J. Jamal is a young artist creating his own path. Cultivated by the California sunshine, his desire is to present a largely genre-bending sound. Influenced by gospel greats such as Donnie McClurkin and Kirk Franklin, and soulful crooners like Luther Vandross, Jamal spreads a message of faith, hope, inspiration, and love, that he calls his "LoveStyle".
Jamal Simmons
1053 Stonebryn Dr Harbor City, CA 90710
https://jjamalmusic.com/press-kit
Driven by faith and a determination for change, J. Jamal is a young artist creating his own path. Cultivated by the California sunshine, his desire is to present a largely genre-less sound. Influenced by gospel greats such as Donnie McClurkin and Kirk Franklin, and soulful crooners like Luther Vandross, Jamal spreads a message of faith, hope, inspiration, and love, that he calls his "LoveStyle".
From singing solos as a toddler in church, to recording singles as an adult, J. Jamal has shown his ability to be soulful with a Baptist vibe. He's used this to his advantage, performing as a contestant on the Next Up Concert Series in Inglewood, CA. The best is truly yet to come.
J. Jamal's debut EP iLikeMe and the follow up, Love Letter, have been released. And from there? The sky's the limit! Feel free to sign up to the mailing list and join the movement
Sample Track
Addiction 2:52
Stand Still 3:37
iLikeMe 2:41
Love Letter 3:18
Change Your Mind 4:57
For direct inquiries, booking info, etc., contact me at info@jjamalmusic.com
What A Wonderful World (Cover) 2:16


text:
What can we learn about romantic love from Harry Frankfurt's account of love?
McKeever, N orcid.org/0000-0002-0799-1623 (2019) What can we learn about romantic love from Harry Frankfurt's account of love? Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 14 (3). pp. 204-226. ISSN 1559-3061
Harry Frankfurt has a comprehensive and, at times, compelling, account of love, which are outlined in several of his works. However, he does not think that romantic love fits the ideal of love as it 'includes a number of vividly distracting elements, which do not belong to the essential nature of love as a mode of disinterested concern' (Frankfurt, 2004, p. 43). In this paper, I argue that we can, nonetheless, learn some important things about romantic love from his account. Furthermore, I will suggest, conversely, that there is distinct value in romantic love, which derives from the nature of the relationship on which it is based. Frankfurt tries to take agape and reformulate it so that it can also account for love of particular people. Whilst he succeeds, to some extent, in describing parental love, he fails to accurately describe romantic love and friendship, and, moreover, overlooks what is distinctly valuable about them. Although it was not his intention to describe romantic love, by failing to include features such as reciprocity in his account of love, Frankfurt leaves no room for a kind of love that is important and valuable to many people
McKeever, N https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0799-1623
© 2019 Author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
love; romantic love; Harry Frankfurt; philosophy of love
https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v14i3.553
Filename: 553-Article Text-2146-1-10-20190305.pdf
Licence: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0


translates the various requirements into an acceptable program.
priority list of weeks of their choice.
difficult to take an active part during our cruising.
My share entitles me to eight weeks in a "cruising season"
and is usually allocated as two weeks in each season.
This is a six owner boat and entitles each to 8 weeks cruising per annum.
Annual running cost around £1200 per annum (£150 per week used).
Complete repaint - back to bare metal - June 2018.
2019 Cruising Area to be agreed at AGM.


Beaver Dam was wet. The pits were wet. The track was wet. Everything was behind because of an abnormally wet summer. But the Outlaws stayed their course and stood guard at the gate while the pits were pumped out and the track crew struggled to get the track ready to race. When the gates opened they took their spots in the pits, covered the floors of their trailers with plastic and readied the horses for what looked to be a muddy, sloppy ride. After surveying the track, there was one that smiled: he liked wet, he liked heavy and when the checkered flags waved, that smile turned to emotion as Craig Dollansky remembered an old friend and mentor.
The Outlaws took the track 36 cars strong. They were aiming for an 11.275 second lap around the 1/3 mile high banked clay oval track. It could be done: Daryn Pittman had done it in 2001. But with heavy wet track conditions it was highly unlikely that it would be done again tonight. The engines seem to strain to make the laps with even the most seasoned veterans' cars sounding like they were at the top of the peg but when the smoke cleared it was Jason Sides who came home with Quick Time. Sides turned a lap of 13.115 seconds to collect his first Quick Time of the season. He was followed by James McFadden, Paul McMahan, Cody Darrah and Craig Dollansky.
The heat races were a challenge with minimal passing taking place. David Gravel brought home the first heat win with Craig Dollansky, Donny Schatz, Jason Sides and Brian Brown following him into the A Main. Gravel, Dollansky and Sides would transfer to the Dash.
The second heat was a tight battle between second and third place cars Kraig Kinser and Tim Kaeding. Kinser beat Kaeding to the line by .004 seconds to take the runner up spot. Daryn Pittman took the win, with James McFadden and Paul Nienhiser rounding out the top five for the A Main. Pittman, Kinser, and McFadden would advance to the Dash.
The third heat showed a pattern beginning to form. Cars were able to pass the car in front of them but the slick wet track made it very very difficult to hold the pass. If you could hold the pass it was difficult for an equal car to take the spot back as the turn back was treacherous and hard to control. This would stay true the rest of the night. Joey Saldana took the checkers ahead of Paul McMahan, Steve Kinser, Chad Kemenah and Wayne Modjeski. Saldana and McMahan would go on to the Dash while the others advanced to the A Main.
The final heat race of the night went to Kerry Madsen with some help from fate. Todd King, the assigned pole sitter, jumped the start on the initial green and was penalized one row, putting Madsen on the pole. It was a position that he took full advantage of and rocketed to a two-second lead and never looked back. Cody Darrah and Sammy Swindell battled for second with Darrah coming home on top. Also transferring to the A were Jason Solwold and King.
The Dash was a quick race with Cody Darrah leading all the way after starting on the pole with an inversion of four drawn. The closest race on the track was for the fourth spot between Australian natives James McFadden and Kerry Madsen. McFadden would beat Madsen to the line by just .009 seconds.
The last chance showdown looked more like an IRA (Interstate Racing Association) Sprint race with Bill Balog and Mike Kerscher leading the way from start to finish and crossing the line nose to tail, transferring to the A Main. Jeremy Schulz and Bill Rose also transferred.
The A Main was a 40-lap test of wills and patience. With the track being basically two grooves with a somewhat usable middle groove, the slide job pass was a difficult move. The wet track was slick and the final slide in front of the car you were passing was a tricky move: to get the car to grab the track, move forward and not keep sliding, allowing that car to drive back under you. Craig Dollansky is the master of the heavy, wet, slick track, and tonight was no exception. Once Dollansky took the lead on Lap 14, he only lost it for one brief second in traffic to Daryn Pittman. He regained it the following lap and never looked back.
The race was marred by only one crash when Sammy Swindell and Kraig Kinser got together sending Swindell on his roof between turns three and four. Swindell landed on his wheels and was uninjured. Both crews made repairs and both drivers returned to the track.
For Dollansky, winning the Jim "JB" Boyd memorial was an emotional win. "This is the Jim Boyd Memorial and he was Scott Boyd's father," said Dollansky, who is a long-time friend of the Boyd family. "You know that family supported me for a long time, they owned the team that I raced for 10 years and Jim Boyd was just a great person and an inspiration for me and an awesome individual. He passed away a few years back. He's gone but not forgotten and I know he was riding around with me tonight in spirit."
For second-place finisher Daryn Pittman it was a return to normal after a horrible night on Friday. "We were good all night and I always enjoy coming here," said Pittman, a native of Owasso, Okla. "This is one of my favorite race tracks. We put ourselves in position, just maybe needed to time trial a little better and really got up there and had a shot to win, just came up a little short. I think we were good enough to get around him on the bottom if any lapped cars would have held him up at all or if I hit it right. I passed him twice under green flag, once running second and third and once for the lead, but anytime you pass a good car like that you have to take advantage of it."
For third-place finisher and Friday night's winner Tim Kaeding, it was a return to days gone by. "We worked on the car all night got it way better in the feature, and my motto 'live and die by the high-side' and that's where I went - straight to the top," said Kaeding, of San Jose, Calif. "We had a good car on the bottom too so I could jump around and move around and have a little fun, like crisscross back in the day."
Donny Schatz was the KSE Hard Charger of the race, finishing fourth after starting 13th.
The night ended on a much better note than it began. The plastic made clean up of the trailers and load in easier. The cars would get baths. The caravan would continue on its journey, this time to a small track in New Richmond, Wisconsin called Cedar Lake Speedway. With any luck and a little sun, it would be a better day. But regardless of what the future holds there is one thing you can count on: if the Outlaws are coming to your town, they will race whether heat and sun baked or mud and high waters.


Why du and not ni?
Both are accepted when translating from English to Swedish, since it's ambiguous.
I thought i heard a liason between jag and äter like in french. Is this so?
Is it pronounced eter or yeter after the du?
I hear it more like "eh a tear" but I'm not sure if that's right.
Is there a formal form of "you"? Like in French, it's "vous". In German it's "Sie" and in Spanish, it's "usted".
Like English in that aspect then!
Yes there is - ni. (You in plural) However, it's never used, only in old school books or movies, and if you started calling strangers "ni" while trying to be formal, people would look at you weird.
Would din äter mean you eat?
No. Din means "your" (singular).
I keep mixing up Du meaning You and De meaning They.. is there any way to tell the difference in the future?
If in text, you'll just have to learn the spelling. Perhaps, think of the 'u' in Du = you and the 'e' in De = they? In speech, De is most often pronounced 'dom' so it's easier to distinguish.
Please forgive my ignorance, but why are is there a singular form of for "you" and a plural form? The way I've been thinking of it is the difference between adressing someone in a one-on-one conversation and adressing a goup of people. Am I correct when doing this?
Yup. du = talking to one person. ni = talking to several people.
Some people also use ni as a so called polite pronoun to one person, but there are different opinions about that. Some people hate it and it's never necessary, so we don't recommend this usage.
Tense on pronouns? That would be highly unusual.
I missed the word are. But there is no ar and why the sentence du laser is mean you are reading? Bcause when I write you read its says wrong.
Swedish doesn't have the present continuous construction that English uses with to be + verb + -ing. So both "you eat" and "you are eating" translate to "du äter", and vice versa.
I thougt it was "you eat".
How do I change my keyboard, or add the umlauts and such? It either makes my entry incorrect, or tells me to pay attention!
Du counts as they too, right?


So last week I ordered some custom leather for a customer who wanted to match the inside of her Camry SE with the black and gray factory two-tone leather/cloth mix. It's not that difficult because we use schematics in a specific format to make these orders work.
The car has to go back today and if they complain then I'll just re-order and raise a fuss with the production facility.


Floor CleaningThe 1st 4 Cleaning Group has recently purchased(2012) a high powered, high tech floor cleaning tool which combined with our van mounted machine, will clean your floors to a high standard.
It can be used to clean stone and grout and cleans deep down; even into the small crevices which other equipment cannot reach.
The machine works by spraying high pressure hot water onto the floor and recovering that water with a powerful vacuum. This means very effective cleaning and fast drying.
All hard floors can be very effectively cleaned including wood, plastic, Amtico, Karndean, marble, limestone, rubber, tile and mosaic.


H.T. Lyons is part of ENGIE MEP Services Northeast, a mechanical, HVAC, distributed energy, and project delivery solutions-provider subsidiary of ENGIE North America. ENGIE MEP is five companies with nearly 750 employees serving the Northeast U.S.
H.T. Lyons is a full-service and award-winning mechanical contractor serving Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware, New Jersey and Connecticut. We serve business segments including colleges & universities, commercial, government, healthcare, industrial, entertainment, high-tech and life sciences. H.T. Lyons offers a full complement of engineering, design, construction, maintenance and energy solutions. We are a single-source provider for everything from $40 million design-build projects to a simple plumbing repair and have been serving our clients since 1973.
Our extensive in-house capabilities allow us to offer our clients the highest quality and most cost-effective building services in the industry. As an ENGIE MEP Solutions company, we have the resources and backing to handle the largest design-build, design-assist, industrial and commercial projects with confidence.
Count on us to deliver the expertise and experience to keep your facility operating reliably and efficiently.
ServiceEye is an easy to use, web-based service management tool provided exclusively by H.T. Lyons for our Maintenance Contract clients. Log onto ServiceEye.net from anywhere to view the details of service activity immediately after work is performed.


All CARTER PARK homes currently listed for sale in Vancouver as of 04/19/2019 are shown below. You can change the search criteria at any time by pressing the 'Change Search' button below.
"Escape the ordinary with this spacious Cape Cod house. Located in the prestigious Carter Park Neighborhood in Downtown Vancouver, this house is in the perfect location for those who want to stroll to Main Street for shopping and food. With 4 bedrooms and 2 1/2 bathrooms, forced air heat and A/C, amazing vintage gas stove, wood floors, coved ceilings and so much more!"
"Ready To Move In! 3 bedroom, 2.5 bathroom, 2 car garage home ready for it's next family. Perfect opportunity to first-time home buyer or investor. New carpet, newer laminate, inside refreshed, w/ stainless steel fridge, and washer and dryer included. Small yard front and back are easy to maintain for busy families. No HOA. 5 mins commute to downtown Vancouver and Farmers Market; 20 mins average commute to downtown Portland."


It looks like It director Andy Muschietti is coming back for the sequel—and he confirmed the news in the best way.
As for who will play the adults, we're not really sure.
With no official casting announced, there have been rumors of Jessica Chastain being in talks to be the adult version of Beverly in the IT sequel, but neither Chastain nor New Line have officially confirmed or denied her involvement in the upcoming film.
While we're not sure who will play the adult verisons of the Loser's Club, we can rest assured that Bill Skarsgård will be coming back to eat the children, uhm, adults, of the Losers' Club.
We may not have an official casting for the second It film, but we're still pretty excited to see It: Part 2.


One residential property in Eastbourne.
Subsidised constituency office accommodation from Sheffield City Council.
Aegis Defence Services Limited (non-executive).
Senior Vice-President, MMC Group; insurance brokers.
Welcome Break; operator of motorway service stations.
GSC Partners; an investment company.
Holiday flat in Dorset, jointly owned.
(a) Cassbar Ltd; trades as 'Entropy' as a bar and a restaurant on two sites in central Leicester.
The salary of my Research Assistant is met by Christian Action, Research and Education (CARE).
Unremunerated director of Spelman, Cormack and Associates; family business specialising in food and biotechnology.
Members of my family benefit from a trust.
Consultant on financial services to Fidelity Investment Management Ltd.
(b) Royal Dutch Shell PLC; oil company.
Former family home in Oxford, now let to tenants.
Member of Parliamentary Panel of Royal College of Nurses (unpaid).
Farmland and woodland in Perthshire, from which rental income is received.
CSL Publishing Ltd; publisher of consumer magazines and newspapers.
Partner in Go Enterprises, which receives licensing income for use of magazine and newspaper titles owned by the partnership.
Lewis Charles Sofia Property Fund Limited; company acquires, develops and sells property in Bulgaria.
Residential leasehold flat in West London, for which rent is received.
New business consultant, Aon Limited; professional risks.
Marden Holdings Ltd - family business with interests in property.
C Syms and Sons Ltd - family building business.
(b) C Syms and sons Ltd - family building business.


It was the famous Jennifer Lopez who taught us that "love don't cost a thing". And while J-Lo is right about most things, she might have gotten this one wrong. It seems when it comes to matters of the heart, money does in fact play a part. A new study by Choosi and CoreData has examined the financial behaviours of Australians, paying particular attention to how cash can affect couples. How much of our savings do we share with our sweetheart? Will a bad bank balance end in a broken heart? And is having a separate account a good or bad thing?
Read on to find out the price you pay for the perfect partnership!
These days it pays to be pretty switched on when it comes to spending and it turns out most Australians are. In fact, the research found 69% of people believe it has become trendier to be financially savvy. So, that makes it hardly surprising that most couples prepare accordingly before entering into a binding relationship. The study uncovered that 81% of Australian couples have financial agreements in place.
When it comes to the game of love most couples see separation as a last resort...unless you're talking about money. The study detailed that 70% of Australians who are happily in love are also happily maintaining separate financial resources. It seems the day of the 'joint' bank account is dead and buried. This is in line with the idea that now, more than ever, we're independent with our finances. The study also found that 45% of Gen Y-ers have documented financial goals - proof that we're putting in the hard yards with our hard earned! So we're not about to share it, even if we share a bed!
They say honesty is the best policy, especially when it comes to the ones you love, but that doesn't seem to always be the case. While trust and truth are the bedrock of any solid relationship, 1 in 3 people did admit they sometimes hide aspects of their finances from their partners. Whether it's a sneaky savings account for a rainy day or perhaps the total of their weekly pay packet, either way it's an interesting trend. Maybe it's more of a self-preservation tactic as opposed to an attempt at being sneaky? The report also found that 63% of people believe they are 'average' or 'terrible' savers with people citing a lack of money (58%), impulsive spending (22%) and a lack of discipline (21%) as the most common barriers. It could be that keeping your partner out of the loop is a smart way of not having to face the truth!
Bad with money? Later honey!
We're all pretty aware of the instant red flags when it comes to a new relationship. Bad breath, messy eater, hung up on an ex and... bad with money? That's right, it seems those who are weak with the wallet will be unlucky in love. The national study proved that 64% of people believe bad finances are a deal breaker. So, if you're struggling to save your dollars you may be struggling to get a date too! To make matters worse, 58% of couples admit finances can be a source of conflict. So even once you've landed a significant other, cash can still cause some serious issues! If you want to learn more about how Aussies manage their money, read about the study in detail.


text:
Tags > disease
Tags > disease Clear All
Coronary heart disease death rates, New Jersey, by year: Beginning 2010
Tags corob death disease heart mortality and 1 more
Rate: Age-adjusted rate of deaths due to coronary heart disease per 100,000 population.
Definition: deaths with coronary heart disease as the underlying cause (ICD-10 codes: I11, I20-I25).
(2) Population Estimates, State Data Center, New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development.
End-stage renal disease incidence rate (cases per 100,000), New Jersey, by year: Beginning 2010
Tags disease end-stage incidence rate renal
Chronic kidney disease death rate, New Jersey, by year: Beginning 2010
Tags chronic death disease ethnicity kidney and 3 more
Rate: New cases of end-stage renal disease (per 100,000 population).
Definition: New cases of end-stage renal disease per 100,000 population.
(2) Quality Insights Renal Network
End-stage renal disease death rate (per 100,000), New Jersey, by year: Beginning 2010
Rate: Number of deaths (per 100,000) due to end-stage renal disease.
Definition: Deaths with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as the underlying cause of death ICD-10 code: N18.0 (1999-2010), N18.5 (2011 and after).
(1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Tags death disease end-stage ethnicity mortality and 3 more
This measure is being tracked for informational purposes. If warranted, a target will be set during the decade.
Rate: Number of deaths due to kidney disease per 100,000 population.
Definition: Deaths with nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis (kidney disease) as the underlying cause (ICD-10 codes: N00-N07, N17-N19, N25-N27).
Rate of sustained domestic transmission of primary and secondary syphilis, New Jersey, by year: Beginning 2010
Rate: Number of newly reported cases of primary and secondary syphilis among total number of persons in the population per 100,000 population.
Definition: Newly reported cases of primary and secondary syphilis per 100,000 population.
Data Source: Division of HIV/AIDS, STD and TB Services, New Jersey Department of Health
Tags case diagnose diagnosis disease infect and 6 more
Congenital syphilis incidence rate (per 100,000), New Jersey, by year: Beginning 2010
Tags birth case congenital defect disease and 9 more
Current Page 1 page 2 ▸▸▸


text:
Drinking Water Crisis in Mumbai-Karnataka region
BENGALURU: Water from Maharashtra is expected to flow into river Krishna in Karnataka in the next two days, Chief Minister H.D.Kumaraswamy announced on Sunday.
Karnataka had requested Maharashtra to release water from its Koyna or Warna reservoirs to meet the drinking water needs of Belagavi, Vijayapura and Bagalkot districts. The neighbouring state has also requested Karnataka to release water from Almatti reservoir to meet its the drinking water needs, too, across the border.
Kumaraswamy, in a tweet said, the Maharashtra Chief Secretary has sent an official communication to his Karnataka counterpart on the release of water.
On Friday, a delegation of BJP MLAs and MPs from North Karnataka had met Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis and sought his intervention to deal with the drinking water crisis in parts of Karnataka. Water Resources Minister D.K.Shivakumar too had been pursuing the request with Maharashtra.